Difference between revisions of "Talk:1459: Documents"
m (Removed unnecessary section heading) |
Brettpeirce (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
Using the image format (.jpg) to store text information (like addresses) will also contribute to an annoying future if you ever need to copy data from that file into some other programme. [[User:SirKitKat|sirKitKat]] ([[User talk:SirKitKat|talk]]) 09:58, 12 December 2014 (UTC) | Using the image format (.jpg) to store text information (like addresses) will also contribute to an annoying future if you ever need to copy data from that file into some other programme. [[User:SirKitKat|sirKitKat]] ([[User talk:SirKitKat|talk]]) 09:58, 12 December 2014 (UTC) | ||
| + | : oo good point -- [[User:Brettpeirce|Brettpeirce]] ([[User talk:Brettpeirce|talk]]) 13:13, 12 December 2014 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 13:13, 12 December 2014
742 Evergreen Terrace.docx 742 Evergreen Terrace (2).docx
141.101.99.51 07:24, 12 December 2014 (UTC)
I'm sure everyone can relate to using poor filenames occasionally. As far as default filenames go:
- Notepad (XP) = *.txt - Cannot save without choosing a new filename.
- Word (2003) = Title (if set by template) > First sentence of document > Doc1.doc, Doc2.doc, etc
- Paint (XP) = untitled.bmp
--Pudder (talk) 08:58, 12 December 2014 (UTC)
Using the image format (.jpg) to store text information (like addresses) will also contribute to an annoying future if you ever need to copy data from that file into some other programme. sirKitKat (talk) 09:58, 12 December 2014 (UTC)
- oo good point -- Brettpeirce (talk) 13:13, 12 December 2014 (UTC)
