Difference between revisions of "Talk:971: Alternative Literature"
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
I think it is worse when vets do it to cattle and sheep. You never get to hear the farmer saying "Bah!" | I think it is worse when vets do it to cattle and sheep. You never get to hear the farmer saying "Bah!" | ||
| − | though. Odd, that. | + | though. Odd, that.[[User:Weatherlawyer| I used Google News BEFORE it was clickbait]] ([[User talk:Weatherlawyer|talk]]) 19:10, 22 January 2015 (UTC) |
Revision as of 19:10, 22 January 2015
I would totally buy a blank book. I could hollow them out to make boxes, or wire up the insides to build a revolving door, or hire an artist to draw wonderful images in them to put on display for anyone who comes over to my home. Davidy²²[talk] 08:21, 9 March 2013 (UTC)
Interestingly, this is exactly the argument used to explain why reading books is better than watching TV: TV gives too much of the ready context, while a book allows the reader to fill in the blanks with his own imagination. The empty books just go one step further. 108.162.246.11 22:15, 21 January 2014 (UTC)
I write short stories all the time but nobody reads them. Maybe I should get a printer?
"Telling someone who trusts you that you're giving them medicine, when you know you're not, because you want their money, isn't just lying--it's like an example you'd make up if you had to illustrate for a child why lying is wrong."
I think it is worse when vets do it to cattle and sheep. You never get to hear the farmer saying "Bah!" though. Odd, that. I used Google News BEFORE it was clickbait (talk) 19:10, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
