<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=172.70.134.39</id>
		<title>explain xkcd - User contributions [en]</title>
		<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=172.70.134.39"/>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php/Special:Contributions/172.70.134.39"/>
		<updated>2026-04-14T08:03:11Z</updated>
		<subtitle>User contributions</subtitle>
		<generator>MediaWiki 1.30.0</generator>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:2943:_Unsolved_Chemistry_Problems&amp;diff=344030</id>
		<title>Talk:2943: Unsolved Chemistry Problems</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:2943:_Unsolved_Chemistry_Problems&amp;diff=344030"/>
				<updated>2024-06-08T04:55:53Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;172.70.134.39: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&amp;lt;!--Please sign your posts with ~~~~ and don't delete this text. New comments should be added at the bottom.--&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
P stands for poncentration, SMH my head 😒 --[[Special:Contributions/172.70.162.211|172.70.162.211]] 21:22, 7 June 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Is 'depolymerization' in this context referring to means of chemically recycling plastics? As I understand it, we basically just do recycling of thermoplastics at the moment by physically melting them, whereas being able to split a plastic apart into its component monomers would in principle enable a completely closed loop lifecycle for plastics, easing the strain on dwindling oil reserves and landfills and whatnot. Since these are supposed to be important unsolved problems, I feel like it probably is a reference to this, but I'm not a chemist and there may be something else which makes more sense. [[Special:Contributions/162.158.33.134|162.158.33.134]] 22:37, 7 June 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
i've always been taught that the p stood for &amp;quot;parts&amp;quot;. [[user talk:lettherebedarklight|youtu.be/miLcaqq2Zpk]] 04:01, 8 June 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:In chemistry, I was taught that it was &amp;quot;potential&amp;quot;. I didn't even know this was in dispute. [[User:L-Space Traveler|L-Space Traveler]] ([[User talk:L-Space Traveler|talk]]) 04:54, 8 June 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
P does not stand for anything. Originally, it was contrasted with q. Sørensen was performing electrochemical experiments and contrasted the reference electrode q with the hydrogen electrode p. Using p and q like this is common, like using x and y, u and v, or m and n. It's not an abbreviation, just a variable name. He recommended normalizing the concentration of hydrogen ions (i.e. dividing it by 1 mol/l) and calling the result Cₚ or C_q (depending on the electrode). Then each of these tends to be a small number, which we could write as 10^(-p) or 10^(-q). The number p⁺_H then represented the negative log of the normalized concentration of hydrogen cations at the hydrogen electrode. You can read about it in &amp;quot;The origin and the meaning of the little p in pH&amp;quot; by Jens G. Nørby, published in Cell. The associations with words like &amp;quot;power&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;potential&amp;quot; are now widely considered urban legends. [[Special:Contributions/172.70.134.39|172.70.134.39]] 04:55, 8 June 2024 (UTC)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>172.70.134.39</name></author>	</entry>

	</feed>