Difference between revisions of "1974: Conversational Dynamics"

Explain xkcd: It's 'cause you're dumb.
Jump to: navigation, search
m (Explanation: Fixed minor treaty glitches.)
(Transcript: Removed tag.)
Line 13: Line 13:
  
 
==Transcript==
 
==Transcript==
{{incomplete transcript|Do NOT delete this tag too soon.}}
 
 
:[Cueball is sitting at a computer and pointing at the CRT monitor. White Hat is standing behind him.]
 
:[Cueball is sitting at a computer and pointing at the CRT monitor. White Hat is standing behind him.]
 
:Cueball: Check it out!  My new system allows anyone on Earth to inject themselves into any conversation happening anywhere  at any time.
 
:Cueball: Check it out!  My new system allows anyone on Earth to inject themselves into any conversation happening anywhere  at any time.

Revision as of 08:49, 31 March 2018

Conversational Dynamics
"You should make it so people can search for and jump into hundreds of conversations at once if they want." "Ooh, good idea! I imagine only the most well-informed people with the most critical information to share will use that feature."
Title text: "You should make it so people can search for and jump into hundreds of conversations at once if they want." "Ooh, good idea! I imagine only the most well-informed people with the most critical information to share will use that feature."

Explanation

On the modern World Wide Web (usually coined as Web 2.0, in contrast to the original web envisioned and created by Tim Berners-Lee), particularly on internet forums (like the xkcd forums), a pervasive issue is that forum users with strong opinions but little interest in fruitful discussion will often interject themselves into all conversations that are related to their area of interest; examples include conspiracy theorists, political extremists, and trolls. This counterproductive behavior is not feasible in real life, where conversations happen locally and synchronously and one must be physically present in order to participate. In this sense it is enabled by Internet forum technology. In forums that have search features, it is even easier for these problematic users to identify and target large numbers of threads rapidly. The field of conversational dynamics studies the interpersonal processes underlying dialog between people, and this is an example of how changing the mode of communication can negatively impact productive conversational dynamics.

In this satirical comic, Randall imagines the inventors of the modern web (note that in contrast of what the comic depicts, there is no single person or group who created the foundation of the modern web, unlike the original web where there is an identifiable person) correctly anticipating that anyone will be able to inject their opinion into any conversation, but naively interpreting this as a benefit of the medium (by enabling broader participation by helpful users with relevant information), rather than as a potential problem. The title text imagines how search features will enable these helpful users to be even more helpful. In reality, as any modern user of Internet forums would be aware, both of these technologies are routinely abused by problematic users, and the characters are being too optimistic.

Transcript

[Cueball is sitting at a computer and pointing at the CRT monitor. White Hat is standing behind him.]
Cueball: Check it out! My new system allows anyone on Earth to inject themselves into any conversation happening anywhere  at any time.
White Hat: Cool! I bet this won't lead to any unhealthy dynamics!
[Caption under the panel:]
The creation of the modern web


comment.png add a comment! ⋅ comment.png add a topic (use sparingly)! ⋅ Icons-mini-action refresh blue.gif refresh comments!

Discussion

The spacing between "anywhere" and "at" is around 12px, while the spacing between other words is around 6px. It's a mistake or it's intended to emphasize "at any time"? 108.162.219.28 21:43, 30 March 2018 (UTC)

It is not unusual to expand the spacing between words to make the edges of the lines match up more evenly. He could have space the words more evenly but he is doing this by hand. 162.158.146.124 15:11, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
The paragraph wouldn't truly be justified, unless the entire right side were closer to being flush. These Are Not The Comments You Are Looking For (talk) 03:47, 1 April 2018 (UTC)

I don't have any critical information to share! Ianrbibtitlht (talk) 16:44, 31 March 2018 (UTC)