57: Wait For Me

Explain xkcd: It's 'cause you're dumb.
Revision as of 17:19, 21 September 2012 by (Talk)

Jump to: navigation, search
Wait For Me
Opening dialogue by Scott
Title text: Opening dialogue by Scott


In this comic, Megan is returning after a short absence of under two minutes. Cueball's reaction is as if she had been gone for years, and had formed a relationship with someone else while waiting.

His pause before admitting to the affair, as well as the claim of having a son by the affair Megan's age suggest that he is joking. It is impossible for Cueball to have a son Megan's age from an affair while he is notionally seeing Megan (unless he had the relationship with Megan, and the affair, 9 months before she was born. Certainly not within the 90 seconds Megan claims to have been gone.


[A man and a woman stand facing one another]

Woman: Why didn't you wait for me?

Man: I thought you were gone forever!

Woman: I said I'd be back in a minute!

Man: The . . . the seconds went fast at first, but then they started to drag on. She was there for me.

Woman: You had an affair in the 90 seconds I was gone?!

Man: . . . yes.

Man: And we had a son.

Man: He'd be about your age now.

comment.png add a comment! ⋅ comment.png add a topic (use sparingly)! ⋅ Icons-mini-action refresh blue.gif refresh comments!


This could also be a reference to relativity, but I may be overthinking it. 06:24, 9 March 2013 (UTC)

I'm going with the more fantastical route. Cueball could have gone to Narnia in the ninety seconds she was gone. He could have had an affair and a child that is her age within that time. 10:51, 18 May 2013 (UTC)

And is maybe even a half-fawn? ;) 23:06, 24 June 2013 (UTC)

Who is "Scott"? He is mentioned here a couple of times so, we do need a category for him at this wiki.--Dgbrt (talk) 22:27, 25 June 2013 (UTC)

We already have a page for him. I've adjusted the two pages that refer to him in the title text to wikilink his name like the third already did. Mark Hurd (talk) 01:37, 26 June 2013 (UTC)

The 90 seconds could refer to time to read the comic for some people? 14:13, 18 July 2013 (UTC)

I strongly feel that cueball is making a joke about relativity. 19:22, 20 September 2013

The joke is about relativity. A very popular example found in books is the so-called twin paradox, where one brother stays on earth and the other travels at a speed of light. When the traveling twin returns, he finds his brother having aged years while only hours had passed for the traveler.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Twin_paradox 05:41, 22 September 2013 (UTC)

I feel pretty strongly that Cueball's hesitation is more because he is embarrassed, than because he is joking. bringing cueball's son into the situation would then pull relativity into the matter. GallantChaos (talk) 17:51, 22 September 2013 (UTC)

It seems to me more like a sketch based on the premise of the Bill Nighy film About Time where the males of the family can travel backwards in time, sometimes changing the future as a result 10:57, 8 November 2013 (UTC)Pab

How could Randall have referenced a 2013 movie in 2006? -- Oh. I see what you did there. -- Madbadger2742 (talk) (please sign your comments with ~~~~)

A woman announces: One minute...—that's the joke!--Dgbrt (talk) 21:38, 8 November 2013 (UTC)

He may be also referring to Star trek episode 'The Inner Light' (talk) (please sign your comments with ~~~~)

It is interesting to note that since the comic gradually reveals how much time has elapsed (or has been imagined/joked to have elapsed), it gives the impression of time accelerating as you read the comic. So if you read it quasi-statically, it seems that Cueball has merely been gone for long enough to have a son about Megan's age, but if you read dynamically, it seems that Cueball is getting older as he speaks, and will age and die before the conversation is over. Richmond tudor (talk) 03:55, 13 March 2015 (UTC)

Why is it 'stereotypically female' to announce approximately how long task will take? In the UK, at least, men do this as well. 09:17, 4 April 2015 (UTC)

Personal tools


It seems you are using noscript, which is stopping our project wonderful ads from working. Explain xkcd uses ads to pay for bandwidth, and we manually approve all our advertisers, and our ads are restricted to unobtrusive images and slow animated GIFs. If you found this site helpful, please consider whitelisting us.

Want to advertise with us, or donate to us with Paypal?