<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=172.69.156.159</id>
		<title>explain xkcd - User contributions [en]</title>
		<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=172.69.156.159"/>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php/Special:Contributions/172.69.156.159"/>
		<updated>2026-04-16T08:54:11Z</updated>
		<subtitle>User contributions</subtitle>
		<generator>MediaWiki 1.30.0</generator>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:2723:_Outdated_Periodic_Table&amp;diff=304718</id>
		<title>Talk:2723: Outdated Periodic Table</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:2723:_Outdated_Periodic_Table&amp;diff=304718"/>
				<updated>2023-01-13T15:04:46Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;172.69.156.159: Forgot to sign comment&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&amp;lt;!--Please sign your posts with ~~~~ and don't delete this text. New comments should be added at the bottom.--&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Big_Bang_nucleosynthesis BBN did only produce unstable Berylium-7 with a half-life of 53.22 days. Thus after 30 minutes there was still plenty of Be-7 left.&lt;br /&gt;
--[[Special:Contributions/172.71.160.38|172.71.160.38]] 15:36, 11 January 2023 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;unnilium&amp;quot; is a reference to &amp;quot;unnilunium&amp;quot;, which was the name for Mendelevium (atomic number 101; from &amp;quot;un nil un&amp;quot;, 1-0-1) before it was given a formal name. Therefore the 6th new element referenced, on top of the 4 already in the table, would be #10, or &amp;quot;un nil&amp;quot;, or unnilium.  [[Special:Contributions/172.71.190.132|172.71.190.132]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Pentium&amp;quot; was also the first non-numeric name for the Intel family. Before that, it was the 80486/i486. [[Special:Contributions/172.70.134.195|172.70.134.195]] 16:17, 11 January 2023 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Then they chickened out and didn't called the next CPU hexium. -- [[User:Hkmaly|Hkmaly]] ([[User talk:Hkmaly|talk]]) 18:24, 12 January 2023 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::Maybe they considered the Pro, II, III, 4, etc. just as isotopes (or alternate oxidation states!).&lt;br /&gt;
::Though then your criticism still applies to the Core brand (..., 2, i3, etc; although most of that range are clearly imaginary, as well as odd). [[Special:Contributions/162.158.159.75|162.158.159.75]] 19:50, 12 January 2023 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::Because they didn't want to curse it.[[Special:Contributions/172.70.85.200|172.70.85.200]] 12:41, 13 January 2023 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I have a science textbook at home that doesn't have ''any'' elements in a periodic table, though you'd think it should. It has a very nice ''list'' of elements (with dodgy details, e.g. I think at least one of them was later proven to be two separate but tricky to isolate elements), but was written prior to the popularisation of Mendeleev's table. (i.e. post-1869, but not by much!) Now, obviously, I don't want to diss Randall's humour, but I have so few such retro-geeky things I can brag about so I just wanted to mention this in passing. (Also, when I actually did my own chemistry, the lab wall had a PT on it that featured the element &amp;quot;{{w|Dubnium|Hahniun}}&amp;quot;, and some others since replaced/resolved differently. I sometimes still forget myself and refer to the wrong names if I have to answer trivia questions about them ) [[Special:Contributions/172.70.91.127|172.70.91.127]] 23:45, 11 January 2023 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
: It's a proleptic periodic table [[User:Sabik|Sabik]] ([[User talk:Sabik|talk]])&lt;br /&gt;
:: Indeed, but your comment now makes me wonder what a ''pre-lepton'' table would look like. ;) [[Special:Contributions/172.70.85.200|172.70.85.200]] 10:00, 12 January 2023 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Is there a category for comics about the Periodic Table? I recall one from a year or so ago where the symbols were replaced with ones based on the modern names for the elements. [[User:Barmar|Barmar]] ([[User talk:Barmar|talk]]) 05:29, 12 January 2023 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: I think you mean [[2639:_Periodic_Table_Changes]]. --[[Special:Contributions/172.70.242.156|172.70.242.156]] 06:35, 12 January 2023 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
After an edit, I was left with &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;and adding an -[LINEWRAP HERE]ium at the end&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;, at least on my display (may depend on browser/display width, etc). If I adjusted the to bring the characters away from the line-wrap point then it could just break again whenever/wherever it found itself back in the same bit of the screen again, so I tried to quote it, but got &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;and adding an &amp;quot;-[LINEWRAP HERE]ium&amp;quot; at the end&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt; anyway. If anyone can recall how to implement a 'non-breaking ''non-''space' character, or perhaps wishes to aplly a whole wrap-preventing enclosing tag, then I invite them to apply it there. Assuming it isn't edited out of existence, already, and making the issue moot. ;) [[Special:Contributions/172.70.162.222|172.70.162.222]] 16:27, 12 January 2023 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Would this shape of periodic table (with helium separated from lithium and beryllium) make sense before atoms existed? Would researchers from T+90 minutes even see &amp;quot;periods&amp;quot; as a useful way to organize elements? [[Special:Contributions/172.69.156.159|172.69.156.159]] 15:04, 13 January 2023 (UTC)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>172.69.156.159</name></author>	</entry>

	</feed>