Difference between revisions of "Talk:350: Network"
Divad27182 (talk | contribs) |
|||
| (4 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
I'm just going to say it if your going to infect them anyway and not update them why would you need to get licenses legally. okies i said what we're all thinking byesies[[Special:Contributions/24.2.26.20|24.2.26.20]] 20:06, 14 May 2013 (UTC) | I'm just going to say it if your going to infect them anyway and not update them why would you need to get licenses legally. okies i said what we're all thinking byesies[[Special:Contributions/24.2.26.20|24.2.26.20]] 20:06, 14 May 2013 (UTC) | ||
: License are not for the updates. Licenses are to not be committing copyright violation, and thus to be legal. --[[User:Divad27182|Divad27182]] ([[User talk:Divad27182|talk]]) 16:41, 5 June 2013 (UTC) | : License are not for the updates. Licenses are to not be committing copyright violation, and thus to be legal. --[[User:Divad27182|Divad27182]] ([[User talk:Divad27182|talk]]) 16:41, 5 June 2013 (UTC) | ||
| + | ::I believe Microsoft's MSDN licenses allow for setting up development/testing environments, and would be what I might use if I was setting something like this up for personal reasons, but still had enough money to buy a 103" flat-panel display... [[User:Tryc|Tryc]] ([[User talk:Tryc|talk]]) 20:10, 20 June 2013 (UTC) | ||
| + | :::This comic is not about Microsoft licences, it's just about an experiment at an isolated network exposed to many violent viruses effecting only Microsoft systems. That Linux/MAC prediction is still not explained: So this is incomplete.--[[User:Dgbrt|Dgbrt]] ([[User talk:Dgbrt|talk]]) 21:03, 20 June 2013 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ;A mention of WecanHastheTechnology? | ||
| + | |||
| + | Hey, perhaps we should mention something about the site http://wecan.hasthe.technology? Someone actually set up a system like this (in the FAQ, it was actually stated as being inspired by this comic.) Although, I suppose it's understandable (for security purposes) not to link to external untrusted sites. {{unsigned ip|173.245.56.205}} | ||
Revision as of 00:07, 1 July 2014
I'm just going to say it if your going to infect them anyway and not update them why would you need to get licenses legally. okies i said what we're all thinking byesies24.2.26.20 20:06, 14 May 2013 (UTC)
- License are not for the updates. Licenses are to not be committing copyright violation, and thus to be legal. --Divad27182 (talk) 16:41, 5 June 2013 (UTC)
- A mention of WecanHastheTechnology?
Hey, perhaps we should mention something about the site http://wecan.hasthe.technology? Someone actually set up a system like this (in the FAQ, it was actually stated as being inspired by this comic.) Although, I suppose it's understandable (for security purposes) not to link to external untrusted sites. 173.245.56.205 (talk) (please sign your comments with ~~~~)
