<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=162.158.91.95</id>
		<title>explain xkcd - User contributions [en]</title>
		<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=162.158.91.95"/>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php/Special:Contributions/162.158.91.95"/>
		<updated>2026-06-27T20:08:39Z</updated>
		<subtitle>User contributions</subtitle>
		<generator>MediaWiki 1.30.0</generator>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=1285:_Third_Way&amp;diff=188322</id>
		<title>1285: Third Way</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=1285:_Third_Way&amp;diff=188322"/>
				<updated>2020-03-09T10:20:07Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;162.158.91.95: /* Explanation */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{comic&lt;br /&gt;
| number    = 1285&lt;br /&gt;
| date      = November 1, 2013&lt;br /&gt;
| title     = Third Way&lt;br /&gt;
| image     = third way.png&lt;br /&gt;
| titletext = 'The monospaced-typewriter-font story is a COMPLETE FABRICATION!&amp;amp;nbsp; WAKE UP, SHEEPLE' 'It doesn't matter! Studies support single spaces!' 'Those results weren't statistically significant!' 'Fine, you win. I'm using double spaces right now!' 'Are not!&amp;amp;nbsp; We can all hear your stupid whitespace.'&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Explanation==&lt;br /&gt;
This comic refers to the debate occurring in the United States about the correct {{w|Sentence spacing|number of space characters after a period at the end of a sentence}}.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
While typewriter typists in the United States were traditionally taught to use two spaces between sentences, this is becoming less common and many sources now recommend having only one space, although this topic is still {{w|Sentence spacing#Controversy|controversial}}.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Cueball]] is advocating a line break after every sentence, the eponymous &amp;quot;third way&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This obviates the problem, as a period will always appear at the end of a line and the spacing after it becomes moot. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A line break after every sentence is sometimes called &amp;quot;[http://rhodesmill.org/brandon/2012/one-sentence-per-line/ semantic linefeeds]&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This is particularly useful when plain text files based on a markup language (such as {{w|HTML}}, {{w|TeX}}, or {{w|Wiki markup}}) are edited by multiple people using a {{w|Revision control|version control system}} where it helps to facilitate comparison of changes and avoid merge conflicts.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In most markup languages, a single line feed in the source is rendered as a simple space, while two linefeeds generate a paragraph break.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This approach allows the source to be easily manipulated and versioned, while the rendered output still keeps the regular flow and justification abilities of running text.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
(Incidentally, HTML and languages derived from it such as {{w|BBCode}} and {{w|Wiki markup}} will generally render multiple consecutive whitespace characters as a single space, so pretty much every page on the Internet uses single spacing whether the author wants to or not.)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The title text uses single spaces between the back-and-forth quotations; but within each quotation, the quoted speaker's preferred spacing is used.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In particular, when the single-spacing advocate claims to be using double spacing, this is indeed a lie.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
However, realistically, it is implausible that one can hear whitespace.{{Citation needed}}.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Sentence spacing was previously mentioned in the titletext of [[1070: Words for Small Sets]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Note that this is not the first time Randall has [[:Category:Compromise|proposed a controversial third way]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Randall's mocking characterization in the title text of overzealous advocates using the phrase &amp;quot;WAKE UP, SHEEPLE&amp;quot; has appeared in previous comics [[496: Secretary: Part 3]] and [[1013: Wake Up Sheeple]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This debate is later referenced in [[1989: IMHO]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Transcript==&lt;br /&gt;
:[To the left a group with three Cueballs, a Ponytail and Megan at the front which face another group with two Cueballs, a Ponytail and a black haired ponytail at the front. Each group has a placard. A Cueball in the left group has a cutlass and a Cueball in the right group has a spear as they are angrily facing off against each other. Off to the far right side stands a lone Cueball also with a placard.]&lt;br /&gt;
:Left placard: '''Two''' spaces after a period&lt;br /&gt;
:Middle placard: '''One''' space after a period&lt;br /&gt;
:Right placard: Line break after every sentence&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{comic discussion}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Comics featuring Cueball]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Comics featuring Ponytail]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Comics featuring Megan]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Multiple Cueballs]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Sheeple]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Compromise]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Language]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>162.158.91.95</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=explain_xkcd:Editor_FAQ&amp;diff=188277</id>
		<title>explain xkcd:Editor FAQ</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=explain_xkcd:Editor_FAQ&amp;diff=188277"/>
				<updated>2020-03-07T09:18:35Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;162.158.91.95: Reverting vandalism&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''Frequently Asked Questions for editors'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This FAQ is a short description about editing pages at this wiki. Please read this carefully and if you have any further questions do not hesitate to enter them into this [[explain xkcd talk:Editor FAQ|talk page]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For general questions please read first the MediaWiki help pages about [[mw:Help:Editing pages|Editing pages]] or look at the full overview here: [[mw:Help:Contents|Help Contents]]. You also can use your preferred search engine by entering &amp;quot;MediaWiki mytopic&amp;quot;. Change mytopic to the theme you're searching for, i.e. &amp;quot;MediaWiki tables&amp;quot; will show you many useful sites about editing tables.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Please always use the preview button to verify your edit before finally pressing the save button.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This FAQ focuses only on topics related to this specific Wiki.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==What is the general layout of a comic page?==&lt;br /&gt;
In general, you don't have to care about this because the pages are generated by a bot nearly immediately after a new comic is released. If the bot fails please follow exactly the instructions here [[User:dgbrtBOT]] to do all the needed actions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The layout and order is always this:&lt;br /&gt;
*Comic ''picture'' with the ''title text'' below&lt;br /&gt;
*''Explanation''&lt;br /&gt;
*''Transcript''&lt;br /&gt;
*''Trivia'' (optional)&lt;br /&gt;
*''Discussion'' (embedded Talk page)&lt;br /&gt;
*List of non standard ''categories''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==What should I include in the explanation?==&lt;br /&gt;
Everything is welcome as long as it explains the content of the comic. Everybody can edit here and when others disagree about your contributions they may change it.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==In which cases are tables meaningful, and when are they not?==&lt;br /&gt;
At the transcript tables should never be used, even when there is a table in the comic image it should be described by text.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
At the explanation tables only make sense when the content is compact. When a single row contains more than a small item like a number, a small phrase, or something similar a table isn't the proper layout because it's hard to read. Instead it should be written in floating text chapters with distinct headers above (see next section below.)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Instead of using a two-column table (e.g. &amp;quot;sentence from comic&amp;quot;, &amp;quot;explanation&amp;quot;), consider using a description list (''bold text''). Place a semicolon (&amp;lt;code&amp;gt;;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;) at the beginning of the sentence to be explained and a colon (&amp;lt;code&amp;gt;:&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;) at the beginning of each paragraph of the explanation, like this (from [[1987: Python Environment#Explanation|1987]]):&lt;br /&gt;
 ; Anaconda Python&lt;br /&gt;
 : Anaconda is a Python distribution for data science and machine learning related applications.&lt;br /&gt;
 : A second paragraph for the explanation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Wikipedia's {{w|WP:WHENTABLE#Appropriate use|Manual of Style/Tables}} describes it best:&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;Often a list is best left as a list. Before reformatting a list into table form, consider whether the information will be more clearly conveyed by virtue of having rows and columns. If so, then a table is probably a good choice. If there is no obvious benefit to having rows and columns, then a table is probably not the best choice. &amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==What is the proper layout for headers?==&lt;br /&gt;
For headlines you have to use Wiki-style code. The simplest way is a preceding semicolon at the beginning of the line which causes the entire line to be rendered in bold.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On large explanations it can be handy to divide it into subsections. In this case the header is written like this: &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;===Sub header===&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;. But in most cases the simple semicolon is just enough.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==What is the format of the transcript section?==&lt;br /&gt;
The transcript should describe the content (think about explaining the comic to a visually impaired person, or to someone on phone). It should do this in a compact manner, and cite all written words. Every line should begin with an indent (a simple &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;:&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt; at the beginning), and every panel from the comic should be separated by a blank line. The transcript must not contain any links, nor rich math markup, which once again relies on visuals. Tables should generally be avoided, although not all transcripts comply with this. Furthermore the title text is not included in the transcript. Checking the pages for the older comics will help understand this.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==One or two spaces after a period? And what about newlines?==&lt;br /&gt;
There is a controversy if one or two spaces after a period ending a sentence should be used. The fact is that even three   or more       spaces are rendered as only one.&lt;br /&gt;
Furthermore a single newline is also just rendered as a space.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A new paragraph like this needs an empty line before, not just a single newline. Click the edit/source button to see how this chapter is written.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==What belongs to the trivia section?==&lt;br /&gt;
As implied by the section name, it's just trivia, consisting of unimportant odds-and-ends related to the comic. Since this wiki focuses on explaining this section is not part of the default layout. If a word has been misspelled in the comic or title text, or the image was originally broken at xkcd and reuploaded... basically the things that don't belong in the explanation but should still be mentioned, then it should be mentioned in the trivia section.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==How do I behave on the talk page (discussion)?==&lt;br /&gt;
Everybody can add here any thoughts about the comic and more. Please follow the common netiquette and don't be rude. Unless you are replying to a previous comment, in which you should add a colon before your comment, you should add comments at the bottom. Every comment has to be signed at the end with &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;~~~~&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt; or just click the sign button [[File:Button sig.png]] at the top of the editor.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==What does the incomplete tag mean?==&lt;br /&gt;
There are two templates to indicate that an explanation or the transcript do need further rework. Just enter &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{incomplete|YOUR REASON}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt; or respectively &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{incomplete transcript|YOUR REASON}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt; and don't forget to enter a proper reason to replace the filler text left by the bot (Created by a BOT - Please change this comment when editing this page. Do NOT delete this tag too soon.), or if the reason said in the tag has been dealt with. The reason at the transcript is not shown to the viewer.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==How do I enter links to other pages?==&lt;br /&gt;
The three mostly used options are:&lt;br /&gt;
*an internal link like &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;[[Cueball]]&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt; which renders like this: [[Cueball]]&lt;br /&gt;
*a link to the English Wikipedia should use this template: &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{w|Page}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt; links to the Wikipedia article on &amp;quot;Page&amp;quot; or &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{w|Page|Display}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt; prints &amp;quot;Display&amp;quot; which links to the Wikipedia article on &amp;quot;Page&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
*other external links can be done in three ways:&lt;br /&gt;
**just write the URL and it will be shown like this: http://www.example.com&lt;br /&gt;
**put it into single brackets: &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;[http://www.example.com]&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt; and you will see this [http://www.example.com] (please avoid this)&lt;br /&gt;
**and add a text: &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;[http://www.example.com Example Homepage]&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt; everything after the first space is shown: [http://www.example.com Example Homepage]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Why can't I upload pictures or create pages?==&lt;br /&gt;
Only registered and trusted users can create pages or upload images. After the registration you have to wait at least three days and you must have done a small amount of edits, then you will be able to create pages and upload images at will. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==How do I embed images?==&lt;br /&gt;
This Wiki isn't a picture book, use this feature only sparingly and reduce the size as much as possible. An example can be seen here: [[1400: D.B. Cooper]]. The syntax in this case is &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;[[File:DBCooper.jpg|thumb|150px|Cooper]]&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt; and the picture is taken from Commons, the main source for Wikipedia images. The full syntax can be found at [[mw:Help:Images|MediaWiki]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You also can upload pictures directly to this Wiki by using the [[Special:Upload]] link from the menu. But do not violate any copyright rules or it will be deleted. And when the picture is available at Commons there is no need to upload it here.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==The picture at xkcd was updated, how do I upload this here?==&lt;br /&gt;
Sometimes the initial picture at [[xkcd]] contains typos or other errors. When that has been fixed the comic picture here should also be updated. Save the picture from xkcd to your local PC but be careful, there are two versions available. We here use only the smaller version ''picture.png'' and not the larger one ''picture_2x.png''. So change &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;https://imgs.xkcd.com/comics/picture_2x.png&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt; to &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;https://imgs.xkcd.com/comics/picture.png&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt; when your browser shows the 2x version.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To update it here just click the image in the comic page and then click &amp;quot;Upload a new version of this file&amp;quot; below the file history. And please be patient, you won't see your upload immediately because it still comes from the cache at the server. But when you see your upload in the file history everything is OK. Just wait...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==How do I enter mathematical or chemical formulas?==&lt;br /&gt;
You can use the Math markup &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;...&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;. The other known code from Wikipedia &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;chem&amp;gt;...&amp;lt;/chem&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt; is NOT supported yet. It's based on LaTeX syntax and a general overview can be found at this {{w|Help:Displaying a formula|Wikipedia help page}} -- don't use it unless you understand what you are doing.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Furthermore never use this markup at the ''transcript'' because that math code is rendered to a picture -- at the transcript we try to describe the comic ''image'' by ''words'', a picture there wouldn't be helpful.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Is the ''Citation needed'' template here similar to the analog at Wikipedia?==&lt;br /&gt;
Simple answer: NO. In fact that template just links to [[285: Wikipedian Protester]], a comic from July 4, 2007 and was meant to be a joke. Adding this template to every comic doesn't explain anything at all (that's what this Wiki aims to do) and should be placed only when there is a deeper sense of humor.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>162.158.91.95</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:2141:_UI_vs_UX&amp;diff=173319</id>
		<title>Talk:2141: UI vs UX</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:2141:_UI_vs_UX&amp;diff=173319"/>
				<updated>2019-04-29T14:29:18Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;162.158.91.95: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&amp;lt;!--Please sign your posts with ~~~~ and don't delete this text. New comments should be added at the bottom.--&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The comic as a whole is making fun of how meta software developers get about the user experience, seeking to name all the different types of interactions a user can have with an app or webpage. &lt;br /&gt;
This comic is massive for me on my desktop (chrome); I wonder if this is a joke about bad UX or if it is a genuine error? [[User:Fwacer|Fwacer]] ([[User talk:Fwacer|talk]]) 18:50, 24 April 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:It's not this big on xkcd.com. Did it start this big and got fixed on the original site? Update: replaced with the image from xkcd.com which was much smaller. [[User:Cgrimes85|Cgrimes85]] ([[User talk:Cgrimes85|talk]]) 18:55, 24 April 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Looks like it is fixed now, but yes it was also that big on xkcd.com initially. [[User:Fwacer|Fwacer]] ([[User talk:Fwacer|talk]]) 19:19, 24 April 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To me, it comes across as a hyperbolic play on the common confusion between the meaning of UI and UX. [https://twitter.com/sdw/status/709853249407361024] [[User:Ahiijny|Ahiijny]] ([[User talk:Ahiijny|talk]]) 19:06, 24 April 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It makes sense that it would be alpha and omega, but I originally thought it was the &amp;quot;proportional&amp;quot; symbol. I only ask because alpha is lowercase and omega is uppercase, although perhaps this was to avoid confusion with the Latin &amp;quot;A&amp;quot;. [[User:Cgrimes85|Cgrimes85]] ([[User talk:Cgrimes85|talk]]) 19:13, 24 April 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Concerning the lowercase/uppercase difference, since alpha is the beginning and omega is the end, then consider that in the beginning we are born little and then grow up - we start out as lowercase and end up as uppercase. [[User:Ianrbibtitlht|Ianrbibtitlht]] ([[User talk:Ianrbibtitlht|talk]]) 19:30, 24 April 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This is a joke on integration, yes?[[Special:Contributions/172.69.68.129|172.69.68.129]] 19:33, 24 April 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
: &amp;quot;The arc of the moral universe is long, but it bends toward justice&amp;quot; -- I guess the big in the comic being about the arc of the moral universe can reference the fight against segregation and thus for integration...&lt;br /&gt;
:: I meant mathematical integration...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I'm happy with the explanations I just added for everything but &amp;quot;Life's experience of time&amp;quot; -- does anyone know what that phrase is from? [[Special:Contributions/172.68.133.54|172.68.133.54]] 05:48, 25 April 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:I thought it was made by a U[unprintable glyph] designer. [[Special:Contributions/172.68.226.64|172.68.226.64]] 07:40, 25 April 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
No UK - well that is about par [[Special:Contributions/141.101.107.240|141.101.107.240]] 20:45, 25 April 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On what level are those idiots who say &amp;quot;user doesn't need this setting, it would only confuse him&amp;quot;? -- [[User:Hkmaly|Hkmaly]] ([[User talk:Hkmaly|talk]]) 22:20, 25 April 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:UG&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; - user second-guessing. [[Special:Contributions/172.68.142.197|172.68.142.197]] 06:27, 26 April 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Why has Randall chosen this particular set of characters?  Why Z? Why alpha and omega - the first and last letters of the Greek alphabet, used in the bible quote &amp;quot;i am the alpha and omega&amp;quot; i.e. the beginning and the end, but what link with the subject?  Or is it just a sequence of increasingly improbable characters from latin through Greek, then glyphs then unprintable glyphs..? &lt;br /&gt;
[[Special:Contributions/108.162.229.82|108.162.229.82]] 07:34, 26 April 2019 (UTC) Dancergraham&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:UX comes after UI in the alphabet, and so Randall first extended that to the last letter of the Latin alphabet, then Greek. Infinity then also makes sense, but I don't know about the bullet. [[User:Oliphaunt|Oliphaunt]] ([[User talk:Oliphaunt|talk]]) 09:08, 26 April 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Other than being the last letter of the Latin alphabet, I can't come up with any other meaning for &amp;quot;Z&amp;quot; to represent something in psychology. As for the remaining symbols, I think alpha might represent the &amp;quot;a&amp;quot; in actualization or the beginning of the user's awareness or life because alpha represents beginning.  Since Omega means the end, this likely represents the end of the user's life, which determines the length of the arc of their life. I believe the infinity symbol is a reference to how time looks to the typical life of a user, since it extends well before and after a user's life. Lastly, I think the black circle might represent a view of morality as either a black hole or a dark subject. This is just my impressions. [[User:Ianrbibtitlht|Ianrbibtitlht]] ([[User talk:Ianrbibtitlht|talk]]) 13:31, 26 April 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::I did think about &amp;quot;Z&amp;quot; representing Zen, but I'm not sure how that connects with psychology. [[User:Ianrbibtitlht|Ianrbibtitlht]] ([[User talk:Ianrbibtitlht|talk]]) 13:57, 26 April 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:: Zychology...[[Special:Contributions/162.158.91.95|162.158.91.95]] 14:29, 29 April 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
My initial thought was that the black circle represents the &amp;quot;black point message&amp;quot; that crashed apps like whatsapp a while ago.  I never saw it personally but Tom Scott did a video on it last year.  It might be a commentary on how understanding of the universe's moral arc could be considered untouchable/unobtainable. [[User:Blik|Blik]] ([[User talk:Blik|talk]]) 14:30, 26 April 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:I took the black circle as a Black Hole - that changes the arc of everything in the Universe! [[User:John.Adriaan|John.Adriaan]] ([[User talk:John.Adriaan|talk]]) 02:14, 29 April 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hmm.  It looks like UY got skipped.  The study of the user's motivation and goals.  Like UI and UX, it's a real thing.  But that's really the job of concept or marketing.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>162.158.91.95</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:473:_Still_Raw&amp;diff=146869</id>
		<title>Talk:473: Still Raw</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:473:_Still_Raw&amp;diff=146869"/>
				<updated>2017-10-19T11:46:23Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;162.158.91.95: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;The explanation says: &amp;quot;... Pluto has been the ninth planet in our solar system until 2006 ...&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It should says 'the tenth' isn'it?&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:SioD|SioD]] ([[User talk:SioD|talk]]) 14:52, 30 August 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Pluto was discovered in 1930, and has been since the ninth body to be discovered and classified as a &amp;quot;planet&amp;quot;. The sentence is a temporal rather than spacial reference, if that clears up any confusion. [[User:Thokling|Thokling]] ([[User talk:Thokling|talk]]) 12:04, 24 September 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Actually, no. Using the temporal definition, Pluto would be number 13. It was discovered after Ceres, Pallas, Juno and Vesta, which were discovered, named and classified, but then quickly demoted, all about 120 years before Pluto. This was due to the fact that telescopes of the day were strong enough to see quite a bit of the asteroid belt in a relatively short time, unlike with the &amp;quot;previously mythical&amp;quot; Kuiper belt. &lt;br /&gt;
::Also, if any thing, the spacial discrepancy should be between eighth and ninth, as Pluto's orbit is squeezed enough to be inside that of Neptune, but long enough to extend outside it. Charon, Pluto's &amp;quot;moon&amp;quot; may cause additional worry, but is usually ignored. &lt;br /&gt;
::Anonymous 01:11, 4 December 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::I think this interpretation is a bit deliberately obtuse. Ceres wasn't considered a planet at the same time that Pluto was, so Pluto was indeed the ninth planet for a period of time. There is no confusion here.&lt;br /&gt;
:::On another note, the Dawn and New Horizons probes have now given us a large world covered in volatiles and weather, with internally driven geology, and a smaller, more obviously non-spherical cratered ball of rock. A common sense definition of a planet would probably leave Ceres out. As for Vesta, nobody has ever considered that a planet, not even the &amp;quot;Pluto should still be a planet&amp;quot; crowd. Again, being deliberately contrarian doesn't usually shed any light on scientific questions. [[Special:Contributions/108.162.250.158|108.162.250.158]] 03:38, 18 April 2016 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I think we would all be happy if the astronomers would come up with a definition of a planet that reasonably included Pluto but reasonably excluded the other 'candidates' that have been found so far.  You know, the ones without large moons. Or Pluto could just be grandfathered in.  Exactly how would science be held back by this??  [[Special:Contributions/108.162.219.223|108.162.219.223]] 00:00, 4 January 2014 (UTC)  &lt;br /&gt;
:You don't think they tried to find a standard that included Pluto and excluded the others? Also grandfathering makes the idea of making a standard definition useless. {{unsigned ip|108.162.250.162}}&lt;br /&gt;
:: For my part, I never understood why it was such an issue to not have the other things that are now dwarf planets classified as planets. More planets are cool, aren't they? They could have used whatever cut they made between dwarf planets and other stuff as definition boundary for planets and promoted them instead of declassifiying Pluto. You could then have split the category &amp;quot;planets&amp;quot; into &amp;quot;instert-cool-name-here&amp;quot;-planets and dwarf planets and voilà, more planets AND congruent definition. Also, less confusing nomenclature, as with the present definition dwarf planets aren't planets, even though the name makes it appear as if they are a subcategory of planets. I totally get why Pluto should be in a seperate category from the other large planets. [[Special:Contributions/162.158.91.95|162.158.91.95]] 11:46, 19 October 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The airplane/treadmill question is actually hard to define properly. In real case scenario, the plane would of course take off, but you can keep it in place if you assume really fast treadmill (much faster that the plane), friction in airplane wheels and that those wheels won't break off, catch fire or otherwise get destroyed under the stress much higher they are developed for. Oh, wait, actually the airplane WONT take off if the wheels break. :-) -- [[User:Hkmaly|Hkmaly]] ([[User talk:Hkmaly|talk]]) 12:01, 5 December 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:If you choose to model friction in the wheels, it would be simpler to model the airplane with NO wheels, and then ask whether it could take off.  Well, 'Airplane!' notwithstanding, it couldn't.  But that's not an interesting problem, right?  And neither is the variation with friction in the wheels.  [[Special:Contributions/108.162.219.223|108.162.219.223]] 23:54, 3 January 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::Odd that carrier decks still have to be so long. In fact launching them from podiums would allow the use of on-deck hangars.&lt;br /&gt;
::Anyone know if this applies to helicopters?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Weatherlawyer| I used Google News BEFORE it was clickbait]] ([[User talk:Weatherlawyer|talk]]) 02:14, 31 January 2015 (UTC)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>162.158.91.95</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:1904:_Research_Risks&amp;diff=146792</id>
		<title>Talk:1904: Research Risks</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:1904:_Research_Risks&amp;diff=146792"/>
				<updated>2017-10-18T14:50:13Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;162.158.91.95: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&amp;lt;!--Please sign your posts with ~~~~ and don't delete this text. New comments should be added at the bottom.--&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Entymology? Misspelled &amp;quot;entomology&amp;quot; or (more confusingly) &amp;quot;etymology&amp;quot;?&lt;br /&gt;
Psychology lower risk than micology? Absolutely hogwash!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Molasses storage is misplaced -- should be in the quadrant to its right.  See [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_Molasses_Flood].  21 dead and 150 injured. [[Special:Contributions/108.162.219.52|108.162.219.52]] 14:12, 18 October 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
Agreed that it did get out and kill people. But only once in something like 200 years and only a few. (Is this where the phrase slower than molasses in January comes from?) &lt;br /&gt;
I would not expect that this would be a common danger.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I think entymology is a reference to [https://xkcd.com/1012 1012]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Special:Contributions/162.158.91.95|162.158.91.95]] 14:50, 18 October 2017 (UTC)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>162.158.91.95</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:1796:_Focus_Knob&amp;diff=134948</id>
		<title>Talk:1796: Focus Knob</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:1796:_Focus_Knob&amp;diff=134948"/>
				<updated>2017-02-08T10:19:50Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;162.158.91.95: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&amp;lt;!--Please sign your posts with ~~~~--&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Maybe Randall is implying that he has issues with keeping the big picture in mind while doing detail work and gets lost in the details of implementation and vice versa. &lt;br /&gt;
This means that for him the knob is more of an on/off or selection switch. Pulse Width Modulation would then allow him to use this on/off switch more like the knob in the picture shown. (... or whoevers voice Randall is speaking in as many people probably have issues with this, myself included.) &lt;br /&gt;
I wonder if he obsessed over how to implement this comic: &lt;br /&gt;
1. As an on/off switch? &lt;br /&gt;
2. As a knob with limited none-usefull settings with &amp;quot;ideal&amp;quot; labeled between the actual settings available? &lt;br /&gt;
3. Like this, for simplicity, keeping the big picture in mind and not obsessing over the details of how it may under some circumstances be viewed?&lt;br /&gt;
--[[Special:Contributions/162.158.91.95|162.158.91.95]] 10:19, 8 February 2017 (UTC)cdm&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>162.158.91.95</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:1767:_US_State_Names&amp;diff=131913</id>
		<title>Talk:1767: US State Names</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:1767:_US_State_Names&amp;diff=131913"/>
				<updated>2016-12-02T10:40:49Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;162.158.91.95: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&amp;lt;!--Please sign your posts with ~~~~--&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
I'm wondering whether this could be a joke about autocorrect/suggested completion as found in smartphone texting apps.&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Dromaeosaur|Dromaeosaur]] ([[User talk:Dromaeosaur|talk]]) 08:06, 2 December 2016 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:But would autocorrect replace Texas with Hexxus?--[[User:Blaisorblade|Blaisorblade]] ([[User talk:Blaisorblade|talk]]) 09:02, 2 December 2016 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
According to Wikipedia Will Wheaton is not from Washington [[Special:Contributions/162.158.133.150|162.158.133.150]] 08:56, 2 December 2016 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I think the starting point is the ambiguity of the standard &amp;quot;Name all 50 states&amp;quot; challenge. I'm no native speaker but &amp;quot;Name&amp;quot; means both &amp;quot;invent a new name&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;give the correct name for&amp;quot;, and Randall is misunderstanding this on purpose. Maybe that's obvious to some, but it seems the sort of thing worth explaining here?--[[User:Blaisorblade|Blaisorblade]] ([[User talk:Blaisorblade|talk]]) 09:02, 2 December 2016 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Colocated&amp;quot; is technically misspelled (it's either &amp;quot;co-located&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;collocated&amp;quot;), though that could be for the sake of matching it to &amp;quot;Colorado.&amp;quot; However, the word is used in many situations other than &amp;quot;co-location center&amp;quot; (e.g. workers being collocated in the same office), so unless Colorado is particularly notable for its co-location centers, I don't think it makes sense to claim that that's what it's specifically referring to. –[[User:PhantomLimbic|PhantomLimbic]] ([[User talk:PhantomLimbic|talk]]) 09:36, 2 December 2016 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Hmm, it looks like &amp;quot;colocated&amp;quot; is a spelling used specifically within the industry, so perhaps the claim is warranted after all. –[[User:PhantomLimbic|PhantomLimbic]] ([[User talk:PhantomLimbic|talk]]) 09:50, 2 December 2016 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Isn't it a challenge to correctly name all the states with clues given as to the proper name?[[Special:Contributions/162.158.91.95|162.158.91.95]] 10:27, 2 December 2016 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:I think the challenge is supposed to be a blank map that someone has filled out in red pen. The joke is that whoever filled it out does pretty much know all of the states but isn't really clear on their actual names.[[Special:Contributions/108.162.238.50|108.162.238.50]] 10:34, 2 December 2016 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
Right, I get you. Something a bored Geography teacher may or may not find amusing when it comes to giving out detentions for the week :)[[Special:Contributions/162.158.91.95|162.158.91.95]] 10:40, 2 December 2016 (UTC)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>162.158.91.95</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:1767:_US_State_Names&amp;diff=131909</id>
		<title>Talk:1767: US State Names</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:1767:_US_State_Names&amp;diff=131909"/>
				<updated>2016-12-02T10:27:17Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;162.158.91.95: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&amp;lt;!--Please sign your posts with ~~~~--&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
I'm wondering whether this could be a joke about autocorrect/suggested completion as found in smartphone texting apps.&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Dromaeosaur|Dromaeosaur]] ([[User talk:Dromaeosaur|talk]]) 08:06, 2 December 2016 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:But would autocorrect replace Texas with Hexxus?--[[User:Blaisorblade|Blaisorblade]] ([[User talk:Blaisorblade|talk]]) 09:02, 2 December 2016 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
According to Wikipedia Will Wheaton is not from Washington [[Special:Contributions/162.158.133.150|162.158.133.150]] 08:56, 2 December 2016 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I think the starting point is the ambiguity of the standard &amp;quot;Name all 50 states&amp;quot; challenge. I'm no native speaker but &amp;quot;Name&amp;quot; means both &amp;quot;invent a new name&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;give the correct name for&amp;quot;, and Randall is misunderstanding this on purpose. Maybe that's obvious to some, but it seems the sort of thing worth explaining here?--[[User:Blaisorblade|Blaisorblade]] ([[User talk:Blaisorblade|talk]]) 09:02, 2 December 2016 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Colocated&amp;quot; is technically misspelled (it's either &amp;quot;co-located&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;collocated&amp;quot;), though that could be for the sake of matching it to &amp;quot;Colorado.&amp;quot; However, the word is used in many situations other than &amp;quot;co-location center&amp;quot; (e.g. workers being collocated in the same office), so unless Colorado is particularly notable for its co-location centers, I don't think it makes sense to claim that that's what it's specifically referring to. –[[User:PhantomLimbic|PhantomLimbic]] ([[User talk:PhantomLimbic|talk]]) 09:36, 2 December 2016 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Hmm, it looks like &amp;quot;colocated&amp;quot; is a spelling used specifically within the industry, so perhaps the claim is warranted after all. –[[User:PhantomLimbic|PhantomLimbic]] ([[User talk:PhantomLimbic|talk]]) 09:50, 2 December 2016 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Isn't it a challenge to correctly name all the states with clues given as to the proper name?[[Special:Contributions/162.158.91.95|162.158.91.95]] 10:27, 2 December 2016 (UTC)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>162.158.91.95</name></author>	</entry>

	</feed>