Difference between revisions of "Talk:1429: Data"

Explain xkcd: It's 'cause you're dumb.
Jump to: navigation, search
(Created page with "What should "off-screen" be called in the transcript? I just put that since I didn't know what else to say. Also, someone needs to a) explain the Kirk/Picard situation and b...")
 
Line 1: Line 1:
 
What should "off-screen" be called in the transcript?  I just put that since I didn't know what else to say.  Also, someone needs to a) explain the Kirk/Picard situation and b) explain the title text.  Sorry for not doing it myself, but I'm editting on my phone so there are probably errors that people need to fix and other peolle know far more about it anyway. [[User:Athang|Athang]] ([[User talk:Athang|talk]]) 04:42, 3 October 2014 (UTC)
 
What should "off-screen" be called in the transcript?  I just put that since I didn't know what else to say.  Also, someone needs to a) explain the Kirk/Picard situation and b) explain the title text.  Sorry for not doing it myself, but I'm editting on my phone so there are probably errors that people need to fix and other peolle know far more about it anyway. [[User:Athang|Athang]] ([[User talk:Athang|talk]]) 04:42, 3 October 2014 (UTC)
 +
 +
The comic refers tp "pedants '''on all sides'''", which implies there is some kind of debate/dispute about the issue in the grammatical world. If someone who is aware of this dispute were to explain the details of it and/or provide links to sites that discuss it, I think the explanation would be greatly improved.

Revision as of 04:47, 3 October 2014

What should "off-screen" be called in the transcript? I just put that since I didn't know what else to say. Also, someone needs to a) explain the Kirk/Picard situation and b) explain the title text. Sorry for not doing it myself, but I'm editting on my phone so there are probably errors that people need to fix and other peolle know far more about it anyway. Athang (talk) 04:42, 3 October 2014 (UTC)

The comic refers tp "pedants on all sides", which implies there is some kind of debate/dispute about the issue in the grammatical world. If someone who is aware of this dispute were to explain the details of it and/or provide links to sites that discuss it, I think the explanation would be greatly improved.