Explain xkcd: It's 'cause you're dumb.
|Choices: Part 5|
Title text: I wonder what percentage of not-obviously-busy people on the street would say yes to kite-flying with a stranger. This looks like a job for Science!
In the final part of Choices, Megan is back to real life, and has forgotten about her trip, as afterlife-Megan said. However, she has an epiphany, and in the spirit of what she told her, she talks to the stranger at the street.
The urge to talk to strangers in awkward situations has been touched on in 235: Kite and can also be used when you are already flying a kite (see 1614: Kites.)
The title text suggests a weird sociological investigation. The capital "S" in "Science" suggests a personification.
The series was released on 5 consecutive days (Monday-Friday).
All parts of "Choices":
- [Megan is walking towards the right of the panel.]
- [Cueball wearing a backpack is walking towards the left of the panel.]
- [They walk past each other.]
- [Megan has a sudden thought, in a drawing without a frame between two panels.]
- [Megan turns, lifts her arm and calls out to Cueball who then turn towards her.]
- Megan: Hi.
- Cueball: Uh, hi.
- [Only Megan is shown.]
- Megan: Sorry if this is weird, but, do you like flying kites?
add a comment! ⋅ add a topic (use sparingly)! ⋅ refresh comments!
I think it's related to 235: Kite. There is kite, Megan, Cueball - but they didn't say "hi". 18.104.22.168 (talk) (please sign your comments with ~~~~)
I'd agree here. It's nice to have pleasant realisations. Ribbit it's Toad! (talk) 05:44, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
I'm not sure if this should be taken as something that happens in direct chronological relation with the previous "Megan travels to another universe" series; it's not apparently related. I see no reason to treat these cartoons as if they follow any particular order or time frame, except when it's obvious. In fact, until I came here and started reading the explanations, I never even thought of them as particular "characters" with names, just representations of certain types of people. It wasn't long, but I hadn't even associated Black Hat with being an "asshole" in particular. I thought it was just a way of giving the series some texture. In any case, he's the only one that shows a real definite set to his personality, and he could be representative of a certain type of person. The others are less so, but I don't think they should be viewed as sequential characters in a storyline; they're more like people in The Far Side, where they usually look very much alike, but there is no actual relation between the people shown in on frame and the next. Not to say giving them names doesn't make explaining easier, but I wouldn't take it any further than that. Personally, anyway. Unless Randall specifically said they were intended to be specific characters at some point... 22.214.171.124 06:19, 13 May 2016 (UTC)
- Um, you've seen the strip title? It's labeled as part of the series, if it wasn't enough to be directly after and contain an identical character doing something in line with the previous strip's suggestions. 126.96.36.199 17:20, 26 May 2016 (UTC)