<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=172.71.166.98</id>
		<title>explain xkcd - User contributions [en]</title>
		<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=172.71.166.98"/>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php/Special:Contributions/172.71.166.98"/>
		<updated>2026-04-16T19:31:39Z</updated>
		<subtitle>User contributions</subtitle>
		<generator>MediaWiki 1.30.0</generator>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:333:_Getting_Out_of_Hand&amp;diff=363371</id>
		<title>Talk:333: Getting Out of Hand</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:333:_Getting_Out_of_Hand&amp;diff=363371"/>
				<updated>2025-01-23T19:06:05Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;172.71.166.98: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;The headline &amp;quot;Getting Out of Hand&amp;quot; appears to be a double entendre when the word &amp;quot;hand&amp;quot; is taken literally. [[User:Danshoham|Mountain Hikes]] ([[User talk:Danshoham|talk]]) 17:18, 6 October 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You could extend this to AI/LLM's nowadays.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>172.71.166.98</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=1696:_AI_Research&amp;diff=333209</id>
		<title>1696: AI Research</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=1696:_AI_Research&amp;diff=333209"/>
				<updated>2024-01-19T22:17:21Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;172.71.166.98: /* Explanation */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{comic&lt;br /&gt;
| number    = 1696&lt;br /&gt;
| date      = June 20, 2016&lt;br /&gt;
| title     = AI Research&lt;br /&gt;
| image     = ai_research.png&lt;br /&gt;
| titletext = Lambda calculus? More like SHAMbda calculus, amirite?&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Explanation==&lt;br /&gt;
This is another one of [[Randall|Randall's]] [[:Category:Tips|Tips]], this time an AI Tip.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Developing {{w|artificial intelligence}} (AI) has been a challenge for a long time. Even to develop one with the intelligence of a six-year-old child would be a great milestone, and presumably a stepping stone on the path to making one with the intelligence of an adult human.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In this comic, [[Randall]]/[[Cueball]] jokingly suggests that in order to accomplish this goal, one can give him an AI that's already as smart as an adult, and let him teach it childish and silly things. He is shown teaching it dumb jokes, much like the ones a sassy six-year-old would make, as the first {{w|Flatulence humor|&amp;quot;fart&amp;quot; joke}} where ''art''ificial is changed to ''fart''ificial.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The humor in the comic is that Randall is essentially accomplishing the present goal of a six-year-old-equivalent AI by starting with the final goal, which is a full human intelligence, and making it dumber, just by teaching it poor humor. This is not unlike the old joke, &amp;quot;The easiest way to make a small fortune on Wall Street [or similar] is to start with a large one.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The specific situation may also be a reference to {{w|Tay (bot)|Tay}}, a Microsoft chatbot that was taught to {{w|internet troll|troll}} within hours of its exposure to the public.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;[http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=up%20dog Updog]&amp;quot; refers to a light-hearted {{w|practical joke}} in which the perpetrator casually uses the neologism 'updog' in a sentence (&amp;quot;Hey, I'm going to get some updog, you want any?&amp;quot;). The unsuspecting listener is expected to be curious about the meaning of the neologism and ask the perpetrator its meaning, specifically in the format &amp;quot;What's 'updog'?&amp;quot;, inadvertently invoking the highly casual greeting of &amp;quot;What's up, dawg?&amp;quot;. The perpetrator then draws attention to this by replying along the lines of &amp;quot;Not much, you?&amp;quot;, causing the target to realize the foolish thing they just said. Other neologisms used in the context of this joke include 'updoc', 'snoo', 'samatta', and 'butfor' (&amp;quot;[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pwLn_His9Yw What's up, doc?]&amp;quot;, &amp;quot;What's new?&amp;quot;, &amp;quot;What's the matter?&amp;quot;, and &amp;quot;What's a butt for?&amp;quot;, respectively). Updog is mainly an American joke not particularly well known in other English-speaking countries.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the title text there is a joke on {{w|lambda calculus}}, where ''lam''bda is changed to ''SHAM''bda. Lambda calculus is an area of mathematical logic and theoretical computer science. It is a formal language which can express computation and evaluation. It is Turing Complete, which means it can do any computation which can be executed by a computer. However, it is very simple, consisting only of two primitive notions: ''abstraction'', which is forming a unary function (a function that takes one argument) and ''application'' which is applying a function to an input value. For example, a function which squares a given number can be written λx.x². Here the ''λ'' indicates an abstraction (hence the name ''lambda calculus''), the ''x'' is the input value and the output is ''x²''. As an example of application, if we apply this function to 5, we get (λx.x²)(5) = 5² = 25. The title text makes fun of this by inserting the word &amp;quot;Sham&amp;quot; into the phrase, a word used to describe a trick or con; essentially, it denies that such calculus is useful or valid.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The title text finishes with ''[http://da.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=amirite amirite]'', short for ''am I right?'' which is often used to finish sentences on web forums, to prevent anyone saying you are wrong. Not very mature to use in a serious discussion, so very fit to use for a AI that tries to emulate the intelligence of a six-year-old.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Transcript==&lt;br /&gt;
:[Cueball, is gesturing, with his hands held out in front of him, towards a large computer console with several screens, buttons and unreadable text. They are talking. The computers reply is indicated to come from the console with a zigzag line, rather than the straight lines for Cueball.]&lt;br /&gt;
:Cueball: Then you say &amp;quot;More like ''fart''ificial intelligence!&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
:Computer: Understood.&lt;br /&gt;
:Cueball: Great! Now let me teach you about &amp;quot;updog&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[Caption beneath the panel:]&lt;br /&gt;
:AI tip: To develop a computer with the intelligence of a six-year-old child, start with one as smart as an adult and let me teach it stuff.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{comic discussion}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Comics featuring Cueball]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Tips]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Artificial Intelligence]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Computers]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Math]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>172.71.166.98</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=2875:_2024&amp;diff=331861</id>
		<title>2875: 2024</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=2875:_2024&amp;diff=331861"/>
				<updated>2024-01-02T16:35:56Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;172.71.166.98: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
== Headline text ==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;noinclude&amp;gt;:''This page refers to the comic named &amp;quot;2024&amp;quot;. For comic #2024, see [[2024: Light Hacks]].''&amp;lt;/noinclude&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{comic&lt;br /&gt;
| number    = 2875&lt;br /&gt;
| date      = January 1, 2024&lt;br /&gt;
| title     = 2024&lt;br /&gt;
| image     = 2024_2x.png&lt;br /&gt;
| imagesize = 740x553px&lt;br /&gt;
| noexpand  = true&lt;br /&gt;
| titletext = It wasn't originally constitutionally required, but presidents who served two terms have traditionally followed George Washington's example and gotten false teeth.&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Explanation==&lt;br /&gt;
{{incomplete|Created by OBAMA'S TEETH - Please change this comment when editing this page. Do NOT delete this tag too soon.}}&lt;br /&gt;
In what starts off almost like a &amp;quot;[[:Category:Comics to make one feel old|doesn't time fly?]]&amp;quot; scene, the unstoppable progression of the calendar is observed, as [[Ponytail]] points out that it's now 2024. [[Cueball]], in response, notes that it is an election year, in this context a {{w|President of the United States#Election|US ''Presidential'' election}} year, which occurs every four years and has (in one form or other) since 1788. Ponytail then replies in some form of exasperated tone that they &amp;quot;keep on happening&amp;quot;, which is true but (normally) unsurprising, even/especially with other major elections happening every two years, presumably not compared to how [https://www.bristol247.com/news-and-features/news/youre-joking-not-another-one/ some other democracies] might be less predictable/more frequent.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On top of this, Ponytail seems to have not been aware (or maybe has chosen to forget) the passing of two whole election cycles (and two newer incumbents) as the discussion focuses upon {{w|Barack Obama}}, the ''former'' US President. Ponytail seems to be quite behind the times as she asks if Obama is still president (he left office January 20th, 2017, which was 7 (!) years ago, a fact that Cueball cannot quite believe Ponytail is ignorant of). Ponytail states that she liked him, and wonders if he'll be up for taking on the position again. But Cueball states that he ''can't'' be made President again, having already served two terms, which Ponytail confirms by checking for herself the details of the {{w|Twenty-second Amendment to the United States Constitution}}.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The humor in the comic comes in the second half; Cueball and Ponytail discuss whether Obama is the same person (like the mythical {{w|Ship of Theseus}}, most of his constituent cells are frequently replaced), with Ponytail looking into the possibility of Obama's re-election based upon philosophical/biological technicalities (as applied to the Constitution's words), rather than as legal/political convention might normally suggest. But when even that approach is seen to be wanting, requiring a wait significantly exceeding 30 years, Ponytail suggests negating that issue by having all of Obama's teeth removed and replaced with false teeth.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In order to facilitate the latter goal, Ponytail announces her intention to consult a dentist and (for exact reasons that can only be guessed at) a lawyer. Seeing where her current misplaced, and {{w|Dunning–Kruger effect|less than informed}}, zeal might be leading her, Cueball gives his prediction that the probable {{w|Supreme Court of the United States|ultimate legal arbiters}} of her plan might be unanimous in rejecting its validity (if not dissuading its attempt). SCOTUS being unanimous on an issue is now a [https://www.scotusblog.com/2022/07/as-unanimity-declines-conservative-majoritys-power-runs-deeper-than-the-blockbuster-cases/ comparatively rare event&amp;lt;!-- I looked for a decent post-2021 summary, but could not find one, perhaps someone else could check and replace/rephrase if they can establish better search engine skills--&amp;gt;].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The title text references {{w|George Washington's teeth|George Washington's (in)famous 'false teeth'}}. Washington's dentures are often falsely claimed to be made of wood; in truth they were ''real'' teeth procured from other sources. Regardless, this would have likely resolved the rather specific problems established in the philosophical conundrum, and the title text claims that other presidents used this plan to get around the Constitutional limitations concerned in case they wanted to serve more than two terms.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
However, no one has yet even ''needed'' to carry out this plan. Only one President has exceeded the limit; {{w|Franklin D. Roosevelt}} died in office during his ''fourth'' term, but he served prior to the 22nd Amendment and was thus unaffected by the rule, which was enacted six years after his death. (FDR did have a partial denture, but given that he retained some of his natural teeth, he did not engage in Ponytail's proposed scheme.) Presidents since then have definitely tried various schemes aimed at securing a second term, with both successes and failures, but nobody has yet planned ''this particular plan'' to achieve a third or beyond. Or at least one can assume that those that perhaps did (including, as noted, all those who were not yet 'required' to go to these lengths) failed to attain their goals for entirely different reasons.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Transcript==&lt;br /&gt;
{{incomplete transcript|Do NOT delete this tag too soon.}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[Ponytail and Cueball are walking.]&lt;br /&gt;
:Ponytail: So this is 2024.&lt;br /&gt;
:Cueball: Yup. Guess it's an election year now.&lt;br /&gt;
:Ponytail: Again? Man, those just keep happening, huh?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[Ponytail and Cueball now standing.]&lt;br /&gt;
:Ponytail: Who's the president these days, anyway? Is it still Obama?&lt;br /&gt;
:Cueball: What? No? He hasn't been... How do you not...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[Ponytail and Cueball still standing.]&lt;br /&gt;
:Ponytail: Darn, I liked him. Is he running this time?&lt;br /&gt;
:Cueball: No, he's not allowed to.&lt;br /&gt;
:Ponytail: He's not? Why?&lt;br /&gt;
:Cueball: Constitution.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[Ponytail checks her smartphone.]&lt;br /&gt;
:Phone: ''Amendment 22''&lt;br /&gt;
:Phone: No person shall be elected to the office of the president more than twice&lt;br /&gt;
:Ponytail: What?? C'mon...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[Ponytail talking to Cueball.]&lt;br /&gt;
:Ponytail: Don't all your cells get replaced every seven years, Ship of Theseus-style? Is he even the same person?&lt;br /&gt;
:Ponytail: Maybe &amp;quot;no person shall be elected more than twice&amp;quot; isn't a prohibition, it's more of an observation, like &amp;quot;you can't step in the same river twice.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[Zoom in on Cueball.]&lt;br /&gt;
:Cueball: Isn't the cell thing a myth?&lt;br /&gt;
:Cueball: I think tooth enamel has a turnover half-life of 30+ years. His teeth molecules are probably the same.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[Ponytail heads off with a finger raised.]&lt;br /&gt;
:Ponytail: So if Obama just gets false teeth, he can run again! I need to talk to a dentist and a lawyer!&lt;br /&gt;
:Cueball: The Supreme Court is about to vote 9-0 to block your number.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{comic discussion}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Comics featuring Ponytail]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Comics featuring Cueball]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Elections]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Politics]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Biology]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>172.71.166.98</name></author>	</entry>

	</feed>