Difference between revisions of "Talk:798: Adjectives"
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
I think a better comparison would be substituting "as fuck" for "as shit." I found more results for "'improper as fuck'" than for "'improper as shit' -xkcd". I added the -xkcd because otherwise many of the results would be xkcd references. --[[Special:Contributions/108.162.216.36|108.162.216.36]] 00:11, 19 January 2014 (UTC) | I think a better comparison would be substituting "as fuck" for "as shit." I found more results for "'improper as fuck'" than for "'improper as shit' -xkcd". I added the -xkcd because otherwise many of the results would be xkcd references. --[[Special:Contributions/108.162.216.36|108.162.216.36]] 00:11, 19 January 2014 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | And the day after xkcd published this comic, results for "f***ing peristeronic" jumped off the charts (as was the case with other xkcd comics :-) ). [[Special:Contributions/108.162.221.150|108.162.221.150]] 00:11, 19 August 2015 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 00:11, 19 August 2015
The continued validity of some of these results is stochastic as shit, but to believe that they won't eventually change is just jejune as shit. (2 down, 4 more to go) --68.97.21.122 06:20, 15 July 2013 (UTC)
You would think that "improper as shit" would actually have more hits than that. 173.245.54.87 09:30, 25 November 2013 (UTC)
I think a better comparison would be substituting "as fuck" for "as shit." I found more results for "'improper as fuck'" than for "'improper as shit' -xkcd". I added the -xkcd because otherwise many of the results would be xkcd references. --108.162.216.36 00:11, 19 January 2014 (UTC)
And the day after xkcd published this comic, results for "f***ing peristeronic" jumped off the charts (as was the case with other xkcd comics :-) ). 108.162.221.150 00:11, 19 August 2015 (UTC)
