314: Dating Pools

Explain xkcd: It's 'cause you're dumb.
Revision as of 01:06, 8 June 2013 by Frankie (Talk | contribs)

Jump to: navigation, search
Dating Pools
The full analysis is of course much more complicated, but I can't stay to talk about it because I have a date.
Title text: The full analysis is of course much more complicated, but I can't stay to talk about it because I have a date.


Half Plus Seven Rule

Megan is upset because she is apparently older than 26, so more than half of people her age have gotten married. Cueball reassures her using the Half Plus Seven Rule combined with Census Bureau data to show that her eligible dating pool is still increasing.

Megan notes that graph-making nerds like Cueball may have a hard time finding dates, but this is belied by the title text.


[Megan is sitting on the ground with her elbows on her knees and her hands on her chin.]
Megan: This sucks. The median first marriage age is 26. The pools of singles is shrinking. I'm running out of time.
Cueball: Actually, not quite.
Cueball: Yes, older singles are rarer. But as you get older, the dateable age range gets wider. An 18-year-old's range is 16-22, whereas a 30-year-old's might be more like 22-46.
Text on chart: Standard creepiness rule: Don't date under (Age/2 + 7)
Cueball: I did some analysis of this with the Census Bureau numbers just last weekend. Your dating pool actually GROWS until middle age. So don't fret so much!
[The first chart is labeled Singles, and is a decreasing graph. The second graph is labeled Dating Pool, and is a bell curve.]
Megan: Did you analysis say anything about the dating prospects of people who spend weekends at home making graphs?
Cueball: Come on. Somewhere at the edge of the bell curve is the girl for me.
comment.png add a comment! ⋅ Icons-mini-action refresh blue.gif refresh comments!


The following text is exactly 160 characters long, which is the maximum length of an SMS:

(2013-08-17)-(199X-XX-XX)=6XXX days
(2013-08-17)-(199X-XX-XX)=5XXX days
7 years=2556.75 days
Standard Creepiness Rule: Don't date under age/2+7

Don't ask me how I found it :P (some digits are replaced with X for privacy reasons) --DiEvAl (talk) 10:08, 17 August 2013 (UTC)

Don't ask you how you found it? I'm a little concerned about that credo... 06:18, 14 September 2013 (UTC)

By this standard, 14 is the minimum dating age. As a father, I approve Cflare (talk) 14:49, 21 July 2014 (UTC)

The chart appears to be using the following function for the maximum age: max_age_other <= (your_age - 7) * 2 The max age is determined by the oldest the other person can be before you are too young for them according to the age/2 + 7 rule. 17:20, 24 September 2014 (UTC)

Am I the only one who thought of this? http://www.roundstable.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2013/11/Screen-Shot-2013-11-19-at-8.32.48-AM-690x377.png

(as far as making charts on stuff like love and shtuff. (talk) (please sign your comments with ~~~~)
Personal tools


It seems you are using noscript, which is stopping our project wonderful ads from working. Explain xkcd uses ads to pay for bandwidth, and we manually approve all our advertisers, and our ads are restricted to unobtrusive images and slow animated GIFs. If you found this site helpful, please consider whitelisting us.

Want to advertise with us, or donate to us with Paypal or Bitcoin?