<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=173.245.50.83</id>
		<title>explain xkcd - User contributions [en]</title>
		<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=173.245.50.83"/>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php/Special:Contributions/173.245.50.83"/>
		<updated>2026-06-24T20:55:09Z</updated>
		<subtitle>User contributions</subtitle>
		<generator>MediaWiki 1.30.0</generator>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:1733:_Solar_Spectrum&amp;diff=127174</id>
		<title>Talk:1733: Solar Spectrum</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:1733:_Solar_Spectrum&amp;diff=127174"/>
				<updated>2016-09-16T15:37:47Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;173.245.50.83: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&amp;lt;!--Please sign your posts with ~~~~--&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Sun in sunglasses is also in whatif &amp;quot;Into the sun&amp;quot; and I'm 99% sure this is not the only xkcd appearance of that... --[[Special:Contributions/162.158.86.119|162.158.86.119]] 11:38, 15 September 2016 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Why is Randall using JPEG for the second time in a row? Gosh, the comics look horrifying when zoomed in. [[Special:Contributions/108.162.244.67|108.162.244.67]] 12:35, 15 September 2016 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:It looks like a .PNG to me, maybe the .jpg was temporary for an upload deadline?  [[Special:Contributions/108.162.241.127|108.162.241.127]] 12:54, 15 September 2016 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::The one on this page has always been a png file (see [http://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=1733:_Solar_Spectrum&amp;amp;oldid=127003 the first revision]). This also means that whoever wrote the complaint must have had access to [http://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php/File:solar_spectrum.png this same file], which has not been updated here since. Of course Randall may have had another version up first, but that seems highly unlikely... --[[User:Kynde|Kynde]] ([[User talk:Kynde|talk]]) 14:38, 15 September 2016 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Are the spectral lines actually accurate apart from the sunglasses? Wouldn't surprise me to much... (Meh, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fraunhofer_lines, believably close). [[Special:Contributions/141.101.105.10|141.101.105.10]] 12:51, 15 September 2016 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I feel we need an explanation of the concept of spectral lines for those readers not familiar with absorption spectra [[Special:Contributions/141.101.70.91|141.101.70.91]] 13:21, 15 September 2016 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I think he's referring to the spectral lines of transition metals - not pictures of the sun wear glasses. The transition lenses reference is a play on words. &lt;br /&gt;
[[Special:Contributions/108.162.218.154|108.162.218.154]] 13:27, 15 September 2016 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Can we figure out what sunglasses he is referring to by comparing the spectral absorption of different brands? [[Special:Contributions/108.162.246.119|108.162.246.119]] 14:06, 15 September 2016 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Any good links to &amp;quot;permanent&amp;quot; images of a sun with sunglasses? Guess there is none of Wikipedia? --[[User:Kynde|Kynde]] ([[User talk:Kynde|talk]]) 14:38, 15 September 2016 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:I agree this refers to &amp;quot;Transitions&amp;quot; light-reacting prescription sunglasses / regular reading glasses.  However, Google won't give me a sun wearing sunglasses picture unless I type in &amp;quot;sun&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;sunglasses&amp;quot;.  Not for Transitions or Reactolite, not for weather forecasts, not for emojis.  With eyes yes, big smile too, but not shades.  I suppose because it actually is a stupid thing for the sun to have.  Otherwise, nearest I get: http://www.essilor.com/en/BrandsAndProducts/Lenses/Photochromics/Pages/CrizalTransitions.aspx  :-)  &amp;quot;30% faster&amp;quot; (than what?  taking off the glasses?)  Robert Carnegie rja.carnegie@excite.com [[Special:Contributions/141.101.98.90|141.101.98.90]] 15:11, 15 September 2016 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
See: http://imgur.com/a/35RDC [[Special:Contributions/162.158.203.147|162.158.203.147]] 14:18, 15 September 2016 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Is there a category for comics without characters? Are there enough comics to need a new category? [[User:GizmoDude|GizmoDude]] ([[User talk:GizmoDude|talk]]) 14:27, 15 September 2016 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:There are many many comics without characters, so it would be a huge job to make such a category and they do not necessarily have anything in common like two comics with [[Blondie]] for instance does. So I would say no. --[[User:Kynde|Kynde]] ([[User talk:Kynde|talk]]) 14:38, 15 September 2016 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;quot;Charts&amp;quot; looks right, seems implicitly to cover &amp;quot;infographics&amp;quot; (btw I agree with worrying about readers who don't know what spectral lines actually are although clearly everyone writing here does, or thinks so).  Another possible edition for other cases is &amp;quot;Landscapes&amp;quot; but those in fact tend to have people in (or Mars rovers or such), also landscape in the sense of vista may be covered by &amp;quot;Large drawings&amp;quot; unless that specifically means &amp;quot;Image is larger than the pane on screen&amp;quot;, since there also isn't a Scroll it&amp;quot; category.  Alternatively...  &amp;quot;Spectacles&amp;quot;.  Robert Carnegie rja.carnegie@excite.com [[Special:Contributions/141.101.98.90|141.101.98.90]] 15:23, 15 September 2016 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ya'll should keep in mind the large number of multivitamins that use rainbows as part of their branding and often some form of spectra/spectrum as part of the brand name. Here's a relevant image: http://centrum.com/sites/default/files/wheel_silver_adults_0.png [[Special:Contributions/173.245.48.65|173.245.48.65]] 17:59, 15 September 2016 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Except Centrum is the only brand I've seen that does that. [[Special:Contributions/141.101.70.61|141.101.70.61]] 08:03, 16 September 2016 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There's another image of a Sun with sunglasses (and a giant banana) at http://what-if.xkcd.com/129/ [[User:Jojonete|Jojonete]] ([[User talk:Jojonete|talk]]) 22:59, 15 September 2016 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
And perhaps we should acknowledge John Finnemore's terrific sketch about J M W Turner painting sunglasses on the sun (transcribed here: http://j-f-s-p.livejournal.com/5403.html). {{unsigned ip|141.101.70.49}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Given that all the lines for the sunglasses are in the red-orange spectrum I took it as a joke about glasses &amp;lt;a href=https://www.google.com/search?q=orange+wraparound&amp;amp;ie=utf-8&amp;amp;oe=utf-8#q=orange+wrap+around+glasses&amp;gt;similar to these.&amp;lt;/a&amp;gt;  Sorry I can't find the exact model I've seen in ads from the early 90s of wraparound over regular glasses that were orangish (old style Blue Blockers.) [[Special:Contributions/108.162.216.128|108.162.216.128]] 14:22, 16 September 2016 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The idea of the sun wearing transitions lenses became even more silly when I did a little research and found that the silver chloride that they often make transitions lenses with actually has a lower melting point (455°C) than glass itself typically has (1400°C to 1600°C.) I'm not sure that this has any relevance, but I was trying to find a plausible connection between the fabrication of transitions lenses as opposed to standard lenses and the use a sun (a sentient sun) might have for them.   [[Special:Contributions/173.245.50.83|173.245.50.83]] 15:37, 16 September 2016 (UTC) Sam&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>173.245.50.83</name></author>	</entry>

	</feed>