Difference between revisions of "Talk:500: Election"

Explain xkcd: It's 'cause you're dumb.
Jump to: navigation, search
(Undo revision 122135 by 108.162.219.58 (talk) If you strongly disagree with someone, say it. No one changes what anyone else says here.)
Line 2: Line 2:
 
:They have only voted for a chimpanzee twice. That's not a bad score in 400 years.
 
:They have only voted for a chimpanzee twice. That's not a bad score in 400 years.
 
:Of course you could say that voting for chimpanzees has only ever been a colonial occupation after they declared independence. So that's about twice as often, isn't it?
 
:Of course you could say that voting for chimpanzees has only ever been a colonial occupation after they declared independence. So that's about twice as often, isn't it?
 +
:In fact, if you admit that it only happened after Texas was granted statehood, it narrows it down a lot.
  
 
[[User:Weatherlawyer| I used Google News BEFORE it was clickbait]] ([[User talk:Weatherlawyer|talk]]) 20:43, 30 January 2015 (UTC)
 
[[User:Weatherlawyer| I used Google News BEFORE it was clickbait]] ([[User talk:Weatherlawyer|talk]]) 20:43, 30 January 2015 (UTC)

Revision as of 09:43, 19 June 2016

Is this genuinely a thing that Americans do during election years? Davidy²²[talk] 22:49, 10 November 2014 (UTC)

They have only voted for a chimpanzee twice. That's not a bad score in 400 years.
Of course you could say that voting for chimpanzees has only ever been a colonial occupation after they declared independence. So that's about twice as often, isn't it?
In fact, if you admit that it only happened after Texas was granted statehood, it narrows it down a lot.

I used Google News BEFORE it was clickbait (talk) 20:43, 30 January 2015 (UTC)