Difference between revisions of "329: Turing Test"

Explain xkcd: It's 'cause you're dumb.
Jump to: navigation, search
(Explanation: grammatical cleanup; minor link edits)
Line 9: Line 9:
  
 
== Explanation ==
 
== Explanation ==
In brief, [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Turing_test Turing test] is a test for assessing whether a machine/program demonstrates "intelligent" behaviour. It was suggested by [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alan_Turing Alan Turing] and the test involves a human examiner talking through a computer terminal to either a human or computer which is not known to the examiner. If the machine/program can response to the examiner so good to convince the examiner by imitating human response, the machine/program is said to be passing the test. This comics suggests that extra credit should be awarded if the machine/program is capable of "counter-convincing" the examiner that he's actually a computer.
+
In brief, a [[wikipedia:Turing test|Turing test]] is a test for assessing whether a machine/program demonstrates "intelligent" behaviour. Suggested by [[wikipedia:Alan Turing|Alan Turing]], the test involves a human examiner talking through a computer terminal to either a human or a computer -- which it is, is not known to rhe examiner. If the machine/program's responses convince the examiner that he/she is talking to a human, the machine/program is said to be passing the test. This comic suggests that extra credit should be awarded if the machine/program is capable of "counter-convincing" the examiner that he's actually a computer.
  
 
== Transcript ==
 
== Transcript ==

Revision as of 02:28, 24 August 2012

Turing Test
Hit Turing right in the test-tees
Title text: Hit Turing right in the test-tees

Explanation

In brief, a Turing test is a test for assessing whether a machine/program demonstrates "intelligent" behaviour. Suggested by Alan Turing, the test involves a human examiner talking through a computer terminal to either a human or a computer -- which it is, is not known to rhe examiner. If the machine/program's responses convince the examiner that he/she is talking to a human, the machine/program is said to be passing the test. This comic suggests that extra credit should be awarded if the machine/program is capable of "counter-convincing" the examiner that he's actually a computer.

Transcript

Screen 1:
Title:
Turing test extra credit:
Convince the examiner that he's a computer.
Examiner:
You know, you make some really good points.
I'm... not even sure who I am any more


comment.png add a comment! ⋅ comment.png add a topic (use sparingly)! ⋅ Icons-mini-action refresh blue.gif refresh comments!

Discussion

I think this is also a pretty obvious joke about Cleverbot, which constantly insists that you are a robot and it is a human. (See also 948: AI) 24.41.66.114 02:33, 16 September 2013 (UTC)

I disagree, I think that's stretching it. Randall doesn't usually use others' punchlines wholesale, this seems like an original joke, and there are no references to Cleverbot to place the joke into that context. 108.162.249.155 03:39, 10 March 2016 (UTC)

Victorian era ended in 1901

Turing was convicted in 1952. 108.162.216.69 (talk) (please sign your comments with ~~~~)

The law was Victorian (1885), not the conviction. 23:52, 11 February 2015 (UTC)

"Chemical castration" simply reduces the libido - so hitting Turing in the testes would induce the same pain as in any other man.141.101.98.215 12:44, 21 May 2015 (UTC)

Shouldn't the description for the Turing test be changed to "demonstrate human-like behavior"? -- Flewk (talk) (please sign your comments with ~~~~)