<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Honor Societies</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.explainxkcd.com/2010/02/17/honor-societies/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.explainxkcd.com/2010/02/17/honor-societies/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 05 Sep 2010 05:47:38 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Bama Cracker</title>
		<link>http://www.explainxkcd.com/2010/02/17/honor-societies/comment-page-1/#comment-1326</link>
		<dc:creator>Bama Cracker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2010 12:07:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.explainxkcd.com/?p=380#comment-1326</guid>
		<description>So, did anyone besides me notice Jason Foxx in the third panel?  Most of my friends don&#039;t &quot;get&quot; it, because they never read Foxtrot.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, did anyone besides me notice Jason Foxx in the third panel?  Most of my friends don&#8217;t &#8220;get&#8221; it, because they never read Foxtrot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Quim Nuss</title>
		<link>http://www.explainxkcd.com/2010/02/17/honor-societies/comment-page-1/#comment-1306</link>
		<dc:creator>Quim Nuss</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Feb 2010 00:01:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.explainxkcd.com/?p=380#comment-1306</guid>
		<description>Moreover, it may actually be also based on computer science&#039;s propositional logic, taken directly from philosophy as stated above.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Moreover, it may actually be also based on computer science&#8217;s propositional logic, taken directly from philosophy as stated above.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ahmed</title>
		<link>http://www.explainxkcd.com/2010/02/17/honor-societies/comment-page-1/#comment-1304</link>
		<dc:creator>ahmed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Feb 2010 16:28:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.explainxkcd.com/?p=380#comment-1304</guid>
		<description>The first rule of Fight Club is, you do not talk about Fight Club.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The first rule of Fight Club is, you do not talk about Fight Club.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thomas</title>
		<link>http://www.explainxkcd.com/2010/02/17/honor-societies/comment-page-1/#comment-1303</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Feb 2010 12:14:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.explainxkcd.com/?p=380#comment-1303</guid>
		<description>The latter one is actually a axiom in logic dating back to Aristotle.

Let P be a true/false statement.
Either P or not P is true, but not both at the same time, and there is no third option.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Term_logic</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The latter one is actually a axiom in logic dating back to Aristotle.</p>
<p>Let P be a true/false statement.<br />
Either P or not P is true, but not both at the same time, and there is no third option.</p>
<p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Term_logic" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Term_logic</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shlamko</title>
		<link>http://www.explainxkcd.com/2010/02/17/honor-societies/comment-page-1/#comment-1302</link>
		<dc:creator>Shlamko</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Feb 2010 05:01:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.explainxkcd.com/?p=380#comment-1302</guid>
		<description>Tautology can also reffer to an argument that proves itself of is its own explanation, or, like it can also be, both.

And, of course, thre is a nice circular logic in the fact that this strip is reffering to this group:
http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=336707071150&amp;ref=nf
Which reffers to the strip. Join!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tautology can also reffer to an argument that proves itself of is its own explanation, or, like it can also be, both.</p>
<p>And, of course, thre is a nice circular logic in the fact that this strip is reffering to this group:<br />
<a href="http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=336707071150&amp;ref=nf" rel="nofollow">http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=336707071150&amp;ref=nf</a><br />
Which reffers to the strip. Join!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://www.explainxkcd.com/2010/02/17/honor-societies/comment-page-1/#comment-1301</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2010 22:58:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.explainxkcd.com/?p=380#comment-1301</guid>
		<description>Tautologies are actually statements that are universally true, like &quot;All bachelors are unmarried,&quot; or, &quot;I&#039;m either at the movies or not at the movies, but not both.&quot;

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tautology</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tautologies are actually statements that are universally true, like &#8220;All bachelors are unmarried,&#8221; or, &#8220;I&#8217;m either at the movies or not at the movies, but not both.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tautology" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tautology</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam Doyle</title>
		<link>http://www.explainxkcd.com/2010/02/17/honor-societies/comment-page-1/#comment-1300</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam Doyle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2010 20:53:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.explainxkcd.com/?p=380#comment-1300</guid>
		<description>Aside from its use in the English language, it&#039;s also a term in Discreet Math where a &quot;statement&quot; is true for all possible inputs.  It&#039;s the opposite of a contradiction.  For instance, the statement p == p is a tautology because it will always return true no matter what the value of p is.  I would guess that Randall, with his comics being heavily inspired by math, probably came to knowing of a tautology from his math background.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Aside from its use in the English language, it&#8217;s also a term in Discreet Math where a &#8220;statement&#8221; is true for all possible inputs.  It&#8217;s the opposite of a contradiction.  For instance, the statement p == p is a tautology because it will always return true no matter what the value of p is.  I would guess that Randall, with his comics being heavily inspired by math, probably came to knowing of a tautology from his math background.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: altor</title>
		<link>http://www.explainxkcd.com/2010/02/17/honor-societies/comment-page-1/#comment-1298</link>
		<dc:creator>altor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2010 14:51:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.explainxkcd.com/?p=380#comment-1298</guid>
		<description>The &quot;If 1,000,000 people joined...&quot; statement is also a jab at all those types of groups out there.

http://www.google.com/search?q=if+1000000+people+join</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The &#8220;If 1,000,000 people joined&#8230;&#8221; statement is also a jab at all those types of groups out there.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.google.com/search?q=if+1000000+people+join" rel="nofollow">http://www.google.com/search?q=if+1000000+people+join</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: onli</title>
		<link>http://www.explainxkcd.com/2010/02/17/honor-societies/comment-page-1/#comment-1297</link>
		<dc:creator>onli</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2010 14:26:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.explainxkcd.com/?p=380#comment-1297</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s not primary about repeating, it&#039;s about explaining something with itself. It&#039;s honourable if you do something honourable...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s not primary about repeating, it&#8217;s about explaining something with itself. It&#8217;s honourable if you do something honourable&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
