<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=162.158.93.105</id>
		<title>explain xkcd - User contributions [en]</title>
		<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=162.158.93.105"/>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php/Special:Contributions/162.158.93.105"/>
		<updated>2026-04-16T18:30:39Z</updated>
		<subtitle>User contributions</subtitle>
		<generator>MediaWiki 1.30.0</generator>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:2293:_RIP_John_Conway&amp;diff=190607</id>
		<title>Talk:2293: RIP John Conway</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:2293:_RIP_John_Conway&amp;diff=190607"/>
				<updated>2020-04-14T14:18:16Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;162.158.93.105: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&amp;lt;!--Please sign your posts with ~~~~ and don't delete this text. New comments should be added at the bottom.--&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This is really very impressive.  The design of the stick figure to allow it to release a glider that ascends upwards (the &amp;quot;soul&amp;quot; rising to &amp;quot;heaven&amp;quot; or whatever) with the body decaying - that's a hard thing to get right using just the Game of Life rules. [[Special:Contributions/172.69.68.175|172.69.68.175]] 17:49, 13 April 2020 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Although Randall is clever, the Game of Life has been studied for so long that I'm sure this is a well-known animation. [[User:Barmar|Barmar]] ([[User talk:Barmar|talk]]) 18:29, 13 April 2020 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:: I played with the game a bunch in the past, but I've only done a bit of research after this appeared. I don't immediately find any previous report of this starting arrangement&lt;br /&gt;
:: This is unlikely, as the Game of Life has an uncountable number of patterns of this size, some of which are still being discovered. The pattern above is 7 cells wide by 9 cells tall - the number of distinct patterns that can be drawn in that box nears 2 --&amp;gt; 60 --&amp;gt; 1 (2^60). It's most likely that patterns such as this one are commonplace, and Randall just fiddled around until he reached one that he desired. The pattern itself, however, has likely never been discovered before. (As a fun postscript, [http://catagolue.appspot.com/object/xp16_0c2w3vz33032988/b3s23 a notable 8-cell wide, 9-cell tall pattern oscillating at period 16], just slightly larger than the one above, was discovered in February 2020.)[[User:Hdjensofjfnen|Hdjensofjfnen]] ([[User talk:Hdjensofjfnen|talk]]) 21:31, 13 April 2020 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::I suspect it's probably more likely that he worked it out backwards, rather than &amp;quot;just fiddled with it.&amp;quot; [[Special:Contributions/108.162.216.244|108.162.216.244]] 04:24, 14 April 2020 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::::AFAIK, many CAs such as Life have the property of being irreversible, which is the entire point for various pattern search efforts.[[Special:Contributions/162.158.92.54|162.158.92.54]] 07:13, 14 April 2020 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::He probably started with the floater, and adjusted the rest so it wouldn't interfere. Most figures decay in the game of life (I learned when playing with it, decades ago) --[[Special:Contributions/162.158.111.79|162.158.111.79]] 10:45, 14 April 2020 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
was there a placeholder comic posted before the gif went live?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I am certain there was one with &amp;quot;uh oh one of the lights went out&amp;quot; &amp;quot;that's not supposed to happen&amp;quot; and a picture of a pattern that I did not recognise, which I found to be quite sad. [[Special:Contributions/162.158.92.54|162.158.92.54]] 10:35, 14 April 2020 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::This was SMBC, and the pattern is a glider generator. [[Special:Contributions/188.114.111.211|188.114.111.211]] 12:30, 14 April 2020 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Looks like this is second animated comic in xkcd, besides 1116(though 1190 could be possibly counted together) [[Special:Contributions/172.69.190.16|172.69.190.16]] 19:34, 13 April 2020 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Uh, [[1331: Frequency]] and [[1264: Slideshow]] immediately come to mind, and then I remember about [[961: Eternal Flame]]. There's a lot more than two. [[User:Volleo6144|Volleo6144]] ([[User talk:Volleo6144|talk]]) 19:43, 13 April 2020 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::[[:Category:Comics with animation]]; just added it. [[User:Yngvadottir|Yngvadottir]] ([[User talk:Yngvadottir|talk]]) 20:19, 13 April 2020 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The explanation says that the simulation is run on an infinite grid, but even when the grid is calculated out beyond the border of the viewable area, bounding errors &amp;amp; boundary formations can occur. I've never seen ''any'' implementation that actually produces an infinite, nor even ''practically'' infinite grid. (In fact, wasn't there a Minecraft mod that runs until it lags out the engine?) Can anybody point me to a truly infinite grid implementation? Conway's ''definitely'' was not infinite, he even commented at length about the boundary formations that show up at the grid edges (which are among the most subjectively beautiful, incidentally). I think the explanation needs correction? &lt;br /&gt;
[[User:ProphetZarquon|ProphetZarquon]] ([[User talk:ProphetZarquon|talk]]) 21:59, 13 April 2020 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
: The explanation is describing Conway's game of life, not any particular implementation IMHO.  No change needed IMHOA.  Also, the previous post was not signed properly. [[Special:Contributions/162.158.107.167|162.158.107.167]] 21:47, 13 April 2020 (UTC) &lt;br /&gt;
::Except many of Conway's observations about the &amp;quot;game&amp;quot; &amp;amp; even ''his initial description'' of it explicitly state &amp;amp; indeed hinge upon the fact that it's not (&amp;amp; thus far ''cannot'' be) implemented as an &amp;quot;infinite&amp;quot; grid. Part of the whole point of his experiment with it &amp;amp; the various demonstrations is to illustrate edge effects resulting from a finite range of calculations. '''It's extremely relevant that it's''' '''''not''''' '''infinite.''' It's actually kinda the whole point of his creating it, much the same way people working with fractals likewise tend to become very interested in bounding errors. The boundaries are where the interesting work is done. Apparently someone agreed with me at least in part, because they edited the wording. Thanks... Brian? I think we should actually '''add''' to the description of the &amp;quot;game&amp;quot; info highlighting the edge effects, because that's the primary focus of the project &amp;amp; its outgrowths in the first place. (We can't adequately simulate infinity &amp;amp; that's a big part of the interest in it.) Also, I frequently have to submit &amp;amp; then refresh &amp;amp; sign afterward because of the device I'm on. In this case I'm glad I did, because I saw your reply &amp;amp; the other new stuff!&lt;br /&gt;
::[[User:ProphetZarquon|ProphetZarquon]] ([[User talk:ProphetZarquon|talk]]) 22:17, 13 April 2020 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Golly uses a grid of arbitrary size by default. It can very easily be verified to at least ±2&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;10000&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;. (Note that it also includes finite rectangular and toroidal grids.) [[User:LegionMammal978|LegionMammal978]] ([[User talk:LegionMammal978|talk]]) 01:39, 14 April 2020 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
No computer [Citation Needed] can run an ''actual'' infinite grid, but with some intelligent bounding you can mitigate early signs of problems by maintaining &amp;quot;bubbles&amp;quot; of cells with offsets. You get into problems once you start machine-gunning out gliders (offsets will eventually overflow or awkwardly lose precision, depending on the var-types used; and maintaining a longer and longer bubble, or more and more bubbles just above glider-sized, is probably your other challenge) but it's probably good enough for most purposes. If you somehow have finite patterns that move out in huge (wasteless) cycles from the 'origin' and hold that path until enacting hugely-delayed doglegs (mathematically, it must be a point no further away than can be reasonably enumerated by the bits of information contained within each formation, and significantly less as it'd be a far less efficient count-down cycler than any folded LFSR, but it's ''imaginable'') to meet again at some arbitrary (though deterministic and replicable) distance out in the far far reaches of your abstracted bubble-land then it's possible you could ''pretend'' you have infinite space. [[Special:Contributions/162.158.91.101|162.158.91.101]] 22:26, 13 April 2020 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:ProphetZarquon|ProphetZarquon]], do you have a source for your claim that the main point of Conway's creation of Life was to study the edge effects? [https://conwaylife.com/wiki/Conway%27s_Game_of_Life The page for Life on its own wiki] describes the Life grid as &amp;quot;infinite&amp;quot; and only mentions edge effects as inaccuracies to be avoided, and [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R9Plq-D1gEk this Conway interview about Life's creation] doesn't mention edges at all.&lt;br /&gt;
[[Special:Contributions/108.162.241.24|108.162.241.24]] 23:34, 13 April 2020‎ (UTC) &lt;br /&gt;
:First of all, as a tip, reply directly to the comment when you want to talk with someone. Secondly, yeah, I'm pretty sure that person's just blasting ass ham. [[Special:Contributions/172.69.69.28|172.69.69.28]] 02:49, 14 April 2020 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Possibly worth noting is the bit of artistry in the rendering. Munroe alters the step period of the iterations so that the deconstruction of the humanoid shape happens more quickly, with the stepping of the glider translating away occurring more slowly. [[User:Fixer|Fixer]] ([[User talk:Fixer|talk]]) 21:52, 13 April 2020 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I like the comic very much, and I'm afraid to say I hadn't heard of his death in amongst... well, everything else. RIP.&lt;br /&gt;
While I'm here, though, I'm a bit concerned about the current cell generation cycle explanation, as it feels awkward.  Currently it is (paraphrased) &amp;quot;live cells survive if just enough neighbours / dead cells come to life with exactly enough neighbours / any other dies or stays dead&amp;quot;.  I'd prefer something that more delineates it as birth (dead to live, by propogation from the right number of live neighbours), death (live to dead due to ''either'' isolation ''or'' overcrowding) and continuation of state in all other cases. Can't work out a good phrasing yet, but ''may'' try it out later. [[Special:Contributions/162.158.91.101|162.158.91.101]] 22:26, 13 April 2020 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
: Agreed 100%. I believe the problem lies in the confusion between &amp;quot;cell as in biology&amp;quot; versus &amp;quot;cell as in jail&amp;quot;. It would be better to avoid the word &amp;quot;cell&amp;quot; and describe a grid with squares that are either inhabited or empty; inhabitants with two or three neighbours survive to the next generation, otherwise they die (square becomes empty the next generation); exactly three neighbours to an empty square will give birth (become inhabited) in the next generation; and any other empty square stays empty.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Given the cause of death, should this comic be listed among the Covid-19 series? [[User:Momerath|Momerath]] ([[User talk:Momerath|talk]]) 05:02, 14 April 2020 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Yes.--[[User:Kynde|Kynde]] ([[User talk:Kynde|talk]]) 10:51, 14 April 2020 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:No. This is about John Conway. It would have presumably run regardless of the cause of death.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Interesting to see if the next comic is also a Covid-19 comic, because then it will be the 19th covid-19 comic... --[[User:Kynde|Kynde]] ([[User talk:Kynde|talk]]) 10:53, 14 April 2020 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I really think this should not be regarded as a Covid-19 comic, since it's a memorial one and the cause of death is not important for this comic. [[Special:Contributions/162.158.93.105|162.158.93.105]] 14:18, 14 April 2020 (UTC)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>162.158.93.105</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=2288:_Collector%27s_Edition&amp;diff=189709</id>
		<title>2288: Collector's Edition</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=2288:_Collector%27s_Edition&amp;diff=189709"/>
				<updated>2020-04-03T10:49:20Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;162.158.93.105: /* Hints */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{comic&lt;br /&gt;
| number    = 2288&lt;br /&gt;
| date      = April 3, 2020&lt;br /&gt;
| title     = Collectors Edition&lt;br /&gt;
| image     = collectors_edition.png&lt;br /&gt;
| titletext = I'm sure you can find some suitable worldbuilding material if you scavenge through the archives.&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Explanation==&lt;br /&gt;
{{incomplete|Created by TECHNICAL DIFFICULTIES. Please mention here why this explanation isn't complete. Do NOT delete this tag too soon.}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This is an April 1st comic. It is a large image, of which only part is visible, but it can be dragged around. The large image contains a collection of items, sometimes humorous, often repeating. Items keep appearing in real time. Different viewers can place these items on the page by first collecting them from other comics.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There is a &amp;quot;backpack&amp;quot; at the bottom, similar to &amp;quot;backpacks&amp;quot; in video games containing items collected by the player. Items can be found by visiting different XKCD comics/pages. Randomly, some pages will have a treasure chest which will contain the sticker related to the page. It is believed that the hint represents what page currently has a chest.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The sticker images can be seen at `https://xkcd.com/2288/collectors/static/loot/loot_XXX.png`, where XXX is a number from 001-253.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Hints===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Doctors in a row&amp;quot;, &amp;quot;Get out the (US) vote&amp;quot;, &amp;quot;Find a box of nice stuff on a picture with words like these&amp;quot;, &amp;quot;Sweet dreams, kitty&amp;quot;, &amp;quot;What is this hint pointing to? Hell if I know.&amp;quot;, &amp;quot;Somebody set up us the bomb&amp;quot;, &amp;quot;Cowabunga&amp;quot;, &amp;quot;Take a ride in a barrel&amp;quot;, &amp;quot;I want to believe&amp;quot;, &amp;quot;Bleeped&amp;quot;, &amp;quot;why waste time say few word when lot word do trick&amp;quot;, &amp;quot;Cooler than electric scooters&amp;quot;, &amp;quot;Take it from the top&amp;quot;, &amp;quot;I accept the yucca gnocchi, this meal is a success!&amp;quot;, &amp;quot;Catch up on the news&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Trivia==&lt;br /&gt;
* This comic is the 2020 April Fools comic, and was supposed to be released April 1st. However, the below message was displayed on the top of the page until early Friday (April 3rd) morning, when the comic finally went live. It remains to be seen if Friday's intended comic will be published later.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Note: For technical reasons Wednesday's comic will be posted Thursday instead. Apologies for the delay!&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Transcript==&lt;br /&gt;
{{incomplete transcript|Do NOT delete this tag too soon.}}&lt;br /&gt;
:[Cueball stands to the left of a vibrating box.]&lt;br /&gt;
:[The words &amp;quot;Collector's Edition&amp;quot; are written above him and boxed.]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{comic discussion}}&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>162.158.93.105</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:2287:_Pathogen_Resistance&amp;diff=189562</id>
		<title>Talk:2287: Pathogen Resistance</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:2287:_Pathogen_Resistance&amp;diff=189562"/>
				<updated>2020-03-31T21:21:34Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;162.158.93.105: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&amp;lt;!--Please sign your posts with ~~~~ and don't delete this text. New comments should be added at the bottom.--&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Note that the title text says &amp;quot;not not&amp;quot; -- meaning we're both trapped in here together [[User:John.Adriaan|John.Adriaan]] ([[User talk:John.Adriaan|talk]]) 04:38, 31 March 2020 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Randall fixed that. [[User:Jacky720|That's right, Jacky720 just signed this]] ([[User talk:Jacky720|talk]] | [[Special:Contributions/Jacky720|contribs]]) 16:38, 31 March 2020 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Do bacteriophages &amp;quot;afflict&amp;quot; humanity? To my knowledge, they only infect bacteria and are even considered a possible future alternative to antibiotics by some. What is up with them being represented here? 09:12, 31 March 2020 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
: Yeah, bacteriophage is just wrong here, it's a generic virus. This type of virus is depicted on the bacteriophage wikipedia page but viruses that affect humans can have that shape also. [[Special:Contributions/172.68.51.94|172.68.51.94]]&lt;br /&gt;
: There are no known human viruses of that shape (source: I'm a biologist), so this seems like more of a mistake on Randall's side (albeit an odd one for him to make, so perhaps somehow deliberate?). [[Special:Contributions/162.158.91.155|162.158.91.155]] 08:55, 31 March 2020 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::But... if it affects bacteria and humen have many bacteria (and many/most of them useful) in them, shouldn't it affect the human then as well? indirectly? Source: I have very vague knowledge :D --[[User:Lupo|Lupo]] ([[User talk:Lupo|talk]]) 09:06, 31 March 2020 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::It may be deliberate in the sense that almost everyone will go &amp;quot;Oh, that's a virus!&amp;quot; when they see this shape, contrary to the other 2 which look more like big molecules or bacteria.[[Special:Contributions/162.158.111.7|162.158.111.7]] 09:20, 31 March 2020 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:: The bacteriophage point is now very nicely addressed in the explanation. Good job to all who contributed to that part! [[Special:Contributions/162.158.93.105|162.158.93.105]] 21:04, 31 March 2020 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Don’t worry, pathogens! All is not lost. There will always be some humans whose brains don’t work very well, who will buy into ideas like “vaccines cause autism”, or “faith healing”, or “natural remedies”, or “Trump is always right”. You’ll still have hosts. [[User:Tualha|Tualha]] ([[User talk:Tualha|talk]]) 07:27, 31 March 2020 (UTC) &lt;br /&gt;
:That's right [[Special:Contributions/108.162.216.158|108.162.216.158]] 13:13, 31 March 2020 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Bacteriophages only infect bacteria and some kinds of Archaea, not humans, so the explanation is slightly wrong. They are probably the prettiest and easiest to recognise viral shape though, which is why they are so commonly used in cartoons and illustrations.[[User:Phil|Phil]] ([[User talk:Phil|talk]]) 08:29, 31 March 2020 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:I am just as much a hobby-virologist as anybody else suddenly is, but I have no clue what you are talking about. I don't even know which of the 3 shapes you mean. So please edit the explanation yourself if you see, that it is wrong. --[[User:Lupo|Lupo]] ([[User talk:Lupo|talk]]) 08:37, 31 March 2020 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:: The narrator-virus in the middle of the three, that looks somewhat like a rotation of a mosquito, with a D20 on top.  [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bacteriophage#/media/File:PhageExterior.svg Wikipedia diagram]  [[Special:Contributions/141.101.69.13|141.101.69.13]] 12:17, 31 March 2020 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;They bought lots of pasta.&amp;quot;  More like they bought lots of toilet paper!  Humans, when we think rationally, can make great things happen.  Humans, when we panic, can make incredibly foolish decisions.  [[User:Nutster|Nutster]] ([[User talk:Nutster|talk]]) 11:32, 31 March 2020 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:It's both. At least in the supermarkets close to my place (western Germany), pasta, toilet paper, rice, milk, flour, yeast are all common to be out of stock or almost out of stock and usually their shelfes have by now signs that they will only sell a certain amount of them to each customer. --[[User:Lupo|Lupo]] ([[User talk:Lupo|talk]]) 12:14, 31 March 2020 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
Why does one of the voices say, &amp;quot;I hate lungs&amp;quot;? --[[Special:Contributions/108.162.216.62|108.162.216.62]] 13:08, 31 March 2020 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:To emphasize that they really do want to destroy those lungs. All good here. 13:13, 31 March 2020 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
This comic is a positive message giving good advice to people on how to beat the current COVID-19 spread.  But the numbers clearly show it is not working (https://www.bbc.com/news/av/world-us-canada-52066105/coronavirus-us-death-rates-v-china-italy-and-south-Korea, and many other locations on the internet.)  Continuing to believe this pandemic can be beat with only lock-downs, hand washing and telling people to not do things they do naturally without thinking, is the public health equivalent of engineering design with friction-less surfaces and mass-less pullies.  We need solutions that understand human nature and tell people to do things they actually will do, not keep saying the same things over and over again despite experience screaming at us that people are not doing it.  The 6 places that have controlled the outbreak (China, Taiwan, Hong Kong, Singapore, South Korea and Japan) have used different methods of testing, tracing, isolating, restricting travel, etc., but the one thing they have in common is a large portion of the population is wearing masks in public.  The 5 places with the largest uncontrolled outbreaks (USA (especially NYC) Italy, Spain, Germany and France) are all using the same lock down strategy and all have public health officials discouraging /  preventing people from wearing masks in public.  This should not be hard to figure out. And saying the limited supply of masks need to go to certain people, not working to increase the number of masks, is what failure looks like.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{|class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
Pathogens: ''infect humans through day-to-day contact''&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Humans: ''stop day-to-day contact''&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Humans: Checkmate.&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Jacky720|That's right, Jacky720 just signed this]] ([[User talk:Jacky720|talk]] | [[Special:Contributions/Jacky720|contribs]]) 16:38, 31 March 2020 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Masks like the 1.2 million defective ones that a Chinese manufacturer sold to the Dutch government for the care workers? Or the simpler ones that Dutch experts say aren't effective because they're bound to be used incorrectly and thus give a false sense of security? [[Special:Contributions/172.69.54.219|172.69.54.219]] 18:09, 31 March 2020 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:In a situation like the current one it is wise even for expert epidemiologists, virologists and medical practitioners to be very careful in their assumptions, analyses and conclusions. For anyone with little or no expertise in those fields, that goes doubly so. Note, for instance, that the regions you name as having controlled the outbreak also have very different social customs from those you name as uncontrolled. To an Italian, the everyday way Asians (excuse the generalizations) interact with each other is pretty much equivalent to &amp;quot;social distancing&amp;quot;. When you regularly shake hands or hug (and then touch your nose or eyes, which people do constantly and subconsciously), the mask is not protective. In other words, there are many factors beyond simply wearing masks that can explain the current differences in virus spread, if such differences are even real (the current numbers are heavily skewed by test availability and criteria for who gets tested). More generally, we currently simply do not have enough information to confidently answer all the questions about this disease and how we should best combat it. Thus, I would recommend using expressions such as &amp;quot;this should not be hard to figure out&amp;quot; sparingly, especially given the knowledge that many very smart and highly trained people are working on &amp;quot;figuring it out&amp;quot;... [[Special:Contributions/162.158.93.105|162.158.93.105]] 21:21, 31 March 2020 (UTC)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>162.158.93.105</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:2287:_Pathogen_Resistance&amp;diff=189561</id>
		<title>Talk:2287: Pathogen Resistance</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:2287:_Pathogen_Resistance&amp;diff=189561"/>
				<updated>2020-03-31T21:04:00Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;162.158.93.105: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&amp;lt;!--Please sign your posts with ~~~~ and don't delete this text. New comments should be added at the bottom.--&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Note that the title text says &amp;quot;not not&amp;quot; -- meaning we're both trapped in here together [[User:John.Adriaan|John.Adriaan]] ([[User talk:John.Adriaan|talk]]) 04:38, 31 March 2020 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Randall fixed that. [[User:Jacky720|That's right, Jacky720 just signed this]] ([[User talk:Jacky720|talk]] | [[Special:Contributions/Jacky720|contribs]]) 16:38, 31 March 2020 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Do bacteriophages &amp;quot;afflict&amp;quot; humanity? To my knowledge, they only infect bacteria and are even considered a possible future alternative to antibiotics by some. What is up with them being represented here? 09:12, 31 March 2020 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
: Yeah, bacteriophage is just wrong here, it's a generic virus. This type of virus is depicted on the bacteriophage wikipedia page but viruses that affect humans can have that shape also. [[Special:Contributions/172.68.51.94|172.68.51.94]]&lt;br /&gt;
: There are no known human viruses of that shape (source: I'm a biologist), so this seems like more of a mistake on Randall's side (albeit an odd one for him to make, so perhaps somehow deliberate?). [[Special:Contributions/162.158.91.155|162.158.91.155]] 08:55, 31 March 2020 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::But... if it affects bacteria and humen have many bacteria (and many/most of them useful) in them, shouldn't it affect the human then as well? indirectly? Source: I have very vague knowledge :D --[[User:Lupo|Lupo]] ([[User talk:Lupo|talk]]) 09:06, 31 March 2020 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::It may be deliberate in the sense that almost everyone will go &amp;quot;Oh, that's a virus!&amp;quot; when they see this shape, contrary to the other 2 which look more like big molecules or bacteria.[[Special:Contributions/162.158.111.7|162.158.111.7]] 09:20, 31 March 2020 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:: The bacteriophage point is now very nicely addressed in the explanation. Good job to all who contributed to that part! [[Special:Contributions/162.158.93.105|162.158.93.105]] 21:04, 31 March 2020 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Don’t worry, pathogens! All is not lost. There will always be some humans whose brains don’t work very well, who will buy into ideas like “vaccines cause autism”, or “faith healing”, or “natural remedies”, or “Trump is always right”. You’ll still have hosts. [[User:Tualha|Tualha]] ([[User talk:Tualha|talk]]) 07:27, 31 March 2020 (UTC) &lt;br /&gt;
:That's right [[Special:Contributions/108.162.216.158|108.162.216.158]] 13:13, 31 March 2020 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Bacteriophages only infect bacteria and some kinds of Archaea, not humans, so the explanation is slightly wrong. They are probably the prettiest and easiest to recognise viral shape though, which is why they are so commonly used in cartoons and illustrations.[[User:Phil|Phil]] ([[User talk:Phil|talk]]) 08:29, 31 March 2020 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:I am just as much a hobby-virologist as anybody else suddenly is, but I have no clue what you are talking about. I don't even know which of the 3 shapes you mean. So please edit the explanation yourself if you see, that it is wrong. --[[User:Lupo|Lupo]] ([[User talk:Lupo|talk]]) 08:37, 31 March 2020 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:: The narrator-virus in the middle of the three, that looks somewhat like a rotation of a mosquito, with a D20 on top.  [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bacteriophage#/media/File:PhageExterior.svg Wikipedia diagram]  [[Special:Contributions/141.101.69.13|141.101.69.13]] 12:17, 31 March 2020 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;They bought lots of pasta.&amp;quot;  More like they bought lots of toilet paper!  Humans, when we think rationally, can make great things happen.  Humans, when we panic, can make incredibly foolish decisions.  [[User:Nutster|Nutster]] ([[User talk:Nutster|talk]]) 11:32, 31 March 2020 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:It's both. At least in the supermarkets close to my place (western Germany), pasta, toilet paper, rice, milk, flour, yeast are all common to be out of stock or almost out of stock and usually their shelfes have by now signs that they will only sell a certain amount of them to each customer. --[[User:Lupo|Lupo]] ([[User talk:Lupo|talk]]) 12:14, 31 March 2020 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
Why does one of the voices say, &amp;quot;I hate lungs&amp;quot;? --[[Special:Contributions/108.162.216.62|108.162.216.62]] 13:08, 31 March 2020 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:To emphasize that they really do want to destroy those lungs. All good here. 13:13, 31 March 2020 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
This comic is a positive message giving good advice to people on how to beat the current COVID-19 spread.  But the numbers clearly show it is not working (https://www.bbc.com/news/av/world-us-canada-52066105/coronavirus-us-death-rates-v-china-italy-and-south-Korea, and many other locations on the internet.)  Continuing to believe this pandemic can be beat with only lock-downs, hand washing and telling people to not do things they do naturally without thinking, is the public health equivalent of engineering design with friction-less surfaces and mass-less pullies.  We need solutions that understand human nature and tell people to do things they actually will do, not keep saying the same things over and over again despite experience screaming at us that people are not doing it.  The 6 places that have controlled the outbreak (China, Taiwan, Hong Kong, Singapore, South Korea and Japan) have used different methods of testing, tracing, isolating, restricting travel, etc., but the one thing they have in common is a large portion of the population is wearing masks in public.  The 5 places with the largest uncontrolled outbreaks (USA (especially NYC) Italy, Spain, Germany and France) are all using the same lock down strategy and all have public health officials discouraging /  preventing people from wearing masks in public.  This should not be hard to figure out. And saying the limited supply of masks need to go to certain people, not working to increase the number of masks, is what failure looks like.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{|class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
Pathogens: ''infect humans through day-to-day contact''&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Humans: ''stop day-to-day contact''&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Humans: Checkmate.&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Jacky720|That's right, Jacky720 just signed this]] ([[User talk:Jacky720|talk]] | [[Special:Contributions/Jacky720|contribs]]) 16:38, 31 March 2020 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Masks like the 1.2 million defective ones that a Chinese manufacturer sold to the Dutch government for the care workers? Or the simpler ones that Dutch experts say aren't effective because they're bound to be used incorrectly and thus give a false sense of security? [[Special:Contributions/172.69.54.219|172.69.54.219]] 18:09, 31 March 2020 (UTC)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>162.158.93.105</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=2131:_Emojidome&amp;diff=172013</id>
		<title>2131: Emojidome</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=2131:_Emojidome&amp;diff=172013"/>
				<updated>2019-04-02T10:46:37Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;162.158.93.105: /* Explanation */ There is an active websocket communicating with the server, so there is no traffic allowing voting is false.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{comic&lt;br /&gt;
| number    = 2131&lt;br /&gt;
| date      = April 1, 2019&lt;br /&gt;
| title     = Emojidome&lt;br /&gt;
| image     = emojidome.png&lt;br /&gt;
| titletext = 🤼🤼🤼🤼🤼🤼🤼🤼&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
*To experience the interactivity, visit the {{xkcd|2131|original comic}}.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Explanation==&lt;br /&gt;
{{incomplete|Created by 😇. Needs more elaboration on font influencing emoji..}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This is the ninth [[:Category:April fools' comics|April fools' comic]] released by [[Randall]]. The previous fools comic was [[1975: Right Click]] from Sunday April 1, 2018.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The title is a reference to the movie ''{{w|Mad Max Beyond Thunderdome}},'' which had the tagline:  &amp;quot;Two men enter. One man leaves.&amp;quot; The &amp;quot;Thunderdome&amp;quot; in the film is a gladiatorial arena where conflicts are resolved by a duel to the death.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the interactive comic, which began at noon ET (16:00 UTC) on April 1, 2019, users are shown two emoji, and vote for their favorite. In the first round, the voting period for each bout lasted 37.5 seconds. The voting period for each bout doubled for the second, third, and fourth rounds. The voting period for each bout for the fifth round through the end was 26 minutes. The entire bracket is expected to take 24 hours 6 minutes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! Round !! Start (ET) !! Start (UTC) !! Bouts !! Bout length !! Round length&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 1 || 12:00 || 16:00 || 256 || 37.5 s || 2 h 40 m&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 2 || 14:40 || 18:40 || 128 || 1 m 15 s || 2 h 40 m&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 3 || 17:20 || 21:20 || 64 || 2 m 30 s || 2 h 40 m&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 4 || 20:00 || 0:00 || 32 || 5 m || 2 h 40 m&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 5 || 22:40 || 2:40 || 16 || 26 m || 6 h 56 m&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 6 || 5:36 || 9:36 || 8 || 26 m || 3 h 28 m&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 7* || 9:04 || 13:04 || 4 || 26 m || 1 h 44 m&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 8* || 10:48 || 14:48 || 2 || 26 m || 52 m&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 9* || 11:40 || 15:40 || 1 || 26 m || 26 m&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;*&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt; projected&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The competing candidates are periodically overlaid with heart emojis that float up from the vote button oscillating in a triangle wave pattern before disappearing above the candidate, and may represent real-time votes for each emoji. Below, the results of past bouts are shown with the &amp;quot;loser&amp;quot; displayed in greyscale. Supposedly, the emoji will be eliminated one-by-one until there are a final two emoji facing off, with the one most voted-for being crowned the best emoji. This is likely a parody of March Madness.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This would mean that the commentary and the winners could have been scripted before the competition began.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The commentary appears to suggest that there's some real-time feedback from the results of the competition, for instance &amp;quot;It seems like our friends over Australia is joining the fun&amp;quot; appeared in the commentary. So does &amp;quot;We are getting a lot of questions on this today. This is live commentary, folks.&amp;quot;  https://i.imgur.com/8kPwjou.png, directly declaring that the commentary is live. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Note that the schedule might show different emoji pictures than the main voting screen, presumably because of fonts. The image is pre-rendered.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The competing candidates are chosen in order of unicode value at first, resulting in similar emojis being compared. Examples include:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
😜 squaring off against 😛 - two emoji playfully sticking their tongues out&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
🤩 squaring off against 😍 - two smiling emojis with symbols for eyes&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
😂 squaring off with 🤣 - two emojis that are crying in laughter/joy.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The title text consists of the wrestlers emoji (🤼) eight times over. If it appears to be nonsense, then your browser may not be parsing the title text correctly.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It appears the eggplant emoji (🍆) and the peach emoji (🍑) have been left out of the bracket.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A robot face announcer-emoji (🤖) and a link to the full bracket was added at 38 minutes in. &lt;br /&gt;
https://www.xkcd.com/2131/emojidome_bracket.png shows 512 emojis in a single-elimination tournament.&lt;br /&gt;
https://www.xkcd.com/2131/emojidome_bracket_256.png was added later and shows the 256 emojis that competed on the second round.&lt;br /&gt;
https://www.xkcd.com/2131/emojidome_bracket_round_3.png was added for the third round. https://www.xkcd.com/2131/emojidome_bracket_round_4.png was added for the fourth round.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is not clear how the winner is decided when both emoji tie for first. This has happened once in 🧁 vs. 🎂 with 3658 points each, where 🎂 was declared winner.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Alternative viewers==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Real live data with results (clicks) can be seen as JSON-websocket at '''https://emojidome.xkcd.com/2131/socket'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A live (user-created) vote tally can be found at '''https://emojidome.playcode.io/'''. Thanks Andy! (live updates)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''http://srv-01.valo.media/''' has a tally with slightly more details. (live updates)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''https://phiresky.github.io/emojidome/''' is a [https://www.reddit.com/r/xkcd/comments/b89zz1/emojidome_live_bracket_viewer/ redditor-made] live bracket display (live updates)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''https://dancoates.github.io/emojidome/index.html''' is a [https://www.reddit.com/r/xkcd/comments/b8g3av/emojidome_trend_viewer/ redditor-made] graph of the current match-up.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Transcript==&lt;br /&gt;
{{incomplete transcript|This transcript is for the image that embeds and automated programs usually see. Do NOT delete this tag too soon.}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[A tournament bracket tree is shown with eight participants each on the left and right side, for a total of sixteen, all of which are the 😰 emoji (a face with eyebrows, one teardrop and a blue forehead). From both sides towards the middle the brackets reduce to eight, then four, two, and one line where the latter join to a rectangle in the middle.]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Visit xkcd.com to participate&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;If you ''are'' on xkcd.com, then you're seeing this&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;because of something something JavaScript.&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;Listen, websites are hard 😰&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Round 1===&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! Competitors and score !! Commentary&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 😀 (0) vs 😁 (0) || You do not want to miss the fan favorite 😀. Coming up next!&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 😆 (207) vs 😅 (251) || Next up, 😅 and 😆.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;I'm really looking forward to everything we're going to see today.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 😂 (772) vs 🤣 (824) || Oh, this one should be good.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 🙂 (939) vs 🙃 (1494) || You do not want to miss the fan favorite 🙂. Coming up next!&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;You think this is something, folks, well... we're just getting started.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 😊 (857) vs 😉 (1774) || They have been attacking each other on social media all week. Next up! It's 😉 vs. 😊.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 🥰 (1392) vs 😇 (1417) || Welcome back, it's time for 😇 and 🥰 to go head to head.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 🤩 (1447) vs 😍 (2159) || We will be right back with 😍 vs. 🤩!&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 😗 (1045) vs 😘 (2595) || They have been attacking each other on social media all week. Next up! It's 😗 vs. 😘.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;This is a day that 😗 has been anticipating for a long time.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 😚 (1619) vs 😙 (1770) || Have at it, 😙 and 😚!&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;If you are just joining us, fear not! You haven't missed much.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 😋 (1549) vs 😛 (2644) || It's time to find out: Who would win in a match, 😋 or 😛?&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;😋 stole that win.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 🤪 (2085) vs 😜 (2302) || Next up, 😜 and 🤪.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;😜 didn't do their homework.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 🤑 (1372) vs 😝 (2568) || Don't change that channel, folks. We have 😝 and 🤑 warming up.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 🤗 (1598) vs 🤭 (2316) || Next up, 🤗 and 🤭.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Sometimes miracles happen.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 🤫 (734) vs 🤔 (4374) || Oh, this one should be good.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 🤐 (1119) vs 🤨 (2928) || We will be right back with 🤐 vs. 🤨!&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Not sure which way this one goes.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 😐 (1506) vs 😑 (1665) || They have been attacking each other on social media all week. Next up! It's 😐 vs. 😑.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;One for the history books.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 😶 (2437) vs 😏 (2659) || It's time to find out: Who would win in a match, 😏 or 😶?&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;This one was over before it started.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 😒 (1562) vs 🙄 (2692) || If you're like me, you've argued over who would win head-to-head, 😒 or 🙄.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 🤥 (1137) vs 😬 (3345) || Oh this one should be good.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;No surprises here. 🤥 skates to an easy win.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;I hope everyone has printed their brackets and are ready, because time waits for very few people!&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;No surprises here. 😬 skates to an easy win.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 😌 (1980) vs 😔 (2238) || Next! Who would win in a match between 😌 and 😔? We are about to find out.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;😔 comes out on top.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 🤤 (1957) vs 😴 (2770) || Oh, this one should be good.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;A dominant performance by 😴.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 😷 (1760) vs 🤒 (2629) || Welcome back, it's time for 😷 and 🤒 to go head to head.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;In the end, there was nothing 😷 could do to stop the power of 🤒.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 🤢 (2270) vs 🤕 (2648) || Next up, 🤕 and 🤢.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;🤕 stole that win.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 🤧 (2325) vs 🤮 (3260) || Will it be 🤧 or 🤮? Find out next after this message from our sponsors.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;🤮 opened strong and 🤧 never caught up.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 🥵 (1884) vs 🥶 (3983) || You do not want to miss the fan favorite 🥵. Coming up next!&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;I have never seen 🥶 crush an opponent that mercilessly before.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 😵 (2920) vs 🥴 (3762) || Oh this one should be good.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;That was 😵's to give away and they did.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 🤯 (3055) vs 🤠 (3110) || They have been attacking each other on social media all week. Next up! It's 🤠 vs. 🤯.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;However this ends up, someone got blown away.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 🥳 (2201) vs 😎 (4316) || On deck, we have 😎 and 🥳.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;I guess it was that kind of a party.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 😟 (2184) vs 😕 (3663) || Uh oh. 😟 has had words with 😕 before. The next match will be good.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;😕 one, 😟 zero.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| ☹ (1638) vs 😮 (5498) || Next up, ☹ and 😮.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;I hope everyone has printed their brackets and are ready, because time waits for very few people!&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 😲 (2383) vs 😯 (3904) || Don't change that channel, folks. We have 😯 and 😲 warming up.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;And 😲 falls to 😯. A suprising turn of events.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 😧 (3063) vs 😳 (3754) || We will be right back with 😧 vs. 😳!&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;This one was over before it started.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 😨 (2082) vs 😰 (4050) || Oh, this one should be good.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Well, this doesn't look good.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 😢 (2095) vs 😭 (5108) || Have at it, 😢 and 😭!&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;This one's a real tear-jerker.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 😖 (2039) vs 😱 (4758) || If you're like me, you've argued over who would win head-to-head, 😖 or 😱.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;😱 stole that win.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 😞 (2879) vs 😣 (3528) || Coming to you live from the Emojidome, it's 😞 vs. 😣!&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;This one's painful.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 😩 (2785) vs 😓 (3231) || On deck, we have 😓 and 😩.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;It's early yet, folks. The coffee hasn't kicked in.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 😫 (1827) vs 😤 (4871) || Coming to you live from the Emojidome, it's 😤 vs. 😫!&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;I didn't remember 😫 qualifying. I think they snuck in.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 😠 (1866) vs 😡 (5192) || Will it be 😠 or 😡? Find out next after this message from our sponsors.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;It is astounding how much competition we have in store for today.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 🤬 (3072) vs 😈 (4225) || Coming to you live from the Emojidome, it's 😈 vs. 🤬!&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Speak of the devil...&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 👿 (2341) vs 💀 (4739) || We will be right back with 👿 vs. 💀!&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;It has been a long road for 💀 to get to competing on the world stage.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 🤡 (2514) vs 💩 (4829) || Have at it, 💩 and 🤡!&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;I think we all know how this is going to go.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 👻 (3680) vs 👽 (3983) || Have at it, 👻 and 👽!&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 🏰 (2715) vs 👾 (4412) || They have been attacking each other on social media all week. Next up! It's 🏰 vs. 👾.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;👾 opened strong and 🏰 never caught up.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 😸 (3334) vs 😺 (3542) || They have been attacking each other on social media all week. Next up! It's 😸 vs. 😺.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;This one is serious, folks.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 😹 (2778) vs 😻 (3702) || Welcome back, it's time for 😹 and 😻 to go head to head.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;The hearts are my favorite part. It all comes down to love. And that really says something.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 😽 (1815) vs 😼 (3991) || I'm looking forward to this.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Sometimes miracles happen.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 😿 (1189) vs 🙀 (4682) || On deck, we have 😿 and 🙀.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 💋 (2122) vs 😾 (3837) || Oh, this one should be good.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 💌 (1659) vs 💖 (3386) || Next! Who would win in a match between 💌 and 💖? We are about to find out.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;💌 is an fan favorite to go far today.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 💔 (1920) vs ❤ (3904) || Uh oh. 💔 has had words with ❤ before. The next match will be good.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 🖤 (2940) vs 💯 (3866) || It is a battle as old as time itself. 💯 and 🖤! Facing off against each other again!&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;A dominant performance by 💯.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 💥 (3055) vs 💦 (3843) || Welcome back, it's time for 💥 and 💦 to go head to head.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Like fire and water.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 🕳 (2476) vs 💣 (4063) || Don't change that channel, folks. We have 💣 and 🕳 warming up.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;This one was a mess.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 🤞 (2246) vs 🤘 (4845) || You do not want to miss the fan favorite 🤘. Coming up next!&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;It feels like these early matches are over almost before they begin.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 👎 (2231) vs 👍 (5077) || Will it be 👍 or 👎? Find out next after this message from our sponsors.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Nice to see the support for positivity.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 🙏 (3114) vs 👊 (4861) || Have at it, 👊 and 🙏!&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;I don't think 🙏 expected to see 👊 opposite them today.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 💅 (2366) vs 🦵 (4060) || It's time to find out: Who would win in a match, 💅 or 🦵?&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;If 🦵 wins this match, it will be interesting to see how far they can go.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 🦷 (1409) vs 🧠 (5821) || Oh this one should be good.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 🦴 (2198) vs 👀 (4052) || Uh oh. 🦴 has had words with 👀 before. The next match will be good.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 👄 (1712) vs 👅 (4648) || Don't change that channel, folks. We have 👄 and 👅 warming up.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 👶 (1414) vs 🤦 (5666) || Uh oh. 🤦 has had words with 👶 before. The next match will be good.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 🤷 (2385) vs 👩‍🔬 (6374) || Have at it, 👩‍🔬 and 🤷!&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 🦸 (2302) vs 👩‍🚀 (5502) || It's time to find out: Who would win in a match, 👩‍🚀 or 🦸?&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 🧚 (1909) vs 🧙 (6294) || Uh oh. 🧚 has had words with 🧙 before. The next match will be good.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;There are some titanic match-ups that could happen today.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Yes, this is live commentary.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;We have only just started, folks. Stay tuned for more amazing contests!&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 🧜 (3835) vs 🧛 (3840) || You do not want to miss the fan favorite 🧛. Coming up next!&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Not sure which way this one goes.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 💆 (2815) vs 🧟 (3747) || Next up, 💆 and 🧟.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;That's just a typical Monday for you.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 💇 (3029) vs 🚶 (3055) || We will be right back with 💇 vs. 🚶!&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;It's going to be a busy day, folks. Remember to pace yourself.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 🏃 (2239) vs 💃 (5833) || On deck, we have 🏃 and 💃.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Make some noise! Show 🏃 and 💃 some love!&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;That was 🏃's to give away and they did.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 🕺 (1990) vs 🕴 (5035) || We will be right back with 🕴 vs. 🕺!&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;I spoke with 🕴 before we started today. They were hoping to dodge 🕺. Too bad for them.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 🏇 (2563) vs 🤺 (5157) || Have at it, 🏇 and 🤺!&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Never bring a sword to a horse fight.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 🏂 (3762) vs ⛷ (4510) || Coming to you live from the Emojidome, it's ⛷ vs. 🏂!&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;We have a lot of excited fans in the audience.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 🏌 (2557) vs 🏄 (6285) || It's time to find out: Who would win in a match, 🏄 or 🏌?&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Ok! Let's see those hearts!&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;I have never seen 🏄 crush an opponent that mercilessly before.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| ⛹ (2793) vs 🏊 (5994) || Have at it, ⛹ and 🏊!&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 🏋 (2300) vs 🚴 (8063) || Will it be 🏋 or 🚴? Find out next after this message from our sponsors.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Right now the crowd is chanting 🏋! 🏋! An early sign of a favorite?&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 🤾 (4698) vs 🚵 (5650) || We will be right back with 🚵 vs. 🤾!&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;It's neck and neck!&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 👤 (2195) vs 🛀 (5529) || Don't change that channel, folks. We have 👤 and 🛀 warming up.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 🦍 (3336) vs 🐒 (4644) || Oh, this one should be good.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 🐕 (3458) vs 🐶 (4004) || You do not want to miss the fan favorite 🐕. Coming up next!&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Mostly a matter of perspective.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 🐺 (2774) vs 🦊 (6024) || Oh, this one should be good.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Again, small variations make all the difference.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 🦝 (4017) vs 🐱 (4931) || They have been attacking each other on social media all week. Next up! It's 🐱 vs. 🦝.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;🦝 is an fan favorite to go far today.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;🐱 stole that win.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 🦁 (3957) vs 🐈 (5046) || Don't change that channel, folks. We have 🐈 and 🦁 warming up.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Again, we are getting a lot of questions on this today. This is live commentary, folks.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;We have a lot of excited fans in the audience.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 🐆 (2186) vs 🐅 (6280) || It's time to find out: Who would win in a match, 🐅 or 🐆?&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Stripes or Spots, Stripes or Spots&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 🐴 (3722) vs 🐎 (4120) || Next! Who would win in a match between 🐎 and 🐴? We are about to find out.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;I've got your horse right here.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 🦓 (3486) vs 🦄 (6830) || Next! Who would win in a match between 🦄 and 🦓? We are about to find out.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;I think we all know how this is going to go.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;It was neck and neck until the very end, but some necks are longer than others.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 🐮 (3658) vs 🦌 (5111) || Uh oh. 🦌 has had words with 🐮 before. The next match will be good.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;This is a close one!&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 🐖 (3568) vs 🐷 (5175) || You do not want to miss the fan favorite 🐖. Coming up next!&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Who will bring home the bacon?&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 🐗 (2576) vs 🐏 (6073) || It's time to find out: Who would win in a match, 🐏 or 🐗?&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 🐪 (3329) vs 🐐 (5304) || It's time to find out: Who would win in a match, 🐐 or 🐪?&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 🦙 (4397) vs 🦒 (5164) || Uh oh. 🦙 has had words with 🦒 before. The next match will be good.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;It's neck and neck!&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;I hope 🦙 comes back next year. It would be a sham to see it all end like this.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 🦏 (3804) vs 🐘 (4809) || It's time to find out: Who would win in a match, 🐘 or 🦏?&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;We'll never forget this.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 🐁 (4039) vs 🦛 (4085) || It's time to find out: Who would win in a match, 🐁 or 🦛?&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 🐀 (2994) vs 🐹 (4580) || Will it be 🐀 or 🐹? Find out next after this message from our sponsors.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Today is also about settling scores, there is no doubt about that for some of our contestants.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 🐰 (1865) vs 🐿 (5175) || If you're like me, you've argued over who would win head-to-head, 🐰 or 🐿.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Its about reflexes.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 🦇 (3648) vs 🦔 (4507) || They have been attacking each other on social media all week. Next up! It's 🦇 vs. 🦔.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;This one is a toss-up in my book, folks.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 🐻 (2686) vs 🐨 (5059) || Coming to you live from the Emojidome, it's 🐨 vs. 🐻!&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Ok! You know what to do! Let's see those hearts!&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 🐼 (2896) vs 🦘 (5185) || Next! Who would win in a match between 🐼 and 🦘? We are about to find out.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;It's exciting to look around and see so many joining us from all over the world.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;One for the history books.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 🦃 (2553) vs 🦡 (5483) || It is a battle as old as time itself. 🦃 and 🦡! Facing off against each other again!&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;That was a stinker of a battle, if you ask me.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 🐓 (2883) vs 🐣 (5153) || Welcome back, it's time for 🐓 and 🐣 to go head to head.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 🕊 (2432) vs 🐧 (5951) || We will be right back with 🐧 vs. 🕊!&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 🦅 (3871) vs 🦆 (4800) || Uh oh. 🦆 has had words with 🦅 before. The next match will be good.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 🦢 (1613) vs 🦉 (7025) || They have been attacking each other on social media all week. Next up! It's 🦉 vs. 🦢.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;🦉 didn't do their homework.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;I hope everyone has printed their brackets and are ready, because time waits for very few people!&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Yes, this is live commentary.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;🦉 one, 🦢 zero.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 🦚 (4333) vs 🦜 (4803) || Oh, this one should be good.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;I know some very invested audience members for this one.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 🐊 (3986) vs 🐢 (6403) || I'm looking forward to this.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 🦎 (4415) vs 🐍 (5378) || Have at it, 🐍 and 🦎!&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;In the end, there was nothing 🐍 could do to stop the power of 🦎.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Did you just see that!?&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Plenty of matches left to see. Don't go anywhere.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 🦕 (4855) vs 🐉 (5359) || Have at it, 🐉 and 🦕!&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;One for the history books.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 🦖 (5411) vs 🐳 (5445) || I'm looking forward to this.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Again, another difficult match-up for our audience.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 🐟 (1639) vs 🐬 (8071) || Will it be 🐟 or 🐬? Find out next after this message from our sponsors.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;I know which one I would choose, but I don't have time to vote!&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 🐡 (2307) vs 🦈 (6544) || Have at it, 🐡 and 🦈!&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;🦈 opened strong and 🐡 never caught up.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 🐚 (1590) vs 🐙 (8224) || They have been attacking each other on social media all week. Next up! It's 🐙 vs. 🐚.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;This one was over before it started.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 🐌 (4816) vs 🦋 (4835) || We will be right back with 🐌 vs. 🦋!&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;The hearts are flying on this one!&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 🐜 (3194) vs 🐛 (5132) || I'm looking forward to this.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;🐜 didn't do their homework.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 🐞 (3561) vs 🐝 (5804) || On deck, we have 🐝 and 🐞.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;This one is a true test of the audience today.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Will luck be a ladybug tonight?&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Amazing!&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 🦗 (4195) vs 🕷 (4806) || Uh oh. 🦗 has had words with 🕷 before. The next match will be good.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;And 🦗 falls to 🕷. A suprising turn of events.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 🦂 (3853) vs 🦠 (4971) || Next! Who would win in a match between 🦂 and 🦠? We are about to find out.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Nope. Nope nope nope nope.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 🌷 (3767) vs 🌻 (4374) || We will be right back with 🌷 vs. 🌻!&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Now that's more like it.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 🌳 (1973) vs 🌲 (6563) || If you're like me, you've argued over who would win head-to-head, 🌲 or 🌳.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Who would have thought, eh?&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 🌴 (3876) vs 🌵 (5468) || Oh, this one should be good.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;In the end, there was nothing 🌴 could do to stop the power of 🌵.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 🍈 (2617) vs 🍇 (5319) || It's time to find out: Who would win in a match, 🍇 or 🍈?&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Folks, I am just as stunned at the outcome as you.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 🍋 (4186) vs 🍉 (4720) || They have been attacking each other on social media all week. Next up! It's 🍉 vs. 🍋.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;I just don't know why they can't find common ground.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;🍉 one, 🍋 zero.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 🍌 (4704) vs 🍍 (5525) || Don't change that channel, folks. We have 🍌 and 🍍 warming up.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Ok! Let's see those hearts!&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;I guess it was that kind of a party.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 🥭 (3830) vs 🍎 (5111) || I'm looking forward to this.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 🍏 (2703) vs 🍓 (6403) || It's time to find out: Who would win in a match, 🍏 or 🍓?&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;We might be close to some matches the audience is expecting or hoping to see today.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Berry nice!&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 🍅 (3002) vs 🥝 (5348) || They have been attacking each other on social media all week. Next up! It's 🍅 vs. 🥝.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 🥥 (3840) vs 🥑 (5759) || On deck, we have 🥑 and 🥥.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Somehow, someone will blame millenials for this.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 🥕 (4577) vs 🥔 (4620) || Next! Who would win in a match between 🥔 and 🥕? We are about to find out.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Ahhh the age old question, 🥕 or 🥔.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 🌽 (4074) vs 🌶 (5087) || Have at it, 🌶 and 🌽!&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 🥬 (2694) vs 🥒 (5472) || You do not want to miss the fan favorite 🥒. Coming up next!&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Not sure which way this one goes.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 🥦 (2707) vs 🍄 (5850) || Will it be 🍄 or 🥦? Find out next after this message from our sponsors.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Folks, we are nearly halfway through the first bracket!&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Again, we are getting a lot of questions on this today. This is live commentary, folks.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Into the second half of the first round.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;That was 🥦's to give away and they did.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 🌰 (2698) vs 🥜 (6225) || It's time to find out: Who would win in a match, 🌰 or 🥜?&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;I am not even sure what I am looking at here.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 🍞 (2934) vs 🥐 (6465) || They have been attacking each other on social media all week. Next up! It's 🍞 vs. 🥐.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Well, I know who I would vote for.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 🥖 (4800) vs 🥨 (5136) || We will be right back with 🥖 vs. 🥨!&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 🥯 (2470) vs 🥞 (5926) || Uh oh. 🥯 has had words with 🥞 before. The next match will be good.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Now I am just hungry.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 🥩 (3959) vs 🧀 (6225) || Oh this one should be good.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Truly a battle for the ages.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 🍟 (3719) vs 🍔 (5352) || Don't change that channel, folks. We have 🍔 and 🍟 warming up.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 🌭 (1340) vs 🍕 (7881) || If you're like me, you've argued over who would win head-to-head, 🌭 or 🍕.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 🥪 (2869) vs 🌮 (6417) || It's time to find out: Who would win in a match, 🌮 or 🥪?&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;I'll be honest, even I voted in that last one.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;There are some titanic match-ups that could happen today.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;One for the history books.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 🥚 (3868) vs 🌯 (5359) || It's time to find out: Who would win in a match, 🌯 or 🥚?&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;🥚 is an fan favorite to go far today.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;One for the history books.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 🥗 (3101) vs 🍳 (5293) || Have at it, 🍳 and 🥗!&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;There can be very food-centric history books.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;If 🍳 wins this match, it will be interesting to see how far they can go.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 🧂 (2067) vs 🍿 (2640) || Oh, this one should be good.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;This one was over before it started.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 🥫 (1948) vs 🍱 (4931) || They have been attacking each other on social media all week. Next up! It's 🍱 vs. 🥫.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;It is early still. Possibly too early to predict an over-all winner. But I am hearing 🏇 mentioned a fair bit.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;And 🥫 falls to 🍱. A suprising turn of events.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 🍤 (2334) vs 🍣 (5552) || They have been attacking each other on social media all week. Next up! It's 🍣 vs. 🍤.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Plenty of matches left to see. Don't go anywhere.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 🥡 (3101) vs 🥟 (4128) || They have been attacking each other on social media all week. Next up! It's 🥟 vs. 🥡.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;🥟 one, 🥡 zero.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 🦀 (3762) vs 🦞 (4739) || Coming to you live from the Emojidome, it's 🦀 vs. 🦞!&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 🦐 (2421) vs 🦑 (6162) || Will it be 🦐 or 🦑? Find out next after this message from our sponsors.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 🍦 (3804) vs 🍨 (4698) || If you're like me, you've argued over who would win head-to-head, 🍦 or 🍨.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 🍪 (3722) vs 🍩 (5167) || We will be right back with 🍩 vs. 🍪!&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 🎂 (3658) vs 🧁 (3658) || Next up, 🎂 and 🧁.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 🍬 (1244) vs 🍫 (6674) || We will be right back with 🍫 vs. 🍬!&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 🍭 (2568) vs 🍯 (5445) || It's time to find out: Who would win in a match, 🍭 or 🍯?&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Thank you for tuning in. I promise you are in for a treat today.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 🍼 (1824) vs 🥛 (5239) || Will it be 🍼 or 🥛? Find out next after this message from our sponsors.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 🍾 (3227) vs ☕ (4813) || If you're like me, you've argued over who would win head-to-head, ☕ or 🍾.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Time to get another feel for our audience today.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 🍷 (3021) vs 🍹 (3561) || It is a battle as old as time itself. 🍷 and 🍹! Facing off against each other again!&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Well now I am just getting thirsty.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 🥤 (3897) vs 🍺 (5763) || Will it be 🍺 or 🥤? Find out next after this message from our sponsors.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Still thirsty!&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 🍴 (3917) vs 🥢 (4348) || We will be right back with 🍴 vs. 🥢!&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;I know which one I would choose, but I don't have time to vote!&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 🥄 (1742) vs 🔪 (5627) || Have at it, 🔪 and 🥄!&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 🏺 (2604) vs 🧭 (4784) || Don't change that channel, folks. We have 🏺 and 🧭 warming up.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;You just know that 🏺 is thinking about 🏎 right now.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| ⛰ (1843) vs 🌋 (6793) || You do not want to miss the fan favorite ⛰. Coming up next!&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;This one was over before it started.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 🏖 (3159) vs 🏕 (5611) || Welcome back, it's time for 🏕 and 🏖 to go head to head.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Time to pick your poison!&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 🏟 (2537) vs 🏝 (6180) || I'm looking forward to this.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 🧱 (3680) vs 🏗 (4093) || Oh this one should be good.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;What an amazing display of prowess from 🏗.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 🏢 (2178) vs 🏠 (5829) || Oh, this one should be good.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;🏠 has every reason to be concerned about this match-up.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 🏨 (1367) vs 🏥 (5326) || Next! Who would win in a match between 🏥 and 🏨? We are about to find out.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;is $6,000,000 of one and Six million of the other, am I right?&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 🏪 (3114) vs 🗽 (4875) || It is a battle as old as time itself. 🏪 and 🗽! Facing off against each other again!&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| ⛺ (3483) vs ⛲ (4296) || Don't change that channel, folks. We have ⛲ and ⛺ warming up.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;If you look away for a moment, you may miss your chance to send ⛺ into the later rounds.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 🌁 (3488) vs 🌃 (4354) || I'm looking forward to this.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 🏙 (2396) vs 🌅 (6055) || Next up, 🌅 and 🏙.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;🏙 is fully committed to this match.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 🎠 (3307) vs 🎡 (4648) || It's time to find out: Who would win in a match, 🎠 or 🎡?&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Oh no. 🎠 fans are not going to like this match-up.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 💈 (2137) vs 🎢 (5854) || Next up, 🎢 and 💈.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;This one will be filled with twists and turns!&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 🚂 (3915) vs 🚄 (4826) || They have been attacking each other on social media all week. Next up! It's 🚂 vs. 🚄.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;The future waits on no one. Let's see those hearts!&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 🚇 (3395) vs 🚝 (4881) || Coming to you live from the Emojidome, it's 🚇 vs. 🚝!&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;On the other hand, time and space are a matter of perspective, right?&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;I guess it was that kind of a party.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 🚌 (2412) vs 🚑 (5363) || They have been attacking each other on social media all week. Next up! It's 🚌 vs. 🚑.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Uh oh, that can't be good for 🚌.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 🚓 (2703) vs 🚒 (6746) || Oh, this one should be good.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Uh oh, that can't be good for 🚓.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;This is a classic struggle.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 🚕 (3400) vs 🚗 (3794) || Don't change that channel, folks. We have 🚕 and 🚗 warming up.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Well that's certainly something.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 🚘 (2922) vs 🚜 (5363) || Next up, 🚘 and 🚜.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;This one is a real nail biter!&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;If 🚘 falls today, we might start hearing serious conversations about retirement.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 🏎 (3103) vs 🛵 (4839) || Don't change that channel, folks. We have 🏎 and 🛵 warming up.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Well this is just fan service. And I am ok with it.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 🛴 (2103) vs 🚲 (6970) || Next! Who would win in a match between 🚲 and 🛴? We are about to find out.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Frankly, I don't think anyone saw this coming.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 🛢 (3474) vs 🛹 (4780) || Next! Who would win in a match between 🛢 and 🛹? We are about to find out.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;And 🛢 falls to 🛹. A suprising turn of events.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 🚨 (2389) vs ⚓ (4816) || Welcome back, it's time for ⚓ and 🚨 to go head to head.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Just to stress this again. Live commentary, folks. Completely unscripted and coming in hot.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;This one is a true test of the audience today.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 🚢 (2877) vs ⛵ (4941) || Coming to you live from the Emojidome, it's ⛵ vs. 🚢!&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;SAIL!&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 💺 (1776) vs 🛩 (5947) || You do not want to miss the fan favorite 💺. Coming up next!&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 🚡 (3729) vs 🚁 (4148) || If you're like me, you've argued over who would win head-to-head, 🚁 or 🚡.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Sometimes miracles happen.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Plenty of matches left to see. Don't go anywhere.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 🛰 (3655) vs 🚀 (4861) || Welcome back, it's time for 🚀 and 🛰 to go head to head.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;🛰 and 🚀 have been friends for a long time. I am not sure where that relationship is going to be after today.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| ⏳ (3021) vs 🛸 (5203) || It's time to find out: Who would win in a match, ⏳ or 🛸?&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;This one is serious, folks.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| ⏰ (3619) vs ⌚ (4462) || You do not want to miss the fan favorite ⌚. Coming up next!&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;If you believe in ⏰, now is the time to clap or whatever, because it is not looking good.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;If you believe in ⏰, now is the time to clap or whatever, because it is not looking good.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 🌕 (3690) vs 🌒 (4145) || You do not want to miss the fan favorite 🌒. Coming up next!&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;What a shocking result!&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 🌡 (2829) vs 🌙 (4432) || It is a battle as old as time itself. 🌙 and 🌡! Facing off against each other again!&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 🌝 (3559) vs 🌞 (3871) || You do not want to miss the fan favorite 🌝. Coming up next!&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| ⭐ (2063) vs 🌌 (5731) || Uh oh. 🌌 has had words with ⭐ before. The next match will be good.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 🌦 (1983) vs ⛈ (5487) || Don't change that channel, folks. We have ⛈ and 🌦 warming up.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;And 🌦 falls to ⛈. A suprising turn of events.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 🌨 (3646) vs 🌪 (4139) || It is a battle as old as time itself. 🌨 and 🌪! Facing off against each other again!&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Folks, I am just as stunned at the outcome as you.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 🌀 (3034) vs 🌈 (7070) || Next! Who would win in a match between 🌀 and 🌈? We are about to find out.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| ☂ (2117) vs ⚡ (5125) || You do not want to miss the fan favorite ☂. Coming up next!&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| ⛄ (2602) vs ☄ (4988) || They have been attacking each other on social media all week. Next up! It's ☄ vs. ⛄.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Another curious match-up with significant implications on how the rest of the day will go.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 🌊 (3356) vs 🔥 (5286) || Oh, this one should be good.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;I am not sure if 🌊 was prepared for today.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 🎆 (3284) vs 🎃 (4418) || If you're like me, you've argued over who would win head-to-head, 🎃 or 🎆.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;This is a mystery.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 🎇 (2770) vs 🧨 (4066) || Coming to you live from the Emojidome, it's 🎇 vs. 🧨!&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Get ready for an explosive result!&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 🎈 (2619) vs 🎉 (4673) || I'm looking forward to this.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;I guess it was that kind of a party.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 🎊 (2250) vs 🎁 (4203) || Welcome back, it's time for 🎁 and 🎊 to go head to head.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;This one was a mess.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 🎟 (2054) vs 🏆 (4558) || Don't change that channel, folks. We have 🎟 and 🏆 warming up.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Truly a dizzying win.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| ⚽ (3116) vs 🏅 (4383) || Have at it, ⚽ and 🏅!&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;A dominant performance by 🏅.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 🥎 (2335) vs ⚾ (5479) || Uh oh. 🥎 has had words with ⚾ before. The next match will be good.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Uhhhh. I can't tell the difference here, can you?&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 🏐 (3742) vs 🏀 (4148) || Oh this one should be good.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;The ball is round, everything else is negotiable.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 🏈 (2932) vs 🎾 (6003) || Next up, 🎾 and 🏈.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;The ball is round ...er .... well .... uh.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 🎳 (4071) vs 🥏 (4561) || We will be right back with 🎳 vs. 🥏!&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;I had BOWLING BALL in my March Madness bracket. I did not do well.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Ok. Now this is just ridiculous.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 🏑 (2742) vs 🏏 (3810) || We will be right back with 🏏 vs. 🏑!&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 🥍 (2291) vs 🏒 (5926) || Oh this one should be good.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Floor stick vs. sky stick—who will win?&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 🥊 (2203) vs 🏓 (5858) || Coming to you live from the Emojidome, it's 🏓 vs. 🥊!&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| ⛸ (2465) vs 🛷 (4552) || They have been attacking each other on social media all week. Next up! It's ⛸ vs. 🛷.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Foot sled vs. regular sled!&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 🎯 (1539) vs 🥌 (1873) || Next! Who would win in a match between 🎯 and 🥌? We are about to find out.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 🔮 (2657) vs 🎮 (6798) || Oh, this one should be good.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 🎭 (2137) vs 🎲 (4868) || If you're like me, you've argued over who would win head-to-head, 🎭 or 🎲.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 🧶 (2994) vs 🎨 (4172) || Uh oh. 🧶 has had words with 🎨 before. The next match will be good.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;A lot of cats clicking on screens right now.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 🥽 (3986) vs 👓 (4206) || Have at it, 👓 and 🥽!&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Glasses vs. Science Glasses!&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 👛 (1029) vs 🧦 (5468) || Have at it, 👛 and 🧦!&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 👟 (2756) vs 🎒 (3516) || Don't change that channel, folks. We have 🎒 and 👟 warming up.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Time for school! Which one will you bring?&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 👠 (1627) vs 👑 (5203) || Oh this one should be good.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 💄 (1719) vs 🎩 (5611) || They have been attacking each other on social media all week. Next up! It's 🎩 vs. 💄.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;The fanciest matchup!&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 💍 (1284) vs 💎 (5973) || Will it be 💍 or 💎? Find out next after this message from our sponsors.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;If you like the one on the right, put a ring on it!&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 🎤 (1728) vs 🎵 (5239) || On deck, we have 🎤 and 🎵.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;:notes::notes::notes:&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Music!&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 📻 (2021) vs 🎷 (4934) || Don't change that channel, folks. We have 🎷 and 📻 warming up.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;The radio and the saxophone are having a music fight. Who can be louder?&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 🎺 (3427) vs 🎸 (4388) || Uh oh. 🎺 has had words with 🎸 before. The next match will be good.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Truly, this is a day that will live in the memories of everyone here.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 🥁 (2857) vs 🎻 (4450) || They have been attacking each other on social media all week. Next up! It's 🎻 vs. 🥁.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;You can hit either one with drumsticks, technically.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 📱 (3837) vs 📞 (3980) || They have been attacking each other on social media all week. Next up! It's 📞 vs. 📱.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;📞 is fully committed to this match.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 📠 (2877) vs 📟 (3262) || Uh oh. 📠 has had words with 📟 before. The next match will be good.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;This one is a toss-up in my book, folks.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Only 15% of the people voting recognize either of these antique devices.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 🔋 (2676) vs 💻 (4418) || Oh this one should be good.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;I spoke with 💻 before the match today, and they had this to say: 💻.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Sparks fly!&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 🖨 (1909) vs ⌨ (5293) || Oh, this one should be good.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;A keyboard is just a reverse printer.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 🖱 (2661) vs 💾 (6308) || I'm looking forward to this.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Yes, this is live commentary.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;This one is a mystery to me, folks.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 📀 (2585) vs 🧮 (5282) || Will it be 📀 or 🧮? Find out next after this message from our sponsors.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 📺 (2752) vs 📷 (4543) || Next up, 📷 and 📺.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;📷 certainly has its work cut out for it going up agaist 📺.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;The camera comes with a tiny TV on the back, which hardly seems fair.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 📼 (3648) vs 🔎 (3663) || It's time to find out: Who would win in a match, 📼 or 🔎?&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;🔎 has every reason to be concerned about this match-up.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;These two can combine for a very unsatisfying movie-watching experience.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 🕯 (3910) vs 💡 (4178) || Welcome back, it's time for 💡 and 🕯 to go head to head.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;I'm so happy to see 💡 here, after 🧠 didn't make it.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Some would argue this one was settled in the 1800s.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 🔦 (1663) vs 📚 (5960) || It is a battle as old as time itself. 📚 and 🔦! Facing off against each other again!&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;The flashlight illuminates the pages, but it only makes the books stronger!&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 📰 (2524) vs 📜 (5491) || You do not want to miss the fan favorite 📜. Coming up next!&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;I thought we had seen everything, but look at 📜 go! Amazing!&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;A faceoff between two types of ancient scrolls.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 💳 (2655) vs 💰 (5595) || It is a battle as old as time itself. 💰 and 💳! Facing off against each other again!&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 📬 (3218) vs 📦 (3350) || Don't change that channel, folks. We have 📦 and 📬 warming up.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Will the package fit in the mailbox? Vote now!&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 🗳 (2403) vs 🖋 (4691) || Welcome back, it's time for 🖋 and 🗳 to go head to head.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;The winner of this bout will go on to face The Sword.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;The winner of this bout will go on to face The Sword. Who’s mightier?&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 🖌 (3530) vs 🖍 (3897) || It is a battle as old as time itself. 🖌 and 🖍! Facing off against each other again!&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;If 🖍 falls today, we might start hearing serious conversations about retirement.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Paintbrush (hard mode) vs. Paintbrush (easy mode)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 💼 (2264) vs 📅 (3884) || Oh, this one should be good.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;You have to wonder if 💼 even wanted to be here today.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 🗒 (2430) vs 📊 (4726) || They have been attacking each other on social media all week. Next up! It's 📊 vs. 🗒.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;*checks notes* Yikes.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 📌 (2799) vs 📎 (4796) || Uh oh. 📎 has had words with 📌 before. The next match will be good.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;I am excited about this match. This might be my favorite early match so far.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 🗑 (2409) vs ✂ (3762) || We will be right back with ✂ vs. 🗑!&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;This is a day that ✂ has been anticipating for a long time.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 🔒 (2827) vs 🗝 (5214) || Oh this one should be good.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Finally, an answer to the classic question.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 🔨 (3350) vs 🗡 (5042) || Oh, this one should be good.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Between the two of these, you can cover almost any home improvement situation.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 🔫 (3734) vs ⚔ (5352) || I'm looking forward to this.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Pew pew pew!&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;[sword noises]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 🛡 (2629) vs 🏹 (4931) || Coming to you live from the Emojidome, it's 🏹 vs. 🛡!&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Where is the Master Sword when you need it?&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;In this match, we see Legolas take on Captain America.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 🗜 (3393) vs 🔧 (3481) || Don't change that channel, folks. We have 🔧 and 🗜 warming up.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;[drops pretense of impartiality] VOTE C clamp!&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 🧰 (1868) vs ⚖ (4961) || Coming to you live from the Emojidome, it's ⚖ vs. 🧰!&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;I know some of you out there had a challenging commute. Hopefully today's matches will improve your day.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;If there’s any justice in the world, the one on the left will win.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 🧪 (4134) vs 🧲 (4519) || It's time to find out: Who would win in a match, 🧪 or 🧲?&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Do you want super-powers? Because this is how you get super-powers!&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 🔬 (2587) vs 🧬 (5487) || Oh, this one should be good.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Do you want super-science? Because this is how you get super-science!&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 📡 (3609) vs 🔭 (4607) || You do not want to miss the fan favorite 📡. Coming up next!&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;This one is a real nail biter!&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 🚿 (3933) vs 🚽 (4031) || Next up, 🚽 and 🚿.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Combine these to save time in the morning!&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 🧷 (2740) vs 🛁 (4131) || You do not want to miss the fan favorite 🛁. Coming up next!&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Well that just doesn't seem fair.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 🧹 (2655) vs 🧻 (5118) || Will it be 🧹 or 🧻? Find out next after this message from our sponsors.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 🧯 (4009) vs ⚰ (4651) || You do not want to miss the fan favorite ⚰. Coming up next!&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;You should have one of these handy in your house, although I guess which one is up to you.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 🆗 (5326) vs 🆒 (5506) || Don't change that channel, folks. We have 🆒 and 🆗 warming up.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Here it is, the final match before the second round!&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;At least this one is going to be over quickly.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Here it is, the final match before the second round!&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Round 2===&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! Competitors and score !! Commentary&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 😁 (5968) vs 😅 (9223) || They have been attacking each other on social media all week. Next up! It's 😁 vs. 😅.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;What a shocking result!&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Welcome to round 2!&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Welcome to round 2! These rounds will be a little slower.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Welcome to round 2!&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 🤣 (5892) vs 🙃 (12578) || It's time to find out: Who would win in a match, 🙃 or 🤣?&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Round two is serious business, folks.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Rolling-on-the-floor-laughing is a top seed, but the upside-down smiley has a certain intriguing ambiguity. Possible upset?&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 😇 (4117) vs 😉 (10595) || Uh oh. 😉 has had words with 😇 before. The next match will be good.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Is it winking *at* the halo? Or is it winking at me?&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;I didn't remember 😉 qualifying.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 😘 (6659) vs 😍 (8816) || On deck, we have 😍 and 😘.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;I expect to see a lot of hearts on the page for this one.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 😙 (2284) vs 😛 (11620) || It is a battle as old as time itself. 😙 and 😛! Facing off against each other again!&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;This one is a toss-up in my book, folks.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Don’t you hate it when one of you sticks out your tongue right as the other goes for the kiss?&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Close one!&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 😝 (6304) vs 😜 (7167) || You do not want to miss the fan favorite 😜. Coming up next!&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 🤭 (1796) vs 🤔 (15162) || Will it be 🤔 or 🤭? Find out next after this message from our sponsors.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;You know what the correct answer is here.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 😑 (5943) vs 🤨 (9223) || You do not want to miss the fan favorite 😑. Coming up next!&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;😑 certainly has its work cut out for it going up agaist 🤨.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 🙄 (5122) vs 😏 (8486) || Welcome back, it's time for 😏 and 🙄 to go head to head.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Why is the one on the right looking at me like that?&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 😔 (4101) vs 😬 (8574) || It's time to find out: Who would win in a match, 😔 or 😬?&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;I don’t think either competitor wants to win this round.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;See? That's how you should feel. Starting at a humble live commentator doing live commentary.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 🤒 (2281) vs 😴 (8582) || Coming to you live from the Emojidome, it's 😴 vs. 🤒!&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Mondays, am I right?&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Two big moods enter, one leaves.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 🤕 (5579) vs 🤮 (8136) || On deck, we have 🤕 and 🤮.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;I don't feel so good...&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Really leaving it all on the floor with this one.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 🥴 (5548) vs 🥶 (7121) || On deck, we have 🥴 and 🥶.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Ice to see you.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;I think they might be trying to ice the kicker!&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 🤠 (5576) vs 😎 (8912) || Have at it, 😎 and 🤠!&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Howdy, I’m the sheriff of cool!&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 😕 (4748) vs 😮 (7861) || I'm looking forward to this.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;An unexpected pairing! This should be good.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;I mean ... you can *see* the bracket so it isn't completely unexpected.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 😳 (5552) vs 😯 (6583) || It is a battle as old as time itself. 😯 and 😳! Facing off against each other again!&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Wasn't 😯 in the last match?&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 😰 (2756) vs 😭 (9508) || Oh, this one should be good.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;😰 is going to have to dig deep if they want to continue.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 😣 (2674) vs 😱 (10403) || Oh, this one should be good.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;It doesn't get more real than this, folks.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 😓 (4790) vs 😤 (7053) || Welcome back, it's time for 😓 and 😤 to go head to head.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Nice. Nice nice nice nice.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 😡 (4209) vs 😈 (9437) || It's time to find out: Who would win in a match, 😈 or 😡?&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;This one is a toss-up in my book, folks.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 💩 (7681) vs 💀 (12905) || They have been attacking each other on social media all week. Next up! It's 💀 vs. 💩.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;This one is going to cause some arguments.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 👽 (4888) vs 👾 (9937) || I'm looking forward to this.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Space invaders: Analog vs. Digital&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 😻 (5800) vs 😺 (6451) || Coming to you live from the Emojidome, it's 😺 vs. 😻!&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;I love cats. I love every kind of cat.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 😼 (4767) vs 🙀 (7648) || Oh this one should be good.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Every. Kind. Of. Cat.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Did someone say &amp;quot;V-E-T?&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 😾 (5464) vs 💖 (7037) || Next up, 💖 and 😾.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;😾 looks pretty upset.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| ❤ (7490) vs 💯 (7881) || You do not want to miss the fan favorite ❤. Coming up next!&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Two crowd-pleasers here, folks!&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;The score is Love-100&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 💣 (6379) vs 💦 (7343) || Next up, 💣 and 💦.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;From where I am standing 💦 has a commanding grip on this bracket.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Well that's certainly something.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;I know which one I would choose, but I don't have time to vote!&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 🤘 (6417) vs 👍 (7610) || On deck, we have 👍 and 🤘.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;This is going well, right? This is working for you?&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 🦵 (3323) vs 👊 (8368) || Next up, 👊 and 🦵.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Kickpuncher or punchkicker?&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 👀 (6253) vs 🧠 (6412) || If you're like me, you've argued over who would win head-to-head, 👀 or 🧠.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Whoever wins this one gets punched by the fist emoji in the next round. Choose wisely.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Whoever wins this one gets punched by the fist emoji in the next round. Choose wisely.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 👅 (4726) vs 🤦 (7496) || It's time to find out: Who would win in a match, 👅 or 🤦?&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Look, we are a little disappointed, too.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 👩‍🚀 (5246) vs 👩‍🔬 (7971) || Oh, this one should be good.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;So, what do you want to be when you grow up?&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Neither of these professions go well with concussions.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 🧛 (2269) vs 🧙 (13138) || We will be right back with 🧙 vs. 🧛!&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Science?&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 🧟 (6020) vs 🚶 (6112) || Oh this one should be good.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Oh no. 🚶 fans are not going to like this match-up.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Walk for your lives!&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 🕴 (5070) vs 💃 (7283) || You do not want to miss the fan favorite 💃. Coming up next!&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;The Matrix is TWENTY YEARS OLD&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;The Matrix is *TWENTY* *YEARS* *OLD*&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| ⛷ (4388) vs 🤺 (7484) || On deck, we have ⛷ and 🤺.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;A slippery slope. En guard!&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;The IOC has rejected this combination sport.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 🏊 (4139) vs 🏄 (5491) || They have been attacking each other on social media all week. Next up! It's 🏄 vs. 🏊.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;This one, too.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 🚴 (4082) vs 🚵 (7642) || Coming to you live from the Emojidome, it's 🚴 vs. 🚵!&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Why is 🚵 stuck in a box?&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 🛀 (4042) vs 🐒 (6948) || They have been attacking each other on social media all week. Next up! It's 🐒 vs. 🛀.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Uh-oh.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 🐶 (5214) vs 🦊 (12396) || We will be right back with 🐶 vs. 🦊!&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Again, we are getting a lot of questions on this today. This is live commentary, folks.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;12/10 Both good doggos.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 🐱 (5182) vs 🐈 (7578) || We will be right back with 🐈 vs. 🐱!&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;EVERY. CAT.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 🐎 (4944) vs 🐅 (9398) || Have at it, 🐅 and 🐎!&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;If it were up to me, the last bracket would have eight cats and then just stop there with eight winners.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 🦌 (5619) vs 🦄 (10318) || Have at it, 🦄 and 🦌!&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;The IOC had some words about this pairing as well&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 🐷 (5341) vs 🐏 (8541) || Welcome back, it's time for 🐏 and 🐷 to go head to head.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Or side to head, or whatever. VOTE!&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;That was 🐷's to give away and they did.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 🐐 (6038) vs 🦒 (8345) || I'm looking forward to this.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Yet more Very good dogs&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 🦛 (3614) vs 🐘 (11342) || Oh, this one should be good.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Another curious match-up with significant implications on how the rest of the day will go.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 🐹 (3660) vs 🐿 (10713) || It is a battle as old as time itself. 🐹 and 🐿! Facing off against each other again!&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;We are incredibly excited to see so many fans here.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Finally, the long-awaited showdown between Alvin and the Chipmunks and the Hamster Dance.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 🐨 (5171) vs 🦔 (10929) || On deck, we have 🐨 and 🦔.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;It doesn't get more real than this, folks.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Tree pocket cat vs. spiky cat&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 🦘 (6954) vs 🦡 (7727) || Will it be 🦘 or 🦡? Find out next after this message from our sponsors.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;If you believe in 🦘, now is the time to clap or whatever, because it is not looking good.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 🐣 (5846) vs 🐧 (12239) || We will be right back with 🐣 vs. 🐧!&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Don't count 🐣 out yet. They may have a contingent of fans just tuning in to battle.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;I thought we had seen everything, but look at 🐧 go! Amazing!&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;A generational battle.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 🦆 (6558) vs 🦉 (9674) || Will it be 🦆 or 🦉? Find out next after this message from our sponsors.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;You just know that 🦆 is thinking about 🏥 right now.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Duck... duck... duck... duck... owl!&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 🦜 (3957) vs 🐢 (11594) || Uh oh. 🦜 has had words with 🐢 before. The next match will be good.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Sometimes miracles happen.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 🐍 (5264) vs 🐉 (6954) || Have at it, 🐉 and 🐍!&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;How spiky do you like your sneks?&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Snake is currently losing to Fanfiction Snake.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Snake is losing to Snake Fanfiction&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 🐬 (7916) vs 🐳 (9398) || On deck, we have 🐬 and 🐳.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;It's the battle of the blowholes!&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 🦈 (3695) vs 🐙 (8799) || Next up, 🐙 and 🦈.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;This one is potentially a battle between two mimic octopuses.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 🐛 (5330) vs 🦋 (9176) || On deck, we have 🐛 and 🦋.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Time waits for no one.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Another generational struggle.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 🕷 (5714) vs 🐝 (12151) || We will be right back with 🐝 vs. 🕷!&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;🕷 and 🐝 have been friends for a long time. I am not sure where that relationship is going to be after today.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 🌻 (6639) vs 🦠 (10448) || Oh, this one should be good.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;You *knwo* what to do, folks.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Oh no. 🦠 fans are not going to like this match-up.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Fresh off its victory over the aliens in War of the Worlds…&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 🌲 (8099) vs 🌵 (8194) || Will it be 🌲 or 🌵? Find out next after this message from our sponsors.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;DISAPPOINTED!&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;both are surprisingly spiky!&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;This is the closest battle in the bracket so far.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 🍇 (6548) vs 🍉 (8681) || Oh this one should be good.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;sweet!&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 🍎 (5411) vs 🍍 (10586) || Have at it, 🍍 and 🍎!&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Regular apple versus Pine’s Apple&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Fancy apple holds a clear lead over Regular Apple.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 🥝 (7540) vs 🍓 (8877) || It's time to find out: Who would win in a match, 🍓 or 🥝?&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Seeds: Inside or Out?&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Outside: Seeds or Hair?&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 🥔 (7800) vs 🥑 (9580) || Don't change that channel, folks. We have 🥑 and 🥔 warming up.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Fun fact: Several different analyses confirm baby boomers like avocados more than millennials!&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 🥒 (6360) vs 🌶 (8714) || You do not want to miss the fan favorite 🌶. Coming up next!&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;I know some very invested audience members for this one.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 🥜 (5311) vs 🍄 (8929) || You do not want to miss the fan favorite 🍄. Coming up next!&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;It's peanut butter mushroom time!&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 🥨 (7003) vs 🥐 (9204) || Don't change that channel, folks. We have 🥐 and 🥨 warming up.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Buttery curved bread: extra-buttery or extra-curved?&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 🥞 (7881) vs 🧀 (9457) || Will it be 🥞 or 🧀? Find out next after this message from our sponsors.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;I wonder what cheesy pancakes are like.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 🍔 (5917) vs 🍕 (11407) || It is a battle as old as time itself. 🍔 and 🍕! Facing off against each other again!&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Friday Night Food Fight!&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 🌮 (7714) vs 🌯 (8885) || Coming to you live from the Emojidome, it's 🌮 vs. 🌯!&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;………&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;. . . . . .&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 🍿 (7104) vs 🍳 (8128) || You do not want to miss the fan favorite 🍳. Coming up next!&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;The saltiest and butteriest matchup yet&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 🍱 (4259) vs 🍣 (7578) || Oh, this one should be good.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Hungry again. Wasn't it just lunch time?&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;This part of the bracket has been *wild*&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Sushi takes the lead!&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 🥟 (5804) vs 🦞 (7681) || Oh this one should be good.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;A delicious dumpling vs some kind of large spider&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 🍨 (7349) vs 🦑 (7834) || If you're like me, you've argued over who would win head-to-head, 🍨 or 🦑.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;I think there’s another squid hiding in the ice cream bowl.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 🎂 (4175) vs 🍩 (8454) || If you're like me, you've argued over who would win head-to-head, 🍩 or 🎂.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 🍯 (4787) vs 🍫 (7565) || Next! Who would win in a match between 🍫 and 🍯? We are about to find out.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;The beans vs. the bees!&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 🥛 (5344) vs ☕ (7674) || Coming to you live from the Emojidome, it's ☕ vs. 🥛!&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Would you like some coffee with your milk?&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 🍹 (4901) vs 🍺 (7490) || Uh oh. 🍺 has had words with 🍹 before. The next match will be good.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;how drunk do you want to get?&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;One small glass of beer with an umbrella, please.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 🥢 (5468) vs 🔪 (7787) || Oh, this one should be good.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;The two most popular ways to eat food&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 🧭 (4079) vs 🌋 (8706) || I'm looking forward to this.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;That compass is not leading you in a good direction.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 🏝 (5445) vs 🏕 (8722) || Coming to you live from the Emojidome, it's 🏕 vs. 🏝!&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 🏠 (5722) vs 🏗 (5804) || It is a battle as old as time itself. 🏗 and 🏠! Facing off against each other again!&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;It's building vs. building!&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 🗽 (5981) vs 🏥 (7053) || We will be right back with 🏥 vs. 🗽!&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| ⛲ (5498) vs 🌃 (6519) || You do not want to miss the fan favorite ⛲. Coming up next!&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 🎡 (3212) vs 🌅 (8000) || It is a battle as old as time itself. 🌅 and 🎡! Facing off against each other again!&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 🎢 (4701) vs 🚄 (7014) || We will be right back with 🎢 vs. 🚄!&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Do you like your fast trains flat, or up-and-down?&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 🚑 (4901) vs 🚝 (7087) || On deck, we have 🚑 and 🚝.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 🚗 (2707) vs 🚒 (8391) || Will it be 🚒 or 🚗? Find out next after this message from our sponsors.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 🛵 (5344) vs 🚜 (6475) || It's time to find out: Who would win in a match, 🚜 or 🛵?&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Both of these are popular rideshare vehicles.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 🛹 (3509) vs 🚲 (9447) || They have been attacking each other on social media all week. Next up! It's 🚲 vs. 🛹.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;next wave of rideshare vehicles.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| ⛵ (6431) vs ⚓ (6608) || Welcome back, it's time for ⚓ and ⛵ to go head to head.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Should I stay or should I go?&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 🛩 (5694) vs 🚁 (6529) || Will it be 🚁 or 🛩? Find out next after this message from our sponsors.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Here in the future, flying cars are common!&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 🚀 (7266) vs 🛸 (14945) || They have been attacking each other on social media all week. Next up! It's 🚀 vs. 🛸.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;IFO vs UFO&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| ⌚ (6623) vs 🌒 (7404) || They have been attacking each other on social media all week. Next up! It's ⌚ vs. 🌒.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Waxing crescent already? I must be running slow.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 🌙 (8921) vs 🌞 (15703) || Welcome back, it's time for 🌙 and 🌞 to go head to head.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Two contenders as different as night and day.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;In five billion years, this battle will play out in real life with the same result.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| ⛈ (9358) vs 🌌 (17038) || I'm looking forward to this.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Astronomers are hammering the button on the right as hard as they can.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 🌪 (9848) vs 🌈 (11326) || You do not want to miss the fan favorite 🌈. Coming up next!&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;The Wizard Of Oz (1938)&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;The Wizard Of Oz (1939)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| ⚡ (7597) vs ☄ (8014) || Oh, this one should be good.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;The two leading theories for what killed the dinosaurs: A comet strike, or Zeus.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Boom!&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 🎃 (4112) vs 🔥 (10407) || If you're like me, you've argued over who would win head-to-head, 🎃 or 🔥.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 🎉 (5422) vs 🧨 (18509) || Oh this one should be good.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;How emphatic do you like your celebrations?&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 🏆 (5564) vs 🎁 (6499) || Have at it, 🎁 and 🏆!&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| ⚾ (5404) vs 🏅 (7337) || Oh, this one should be good.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Sports fact: If you hit a medal-winner with a ball, you take their title.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 🎾 (6117) vs 🏀 (6171) || We will be right back with 🎾 vs. 🏀!&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Sports fact: If you hit a medal-winner with a ball, you take the medal (but they take first base.)&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Sports showdowns: Bouncy edition&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Would you rather play basketball with a tennis ball, or tennis with a basketball?&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 🏏 (7343) vs 🥏 (7546) || You do not want to miss the fan favorite 🏏. Coming up next!&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 🏒 (8078) vs 🏓 (8739) || Uh oh. 🏓 has had words with 🏒 before. The next match will be good.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 🛷 (7104) vs 🥌 (7733) || Have at it, 🛷 and 🥌!&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 🎲 (11931) vs 🎮 (14739) || They have been attacking each other on social media all week. Next up! It's 🎮 vs. 🎲.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Digital or analog?&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Devices or, uh, dices?&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 👓 (4988) vs 🎨 (5374) || We will be right back with 🎨 vs. 👓!&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;two ways to add color to your world&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 🧦 (4819) vs 🎒 (4961) || We will be right back with 🎒 vs. 🧦!&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;You can put your feet in either of these! No one can stop you.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 👑 (19274) vs 🎩 (23265) || Will it be 🎩 or 👑? Find out next after this message from our sponsors.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Hats for fancy people!&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 💎 (9378) vs 🎵 (17951) || We will be right back with 🎵 vs. 💎!&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;C-notes&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 🎷 (6954) vs 🎸 (10692) || They have been attacking each other on social media all week. Next up! It's 🎷 vs. 🎸.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;I've never heard the dueling banjos played like this!&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 📞 (8172) vs 🎻 (11568) || They have been attacking each other on social media all week. Next up! It's 🎻 vs. 📞.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Can I put you on hold? I can't hang onto both of these with my chin&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 💻 (7355) vs 📟 (9348) || It is a battle as old as time itself. 💻 and 📟! Facing off against each other again!&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Over time, computers have gotten steadily smaller.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| ⌨ (3372) vs 💾 (8550) || I'm looking forward to this.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;fun fact: it would take the average person 20 years to type an entire floppy disk&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 📷 (10623) vs 🧮 (12401) || Oh, this one should be good.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 🔎 (7902) vs 💡 (12706) || On deck, we have 💡 and 🔎.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;it's mostly clicks either way. &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Both equally bad for bugs. &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 📜 (4020) vs 📚 (32459) || Oh, this one should be good.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Turning pages: hot new technology, or too much complication?&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 💰 (5378) vs 📦 (17957) || Oh, this one should be good.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Let's be real. Neither contain actual money. &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 🖋 (6166) vs 🖍 (42115) || It is a battle as old as time itself. 🖋 and 🖍! Facing off against each other again!&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Neither is coming off your walls if a kid gets ahold of them. &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 📅 (3309) vs 📊 (5217) || Have at it, 📅 and 📊!&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;It’s cool how, if you design an emoji font, you get to tell everyone your birthday.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| ✂ (4504) vs 📎 (5846) || It is a battle as old as time itself. ✂ and 📎! Facing off against each other again!&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Look, we all have too much paper in our lives, but we all deal with it differently&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Clippy, I swear…&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 🗡 (5537) vs 🗝 (6193) || They have been attacking each other on social media all week. Next up! It's 🗝 vs. 🗡.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;There are two ways to open doors: The easy way and the fun way.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| ⚔ (5514) vs 🏹 (7201) || Welcome back, it's time for ⚔ and 🏹 to go head to head.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Close-up stabby, or stabby from a ways off?&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 🔧 (4351) vs ⚖ (6153) || Will it be ⚖ or 🔧? Find out next after this message from our sponsors.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;⚖ comes out on top.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 🧲 (4654) vs 🧬 (9019) || Oh this one should be good.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 🚽 (4388) vs 🔭 (8647) || They have been attacking each other on social media all week. Next up! It's 🔭 vs. 🚽.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;I got these mixed up last week and I still haven't heard the end of it.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 🛁 (4540) vs 🧻 (11347) || Welcome back, it's time for 🛁 and 🧻 to go head to head.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Needed both of these after the telescope incident.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 🆒 (6024) vs ⚰ (7909) || On deck, we have ⚰ and 🆒.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;And that wraps up the round!&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Round 3===&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! Competitors and score !! Commentary&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 😅 (6285) vs 🙃 (31589) || Uh oh. 🙃 has had words with 😅 before. The next match will be good.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 😍 (8430) vs 😉 (10837) || Next! Who would win in a match between 😉 and 😍? We are about to find out.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Some of us are more suave than others...&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 😛 (9010) vs 😜 (10428) || Uh oh. 😜 has had words with 😛 before. The next match will be good.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Battle of the tongues&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 🤨 (6519) vs 🤔 (18849) || Next up, 🤔 and 🤨.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Some behind the scenes for you, folks. I know for a fact that 🤔 wanted first billing for this match and 🤨 refused to budge.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 😬 (8983) vs 😏 (11449) || It is a battle as old as time itself. 😏 and 😬! Facing off against each other again!&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 🤮 (7773) vs 😴 (10588) || Have at it, 😴 and 🤮!&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;🤮 opened strong and 😴 never caught up.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;I hope everyone has printed their brackets and are ready, because time waits for very few people!&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;I guess it was that kind of a party.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 🥶 (9176) vs 😎 (11469) || Oh, this one should be good.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;🥶 has a chance here, but it is slipping away.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;What's cooler than being cool?&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;What’s cooler than being cool?&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;You need to be cooler than that!&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 😯 (7648) vs 😮 (7944) || Oh, this one should be good.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Anyone want to go bowling?&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Sometimes I spend so long deciding on which of these to use that the conversation moves on.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 😭 (7559) vs 😱 (8894) || They have been attacking each other on social media all week. Next up! It's 😭 vs. 😱.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;In these kinds of contests, everyone comes away a little hurt.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 😤 (5475) vs 😈 (9739) || Uh oh. 😤 has had words with 😈 before. The next match will be good.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;I don't think 😤 expected to see 😈 opposite them today.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Devils over Cotton by a country mile. Let's see those hearts!&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;This one was over before it started.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 💀 (6669) vs 👾 (11173) || It's time to find out: Who would win in a match, 👾 or 💀?&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;It doesn't get more real than this, folks.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 😺 (7993) vs 🙀 (8903) || On deck, we have 😺 and 🙀.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;I spoke with 🙀 before we started today. They were hoping to dodge 😺. Too bad for them.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;The next few are contests are going to break friendships.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;This one is a real nail biter!&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 💯 (9859) vs 💖 (10041) || Next! Who would win in a match between 💖 and 💯? We are about to find out.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;I've always considered 💖 to be one of the greats.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Starting to think 100 might go all the way.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Starting to think 💯 might go all the way.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 👍 (9892) vs 💦 (9960) || It's time to find out: Who would win in a match, 👍 or 💦?&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;What an unexpected result!!&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Now what is going to happen here:&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;We are seeing some real back and forth matches this round.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Again, cannot stress this enough. This commentary is 100% (sorry) live.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 👊 (6867) vs 🧠 (12115) || They have been attacking each other on social media all week. Next up! It's 👊 vs. 🧠.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Sometimes miracles happen.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;The match-up you have been waiting for!&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 🤦 (7172) vs 👩‍🔬 (15141) || Oh this one should be good.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Looks like someone forgot their PPE today!&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 🚶 (2581) vs 🧙 (17413) || Welcome back, it's time for 🚶 and 🧙 to go head to head.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Another fan favorite. Can 🚶 catch up to 🧙?&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Well folks, it is not looking good for 🚶.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;In the end, there was nothing 🚶 could do to stop the power of 🧙.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 💃 (10409) vs 🤺 (10987) || We will be right back with 💃 vs. 🤺!&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Pointy Dancy vs. Pointy Stancy&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;This one should be familiar to anyone who has tried fencing in heels.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 🏄 (7355) vs 🚵 (10300) || Oh this one should be good.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;🏄 has a chance here, but it is slipping away.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Bicycle --&amp;amp;gt; Unicycle --&amp;amp;gt; None-cycle with left waves&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;🏄 has a chance here, but it is slipping away.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 🐒 (4784) vs 🦊 (15635) || It is a battle as old as time itself. 🐒 and 🦊! Facing off against each other again!&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Another challenging contest of cute!&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;What *does* the fox say?  &amp;quot;NOT TODAY, MONKEY.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 🐅 (7014) vs 🐈 (11420) || Oh this one should be good.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;I have taken this yoga class!&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;It looks like it is Cat vs. Extremely Cat.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 🐏 (12498) vs 🦄 (12505) || On deck, we have 🐏 and 🦄.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;🐏 is an fan favorite to go far today.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;This one is a real nail biter!&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;This one is a real horn-biter!&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 🦒 (6162) vs 🐘 (11723) || Have at it, 🐘 and 🦒!&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Two great examples of character creator parameters set to different extremes.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 🐿 (9539) vs 🦔 (12565) || Have at it, 🐿 and 🦔!&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;I have no idea how you are going to handle this one, folks.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;🦔 is out to an early lead, but don't count 🐿 out just yet.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;the crowd is going nuts!&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;One for the history books.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 🦡 (7361) vs 🐧 (14230) || It is a battle as old as time itself. 🐧 and 🦡! Facing off against each other again!&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Arriving at the party ... same party two hours later.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 🐢 (10674) vs 🦉 (10893) || Coming to you live from the Emojidome, it's 🐢 vs. 🦉!&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Yeah, we know. This one is going to sting.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;It's neck and ... very interesting neck!&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Owl standing in for Hare in this round. We're all as surprised as you are.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 🐳 (9881) vs 🐉 (12000) || Welcome back, it's time for 🐉 and 🐳 to go head to head.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Dry Snek vs. Wet Snek.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;A showdown between two mythical creatures!&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;The dragon keeps beating real animals, even though dragons are just our animal fanfic.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Save the whales!&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 🦋 (6011) vs 🐙 (13431) || On deck, we have 🐙 and 🦋.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;save the butterwhales!&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Here we have a contest between two mimic octopuses&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;The octopus has over twice as many clicks, folks. This one isn’t looking close.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;The octopus has over twice as many clicks, folks. This one isn’t close.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 🦠 (16657) vs 🐝 (19577) || I'm looking forward to this.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;nooooon, :butterfly:&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;nooooon, butterfly (edited)&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Honeybees vs. colony collapse disorder&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;I’m looking at the totals, and this one is extremely close.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;🦠 fans need to click more and faster!&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;I mean, 🐝 fans need to keep clicking!&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Fun fact: You can click more than once, although if you click too much it ignores you.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;No! Save the bees!&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Bees!&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 🍉 (12946) vs 🌵 (13830) || Have at it, 🌵 and 🍉!&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;As a dessert for saving the bees, try one of these fine desert fruits.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Ever wonder what the inside of a cactus looks like? We’ve cut one open for you here.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 🍓 (12167) vs 🍍 (12522) || Uh oh. 🍓 has had words with 🍍 before. The next match will be good.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;What fruit is best to eat in the night? Could it be Pine’s Apple?&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;The weird-textured fruit showdown features two strong competitors.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 🌶 (13812) vs 🥑 (13975) || Uh oh. 🥑 has had words with 🌶 before. The next match will be good.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;We have reached the halfway point of round 3!&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;As Twitter user @jitka said, “I like avocados because they taste pretty good and also they come with a cool wood ball you get to keep”&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 🍄 (11290) vs 🥐 (11348) || Next up, 🍄 and 🥐.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Don’t eat either of these if you find them on the ground in the woods.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 🧀 (8558) vs 🍕 (13520) || Don't change that channel, folks. We have 🍕 and 🧀 warming up.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;cheese: baked or not?&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;pizza is just impure cheese&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 🍳 (8407) vs 🌯 (9848) || Don't change that channel, folks. We have 🌯 and 🍳 warming up.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;one burrito, sunny-side up&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Now I want a burrito.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 🦞 (9488) vs 🍣 (11362) || It is a battle as old as time itself. 🍣 and 🦞! Facing off against each other again!&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;I thought we had seen everything, but look at 🍣 go! Amazing!&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 🍩 (12192) vs 🦑 (12893) || On deck, we have 🍩 and 🦑.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Do not mix these flavors.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| ☕ (7248) vs 🍫 (13919) || If you're like me, you've argued over who would win head-to-head, ☕ or 🍫.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;what a cruel choice&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;in which form would you like your beans?&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;mocha hold the chocolate vs. mocha hold the coffee&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 🍺 (11448) vs 🔪 (12597) || Will it be 🍺 or 🔪? Find out next after this message from our sponsors.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;What an amazingly bad combination!&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Its ... a close shave.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 🏕 (6055) vs 🌋 (13928) || They have been attacking each other on social media all week. Next up! It's 🌋 vs. 🏕.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;What an amazingly bad combination! .... Again!&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;the eruption of mt. Saint helens (artist's conception)&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;ruuuuunn!&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 🏥 (7225) vs 🏗 (8415) || You do not want to miss the fan favorite 🏗. Coming up next!&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;the crane can build hospitals, so voting for the crane is like wishing for infinite wishes &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 🌅 (7042) vs 🌃 (10460) || Oh this one should be good.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;all good things must come to an end&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 🚄 (8128) vs 🚝 (8903) || I'm looking forward to this.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 🚜 (6598) vs 🚒 (8085) || Coming to you live from the Emojidome, it's 🚒 vs. 🚜!&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;We can put out your fire, or we can move it over there.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| ⚓ (6987) vs 🚲 (9001) || If you're like me, you've argued over who would win head-to-head, ⚓ or 🚲.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 🚁 (3409) vs 🛸 (12591) || Oh, this one should be good.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Independence Day (1996)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 🌞 (6290) vs 🌒 (11026) || Coming to you live from the Emojidome, it's 🌒 vs. 🌞!&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 🌈 (12417) vs 🌌 (13194) || Uh oh. 🌌 has had words with 🌈 before. The next match will be good.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| ☄ (7687) vs 🔥 (8315) || Have at it, ☄ and 🔥!&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Armageddon (1998)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 🎁 (5311) vs 🧨 (9417) || I'm looking forward to this.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Do you like surprises?&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 🏀 (3729) vs 🏅 (9083) || If you're like me, you've argued over who would win head-to-head, 🏀 or 🏅.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;This match has me questioning 🏀's commitment.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 🥏 (7916) vs 🏓 (9290) || I'm looking forward to this.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Don't blink.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 🎮 (11060) vs 🥌 (14205) || Welcome back, it's time for 🎮 and 🥌 to go head to head.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Curling Simulator 2019&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;If you love 🥌, you will have to show it now!&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Its a close match!&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;🎮 sweeping up&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;🥌 sweeping up&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;I think 🥌 has it.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 🎒 (5682) vs 🎨 (8574) || Oh this one should be good.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Is the backpack Blue or Red??&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Blue or Red isn't going to matter if 🎨 keeps their lead!&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;This one was over before it started.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 🎩 (9120) vs 🎵 (10259) || It's time to find out: Who would win in a match, 🎩 or 🎵?&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Top Hat (1935)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 🎸 (7349) vs 🎻 (10889) || Don't change that channel, folks. We have 🎸 and 🎻 warming up.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;the day the music died&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 📟 (3276) vs 💾 (14470) || Don't change that channel, folks. We have 💾 and 📟 warming up.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;🖍, are you watching this match?&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;At this rate, 📟 will lose worse than 🎒 earlier!&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 💡 (7834) vs 🧮 (10579) || It is a battle as old as time itself. 💡 and 🧮! Facing off against each other again!&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;What an illuminating contest.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;In case you were wondering, the obsolete tech bracket is coming to a close soon.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;🧮 comes out on top.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 📦 (3650) vs 📚 (13464) || Uh oh. 📦 has had words with 📚 before. The next match will be good.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Remember trees?&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 📊 (7144) vs 🖍 (8035) || It is a battle as old as time itself. 📊 and 🖍! Facing off against each other again!&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Which crayon is the shortest&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Which crayon is the shortest?&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 📎 (8114) vs 🗝 (9019) || Have at it, 📎 and 🗝!&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Have you considered just casting 'Knock'?&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| ⚖ (6910) vs 🏹 (9251) || You do not want to miss the fan favorite ⚖. Coming up next!&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;I am not sure if there is anything else that 🏹 needs to prove.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 🔭 (9037) vs 🧬 (11772) || It's time to find out: Who would win in a match, 🔭 or 🧬?&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Pretty sure that is not how any of this works.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| ⚰ (12470) vs 🧻 (13083) || Don't change that channel, folks. We have ⚰ and 🧻 warming up.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;This is the final match of round 3!&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;You have died of Dysentery.&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Round 4===&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! Competitors and score !! Commentary&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 😉 (13589) vs 🙃 (22912) || Will it be 😉 or 🙃? Find out next after this message from our sponsors.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Finally! A rivalry spoke only in whispers now takes center stage.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;I see our friends in Australia have joined in the fun.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;😉 has some time to recover, but they are going to need help.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Down to our last minute in the match!&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;😉 never had a chance.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 😜 (6578) vs 🤔 (25692) || Next! Who would win in a match between 😜 and 🤔? We are about to find out.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;This match-up reminds me of something clever I heard earlier ...&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Oh! I remember what it was!&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Someone said&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 😴 (11518) vs 😏 (12506) || If you're like me, you've argued over who would win head-to-head, 😏 or 😴.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Success is no stranger to 😏. Let's see if they can keep it going.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Don't sleep on this match-up!&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 😮 (18361) vs 😎 (18415) || Next up, 😎 and 😮.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;I don't know about you, but this is the match I have been waiting all day to see.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Sunglasses pulling ahead.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;The betting markets had 😮 as favourite today, but it sure looks like 😎 is going to make it!&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;It's all up to 😎 now. Can they hold 😮 back long enough to claim victory?&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;The betting markets had 😮 as favourite today, but it sure looks like 😎 is going to make it!&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;The gap is closing! Is there enough time for 😮 to take the lead?&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;This one is coming down to the wire!&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Surprised Pikachu pulls ahead!&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 😱 (4868) vs 😈 (5411) || It is a battle as old as time itself. 😈 and 😱! Facing off against each other again!&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 👾 (18385) vs 🙀 (18571) || 👾 and 🙀 have been friends for a long time. I am not sure where that relationship is going to be after today.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;This could get interesting if 🙀 brings out their lasers!&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;This could get interesting if 👾 brings out their lasers!&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Can we go back to the laser kittens for a minute?&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;laser kittens! mew mew mew!&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Uh oh. The cat cheering section seems to be slacking.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Can the cats make a comeback and save us all?&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;It's gonna be tight!&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 💦 (13865) vs 💖 (15698) || Someone has to win this match and someone has to lose, but you have to acknowledge the pure sportsmanship of these competitors.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Click the link at the bottom of the comic to view the current bracket! (Just updated.)&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;That last one came down to the wire, and this one's looking like it might too.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;The three other Planeteers are watching this match tensely.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Sparkle Heart has been a surprisingly strong contender, knocking out the 100 emoji early!&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Click the link at the bottom of the comic to view the current bracket!&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Sparkle heart appears to be running away with another one.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 🧠 (9398) vs 👩‍🔬 (19865) || This is a match that no one wanted to deal with until the end.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;what exactly is 👩‍🔬 going to do with that beaker?&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Neuroscience vs. Neuro!&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;There seems to be a commotion in the audience as to whether that was a flask or a beaker.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;I *was* a beaker, but someone changed it in post!&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Looks like 👩‍🔬 is really taking 🧠 to *flask*.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 🤺 (8947) vs 🧙 (25337) || 🤺 has been a fan favorite all day. Suprising literally no one.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;However, 🧙 has literally been disintegrating their competition all afternoon.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;What are we thinking here? 'Heat Metal'?&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Parry hotter vs Harry Potter?&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 🚵 (7397) vs 🦊 (27045) || This is a match that no one wanted to deal with until the end.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;several people are typing.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;🦊 is putting 🚵 in the rear-view mirror and stepping on the gas.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;I have never seen 🦊 crush an opponent that mercilessly before.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 🦄 (20912) vs 🐈 (25965) || Oh this one should be good.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;I am not sure if there is anything else that 🐈 needs to prove.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 🐘 (23083) vs 🦔 (23975) || I spoke with 🐘 before the match today, and they had this to say: 🐘.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;This is one grudge that won't be resolved soon: 🐘 never forgets.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Hedgehog has been a strong contender but elephant is running surprisingly close.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;This is going to come down to the final seconds.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;An amazing match from 🦔.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 🐧 (19957) vs 🦉 (22737) || There are a lot of 🐧 fans in the audience today hoping to see their champ make it through.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Another close match in the making!&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;1 minute for 🦉 to overtake 🐧!&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;I think the bird has it.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 🐉 (25129) vs 🐙 (25238) || You wouldn't know it to look at them right now, but 🐉 and 🐙 have been friends for years.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;I think 🐉 may have finally met their match.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;🐙 is trying to get back in the lead. But 🐉 is not having any of it.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;The totals are back and forth!&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;An unbelievably close match is down to the final minute!&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;It’s neck and neck, despite one being all neck and the other having none.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;The final seconds are here. Who will take the final lead?&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 🌵 (17985) vs 🐝 (18691) || 🌵 has really suprised me today.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;another close match. Are all of the contests going to be like this now?&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 🥑 (18099) vs 🍍 (19728) || 🍍 continues to show why they are just the dominant force to be reckoned with today.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Avocado Toast or Pineapple Pizza&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Avocado Toast or Pineapple Pizza?&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 🥐 (11100) vs 🍕 (19207) || Oh this one should be good.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Pineapple pizza isn't real pizza&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;There are two correct answers here. Choose wisely.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Pizzas are like croissant tacos&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Looks like 🥐 is getting roasted.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;🥐 burn so easily. Who knew?&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 🌯 (16204) vs 🍣 (17599) || 🌯 came to play. It is so obvious.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;why do we have to choose?&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;I have definitely eaten food that was described as both of these.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 🍫 (17503) vs 🦑 (18313) || Oh this one should be good.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;No No Nothing about this is good.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;🍫 is pretty sweet, but I'm a sucker for 🦑&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 🔪 (7144) vs 🌋 (18049) || 🌋 has been a fan favorite all day. Suprising literally no one.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;before the knives come out of the mountain they're technically called &amp;quot;magma&amp;quot;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;before knives come out of a mountain they're technically called 'magma'&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 🏗 (7355) vs 🌃 (12660) || Oh this one should be good.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Has anyone ever seen one of these without the other? Hmm.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;163&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 🚒 (4736) vs 🚝 (9570) || 🚒 is dedicating this match to someone very special in their lives.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 🚲 (11477) vs 🛸 (14994) || 🚲 has really suprised me today.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;E.T. (1982)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 🌒 (7313) vs 🌌 (15975) || I am very excited to see 🌌 still in this competition.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;This battle is out of this world!&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 🧨 (8239) vs 🔥 (13588) || This is a match with a special meaning for 🔥.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Uh oh, this is one of those battles where nobody wins.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;🔥 bolting ahead with an alarming lead against 🧨&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Take cover folks, this looks like it's going to be a hot one.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;aaaaaand boom goes the dynamite!&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 🏅 (9309) vs 🏓 (11409) || I am very excited to see 🏅 still in this competition.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Ohhhhhhhh. That one is going to leave a mark.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 🎨 (11242) vs 🥌 (20329) || Look at where you came from 🎨. Look at where you started! You would think that this would be enough.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;C'mon baby put the rock in the house&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 🎵 (10452) vs 🎻 (11806) || 🎵 came to play. It is so obvious.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;It is a battle as old as time itself. 🎵 and 🎻! Facing off against each other again!&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;No, that's not the iTunes logo&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;🎻's tuning might be working against them right now.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 🧮 (13339) vs 💾 (16887) || 💾 is dedicating this match to someone very special in their lives.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Welcome back to the Obsolete Technology Dome!&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;MicroSD Card is watching closely at this battle of two square data storage options&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 🖍 (6157) vs 📚 (16083) || This is going to be a challenge for 📚.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;📚 really left a mark on 🖍 in their last match.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;🖍 really left a mark on 📚 in their last match.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 🗝 (11789) vs 🏹 (14112) || 🏹 is looking fierce, but 🗝 is having none of it.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 🧻 (8107) vs 🧬 (24415) || 🧬 came to play. It is so obvious.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;🧻 and 🧬 are neck and neck here in the final bout of round 3!&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;when either is missing, you're in trouble&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;And 🧻 falls to 🧬. A suprising turn of events.&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Round 5===&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! Competitors and score !! Commentary&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 🙃 (77562) vs 🤔 (85714) || all remaining rounds will be 26 minutes&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;all remaining bouts will be 26 minutes&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Sometimes I think they've gone too far with plastic surgery&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;This one's a fitting start to the round of 32, don't you think?&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Spiderman (2002)&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;these vote totals are getting *close*! 🤔&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;up is down, down is up! 🤔&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;up is down, down is up! 🙃&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Getting knocked out in the round of 32 🙃&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 😎 (35129) vs 😏 (35485) || 😎 and 😏 have been friends for a long time. I am not sure where that relationship is going to be after today.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;wink wink vs nudge nudge&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;The Blues Brothers (1980)&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Can't read my p-p-p-poker face&amp;quot;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Can't read my p-p-p-poker face&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;David Caruso, is that you&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;explicit vs. implicit&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 🙀 (34060) vs 😈 (46401) || Are we about to see a huge upset?&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;The devil went down to kittytown&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;We're not sure which of these is a more accurate representation of a cat&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Both of them like to make your life hell.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Which side are the Hellcats cheering for?&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;9 circles of hell. 9 lives. COINCIDENCE?&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Better the devil you know than the one you pet.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 💖 (15594) vs 👩‍🔬 (43035) || This is a match that no one wanted to deal with until the end.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Love Potion No. 9 (1963)&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;The shine seems to be wearing off for sparkle heart.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;The shine seems to be wearing off for sparkle heart. What's in that flask?&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 🦊 (48941) vs 🧙 (49275) || 🦊 has really suprised me today.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;:leaves:: Target creature gets +3/+3 until end of turn targeting Devilthorn Fox&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;G: Target creature gets +3/+3 until end of turn targeting Devilthorn Fox&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{comic discussion}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:April fools' comics]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Interactive comics]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Emoji]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>162.158.93.105</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:2131:_Emojidome&amp;diff=172012</id>
		<title>Talk:2131: Emojidome</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:2131:_Emojidome&amp;diff=172012"/>
				<updated>2019-04-02T10:44:18Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;162.158.93.105: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&amp;lt;!--Please sign your posts with ~~~~ and don't delete this text. New comments should be added at the bottom.--&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
I've checked the network tab and console - nothing really seems to happen when you vote, which may be something we want to put on the explanation tomorrow - Myxoh&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I suspect the real april fools joke is going to come on Wednesday when xkdc posts an app showing us our psychological profiles that they are now selling to marketing companies after data-mining our emotional preferences to marketing firms - Nosajimiki&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
@Nosajimiki: psychological profiles of xkcd fans. That might be some interesting marketing. - 5Cincinatus&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
@Myxoh: I came here to see if anyone else had noticed this! But, I do also see a websocket connection to emojidome.xkcd.com, I bet it's counting votes that way.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There is a websocket connection. A message is sent every time you vote. It looks like there are also status update messages every second (saying which emoji currently has exactly how many votes, i suspect this changes the amount of hearts that show up), and &amp;quot;bracket start&amp;quot; messages every so often. The bracket start message seems to contain hundreds of upcoming emoji pairs. Edit: a bracket start is sent at the start of every match (so every ~30 seconds). It also contains logs of which messages to show for previous matches, and which emoji are currently battling.[[Special:Contributions/172.69.138.10|172.69.138.10]] 16:30, 1 April 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There seems to be nothing stopping me from clicking multiple times. Do you think it actually counts it all those times? Can I click-spam to say &amp;quot;this is much better&amp;quot;? [[User:Fabian42|Fabian42]] ([[User talk:Fabian42|talk]]) 16:48, 1 April 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Randall just confirmed that you can vote multiple times, although if you click too fasr you get rate limited. (*warning: generic ip address assigned to phone data.*) [[Special:Contributions/172.69.70.47|172.69.70.47]] 22:35, 1 April 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Where did he confirm that? [[Special:Contributions/162.158.93.105|162.158.93.105]] 10:44, 2 April 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Well this is fun. Look like there are 512 symbols, meaning 256 first-round contests. The first round would take (at 38 seconds / round) ~2.7 hours. The remaining rounds, from an estimate of geometric progression, would just under double this, meaning this comic will run for ~ 5 hours until we have our winner... ~alexandicity [[Special:Contributions/172.69.226.177|172.69.226.177]] 16:51, 1 April 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Did he just add a scroll bar to the previous matches? I didn't notice it earlier [[Special:Contributions/162.158.255.148|162.158.255.148]] 18:17, 1 April 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Nope, you were able to scroll before, too. At least about 2 hours ago. [[User:Fabian42|Fabian42]] ([[User talk:Fabian42|talk]]) 18:20, 1 April 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
While some of the recaps of past battles are generic (taco vs sandwich: &amp;quot;One for the history books&amp;quot;), many seem to be specifically written for the battle (light bulb vs candle: &amp;quot;Some would argue that this one was settled in the 1800s&amp;quot;). I wonder if/how much this will continue into round 2.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Round two has just begun, and the timeout has been bumped to 60 seconds. --[[User:Anarcat|Anarcat]] ([[User talk:Anarcat|talk]]) 18:41, 1 April 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:If that trend continues, the full competition will take pretty close to 24 hours. [[User:Fabian42|Fabian42]] ([[User talk:Fabian42|talk]]) 18:45, 1 April 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:It looks like it's 1:14/round, which is double what the time was in round one. Will round three be 2:28? 1:51?&lt;br /&gt;
::It's just over 1:15/round from the history JSON (plus some hundredths of a second, but it appears 1:15 is the intent)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Hadn't looked there. Round one concluded at 18:39:20-ish, 9560 seconds from 16:00:00. At 256 battles, that's 37.34 seconds/battle. However, it looks like the first battle ended at 15:59:57, which would add about 40 seconds, 9600 seconds/256=37.5 seconds exactly. Doubling for round 2 gives 75 seconds.&lt;br /&gt;
::2 minutes 30 seconds per battle now. Looks like each round will be 2 hours 40 minutes long.&lt;br /&gt;
:: Well it is after 5:00 PST and round 4 just started - and this thing is at exactly 5 minutes a round - which means another 160 minutes for the round.  Will see in 2 hours and 40 minutes if the times go up to minutes. --[[Special:Contributions/172.69.33.65|172.69.33.65]] 00:25, 2 April 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
And while the match-ups winners are typically colored, and underlined, the losers are endgame grey.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Has anyone determined if multiple-voting is actually counted? For me at least the vote button fades back to gray after I click it, which implies you can/should click it again, but that may not actually be processed. We might add a clarification about that to the explanation. [[User:Jerodast|- jerodast]] ([[User talk:Jerodast|talk]]) 19:01, 1 April 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
: A reddit user on the r/xkcd thread (https://www.reddit.com/r/xkcd/comments/b84at1/xkcd_2131_emojidome_script_src2131comicjs/) claims to have attempted &amp;quot;vote stuffing via the console&amp;quot; with no noticeable change in vote totals. So it looks like it may be sending it client-side, but only counting the vote once server-side  --l&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Just few minutes ago there was message in &amp;quot;fun facts&amp;quot; that you can click multiple times, although it's not counted if you click too many times (or something like that). I guess that vote stuffing was too much. -- [[User:Hkmaly|Hkmaly]] ([[User talk:Hkmaly|talk]]) 22:34, 1 April 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It would appear that we are supposed to believe the commentary is live, and unscripted:&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot; {&amp;quot;This one is a true test of the audience today.&amp;quot;,&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Just to stress this again. Live commentary, folks. Completely unscripted and coming in hot.} &amp;quot;--[[Special:Contributions/162.158.79.173|162.158.79.173]] 19:20, 1 April 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:It's clearly live because the result of a previous round is affecting the next round's commentary - and the combinatorial explosion would prohibit that from being remotely plausible.  We're watching live comedy here! [[User:SteveBaker|SteveBaker]] ([[User talk:SteveBaker|talk]]) 19:30, 1 April 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
: On the dog vs. wolf, he said &amp;quot;Again, we are getting a lot of questions on this today. This is live commentary, folks.&amp;quot; Proof I guess. HI RANDALL! [[Special:Contributions/172.68.189.241|172.68.189.241]] 19:31, 1 April 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Is there really anything we can put for the transcript? [[Special:Contributions/172.68.189.241|172.68.189.241]] 19:25, 1 April 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
: We can go into the socket data and pull out the commentary for each matchup.  -- [[User:Bobson|Bobson]] ([[User talk:Bobson|talk]]) 04:05, 2 April 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Aby ideas on how the commentary is done? It seems to sort of match the emojis.&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Svízel přítula|Svízel přítula]] ([[User talk:Svízel přítula|talk]]) 19:31, 1 April 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
: It seems that Randall is commetating this live, as he periodcally says it's live in the robot commentator text. See above. [[Special:Contributions/172.68.189.241|172.68.189.241]] 19:36, 1 April 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::Perhaps not &amp;quot;live&amp;quot; as each round 2 matchup was known 160 minutes before it was voted on. He could comment on the battle itself, and/or provide a comment if one or the other combatant won. I think he's a couple hours ahead of us.&lt;br /&gt;
::: I dunno. Whenever a new battle starts, there is a default message, that is soon replaced by a more pertinent message. That seems to suggest that he's doing it on the fly. [[User:9yz|9yz]] ([[User talk:9yz|talk]]) 20:03, 1 April 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::::If that's live, Randall, and if you see this, give us a shout-out as proof. -Brent&lt;br /&gt;
This is a quick piece of python to see the json results (and commentary):&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;import json, urllib.request&lt;br /&gt;
d = json.loads(urllib.request.urlopen(&amp;quot;https://emojidome.xkcd.com/2131/socket  &amp;quot;).read().decode('utf-8'))&lt;br /&gt;
for g in d['bracket']['played'][0]:&lt;br /&gt;
  c1, c2 = g['game']&lt;br /&gt;
  print(f&amp;quot;{c1['score']} {c1['competitor']}-{c2['competitor']} {c2['score']}&amp;quot;)&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Tammo80|Tammo80]] ([[User talk:Tammo80|talk]]) 19:42, 1 April 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: or if you want to see the vote count live in browser: https://emojidome.playcode.io/ -Andy 22:01, April 2019&lt;br /&gt;
:: Awesome, thank you [[User:9yz|9yz]] ([[User talk:9yz|talk]]) 20:23, 1 April 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There must be some kind of manipulation going on with the votes. There is NO WAY the poop emoji would lose to the skull emoji in round two. It was my guess for the winner &amp;gt;:( [[Special:Contributions/162.158.106.138|162.158.106.138]] 20:50, 1 April 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
: And the 100 emoji just lost to the shiny heart. :(&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Well, there's the comment &amp;quot;How do you know for sure that your votes are doing anything?&amp;quot;. For my side because every single one I voted for lost so far. Well, I'm not a lucky charm, apparently... [[Special:Contributions/141.101.104.11|141.101.104.11]] 10:14, 2 April 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The second round bracket was released, but is hidden behind the bottom nav buttons: https://xkcd.com/2131/emojidome_bracket_256.png --[[User:Thefallen138|Thefallen138]] ([[User talk:Thefallen138|talk]]) 20:56, 1 April 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
And now the third round has begun. Strangely, the bracket is not visible yet: https://xkcd.com/2131/emojidome_bracket_128.png. The delay has been bump to something above two minutes as well. --[[User:Anarcat|Anarcat]] ([[User talk:Anarcat|talk]]) 21:21, 1 April 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: It's here https://xkcd.com/2131/emojidome_bracket_round_3.png [[Special:Contributions/162.158.107.79|162.158.107.79]] 21:41, 1 April 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:: It seems to be he overwrote round_3.png with round_4.png (at least its the same picture)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Both the Emojidome and counter were brought together in iframes https://ducakedhare.co.uk/emojidome.html [[Special:Contributions/141.101.99.17|141.101.99.17]] 23:39, 1 April 2019 (UTC)taikedz&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Anyone have an IRC room for Emojidome discussion? [[Special:Contributions/162.158.146.10|162.158.146.10]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== &amp;quot;Emoji&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;emojis&amp;quot; as the plural? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Due to the nature of the Japanese language, &amp;quot;emoji&amp;quot; is technically both the plural and the singular - however, the improper form &amp;quot;emojis&amp;quot; is used more as a plural frequently nowadays among English speakers. Which form should this explanation use? --[[User:Youforgotthisthing|Youforgotthisthing]] ([[User talk:Youforgotthisthing|talk]]) 22:27, 1 April 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The &amp;quot;friends in Australia&amp;quot; comment was made during the last round's wink vs upside down smile battle. This is probably a pun on how Australia is on the other side of the world from America; I don't think Randall was seriously saying he witnessed an influx of Australians inbound. [[Special:Contributions/108.162.219.82|108.162.219.82]] 00:47, 2 April 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Draws ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What would happen if any of the fights resulted in a draw? (same number of votes for both)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Given the # of matchups, it's not actually that unlikely.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We should try to test this. Gotta keep Randall on his feet!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Pretty sure one early on resulted in a tie.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: The very first round was 0-0.  I guess no one refreshed at exactly the right minute to see it. --[[User:Bobson|Bobson]] ([[User talk:Bobson|talk]]) 04:05, 2 April 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: Actually, Birthday Cake vs Cupcake was a tie at 3658:3658. Birthday Cake advanced. I wonder why? (from the socket: [{&amp;quot;score&amp;quot;:3658,&amp;quot;competitor&amp;quot;:&amp;quot;ðŸŽ‚&amp;quot;},{&amp;quot;score&amp;quot;:3658,&amp;quot;competitor&amp;quot;:&amp;quot;ðŸ§&amp;quot;}]) [[Special:Contributions/162.158.106.138|162.158.106.138]] 04:54, 2 April 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Emoji Fonts ==&lt;br /&gt;
Having an emoji font is required to see emoji displayed on sites such as http://srv-01.valo.media/ . If anybody else is looking for a way to display these, there's a good free emoji font available here:&lt;br /&gt;
https://github.com/eosrei/twemoji-color-font&lt;br /&gt;
It includes a script to replace the default Windows emoji fonts to get them to display properly on windows. Unfortunately it's only black-and-white in chrome. If anybody knows any better options, please let me know!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Commentary Transcript == &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I've written a script that pulls the commentary history and transforms it into a wiki table.  It's up to date as of right now, and I'll run it again in the morning and one last time after the final round.  If you have formatting suggestions, just put them here and I'll incorporate it when I regenerate the table.  -- [[User:Bobson|Bobson]] ([[User talk:Bobson|talk]]) 04:58, 2 April 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: Wonderful, thank you! Could you perhaps make the winner bold (or underlined like in the comic)?  -Andy&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Successful Ballot-stuffing? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As I type this, I'm watching owl blast past 180000 votes in the owl-octopus bout. That means that in about 10 minutes, owl has earned more votes than all the votes earned in the entirety of any other individual bout. I could be totally off-base, but that seems vaguely suspicious to me. [[Special:Contributions/162.158.214.82|162.158.214.82]] 05:28, 2 April 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I concur: that is highly suspicious. Fortunately, nothing of importance is at stake here, even if you were really pulling for the octopus. At this moment, we're ±10 minutes into bee vs pineapple and nothing comparable has happened. It may be an isolated incident. [[Special:Contributions/162.158.106.144|162.158.106.144]] 05:50, 2 April 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I've seen enough hentai to...what? The *owl* has won? O RLY? I demand a recount! [[Special:Contributions/141.101.105.6|141.101.105.6]] 08:10, 2 April 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
YOLO. You Obviously Like Owls. [[Special:Contributions/141.101.104.11|141.101.104.11]] 10:11, 2 April 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For the violin vs the curling stone ('classical vs house'), the stone was ahead, but in the last four minutes I spammed my discord server to vote and we just got it over the line. - fudgeforlife&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Avocado quote citation ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I'm not sure where to put this. The &amp;quot;I like avocados because they taste pretty good and also they come with a cool wood ball you get to keep&amp;quot; quote is from here: https://twitter.com/jitka/status/236240801926086656 . [[Special:Contributions/172.69.33.41|172.69.33.41]] 07:15, 2 April 2019 (UTC)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>162.158.93.105</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:Title_text&amp;diff=151445</id>
		<title>Talk:Title text</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:Title_text&amp;diff=151445"/>
				<updated>2018-01-23T08:33:24Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;162.158.93.105: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Everyone except this wiki calls it ‘alt-text’, Randall himself included. See XKCD 45. I vote for changing all occurrences of title text in this wiki to alt-text. --[[Special:Contributions/173.245.51.212|173.245.51.212]] 20:55, 3 July 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
: Randall also called it “title text” twice: [[442]], [[1045]]. —[[Special:Contributions/108.162.253.174|108.162.253.174]] 09:07, 23 June 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
: The link doesn't give any evidence why calling this the 'alt text' is incorrect. But if you inspect the page source, you'll see Randall uses the 'title' attribute, rather than the 'alt' attribute for this purpose. {{unsigned|Accidus}}&lt;br /&gt;
:: This is because while a &amp;quot;title&amp;quot; shows up on mouseover, the &amp;quot;alt&amp;quot; shows up only if the image doesn't load, so you know what was supposed to be there. It'd be harder to cause the image not to load just to see a little extra joke. [[Special:Contributions/172.68.26.23|172.68.26.23]] 12:14, 22 January 2018 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Please stop writing in all-capitals in your edit summaries. It sounds like you're shouting. --[[Special:Contributions/162.158.93.105|162.158.93.105]] 08:33, 23 January 2018 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:This is also because the &amp;quot;alt&amp;quot; attribute is older than the &amp;quot;title&amp;quot; attribute and most browsers used to show the value of &amp;quot;alt&amp;quot; as a tooltip if no &amp;quot;title&amp;quot; was given. --[[Special:Contributions/162.158.93.105|162.158.93.105]] 08:33, 23 January 2018 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Are there actually any comics without title text? If not, I propose removing the first &amp;quot;almost.&amp;quot; [[Special:Contributions/172.68.34.4|172.68.34.4]] 20:54, 17 November 2017 (UTC)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>162.158.93.105</name></author>	</entry>

	</feed>