Main Page

Explain xkcd: It's 'cause you're dumb.
Revision as of 16:19, 23 April 2013 by Markhurd (Talk | contribs)

Jump to: navigation, search

Welcome to the explain xkcd wiki!

We have collaboratively explained 1481 xkcd comics, and only -3 (-0%) remain. Add yours while there's a chance!

Latest comic

Go to this comic explanation

If all else fails, use "signifcant at a p>0.05 level" and hope no one notices.
Title text: If all else fails, use "signifcant at a p>0.05 level" and hope no one notices.


Ambox notice.png This explanation may be incomplete or incorrect: Needs work to improve readability for non-statisticians.

This comic plays on how the significance of scientific experiments is measured and interpreted. The p-value is a statistical measure of how well the results of an experiment fit with the results predicted by the hypothesis. Low p-values occur when the results appear to reject the null hypothesis, whereas the high p-values suggest no relation between the hypothesis and the real world. The p-value calculated from the experiment data is used to interpret whether the experiment was significant and supports the hypothesis.

The significance threshold (usually 0.05) should be set prior the experiment in order to avoid ex-post changes in order to get a better experiment report. A simple change of this threshold (e.g. from 0.05 to 0.1) can change the experiment result with p-value=0.06 from "barely significant" to "significant".

The highest p-value at which most studies typically draw significance is p<0.05, which is why all p-values in the comic below that number are marked at least significant. 0.050 is labeled "Oh crap. Redo calculations," because the p-value is very close to being considered significant, but isn't. Redoing the calculations may result in a different answer, but it is not guaranteed that it will be lower than 0.050. Values that are higher than 0.050 and lower than .1 are considered to be suggesting significance without actually supporting it, which will likely support additional trials.

Values higher than .1 should be considered not significant at all, however the comic suggests taking a part of the sample (a "subgroup") and analyzing that subgroup without regard to the rest of the sample. For example, in a study trying to prove that people always sneeze when walking by a particular street lamp, someone would record the number of people who pass the lamp and the number of people who sneezes. If the results don't get the desired p<0.1, then pick a subgroup (e.g. OK, not all people sneeze, but look! women sneeze more than men, so let's analyze only women). Of course, this is not accepted scientific procedure as it's very likely to add sampling bias to the result.

The title text suggests that, if the results cannot be normally considered significant, to invert p<0.050, making it p>0.050. This is intended to fool casual readers, as the change is only to the inequality sign, which may go unnoticed. Notice that there is another mistake in the title text, specifically the word "significant" is misspelled as "signifcant". This is quite possibly not an author's error and rather another comical pun that further supports the "hope no one notices" theme featured in the same sentence.


Ambox notice.png This explanation may be incomplete or incorrect: First draft.

There are two columns in a T-table labelled "p-value" and "interpretation". The interpretation column selects various areas of the P-value column.

P-value Interpretation
0.001 Highly significant
0.04 Significant
0.050 Oh crap. Redo calculations.
0.051 On the edge of significance
0.07 Highly suggestive, relevant at the p<0.10 level
≥0.1 Hey, look at this interesting subgroup analysis

Is this out of date? Clicking here will fix that.

New here?

Last 7 days (Top 10)

Lots of people contribute to make this wiki a success. Many of the recent contributors, listed above, have just joined. You can do it too! Create your account here.

You can read a brief introduction about this wiki at explain xkcd. Feel free to sign up for an account and contribute to the wiki! We need explanations for comics, characters, themes, memes and everything in between. If it is referenced in an xkcd web comic, it should be here.

  • List of all comics contains a complete table of all xkcd comics so far and the corresponding explanations. The missing explanations are listed here. Feel free to help out by creating them! Here's how.


Don't be a jerk. There are a lot of comics that don't have set in stone explanations; feel free to put multiple interpretations in the wiki page for each comic.

If you want to talk about a specific comic, use its discussion page.

Please only submit material directly related to —and helping everyone better understand— xkcd... and of course only submit material that can legally be posted (and freely edited.) Off-topic or other inappropriate content is subject to removal or modification at admin discretion, and users who repeatedly post such content will be blocked.

If you need assistance from an admin, post a message to the Admin requests board.

Personal tools


It seems you are using noscript, which is stopping our project wonderful ads from working. Explain xkcd uses ads to pay for bandwidth, and we manually approve all our advertisers, and our ads are restricted to unobtrusive images and slow animated GIFs. If you found this site helpful, please consider whitelisting us.

Want to advertise with us, or donate to us with Paypal or Bitcoin?