Difference between revisions of "Talk:900: Religions"

Explain xkcd: It's 'cause you're dumb.
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 6: Line 6:
  
 
:I'm sure you can find not one but several definitions of god with experimental evidence. Of course, this says more about how vague definitions of god are that about the god. -- [[User:Hkmaly|Hkmaly]] ([[User talk:Hkmaly|talk]]) 00:06, 25 April 2014 (UTC)
 
:I'm sure you can find not one but several definitions of god with experimental evidence. Of course, this says more about how vague definitions of god are that about the god. -- [[User:Hkmaly|Hkmaly]] ([[User talk:Hkmaly|talk]]) 00:06, 25 April 2014 (UTC)
 +
 +
::Agreed. There are no proof that no god exist, only some proof that certain definition of god cannot be true. [[User:Arifsaha|Arifsaha]] ([[User talk:Arifsaha|talk]]) 20:49, 28 October 2014 (UTC)

Revision as of 20:49, 28 October 2014

Where's the experimental evidence that there is actually a god? Davidy²²[talk] 02:01, 17 April 2013 (UTC)

Consider who is proposing such an experiment. QED. 184.66.160.91 03:10, 26 August 2013 (UTC)
The Bible, duh! Alpha (talk) 00:22, 1 January 2014 (UTC)
I'm sure you can find not one but several definitions of god with experimental evidence. Of course, this says more about how vague definitions of god are that about the god. -- Hkmaly (talk) 00:06, 25 April 2014 (UTC)
Agreed. There are no proof that no god exist, only some proof that certain definition of god cannot be true. Arifsaha (talk) 20:49, 28 October 2014 (UTC)