Difference between revisions of "Talk:1250: Old Accounts"
(I agree with Eqdw) |
|||
Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
The reference to defriending in reverse order could be a joke about memory management in programming: You free up memory in reverse of the order you allocated it --[[User:Eqdw|Eqdw]] ([[User talk:Eqdw|talk]]) 16:49, 12 August 2013 (UTC) | The reference to defriending in reverse order could be a joke about memory management in programming: You free up memory in reverse of the order you allocated it --[[User:Eqdw|Eqdw]] ([[User talk:Eqdw|talk]]) 16:49, 12 August 2013 (UTC) | ||
+ | |||
+ | :I agree with Eqdw on the memory management reference; the title text especially seems to reference memory leak problems. Unfortunately, I lack sufficient technical knowledge to provide a good explanation of this for the description. [[User:Thegreatsasquatch|TheGreatSasquatch]] ([[User talk:Thegreatsasquatch|talk]]) 17:15, 12 August 2013 (UTC) |
Revision as of 17:15, 12 August 2013
Kind of reminds me of all these movies where someone deletes something from a computer by dramatically backspacing everything. Like in Daredevil, for example. 95.35.60.227 07:34, 12 August 2013 (UTC)
It wouldn't surprise me if FB kept a list of all the people who unfriended you. I know that they don't delete accounts that have been deleted. Hax (talk) 14:45, 12 August 2013 (UTC)
The reference to defriending in reverse order could be a joke about memory management in programming: You free up memory in reverse of the order you allocated it --Eqdw (talk) 16:49, 12 August 2013 (UTC)
- I agree with Eqdw on the memory management reference; the title text especially seems to reference memory leak problems. Unfortunately, I lack sufficient technical knowledge to provide a good explanation of this for the description. TheGreatSasquatch (talk) 17:15, 12 August 2013 (UTC)