User talk:Frankie

Explain xkcd: It's 'cause you're dumb.
(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
(Replaced content with "{{spam}}")
(Undo revision 25375 by Davidy22 (talk) SHIT MY TRIGGER FINGER SORRY)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{spam}}
+
== Making unfounded accusations ==
 +
Accusing another editor of making harmful edits without producing evidence is a serious accusation, and you have made it in the most [[Talk:1159: Countdown|inappropriate]] of places. If you have a grievance to lodge against an editor please use [[explain xkcd:Community portal/Admin requests]]. I should warn you that most of your edits can be categorized as rude, brusque, and not in the spirit of {{w|WP:FAITH}}. Not only that, but you appear to have singled out [[User:St.nerol|St.nerol]] to receive your abuse. No action has been taken yet as St.nerol has not yet complained of your treatment. If this kind of inappropriate behavior continues action may be taken even without any request for admin intercession. [[User:Lcarsos|lcarsos]]<span title="I'm an admin. I can help.">_a</span> ([[User talk:Lcarsos|talk]])  23:28, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
 +
:Abolutely not. I have every confidence that St.nerol is editing in good faith. The issues are:
 +
# I think some of his math interpretations are incorrect; he thinks the converse.
 +
# 2 out of 2 times he has disagreed with my additions to articles, he has blanked my statement rather than try to incorporate the alternate view.
 +
:Furthermore, your assertion that [[Special:Contributions/Frankie|"most of my edits"]] are unfriendly is an unfounded accusation. My edit history is clearly constructive, aside from one annoyed talk post about being blanked for the second time. And that post was a request for information to resolve the dispute. - [[User:Frankie|Frankie]] ([[User talk:Frankie|talk]]) 11:50, 14 January 2013 (UTC)

Revision as of 11:56, 14 January 2013

Making unfounded accusations

Accusing another editor of making harmful edits without producing evidence is a serious accusation, and you have made it in the most inappropriate of places. If you have a grievance to lodge against an editor please use explain xkcd:Community portal/Admin requests. I should warn you that most of your edits can be categorized as rude, brusque, and not in the spirit of WP:FAITH. Not only that, but you appear to have singled out St.nerol to receive your abuse. No action has been taken yet as St.nerol has not yet complained of your treatment. If this kind of inappropriate behavior continues action may be taken even without any request for admin intercession. lcarsos_a (talk) 23:28, 12 January 2013 (UTC)

Abolutely not. I have every confidence that St.nerol is editing in good faith. The issues are:
  1. I think some of his math interpretations are incorrect; he thinks the converse.
  2. 2 out of 2 times he has disagreed with my additions to articles, he has blanked my statement rather than try to incorporate the alternate view.
Furthermore, your assertion that "most of my edits" are unfriendly is an unfounded accusation. My edit history is clearly constructive, aside from one annoyed talk post about being blanked for the second time. And that post was a request for information to resolve the dispute. - Frankie (talk) 11:50, 14 January 2013 (UTC)
Personal tools
Namespaces

Variants
Actions
Navigation
Toolbox

It seems you are using noscript, which is stopping our project wonderful ads from working. Explain xkcd uses ads to pay for bandwidth, and we manually approve all our advertisers, and our ads are restricted to unobtrusive images and slow animated GIFs. If you found this site helpful, please consider whitelisting us.

Want to advertise with us, or donate to us with Paypal or Bitcoin?