Explain xkcd: It's 'cause you're dumb.
Douglas Hofstadter is an American and to quote Wikipedia: "...an American academic whose research focuses on consciousness, analogy-making, artistic creation, literary translation, and discovery in mathematics and physics." In 2007, he wrote a book called I Am a Strange Loop in which he studied the properties of self-referential systems. In popular culture, self-reference is referred to as being meta.
So, the one line autobiography is meta because it is also an acronym which reads "IS META", thus finishing its own sentence.
In the title text, reference implementation is a reference to the standard implementation during a software development process.
- [A man sits at a desk, working on a laptop. A woman approaches the desk and picks up a tiny book.]
- Woman: What's this?
- Man: Douglas Hofstadter's six-word autobiography. After all those 700-page tomes, I guess he wanted to try for brevity.
- Woman: Huh. Let's see...
- [Close up of woman, reading the tiny book.]
- Book: I'm So Meta, Even This Acronym
- [Full shot of man and woman again. The woman looks down at the tiny book in her hand.]
- Woman: ...whoa.
- Man: I think he nailed it.
add a comment! ⋅ add a topic (use sparingly)! ⋅ refresh comments!
I bet Randall felt so clever when he came up with that acronym. Davidy²²[talk] 01:24, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
IMO he had every right to. 184.108.40.206 (talk) (please sign your comments with ~~~~)
Is it worth mentioning that Is Meta is an acronym for "I'm," the first word of the acronym? That seems like it would be in the spirit of Hofstadter and "meta," especially since Hofstadter talks a lot about the meaning of "I" in his books. --220.127.116.11 04:28, 4 November 2013 (UTC)
Would "this acronym" imply that the sentence itself is an acronym for something much larger? A biography, perhaps? 18.104.22.168 14:48, 28 May 2014 (UTC)
The acronym of the title text is "tit riots (r)j". I'm fairly sure this doesn't really mean anything, but "tit riots" just made me giggle. 22.214.171.124 11:41, 18 June 2014 (UTC)
Should it read “I'm so meta, even this acrostic”? Or did Randall eschew correctness in favor of more readers knowing what the comic's words meant? YatharthROCK (talk) 22:25, 27 November 2015 (UTC)
The explanation is factually incorrect... the prefix "meta" comes from the (ancient) Greek preposition "meta" which doesn't mean "beyond" or "out of" but merely "after". It came to mean, as a prefix, "beyond" or "reflexive", in modern european languages, via the latin neologism "metaphysica", supposed to be a translitteration of the title of Aristotle's collection of essays. This mysterious title was given by their first editor, living centuries after Aristotle, and was "ta meta ta physica", that is to say something like : "those [the books] after those regarding nature". As those mysteriously titled books concerned the general principles of reality, (including famously the "god", the divine principle of nature"), the title came wrongly to be understood as meaning "beyond nature". Eventually, the "metaphysics" of something came to be understood as dealing with the principles "beyond" a given domain, hence "meta-studies" or "meta-psychology", etc. It is, however, a mistake made since centuries... --Antinomiste (talk) 19:31, 3 March 2016 (UTC)