Explain xkcd: It's 'cause you're dumb.
Revision as of 18:11, 6 June 2013
|Forks and Spoons|
Title text: Their biggest mistake was bringing Rachael Ray and Emeril to tour the lab and sign off on the project. That's when Spielberg caught wind of it.
This comic begins like standard sci-fi fare, where amoral scientists request funding from mysterious benefactors. The dialogue of "You're toying with powerful forces here" and "We know what we're doing" is a classic trope, foreshadowing that things will soon go horribly wrong. It inevitably leads to the humorous incongruity of a sentient spork on a murderous rampage.
- Presenter: A spoon crossed with a fork is a spork.
- Off-panel presenter's voice: Our lab has successfully crossed a spork with a spoon. [Diagram showing the fractions of fork and spoon in each item.]
- [Chart showing possible combinations of spoons a forks.]
- Presenter, facing audience: With your funding, we could create hybrids in proportions corresponding to any binary fraction.
- [Fork-Spoon Spectrum]
- Audience member: You're toying with powerful forces here.
- Presenter: We know what we're doing.
- Two weeks later:
- Hop hop hop. [Picture of a destroyed lab with two dead bodies, blood everywhere and a spoon-fork hybrid hopping away.]
add a comment! ⋅ add a topic (use sparingly)! ⋅ refresh comments!
What could the title text be about? 188.8.131.52 05:45, 4 September 2013 (UTC)
Rachael Ray and Emeril are two celebrity cooks in America; he has a TV show (or did at the time this was drawn); she has her own magazine. Spielberg is presumably the movie guy. 184.108.40.206 (talk) (please sign your comments with ~~~~)
Speilberg is definitely "the movie guy" and most relevantly the director of Jurassic Park, with which Randall has a well-documented obsession (87:_Velociraptors, 135:_Substitute, and many others.) The overall plot -- disaster brought about by cocky scientists "toying with powerful forces" -- is the same as this comic's. Rachel Ray and Emeril would presumably be the stand-ins for JP's Drs. Sattler and Grant. --220.127.116.11 17:38, 28 October 2013 (UTC)
It looks more like a spoork (stage 2 spork) in the last panel18.104.22.168 09:16, 24 January 2014 (UTC)
could it be a knife at the last panel? Imanton1 (talk) 03:39, 26 January 2014 (UTC)
It does look like a knife; one edge is completely straight and one is rounded. LogicalOxymoron (talk) 20:18, 11 March 2014 (UTC)
The first line of the explanation suggests that the spoon-spork hybrids are produced in manner "similar to Mendelian inheritance" is incorrect. In fact the process is far more similar to non-Mendelian inheritance. LordofMarzipan (talk) 06:46, 25 June 2014 (UTC)
Might be going too deep into the charts... --flewk (talk) 16:26, 28 December 2015 (UTC)
"Should'a just stayed with the fork'n knife"
"Huh?! What kind'a knife?" NerillDP (talk) 19:28, 1 April 2016 (UTC)Nerill
- A sponife! 1/2 spoon and 1/2 knife! You don't need spoons anymore! Weirdly enough, I have a weird utensil that is a fork and knife on one side, and a spoon on the other side. It can be kind of weird to eat with it because you have to be careful to not cut yourself while using the spoon.
"I don't use a spoon or fork, i use a spork!" (Jurassic Park music starts playing)Dontknow (talk) 00:08, 3 May 2017 (UTC)