<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=108.162.215.47</id>
		<title>explain xkcd - User contributions [en]</title>
		<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=108.162.215.47"/>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php/Special:Contributions/108.162.215.47"/>
		<updated>2026-06-26T19:15:59Z</updated>
		<subtitle>User contributions</subtitle>
		<generator>MediaWiki 1.30.0</generator>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:1767:_US_State_Names&amp;diff=132078</id>
		<title>Talk:1767: US State Names</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:1767:_US_State_Names&amp;diff=132078"/>
				<updated>2016-12-05T01:01:39Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;108.162.215.47: discussed collocate vs co-locate vs colocate&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&amp;lt;!--Please sign your posts with ~~~~--&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
I'm wondering whether this could be a joke about autocorrect/suggested completion as found in smartphone texting apps.&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Dromaeosaur|Dromaeosaur]] ([[User talk:Dromaeosaur|talk]]) 08:06, 2 December 2016 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:But would autocorrect replace Texas with Hexxus?--[[User:Blaisorblade|Blaisorblade]] ([[User talk:Blaisorblade|talk]]) 09:02, 2 December 2016 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
According to Wikipedia Will Wheaton is not from Washington [[Special:Contributions/162.158.133.150|162.158.133.150]] 08:56, 2 December 2016 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I think the starting point is the ambiguity of the standard &amp;quot;Name all 50 states&amp;quot; challenge. I'm no native speaker but &amp;quot;Name&amp;quot; means both &amp;quot;invent a new name&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;give the correct name for&amp;quot;, and Randall is misunderstanding this on purpose. Maybe that's obvious to some, but it seems the sort of thing worth explaining here?--[[User:Blaisorblade|Blaisorblade]] ([[User talk:Blaisorblade|talk]]) 09:02, 2 December 2016 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Clever! That's certainly true, it could be a pun on the word &amp;quot;name&amp;quot;. Although Randall has done similar things in the past (putting objects in states, reordering states, drawing physically cumbersome bicycles) that suggest he likes playing with the idea that people who ''sort of'' know how things work but ultimately end up mixing things up and creating something that's not all that accurate (but nonetheless very interesting and creative). [[Special:Contributions/172.68.79.81|172.68.79.81]] 18:31, 3 December 2016 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Colocated&amp;quot; is technically misspelled (it's either &amp;quot;co-located&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;collocated&amp;quot;), though that could be for the sake of matching it to &amp;quot;Colorado.&amp;quot; However, the word is used in many situations other than &amp;quot;co-location center&amp;quot; (e.g. workers being collocated in the same office), so unless Colorado is particularly notable for its co-location centers, I don't think it makes sense to claim that that's what it's specifically referring to. –[[User:PhantomLimbic|PhantomLimbic]] ([[User talk:PhantomLimbic|talk]]) 09:36, 2 December 2016 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Hmm, it looks like &amp;quot;colocated&amp;quot; is a spelling used specifically within the industry, so perhaps the claim is warranted after all. –[[User:PhantomLimbic|PhantomLimbic]] ([[User talk:PhantomLimbic|talk]]) 09:50, 2 December 2016 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Collocate is not a synonym for co-locate; [https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/collocate collocate]  (pronounced like &amp;quot;kallocate&amp;quot;) has the sense of juxtaposing things with each other, especially placing them side by side. This is subtly different from co-locate (housing them in the same location). &amp;quot;Colocate&amp;quot; is an industry [http://www.nytimes.com/2007/10/07/weekinreview/07mcgrath.html shortening] of &amp;quot;co-locate&amp;quot;, not a misspelling of &amp;quot;collocate&amp;quot;. [[Special:Contributions/108.162.215.47|108.162.215.47]] 01:01, 5 December 2016 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Isn't it a challenge to correctly name all the states with clues given as to the proper name?[[Special:Contributions/162.158.91.95|162.158.91.95]] 10:27, 2 December 2016 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I think the challenge is supposed to be a blank map that someone has filled out in red pen. The joke is that whoever filled it out does pretty much know all of the states but isn't really clear on their actual names.[[Special:Contributions/108.162.238.50|108.162.238.50]] 10:34, 2 December 2016 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
Right, I get you. Something a bored Geography teacher may or may not find amusing when it comes to giving out detentions for the week :)[[Special:Contributions/162.158.91.95|162.158.91.95]] 10:40, 2 December 2016 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Is Georgia / George a reference to the kings of georgia (of which 9 were named george)? (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Georgian_monarchs) [[Special:Contributions/141.101.98.253|141.101.98.253]] 10:49, 2 December 2016 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
About &amp;quot;OH HI&amp;quot;, I've understood it as a reference to the cult movie &amp;quot;The Room&amp;quot; (2003) (http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0368226), where the main character Johnny greets the other ones with a &amp;quot;Oh hi!&amp;quot;. But that's maybe only my view. [[Special:Contributions/108.162.226.112|108.162.226.112]] 12:12, 2 December 2016 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I think it's within plausibility for OH HI to be a reference to the logic game 0h h1 [http://0hh1.com].  Toss that possibility around?  --[[Special:Contributions/108.162.212.96|108.162.212.96]] 23:30, 3 December 2016 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As a Hoosier, I think that the name given to Indiana is on point. [[Special:Contributions/108.162.238.45|108.162.238.45]] 14:06, 2 December 2016 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Shouldn't the table be alphabetical and the transcript be in geographical order (rather than the other way around as it is now)?[[Special:Contributions/108.162.219.83|108.162.219.83]] 15:12, 2 December 2016 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I'm fairly confident that &amp;quot;Mossouri&amp;quot; is not a typo, but rather a reference to Katie Mossouris, the Microsoft security researcher who created the bug bounty program. see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Katie_Moussouris. [[Special:Contributions/108.162.245.54|108.162.245.54]] 18:06, 2 December 2016 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Dear, it's old to complain of xkcd's various quality drops, but I think this is my turn. A good number of recent comics have just been variously exaggerated text lists of stuff. Randall might just as well switch to a written format; pictorial context is becoming less and less necessary for his comics by the week. &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;~~~~&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt; {{unsigned ip|162.158.203.149}}&lt;br /&gt;
:Never read [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cerebus_the_Aardvark Cerebus the Aardvark], did you?  --[[Special:Contributions/172.68.78.133|172.68.78.133]] 14:04, 3 December 2016 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I'm thinking that at least in part, it's a commentary on what the average American middle-schooler knows about their country's geography. [[Special:Contributions/173.245.52.98|173.245.52.98]] 10:56, 2 December 2016 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I'm pretty sure there is no 'ee' sound in Michigan, also of note the Carolina's are named for one the British King Charles's although I'm not sure which, and Wysiwyg has been used in xkcd before... Somewhere[[Special:Contributions/108.162.237.88|108.162.237.88]] 21:14, 2 December 2016 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Agreed re Michigan and removed.  [[User:Miamiclay|Miamiclay]] ([[User talk:Miamiclay|talk]]) 23:11, 3 December 2016 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Newark?  He named New York after Newark, New Jersey?  Yea, I got your Newark right here, buddy!  --[[Special:Contributions/172.68.78.133|172.68.78.133]] 14:04, 3 December 2016 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For me, Randall's comic is a gentle-but-hilarious depiction of the general imprecision of human cognition --- pretty much every story that we tell, and every fact we remember, arrives in our awareness in the foggy forms that this comic makes fun of.  [[User:John Sidles|John Sidles]] ([[User talk:John Sidles|talk]]) 02:12, 4 December 2016 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Spanish Maine&amp;quot; is ironic given the sinking of the {{w|USS Maine (ACR-1)|naval ship of the same name}} and the inspired rally, &amp;quot;Remember the Maine, to Hell with Spain!&amp;quot; [[Special:Contributions/172.68.79.81|172.68.79.81]] 18:31, 3 December 2016 (UTC)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>108.162.215.47</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:1381:_Margin&amp;diff=69439</id>
		<title>Talk:1381: Margin</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:1381:_Margin&amp;diff=69439"/>
				<updated>2014-06-13T07:58:35Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;108.162.215.47: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Isn't it possible that a mathematician knows about the existance or the proof of something, but doen't know how to technically do it? In this case, the margin remark would be accurate and not so funny. They have found a proof of existance for infinite information compression, but not yet discovered an actual method to do it. [[Special:Contributions/141.101.104.56|141.101.104.56]] 05:32, 13 June 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Yes, when there's no example, it's called a {{w|pure existence theorem}}.  If you actually demonstrate an example, that is a {{w|constructive proof}}. [[User:Mattflaschen|Mattflaschen]] ([[User talk:Mattflaschen|talk]]) 05:38, 13 June 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::Actually the proof of the Shannon-Hartley theorem is non-constructive.  It tells you the data rate of the best possible channel coding, but does not tell you how to achieve it! [[Special:Contributions/108.162.215.47|108.162.215.47]] 07:58, 13 June 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
Setting font-size to 0 would be the same as not ''printing'' any information at all, you'll still use the same number of bits and be able to send the text to other computers which can read the information. The Shannon-Hartley theorem is, as far as I can see from the wikipedia article, about analogue channels anyway. --[[User:Buggz|Buggz]] ([[User talk:Buggz|talk]]) 06:16, 13 June 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Isn't this also a reference to {{w|Jan Sloot}}'s digital compression mechanism where a movie would fit into 8 kbyte? [[User:Kaa-ching|Kaa-ching]] ([[User talk:Kaa-ching|talk]]) 07:36, 13 June 2014 (UTC)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>108.162.215.47</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:1381:_Margin&amp;diff=69438</id>
		<title>Talk:1381: Margin</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:1381:_Margin&amp;diff=69438"/>
				<updated>2014-06-13T07:58:10Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;108.162.215.47: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Isn't it possible that a mathematician knows about the existance or the proof of something, but doen't know how to technically do it? In this case, the margin remark would be accurate and not so funny. They have found a proof of existance for infinite information compression, but not yet discovered an actual method to do it. [[Special:Contributions/141.101.104.56|141.101.104.56]] 05:32, 13 June 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Yes, when there's no example, it's called a {{w|pure existence theorem}}.  If you actually demonstrate an example, that is a {{w|constructive proof}}. [[User:Mattflaschen|Mattflaschen]] ([[User talk:Mattflaschen|talk]]) 05:38, 13 June 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
Setting font-size to 0 would be the same as not ''printing'' any information at all, you'll still use the same number of bits and be able to send the text to other computers which can read the information. The Shannon-Hartley theorem is, as far as I can see from the wikipedia article, about analogue channels anyway. --[[User:Buggz|Buggz]] ([[User talk:Buggz|talk]]) 06:16, 13 June 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::Actually the proof of the Shannon-Hartley theorem is non-constructive.  It tells you the data rate of the best possible channel coding, but does not tell you how to achieve it! [[Special:Contributions/108.162.215.47|108.162.215.47]] 07:58, 13 June 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Isn't this also a reference to {{w|Jan Sloot}}'s digital compression mechanism where a movie would fit into 8 kbyte? [[User:Kaa-ching|Kaa-ching]] ([[User talk:Kaa-ching|talk]]) 07:36, 13 June 2014 (UTC)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>108.162.215.47</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=1369:_TMI&amp;diff=67507</id>
		<title>1369: TMI</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=1369:_TMI&amp;diff=67507"/>
				<updated>2014-05-18T02:31:16Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;108.162.215.47: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{comic&lt;br /&gt;
| number    = 1369&lt;br /&gt;
| date      = May 16, 2014&lt;br /&gt;
| title     = TMI&lt;br /&gt;
| image     = tmi.png&lt;br /&gt;
| titletext = 'TMI' he whispered, gazing into the sea.&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Explanation==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;TMI&amp;quot; is an acronym that means &amp;quot;too much information&amp;quot;. It is typically used as a response to someone ''oversharing'' — telling details (usually gross, boring, or otherwise unpleasant) that the listener would rather not have heard. Here, however, [[Cueball]] may be using it in a more literal and absolute sense: He feels overwhelmed by the colossal amount of information that is now generally available to anyone with an Internet connection. Additionally, he could be disgusted by how ridiculous the Internet is.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{incomplete|The section below needs lots of work. [[User:MrGameZone|I personally]] believe it should be removed altogether.}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Wikipedia page for the acronym {{w|TMI|&amp;quot;TMI&amp;quot;}} contains links to approx. 40 articles belonging to this acronym. &amp;quot;Too much information&amp;quot; is mentioned but no link is shown here to this matter. The article {{w|Too Much Information|&amp;quot;Too Much Information&amp;quot;}} belongs to a single released by {{w|Duran Duran}}.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But there is a Wikipedia article {{w|Information overload}} which covers the &amp;quot;too much information&amp;quot; issue, but most people just would say TMI while looking at this.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Transcript==&lt;br /&gt;
:[Cueball is sitting at a desk, looking at a laptop.]&lt;br /&gt;
:Cueball: Ugh, TMI.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Offscreen: Oh? What?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Cueball: Just... Everything.&lt;br /&gt;
:Offscreen: ''True.''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{comic discussion}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Comics featuring Cueball]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>108.162.215.47</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=441:_Babies&amp;diff=67123</id>
		<title>441: Babies</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=441:_Babies&amp;diff=67123"/>
				<updated>2014-05-12T03:58:35Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;108.162.215.47: /* Explanation */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{comic&lt;br /&gt;
| number    = 441&lt;br /&gt;
| date      = June 25, 2008&lt;br /&gt;
| title     = Babies&lt;br /&gt;
| image     = babies.png&lt;br /&gt;
| titletext = I bet my future kids will read this someday. DEAR FUTURE KIDS: how did you get internet in the cellar?&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Explanation==&lt;br /&gt;
A common theme of xkcd is that one never feels that one has &amp;quot;transitioned to adulthood&amp;quot;, in the sense of actually attaining the seriousness and sense of responsibility that children imagine all adults to possess. Here, the author illustrates this by imagining [[Cueball]] and [[Megan]] taking on the ultimate &amp;quot;adult responsibility&amp;quot; — having a child, treating it as they would any other engineering project. Disassembling a project to check the parts is an activity that is appropriate for a self-built computer or robot, but is impractical for a child. Megan also shows her lack of child experience by holding the baby upside-down by the foot, which usually isn't a good idea.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The title text implies the author will have kids someday. It will be surprising if they read this comic, not just because it will give them an unflattering look into their father's attitudes on having children, but because he plans to lock them in the cellar where there will be no internet access.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Transcript==&lt;br /&gt;
:It doesn't seem right that we're old enough to have kids.&lt;br /&gt;
:[Megan holds a baby upside-down by one leg.]&lt;br /&gt;
:Megan: Sweet! We made a baby!&lt;br /&gt;
:Cueball: Are we sure we did it right?&lt;br /&gt;
:Cueball: We should disassemble it, check all the parts, and put it back together.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{comic discussion}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Comics featuring Cueball]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Comics featuring Megan]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>108.162.215.47</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=674:_Natural_Parenting&amp;diff=67122</id>
		<title>674: Natural Parenting</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=674:_Natural_Parenting&amp;diff=67122"/>
				<updated>2014-05-12T03:56:42Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;108.162.215.47: /* Explanation */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{comic&lt;br /&gt;
| number    = 674&lt;br /&gt;
| date      = December 11, 2009&lt;br /&gt;
| title     = Natural Parenting&lt;br /&gt;
| image     = natural_parenting.png&lt;br /&gt;
| titletext = On one hand, every single one of my ancestors going back billions of years has managed to figure it out. On the other hand, that's the mother of all sampling biases.&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Explanation==&lt;br /&gt;
This comic relates to the anxiety most couples experience after having a child. Some couples employ an approach called natural parenting or {{w|attachment parenting}}. This strategy for child-rearing normally entails providing whole foods and extended nursing but can also include birth without anesthetics, applying reusable cloth diapers, using herbal remedies instead of medicine, and other decisions intended to protect the environment and raise a baby to be physically and mentally healthy. Natural parenting approaches can vary greatly from parent to parent, with some being very extreme and possibly detrimental. Because of the awkwardness and stigma of breastfeeding as well as its traditionalism, attachment parenting can  elicit powerful opinions from both its opponents and proponents. Various media and politicians have seized on this hot topic, as well as motherhood in general. Extreme natural parenting methods became the notorious cover story of TIME Magazine in May 2012.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
However, the characters in this strip took natural parenting to mean doing &amp;quot;what comes naturally&amp;quot;, i.e. having another baby.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[441: Babies]] is another strip featuring clueless new parents.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One interpretation of the title text is as note of the sentiments expressed by proponents of natural parenting, stating that traditional or instinctive methods have worked for thousands of years. It is also possible that the narrator means that parenting can't be too hard because historically everyone must have figured it out. Randall jokes that this is the &amp;quot;mother&amp;quot; of all sampling biases because his ancestors represent only the (possibly small) fraction who survived the instinctive or easily learned methods of parenthood, instead of the entire sample of people attempting to raise children.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The baby says, &amp;quot;Baby!&amp;quot;, either copying Cueball, or saying its name, Pokemon-style.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Transcript==&lt;br /&gt;
:[Cueball and woman are standing with a baby in between them.]&lt;br /&gt;
:Cueball: Oh man, we made a baby.&lt;br /&gt;
:Megan: ''Don't panic. Don't panic.''&lt;br /&gt;
:Baby: Baby!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Cueball: Parenting can't be that hard. Let's just do what comes naturally.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[Beat frame.]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Soon:&lt;br /&gt;
:[There are now two babies in between them.]&lt;br /&gt;
:Megan: Aw, crap.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{comic discussion}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Comics featuring Cueball]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Comics featuring Megan]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Romance]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>108.162.215.47</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=440:_Road_Rage&amp;diff=67120</id>
		<title>440: Road Rage</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=440:_Road_Rage&amp;diff=67120"/>
				<updated>2014-05-12T01:31:57Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;108.162.215.47: /* Explanation */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{comic&lt;br /&gt;
| number    = 440&lt;br /&gt;
| date      = June 23, 2008&lt;br /&gt;
| title     = Road Rage&lt;br /&gt;
| image     = road rage.png&lt;br /&gt;
| titletext = Okay, now just as the loss hits him, slam on the brakes.&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Explanation==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Black Hat]] is driving a car, and [[Danish]] is with him in the passenger's seat. Black Hat gets annoyed because the car behind him is too close.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Danish decides to fight back, so she turns on her laptop and finds that the car behind them also has a laptop running. Since the cars are so close, the other laptop is well within WiFi range, so she manages to establish a WiFi connection with the laptop in the other car. Then, Danish finds a security hole (in the comic, a &amp;quot;remote exploit&amp;quot;). She uses it to break into the laptop and install a speech synthesizer.&lt;br /&gt;
This means that the laptop in the car behind just starts saying words at Danish's will.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The driver of the other car is puzzled when he starts hearing a voice. He's completely clueless about where the voice comes from. Also, he's driving alone so he's probably frightened (or nervous at least) to find that someone is speaking inside his car. The fact that the voice says &amp;quot;she'd be alive if it weren't for you&amp;quot; surely won't help him relax.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the message text, Danish is continuing her revenge, asking Black Hat to slam on the brakes. As it is now to be expected that the driver is nervous, puzzled and surprised on top of being  distracted, looking for the voice's source, while already driving unsafely close, it is clear that Danish hopes he won't have enough stopping distance to avoid a collision, slamming into Black Hat's car. Since the blame for such types of accident is always given to the driver of the car behind, Black Hat will no doubt enjoy adding both the blame and the traffic accident on top of what Danish has already accomplished. This may seem ironic as Black Hat was annoyed to begin with, but he will rather make an example than avoid the accident.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Transcript==&lt;br /&gt;
:[Black Hat is driving and Danish who seems to be his equal is in the passenger's seat. They are closely followed by some other vehicle.]&lt;br /&gt;
:Black Hat: That guy's tailgating me.&lt;br /&gt;
:Danish: I'll take a look.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[A car is shown to be closely behind Black Hat's car.]&lt;br /&gt;
:Danish: His laptop's running, probably in the back seat. And... yup, the WiFi autoconnects.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[Close-up of Danish using a laptop.]&lt;br /&gt;
:Danish: Now we just scan for remote exploits... install speech synth... And take a shot in the psychological dark.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[Cueball's car.]&lt;br /&gt;
:Laptop: Hello.&lt;br /&gt;
:Cueball: What? Who's there?&lt;br /&gt;
:Laptop: She'd be alive if it weren't for you.&lt;br /&gt;
:Cueball: ...Oh God.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{comic discussion}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Comics featuring Cueball]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Comics featuring Black Hat]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Comics featuring Danish]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>108.162.215.47</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=1027:_Pickup_Artist&amp;diff=67119</id>
		<title>1027: Pickup Artist</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=1027:_Pickup_Artist&amp;diff=67119"/>
				<updated>2014-05-12T01:28:31Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;108.162.215.47: /* Explanation */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{comic&lt;br /&gt;
| number    = 1027&lt;br /&gt;
| date      = March 9, 2012&lt;br /&gt;
| title     = Pickup Artist&lt;br /&gt;
| image     = pickup_artist.png&lt;br /&gt;
| titletext = Son, don't try to play 'make you feel bad' with the Michael Jordan of making you feel bad.&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Explanation==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Hairy]] and [[Cueball]] are sitting at a table with drinks. Hairy tells Cueball that he's learned some {{w|pickup artist}} tricks. Cueball is appalled, declaring that pickup artists are &amp;quot;dehumanizing creeps&amp;quot;. Hairy argues that he's simply learning new tactics such as &amp;quot;[http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=negging negging]&amp;quot; (undercutting the target's self-esteem so that she'll feel vulnerable and crave approval), evidently oblivious to the fact that he's proving Cueball's point. Rejecting Cueball's advice to simply talk to women &amp;quot;like a fucking human being&amp;quot;, Hairy sets off to try out the technique.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Meanwhile, [[Black Hat]] and [[Danish]] are sitting at another table. Black Hat leaves to roll a bowling ball through the rest room stalls to smash the feet of anyone else who using them. As people sit down to use a bathroom stall most of the time, their feet would be vulnerable to being hit in sequence. Perhaps Black Hat is going for a 'strike'. Hairy approaches Danish, while Cueball looks on and says &amp;quot;oh no&amp;quot; — seemingly recognizing Danish and anticipating the disaster Hairy is walking into.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hairy makes an attempt at &amp;quot;negging&amp;quot; by suggesting that Danish's fruit plate reflects a need to lose weight. Danish, naturally being a master at psychological manipulation, immediately realizes his game, and crushes him utterly by taking another shot in the psychological dark ([[440: Road Rage]]) — telling him that he's trapped in an endless cycle of failure because he's ultimately a mediocre person and will never do anything of value with his life. Demoralized, Hairy declares that he needs to go home and think about his life; Danish tells him &amp;quot;It won't help&amp;quot;. Presumably she has some experience.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The title text refers to {{w|Michael Jordan}}, a very popular and accomplished {{w|basketball}} player who played for the {{w|Chicago Bulls}} and the {{w|Washington Wizards}}. His name is often used as a noun to denote that someone is the best in their field, which is later used in [[1120: Blurring the Line]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The pick up subject and Hairy returned in [[1178: Pickup Artists]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Transcript==&lt;br /&gt;
:[Hairy and Cueball sitting at a table.]&lt;br /&gt;
:Hairy: I've been learning tricks from pickup artist forums.&lt;br /&gt;
:Cueball: Pickup artists are dehumanizing creeps who see relationships as adversarial and women as sex toys.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[Close-up of Hairy's head, with a faint outline of Black hat and Danish sitting at a table in the background.]&lt;br /&gt;
:Hairy: No, it's just a bunch of tips! Like ''negging'': you belittle chicks to undermine their self-confidence so they'll be more vulnerable and seek your approval.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[Close-up of Cueball's head.]&lt;br /&gt;
:Cueball: Just talk to them like a fucking human being.&lt;br /&gt;
:Hairy: Nah, that's a sucker's game. Ok— wish me luck!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:''Meanwhile''&lt;br /&gt;
:[Black Hat and Danish at a table. Black hat is standing up with a bowling ball under his arm.]&lt;br /&gt;
:Black Hat: I'm going to the bathroom to roll a bowling ball under the line of stalls.&lt;br /&gt;
:Danish: Cool.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[Close up of Cueball's head, with Hairy approaching Danish's table in the background.]&lt;br /&gt;
:Cueball: Oh no.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[Hairy and Danish at a table. Hairy is standing up and leaning on the table.]&lt;br /&gt;
:Hairy: You look like you're on a diet. That's great! How's the fruit plate?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[Close-up of Danish's head.]&lt;br /&gt;
:Danish: Ooh- are we negging? Let me try!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[Close-up of Danish's head, with her hand raised.]&lt;br /&gt;
:Danish: You look like you're going to spend your life having one epiphany after another, always thinking you've finally figured out what's holding you back, and how you can finally be productive and creative and turn your life around. But nothing will ever change. That cycle of mediocrity isn't due to some obstacle. It's who you ''are''. The thing standing in the way of your dreams is; that the person having them is ''you''.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[Hairy and Danish at a table. Hairy is standing up.]&lt;br /&gt;
:Danish: Ok, your turn! Ooh, try insulting my hair!&lt;br /&gt;
:Hairy: I think I need to go home and think about my life.&lt;br /&gt;
:Danish: It won't help.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{comic discussion}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Comics featuring Cueball]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Comics featuring Black Hat]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Comics featuring Hairy]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Comics featuring Danish]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Romance]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>108.162.215.47</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:1363:_xkcd_Phone&amp;diff=66696</id>
		<title>Talk:1363: xkcd Phone</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:1363:_xkcd_Phone&amp;diff=66696"/>
				<updated>2014-05-04T10:15:22Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;108.162.215.47: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;This seems like an SCP artifact [[Special:Contributions/108.162.249.220|108.162.249.220]] 10:09, 4 May 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I really dislike the tone of the explanation. I mean it's so negative about the features! Not that they are all useful, but isn't this a wiki and should be neutral? It takes also the fun out of it. I would like a screaming while falling phone and the relativity thing would be great for teaching relativity! [[User:RecentlyChanged|RecentlyChanged]] ([[User talk:RecentlyChanged|talk]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Where can i get one of these? :D [[User:UniTrader|UniTrader]] ([[User talk:UniTrader|talk]]) 04:11, 2 May 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I'm pretty sure the &amp;quot;scream when falling&amp;quot; thing and the &amp;quot;flightaware&amp;quot; stuff can be done somehow with Tasker. [[Special:Contributions/141.101.103.206|141.101.103.206]] 04:23, 2 May 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
;Designer?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I suspect it was either Black Hat or Beret Guy, but I'm not sure which. A collaboration? [[Special:Contributions/173.245.54.45|173.245.54.45]] 04:47, 2 May 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This sounds like something straight out of aperture. {{unsigned ip|108.162.221.55}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
;Simulates alternate speeds of light&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Yes, useless as a feature on all the time; but it would be a cool app. [[User:Markhurd|Mark Hurd]] ([[User talk:Markhurd|talk]]) 05:57, 2 May 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Absolutely. Where can I get an app like that?[[Special:Contributions/108.162.225.157|108.162.225.157]] 06:22, 2 May 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Travelling at above the simulated speed of light should give an imaginary time dilation, not a negative time dilation.&lt;br /&gt;
gamma = 1/sqrt{1-v^2/c^2}&lt;br /&gt;
Thus, after such travel, the value of the clock would be a complex number. [[Special:Contributions/108.162.219.35|108.162.219.35]] 15:42, 2 May 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Changed the speed of light to 2.99x10^8'''&lt;br /&gt;
:You guys should probably clarify that the relativisic affects actually depend on how long your trip is or how long you wait to sync your phone.  For relativity to be observable on a 12 hour trip, Minimum speed for a phone would have to be 300 m/s or 3000 m/s for the clock to measure even a microsecond/millisecond difference in time. This is well known thanks to the certain  [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Time_dilation#Velocity_and_gravitational_time_dilation_combined-effect_tests time dilation experiments with planes]. Your GPS chip helps account for an error of [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Error_analysis_for_the_Global_Positioning_System#Relativity 7 to 47 microseconds per day]. My point is in terms of time dilation, relativity mattering depends on how long a trip or waiting for synchronization is. By synching, I literally mean with the atomic time clock or with a GPS satellite. The synchronization of your phone with satellites is actually a couple of hundred microseconds, so normally even a light changing clock might not have as noticable changes as you might think. [[Special:Contributions/108.162.238.225|108.162.238.225]] 13:49, 2 May 2014 (UTC) --[[Special:Contributions/108.162.238.225|108.162.238.225]] 13:49, 2 May 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
Yeah sorry forgot to login. does anyone know how to do the indices formatting other than eg 2.99x10(littlex) rather then 2.99x10^x? [[User:Jonv4n|Jonv4n]] ([[User talk:Jonv4n|talk]]) 06:29, 2 May 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
: Whas&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;sup&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;? [[Special:Contributions/141.101.89.220|141.101.89.220]] 07:43, 2 May 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
; relativistic effect&lt;br /&gt;
Forgive me if I'm wrong, I'm not a physicist but the above explanation says that relativistic time dilation affects only occur at a significant fraction of the speed of light. It is my understanding that time dilation occurs at any speed, but is only perceptible/noticeable/measurable at very large fraction of the speed of light. Unless I'm mistaken the above it should reflect this. [[Special:Contributions/173.245.56.91|173.245.56.91]] 22:24, 2 May 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
; putting &amp;quot;Relative&amp;quot; back into relativity&lt;br /&gt;
First time poster, please forgive my transgressions :)&lt;br /&gt;
My understanding regarding relativistic effects is that, for a given frame of reference (e.g. phone operator travelling at 0.9c) would be absolutely none. Relativistic effects (as I understand them) would only apply between two different frames of reference. The only effect I can see in this case is if you are moving towards, or away from the phone while operating, and red/blue shift of the radio frequencies. In general, wifi and bluetooth are used locally so wouldn't apply; only the phone network would be affected.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Also, perhaps the adjustable speed of light is a reference to the the game &amp;quot;A slower speed of light&amp;quot; by MIT Game Lab http://gamelab.mit.edu/games/a-slower-speed-of-light/ (in which you walk around collecting objects; each object slows light down, and increases relativistic effects).&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Jaybee|Jaybee]] ([[User talk:Jaybee|talk]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Phone may attract/trap insects; this is normal.'''&lt;br /&gt;
Funnier if you take it as a reference to the [http://www.slate.com/blogs/the_slatest/2014/04/07/mazda_issues_recall_because_spiders_invade_fuel_tank_causing_fire_risk.html spider problems] Mazda keeps on having... {{unsigned ip|108.162.215.64}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
About the attracting insects ... I would expect this to be normal feature in night. Trapping, however ... -- [[User:Hkmaly|Hkmaly]] ([[User talk:Hkmaly|talk]]) 09:08, 2 May 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
: There are other indications that the phone is at least partly biological, this being the strongest evidence of that. Insects could be the power source for the biological part(s). [[Special:Contributions/173.245.54.45|173.245.54.45]] 14:07, 2 May 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Siri'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Could the Siri bit be a reference to Portal?  When I first read it, I remembered this GLaDOS quote: &amp;quot;Your Aperture Science Weighted Companion Cube will never threaten to stab you, and in fact cannot speak. If your Weighted Companion Cube does speak, please disregard its advice.&amp;quot;  Could be completely wrong; just a thought.  [[Special:Contributions/173.245.54.51|173.245.54.51]] 10:09, 2 May 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Perhaps Siri is beling likened to the &amp;quot;ATMOS&amp;quot; device in the Doctor Who episode &amp;quot;The Sontaran Stratagem&amp;quot; [[User:Esp666|Esp666]] ([[User talk:Esp666|talk]]) 11:20, 2 May 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Lamest. Comic. Ever. And I'm not just saying that because he doesn't mention the Ubuntu Touch OS. ''– [[User:Tbc|tbc]] ([[User talk:Tbc|talk]]) 12:22, 2 May 2014 (UTC)''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Realistic case'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Car telephones and the first cellphones were rather expensive, at least in Germany fake &amp;quot;realistic cases&amp;quot; were sold without any working electronics in it. Usage was to impress silly friends. {{unsigned ip|173.245.52.204}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I thought this was aimed at the iPhone.  Apparently these have an elegant case, but I have never actually seen one.  Everyone I know covers their iPhone with some hideous plastic monstrosity, since the design is not practical.--[[Special:Contributions/108.162.218.59|108.162.218.59]] 14:10, 2 May 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Could possibly be a reference to the &amp;quot;Realistic&amp;quot; brand, which was used on various products sold by Radio Shack (U.S. electronics retail chain) from 1954 to some time in the '90s.[[Special:Contributions/108.162.219.76|108.162.219.76]] 16:14, 2 May 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Screaming when in free fall: my first Android app!'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I love the bit about screaming when in free fall: that was the first Android app I hacked together back in 2009 (based on the tricorder app).  [[User:Nealmcb|Nealmcb]] ([[User talk:Nealmcb|talk]]) 13:49, 2 May 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Title Text'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hover-over title text was truncated; love it.&lt;br /&gt;
14:43, 2 May 2014 (UTC)[[User:Pocono Chuck|Pocono Chuck]] ([[User talk:Pocono Chuck|talk]])&lt;br /&gt;
: you must have an really old firefox browser -- you should update !!! [[Special:Contributions/199.27.130.210|199.27.130.210]] 16:23, 2 May 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:: Happened to me.  Using whatever the latest IE is at the moment.  It cut off at nause-. [[Special:Contributions/173.245.54.54|173.245.54.54]] 17:13, 3 May 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Price includes 2-year Knicks contract.''' ... but a contract with the Knicks would only appeal to pro basketball players.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Nonsense.  Lots of &amp;quot;regular&amp;quot; folks would buy this phone it it meant they got to play in the NBA. [[Special:Contributions/199.27.128.84|199.27.128.84]] 16:26, 2 May 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: I agree with this.  A whole lot of people who think they have &amp;quot;skillz&amp;quot; would buy the phone if they got into the NBA. [[Special:Contributions/173.245.54.54|173.245.54.54]] 17:14, 3 May 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This may also be an indirect way of stating that it is incredibly expensive, seeing as those sort of contracts usually involve ''you'' getting compensated. --[[Special:Contributions/108.162.216.33|108.162.216.33]] 13:41, 3 May 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Your mobile world just went digital&amp;quot; is an inversion of the marketing-speak that was common when what we'd now regard as smartphones first began to be adopted by the mainstream (iPhone/G1 era, since Symbians, Blackberries, and early WinMo tended to be business or enthusiast devices). People already ubiquitously e-mailed, browsed the Web, etc...what was presented as 'new' was that you could now do it from your phone. [[Special:Contributions/173.245.54.58|173.245.54.58]] 19:09, 2 May 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I think the &amp;quot;Under certain circumstances, wireless transmitter may control God&amp;quot; statement might be a reference to how transmitting devices have to comply with FCC regulation and not interfere with aircraft or government communications. Perhaps this phone is intended to be noncompliant so as to control high-level electronics, even at supernatural levels. [[Special:Contributions/173.245.56.66|173.245.56.66]] 21:11, 2 May 2014 (UTC)Dbrak&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Frictionless''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You could hold a frictionless phone just by hooking your little finger under the bottom edge, regardless of friction gravity will hold it into your hand. Just like you could leave it in a bowl without it jumping out. [[Special:Contributions/108.162.229.72|108.162.229.72]] 19:12, 2 May 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Unless you held your pinky perfectly balanced, horizontal and motionless, a frictionless object would slide right off it, as it would off any flat surface that is not perfectly horizontal.&lt;br /&gt;
14:13, 3 May 2014 (UTC) [[Special:Contributions/108.162.242.4|108.162.242.4]] 13:15, 3 May 2014 (UTC)DCollins&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Wouldn't you be able to hold it somewhat like a normal phone, if you hold a finger under the bottom of it? [[Special:Contributions/173.245.54.54|173.245.54.54]] 17:08, 3 May 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
;Why the hell this funny phone isn't available at the xkcd store?&lt;br /&gt;
I would buy if the price would be in the range of other articles there. Just for fun...--[[User:Dgbrt|Dgbrt]] ([[User talk:Dgbrt|talk]]) 19:30, 2 May 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Root needed'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I think that needing root for ajust the volume may be a allusion people needing to root Android to change fonts or to take screenshots (untill version 4.x). [[User:FlavianusEP|FlavianusEP]] ([[User talk:FlavianusEP|talk]]) 23:04, 2 May 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Alternative meaning: The spirit of xkcd'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I think there's a secondary possible interpretation for this comic -- that the various features of the phone represent the overall &amp;quot;spirit&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;attitude&amp;quot; of xkcd, in a way reminiscent of an early strip -- http://xkcd.com/207/ -- about &amp;quot;what xkcd means.&amp;quot; More specifically, a common theme in xkcd is taking advanced concepts in science and technology, and applying them to whimsical, humorous, impractical, or outright impossible uses. Several of phone's features -- such as the simulated speed of light -- touch on the same theme. Wordplay, another common xkcd theme, is present as well; and the anthropomorphism of technology, along with making devices appear 'cute', is also present, and also is something that has come up in xkcd many times in the past.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The comic is called &amp;quot;xkcd Phone&amp;quot;, after all -- I think simultaneously with being a parody of phone advertisements, the comic is also meant to show us what a phone that fits into the xkcd world would be like. [[Special:Contributions/108.162.241.114|108.162.241.114]] 17:52, 3 May 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Blowing out candles....'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For the birthday candles thing: I do remember seeing a video ad for an app back when the iphone was first opened up to outside developers that would turn the phone into a fan, and it demonstrated that it was strong enough to blow out a birthday candle. Seemed quite useless at the time. Still does today for that matter&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>108.162.215.47</name></author>	</entry>

	</feed>