<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=172.69.69.46</id>
		<title>explain xkcd - User contributions [en]</title>
		<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=172.69.69.46"/>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php/Special:Contributions/172.69.69.46"/>
		<updated>2026-04-15T18:01:03Z</updated>
		<subtitle>User contributions</subtitle>
		<generator>MediaWiki 1.30.0</generator>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=2038:_Hazard_Symbol&amp;diff=161933</id>
		<title>2038: Hazard Symbol</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=2038:_Hazard_Symbol&amp;diff=161933"/>
				<updated>2018-08-27T14:56:11Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;172.69.69.46: /* Transcript */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{comic&lt;br /&gt;
| number    = 2038&lt;br /&gt;
| date      = August 27, 2018&lt;br /&gt;
| title     = Hazard Symbol&lt;br /&gt;
| image     = hazard_symbol.png&lt;br /&gt;
| titletext = The warning diamond on the Materials Safety Data Sheet for this stuff just has the &amp;quot;😰&amp;quot; emoji in all four fields.&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Explanation==&lt;br /&gt;
{{incomplete|Created by a LASER EMITTING RADIOACTIVE SLIPPERY BIOHAZARD in about 10 minutes, ignoring writing rules. - Please change this comment when editing this page. Do NOT delete this tag too soon.}}&lt;br /&gt;
Hazard symbols are often required to indicate certain threats to human health. These symbols are typically black symbols on yellow backgrounds, a contrast typically associated with danger even in nature. However, these symbols also need to be easy to interpret. Therefore, they have simple, recognizable shapes that are internationally uniform and well-understood.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This comic inverts this latter expectation, by combining multiple hazard symbols into one, creating something that is unique, and very hard to understand. In practice, if such an object were to be labelled, the five hazard symbols would be separated, each in their own triangle.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The title text refers to another unsafe subversion of expectations, in this case, with against the [[wikipedia:NFPA 704|NFPA 704]] &amp;quot;fire diamond&amp;quot;. These are the colourful diamond-shaped symbols often found on the back of tankers, but they are also necessary inclusions on materials safety datasheets. These symbols give numeric indication of the hazardous nature of the material, in three different respects (flammability, health, and reactivity), in addition to providing space for an extra warning on the bottom, typically in the form of one or more letters. Using an emoji instead of numbers and letters would defeat the purpose of the fire diamond, as it would only give a qualitative indication of the danger (&amp;quot;very dangerous&amp;quot;), and additionally, could be very easily mistaken for a 0 (meaning safe).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Transcript==&lt;br /&gt;
{{incomplete transcript|Do NOT delete this tag too soon.}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The comic emphasizes a conglomerate of warning symbols (described below), drawn in black on top of a 'safety-yellow' background. &lt;br /&gt;
*The outer symbol is the outer portion of the international sign for bio hazard (not to be confused with the Jolly Rodger for poison).&lt;br /&gt;
** The section is much larger than the other symbols as it contains them all.&lt;br /&gt;
*At the center of the biohazard's contribution is the international symbol for radiation.&lt;br /&gt;
**The symbol and the remaining symbols are approximately the same size. &lt;br /&gt;
*Directly above (at 12:00) radiation is a common American symbol for slippery floors.&lt;br /&gt;
**It is a line representing the floor, and a person suspended in air and tilted at an angle as though falling backwards.&lt;br /&gt;
*At 4:00, is the symbol for high powered lasers&lt;br /&gt;
**This is tilted approximately 225 degrees and its tail shorted as a result of the conglomeration. &lt;br /&gt;
**This symbol is a trail of a laser, and emission of lines at some imagined point of contact.&lt;br /&gt;
*At 8:00 is the international symbol for high voltage&lt;br /&gt;
**This is tilted approximately 45 degrees, and drawn with significant irregularities.&lt;br /&gt;
**This symbol is an inverted Z like, lightning bolt with an arrow tip. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Under that from is a written caption:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;It's important to know the international warning symbol for radioactive high-voltage laser-emitting biohazards that coat the floor and make it slippery.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{comic discussion}}&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>172.69.69.46</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:1979:_History&amp;diff=155716</id>
		<title>Talk:1979: History</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:1979:_History&amp;diff=155716"/>
				<updated>2018-04-11T20:50:09Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;172.69.69.46: New comment re: erroneous period&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&amp;lt;!--Please sign your posts with ~~~~ and don't delete this text. New comments should be added at the bottom.--&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Heh. I accidentally misread the line, so I thought it said: &amp;quot;I honestly have enough trouble with just the ''president''&amp;quot;. [[User:Linker|Linker]] ([[User talk:Linker|talk]]) 11:48, 11 April 2018 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Same here. Then I thought &amp;quot;What the heck?&amp;quot; and read the last line again. Lol. [[User:Herobrine|Herobrine]] ([[User talk:Herobrine|talk]]) 13:20, 11 April 2018 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::And same here, lol!  I was actually wondering about what the possible motivations could have been to use Megan as the character to say that.  Then I read it again :D [[Special:Contributions/162.158.255.172|162.158.255.172]] 14:26, 11 April 2018 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Considering Randall's opinion on Trump, it made a little sense. But he hasn't ever attacked him directly.[[User:Linker|Linker]] ([[User talk:Linker|talk]]) 15:22, 11 April 2018 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I only make comments, and let others figure out how to edit it into the above.  I once read someplace that there is a reasonable limit to accurate historical research at about 3 centuries- events more than 300 years in the past become more mythological than factual, and events more than 500 years in the past are so remote that we can't even begin to understand the culture in which they occurred.  While there are famous exceptions to this rule, they occur entirely in the realms of either archaeology or  theology and religion, not in the science of history.[[User:Seebert|Seebert]] ([[User talk:Seebert|talk]]) 13:32, 11 April 2018 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:What is &amp;quot;accurate historical research&amp;quot;? No scientist would use those words. And a historian as an expert - let's say of the Roman Empire or the medieval - would strictly disagree. --[[User:Dgbrt|Dgbrt]] ([[User talk:Dgbrt|talk]]) 15:12, 11 April 2018 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Even shorter periods of time.  There were a lot of changes in the twentieth century.  I was born in 1960.  At that time, there were people alive before the automobile, powered airflight, the telephone.  How about photocopiers which really got going in the 1970s?  Can any of you younger people understand not being able to photocopy something?  Then, there are the developments in computers and mobile phones.&lt;br /&gt;
:On a USENET newgroup that I follow -- alt.talk.royalty -- there is one monarchist who posts a series of posts on Queen Elizabeth II.  Sort of.  He takes the current length of her reign and goes back that far before it (less a day, I think).  He then describes the world at that time and finishes with &amp;quot;Consider all the changes, natural and manmade, visited upon the world in all the time since.  And now consider this...Queen Elizabeth II has been on the Throne for MOST of that time since then.&amp;quot;  Twice her reign length from present time is now in the 1880s.  A very different world.&lt;br /&gt;
:[[Special:Contributions/108.162.216.220|108.162.216.220]] 15:16, 11 April 2018 (UTC) Gene Wirchenko genew@telus.net&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The link to the actual page of the paper is fantastic - especially the ads along the right side - &amp;quot;Anti-Morbific, the Great Liver and Kidney Remedy&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;Trash's Magnetic Ointment&amp;quot;. So, a question - there's no by-line. Is there any way to figure out who wrote this? I assume maybe multiple people, like and editorial board? [[User:DanB|DanB]] ([[User talk:DanB|talk]]) 13:36, 11 April 2018 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I think this comic is referencing how so many people are commenting on how unprecedented Trump’s presidency has been, how it’ll be the sort of think future students will read about in history classes, and overall how dramatic it is, like you’d find unbelievable, even in a movie. This comic is commenting on how people in the moment often think that way, yet Trump’ll likely be a footnote in 200 years too. [[User:PotatoGod|PotatoGod]] ([[User talk:PotatoGod|talk]]) 19:24, 11 April 2018 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I need to comment, but I'll do my best to temper it a bit. I think it's a stretch to think this is saying anything about Trump. It seems like this comic is just a reflection on how difficult it is to ever have a complete and thorough account of everything that happens in the history of our world. The best we can hope for is a summary of the general facts, but that will always omit important details - as it says, history is BIG! In summary, can we not make every comic about Trump, please? [[User:Ianrbibtitlht|Ianrbibtitlht]] ([[User talk:Ianrbibtitlht|talk]]) 20:43, 11 April 2018 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There is an erroneous period at the end of the first line of the last paragraph: &amp;quot;...the present. period may...&amp;quot;.  I added the period to the transcript, but I'm not sure if the local policy is to include &amp;quot;[sic]&amp;quot; in the transcript, to note that in an &amp;quot;errors&amp;quot; section, etc.  I'd invite someone who knows the policy to edit the page accordingly.  --[[Special:Contributions/172.69.69.46|172.69.69.46]] 20:50, 11 April 2018 (UTC)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>172.69.69.46</name></author>	</entry>

	</feed>