<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=141.101.107.18</id>
		<title>explain xkcd - User contributions [en]</title>
		<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=141.101.107.18"/>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php/Special:Contributions/141.101.107.18"/>
		<updated>2026-04-15T17:26:12Z</updated>
		<subtitle>User contributions</subtitle>
		<generator>MediaWiki 1.30.0</generator>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=1537:_Types&amp;diff=174835</id>
		<title>1537: Types</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=1537:_Types&amp;diff=174835"/>
				<updated>2019-06-03T12:15:24Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;141.101.107.18: corrected numbering&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{comic&lt;br /&gt;
| number    = 1537&lt;br /&gt;
| date      = June 12, 2015&lt;br /&gt;
| title     = Types&lt;br /&gt;
| image     = types.png&lt;br /&gt;
| titletext = colors.rgb(&amp;quot;blue&amp;quot;) yields &amp;quot;#0000FF&amp;quot;. colors.rgb(&amp;quot;yellowish blue&amp;quot;) yields NaN. colors.sort() yields &amp;quot;rainbow&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Explanation==&lt;br /&gt;
This comic is a series of programming jokes about a ridiculous new programming language, perhaps inspired by {{w|Mathematica}} and {{w|Wolfram Language}} — the latter was used by [[Randall]] many times before. Maybe it's also inspired by [https://www.destroyallsoftware.com/talks/wat Gary Bernhardt's CodeMash 2012 lightning talk] on JavaScript's unpredictable typing. In the talk, the highly technical audience was unable to correctly guess the results of adding various JavaScript types and roared with laughter when they were revealed. The programming language shown in this comic has types even more unpredictable than JavaScript.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Most regular programming languages distinguish types, e.g. integers, strings, lists… all of which have different behaviours. But for instance, the operation &amp;quot;+&amp;quot; is usually conventionally defined over more than one of these types. Applied to two integers, it returns their sum.  Applied to two strings (denoted by being enclosed in quotes) it concatenates them:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;gt; 2 + 3&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;5&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;gt; &amp;quot;123&amp;quot; + &amp;quot;abc&amp;quot;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;quot;123abc&amp;quot;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
While these behaviours are standard, conventional, and intuitive, there is a huge amount of variation among programming languages when you apply an operation like &amp;quot;+&amp;quot; to different types. One logical approach is to always return an error in all cases of type mixing, but it is often practical to allow some case mixing, since it can hugely simplify expressions. Variation and lack of a clearly more intuitive behaviour leads some languages to have weird results when you mix types.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Weird results abound in the new XKCD programming language:&lt;br /&gt;
# &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;2 + &amp;quot;2&amp;quot;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt; uses the &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;+&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt; operator on a number and a string. In some programming languages, this might result in the number &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt; in math addition, or &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;quot;22&amp;quot;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt; in string concatenation; however, the new language converts the string to an integer, adds them to produce &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt; and converts back to a string. Alternatively, it may instead be adding 2 to the ASCII value of the character &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;quot;2&amp;quot;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt; (50), resulting in the character &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;quot;4&amp;quot;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt; (52). This is (somewhat) consistent with the behavior for item 4.&lt;br /&gt;
# &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; + []&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt; adds a string to an array or list. This first inexplicably converts the string to a number again, and then it literally adds the number to the list by prepending it. And then the result (the entire array) is converted to a string again.&lt;br /&gt;
# &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;(2/0)&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt; divides &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt; by &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;0&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt; and quite reasonably results in &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;NaN&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;, meaning &amp;quot;Not a Number&amp;quot;, though in most languages, as prescribed by the IEEE 754 standard for floating point numbers, dividing a nonzero number by zero would instead return an infinity value.&lt;br /&gt;
# &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;(2/0)+2&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt; adds &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt; to &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;NaN&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;. &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt; Is &amp;quot;added&amp;quot; to the string &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;quot;NaN&amp;quot;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt; as again, the number is converted to a string for apparently no reason, which produces &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;quot;NaP&amp;quot;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;. If the language's convention is to add to the ASCII value of a character or string, then in this case it added 2 to the character &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;quot;N&amp;quot;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt; (78), resulting in &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;quot;P&amp;quot;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt; (80). How the string &amp;quot;NaP&amp;quot; is converted into a bare NaP with undefined meaning is not clear. It is possible the &amp;quot;NaP&amp;quot; means &amp;quot;Not a Positive&amp;quot; as opposed to &amp;quot;Not a Negative&amp;quot;.  It could also mean &amp;quot;Not a Prayer&amp;quot;, as you're taking a &amp;quot;NaN&amp;quot; condition and trying to do more with it.&lt;br /&gt;
# &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;quot;&amp;quot;+&amp;quot;&amp;quot;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;: In many languages, two consecutive double-quote characters denote an empty string, so this expression would concatenate two empty strings, resulting in an empty string.  However,  it appears that this language treats only the outermost quotes of the expression as the string boundary, so all of the characters between them become part of the literal string, producing '&amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;quot;+&amp;quot;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;' (In many programming languages, you can use both &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;quot;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt; or &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;'&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt; to delimit strings and both behave similarly if not identical). Alternately, theses two consecutive double quotes may be treated similarly to the way that consecutive single quotes are treated in a SQL string, with the first quote escaping the 2nd. This would result in a string that contains the value &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;quot;+&amp;quot;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;. It is also possible to read this expression as &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;'&amp;quot;'+'&amp;quot;'&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;, which would usually be &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;'&amp;quot;&amp;quot;'&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
# &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;[1,2,3]+2&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt; seems to test whether it's sound to append &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt; to the list &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;[1,2,3]&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;, and concludes that it doesn't fit the pattern, returning the boolean value &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;false&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;. It could conceivably also be the result of an attempt to add &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt; to the ''set'' &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;[1,2,3]&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;, which already contains that element (although &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;{1,2,3}&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt; would be a more common notation for sets).&lt;br /&gt;
# &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;[1,2,3]+4&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt; returns &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;true&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt; for much the same reason.&lt;br /&gt;
# &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;2/(2-(3/2+1/2))&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt; is a floating point joke. Floating point numbers are notoriously imprecise. With precise mathematics, &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;(3/2+1/2)&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt; would be exactly 2, hence the entire thing would evaluate to &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;2/0&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt; or &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;NaN&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt; in Randall's new language. However, the result of &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;(3/2+1/2)&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt; is &amp;quot;just slightly off,&amp;quot; which makes the result &amp;quot;just slightly off&amp;quot; of &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;NaN&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;, which would be ridiculous in a real language. The ironic thing is that fractions with 2 in the denominator are ''not'' the kind of numbers that typically suffer from floating point imprecision. Additionally, if there had indeed been a rounding error, the actual calculation would become something like &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;2/0.000000000000013&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;, which should not return a &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;NaN&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt; since it is not division by zero. It is most likely not a coincidence that there are 13 zeros before the &amp;quot;13&amp;quot; at the end of the &amp;quot;decimal&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
# &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;RANGE(&amp;quot; &amp;quot;)&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt; normally wouldn't make any sense. However, the new language appears to interpret it as ASCII, and in the ASCII table, character #32 is space, #33 is &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;!&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;, and #34 is &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;quot;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;. So, instead of interpreting &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;quot; &amp;quot;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt; as a string, it seems to be interpreted as &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;34, 32, 34&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt; (in ASCII), and then &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;range&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt; appears to transform this into &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;34, 33, 32, 33, 34&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt; (the &amp;quot;ranges&amp;quot; between the numbers), which, interpreted as ASCII, becomes &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;('&amp;quot;','!',' ','!','&amp;quot;')&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
# &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;+2&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt; adds 2 to the ''line number'', 10, and returns the result, 12.&lt;br /&gt;
# &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;2+2&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt; would normally be &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;. However, the interpreter takes this instruction to mean that the user wishes to increase the actual value of the number &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt; (aka the &amp;quot;literal value&amp;quot;) by &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt; for the remainder of the program, making it &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt; and then reports that the work is &amp;quot;Done&amp;quot;.  The result can be seen in the subsequent lines where all &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;s are replaced by &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;s. This could be a reference to languages like Fortran where [http://everything2.com/title/Changing+the+value+of+5+in+FORTRAN literals could be assigned new values].&lt;br /&gt;
#&amp;lt;code&amp;gt;RANGE(1,5)&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt; would normally return &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;(1,2,3,4,5)&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;; however, because the value of &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt; has been changed to &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;, it returns &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;(1,4,3,4,5)&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;. This also affects the line number by changing the &amp;quot;2&amp;quot; in 12 to &amp;quot;4&amp;quot; resulting in the line number 14.&lt;br /&gt;
#&amp;lt;code&amp;gt;FLOOR(10.5)&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt; should return &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;10&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt; (the &amp;quot;floor&amp;quot; of a decimal number is that number rounded down); however, it instead returns {{w|ASCII art}} of the number on a &amp;quot;floor.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The title text contains three further examples relating to color. &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;color.rgb(&amp;quot;blue&amp;quot;)&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt; returns the hexadecimal code for pure blue (as would be used in HTML, for example), which is how a real programming language might work. The lookup for &amp;quot;yellowish blue&amp;quot; returns &amp;quot;NaN&amp;quot; (Not a Number) again, which makes sense at one level because there is no such color as &amp;quot;yellowish blue&amp;quot; (yellow and blue are opposites on the RGB {{w|color triangle}}, making yellowish-blue an {{w|impossible colour}}, which can only be perceived with great difficulty through contrived figures). However a more typical result would have been a failure indicating that the color database does not include the name, in the same way that a typo such as &amp;quot;bluw&amp;quot; would. (Note that HTML does [http://stackoverflow.com/q/8318911/256431 explicitly attempt] to handle all &amp;quot;color names&amp;quot;. For the record, &amp;quot;yellowish blue&amp;quot; is a dark blue with an imperceptible amount of red — &amp;lt;code style='background-color: #0e00b0; color: white'&amp;gt;#0E00B0&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;.) Similarly sorting the colors would normally produce some defined ordering, such as alphabetical, but in this language it generates the string &amp;quot;rainbow&amp;quot;. It seems that Randall's new language understands color theory in an unusually deep way.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Transcript==&lt;br /&gt;
:[Caption above the black part of the comic:]&lt;br /&gt;
:My new language is great, but it &lt;br /&gt;
:has a few quirks regarding type:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[The rest of the comic is written in a black rectangle. All text to the left of &amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;quot; is written in gray. Text to the right of the &amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;quot; on the lines with numbers are in white, and then gray text on the other lines. There seems to be a missing &amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;quot; after line no. 3.]&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;[1]&amp;gt; 2+&amp;quot;2&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;=&amp;gt; &amp;quot;4&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;[2]&amp;gt; &amp;quot;2&amp;quot;+[]&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;=&amp;gt; &amp;quot;[2]&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;[3] (2/0)&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;= &amp;gt; NaN&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;[4]&amp;gt; (2/0)+2&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;= &amp;gt; NaP&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;[5]&amp;gt; &amp;quot;&amp;quot; + &amp;quot;&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;= &amp;gt; ' &amp;quot;+&amp;quot; '&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;[6]&amp;gt; [1,2,3]+2&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;= &amp;gt; False&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;[7]&amp;gt; [1,2,3]+4&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;= &amp;gt; True&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;[8]&amp;gt; 2/(2-(3/2+1/2))&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;= &amp;gt; NaN.000000000000013&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;[9]&amp;gt; Range(&amp;quot;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;quot;)&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;= &amp;gt; (' &amp;quot; ',&amp;quot;! &amp;quot;,&amp;quot; &amp;quot;,&amp;quot;!&amp;quot;,' &amp;quot; ')&lt;br /&gt;
:[10]&amp;gt; + 2&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;= &amp;gt; 12&lt;br /&gt;
:[11]&amp;gt; 2+2&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;= &amp;gt; Done&lt;br /&gt;
:[14]&amp;gt; Range(1,5)&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;= &amp;gt; (1,4,3,4,5)&lt;br /&gt;
:[13]&amp;gt; Floor(10.5)&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;= &amp;gt; |&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;= &amp;gt; |&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;= &amp;gt; |&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;= &amp;gt; |_ _ _10.5_ _ _&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Trivia==&lt;br /&gt;
*There is an inconsistency in the comic after [3] where the &amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;quot; is missing.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{comic discussion}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;Programming]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;Language]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>141.101.107.18</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:1849:_Decades&amp;diff=141302</id>
		<title>Talk:1849: Decades</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:1849:_Decades&amp;diff=141302"/>
				<updated>2017-06-13T11:48:48Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;141.101.107.18: get off my lawn&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&amp;lt;!--Please sign your posts with ~~~~--&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There seems to be a slightly tongue-in-cheek move to call the 2000's &amp;quot;the noughties&amp;quot; with the obvious implication of 'naughty'. Personally though I'm still waiting for everyone to stop saying &amp;quot;2000 and something, it very annoying! [[User:RoyT|RoyT]] ([[User talk:RoyT|talk]]) 14:38, 12 June 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Some people I know use the term &amp;quot;double-o's&amp;quot; for the period 2001-2009. Perhaps inspired by 007. &amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;--[[User:Nialpxe|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color: #000; text-decoration: none;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Nialpxe&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]], 2017. [[User_talk:Nialpxe|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color: #000; text-decoration: none;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;(Arguments welcome)&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; 02:30, 13 June 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Where would the descriptor &amp;quot;millennial&amp;quot; (adj) fit on this? I suggest that 00's fads be designated &amp;quot;millennial&amp;quot; and 10's fads be... forgotten.&lt;br /&gt;
[[Special:Contributions/173.245.48.171|173.245.48.171]] 14:57, 12 June 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Just a quick note to highlight the double &amp;quot;and&amp;quot; in the text: &amp;quot;(...) is ambiguous and and &amp;quot;aughts&amp;quot; (...)&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
[[Special:Contributions/162.158.6.52|162.158.6.52]] 14:43, 12 June 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Good eyes on the double 'and'. Perhaps the explanation needs a sections about other terms not mentioned here &amp;quot;teensies&amp;quot; &amp;quot;noughties&amp;quot; &amp;quot;tenies&amp;quot; etc. (and perhaps the Aughts aren't used due to cultural differences between Brits and Americans, the former more likely to call them the &amp;quot;Noughts&amp;quot;). Also I assume the title text refers to Randal's local variety radio. [[User:WamSam|WamSam]] ([[User talk:WamSam|talk]]) 15:07, 12 June 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
: It's no phenomenom of English language. In Germany &amp;quot;80er, 90er und heute&amp;quot; is used quite frequently by several radio stations. [[User:Elektrizikekswerk|Elektrizikekswerk]] ([[User talk:Elektrizikekswerk|talk]]) 06:48, 13 June 2017 (UTC) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: Around here (UK) I'm used to hearing &amp;quot;80s, 90s, and now&amp;quot;. Seems a bit weird on a 'classic' radio station who didn't play music from the current decade until the 2k rebranding. - [[Special:Contributions/162.158.154.109|162.158.154.109]] 08:37, 13 June 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I listen to a radio station that says &amp;quot;90s, 2K, and today.&amp;quot; It's not the only time I've seen &amp;quot;2K&amp;quot; used for the first decade of the 2000s {{unsigned ip|162.158.62.75}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2K might end up being the accepted form. It might morph into &amp;quot;the 2-10s,&amp;quot; &amp;quot;the  2-20s,&amp;quot;  &amp;quot;the 2-30s,&amp;quot; and so on. It differentiates the seperate centuries and is short enough to survive the endless grinding of popular culture. [[Special:Contributions/108.162.216.40|108.162.216.40]] 23:49, 12 June 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
My local variety station has been says &amp;quot;80s, 90s and today&amp;quot; since the mid-90s, which was really odd for the 5 years or so that it was redundant. {{unsigned ip|172.68.78.28}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Around here &amp;quot;the zeroes&amp;quot; is commonly used. {{unsigned ip|141.101.76.46}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
;Next Comic&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;pre&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
                                                       COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS:&lt;br /&gt;
                                                      |&amp;lt; &amp;lt;PREV RANDOM NEXT&amp;gt; &amp;gt;|&lt;br /&gt;
|---------------------------| |----------------------------| |----------------------------| |----------------------------|&lt;br /&gt;
| Normal Company            | |   Stingy Company           | | Bored Economist            | |                *crash*     |&lt;br /&gt;
|                           | |                            | |                            | |                            |&lt;br /&gt;
| Is it worth it  Let's     | | Is cost-      Let's do     | | I built a        Did you   | |                            |&lt;br /&gt;
| to spend that  do cost-   | | Benefit       Cost-Benefit | | machine to do    do cost-  | | No, why?    YOU FOOL!      |&lt;br /&gt;
| much on        benefit    | | analysis      analysis to  | | cost-benefit     benefit   | |             YOU'VE         |&lt;br /&gt;
| development?   analysis   | | worth it?     see          | | analysis         analysis? | |             DOOMED US ALL!!|&lt;br /&gt;
|  /                /       | |   /             /          | |    /                /      | |  /               /         |&lt;br /&gt;
|  O               0        | |  O              0          | |   O                0       | |  O               0         |&lt;br /&gt;
| /|\             /|\       | | /|\            /|\         | |  /|\              /|\      | | /|\             /|\        |&lt;br /&gt;
| / \             / \       | | / \            / \         | |  / \              / \      | | / \             / \        |&lt;br /&gt;
|                           | |                            | |                            | |                *rumble*    |&lt;br /&gt;
|---------------------------| |----------------------------| |----------------------------| |----------------------------|&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/pre&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{unsigned ip|173.245.50.102}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:@173.245.50.102 Wait, what? [[Special:Contributions/162.158.154.163|162.158.154.163]] 06:23, 13 June 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What does Randall usually do when there is typo/grammatical error in a comic? Will he correct it and re-upload it, or just leave it?&lt;br /&gt;
[[Special:Contributions/172.68.58.149|172.68.58.149]] 23:02, 12 June 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:He'll often notice errors and upload corrected versions, though as of this comment he hasn't yet (nearly 3AM Eastern). Then that fact ends up as trivia here. For example, a few comics ago, the map of America with a word in each state, a paragraph saying how you can make maps like this show whatever you want, he had missed the line separating New Hampshire and Maine, and later the line was there. Same with text errors, a month or two ago was a comic saying &amp;quot;defeatest&amp;quot;, then later &amp;quot;defeatist&amp;quot;. [[User:NiceGuy1|NiceGuy1]] ([[User talk:NiceGuy1|talk]]) 06:52, 13 June 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Wouldn't we run into the same issue in 2020? Since contemporary radio stations are always naming the previous two decades (this formula seems to apply worldwide, it at least does in germany) we wouldn't be able to name them in 2020. &amp;quot;The best hits of the last two decades!&amp;quot;? &amp;quot;You're tuning in to DCKX 102.5! Where we play music - sometimes, duh!&amp;quot;? [[Special:Contributions/162.158.92.118|162.158.92.118]] 07:28, 13 June 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
my daughter (2009) gleefully uses the term &amp;quot;noughties&amp;quot; since that makes her homophonously &amp;quot;naughty&amp;quot;. she's not so keen on her siblings (2011) being &amp;quot;teens&amp;quot; although that may change when she actually becomes one herself. as with so many things, it's not ultimately up to the old to decide these things. --[[Special:Contributions/141.101.107.18|141.101.107.18]] 11:48, 13 June 2017 (UTC)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>141.101.107.18</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=1836:_Okeanos&amp;diff=140111</id>
		<title>1836: Okeanos</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=1836:_Okeanos&amp;diff=140111"/>
				<updated>2017-05-21T23:55:29Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;141.101.107.18: Undo revision 140098 by 162.158.179.220 (talk) Revert vandalism&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{comic&lt;br /&gt;
| number    = 1836&lt;br /&gt;
| date      = May 12, 2017&lt;br /&gt;
| title     = Okeanos&lt;br /&gt;
| image     = okeanos.png&lt;br /&gt;
| titletext = WHEN I WAS ON A BOAT I DROPPED MY PHONE CAN U LOOK FOR IT&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Explanation==&lt;br /&gt;
{{incomplete|Chat comments still need more explanation.}}&lt;br /&gt;
The {{w|NOAAS_Okeanos_Explorer_(R_337)|NOAAS Okeanos Explorer}}, named after the Greek (and Roman) personification of the sea {{w|Okeanos}}, is a vessel that is currently exploring the Central Pacific Basin. It livestreams the video feed [http://oceanexplorer.noaa.gov/okeanos/media/exstream/exstream.html] of its deep sea exploration online. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This comic seems to be a representation of the livestream on YouTube [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xmVT36Axtn0]; see the [[#Table of comments|table]] below for details. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The chat section for the actual livestream is disabled, but the comic adds some humorous examples of what the chat section would look like.  Several of the examples are the product of commenters falsely believing the livestream is that of a game, probably since most livestreams on YouTube are of people playing games; [[Randall]] is joking about the viewers of said streams in particular not being able to tell the difference, as well as YouTube commenters in general. Randall has mentioned the ridiculousness of comments on YouTube before in both [[202: YouTube]] and [[481: Listen to Yourself]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the caption below Randall states that he likes to view the stream and commends them on disabling the chat section, for the reasons given in the comic above.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The title text is yet another comment by someone who dropped their phone in the ocean from a boat, and now wants to use Okeanos' resources to find it, which is of course impossible, as the phone will by now be hidden in the silt on the bottom. And even if not, the chance of finding anything dropped in the {{w|pacific ocean}}, the largest Ocean on the Earth, is all but zero. Also, the Central Pacific Basin, where Okeanos was at the time of this comic's release, is 6500 meters deep; at that depth the water pressure is approximately 4454863 Pascal's, or roughly 646 PSI. This is probably enough to irrevocably damage something as breakable as a cell phone. Even if the phone were of the so-called &amp;quot;waterproof&amp;quot; variety, that rating is usually only applicable to a few meters of depth rather than thousands of meters.  Needless to say, retrieving one's phone from the bottom of the Central Pacific Basin would be a challenging and pointless endeavor.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Table of comments==&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
!Comment&lt;br /&gt;
!Explanation&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Fake&lt;br /&gt;
| A very common YouTube comment expressing skepticism, for example saying that the content is edited or computer generated.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Who else is watching this in 2017?&lt;br /&gt;
| This type of comment appears frequently on videos, as a kind of community bonding over discovering or revisiting older content. It is not relevant here, as this is a live feed in 2017.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Is this {{w|Pre-rendering|prerendered}} or will these graphics be in the game?&lt;br /&gt;
| Previews for video games often use a mix of pre-rendered computer graphics and in-game footage, generally because in-game footage is not always visually impressive, interesting to watch, or easy to fit into the narrative of a preview advertisement. This practice can easily mislead people into believing that the pre-rendered graphics represent the actual game graphics, leading to disappointment when they purchase the game and find out that this isn't the case. The commenter, who has mistaken the marine footage for a game trailer, is trying determine if what he's seeing is pre-rendered or not, since it looks photorealistic to the point that he can't believe these are in-game graphics.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| That squid is a {{w|Neoliberalism|neoliberal}}.&lt;br /&gt;
| Likely an attempt at trolling; anyone with even a passing knowledge of marine life will be annoyed that the commenter confused the onscreen jellyfish with a squid, and everyone else will be annoyed by the politically-charged accusation in a place where such conversation clearly does not belong. Judging by the following comments, they have successfully baited at least one other person in the chat.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Why do the McElroy's never talk?&lt;br /&gt;
| A reference to The Adventure Zone, a ''{{w|Dungeons &amp;amp; Dragons}}'' podcast hosted by the McElroy Brothers and their father. In the world of The Adventure Zone, there is a creature called the Voidfish, which is generally interpreted to look like a jellyfish. Its abilities include censoring forbidden knowledge spoken by initiated to the uninitiated, so the commenter can't hear anything the McElroys are saying.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Stop messing around and eat the fish already.&lt;br /&gt;
| Possibly a gamer or food vlog watcher. It could also be that the commenter believes that the footage is from the perspective of a marine predator.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| This is why {{w|Donald Trump|Trump}} won.&lt;br /&gt;
| Another unwelcome injection of politics. This is likely targeted at the 'squid is a neoliberal' commenter, accusing them (in so many words) of being endemic of the widespread ignorance amongst the American population which led to the election of Donald Trump as the 45th President of the United States.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Why do you never craft anything?&lt;br /&gt;
| A comment referencing games such as ''{{w|Subnautica}}'' and ''{{w|Minecraft}}'', where a key aspect to survival is crafting materials. Not crafting items in these games is often taken as a sign of ignorance or inexperience, which may be a source of mockery for commenters watching a gaming stream.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| This is just a distraction&lt;br /&gt;
| Commenter thinks people should be focused on other things which are more important. Possibly political comment. Possibly conspiracy theorist.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Something is wrong with that baby giraffe.&lt;br /&gt;
| A live video of a giraffe in labor and giving birth was viral in April 2017. This commenter is either confused about which video they're watching, and is concerned that the creature on screen (a jellyfish) looks unlike a healthy baby giraffe, or is feigning this confusion as a joke.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| [title text]&lt;br /&gt;
When i was on a boat i dropped my phone can u look for it&lt;br /&gt;
| Someone in chat is asking the Explorer to look for a phone they dropped in the ocean.  The Explorer doesn't have retrieving lost articles as part of it's stated duties, and the impossibility of finding such a small item in such a huge ocean means this request will likely be ignored.&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Transcript==&lt;br /&gt;
:[The comic takes place during a typical YouTube live-stream. The live-stream is from &amp;quot;OceanExplorerGov&amp;quot;, using a submarine to explore the Central Pacific Basin. On the left hand side, the live video feed is playing, showing the ocean's depths. On the right hand side, the chat (typically shown in live-streams) is displayed]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:User #1: Fake&lt;br /&gt;
:User #2: Who else is watching this in 2017?&lt;br /&gt;
:User #3: Is this pre-rendered or will this be in the game?&lt;br /&gt;
:User #4: That squid is a neo-liberal&lt;br /&gt;
:User #5: Why do the McElroys never talk&lt;br /&gt;
:User #6: Stop messing around and eat the fish already.&lt;br /&gt;
:User #7: This is why Trump won&lt;br /&gt;
:User #8: Why do you never craft anything&lt;br /&gt;
:User #9: This is just a distraction&lt;br /&gt;
:User #10: Something is wrong with that baby giraffe&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Caption: I love watching the Okeanos Ocean Exploration live-stream, but it's probably for the best that they don't enable chat.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{comic discussion}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Comics with color]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:YouTube]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>141.101.107.18</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:1829:_Geochronology&amp;diff=139278</id>
		<title>Talk:1829: Geochronology</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:1829:_Geochronology&amp;diff=139278"/>
				<updated>2017-04-26T11:58:55Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;141.101.107.18: i've got a lovely bunch of coconuts&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;This might help explaining:&lt;br /&gt;
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_tectonic_plates&lt;br /&gt;
Between the Newfoundland Plate (Canada) and the Labrador part of the Canadian Shield the Appalachian Mountains exist.--[[Special:Contributions/141.101.105.150|141.101.105.150]] 07:45, 26 April 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This link is probably more useful:&lt;br /&gt;
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geography_of_Newfoundland_and_Labrador&lt;br /&gt;
I'll leave the detailed explanation to somebody with actual geologic knowledge of the region&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Condor70|Condor70]] ([[User talk:Condor70|talk]]) 09:25, 26 April 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Dalmatia is a place, but apparently doesn't have a microplate. It might be part of the joke since it makes the first listed microplate somewhat believable.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Laika&amp;quot; may be an island in Vanuatu (thanks, Wikipedia) but it's not a breed, it's only possibly [[Wikipedia:Laika|The Most Famous Dog Ever Ever Ever]]. --[[Special:Contributions/141.101.107.18|141.101.107.18]] 11:58, 26 April 2017 (UTC)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>141.101.107.18</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:1827:_Survivorship_Bias&amp;diff=139166</id>
		<title>Talk:1827: Survivorship Bias</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:1827:_Survivorship_Bias&amp;diff=139166"/>
				<updated>2017-04-24T12:10:48Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;141.101.107.18: don't believe the hype&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&amp;lt;!--Please sign your posts with ~~~~--&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Is &amp;quot;defeatest&amp;quot; a typo or a joke? I've never seen Randall make a typo before, but I also don't get the joke if there is one. [[Special:Contributions/162.158.2.184|162.158.2.184]] 04:28, 21 April 2017 (UTC)   &lt;br /&gt;
:Definitely a typo. [[User:Cardboardmech|Cardboardmech]] ([[User talk:Cardboardmech|talk]]) 04:59, 21 April 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::At first I thought this was an unfamiliarity with the word, and was about to talk about how it's a real word and what it means, then I noticed the spelling, LOL! I KNOW I've seen such spelling errors several times before - often getting fixed in the next day or two - but I couldn't provide examples even if my life depended on it. And yeah, I'd say this is more &amp;quot;spelling error&amp;quot; than &amp;quot;typo&amp;quot;, the I is nowhere near the E on any keyboard. :) - NiceGuy1 [[Special:Contributions/108.162.219.88|108.162.219.88]] 05:58, 21 April 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::If itdoesn't get fixed, it might be some weird pun on &amp;quot;[survival of] the fittest&amp;quot;. Wouldn't make a lot of sense in the context of the sentence though [[Special:Contributions/162.158.91.233|162.158.91.233]] 09:12, 21 April 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::::sometimes Randall do not fix errors, so nothing can be concluded on that (would it be survivorship bias to do so? ;-) How should the word be spelled (I'm not native English speaking), and does the word even exist? The spelling should be mentioned when someone explains the title text. I'm not up for it. And then if it is corrected later, it should go into the trivia section as a corrected error. --[[User:Kynde|Kynde]] ([[User talk:Kynde|talk]]) 10:29, 21 April 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
It has been corrected to defeatist [[User:Rtanenbaum|Rtanenbaum]] ([[User talk:Rtanenbaum|talk]]) 13:28, 21 April 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Transcript's kind of done. [[User:Cardboardmech|Cardboardmech]] ([[User talk:Cardboardmech|talk]]) 05:17, 21 April 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:I have changed the format to the usual style and added a bit more detail. But else nicely done. --[[User:Kynde|Kynde]] ([[User talk:Kynde|talk]]) 10:29, 21 April 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Other than the title text, does any more work need to be done on the explanation? The Template:Incomplete param is pretty vague right now. &amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;background:#0064de;font-size:12px;padding:4px 12px;border-radius:8px;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[[User talk:AgentMuffin|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#f0faff;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;~AgentMuffin&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
No doubt a lottery isn't a wise investment. However, I have not heard about accepting 25% of the prize or in annual instalments for over a decade before. Is that an american habbit? Vince [[Special:Contributions/141.101.105.174|141.101.105.174]] 06:17, 21 April 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
: Never heard of such things, either... [[User:Elektrizikekswerk|Elektrizikekswerk]] ([[User talk:Elektrizikekswerk|talk]]) 08:27, 21 April 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:This is a thing that some American lotteries do. It reduces the amount that you have to pay in taxes. [[User:Mulan15262|Mulan15262]] ([[User talk:Mulan15262|talk]]) 12:49, 21 April 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
: I don't play the lottery but I have heard of this practice and I think its typical here in the states. As I remember, you have the option of accepting 50% of the prize as an immediate payment or of accepting the full amount in installments over 20 years. With a progressive tax schedule this of course will affect the actual amount received and available for use. The use of payments helps the lottery itself as well and the choices of 50% and 20 years is no accident. The lottery can take the 50% it would have paid directly and invest it. A doubling period of 20 years needs an annual return on investment of only 3.6% (approx) so it works out to be a good deal for both parties. Unless of course your life expectancy is less than 20 years! [[User:ExternalMonolog|ExternalMonolog]] ([[User talk:ExternalMonolog|talk]]) 00:31, 22 April 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
The title text is written in the style of an inspirational/motivational speech. Do not be deterred, you can do ANYTHING. Sebastian --[[Special:Contributions/172.68.110.58|172.68.110.58]] 07:05, 21 April 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I took the liberty of editing the very emotional text and replace it with something a bit more &amp;quot;professional&amp;quot;, as I think fits this site better. I am still not quite happy about it, as advertising jackpots without taxes and not advertising the payout time are local phenomena only applicable to some jurisdictions, and make no difference to the overall survivor bias that is the theme of the comic [[Special:Contributions/172.68.182.202|172.68.182.202]] 08:16, 21 April 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
: I think the whole tax stuff can be deleted. Playing lottery is always stupid - even if there were no taxes on the prize. [[User:Elektrizikekswerk|Elektrizikekswerk]] ([[User talk:Elektrizikekswerk|talk]]) 08:25, 21 April 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::I agree with Elektrizikekswerk on both issues. Lottery is just tax on low IQ we call it in my family ;-) --[[User:Kynde|Kynde]] ([[User talk:Kynde|talk]]) 10:25, 21 April 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::: I've heard it called &amp;quot;gambling for the math-impaired.&amp;quot;  [[User:Miamiclay|Miamiclay]] ([[User talk:Miamiclay|talk]]) 17:30, 21 April 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Third paragraph is taken word-by-word from Wikipedia article on Survivorship Bias. [[Special:Contributions/162.158.92.88|162.158.92.88]] 12:54, 21 April 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Here's another example of survivorship bias, &amp;quot;We grew up without bicycle helmets and 'nonsense' like that when kids and dogs ran free and '''we came out fine'''&amp;quot; but of course I also remember there were a lot of kids with concussions and there were a lot of three-legged dogs running around. Both cases have greatly decreased because of bicycle helmets and leash laws. [[User:Rtanenbaum|Rtanenbaum]] ([[User talk:Rtanenbaum|talk]]) 13:39, 21 April 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:And don't forget all the dog bites that came out &amp;quot;just fine&amp;quot;! [[User:ExternalMonolog|ExternalMonolog]] ([[User talk:ExternalMonolog|talk]]) 00:58, 22 April 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If I may suggest, survivor bias is a special example of Bastiat's &amp;quot;That Which Is Seen, and That Which Is Unseen&amp;quot;, aka, the Broken Window Fallacy. The logic failure lies in paying attention to only part of the results, not all of them. I'd extend this to argue for acceptance of &amp;quot;The Ends Justify The Means... Buy You Gotta Consider ALL The Ends, Not Just Some Of Them&amp;quot;. Saving 100 people is one great end. But if you also kill 10,000 of them, but in the background, where they don't stand out, the ends aren't justified.&lt;br /&gt;
--[[Special:Contributions/108.162.212.227|108.162.212.227]] 19:54, 21 April 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There actually was a case of a man who won the lottery after buying the same set of numbers every time. Naturally, his advice to everyone was &amp;quot;Keep buying the same numbers every time and you'll win eventually.&amp;quot; Of course, there's no way he could be persuaded this was nonsense. [[User:Mark314159|Mark314159]] ([[User talk:Mark314159|talk]]) 01:43, 22 April 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This is an awfully long explanation, considering that it barely mentions Randall's assertion that *all* motivational speakers should include disclaimers (IE: &amp;quot;Results are not typical.&amp;quot;). If compared by net-income versus cost-of-living, the vast majority of people end their lives with less wealth than their parents, in spite of any efforts to better their situation through education, savings, investment, et cetera. In other words, no matter how hard they try, most people lose. That's just a hard economic truth, &amp;amp; many people espousing hard work, dedication &amp;amp; especially sticking to your goals, tend to overlook the fact that financial success is actually quite rare, regardless of the lifelong effort put into it. As stated, nobody hires the failures to give talks; Maybe we should!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Also, speaking to graduating students is far from the most common activity of such professional speakers. The use of motivational speakers at conventions, paid seminars, &amp;amp; sales pitches is much more common &amp;amp; frequent than talks given to students. Since Randall doesn't mention students in any way, I think that specific phrase about students should be removed from the explanation. [[Special:Contributions/141.101.99.11|141.101.99.11]] 17:46, 22 April 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Less wealth than their parents? While it would be hard to compare, I would argue that they mostly end up better, as technological advances makes economy grow. Although it's true that depressions can reverse it. -- [[User:Hkmaly|Hkmaly]] ([[User talk:Hkmaly|talk]]) 00:09, 23 April 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This isn't quite relevant to the topic, but please let me vent out about a certain opinion that is going to appear in the explanation eventually: that lotteries are bad investment ''just'' because they lose you money on average.  This is in fact bullshit, because so does insurance!  If you really want to apply math to such things, you need to integrate welfare, not money profit, over the probabilities.  Wherein welfare is some half-arbitrary function over money that denotes its actual impact on one's life and that ''usually'' grows slower than linearly on positive side (your life changes more after earning the first million dollars than after the second one), but sharply drops on the negative side (a bad debt is a life-ender).  With such a welfare($) choice lottery is in fact bad while insurance is good.  Note, hovewer, that in some situations, like when you already have a big debt and the mafia is killing you for it next week, lottery makes a surprisingly good, while still unlikely, investment!  It's all a matter of the specific situation with welfare($).  (Sorry for bad engrish, I never learned all those math terms.)  [[Special:Contributions/172.68.182.136|172.68.182.136]] 20:18, 22 April 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 For example, although Donald Trump had '''many''' successful businesses, he also had '''some''' that went bankrupt.&lt;br /&gt;
this is back to front. you need to do more research. --[[Special:Contributions/141.101.107.18|141.101.107.18]] 12:10, 24 April 2017 (UTC)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>141.101.107.18</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:1826:_Birdwatching&amp;diff=138986</id>
		<title>Talk:1826: Birdwatching</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:1826:_Birdwatching&amp;diff=138986"/>
				<updated>2017-04-19T12:56:30Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;141.101.107.18: i would say disgusted since he's an sjw&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&amp;lt;!--Please sign your posts with ~~~~--&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
This is a big one.[[Special:Contributions/108.162.246.41|108.162.246.41]] 04:07, 19 April 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I wonder if the size is a technical error, or if I am missing some subtle joke. [[Special:Contributions/108.162.245.184|108.162.245.184]] 04:37, 19 April 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I guess it's the latter. [[Special:Contributions/162.158.166.71|162.158.166.71]] 04:39, 19 April 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I think the vacuum is a further joke about scale and distance playing on the absurdity of trying to vacuum from a range of one mile. I must say I don't really understand this comic very well.[[Special:Contributions/108.162.245.70|108.162.245.70]] 04:47, 19 April 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I thought the vacuum was trying to drain the atmosphere to make it so that the birds can't fly as high.[[User:1I1III1|1I1III1]] ([[User talk:1I1III1|talk]]) 05:42, 19 April 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
: That was my thought, too. (/edit: Honestly, to think of sucking the birds in I found being too absurd, while sucking the atmosphere seemed absolutely plausible - at least for an XKCD...) [[User:Elektrizikekswerk|Elektrizikekswerk]] ([[User talk:Elektrizikekswerk|talk]]) 08:18, 19 April 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Are these the same birds from 1824? [[User:Codrus|Codrus]] ([[User talk:Codrus|talk]]) 06:16, 19 April 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Pretty sure the size is an error, I've seen this happen briefly before. It's 1200 dpi, suitable for archival, printing, or just what comes off the scanner [[Special:Contributions/108.162.246.107|108.162.246.107]] 09:04, 19 April 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hey folks, am I the only one thinking that Cueball also holds the binoculars the wrong way around? Usually the small end is nearest to the eyes... That would for sure make birdwatching even MORE difficult. Regarding size, I think it is intentional.[[Special:Contributions/162.158.150.76|162.158.150.76]] 09:16, 19 April 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
: Hey, that's a reflex camera, isn't it? Some camera geek can comment on birdwatching situation camera? That zoom seems much too small for the job, but I've got no real clue...--[[User:Blaisorblade|Blaisorblade]] ([[User talk:Blaisorblade|talk]]) 09:34, 19 April 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The size is intentional. it kinda freaked m out wen i saw it, though. i thought there was a problem with my phone! [[User:Will X|Will X]] ([[User talk:Will X|talk]]) 11:24, 19 April 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I think the size is biting Randall in the rear.  I'm getting all sorts of 503 gateway timeouts that appear to be from his Varnish web accelerator. The East coast is waking up and pounding his server... [[Special:Contributions/162.158.78.106|162.158.78.106]] 11:32, 19 April 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
i would take issue with the use of the word &amp;quot;confused&amp;quot; in the transcript. perhaps &amp;quot;blankly&amp;quot; would be more descriptive. --[[Special:Contributions/141.101.107.18|141.101.107.18]] 12:56, 19 April 2017 (UTC)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>141.101.107.18</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:1815:_Flag&amp;diff=137921</id>
		<title>Talk:1815: Flag</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:1815:_Flag&amp;diff=137921"/>
				<updated>2017-03-27T12:24:00Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;141.101.107.18: losers. sad.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&amp;lt;!--Please sign your posts with ~~~~--&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Makes me wonder why he was doing this at 5:48 pm.&lt;br /&gt;
--[[Special:Contributions/108.162.249.190|108.162.249.190]] 20:56, 25 March 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A vote for me is a vote for bread on every table and a [https://smile.amazon.com/Off-Be-Wizard-Magic-2-0/dp/1612184715/ 73% battery level] until the end of time! [[User:Jameslucas|jameslucas]] &amp;lt;small&amp;gt;([[User talk:Jameslucas|&amp;quot; &amp;quot;]] / [[Special:Contributions/Jameslucas|+]])&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt; 14:02, 24 March 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Given that the design is a screenshot, the flag could be part of an existing logo, e.g. of a U.S. sport association.--[[Special:Contributions/162.158.150.82|162.158.150.82]] 14:15, 24 March 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The comic states &amp;quot;our NEW country&amp;quot; so I removed the theory it could be a new US flag.&lt;br /&gt;
The most recent sovereign state, according to Wikipedia, is South Sudan created in 2011 so we could assume Randall never intended to talk about a real-life country [[Special:Contributions/162.158.234.28|162.158.234.28]] 14:25, 24 March 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:It could be referring to new country proposals by techno-libertarians and the like? [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Seasteading] -[[User:Jules.LT|Jules.LT]] ([[User talk:Jules.LT|talk]]) 14:32, 24 March 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:: for instance https://www.cnet.com/news/asgardia-will-be-a-new-nation-in-space-and-you-can-be-a-citizen/ [[User:WhiteDragon|WhiteDragon]] ([[User talk:WhiteDragon|talk]]) 14:44, 24 March 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Note that official flags have an aspect ratio of 3:2 (with a few exceptions, like Switzerland and Nepal). The proposed flag including the notification bar measures 474 x 316 pixels (3*158 x 2*158 pixels), following the standard. If one removes the notification bar the resulting flag is somewhat wider than the standard. [[Special:Contributions/188.114.110.250|188.114.110.250]] 15:06, 24 March 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Those &amp;quot;few&amp;quot; exceptions include 106 of the 189 or so sovereign states.  Even that overstates the popularity of 3:2 since some nations have multiple different official flag specifications for different uses or users.  --[[Special:Contributions/162.158.62.21|162.158.62.21]] 15:29, 24 March 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
According to [https://developer.apple.com/ios/human-interface-guidelines/ui-bars/status-bars/ Apple's own documentation], this kind of bar is referred to as a &amp;quot;status bar&amp;quot;, and not a &amp;quot;notification bar&amp;quot;. --[[User:Jonhaugen|Jonhaugen]] ([[User talk:Jonhaugen|talk]]) 15:28, 24 March 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Key word: Apple. Notification bar is a term used more commonly in Android, largely from the time Android had a pull down notification tray and iOS didn't. [[Special:Contributions/162.158.34.28|162.158.34.28]] 02:02, 25 March 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Since the screenshot is part of the editing process, I don't think this can be interpreted as a mistake. It probably is entirely deliberate. The joke relies on the fact that most of the times when this bar appears, it is a side effect of the way the relevant data (the rest of the image) has been obtained, rather than part of the information itself. Actually, not only can the bar be ignored most of the time, but this is so often true that some people may not pay any attention to it at all. The committee's mistake might not have been that they failed to understand that Randall actually meant for the bar to be there, they might have not noticed it at all (even more likely if they looked at the image in full screen on a similar device). [[Special:Contributions/141.101.88.184|141.101.88.184]] 16:08, 24 March 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The real reason for firing him would most probably be that he made the committee and any decision making bodies up the chain look unprofessional. He may have missed it or intentionally trolled them, but it seems the status bar made it through the committee and all the way to becoming official without getting noticed. That sort of publicity will result in heads rolling, starting with the easiest target, the designer (depending on the state maybe literally, but if he was just fired it's probably not that type of system).--[[Special:Contributions/162.158.102.76|162.158.102.76]] 18:07, 24 March 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What kind of barbaric country still relies on 3G? It's like we're going back to the stone age!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I think this new flag represents a part of USA (3 states) that has either split with the rest due to the current president or are the three states that was left after the other 47 left. This makes sense with Randall's views of Trump and the colour stars and stripes is so clearly a reference to the Stars and Stripes also given Randall is from the states and as he was asked to make the flag. Maybe it is Massechusets, Conneticut and New York that had formed an independent country? ;-) --[[User:Kynde|Kynde]] ([[User talk:Kynde|talk]]) 19:30, 24 March 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The United States of Macutny had better be prepared for a long war with the remaining USA over access to Vermont, New Hampshire and Maine. - [[User:These Are Not The Comments You Are Looking For|These Are Not The Comments You Are Looking For]] ([[User talk:These Are Not The Comments You Are Looking For|talk]]) 20:28, 25 March 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I sure hope those are the states he picked! But also, Connecticut annexes Rhode Island. - Lieutenant Zipp&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Is the notification bar a standard one for some OS or common system, or has Randall invented it? Probably not an interesting comment, but I'm curious if that layout actually exists. Would seem an awful waste of screen real-estate devoting a third of the bar to an almost meaningless &amp;quot;signal strength&amp;quot; metric -- [[Special:Contributions/162.158.154.109|162.158.154.109]] 20:29, 24 March 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The bar is the one redesigned in iOS 7. The off-white coloration, layout, and even the specific icons beside the battery display are taken from that interface. The issue with the wasted space of the cellular strength meter is even worse on an actual device, where the name of your service provider (or the word &amp;quot;iPad&amp;quot; on, well, an iPad) is also displayed at all times. &amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;background:#0064de;font-size:12px;padding:4px 12px;border-radius:8px;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[[User talk:AgentMuffin|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#f0faff;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;~AgentMuffin&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[https://o.lgm.cl/xkcd1815/ A construction sheet for the XKCD 1815 flag] (excluding notification bar)[[User:Locoluis|Locoluis]] ([[User talk:Locoluis|talk]]) 22:32, 25 March 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Has anybody noticed that the flag perfectly represents the overall politican division of the current US with the blue states on the coast, and the red states in the middle? [[Special:Contributions/162.158.155.38|162.158.155.38]] 08:59, 27 March 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Is it just me but the 39% could be a take on the current approval rating of the US president and the 3G to the 3 branches of government?[[Special:Contributions/162.158.126.52|162.158.126.52]] 10:16, 27 March 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Could this also not be a dig at the hopelessly tech illiterate (mostly, in my humble experience iPhone users) who habitually take screenshots rather than saving an image to disk? And continue to do so even after it's pointed out to them that they don't need all that cruft. That saving to disk is so simple makes it doubly hilarious and vexing. --[[Special:Contributions/141.101.107.18|141.101.107.18]] 12:24, 27 March 2017 (UTC)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>141.101.107.18</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=1813:_Vomiting_Emoji&amp;diff=137587</id>
		<title>1813: Vomiting Emoji</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=1813:_Vomiting_Emoji&amp;diff=137587"/>
				<updated>2017-03-20T15:16:53Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;141.101.107.18: /* Explanation */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{comic&lt;br /&gt;
| number    = 1813&lt;br /&gt;
| date      = March 20, 2017&lt;br /&gt;
| title     = Vomiting Emoji&lt;br /&gt;
| image     = vomiting_emoji.png&lt;br /&gt;
| titletext = My favorite might be U+1F609 U+1F93F WINKING FACE VOMITING.&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Explanation==&lt;br /&gt;
{{incomplete|Created by a BOT - Please change this comment when editing this page. Do NOT delete this tag too soon.}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
C'mon... Why did u have to take it down?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Transcript==&lt;br /&gt;
{{incomplete transcript|Do NOT delete this tag too soon.}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{comic discussion}}&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>141.101.107.18</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:1809:_xkcd_Phone_5&amp;diff=137179</id>
		<title>Talk:1809: xkcd Phone 5</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:1809:_xkcd_Phone_5&amp;diff=137179"/>
				<updated>2017-03-14T12:40:11Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;141.101.107.18: signs point to no&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&amp;lt;!--Please sign your posts with ~~~~--&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Darn, I was almost fast enough to get the cot-caught merger explanation in there. That being said, now I really want a phone with a Zelda style hook shot. [[User:Andyd273|Andyd273]] ([[User talk:Andyd273|talk]]) 14:02, 10 March 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
--I just came to say the same.  I want the hookshot! [[Special:Contributions/172.68.78.100|172.68.78.100]] 14:05, 10 March 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It's way more likely that this refers to the Zelda hook shot, as it looks like a little tube where some sort of grappling hook could potentially shoot out from. It doesn't look like it could shoot out basketballs, though. [[Special:Contributions/108.162.238.17|108.162.238.17]] 15:28, 10 March 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It looks like &amp;quot;Hook Shot&amp;quot; is a clever suggestion for a feature name: the lens attaches to the camera with a 'hook' so you can take great 'shot's. [[User:Schnitz|Schnitz]] ([[User talk:Schnitz|talk]]) 18:01, 10 March 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::And how is the Hook shot not a DotA/DotA 2 reference? My first reaction upon seeing the Hook shot was DotA. See http://dota2.gamepedia.com/Clockwerk and http://dota.wikia.com/wiki/Clockwerk --[[Special:Contributions/162.158.126.28|162.158.126.28]] 14:10, 13 March 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It's worth noting that most of the Loran-C system (which presumably is what would be used on a phone) has been decommissioned in the last decade or so, including all the stations operated by the US and Canadian governments. [[Special:Contributions/162.158.62.201|162.158.62.201]] 15:52, 10 March 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Notice''' the new [[what if?]] ''{{what if|156|Electrofishing for Whales}}'' released the day before this comic! Only 9 days between releases... --[[User:Kynde|Kynde]] ([[User talk:Kynde|talk]]) 16:33, 10 March 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:OFF TOPIC: Can you imagine how much Randall must have been laughing while looking at all those funny electrofishing sources he is citing... ROFL--[[User:Dgbrt|Dgbrt]] ([[User talk:Dgbrt|talk]]) 19:44, 10 March 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
LORAN -- I was under the impression that the US LORAN base stations were turned off in 2010.  Perhaps a few years later in some other parts of the world.  So a LORAN reciever is of less use than a chocolate teapot.--[[Special:Contributions/162.158.62.21|162.158.62.21]] 18:08, 10 March 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I understand &amp;quot;Can Feel Pain&amp;quot; as the next step up for Siri (or Google or Alexa or...) to become conscious. [[Special:Contributions/108.162.219.160|108.162.219.160]] 18:18, 10 March 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The phone is slightly round. What could this mean? It's not like Galaxy Edge.--[[User:Dgbrt|Dgbrt]] ([[User talk:Dgbrt|talk]]) 19:44, 10 March 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I think part of the joke of &amp;quot;Squelch knob&amp;quot; is that a lot of people simply don't know what a squelch knob does. May as well put this mysterious knob on a phone, too. Does anyone else agree? [[Special:Contributions/162.158.106.18|162.158.106.18]] 01:36, 11 March 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It was really funny for me personally that this comic came out this Friday as right before I came home and saw the new xkcd phone I had just picked up my new smartphone. It was &amp;quot;just&amp;quot; a Samsung so great I didn't see this first because then I would have been disappointed by the few features my new phone has. But at least it is now easier to make such a comment like this on the phone --[[User:Kynde|Kynde]] ([[User talk:Kynde|talk]]) 16:17, 11 March 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Pokemon spoiler inside (rot 13): Va rcvfbqr 16 bs gur Cbxrzba bevtvany frevrf, Nfu, Zvfgl, Oebpx, Wrffvr, naq Wnzrf, nybat jvgu gurve znal Cbxrzba, ner genccrq ba n obng. Orvat irel uhatel, gurl pbafvqre rngvat Wnzrf'f Zntvxnec, hagvy Zrbjgu ovgrf Zntvxnec...naq oernxf uvf grrgu.[[Special:Contributions/162.158.78.208|162.158.78.208]] 21:05, 11 March 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Vf vg ernyyl n fcbvyre gb erirny n cybg cbvag 18+ lrnef nsgre gur bevtvany nve qngr?[[User:These Are Not The Comments You Are Looking For|These Are Not The Comments You Are Looking For]] ([[User talk:These Are Not The Comments You Are Looking For|talk]]) 03:14, 12 March 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Every time I see another one in this lame series I get a stronger impression that this is Randall's way of &amp;quot;phoning in&amp;quot; a comic when his creative well goes dry. ''&amp;amp;mdash; [[User:Tbc|tbc]] ([[User talk:Tbc|talk]]) 04:32, 12 March 2017 (UTC)''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;there is an xkcd Phone 2 available&amp;quot; - really?  (Not really.)&lt;br /&gt;
Real &amp;quot;haptic&amp;quot; (touch) technology on devices includes producing the sensation of touching a real version of a virtual object, as well as a device sensing not only being touched, but how it is touched.  On the other hand, I don't think our relationships with devices will be improved if they can feel pain.  Or fear, which logically comes next.  That's wrong, even if they are already doing it to us.  rja.carnegie@excite.com [[Special:Contributions/141.101.98.160|141.101.98.160]] 03:34, 13 March 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I think &amp;quot;retina storage&amp;quot; is like a retina scanner -- except it's not read-only. --[[Special:Contributions/172.68.54.112|172.68.54.112]] 05:05, 13 March 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=====Layout question=====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We have five xkcd phone explanations. Three of them are using a bullet list and two (including this) use a table. I prefer the bullets, not only because it's easier for editors. A table cell where the text needs a couple of lines is either bad text or bad layout. I think it's the layout. What do you think?--[[User:Dgbrt|Dgbrt]] ([[User talk:Dgbrt|talk]]) 19:57, 10 March 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:I like the table but I do not wish to use the time to change any of these explanations. Also it is not important to me but I would prefer the five explanations used the same layout. So I would not object if all where made into bullets lists. --[[User:Kynde|Kynde]] ([[User talk:Kynde|talk]]) 08:14, 11 March 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::It's me - I have copied the tabular layout from the other phone comic explanation. I like tables more than bullet lists even if the explanation is large, because tables keep explained items visually separate, so you can easily find the one you're looking for - and there's a sortable version. It is more troublesome for editors indeed. Maybe we should use wiki definition lists (which translate directly to HTML definition lists) to combine the best of both worlds. It may be possible to add some nice CSS for a better look but I don't know how do do it in wiki. Or maybe create some new pretty macro? I don't know anything about creating wiki macros. Below I put an example definition list to show how to write it in wiki markup and how it looks like - definitely better than bullet list IMHO. -- [[User:Malgond|Malgond]] ([[User talk:Malgond|talk]]) 10:38, 13 March 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Hi Malgond, there was only one phone with a table; three others using simple headers for the items. Looks much better and it's also easier to read. But nested bullet lists are even worse. And no professional writer would use a table like this here.--[[User:Dgbrt|Dgbrt]] ([[User talk:Dgbrt|talk]]) 21:10, 13 March 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::::Indeed; I have used the table only because it looks better ''for me''. Opinions may vary. We need some decision here - and someone willing to put in effort to reformat explanations to an agreed standard. How about me trying to reformat this explanation into a definition list? It can be easily undone if the consensus is it doesn't look good... -- [[User:Malgond|Malgond]] ([[User talk:Malgond|talk]]) 09:18, 14 March 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Definition list example:&lt;br /&gt;
; something to explain : long and windy explanation of a really trivial topic that users of this site really love to write&lt;br /&gt;
; xkcd : just a point in four-letter namespace&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The page refers to &amp;quot;monroe&amp;quot;. Is this standard? --[[Special:Contributions/141.101.107.18|141.101.107.18]] 12:40, 14 March 2017 (UTC)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>141.101.107.18</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:1804:_Video_Content&amp;diff=136187</id>
		<title>Talk:1804: Video Content</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:1804:_Video_Content&amp;diff=136187"/>
				<updated>2017-02-28T12:33:11Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;141.101.107.18: sorry&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&amp;lt;!--Please sign your posts with ~~~~--&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This was my first time writing a transcript, so let me know if I did anything wrong. [[Special:Contributions/108.162.219.88|108.162.219.88]] 16:52, 27 February 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Nice, but it's called a panel, not a frame. [[User:Jtvjan|Jtvjan]] ([[User talk:Jtvjan|talk]]) 17:04, 27 February 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::sorry, my fault, I exchanged &amp;quot;comic&amp;quot; by &amp;quot;frame&amp;quot; instead of &amp;quot;panel&amp;quot; - solved :-) --[[User:LaVe|LaVe]] ([[User talk:LaVe|talk]]) 17:12, 27 February 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Well done ;) -- please have a look at my changes to the layout.--[[User:Dgbrt|Dgbrt]] ([[User talk:Dgbrt|talk]]) 17:57, 27 February 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Who is Neil Cicierega? [[Special:Contributions/141.101.98.160|141.101.98.160]] 18:15, 27 February 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:[//en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neil_Cicierega Lemon demon]'s real name [[User:Jtvjan|Jtvjan]] ([[User talk:Jtvjan|talk]]) 18:20, 27 February 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I understood this comic as being a parody on how news organizations decide their content and media regardless of how annoying it is to actually try to get all your news information out of videos (which I think annoys Randall) https://xkcd.com/1280/ [[Special:Contributions/108.162.215.214|108.162.215.214]] 19:01, 27 February 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I've added information on a real example of &amp;quot;sexy news&amp;quot;, and in the process extended our wikinfrastructure with [[Template:Hov]] (for hovertext) and [[Template:NSFW]] (for potentially NSFW links which belong on the wiki- like the link to Naked News's Wikipedia article). [[User:Hppavilion1|Hppavilion1]] ([[User talk:Hppavilion1|talk]]) 00:23, 28 February 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:I'd recommend adding a dotted bottom-border to Hov and changing the cursor it shows to &amp;quot;help&amp;quot;. &amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;background:#0064de;font-size:12px;padding:4px 12px;border-radius:8px;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[[User talk:AgentMuffin|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#f0faff;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;~AgentMuffin&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Obviously the presenters need to be skilled in tactile signing (see Wikipedia's [[wikipedia:Deafblindness|Deafblindness]] article). No problem there. [[Special:Contributions/108.162.221.64|108.162.221.64]] 01:17, 28 February 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &amp;quot;This concept has not, for some reason, spread to the mainstream...&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
...possibly because naked women are a fairly narrow and [[305|arbitrary]] definition of &amp;quot;sexy&amp;quot;. --[[Special:Contributions/141.101.107.18|141.101.107.18]] 12:33, 28 February 2017 (UTC)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>141.101.107.18</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:1804:_Video_Content&amp;diff=136186</id>
		<title>Talk:1804: Video Content</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:1804:_Video_Content&amp;diff=136186"/>
				<updated>2017-02-28T12:32:32Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;141.101.107.18: works for me, though&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&amp;lt;!--Please sign your posts with ~~~~--&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This was my first time writing a transcript, so let me know if I did anything wrong. [[Special:Contributions/108.162.219.88|108.162.219.88]] 16:52, 27 February 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Nice, but it's called a panel, not a frame. [[User:Jtvjan|Jtvjan]] ([[User talk:Jtvjan|talk]]) 17:04, 27 February 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::sorry, my fault, I exchanged &amp;quot;comic&amp;quot; by &amp;quot;frame&amp;quot; instead of &amp;quot;panel&amp;quot; - solved :-) --[[User:LaVe|LaVe]] ([[User talk:LaVe|talk]]) 17:12, 27 February 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Well done ;) -- please have a look at my changes to the layout.--[[User:Dgbrt|Dgbrt]] ([[User talk:Dgbrt|talk]]) 17:57, 27 February 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Who is Neil Cicierega? [[Special:Contributions/141.101.98.160|141.101.98.160]] 18:15, 27 February 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:[//en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neil_Cicierega Lemon demon]'s real name [[User:Jtvjan|Jtvjan]] ([[User talk:Jtvjan|talk]]) 18:20, 27 February 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I understood this comic as being a parody on how news organizations decide their content and media regardless of how annoying it is to actually try to get all your news information out of videos (which I think annoys Randall) https://xkcd.com/1280/ [[Special:Contributions/108.162.215.214|108.162.215.214]] 19:01, 27 February 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I've added information on a real example of &amp;quot;sexy news&amp;quot;, and in the process extended our wikinfrastructure with [[Template:Hov]] (for hovertext) and [[Template:NSFW]] (for potentially NSFW links which belong on the wiki- like the link to Naked News's Wikipedia article). [[User:Hppavilion1|Hppavilion1]] ([[User talk:Hppavilion1|talk]]) 00:23, 28 February 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:I'd recommend adding a dotted bottom-border to Hov and changing the cursor it shows to &amp;quot;help&amp;quot;. &amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;background:#0064de;font-size:12px;padding:4px 12px;border-radius:8px;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[[User talk:AgentMuffin|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#f0faff;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;~AgentMuffin&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Obviously the presenters need to be skilled in tactile signing (see Wikipedia's [[wikipedia:Deafblindness|Deafblindness]] article). No problem there. [[Special:Contributions/108.162.221.64|108.162.221.64]] 01:17, 28 February 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &amp;quot;This concept has not, for some reason, spread to the mainstream...&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
...possibly because naked women are a fairly narrow and [[305|arbitrary]] definition of &amp;quot;sexy&amp;quot;.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>141.101.107.18</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:1801:_Decision_Paralysis&amp;diff=135800</id>
		<title>Talk:1801: Decision Paralysis</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:1801:_Decision_Paralysis&amp;diff=135800"/>
				<updated>2017-02-21T12:35:40Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;141.101.107.18: quibble&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&amp;lt;!--Please sign your posts with ~~~~--&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Don't hurt me: First explanation. There's serious problems with it, I know. Be gentle. [[Special:Contributions/162.158.62.159|162.158.62.159]] 05:59, 20 February 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[356: Nerd Sniping]] appears to be a practical application of this. [[Special:Contributions/162.158.114.16|162.158.114.16]] 09:14, 20 February 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[309:_Shopping_Teams]] is also directly relevant.  [[User:B jonas|B jonas]] ([[User talk:B jonas|talk]]) 11:26, 20 February 2017 (UTC)  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Talking about Nerds: [[309: Shopping Teams]] ??? {{unsigned ip|141.101.76.250}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Depends on what internet service you use to make your decision. I tried to compare car reviews with Amazon's Alexa and it led me to binge watching the recently concluded season of The Grand Tour. [[User:Nialpxe|Nialpxe]] ([[User talk:Nialpxe|talk]]) 13:59, 20 February 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
My first reaction upon seeing the comic was: &amp;quot;There are two of you and two cars! Just steal each a car and whoever gets to the base first starts dealing with the bomb. (Plus, you get to find which car is faster)&amp;quot; [[Special:Contributions/188.114.110.178|188.114.110.178]] 14:35, 20 February 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Good point. Of course the joke is that Cueball/Randall gets sucked into comparing. The third option might seem like a good alternative rather than risking being at the base when the bomb explodes (more likely due to the time wasted in the first place...) --[[User:Kynde|Kynde]] ([[User talk:Kynde|talk]]) 19:31, 20 February 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Randall has previously mentioned ways of harming him, like that one where he taught everyone to impersonate him, or trick his friends into punching him. [[Special:Contributions/141.101.76.100|141.101.76.100]] 19:51, 20 February 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:I guess you mean this for the impersonate: [[1121: Identity]]. I'm a bit more uncertain if the other is this one [[706: Freedom]]. But this seems more like something that could happen not something that has happened. I have included the first as I think that it relevant. Thanks. --[[User:Kynde|Kynde]] ([[User talk:Kynde|talk]]) 20:04, 20 February 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If the pair are, as the page asserts, standing next to the cars then megan would have said ''these cars''. also, the cars as drawn, if next to the pair, are '''very small''' and floating in space. they appear instead to be quite '''far away'''. --[[Special:Contributions/141.101.107.18|141.101.107.18]] 12:35, 21 February 2017 (UTC)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>141.101.107.18</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=1799:_Bad_Map_Projection:_Time_Zones&amp;diff=135341</id>
		<title>1799: Bad Map Projection: Time Zones</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=1799:_Bad_Map_Projection:_Time_Zones&amp;diff=135341"/>
				<updated>2017-02-15T12:33:18Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;141.101.107.18: sp&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{comic&lt;br /&gt;
| number    = 1799&lt;br /&gt;
| date      = February 15, 2017&lt;br /&gt;
| title     = Bad Map Projection: Time Zones&lt;br /&gt;
| image     = bad_map_projection_time_zones.png&lt;br /&gt;
| titletext = This is probably the first projection in cartographic history that can be criticized for its disproportionate focus on Finland, Mongolia, and the Democratic Republic of the Congo.&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
*A [http://imgs.xkcd.com/comics/bad_map_projection_time_zones_2x.png double sized version] of this image can be found by clicking the image at xkcd.com - the comic's page can also be accessed by clicking on the comic number above.&lt;br /&gt;
*Recent comics always have a larger (often the original) drawing using ''_2x'' added to the file name to indicate a different size. Modern browsers decide which resolution is shown. But at this comic the larger version is also clickable on the image. See much more details on this under the expanded explanation for the [[:Category:Large drawings|large drawings category]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Explanation==&lt;br /&gt;
{{incomplete|[[#Table of countries and their timezones|Table]] needs to be filled out  for each country, both named and unnamed that are shown in the map with explanation of its timezone and why it looks as it does on the map. (Especially Russia, China and Greenland as well as those from title text needs explanation like that). Some of the info already given in the explanation could be moved to the table. Finally all labeled countries should be listed in the transcript as well.}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This is the second comic in the series of  [[:Category:Bad Map Projections|Bad Map Projections]]. The first was released just over a month before this one and was called [[1784: Bad Map Projection: Liquid Resize]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Notably, &amp;quot;Liquid Resize&amp;quot; was #107, while this comic features #79, so either [[Randall]] has put them in a new arbitrary order or he is counting down from least to most terrible.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Conceptually, the series is a comment on the fact that there is no perfect way to draw a map of the world on a flat piece of paper. Each one will introduce a different type of distortion, and the best projection for a given situation is sometimes very disputed. Randall previously explored 12 different projections in [[977: Map Projections]], and expressed his disdain for some types he sees as less efficient but whose users feel superior. None of them are really good as any 2D map projection will always distort in a way the spherical reality, and a map projection that is useful for one aspect (like navigation, geographical shapes and masses visualization, etc.) will not be so for all the others. Local maps of smaller areas can be quite accurate, but the idea of both these map projection comics is to map the entire globe on a flat surface.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Randall, being Randall, runs with the idea. Has made yet another map projection that is not only inaccurate, but utterly unusable, though less so than the previous one.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This comic shows a {{w|Map projection|map projection}} in which countries are placed according to the {{w|Time zone|time zones}} that they fall under. Based on the way the Sun shines on the Earth, these time zones, which are based on the sun's position in the sky, would best be divided by roughly longitudinal (North-to-South Pole) lines.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
However, this is not the case in practice, as the defined time zones tend to have very jagged boundaries. Since [[Randall]] knows he cannot fix the boundaries of the time zones, he instead &amp;quot;fixes&amp;quot; the world by making a map appear to match up with the time zone system. This results in bizarre distortions such as the large, gum-like strands of Greenland and enormous gulfs in parts of northern Russia.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The effect of this map is &amp;quot;punish&amp;quot; large countries with a single time zone - for instance, China, which uses UTC+8 across the whole country - and countries that share large time zones - for instance, almost all of Europe is packed into the Central European UTC+1 zone - by shrinking these down. Conversely, countries that span multiple time zones are stretched out - for example, the Democratic Republic of the Congo, as pointed out in the alt-text - as are those that belong to very small time zones - Finland and the Baltic states look huge because they are the only countries using the UTC+2 Eastern Europe time.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Other map projections distort countries this way as well, but based on their actual physical location as opposed to their position on imaginary time zones. The {{w|Mercator projection}} is infamous for distorting Greenland in this way, to the point that it appears to be larger than Africa despite being nowhere near the same size. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The title text lampoons the fact that the same phenomenon occurs on Randall's bad map projection, but for countries that do not tend to experience this on typical projections. Several smaller countries such as Finland, Mongolia, and the DRC, appear much larger than their actual size due to being stretched across time zone boundaries.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
See the [[#Table of countries and their timezones|table]] below for lots more information on the comic, but here are some further details.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Some countries look especially odd. Greenland gets some jutting out points - these are the towns of {{w|Danmarkshavn}} (UTC) and {{w|Ittoqqortoormiit}} (UTC-1), which use different time zones to the rest of the island - while Russia gets big holes in it in places where there is a 2 hour time zone difference between states. For instance, in reality {{w|Komi}} and {{w|Khanty-Mansi}} touch each other. However, Komi uses Moscow time (UTC+3) and Khanty-Mansi uses Yekaterinburg Time (UTC+5). There is no state between them using UTC+4, so Randall draws a big gap in northern Russia here.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The map is imperfect since it doesn't allow for half-hour time zones (India, for instance, is on UTC+5.5). Instead, countries that use fractional time zones are shifted so they straddle the two time zones, and are then marked with an asterisk (*). There's also no mention of daylight savings - all countries shown are given the base winter time. Depending on the time of year, countries will shift around - around June, many northern hemisphere countries will move east, while some southern hemisphere countries will move east around December. Randall attempts to preserve adjacencies where possible - for instance, Chad and Sudan are neighbors even though Chad uses West Africa Time (UTC+1) and Sudan uses East Africa Time (UTC+3). Randall draws an extremely thin strand connecting the countries though Central/South Africa Time (UTC+2), even though no part of Chad or Sudan uses this time. Similarly, a thin strand of Kazakhstan and Turkmenistan is shown projecting into the UTC+4 time zone in order to separate Russia and Iran, which do not really share a border.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Australia has most of these peculiar timezone as there is a section in the center of Australia with half hour time zone, so it's marked with the *, but it is not the entire country, so the * is not behind the name as it is for instance with India. also the only extra detail mentioned in the map is for Australia. It is the {{w|UTC%2B08:45|UTC+8:45}} time zone that are listed. It is used only by 5 roadhouses in South Australia and Western Australia covering a population of only a few hundred people.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are several labeling errors in the map. See [[#Errors|below]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Table of countries and their timezones==&lt;br /&gt;
*This table should include all countries not just those labeled.&lt;br /&gt;
**Also continents should be mentioned as they are also more or less distorted not necessarily depending on the distortion of the countries within.&lt;br /&gt;
*The labels used should be noted first, and the full country name (with wiki link) should be mentioned if abbreviations has been used in a bracket after.&lt;br /&gt;
*Timezone(s) for the country should be listed.&lt;br /&gt;
*Clear distortion shown in the image should be described&lt;br /&gt;
*Explanation for that based on timezone as well as other interesting details can be noted.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
! Country/Continent&lt;br /&gt;
! Timezone(s)&lt;br /&gt;
! Distortions&lt;br /&gt;
! Explanation&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Add more - just several examples made so far: ||  ||  ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| {{w|Europe}} (not labeled) || UTC+0 &amp;amp;ndash; UTC+3 || Compressed with the countries of central and western Europe pressed closer in east-west direction while eastern countries are stretched in all directions. ||&lt;br /&gt;
Portugal is the only country in mainland Europe which uses UTC+0 &amp;amp;ndash; that's why it sticks out a bit towards the British Isles which use UTC+0 as well. Iceland is here, too.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Most of Europe uses UTC+1 but these countries in reality spread over a much larger area than just one zone. This is why central and western countries are so compressed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The eastern countries (except Belarus and the European part of Russia but not the Kaliningrad enclave) use UTC+2. These are: Finland, Latvia, Estonia, Lithuania, Belarus, Moldova, Ukraine, Bulgaria, Romania and Greece. In reality, they occupy a smaller area on the map, but on Randall's map they are stretched to fill the UTC+2 zone strip.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Belarus, most of the European part of Russia and Crimea use UTC+3. See below for peculiarities regarding Russia and Ukraine.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Finland looks specifically distorted, partly because in reality it borders with Norway on the north, and Norway uses UTC+1. On Randall's map Norway is compressed into UTC+1 strip and Finland suddenly got some coast on Barents Sea. Poland (abbreviated ''POL.'' on the map) and Belarus (''BEL'') have common border but differ by two time zones, Poland uses UTC+1 but Belarus uses UTC+3 (Moscow time). Therefore on the map they have protruding 'tongues', touching one another, squeezed between Lithuania and Latvia on the north and Ukraine on the south. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Randall got Turkey a bit wrong, however: it's European part is stretched into UTC+2 zone, but in reality Turkey uses UTC+3 on its whole territory.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| {{w|Greenland}}|| UTC-4 &amp;amp;ndash; UTC+0  || Two landmasses strechted from the rest of the country || Greenland stretches from UTC-4 to UTC+0 with most of the country being UTC-3. UTC-4 is only applicable to Thule Air Base in the southern part of the Hayes-Peninsula, UTC-1 and UTC+0 is used in smaller areas on the east coast of Greenland. Even though UTC-2 is not used in Greenland at all, the country is depicted as a single landmass with two small strips of land connecting the UTC-1 and UTC+0 landmasses. These two strips should be considered infinitesimally thin but depicted to clarify the two areas are not separate islands but connected with the rest of Greenland.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| {{w|Russia}} || UTC+2 &amp;amp;ndash; UTC+12 || Three deep troughs almost cutting Russia in pieces, but not quite, also much longer at the normal|| Russia covers several timezones but also uses several, and should thus stay as large as normal. However, there are regions where it is only the southern parts of Russia that used a specific time zone, and two other regions above have a border whit two hours difference. This seems to occur three times explaining the troughs. (More on this and the length to the east needed)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| UK ({{w|United Kingdom}}) || UTC+0 || None || The country is fully within the single time zone used for the country. UK defined the timezones so their time zone is by definition the one with UTC+0 (or GMT).&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| {{w|Ukraine}} || UTC+2 (UTC+3 in disputed regions) || Crimea stretched from the rest of the country || Since the {{w|annexation of Crimea by the Russian Federation}}, the peninsula has used Moscow time (UTC+3). The sovereignty of Crimea is disputed, but it is currently ''de facto'' controlled by Russia, and Randall colors it like Russia. Two breakaway provinces in the east, Donetsk and Luhansk, also use Moscow time. These are not shown.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Copy this line and the line above  and set in directly under another entry ||  ||  ||&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Transcript==&lt;br /&gt;
{{incomplete transcript|All the names on the countries}}&lt;br /&gt;
:[This transcript will note everything readable from the 2x zoom version found by clicking the comic on xkcd.]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[Caption at the top of the panel:]&lt;br /&gt;
:Bad map projection #79:&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;big&amp;gt;Time Zones&amp;lt;/big&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:Where each country '''''should''''' be, based on its time zone(&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;s&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[Below the caption there is a map of the world divided and colored by political boundaries, with outlines around each continent in black and around each country in dark gray. Antarctica is not included. Bodies of water are white, and countries in pale shades of red, orange, yellow, green, blue, and purple. The map is clearly distorted, with Europa and Africa in the center, but not all continents or countries looks wrong. Africa, Australia and North America seems least distorted. But the bottom part of of South America is very slim, Greenland has two chewing gum like blobs stretched away from it to the right, Iceland is over the UK, and most of Europe has been compressed. Finland though is too large. In Africa especially Dem. Rep. the Congo has been enlarged. The worst distortion is in Asia, where especially Russia looks weird with three deep troughs down the length of the country and the end to the right seems to be much longer than usually. But also China is completely wrong as it has been compressed, Mongolia taking up most of its usual position.]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[Most countries over a certain size have their name listed in a gray font. Small countries like Ireland and Haiti has their name listed because it can be noted in the oceans around them. Most other countries have the name inside the country, but if there is not enough room abbreviation are used like Germany which has Ger. noted. There are though several small countries in the middle of Europa which has no name, as there are simply not enough space for even an abbreviation. This is countries like Belgium, The Netherlands and Denmark a long the coast towards England (with not enough Ocean space either for the name) and the small central countries like Austria, Switzerland and Luxembourg. There are also a few specialties mentioned when time zones are not divided in full hours, for instance a foot note regarding half hour time zones. Below all the mentioned countries will be listed starting from the left, going through each (political) continent from top left and down, and the same for each country in the continent:]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[North America:]&lt;br /&gt;
:Canada&lt;br /&gt;
:United States&lt;br /&gt;
:Mexico&lt;br /&gt;
:Cuba&lt;br /&gt;
:Haiti&lt;br /&gt;
:Jam.&lt;br /&gt;
:D.R&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[Central America:]&lt;br /&gt;
:Gua.&lt;br /&gt;
:Hon.&lt;br /&gt;
:Nic.&lt;br /&gt;
:CR.&lt;br /&gt;
:Pan.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[South America:]&lt;br /&gt;
:Columbia&lt;br /&gt;
:...&lt;br /&gt;
:&lt;br /&gt;
:Argentina&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[Europa:]&lt;br /&gt;
:Greenland&lt;br /&gt;
:Iceland&lt;br /&gt;
:Ireland&lt;br /&gt;
:UK&lt;br /&gt;
:Norway&lt;br /&gt;
:...&lt;br /&gt;
:&lt;br /&gt;
:&lt;br /&gt;
:Bulgaria&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[Africa:]&lt;br /&gt;
:W.S.&lt;br /&gt;
:Algeria&lt;br /&gt;
:Tunis&lt;br /&gt;
:...&lt;br /&gt;
:&lt;br /&gt;
:&lt;br /&gt;
:&lt;br /&gt;
:South Africa&lt;br /&gt;
:Madagascar&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[Asia:]&lt;br /&gt;
:Russia&lt;br /&gt;
:&lt;br /&gt;
:&lt;br /&gt;
:...&lt;br /&gt;
:Iran*&lt;br /&gt;
:Afghanistan*&lt;br /&gt;
:...&lt;br /&gt;
:&lt;br /&gt;
:...&lt;br /&gt;
:Russia&lt;br /&gt;
:...&lt;br /&gt;
:&lt;br /&gt;
:...&lt;br /&gt;
:India*&lt;br /&gt;
:Nepal*&lt;br /&gt;
:...&lt;br /&gt;
:Bur*&lt;br /&gt;
:...&lt;br /&gt;
:&lt;br /&gt;
:&lt;br /&gt;
:...&lt;br /&gt;
:China&lt;br /&gt;
:N.K*&lt;br /&gt;
:S.K.&lt;br /&gt;
:Japan&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[Oceania:]&lt;br /&gt;
:Malaysia&lt;br /&gt;
:Indonesia&lt;br /&gt;
:Philippines&lt;br /&gt;
:Papua New Guinea&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[Australia. In the country there is a star * in the middle of it above the name:]&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;*&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:Australia&lt;br /&gt;
:New Zealand&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[Below Australia there is an arrow pointing to a pointing the south cost and below that a foot note for the stars * used above:]&lt;br /&gt;
:UTC +8:45&lt;br /&gt;
:(One small area)&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;*&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;=Half-hour offset&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Errors===&lt;br /&gt;
* Randall mixes up Morocco and Western Sahara (a disputed territory)&lt;br /&gt;
* {{w|East Thrace}}, the European portion of Turkey, is shown in Eastern European time (UTC+2). Actually, like the rest of Turkey, it uses UTC+3&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{comic discussion}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Large drawings]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Comics with color]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Maps]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Bad Map Projections]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>141.101.107.18</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:1793:_Soda_Sugar_Comparisons&amp;diff=134645</id>
		<title>Talk:1793: Soda Sugar Comparisons</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:1793:_Soda_Sugar_Comparisons&amp;diff=134645"/>
				<updated>2017-02-01T13:21:54Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;141.101.107.18: Crème != Creme&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&amp;lt;!--Please sign your posts with ~~~~--&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
And that's why I don't really drink soda.  [[User:Cardboardmech|Cardboardmech]] ([[User talk:Cardboardmech|talk]]) 06:30, 1 February 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:...sadly, coke zero costs as much as normal coke, despite one having 0% sugar, and thus, give the body zero energy. No financial incentive to switch. :D --[[Special:Contributions/162.158.150.76|162.158.150.76]] 10:52, 1 February 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Stellar work from [[User:Schroduck|Schroduck]] but can we get a better idea of the calories in a candy counter. We're looking at approx 3000 candy bars (a catering box holds 48 bars, is designed to be usable for display and about 2 bars wide) ballpark figures though so not adding the edit yet, but 3 tiers of boxes would be about right [[User:Luckykaa|Luckykaa]] ([[User talk:Luckykaa|talk]]) 09:26, 1 February 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Thanks! I did a bit of digging, and updated the data. It looks like it significantly overestimates the sugar (''if'' the display only holds chocolate/candy and not, say, sugar-free gum). [[User:Schroduck|Schroduck]] ([[User talk:Schroduck|talk]]) 11:56, 1 February 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One issue I have personally with these comparison are that it is easy to get huge numbers just by adding time. However, in this case, if you translate this into body fat it does make sense. Another tangent: Eating an orange is 9 grams of sugar according to google sources. 7 oranges per day is a lot of fruit. Throwing this out there for anyone to play with. [[Special:Contributions/141.101.80.214|141.101.80.214]] 11:07, 1 February 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The page mentions &amp;quot;Crème eggs.&amp;quot; While this is a common autocorrect, Cadbury don't use this on their packaging. Confusingly, this appears to be the case in the USA as well, even though Hershey on its website uses it. Can someone find a citation to confirm or deny that this this is ever the correct spelling? Also, don't drink soda. Really. --[[Special:Contributions/141.101.107.18|141.101.107.18]] 13:21, 1 February 2017 (UTC)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>141.101.107.18</name></author>	</entry>

	</feed>