Difference between revisions of "Talk:1908: Credit Card Rewards"
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
There's also [https://xkcd.com/1445/ 1445 (Efficiency)], in which Randall confesses this search to optimize tasks killing his effeiciency is a personal problem for him. [[Special:Contributions/162.158.69.241|162.158.69.241]] 14:30, 30 October 2017 (UTC) | There's also [https://xkcd.com/1445/ 1445 (Efficiency)], in which Randall confesses this search to optimize tasks killing his effeiciency is a personal problem for him. [[Special:Contributions/162.158.69.241|162.158.69.241]] 14:30, 30 October 2017 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | There is also [https://xkcd.com/1205/ 1205 (Is it worth the time)] which explores how much time you can spend to make a task more efficient before you break even. | ||
Revision as of 23:23, 30 October 2017
Does Randall realize this goes completely against the "Working" comic (https://xkcd.com/951/)? I wonder if he's changed his outlook or if he's just inconsistent :P
- I read it as if the character likes doing this, and wouldn't be doing anything more fun otherwise. So if it is a game to you, sure waste your time, but if you are doing something you don't particularly like and waste more time than you save in money, you are just being stupid.162.158.202.28 22:43, 29 October 2017 (UTC)
- There's also the fact that in "Working" the additional work was required every time, and so each additional penny saved comes from additional work. Here, this is about doing the work once and getting the outcome several times. This is actually pretty consistent with someone who is into programming - where in theory you do more work once to save time on each occurence of a repeted task. Now the fact that even "optimizing once and for all" isn't a sure outcome is discussed in https://xkcd.com/1319/ . 162.158.92.136 11:24, 30 October 2017 (UTC)
I don't it goes against 951, essentially he's trying to stop before he's spent 9 minutes to save a dollar (and hairy is questioning that he would have otherwise spent that 9 minutes earning more than a dollar) 108.162.216.136 01:17, 28 October 2017 (UTC)
This reminds me of Hofstadter's law // See also #1658 and this Explain xkcd for #1658 18:26, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
How did he miss the circular reference error? (unsigned comment from 108.162.219.94)
This is similar to comic 1205 (Worth the time), except that it's just a one-time event and just thinking about the table makes it worse. For example the top right cell of that table could just say "none, because it took you longer to search for and apply this chart). Fabian42 (talk) 09:36, 30 October 2017 (UTC)
There's also 1445 (Efficiency), in which Randall confesses this search to optimize tasks killing his effeiciency is a personal problem for him. 162.158.69.241 14:30, 30 October 2017 (UTC)
There is also 1205 (Is it worth the time) which explores how much time you can spend to make a task more efficient before you break even.
