Difference between revisions of "14: Copyright"

Explain xkcd: It's 'cause you're dumb.
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 11: Line 11:
 
{{w|Copyright}} is a monopoly granted by governments to writers, artists, and performers to control the distribution, copying, and performance of their creative expression.  Before the digital age, it allowed authors and publishers an opportunity to profit from their work without fear of someone making copies and selling them for their gain.
 
{{w|Copyright}} is a monopoly granted by governments to writers, artists, and performers to control the distribution, copying, and performance of their creative expression.  Before the digital age, it allowed authors and publishers an opportunity to profit from their work without fear of someone making copies and selling them for their gain.
  
In the digital age, when the cost and difficulty of copying has been reduced to near zero, it hasn't worked so well, especially for publishers of music and video. Industry trade organizations like the {{w|RIAA}} and {{w|MPAA}} have fought to preserve their old business models, lobbying for new laws to protect their income streams in an age where anyone can copy an {{w|MP3}} file or a DVD quickly and cheaply. This has involved ordering web sites to take down "infringing" material (and many times material which wasn't infringing), media campaigns comparing file copiers to folks who commit murder on the high seas, and suing artists and writers who have used samples of music or movies in their own work.  The {{w|RIAA}} have claimed that rampant illegal copying hurts the artists who's work is copied, as it cuts into the artists royalty payments; many artists, on the other hand, complain that the RIAA's accounting practices have denied them their fair royalties for decades anyway, and that increased copying leads to increased fans and money through direct sales and is actually better for them than the RIAA.  It's a vicious war.
+
In the digital age, when the cost and difficulty of copying has been reduced to near zero, it hasn't worked so well, especially for publishers of music and video. Industry trade organizations like the {{w|RIAA}} and {{w|MPAA}} have fought to preserve their old business models, lobbying for new laws to protect their income streams in an age where anyone can copy an {{w|MP3}} file or a DVD quickly and cheaply. This has involved ordering web sites to take down "infringing" material (and many times material which wasn't infringing), media campaigns comparing file copiers to folks who commit murder on the high seas, and suing artists and writers who have used samples of music or movies in their own work.  The {{w|RIAA}} have claimed that rampant illegal copying hurts the artists who's work is copied, as it cuts into the artists royalty payments; many artists, on the other hand, complain that the RIAA's accounting practices have denied them their fair royalties for decades anyway, and that increased copying leads to increased fans and money through direct sales and is actually better for them than the RIAA.  It's a vicious war.
  
An early casualty in the copyright wars was {{w|Napster}}, a later casualty was the concept of {{w|DRM}} (Digital Rights Management) on recorded music. The wars have been going on since the early 1990's and show no sign of slowing down.
+
An early casualty in the copyright wars was {{w|Napster}}, a later casualty was the concept of {{w|DRM}} (Digital Rights Management) on recorded music. The wars have been going on since the early 1990's and show no sign of slowing down.
  
 
[http://slashdot.com Slashdot] and [http://boingboing.net Boing Boing] are two news aggregation websites which cover (among other things) the copyright wars in detail, usually biased against the RIAA, MPAA, and similar organizations.
 
[http://slashdot.com Slashdot] and [http://boingboing.net Boing Boing] are two news aggregation websites which cover (among other things) the copyright wars in detail, usually biased against the RIAA, MPAA, and similar organizations.
Line 25: Line 25:
 
==Trivia==
 
==Trivia==
 
* Original quote from [[Randall]]: "I posted this to a Slashdot thread about copyrights, and without any moderation, over 600 people clicked on it."
 
* Original quote from [[Randall]]: "I posted this to a Slashdot thread about copyrights, and without any moderation, over 600 people clicked on it."
* This is the twelfth comic posted to livejournal. The previous was [[10: Pi Equals]]. The next was [[11: Barrel - Part 2]].
+
* This is the twelfth comic posted to livejournal. The previous was [[10: Pi Equals]]. The next was [[11: Barrel - Part 2]].
  
 
{{comic discussion}}
 
{{comic discussion}}

Revision as of 00:53, 22 November 2012

Copyright
After reading Slashdot and BoingBoing, sometimes I have to go outside.
Title text: After reading Slashdot and BoingBoing, sometimes I have to go outside.

Explanation

Copyright is a monopoly granted by governments to writers, artists, and performers to control the distribution, copying, and performance of their creative expression. Before the digital age, it allowed authors and publishers an opportunity to profit from their work without fear of someone making copies and selling them for their gain.

In the digital age, when the cost and difficulty of copying has been reduced to near zero, it hasn't worked so well, especially for publishers of music and video. Industry trade organizations like the RIAA and MPAA have fought to preserve their old business models, lobbying for new laws to protect their income streams in an age where anyone can copy an MP3 file or a DVD quickly and cheaply. This has involved ordering web sites to take down "infringing" material (and many times material which wasn't infringing), media campaigns comparing file copiers to folks who commit murder on the high seas, and suing artists and writers who have used samples of music or movies in their own work. The RIAA have claimed that rampant illegal copying hurts the artists who's work is copied, as it cuts into the artists royalty payments; many artists, on the other hand, complain that the RIAA's accounting practices have denied them their fair royalties for decades anyway, and that increased copying leads to increased fans and money through direct sales and is actually better for them than the RIAA. It's a vicious war.

An early casualty in the copyright wars was Napster, a later casualty was the concept of DRM (Digital Rights Management) on recorded music. The wars have been going on since the early 1990's and show no sign of slowing down.

Slashdot and Boing Boing are two news aggregation websites which cover (among other things) the copyright wars in detail, usually biased against the RIAA, MPAA, and similar organizations.

Following the copyright wars continuously can be tiring; hence Cueball's desire to just go outside and get away from it for a while.

Transcript

[Colored drawing of a hilly grassy landscape, Cueball leaning against a tree.]
Cueball: Sometimes I just can't get outraged over copyright law

Trivia

  • Original quote from Randall: "I posted this to a Slashdot thread about copyrights, and without any moderation, over 600 people clicked on it."
  • This is the twelfth comic posted to livejournal. The previous was 10: Pi Equals. The next was 11: Barrel - Part 2.


comment.png add a comment! ⋅ comment.png add a topic (use sparingly)! ⋅ Icons-mini-action refresh blue.gif refresh comments!

Discussion

First world problems. Davidy22[talk] 14:09, 8 January 2013 (UTC)

Yeah, definitely! :D A funny thing is that according to Know Your Meme Google statistics the "first world problems"-thing started in 2011, but in Sweden we've had jokes about "I-landsproblem" all since Hipphipp! (a hilarious Swedish humor show) ran back in 2001/2003. –St.nerol (talk) 17:28, 8 January 2013 (UTC)

does this mean i'm a criminal? i pirated minecraft and ksp An user who has no account yet (talk) 10:28, 7 September 2023 (UTC)