<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=108.162.210.39</id>
		<title>explain xkcd - User contributions [en]</title>
		<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=108.162.210.39"/>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php/Special:Contributions/108.162.210.39"/>
		<updated>2026-06-24T12:07:20Z</updated>
		<subtitle>User contributions</subtitle>
		<generator>MediaWiki 1.30.0</generator>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:1505:_Ontological_Argument&amp;diff=87428</id>
		<title>Talk:1505: Ontological Argument</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:1505:_Ontological_Argument&amp;diff=87428"/>
				<updated>2015-03-30T13:14:58Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;108.162.210.39: words on a page&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Reminds me some kind of the [http://hitchhikers.wikia.com/wiki/Babel_Fish#Philosophical_implications Babel Fish]... [[User:Elektrizikekswerk|Elektrizikekswerk]] ([[User talk:Elektrizikekswerk|talk]]) 06:54, 30 March 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Isn't the greatest fallacy of ontological argument the fact that the set of entities may not be well-ordered by &amp;quot;greatest&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;goodness&amp;quot;? -- [[User:Hkmaly|Hkmaly]] ([[User talk:Hkmaly|talk]]) 11:17, 30 March 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::That's a great point, and (IMHO) a truly serious problem in these attempts to &amp;quot;order&amp;quot; gods (maybe it stems from being tied down to monotheistic thinking?). But it's not really a &amp;quot;fallacy,&amp;quot; properly speaking. Not all flaws in reasoning are fallacies...&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>108.162.210.39</name></author>	</entry>

	</feed>