<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=162.158.89.253</id>
		<title>explain xkcd - User contributions [en]</title>
		<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=162.158.89.253"/>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php/Special:Contributions/162.158.89.253"/>
		<updated>2026-04-17T01:18:23Z</updated>
		<subtitle>User contributions</subtitle>
		<generator>MediaWiki 1.30.0</generator>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:101:_Laser_Scope&amp;diff=133688</id>
		<title>Talk:101: Laser Scope</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:101:_Laser_Scope&amp;diff=133688"/>
				<updated>2017-01-13T17:56:28Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;162.158.89.253: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Wouldn't this comic be about a whole gun aparatus including a laser scope if it were about &amp;quot;missing&amp;quot; (by target) your loved ones? In my opinion, this is much more about stalkers. The &amp;quot;good&amp;quot; stalkers are rarely seen (i.e. using a high powered viewing device of some kind), which would only need the sight, not a whole gun. [[User:Lcarsos|lcarsos]] ([[User talk:Lcarsos|talk]]) 22:03, 13 September 2012 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Nope.  Nothin' ta do with stalkers.  The scope is to improve the accuracy of the firearm it is attached to. It's saying &amp;quot;are you missing your loved ones with your un-scopified weapon?  This scope will improve your accuracy and you won't miss anymore.&amp;quot; [[Special:Contributions/207.225.239.130|207.225.239.130]] 22:33, 13 September 2012 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Scopified?, really [[User:Whiskey07|Whiskey07]] ([[User talk:Whiskey07|talk]]) 09:15, 27 November 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The parity of meanings shown here is also known as &amp;quot;zeugma&amp;quot;. AP English Language for the win! Anonymous 06:31, 3 December 2013 (UTC) {{unsigned ip|173.245.54.91}}&lt;br /&gt;
:Actually, a zeugma is specifically an instance in which the word is used once, but applies to multiple parts of the sentence. If it were stated that &amp;quot;I wish I'd missed you then, so I wouldn't now,&amp;quot; the title text would be an example. Since missed is included twice, it misses being a zeugma, but not being memorable. (One favorite of mine is: &amp;quot;You are free to execute your laws, and your citizens, as you see fit.&amp;quot; -William Riker, Star Trek: TNG.) [[Special:Contributions/108.162.246.197|108.162.246.197]] 05:36, 8 October 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Might also be an reference to the classic &amp;quot;blues brothers movies&amp;quot; in which a stalker makes numerous attempts, including one attempt where she uses a rocket launcher&lt;br /&gt;
--[[Special:Contributions/141.101.104.180|141.101.104.180]] 10:36, 14 September 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Could also be a reference to the common situation, that one is too sure about one's partner (i.e. not showing them, that one misses them when being a couple but spacially apart) and this being the reason for the partner for leaving one. If one had missed them while being together they would'nt have left. [[Special:Contributions/162.158.89.253|162.158.89.253]] 17:56, 13 January 2017 (UTC)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>162.158.89.253</name></author>	</entry>

	</feed>