1134: Logic Boat

< Prev Comic #1134 (November 14, 2012) Next >

Logic Boat

Title text: Or a cabbage, for that matter. Goats make sense. Goats are fine.

Explanation

The comic is a play on the well-known logic puzzle where a fictional subject has to ferry three objects in a vehicle of limited capacity. Puzzle rules prohibit leaving certain pairs of objects alone unattended. The traditional solution to the puzzle in the comic would be:

1. Take goat across.
2. Go back alone.
3. Take cabbage across.
4. Take back goat.
5. Take wolf across.
6. Go back alone.
7. Take goat across.

By leaving the wolf behind, four steps are saved - the comic's "step 4" isn't a step, just a comment - and the troublesome wolf is eliminated from the picture. It is also a jab on the idea that logic puzzles have one pre-defined "best" solution. The goal is often to keep the other person guessing until they arrive at the pre-defined solution, no matter how many other correct solution they arrive at. The shown solution is entirely valid yet wouldn't be accepted by someone telling you the puzzle.

The title text goes further, questioning the value of keeping the cabbage as well.

Transcript

Problem:

[Two islands are on either side of the screen. Cueball is standing on the left island with a wolf, goat, cabbage and boat. The islands are separated by a body of water.]

The boat only holds two, but you can't leave the goat with the cabbage or the wolf with the goat.

Solution:

[Cueball in a boat with the goat]

1. Take the goat accross.

[Cueball in the boat alone]

2. Return alone.

[Cueball in the boat with the cabbage]

3. Take the cabbage across.

[Boat is tethered and Cueball walks away with the goat and cabbage.

4. Leave the wolf.

Why did you have a wolf?

 add a comment!

Discussion

Why not take the boat as well? The goat could drag it around, and you could use it as a makeshift shelter until you finish building a proper house. Also, why does cabbage weigh as much as a goat? Davidy²²(talk) 05:50, 14 November 2012 (UTC)

I'd say that the wolf is the only one amongst them he should keep. Seeing as how the wolf doesn't treat Cueball like the goat--i.e. rip him to shreds--and actually fears him enough to even respect the goat in his presence, I'd say that the wolf is well broken-in and might make a good companion. The goat, on the other hand, is just dead weight. (Sure, Cueball could eat her, but that's why he has the cabbage.)
[1] Take the cabbage across [2] Return alone [3] Find the goat problem solved--and your friend well-fed [4] Take the wolf across 207.237.164.241 06:33, 14 November 2012 (UTC)

I am not the only one, then! I like wolves a lot more than goats. Then again, I simply like wolves. Greyson (talk) 03:48, 15 November 2012 (UTC)

They're like puppies! Except instead of love them, you have to occasionally beat the shit out of them to ensure that they continue to fear and respect you. Oh, and instead of love you back, they sometimes physically challenge your authority over the "pack". But yeah, they're all around awesome. 207.237.164.241 09:42, 15 November 2012 (UTC)

...

I compare such a relationship (especially the "beat up the wolf in order for the wolf to fear you") to Untoward's relationship with a pig. Greyson (talk) 15:03, 19 November 2012 (UTC)

Why would cabbage count towards the total capacity of the boat? Take the wolf and the cabbage, return alone, take the goat.--69.197.220.27 08:08, 14 November 2012 (UTC)

Maybe it's a sentient boat that knows how many passengers/objects are aboard no matter their weight?--Dangerkeith3000 (talk) 16:09, 14 November 2012 (UTC)

The comments describing other shortcuts are really just emphasizing the joke in this comic. The logic puzzle introduces arbitrary constraints and asks the solver to come up with a solution. (This is reminiscent of the classic xkcd on Nerd Sniping.) Most normal people would have the responses you listed about the constraints being arbitrary, but the people vulnerable to Nerd Sniping (i.e. nerds) usually are willing to ignore reality to solve a puzzle with artificial constraints. The purpose of the puzzle is to encourage logical thinking. (Maybe I should take the wolf first so it can't eat the goat. Oh, but then the goat would eat the cabbage. But if I take the cabbage first, the wolf would eat the goat. Therefore, I must take the goat first. ... Continue reasoning with trial and error until the puzzle is solved...) However, you correctly are pointing out how artificial the constraints on the puzzle are. In the actual comic, the solution of leaving the wolf behind would come as a humorous surprise to the nerd following along coming up with a solution. S (talk) 00:07, 15 November 2012 (UTC)

And that would be the long way towards the 'Explanation' section 207.237.164.241 09:42, 15 November 2012 (UTC)

I see this as a play on the common use of “logical” to mean “consistent implicit goals or values,” as oppose to “consistent with the principles of inference” as in formal logic. For example, it's the former usage we see when Spock in Star Trek II says, “Logic clearly dictates that the needs of the many outweigh the needs of the few,” or in Star Trek IV, he says, “To hunt a species to extinction is not logical.” You leave the wolf because it’s not logical to hang around wolves longer than necessary –they’re dangerous. Of course, this usage of “logic” is highly relative and subjective (in contrast to formal logic). As some have argued, wolves are not only logical, but awesome. Title text drills home how subjective and relative this use of “logic” is. It’s not logical to take the cabbage because I don’t like cabbage. But I like goats so they “make sense.” --Emzed (talk) 18:40, 30 November 2012 (UTC) Everybody knows the classic wolf, sheep and cabbage problem, but I just realized that this is not same problem! Just read the first panel: you have the constraints that the boat can carry two and you can't leave the goat with the cabbage or the wolf with the goat as in the classic problem, but nowhere is stated that you must reach the other side with the other three! You can just do nothing, or carry the sheep on the other side and go away with the boat... --Sandman (talk) 20:02, 16 November 2012 (UTC)

The problem actually doesn't state any requirement. An equally valid solution would be you starve to death, the cabbage rots to slime and the goat runs away while the wolf tears strips of flesh from your corpse. 216.52.207.104 23:23, 5 December 2012 (UTC)

Alternate Solution: Share the Cabbage with the goat. The wolf obviously respects you, so take it with you to make your pet. Don't let the goat ride- make it swim. 66.220.143.177 (talk) (please sign your comments with ~~~~)

When I was a kid, we used the version with a dog, a chicken, and a bushel of corn. Being a farm kid, my solution was: take chicken, shoot dog, take corn. Because why the hell do you have a dog that eats chickens? Also, tie your bag o'corn up properly so a chicken couldn't get in. They're not that smart. And they cannot eat a bushel of corn in the time it takes you to cross a river and come back. Also, how did you manage to get to this point without everybody eating each other? Why isn't the chicken in a cage? That could protect it from getting eaten. Is it just sitting quietly awaiting your command? Won't it just wander away once you get it to the other side?

To the above: Goats HATE water. They do not swim well either. I think the wolf should swim. My solution to the wolf/goat/cabbage is to tether the goat and the wolf far away from each other, whichever side they may be on. --184.21.245.225 22:29, 17 February 2013 (UTC) Goats eat cabbage.. 24.59.184.243 09:18, 13 January 2013 (UTC)</div>