Difference between revisions of "Talk:558: 1000 Times"
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
A bit surprised Randall ignored the still significant figure of 0.1% paid out as bonuses instead of being used to help revitalize the economy. [[User:Flewk|flewk]] ([[User talk:Flewk|talk]]) 07:50, 5 January 2016 (UTC) | A bit surprised Randall ignored the still significant figure of 0.1% paid out as bonuses instead of being used to help revitalize the economy. [[User:Flewk|flewk]] ([[User talk:Flewk|talk]]) 07:50, 5 January 2016 (UTC) | ||
| + | :I believe he was more upset about the dishonest reporting. How drastic that .1% are is a matter of debate, but I would argue that the amount of outrage the dishonest figures aim to incite is certainly unwarranted and would not serve any attempt at rational discourse. Randall has also shown a certain a ersion to making political comics and commentaries until recently. [[Special:Contributions/162.158.89.61|162.158.89.61]] 06:15, 3 March 2017 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 06:15, 3 March 2017
Most honest: Bailout - 1.7 x 10^11 Bonuses - 1.65 x 10^8 BruceJohnJennerLawso (talk) 23:39, 17 November 2013 (UTC)
- so what WERE the boni for?
I used Google News BEFORE it was clickbait (talk) 16:54, 30 January 2015 (UTC)
- For bringing money into the company (from the government) according to those executives' contracts 198.41.235.59 (talk) (please sign your comments with ~~~~)
A bit surprised Randall ignored the still significant figure of 0.1% paid out as bonuses instead of being used to help revitalize the economy. flewk (talk) 07:50, 5 January 2016 (UTC)
- I believe he was more upset about the dishonest reporting. How drastic that .1% are is a matter of debate, but I would argue that the amount of outrage the dishonest figures aim to incite is certainly unwarranted and would not serve any attempt at rational discourse. Randall has also shown a certain a ersion to making political comics and commentaries until recently. 162.158.89.61 06:15, 3 March 2017 (UTC)
