<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=141.101.98.243</id>
		<title>explain xkcd - User contributions [en]</title>
		<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=141.101.98.243"/>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php/Special:Contributions/141.101.98.243"/>
		<updated>2026-06-24T14:18:00Z</updated>
		<subtitle>User contributions</subtitle>
		<generator>MediaWiki 1.30.0</generator>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:3022:_Making_Tea&amp;diff=359220</id>
		<title>Talk:3022: Making Tea</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:3022:_Making_Tea&amp;diff=359220"/>
				<updated>2024-12-12T09:47:36Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;141.101.98.243: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&amp;lt;!--Please sign your posts with ~~~~ and don't delete this text. New comments should be added at the bottom.--&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
I wonder where [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boston_Tea_Party making it in Boston Harbor, at ambient temperature, at scale] would fit on this scale. [[Special:Contributions/172.70.206.162|172.70.206.162]] 04:38, 10 December 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
: A little to the left of the microwave thing. [[Special:Contributions/162.158.186.252|162.158.186.252]] 05:14, 10 December 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:: Oh, no, much further to the right. You stole our colony from us, set up some tinpot, pretended 'country' in its place, and you didn't even have the class to make a decent cup of tea first. [[Special:Contributions/172.68.205.93|12.68.205.93]] 06:24, 10 December 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:: And, even if [https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-68085304 this guy] is right, ''way'' too much salt... [[Special:Contributions/172.70.91.130|172.70.91.130]] 07:03, 10 December 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::: Soyuz nyerushimyy respublik svobodnik... [[User:DollarStoreBa&amp;amp;#39;al|DollarStoreBa&amp;amp;#39;al]] ([[User talk:DollarStoreBa&amp;amp;#39;al|talk]]) 14:13, 10 December 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::: Well maybe if you didnt force us to buy discounted tea from you after fighting a war for us, we wouldn't be in this situation. [[User:Apollo11|Apollo11]] ([[User talk:Apollo11|talk]]) 15:43, 10 December 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::::: Yeah, a tiny island should not have that much control over a fractionable part of a continent [[User:Danger Kitty|Danger Kitty]] ([[User talk:Danger Kitty|talk]])&lt;br /&gt;
:::::: EXACTLY, it's not like you funded the voyages, sent supplies to the colonies, or protected us from the French, or anything. [[User:Apollo11|Apollo11]] ([[User talk:Apollo11|talk]]) 14:59, 11 December 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
: I would like to as a british person to corroborate this, in the 80's my Dad visited the USA (he did go to florida) and still is complaining that the freshly boiled water wasn't poured directly onto the tea bag but was instead the tea bag and the hot water(now luke warm water) and bag was delivered separately!!! The delivery of freshly boiling water on to the bag is the major issue with microwaves, not the nucleation thing in my experience. Bear in mind I don't even actually like tea, still care enough to right this, but i'll be signing this anonymously to avoid shame being bought on my family and my family's familys. Murderous royals are a lot less popular the tea [[Special:Contributions/108.162.245.227|108.162.245.227]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: I first visited the US in 1980.  A friend who was with hate coffee and was horrified when he ordered tea that he got the water and the tea bag separately.  When he suggested they add the water as soon as it was boiled, the wait staff thought he was joking.  Many years later in Texas, a waiter asked me why I, a Brit, was drinking coffee, not tea.  &amp;quot;You don't know how to make it,&amp;quot; I replied.  (In my house, the electric kettle and teapot sit next to each other on the kitchen worktop.)--[[Special:Contributions/172.70.160.135|172.70.160.135]] 09:22, 10 December 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
When I make ramen, I put the measuring cup in the microwave. Fight me. [[Special:Contributions/162.158.167.87|162.158.167.87]] 05:35, 10 December 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
: On behalf of the British Empire: whateva.  [[User:Kev|Kev]] ([[User talk:Kev|talk]]) 18:28, 10 December 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;...to the point virtually every home has an electric tea kettle as a standard appliance&amp;quot;. If I'm reading it correctly, this and the comic suggests we (though not I, as I'm not a tea-drinker) make tea ''in the electric kettle''. Electric tea-urns, yes, or maybe a setup like a samovar. But, generally, the kettle itself (and, so far as I'm aware, always with an electric kettle) is used to heat the water, which you then pour into the tea''pot'' into which the requisite number of tealeaves/teabags are also put to steep. (Or, for the lazy way, into the mug-with-teabag.) I wouldn't be able to use my electric kettle to (for example) make my instant mashed-potato into the actual mash, if I'd have regularly used it to mash tea. Or top up the boiling saucepan that I'd realised I'd not quite enough water in to cover the pasta/vegetables/whatever. Or to easily add nust a little more heat (with less new water) to the washing-up bowl than would be possible from the hot tap, back to as hot as possible without scalding me. – Whether intentional or not, I suspect Randall has the role of kettle and teapot mixed up, and so (without the intent to parody) has the editor who wrote the above. [[Special:Contributions/172.70.160.135|172.70.160.135]] 05:49, 10 December 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
: Agree, we make tea in a mug using water from a kettle.  I'd be furious if an American made tea in my kettle, how will I then make up my instant Nescafe? [[User:Kev|Kev]] ([[User talk:Kev|talk]]) 18:28, 10 December 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I don't think the section on 'Boiling the water in a pot' refers to a teapot - I think it means boiling the water in a pot on the hob, and then making tea with it (in a pot/mug). [[Special:Contributions/172.69.195.27|172.69.195.27]] 07:53, 10 December 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:I agree, but I also think there's a language issue with the use of pot vs. pan that makes things more confusing. I think there are several types of cookware that Americans call pot and British call pan. So British would not say they boil water in a pot but rather in a saucepan (if there's no kettle available of course). [[User:Mtcv|Mtcv]] ([[User talk:Mtcv|talk]]) 09:03, 10 December 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I (as Brit) am uncommon in using an electric filter coffee machine to make tea (two bags in what is supposed to be the coffee filter). Set up, press the button and come back to a not jug of fresh tea which is not stewed. If later, the hot plate has shut off and it is cold, you can zap it in a mug in the microwave. [[User:RIIW - Ponder it|RIIW - Ponder it]] ([[User talk:RIIW - Ponder it|talk]]) 08:11, 10 December 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
: As another brit, what? I do not understand the mechanics of this, please elaborate. Additionally, my understanding is that the water would be *briefly acquainted* with the tea, thus would be a poor facsimile of &amp;quot;tea&amp;quot; and would rather be closer to something the americans would attempt. [[Special:Contributions/141.101.99.126|141.101.99.126]] 11:46, 10 December 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::I did say 'uncommon' but Kenwood made a coffee/tea machine to do this. It sounds like it shouldn't work, but 167 below has the basics right. [[User:RIIW - Ponder it|RIIW - Ponder it]] ([[User talk:RIIW - Ponder it|talk]]) 09:13, 11 December 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::I'm guessing the water would drip on to the teabags, then soak all the way through them and drip out into the jug, without allowing sufficient to accumulate that it would run straight out without passing fully through the bag. It's an intriguing idea. But most definitely wrong.[[Special:Contributions/172.70.85.239|172.70.85.239]] 17:15, 10 December 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Your guess is right. It works because the (finely cut) leaves are exposed to boiling hot water for a few minutes, you wouldn't drink any before you have half a jug and that is quite 'bright'. Better than a teabag in a mug! Want it stronger, use more bags. Big advantage - you set it up, press button, come back in 5 to 25 minutes and your tea is waiting, including a second mug, not and not stewed. Wrong - but works so right. [[User:RIIW - Ponder it|RIIW - Ponder it]] ([[User talk:RIIW - Ponder it|talk]]) 09:13, 11 December 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thanks, [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_yMMTVVJI4c Technology Connections]! [[Special:Contributions/141.101.109.167|141.101.109.167]] 09:51, 10 December 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You Westerners have literally no idea how to make proper, good tea!  SMH [[User:TPS|TPS]] ([[User talk:TPS|talk]]) 13:00, 10 December 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As a Brit who grew up in sight of the Yorkshire Tea factory – and worked there on occasion – and having travelled very widely around the world – including in the US – I feel I'm supposed to have an opinion. However, I have ''never'' encountered the microwaving of water as mentioned here, and I would not object to it as supposedly problematic for tea-quality reasons. I'd object for reasons of common sense. What mystifies me is the idea that kettles are tea-specific. They are for heating water, not making tea. Coffee uses hot water. Pasta, rice and potatoes use hot water. Peas, carrots, cabbage, sweetcorn... &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Baking bread often involves a pan of steaming water in the oven.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;But I can boil water in a pan for cooking pasta or vegetables.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Yes, but you'll be waiting a l-o-o-o-ng time. I'll heat my water in the kettle, pour it into the now-hot pan, cook my pasta, and I'll be eating before your water is boiling. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A kettle is not a tea-making item any more than a frying pan is an omelette-making item; tea is simply one of the things you can make with water from a kettle. Hot water is a basic civilised human commodity, predating recorded history. That we should live in a mechanised world, and the Consumer Nation doesn't have water-boiling appliances as standard (saying instead &amp;quot;I don't have a kettle because I don't drink tea&amp;quot;) is ludicrous. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Using a microwave rather than buying a kettle is a bit like not buying a hammer for driving in nails because you've got a big pair of pliers that will do. Sure, they're heavy lumps of metal than live in your toolbag, but they're not the right thing. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Brits, incidentally, are not tea lovers. They are prolific consumers of awful tea that actual tea lovers wouldn't use for cleaning their drains. The most enthusiastic tea enthusiasts I've ever met were from Maryland.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It's all just social ceremony in the UK. Milk first, tea first, must use a saucer, must use a pot...tea is a British religion, not a British drink. [[User:Yorkshire Pudding|Yorkshire Pudding]] ([[User talk:Yorkshire Pudding|talk]]) 14:23, 10 December 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
: How long does it take you to boil water for, let's say enough water for four people's worth of pasta, using an electric kettle?  I reckon that's about 4 liters of water?  I'm genuinely curious.  Now also double the time, because as mentioned in the explanation, American outlets produce half the power of British outlets.  And let me not fail to mention that almost all American homes have either special higher power outlets for stoves or gas powered stoves, and frequently have special high-power outlets for microwaves as well.  4 liters of water to boil takes about 5-6 minutes on a low-end American stove, about 3-4 minutes on a gas stove, and about 2 minutes on an induction stove.  None of which strikes me as a particularly long time, especially when the most popular varieties of pasta in America all need to be boiled for 8+ minutes. How does this compare to twice the length of time as your electric kettle?  Because if your Electric Kettle actually allows you to be eating your pasta before our water has even boiled, that would require your kettle to boil water in around -2min to -6min. And if your electric kettle can time travel, then that is truly an astonishing device.  Honestly my takeaway from this is that British Stoves must be apparently heated by a single candle if &amp;quot;boiling water for pasta&amp;quot; is considered to take a &amp;quot;l-o-o-o-ng time&amp;quot;. {{unsigned ip|162.158.126.161|21:51, 10 December 2024 (UTC)}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I wonder what the Brits would feel about repurposing a single-cup coffee maker.  These days, I usually put a tea bag in a mug and place it in a Keurig machine and run it (without a K-cup, of course) to deliver the hot water.  Probably the wrong temperature, but fast and easy and the result is good enough.  [[User:Shamino|Shamino]] ([[User talk:Shamino|talk]]) 14:52, 10 December 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Would any British person care to evaluate my tea making practices? Boil water in electric kettle. Pour water over teabag, allow to steep, remove teabag. Add sugar and ice cubes. [[User:RegularSizedGuy|RegularSizedGuy]] ([[User talk:RegularSizedGuy|talk]]) 15:54, 10 December 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:...well, seems a fairly standard &amp;quot;making one mug of tea for oneself&amp;quot; process. It lacks a milk-adding stage (thus no arguments about whether before or after the water). Removing the teabag at that point probably means it's not going to become a Builders' Brew, which is your choicd. Sugar is ok. And... Waitwhat... ''Ice Cubes?!?'' ...can I get back to you on that? [[Special:Contributions/172.70.162.163|172.70.162.163]] 17:50, 10 December 2024 (UTC)  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I can confirm (by inadvertent experiments conducted on flatmates) that they indeed do not like tea being make in the kettle.  What really makes them angry though is making coffee in the teapot.  It ruins the taste of the teapot forever apparently.  There is also a faction that insists that a teapot should never be washed, and washing it invokes a lesser anger.[[User:Gopher|Gopher]] ([[User talk:Gopher|talk]]) 15:56, 10 December 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:This is a source of tension in our house, where we are one washer and one non-washer![[Special:Contributions/141.101.98.243|141.101.98.243]] 09:45, 12 December 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On rare occasions where I don't have a kettle available, I use a microwave oven to boil water for tea. But it doesn't look and taste quite the same, and often leaves an ugly foam at the surface when the tea bag is added. This phenomenon is investigated here: https://cooking.stackexchange.com/a/22264. So the British might be right... Disclaimer: I'm neither from the UK nor from the US. [[Special:Contributions/172.69.68.126|172.69.68.126]] 16:16, 10 December 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There is a [https://www.tumblr.com/elodieunderglass/669449994039853056/wizardlyghost-silverjirachi-pidoop tumblr thread] about the topic of teamaking in microwaves, kettles, etc. Funnily enough it showed up in my Instagram reels feed just a few hours before this comic was posted. I was thinking perhaps Randall saw it too and was inspired by it? Both of them have to deal with the different ways of making tea and how &amp;quot;absurd&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;unconventional&amp;quot; (etc.) they are. Even if Randall didn't have it in mind, it's certainly a funny little coincidence. [[User:Pie Guy|Pie Guy]] ([[User talk:Pie Guy|talk]]) 16:36, 10 December 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I'm guessing my occasional summertime practice of filling a gallon jar with water and lots of tea bags, setting it on the back porch in the sun for a few hours until the water turns dark brown, then putting the whole thing in the refrigerator and later drinking it over ice would be toward the more angry end of the spectrum.[[Special:Contributions/172.70.126.204|172.70.126.204]] 16:39, 10 December 2024 (UTC)Pat&lt;br /&gt;
:I think the &amp;quot;in the sun for a few hours&amp;quot; part might just be too incomprehensible to most of us, here in Britain. If we ''have'' a few hours of sun (and we're not abroad and deliberately sunburning ourselves on the beach/beside the pool in our week at the Costa Lotta budget-all-inclusivs holiday) then we're either fuming at our workdesks complaining about the louts stripping down to their shirtsleeves and splashing in the town-centre fountains or we're on our lunch-break and we ''are'' the louts stripping down to our shirtsleeves and splashing in the town-centre fountains. In neither case would sun-stewed tea be a priority. [[Special:Contributions/172.70.162.163|172.70.162.163]] 17:50, 10 December 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Perhaps it's worth to mention how dangerous it is to boil water in a microwave. https://tastecooking.com/dangerous-microwave-water/&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Mestafais|Mestafais]] ([[User talk:Mestafais|talk]]) 15:22, 10 December 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:I have a &amp;gt;5 inch burn scar on my forearm, to arrest to that. [[User:ProphetZarquon|ProphetZarquon]] ([[User talk:ProphetZarquon|talk]]) 14:21, 11 December 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::I know most Brits would consider it criminal, but I didn't realise you could actually be arrested for it.[[Special:Contributions/141.101.98.243|141.101.98.243]] 09:47, 12 December 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are several comics with unmarked scales. It would be interesting if the descriptions started using pixels to point where each mark is along the line. As a rough estimate, the four points mentioned here are at X-values: 90px, 115px, 345px, and 645px, indicating that the pot method is 10% as infuriating as the chalice method - or that making tea in a pot ten times would be equally as infuriating as making it once in a chalice (at least, assuming the kettle method causes zero furons. I know of {{w|hedons and dolors}}. I guess 'furons' are a unit of fury, right? [[Special:Contributions/172.70.46.236|172.70.46.236]] 16:11, 10 December 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Interesting to see the interest in editing this. Had a quick check of the last ten comics, looking at the number of edits made in the first 14 hours (the exact time this page has been around, as of me starting the check) and in total, and extrapolated to edits/day (in the case of total edits, both just to the latest edit and right up to 'now'). Thought it'd be interesting to give you my results (assuming I tallied/etc correctly)...&lt;br /&gt;
*3022 - 14hr: '''61''' ('''105'''/day); Total: 61 ('''105/day...''')&lt;br /&gt;
*3021 - 14hr: 23 (39/day); Total: 39 (11/day -&amp;gt; 10/day)&lt;br /&gt;
*3020 - 14hr: 22 (38/day); Total: 36 (10/day -&amp;gt; 6/day)&lt;br /&gt;
*3019 - 14hr: 28 (48/day); Total: 54 (17/day -&amp;gt; 7/day)&lt;br /&gt;
*3018 - 14hr: 14 (24/day); Total: 48 (4/day -&amp;gt; 4/day)&lt;br /&gt;
*3017 - 14hr: 29 (50/day); Total: 33 (32/day -&amp;gt; 3/day)&lt;br /&gt;
*3016 - 14hr: 28 (48/day); Total: 46 (4/day -&amp;gt; 3/day)&lt;br /&gt;
*3015 - 14hr: 20 (32/day); Total: '''83''' (5/day -&amp;gt; 5/day)&lt;br /&gt;
*3014 - 14hr: 40 (69/day); Total: 66 (16/day -&amp;gt; 3/day)&lt;br /&gt;
*3013 - 14hr: 36 (61/day); Total: 68 (3/day -&amp;gt; 3/day)&lt;br /&gt;
...of course, the first 14 hours probably biases to British readers/editors, and it was too fiddly to add up ''|bytes changed per edit|'' as a more useful metric than mere number of pokes. But quite a bit of interest we already have here. More edits in fourteen hours than any other article less than fourteen (indeed, 17!) days old... ;) Seems to have really hit a mark, this subject! [[Special:Contributions/172.69.195.201|172.69.195.201]] 19:21, 10 December 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:This one is super weird. I may be weirdness incarnate... but... [[User:Maybe Bill Cipher|An anonymous Gravity Falls expert]] ([[User talk:Maybe Bill Cipher|talk]]) 19:33, 10 December 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Well obviously. I mean this one ''really'' matters![[Special:Contributions/141.101.98.23|141.101.98.23]] 08:52, 11 December 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I would argue that the more pessimistic interpretation of the two low-end options makes sense, rather than the more generous versions offered in the current explanation. I think the first one does literally mean making tea in the kettle, and the second one does mean boiling water in a teapot. Making tea *using* a kettle isn't anything to get mad about, it's the default practice. That should put it at the zero point of the line, but it isn't, it's to the right. On the other hand, obviously making tea *in* the kettle would incite a modest amount of rage (on the scale of zero to microwaving a mug), and it makes sense that boiling water in a teapot would incite about 50% more, as shown.[[Special:Contributions/172.69.134.160|172.69.134.160]] 19:51, 10 December 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
: An American making tea in the correct way by boiling water in the kettle and then pouring that into a teapot with the tea would still probably conspire to make it badly and make the Brit angry. And Brits really do get quite upset about the idea of tea made with water boiled in a stovetop pan.[[Special:Contributions/141.101.98.23|141.101.98.23]] 08:55, 11 December 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There is a standard for making tea, ISO 3103: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ISO_3103, and apparently from the Royal Society of Chemistry.&lt;br /&gt;
And, of course, it must be really hot for in infinite improbability drive to work properly.&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Lordpishky|Lordpishky]] ([[User talk:Lordpishky|talk]]) 20:24, 10 December 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
All this blather and not one bit about that quintessential Kiwi staple, [https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/gumboot_tea gumboot tea]. Boil the kettle (about the size of a Dutch oven), throw in handfuls of leaf black tea, and let it sit until consumed. Reheat as needed. One sip, and the source of the Commonwealth aversion to the insane Yankee habit of drinking tea black is immediately apparent. [[Special:Contributions/172.70.123.8|172.70.123.8]] 20:31, 10 December 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
So, I have a Quooker that boils my water. Add tea (leaves)... done. But *don't* add milk, please.... spoil... {{unsigned|Palmpje|20:50, 10 December 2024 (UTC)}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''Ultimately, the real difference comes down to convenience: In the USA, the standard voltage for electric appliances (including an electric kettle) is 120 volts, while it is twice that (240 volts in practice, though nominally 230V) in the UK. Since the amperage for an electric kettle is the the same in both countries (15 amps), this means that an equivalent kettle in the UK has twice the power (3.2kw versus 1.6kw), and can heat the water in a fraction of the time. Meanwhile, a standard microwave has a similar power in both countries (from 700 to 1000 watts), for reasons unrelated to the supply voltage it is equipped to use. Therefore, heating a small cup in a microwave might take a few moments longer than a kettle in the USA, but is many times slower to wait for compared to using an electric kettle in the UK.'' Electric kettles are a bit faster in the UK due to the voltage difference, but it's not that much and I highly doubt speed is the main concern here. The main 'convenience' difference between boiling water in a kettle vs a microwave is quantity: Brits usually don't just make one cup/mug of tea! On the rare occasion Americans drink tea, it's more often just the one person drinking one cup, making a microwave a convenient choice.[[Special:Contributions/162.158.233.90|162.158.233.90]] 21:40, 10 December 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Add in some [https://www.foodandwine.com/why-you-should-add-salt-to-tea-8549735 salt]! '''[[User:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:9pt;color:#A9C6CA&amp;quot;&amp;gt;42.book.addict&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:6pt;color:#516874&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Talk to me!&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;''' 21:44, 10 December 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It's not about voltage. They use different gauge heater wire to get the Watts wanted/allowed. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The classic UK plug is nominal 13 Amps. (The circuits may be nominal 16A but there is now better insulation than in 1949.) At 230 Volts that would be 3KW (near enuff). That will be the &amp;quot;legal numbers&amp;quot;. At 240V it may be 3,250W true. OTOH a 10V sag might be expected in all but the poshest wall-wiring. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
amazon.co.uk sells kettles nearly all rated 3KW. Exceptions are Greepas at 1800W (&amp;quot;However, some customers have reported that it's very slow to boil&amp;quot;); also Philips 2200W, Daewoo 1400W, and OLEGA 1500W 'Fast Boiling'.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
OTOH!!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On Amazon US site nearly all kettles are 1500W, a few lower like 1100W. At assumed 120V 1500W is 12.5Amps. 15Amp circuits are still common in older houses (despite changes in 1960s) but we supposed to de-rate for 'long-running' (not clearly specified in old code) so 12 Amps is in a ballpark. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Note that all US kettles are lower power than all but the tamest UK kettles. Essentially half power. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
And IIRC, the 13/16A rating which allows super-power kettles in the UK was not for tea but for &amp;quot;electric fire&amp;quot;, room heat. In post-War rebuilding, smokey coal was already depreciated in cities, steam plumbing and chimneys are expensive. Copper wire is costly too, but you &amp;quot;have&amp;quot; to have electric, and low-cost plans like ring-main were investigated.&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:PRR|PRR]] ([[User talk:PRR|talk]]) 22:44, 10 December 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;accept that tea-appropriate boiling water can be obtained directly from the sink's plumbing&amp;quot; - unless it comes out literally at boiling temperature, it isn't tea appropriate. I live in France now, and order catering bags of tea from Amazon because French tea is dismally awful, not helped at all by this fairly widespread belief that black tea steeps at 60C. When I share tea bags with friends, I have to keep reminding them, boiling! Boiling! So, see, there are worse things than using a microwave to heat the water... [[Special:Contributions/172.71.126.208|172.71.126.208]] 06:00, 11 December 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Not boiling - OFF boiling. Higher than 60C, yes, but if you put actually boiling water straight on to the tea (or worse, boil the water with the tea in it), that's at least as bad. (And how far off the boil exactly depends on the type of tea.) [[Special:Contributions/141.101.98.22|141.101.98.22]] 09:00, 11 December 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What's up with the &amp;quot;We want to ensure'''[sic]''' the good people of the U.K&amp;quot;?&lt;br /&gt;
I really can't see the US Embassy insuring them for any amount, so what gives? [[User:Ryden|Ryden]] ([[User talk:Ryden|talk]]) 12:27, 11 December 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Came here to make the same note. “Ensure” is not misspelled, why is it marked with “[sic]”? [[User:Dúthomhas|Dúthomhas]] ([[User talk:Dúthomhas|talk]]) 12:40, 11 December 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::It's the wrong word entirely for the longer sentence. They perhaps wished to ''assure'' the good people, etc... &amp;quot;Ensure&amp;quot; means to &amp;quot;check and fix&amp;quot; something, in the way this is connected to &amp;quot;the good people&amp;quot; (implying that ''they'' would be changed to deal with any discrepancy of expectations), but this reading also goes wrong by the &amp;quot;that&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
::In the sense of making a pledge (probably the actual intent), the structure is all wrong and probably was hastily reworded from a different narrative path, but left half-and-half and not making sense. My most minimal rewording for this would be &amp;quot;We want to ensure &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;to&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; the good people of the U.K. that ...&amp;quot;, but it still reads very awkwardly. Perhaps it always made more sense to the average 'Merkin (c.f. &amp;quot;write me&amp;quot; instead of &amp;quot;write &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;to&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; me&amp;quot;), but I still would have written &amp;quot;assure&amp;quot; (as attempt to be comforting) or &amp;quot;pledge to&amp;quot; (for a more fervent sincerity of positive action).&lt;br /&gt;
::And to &amp;quot;insure&amp;quot; (for British English) is different yet again. While not working at all in the full sentence, it would start to suggest the actual possibility of such wrongness happening, but with the promise of monetary (or other) compensation if it does. [[Special:Contributions/141.101.98.149|141.101.98.149]] 15:43, 11 December 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Question: Does the obsession with tea apply to all of Britain equally? E.g. are the Scottish just as stereotypicly known for loving tea as the English? This comic immediately brings Arthur Dent to my mind, and he's Very English Indeed. (&amp;quot;A liquid almost but not quite entirely unlike tea&amp;quot; is missing somewhere in the left third of the comic. :) --an intrigued German [[Special:Contributions/172.71.148.103|172.71.148.103]] 14:35, 11 December 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:The four nations probably have had a similar outlook, but everyone may have had different social reasons. Tea-totalling perhaps was the initial driver in the more methodist corners, to get working people not to drink too much beer/cider/gin. The high social status version of regency ladies. It then sort of met in the middle by the time of the tea-ladies trolleying around refreshments to boardrooms and factory floors alike, in the same building.&lt;br /&gt;
:For WW2, the British government's demand for tea supplies was at least as important as ammunition. All British tanks apparently had (and continue to have) a hot-water boiler in the crew comparatment (not just for tea, but, probably the main thing at times). Official worries about tea [http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/7382750.stm lasted beyond that era].&lt;br /&gt;
:Generalising for everyone ''now'' is probably wrong, but visiting elderly relatives all over the UK, I'd ''always'' be passed a cup of tea (and a plate of cakes, or biscuits, placed temptingly close at hand). A pity that I never really liked tea (the cakes/biscuits are a bonus and a mitigating factor, but politeness demands that I throttle back my desires in that direction). [[Special:Contributions/141.101.98.149|141.101.98.149]] 15:43, 11 December 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Boy, they ''really'' get mad when you microwave the Chalice. [[User:ProphetZarquon|ProphetZarquon]] ([[User talk:ProphetZarquon|talk]]) 14:18, 11 December 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:I think putting metal in the microwave is probably frowned upon worldwide. (Unless you're an ex-Navy Seal and cook who has found your ship taken over by mercenaries with a mad plan. Then go ahead.) [[Special:Contributions/162.158.74.119|162.158.74.119]] 16:07, 11 December 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I find that Brits really hate it when you bring up the concept of sweet tea, during the summer my family would fill up a jug with water add some tea bags then leave it on the porch over night. [[User:Resign|Resign]] ([[User talk:Resign|talk]]) 07:35, 12 December 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This is the most comprehensively explained comic in a while 😂 I guess there are a lot of passionate tea-makers around here. As a non-tea-drinker living in a Commonwealth country, I have definitely heard the outrageous stereotype that Americans microwave their water. Definitely practical when you don't own a kettle, but slow when brewing for a group. [[User:Alcatraz ii|Alcatraz ii]] ([[User talk:Alcatraz ii|talk]]) 08:07, 12 December 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Would the small metal piece that sticks together the label of the teabag at the end of the string be an issue when microwaved (with the water or seperately)? Or is too small for that? (I know not all teabags have that, especially british &amp;quot;black tea&amp;quot; often comes in packages without string, but my usual tea does have it...) --[[User:Lupo|Lupo]] ([[User talk:Lupo|talk]]) 08:59, 12 December 2024 (UTC)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>141.101.98.243</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:3022:_Making_Tea&amp;diff=359219</id>
		<title>Talk:3022: Making Tea</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:3022:_Making_Tea&amp;diff=359219"/>
				<updated>2024-12-12T09:45:54Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;141.101.98.243: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&amp;lt;!--Please sign your posts with ~~~~ and don't delete this text. New comments should be added at the bottom.--&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
I wonder where [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boston_Tea_Party making it in Boston Harbor, at ambient temperature, at scale] would fit on this scale. [[Special:Contributions/172.70.206.162|172.70.206.162]] 04:38, 10 December 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
: A little to the left of the microwave thing. [[Special:Contributions/162.158.186.252|162.158.186.252]] 05:14, 10 December 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:: Oh, no, much further to the right. You stole our colony from us, set up some tinpot, pretended 'country' in its place, and you didn't even have the class to make a decent cup of tea first. [[Special:Contributions/172.68.205.93|12.68.205.93]] 06:24, 10 December 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:: And, even if [https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-68085304 this guy] is right, ''way'' too much salt... [[Special:Contributions/172.70.91.130|172.70.91.130]] 07:03, 10 December 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::: Soyuz nyerushimyy respublik svobodnik... [[User:DollarStoreBa&amp;amp;#39;al|DollarStoreBa&amp;amp;#39;al]] ([[User talk:DollarStoreBa&amp;amp;#39;al|talk]]) 14:13, 10 December 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::: Well maybe if you didnt force us to buy discounted tea from you after fighting a war for us, we wouldn't be in this situation. [[User:Apollo11|Apollo11]] ([[User talk:Apollo11|talk]]) 15:43, 10 December 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::::: Yeah, a tiny island should not have that much control over a fractionable part of a continent [[User:Danger Kitty|Danger Kitty]] ([[User talk:Danger Kitty|talk]])&lt;br /&gt;
:::::: EXACTLY, it's not like you funded the voyages, sent supplies to the colonies, or protected us from the French, or anything. [[User:Apollo11|Apollo11]] ([[User talk:Apollo11|talk]]) 14:59, 11 December 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
: I would like to as a british person to corroborate this, in the 80's my Dad visited the USA (he did go to florida) and still is complaining that the freshly boiled water wasn't poured directly onto the tea bag but was instead the tea bag and the hot water(now luke warm water) and bag was delivered separately!!! The delivery of freshly boiling water on to the bag is the major issue with microwaves, not the nucleation thing in my experience. Bear in mind I don't even actually like tea, still care enough to right this, but i'll be signing this anonymously to avoid shame being bought on my family and my family's familys. Murderous royals are a lot less popular the tea [[Special:Contributions/108.162.245.227|108.162.245.227]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: I first visited the US in 1980.  A friend who was with hate coffee and was horrified when he ordered tea that he got the water and the tea bag separately.  When he suggested they add the water as soon as it was boiled, the wait staff thought he was joking.  Many years later in Texas, a waiter asked me why I, a Brit, was drinking coffee, not tea.  &amp;quot;You don't know how to make it,&amp;quot; I replied.  (In my house, the electric kettle and teapot sit next to each other on the kitchen worktop.)--[[Special:Contributions/172.70.160.135|172.70.160.135]] 09:22, 10 December 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
When I make ramen, I put the measuring cup in the microwave. Fight me. [[Special:Contributions/162.158.167.87|162.158.167.87]] 05:35, 10 December 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
: On behalf of the British Empire: whateva.  [[User:Kev|Kev]] ([[User talk:Kev|talk]]) 18:28, 10 December 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;...to the point virtually every home has an electric tea kettle as a standard appliance&amp;quot;. If I'm reading it correctly, this and the comic suggests we (though not I, as I'm not a tea-drinker) make tea ''in the electric kettle''. Electric tea-urns, yes, or maybe a setup like a samovar. But, generally, the kettle itself (and, so far as I'm aware, always with an electric kettle) is used to heat the water, which you then pour into the tea''pot'' into which the requisite number of tealeaves/teabags are also put to steep. (Or, for the lazy way, into the mug-with-teabag.) I wouldn't be able to use my electric kettle to (for example) make my instant mashed-potato into the actual mash, if I'd have regularly used it to mash tea. Or top up the boiling saucepan that I'd realised I'd not quite enough water in to cover the pasta/vegetables/whatever. Or to easily add nust a little more heat (with less new water) to the washing-up bowl than would be possible from the hot tap, back to as hot as possible without scalding me. – Whether intentional or not, I suspect Randall has the role of kettle and teapot mixed up, and so (without the intent to parody) has the editor who wrote the above. [[Special:Contributions/172.70.160.135|172.70.160.135]] 05:49, 10 December 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
: Agree, we make tea in a mug using water from a kettle.  I'd be furious if an American made tea in my kettle, how will I then make up my instant Nescafe? [[User:Kev|Kev]] ([[User talk:Kev|talk]]) 18:28, 10 December 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I don't think the section on 'Boiling the water in a pot' refers to a teapot - I think it means boiling the water in a pot on the hob, and then making tea with it (in a pot/mug). [[Special:Contributions/172.69.195.27|172.69.195.27]] 07:53, 10 December 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:I agree, but I also think there's a language issue with the use of pot vs. pan that makes things more confusing. I think there are several types of cookware that Americans call pot and British call pan. So British would not say they boil water in a pot but rather in a saucepan (if there's no kettle available of course). [[User:Mtcv|Mtcv]] ([[User talk:Mtcv|talk]]) 09:03, 10 December 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I (as Brit) am uncommon in using an electric filter coffee machine to make tea (two bags in what is supposed to be the coffee filter). Set up, press the button and come back to a not jug of fresh tea which is not stewed. If later, the hot plate has shut off and it is cold, you can zap it in a mug in the microwave. [[User:RIIW - Ponder it|RIIW - Ponder it]] ([[User talk:RIIW - Ponder it|talk]]) 08:11, 10 December 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
: As another brit, what? I do not understand the mechanics of this, please elaborate. Additionally, my understanding is that the water would be *briefly acquainted* with the tea, thus would be a poor facsimile of &amp;quot;tea&amp;quot; and would rather be closer to something the americans would attempt. [[Special:Contributions/141.101.99.126|141.101.99.126]] 11:46, 10 December 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::I did say 'uncommon' but Kenwood made a coffee/tea machine to do this. It sounds like it shouldn't work, but 167 below has the basics right. [[User:RIIW - Ponder it|RIIW - Ponder it]] ([[User talk:RIIW - Ponder it|talk]]) 09:13, 11 December 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::I'm guessing the water would drip on to the teabags, then soak all the way through them and drip out into the jug, without allowing sufficient to accumulate that it would run straight out without passing fully through the bag. It's an intriguing idea. But most definitely wrong.[[Special:Contributions/172.70.85.239|172.70.85.239]] 17:15, 10 December 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Your guess is right. It works because the (finely cut) leaves are exposed to boiling hot water for a few minutes, you wouldn't drink any before you have half a jug and that is quite 'bright'. Better than a teabag in a mug! Want it stronger, use more bags. Big advantage - you set it up, press button, come back in 5 to 25 minutes and your tea is waiting, including a second mug, not and not stewed. Wrong - but works so right. [[User:RIIW - Ponder it|RIIW - Ponder it]] ([[User talk:RIIW - Ponder it|talk]]) 09:13, 11 December 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thanks, [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_yMMTVVJI4c Technology Connections]! [[Special:Contributions/141.101.109.167|141.101.109.167]] 09:51, 10 December 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You Westerners have literally no idea how to make proper, good tea!  SMH [[User:TPS|TPS]] ([[User talk:TPS|talk]]) 13:00, 10 December 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As a Brit who grew up in sight of the Yorkshire Tea factory – and worked there on occasion – and having travelled very widely around the world – including in the US – I feel I'm supposed to have an opinion. However, I have ''never'' encountered the microwaving of water as mentioned here, and I would not object to it as supposedly problematic for tea-quality reasons. I'd object for reasons of common sense. What mystifies me is the idea that kettles are tea-specific. They are for heating water, not making tea. Coffee uses hot water. Pasta, rice and potatoes use hot water. Peas, carrots, cabbage, sweetcorn... &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Baking bread often involves a pan of steaming water in the oven.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;But I can boil water in a pan for cooking pasta or vegetables.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Yes, but you'll be waiting a l-o-o-o-ng time. I'll heat my water in the kettle, pour it into the now-hot pan, cook my pasta, and I'll be eating before your water is boiling. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A kettle is not a tea-making item any more than a frying pan is an omelette-making item; tea is simply one of the things you can make with water from a kettle. Hot water is a basic civilised human commodity, predating recorded history. That we should live in a mechanised world, and the Consumer Nation doesn't have water-boiling appliances as standard (saying instead &amp;quot;I don't have a kettle because I don't drink tea&amp;quot;) is ludicrous. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Using a microwave rather than buying a kettle is a bit like not buying a hammer for driving in nails because you've got a big pair of pliers that will do. Sure, they're heavy lumps of metal than live in your toolbag, but they're not the right thing. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Brits, incidentally, are not tea lovers. They are prolific consumers of awful tea that actual tea lovers wouldn't use for cleaning their drains. The most enthusiastic tea enthusiasts I've ever met were from Maryland.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It's all just social ceremony in the UK. Milk first, tea first, must use a saucer, must use a pot...tea is a British religion, not a British drink. [[User:Yorkshire Pudding|Yorkshire Pudding]] ([[User talk:Yorkshire Pudding|talk]]) 14:23, 10 December 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
: How long does it take you to boil water for, let's say enough water for four people's worth of pasta, using an electric kettle?  I reckon that's about 4 liters of water?  I'm genuinely curious.  Now also double the time, because as mentioned in the explanation, American outlets produce half the power of British outlets.  And let me not fail to mention that almost all American homes have either special higher power outlets for stoves or gas powered stoves, and frequently have special high-power outlets for microwaves as well.  4 liters of water to boil takes about 5-6 minutes on a low-end American stove, about 3-4 minutes on a gas stove, and about 2 minutes on an induction stove.  None of which strikes me as a particularly long time, especially when the most popular varieties of pasta in America all need to be boiled for 8+ minutes. How does this compare to twice the length of time as your electric kettle?  Because if your Electric Kettle actually allows you to be eating your pasta before our water has even boiled, that would require your kettle to boil water in around -2min to -6min. And if your electric kettle can time travel, then that is truly an astonishing device.  Honestly my takeaway from this is that British Stoves must be apparently heated by a single candle if &amp;quot;boiling water for pasta&amp;quot; is considered to take a &amp;quot;l-o-o-o-ng time&amp;quot;. {{unsigned ip|162.158.126.161|21:51, 10 December 2024 (UTC)}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I wonder what the Brits would feel about repurposing a single-cup coffee maker.  These days, I usually put a tea bag in a mug and place it in a Keurig machine and run it (without a K-cup, of course) to deliver the hot water.  Probably the wrong temperature, but fast and easy and the result is good enough.  [[User:Shamino|Shamino]] ([[User talk:Shamino|talk]]) 14:52, 10 December 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Would any British person care to evaluate my tea making practices? Boil water in electric kettle. Pour water over teabag, allow to steep, remove teabag. Add sugar and ice cubes. [[User:RegularSizedGuy|RegularSizedGuy]] ([[User talk:RegularSizedGuy|talk]]) 15:54, 10 December 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:...well, seems a fairly standard &amp;quot;making one mug of tea for oneself&amp;quot; process. It lacks a milk-adding stage (thus no arguments about whether before or after the water). Removing the teabag at that point probably means it's not going to become a Builders' Brew, which is your choicd. Sugar is ok. And... Waitwhat... ''Ice Cubes?!?'' ...can I get back to you on that? [[Special:Contributions/172.70.162.163|172.70.162.163]] 17:50, 10 December 2024 (UTC)  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I can confirm (by inadvertent experiments conducted on flatmates) that they indeed do not like tea being make in the kettle.  What really makes them angry though is making coffee in the teapot.  It ruins the taste of the teapot forever apparently.  There is also a faction that insists that a teapot should never be washed, and washing it invokes a lesser anger.[[User:Gopher|Gopher]] ([[User talk:Gopher|talk]]) 15:56, 10 December 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:This is a source of tension in our house, where we are one washer and one non-washer![[Special:Contributions/141.101.98.243|141.101.98.243]] 09:45, 12 December 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On rare occasions where I don't have a kettle available, I use a microwave oven to boil water for tea. But it doesn't look and taste quite the same, and often leaves an ugly foam at the surface when the tea bag is added. This phenomenon is investigated here: https://cooking.stackexchange.com/a/22264. So the British might be right... Disclaimer: I'm neither from the UK nor from the US. [[Special:Contributions/172.69.68.126|172.69.68.126]] 16:16, 10 December 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There is a [https://www.tumblr.com/elodieunderglass/669449994039853056/wizardlyghost-silverjirachi-pidoop tumblr thread] about the topic of teamaking in microwaves, kettles, etc. Funnily enough it showed up in my Instagram reels feed just a few hours before this comic was posted. I was thinking perhaps Randall saw it too and was inspired by it? Both of them have to deal with the different ways of making tea and how &amp;quot;absurd&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;unconventional&amp;quot; (etc.) they are. Even if Randall didn't have it in mind, it's certainly a funny little coincidence. [[User:Pie Guy|Pie Guy]] ([[User talk:Pie Guy|talk]]) 16:36, 10 December 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I'm guessing my occasional summertime practice of filling a gallon jar with water and lots of tea bags, setting it on the back porch in the sun for a few hours until the water turns dark brown, then putting the whole thing in the refrigerator and later drinking it over ice would be toward the more angry end of the spectrum.[[Special:Contributions/172.70.126.204|172.70.126.204]] 16:39, 10 December 2024 (UTC)Pat&lt;br /&gt;
:I think the &amp;quot;in the sun for a few hours&amp;quot; part might just be too incomprehensible to most of us, here in Britain. If we ''have'' a few hours of sun (and we're not abroad and deliberately sunburning ourselves on the beach/beside the pool in our week at the Costa Lotta budget-all-inclusivs holiday) then we're either fuming at our workdesks complaining about the louts stripping down to their shirtsleeves and splashing in the town-centre fountains or we're on our lunch-break and we ''are'' the louts stripping down to our shirtsleeves and splashing in the town-centre fountains. In neither case would sun-stewed tea be a priority. [[Special:Contributions/172.70.162.163|172.70.162.163]] 17:50, 10 December 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Perhaps it's worth to mention how dangerous it is to boil water in a microwave. https://tastecooking.com/dangerous-microwave-water/&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Mestafais|Mestafais]] ([[User talk:Mestafais|talk]]) 15:22, 10 December 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:I have a &amp;gt;5 inch burn scar on my forearm, to arrest to that. [[User:ProphetZarquon|ProphetZarquon]] ([[User talk:ProphetZarquon|talk]]) 14:21, 11 December 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are several comics with unmarked scales. It would be interesting if the descriptions started using pixels to point where each mark is along the line. As a rough estimate, the four points mentioned here are at X-values: 90px, 115px, 345px, and 645px, indicating that the pot method is 10% as infuriating as the chalice method - or that making tea in a pot ten times would be equally as infuriating as making it once in a chalice (at least, assuming the kettle method causes zero furons. I know of {{w|hedons and dolors}}. I guess 'furons' are a unit of fury, right? [[Special:Contributions/172.70.46.236|172.70.46.236]] 16:11, 10 December 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Interesting to see the interest in editing this. Had a quick check of the last ten comics, looking at the number of edits made in the first 14 hours (the exact time this page has been around, as of me starting the check) and in total, and extrapolated to edits/day (in the case of total edits, both just to the latest edit and right up to 'now'). Thought it'd be interesting to give you my results (assuming I tallied/etc correctly)...&lt;br /&gt;
*3022 - 14hr: '''61''' ('''105'''/day); Total: 61 ('''105/day...''')&lt;br /&gt;
*3021 - 14hr: 23 (39/day); Total: 39 (11/day -&amp;gt; 10/day)&lt;br /&gt;
*3020 - 14hr: 22 (38/day); Total: 36 (10/day -&amp;gt; 6/day)&lt;br /&gt;
*3019 - 14hr: 28 (48/day); Total: 54 (17/day -&amp;gt; 7/day)&lt;br /&gt;
*3018 - 14hr: 14 (24/day); Total: 48 (4/day -&amp;gt; 4/day)&lt;br /&gt;
*3017 - 14hr: 29 (50/day); Total: 33 (32/day -&amp;gt; 3/day)&lt;br /&gt;
*3016 - 14hr: 28 (48/day); Total: 46 (4/day -&amp;gt; 3/day)&lt;br /&gt;
*3015 - 14hr: 20 (32/day); Total: '''83''' (5/day -&amp;gt; 5/day)&lt;br /&gt;
*3014 - 14hr: 40 (69/day); Total: 66 (16/day -&amp;gt; 3/day)&lt;br /&gt;
*3013 - 14hr: 36 (61/day); Total: 68 (3/day -&amp;gt; 3/day)&lt;br /&gt;
...of course, the first 14 hours probably biases to British readers/editors, and it was too fiddly to add up ''|bytes changed per edit|'' as a more useful metric than mere number of pokes. But quite a bit of interest we already have here. More edits in fourteen hours than any other article less than fourteen (indeed, 17!) days old... ;) Seems to have really hit a mark, this subject! [[Special:Contributions/172.69.195.201|172.69.195.201]] 19:21, 10 December 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:This one is super weird. I may be weirdness incarnate... but... [[User:Maybe Bill Cipher|An anonymous Gravity Falls expert]] ([[User talk:Maybe Bill Cipher|talk]]) 19:33, 10 December 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Well obviously. I mean this one ''really'' matters![[Special:Contributions/141.101.98.23|141.101.98.23]] 08:52, 11 December 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I would argue that the more pessimistic interpretation of the two low-end options makes sense, rather than the more generous versions offered in the current explanation. I think the first one does literally mean making tea in the kettle, and the second one does mean boiling water in a teapot. Making tea *using* a kettle isn't anything to get mad about, it's the default practice. That should put it at the zero point of the line, but it isn't, it's to the right. On the other hand, obviously making tea *in* the kettle would incite a modest amount of rage (on the scale of zero to microwaving a mug), and it makes sense that boiling water in a teapot would incite about 50% more, as shown.[[Special:Contributions/172.69.134.160|172.69.134.160]] 19:51, 10 December 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
: An American making tea in the correct way by boiling water in the kettle and then pouring that into a teapot with the tea would still probably conspire to make it badly and make the Brit angry. And Brits really do get quite upset about the idea of tea made with water boiled in a stovetop pan.[[Special:Contributions/141.101.98.23|141.101.98.23]] 08:55, 11 December 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There is a standard for making tea, ISO 3103: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ISO_3103, and apparently from the Royal Society of Chemistry.&lt;br /&gt;
And, of course, it must be really hot for in infinite improbability drive to work properly.&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Lordpishky|Lordpishky]] ([[User talk:Lordpishky|talk]]) 20:24, 10 December 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
All this blather and not one bit about that quintessential Kiwi staple, [https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/gumboot_tea gumboot tea]. Boil the kettle (about the size of a Dutch oven), throw in handfuls of leaf black tea, and let it sit until consumed. Reheat as needed. One sip, and the source of the Commonwealth aversion to the insane Yankee habit of drinking tea black is immediately apparent. [[Special:Contributions/172.70.123.8|172.70.123.8]] 20:31, 10 December 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
So, I have a Quooker that boils my water. Add tea (leaves)... done. But *don't* add milk, please.... spoil... {{unsigned|Palmpje|20:50, 10 December 2024 (UTC)}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''Ultimately, the real difference comes down to convenience: In the USA, the standard voltage for electric appliances (including an electric kettle) is 120 volts, while it is twice that (240 volts in practice, though nominally 230V) in the UK. Since the amperage for an electric kettle is the the same in both countries (15 amps), this means that an equivalent kettle in the UK has twice the power (3.2kw versus 1.6kw), and can heat the water in a fraction of the time. Meanwhile, a standard microwave has a similar power in both countries (from 700 to 1000 watts), for reasons unrelated to the supply voltage it is equipped to use. Therefore, heating a small cup in a microwave might take a few moments longer than a kettle in the USA, but is many times slower to wait for compared to using an electric kettle in the UK.'' Electric kettles are a bit faster in the UK due to the voltage difference, but it's not that much and I highly doubt speed is the main concern here. The main 'convenience' difference between boiling water in a kettle vs a microwave is quantity: Brits usually don't just make one cup/mug of tea! On the rare occasion Americans drink tea, it's more often just the one person drinking one cup, making a microwave a convenient choice.[[Special:Contributions/162.158.233.90|162.158.233.90]] 21:40, 10 December 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Add in some [https://www.foodandwine.com/why-you-should-add-salt-to-tea-8549735 salt]! '''[[User:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:9pt;color:#A9C6CA&amp;quot;&amp;gt;42.book.addict&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:6pt;color:#516874&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Talk to me!&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;''' 21:44, 10 December 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It's not about voltage. They use different gauge heater wire to get the Watts wanted/allowed. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The classic UK plug is nominal 13 Amps. (The circuits may be nominal 16A but there is now better insulation than in 1949.) At 230 Volts that would be 3KW (near enuff). That will be the &amp;quot;legal numbers&amp;quot;. At 240V it may be 3,250W true. OTOH a 10V sag might be expected in all but the poshest wall-wiring. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
amazon.co.uk sells kettles nearly all rated 3KW. Exceptions are Greepas at 1800W (&amp;quot;However, some customers have reported that it's very slow to boil&amp;quot;); also Philips 2200W, Daewoo 1400W, and OLEGA 1500W 'Fast Boiling'.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
OTOH!!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On Amazon US site nearly all kettles are 1500W, a few lower like 1100W. At assumed 120V 1500W is 12.5Amps. 15Amp circuits are still common in older houses (despite changes in 1960s) but we supposed to de-rate for 'long-running' (not clearly specified in old code) so 12 Amps is in a ballpark. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Note that all US kettles are lower power than all but the tamest UK kettles. Essentially half power. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
And IIRC, the 13/16A rating which allows super-power kettles in the UK was not for tea but for &amp;quot;electric fire&amp;quot;, room heat. In post-War rebuilding, smokey coal was already depreciated in cities, steam plumbing and chimneys are expensive. Copper wire is costly too, but you &amp;quot;have&amp;quot; to have electric, and low-cost plans like ring-main were investigated.&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:PRR|PRR]] ([[User talk:PRR|talk]]) 22:44, 10 December 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;accept that tea-appropriate boiling water can be obtained directly from the sink's plumbing&amp;quot; - unless it comes out literally at boiling temperature, it isn't tea appropriate. I live in France now, and order catering bags of tea from Amazon because French tea is dismally awful, not helped at all by this fairly widespread belief that black tea steeps at 60C. When I share tea bags with friends, I have to keep reminding them, boiling! Boiling! So, see, there are worse things than using a microwave to heat the water... [[Special:Contributions/172.71.126.208|172.71.126.208]] 06:00, 11 December 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Not boiling - OFF boiling. Higher than 60C, yes, but if you put actually boiling water straight on to the tea (or worse, boil the water with the tea in it), that's at least as bad. (And how far off the boil exactly depends on the type of tea.) [[Special:Contributions/141.101.98.22|141.101.98.22]] 09:00, 11 December 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What's up with the &amp;quot;We want to ensure'''[sic]''' the good people of the U.K&amp;quot;?&lt;br /&gt;
I really can't see the US Embassy insuring them for any amount, so what gives? [[User:Ryden|Ryden]] ([[User talk:Ryden|talk]]) 12:27, 11 December 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Came here to make the same note. “Ensure” is not misspelled, why is it marked with “[sic]”? [[User:Dúthomhas|Dúthomhas]] ([[User talk:Dúthomhas|talk]]) 12:40, 11 December 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::It's the wrong word entirely for the longer sentence. They perhaps wished to ''assure'' the good people, etc... &amp;quot;Ensure&amp;quot; means to &amp;quot;check and fix&amp;quot; something, in the way this is connected to &amp;quot;the good people&amp;quot; (implying that ''they'' would be changed to deal with any discrepancy of expectations), but this reading also goes wrong by the &amp;quot;that&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
::In the sense of making a pledge (probably the actual intent), the structure is all wrong and probably was hastily reworded from a different narrative path, but left half-and-half and not making sense. My most minimal rewording for this would be &amp;quot;We want to ensure &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;to&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; the good people of the U.K. that ...&amp;quot;, but it still reads very awkwardly. Perhaps it always made more sense to the average 'Merkin (c.f. &amp;quot;write me&amp;quot; instead of &amp;quot;write &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;to&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; me&amp;quot;), but I still would have written &amp;quot;assure&amp;quot; (as attempt to be comforting) or &amp;quot;pledge to&amp;quot; (for a more fervent sincerity of positive action).&lt;br /&gt;
::And to &amp;quot;insure&amp;quot; (for British English) is different yet again. While not working at all in the full sentence, it would start to suggest the actual possibility of such wrongness happening, but with the promise of monetary (or other) compensation if it does. [[Special:Contributions/141.101.98.149|141.101.98.149]] 15:43, 11 December 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Question: Does the obsession with tea apply to all of Britain equally? E.g. are the Scottish just as stereotypicly known for loving tea as the English? This comic immediately brings Arthur Dent to my mind, and he's Very English Indeed. (&amp;quot;A liquid almost but not quite entirely unlike tea&amp;quot; is missing somewhere in the left third of the comic. :) --an intrigued German [[Special:Contributions/172.71.148.103|172.71.148.103]] 14:35, 11 December 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:The four nations probably have had a similar outlook, but everyone may have had different social reasons. Tea-totalling perhaps was the initial driver in the more methodist corners, to get working people not to drink too much beer/cider/gin. The high social status version of regency ladies. It then sort of met in the middle by the time of the tea-ladies trolleying around refreshments to boardrooms and factory floors alike, in the same building.&lt;br /&gt;
:For WW2, the British government's demand for tea supplies was at least as important as ammunition. All British tanks apparently had (and continue to have) a hot-water boiler in the crew comparatment (not just for tea, but, probably the main thing at times). Official worries about tea [http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/7382750.stm lasted beyond that era].&lt;br /&gt;
:Generalising for everyone ''now'' is probably wrong, but visiting elderly relatives all over the UK, I'd ''always'' be passed a cup of tea (and a plate of cakes, or biscuits, placed temptingly close at hand). A pity that I never really liked tea (the cakes/biscuits are a bonus and a mitigating factor, but politeness demands that I throttle back my desires in that direction). [[Special:Contributions/141.101.98.149|141.101.98.149]] 15:43, 11 December 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Boy, they ''really'' get mad when you microwave the Chalice. [[User:ProphetZarquon|ProphetZarquon]] ([[User talk:ProphetZarquon|talk]]) 14:18, 11 December 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:I think putting metal in the microwave is probably frowned upon worldwide. (Unless you're an ex-Navy Seal and cook who has found your ship taken over by mercenaries with a mad plan. Then go ahead.) [[Special:Contributions/162.158.74.119|162.158.74.119]] 16:07, 11 December 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I find that Brits really hate it when you bring up the concept of sweet tea, during the summer my family would fill up a jug with water add some tea bags then leave it on the porch over night. [[User:Resign|Resign]] ([[User talk:Resign|talk]]) 07:35, 12 December 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This is the most comprehensively explained comic in a while 😂 I guess there are a lot of passionate tea-makers around here. As a non-tea-drinker living in a Commonwealth country, I have definitely heard the outrageous stereotype that Americans microwave their water. Definitely practical when you don't own a kettle, but slow when brewing for a group. [[User:Alcatraz ii|Alcatraz ii]] ([[User talk:Alcatraz ii|talk]]) 08:07, 12 December 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Would the small metal piece that sticks together the label of the teabag at the end of the string be an issue when microwaved (with the water or seperately)? Or is too small for that? (I know not all teabags have that, especially british &amp;quot;black tea&amp;quot; often comes in packages without string, but my usual tea does have it...) --[[User:Lupo|Lupo]] ([[User talk:Lupo|talk]]) 08:59, 12 December 2024 (UTC)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>141.101.98.243</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:3022:_Making_Tea&amp;diff=359218</id>
		<title>Talk:3022: Making Tea</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:3022:_Making_Tea&amp;diff=359218"/>
				<updated>2024-12-12T09:42:48Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;141.101.98.243: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&amp;lt;!--Please sign your posts with ~~~~ and don't delete this text. New comments should be added at the bottom.--&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
I wonder where [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boston_Tea_Party making it in Boston Harbor, at ambient temperature, at scale] would fit on this scale. [[Special:Contributions/172.70.206.162|172.70.206.162]] 04:38, 10 December 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
: A little to the left of the microwave thing. [[Special:Contributions/162.158.186.252|162.158.186.252]] 05:14, 10 December 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:: Oh, no, much further to the right. You stole our colony from us, set up some tinpot, pretended 'country' in its place, and you didn't even have the class to make a decent cup of tea first. [[Special:Contributions/172.68.205.93|12.68.205.93]] 06:24, 10 December 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:: And, even if [https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-68085304 this guy] is right, ''way'' too much salt... [[Special:Contributions/172.70.91.130|172.70.91.130]] 07:03, 10 December 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::: Soyuz nyerushimyy respublik svobodnik... [[User:DollarStoreBa&amp;amp;#39;al|DollarStoreBa&amp;amp;#39;al]] ([[User talk:DollarStoreBa&amp;amp;#39;al|talk]]) 14:13, 10 December 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::: Well maybe if you didnt force us to buy discounted tea from you after fighting a war for us, we wouldn't be in this situation. [[User:Apollo11|Apollo11]] ([[User talk:Apollo11|talk]]) 15:43, 10 December 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::::: Yeah, a tiny island should not have that much control over a fractionable part of a continent [[User:Danger Kitty|Danger Kitty]] ([[User talk:Danger Kitty|talk]])&lt;br /&gt;
:::::: EXACTLY, it's not like you funded the voyages, sent supplies to the colonies, or protected us from the French, or anything. [[User:Apollo11|Apollo11]] ([[User talk:Apollo11|talk]]) 14:59, 11 December 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
: I would like to as a british person to corroborate this, in the 80's my Dad visited the USA (he did go to florida) and still is complaining that the freshly boiled water wasn't poured directly onto the tea bag but was instead the tea bag and the hot water(now luke warm water) and bag was delivered separately!!! The delivery of freshly boiling water on to the bag is the major issue with microwaves, not the nucleation thing in my experience. Bear in mind I don't even actually like tea, still care enough to right this, but i'll be signing this anonymously to avoid shame being bought on my family and my family's familys. Murderous royals are a lot less popular the tea [[Special:Contributions/108.162.245.227|108.162.245.227]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: I first visited the US in 1980.  A friend who was with hate coffee and was horrified when he ordered tea that he got the water and the tea bag separately.  When he suggested they add the water as soon as it was boiled, the wait staff thought he was joking.  Many years later in Texas, a waiter asked me why I, a Brit, was drinking coffee, not tea.  &amp;quot;You don't know how to make it,&amp;quot; I replied.  (In my house, the electric kettle and teapot sit next to each other on the kitchen worktop.)--[[Special:Contributions/172.70.160.135|172.70.160.135]] 09:22, 10 December 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
When I make ramen, I put the measuring cup in the microwave. Fight me. [[Special:Contributions/162.158.167.87|162.158.167.87]] 05:35, 10 December 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
: On behalf of the British Empire: whateva.  [[User:Kev|Kev]] ([[User talk:Kev|talk]]) 18:28, 10 December 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;...to the point virtually every home has an electric tea kettle as a standard appliance&amp;quot;. If I'm reading it correctly, this and the comic suggests we (though not I, as I'm not a tea-drinker) make tea ''in the electric kettle''. Electric tea-urns, yes, or maybe a setup like a samovar. But, generally, the kettle itself (and, so far as I'm aware, always with an electric kettle) is used to heat the water, which you then pour into the tea''pot'' into which the requisite number of tealeaves/teabags are also put to steep. (Or, for the lazy way, into the mug-with-teabag.) I wouldn't be able to use my electric kettle to (for example) make my instant mashed-potato into the actual mash, if I'd have regularly used it to mash tea. Or top up the boiling saucepan that I'd realised I'd not quite enough water in to cover the pasta/vegetables/whatever. Or to easily add nust a little more heat (with less new water) to the washing-up bowl than would be possible from the hot tap, back to as hot as possible without scalding me. – Whether intentional or not, I suspect Randall has the role of kettle and teapot mixed up, and so (without the intent to parody) has the editor who wrote the above. [[Special:Contributions/172.70.160.135|172.70.160.135]] 05:49, 10 December 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
: Agree, we make tea in a mug using water from a kettle.  I'd be furious if an American made tea in my kettle, how will I then make up my instant Nescafe? [[User:Kev|Kev]] ([[User talk:Kev|talk]]) 18:28, 10 December 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I don't think the section on 'Boiling the water in a pot' refers to a teapot - I think it means boiling the water in a pot on the hob, and then making tea with it (in a pot/mug). [[Special:Contributions/172.69.195.27|172.69.195.27]] 07:53, 10 December 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:I agree, but I also think there's a language issue with the use of pot vs. pan that makes things more confusing. I think there are several types of cookware that Americans call pot and British call pan. So British would not say they boil water in a pot but rather in a saucepan (if there's no kettle available of course). [[User:Mtcv|Mtcv]] ([[User talk:Mtcv|talk]]) 09:03, 10 December 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I (as Brit) am uncommon in using an electric filter coffee machine to make tea (two bags in what is supposed to be the coffee filter). Set up, press the button and come back to a not jug of fresh tea which is not stewed. If later, the hot plate has shut off and it is cold, you can zap it in a mug in the microwave. [[User:RIIW - Ponder it|RIIW - Ponder it]] ([[User talk:RIIW - Ponder it|talk]]) 08:11, 10 December 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
: As another brit, what? I do not understand the mechanics of this, please elaborate. Additionally, my understanding is that the water would be *briefly acquainted* with the tea, thus would be a poor facsimile of &amp;quot;tea&amp;quot; and would rather be closer to something the americans would attempt. [[Special:Contributions/141.101.99.126|141.101.99.126]] 11:46, 10 December 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::I did say 'uncommon' but Kenwood made a coffee/tea machine to do this. It sounds like it shouldn't work, but 167 below has the basics right. [[User:RIIW - Ponder it|RIIW - Ponder it]] ([[User talk:RIIW - Ponder it|talk]]) 09:13, 11 December 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::I'm guessing the water would drip on to the teabags, then soak all the way through them and drip out into the jug, without allowing sufficient to accumulate that it would run straight out without passing fully through the bag. It's an intriguing idea. But most definitely wrong.[[Special:Contributions/172.70.85.239|172.70.85.239]] 17:15, 10 December 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Your guess is right. It works because the (finely cut) leaves are exposed to boiling hot water for a few minutes, you wouldn't drink any before you have half a jug and that is quite 'bright'. Better than a teabag in a mug! Want it stronger, use more bags. Big advantage - you set it up, press button, come back in 5 to 25 minutes and your tea is waiting, including a second mug, not and not stewed. Wrong - but works so right. [[User:RIIW - Ponder it|RIIW - Ponder it]] ([[User talk:RIIW - Ponder it|talk]]) 09:13, 11 December 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thanks, [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_yMMTVVJI4c Technology Connections]! [[Special:Contributions/141.101.109.167|141.101.109.167]] 09:51, 10 December 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You Westerners have literally no idea how to make proper, good tea!  SMH [[User:TPS|TPS]] ([[User talk:TPS|talk]]) 13:00, 10 December 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As a Brit who grew up in sight of the Yorkshire Tea factory – and worked there on occasion – and having travelled very widely around the world – including in the US – I feel I'm supposed to have an opinion. However, I have ''never'' encountered the microwaving of water as mentioned here, and I would not object to it as supposedly problematic for tea-quality reasons. I'd object for reasons of common sense. What mystifies me is the idea that kettles are tea-specific. They are for heating water, not making tea. Coffee uses hot water. Pasta, rice and potatoes use hot water. Peas, carrots, cabbage, sweetcorn... &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Baking bread often involves a pan of steaming water in the oven.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;But I can boil water in a pan for cooking pasta or vegetables.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Yes, but you'll be waiting a l-o-o-o-ng time. I'll heat my water in the kettle, pour it into the now-hot pan, cook my pasta, and I'll be eating before your water is boiling. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A kettle is not a tea-making item any more than a frying pan is an omelette-making item; tea is simply one of the things you can make with water from a kettle. Hot water is a basic civilised human commodity, predating recorded history. That we should live in a mechanised world, and the Consumer Nation doesn't have water-boiling appliances as standard (saying instead &amp;quot;I don't have a kettle because I don't drink tea&amp;quot;) is ludicrous. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Using a microwave rather than buying a kettle is a bit like not buying a hammer for driving in nails because you've got a big pair of pliers that will do. Sure, they're heavy lumps of metal than live in your toolbag, but they're not the right thing. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Brits, incidentally, are not tea lovers. They are prolific consumers of awful tea that actual tea lovers wouldn't use for cleaning their drains. The most enthusiastic tea enthusiasts I've ever met were from Maryland.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It's all just social ceremony in the UK. Milk first, tea first, must use a saucer, must use a pot...tea is a British religion, not a British drink. [[User:Yorkshire Pudding|Yorkshire Pudding]] ([[User talk:Yorkshire Pudding|talk]]) 14:23, 10 December 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
: How long does it take you to boil water for, let's say enough water for four people's worth of pasta, using an electric kettle?  I reckon that's about 4 liters of water?  I'm genuinely curious.  Now also double the time, because as mentioned in the explanation, American outlets produce half the power of British outlets.  And let me not fail to mention that almost all American homes have either special higher power outlets for stoves or gas powered stoves, and frequently have special high-power outlets for microwaves as well.  4 liters of water to boil takes about 5-6 minutes on a low-end American stove, about 3-4 minutes on a gas stove, and about 2 minutes on an induction stove.  None of which strikes me as a particularly long time, especially when the most popular varieties of pasta in America all need to be boiled for 8+ minutes. How does this compare to twice the length of time as your electric kettle?  Because if your Electric Kettle actually allows you to be eating your pasta before our water has even boiled, that would require your kettle to boil water in around -2min to -6min. And if your electric kettle can time travel, then that is truly an astonishing device.  Honestly my takeaway from this is that British Stoves must be apparently heated by a single candle if &amp;quot;boiling water for pasta&amp;quot; is considered to take a &amp;quot;l-o-o-o-ng time&amp;quot;. {{unsigned ip|162.158.126.161|21:51, 10 December 2024 (UTC)}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I wonder what the Brits would feel about repurposing a single-cup coffee maker.  These days, I usually put a tea bag in a mug and place it in a Keurig machine and run it (without a K-cup, of course) to deliver the hot water.  Probably the wrong temperature, but fast and easy and the result is good enough.  [[User:Shamino|Shamino]] ([[User talk:Shamino|talk]]) 14:52, 10 December 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Would any British person care to evaluate my tea making practices? Boil water in electric kettle. Pour water over teabag, allow to steep, remove teabag. Add sugar and ice cubes. [[User:RegularSizedGuy|RegularSizedGuy]] ([[User talk:RegularSizedGuy|talk]]) 15:54, 10 December 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:...well, seems a fairly standard &amp;quot;making one mug of tea for oneself&amp;quot; process. It lacks a milk-adding stage (thus no arguments about whether before or after the water). Removing the teabag at that point probably means it's not going to become a Builders' Brew, which is your choicd. Sugar is ok. And... Waitwhat... ''Ice Cubes?!?'' ...can I get back to you on that? [[Special:Contributions/172.70.162.163|172.70.162.163]] 17:50, 10 December 2024 (UTC)  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I can confirm (by inadvertent experiments conducted on flatmates) that they indeed do not like tea being make in the kettle.  What really makes them angry though is making coffee in the teapot.  It ruins the taste of the teapot forever apparently.  There is also a faction that insists that a teapot should never be washed, and washing it invokes a lesser anger.[[User:Gopher|Gopher]] ([[User talk:Gopher|talk]]) 15:56, 10 December 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On rare occasions where I don't have a kettle available, I use a microwave oven to boil water for tea. But it doesn't look and taste quite the same, and often leaves an ugly foam at the surface when the tea bag is added. This phenomenon is investigated here: https://cooking.stackexchange.com/a/22264. So the British might be right... Disclaimer: I'm neither from the UK nor from the US. [[Special:Contributions/172.69.68.126|172.69.68.126]] 16:16, 10 December 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There is a [https://www.tumblr.com/elodieunderglass/669449994039853056/wizardlyghost-silverjirachi-pidoop tumblr thread] about the topic of teamaking in microwaves, kettles, etc. Funnily enough it showed up in my Instagram reels feed just a few hours before this comic was posted. I was thinking perhaps Randall saw it too and was inspired by it? Both of them have to deal with the different ways of making tea and how &amp;quot;absurd&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;unconventional&amp;quot; (etc.) they are. Even if Randall didn't have it in mind, it's certainly a funny little coincidence. [[User:Pie Guy|Pie Guy]] ([[User talk:Pie Guy|talk]]) 16:36, 10 December 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I'm guessing my occasional summertime practice of filling a gallon jar with water and lots of tea bags, setting it on the back porch in the sun for a few hours until the water turns dark brown, then putting the whole thing in the refrigerator and later drinking it over ice would be toward the more angry end of the spectrum.[[Special:Contributions/172.70.126.204|172.70.126.204]] 16:39, 10 December 2024 (UTC)Pat&lt;br /&gt;
:I think the &amp;quot;in the sun for a few hours&amp;quot; part might just be too incomprehensible to most of us, here in Britain. If we ''have'' a few hours of sun (and we're not abroad and deliberately sunburning ourselves on the beach/beside the pool in our week at the Costa Lotta budget-all-inclusivs holiday) then we're either fuming at our workdesks complaining about the louts stripping down to their shirtsleeves and splashing in the town-centre fountains or we're on our lunch-break and we ''are'' the louts stripping down to our shirtsleeves and splashing in the town-centre fountains. In neither case would sun-stewed tea be a priority. [[Special:Contributions/172.70.162.163|172.70.162.163]] 17:50, 10 December 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Perhaps it's worth to mention how dangerous it is to boil water in a microwave. https://tastecooking.com/dangerous-microwave-water/&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Mestafais|Mestafais]] ([[User talk:Mestafais|talk]]) 15:22, 10 December 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:I have a &amp;gt;5 inch burn scar on my forearm, to arrest to that. [[User:ProphetZarquon|ProphetZarquon]] ([[User talk:ProphetZarquon|talk]]) 14:21, 11 December 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are several comics with unmarked scales. It would be interesting if the descriptions started using pixels to point where each mark is along the line. As a rough estimate, the four points mentioned here are at X-values: 90px, 115px, 345px, and 645px, indicating that the pot method is 10% as infuriating as the chalice method - or that making tea in a pot ten times would be equally as infuriating as making it once in a chalice (at least, assuming the kettle method causes zero furons. I know of {{w|hedons and dolors}}. I guess 'furons' are a unit of fury, right? [[Special:Contributions/172.70.46.236|172.70.46.236]] 16:11, 10 December 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Interesting to see the interest in editing this. Had a quick check of the last ten comics, looking at the number of edits made in the first 14 hours (the exact time this page has been around, as of me starting the check) and in total, and extrapolated to edits/day (in the case of total edits, both just to the latest edit and right up to 'now'). Thought it'd be interesting to give you my results (assuming I tallied/etc correctly)...&lt;br /&gt;
*3022 - 14hr: '''61''' ('''105'''/day); Total: 61 ('''105/day...''')&lt;br /&gt;
*3021 - 14hr: 23 (39/day); Total: 39 (11/day -&amp;gt; 10/day)&lt;br /&gt;
*3020 - 14hr: 22 (38/day); Total: 36 (10/day -&amp;gt; 6/day)&lt;br /&gt;
*3019 - 14hr: 28 (48/day); Total: 54 (17/day -&amp;gt; 7/day)&lt;br /&gt;
*3018 - 14hr: 14 (24/day); Total: 48 (4/day -&amp;gt; 4/day)&lt;br /&gt;
*3017 - 14hr: 29 (50/day); Total: 33 (32/day -&amp;gt; 3/day)&lt;br /&gt;
*3016 - 14hr: 28 (48/day); Total: 46 (4/day -&amp;gt; 3/day)&lt;br /&gt;
*3015 - 14hr: 20 (32/day); Total: '''83''' (5/day -&amp;gt; 5/day)&lt;br /&gt;
*3014 - 14hr: 40 (69/day); Total: 66 (16/day -&amp;gt; 3/day)&lt;br /&gt;
*3013 - 14hr: 36 (61/day); Total: 68 (3/day -&amp;gt; 3/day)&lt;br /&gt;
...of course, the first 14 hours probably biases to British readers/editors, and it was too fiddly to add up ''|bytes changed per edit|'' as a more useful metric than mere number of pokes. But quite a bit of interest we already have here. More edits in fourteen hours than any other article less than fourteen (indeed, 17!) days old... ;) Seems to have really hit a mark, this subject! [[Special:Contributions/172.69.195.201|172.69.195.201]] 19:21, 10 December 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:This one is super weird. I may be weirdness incarnate... but... [[User:Maybe Bill Cipher|An anonymous Gravity Falls expert]] ([[User talk:Maybe Bill Cipher|talk]]) 19:33, 10 December 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Well obviously. I mean this one ''really'' matters![[Special:Contributions/141.101.98.23|141.101.98.23]] 08:52, 11 December 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I would argue that the more pessimistic interpretation of the two low-end options makes sense, rather than the more generous versions offered in the current explanation. I think the first one does literally mean making tea in the kettle, and the second one does mean boiling water in a teapot. Making tea *using* a kettle isn't anything to get mad about, it's the default practice. That should put it at the zero point of the line, but it isn't, it's to the right. On the other hand, obviously making tea *in* the kettle would incite a modest amount of rage (on the scale of zero to microwaving a mug), and it makes sense that boiling water in a teapot would incite about 50% more, as shown.[[Special:Contributions/172.69.134.160|172.69.134.160]] 19:51, 10 December 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
: An American making tea in the correct way by boiling water in the kettle and then pouring that into a teapot with the tea would still probably conspire to make it badly and make the Brit angry. And Brits really do get quite upset about the idea of tea made with water boiled in a stovetop pan.[[Special:Contributions/141.101.98.23|141.101.98.23]] 08:55, 11 December 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There is a standard for making tea, ISO 3103: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ISO_3103, and apparently from the Royal Society of Chemistry.&lt;br /&gt;
And, of course, it must be really hot for in infinite improbability drive to work properly.&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Lordpishky|Lordpishky]] ([[User talk:Lordpishky|talk]]) 20:24, 10 December 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
All this blather and not one bit about that quintessential Kiwi staple, [https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/gumboot_tea gumboot tea]. Boil the kettle (about the size of a Dutch oven), throw in handfuls of leaf black tea, and let it sit until consumed. Reheat as needed. One sip, and the source of the Commonwealth aversion to the insane Yankee habit of drinking tea black is immediately apparent. [[Special:Contributions/172.70.123.8|172.70.123.8]] 20:31, 10 December 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
So, I have a Quooker that boils my water. Add tea (leaves)... done. But *don't* add milk, please.... spoil... {{unsigned|Palmpje|20:50, 10 December 2024 (UTC)}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''Ultimately, the real difference comes down to convenience: In the USA, the standard voltage for electric appliances (including an electric kettle) is 120 volts, while it is twice that (240 volts in practice, though nominally 230V) in the UK. Since the amperage for an electric kettle is the the same in both countries (15 amps), this means that an equivalent kettle in the UK has twice the power (3.2kw versus 1.6kw), and can heat the water in a fraction of the time. Meanwhile, a standard microwave has a similar power in both countries (from 700 to 1000 watts), for reasons unrelated to the supply voltage it is equipped to use. Therefore, heating a small cup in a microwave might take a few moments longer than a kettle in the USA, but is many times slower to wait for compared to using an electric kettle in the UK.'' Electric kettles are a bit faster in the UK due to the voltage difference, but it's not that much and I highly doubt speed is the main concern here. The main 'convenience' difference between boiling water in a kettle vs a microwave is quantity: Brits usually don't just make one cup/mug of tea! On the rare occasion Americans drink tea, it's more often just the one person drinking one cup, making a microwave a convenient choice.[[Special:Contributions/162.158.233.90|162.158.233.90]] 21:40, 10 December 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Add in some [https://www.foodandwine.com/why-you-should-add-salt-to-tea-8549735 salt]! '''[[User:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:9pt;color:#A9C6CA&amp;quot;&amp;gt;42.book.addict&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:6pt;color:#516874&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Talk to me!&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;''' 21:44, 10 December 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It's not about voltage. They use different gauge heater wire to get the Watts wanted/allowed. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The classic UK plug is nominal 13 Amps. (The circuits may be nominal 16A but there is now better insulation than in 1949.) At 230 Volts that would be 3KW (near enuff). That will be the &amp;quot;legal numbers&amp;quot;. At 240V it may be 3,250W true. OTOH a 10V sag might be expected in all but the poshest wall-wiring. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
amazon.co.uk sells kettles nearly all rated 3KW. Exceptions are Greepas at 1800W (&amp;quot;However, some customers have reported that it's very slow to boil&amp;quot;); also Philips 2200W, Daewoo 1400W, and OLEGA 1500W 'Fast Boiling'.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
OTOH!!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On Amazon US site nearly all kettles are 1500W, a few lower like 1100W. At assumed 120V 1500W is 12.5Amps. 15Amp circuits are still common in older houses (despite changes in 1960s) but we supposed to de-rate for 'long-running' (not clearly specified in old code) so 12 Amps is in a ballpark. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Note that all US kettles are lower power than all but the tamest UK kettles. Essentially half power. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
And IIRC, the 13/16A rating which allows super-power kettles in the UK was not for tea but for &amp;quot;electric fire&amp;quot;, room heat. In post-War rebuilding, smokey coal was already depreciated in cities, steam plumbing and chimneys are expensive. Copper wire is costly too, but you &amp;quot;have&amp;quot; to have electric, and low-cost plans like ring-main were investigated.&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:PRR|PRR]] ([[User talk:PRR|talk]]) 22:44, 10 December 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;accept that tea-appropriate boiling water can be obtained directly from the sink's plumbing&amp;quot; - unless it comes out literally at boiling temperature, it isn't tea appropriate. I live in France now, and order catering bags of tea from Amazon because French tea is dismally awful, not helped at all by this fairly widespread belief that black tea steeps at 60C. When I share tea bags with friends, I have to keep reminding them, boiling! Boiling! So, see, there are worse things than using a microwave to heat the water... [[Special:Contributions/172.71.126.208|172.71.126.208]] 06:00, 11 December 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Not boiling - OFF boiling. Higher than 60C, yes, but if you put actually boiling water straight on to the tea (or worse, boil the water with the tea in it), that's at least as bad. (And how far off the boil exactly depends on the type of tea.) [[Special:Contributions/141.101.98.22|141.101.98.22]] 09:00, 11 December 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What's up with the &amp;quot;We want to ensure'''[sic]''' the good people of the U.K&amp;quot;?&lt;br /&gt;
I really can't see the US Embassy insuring them for any amount, so what gives? [[User:Ryden|Ryden]] ([[User talk:Ryden|talk]]) 12:27, 11 December 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Came here to make the same note. “Ensure” is not misspelled, why is it marked with “[sic]”? [[User:Dúthomhas|Dúthomhas]] ([[User talk:Dúthomhas|talk]]) 12:40, 11 December 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::It's the wrong word entirely for the longer sentence. They perhaps wished to ''assure'' the good people, etc... &amp;quot;Ensure&amp;quot; means to &amp;quot;check and fix&amp;quot; something, in the way this is connected to &amp;quot;the good people&amp;quot; (implying that ''they'' would be changed to deal with any discrepancy of expectations), but this reading also goes wrong by the &amp;quot;that&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
::In the sense of making a pledge (probably the actual intent), the structure is all wrong and probably was hastily reworded from a different narrative path, but left half-and-half and not making sense. My most minimal rewording for this would be &amp;quot;We want to ensure &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;to&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; the good people of the U.K. that ...&amp;quot;, but it still reads very awkwardly. Perhaps it always made more sense to the average 'Merkin (c.f. &amp;quot;write me&amp;quot; instead of &amp;quot;write &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;to&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; me&amp;quot;), but I still would have written &amp;quot;assure&amp;quot; (as attempt to be comforting) or &amp;quot;pledge to&amp;quot; (for a more fervent sincerity of positive action).&lt;br /&gt;
::And to &amp;quot;insure&amp;quot; (for British English) is different yet again. While not working at all in the full sentence, it would start to suggest the actual possibility of such wrongness happening, but with the promise of monetary (or other) compensation if it does. [[Special:Contributions/141.101.98.149|141.101.98.149]] 15:43, 11 December 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Question: Does the obsession with tea apply to all of Britain equally? E.g. are the Scottish just as stereotypicly known for loving tea as the English? This comic immediately brings Arthur Dent to my mind, and he's Very English Indeed. (&amp;quot;A liquid almost but not quite entirely unlike tea&amp;quot; is missing somewhere in the left third of the comic. :) --an intrigued German [[Special:Contributions/172.71.148.103|172.71.148.103]] 14:35, 11 December 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:The four nations probably have had a similar outlook, but everyone may have had different social reasons. Tea-totalling perhaps was the initial driver in the more methodist corners, to get working people not to drink too much beer/cider/gin. The high social status version of regency ladies. It then sort of met in the middle by the time of the tea-ladies trolleying around refreshments to boardrooms and factory floors alike, in the same building.&lt;br /&gt;
:For WW2, the British government's demand for tea supplies was at least as important as ammunition. All British tanks apparently had (and continue to have) a hot-water boiler in the crew comparatment (not just for tea, but, probably the main thing at times). Official worries about tea [http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/7382750.stm lasted beyond that era].&lt;br /&gt;
:Generalising for everyone ''now'' is probably wrong, but visiting elderly relatives all over the UK, I'd ''always'' be passed a cup of tea (and a plate of cakes, or biscuits, placed temptingly close at hand). A pity that I never really liked tea (the cakes/biscuits are a bonus and a mitigating factor, but politeness demands that I throttle back my desires in that direction). [[Special:Contributions/141.101.98.149|141.101.98.149]] 15:43, 11 December 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Boy, they ''really'' get mad when you microwave the Chalice. [[User:ProphetZarquon|ProphetZarquon]] ([[User talk:ProphetZarquon|talk]]) 14:18, 11 December 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:I think putting metal in the microwave is probably frowned upon worldwide. (Unless you're an ex-Navy Seal and cook who has found your ship taken over by mercenaries with a mad plan. Then go ahead.) [[Special:Contributions/162.158.74.119|162.158.74.119]] 16:07, 11 December 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I find that Brits really hate it when you bring up the concept of sweet tea, during the summer my family would fill up a jug with water add some tea bags then leave it on the porch over night. [[User:Resign|Resign]] ([[User talk:Resign|talk]]) 07:35, 12 December 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This is the most comprehensively explained comic in a while 😂 I guess there are a lot of passionate tea-makers around here. As a non-tea-drinker living in a Commonwealth country, I have definitely heard the outrageous stereotype that Americans microwave their water. Definitely practical when you don't own a kettle, but slow when brewing for a group. [[User:Alcatraz ii|Alcatraz ii]] ([[User talk:Alcatraz ii|talk]]) 08:07, 12 December 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Would the small metal piece that sticks together the label of the teabag at the end of the string be an issue when microwaved (with the water or seperately)? Or is too small for that? (I know not all teabags have that, especially british &amp;quot;black tea&amp;quot; often comes in packages without string, but my usual tea does have it...) --[[User:Lupo|Lupo]] ([[User talk:Lupo|talk]]) 08:59, 12 December 2024 (UTC)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>141.101.98.243</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:3022:_Making_Tea&amp;diff=359216</id>
		<title>Talk:3022: Making Tea</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:3022:_Making_Tea&amp;diff=359216"/>
				<updated>2024-12-12T09:42:01Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;141.101.98.243: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&amp;lt;!--Please sign your posts with ~~~~ and don't delete this text. New comments should be added at the bottom.--&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
I wonder where [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boston_Tea_Party making it in Boston Harbor, at ambient temperature, at scale] would fit on this scale. [[Special:Contributions/172.70.206.162|172.70.206.162]] 04:38, 10 December 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
: A little to the left of the microwave thing. [[Special:Contributions/162.158.186.252|162.158.186.252]] 05:14, 10 December 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:: Oh, no, much further to the right. You stole our colony from us, set up some tinpot, pretended 'country' in its place, and you didn't even have the class to make a decent cup of tea first. [[Special:Contributions/172.68.205.93|12.68.205.93]] 06:24, 10 December 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:: And, even if [https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-68085304 this guy] is right, ''way'' too much salt... [[Special:Contributions/172.70.91.130|172.70.91.130]] 07:03, 10 December 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::: Soyuz nyerushimyy respublik svobodnik... [[User:DollarStoreBa&amp;amp;#39;al|DollarStoreBa&amp;amp;#39;al]] ([[User talk:DollarStoreBa&amp;amp;#39;al|talk]]) 14:13, 10 December 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::: Well maybe if you didnt force us to buy discounted tea from you after fighting a war for us, we wouldn't be in this situation. [[User:Apollo11|Apollo11]] ([[User talk:Apollo11|talk]]) 15:43, 10 December 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::::: Yeah, a tiny island should not have that much control over a fractionable part of a continent [[User:Danger Kitty|Danger Kitty]] ([[User talk:Danger Kitty|talk]])&lt;br /&gt;
:::::: EXACTLY, it's not like you funded the voyages, sent supplies to the colonies, or protected us from the French, or anything. [[User:Apollo11|Apollo11]] ([[User talk:Apollo11|talk]]) 14:59, 11 December 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
: I would like to as a british person to corroborate this, in the 80's my Dad visited the USA (he did go to florida) and still is complaining that the freshly boiled water wasn't poured directly onto the tea bag but was instead the tea bag and the hot water(now luke warm water) and bag was delivered separately!!! The delivery of freshly boiling water on to the bag is the major issue with microwaves, not the nucleation thing in my experience. Bear in mind I don't even actually like tea, still care enough to right this, but i'll be signing this anonymously to avoid shame being bought on my family and my family's familys. Murderous royals are a lot less popular the tea [[Special:Contributions/108.162.245.227|108.162.245.227]]&lt;br /&gt;
:: I first visited the US in 1980.  A friend who was with hate coffee and was horrified when he ordered tea that he got the water and the tea bag separately.  When he suggested they add the water as soon as it was boiled, the wait staff thought he was joking.  Many years later in Texas, a waiter asked me why I, a Brit, was drinking coffee, not tea.  &amp;quot;You don't know how to make it,&amp;quot; I replied.  (In my house, the electric kettle and teapot sit next to each other on the kitchen worktop.)--[[Special:Contributions/172.70.160.135|172.70.160.135]] 09:22, 10 December 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
When I make ramen, I put the measuring cup in the microwave. Fight me. [[Special:Contributions/162.158.167.87|162.158.167.87]] 05:35, 10 December 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:: On behalf of the British Empire: whateva.  [[User:Kev|Kev]] ([[User talk:Kev|talk]]) 18:28, 10 December 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;...to the point virtually every home has an electric tea kettle as a standard appliance&amp;quot;. If I'm reading it correctly, this and the comic suggests we (though not I, as I'm not a tea-drinker) make tea ''in the electric kettle''. Electric tea-urns, yes, or maybe a setup like a samovar. But, generally, the kettle itself (and, so far as I'm aware, always with an electric kettle) is used to heat the water, which you then pour into the tea''pot'' into which the requisite number of tealeaves/teabags are also put to steep. (Or, for the lazy way, into the mug-with-teabag.) I wouldn't be able to use my electric kettle to (for example) make my instant mashed-potato into the actual mash, if I'd have regularly used it to mash tea. Or top up the boiling saucepan that I'd realised I'd not quite enough water in to cover the pasta/vegetables/whatever. Or to easily add nust a little more heat (with less new water) to the washing-up bowl than would be possible from the hot tap, back to as hot as possible without scalding me. – Whether intentional or not, I suspect Randall has the role of kettle and teapot mixed up, and so (without the intent to parody) has the editor who wrote the above. [[Special:Contributions/172.70.160.135|172.70.160.135]] 05:49, 10 December 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:: Agree, we make tea in a mug using water from a kettle.  I'd be furious if an American made tea in my kettle, how will I then make up my instant Nescafe? [[User:Kev|Kev]] ([[User talk:Kev|talk]]) 18:28, 10 December 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I don't think the section on 'Boiling the water in a pot' refers to a teapot - I think it means boiling the water in a pot on the hob, and then making tea with it (in a pot/mug). [[Special:Contributions/172.69.195.27|172.69.195.27]] 07:53, 10 December 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:I agree, but I also think there's a language issue with the use of pot vs. pan that makes things more confusing. I think there are several types of cookware that Americans call pot and British call pan. So British would not say they boil water in a pot but rather in a saucepan (if there's no kettle available of course). [[User:Mtcv|Mtcv]] ([[User talk:Mtcv|talk]]) 09:03, 10 December 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I (as Brit) am uncommon in using an electric filter coffee machine to make tea (two bags in what is supposed to be the coffee filter). Set up, press the button and come back to a not jug of fresh tea which is not stewed. If later, the hot plate has shut off and it is cold, you can zap it in a mug in the microwave. [[User:RIIW - Ponder it|RIIW - Ponder it]] ([[User talk:RIIW - Ponder it|talk]]) 08:11, 10 December 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
: As another brit, what? I do not understand the mechanics of this, please elaborate. Additionally, my understanding is that the water would be *briefly acquainted* with the tea, thus would be a poor facsimile of &amp;quot;tea&amp;quot; and would rather be closer to something the americans would attempt. [[Special:Contributions/141.101.99.126|141.101.99.126]] 11:46, 10 December 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::I did say 'uncommon' but Kenwood made a coffee/tea machine to do this. It sounds like it shouldn't work, but 167 below has the basics right. [[User:RIIW - Ponder it|RIIW - Ponder it]] ([[User talk:RIIW - Ponder it|talk]]) 09:13, 11 December 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::I'm guessing the water would drip on to the teabags, then soak all the way through them and drip out into the jug, without allowing sufficient to accumulate that it would run straight out without passing fully through the bag. It's an intriguing idea. But most definitely wrong.[[Special:Contributions/172.70.85.239|172.70.85.239]] 17:15, 10 December 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Your guess is right. It works because the (finely cut) leaves are exposed to boiling hot water for a few minutes, you wouldn't drink any before you have half a jug and that is quite 'bright'. Better than a teabag in a mug! Want it stronger, use more bags. Big advantage - you set it up, press button, come back in 5 to 25 minutes and your tea is waiting, including a second mug, not and not stewed. Wrong - but works so right. [[User:RIIW - Ponder it|RIIW - Ponder it]] ([[User talk:RIIW - Ponder it|talk]]) 09:13, 11 December 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thanks, [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_yMMTVVJI4c Technology Connections]! [[Special:Contributions/141.101.109.167|141.101.109.167]] 09:51, 10 December 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You Westerners have literally no idea how to make proper, good tea!  SMH [[User:TPS|TPS]] ([[User talk:TPS|talk]]) 13:00, 10 December 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As a Brit who grew up in sight of the Yorkshire Tea factory – and worked there on occasion – and having travelled very widely around the world – including in the US – I feel I'm supposed to have an opinion. However, I have ''never'' encountered the microwaving of water as mentioned here, and I would not object to it as supposedly problematic for tea-quality reasons. I'd object for reasons of common sense. What mystifies me is the idea that kettles are tea-specific. They are for heating water, not making tea. Coffee uses hot water. Pasta, rice and potatoes use hot water. Peas, carrots, cabbage, sweetcorn... &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Baking bread often involves a pan of steaming water in the oven.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;But I can boil water in a pan for cooking pasta or vegetables.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Yes, but you'll be waiting a l-o-o-o-ng time. I'll heat my water in the kettle, pour it into the now-hot pan, cook my pasta, and I'll be eating before your water is boiling. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A kettle is not a tea-making item any more than a frying pan is an omelette-making item; tea is simply one of the things you can make with water from a kettle. Hot water is a basic civilised human commodity, predating recorded history. That we should live in a mechanised world, and the Consumer Nation doesn't have water-boiling appliances as standard (saying instead &amp;quot;I don't have a kettle because I don't drink tea&amp;quot;) is ludicrous. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Using a microwave rather than buying a kettle is a bit like not buying a hammer for driving in nails because you've got a big pair of pliers that will do. Sure, they're heavy lumps of metal than live in your toolbag, but they're not the right thing. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Brits, incidentally, are not tea lovers. They are prolific consumers of awful tea that actual tea lovers wouldn't use for cleaning their drains. The most enthusiastic tea enthusiasts I've ever met were from Maryland.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It's all just social ceremony in the UK. Milk first, tea first, must use a saucer, must use a pot...tea is a British religion, not a British drink. [[User:Yorkshire Pudding|Yorkshire Pudding]] ([[User talk:Yorkshire Pudding|talk]]) 14:23, 10 December 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
: How long does it take you to boil water for, let's say enough water for four people's worth of pasta, using an electric kettle?  I reckon that's about 4 liters of water?  I'm genuinely curious.  Now also double the time, because as mentioned in the explanation, American outlets produce half the power of British outlets.  And let me not fail to mention that almost all American homes have either special higher power outlets for stoves or gas powered stoves, and frequently have special high-power outlets for microwaves as well.  4 liters of water to boil takes about 5-6 minutes on a low-end American stove, about 3-4 minutes on a gas stove, and about 2 minutes on an induction stove.  None of which strikes me as a particularly long time, especially when the most popular varieties of pasta in America all need to be boiled for 8+ minutes. How does this compare to twice the length of time as your electric kettle?  Because if your Electric Kettle actually allows you to be eating your pasta before our water has even boiled, that would require your kettle to boil water in around -2min to -6min. And if your electric kettle can time travel, then that is truly an astonishing device.  Honestly my takeaway from this is that British Stoves must be apparently heated by a single candle if &amp;quot;boiling water for pasta&amp;quot; is considered to take a &amp;quot;l-o-o-o-ng time&amp;quot;. {{unsigned ip|162.158.126.161|21:51, 10 December 2024 (UTC)}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I wonder what the Brits would feel about repurposing a single-cup coffee maker.  These days, I usually put a tea bag in a mug and place it in a Keurig machine and run it (without a K-cup, of course) to deliver the hot water.  Probably the wrong temperature, but fast and easy and the result is good enough.  [[User:Shamino|Shamino]] ([[User talk:Shamino|talk]]) 14:52, 10 December 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Would any British person care to evaluate my tea making practices? Boil water in electric kettle. Pour water over teabag, allow to steep, remove teabag. Add sugar and ice cubes. [[User:RegularSizedGuy|RegularSizedGuy]] ([[User talk:RegularSizedGuy|talk]]) 15:54, 10 December 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:...well, seems a fairly standard &amp;quot;making one mug of tea for oneself&amp;quot; process. It lacks a milk-adding stage (thus no arguments about whether before or after the water). Removing the teabag at that point probably means it's not going to become a Builders' Brew, which is your choicd. Sugar is ok. And... Waitwhat... ''Ice Cubes?!?'' ...can I get back to you on that? [[Special:Contributions/172.70.162.163|172.70.162.163]] 17:50, 10 December 2024 (UTC)  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I can confirm (by inadvertent experiments conducted on flatmates) that they indeed do not like tea being make in the kettle.  What really makes them angry though is making coffee in the teapot.  It ruins the taste of the teapot forever apparently.  There is also a faction that insists that a teapot should never be washed, and washing it invokes a lesser anger.[[User:Gopher|Gopher]] ([[User talk:Gopher|talk]]) 15:56, 10 December 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On rare occasions where I don't have a kettle available, I use a microwave oven to boil water for tea. But it doesn't look and taste quite the same, and often leaves an ugly foam at the surface when the tea bag is added. This phenomenon is investigated here: https://cooking.stackexchange.com/a/22264. So the British might be right... Disclaimer: I'm neither from the UK nor from the US. [[Special:Contributions/172.69.68.126|172.69.68.126]] 16:16, 10 December 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There is a [https://www.tumblr.com/elodieunderglass/669449994039853056/wizardlyghost-silverjirachi-pidoop tumblr thread] about the topic of teamaking in microwaves, kettles, etc. Funnily enough it showed up in my Instagram reels feed just a few hours before this comic was posted. I was thinking perhaps Randall saw it too and was inspired by it? Both of them have to deal with the different ways of making tea and how &amp;quot;absurd&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;unconventional&amp;quot; (etc.) they are. Even if Randall didn't have it in mind, it's certainly a funny little coincidence. [[User:Pie Guy|Pie Guy]] ([[User talk:Pie Guy|talk]]) 16:36, 10 December 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I'm guessing my occasional summertime practice of filling a gallon jar with water and lots of tea bags, setting it on the back porch in the sun for a few hours until the water turns dark brown, then putting the whole thing in the refrigerator and later drinking it over ice would be toward the more angry end of the spectrum.[[Special:Contributions/172.70.126.204|172.70.126.204]] 16:39, 10 December 2024 (UTC)Pat&lt;br /&gt;
:I think the &amp;quot;in the sun for a few hours&amp;quot; part might just be too incomprehensible to most of us, here in Britain. If we ''have'' a few hours of sun (and we're not abroad and deliberately sunburning ourselves on the beach/beside the pool in our week at the Costa Lotta budget-all-inclusivs holiday) then we're either fuming at our workdesks complaining about the louts stripping down to their shirtsleeves and splashing in the town-centre fountains or we're on our lunch-break and we ''are'' the louts stripping down to our shirtsleeves and splashing in the town-centre fountains. In neither case would sun-stewed tea be a priority. [[Special:Contributions/172.70.162.163|172.70.162.163]] 17:50, 10 December 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Perhaps it's worth to mention how dangerous it is to boil water in a microwave. https://tastecooking.com/dangerous-microwave-water/&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Mestafais|Mestafais]] ([[User talk:Mestafais|talk]]) 15:22, 10 December 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:I have a &amp;gt;5 inch burn scar on my forearm, to arrest to that. [[User:ProphetZarquon|ProphetZarquon]] ([[User talk:ProphetZarquon|talk]]) 14:21, 11 December 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are several comics with unmarked scales. It would be interesting if the descriptions started using pixels to point where each mark is along the line. As a rough estimate, the four points mentioned here are at X-values: 90px, 115px, 345px, and 645px, indicating that the pot method is 10% as infuriating as the chalice method - or that making tea in a pot ten times would be equally as infuriating as making it once in a chalice (at least, assuming the kettle method causes zero furons. I know of {{w|hedons and dolors}}. I guess 'furons' are a unit of fury, right? [[Special:Contributions/172.70.46.236|172.70.46.236]] 16:11, 10 December 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Interesting to see the interest in editing this. Had a quick check of the last ten comics, looking at the number of edits made in the first 14 hours (the exact time this page has been around, as of me starting the check) and in total, and extrapolated to edits/day (in the case of total edits, both just to the latest edit and right up to 'now'). Thought it'd be interesting to give you my results (assuming I tallied/etc correctly)...&lt;br /&gt;
*3022 - 14hr: '''61''' ('''105'''/day); Total: 61 ('''105/day...''')&lt;br /&gt;
*3021 - 14hr: 23 (39/day); Total: 39 (11/day -&amp;gt; 10/day)&lt;br /&gt;
*3020 - 14hr: 22 (38/day); Total: 36 (10/day -&amp;gt; 6/day)&lt;br /&gt;
*3019 - 14hr: 28 (48/day); Total: 54 (17/day -&amp;gt; 7/day)&lt;br /&gt;
*3018 - 14hr: 14 (24/day); Total: 48 (4/day -&amp;gt; 4/day)&lt;br /&gt;
*3017 - 14hr: 29 (50/day); Total: 33 (32/day -&amp;gt; 3/day)&lt;br /&gt;
*3016 - 14hr: 28 (48/day); Total: 46 (4/day -&amp;gt; 3/day)&lt;br /&gt;
*3015 - 14hr: 20 (32/day); Total: '''83''' (5/day -&amp;gt; 5/day)&lt;br /&gt;
*3014 - 14hr: 40 (69/day); Total: 66 (16/day -&amp;gt; 3/day)&lt;br /&gt;
*3013 - 14hr: 36 (61/day); Total: 68 (3/day -&amp;gt; 3/day)&lt;br /&gt;
...of course, the first 14 hours probably biases to British readers/editors, and it was too fiddly to add up ''|bytes changed per edit|'' as a more useful metric than mere number of pokes. But quite a bit of interest we already have here. More edits in fourteen hours than any other article less than fourteen (indeed, 17!) days old... ;) Seems to have really hit a mark, this subject! [[Special:Contributions/172.69.195.201|172.69.195.201]] 19:21, 10 December 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:This one is super weird. I may be weirdness incarnate... but... [[User:Maybe Bill Cipher|An anonymous Gravity Falls expert]] ([[User talk:Maybe Bill Cipher|talk]]) 19:33, 10 December 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Well obviously. I mean this one ''really'' matters![[Special:Contributions/141.101.98.23|141.101.98.23]] 08:52, 11 December 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I would argue that the more pessimistic interpretation of the two low-end options makes sense, rather than the more generous versions offered in the current explanation. I think the first one does literally mean making tea in the kettle, and the second one does mean boiling water in a teapot. Making tea *using* a kettle isn't anything to get mad about, it's the default practice. That should put it at the zero point of the line, but it isn't, it's to the right. On the other hand, obviously making tea *in* the kettle would incite a modest amount of rage (on the scale of zero to microwaving a mug), and it makes sense that boiling water in a teapot would incite about 50% more, as shown.[[Special:Contributions/172.69.134.160|172.69.134.160]] 19:51, 10 December 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
: An American making tea in the correct way by boiling water in the kettle and then pouring that into a teapot with the tea would still probably conspire to make it badly and make the Brit angry. And Brits really do get quite upset about the idea of tea made with water boiled in a stovetop pan.[[Special:Contributions/141.101.98.23|141.101.98.23]] 08:55, 11 December 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There is a standard for making tea, ISO 3103: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ISO_3103, and apparently from the Royal Society of Chemistry.&lt;br /&gt;
And, of course, it must be really hot for in infinite improbability drive to work properly.&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Lordpishky|Lordpishky]] ([[User talk:Lordpishky|talk]]) 20:24, 10 December 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
All this blather and not one bit about that quintessential Kiwi staple, [https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/gumboot_tea gumboot tea]. Boil the kettle (about the size of a Dutch oven), throw in handfuls of leaf black tea, and let it sit until consumed. Reheat as needed. One sip, and the source of the Commonwealth aversion to the insane Yankee habit of drinking tea black is immediately apparent. [[Special:Contributions/172.70.123.8|172.70.123.8]] 20:31, 10 December 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
So, I have a Quooker that boils my water. Add tea (leaves)... done. But *don't* add milk, please.... spoil... {{unsigned|Palmpje|20:50, 10 December 2024 (UTC)}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''Ultimately, the real difference comes down to convenience: In the USA, the standard voltage for electric appliances (including an electric kettle) is 120 volts, while it is twice that (240 volts in practice, though nominally 230V) in the UK. Since the amperage for an electric kettle is the the same in both countries (15 amps), this means that an equivalent kettle in the UK has twice the power (3.2kw versus 1.6kw), and can heat the water in a fraction of the time. Meanwhile, a standard microwave has a similar power in both countries (from 700 to 1000 watts), for reasons unrelated to the supply voltage it is equipped to use. Therefore, heating a small cup in a microwave might take a few moments longer than a kettle in the USA, but is many times slower to wait for compared to using an electric kettle in the UK.'' Electric kettles are a bit faster in the UK due to the voltage difference, but it's not that much and I highly doubt speed is the main concern here. The main 'convenience' difference between boiling water in a kettle vs a microwave is quantity: Brits usually don't just make one cup/mug of tea! On the rare occasion Americans drink tea, it's more often just the one person drinking one cup, making a microwave a convenient choice.[[Special:Contributions/162.158.233.90|162.158.233.90]] 21:40, 10 December 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Add in some [https://www.foodandwine.com/why-you-should-add-salt-to-tea-8549735 salt]! '''[[User:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:9pt;color:#A9C6CA&amp;quot;&amp;gt;42.book.addict&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:6pt;color:#516874&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Talk to me!&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;''' 21:44, 10 December 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It's not about voltage. They use different gauge heater wire to get the Watts wanted/allowed. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The classic UK plug is nominal 13 Amps. (The circuits may be nominal 16A but there is now better insulation than in 1949.) At 230 Volts that would be 3KW (near enuff). That will be the &amp;quot;legal numbers&amp;quot;. At 240V it may be 3,250W true. OTOH a 10V sag might be expected in all but the poshest wall-wiring. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
amazon.co.uk sells kettles nearly all rated 3KW. Exceptions are Greepas at 1800W (&amp;quot;However, some customers have reported that it's very slow to boil&amp;quot;); also Philips 2200W, Daewoo 1400W, and OLEGA 1500W 'Fast Boiling'.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
OTOH!!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On Amazon US site nearly all kettles are 1500W, a few lower like 1100W. At assumed 120V 1500W is 12.5Amps. 15Amp circuits are still common in older houses (despite changes in 1960s) but we supposed to de-rate for 'long-running' (not clearly specified in old code) so 12 Amps is in a ballpark. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Note that all US kettles are lower power than all but the tamest UK kettles. Essentially half power. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
And IIRC, the 13/16A rating which allows super-power kettles in the UK was not for tea but for &amp;quot;electric fire&amp;quot;, room heat. In post-War rebuilding, smokey coal was already depreciated in cities, steam plumbing and chimneys are expensive. Copper wire is costly too, but you &amp;quot;have&amp;quot; to have electric, and low-cost plans like ring-main were investigated.&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:PRR|PRR]] ([[User talk:PRR|talk]]) 22:44, 10 December 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;accept that tea-appropriate boiling water can be obtained directly from the sink's plumbing&amp;quot; - unless it comes out literally at boiling temperature, it isn't tea appropriate. I live in France now, and order catering bags of tea from Amazon because French tea is dismally awful, not helped at all by this fairly widespread belief that black tea steeps at 60C. When I share tea bags with friends, I have to keep reminding them, boiling! Boiling! So, see, there are worse things than using a microwave to heat the water... [[Special:Contributions/172.71.126.208|172.71.126.208]] 06:00, 11 December 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Not boiling - OFF boiling. Higher than 60C, yes, but if you put actually boiling water straight on to the tea (or worse, boil the water with the tea in it), that's at least as bad. (And how far off the boil exactly depends on the type of tea.) [[Special:Contributions/141.101.98.22|141.101.98.22]] 09:00, 11 December 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What's up with the &amp;quot;We want to ensure'''[sic]''' the good people of the U.K&amp;quot;?&lt;br /&gt;
I really can't see the US Embassy insuring them for any amount, so what gives? [[User:Ryden|Ryden]] ([[User talk:Ryden|talk]]) 12:27, 11 December 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Came here to make the same note. “Ensure” is not misspelled, why is it marked with “[sic]”? [[User:Dúthomhas|Dúthomhas]] ([[User talk:Dúthomhas|talk]]) 12:40, 11 December 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::It's the wrong word entirely for the longer sentence. They perhaps wished to ''assure'' the good people, etc... &amp;quot;Ensure&amp;quot; means to &amp;quot;check and fix&amp;quot; something, in the way this is connected to &amp;quot;the good people&amp;quot; (implying that ''they'' would be changed to deal with any discrepancy of expectations), but this reading also goes wrong by the &amp;quot;that&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
::In the sense of making a pledge (probably the actual intent), the structure is all wrong and probably was hastily reworded from a different narrative path, but left half-and-half and not making sense. My most minimal rewording for this would be &amp;quot;We want to ensure &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;to&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; the good people of the U.K. that ...&amp;quot;, but it still reads very awkwardly. Perhaps it always made more sense to the average 'Merkin (c.f. &amp;quot;write me&amp;quot; instead of &amp;quot;write &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;to&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; me&amp;quot;), but I still would have written &amp;quot;assure&amp;quot; (as attempt to be comforting) or &amp;quot;pledge to&amp;quot; (for a more fervent sincerity of positive action).&lt;br /&gt;
::And to &amp;quot;insure&amp;quot; (for British English) is different yet again. While not working at all in the full sentence, it would start to suggest the actual possibility of such wrongness happening, but with the promise of monetary (or other) compensation if it does. [[Special:Contributions/141.101.98.149|141.101.98.149]] 15:43, 11 December 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Question: Does the obsession with tea apply to all of Britain equally? E.g. are the Scottish just as stereotypicly known for loving tea as the English? This comic immediately brings Arthur Dent to my mind, and he's Very English Indeed. (&amp;quot;A liquid almost but not quite entirely unlike tea&amp;quot; is missing somewhere in the left third of the comic. :) --an intrigued German [[Special:Contributions/172.71.148.103|172.71.148.103]] 14:35, 11 December 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:The four nations probably have had a similar outlook, but everyone may have had different social reasons. Tea-totalling perhaps was the initial driver in the more methodist corners, to get working people not to drink too much beer/cider/gin. The high social status version of regency ladies. It then sort of met in the middle by the time of the tea-ladies trolleying around refreshments to boardrooms and factory floors alike, in the same building.&lt;br /&gt;
:For WW2, the British government's demand for tea supplies was at least as important as ammunition. All British tanks apparently had (and continue to have) a hot-water boiler in the crew comparatment (not just for tea, but, probably the main thing at times). Official worries about tea [http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/7382750.stm lasted beyond that era].&lt;br /&gt;
:Generalising for everyone ''now'' is probably wrong, but visiting elderly relatives all over the UK, I'd ''always'' be passed a cup of tea (and a plate of cakes, or biscuits, placed temptingly close at hand). A pity that I never really liked tea (the cakes/biscuits are a bonus and a mitigating factor, but politeness demands that I throttle back my desires in that direction). [[Special:Contributions/141.101.98.149|141.101.98.149]] 15:43, 11 December 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Boy, they ''really'' get mad when you microwave the Chalice. [[User:ProphetZarquon|ProphetZarquon]] ([[User talk:ProphetZarquon|talk]]) 14:18, 11 December 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:I think putting metal in the microwave is probably frowned upon worldwide. (Unless you're an ex-Navy Seal and cook who has found your ship taken over by mercenaries with a mad plan. Then go ahead.) [[Special:Contributions/162.158.74.119|162.158.74.119]] 16:07, 11 December 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I find that Brits really hate it when you bring up the concept of sweet tea, during the summer my family would fill up a jug with water add some tea bags then leave it on the porch over night. [[User:Resign|Resign]] ([[User talk:Resign|talk]]) 07:35, 12 December 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This is the most comprehensively explained comic in a while 😂 I guess there are a lot of passionate tea-makers around here. As a non-tea-drinker living in a Commonwealth country, I have definitely heard the outrageous stereotype that Americans microwave their water. Definitely practical when you don't own a kettle, but slow when brewing for a group. [[User:Alcatraz ii|Alcatraz ii]] ([[User talk:Alcatraz ii|talk]]) 08:07, 12 December 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Would the small metal piece that sticks together the label of the teabag at the end of the string be an issue when microwaved (with the water or seperately)? Or is too small for that? (I know not all teabags have that, especially british &amp;quot;black tea&amp;quot; often comes in packages without string, but my usual tea does have it...) --[[User:Lupo|Lupo]] ([[User talk:Lupo|talk]]) 08:59, 12 December 2024 (UTC)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>141.101.98.243</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=3022:_Making_Tea&amp;diff=359215</id>
		<title>3022: Making Tea</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=3022:_Making_Tea&amp;diff=359215"/>
				<updated>2024-12-12T09:41:12Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;141.101.98.243: /* Other tea controversies */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{comic&lt;br /&gt;
| number    = 3022&lt;br /&gt;
| date      = December 9, 2024&lt;br /&gt;
| title     = Making Tea&lt;br /&gt;
| image     = making_tea_2x.png&lt;br /&gt;
| imagesize = 690x291px&lt;br /&gt;
| noexpand  = true&lt;br /&gt;
| titletext = No, of course we don't microwave the mug WITH the teabag in it. We microwave the teabag separately.&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Explanation==&lt;br /&gt;
{{incomplete|Microwaved by a BRITISH PERSON RAGING OVER TEA MADE FROM THE GREAT LAKES - Do NOT delete this tag too soon.}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{w|Tea}} is exceptionally popular in the United Kingdom (although [https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c4gpll9l535o decreasingly so], and not as serious a business as in {{w|Japanese tea ceremony|Japan}} and {{w|Chinese tea culture|China}}). Virtually every home has an electric kettle as a standard appliance for boiling hot water (used to make tea, coffee, soup powders, instant mash, etc) and teapots and other related crockery can be found in many cupboards, or even on a shelf in full display, whether or not regularly used. British people are perceived as taking tea seriously, having very specific and strongly held opinions on the proper way to make tea. In contrast, tea (especially hot tea) is less commonplace in the United States of America (Randall's native country) and owning tea-making equipment is probably far less common than having coffee-makers and/or juicers of various kinds. While some US households have kettles that can be put on a stove top, many do not have any specific device to boil water. As a result, when Americans need a cup of hot water — for tea or otherwise — the options are usually to use a pan on the stove, or to simply microwave a mug of water (the latter probably being more common in modern times). {{w|Instant hot water dispenser|Instant hot water taps}} are also common in many homes, water coolers, and public drinking fountains in the US; they are being marketed for &amp;quot;high-end kitchens&amp;quot; in the UK, in particularly fancy multi-function taps (US: 'faucets'), but the British are still somewhat reluctant to accept the 'mixer tap' concept, and probably will take quite some time to accept that tea-appropriate boiling water can be obtained directly from the sink's plumbing.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
British people are stereotyped as taking genuine offense to microwaved water, believing it to be an objectively incorrect way to make tea. Randall mocks this stereotype through exaggeration, saying British people would be significantly less offended by someone stealing {{w|Crown Jewels of the United Kingdom|the Crown Jewels}} and using those for tea-making than they would be by tea made with a cup of microwaved water.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Methods mentioned===&lt;br /&gt;
;Making it in a kettle&lt;br /&gt;
:Perhaps an intentional misnomer. Water may be ''boiled'' in a kettle, but the tea itself is made in a separate {{w|teapot}}, with loose or bagged tea-leaves, ready for pouring into any number of {{w|teacup}}s, {{w|mug}}s or {{w|vacuum flask|thermos flask}} as required. Making tea actually ''in'' the kettle, by placing the tea in with the water and then boiling it, would be considered ''very'' bad form  and render the kettle less useful for its other purposes (and likely void your warranty). Boiling the water in a kettle is standard practice (occasionally a {{w|Water heating|potable water geyser}} or similar may be available), leaving the tea-making process to occur in the teapot (as above) or the drinking vessel (as below). Randall may be suggesting that the spectacle of someone making tea directly in a kettle would be so bizarre that a British onlooker would be so baffled that they would completely forget to be angry about it, but the absence of a data point for the historically standard method &amp;quot;making it in a teapot&amp;quot; could suggest more that he's accidentally written &amp;quot;in a kettle&amp;quot; when he meant &amp;quot;with a kettle&amp;quot;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
;Boiling water in a pot, steeping in a mug&lt;br /&gt;
:Identical to the basic boiling process above, except using a pot (commonly called a 'saucepan' in the UK) on the stove, rather than a kettle. This is slightly less convenient than using a kettle (since the pan often lacks a dedicated spout for pouring, and either whistle, which the steam sounds when the water boils, or the automatic cut-off found on most electric kettles), but is otherwise functionally identical. Nonetheless, the comic notes that Brits would take mild offense, considering it to be inferior to using a kettle.&lt;br /&gt;
:To confuse matters, British people would normally take '{{wiktionary|pot#Noun|pot}}' (in the specific context of tea-making) to be [https://idioms.thefreedictionary.com/one+for+the+pot short for 'teapot']. However, a ceramic teapot should ''never'' be directly heated in the manner of a pan or a kettle. It should be filled with recently boiled (but not boiling) water, ''ideally'' after an initial small splash of hot water is swirled around it to 'condition' the teapot and then the requisite number of teabags (or quantity of tealeaves) dropped in.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
;Making it in a chalice and ampulla stolen from the Crown Jewels&lt;br /&gt;
:A {{w|chalice}} is an ornate type of cup; an {{w|ampulla}} is a type of flask or bottle. Both are typically now terms used in relation to objects used in ritual. Randall is likely drawing a parallel here with the ritualism and particularity with which some people surround the making of tea and its associated artefacts.&lt;br /&gt;
:The {{w|Crown_Jewels_of_the_United_Kingdom|Crown Jewels}} are a set of items belonging to the British monarchy, including ceremonial items and clothing using in royal coronations. These items have both major cultural significance, due to their historical connection with the monarchy, and major objective value, as many of them are heavily jeweled and/or made of precious metals. To steal items from this collection for the purpose of tea-making would obviously be both highly criminal and highly disrespectful. The ampulla referenced is used to anoint the monarch with oil during the coronation ceremony and the chalice may refer to a {{w|Eucharist|Communion vessel}}, giving them religious significance as well.&lt;br /&gt;
:More importantly for many, though, this would be incorrect tea-ware. The gold or silver chalices and gold ampulla are doubtful as being of suitable materials for British tea-making (as opposed to using cast iron, stainless steel, silver-plate, robust ceramics and/or fine china, for various stages of the process) and there'd definitely be some complaints that it does not taste like a proper cuppa (particularly if oil residue from the ampulla has made its way into the tea). To use such objects to make tea would simply {{wiktionary|not cricket|not be cricket}}.&lt;br /&gt;
:The suggestion that this method is less angering than microwaving a mug emphasizes the British hate for microwaving.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
;Microwaving a mug&lt;br /&gt;
:As mentioned above, heating water in a microwave, for any purpose, is considered acceptable and common in the US. To do so to make tea is considered uncommon and borderline heretical in the UK. The reasons for this are difficult to pin down. Some argue that the microwave doesn't allow proper control over the water temperature (which is considered vital for proper tea-making), but this position is questionable at best. Others raise the danger of superheating water which might boil over when the tea bag is added, but this is likely a highly overblown concern. Some people even argue that microwaving changes the quality or composition of the water in some way, but there's very little science to back that up.&lt;br /&gt;
:Another disputed theory for the difference in approach surrounds convenience. Electric kettles and microwaves are both highly efficient methods of heating water with electricity, but electric kettles in the UK tend to draw significantly more power than either US kettles or microwaves (due, in part, to higher main voltage in the UK grid). As a result, UK kettles can heat an equivalent volume of water significantly faster than can microwaves. When making a single cup, the difference is unlikely to be significant, but when making tea for a whole family, or for guests (as is much more common in the UK), using a microwave would be much less convenient.&lt;br /&gt;
:Ultimately, though, the difference probably comes down to an accident of culture. Most likely, the preparation of tea simply has a sense of tradition and ritual in Britain, and using a microwave feels crass, modern, and completely disconnected from the cultural associations of tea. It may also feel wrong because it inverts the expectation that the hot water is poured over the tea, requiring instead that the tea be submerged in the water. Meanwhile, electric kettles have simply never really caught on in the US.&lt;br /&gt;
:The title text continues with this theme, by reassuring us that the microwaved mug doesn't have a teabag in it (analogous to the 'boiling tea-kettle' version). It then strays into farce, though, by suggesting it is separately microwaved. There is no obvious reason to microwave a teabag. Microwave ovens heat water molecules almost exclusively, and tealeaves (and bag) should be dry before use, with no water molecules to heat. The wrongheadedness of this claim does little but provoke a skeptic's doubts about how utterly perverse this colonial variation on tea-making has become.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Other tea controversies===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Other sources of controversy in the {{w|A Nice Cup of Tea|correct way to make tea}} are not covered in the comic, or hidden behind the other 'obvious errors'. Perhaps primary among these is the question of the difference between making (and steeping) the tea in a teapot and pouring the water over a teabag in a mug.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The former tends to be a more formal method, to serve in polite company, ''or'' from the traditional need to prepare a large volume of tea for an indeterminate number of recipients and refills, such as in a canteen/cafeteria situation, where the 'pot' stays hot for almost as long as the supply lasts. A prepared teapot of tea allows a fairly consistent 'brew' that is readily poured out into teacups (or mugs) as and when required, and can be readily topped up if an increase in the supply is needed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The latter method relies upon individual teabags or loose-leaf tea in an individual infuser, and lets each recipient leave the tea in for as long as they personally prefer (or end up having to), which reflects more individual flexibility. Again, this splits between 'high' and 'low' class use. The infamous &amp;quot;builders' tea&amp;quot; often has the teabag left in for a long time (even during drinking), with plenty of milk and sugar, to perhaps produce an increasingly dense brew as the workman concerned takes opportune sips as he (usually) can during his work. Conversely, the trend in more stylish restaurants and tearooms tends to be to supply each customer their teacup together with an individual small vessel of freshly boiled water (rarely more than one or two cups-worth) and the recipient's choices of bagged tea (including fruit/herbal) and additions (milk, or equivalent, lemon, etc, plus sweeteners of all kinds), letting them prepare their own infusion exactly in their own way; this is often presented with an air of 'continental sophistication', but may bemuse and confuse the more down-to-Earth British tea-drinker used to their home method, as does the choice of dozens of fancy coffees from a barista when they'd be happy enough with a decent &amp;quot;instant coffee&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The issue of whether the milk (not obligatory, but decisively traditional) should be put in ''before'' the tea (or teabag!) is also often considered {{tvtropes|SeriousBusiness|Serious Business}}...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In [https://www.foodandwine.com/why-you-should-add-salt-to-tea-8549735 January of 2024], Michelle Francl, Ph.D., a chemistry professor at Bryn Mawr College in Pennsylvania, suggested putting a pinch of salt into tea, saying that the sodium in salt blocks the bitter taste of tea. This prompted a great outcry by [https://www.theguardian.com/food/2024/jan/24/perfect-cup-of-tea-needs-a-pinch-of-salt-and-squeeze-of-lemon-says-us-chemist?scrlybrkr=361c99cc The Guardian] and a statement by the US embassy on X (Twitter): “Today's media reports of an American Professor's recipe for the 'perfect' cup of tea has landed our special bond with the United Kingdom in hot water … We want to ensure[sic] the good people of the U.K. that the unthinkable notion of adding salt to Britain's national drink is not official United States Policy. And never will be. ... The US embassy will continue to make tea in the proper way – by microwaving it.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Transcript==&lt;br /&gt;
:[A line chart is shown. Above the chart are, from top to bottom, a heading, a subheading, and an arrow pointing right with a label above. On the line there are four labeled tick marks, with the labels written beneath the line. A small curved line is going from each label to below their tick. The first two ticks are close together on the far left side of the graph, the third is approximately in the center, and the fourth is on the far right side of the graph.] &lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;big&amp;gt;Ways of Making Tea&amp;lt;/big&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:By how angry British people get when Americans do them&lt;br /&gt;
:More angry&lt;br /&gt;
:Making it in a kettle&lt;br /&gt;
:Boiling water in a pot, steeping in a mug&lt;br /&gt;
:Making it in a chalice and ampulla stolen from the Crown Jewels&lt;br /&gt;
:Microwaving a mug&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{comic discussion}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Charts]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Food]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Rankings]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>141.101.98.243</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=3022:_Making_Tea&amp;diff=359214</id>
		<title>3022: Making Tea</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=3022:_Making_Tea&amp;diff=359214"/>
				<updated>2024-12-12T09:40:18Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;141.101.98.243: /* Other tea controversies */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{comic&lt;br /&gt;
| number    = 3022&lt;br /&gt;
| date      = December 9, 2024&lt;br /&gt;
| title     = Making Tea&lt;br /&gt;
| image     = making_tea_2x.png&lt;br /&gt;
| imagesize = 690x291px&lt;br /&gt;
| noexpand  = true&lt;br /&gt;
| titletext = No, of course we don't microwave the mug WITH the teabag in it. We microwave the teabag separately.&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Explanation==&lt;br /&gt;
{{incomplete|Microwaved by a BRITISH PERSON RAGING OVER TEA MADE FROM THE GREAT LAKES - Do NOT delete this tag too soon.}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{w|Tea}} is exceptionally popular in the United Kingdom (although [https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c4gpll9l535o decreasingly so], and not as serious a business as in {{w|Japanese tea ceremony|Japan}} and {{w|Chinese tea culture|China}}). Virtually every home has an electric kettle as a standard appliance for boiling hot water (used to make tea, coffee, soup powders, instant mash, etc) and teapots and other related crockery can be found in many cupboards, or even on a shelf in full display, whether or not regularly used. British people are perceived as taking tea seriously, having very specific and strongly held opinions on the proper way to make tea. In contrast, tea (especially hot tea) is less commonplace in the United States of America (Randall's native country) and owning tea-making equipment is probably far less common than having coffee-makers and/or juicers of various kinds. While some US households have kettles that can be put on a stove top, many do not have any specific device to boil water. As a result, when Americans need a cup of hot water — for tea or otherwise — the options are usually to use a pan on the stove, or to simply microwave a mug of water (the latter probably being more common in modern times). {{w|Instant hot water dispenser|Instant hot water taps}} are also common in many homes, water coolers, and public drinking fountains in the US; they are being marketed for &amp;quot;high-end kitchens&amp;quot; in the UK, in particularly fancy multi-function taps (US: 'faucets'), but the British are still somewhat reluctant to accept the 'mixer tap' concept, and probably will take quite some time to accept that tea-appropriate boiling water can be obtained directly from the sink's plumbing.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
British people are stereotyped as taking genuine offense to microwaved water, believing it to be an objectively incorrect way to make tea. Randall mocks this stereotype through exaggeration, saying British people would be significantly less offended by someone stealing {{w|Crown Jewels of the United Kingdom|the Crown Jewels}} and using those for tea-making than they would be by tea made with a cup of microwaved water.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Methods mentioned===&lt;br /&gt;
;Making it in a kettle&lt;br /&gt;
:Perhaps an intentional misnomer. Water may be ''boiled'' in a kettle, but the tea itself is made in a separate {{w|teapot}}, with loose or bagged tea-leaves, ready for pouring into any number of {{w|teacup}}s, {{w|mug}}s or {{w|vacuum flask|thermos flask}} as required. Making tea actually ''in'' the kettle, by placing the tea in with the water and then boiling it, would be considered ''very'' bad form  and render the kettle less useful for its other purposes (and likely void your warranty). Boiling the water in a kettle is standard practice (occasionally a {{w|Water heating|potable water geyser}} or similar may be available), leaving the tea-making process to occur in the teapot (as above) or the drinking vessel (as below). Randall may be suggesting that the spectacle of someone making tea directly in a kettle would be so bizarre that a British onlooker would be so baffled that they would completely forget to be angry about it, but the absence of a data point for the historically standard method &amp;quot;making it in a teapot&amp;quot; could suggest more that he's accidentally written &amp;quot;in a kettle&amp;quot; when he meant &amp;quot;with a kettle&amp;quot;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
;Boiling water in a pot, steeping in a mug&lt;br /&gt;
:Identical to the basic boiling process above, except using a pot (commonly called a 'saucepan' in the UK) on the stove, rather than a kettle. This is slightly less convenient than using a kettle (since the pan often lacks a dedicated spout for pouring, and either whistle, which the steam sounds when the water boils, or the automatic cut-off found on most electric kettles), but is otherwise functionally identical. Nonetheless, the comic notes that Brits would take mild offense, considering it to be inferior to using a kettle.&lt;br /&gt;
:To confuse matters, British people would normally take '{{wiktionary|pot#Noun|pot}}' (in the specific context of tea-making) to be [https://idioms.thefreedictionary.com/one+for+the+pot short for 'teapot']. However, a ceramic teapot should ''never'' be directly heated in the manner of a pan or a kettle. It should be filled with recently boiled (but not boiling) water, ''ideally'' after an initial small splash of hot water is swirled around it to 'condition' the teapot and then the requisite number of teabags (or quantity of tealeaves) dropped in.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
;Making it in a chalice and ampulla stolen from the Crown Jewels&lt;br /&gt;
:A {{w|chalice}} is an ornate type of cup; an {{w|ampulla}} is a type of flask or bottle. Both are typically now terms used in relation to objects used in ritual. Randall is likely drawing a parallel here with the ritualism and particularity with which some people surround the making of tea and its associated artefacts.&lt;br /&gt;
:The {{w|Crown_Jewels_of_the_United_Kingdom|Crown Jewels}} are a set of items belonging to the British monarchy, including ceremonial items and clothing using in royal coronations. These items have both major cultural significance, due to their historical connection with the monarchy, and major objective value, as many of them are heavily jeweled and/or made of precious metals. To steal items from this collection for the purpose of tea-making would obviously be both highly criminal and highly disrespectful. The ampulla referenced is used to anoint the monarch with oil during the coronation ceremony and the chalice may refer to a {{w|Eucharist|Communion vessel}}, giving them religious significance as well.&lt;br /&gt;
:More importantly for many, though, this would be incorrect tea-ware. The gold or silver chalices and gold ampulla are doubtful as being of suitable materials for British tea-making (as opposed to using cast iron, stainless steel, silver-plate, robust ceramics and/or fine china, for various stages of the process) and there'd definitely be some complaints that it does not taste like a proper cuppa (particularly if oil residue from the ampulla has made its way into the tea). To use such objects to make tea would simply {{wiktionary|not cricket|not be cricket}}.&lt;br /&gt;
:The suggestion that this method is less angering than microwaving a mug emphasizes the British hate for microwaving.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
;Microwaving a mug&lt;br /&gt;
:As mentioned above, heating water in a microwave, for any purpose, is considered acceptable and common in the US. To do so to make tea is considered uncommon and borderline heretical in the UK. The reasons for this are difficult to pin down. Some argue that the microwave doesn't allow proper control over the water temperature (which is considered vital for proper tea-making), but this position is questionable at best. Others raise the danger of superheating water which might boil over when the tea bag is added, but this is likely a highly overblown concern. Some people even argue that microwaving changes the quality or composition of the water in some way, but there's very little science to back that up.&lt;br /&gt;
:Another disputed theory for the difference in approach surrounds convenience. Electric kettles and microwaves are both highly efficient methods of heating water with electricity, but electric kettles in the UK tend to draw significantly more power than either US kettles or microwaves (due, in part, to higher main voltage in the UK grid). As a result, UK kettles can heat an equivalent volume of water significantly faster than can microwaves. When making a single cup, the difference is unlikely to be significant, but when making tea for a whole family, or for guests (as is much more common in the UK), using a microwave would be much less convenient.&lt;br /&gt;
:Ultimately, though, the difference probably comes down to an accident of culture. Most likely, the preparation of tea simply has a sense of tradition and ritual in Britain, and using a microwave feels crass, modern, and completely disconnected from the cultural associations of tea. It may also feel wrong because it inverts the expectation that the hot water is poured over the tea, requiring instead that the tea be submerged in the water. Meanwhile, electric kettles have simply never really caught on in the US.&lt;br /&gt;
:The title text continues with this theme, by reassuring us that the microwaved mug doesn't have a teabag in it (analogous to the 'boiling tea-kettle' version). It then strays into farce, though, by suggesting it is separately microwaved. There is no obvious reason to microwave a teabag. Microwave ovens heat water molecules almost exclusively, and tealeaves (and bag) should be dry before use, with no water molecules to heat. The wrongheadedness of this claim does little but provoke a skeptic's doubts about how utterly perverse this colonial variation on tea-making has become.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Other tea controversies===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Other sources of controversy in the {{w|A Nice Cup of Tea|correct way to make tea}} are not covered in the comic, or hidden behind the other 'obvious errors'. Perhaps primary among these is the question of the difference between making (and steeping) the tea in a teapot and pouring the water over a teabag in a mug.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The former tends to be a more formal method, to serve in polite company, ''or'' from the traditional need to prepare a large volume of tea for an indeterminate number of recipients and refills, such as in a canteen/cafeteria situation, where the 'pot' stays hot for almost as long as the supply lasts. A prepared teapot of tea allows a fairly consistent 'brew' that is readily poured out into teacups (or mugs) as and when required, and can be readily topped up if an increase in the supply is needed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The latter method relies upon individual teabags or loose-leaf tea in an individual infuser, and lets each recipient leave the tea in for as long as they personally prefer (or end up having to), which reflects more individual flexibility. Again, this splits between 'high' and 'low' class use. The infamous &amp;quot;builders' tea&amp;quot; often has the teabag left in for a long time (even during drinking), with plenty of milk and sugar, to perhaps produce an increasingly dense brew as the workman concerned takes opportune sips as he (usually) can during his work. Conversely, the trend in more stylish restaurants and tearooms tends to be to supply each customer their teacup together with an individual small vessel of freshly boiled water (rarely more than one or two cups-worth) and the recipient's choices of bagged tea (including fruit/herbal) and additions (milk, or equivalent, lemon, etc, plus sweeteners of all kinds), letting them prepare their own infusion exactly in their own way; this is often presented with an air of 'continental sophistication', but may bemuse and confuse the more down-to-Earth British tea-drinker used to their home method, as does the choice of dozens of fancy coffees from a barista when they'd be happy enough with a decent &amp;quot;instant coffee&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The issue of whether the milk (not obligatory, but decisively traditional) should be put in ''before'' the tea (or teabag!) is also often considered {{tvtropes|SeriousBusiness|Serious Business}}...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In [https://www.foodandwine.com/why-you-should-add-salt-to-tea-8549735 January of 2024], Michelle Francl, Ph.D., a chemistry professor at Bryn Mawr College in Pennsylvania, suggested to put a pinch of salt into tea, saying that the sodium in salt blocks the bitter taste of tea. This prompted a great outcry by [https://www.theguardian.com/food/2024/jan/24/perfect-cup-of-tea-needs-a-pinch-of-salt-and-squeeze-of-lemon-says-us-chemist?scrlybrkr=361c99cc The Guardian] and a statement by the US embassy on X (Twitter): “Today's media reports of an American Professor's recipe for the 'perfect' cup of tea has landed our special bond with the United Kingdom in hot water … We want to ensure[sic] the good people of the U.K. that the unthinkable notion of adding salt to Britain's national drink is not official United States Policy. And never will be. ... The US embassy will continue to make tea in the proper way – by microwaving it.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Transcript==&lt;br /&gt;
:[A line chart is shown. Above the chart are, from top to bottom, a heading, a subheading, and an arrow pointing right with a label above. On the line there are four labeled tick marks, with the labels written beneath the line. A small curved line is going from each label to below their tick. The first two ticks are close together on the far left side of the graph, the third is approximately in the center, and the fourth is on the far right side of the graph.] &lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;big&amp;gt;Ways of Making Tea&amp;lt;/big&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:By how angry British people get when Americans do them&lt;br /&gt;
:More angry&lt;br /&gt;
:Making it in a kettle&lt;br /&gt;
:Boiling water in a pot, steeping in a mug&lt;br /&gt;
:Making it in a chalice and ampulla stolen from the Crown Jewels&lt;br /&gt;
:Microwaving a mug&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{comic discussion}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Charts]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Food]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Rankings]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>141.101.98.243</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=2514:_Lab_Equipment&amp;diff=217954</id>
		<title>2514: Lab Equipment</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=2514:_Lab_Equipment&amp;diff=217954"/>
				<updated>2021-09-11T22:08:31Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;141.101.98.243: /* Transcript */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{comic&lt;br /&gt;
| number    = 2514&lt;br /&gt;
| date      = September 10, 2021&lt;br /&gt;
| title     = Lab Equipment&lt;br /&gt;
| image     = lab_equipment.png&lt;br /&gt;
| titletext = I've been working on chocolate bar annealing techniques to try to produce the perfect laser s'more. Maybe don't mention that on the grant application though.&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Explanation==&lt;br /&gt;
{{incomplete|Created by a LASER TOASTED MARSHMALLOW - Please change this comment when editing this page. Do NOT delete this tag too soon.}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This comic claims that in every science lab, there exist some piece of equipment that sticks around less for being useful, and more because the scientists and technicians just think the device is really cool.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The comic presents a laboratory containing equipment for analysis of substances. While giving a tour [[Ponytail]] shows a spectrometer &amp;amp;mdash; a device that examines light emitted from or passed through samples to fingerprint emission or absorption lines in the mix of light. Next she shows the &amp;quot;Nd:YAG&amp;quot; laser. &amp;quot;Nd:YAG&amp;quot; stands for {{w|Nd:YAG_laser|neodymium-doped yttrium aluminum garnet}}; it is a lasing medium commonly used in lasers. Lastly she shows off a decommissioned laser not used in experiments, but rather for toasting marshmallows.  Misuse of expensive, high-end equipment for heating junk food can lead to important breakthroughs.  For example, the microwave oven was invented when {{w|Percy Spencer|someone working on microwave radar}} accidentally melted a candy bar.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Contrariwise, laser etching and cutting is commonly available in hackerspaces or makerspaces, and toasted marshmallows can be made with high-definition shapes and textures, although a normal laser cutter may introduce toxic compounds to the food.  Food products have also been fed through 3d printers in place of plastic filament, and the printer will heat and plot them into arbitrarily shaped volumes.  Engineering research labs will also have some of these tools, but for chemical labs they could be a rare delight.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The title-text probably relates to the critical heating required for proper {{w|Chocolate#Tempering|tempering}} of chocolate, as arbitrarily (re)melted chocolate loses various qualities of {{w|mouthfeel}} from the crystalline sugary structures that manufacturers engineer into them. In this case it is described as {{w|Annealing (materials science)|annealing}}, which is more commonly a heat-treatment technique more used to influence the nature of the crystals in metals for structural reasons.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Transcript==&lt;br /&gt;
{{incomplete transcript|Do NOT delete this tag too soon.}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[Ponytail and Cueball are talking to each other. They are standing between two tables with equipment scattered on them, including lens-stands and eye-protection. Ponytail is pointing away from Cueball towards an unidentified off-panel location.]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Ponytail: The spectrometer is over here, the Nd:YAG lasers are over here,&lt;br /&gt;
:Ponytail: and in the corner is a laser that turned out not to be useful for us, but we keep it because it's fun to toast marshmallows with it.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[Caption below the panel]&lt;br /&gt;
:Every lab in every field has some piece of equipment like this.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{comic discussion}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Science]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Food]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>141.101.98.243</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=482:_Height&amp;diff=85551</id>
		<title>482: Height</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=482:_Height&amp;diff=85551"/>
				<updated>2015-03-03T17:21:29Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;141.101.98.243: /* Explanation */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{comic&lt;br /&gt;
| number    = 482&lt;br /&gt;
| date      = September 29, 2008&lt;br /&gt;
| title     = Height&lt;br /&gt;
| before    = [[#Explanation|↓ Skip to explanation ↓]]&lt;br /&gt;
| image     = height.png&lt;br /&gt;
| titletext = Interestingly, on a true vertical log plot, I think the Eiffel Tower's sides would really be straight lines.&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Explanation==&lt;br /&gt;
The comic is a companion piece to [[485: Depth]]. Where ''Depth'' uses a {{w|logarithmic scale}} to depict the Earth at progressively greater magnification, from Earth's surface to the interior of a single proton, ''Height'' uses a logarithmic scale to depict the contents of the universe at progressively smaller distances, from the edge of the observable universe to the grass beneath our feet.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Starting from the top, as one often does when reading comics, we begin with the top of the observable universe, described as being 46 billion {{w|light years}} out from the Earth. This is the longest distance that a ray of light has ever traveled to reach Earth. To the right of the text, [[Black Hat]] stands atop the comic, having just dropped a cat off the edge; he may be testing if cats always land on their feet, or may just be being a jerk, per his usual character. As one scrolls down, the depicted distances become less compressed, until arriving at the surface of Earth, all the while approaching a 1:1 scale with real-life distances. As shown in [[1162: Log Scale]], if Randall didn't do this, the comic would be much, MUCH longer.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In this comic, most objects that are grounded on Earth are scaled logarithmically on the vertical axes and linearly on the horizontal axes (some are scaled linearly on both axes). Displaying objects in this manner noticeably distorts their shape; the Great Pyramid, for instance, looks not like a pyramid but like a bullet. In the title text, Randall muses on how the inwardly-curved sides of the Eiffel Tower might actually become perfectly straightened when subjected to this logarithmic distortion, although it is shown to bulge in the comic proper, meaning Randall probably doesn't fully believe his own musings. The actual shape of the Tower approximates an {{w|Exponential function|exponential curve}}, which would indeed give a straight line on a log scale, although it was actually designed by {{w|Gustave Eiffel}} to minimize wind resistance rather than to be mathematically exact (the design is so perfect that the amount the Tower sways in the wind is less than the amount it is distorted due to thermal expansion of the sunlit side).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Outside of the Earth's atmosphere, the objects are placed at their actual distances from Earth on the log scale, but their shapes are not subjected to the logarithmic scaling of Earth objects, instead appearing as they would be seen (otherwise, round objects like the sun would appear more egg shaped, with the flatter side facing upward). However, objects are still much larger or much smaller than they would be in real life, in order to allow them to be properly seen.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Objects===&lt;br /&gt;
All objects are sorted from bottom to top by their maximum distance from earth for objects in a solar orbit, and their current distance for others.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! Distance&lt;br /&gt;
! Object&lt;br /&gt;
! Description&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 435&amp;amp;nbsp;×10&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;24&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;m&lt;br /&gt;
| Black Hat and cat&lt;br /&gt;
| Black Hat kicking a cat off the top of the comic, presumably to determine whether it will land on its feet.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 435&amp;amp;nbsp;×10&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;24&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;m&lt;br /&gt;
| colspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;background: #ffdead;&amp;quot; | Top of observable universe&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 11.3&amp;amp;nbsp;×10&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;24&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;m&lt;br /&gt;
| {{w|Hubble Deep Field}} objects&lt;br /&gt;
| Objects of extremely distant galaxies found in a long-exposure photograph by of the Hubble telescope, 12 billion light-years away. The right most object is probably intended to be a pulsar, schematically shown from the side.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 9.46&amp;amp;nbsp;×10&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;24&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;m&lt;br /&gt;
| colspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;background: #ffdead;&amp;quot; | One billion light years&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 3.1&amp;amp;nbsp;×10&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;24&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;m&lt;br /&gt;
| {{w|Pulsar}}&lt;br /&gt;
| A highly magnetized, rotating neutron star that emits a beam of electromagnetic radiation.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 2.36&amp;amp;nbsp;×10&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;24&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;m&lt;br /&gt;
| {{w|Great Attractor}}&lt;br /&gt;
| An unusual concentration of intergalactic mass.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 425&amp;amp;nbsp;×10&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;21&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;m&lt;br /&gt;
| {{w|Antennae Galaxies}} (colliding)&lt;br /&gt;
| A pair of colliding galaxies.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 23.6&amp;amp;nbsp;×10&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;21&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;m&lt;br /&gt;
| {{w|Andromeda Galaxy}}&lt;br /&gt;
| A sibling to our Milky Way. It is the nearest spiral galaxy to ours.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 9.46&amp;amp;nbsp;×10&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;21&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;m&lt;br /&gt;
| colspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;background: #ffdead;&amp;quot; | One million light years&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 2.38&amp;amp;nbsp;×10&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;21&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;m&lt;br /&gt;
| [http://knowyourmeme.com/memes/cat-on-a-keyboard-in-space Cat on a keyboard in space]&lt;br /&gt;
| An internet meme featuring a picture of a cat sitting on a musical keyboard, superimposed on an image of space.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 1.56&amp;amp;nbsp;×10&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;21&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;m&lt;br /&gt;
| {{w|Magellanic Clouds}}&lt;br /&gt;
| These clouds are a pair of nearby dwarf galaxies.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 263&amp;amp;nbsp;×10&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;18&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;m&lt;br /&gt;
| Edge of Galaxy&lt;br /&gt;
| The edge of the {{w|Milky Way}} galaxy, the galaxy in which we reside.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 245&amp;amp;nbsp;×10&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;18&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;m&lt;br /&gt;
| {{w|Galactic Center}}&lt;br /&gt;
| The center of the Milky Way galaxy.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 61.5&amp;amp;nbsp;×10&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;18&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;m&lt;br /&gt;
| {{w|Crab Nebula}}&lt;br /&gt;
| Nebula are supernova remnants&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 14.2&amp;amp;nbsp;×10&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;18&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;m&lt;br /&gt;
| {{w|Horsehead Nebula}}&lt;br /&gt;
| A dark nebula that is part of the Orion Constellation.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 12.7&amp;amp;nbsp;×10&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;18&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;m&lt;br /&gt;
| {{w|Orion Nebula}}&lt;br /&gt;
| A nebula that is part of the Orion Constellation, just south of Orion's Belt.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 8.14&amp;amp;nbsp;×10&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;18&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;m&lt;br /&gt;
| {{w|Rigel}}&lt;br /&gt;
| The brightest star in the Orion Constellation it is actually a triple star system known alternatively as Beta Orionis&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 6.08&amp;amp;nbsp;×10&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;18&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;m&lt;br /&gt;
| {{w|Betelgeuse}}&lt;br /&gt;
| The star Betelgeuse is displayed along with the location of {{w|Ford_Prefect (character)|Ford Prefect}} on his home planet which orbits Betelgeuse. Ford Prefect is a fictional character from the science fiction parody {{w|The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy}}.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 4.20&amp;amp;nbsp;×10&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;18&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;m&lt;br /&gt;
| {{w|Pleiades}}&lt;br /&gt;
| The Pleiades also have a derogatory remark, as per [[66: Abusive Astronomy]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 2.90&amp;amp;nbsp;×10&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;18&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;m&lt;br /&gt;
| The [http://en.memory-alpha.org/wiki/Romulan_Neutral_Zone Romulan Neutral Zone]&lt;br /&gt;
| This marks the edge of the {{w|Star Trek}} Federation.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 931&amp;amp;nbsp;×10&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;15&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;m&lt;br /&gt;
| colspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;background: #ffdead;&amp;quot; |  The first radio broadcast was in January 1910. Since radio waves travel at the speed of light, and this was published in September of 2008 this the radio waves traveled about 98.5 light years. See {{w|Contact (1997 film)}} for a depiction of this. This is also referenced in [[1212: Interstellar Memes]].&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 350&amp;amp;nbsp;×10&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;15&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;m&lt;br /&gt;
| {{w|Arcturus}}&lt;br /&gt;
| An orange giant star that is part of the Boötes constellation.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 320&amp;amp;nbsp;×10&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;15&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;m&lt;br /&gt;
| {{w|Pollux}}&lt;br /&gt;
| One of the most distinct stars in the Gemini Constellation it is large Orange Giant with an apparent visual magnitude of 1.1&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 242&amp;amp;nbsp;×10&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;15&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;m&lt;br /&gt;
| The edge of {{w|Federation Sector 0-0-1}}&lt;br /&gt;
| The sector of space assigned to Earth in {{w|Star Trek}}.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 224&amp;amp;nbsp;×10&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;15&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;m&lt;br /&gt;
| {{w|Iraq and weapons of mass destruction|&amp;quot;missing WMDs&amp;quot;}}&lt;br /&gt;
| A reference to the alleged weapons of mass destruction that were used as a pretence to mobilize the world population against Iraq, and start the Iraq war.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 81.3&amp;amp;nbsp;×10&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;15&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;m&lt;br /&gt;
| {{w|Sirius}}&lt;br /&gt;
|Also known as Alpha Canis Majoris, the Dog Star, or the North Star it is actually a binary system of Stars consisting of a main sequence white star and a small white dwarf.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 56.6&amp;amp;nbsp;×10&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;15&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;m&lt;br /&gt;
| {{w|Barnard's Star}}&lt;br /&gt;
| Barnards star is a very small red giant that is of great interest to astronomers as an achievement in the SIM (Space Interforometry Mission) to find a celestial object out of solar system that is a s small as 3 earth masses&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 41.3&amp;amp;nbsp;×10&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;15&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;m&lt;br /&gt;
| {{w|Alpha Centauri}}&lt;br /&gt;
| Alpha Centauri is the closest star system to our planet.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 30.9&amp;amp;nbsp;×10&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;15&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;m&lt;br /&gt;
| colspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;background: #ffdead;&amp;quot; | One parsec.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 9.46&amp;amp;nbsp;×10&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;15&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;m&lt;br /&gt;
| colspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;background: #ffdead;&amp;quot; | One light-year.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 15.0&amp;amp;nbsp;×10&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;15&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;m&lt;br /&gt;
| {{w|Oort cloud}}&lt;br /&gt;
| A halo of ice balls surrounding our solar system, but missing the {{w|Kupier belt}} between Neptune and the Oort cloud.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 350&amp;amp;nbsp;×10&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;12&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;m&lt;br /&gt;
| {{w|Bupkis}}&lt;br /&gt;
| Yiddish for &amp;quot;nothing&amp;quot;. Only a handful of objects are known to orbit between the Kuiper Belt and the Oort Cloud.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 55.0&amp;amp;nbsp;×10&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;12&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;m&lt;br /&gt;
| A comet which will destroy earth in late 2063 &lt;br /&gt;
| To coincide with the latest biblicaly based prophesy for the [http://www.askelm.com/prophecy/p971105.htm end of the world].&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 19.5&amp;amp;nbsp;×10&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;12&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;m&lt;br /&gt;
| {{w|Voyager 1}}&lt;br /&gt;
| An early space probe. Distance correct as of 20th Nov 2014, click [http://voyager.jpl.nasa.gov/where/ here] to see NASA's live distance counter.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 16.7&amp;amp;nbsp;×10&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;12&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;m&lt;br /&gt;
| {{w|Pioneer 10}}&lt;br /&gt;
| Listed distance is an estimate based on {{w|Pioneer_10#Current_status|this information}}.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 17.7&amp;amp;nbsp;×10&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;12&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;m&lt;br /&gt;
| {{w|Pioneer 11}}&lt;br /&gt;
| By the similarity in appearance to Pioneer 10 this unlabeled probe must be Pioneer 11. Listed distance is an estimate based on {{w|Pioneer_11#Current_status|this information}}.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 14.5&amp;amp;nbsp;×10&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;12&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;m&lt;br /&gt;
| {{w|Eris (dwarf planet)|Eris}}&lt;br /&gt;
| One of a pair of {{w|Trans-Neptunian object}}s now classified as {{w|dwarf planet}}s. The &amp;quot;All hail Discordia!&amp;quot; after Eris is a reference to {{w|Discordianism}}, a somewhat tongue-in-cheek religion based around the goddess Eris. The distance is the maximum distance from earth.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 7.50&amp;amp;nbsp;×10&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;12&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;m&lt;br /&gt;
| {{w|Pluto}}&lt;br /&gt;
| One of a pair of {{w|Trans-Neptunian object}}s now classified as {{w|dwarf planet}}s. Pluto was originally classified as the 9th planet of the Solar system. Many people was appalled when it was suddenly degraded to dwarf planet. Obviously Randall does not think much of these people thus the comment: ''Not a planet. Neener neener''. The distance is the maximum distance of Pluto from Earth.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 4.70&amp;amp;nbsp;×10&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;12&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;m&lt;br /&gt;
| {{w|Neptune}} &lt;br /&gt;
| Neptune is displayed here with its moons. Neptune is the eighth and final planet in our solar system.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 3.20&amp;amp;nbsp;×10&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;12&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;m&lt;br /&gt;
| {{w|Uranus}} &lt;br /&gt;
| Uranus is dispayed here with its moons. Uranus is the seventh planet in our solar system.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 1.67&amp;amp;nbsp;×10&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;12&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;m&lt;br /&gt;
| {{w|Saturn}} &lt;br /&gt;
| Saturn is displayed along with its moons. One of Saturn's moons, most likely Titan, is labeled as a potential location to find life.  Titan is the only known moon to have an atmosphere and oceans. The oceans cannot be filled with liquid water, as it is far too cold, but are instead filled with liquid methane and ethane. Some hypothisize that life could have formed in such oceans.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 928&amp;amp;nbsp;×10&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;9&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;m&lt;br /&gt;
 | {{w|Jupiter}} &lt;br /&gt;
| Jupiter is displayed along with its moons. One of Jupiter's moons, most likely Europa, is labeled as a potential location to find life.  Europa may be covered by a deep ocean of water found under a layer of ice many kilometers thick. Some hypothisize that life could have formed in such oceans.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 222&amp;amp;nbsp;×10&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;9&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;m&lt;br /&gt;
| Asteroids&lt;br /&gt;
| The {{w|Asteroid|Asteroid belt}} contains a spaceship from {{w|Asteroids (video game)}}&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 133&amp;amp;nbsp;×10&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;9&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;m&lt;br /&gt;
| {{w|Mars}}&lt;br /&gt;
| Note the path, reflecting the fact that their distances from Earth vary as the planets move in their orbits with a maximum distance of 261 million km and a minimum of 54.6 million km.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 114&amp;amp;nbsp;×10&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;9&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;m&lt;br /&gt;
| {{w|Venus}}&lt;br /&gt;
| Note the path, reflecting the fact that their distances from Earth vary as the planets move in their orbits with a maximum distance of 401 million km and a minimum of 37.7 million km.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 138&amp;amp;nbsp;×10&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;9&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;m&lt;br /&gt;
| {{w|Mercury}}&lt;br /&gt;
| Mercury is the first planet in out solar system. The distance shown is the maximum distance from Earth.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 149&amp;amp;nbsp;×10&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;9&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;m&lt;br /&gt;
| {{w|Sun}}&lt;br /&gt;
| The Sun is the star at the center of our solar system, around which the Earth orbits.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 16.3&amp;amp;nbsp;×10&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;9&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;m&lt;br /&gt;
| {{w|Discovery One}}&lt;br /&gt;
| The Discovery One from {{w|2001: A Space Odyssey}}, referring to the quote &amp;quot;open the pod bay door, HAL.&amp;quot; Also may be a reference to [[375: Pod Bay Doors]].&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 9.43&amp;amp;nbsp;×10&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;9&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;m&lt;br /&gt;
| Planet Express&lt;br /&gt;
| The spaceplane is most likely the Planet Express from {{w|Futurama}}, where Fry once discussed &amp;quot;a big heaping bowl of salt.&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 400&amp;amp;nbsp;×10&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;6&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;m&lt;br /&gt;
| Human Altitude Record &lt;br /&gt;
| Achieved by the team of {{w|Apollo 13}} approximately 100km higher than the remaining Apollo missions.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 384&amp;amp;nbsp;×10&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;6&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;m&lt;br /&gt;
| {{w|Moon}} &lt;br /&gt;
| The Moon is the Earth's only natural satellite.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 90.4&amp;amp;nbsp;×10&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;6&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;m&lt;br /&gt;
| {{w|Snoop Dogg}}&lt;br /&gt;
| A tongue-in-cheek reference to a rapper notorious for smoking marijuana, shown as having the second-highest altitude record. Someone who is taking drugs is said to be getting high.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 60.5&amp;amp;nbsp;×10&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;6&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;m&lt;br /&gt;
| {{w|Space elevator}}&lt;br /&gt;
| A proposed method of transporting cargo or people into orbit, consisting of a large mass beyond geosynchronous orbit, a station at the geosynchronous point, a cable connecting it to the Earth, and a climber that can scale the cable. Space elevators are also seen in [[697: Tensile vs. Shear Strength]] and [[536: Space Elevators]].&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 42.1&amp;amp;nbsp;×10&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;6&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;m&lt;br /&gt;
| colspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;background: #ffdead;&amp;quot; | {{w|Geosynchronous orbit|Geosynchronous Orbit}}&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 20.2&amp;amp;nbsp;×10&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;6&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;m&lt;br /&gt;
| {{w|GPS (satellite)|GPS Satellites}}&lt;br /&gt;
| GPS satellites are used for global positioning.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 3.94&amp;amp;nbsp;×10&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;6&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;m&lt;br /&gt;
| {{w|Lunar Lander}} &lt;br /&gt;
| The quote is a reference to {{w|Contact (1997 film)}} where the main character Ellie Arroway after witnessing a celestial light show up close says &amp;quot;Poetry! They should've sent a poet.&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 800&amp;amp;nbsp;×10&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;m&lt;br /&gt;
| {{w|Space debris|Space Junk}}&lt;br /&gt;
| There is a large quantity of defunct objects in orbit around the earth. Amongst other things, this includes old satellites, rocket stages and fragments from collisions or disintegration. Space junk is also referenced in [[1242: Scary Names]] under the title {{w|Kessler syndrome}}&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 422.5&amp;amp;nbsp;×10&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;m&lt;br /&gt;
| {{w|International Space Station}}&lt;br /&gt;
| The ISS (International Space Station) is a multinational effort to put a research vessel in space. It is currently the largest artifical object in Earth's orbit, as well as the location of the longest continuous human presence in space.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 100&amp;amp;nbsp;×10&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;m&lt;br /&gt;
| colspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;background: #ffdead;&amp;quot; | The {{w|Edge of space|official edge of space}} as defined by the {{w|Kármán line}}&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 76.0&amp;amp;nbsp;×10&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;m&lt;br /&gt;
| {{w|Meteors}}&lt;br /&gt;
| Meteors are chunks of rock (usually asteroids) that burn up in the atmosphere, producing the bright light associated with them. If the are large enough to hit the ground, they become meterorites, which is why Munroe labeled them only in the upper atmosphere.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 25.0&amp;amp;nbsp;×10&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;m&lt;br /&gt;
| {{w|High-altitude balloon|High-altitude balloons}}&lt;br /&gt;
|  Unmanned balloons, typically filled with helium or hydrogen. The current altitude record was set in 2002 by a balloon named BU60-1 which reached 53,000m.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 16.1&amp;amp;nbsp;×10&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;m&lt;br /&gt;
| colspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;background: #ffdead;&amp;quot; | 1/10 ATM = 0.1 {{w|Atmospheric pressure|atmosphere of pressure}}&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 12.0&amp;amp;nbsp;×10&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;m&lt;br /&gt;
| {{w|Airliner|Airliners}}&lt;br /&gt;
| This is a typical cruising altitude of jet aircraft, equating to roughly 40,000 feet. (Aircraft altitude tends to be specified in feet rather than metres (yay!) ) &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 8.84&amp;amp;nbsp;×10&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;m&lt;br /&gt;
| {{w|Mount Everest}} &lt;br /&gt;
| The Earths highest mountain, located in the {{w|Himalayas|Himalayan mountain range}} in South Asia.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 8.00&amp;amp;nbsp;×10&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;m&lt;br /&gt;
| {{w|Cory Doctorow}} &lt;br /&gt;
| Cory Doctorow in a balloon, a reference to comic [[239: Blagofaire]].&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 6.34&amp;amp;nbsp;×10&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;m&lt;br /&gt;
| {{w|Space Shuttle Columbia disaster}} &lt;br /&gt;
| The {{w|Space Shuttle Columbia}} and its seven crew were lost when it disintegrated at [http://books.google.co.uk/books?id=6v16AgAAQBAJ&amp;amp;lpg=PA7&amp;amp;ots=LDKQ3nsNHs&amp;amp;dq=shuttle%20columbia%20altitude&amp;amp;pg=PA7#v=onepage&amp;amp;q=shuttle%20columbia%20altitude&amp;amp;f=false approximately 63,400m] in 2003. This number is inconsistent with the height of the graph by a factor of 10 probably a mistype by Randall.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 6.00&amp;amp;nbsp;×10&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;m&lt;br /&gt;
| {{w|Helicopter}} &lt;br /&gt;
| Though the record for helicopter altitude (without payload) is 12,442m, normal flying is usually performed much lower. In the US, 6000m is into {{w|Class A airspace}}, which is restricted and requires flight under {{w|Instrument Flight Rules}}.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 6.00&amp;amp;nbsp;×10&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;m&lt;br /&gt;
| {{w|Cloud}} &lt;br /&gt;
| Though not actually labelled there are a couple of clouds shown. While different cloud types vary in height, 6000m is roughly in the middle of the height range for clouds in temperate regions [http://weatherfaqs.org.uk/node/21]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 5.49&amp;amp;nbsp;×10&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;m&lt;br /&gt;
| colspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;background: #ffdead;&amp;quot; | 1/2 ATM = 0.5 {{w|Atmospheric pressure|atmosphere of pressure}}&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 1.78&amp;amp;nbsp;×10&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;m&lt;br /&gt;
| [[Cueball]] &lt;br /&gt;
| Apparently still using Python as shown in comic [[353: Python]].&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 800&amp;amp;nbsp;×10&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;0&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;m&lt;br /&gt;
| colspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;background: #ffdead;&amp;quot; | 800 meters&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 800&amp;amp;nbsp;×10&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;0&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;m&lt;br /&gt;
| {{w|Burj Khalifa|Burj Dubai}}  &lt;br /&gt;
| Now known as the Burj Khalifa, is the tallest building in the world.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 500&amp;amp;nbsp;×10&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;0&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;m&lt;br /&gt;
| colspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;background: #ffdead;&amp;quot; | 500 meters&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 400&amp;amp;nbsp;×10&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;0&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;m&lt;br /&gt;
| colspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;background: #ffdead;&amp;quot; | 400 meters&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 325&amp;amp;nbsp;×10&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;0&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;m&lt;br /&gt;
| {{w|Eiffel Tower}} &lt;br /&gt;
| A famous landmark in Paris, France.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 300&amp;amp;nbsp;×10&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;0&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;m&lt;br /&gt;
| colspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;background: #ffdead;&amp;quot; | 300 meters&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 200&amp;amp;nbsp;×10&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;0&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;m&lt;br /&gt;
| colspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;background: #ffdead;&amp;quot; | 200 meters&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 150&amp;amp;nbsp;×10&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;0&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;m&lt;br /&gt;
| Kite &lt;br /&gt;
| Kite string is commonly sold in large spools; a nice thick spool will probably hold 150 meters.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 140&amp;amp;nbsp;×10&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;0&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;m&lt;br /&gt;
| {{w|Great Pyramid of Giza}} &lt;br /&gt;
| One of the Seven Wonders of the Ancient World. It is located in Egypt.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 120&amp;amp;nbsp;×10&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;0&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;m&lt;br /&gt;
| {{w|Baseball|Pop Fly}} &lt;br /&gt;
| In Baseball a 'Pop Fly' is when the batter mis-hits the baseball, which then follows a tall arc deep into the infield where it's easy picking for the other team to catch on its way down. The highest recorded pop fly, not including those that landed in foul territory, was 172 meters.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 115&amp;amp;nbsp;×10&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;0&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;m&lt;br /&gt;
| {{w|Redwood Tree|Redwood trees}} &lt;br /&gt;
| The tallest trees in the world. At 115.61m (379.3ft) {{w|Hyperion (tree)|Hyperion}}, a Coast Redwood, holds the record for the tallest tree in the world.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 100&amp;amp;nbsp;×10&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;0&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;m&lt;br /&gt;
| colspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;background: #ffdead;&amp;quot; | 100 meters&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 20.0&amp;amp;nbsp;×10&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;0&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;m&lt;br /&gt;
| {{w|Oak}} &lt;br /&gt;
| While oaks may grow to be in excess of 40m in height, heights of around 20m are more typical. The person in the tree saying, &amp;quot;Hey, squirrels!&amp;quot; is a reference to [[167: Nihilism]].&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 16.4&amp;amp;nbsp;×10&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;0&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;m&lt;br /&gt;
| Tallest stilts &lt;br /&gt;
| The tallest {{w|stilts}} recorded by the Guinness Book of World Records (as of November 2006) were 16.4 meters, or nearly 54 feet.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 13.0&amp;amp;nbsp;×10&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;0&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;m&lt;br /&gt;
| {{w|Brachiosaurus|Brachiosaur}}&lt;br /&gt;
| A large genus of dinosaur.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 8.00&amp;amp;nbsp;×10&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;0&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;m&lt;br /&gt;
| {{w|Giraffe}} &lt;br /&gt;
| The the tallest living terrestrial animal, with fully grown adults reaching in excess of 5m. While labelled 8m in the comic, the [http://www.big-animals.com/the-giraffe-the-worlds-tallest-animal/ record] for height is reported at 5.8m.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 1.70&amp;amp;nbsp;×10&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;0&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;m&lt;br /&gt;
| {{w|Human height|Folks}}&lt;br /&gt;
| Determining an average height of the world population is fraught with complications, but as a ballpark figure 1.7m is fairly accurate.&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Transcript==&lt;br /&gt;
:'''Top of observable universe'''&lt;br /&gt;
:[Black Hat is standing on top, throwing a black kitty down.]&lt;br /&gt;
:Black Cat: Mrowl!&lt;br /&gt;
:[Map of the universe from observable universe to Earth. Each area of item is labeled. Labels left to right, up to down:]&lt;br /&gt;
:(46 billion light years up)&lt;br /&gt;
::Hubble Deep Field Objects&lt;br /&gt;
:-One billion light years-&lt;br /&gt;
::Great Attractor&lt;br /&gt;
::Antennae Galaxies (colliding)&lt;br /&gt;
::Andromeda&lt;br /&gt;
::Holy crap lots of space&lt;br /&gt;
:-One million light years-&lt;br /&gt;
::Magellanic Clouds&lt;br /&gt;
::Edge of galaxy&lt;br /&gt;
::Galactic center&lt;br /&gt;
::Crab Nebula&lt;br /&gt;
::Orion Nebula&lt;br /&gt;
::Horsehead Nebula&lt;br /&gt;
::Romulan neutral zone&lt;br /&gt;
::The Pleiades, duh!&lt;br /&gt;
::Rigel&lt;br /&gt;
::Betelgeuse&lt;br /&gt;
::Ford Prefect&lt;br /&gt;
:[Three arrows are pointing up above three lines with the following label:]&lt;br /&gt;
:-Expanding shell of radio transmissions-&lt;br /&gt;
::[Above a dotted line:]&lt;br /&gt;
::Edge of federation sector 0-0-1&lt;br /&gt;
::Pollux&lt;br /&gt;
::Arcturus&lt;br /&gt;
::Missing WMDs&lt;br /&gt;
::Sirius&lt;br /&gt;
::Barnard's Star&lt;br /&gt;
::Alpha Centauri&lt;br /&gt;
:-One parsec-&lt;br /&gt;
:-One light year-&lt;br /&gt;
::Oort Cloud (?)&lt;br /&gt;
::Bupkis&lt;br /&gt;
::Comet which will destroy Earth in late 2063&lt;br /&gt;
::Pioneer 10&lt;br /&gt;
::Voyager I&lt;br /&gt;
::Eris (All hail Discordia!)&lt;br /&gt;
::Pluto (Not a planet. Neener neener.)&lt;br /&gt;
::Neptune&lt;br /&gt;
::Uranus&lt;br /&gt;
::Saturn&lt;br /&gt;
::[Two arrows point to two moons, one next to each of the planets aboe and below.]&lt;br /&gt;
::&amp;lt;-- Life --&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
::Jupiter&lt;br /&gt;
::Asteroids&lt;br /&gt;
::Mars&lt;br /&gt;
::Venus&lt;br /&gt;
::Sun&lt;br /&gt;
::Mercury&lt;br /&gt;
::Spaceship Planet Express: Hey, a heaping bowl of salt!&lt;br /&gt;
::Spaceship Discovery One: Open the fridge door, Hal.&lt;br /&gt;
::Moon&lt;br /&gt;
::Human altitude record (Apollo 13)&lt;br /&gt;
::2nd place: Snoop Dogg&lt;br /&gt;
::Space elevator - One of these days, promise!&lt;br /&gt;
::Geosynchronous Orbit&lt;br /&gt;
::GPS satellites&lt;br /&gt;
::Lunar lander: In retrospect, they &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;shouldn't&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; have sent a poet. I have no idea how to land.&lt;br /&gt;
::International Space Station&lt;br /&gt;
::Space junk&lt;br /&gt;
:-Official edge of space (100 km)-&lt;br /&gt;
::Meteors&lt;br /&gt;
:-1/10 ATM-&lt;br /&gt;
::High altitude balloons&lt;br /&gt;
::Airliners&lt;br /&gt;
::Shuttle Columbia lost&lt;br /&gt;
:-1/2 ATM-&lt;br /&gt;
::Cory Doctrow&lt;br /&gt;
::Everest&lt;br /&gt;
::Helicopters (6000 m)&lt;br /&gt;
::Cueball: Woo Python!&lt;br /&gt;
::[A vertical scale is drawn along the right side of the picture, starting at 1 km and getting progressivly smaller and smaller.]&lt;br /&gt;
:1 km&lt;br /&gt;
:-800 m-&lt;br /&gt;
::Burj Dubai (~800 m)&lt;br /&gt;
:500&lt;br /&gt;
:400&lt;br /&gt;
::Eiffel Tower (325 m)&lt;br /&gt;
:200&lt;br /&gt;
::Kites&lt;br /&gt;
::Great Pyramid (140 m)&lt;br /&gt;
::Pop fly&lt;br /&gt;
::Redwood (115 m)&lt;br /&gt;
:100m&lt;br /&gt;
::Oak (20 m)&lt;br /&gt;
::A person in the oak: Hey squirrels!&lt;br /&gt;
::Tallest stilts&lt;br /&gt;
::Brachiosaur (13 m)&lt;br /&gt;
::Giraffe (8 m)&lt;br /&gt;
::[Megan and Cueball holding the kite are labeled:] &lt;br /&gt;
::Folks&lt;br /&gt;
:'''The observable universe, from top to bottom''''&lt;br /&gt;
::~On a log scale~&lt;br /&gt;
::Sizes are not to scale, but heights above the Earth's surface are accurate on a log scale (that is, each step up is double the height.)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{comic discussion}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Charts]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Large drawings]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Comics featuring Cory Doctorow]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Comics featuring Black Hat]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Comics featuring Cueball]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Comics featuring Megan]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>141.101.98.243</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=1171:_Perl_Problems&amp;diff=85192</id>
		<title>1171: Perl Problems</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=1171:_Perl_Problems&amp;diff=85192"/>
				<updated>2015-02-25T23:41:22Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;141.101.98.243: /* Explanation */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{comic&lt;br /&gt;
| number    = 1171&lt;br /&gt;
| date      = February 8, 2013&lt;br /&gt;
| title     = Perl Problems&lt;br /&gt;
| image     = perl problems.png&lt;br /&gt;
| titletext = To generate #1 albums, 'jay --help' recommends the -z flag.&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Explanation==&lt;br /&gt;
{{w|Perl}} is a scripting language that makes heavy use of {{w|Regular expression|regular expressions}}, which are good for dealing with large amounts of text quickly. In the comic, the man wearing sunglasses parodies the song &amp;quot;{{w|99 Problems}}&amp;quot; in which the rapper {{w|Jay-Z}} says:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:If you're havin' girl problems&lt;br /&gt;
:I feel bad for you, son-&lt;br /&gt;
:I got 99 problems,&lt;br /&gt;
:But a bitch ain't one.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the comic however, the rapper tries to solve his problems with Perl's regular expressions, and ends up only creating another problem for himself, which is a reference to a [http://regex.info/blog/2006-09-15/247 famous quote by Jamie Zawinski] (whose name could also be shortened to &amp;quot;Jay-Z&amp;quot;): &amp;quot;Some people, when confronted with a problem, think 'I know, I'll use regular expressions.' Now they have two problems.&amp;quot; (This quote was revisited in [[1313: Regex Golf]].)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;program --help&amp;quot; is a common way, originating with the GNU project, to ask a program to show documentation on its usage and supported parameters; which, for some program, could include a &amp;quot;-z&amp;quot; command-line argument (&amp;quot;flag&amp;quot;), so the command would read &amp;quot;jay -z&amp;quot;. In this case, it is just an obvious play on the rapper's name. [http://www.cs.rit.edu/~ats/projects/lp/doc/jay/package-summary.html '''jay'''] is also an actual C program that is a compiler-compiler for java, but it doesn't have a &amp;quot;-z&amp;quot; flag.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Transcript==&lt;br /&gt;
:[Man with sunglasses and Cueball talking.]&lt;br /&gt;
:Sunglasses: If you're havin' perl problems I feel bad for you, son-&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Sunglasses: I got 99 problems,&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Sunglasses: So I used regular expressions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Sunglasses: Now I have 100 problems.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{comic discussion}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Music]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Comics featuring Cueball]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Regex]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>141.101.98.243</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=245:_Floor_Tiles&amp;diff=85191</id>
		<title>245: Floor Tiles</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=245:_Floor_Tiles&amp;diff=85191"/>
				<updated>2015-02-25T23:24:48Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;141.101.98.243: /* Explanation */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{comic&lt;br /&gt;
| number    = 245&lt;br /&gt;
| date      = April 6, 2007&lt;br /&gt;
| title     = Floor Tiles&lt;br /&gt;
| image     = floor_tiles.png&lt;br /&gt;
| titletext = The worst part is when sidewalk cracks are out-of-sync with your natural stride.&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Explanation==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Cueball]] is walking according to a certain pattern of floor tiles which makes sense to him in his head (the same pattern was first introduced in [[207: What xkcd Means]]). But as his friend asks him why he is walking funny, he realises that the algorithm he is using for walking on floor tiles would be so tedious and time-consuming to explain to his friend that he decides instead to simply defend himself and say that he isn't walking funny. Either that, or he is embarrassed to explain. This being far simpler than trying to show his friend exactly how his logic works - in his head, he imagines a complex diagram.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The title text refers to a common compulsion that leads people to place their feet either exactly between sidewalk cracks or directly on top of them while walking. Indeed, if the cracks are out of sync with one's natural stride, this will cause you to &amp;quot;walk funny&amp;quot; as you stumble to correct your foot placement.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Transcript==&lt;br /&gt;
:[Two characters walk on a floor tiled in black and white.]&lt;br /&gt;
:Friend: Why are you walking funny?&lt;br /&gt;
:[Second panel consists of Cueball's thought cloud in which he points to an easel mounted diagram of the floor tile pattern.]&lt;br /&gt;
:Cueball, thinking: Well, my instinct is to step only on black tiles, but they're too far apart. So I'm letting myself walk on the tiles directly in line with the black ones, but that means that when we walk diagonally, I have to step in a pattern where...&lt;br /&gt;
:[Returns to situation in first panel.]&lt;br /&gt;
:Cueball: I'm not walking funny.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{comic discussion}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Comics with color]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Comics featuring Cueball]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>141.101.98.243</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=1490:_Atoms&amp;diff=84988</id>
		<title>1490: Atoms</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=1490:_Atoms&amp;diff=84988"/>
				<updated>2015-02-23T17:27:09Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;141.101.98.243: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{comic&lt;br /&gt;
| number    = 1490&lt;br /&gt;
| date      = February 23, 2015&lt;br /&gt;
| title     = Atoms&lt;br /&gt;
| image     = atoms.png&lt;br /&gt;
| titletext = When I was little I had trouble telling my dad apart form the dog. I always recognized my mom because she had a bunch of extra plutoniums in her middle. I never did ask her why ...&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Explanation==&lt;br /&gt;
In this comic, [[Megan]] is preparing a sample of what appears to be some mineral for {{w|elemental analysis}}. It seems to be some kind of {{w|silicate}} containing a small amount of {{w|iron}} (a common example of this would be {{w|red sandstone}}), and she is running a test to see if it contains {{w|beryllium}} (a rarer element whose best-known natural form is as a component of {{w|emerald}}).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Beret Guy]] seems to be able to tell what elements the substance is composed of just by eyeballing it, making him perhaps the perfect elemental analysis instrument. To confirm this, Megan asks Beret Guy what he sees when he looks at her face. Since he only sees the atoms Megan is composed of (mostly {{w|Composition_of_the_human_body|oxygen, carbon and hydrogen}}) he only notices the unusual atoms. In this case he sees the metal atoms her {{w|Dental_restoration#Materials_used|dental fillings}} are composed of. Megan finds this bizarre and asks him what is wrong with him. He states that he suspects people think he is weird because he contains too much {{w|zinc}}, missing Megan’s point: what is weird is not Beret guy’s zinc content, but his tendency to apparently see everyone as clouds of atoms.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
High zinc intake ({{w|Zinc_toxicity|zinc toxicity}}) can cause nausea, vomiting, pain, cramps and diarrhea. It also reduces copper absorption, which affects the immune system.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The comic continues the theme of Beret Guy’s naive misunderstandings of scientific terminology turning to be literally true: in a previous [[1486: Vacuum|comic]] his ill-informed misinterpretation of the notion of energy in the vacuum resulted in him gaining significant superpowers.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the title text, the concept is taken even further: Beret Guy found his dad indistinguishable from a dog; and apparently could recognize his mother only because she contained {{w|plutonium}} ― a very unusual occurrence that cannot possibly occur in nature ― either she had an {{w|Radioisotope thermoelectric generator|RTG}}-powered pacemaker (a few hundred were made in the 1970s), or she was the victim of unethical medical experimentation. Thus the probable reason for his abnormality.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Transcript==&lt;br /&gt;
:Beret guy: What’re you doing?&lt;br /&gt;
:&lt;br /&gt;
:Megan: Testing a sample for beryllium.&lt;br /&gt;
:Beret guy: That? Yeah, there’s a bunch of berylliums.&lt;br /&gt;
:Megan: How do you know?&lt;br /&gt;
:&lt;br /&gt;
:Beret guy: Look at it! See? Tons of oxygens and silicons, a few irons but definitely some berylliums too! Can’t you see them?&lt;br /&gt;
:&lt;br /&gt;
:Megan: No, I can’t see a list of the atoms in a thing by looking.&lt;br /&gt;
:Beret guy: How do you tell what things are?&lt;br /&gt;
:&lt;br /&gt;
:Megan: This is ridiculous. Look at me. What do you see?&lt;br /&gt;
:Beret guy: You have tons of metal in your face. Lots of fillings, I guess?&lt;br /&gt;
:&lt;br /&gt;
:Megan: What’s wrong with you?&lt;br /&gt;
:Beret guy: Too many zincs? I’ve always worried I had too much zinc and everyone thought I was weird.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{comic discussion}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Comics featuring Beret Guy]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Comics featuring Megan]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>141.101.98.243</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=1490:_Atoms&amp;diff=84976</id>
		<title>1490: Atoms</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=1490:_Atoms&amp;diff=84976"/>
				<updated>2015-02-23T15:26:24Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;141.101.98.243: /* Explanation */ better explanation of what Megan's doing&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{comic&lt;br /&gt;
| number    = 1490&lt;br /&gt;
| date      = February 23, 2015&lt;br /&gt;
| title     = Atoms&lt;br /&gt;
| image     = atoms.png&lt;br /&gt;
| titletext = When I was little I had trouble telling my dad apart form the dog. I always recognized my mom because she had a bunch of extra plutoniums in her middle. I never did ask her why ...&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Explanation==&lt;br /&gt;
In this cartoon, [[Megan]] is preparing a sample of what appears to be some mineral for {{w|elemental analysis}}. It seems to be some kind of {{w|silicate}} containing a small amount of {{w|iron}} (a common example of this would be {{w|red sandstone}}), and she is running a test to see if it contains {{w|beryllium}} (a rarer element whose best-known natural form is as a component of {{w|emerald}}).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Beret Guy]] seems to be able to tell what elements the substance is composed of just by eyeballing it, making him perhaps the perfect elemental analysis instrument. Megan finds this bizarre and asks him what is wrong with him.  He states that he suspects he contains too much {{w|zinc}} because people think he is weird, missing Megan’s point: what is weird is not Beret guy’s zinc content, but his tendency to apparently see everyone as clouds of atoms.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The cartoon continues the theme of Beret Guy’s naive misunderstandings of scientific terminology turning to be literally true: in another [[1486: Vacuum|cartoon]] his ill-informed misinterpretation of the notion of energy in the vacuum resulted in him gaining significant superpowers.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the title text, the concept is taken even further: Beret Guy found his dad indistinguishable from a dog; and apparently could recognize his mother only because she contained {{w|plutonium}} ― a very unusual occurrence that cannot possibly occur in nature ― either she had an {{w|Radioisotope thermoelectric generator|RTG}}-powered pacemaker (a few hundred were made in the 1970s), or she was the victim of {{w|unethical medical experimentation#Plutonium experiments|unethical medical experimentation}}. Thus the probable reason for his abnormality.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Transcript==&lt;br /&gt;
:Beret guy: What’re you doing?&lt;br /&gt;
:&lt;br /&gt;
:Megan: Testing a sample for beryllium.&lt;br /&gt;
:Beret guy: That? Yeah, there’s a bunch of berylliums.&lt;br /&gt;
:Megan: How do you know?&lt;br /&gt;
:&lt;br /&gt;
:Beret guy: Look at it! See? Tons of oxygens and silicons, a few irons but definitely some berylliums too! Can’t you see them?&lt;br /&gt;
:&lt;br /&gt;
:Megan: No, I can’t see a list of the atoms in a thing by looking.&lt;br /&gt;
:Beret guy: How do you tell what things are?&lt;br /&gt;
:&lt;br /&gt;
:Megan: This is ridiculous. Look at me. What do you see?&lt;br /&gt;
:Beret guy: You have tons of metal in your face. Lots of fillings, I guess?&lt;br /&gt;
:&lt;br /&gt;
:Megan: What’s wrong with you?&lt;br /&gt;
:Beret guy: Too many zincs? I’ve always worried I had too much zincs and everyone thought I was weird.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{comic discussion}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Comics featuring Beret Guy]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Comics featuring Megan]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>141.101.98.243</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=1304:_Glass_Trolling&amp;diff=84874</id>
		<title>1304: Glass Trolling</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=1304:_Glass_Trolling&amp;diff=84874"/>
				<updated>2015-02-21T16:27:49Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;141.101.98.243: /* Explanation */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{comic&lt;br /&gt;
| number    = 1304&lt;br /&gt;
| date      = December 16, 2013&lt;br /&gt;
| title     = Glass Trolling&lt;br /&gt;
| image     = glass_trolling.png&lt;br /&gt;
| titletext = Plus, when someone finally grabs your glasses and stomps on them, it costs way less than $1,500 to replace them.&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Explanation==&lt;br /&gt;
{{w|Google Glass}} is a set of glasses frames worn like typical glasses that features an optical display and internet connectivity. It responds to voice commands starting with [https://support.google.com/glass/answer/3079305 &amp;quot;OK ''glass''&amp;quot;], for example to initiate video recording or to check tomorrow's weather. Strangers and other people surrounding the user would often find it annoying to hear someone talking to &amp;quot;himself&amp;quot;, or to ''Glass''.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Cueball]] is checking tomorrow's weather and says &amp;quot;OK, ''glass''&amp;quot; while he is only wearing regular glasses. Apparently this is even more annoying to the bystander than if Cueball actually would wear a ''Glass''.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the title text, he states that if someone is eventually getting fed up with the annoyance and smashes the glasses. It would actually cost much less then the &amp;quot;google glass&amp;quot; which are very expensive.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The &amp;quot;OK, ''Glass''&amp;quot; keyword is not useless outside of ''Glass''; in the browser Chrome and the Android/iOS app ''Google Now'', &amp;quot;OK, ''Glass''&amp;quot; is also valid instead of &amp;quot;OK, ''Google''&amp;quot; to initiate a voice command. While Cueball may be using this app, it is not necessarily the case, given that the caption states that Cueball enjoys prefacing everything with the phrase.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Google glass was also the main theme in [[1251: Anti-Glass]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This is another strip in the [[My Hobby]] series.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Transcript==&lt;br /&gt;
:My Hobby:&lt;br /&gt;
:Cueball: Ok, Glass, check tomorrow's weather.&lt;br /&gt;
:Cueball: Ooh, snow!&lt;br /&gt;
:Off-frame-bystander: Oh my god, it's somehow even ''more'' annoying than if you had it.&lt;br /&gt;
:Saying &amp;quot;Ok, Glass&amp;quot; before everything while wearing regular glasses.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{comic discussion}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:My Hobby]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Comics featuring Cueball]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>141.101.98.243</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=559:_No_Pun_Intended&amp;diff=84873</id>
		<title>559: No Pun Intended</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=559:_No_Pun_Intended&amp;diff=84873"/>
				<updated>2015-02-21T16:09:35Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;141.101.98.243: /* Explanation */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{comic&lt;br /&gt;
| number    = 559&lt;br /&gt;
| date      = March 23, 2009&lt;br /&gt;
| title     = No Pun Intended&lt;br /&gt;
| image     = no_pun_intended.png&lt;br /&gt;
| titletext = Like spelling 'dammit' correctly -- with two m's -- it's a troll that works best on the most literate.&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Explanation==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;No pun intended&amp;quot; is an idiom meaning that something just said wasn't meant to be a pun, implying that the preceding statement could be interpreted as one. As done in the comic, following a non-pun with &amp;quot;no pun intended&amp;quot;, although factually accurate, breaks this implication and confuses listeners who will be trying to work out which part of the sentence could have been interpreted as a pun.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The title text elicits a similar confused reaction, as the most literate people will be more likely to want to spell out &amp;quot;damn it&amp;quot; rather than using an abbreviated form with morphed spelling.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Transcript==&lt;br /&gt;
:My Hobby: Appending &amp;quot;no pun intended&amp;quot; to lines with no pun in them.&lt;br /&gt;
:[Cueball is talking to Beret Guy.]&lt;br /&gt;
:Cueball: I think he's internalized his girlfriend's attitudes - no pun intended - and so...&lt;br /&gt;
:Three hours later:&lt;br /&gt;
:[Beret Guy is thinking.]&lt;br /&gt;
:Beret Guy: &amp;quot;Internalized?&amp;quot; Lied? Analyzed? Or is it &amp;quot;attitudes&amp;quot;? Dammit.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{comic discussion}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Comics featuring Cueball]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Comics featuring Beret Guy]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:My Hobby]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Language]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>141.101.98.243</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=1156:_Conditioning&amp;diff=84872</id>
		<title>1156: Conditioning</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=1156:_Conditioning&amp;diff=84872"/>
				<updated>2015-02-21T15:46:29Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;141.101.98.243: /* Explanation */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{comic&lt;br /&gt;
| number    = 1156&lt;br /&gt;
| date      = January 4, 2013&lt;br /&gt;
| title     = Conditioning&lt;br /&gt;
| image     = conditioning.png&lt;br /&gt;
| titletext = 'Why are you standing in the yard wearing a papal hat and a robe covered in seeds?' 'Well, the Pope is visiting our town next month ...'&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Explanation==&lt;br /&gt;
Herein, the author devises a method of addressing the issue of drivers who turn up their music to irritating levels which usually results in a lot of bass coming from the car — the low frequencies being the ones that most easily penetrate the car and travel further, thus being more audible to those around the car.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As the title suggests, the idea is to {{w|Classical conditioning|condition}} animals to respond to a thumping bass. The machine is described as working as follows: every few hours, the bass would turn on, and the box would dispense food behind an opening designed to look like an open car window. Over time, local wildlife would flock to the box to get the food from inside, and would become trained that the sound of a subwoofer means that they can get food by flying through a car window.. Eventually, the animals would respond to any low music, including that played by cars.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The end result would be that the local wildlife would approach, and presumably attempt to enter, any car that has that same thumping bass. Drivers, in turn, would cease to turn up their music in order to prevent the groups of animals from chasing after their cars, thus solving the problem of annoyingly loud bass. This behavior modification can itself be seen as a {{w|Operant conditioning|somewhat different form of conditioning}}.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Although this plan may seem far-fetched, a similar scheme was seriously proposed in Britain during the First World War to condition seagulls to associate a submarine's periscope with food, which would give away the locations of enemy submarines as the gulls flocked to their periscopes being raised.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The title text is a dialogue about using a similar method of conditioning to send animals after the Pope. Why someone would want that to happen is left to the reader's imagination.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Transcript==&lt;br /&gt;
:Every few hours, subwoofer plays throbbing bass for 10 seconds... [With arrow pointing to subwoofer.]&lt;br /&gt;
:...then bread crumbs are dispensed into box [With arrow pointing to bread feeder machine.]&lt;br /&gt;
:Opening [With arrow pointing to feeder opening shaped like a driver side car window.]&lt;br /&gt;
:Local wildlife [With arrows pointing to birds and a squirrel.]&lt;br /&gt;
:Protip: Leave this device in your yard for a week, then watch as the problem of loud music from passing cars solves itself.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{comic discussion}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Biology]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Protip]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>141.101.98.243</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=1427:_iOS_Keyboard&amp;diff=76452</id>
		<title>1427: iOS Keyboard</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=1427:_iOS_Keyboard&amp;diff=76452"/>
				<updated>2014-09-29T12:31:59Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;141.101.98.243: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{comic&lt;br /&gt;
| number    = 1427&lt;br /&gt;
| date      = September 29, 2014&lt;br /&gt;
| title     = iOS Keyboard&lt;br /&gt;
| image     = ios_keyboard.png&lt;br /&gt;
| titletext = More actual results: 'Hello. My name is Inigo Montoya. You [are the best. The best thing ever]', 'Revenge is a dish best served [by a group of people in my room]', and 'They may take our lives, but they'll never take our [money].'&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Explanation==&lt;br /&gt;
It looks like [[Randall]] has been playing with his Apple device after installing the recently released {{w|iOS 8}} update. The comic is referencing the autocomplete function on the iOS virtual [[1031:_s/keyboard/leopard/|leopard]] (a comparable feature is also available on other operating systems, like Android). When the phrase, for example, 'Revenge is a dish best served' is typed, the leopard will suggest 'by', followed by 'a', then 'group' and so on.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The following movies are referenced:&lt;br /&gt;
:{{w|Sherlock_Holmes#.22Elementary.2C_my_dear_Watson.22|Sherlock Holmes}}: Elementary, my dear Watson (paraphrased in several movies, never actually used in the books)&lt;br /&gt;
:[http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0086250/quotes Scarface (1983)]: You wanna fuck with me? Okay. You wanna play rough? Okay. Say hello to my little friend!&lt;br /&gt;
:[http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0032138/quotes The Wizard of Oz (1939)]: Toto, I've a feeling we're not in Kansas any more.&lt;br /&gt;
:[http://www.imdb.com/character/ch0000007/quotes James Bond]: Bond, James Bond. (nothing follows)&lt;br /&gt;
:[http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0379786/quotes Serenity (2005)]: I am a leaf on the wind - watch how I soar.&lt;br /&gt;
:[http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0089218/quotes The Goonies (1985)]: Goonies never say die!&lt;br /&gt;
:[http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0120737/quotes The Lord of The Rings: The Fellowship of the Ring (2001)]: You have my sword... And you have my bow. And *my* axe.&lt;br /&gt;
:[http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0093779/quotes The Princess Bride (1987)]: Hello. My name is Inigo Montoya. You killed my father. Prepare to die.&lt;br /&gt;
:{{w|Revenge#Proverbs|Revenge is a dish best served cold}} (several movies, with variations, and books before that)&lt;br /&gt;
:[http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0112573/quotes Braveheart (1995)]: ...they may take our lives, but they'll never take... OUR FREEDOM!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
An older comic [[1068: Swiftkey]] is also about keyboard predictions, but without any preceding text (by the Swiftkey keyboard application instead of by the iOS 8 keyboard).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Transcript==&lt;br /&gt;
Movie Quotes&lt;br /&gt;
:[typed on an iPhone] Elementary, my dear&lt;br /&gt;
:[suggested by the virtual keyboard] Friend | Lord | Friends&lt;br /&gt;
According to iOS 8 keyboard predictions&lt;br /&gt;
:Say hello to my little [sister and my mom and my dad and my friends]&lt;br /&gt;
:Toto, I've a feeling we're not [going to the gym today]&lt;br /&gt;
:Bond, James Bond [yields]&lt;br /&gt;
:I'm a leaf on the wind. Watch [me play my piano]&lt;br /&gt;
:Goonies never say [anything]&lt;br /&gt;
:You have my sword. And my bow. And my [dad]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{comic discussion}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Firefly]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>141.101.98.243</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=1409:_Query&amp;diff=74241</id>
		<title>1409: Query</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=1409:_Query&amp;diff=74241"/>
				<updated>2014-08-25T12:28:59Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;141.101.98.243: /* Explanation */  added demographic percentages&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{comic&lt;br /&gt;
| number    = 1409&lt;br /&gt;
| date      = August 17, 2014&lt;br /&gt;
| title     = Query&lt;br /&gt;
| image     = query.png&lt;br /&gt;
| titletext = SELECT * FROM GHOSTS&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Explanation==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Megan]] picks up a strange device that mysteriously asks her to enter a query after stating &amp;quot;LOADED TABLE: PEOPLE / ENTER QUERY.&amp;quot; In computer databases, &amp;quot;{{w|Table (database)|tables}}&amp;quot; are groups of similar information consisting of records each having certain attributes. Databases are generally made up of many tables, each containing different types of records. A database for a traditional library might have a &amp;quot;Books&amp;quot; table and a &amp;quot;Cardholders&amp;quot; table with records of all of the books in the library, and all of the people who have library cards. Each table will have different columns for certain attributes for every record. For example, the &amp;quot;Books&amp;quot; table might have columns for &amp;quot;title&amp;quot;, &amp;quot;author&amp;quot;, &amp;quot;date&amp;quot;, etc.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A request from a database by a user is called a &amp;quot;query&amp;quot;. {{w|SQL}} (Structured Query Language) is a programming language designed for databases, and has a certain syntax for its queries. A common query is &amp;quot;select&amp;quot; which requests certain information from the database. In the library example, one might select (in plain English) all books written by a certain author or published after a certain date, etc.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Megan uses the device by entering an SQL query into it: &amp;quot;SELECT * FROM PEOPLE WHERE AGE &amp;gt; 30&amp;quot; (show all the people older than 30). It appears that the actual people around her who are over 30 are wrapped in a yellow light, which does not apply to Megan in this query. Megan then tries other experimental queries, presumably to determine whether the results are correct. First, she queries for people with a high annual income (a group that does not include her), then for those who are afraid of flying (which does include her). Because the results for herself are valid both times, she then indulges her curiosity by asking who has watched porn in the preceding twelve hours. This suggests that whatever &amp;quot;database&amp;quot; she is accessing is extremely thorough as it contains updated records of people's day-to-day activities.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The percentage of people lit appears to approximately correspond to real demographic data: note, 5 of the 10 characters are female; the median world/US age are fairly close to 30; top decile income in the USA is approximately $100,000 (and top earners are usually men); up to 40% of people are afraid of flying. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Finally, she types &amp;quot;DROP TABLE PEOPLE&amp;quot;. Drop is an SQL command to delete a table. When she enters the command the entire table disappears and because she is also in this table she disappears, too. The implications are unclear. It may be a suggestion that all of reality is a computer program, all of the people are merely &amp;quot;data&amp;quot; in the program, and Megan was somehow granted access to the database for the program. It could also be an allusion to the fact that human life is so rich, diverse &amp;amp; interesting, but also, extremely fragile. Someone who controls much power can, simply with the press of a few buttons, erase everything that thousands or millions of people had worked so hard on.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
When everything that everyone carried (cell phones, ice cream cones) drop to the ground, the tablet Megan originally found falls to the same spot it was in the first panel. Perhaps this cycle has repeated itself before, with the mysterious device on the ground, a group of people ambling in, and then someone like Megan picking up the tablet and starting the process all over again.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There is a subtle pun included here. If we were to assume that the device ''physically contains'' the table &amp;quot;people&amp;quot;. When Megan tasks the device with dropping the table, it not only causes the data table to be dropped, but also the physical storage itself to be dropped.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The title text suggests the possibility that when the people disappeared or &amp;quot;died&amp;quot;, their records were moved to a table called &amp;quot;GHOSTS&amp;quot;. The query would then, presumably, see all the people that were deleted. In some implementations of databases deleted records are still hidden and remain until a &amp;quot;Ghost Cleanup Process&amp;quot; removes the data permanently. The title text may also allude to this process.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Transcript==&lt;br /&gt;
:[Megan picks up a device.]&lt;br /&gt;
:Device: ''LOADED TABLE: PEOPLE''&lt;br /&gt;
:Device: ''ENTER QUERY''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[Megan looks around and sees nine people nearby.]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[Megan types into the device:] SELECT * FROM PEOPLE WHERE AGE &amp;gt; 30&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[Five people are highlighted.]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[Megan types:] SELECT * FROM PEOPLE WHERE ANNUAL_INCOME &amp;gt; 100 000&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[One person is highlighted.]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[Megan types:] SELECT * FROM PEOPLE WHERE AFRAID_OF_FLYING = TRUE&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[Four people, including herself, are highlighted.]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[Megan types:] SELECT * FROM PEOPLE WHERE HOURS_SINCE_WATCHING_PORN &amp;lt; 12&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[Three people are highlighted.]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Megan: Neat&lt;br /&gt;
:Megan: ...&lt;br /&gt;
:[Megan types:] DROP TABLE PEOPLE&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[Everyone disappears; the items they were holding drop to the ground.]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{comic discussion}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Comics featuring Cueball]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Comics featuring Megan]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Comics featuring Ponytail]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Comics featuring Hairy]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Comics with color]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>141.101.98.243</name></author>	</entry>

	</feed>