Difference between revisions of "Talk:361: Christmas Back Home"
(Created page with "Can we just change "used to using", if it is bad, into something better, instead of marking the explanation as incomplete because of a wording issue? -~~~~") |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Can we just change "used to using", if it is bad, into something better, instead of marking the explanation as incomplete because of a wording issue? -[[User:St.nerol|St.nerol]] ([[User talk:St.nerol|talk]]) 10:43, 19 August 2013 (UTC) | Can we just change "used to using", if it is bad, into something better, instead of marking the explanation as incomplete because of a wording issue? -[[User:St.nerol|St.nerol]] ([[User talk:St.nerol|talk]]) 10:43, 19 August 2013 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | Because Cueball exclaims that it's barely 3 AM, would Cueball's internal sleep clock need to be turned more than five hours to sync with his family? I know it's a small detail, but I thought it would be worth noting. Cueball would probably stay up past 3 AM into the morning hours before going to bed. [[User:NAE|NAE]] ([[User talk:NAE|talk]]) 14:45, 26 October 2017 (UTC) | ||
Latest revision as of 14:45, 26 October 2017
Can we just change "used to using", if it is bad, into something better, instead of marking the explanation as incomplete because of a wording issue? -St.nerol (talk) 10:43, 19 August 2013 (UTC)
Because Cueball exclaims that it's barely 3 AM, would Cueball's internal sleep clock need to be turned more than five hours to sync with his family? I know it's a small detail, but I thought it would be worth noting. Cueball would probably stay up past 3 AM into the morning hours before going to bed. NAE (talk) 14:45, 26 October 2017 (UTC)
