Difference between revisions of "Talk:1364: Like I'm Five"

Explain xkcd: It's 'cause you're dumb.
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 11: Line 11:
 
I did remove this statement: "possibly originating from an [http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1171346/quotes?item=qt0381329 episode of Psych])". Maybe someone can give a better prove; the explain still needs some enhancements. --[[User:Dgbrt|Dgbrt]] ([[User talk:Dgbrt|talk]]) 19:31, 5 May 2014 (UTC)
 
I did remove this statement: "possibly originating from an [http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1171346/quotes?item=qt0381329 episode of Psych])". Maybe someone can give a better prove; the explain still needs some enhancements. --[[User:Dgbrt|Dgbrt]] ([[User talk:Dgbrt|talk]]) 19:31, 5 May 2014 (UTC)
  
Does this remind anyone else of [[547]]?  Except that xkcd argued the opposite (that simplified explanations are beneficial). [[User:S|S]] ([[User talk:S|talk]]) 23:02, 5 May 2014 (UTC)
+
Does this remind anyone else of [[547]]?  Except that xkcd argued the opposite (that simplified explanations are beneficial). I'd assume that this means there is a happy middle ground between offering simple, accessible explanations and dumbing things down to the level needed for a 5 year old to understand. [[User:S|S]] ([[User talk:S|talk]]) 23:02, 5 May 2014 (UTC)

Revision as of 23:04, 5 May 2014

Almost certainly a reference to this. 108.162.219.44 05:58, 5 May 2014 (UTC)

I actually do something like this, though I never heard of the Reddit thing or the above page. 108.162.237.218 06:46, 5 May 2014 (UTC)

The alt text leads into me imagining them both "being" 5 and start arguing in a very childish way. I think that's a part of the alt joke. 108.162.219.39 08:59, 5 May 2014 (UTC)

I read it as a pun on "parens". As in the equations being so complicated it's hard to tell which parentheses belong together. 141.101.88.211 12:04, 5 May 2014 (UTC)

But those parentheses are only in your mind. The thesis could very well be about Psychology or Latin. 173.245.50.84 14:24, 5 May 2014 (UTC)

I did remove this statement: "possibly originating from an episode of Psych)". Maybe someone can give a better prove; the explain still needs some enhancements. --Dgbrt (talk) 19:31, 5 May 2014 (UTC)

Does this remind anyone else of 547? Except that xkcd argued the opposite (that simplified explanations are beneficial). I'd assume that this means there is a happy middle ground between offering simple, accessible explanations and dumbing things down to the level needed for a 5 year old to understand. S (talk) 23:02, 5 May 2014 (UTC)