<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=42.book.addict</id>
		<title>explain xkcd - User contributions [en]</title>
		<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=42.book.addict"/>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php/Special:Contributions/42.book.addict"/>
		<updated>2026-06-24T23:07:39Z</updated>
		<subtitle>User contributions</subtitle>
		<generator>MediaWiki 1.30.0</generator>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=2288:_Collector%27s_Edition&amp;diff=413993</id>
		<title>2288: Collector's Edition</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=2288:_Collector%27s_Edition&amp;diff=413993"/>
				<updated>2026-05-31T01:13:16Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;42.book.addict: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{comic&lt;br /&gt;
| number    = 2288&lt;br /&gt;
| date      = April 3, 2020&lt;br /&gt;
| title     = Collector's Edition&lt;br /&gt;
| image     = collectors_edition.png&lt;br /&gt;
| titletext = I'm sure you can find some suitable worldbuilding material if you scavenge through the archives.&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{series&lt;br /&gt;
| series        = April&lt;br /&gt;
| number        = 12&lt;br /&gt;
| date          = April 3, 2020&lt;br /&gt;
| days_late     = 2&lt;br /&gt;
| day_category  = Friday&lt;br /&gt;
| prev_title    = 1975: Right Click&lt;br /&gt;
| prev_date     = April 1, 2019&lt;br /&gt;
| next_title    = 2445: Checkbox&lt;br /&gt;
| next_date     = April 1, 2021&lt;br /&gt;
| extra_text    = [[#Trivia|Learn why this comic was released late]].&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{TOC}}To experience the interactivity of the game, visit the {{xkcd|2288|original comic}}!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Explanation==&lt;br /&gt;
{{incomplete|Need to finish uploading the few files of loot missing (UPDATE: Only a few are missing!!!) and loot descriptions.}}&lt;br /&gt;
This comic is a large draggable image that acted as a shared virtual sandbox for users to interact. Chests are &amp;quot;Items&amp;quot; (small and often humorous images) which could be collected from other comics, and then placed in this image by viewers, but today they are no longer dropped. The collection then updated for all viewers in real-time. Multiples of the same item are often seen. There is a &amp;quot;backpack&amp;quot; at the bottom, similar to backpacks in video games containing items collected by the player. As hinted by the title text, items could be found by visiting different xkcd comics/pages. Randomly, some pages would have a treasure chest which contained the sticker related to the page. The hint would refer to the page which currently had a chest.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The image at the origin is a reference to [[1450: AI-Box Experiment]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The comic contains 32993 separate images. The sticker images can be seen at xkcd.com/2288/collectors/static/loot/loot_'''XXX'''.png, where XXX is a number from 001 to 253. Additionally, some images can be found at custom URLs, for example the periodic elements can be found at &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;h&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;ttps://xkcd.com/2288/collectors/static/loot/element-'''XX'''.png, where XX is the element, and text loot at xkcd.com/2288/collectors/static/loot/loot-words-'''X'''.png, where X is the sentence. The [https://github.com/xkcd/maple source code] for the comic was released on GitHub.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Placement is limited to 10,000 horizontal units and 5,000 vertical units from the origin. Users received no messages if they try placing something outside the boundary, with a silent fail and the object not being placed. The coordinates are relative to the bottom left corner of the canvas. As the default coordinates are (-370,-277) and the origin is in the center, the displayed portion of the canvas can be found to be twice this in magnitude, 740 x 544 units. The most common image is loot-30.png, which appears 2576 times.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:2288_full.png|100000px|thumb|left|The full image]]{{clear}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Hints ===&lt;br /&gt;
For a more minimal list of the stickers found in the comic, see [[2288: Collector's Edition/Stickers]].&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable sortable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
!Sticker&lt;br /&gt;
!Hint&lt;br /&gt;
!Comic&lt;br /&gt;
!Item unlocked&lt;br /&gt;
!Notes&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:2288_loot_019.png|50px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|Doctors in a row&lt;br /&gt;
|[[239: Blagofaire]]&lt;br /&gt;
|Cory Doctorow&lt;br /&gt;
|These comics all have the same hint, but only one will have the chest&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:2288_loot_246.png|75px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|Get out the (US) vote&lt;br /&gt;
|Chapter 5 of What If? (New York Style Time Machine)&lt;br /&gt;
|Statue of liberty&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:2288_loot_126.png|75px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|Find a box of nice stuff on a picture with words like these&lt;br /&gt;
|[[ 1375: Astronaut Vandalism]]&lt;br /&gt;
|Signpost&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:2288_loot_228.png|50px]] or [[File:Miniloot-words-dispenser.png|75px]] (maybe incomplete)&lt;br /&gt;
|Plug in or find another power source&lt;br /&gt;
|[[1373: Screenshot]]&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:2288_loot_090.png|75px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|Sweet dreams, kitty&lt;br /&gt;
|[[729: Laser Pointer]] (maybe incomplete)&lt;br /&gt;
|Cat licking laser point&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:2288_loot_185.png|75px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|What is this hint pointing to? Hell if I know.&lt;br /&gt;
|[[1052: Every Major's Terrible]]&lt;br /&gt;
|2 + lightbulb = boat&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:loot 197.png|75px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|Somebody set up us the bomb&lt;br /&gt;
|[[286: All Your Base]]&lt;br /&gt;
|Exploding rock/planet crypton&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:loot 175.png|75px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|Cowabunga&lt;br /&gt;
|[[1412: Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles]] (maybe incomplete)&lt;br /&gt;
|Women Science Fiction Authors&lt;br /&gt;
|[[197: Ninja Turtles]] also works&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:loot 210.png|75px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|I want to believe&lt;br /&gt;
|[[2156: Ufo]]&lt;br /&gt;
|Ufo&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:loot 044.png|75px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|Bleeped&lt;br /&gt;
|[[290]], [[398]], [[430]], [[447]], [[533]], [[549]], [[677]], [[724]] or [[1671]]&lt;br /&gt;
|*$@#!&lt;br /&gt;
|Comics whose titles involve profanities or similar insults.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:loot 159.png|75px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|why waste time say few word when lot word do trick&lt;br /&gt;
|[[7]], [[111]], [[139]], [[143]], [[179]], [[217]], [[445]], [[470]], [[822]], [[823]], [[1022]], [[1247]], [[1491]], [[1921]], [[1991]], [[2182]] or [[2231]]&lt;br /&gt;
|First Annual Award for Excellence in Being Very Smart&lt;br /&gt;
|Comics with titles that are six or more words (with the exception of [[111]], which has five and a spaced dash).&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:loot 006.png|75px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|Cooler than electric scooters&lt;br /&gt;
|[[139]], [[409]], [[577]], [[578]], [[579]], [[580]] or [[581]]&lt;br /&gt;
|An electric skateboard&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:loot 095.png|75px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|Take it from the top&lt;br /&gt;
|[[1: Barrel - Part 1]] (maybe incomplete)&lt;br /&gt;
|I am a turtle from [[889: Turtles]]&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:loot 031.png|75px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|I accept the yucca gnocchi, this meal is a success!&lt;br /&gt;
|[[1713: 50 ccs]] (maybe incomplete)&lt;br /&gt;
|Man carrying parentheses from [[297: Lisp Cycles]]&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|Catch up on the news&lt;br /&gt;
|[[1699: Local News]] (maybe incomplete)&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:loot 096.png|75px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|Participation trophy&lt;br /&gt;
|[[2288: Collector's Edition]] (maybe incomplete)&lt;br /&gt;
|Server rack&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:loot 161.png|75px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|Find an opportunity for a sojourn&lt;br /&gt;
|[[665]], [[681]], [[695]], [[1091]], [[1504]], [[1613]], [[1663]] or [[2111]]&lt;br /&gt;
|Opportunity Mars rover from [[2111: Opportunity Rover]]&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:loot 159.png|75px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|Tastier than tau day&lt;br /&gt;
|[[179: e to the pi times i]] (maybe incomplete)&lt;br /&gt;
|First annual award for excellence in being very smart&lt;br /&gt;
|Need to find out the difference between this, and the entry below!&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:loot 056.png|75px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|Tastier than tau day&lt;br /&gt;
|[[235]], [[396]], [[872]], [[1029]], [[1342]], [[1655]] or [[1967]]&lt;br /&gt;
|Pie sign&lt;br /&gt;
|Published on Pi day&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:loot 216.png|75px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|418 I'm a teapot&lt;br /&gt;
|[[1866: Russell's Teapot]] (maybe incomplete)&lt;br /&gt;
|S.S. NASA: Space is Hard&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:loot 205.png|75px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|26th September, 1983&lt;br /&gt;
|[[2052: Stanislav Petrov Day]]&lt;br /&gt;
|White dove&lt;br /&gt;
|Might also be written &amp;quot;September 26th, 1983&amp;quot;. Locale dependent?&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:loot 151.png|75px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|There are 4241 as of Apr 1, 2020&lt;br /&gt;
|[[1071: Exoplanets]] (maybe incomplete)&lt;br /&gt;
|Little girl from [[2264: Satellite]]&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:loot 079.png|75px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|asableiK&lt;br /&gt;
|[[645: RPS]]&lt;br /&gt;
|A reverse Polish hotdog&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;quot;Kielbasa&amp;quot; backwards, which is &amp;quot;sausage&amp;quot; in Polish&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:loot 203.png|75px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|Critical mass elements&lt;br /&gt;
|[[235: Kite]] or [[239: Blagofaire]]&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:loot 036.png|150x150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|Some Februarys are more equal than others&lt;br /&gt;
|[[390: Nightmares]]? (maybe incomplete)&lt;br /&gt;
|Cueball wheelie from [[272: Linux User at Best Buy]]&lt;br /&gt;
|Comic-hint connection largely conjectural; 390 was the first comic published on a leap day.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:loot 022.png|150x150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|Five spice&lt;br /&gt;
|[[1511: Spice Girl]] or [[1554: Spice Girls]]&lt;br /&gt;
|Rock guitarist&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:loot 058.png|75px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|Call the plumber&lt;br /&gt;
|[[423: Finish Line]]&lt;br /&gt;
|Luigi in a green Kart&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:loot 103.png|150x150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|Was it a rat I saw?&lt;br /&gt;
|[[968: Everything]]&lt;br /&gt;
|Cueball with a large sack, pulling a wagon&lt;br /&gt;
|or [[1503: Squirrel Plan]] for Cueball holding a balloon caught in a ceiling fan.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:loot 045.png|75px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|Churchill's gonna have to seriously rehydrate&lt;br /&gt;
|[[346: Diet Coke+Mentos]]&lt;br /&gt;
|Bottle of soda&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|Keep coming back&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:loot 235.png|75px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|A new model released each year&lt;br /&gt;
|Triggered by visiting all xkcd phone comics in order&lt;br /&gt;
|Phone screaming &amp;quot;Noooo&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:loot 232.png|75px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|Tea Time&lt;br /&gt;
|Maybe [[581: The Race: Part 5]]? Need confirmation.&lt;br /&gt;
|All our tea&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:loot 092.png|75px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|Try pattern-matching! Look for comic 'bout alphabet?&lt;br /&gt;
|[[1045: Constraints]]&lt;br /&gt;
|Two Tetris blocks&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:loot 021.png|75px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|Where's Hilbert?&lt;br /&gt;
|[[195: Map of the Internet]] (maybe incomplete)&lt;br /&gt;
|Hilbert Curve&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:loot 202.png|75px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|Science fiction fetish&lt;br /&gt;
|[[1585: Similarities]]&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:loot 250.png|75px]] / [[File:loot 067.png|75px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|The first one was funnier&lt;br /&gt;
|[[11: Barrel - Part 2]] (maybe incomplete)&lt;br /&gt;
|Falling feather / Sign &amp;quot;The uncomfortable truths well&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:loot 127.png|75px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|It's up to over 260 million cycles!&lt;br /&gt;
|[[1941: Dying Gift]]&lt;br /&gt;
|Megan on a tire swing&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:loot 163.png|75px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|Sleeping Beauty is the same everywhere though&lt;br /&gt;
|[[2233: Aurora Meaning]] (maybe incomplete)&lt;br /&gt;
|Sleeping Cat&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:loot 191.png|75px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|On the internet, nobody knows you're an arachnid&lt;br /&gt;
|[[1530: Keyboard Mash]] (maybe incomplete)&lt;br /&gt;
|Cobwebbed frame from [[1135: Arachnoneurology]]&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:loot 152.png|75px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|Did James Cameron pay for the rice cooker too?&lt;br /&gt;
|[[1598: Salvage]] (maybe incomplete)&lt;br /&gt;
|Rice bowl&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:loot 010.png|75px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|Never going to give you up&lt;br /&gt;
|[[351]], [[389]], [[396]], [[524]], [[573]], [[609]], [[802]], [[1212]], [[1757]] or [[1981]]&lt;br /&gt;
|Cueball in car listening to music&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:loot 247.png|75px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|If red touches yellow, that's 24 ohms&lt;br /&gt;
|[[1604: Snakes]], [[227: Color Codes]]? (maybe incomplete)&lt;br /&gt;
|Yoda with an mp3 player from What If&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:loot 115.png|75px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|An enthusiastic but questionable business opportunity&lt;br /&gt;
|[[1021]], [[1032]], [[1117]], [[1293]], [[1493]], [[1533]], [[1772]], [[1812]], [[1871]], [[1903]], [[1997]], [[2140]], [[2209]] or [[2277]]&lt;br /&gt;
|Beret guy with a goat on leash&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Multiple: loot_106.png, miniloot-words-hair.png, miniloot-words-ominous.png, miniloot-words-eruption.png, miniloot-words-flying.png or miniloot-words-ghost.png (maybe incomplete)&lt;br /&gt;
|Read the fine manual&lt;br /&gt;
|[[293]], [[434]], [[456]], [[912]], [[1343]] or [[1692]]&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:loot 209.png|75px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|That thing's undecimodal!&lt;br /&gt;
|[[1347: t Distribution]] (maybe incomplete)&lt;br /&gt;
|Floating tentacled alien&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:loot 253.png|75px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|Actually, it's Myanmar-Shave now&lt;br /&gt;
|[[491: Twitter]] (maybe incomplete)&lt;br /&gt;
|Expensive bottle&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:loot 002.png|75px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|You don't have to find all 99&lt;br /&gt;
|[[121: Balloon]] (maybe incomplete)&lt;br /&gt;
|Balloon copter&lt;br /&gt;
|Or [[51: Malaria]] ?&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:loot 098.png|75px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|Going in circles&lt;br /&gt;
|[[378: Real Programmers]] (maybe incomplete)&lt;br /&gt;
|Cueball spinning in desk chair&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:loot 158.png|75px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|Couldn't you try knitting, or maybe stamp collecting?&lt;br /&gt;
|[[37]], [[53]], [[60]], [[75]], [[79]], [[148]], [[168]], [[174]], [[236]], [[259]], [[287]], [[296]], [[326]], [[331]], [[389]], [[437]], [[451]], [[559]], [[590]], [[605]], [[687]], [[719]], [[733]], [[790]], [[845]], [[966]], [[1004]], [[1119]], [[1145]], [[1169]], [[1208]], [[1278]], [[1304]], [[1329]], [[1340]], [[1355]], [[1405]], [[1480]], [[1546]], [[1598]], [[1677]], [[1697]], [[1705]], [[1788]], [[1795]], [[1960]], [[1995]], [[2032]], [[2123]], [[2208]] or [[2252]]&lt;br /&gt;
|Phishing License sign&lt;br /&gt;
|Mostly comics that include &amp;quot;My hobby:&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:loot 069.png|75px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|It's the ciiiiircle of HONK&lt;br /&gt;
|[[537: Ducklings]] or [[1729: Migrating Geese]]&lt;br /&gt;
|DUCKLOOP'D?&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:loot 033.png|75px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|Fool me twice&lt;br /&gt;
|Maybe [[292: goto]]? Need confirmation.&lt;br /&gt;
|Raptor Attack&lt;br /&gt;
|The second April Fools' Day comic&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|oOOOoooo&lt;br /&gt;
|Maybe [[316: Loud Sex]]? Need confirmation.&lt;br /&gt;
|Sleeping cat&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:loot 004.png|75px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|Maybe we can ask for new wishes&lt;br /&gt;
|[[879: Lamp]]&lt;br /&gt;
|Genie and his bottle&lt;br /&gt;
|If you place the genie last, you get another genie (indefinitely) - Needs verification, this may also just be a bug!&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:loot 130.png|75px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|HACK THE PLANET&lt;br /&gt;
|[[1337: Hack]] (maybe incomplete)&lt;br /&gt;
|Crash and Burn in the pool from the end of ''Hackers''&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:loot 162.png]]&lt;br /&gt;
|Monetization haute couteur&lt;br /&gt;
|[[20]], [[23]], [[55]], [[123]], [[149]], [[150]], [[162]], [[208]], [[231]], [[242]], [[256]], [[273]], [[285]], [[303]], [[327]], [[377]], [[386]], [[420]], [[435]], [[442]], [[482]], [[505]], [[552]], [[556]], [[585]], [[614]], [[627]], [[657]], [[681]], [[688]], [[705]], [[710]], [[802]], [[821]], [[980]], [[1033]], [[1040]], [[1079]], [[1127]], [[1133]], [[1196]], [[1298]] or [[1428]] (maybe false positives)&lt;br /&gt;
|Two bags of money&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:miniloot-words-eater.png|75px]](maybe incomplete)&lt;br /&gt;
|Maybe writing a script would help&lt;br /&gt;
|[[1319: Automation]]&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:loot 245.png|75px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|Go big to go small&lt;br /&gt;
|[[1365: Inflation]]&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:loot 237.png|75px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|Are you projecting&lt;br /&gt;
|[[850]], [[977]], [[1500]], [[1784]], [[1799]], [[2242]] or [[2256]]&lt;br /&gt;
|Squirrel on a gun&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:loot 007.png|75px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|Do spiders really have six legs&lt;br /&gt;
|[[8]], [[43]], [[126]], [[427]], [[442]] or [[1110]]&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:loot 071.png|75px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|Istanbul or Constantinople or St. Trimble's Island?&lt;br /&gt;
|[[1688: Map Age Guide]]&lt;br /&gt;
|Cephalopod&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:loot 037.png|75px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|Another rulebook?&lt;br /&gt;
|[[393: Ultimate Game]]&lt;br /&gt;
|Merlin in a chair from [[270: Merlin]]&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:loot 192.png|75px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|Moooooon&lt;br /&gt;
|[[482]], [[681]], [[1276]], [[1291]], [[1300]], [[1389]], [[1458]], [[1515]], [[1633]], [[1738]], [[1878]] or [[2258]]&lt;br /&gt;
|MOOOOOON&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:loot 049.png|75px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|Take a flight from LOL to FFS&lt;br /&gt;
|[[1937: IATA Airport Abbreviations]]&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|Everyone deserves a second chnace&lt;br /&gt;
|All comics searched, no matches&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|The misspelling is intentional. [[745: Dyslexics]] would have been a good fit&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:loot 035.png|75px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|Community contribution&lt;br /&gt;
|[[822]], [[823]], [[824]], [[825]], [[826]]&lt;br /&gt;
|[Citation Needed] protester from [[285: Wikipedian Protester]]&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:loot 154.png|75px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|On the other side of the wardrobe&lt;br /&gt;
|[[665: Prudence]], [[969: Delta-P]] or [[2218: Wardrobe]] (maybe incomplete)&lt;br /&gt;
|Authentic Reindeer pulling sled from [[1776: Reindeer]]&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:loot 105.png|75px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|Today's your lucky day&lt;br /&gt;
|[[1053: Ten Thousand]] (maybe incomplete)&lt;br /&gt;
|Ms. Frizzle&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:loot 038.png|75px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|[This hint has been redacted due to a copyright claim]&lt;br /&gt;
|[[1005: SOPA]]&lt;br /&gt;
|The tape&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|loot_times.png or loot_div.png (maybe incomplete)&lt;br /&gt;
|Try a different approach&lt;br /&gt;
|[[55: Useless]] (maybe incomplete)&lt;br /&gt;
|Equals sign&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:loot 144.png|75px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|The cake is a lie!&lt;br /&gt;
|[[606: Cutting Edge]]&lt;br /&gt;
|Cake&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:loot 026.png|75px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|Joanna, fire.&lt;br /&gt;
|[[322: Pix Plz]]&lt;br /&gt;
|Joanna with EMP cannon&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|Everything changes from time to time when the fire nation attacks&lt;br /&gt;
|[[965: Elements]]&lt;br /&gt;
|Symposium&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:loot 041.png|75px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|90KG x 300M&lt;br /&gt;
|[[382: Trebuchet]]&lt;br /&gt;
|Trebuchet&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:loot 046.png|75px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|Copyright Enforcement Brigade&lt;br /&gt;
|[[344: 1337: Part 4]]&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:loot 128.png|75px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|Where Cape Town meets Chukotka&lt;br /&gt;
|[[1500: Upside-Down Map]]&lt;br /&gt;
|Crater&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:loot 005.png|75px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|Take a ride in a barrel&lt;br /&gt;
|View all five barrel comics in reverse order ([[31]], [[25]], [[22]], [[11]], [[1]])&lt;br /&gt;
|Cueball at the door to the playpen-ball-filled apartment from [[150: Grownups]]&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:loot 030.png|75px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|Compiling...&lt;br /&gt;
|[[303: Compiling]]&lt;br /&gt;
|Two Cueballs fighting with swords while on chairs&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:loot 109.png|75px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|[[2288: Collector's Edition]]&lt;br /&gt;
|Sheeple eye from [[1013: Wake Up Sheeple]]&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:loot 167.png|75px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|[[2288: Collector's Edition]]&lt;br /&gt;
|Time machine from [[1747: Spider Paleontology]]&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Transcript==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[Cueball stands to the left of a vibrating box.]&lt;br /&gt;
:[The words &amp;quot;Collector's Edition&amp;quot; are written above him and boxed.]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Trivia==&lt;br /&gt;
*This comic is the 2020 April Fools' Day comic and was supposed to be released on Wednesday, April 1st. However, it did not go live until Friday, April 3. Meanwhile, Friday's comic, [[2289: Scenario 4]], was published a day later for a [[2289: Scenario 4#Trivia|very rare Saturday release]]. The message below was displayed on the [[Header text|header text]] of the site from Wednesday until the comic finally went live:&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;Note: For technical reasons Wednesday's comic will be posted Thursday instead. Apologies for the delay!&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:This is one of the few comics released four days after the previous one. The last time this occurred was [[2224: Software Updates]]. &lt;br /&gt;
*On [[unixkcd]], [https://imgs.xkcd.com/comics/collectors_edition.png this image] is displayed when you try to display this comic.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{comic discussion}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Comics featuring Cueball]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Interactive comics]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Dynamic comics]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Giraffes]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Comics with cursed items]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Animals]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Turtles]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Comics with custom header texts]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>42.book.addict</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=2288:_Collector%27s_Edition&amp;diff=413992</id>
		<title>2288: Collector's Edition</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=2288:_Collector%27s_Edition&amp;diff=413992"/>
				<updated>2026-05-31T01:12:21Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;42.book.addict: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{comic&lt;br /&gt;
| number    = 2288&lt;br /&gt;
| date      = April 3, 2020&lt;br /&gt;
| title     = Collector's Edition&lt;br /&gt;
| image     = collectors_edition.png&lt;br /&gt;
| titletext = I'm sure you can find some suitable worldbuilding material if you scavenge through the archives.&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{series&lt;br /&gt;
| series        = April&lt;br /&gt;
| number        = 12&lt;br /&gt;
| date          = April 3, 2020&lt;br /&gt;
| days_late     = 2&lt;br /&gt;
| day_category  = Friday&lt;br /&gt;
| prev_title    = 1975: Right Click&lt;br /&gt;
| prev_date     = April 1, 2019&lt;br /&gt;
| next_title    = 2445: Checkbox&lt;br /&gt;
| next_date     = April 1, 2021&lt;br /&gt;
| extra_text    = [[#Trivia|Learn why this comic was released late]].&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{TOC}}To experience the interactivity of the game, visit the {{xkcd|2288|original comic}}!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Explanation==&lt;br /&gt;
{{incomplete|Need to finish uploading the few files of loot missing (UPDATE: Only a few are missing!!!) and loot descriptions.}}&lt;br /&gt;
This comic is a large draggable image that acted as a shared virtual sandbox for users to interact. Chests are &amp;quot;Items&amp;quot; (small and often humorous images) which could be collected from other comics, and then placed in this image by viewers, but today they are no longer dropped. The collection then updated for all viewers in real-time. Multiples of the same item are often seen. There is a &amp;quot;backpack&amp;quot; at the bottom, similar to backpacks in video games containing items collected by the player. As hinted by the title text, items could be found by visiting different xkcd comics/pages. Randomly, some pages would have a treasure chest which contained the sticker related to the page. The hint would refer to the page which currently had a chest.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The image at the origin is a reference to [[1450: AI-Box Experiment]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The comic contains 32993 separate images. The sticker images can be seen at xkcd.com/2288/collectors/static/loot/loot_'''XXX'''.png, where XXX is a number from 001 to 253. Additionally, some images can be found at custom URLs, for example the periodic elements can be found at &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;h&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;ttps://xkcd.com/2288/collectors/static/loot/element-'''XX'''.png, where XX is the element, and text loot at xkcd.com/2288/collectors/static/loot/loot-words-'''X'''.png, where X is the sentence. The [https://github.com/xkcd/maple source code] for the comic was released on GitHub.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Placement is limited to 10,000 horizontal units and 5,000 vertical units from the origin. Users received no messages if they try placing something outside the boundary, with a silent fail and the object not being placed. The coordinates are relative to the bottom left corner of the canvas. As the default coordinates are (-370,-277) and the origin is in the center, the displayed portion of the canvas can be found to be twice this in magnitude, 740 x 544 units. The most common image is loot-30.png, which appears 2576 times.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:2288_full.png|100000px|thumb|left|The full image]]{{clear}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Hints ===&lt;br /&gt;
For a more minimal list of the stickers found in the comic, see [[2288: Collector's Edition/Stickers]].&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable sortable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
!Sticker&lt;br /&gt;
!Hint&lt;br /&gt;
!Comic&lt;br /&gt;
!Item unlocked&lt;br /&gt;
!Notes&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:2288_loot_019.png|50px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|Doctors in a row&lt;br /&gt;
|[[239: Blagofaire]]&lt;br /&gt;
|Cory Doctorow&lt;br /&gt;
|These comics all have the same hint, but only one will have the chest&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:2288_loot_246.png|75px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|Get out the (US) vote&lt;br /&gt;
|Chapter 5 of What If? (New York Style Time Machine)&lt;br /&gt;
|Statue of liberty&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:2288_loot_126.png|75px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|Find a box of nice stuff on a picture with words like these&lt;br /&gt;
|[[ 1375: Astronaut Vandalism]]&lt;br /&gt;
|Signpost&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:2288_loot_228.png|50px]] or [[File:Miniloot-words-dispenser.png|75px]] (maybe incomplete)&lt;br /&gt;
|Plug in or find another power source&lt;br /&gt;
|[[1373: Screenshot]]&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:2288_loot_090.png|75px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|Sweet dreams, kitty&lt;br /&gt;
|[[729: Laser Pointer]] (maybe incomplete)&lt;br /&gt;
|Cat licking laser point&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:2288_loot_185.png|75px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|What is this hint pointing to? Hell if I know.&lt;br /&gt;
|[[1052: Every Major's Terrible]]&lt;br /&gt;
|2 + lightbulb = boat&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:loot 197.png|75px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|Somebody set up us the bomb&lt;br /&gt;
|[[286: All Your Base]]&lt;br /&gt;
|Exploding rock/planet crypton&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:loot 175.png|75px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|Cowabunga&lt;br /&gt;
|[[1412: Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles]] (maybe incomplete)&lt;br /&gt;
|Women Science Fiction Authors&lt;br /&gt;
|[[197: Ninja Turtles]] also works&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:loot 210.png|75px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|I want to believe&lt;br /&gt;
|[[2156: Ufo]]&lt;br /&gt;
|Ufo&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:loot 044.png|75px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|Bleeped&lt;br /&gt;
|[[290]], [[398]], [[430]], [[447]], [[533]], [[549]], [[677]], [[724]] or [[1671]]&lt;br /&gt;
|*$@#!&lt;br /&gt;
|Comics whose titles involve profanities or similar insults.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:loot 159.png|75px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|why waste time say few word when lot word do trick&lt;br /&gt;
|[[7]], [[111]], [[139]], [[143]], [[179]], [[217]], [[445]], [[470]], [[822]], [[823]], [[1022]], [[1247]], [[1491]], [[1921]], [[1991]], [[2182]] or [[2231]]&lt;br /&gt;
|First Annual Award for Excellence in Being Very Smart&lt;br /&gt;
|Comics with titles that are six or more words (with the exception of [[111]], which has five and a spaced dash).&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:loot 006.png|75px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|Cooler than electric scooters&lt;br /&gt;
|[[139]], [[409]], [[577]], [[578]], [[579]], [[580]] or [[581]]&lt;br /&gt;
|An electric skateboard&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:loot 095.png|75px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|Take it from the top&lt;br /&gt;
|[[1: Barrel - Part 1]] (maybe incomplete)&lt;br /&gt;
|I am a turtle from [[889: Turtles]]&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:loot 031.png|75px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|I accept the yucca gnocchi, this meal is a success!&lt;br /&gt;
|[[1713: 50 ccs]] (maybe incomplete)&lt;br /&gt;
|Man carrying parentheses from [[297: Lisp Cycles]]&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|Catch up on the news&lt;br /&gt;
|[[1699: Local News]] (maybe incomplete)&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:loot 096.png|75px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|Participation trophy&lt;br /&gt;
|[[2288: Collector's Edition]] (maybe incomplete)&lt;br /&gt;
|Server rack&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:loot 161.png|75px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|Find an opportunity for a sojourn&lt;br /&gt;
|[[665]], [[681]], [[695]], [[1091]], [[1504]], [[1613]], [[1663]] or [[2111]]&lt;br /&gt;
|Opportunity Mars rover from [[2111: Opportunity Rover]]&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:loot 159.png|75px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|Tastier than tau day&lt;br /&gt;
|[[179: e to the pi times i]] (maybe incomplete)&lt;br /&gt;
|First annual award for excellence in being very smart&lt;br /&gt;
|Need to find out the difference between this, and the entry below!&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:loot 056.png|75px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|Tastier than tau day&lt;br /&gt;
|[[235]], [[396]], [[872]], [[1029]], [[1342]], [[1655]] or [[1967]]&lt;br /&gt;
|Pie sign&lt;br /&gt;
|Published on Pi day&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:loot 216.png|75px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|418 I'm a teapot&lt;br /&gt;
|[[1866: Russell's Teapot]] (maybe incomplete)&lt;br /&gt;
|S.S. NASA: Space is Hard&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:loot 205.png|75px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|26th September, 1983&lt;br /&gt;
|[[2052: Stanislav Petrov Day]]&lt;br /&gt;
|White dove&lt;br /&gt;
|Might also be written &amp;quot;September 26th, 1983&amp;quot;. Locale dependent?&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:loot 151.png|75px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|There are 4241 as of Apr 1, 2020&lt;br /&gt;
|[[1071: Exoplanets]] (maybe incomplete)&lt;br /&gt;
|Little girl from [[2264: Satellite]]&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:loot 079.png|75px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|asableiK&lt;br /&gt;
|[[645: RPS]]&lt;br /&gt;
|A reverse Polish hotdog&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;quot;Kielbasa&amp;quot; backwards, which is &amp;quot;sausage&amp;quot; in Polish&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:loot 203.png|75px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|Critical mass elements&lt;br /&gt;
|[[235: Kite]] or [[239: Blagofaire]]&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:loot 036.png|150x150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|Some Februarys are more equal than others&lt;br /&gt;
|[[390: Nightmares]]? (maybe incomplete)&lt;br /&gt;
|Cueball wheelie from [[272: Linux User at Best Buy]]&lt;br /&gt;
|Comic-hint connection largely conjectural; 390 was the first comic published on a leap day.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:loot 022.png|150x150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|Five spice&lt;br /&gt;
|[[1511: Spice Girl]] or [[1554: Spice Girls]]&lt;br /&gt;
|Rock guitarist&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:loot 058.png|75px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|Call the plumber&lt;br /&gt;
|[[423: Finish Line]]&lt;br /&gt;
|Luigi in a green Kart&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:loot 103.png|150x150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|Was it a rat I saw?&lt;br /&gt;
|[[968: Everything]]&lt;br /&gt;
|Cueball with a large sack, pulling a wagon&lt;br /&gt;
|or [[1503: Squirrel Plan]] for Cueball holding a balloon caught in a ceiling fan.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:loot 045.png|75px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|Churchill's gonna have to seriously rehydrate&lt;br /&gt;
|[[346: Diet Coke+Mentos]]&lt;br /&gt;
|Bottle of soda&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|Keep coming back&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:loot 235.png|75px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|A new model released each year&lt;br /&gt;
|Triggered by visiting all xkcd phone comics in order&lt;br /&gt;
|Phone screaming &amp;quot;Noooo&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:loot 232.png|75px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|Tea Time&lt;br /&gt;
|Maybe [[581: The Race: Part 5]]? Need confirmation.&lt;br /&gt;
|All our tea&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:loot 092.png|75px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|Try pattern-matching! Look for comic 'bout alphabet?&lt;br /&gt;
|[[1045: Constraints]]&lt;br /&gt;
|Two Tetris blocks&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:loot 021.png|75px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|Where's Hilbert?&lt;br /&gt;
|[[195: Map of the Internet]] (maybe incomplete)&lt;br /&gt;
|Hilbert Curve&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:loot 202.png|75px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|Science fiction fetish&lt;br /&gt;
|[[1585: Similarities]]&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:loot 250.png|75px]] / [[File:loot 067.png|75px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|The first one was funnier&lt;br /&gt;
|[[11: Barrel - Part 2]] (maybe incomplete)&lt;br /&gt;
|Falling feather / Sign &amp;quot;The uncomfortable truths well&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:loot 127.png|75px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|It's up to over 260 million cycles!&lt;br /&gt;
|[[1941: Dying Gift]]&lt;br /&gt;
|Megan on a tire swing&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:loot 163.png|75px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|Sleeping Beauty is the same everywhere though&lt;br /&gt;
|[[2233: Aurora Meaning]] (maybe incomplete)&lt;br /&gt;
|Sleeping Cat&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:loot 191.png|75px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|On the internet, nobody knows you're an arachnid&lt;br /&gt;
|[[1530: Keyboard Mash]] (maybe incomplete)&lt;br /&gt;
|Cobwebbed frame from [[1135: Arachnoneurology]]&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:loot 152.png|75px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|Did James Cameron pay for the rice cooker too?&lt;br /&gt;
|[[1598: Salvage]] (maybe incomplete)&lt;br /&gt;
|Rice bowl&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:loot 010.png|75px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|Never going to give you up&lt;br /&gt;
|[[351]], [[389]], [[396]], [[524]], [[573]], [[609]], [[802]], [[1212]], [[1757]] or [[1981]]&lt;br /&gt;
|Cueball in car listening to music&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:loot 247.png|75px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|If red touches yellow, that's 24 ohms&lt;br /&gt;
|[[1604: Snakes]], [[227: Color Codes]]? (maybe incomplete)&lt;br /&gt;
|Yoda with an mp3 player from What If&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:loot 115.png|75px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|An enthusiastic but questionable business opportunity&lt;br /&gt;
|[[1021]], [[1032]], [[1117]], [[1293]], [[1493]], [[1533]], [[1772]], [[1812]], [[1871]], [[1903]], [[1997]], [[2140]], [[2209]] or [[2277]]&lt;br /&gt;
|Beret guy with a goat on leash&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Multiple: loot_106.png, miniloot-words-hair.png, miniloot-words-ominous.png, miniloot-words-eruption.png, miniloot-words-flying.png or miniloot-words-ghost.png (maybe incomplete)&lt;br /&gt;
|Read the fine manual&lt;br /&gt;
|[[293]], [[434]], [[456]], [[912]], [[1343]] or [[1692]]&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:loot 209.png|75px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|That thing's undecimodal!&lt;br /&gt;
|[[1347: t Distribution]] (maybe incomplete)&lt;br /&gt;
|Floating tentacled alien&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:loot 253.png|75px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|Actually, it's Myanmar-Shave now&lt;br /&gt;
|[[491: Twitter]] (maybe incomplete)&lt;br /&gt;
|Expensive bottle&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:loot 002.png|75px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|You don't have to find all 99&lt;br /&gt;
|[[121: Balloon]] (maybe incomplete)&lt;br /&gt;
|Balloon copter&lt;br /&gt;
|Or [[51: Malaria]] ?&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:loot 098.png|75px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|Going in circles&lt;br /&gt;
|[[378: Real Programmers]] (maybe incomplete)&lt;br /&gt;
|Cueball spinning in desk chair&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:loot 158.png|75px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|Couldn't you try knitting, or maybe stamp collecting?&lt;br /&gt;
|[[37]], [[53]], [[60]], [[75]], [[79]], [[148]], [[168]], [[174]], [[236]], [[259]], [[287]], [[296]], [[326]], [[331]], [[389]], [[437]], [[451]], [[559]], [[590]], [[605]], [[687]], [[719]], [[733]], [[790]], [[845]], [[966]], [[1004]], [[1119]], [[1145]], [[1169]], [[1208]], [[1278]], [[1304]], [[1329]], [[1340]], [[1355]], [[1405]], [[1480]], [[1546]], [[1598]], [[1677]], [[1697]], [[1705]], [[1788]], [[1795]], [[1960]], [[1995]], [[2032]], [[2123]], [[2208]] or [[2252]]&lt;br /&gt;
|Phishing License sign&lt;br /&gt;
|Mostly comics that include &amp;quot;My hobby:&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:loot 069.png|75px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|It's the ciiiiircle of HONK&lt;br /&gt;
|[[537: Ducklings]] or [[1729: Migrating Geese]]&lt;br /&gt;
|DUCKLOOP'D?&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:loot 033.png|75px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|Fool me twice&lt;br /&gt;
|Maybe [[292: goto]]? Need confirmation.&lt;br /&gt;
|Raptor Attack&lt;br /&gt;
|The second April Fools' Day comic&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|oOOOoooo&lt;br /&gt;
|Maybe [[316: Loud Sex]]? Need confirmation.&lt;br /&gt;
|Sleeping cat&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:loot 004.png|75px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|Maybe we can ask for new wishes&lt;br /&gt;
|[[879: Lamp]]&lt;br /&gt;
|Genie and his bottle&lt;br /&gt;
|If you place the genie last, you get another genie (indefinitely) - Needs verification, this may also just be a bug!&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:loot 130.png|75px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|HACK THE PLANET&lt;br /&gt;
|[[1337: Hack]] (maybe incomplete)&lt;br /&gt;
|Crash and Burn in the pool from the end of ''Hackers''&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:loot 162.png]]&lt;br /&gt;
|Monetization haute couteur&lt;br /&gt;
|[[20]], [[23]], [[55]], [[123]], [[149]], [[150]], [[162]], [[208]], [[231]], [[242]], [[256]], [[273]], [[285]], [[303]], [[327]], [[377]], [[386]], [[420]], [[435]], [[442]], [[482]], [[505]], [[552]], [[556]], [[585]], [[614]], [[627]], [[657]], [[681]], [[688]], [[705]], [[710]], [[802]], [[821]], [[980]], [[1033]], [[1040]], [[1079]], [[1127]], [[1133]], [[1196]], [[1298]] or [[1428]] (maybe false positives)&lt;br /&gt;
|Two bags of money&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:miniloot-words-eater.png|75px]](maybe incomplete)&lt;br /&gt;
|Maybe writing a script would help&lt;br /&gt;
|[[1319: Automation]]&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:loot 245.png|75px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|Go big to go small&lt;br /&gt;
|[[1365: Inflation]]&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:loot 237.png|75px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|Are you projecting&lt;br /&gt;
|[[850]], [[977]], [[1500]], [[1784]], [[1799]], [[2242]] or [[2256]]&lt;br /&gt;
|Squirrel on a gun&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:loot 007.png|75px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|Do spiders really have six legs&lt;br /&gt;
|[[8]], [[43]], [[126]], [[427]], [[442]] or [[1110]]&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:loot 071.png|75px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|Istanbul or Constantinople or St. Trimble's Island?&lt;br /&gt;
|[[1688: Map Age Guide]]&lt;br /&gt;
|Cephalopod&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:loot 037.png|75px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|Another rulebook?&lt;br /&gt;
|[[393: Ultimate Game]]&lt;br /&gt;
|Merlin in a chair from [[270: Merlin]]&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:loot 192.png|75px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|Moooooon&lt;br /&gt;
|[[482]], [[681]], [[1276]], [[1291]], [[1300]], [[1389]], [[1458]], [[1515]], [[1633]], [[1738]], [[1878]] or [[2258]]&lt;br /&gt;
|MOOOOOON&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:loot 049.png|75px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|Take a flight from LOL to FFS&lt;br /&gt;
|[[1937: IATA Airport Abbreviations]]&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|Everyone deserves a second chnace&lt;br /&gt;
|All comics searched, no matches&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|The misspelling is intentional. [[745: Dyslexics]] would have been a good fit&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:loot 035.png|75px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|Community contribution&lt;br /&gt;
|[[822]], [[823]], [[824]], [[825]], [[826]]&lt;br /&gt;
|[Citation Needed] protester from [[285: Wikipedian Protester]]&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:loot 154.png|75px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|On the other side of the wardrobe&lt;br /&gt;
|[[665: Prudence]], [[969: Delta-P]] or [[2218: Wardrobe]] (maybe incomplete)&lt;br /&gt;
|Authentic Reindeer pulling sled from [[1776: Reindeer]]&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:loot 105.png|75px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|Today's your lucky day&lt;br /&gt;
|[[1053: Ten Thousand]] (maybe incomplete)&lt;br /&gt;
|Ms. Frizzle&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:loot 038.png|75px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|[This hint has been redacted due to a copyright claim]&lt;br /&gt;
|[[1005: SOPA]]&lt;br /&gt;
|The tape&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|loot_times.png or loot_div.png (maybe incomplete)&lt;br /&gt;
|Try a different approach&lt;br /&gt;
|[[55: Useless]] (maybe incomplete)&lt;br /&gt;
|Equals sign&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:loot 144.png|75px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|The cake is a lie!&lt;br /&gt;
|[[606: Cutting Edge]]&lt;br /&gt;
|Cake&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:loot 026.png|75px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|Joanna, fire.&lt;br /&gt;
|[[322: Pix Plz]]&lt;br /&gt;
|Joanna with EMP cannon&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|Everything changes from time to time when the fire nation attacks&lt;br /&gt;
|[[965: Elements]]&lt;br /&gt;
|Symposium&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:loot 41.png|75px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|90KG x 300M&lt;br /&gt;
|[[382: Trebuchet]]&lt;br /&gt;
|Trebuchet&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:loot 46.png|75px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|Copyright Enforcement Brigade&lt;br /&gt;
|[[344: 1337: Part 4]]&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:loot 128.png|75px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|Where Cape Town meets Chukotka&lt;br /&gt;
|[[1500: Upside-Down Map]]&lt;br /&gt;
|Crater&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:loot 005.png|75px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|Take a ride in a barrel&lt;br /&gt;
|View all five barrel comics in reverse order ([[31]], [[25]], [[22]], [[11]], [[1]])&lt;br /&gt;
|Cueball at the door to the playpen-ball-filled apartment from [[150: Grownups]]&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:loot 030.png|75px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|Compiling...&lt;br /&gt;
|[[303: Compiling]]&lt;br /&gt;
|Two Cueballs fighting with swords while on chairs&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:loot 109.png|75px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|[[2288: Collector's Edition]]&lt;br /&gt;
|Sheeple eye from [[1013: Wake Up Sheeple]]&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:loot 167.png|75px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|[[2288: Collector's Edition]]&lt;br /&gt;
|Time machine from [[1747: Spider Paleontology]]&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Transcript==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[Cueball stands to the left of a vibrating box.]&lt;br /&gt;
:[The words &amp;quot;Collector's Edition&amp;quot; are written above him and boxed.]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Trivia==&lt;br /&gt;
*This comic is the 2020 April Fools' Day comic and was supposed to be released on Wednesday, April 1st. However, it did not go live until Friday, April 3. Meanwhile, Friday's comic, [[2289: Scenario 4]], was published a day later for a [[2289: Scenario 4#Trivia|very rare Saturday release]]. The message below was displayed on the [[Header text|header text]] of the site from Wednesday until the comic finally went live:&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;Note: For technical reasons Wednesday's comic will be posted Thursday instead. Apologies for the delay!&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:This is one of the few comics released four days after the previous one. The last time this occurred was [[2224: Software Updates]]. &lt;br /&gt;
*On [[unixkcd]], [https://imgs.xkcd.com/comics/collectors_edition.png this image] is displayed when you try to display this comic.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{comic discussion}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Comics featuring Cueball]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Interactive comics]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Dynamic comics]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Giraffes]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Comics with cursed items]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Animals]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Turtles]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Comics with custom header texts]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>42.book.addict</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=File:loot_041.png&amp;diff=413991</id>
		<title>File:loot 041.png</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=File:loot_041.png&amp;diff=413991"/>
				<updated>2026-05-31T01:09:06Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;42.book.addict: Category:Helper comic images (2288)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== Summary ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Helper comic images (2288)]]&lt;br /&gt;
== Licensing ==&lt;br /&gt;
{{XKCD file}}&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>42.book.addict</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=File:loot_046.png&amp;diff=413990</id>
		<title>File:loot 046.png</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=File:loot_046.png&amp;diff=413990"/>
				<updated>2026-05-31T01:08:51Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;42.book.addict: Category:Helper comic images (2288)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== Summary ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Helper comic images (2288)]]&lt;br /&gt;
== Licensing ==&lt;br /&gt;
{{XKCD file}}&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>42.book.addict</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=File:loot_049.png&amp;diff=413989</id>
		<title>File:loot 049.png</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=File:loot_049.png&amp;diff=413989"/>
				<updated>2026-05-31T01:08:40Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;42.book.addict: Category:Helper comic images (2288)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== Summary ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Helper comic images (2288)]]&lt;br /&gt;
== Licensing ==&lt;br /&gt;
{{XKCD file}}&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>42.book.addict</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=File:loot_037.png&amp;diff=413988</id>
		<title>File:loot 037.png</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=File:loot_037.png&amp;diff=413988"/>
				<updated>2026-05-31T01:08:25Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;42.book.addict: Category:Helper comic images (2288)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== Summary ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Helper comic images (2288)]]&lt;br /&gt;
== Licensing ==&lt;br /&gt;
{{XKCD file}}&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>42.book.addict</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=File:loot_071.png&amp;diff=413987</id>
		<title>File:loot 071.png</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=File:loot_071.png&amp;diff=413987"/>
				<updated>2026-05-31T01:08:05Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;42.book.addict: Category:Helper comic images (2288)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== Summary ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Helper comic images (2288)]]&lt;br /&gt;
== Licensing ==&lt;br /&gt;
{{XKCD file}}&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>42.book.addict</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=File:loot_007.png&amp;diff=413986</id>
		<title>File:loot 007.png</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=File:loot_007.png&amp;diff=413986"/>
				<updated>2026-05-31T01:07:32Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;42.book.addict: Category:Helper comic images (2288)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== Summary ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Helper comic images (2288)]]&lt;br /&gt;
== Licensing ==&lt;br /&gt;
{{XKCD file}}&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>42.book.addict</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=File:loot_128.png&amp;diff=413984</id>
		<title>File:loot 128.png</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=File:loot_128.png&amp;diff=413984"/>
				<updated>2026-05-31T01:05:25Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;42.book.addict: Category:Helper comic images (2288)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== Summary ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Helper comic images (2288)]]&lt;br /&gt;
== Licensing ==&lt;br /&gt;
{{XKCD file}}&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>42.book.addict</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=explain_xkcd:Community_portal/Proposals&amp;diff=413983</id>
		<title>explain xkcd:Community portal/Proposals</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=explain_xkcd:Community_portal/Proposals&amp;diff=413983"/>
				<updated>2026-05-31T01:03:21Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;42.book.addict: /* Clearing up how to become a trusted user */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&amp;lt;noinclude&amp;gt;{{Community links}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{|-&lt;br /&gt;
|valign=&amp;quot;top&amp;quot; width=&amp;quot;100%&amp;quot;|[[File:Crystal Clear app ktip.png|left|120px]] &amp;lt;big&amp;gt;&amp;lt;big&amp;gt;&amp;lt;b&amp;gt;Proposals&amp;lt;/b&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/big&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/big&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Place for ideas and suggestions to improve the wiki's design and organization on general issues can be&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;incubated for later submission for consensus discussion. Be sure to check whether your proposal has already been submitted. &amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;{{AddNewSection|Page=Explain XKCD:Community portal/Proposals|Text=&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;(+post)&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
|}&amp;lt;/noinclude&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==ARCHIVED DISCUSSIONS==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;plainlinks&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;background:#edf6ff; border:1px solid #a7d7f9; margin:1em auto 1em auto; width:100%; font-size: 120%; padding: 0.5ex; text-align: center;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Most of the discussions on this page have been archived. The archive is available at '''[[explain xkcd talk:Community portal/Proposals]]'''.&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Removing unnecessary 3-comic categories? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I count eight categories on explainxkcd that satisfy the following properties: 1. They have only three comics in them. 2. They aren't really a comic series; they just feature or reference a comic theme. 3. They aren't Featuring some person or character. In short, they seem to have no real reason to exist. (They're [[:Category:Spice_Girls|t]][[:Category:Wind_turbine|h]]e[[:Category:Ender%27s_Game|s]]o[[:Category:FernGully|n]][[:Category:Giraffes|e]]s.) So my proposal: remove them. -[[User:Account|Account]] ([[User talk:Account|talk]]) 20:37, 9 November 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:In addition, there are [[:Category:Sketches|t]][[:Category:BSD|h]][[:Category:Emacs|i]][[:Category:Identity_Theft|r]][[:Category:Katamari_Damacy|t]][[:Category:Super_Bowl|e]][[:Category:The_Matrix|e]][[:Category:Tournament_bracket|n]][[:Category:Traffic_light| ]][[:Category:Trebuchet|m]][[:Category:Wingsuit|o]][[:Category:Euler_diagrams|r]][[:Category:Pedantic|e]] four-comic categories that also seem rather in need of deletion.&lt;br /&gt;
:: Shouldn't the community at least have some time to expand on these categories, in case they're currently incomplete? For example, [[:Category:The Matrix]] is on your list and now contains 7 strips, and [[:Category:Tournament bracket]] got its 5th entry after your post. Even if they're not, a theme category can save some typing in the search box (and is probably also cheaper in terms of server resources than all the searches it'll eliminate). [[User:Promethean|Promethean]] ([[User talk:Promethean|talk]]) 22:43, 21 November 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::So what do you think the limit should be for categories? Should we create a category when two comics mention the same topic? Three? --[[User:Account|Account]] ([[User talk:Account|talk]]) 16:28, 22 November 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::::Three seems reasonable to me, and I could see a case being made for two. Categories aren't expensive. [[User:Promethean|Promethean]] ([[User talk:Promethean|talk]]) 00:17, 23 November 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Three is only good when it's a series. If it's not a series, it should be 5 or 6 comics. We have too many categories. [[User:YZ100]] 23:07, 6 May 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== New transcript ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The transcripts in the comic pages are quite inconsistent, especially in the brackets where you have to describe what happens in the panels. If I understand correctly, the transcripts are for people to copy the text in the comic without having to type them out. If that's the case, then I think propose a new transcript. This transcript should have the comic with the words erased, and then the copy-pasteable words on top of that. Such a transcript would have no room for error, which would let anyone contribute to a seamless transcript.&lt;br /&gt;
:The aim of the transcript is to provide a text-only version of the comic that would allow someone who is visually impaired to use a text-to-speech converter to understand the comic and also in a machine readable format for searching (see the [[explain_xkcd:Editor_FAQ#What_is_the_format_of_the_transcript_section?|Editor FAQ]]). Anything using mark-up, images or anything other than plain text will interfere with this and so should be avoided in the transcript. [[User:A(l)Chemist|AlChemist]] ([[User talk:A(l)Chemist|talk]]) 18:22, 23 November 2019 (UTC)User_talk:DollarStoreBa'al&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Add title text and heading to transcript section ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It has always bothered me that the transcript did not include the title text since it contributes so much to the humor of the comics. Also, it looks to me like the comic heading is sometimes included as part of the transcript and sometimes left out. I checked the previous proposals and did not see any discussion of these issues. Please consider having a policy going forward of including the heading and the title text within the transcript. [[User:Rtanenbaum|Rtanenbaum]] ([[User talk:Rtanenbaum|talk]]) 22:43, 1 January 2020 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:To my understanding (and also others, see discussion directly above) one of the main points of the transcript is to make the comics searchable, the other is, to make it readable when images are not an option. In both cases the comic's name and the title text mentioned above and below the image should be sufficient. I personally think this convention is fine. [[User:Lupo|Lupo]] ([[User talk:Lupo|talk]]) 08:28, 2 January 2020 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Pardon me -- (and, '''&amp;lt;big&amp;gt;''thanks'' for your patience&amp;lt;/big&amp;gt;''') -- if this is too off-topic (/slash &amp;quot;boring&amp;quot;) or [[wikt:TMI|TMI]] (see {{w|Information overload#Web accuracy}} e.g.), '''...OR''' if this should have been posted elsewhere ...instead of here. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::IMHO the term '''&amp;quot;title text&amp;quot;''' is a misnomer. I think the term is used to refer to the little (or, '''BIG!''') pop-up -- (kinda like what is sometimes called a &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;quot;tooltip&amp;quot;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;, but ... aren't those usually pretty '''small?''') -- that appears when one &amp;quot;hovers&amp;quot; his mouse [pointer] over an XKCD cartoon. ...at least, according to '''the &amp;quot;Talk:&amp;quot; page section''' [[Template talk:comic#The template field called .22titletext.22]] which was added almost 3 years ago. I think that calling it a &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;quot;BONUS text&amp;quot;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt; would be even better than calling it a &amp;quot;caption&amp;quot;. However, [to me], '''either one''' of those terms would make sense ''WAY'' more than calling it a '''&amp;quot;title text&amp;quot;''' ... for reasons which are stated in the [Template] &amp;quot;Talk:&amp;quot; page section mentioned (and ... '''LINKED TO''') above.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;'''&amp;lt;big&amp;gt;Any Comments?  .  .  ''' *** Thanks! *** for listening!&amp;lt;/big&amp;gt; --[[User:Mike Schwartz|Mike Schwartz]] ([[User talk:Mike Schwartz|talk]]) 08:57, 7 April 2020 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Hi Mike, I see your point, and yes, something like &amp;quot;bonus text&amp;quot; might be a bit more descriptive.  But FWIW, I think the reason it's called &amp;quot;title text&amp;quot; is because that's the text that appears in the &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;[https://www.w3schools.com/tags/att_global_title.asp title]&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt; attribute of the HTML &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;[https://www.w3schools.com/tags/tag_img.asp &amp;amp;lt;img&amp;amp;gt;]&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt; tag of the comic's image on the xkcd.com site.  For example, at https://xkcd.com/2364/, the code for the comic image looks like this:&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;pre&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;img src=&amp;quot;//imgs.xkcd.com/comics/parity_conservation.png&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
     title=&amp;quot;Bloody Mary is made of antimatter. It explains so much.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
     alt=&amp;quot;Parity Conservation&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
     srcset=&amp;quot;//imgs.xkcd.com/comics/parity_conservation_2x.png 2x&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/pre&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:::In there, you can see the title text as &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;title=&amp;quot;Bloody Mary is made of antimatter. It explains so much.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;  See [[title text|here]] for more explanation about that, and some discussions about it [[explain xkcd:Community portal/Miscellaneous#Common mistake|here]].  – [[User:Yfmcpxpj|Yfmcpxpj]] ([[User talk:Yfmcpxpj|talk]]) 03:11, 29 September 2020 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::: While the current layout suits the first purpose (ease of search), I would argue that having the &amp;quot;title text&amp;quot; come before in the page layout, and in a completely different section, makes it fail the second (accessibility). Often the contents of the title text are a continuation of the humour in the strip, so it's about as useful as having the explanation ahead of the transcript as far as accessibility is concerned. My suggestion on this matter is to either a) move the transcript to the top of the content, maybe within a collapse section or b) not claim it for accessibility.&lt;br /&gt;
::: As for the secondary topic, I've seen it called &amp;quot;Author Text&amp;quot; before, as it is text by the author and most people won't care what the element attribute is named. [[Special:Contributions/64.114.211.89|64.114.211.89]] 06:55, 18 November 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Wikipedia links. ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I think the links to Wikipedia should have symbols, so it's not confusing which ones lead to other comic pages.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== It's time to remove the HTTPS lock icon ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Explainxkcd should do the same thing that browser makers have done: treat HTTPS as the modern standard, and mark HTTP as the deviation instead.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Here are appropriate replacement icons:&lt;br /&gt;
 * https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Unlock_Icon_Red_(32_bit).png&lt;br /&gt;
 * https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Unlock_Icon_Red_(4_bit).gif&lt;br /&gt;
- [[User:Frankie|Frankie]] ([[User talk:Frankie|talk]]) 12:49, 16 May 2020 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== New page for Randall's regular column in the New York Times ==&lt;br /&gt;
Randall Munroe has been writing and illustrating a monthly science column in the New York Times.  I suggest a page in this Wiki, indexing those columns.  For some reason the New York Times itself does not provide such an index.  If they ever do add one, we would still have a topic article here, similar to the one we have for the What If blog, that could link to their index.  --[[User:JohnB|JohnB]] ([[User talk:JohnB|talk]]) 00:47, 11 June 2020 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
------&lt;br /&gt;
=== New York Times column: Good Question ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Good Question''' is a more-or-less monthly column written and illustrated by '''[[Randall|Randall Munroe]]'''  in the '''[https://www.nytimes.com/section/science Science section of the New York Times]''', beginning in November 2019.  The columns give serious answers to science questions, in Munroe's inimitable style.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The New York Times website ordinarily requires registration, and its content is always protected by copyright.  Most particularly it is ''not'' under [http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.5/ Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 2.5 License] the way [[xkcd]] is.  The good news: anyone can register for a free digital subscription to the New York Times, with access to 'recent' Science articles among some others, but outside of that only five articles per month.  See [https://archive.nytimes.com/www.nytimes.com/info/help/freesearch.html Free Articles].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Unlike for many of their other regular columnists, the New York Times does not provide a clickable link either on the byline '''Randall Munroe''' or on the column title '''Good Question'''.  The following tables are intended to correct that omission.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+ New York Times columns ''by'' Randall Munroe&lt;br /&gt;
! Column !! Headline !! Byline !! Date&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! SCIENCE&lt;br /&gt;
| [https://www.nytimes.com/2019/08/13/science/what-makes-a-red-sky-at-night-and-at-morning.html What Makes a Red Sky at Night (and at Morning)]&lt;br /&gt;
| Randall Munroe&lt;br /&gt;
| Aug. 13, 2019&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! GOOD QUESTION&lt;br /&gt;
| [https://www.nytimes.com/2019/11/12/science/randall-munroe-moon.html If I Touched the Moon, What Would It Feel Like?]&lt;br /&gt;
| Randall Munroe&lt;br /&gt;
| Nov. 12, 2019&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! GOOD QUESTION&lt;br /&gt;
| [https://nytimes.com/2019/12/10/science/earth-size-mass.html Is Earth Getting Bigger Over Time?]&lt;br /&gt;
| Randall Munroe&lt;br /&gt;
| Dec. 10, 2019&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! GOOD QUESTION&lt;br /&gt;
| [https://www.nytimes.com/2020/01/21/science/human-running-speed-quadruped.html How Fast Can a Human Run?]&lt;br /&gt;
| Randall Munroe&lt;br /&gt;
| Jan. 21, 2020 / Feb. 7, 2020&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! GOOD QUESTION&lt;br /&gt;
| [https://www.nytimes.com/2020/02/17/science/worst-odor-smell-thioacetone.html What’s the World’s Worst Smell?]&lt;br /&gt;
| Randall Munroe&lt;br /&gt;
| Feb. 17, 2020 / Feb. 26, 2020&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! GOOD QUESTION&lt;br /&gt;
| [https://nytimes.com/2020/03/10/science/question-randall-munroe-bobsled-gravity.html What if Galileo Had Dropped Bobsleds From the Tower of Pisa?]&lt;br /&gt;
| Randall Munroe&lt;br /&gt;
| March 10, 2020&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! GOOD QUESTION&lt;br /&gt;
| [https://www.nytimes.com/2020/04/07/science/pulsar-xkcd-munroe-stars.html How’s the View From a Spinning Star?]&lt;br /&gt;
| Randall Munroe&lt;br /&gt;
| April 7, 2020&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! GOOD QUESTION&lt;br /&gt;
| [https://www.nytimes.com/2020/05/11/science/traffic-barrier-rice-krispies.html What’s the Sweetest, Crispiest Way to Stay Safe in a Car Crash?]&lt;br /&gt;
| Randall Munroe&lt;br /&gt;
| May 11, 2020&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! GOOD QUESTION&lt;br /&gt;
| [https://www.nytimes.com/2020/06/09/science/randall-munroe-question-eggs.html Can You Boil an Egg Too Long?]&lt;br /&gt;
| Randall Munroe&lt;br /&gt;
| June 9, 2020&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! GOOD QUESTION&lt;br /&gt;
| [https://www.nytimes.com/2020/07/07/science/neutrinos-snowball-randall-munroe.html Could You Make a Snowball of Neutrinos?]&lt;br /&gt;
| Randall Munroe&lt;br /&gt;
| July 7, 2020&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+ New York Times columns ''about'' Randall Munroe&lt;br /&gt;
! Column !! Headline !! Byline !! Date&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! LINK BY LINK&lt;br /&gt;
| [https://www.nytimes.com/2008/05/26/business/media/26link.html This Is Funny Only if You Know Unix]&lt;br /&gt;
| Noam Cohen&lt;br /&gt;
| May 26, 2008&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! BITS&lt;br /&gt;
| [https://bits.blogs.nytimes.com/2014/03/14/techs-favorite-cartoonist-enters-mainstream-publishing/ Tech’s Favorite Cartoonist Enters Mainstream Publishing]&lt;br /&gt;
| Noam Cohen&lt;br /&gt;
| March 14, 2014&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! SCIENCE&lt;br /&gt;
| [https://www.nytimes.com/2014/11/04/science/randall-munroe-the-creator-of-xkcd-explains-complexity-through-absurdity.html He’s Glad You Asked]&lt;br /&gt;
| Kenneth Chang&lt;br /&gt;
| Nov. 3, 2014&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! BOOKS&lt;br /&gt;
| [https://www.nytimes.com/2015/11/24/books/randall-munroe-explains-it-all-for-us.html Randall Munroe Explains It All for Us]&lt;br /&gt;
| Alexandra Alter&lt;br /&gt;
| Nov. 23, 2015&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! SCIENCE&lt;br /&gt;
| [https://www.nytimes.com/2016/03/22/science/randall-munroe-xkcd-science-textbook.html Randall Munroe, XKCD Creator, Goes Back to High School]&lt;br /&gt;
| Kenneth Chang&lt;br /&gt;
| March 21, 2016&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! SCIENCE&lt;br /&gt;
| [https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2016/03/18/science/document-Munroepages.html Randall Munroe of ‘XKCD’ Explains the Human Body, Elevators and the Saturn 5]&lt;br /&gt;
| (Actual pages from '''{{w|Thing_Explainer|Thing&amp;amp;nbsp;Explainer}}''')&lt;br /&gt;
| March 21, 2016&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
------&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: Looks goods to me, you should probably make that an article of its own, maybe [[New York Times: Good Question]]? --[[User:SlashMe|SlashMe]] ([[User talk:SlashMe|talk]]) 22:58, 10 July 2020 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: {{notice|I went and added the page, here: [[New York Times: Good Question]] --[[User:JohnB|JohnB]] ([[User talk:JohnB|talk]]) 02:42, 11 July 2020 (UTC)}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Bring back the {{rw}} template! please ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Can someone restore the &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{rw}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt; template? I insist on its existence. I further assure that it will be of much use. It was deleted by an admin. &amp;lt;span&amp;gt; — [[User:Sqrt-1|The &amp;lt;b&amp;gt;𝗦𝗾𝗿𝘁-𝟭&amp;lt;/b&amp;gt;]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Sqrt-1|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color: blue&amp;quot;&amp;gt;talk&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]] [[Special:Contributions/Sqrt-1|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color: blue&amp;quot;&amp;gt;stalk&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt; 06:10, 29 September 2020 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:nm, did it myself.&amp;lt;span&amp;gt; — [[User:Sqrt-1|The &amp;lt;b&amp;gt;𝗦𝗾𝗿𝘁-𝟭&amp;lt;/b&amp;gt;]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Sqrt-1|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color: blue&amp;quot;&amp;gt;talk&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]] [[Special:Contributions/Sqrt-1|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color: blue&amp;quot;&amp;gt;stalk&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt; 04:15, 1 October 2020 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Link to high-resolution images? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The wiki includes the &amp;quot;standard&amp;quot; resolution images, but would it be worth adding a link to the higher-resolution image on each page?  It appears that this could be automated in at least a strong majority of cases: if the standard image is ''xyzzy.png'', the hi-res one is ''xyzzy'''_2x'''.png'' . [[User:BunsenH|BunsenH]] ([[User talk:BunsenH|talk]]) 22:10, 1 October 2020 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Please stop adding this to the explanations. This is not needed.  [[User:Kynde|Kynde]] ([[User talk:Kynde|talk]]) 08:56, 6 October 2020 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::The high-resolution image was quite useful in parsing the &amp;quot;Amelia's Farm Fresh Cookies&amp;quot; comic. I'm not convinced that the hi-res images are commonly known. I've been reading xkcd for about 7 years and hadn't heard about them until I stumbled across a mention of them in one of the Discussions here. What is the harm in having a one-line ''link'' here? -- not, I emphasize, the actual image, which would take up a great deal of space. [[User:BunsenH|BunsenH]] ([[User talk:BunsenH|talk]]) 17:00, 7 October 2020 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::I didn't know about the high-resolution images either.  While it might be a bit repetitive to add a full sentence to every comic's explanation, I agree that having ''some'' easy way to link to the hi-res image on xkcd.com could be handy.  For example, maybe a &amp;quot;hi-res&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;2x&amp;quot; button before the &amp;quot;Next &amp;gt;&amp;quot; button above the comic in [[Template:comic]]?  That's a bit extreme, but I added an example template, derived from the existing [[Template:comic]], to demonstrate how that could work:&lt;br /&gt;
:::* Template: [[User:Yfmcpxpj/Template:comic 2x test]]&lt;br /&gt;
:::* Demo: [[User:Yfmcpxpj/Sandbox#2x comic template test]]&lt;br /&gt;
:::With those changes to the template, for all comics as of [[1084]] the &amp;quot;2x&amp;quot; button would automatically appear.  (No need to go back and change all comics.)  This assumes the images hosted on explainxkcd generally have the same filename as on xkcd.com, but there are optional parameters to override the filename or omit the &amp;quot;2x&amp;quot; button altogether for specific exceptions.  I'm not suggesting we actually go ahead and implement this; but if there was enough interest, an admin would be needed anyway, to make the changes within [[Template:comic]], which is currently protected.  – [[User:Yfmcpxpj|Yfmcpxpj]] ([[User talk:Yfmcpxpj|talk]]) 23:25, 11 October 2020 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::::FWIW, I like this. [[User:BunsenH|BunsenH]] ([[User talk:BunsenH|talk]]) 20:25, 12 October 2020 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::My proposal is that a bot should add it automatically to the description of each comic image when available so that it does not take up space anywhere and is easily accessible.&amp;lt;span&amp;gt; — [[User:Sqrt-1|The &amp;lt;b&amp;gt;𝗦𝗾𝗿𝘁-𝟭&amp;lt;/b&amp;gt;]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Sqrt-1|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color: blue&amp;quot;&amp;gt;talk&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]] [[Special:Contributions/Sqrt-1|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color: blue&amp;quot;&amp;gt;stalk&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt; 13:49, 8 February 2021 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Proposal to replace the top section with this... ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I have come up with a new design for the top section of all community portals...&lt;br /&gt;
It’s located here... https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=explain_xkcd:Sandbox&amp;amp;oldid=199882 &amp;lt;span&amp;gt; — [[User:Sqrt-1|The &amp;lt;b&amp;gt;𝗦𝗾𝗿𝘁-𝟭&amp;lt;/b&amp;gt;]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Sqrt-1|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color: blue&amp;quot;&amp;gt;talk&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]] [[Special:Contributions/Sqrt-1|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color: blue&amp;quot;&amp;gt;stalk&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt; 14:15, 15 October 2020 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;hr/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{|-&lt;br /&gt;
|valign=&amp;quot;top&amp;quot; width=&amp;quot;80%&amp;quot;|[[File:Crystal Clear app ktip.png|left|120px]] &amp;lt;big&amp;gt;&amp;lt;big&amp;gt;&amp;lt;b&amp;gt;Proposals&amp;lt;/b&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/big&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/big&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Ideas to improve the wiki's design and organization can be added here.&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt; {{AddNewSection|Page=Explain XKCD:Community portal/Proposals|Text=&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;(+post)&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|valign=&amp;quot;top&amp;quot; xalign=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot; width=&amp;quot;100%&amp;quot;|[[File:Crystal Clear app package settings blue.png|50px|link=https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php/explain_xkcd:Community_portal/Technical]][[File:Crystal Clear teamwork.png|50px|link=https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php/explain_xkcd:Community_portal/Coordination]][[File:Mop.svg|50px|link=https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php/explain_xkcd:Community_portal/Admin_requests]][[File:Internet-group-chat.svg|50px|link=https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php/explain_xkcd:Community_portal/Miscellaneous]]&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== I made a template for welcoming new users. ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{Welcome}}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;hr/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Any ideas? Suggestions? Objections?&amp;lt;span&amp;gt; — [[User:Sqrt-1|The &amp;lt;b&amp;gt;𝗦𝗾𝗿𝘁-𝟭&amp;lt;/b&amp;gt;]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Sqrt-1|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color: blue&amp;quot;&amp;gt;talk&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]] [[Special:Contributions/Sqrt-1|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color: blue&amp;quot;&amp;gt;stalk&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt; 16:35, 13 December 2020 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
: this is now in at the top of the Main Page --[[User:Jeff|&amp;lt;b&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;orange&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Jeff&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/b&amp;gt;]] ([[User talk:Jeff|talk]]) 16:38, 5 February 2021 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::Why? This looks like a template intended for (newly created) UserPages. And it replaces interesting data from the frontpage with something not useful for casual visitors (or even non-casual lurkers). I'd undo this change in an instant if I had authority to do so. ((The template looks good, to clarify, just obviously not intended to be in that location.)) [[Special:Contributions/141.101.76.154|141.101.76.154]] 01:36, 6 February 2021 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::[[User: Jeff|Jeff]] is the owner of explainxkcd you dingus. &amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;text-shadow:0 0 7px black&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[[User:Beanie|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-size:11pt;color:#dddddd&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Beanie&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt; &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;text-shadow:0 0 4px #000000&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[[User talk:Beanie|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-size:8pt;color:#dddddd&amp;quot;&amp;gt;talk&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 13:46, 18 June 2021 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== comic groups ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
i think we should have a tech problems list of comics ( as there are quite a few)&lt;br /&gt;
:We already have a category for it. [[:Category:Cueball_Computer_Problems]].&amp;lt;span&amp;gt; — [[User:Sqrt-1|The &amp;lt;b&amp;gt;𝗦𝗾𝗿𝘁-𝟭&amp;lt;/b&amp;gt;]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Sqrt-1|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color: blue&amp;quot;&amp;gt;talk&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]] [[Special:Contributions/Sqrt-1|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color: blue&amp;quot;&amp;gt;stalk&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt; 13:44, 8 February 2021 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Archiving interactive comics? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Has the possibility of archiving interactive comics been discussed? Of course, users can view them on the original website, but it’d be nice to have a working backup of sorts, especially considering some of the interactive comics haven’t aged too well in terms of compatibility or support (e.g. Umwelt displays a blank page for me.)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It probably wouldn’t be possible to do so directly from mediawiki, but I’d be happy to experiment with cloning a few of them on another server, or as simple PHP pages that could be embedded, if it would help. Most of the interactive comics appear to be implemented mostly in client side JS anyways, so replicating them shouldn’t be too bad.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Tague|Tague]] ([[User talk:Tague|talk]]) 13:12, 29 April 2021 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Replace head shots of characters in the wiki with these new and high quality head shots! ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
https://www.reddit.com/r/xkcd/comments/n2u28r/i_took_head_shots_of_the_reccuring_characters_and/&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
These are not only upscaled, but are all squares and have all the features of the characters.&amp;lt;span&amp;gt; — [[User:Sqrt-1|The &amp;lt;b&amp;gt;𝗦𝗾𝗿𝘁-𝟭&amp;lt;/b&amp;gt;]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Sqrt-1|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color: blue&amp;quot;&amp;gt;talk&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]] [[Special:Contributions/Sqrt-1|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color: blue&amp;quot;&amp;gt;stalk&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt; 03:33, 2 May 2021 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:I think you should do it (because higher quality = better) :] &amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;text-shadow:0 0 7px black&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[[User:Beanie|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-size:11pt;color:#dddddd&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Beanie&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt; &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;text-shadow:0 0 4px #000000&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[[User talk:Beanie|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-size:8pt;color:#dddddd&amp;quot;&amp;gt;talk&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 13:42, 18 June 2021 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::There seemed to be no objections, so I went ahead and did it.&amp;lt;span&amp;gt; — [[User:Sqrt-1|The &amp;lt;b&amp;gt;𝗦𝗾𝗿𝘁-𝟭&amp;lt;/b&amp;gt;]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Sqrt-1|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color: blue&amp;quot;&amp;gt;talk&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]] [[Special:Contributions/Sqrt-1|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color: blue&amp;quot;&amp;gt;stalk&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt; 12:40, 21 November 2021 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Cleaning up [[Special:WantedTemplates|Special: Wanted Templates]] ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I decided to take a look at the list of wanted templates. Imagine my surprise when I see that a lot of the templates wanted were mis-capitalizations or misspellings of existing templates. I hereby request permission to create redirect pages for some of the most popular errors. &lt;br /&gt;
I intend to do five, wait a week, and do another five as to not spam the wiki. I will not begin for a week, at which point I will only proceed if nobody has said no OR a moderator has said yes. May I proceed? [[User talk:Quillathe Siannodel|&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;{)|(}&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;]][[User:Quillathe_Siannodel|Quill]][[Special:Contributions/Quillathe_Siannodel|&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;{)|(}&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;]] 11:34, 15 May 2021 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Knit Cap ==&lt;br /&gt;
Sometimes Knit cap has long hair, sometimes short. Is Knit Cap meant to be a male character that sometimes has long hair, or is Knit Cap sometimes female? I want to clear this up before I finish editing [[1350: Lorenz]]. &amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;text-shadow:0 0 7px black&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[[User:Beanie|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-size:11pt;color:#dddddd&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Beanie&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt; &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;text-shadow:0 0 4px #000000&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[[User talk:Beanie|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-size:8pt;color:#dddddd&amp;quot;&amp;gt;talk&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 13:40, 18 June 2021 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Hm, in the 'Enemy Pikachu used theft' scene in [[1350: Lorenz]], Knit Cap's hair looks merely slightly unkempt. From this, I will assume that Knit Cap just sometimes has long hair and is always male. &amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;text-shadow:0 0 6px black&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[[User:Beanie|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-size:11pt;color:#dddddd&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Beanie&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt; &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;text-shadow:0 0 3px #000000&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[[User talk:Beanie|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-size:8pt;color:#dddddd&amp;quot;&amp;gt;talk&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 13:10, 21 June 2021 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::Ok, the official transcripts say that Knit Cap is 'A guy in a knit cap'. I will take that to mean that Knit Cap is definitely male.&lt;br /&gt;
:::(Sorry for necroposting) Knit cap is shown to represent Randall's wife in the &amp;quot;X years&amp;quot; series, I assume that they are thusly female. {{unsigned|B for brain|15:07, 29 March 2026}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== We still need to complete some explanations like this one: ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I think should change the banner shown at the top of every page to show a comic that is still incomplete, like Hoverboard or something. [[User:Sure|Sure]] ([[User talk:Sure|talk]]) 21:32, 30 August 2021 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Update MediaWiki ==&lt;br /&gt;
explainxkcd is running MediaWiki 1.30.0, which reached end-of-life in June 2019. There are likely security issues because of this, so please update MediaWiki to the latest version (or LTS) using the instructions here https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Manual:Upgrading [[User:Cam1170|Cam1170]] ([[User talk:Cam1170|talk]]) 19:41, 26 September 2021 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:It seems like the mysql is too outdated for the upgrade [[User:Starstar|Starstar]] ([[User talk:Starstar|talk]]) 17:37, 26 November 2021 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::Upgrade MySQL then[[User:Aaron Liu|Aaron Liu]] ([[User talk:Aaron Liu|talk]]) 03:16, 20 July 2022 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
Does anybody know how to contact an admin for this? I have no clue. [[User:Cam1170|Cam1170]] ([[User talk:Cam1170|talk]]) 03:25, 13 December 2022 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Allow Users to Edit their own talk page if not auto confimed ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I can edit this page, but I can't create my own talk page! [[User:Starstar|Starstar]] ([[User talk:Starstar|talk]]) 17:34, 26 November 2021 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Upgrade Icons ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The icons look quite old fashion (the ones on the sidebar and the ones above the editing text area), could they be replaced? [[User:Starstar|Starstar]] ([[User talk:Starstar|talk]]) 23:07, 26 November 2021 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:They probably could be, but changing icons the moment they're not absolutely cutting-edge just means using new icons that are as easily edged-out (as tastes change yet again), meanwhile annoying those who prefered the first set and rather wouldn't see a revolving door of ever-evolving aesthetics.&lt;br /&gt;
:If I had a vote, I'd say keep the simple glyphs we're used to. If any are not totally obvious (perhaps some would not be, without the text captions) consider revising, but I think you'll get less agreement on what new images to use than that which would advocate the retention of the current ones.&lt;br /&gt;
:Alternately, it would definitely be on-theme to find Randall-drawn illustrations to replace them all. But the constraints of adapting (say) any particular stick-figure-world depiction of randonmess to ''meaningfully'' replace the current Random Page icon (at the same scale!) might be less than optimal.[[Special:Contributions/172.70.162.57|172.70.162.57]] 01:08, 27 November 2021 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Make searchbar not case-sensitive ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The way the search bar is currently set, it only suggests comic links when what is being typed is capitalized (&amp;quot;Assigning Numbers&amp;quot; rather than &amp;quot;assigning numbers&amp;quot; for instance). Would be nice if we could make it not case-sensitive :D [[User:Char Latte49|Wielder of the Staple Gun]] ([[User talk:Char Latte49|talk]]) 02:48, 27 April 2022 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Good idea. [[User:Marethyu|⟨Winter is coming⟩ Marethyu]] ([[User talk:Marethyu|talk]]) 17:46, 5 May 2022 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Do not allow ordinary users to edit redirects that are just numbers ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This overrides the default page you're sent to when you check a comic; e.g. recently a vandal edited the page entitled &amp;quot;2614&amp;quot; so it overrode the actual page, [[2614: 2]] on the main page.&lt;br /&gt;
:The problem would be when creating a new page and the overrides are needed... [[User:Marethyu|⟨Winter is coming⟩ Marethyu]] ([[User talk:Marethyu|talk]]) 17:48, 5 May 2022 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== ExplainXKCD discord (or other platform)? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I'm just saying if we had instant messages, pings etc. there would be a lot faster reaction to vandals. &lt;br /&gt;
The community portal is hard to get attention from and comments are all very well and good but conversations on Discord could get very quick response, and people could request edits, organise page re-writing etc.&lt;br /&gt;
Idk if we can get &amp;quot;official&amp;quot; backing by anyone high up but we could make one anyways?&lt;br /&gt;
:The problem with platforms like Discord or others is that we can't guarantee that everyone has access to them; on the wiki, anyone can edit, while some people may not have access to discord or such. A possible solution would be having a sort of service built into the wiki, but not sure how that might be done. Besides, this is a wiki, not an xkcd chat site. This is a good idea, though. [[User:Marethyu|⟨Winter is coming⟩ Marethyu]] ([[User talk:Marethyu|talk]]) 17:43, 5 May 2022 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::Anyone can create a discord account like anyone can create an account on this wiki. You don't even need a dedicated client/app as it can run in browser. Just like the wiki. Just my two cents. [[User:Elektrizikekswerk|Elektrizikekswerk]] ([[User talk:Elektrizikekswerk|talk]]) 11:28, 20 May 2022 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Some user may not wish anyone to be able to contact them outside this wiki. You do not need an acount to edit this wiki... [[User:Kynde|Kynde]] ([[User talk:Kynde|talk]]) 17:14, 22 July 2022 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== So, I got a question about transcripts. ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A lot of comics show links (e.g.: all the ones with a drawing of wikipedia on it), and the transcripts don't really have a standard. In the transcript, should it be an actual link or just blue text or what? [[Special:Contributions/162.158.79.52|162.158.79.52]] 15:03, 2 June 2022 (UTC)Bumpf&lt;br /&gt;
:I'd say that if the linked thing (presuming it's a real linkable target!) is linked in the Explanation, it doesn't need to be (re)linked in the ostensibly flat-and-descriptive Transcript.&lt;br /&gt;
:And I know that some Transcripts are hypertext formatted to emulate the thing they are transcribed from (whether bolded, enbiggened, sub-/superscripted and and/or given the hue) but maybe ''primarily'' the &amp;quot;&amp;lt;code&amp;gt;[:Text that describes the text]&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;&amp;quot; should be explaining the details, in case the screen-reader (or text-searching algorithm grepping the Transcript text for &amp;quot;green text&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;superscript&amp;quot; instances can't quite work it out from the various style-tags that can be applied to that effect in so many an various ways.&lt;br /&gt;
:But this is IMO, I don't know if there's a specific policy about it, but it is how I've seen it vaguely applied... Not everywhere quite so consistently, though. [[Special:Contributions/172.70.91.128|172.70.91.128]] 20:28, 2 June 2022 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::We try to keep links and explanations out of the transcript. The link and the explanation goes in the explanation section above. [[User:Kynde|Kynde]] ([[User talk:Kynde|talk]]) 17:12, 22 July 2022 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Use 2X Images ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Apparently xkcd.com provides double-sized versions of almost every comic if you add '''_2x''' to the end of the image name. For instance,&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
https://imgs.xkcd.com/comics/watches.png&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
https://imgs.xkcd.com/comics/watches_2x.png&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Since we are in 2022 and computers can load high-resolution images just fine, and they are easier to read, I propose that this website should use the provided double-sized images. Really, I think Randall ought to be doing this himself as well. [[Special:Contributions/172.68.18.107|172.68.18.107]] 12:22, 17 August 2022 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:While I agree with using the higher quality images which are default on xkcd.com for many people, there has been [https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php/explain_xkcd:Community_portal/Proposals#Link_to_high-resolution_images.3F discussion] about this issue already. At the moment, the consensus seems to be to continue using the 'standard' size to 'use less space,' and instead link to the higher quality image on the image page. —[[User:Theusaf|theusaf]] ([[User talk:Theusaf|talk]]) 14:35, 17 August 2022 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I think I may have mentioned it on that link (or similar), but often when the 2x image is used (or even an unwise too wide image/unbreakable-line-of-content) the explainxkcd site cannot sensibly handle it and it forces the default 'page width' of stuff into a zoomed out narrower column to the left (including the margin-line normally inset a dozen or so pixels in from the right) so that browser-window can display the whole of this wide element.&lt;br /&gt;
::While &amp;quot;saving space&amp;quot; does apply to server resources and viewer download bandwidth/quotas (e.g.[https://imgs.xkcd.com/comics/unreliable_connection.png 53kb] vs [https://imgs.xkcd.com/comics/unreliable_connection_2x.png 109kb]) may seem insignificant, screen-space can be badly hit by this.&lt;br /&gt;
::The motherlode xkcd site has code behind it to (usually?) serve the right image for the right displays, but explainxkcd isn't currently equipped to do the same choose-and-provide (which would need ''both'' images uploaded to it and a revised {{template|comic}} implementation, once we work out the method it could use). And I've never seen any case where the 'low quality' comic is conversely too small and narrow to appreciate (though occasionally the larger one reveals minor drawing details that have been obscured by the downscaling), just when the _2x one makes everything ''else'' too small.&lt;br /&gt;
::...this may not apply to everyone's browser implementation, but it definitely happens, and consistently, on my usual Chrome and/or Firefox on Windows and/or Android platforms (according to which system I happen to be on at the time). [[Special:Contributions/172.70.162.147|172.70.162.147]] 21:20, 17 August 2022 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::ExplainXKCD actually does have the capability to do this. For example, see [[1079:_United_Shapes]]. It generates multiple images, automatically choosing one based on screen size (similar to how xkcd.com does it). The bot could use the `imagesize` parameter to keep the image within the page's width by using the 'standard' image size. This does add a button labeled &amp;quot;click to enlarge,&amp;quot; but if that is annoying, the comic template can be modified to hide that button if specified.&lt;br /&gt;
:::Here is what it might look like:&lt;br /&gt;
:::{{cot}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{User:Theusaf/Template:comic_2x&lt;br /&gt;
| number    = 2647&lt;br /&gt;
| date      = July 18, 2022&lt;br /&gt;
| title     = Capri Suns&lt;br /&gt;
| image     = capri_suns_2x.png&lt;br /&gt;
| titletext = [As security is dragging me away] &amp;quot;Come on, at least I didn't make the mistake in the other direction!&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| imagesize = 315x317px&lt;br /&gt;
| noexpand  = true&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cob}}&lt;br /&gt;
:::which is clearer than the original comic page and the same size. —[[User:Theusaf|theusaf]] ([[User talk:Theusaf|talk]]) 05:20, 18 August 2022 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::::As specificaly implemented above, I certainly see no immediate problem (need to check across machines/devices), but I suspect that part of the mechanism here is the &amp;quot;imagesize = 315x317px&amp;quot;, which seems like it would need (albeit by the page-create bot, algorithm8cally) to be tailored to the 'input' image, not always in this ratio). I'm not technically conversant with the nature of your back-end scripting and doubtless it's all possible (scripts can do almost anything... once you know that they (may) need to do them and rewritten them to catch all the contingencies ;) ), but I don't know know if that's something you've accounted for (e.g. test with a three/four-panel wide comic, or the Earth Temperature Timeline or whatever, and see if it can facilitate them all nicely). Not to mention that if theusafBOT goes offline, the manual-add instructions (as used prior to your replacing the prior functioning bot, for which I thank you) also need this extra step of user involvement to be done, whereas usually the fallback manual method needed little thought in this direction (or indeed however much carbon or silicon there is in the 'brain' involved) except for exceptional circumstances or those rare prior slip-ups by Randall.&lt;br /&gt;
::::I'm just going through the first obvious issue (to me), didn't mean to concentrate so many words on just this before even checking everything else! [[Special:Contributions/172.70.91.80|172.70.91.80]] 09:15, 18 August 2022 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Basically, on the backend, the bot will fetch both the small and the large images, and measure the size of the small image, which is what it will use for the &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;imagesize&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;. I have actually used this system in the past for this bot, but was told to revert it due to the &amp;quot;click comic to enlarge&amp;quot; text. As for if the bot goes offline, there is no problem with falling back to the small image, and if editors want to, I can also provide instructions for using the large image. I'm mostly just waiting to see what others think about this. Are there any other problems to consider? —[[User:Theusaf|theusaf]] ([[User talk:Theusaf|talk]]) 14:44, 18 August 2022 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== I'm making an App that collects web comics ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
My original idea was to use the rss feed present on xkcd, and other webcomic websites, but now im starting to wonder if there was a way to make a better service, that allowed users to maybe look at older comics, and explanations and such as well, and thats how i happened to come across explainxkcd.com. The RSS Feed for this website, would be pretty helpful, if it were like reddit's but apparently, the rss feed is only maintained for the home page. I was wondering if you guys provided that data through an API or something? Also are there wikis for other famous comics like this one? Any other suggestions and ideas for the app are welcome 🙌🙌.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Comics edited after their publication ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
many more comics have been changed than are in Category:Comics edited after their publication ! please add them (i already have done two i remember off the top of my head) [[Special:Contributions/172.70.134.223|172.70.134.223]] 12:56, 7 October 2022 (UTC)Bumpf&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== What if 2 book page creation ==&lt;br /&gt;
What if 2 has come out, but I don't know which page is to be created. There is already a comic under the same name. [[User:ClassicalGames|ClassicalGames]] ([[User talk:ClassicalGames|talk]]) 08:54, 3 May 2023 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Default to 3 Section Headings for Each Explanation: Non-Obvious Info, Recap, and Background Trivia ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This is a proposal that all new comic explanations should, by default, have 3 Sections:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''I. Explanation of the Non-Obvious''' (an actual explanation of the non-obvious elements of the comic for the average reader who might not understand the references/joke/relevant science)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''II. Full Recap'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''III. Background Trivia'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Most of us can agree that Category I is where the value of this website shines.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But today, all 3 of these categories of explanation are typically merged together, making it hard to find the Category I nuggets of goodness.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If we make these 3 section headings the default on every comic explanation, then this default will helpfully nudge editors to put the juiciest stuff up top, and not to clutter that section up with fluff or trivia.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
——&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As an example, take the recent comic #2878 about Astronomer Happiness and Supernova distance.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The main thing a lay reader would want to know — the Category I information — is…&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
..That the shape of the graph is probably a clever reference to a Light Curve, a type of supernova graph&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
..why astronomers like it when a supernova is close, and what happens when it gets too close&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Everything else in the (currently) very wordy explanation gets in the way of the lay reader finding out these two things. It’s a bunch of Category II and Category III info that makes it hard to tease out the Category I info. It’s not BAD information, but it’s sandpaper. It’s friction slowing down the average reader.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Obviously I could go in and edit this particular comic, and I often do this kind of edit, but I think this issue pops up for most explanations, so I think changing the standard default interface will help everyone put their contribution into the right section.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In sum, my proposal would elevate Category I info to the top of each explanation, so instead of full recaps, we get right into the explanation that is going to be most efficiently illuminating for the average, non-expert reader, answering the most common questions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Laser813|Laser813]] ([[User talk:Laser813|talk]]) 10:50, 12 January 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:In general (if I get dibs on the edit, or think I can legitimately re-edit/rearrange), I do try to go for &amp;quot;hook, line, sinker&amp;quot; format (i.e. establish the basics, relate that to what the comic shows, move on to any relevent speculations/extrapolations), very like your setup. Though it is often ''much'' too complicated (multi-layered, cross-disciplinary, etc, so that maybe it has to be interwoven 'mini explanations' per tabulated item) so I'm not sure how easy it would be to enforce a strict structure. I think there's merit to the principle, though. Assuming we can all agree what each comic needs focus on (apply that problem to the following proposal too!), as I've occasionally inserted a sort of &amp;quot;first you need to know &amp;lt;subject&amp;gt;&amp;quot; into an established cold-start explanation (&amp;quot;you see &amp;lt;foo&amp;gt;&amp;quot; only for a later editor to consider it more an afterthought and shuffle it to later (&amp;quot;you see &amp;lt;foo&amp;gt;&amp;quot; ... &amp;quot;&amp;lt;foo&amp;gt; is part of &amp;lt;subject&amp;gt;&amp;quot;), or variations on such layouts. Especially as different people have different ideas as to what's obvious/can be keyword-wikilinked and what needs more waffle to properly enlighten readers.&lt;br /&gt;
:Also, prosaic variation is a good thing. Too formulaic and it could be (whilst accurate) considered too robotic, so some leaway should really always be allowed as we collectively bash together a community interpretation and elaboration. Within communal guidelines, clearly. [[Special:Contributions/172.69.194.203|172.69.194.203]] 15:53, 12 January 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== FAQ Style Editing should be the norm ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Simply, we should experiment with more FAQ-style explanations. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We think of the top questions that the average reader might have about a comic, and we use those as bolded headers to explain the most curious/confusing/subtle/sciency parts of the comic.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The structure would be this (using a recent comic as an example)…&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Q: Why did Randall use this shape of graph?'''&lt;br /&gt;
A: It’s likely a clever reference to a Light Curve, a similarly shaped graph in the study of supernovae that…&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Q: Why do astronomers prefer it when supernovae are closer?'''&lt;br /&gt;
A: It makes it easier to glean information because…&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Laser813|Laser813]] ([[User talk:Laser813|talk]]) 10:50, 12 January 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== sidebar revamp ==&lt;br /&gt;
I think that the sidebar looks plain and it should have a new design. It could be voted on by users [[User:Moderator|Moderator]] ([[User talk:Moderator|talk]]) 02:16, 5 February 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:In leiu of you telling us what you think would be better, my starting vote is that I'm perfectly happy with that 'plain'. If it has the links I might need, why does it need a reskin? Or, worse, a functional revamp which probably removes the easy to use bits I was using already.&lt;br /&gt;
:...could you do a mock-up screenshot (or render equivalents directly in markup) of before/after side by side, at least? [[Special:Contributions/172.69.194.120|172.69.194.120]] 03:11, 5 February 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
My biggest problem is it doesn’t scroll down with you which can be a big pain [[User:Moderator|Moderator]] ([[User talk:Moderator|talk]]) 01:43, 6 February 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Don't know about anyone else, but (when not on a desktop) I read this on a tablet, in landscape, with the effective window quite short (ratio of 1:2 with width, approaching 1:3.5 with already narrowed onscreen keyboard popped up) and if I'm scrolled to the top I see nothing beyond Browse Comics.&lt;br /&gt;
:If we assume separate scroll-control on the sidebar, setting Main Page at the top of browser pane gives What Links Here at the bottom. Now, I rarely use the next three links (or at least reach those pages using them), and separate scrolling wouldn't stop me even seeing the even lower Ad bit (but it ''would'' defeat the entire purpose of the Ad, in that position, whether or not I bother to notice it these days).&lt;br /&gt;
:So whatever missing about you propose, I'm betting it would impact me. Perhaps not negatively, but I've seen enough awful assumptions about my screen-area in the name of scroll-free design. Including the &amp;quot;give us permission (or not) to give you cookies&amp;quot; popovers where it appears the actual buttons to confirm (or deny, or go somewhere to review and customise, if they have that option) are beyond the bottom of my screen. I can temporarily rotate the screen, of course, but often I just back out and don't bother in those cases. I wouldn't be reticent to rotate this site, on occasion, but ''I'd really rather not have to'', if I can be so selfish and stick-in-the-mud, because websites just are not good to use (even temporarily) in narrow-portait mode. (What's worse is the websites that detect I'm on a mobile platform and redesign styles/placements on-the-fly to 'fit portrait view', assuming a vertical smartphone, ''regardless'' of my actual viewport orientation, etc.)&lt;br /&gt;
:So, please, a hard no from me. Notwithstanding that just as solidly &amp;quot;always browse in portrait&amp;quot; people might be overjoyed at changes that would give ''them'' a better site design. But that's a tricky circle to square (or letterbox!), and not what you were suggesting anyway (now we know what it is). I just want to plea that any changes be made with a very good idea of all the knock-on effects of 'improving' certain edge-cases, especially when it comes to yet other edge-cases. [[Special:Contributions/172.70.85.23|172.70.85.23]] 10:29, 6 February 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
==New Logo and Banner Proposals==&lt;br /&gt;
:I have new logo and banner proposals for this site.&lt;br /&gt;
:They're made on Scratch, an all-ages block-based programming language, and are in the style of Right Click.&lt;br /&gt;
:Here they are!&lt;br /&gt;
:Logo proposal: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Logo_proposal_for_explain_xkcd.png&lt;br /&gt;
:Banner proposal: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Banner_proposal_for_explain_xkcd.png {{unsigned ip|172.69.71.37|01:54, 19 February 2024 (UTC)}}&lt;br /&gt;
::I can't see the xkcdicity of the logo, really. The banner is certainly flavourful in the right way (does it scale down well? ...is that what your use of Scratch is for, as opposed to standard static Photoshop/GIMP image editing?), but not sure it'll work better for the current top-left-of-page xkcd (with three xkcd figurses idling away, sat on the letters).&lt;br /&gt;
::Decent concept art for something else related, certainly. I could believe it was a Randall's-own  interactive comic front-end of some kind (which would make sense of the &amp;quot;play button&amp;quot; that is the &amp;quot;►&amp;quot;-bit). Given that it's now in a programming system already, have you tried making a drag'n'click game of the idea of linking/looping the blue-trail, and animating the hanging-on characters? [[Special:Contributions/172.70.90.29|172.70.90.29]] 13:34, 19 February 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::It's an arrow, not a play button. Get it right. {{unsigned ip|172.69.71.72|01:05, 20 February 2024 (UTC)}}&lt;br /&gt;
::::Hold your horses... I was just trying to find a good reason for the whatever-it-is triangle to be there (gave the example of a 'play' button in my speculated usefulness of it). And it isn't really obviously any more of an arrow (c.f. &amp;quot;→&amp;quot;), either. I like your(?) banner's use of xkcd-figures, just not sure where the logo exhibits any form of being xkcd-related, except by the literal reading of it.&lt;br /&gt;
::::Perhaps if it were &amp;quot;xkcd font&amp;quot; (i.e. artfully composited from actual samples of Randall's ALLCAPS comic-writing) then it wouldn't matter so much, but I just wouldn't say it was any more on-brand than the current logo/etc. This being intended as constructive criticism, I hope you understand. And there's more opinions than mine, so maybe I've indeed just missed some point that ''everyone else'' (especially named-users) have already realised. [[Special:Contributions/172.70.86.5|172.70.86.5]] 02:33, 20 February 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Regarding precision in the Unexplained popup ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Would it be possible to add an extra decimal point for the sake of precision? Currently, it shows that 0% of comics are unexplained, which is (as of 13:21 UTC on March 27, 2024) incorrect. It's a small thing, but it's rather annoying. {{unsigned ip|162.158.158.233|13:23, 27 March 2024 (UTC)}}&lt;br /&gt;
:With the current 2911 comics (give or take #404), 0.1% would be slightly under 3 comics. You'd need at least three before 0.1% appeared instead of the equally unuseful 0.0%.&lt;br /&gt;
:I'm of the &amp;quot;at least give everyone a week before you unilaterally declare it 'done'...&amp;quot; camp, so right now ''just'' the latest M/W/F comic incomplete would hover at a token 0.1%.&lt;br /&gt;
:(Actually, from two (0.06...% rounded up) to 4 (0.13...% rounded down. The good news is that it'll be almost seven years until two-rounded-up is insufficient, but also up to six-rounded-down is now &amp;quot;0.1%&amp;quot;, if I've not goofed the carries/etc.)&lt;br /&gt;
:If going to the trouble of editing it to 1DP, make it 2DP with ''exactly'' the same editing effort..?&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&amp;lt;!-- Edited version of current Main page source below here --&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;font size=5px&amp;gt;''Welcome to the '''explain [[xkcd]]''' wiki!''&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
We have an explanation for all [[:Category:All comics|'''{{#expr:{{PAGESINCAT:All comics|R}}-1}}''' xkcd comics]],&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;!-- Note: the -1 in the calculation above is to discount &amp;quot;comic&amp;quot; 404,&lt;br /&gt;
     which is not really a comic, even though we've categorised it so. --&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
and only {{PAGESINCAT:Incomplete explanations|R}}&lt;br /&gt;
({{#expr: {{PAGESINCAT:Incomplete explanations|R}} / {{LATESTCOMIC}} * 100 round 2}}%) [[:Category:Incomplete explanations|are incomplete]]. Help us finish them!&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&amp;lt;!-- Edited version of current Main page source above here --&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:(As of time of posting, the above says &amp;quot;only 2 (0.07%)&amp;quot;. From 0.0687049...% rounded up to 2DP.)&lt;br /&gt;
:Though given that we're only going to go into the future,{{Citation needed}} I suggest we can state the flat-out number. It's not now really going to be as scarily huge as it might have been, as the actual percentage becomes generally less significant.&lt;br /&gt;
:And, for niceness, give it a grammatically/factually agreeable form:&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&amp;lt;!-- exemplars start --&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
;General form:&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;... and {{#ifeq: &amp;lt;!-- count here --&amp;gt; | 0 | no | &amp;lt;!-- count here --&amp;gt; }} comic{{#ifeq: &amp;lt;!-- count here --&amp;gt; | 1 |  | s }} [[:Category:Incomplete explanations|{{#ifeq: &amp;lt;!-- count here --&amp;gt; | 1 | is | are }} incomplete]]. ...&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
;Zero cases (hardcoded):&lt;br /&gt;
:... and {{#ifeq: 0 | 0 | no | &amp;lt;!-- count here, unused --&amp;gt; }} comic{{#ifeq: 0 | 1 |  | s }} [[:Category:Incomplete explanations|{{#ifeq: 0 | 1 | is | are }} incomplete]]. ...&lt;br /&gt;
;One case (hardcoded):&lt;br /&gt;
:... and {{#ifeq: 1 | 0 | no | 1 }} comic{{#ifeq: 1 | 1 |  | s }} [[:Category:Incomplete explanations|{{#ifeq: 1 | 1 | is | are }} incomplete]]. ...&lt;br /&gt;
;Multiple cases (hardcoded):&lt;br /&gt;
:... and {{#ifeq: 42 | 0 | no | 42 }} comic{{#ifeq: 42 | 1 |  | s }} [[:Category:Incomplete explanations|{{#ifeq: 42 | 1 | is | are }} incomplete]]. ...&lt;br /&gt;
;Current cases (dynamic):&lt;br /&gt;
:... and {{#ifeq: {{PAGESINCAT:Incomplete explanations|R}} | 0 | none | {{PAGESINCAT:Incomplete explanations|R}} }} comic{{#ifeq: {{PAGESINCAT:Incomplete explanations|R}} | 1 |  | s }} [[:Category:Incomplete explanations|{{#ifeq: {{PAGESINCAT:Incomplete explanations|R}} | 1 | is | are }} incomplete]]. ...&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&amp;lt;!-- end of exemplars --&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:...easy to replicate to get &amp;quot;Help us finish them!&amp;quot; to change (upon a zero-test truth) to &amp;quot;But they all might be improvable!&amp;quot;. Or change the :Cat:Link to not even be a link when zero, with alternate phrasing dodged over to in order to avoid &amp;quot;no comics are incomplete&amp;quot; in other ways.&lt;br /&gt;
:I wrote the above for minimal nesting of overlapping conditions. You might prefer just to go with &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{#ifeq: &amp;lt;count&amp;gt; | 0 | &amp;lt;whole &amp;quot;zero cases&amp;quot; version&amp;gt; | {{#ifeq: &amp;lt;count&amp;gt; | 1 | &amp;lt;whole &amp;quot;single case&amp;quot; version&amp;gt; | &amp;lt;whole &amp;quot;plurality of cases&amp;quot; version&amp;gt; }} }}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt; - both approaches involve repetitions, but maybe this other one can be given a ''degree'' of wikimarkup-readability within each case, to take pity on future editors. [[Special:Contributions/172.70.160.166|172.70.160.166]] 16:02, 27 March 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Hear me out: What If? discussion page.  ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
That's it. That's my idea. Go crazy, everyone. [[User:Psychoticpotato|Psychoticpotato]] ([[User talk:Psychoticpotato|talk]]) 14:05, 4 April 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Yup, I've been thinking the same thing. I would like a page on each What If entry. [[User:Maplestrip|Maplestrip]] ([[User talk:Maplestrip|talk]]) 07:42, 8 April 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::I've thought about this, over the years. Having 'a page' (rather than the summary table, in the [[what if? (blog)|overview page]], etc) does sound more completist than what we currently have but I then tend to hit the main ontological problem...&lt;br /&gt;
::In the What-Ifs, Randall takes a 'simple' question and then ''explains'' the consequences. At length. A 'comic page' structure (starting with how we'd deal with the multiple midpoint images, so we would stray far from using the {{template|comic}} introduction) that followed the header(image,etc)/explanation/transcript/(trivia)/included-comments format would be silly and have many parts inappropriate. Remove the Transcript, for starters. ''Or'' need a mini-Transcript for each 'illustrative' image. (e.g. &amp;quot;:[Black Hat:] What if we tried more power?&amp;quot;, several times.)&lt;br /&gt;
::Is there an actual need to ''explain Randall's explanation..''? Because that's the only thing 'we' can do. Which is rather silly, and seems like it would take a small (entertainingly rambling) essay and expand it into a large (pedantically rambling) one.&lt;br /&gt;
::Or else we just straight-copy the What-If over here as a 'backup'-blag? Allowable, but not exactly a USP, there'll be Internet Archive and personal copies, should things go bad at Randall's end. Not really a noble-cause.&lt;br /&gt;
::My suggestion, as to how to cover the remaining &amp;quot;explanation gap&amp;quot; and provide a useful 'service' that's worthwhile maintaining, is ''maybe'' two What If? (Blag) sub-pages:&lt;br /&gt;
::#A place to collate all inter-text images (and hover-/title-texts), and Transcript them, for easy searching.&lt;br /&gt;
::#*e.g. when you know you want to refer to the &amp;quot;bomb to the eyeball&amp;quot; one (internally or for something external) but think you might not realise where you need to go to (the supernova neutrinos one!) just by scrolling a bare comic list.&lt;br /&gt;
::#*Or you'd like to see, at a glance, how many different places the Black Hat Try More Power running joke occurs.&lt;br /&gt;
::#*Even if you don't want to open the page itself (160+ 'comics' with say 5 images each, is an 800ish-image page, less rationalising 'repeats' to a single entry), it should at least give you a search result for &amp;quot;dry waterfall&amp;quot; that points you in the direction of the &amp;quot;Niagra Straw&amp;quot; one (and maybe others?).&lt;br /&gt;
::#*I could see these being brief Image/Titletext/Transcript/(optional explanatory context), but not enough material to make them separate comic-style-pages in their own right, right?&lt;br /&gt;
::#Something of the same 'collation page mechanism' for all those superscript-popup-'footnote' bits. Though I admit I'm not entirely sure for what purpose except that it just ''seems'' like a good &amp;quot;collection page&amp;quot; to maintain. Perhaps to offer updated onward-links if any of the originals suffer link-rot? (But then, that fate can occur to all non-popupped links, so maybe I've chosen the wrong thing to highlight.)&lt;br /&gt;
::...the question is, what do you want from it. Bear in mind that if you can creae pages here then you can set up what ''you'' think you'd like to see (e.g. for What-If#1, for starters) then get the community to assess it. Do it as a sub-page to your Userspace, maybe, as proof-of-concept.&lt;br /&gt;
::Just because it's not been seen as necessary so far, doesn't mean it's not necessary. I've thought about it a lot (not thst I'm in a position to inplement anything), but I've only decided that I don't see a need for a straight copy (others' views may differ on that) and not enough reason to pester for ''my'' 'ideas' to be fulfilled. But I aint 'in charge' here, and happily so. [[Special:Contributions/172.69.194.100|172.69.194.100]] 11:29, 8 April 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::You make a fair point. He did already explain in great detail what would happen if [x] scenario happened. It just seems like it would be nice to have a page exclusively for discussing all the ''What If'' articles. [[User:Psychoticpotato|Psychoticpotato]] ([[User talk:Psychoticpotato|talk]]) 20:49, 15 May 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::::People just need to make a draft or two and see what happens. Be sure to link a draft here if one is created, I would like to help on it. &amp;quot;I want to learn more and explore this scenario further&amp;quot; is a valid feeling to have. [[User:Maplestrip|Maplestrip]] ([[User talk:Maplestrip|talk]]) 07:34, 16 May 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Randall-ify the Captcha ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Let's have some fun:  Is it feasible to replace the Captcha with something &amp;quot;xkcd-ish&amp;quot; like &amp;quot;click on Randall's work&amp;quot; with a mix of XKCD stuff and generic pictures.  If not, how about a replacing it with a quiz like &amp;quot;which of the following IS [or IS NOT] xkcd character&amp;quot; with one obvious correct answer. [[Special:Contributions/172.68.26.75|172.68.26.75]] 16:11, 9 May 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:are YOU able to create a CAPTCHA from scratch? [[User:42.book.addict|42.book.addict]] ([[User talk:42.book.addict|talk]]) 15:59, 13 May 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::Choose any images that contain user-made CAPTCHAs from the following selection. [[User:Psychoticpotato|Psychoticpotato]] ([[User talk:Psychoticpotato|talk]]) 21:22, 13 May 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::We could also make captchas based on most of [[:Category:CAPTCHA|these]]. [[User:PDesbeginner|PDesbeginner]] ([[User talk:PDesbeginner|talk]]) 02:57, 11 September 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Incomplete Tag Vote ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I think each comic's discussion page should have a section to vote on whether the explanation is complete or not. How long do you think the voting period should be?[[User:PDesbeginner|PDesbeginner]] ([[User talk:PDesbeginner|talk]]) 03:42, 19 June 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Rather than a voting period, I think it would be ideal if people could &amp;quot;vote&amp;quot; on the completeness of an article at any time. As I go through all the old pages, I come across lots of pages that feel a little bit incomplete. It would be nice if we had a measurement of completion that wasn't binary. [[User:Maplestrip|Maplestrip]] ([[User talk:Maplestrip|talk]]) 10:16, 19 June 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::Feel free to add the incomplete tag again. But don't forget to mention WHY (either in the tag or the discussion or both) you think it's incomplete. :) The tag is mainly there so you can have a list of &amp;quot;incomplete&amp;quot; comics. A comic is either on that list or it isn't. This is pretty much binary. As for voting: If I think an explanation is complete and it bothers me that it's flagged as not I generally juts make a comment in the discussion asking if someone has still something to add or actually knows WHY it's still incomplete. If there's no response after a few days I delete the tag. There's no need to make a voting out of this. And if somone strongly disagrees to you there's always the &amp;quot;Undo&amp;quot;-link ;) [[User:Elektrizikekswerk|Elektrizikekswerk]] ([[User talk:Elektrizikekswerk|talk]]) 11:09, 19 June 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Sometimes I just feel &amp;quot;this could use more detail,&amp;quot; without specifically knowing what the detail would look like. This can be a problem when it's about explaining complicated science: the &amp;quot;completion&amp;quot; of a description of quantum mechanics that is readable by a novice, is very subjective. I am realizing the problem with the persistent voting idea tho: many people will vote something as &amp;quot;incomplete&amp;quot; but wouldn't come back to check on it later. [[User:Maplestrip|Maplestrip]] ([[User talk:Maplestrip|talk]]) 12:08, 19 June 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::::I'm more in the &amp;quot;less is more&amp;quot; camp. Most of my recent contributions to this wiki were deleting parts of bloated explanations: You don't need to explain quantum mechanics unless it's absolutely crucial for understanding the respective comic. Of course, if you are an expert in any given field, [[2501|it's hard to tell]] whether or not the current explanation is sufficient for a layperson and most contributors tend to write &amp;quot;too much&amp;quot;. Which is totally fine. People like me take care of the &amp;quot;too much&amp;quot;. ;) So, if you are an expert in quantum mechanics ignore &amp;quot;completed&amp;quot; comics about quantum mechanics. Surely you could contribute a lot to it but chances are high that most of it is unnecessary for the comic. Instead ask yourself if you need more information to understand that comic about biology. And if you do, add an incomplete and ask for that information ;) [[User:Elektrizikekswerk|Elektrizikekswerk]] ([[User talk:Elektrizikekswerk|talk]]) 12:31, 19 June 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:I've been here a long time, effectively back to when there were ''missing'' explanations (other than the &amp;quot;too new to have the barebones put in&amp;quot; ones, these days only seen when the current BOT is tardy or offline for some reason), and I've seen the Incomplete template change from the useful 'infill marker' to become a regular joke-tag of a similar nature to the Citation Needed. Yes, I agree that both of these (and the Because You're Dumb&amp;quot; tag) are perhaps a bit confusing for new users (like the one who badly edited out a link, just now, apparently thinking it was spam, because of the way it mentioned viagra), but I have grown to see them as community in-jokes (of various degrees of subtlety) that many people seem to appreciate under their current incarnations.&lt;br /&gt;
:We've recently removed the Main Page's more literal &amp;quot;there are # incomplete articles&amp;quot; announcement, which leaves the purpose of ''more accurately'' using the Incomplete tag a little less important. Apart from letting us dive into the (purported) list of Incomplete Explanations, one of the main ''serious'' purposes of the Incomplete tag is removed, leaving the now consistently employed purpose of doing a &amp;quot;Created by a THING OTHER THAN THE BOT&amp;quot; joke much more prominent.&lt;br /&gt;
:Really, all articles are potentially incomplete, still. Some more than others. Something big, like Hoverboard or Gravity, might truly have easter-eggs or subtle details as yet not properly commented upon, but there have been edits to ''double-digit'' comics recently which might be considered improvements. As such, there are really only two 'sensible' direct courses of action:&lt;br /&gt;
:#Completely remove the Incomplete tag, from use, as all pages are only ever as complete as the eye of any particular beholder, and the more recent pages are ''obviously'' incomplete by their being barely 15 minutes (or a day, or ''maybe'' a week) old. Or being so huge (or Time-like!) that they clearly still haven't been 'completely' documented. Maybe the BOT can add a Created By The Bot tag that gets wiped out by the first serious attempt at human editing, but if we wish to lose this part of our site culture so readily then why ever have it at all? A wikivote system is not really that accurate under these circumstances, for a number of reasons that I needn't explain, so go straight to assuming that any such 'vote' would pass, right from the off...&lt;br /&gt;
:#Embrace it for its THING OTHER THAN A BOT usage, alone. Don't be so eager to remove them just because you have no personal changes you'd wish to see. (Votes or not, there could always be another editor along in a minute who has, unlike the rest of you, picked up on an obscure visual pun rendered in what turns out to be hieroglyphs, or similar.) If we have to cull them (not a given!), then let it be an unstated rule (or a stated one?) that if there are more than (e.g.) half a dozen then the 'least amusing' may be removed by the first editor who wishes to express a critical opinion. Just the one at a time. No reinstating, no resurrection, no adding to old articles that never ever had a 'joke Incomplete' before, no entirely new joke (but you can refine what's there, to a degree), just a rolling (and not necessarily consecutive!) set of the &amp;quot;finest natjve explainxkcd wit&amp;quot;. Or at least the least objectionable surviving examples of same.&lt;br /&gt;
:As a practical guide, the &amp;quot;reason why you think it is Incomplete element&amp;quot; could be entirely served by in-line tags (the &amp;quot;What?&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;Why?&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;Date?&amp;quot; things you might see elsewhere). Perhaps we could even do ''both'' things by instead having a &amp;quot;Complete&amp;quot; tag ''explicitly'' for BOT-REPLACEMENT-type tomfoolery (and tongue-in-cheekness about Completion, as we might currently be about Incometeness) from the off. That might confuse the newbods, of course. At least until it doesn't, and then they're not newbods anymore...&lt;br /&gt;
:The companion tag, for Incomplete Transcript, is presumably going to serve as it currently does (as a still serious hint as to actual Incompleteness), albeit that I've noticed a trend for the first editor of a brand new published comic to (possibly ''after'' doing the BOT-replacement joke, or after the editor who did ''only'' that) go straight in and enTranscript it (to varying degrees of accuracy and completion), whether or not they also then remove that specific tag-template at the same time. It seems that some people are more comfortable at providing a ''Transcript''ion-service than they are at establishing even the seed of an Explanation. (Or they only have enough time to do the latter, to the level of detail they wish to achieve in the moment open to them.)&lt;br /&gt;
:This is, of course, a cultural issue. All the above (from me) is just my own perception of practical aspects, notwithstanding those opinions already expressed before that (and elsewhere). I don't speak for everyone. And, as a perpetual IP, technically I should say that I don't speak for ''anyone'', either... [[Special:Contributions/172.70.160.140|172.70.160.140]] 14:21, 19 June 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I like the idea of removing the Incomplete tag. What do you think? [[User:PDesbeginner|PDesbeginner]] ([[User talk:PDesbeginner|talk]]) 14:57, 19 June 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::I greatly approve of a &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{what}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt; tag, as a Wikipedian that's actually really funny. I would want to keep the Incomplete tag, as I think it has purpose, even if it no longer represents a goal to achieve. I think this website will never reach 100.00% completeness and that is good, actually. [[User:Maplestrip|Maplestrip]] ([[User talk:Maplestrip|talk]]) 14:05, 26 June 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::Okay. If someone wants to they can just ignore the incomplete tags. [[User:PDesbeginner|PDesbeginner]] ([[User talk:PDesbeginner|talk]]) 14:37, 28 June 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== &amp;quot;As of &amp;lt;now&amp;gt;&amp;quot;... ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What would be rather useful is an &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{As of now}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt; template (or similar wording, and perhaps an &amp;quot;as of now&amp;quot;-cased alternative for use mid-sentence). There are many articles that will have words along the lines of &amp;quot;this has not yet happened, as of August 2024&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;this situation is continuing, as of August 2024&amp;quot;. Every now and then, someone will come across one of these with an older date (perhaps only just out of date, perhaps years old) and [https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=1858:_4th_of_July&amp;amp;curid=20285&amp;amp;diff=348082&amp;amp;oldid=315524 edit it accordingly]. You could also seek them all out, deliberately, with a bit of effort in the search-bar.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
(Note that &amp;quot;as of&amp;quot; does not ''always'' need updating, there are non-dated examples such as in [[1074: Moon Landing#Trivia]], static transcript versions, like [[1071: Exoplanets#Transcript]] and other instances where the text &amp;quot;as of&amp;quot;, with or without a date, really does not need to be changed... but sometimes is anyway by a well-meaning passer-by.)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Sometimes, this can be done along with another useful edit/update/revision that is spotted, or is just one of the revisions that some other need for change conveniently allows. But it seems a bit vague to rely upon occasional attention.  Instead the template will implement something like &amp;quot;&amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;As of {{Monthyear}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;&amp;quot; (here having to use &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{#time:F Y}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;, ...&amp;quot;As of {{#time:F Y}}&amp;quot;...), though there's the possibility that a parameter-mediated switch can let it alternatively become a to-the-day-level format option (at which point you could even implement/calcuate something like {{template|Yesterday}} would be) or just to the year-level. (Or add {{template|As of this year}}, {{template|As of this month}} and {{template|As of this day}} separately.)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This would negate the need to ''just'' poke and prod any article that happened to 'need' updating every month (or year, or possible day). And to deal with the possibility that some of these cases might actually need to be edited because &amp;quot;as of&amp;quot; does ''not'' now apply, include within it a {{:Category:As of}} membership, letting anyone who is interested keep an eye on these aggregated 'As of's, ready to jump in there and change it to some straight up &amp;quot;Up until &amp;lt;fixed date&amp;gt;&amp;quot; equivalent should any one of them actually no longer apply.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
...obviously, I can't even begin to create the template page required, but I'd be happy to work on the exact wikimedia code required if anyone thinks it needs anything but the most basic transcluded formatting and doesn't know how. Open to discussion, and I'll tag on more if I happen to see that discussion developing. [[Special:Contributions/172.70.162.186|172.70.162.186]] 18:04, 4 August 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:As an addendum/change to my above suggestion, considering a simpler {{template|as of}} (and {{template|As of}}) which does ''no'' automagical continuous updating (just gives the &amp;quot;as of&amp;quot; literal on its own), but still guarantees &amp;quot;Category:As of&amp;quot; membership, so that it doesn't actively give wrong (new) date+circumstance relationships in the likes of [[1047: Approximations]]. In that, the several mentions of populations can safely stay as old years until someone rewrites the proposed value and assessment as well, but it still could be a task to pursue every new year after checking the Cat for likely comics needing a quick check'n'edit.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== “Grammar Bot” ==&lt;br /&gt;
I’m working on a python based bot written with the Pywiki library that aims to use the replace.py scripts to fix simple grammatical mistakes, e.g. correcting Citation needed placements, cleaning up extra spaces, etc. I will be posting the code in a few weeks after I finish it (I’m a bit busy at the moment with school and orchestra) so the entire community can view it. Any thoughts on the idea? Thanks. [[User:42.book.addict|42.book.addict]] ([[User talk:42.book.addict|talk]]) 21:05, 5 September 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:First thoughts are that there are going to be so many exceptions. I definitely agree with the idea of {{template|Citation needed}}s being made consistent (if only it weren't sometimes complicated{{Citation needed}}), as well as that of    mysterious    extra       spaces. But that's not really grammatical. Punctuation, in the first case. I fear a full (or even fragmentary) grammar-checker is going to be complicated and give many false positives.&lt;br /&gt;
:At least at first, perhaps have it ''report'' what it thinks it has found. You may discover definite times that it isn't necessary and it would indeed create new errors.&lt;br /&gt;
:At the very least, run it with two checklists: One to do an automatic replace.py and one to just report. Start with the first list empty. Introduce potential ones to the latter, review all the reports carefully, ''then'' move any sensible-looking ones to former.&lt;br /&gt;
:And have it not fighting other bots (particularly theusafBOT), perhaps selected users (e.g. the likes of Kynde, and of course yourself) or indeed itself (if it makes a change that might inadvertently trigger another 'check') by excluding such changes for a recheck/rechange. Keep a record of what it changed, so that if anybody reverts/recorrects something that seems to have gone wrong it doesn't force it 'wrong' again. At the simplest, give a whole page a decent time-out and/or number of subsequent limits before it ''considers'' a new change. Implement from the start the option of a 'whitelist' (of pages it can ignore) or 'blacklist' (of rules it shouldn't apply, or at least actively apply, to a given page), so you can quickly manually add a throttle-down by simple config-file rather than have to add in a code-kludge when something obviously (in hindsight!) needs correcting about the way it works. And also maybe throttle it to have no more than one bot-edit per hour (while starting from scratch) to not swamp the system and give the rest of us time to assess any errors it has made (and its successes!) - you can unstick that throttle later, when you consider it tested with all its backlog of microcorrections.&lt;br /&gt;
:...there are a few other guidelines I would suggest, but the cautiousness already present in the above approaches might mean that they are left as not so important. Just consider what ''could'' go wrong before unleashing it on our world.&lt;br /&gt;
:And all power to your elbow, it is of course something we all might have considered (I know I have... not that I have the login for it, but what really stopped me was knowing how badly I could mess it up by getting just one detail wrong if I tried it).&lt;br /&gt;
:Among changes/alerts I would have it make would be cases of {{template|cn}}, {{template|citation needed}}, etc, instead of the 'main' template. Plus []-links to either wikipedia pages (most of them should be {{template|w}}-templated) or explainxkcd.com pages (most of them should be [[]]ed), although there are even then some exceptions. It'd also be nice if it can identify all Talk (and Community Portal) contributions that were not signed (more complex, as some may be after the fact, or have been after several years and further editings). I know how I'd do all this, or think I do (only upon starting to do it can I be sure I've actually theorised it correctly!), but I mention this mostly to point out how ''you'' might want to cautiously implement ''your'' ideas. HTH. [[Special:Contributions/172.70.86.15|172.70.86.15]] 00:07, 6 September 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::you have made plenty of wonderful points that I clearly have not thought about-quite the critical oversight on my part. Is anyone interested in collaborating? I don’t think that my skills are good enough to satisfy all of those points. [[User:42.book.addict|42.book.addict]] ([[User talk:42.book.addict|talk]]) 01:06, 6 September 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::hello? Anybody? Please help… [[User:42.book.addict|42.book.addict]] ([[User talk:42.book.addict|talk]]) 17:38, 9 September 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::::I believe this would be a great idea and also an incredibly complicated feat. Randall is no stranger to using weird punctuation in comics or misspelled words. I think it would be neat if it weren't automated and just reported errors it found so we could manually fix them, which would make its development much easier, but at that point it's very similar to a series of search queries for misspelled words, which we can already do. I have no coding skills so I'm not going to be of help. [[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 17:33, 7 November 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
;Update&lt;br /&gt;
I have found a solution to fix most grammatical mistakes, I just need to make sure that it doesn’t correct character names like “Cueball”, not edit war with other bots, come up with a system to log the edits it makes so that it doesn’t revert again, and fix Citation needed templates. I already know how to make sure that it asks me before editing, so I want to create an account to test it out. Does anybody have ideas on what to name the bot? I don’t want to call it 42.book.addictBOT, since the username would be a bit clunky. ToriBOT could work, but I’m also open to any other names. Feel free to reply to this or reply to me on my talk page! '''[[User:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:9pt;color:#db97bf&amp;quot;&amp;gt;42.book.addict&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:6pt;color:#97b6db&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Talk to me!&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;''' 20:30, 29 November 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== &amp;quot;dark mode&amp;quot; ==&lt;br /&gt;
add dark mode [[User:CalibansCreations|'''&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#ff0000;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Caliban&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;''']] ([[User talk:CalibansCreations|talk]]) 09:54, 18 November 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:See [[User:Certified nqh/common.css]] or copy/paste my old [[User:42.book.addict/common.css|common.css]] page history into your common.css page: -42.book.addict [[Special:Contributions/172.69.134.208|172.69.134.208]] 16:10, 18 November 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::ha, thx tori, nqh's common.css works like a charm :) [[User:CalibansCreations|'''&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#ff0000;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Caliban&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;''']] ([[User talk:CalibansCreations|talk]]) 08:51, 21 November 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== reddit ==&lt;br /&gt;
Add reddit- Anonymous {{unsigned ip|172.71.214.80|08:31, 21 November 2024 (UTC)}}&lt;br /&gt;
:You probably need to explain what you mean by that. Add reddit discussions to here? Add this site to reddit? Add some simple link to one from the other? Something else? [[Special:Contributions/172.70.162.163|172.70.162.163]] 13:02, 21 November 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::&amp;gt;Add some simple link to one from the other?&lt;br /&gt;
::I have no idea what they meant either, but I hadn't thought of this! I could see the addition of a simple link to the comic template, like &amp;quot;https://reddit.com/r/xkcd/comments/{{PAGETITLE}&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;https://reddit.com/r/xkcd/search/?q={{PAGETITLE}&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
::I don't partecipate much in the r/xkcd subreddit, so i'm not sure if they have structured post titles or even if they posted all the comics, or if it's automated, but I think this could be cool! Some people will likely come from Reddit, so it would be a straightforward way for them to go back. Thoughts? {{unsigned|FaviFake|16:55, 11 January 2025 (UTC)}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== viewer ==&lt;br /&gt;
i propose to add random page to comic viewer {{unsigned ip|172.71.150.14|00:17, 25 February 2025 (UTC)}}&lt;br /&gt;
:There's already a &amp;quot;Random Page&amp;quot; link.&lt;br /&gt;
:If you mean (it's ambiguous!) a &amp;quot;Random Comic Page&amp;quot; link, then I'm not sure it's needed. There are so many &amp;quot;Comic pages&amp;quot; that it's a fairly good chance that you'll land on one of them for any given click, much more chance within two clicks. The likelihood of not getting a comic within ''three'' clicks will be tiny. Another way to do it is to just use the xkcd.com &amp;quot;Random&amp;quot; button, then (whichever comic you land on, which will be any but [[404]]), change the &amp;quot;xkcd.com&amp;quot; bit of the URL to &amp;quot;expxkcd.com&amp;quot; and... you end up here.&lt;br /&gt;
:If none of that really does what you want (especially if you mean something completely different from what I read it as), some more explanation would probably be appreciated. [[Special:Contributions/172.69.79.164|172.69.79.164]] 01:02, 25 February 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:If you want to make sure to land on all comics, you can go to &amp;quot;Special pages&amp;quot; on the sidebar, scroll down to &amp;quot;Random page in category&amp;quot;, and enter &amp;quot;All comics&amp;quot;. As far as I'm aware, there isn't really a way to automate this, so you have to keep inputting it manually. [[User:Firestar233|guess who]] ([[User talk:Firestar233|if you desire conversing]] | [[Special:Contributions/Firestar233|what i have done]]) 06:38, 25 February 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::I think they meant a button on the {{tl|comic}} template. Would it be technically possible to make it such that it works exacly like the one on the official site? --[[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 17:47, 25 February 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::It ''should'' be a matter of using [[Special:RandomInCategory/All Comics]], I think, but doesn't seem to work when I try that exact attempt. Perhaps mediawiki or the mediawiki extension is not updated enough, or else I'm getting my wikisyntax slightly wrong.&lt;br /&gt;
:::Functionally, though, where the website has its Random button, we have our &amp;quot;go to the xkcd.com original&amp;quot;, so more thought is needed before we just &amp;quot;add a button&amp;quot;. If we do, we want it where the 'mothership' website does, but we still ought to have our details-and-link-to-original given, and I like it as a (faux) button.&lt;br /&gt;
::: Perhaps the {{template|comic}}, where it currently has header 'buttons':&lt;br /&gt;
 [|&amp;lt;&amp;lt;] [Prev] [#9876 (Grune 32, 2525)] [Next] [&amp;gt;&amp;gt;|]&lt;br /&gt;
::: Needs to be changed to maybe:&lt;br /&gt;
       [ #9876 (Grune 32, 2525) ]&lt;br /&gt;
 [|&amp;lt;&amp;lt;] [Prev]   [Random]   [Next] [&amp;gt;&amp;gt;|]&lt;br /&gt;
:::...or equivalent. Haven't checked, but if it's a one-line table, can be easily made into a two-line one with colspan=3 (or 5?) in the right bit. If it's just centred, then it should come out Ok, in a simple way. But I'm not too keen on that change, really, and you'd need to actually have the Random-&amp;gt;Comic link working first, ''anyway''. So I'm giving you my opinions and (slightly lacking) knowledge, in case that can at least make for the better outcome than either nothing (though not sure that's bad!) or some half-hearted ideas from elsewhere. [[Special:Contributions/172.70.86.116|172.70.86.116]] 21:52, 25 February 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::: Unless someone can figure out the requests made by the random in category, a workaround could be to use a (pseudo)random number generator (mediawiki has a [https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Template:Random_number template] on their website) to get a random number in the range of 1 - {{template|LATESTCOMIC}} and put in a link to that comic number using &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;[[number]]&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
:::: Note: There already is a &amp;quot;Random&amp;quot; template, but it was just using random page and was blanked by the person who made it [[User:Firestar233|guess who]] ([[User talk:Firestar233|if you desire conversing]] | [[Special:Contributions/Firestar233|what i have done]]) 03:50, 26 February 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::{{Done|Done!!!}} &amp;amp;nbsp;I tried that wikimedia templaete but couldn't figure out how to make it work. I did it using Special:Random, hoping there aren't too many non-comic pages. Check [[{{LATESTCOMIC}}]] for an example of how it looks and works. --[[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 16:02, 23 April 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::thanks! (i hav an account now) [[User:Bb777|me, hi]] ([[User talk:Bb777|talk]]) 22:30, 25 April 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::No problem! There's also a special custom-designed navbar for the original comics: try clicking the &amp;quot;|&amp;lt;&amp;quot; button! (It's not complete yet, but i'm slowly finishing it!) --[[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 22:36, 25 April 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Contentious Topics Template ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I propose that we create a unified template to slap on contentious and possibly controversial comics, with a warning similar to the one I (and a couple other people added on) wrote in [[3073: Tariffs]]. Now, since I don’t know how to create a template and don’t understand how they work, this is my request for help. If you are available to help write it or have any tips for me, please contact me either in this thread or on my [[User talk:42.book.addict|talk page]]. Thanks! '''[[User:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:9pt;color:pink&amp;quot;&amp;gt;42.book.addict&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:6pt;color:#B1E4E3&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Talk to me!&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;''' 18:01, 16 April 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Hey, I just wanted to ask why you think a new template is needed. {{tl|notice2}} and {{tl|notice}} seem pretty solid. How would a new template differ from them? Btw, I switched the template in [[Talk:3073: Tariffs]] from {{tl|notice}} to {{tl|notice2}} so it's more like a warning, feel free to revert it if you prefer {{tl|notice}}. --[[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 16:56, 17 April 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::I read the idea (which I'm not too enamoured with, but wouldn't argue against either) as being to create a &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{contentious}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;-like template in its own right that (perhaps by using {{template|notice2}} within it) had a standard &amp;quot;This comic, and its explanation, covers a particularly contentious subject. Take even more care than usual when adding to or editing this Explanation/Talk Page&amp;quot; (or similar) text with it.&lt;br /&gt;
::It would probably also have the ability to add further (or alternate) info, by standard template parameters, in case you want to personalise it to the ''exact''nature of the contention.&lt;br /&gt;
::But, my reasons why I didn't volunteer my ideas immediately are:&lt;br /&gt;
::*It paints targets. Anybody who wants to can look at all &amp;quot;pages using the Contentious template&amp;quot; and then troll-bomb them ''specifically''&lt;br /&gt;
::*Looking at the Tariffs-comic warning, that's ''huge'', and catering for that with a &amp;quot;standard text + additional notes&amp;quot; would be awkward... if you really believe it should be so huge in the first place,&lt;br /&gt;
::*Just by being so obviously available, there'd be creep. &amp;quot;Hey, this comic talks disparagingly about Newton's belief in alchemy... Surely that needs a warning too!&amp;quot;, or start off with &amp;quot;Well, nobody's warning about our attitude to the US Senate in this comic, so I can be disparaging&amp;quot; which then practically forces another contentious-tagging (''possibly'' useful, but maybe in making a bolt for the barn door only ''after'' the horse has already made its own bolt through it) as it gets toned-down/-back again.&lt;br /&gt;
::And, though I also imagined the Tariff comic ''would'' get some push-back (there was some minor bits, but we seem to have kept it mature enough, IMO), it seems to be quiet. Can't say for sure it would have been without the warning it now has, but it survived ok before that was added. Hence why I'm ''meh'' about the very proposal. Hard cases make hard laws, and hard situations may prompt hard solutions. But I'm dubious about the actual case for the need. (As you say, we have 'freeform' notice+notice2, and I haven't seen proof even that was necessary as it was used.)&lt;br /&gt;
::But it would be trivial to implement, give or take some fine-tuning. I'll say that as a positive for the idea. Even if we never really use it as much as we could. [[Special:Contributions/162.158.216.83|162.158.216.83]] 20:35, 17 April 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Agreed. Maybe it's a good thing that we have to craft one for each comic we want to tag; this makes sure only actually contentious comics get tagged. An upside to having a specific template is that we wouldn't need to type &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;noinclude&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt; every time, to avoid it displaying on the transcluded talk page.--[[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 21:00, 17 April 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::::mm. all of these are good points. now that i think about it, copy-pasting old warnings and tweaking them as needed is probably better than creating a new template. '''[[User:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:9pt;color:pink&amp;quot;&amp;gt;42.book.addict&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:6pt;color:#B1E4E3&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Talk to me!&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;''' 16:45, 18 April 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Proposal for template page==&lt;br /&gt;
I was thinking that making a template page with instructions about what should and should not be included in which sections would make it easier for new editors to help. I have no idea how I would do this, though.[[User:BobcatInABox|BobcatInABox]] ([[User talk:BobcatInABox|talk]]) 11:49, 4 May 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Which particular template? Many templates ''do'' contain instructions (from basic to rather thorough), and some common ones are also gone into in the FAQ page. [[Special:Contributions/172.70.91.245|172.70.91.245]] 20:25, 4 May 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== The newest stuff goes at top ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I’ve been thinking the newest comments should go at top and replies are under the chose comment with a colon or more. Because every time someone makes a comment but not replying to you, you still get a message. So you only get notifications when someone replies to you. And the always get notifications not related to you is kind of annoying. [[User:Aprilfoolsupdate!|Aprilfoolsupdate!]] ([[User talk:Aprilfoolsupdate!|talk]]) 04:30, 15 May 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:(Ah, so you found it, before I even wrote my directions down on how to get here.)&lt;br /&gt;
:Not sure this helps.&lt;br /&gt;
:Firstly: Top-posting is &amp;lt;s&amp;gt;the work of the Devil... burn it! Burn it all!&amp;lt;/s&amp;gt; very hard to read.&lt;br /&gt;
::A: Because it's in totally the wrong order.&lt;br /&gt;
::Q: Why is Top Posting bad?&lt;br /&gt;
:(Yes, I know you want top-posting ''threads'' but retain bottom-posting ''thread replies'', but can you even imagine the chaos involved with people not properly realising what's top- and what's bottom-posted. Or inter-posted into an existing hierarchy? Not with this 'flatfile' structure, anyway.)&lt;br /&gt;
:Secondly: Does this count for headers (like &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;== The newest stuff goes at top ==&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;)? For 'no-colon' starter comments under a Discussion header? For both?&lt;br /&gt;
:Thirdly: what are we doing with all the past ''pages and pages'' of things that are (more or less..) consistently chronological and bottom-posted? To make new additions work, someone (and probably ''before'' the first commentator who wants to add a brand new one-line witicism to the top of any multi-year-idle page) has to go into every Discussion page (and more?) to reshuffle it all by whatever Top(ish)-Post Criteria are adopted.&lt;br /&gt;
:Fourthly: It wouldn't even change how frequently you get notifications. (Actually, it might make it worse, as inveterate bottom-posters have to be 'corrected' by the followers of the 'new rule', as well as for any actually idle pages that get redone as part of the &amp;quot;thirdly&amp;quot; point.) But I don't think Notifications are clever enough to imagine that a new section  ''above'' what you previously wrote doesn't possibly interest your registered &amp;quot;watch and notify&amp;quot; intent upon any given page.&lt;br /&gt;
:I have a Fifthly and Sixthly, too, but I assume I've made my general opinion quite clear. (And I noted that this is not the only Community Portal edit you made, just before arriving here. Will check the other in a moment.) [[Special:Contributions/172.68.229.142|172.68.229.142]] 06:19, 15 May 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::Never mind. I don’t even need to read the whole thing to know it is complicated. To many words {{unsigned|Aprilfoolsupdate|07:54, 15 May 2025 (UTC)}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Short version: It's complicated, confusing and troublesome to change to. &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;And won't even solve your problem.&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; [[Special:Contributions/172.70.160.197|172.70.160.197]] 12:22, 15 May 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Agree with this message but disagree with the proposal. --[[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 09:28, 18 May 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== By the Numbers ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Greetings all,&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
So we all know that Randall numbers each XKCD comic with an ordinal number in a simple ascending sequence. I have become exceedingly intrigued by the particular properties of numbers now, especially their factors and primes. The most recent prime-numbered comic is [[3109]] and we'll soon see another one with [[3119]]. Does Randall ascribe any meaning or humor to the numbers that happen to appear as the posts play out? He certainly celebrates special dates! As a math-humor-based comic, there certainly must be jokes or surprises hidden therein. I'm not sure I've noticed any yet, though. [[386]] is certainly notorious, though doesn't seem to have a direct sort of Intel connection. [[42]] is unremarkable. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I once read a novel with an autistic protagonist, and each chapter was assigned a prime number. I will henceforth be on the lookout for interesting numerical happenstance as Randall continues to post! Anyone else? [[User:Elizium23|Elizium23]] ([[User talk:Elizium23|talk]]) 08:56, 12 July 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Misc pages ==&lt;br /&gt;
I would like to propose the creation of an additional category for &amp;quot;miscellaneous pages&amp;quot; that aren't really comics, and which generally have a URL slug that's an English word or phrase instead of a number. This includes xkcd.com/YES and xkcd.com/NO, both of which currently have articles. It also includes these ones: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::''[Note by User:FaviFake: I organised this section and moved the links below]''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
...and others as they are found or recovered. If only we could access the forum thread mentioned on the YES and NO pages! I was able to find a link to the thread here, but it's inaccessible. A&lt;br /&gt;
It's the one labeled &amp;quot;Hidden pages on xkcd&amp;quot;: [https://web.archive.org/web/20170927200737/http://forums.xkcd.com/viewforum.php?f=2&amp;amp;sid=973b8a1dcd0a727a9177aa757108d4f6&amp;amp;start=250]. I was able to find the pages above via Reddit: [https://www.reddit.com/r/xkcd/comments/gixd96/what_are_all_the_hidden_pages_on_xkcd_that_you/] [https://www.reddit.com/r/xkcd/comments/35whzf/what/] --[[User:Rumbling7145|Rumbling7145]] ([[User talk:Rumbling7145|talk]]) 00:16, 11 March 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Update: I got into the forum page! [https://web.archive.org/web/20151206001238/http://forums.xkcd.com/viewtopic.php?f=2&amp;amp;t=110093] We can now add these pages to the list:&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Rumbling7145|Rumbling7145]] ([[User talk:Rumbling7145|talk]]) 23:37, 11 March 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;span id=&amp;quot;List of pages&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
===Pages===&lt;br /&gt;
* http://xkcd.com/yes {{Done|Created: [[YES]]}}&lt;br /&gt;
** http://xkcd.com/no {{Done|Created: [[NO]]}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* http://xkcd.com/nakedpictures {{Done|Created: [[nakedpictures]]}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* http://xkcd.com/spiral {{Done|Created: [[spiral]]}}&lt;br /&gt;
**Likely a reference to [[1488: Flowcharts]] (Which links to Spiral) and [[2322: ISO Paper Size Golden Spiral]], spirals above images of people and things&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* http://xkcd.com/burlap {{Done|Created: [[Burlap]]}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* http://xkcd.com/simplewriter {{Done|Created: [[Simple Writer]]}}&lt;br /&gt;
**Tool to Write Like [[Up Goer Five]] and [[Thing Explainer]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* http://xkcd.com/tree_prank&lt;br /&gt;
**This is so funny&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* http://xkcd.com/blue_eyes.html {{Done|Existing: [[Blue Eyes]]}}&lt;br /&gt;
** http://xkcd.com/solution.html, the solution to the problem (also found on [[Blue Eyes]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* http://xkcd.com/morphs ([https://web.archive.org/web/20130313175333/http://xkcd.com:80/morphs/ archive only] — [https://web.archive.org/web/20060219184352/http://www.xkcd.com:80/morphs/ earlier version with more text])&lt;br /&gt;
**&amp;quot;Using several pieces of imaging software, including Photoshop and an image morphing program, I make composite photos of people.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* http://xkcd.com/chesscoaster&lt;br /&gt;
**&amp;quot;People playing chess on roller coasters, inspired by this comic:&amp;quot; image&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* http://xkcd.com/kite&lt;br /&gt;
**&amp;quot;These are pictures I took by hanging cameras from kites, a hobby I've played with on and off over the years&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*https://xkcd.com/kite/kite_trick.jpg&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* http://xkcd.com/dot {{Done|Created: [[dot]]}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* http://xkcd.com/election ([https://web.archive.org/web/20141014075718/http://xkcd.com/election/ archive only])&lt;br /&gt;
**Used by randall for tracking elections, &amp;quot;it's the fastest analysis of the state of the race minute-by-minute&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* http://xkcd.com/event {{Done|Created: [[event]]}} (I still don't quite get it)&lt;br /&gt;
**There's an image on this site that a web browser fails to load, but when downloaded, Windows Photo Viewer can view the image.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* http://xkcd.com/now (redirect to [[1335: Now]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* http://xkcd.com/plus {{Done|Created: [[plus]]}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* http://xkcd.com/sub ([https://web.archive.org/web/20130111054027/http://xkcd.com/sub/ archive only]) — &amp;quot;The Sub Project&amp;quot;, a long explanation of how Randall and others build submarines?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* http://xkcd.com/temp ([https://web.archive.org/web/20061219193846/http://www.xkcd.com/temp/ archive only])&lt;br /&gt;
**This is super interesting! It lists other sub-directories. [https://web.archive.org/web/*/http://www.xkcd.com/temp/* These are the ones that survived in the archive]:&lt;br /&gt;
**http://xkcd.com/temp/email.txt ([https://web.archive.org/web/20100305065807/http://xkcd.com/temp/email.txt archive only]) — Seems to be an email exchange between Randall and someone else?&lt;br /&gt;
**http://xkcd.com:80/temp/euphoria.txt ([https://web.archive.org/web/20160401222138id_/http://xkcd.com:80/temp/euphoria.txt archive only]) — This says &amp;quot;&amp;lt;Sphere&amp;gt; Ok, that last Randall who said 'to clarify' was actually Randall, but pretty much none of the others were. Also no Sphere after this gets linked in chat a second time is actually Randall either. Randall is probably not there.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
**https://xkcd.com/temp/evidenceofidentity.txt ([https://web.archive.org/web/20201118232320/https://xkcd.com/temp/evidenceofidentity.txt archive only]) — &amp;quot;[Randall] Hello to everyone who waited in line to say hi to me on my How To book tour and specifically mentioned this chat!&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;[Sierra] Hello mr. probably not the real Randall :D [...]&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
***The rest are all images:&lt;br /&gt;
**http://www.xkcd.com/temp/humor/baby_mop.jpg ([https://web.archive.org/web/20070127045748/http://www.xkcd.com:80/temp/humor/baby_mop.jpg archive only])&lt;br /&gt;
**http://www.xkcd.com/temp/humor/darthswingset.jpg ([https://web.archive.org/web/20070127045624/http://www.xkcd.com:80/temp/humor/darthswingset.jpg archive only])&lt;br /&gt;
**http://www.xkcd.com/temp/humor/deb6d13b50a581304bac385c463b09c1.jpg ([https://web.archive.org/web/20070225103228/http://www.xkcd.com:80/temp/humor/deb6d13b50a581304bac385c463b09c1.jpg archive only])&lt;br /&gt;
**http://www.xkcd.com/temp/humor/Hacker%20Grave.jpg ([https://web.archive.org/web/20070213182708/http://www.xkcd.com:80/temp/humor/Hacker%20Grave.jpg archive only])&lt;br /&gt;
**http://www.xkcd.com/temp/humor/hotornot.jpg ([https://web.archive.org/web/20061219194445/http://www.xkcd.com:80/temp/humor/hotornot.jpg archive only])&lt;br /&gt;
**http://www.xkcd.com/temp/humor/how_rumors_start_office.jpg ([https://web.archive.org/web/20070111000437/http://www.xkcd.com:80/temp/humor/how_rumors_start_office.jpg archive only])&lt;br /&gt;
**http://www.xkcd.com/temp/humor/owned.jpg ([https://web.archive.org/web/20070228031547/http://www.xkcd.com:80/temp/humor/owned.jpg archive only])&lt;br /&gt;
**http://www.xkcd.com/temp/humor/shark.jpg ([https://web.archive.org/web/20061214082834/http://www.xkcd.com:80/temp/humor/shark.jpg archive only])&lt;br /&gt;
**http://www.xkcd.com/temp/humor/you_cannot_pass.jpg ([https://web.archive.org/web/20070323001005/http://www.xkcd.com:80/temp/humor/you_cannot_pass.jpg archive only])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* http://xkcd.com/test ([https://web.archive.org/web/20170510061033/https://xkcd.com/test/ archive only])&lt;br /&gt;
**This appears identical to the regular xkcd.com homepage, it returns a 404 as of today&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* http://xkcd.com/time (redirect to comic [[1190: Time]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* http://xkcd.com/twitter (redirect to https://x.com/xkcd)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* http://xkcd.com/cyborg.txt&lt;br /&gt;
**Interesting script. According to [https://blog.xkcd.com/2008/05/20/gps-cyborg-implant/ an old blag article], it is &amp;quot;a short Python script that uses a USB GPS device under Linux to help with navigation.  It doesn’t have maps or anything — it just gives distances and, while you’re moving, the direction to the destination (as in 'two o’clock').  It prints this info on the terminal and speaks it using speech synthesis.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* http://xkcd.com/channel.html ([https://web.archive.org/web/20141011002528/https://xkcd.com/channel.html archive only])&lt;br /&gt;
**I have no idea what this it. It's full of gibberish and Chinese text.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* http://xkcd.com/channel.txt ([https://web.archive.org/web/20141014083026/http://xkcd.com/channel.txt archive only])&lt;br /&gt;
** Same as above, but it downloads the file to the PC.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* http://xkcd.com/me.txt ([https://web.archive.org/web/20141014101900/http://xkcd.com:80/me.txt archive only])&lt;br /&gt;
**Only says &amp;quot;I am not in 1110.n01se.net anymore&amp;quot;. [https://www.reddit.com/r/xkcd/comments/5tqrew/xkcd_secret_page/ Learn more in this Reddit thread], in this [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EvLxOVYeo5w YouTube video of how it used to work], and in the [https://github.com/n01se/1110 GitHub for 1110.n01se.net]. I'm assuming Randall wanted to say that anyone who tries to impersonate him in the future isn't him?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* http://xkcd.com/why.txt ([https://web.archive.org/web/20180729163548/https://xkcd.com/why.txt archive only])&lt;br /&gt;
**Contains 33 THOUSAND &amp;quot;why&amp;quot; questions. May be related to [[1256: Questions]]? Very interesting!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* http://xkcd.com/bitcoin {{Done|Existing: [[Bitcoin address]]}}&lt;br /&gt;
**There's also this one, which we have dissected on the page [[Bitcoin address]] (very interesting read!)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* http://holistic.xkcd.com ([https://web.archive.org/web/20160304031258/http://holistic.xkcd.com/ archive only])&lt;br /&gt;
**&amp;quot;The XKCD Holistic Browser. Because we are all one. Type a web address and you'll be taken to one typed by someone else.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* https://aram.xkcd.com ([https://web.archive.org/web/20110816163403/http://aram.xkcd.com/ archive only])&lt;br /&gt;
**&amp;quot;This page is regenerated every day and may be NSFW. It shows a random result from a Google image search for IMG_????.jpg plus a random caption:&amp;quot; Seems it stopped working completely after a few years and got stuck one image&amp;amp;caption. Aram inspired [[Black Hat]], see his page for more.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* https://xkcd.com/verizon/ {{Done|Created: [[verizon]]}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* http://mail.xkcd.com ([https://web.archive.org/web/20120321204721/http://mail.xkcd.com/ archive only])&lt;br /&gt;
**Seems Randall set it up but never used it.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* https://xkcd.com/personal&lt;br /&gt;
**There was a /personal folder on xkcd, but it's been entirely wiped https://web.archive.org/web/*/https://xkcd.com/personal/*&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*https://xkcd.com/ngram-charts/ {{Done|Created: [[ngram charts]]}}&lt;br /&gt;
**Still online, but the images are missing even in [https://web.archive.org/web/20120225171410/http://xkcd.com:80/ngram-charts the archive]. &amp;quot;Some of the interesting charts I've come across while using Google Books ngrams (which analyzes the frequency of word use in their scanned books corpus over time)&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
* https://xkcd.com/color/rgb/&lt;br /&gt;
** https://xkcd.com/color/rgb.txt&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* http://68.57.186.221:8080/ ([https://web.archive.org/web/20041024201125/http://68.57.186.221:8080/ archive only])&lt;br /&gt;
** xkcd.com redirected to this at some points during 2004, this capture is from October 24th of 2004 specifically.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* https://throw.xkcd.com (only available [https://web.archive.org/web/20200919232527/throw.xkcd.com/ in the archive])&lt;br /&gt;
**This was likely hacked, see [https://www.reddit.com/r/xkcd/comments/iw9jsg/throwxkcdcom/ this Reddit thread]: ''&amp;quot;I emailed the xkcd.com webmaster, it was a testing URL he forgot to shut down. It's fixed now.&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* https://c.xkcd.com&lt;br /&gt;
**This is mostly all for comics with dynamic content. There are many subpages, see [https://www.reddit.com/r/xkcd/comments/j54lx3/does_anyone_know_what_cxkcdcom_is/ this reddit thread].&lt;br /&gt;
**https://c.xkcd.com/xb/feed&lt;br /&gt;
**http://c.xkcd.com/random/comic (redirects to random comic)&lt;br /&gt;
**https://c.xkcd.com/graph/1&lt;br /&gt;
**[https://www.reddit.com/r/xkcd/comments/j54lx3/does_anyone_know_what_cxkcdcom_is/ There are others].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* https://static.xkcd.com/ (404, not in archive. [http://web.archive.org/web/*/https://static.xkcd.com/* archived subpages])&lt;br /&gt;
** http://static.xkcd.com/bl.png ([http://web.archive.org/web/20070912213845/http://static.xkcd.com/bl.png archive only])&lt;br /&gt;
** http://static.xkcd.com/br.png ([http://web.archive.org/web/20070912213841/http://static.xkcd.com/br.png archive only])&lt;br /&gt;
** http://static.xkcd.com/favicon.ico ([http://web.archive.org/web/20071208203917/http://static.xkcd.com/favicon.ico archive only])&lt;br /&gt;
** http://static.xkcd.com/general.css ([http://web.archive.org/web/20071208203917/http://static.xkcd.com/general.css archive only])&lt;br /&gt;
** http://static.xkcd.com/ieonly.css ([http://web.archive.org/web/20070911163429/http://static.xkcd.com/ieonly.css archive only])&lt;br /&gt;
** http://static.xkcd.com/ml.png ([http://web.archive.org/web/20070912213838/http://static.xkcd.com/ml.png archive only])&lt;br /&gt;
** http://static.xkcd.com/mr.png ([http://web.archive.org/web/20070912213832/http://static.xkcd.com/mr.png archive only])&lt;br /&gt;
** http://static.xkcd.com/tl.png ([http://web.archive.org/web/20070912213828/http://static.xkcd.com/tl.png archive only])&lt;br /&gt;
** http://static.xkcd.com/tr.png ([http://web.archive.org/web/20070912213835/http://static.xkcd.com/tr.png archive only])&lt;br /&gt;
** http://www.static.xkcd.com/robots.txt ([http://web.archive.org/web/20070501000000*/http://www.static.xkcd.com/robots.txt archive only])&lt;br /&gt;
** https://almamater.xkcd.com/ ([http://web.archive.org/web/20130402215109/https://almamater.xkcd.com/ archive only])&lt;br /&gt;
:: https://almamater.xkcd.com/ ([http://web.archive.org/web/20150209005631/https://almamater.xkcd.com/ archive only])&lt;br /&gt;
:: and errors out: https://almamater.xkcd.com/ ([http://web.archive.org/web/20160528035956/https://almamater.xkcd.com/ archive only, errors out])&lt;br /&gt;
*** http://almamater.xkcd.com/best.csv ([http://web.archive.org/web/20130511122543/http://almamater.xkcd.com/best.csv archive only])&lt;br /&gt;
***See comic [[1193: Externalities]]&lt;br /&gt;
{{misc page}}&lt;br /&gt;
You can monitor the pages that are using this template (so the brand new webpage explanations) by going to [[Special:WhatLinksHere/Template:misc_page]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===How should we treat them?===&lt;br /&gt;
This is great! I think we should first create an article for each of them, and after we have a few articles then we can start to figure out a good name for the category and answer some questions, like:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Should we add a new parameter to the template for these non-comics? To do that, we would have to ask an admin to edit the {{tl|comic}} template to allow us to do that. We can ask Kynde, no big deal.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Some pages, like [[Blue Eyes]] and [[Bitcoin address]] are already in other categories, like [[:Category:Extra comics]] and [[:Category:Design of xkcd.com]]. Should we use the existing categories, or add a new one? How do we distinguish between, for example, [[Blue Eyes]], [[Bitcoin address]], and [[YES]], which are all in theory &amp;quot;misc pages&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Where should the new category be categorised?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*What title should we give for explanations of pages that don't have a name, like xkcd.com/dot? That one is just titled &amp;quot;xkcd.com/dot&amp;quot;, unlike pages like Blue Eyes and [[YES]]. Would it become &amp;quot;dot&amp;quot;, &amp;quot;Dot&amp;quot;, something else? Should we keep it coherent or base ourselves solely on the rendered title on the official site?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I love the idea! I currently don't have time, but I will create these pages eventually. If anyone else wants to chime in, please do! --[[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 16:11, 11 March 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;quot;Unnumbered publications&amp;quot;, or similar, could cover ''anything'' that wasn't xkcd.com/&amp;lt;digits&amp;gt;. Wouldn't cover replacements ([[2642: No One Was Hurt]] was originally 2642, for example), but that's a different class from deliberately off-series items. Also, given that often they are entirely non-image (the Yes and No), or straight text and multi-image (as per Blue Eyes, or other articles with a WhatIf-ish feel to them), I think calling them &amp;quot;comic&amp;quot;s is stretching the term.&lt;br /&gt;
:Though &amp;quot;miscellaneous pages&amp;quot; sort of covers this, I've a feeling that there's at least one... 'entity'... that is built upon multiple actual 'pages', but the list of candidates above doesn't contain any that look like they're what I'm vaguely thinking of. (Neither was it anything like the xkcd survey, or other interactive (numbered) comics, but maybe I'll bring it back to mind sooner rather than later.)&lt;br /&gt;
:As to the use of {{template|comic}}, I think we could spring to a (modified, 'inspired-by') template specifically for all these no-number/off-sequence explanation headers. Either explicit &amp;quot;prev=&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;next=&amp;quot; (per comic, ''could'' get quite mixed up if not kept uncontradictory) or a &amp;quot;position=&amp;quot; which could help maintain a list (and, from that, an auto-generated first/prev/next/last 'page ring') without having to subvert expectations of fitting in with the normal [[Template:LATESTCOMIC]] system.&lt;br /&gt;
:With the Comic template already equipped to deal with &amp;quot;no-number 'comics'&amp;quot;, there wouldn't (in the first instance) be much work needed to &amp;quot;decomic&amp;quot; the new copy, with the exact method of resequencing (if desired) as a parallel series being the biggest question. [[Special:Contributions/172.70.85.49|172.70.85.49]] 17:20, 11 March 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I'm not sure what the last sentenc means, but I like the idea of a new template! However, I don't think we should call the category &amp;quot;Unnumbered publications&amp;quot;. Isn't that just [[:Category:Extra comics]] but without comics [[Disappearing Sunday Update]] and [[No One Was Hurt]]? We should establish a criterion to add pages to this category and then figure out a name i think. --[[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 15:42, 12 March 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On this subject, is there any reason why it's [[YES]] and [[NO]] (currently the valid links) rather than [[Yes]] and [[No]] / [[yes]] and [[no]] (currently invalid links)? And I don't mean &amp;quot;why aren't there redirects?&amp;quot;, which I don't even think is the right way of resolving this, but what was the thinking? (Which then didn't result in [[DOT]], etc, so there's ''definitely'' some inconsistency, one way or another.) [[Special:Contributions/172.68.205.92|172.68.205.92]] 21:54, 17 March 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I don't see inconsistencies. The name of the browser tab for the yes page is &amp;quot;YES&amp;quot; by Randall, same for NO. Instead, the page for [[dot]] is called &amp;quot;xkcd.com/dot/&amp;quot;. We could use that, but that's likely not what Randall intended and might have been a coding oversight. --[[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 16:01, 18 March 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I've created the {{tl|misc page}} template for these pages and removed the incomplete template until we reach consensus on what to do with them. --[[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 14:40, 11 May 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ahem, I'd like to remind everyone that they can feel free to comment on the best way to manage these. Or if they should be included in the wiki at all. [[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 21:38, 17 August 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What if we just create a subcategory for These. It is xkcd so it should belong here. Should not be in the random queue but something like a button to get to these. {{unsigned ip|216.125.50.226|16:51, 18 March 2026 (UTC)}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== New page &amp;quot;Spiral&amp;quot; ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I found a new page at [http://xkcd.com/spiral xkcd/spiral]. what should I do? Thanks! &lt;br /&gt;
This is my first post, sorry it's not formatted correctly. -- [[Special:Contributions/73.169.159.188|73.169.159.188]] 00:27, 12 October 2025‎&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: Welcome. Good find! Any suggestions? -- [[User:Dtgriscom|Dtgriscom]] ([[User talk:Dtgriscom|talk]]) 01:47, 12 October 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::I've moved this over to Coordination and uploaded all images on spiral. I'll be making the page soon. '''[[User:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:9pt;color:#3a795e&amp;quot;&amp;gt;42.book.addict&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:6pt;color:#ce5f15&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Talk to me!&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;''' 05:04, 12 October 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Moving to correct location where we're discussing these pages. More discussion about how we should treat them is welcome! [[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 18:00, 13 October 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== [[:Category:Extra pages]] === &lt;br /&gt;
I've created a category called Extra pages for all of these pages. '''[[User:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:9pt;color:#3a795e&amp;quot;&amp;gt;42.book.addict&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:6pt;color:#ce5f15&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Talk to me!&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;''' 03:14, 5 November 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:So, right now we have &amp;quot;Category:Extra pages&amp;quot; ''and'' &amp;quot;Category:Extra comics&amp;quot;. Some ''are'' unnumbered comics (plus at least one &amp;quot;was a number, then replaced&amp;quot;) and some are 'merely' pages (with possible a fuzzy line between for 'pages' that show images-that-aren't-comics), perhaps we should be consistent between which are which, and how they relate to 'standard' numbered comics.&lt;br /&gt;
:For example, being an Extra Comics was (officially, but you could also manually add it) initiated by the &amp;quot;extra=yes&amp;quot; param to {{template|comic}}. This also (theoretically, problems with the randomness backend aside) adds them to the Random Comics link-choice, ''without'' adding them to the Comic List numbers (such that it states &amp;quot;we have #### comics&amp;quot;, where #### should not be different from the latest comic number, as recently established).&lt;br /&gt;
:Perhaps:&lt;br /&gt;
:*Make the comic template accept &amp;quot;extra=comic&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;extra=page&amp;quot;, instead of &amp;quot;extra=yes&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
:**Perhaps &amp;quot;extra=yes&amp;quot; 'remains' to default to one or the other? ...nah, just make sure all the current &amp;quot;=yes&amp;quot; ones are assigned beforehand.&lt;br /&gt;
:**&amp;quot;extra=no&amp;quot; just defaults back to behaviour without any &amp;quot;extra=&amp;quot; at all, of course, pretty much as currently.&lt;br /&gt;
:*Each of these new distinctions assigns to the 'Extra' category that fits it, but keeps it out of the All (numbered) Comics list, as being not numbered (and some not being 'comics')&lt;br /&gt;
:*Either ''just'' keep Extra Comics feeding to the Random Comic list (All Comics+Extra Comics, as we've painstakingly set it up to do, recently) or ''also'' include Extra Pages (it being AC+EC+EP in the Special:Random target list/whatever). TBD, depends upon whether you like a strictly &amp;quot;non-comic page&amp;quot; potentially popping up as a 'treat' for people.&lt;br /&gt;
:...that's all a ''little'' extra work. Some of which I could probably do right now (though maybe some pages are Protected against my input, haven't checked), but I think this needs discussion before doing any actual refining of the current setup.&lt;br /&gt;
:Might have been better to have proposed and discussed the Extra Pages details before starting that, too, but I'm happy to use this setup as a stepping stone given that it's been done already. [[Special:Contributions/82.132.244.89|82.132.244.89]] 14:20, 5 November 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Update on ngrams ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The images on the ngrams page appear to be generated dynamically. The original URLs are broken, but can be restored by changing &amp;quot;/chart&amp;quot; to &amp;quot;/graph&amp;quot;. This doesn't fix the HTML page, but it does render each of the 58 URLs accessible - see below.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
All graphs default to a corpus from 2009. Note that some graphs, such as the one noted &amp;quot;cherry picking&amp;quot; below, look very different using a more recent corpus.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* http://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=President+Lincoln%2CPresident+Roosevelt%2CPresident+Kennedy%2CPresident+Johnson%2CPresident+Nixon%2CPresident+Reagan%2CPresident+Bush&amp;amp;year_start=1780&amp;amp;year_end=2008&amp;amp;corpus=5&amp;amp;smoothing=3&lt;br /&gt;
* http://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=fuck&amp;amp;year_start=1700&amp;amp;year_end=2008&amp;amp;corpus=0&amp;amp;smoothing=3&lt;br /&gt;
* http://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=the+Great+War%2Cthe+World+War%2CWorld+War+I&amp;amp;year_start=1900&amp;amp;year_end=2000&amp;amp;corpus=0&amp;amp;smoothing=2&lt;br /&gt;
* http://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=christian%2Cchristianity&amp;amp;year_start=1700&amp;amp;year_end=2000&amp;amp;corpus=0&amp;amp;smoothing=3&lt;br /&gt;
* http://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=aliens%2C+predators&amp;amp;year_start=1750&amp;amp;year_end=2008&amp;amp;corpus=0&amp;amp;smoothing=1&lt;br /&gt;
* http://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=explosion+in+popularity&amp;amp;year_start=1900&amp;amp;year_end=2000&amp;amp;corpus=0&amp;amp;smoothing=3&lt;br /&gt;
* http://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=blue+line&amp;amp;year_start=1960&amp;amp;year_end=2008&amp;amp;corpus=0&amp;amp;smoothing=3&lt;br /&gt;
* http://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=upward+trend&amp;amp;year_start=1960&amp;amp;year_end=2008&amp;amp;corpus=0&amp;amp;smoothing=3&lt;br /&gt;
* http://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=gay%2Clesbian%2Cbisexual&amp;amp;year_start=1940&amp;amp;year_end=2008&amp;amp;corpus=0&amp;amp;smoothing=3&lt;br /&gt;
* http://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=Leviticus+18%2Cturn+the+other+cheek&amp;amp;year_start=1960&amp;amp;year_end=2000&amp;amp;corpus=5&amp;amp;smoothing=3 (cherry-picking)&lt;br /&gt;
* http://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=vegetarian&amp;amp;year_start=1750&amp;amp;year_end=2008&amp;amp;corpus=0&amp;amp;smoothing=1&lt;br /&gt;
* http://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=drunk&amp;amp;year_start=1750&amp;amp;year_end=2008&amp;amp;corpus=0&amp;amp;smoothing=1&lt;br /&gt;
* http://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=television%2C+tuberculosis&amp;amp;year_start=1750&amp;amp;year_end=2008&amp;amp;corpus=0&amp;amp;smoothing=1&lt;br /&gt;
* http://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=love%2Chope%2Cfaith%2C+sex&amp;amp;year_start=1750&amp;amp;year_end=2008&amp;amp;corpus=0&amp;amp;smoothing=1&lt;br /&gt;
* http://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=hope&amp;amp;year_start=1700&amp;amp;year_end=2008&amp;amp;corpus=6&amp;amp;smoothing=1&lt;br /&gt;
* http://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=entomology%2Cetymology&amp;amp;year_start=1900&amp;amp;year_end=2008&amp;amp;corpus=0&amp;amp;smoothing=3&lt;br /&gt;
* http://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=carriage%2Ccar%2Cautomobile&amp;amp;year_start=1700&amp;amp;year_end=2008&amp;amp;corpus=0&amp;amp;smoothing=3&lt;br /&gt;
* http://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=irregardless%2Cregardlessly%2Cunregarding&amp;amp;year_start=1800&amp;amp;year_end=2008&amp;amp;corpus=0&amp;amp;smoothing=3&lt;br /&gt;
* http://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=a+bird+in+the+hand%2Clive+by+the+sword%2Clook+before+you+leap%2Ca+penny+saved&amp;amp;year_start=1780&amp;amp;year_end=2008&amp;amp;corpus=0&amp;amp;smoothing=3&lt;br /&gt;
* http://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=war&amp;amp;year_start=1700&amp;amp;year_end=2008&amp;amp;corpus=0&amp;amp;smoothing=3&lt;br /&gt;
* http://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=Muslim%2CMoslem%2CMoslim%2CMussulman%2C+Moslam&amp;amp;year_start=1700&amp;amp;year_end=2008&amp;amp;corpus=0&amp;amp;smoothing=3&lt;br /&gt;
* http://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=Empire%2C+empire&amp;amp;year_start=1700&amp;amp;year_end=2008&amp;amp;corpus=6&amp;amp;smoothing=1&lt;br /&gt;
* http://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=decline%2Cprogress&amp;amp;year_start=1700&amp;amp;year_end=2008&amp;amp;corpus=6&amp;amp;smoothing=1&lt;br /&gt;
* http://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=progress&amp;amp;year_start=1700&amp;amp;year_end=2008&amp;amp;corpus=6&amp;amp;smoothing=1&lt;br /&gt;
* http://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=war&amp;amp;year_start=1700&amp;amp;year_end=2008&amp;amp;corpus=0&amp;amp;smoothing=1&lt;br /&gt;
* http://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=Rapture&amp;amp;year_start=1700&amp;amp;year_end=2008&amp;amp;corpus=0&amp;amp;smoothing=3&lt;br /&gt;
* http://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=history%2Cpast%2Cfuture&amp;amp;year_start=1700&amp;amp;year_end=2008&amp;amp;corpus=0&amp;amp;smoothing=3&lt;br /&gt;
* http://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=Star+Wars%2C+Star+Trek&amp;amp;year_start=1950&amp;amp;year_end=2008&amp;amp;corpus=0&amp;amp;smoothing=0&lt;br /&gt;
* http://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=Jesus+Christ&amp;amp;year_start=1720&amp;amp;year_end=2008&amp;amp;corpus=0&amp;amp;smoothing=3&lt;br /&gt;
* http://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=President&amp;amp;year_start=1780&amp;amp;year_end=2008&amp;amp;corpus=5&amp;amp;smoothing=3&lt;br /&gt;
* http://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=tyranny&amp;amp;year_start=1700&amp;amp;year_end=2000&amp;amp;corpus=0&amp;amp;smoothing=3&lt;br /&gt;
* http://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=power+to+the+people&amp;amp;year_start=1700&amp;amp;year_end=2000&amp;amp;corpus=0&amp;amp;smoothing=3&lt;br /&gt;
* http://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=flag&amp;amp;year_start=1700&amp;amp;year_end=2008&amp;amp;corpus=4&amp;amp;smoothing=3&lt;br /&gt;
* http://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=end+of+the+world&amp;amp;year_start=1700&amp;amp;year_end=2008&amp;amp;corpus=0&amp;amp;smoothing=3&lt;br /&gt;
* http://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=Bible+study&amp;amp;year_start=1800&amp;amp;year_end=2008&amp;amp;corpus=0&amp;amp;smoothing=3&lt;br /&gt;
* http://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=God+bless+America&amp;amp;year_start=1800&amp;amp;year_end=2008&amp;amp;corpus=0&amp;amp;smoothing=3&lt;br /&gt;
* http://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=merry+Christmas%2Chappy+holidays&amp;amp;year_start=1960&amp;amp;year_end=2008&amp;amp;corpus=0&amp;amp;smoothing=3&lt;br /&gt;
* http://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=Space&amp;amp;year_start=1700&amp;amp;year_end=2008&amp;amp;corpus=0&amp;amp;smoothing=1&lt;br /&gt;
* http://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=old+fashioned&amp;amp;year_start=1750&amp;amp;year_end=2008&amp;amp;corpus=0&amp;amp;smoothing=1&lt;br /&gt;
* http://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=sword%2C+gun&amp;amp;year_start=1700&amp;amp;year_end=2008&amp;amp;corpus=0&amp;amp;smoothing=1&lt;br /&gt;
* http://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=pirate&amp;amp;year_start=1700&amp;amp;year_end=2008&amp;amp;corpus=0&amp;amp;smoothing=1&lt;br /&gt;
* http://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=Ayn+Rand&amp;amp;year_start=1700&amp;amp;year_end=2008&amp;amp;corpus=0&amp;amp;smoothing=3&lt;br /&gt;
* http://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=Marx&amp;amp;year_start=1700&amp;amp;year_end=2008&amp;amp;corpus=0&amp;amp;smoothing=3&lt;br /&gt;
* http://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=Marx%2C+Marxy%2C+Marxist%2C+Marxiest&amp;amp;year_start=1850&amp;amp;year_end=2008&amp;amp;corpus=0&amp;amp;smoothing=0&lt;br /&gt;
* http://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=communism%2Ccommunist%2Csocialist&amp;amp;year_start=1830&amp;amp;year_end=2008&amp;amp;corpus=0&amp;amp;smoothing=1&lt;br /&gt;
* http://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=Russia%2C+USSR&amp;amp;year_start=1700&amp;amp;year_end=2008&amp;amp;corpus=0&amp;amp;smoothing=0&lt;br /&gt;
* http://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=savior%2CSavior&amp;amp;year_start=1720&amp;amp;year_end=2008&amp;amp;corpus=0&amp;amp;smoothing=3&lt;br /&gt;
* http://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=trend&amp;amp;year_start=1700&amp;amp;year_end=2008&amp;amp;corpus=0&amp;amp;smoothing=3&lt;br /&gt;
* http://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=girly&amp;amp;year_start=1900&amp;amp;year_end=2008&amp;amp;corpus=0&amp;amp;smoothing=3&lt;br /&gt;
* http://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=restroom%2C+bathroom%2C+toilet&amp;amp;year_start=1700&amp;amp;year_end=2008&amp;amp;corpus=0&amp;amp;smoothing=3&lt;br /&gt;
* http://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=pursuit+of+happiness&amp;amp;year_start=1700&amp;amp;year_end=2008&amp;amp;corpus=0&amp;amp;smoothing=3&lt;br /&gt;
* http://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=telechart%2Ctelephone%2Ctelegram%2Ctelevision%2Cradio%2Cinternet&amp;amp;year_start=1840&amp;amp;year_end=2008&amp;amp;corpus=0&amp;amp;smoothing=3&lt;br /&gt;
* http://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=king&amp;amp;year_start=1700&amp;amp;year_end=2008&amp;amp;corpus=0&amp;amp;smoothing=3&lt;br /&gt;
* http://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=science&amp;amp;year_start=1700&amp;amp;year_end=2008&amp;amp;corpus=0&amp;amp;smoothing=3&lt;br /&gt;
* http://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=decade&amp;amp;year_start=1780&amp;amp;year_end=2008&amp;amp;corpus=0&amp;amp;smoothing=3&lt;br /&gt;
* http://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=thousand&amp;amp;year_start=1700&amp;amp;year_end=2008&amp;amp;corpus=0&amp;amp;smoothing=3&lt;br /&gt;
* http://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=hundred%2Cthousand%2Cmillion%2Cbillion%2Ctrillion&amp;amp;year_start=1700&amp;amp;year_end=2008&amp;amp;corpus=0&amp;amp;smoothing=3&lt;br /&gt;
* http://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=jillion%2Czillion%2Cbazillion%2Ckazillion&amp;amp;year_start=1900&amp;amp;year_end=2008&amp;amp;corpus=0&amp;amp;smoothing=3&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Rumbling7145|Rumbling7145]] ([[User talk:Rumbling7145|talk]]) 16:14, 10 March 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Visual Editor?==&lt;br /&gt;
I, being a nerd in high school, edit on more than just this wiki. For example, I edit on Wikipedia. On Wikipedia, the default editing mode is a visual editor, which automatically converts your wikitext into the final product in real time. It's useful on many levels, and would save all of us a lot of time (I've spent at least 2 hours total fixing broken wikitext). I feel that using this tool would increase overall productivity in the wiki, and probably lessen the amount of people who are intimidated when attempting to edit, allowing more people to join and contribute to the community. --'''''[[User:DollarStoreBa'al |&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Atomic Age;font-size:12pt;color:red;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;DollarStoreBa'al&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:DollarStoreBa'al |'''''Converse''''']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;[[Special:Contributions/DollarStoreBa'al|'''''My life choices''''']] 22:43, 7 August 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Good luck telling that to jeff! --[[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 12:22, 8 August 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Ugh. Well, he's gotta come back eventually, right? He's paying for the domain, after all. --'''''[[User:DollarStoreBa'al |&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Atomic Age;font-size:12pt;color:red;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;DollarStoreBa'al&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:DollarStoreBa'al |'''''Converse''''']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;[[Special:Contributions/DollarStoreBa'al|'''''My life choices''''']] 16:43, 8 August 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Or maybe he just forgot and we actually don't want him to come back. Who knows! --[[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 16:45, 11 August 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Name one person who wants Jeff to just not come back. Either way, I want him back, and I suggested this just in case. This would also be really cool for me, as I joined after jeff's last known user page edit in 2018. --'''''[[User:DollarStoreBa'al |&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Atomic Age;font-size:12pt;color:red;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;DollarStoreBa'al&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:DollarStoreBa'al |'''''Converse''''']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;[[Special:Contributions/DollarStoreBa'al|'''''My life choices''''']] 23:31, 14 August 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Jeez that was a joke. Ofc I want him back lol. [[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 20:09, 15 August 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::still no response from Jeff or any of his friends on: Reddit, X/Twitter; GitHub; Bluesky; Mastodon; and email. Oh, and I asked some person on YouTube with the username lcarsos (as in the other 'crat on here) but I think that he deleted my comment on his video (multiple times). (just a little fyi) '''[[User:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:9pt;color:pink&amp;quot;&amp;gt;42.book.addict&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:6pt;color:#B1E4E3&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Talk to me!&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;''' 18:17, 19 August 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::Does he even remember this? Maybe they all got struck by lightning at the same time while calling someone who just sneezed and saying 'bless you'. --'''''[[User:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#023020&amp;quot;&amp;gt;DollarStoreBa'al&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User_talk:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#000080&amp;quot;&amp;gt;'''''converse'''''&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 16:28, 29 August 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Unicode emoji support==&lt;br /&gt;
This suggestion was made in response to the discussion above. I was completely unable to realize that FaviFake was joking. I feel that Unicode emojis would drastically improve the wiki and allow for more detailed conveyance of thoughts and feelings, and prevent catastrophic misunderstandings not unlike the one above. Other people have insulted me due to the fact that I was unable to convey enough emotion. --'''''[[User:DollarStoreBa'al |&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Atomic Age;font-size:12pt;color:red;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;DollarStoreBa'al&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:DollarStoreBa'al |'''''Converse''''']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;[[Special:Contributions/DollarStoreBa'al|'''''My life choices''''']] 17:18, 19 August 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Text-only media, like this, always has the issue of not being understood, but if someone forgets (or consciously declines) to put a &amp;quot;/s&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;;)&amp;quot; in there, they'll probably also not add an emoji.&lt;br /&gt;
:Of course, one person's very dry humour might go so far over the head of another person that not even a strong hint helps, whereas another's sense of fun might be so obvious that gilding the lilly even sends the ''wrong'' message about it. [[Special:Contributions/92.23.2.228|92.23.2.228]] 20:03, 19 August 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
: I don't understand your suggestion. 😕  The site appears to allow such emojis to be included; I just copied and pasted. There's also the HTML entity  option, e.g. &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;amp;amp;#128533;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;.  &amp;amp;#128533; Or are you asking that the site include code to make it easier to insert emojis? [[User:BunsenH|BunsenH]] ([[User talk:BunsenH|talk]]) 16:57, 29 August 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Custom User-based Signature Template ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
DollarStoreBa'al and I came up with a pretty interesting idea: a template called &amp;quot;sig&amp;quot; that can hold the signatures of other users. This is to allow users to have signatures longer than 255 characters, which is the hard limit set by MediaWiki. To call the template, we can use &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{sig|User:XYZ}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt; and encode the template with wikitext so that each user's signature can be pasted in without confusion. To make things even easier, users can adjust their signatures in Preferences to call this template so that the 4 tildes (&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;~~~~&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;) can still be employed. If enough positive feedback is received, I would love to work on it with the community. If anybody is interested in helping out, please mention it! The template could also function as a signature museum, where you can view other user's custom signatures and get inspiration. '''[[User:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:9pt;color:pink&amp;quot;&amp;gt;42.book.addict&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:6pt;color:#B1E4E3&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Talk to me!&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;''' 16:50, 29 August 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Update. I have found another solution. By creating a sig page, you can call &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{User:XYZ/sig}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;, which enables you to literally copy-paste whatever's in that page into another page. This was first discovered, I believe, by [[User:Omega/sig|User:Omega]]. I don't believe we need the template anymore, but the signature museum would still be cool! '''[[User:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font:9pt Cormorant Garamond&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#89CFF0&amp;quot;&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#FFB7CE&amp;quot;&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#D3D3D3&amp;quot;&amp;gt;.&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#FFB7CE&amp;quot;&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#89CFF0&amp;quot;&amp;gt;o&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#89CFF0&amp;quot;&amp;gt;o&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#FFB7CE&amp;quot;&amp;gt;k&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#D3D3D3&amp;quot;&amp;gt;.&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#FFB7CE&amp;quot;&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#89CFF0&amp;quot;&amp;gt;d&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#89CFF0&amp;quot;&amp;gt;d&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#FFB7CE&amp;quot;&amp;gt;i&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#D3D3D3&amp;quot;&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#FFB7CE&amp;quot;&amp;gt;t&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font:6pt Cormorant Garamond&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#89CFF0&amp;quot;&amp;gt;T&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#FFB7CE&amp;quot;&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#D3D3D3&amp;quot;&amp;gt;l&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#FFB7CE&amp;quot;&amp;gt;k&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#89CFF0&amp;quot;&amp;gt; &amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#89CFF0&amp;quot;&amp;gt;t&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#FFB7CE&amp;quot;&amp;gt;o&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#D3D3D3&amp;quot;&amp;gt; &amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#FFB7CE&amp;quot;&amp;gt;m&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#89CFF0&amp;quot;&amp;gt;e&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#89CFF0&amp;quot;&amp;gt;!&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;''' 19:10, 29 August 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::Not quite sure what it will do. Seems to me that for instance you and [[User:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#023020&amp;quot;&amp;gt;DollarStoreBa'al&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User_talk:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#000080&amp;quot;&amp;gt;'''''converse'''''&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; already have very advanced signatures (using Dollar's here as another example). My own preferences would be a normal signature, where it is easy to see who has made the comment and where the links takes me... But since you can already make this complicated signatures anyway, I'm not as such opposed to the idea. Am I correct in assuming I need to do something in order for this to be possible as the only active admin at the moment? As I will not come by here regularly, then let me know when there has been some relevant activity. Not just a reply to these questions here. But once some other than you two has chimed in. Else I might forget to come back to look! (I wrote this and then had an edit conflict with 42. So maybe this is not relevant anymore? But I will post it now none the less. But this was as a reply to the first proposal) [[User:Kynde|Kynde]] ([[User talk:Kynde|talk]]) 19:16, 29 August 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Hi Kynde. Yes, I believe that we don't need your assistance anymore. The need for a template is erased by the existence of /sig pages, and we can create a museum by ourselves. Thanks for trying and chiming in, though! '''[[User:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font:9pt Cormorant Garamond&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#89CFF0&amp;quot;&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#FFB7CE&amp;quot;&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#D3D3D3&amp;quot;&amp;gt;.&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#FFB7CE&amp;quot;&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#89CFF0&amp;quot;&amp;gt;o&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#89CFF0&amp;quot;&amp;gt;o&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#FFB7CE&amp;quot;&amp;gt;k&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#D3D3D3&amp;quot;&amp;gt;.&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#FFB7CE&amp;quot;&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#89CFF0&amp;quot;&amp;gt;d&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#89CFF0&amp;quot;&amp;gt;d&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#FFB7CE&amp;quot;&amp;gt;i&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#D3D3D3&amp;quot;&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#FFB7CE&amp;quot;&amp;gt;t&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font:6pt Cormorant Garamond&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#89CFF0&amp;quot;&amp;gt;T&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#FFB7CE&amp;quot;&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#D3D3D3&amp;quot;&amp;gt;l&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#FFB7CE&amp;quot;&amp;gt;k&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#89CFF0&amp;quot;&amp;gt; &amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#89CFF0&amp;quot;&amp;gt;t&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#FFB7CE&amp;quot;&amp;gt;o&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#D3D3D3&amp;quot;&amp;gt; &amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#FFB7CE&amp;quot;&amp;gt;m&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#89CFF0&amp;quot;&amp;gt;e&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#89CFF0&amp;quot;&amp;gt;!&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;''' 19:18, 29 August 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::::I do believe the template would work fine... that way it wouldn't show the full wikitext of the signature. --'''''[[User:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#023020&amp;quot;&amp;gt;DollarStoreBa'al&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User_talk:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#000080&amp;quot;&amp;gt;'''''converse'''''&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 19:46, 29 August 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
bad bad bad bad idea, the sig character limit is 255 for a reason, see {{w|WP:SIGLENGTH}}.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
a sig template is an even worse idea, because every instance of it will call #ifexist, an [https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Manual:$wgExpensiveParserFunctionLimit expensive parser function]. these make a page take even longer to load, which this wiki definitely does not need. also, expensive fucntions are capped at 500, so you're making a maximum of 500 signatures (not counting other templates). [[user:lett‪herebedarklight|raeb]] 04:50, 30 August 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:As well as the WP:SIGLENGTH bit, if anybody actually cares about the precedent set by 'mother Wikipedia' then various other dos-and-don'ts from {{w|Wikipedia:Signatures}} might well apply to some extant personal signatures, from the &amp;quot;don't make it look like it's not your signature&amp;quot; through to being inconsiderate of the colour-blind and those otherwise vision-limited.&lt;br /&gt;
:It also gives some nice demonstrations of what ''can'' be done (within reason). Though I still say that just because you can do something doesn't mean that you should. &amp;quot;Looks complicated, codes simply&amp;quot; would be my suggestion. Elegance of spirit, not a bloomin' juggernaut, if you're inclined to take my advice at all. You can still use personally distinctive signatures, and probably should. (Though, quite possibly, by the middle of next week, half the latest Talk comments are going to have orange-background. Don't care about that possibility, as much as I's like having vaguely recognisable namepage and timestamp bits to it that don't take effort to discern properly ''either'' when rendered ''or'' in raw code.) I have simple tastes, perhaps more than others... [[Special:Contributions/82.132.247.193|82.132.247.193]] 05:45, 30 August 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Fully agree with raeb here, the last thing we need is more server load.&lt;br /&gt;
:*If you transclude them, then there's the server load and maximum transclusion problem.&lt;br /&gt;
:*If you substitute the template each time, the issue of hard-to-parse editing views gets worse. It's already annoying having to mentally &amp;quot;remove&amp;quot; your html codes when adding a comment, and we also don't have the VE, which would hide the code.  [[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 13:52, 31 August 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::I got edit conflicted, dangit. Anyway, both your complaints are either invalid or could easily be solved. The #ifexist limit could easily be bypassed if we simply delete the signatures of people who haven't contributed in, say, 6 months. The wikitext complaint is also invalid. Using the template as a signature would simply show &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{User:XYZ/Sig}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;, '''not the wikitext required to display the signature.''' Sincerely, --'''''[[User:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#023020&amp;quot;&amp;gt;DollarStoreBa'al&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User_talk:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#000080&amp;quot;&amp;gt;'''''converse'''''&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 14:14, 3 September 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Hi&lt;br /&gt;
 simply delete the signatures of people who haven't contributed in, say, 6 months&lt;br /&gt;
:::''What?!''&lt;br /&gt;
:::Also, my 1st point wasn't mainly about #ifexist but about server load. It's as if you were adding the amount of code roughly equivalent to {{tl|incomplete}} to every single page you commented on, multiple times on the same page. This absolutely causes a ton of unnecessary server load. Imagine adding {{tl|incomplete}} hundreds of times to dozens and dozens of talk pages across the entire wiki. The software needs to keep all of them up-to-date. [[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 16:47, 3 September 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::::What's wrong with deleting signatures? They can just make a new one, and 6 months seems like a good cutoff for 'they aren't coming back.' I know Tori was away for more than 6 months, she's an exception. The server load is an issue though. Maybe we need to wait for that until Jeff is able to fix the current server issues. --'''''[[User:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#023020&amp;quot;&amp;gt;DollarStoreBa'al&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User_talk:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#000080&amp;quot;&amp;gt;'''''converse'''''&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 17:26, 3 September 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::I randomly drop in every 6–12 months, for what it's worth. [[User:Maplestrip|Maplestrip]] ([[User talk:Maplestrip|talk]]) 13:52, 5 September 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Why penalize people who only occasionally contribute? What does it buy us? -- [[User:Dtgriscom|Dtgriscom]] ([[User talk:Dtgriscom|talk]]) 17:49, 3 September 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::::DSB, the Template is a horrible idea, ok? I slept on it and after further reflection, it really doesn't add much. People can always subst in signatures through &amp;lt;nowki&amp;gt;{{_}}&amp;lt;/nowki&amp;gt;, and it'll also strain the server way too much. There's also a reason why sigs are capped at 255 characters-it'll become impossible to read talk pages if everyone had hulking 1000+ character sigs (like the one that I created). Please stop fixating so much on this specific idea. Also, it is quite rude to penalize people who only occasionally edit (and I don't want to be a special case or something like that-please stop treating me as some godly figure who is better than everyone else.) '''[[User:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:9pt;color:pink&amp;quot;&amp;gt;42.book.addict&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:6pt;color:#B1E4E3&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Talk to me!&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;''' 19:02, 3 September 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Yeah, you're right. The 255 character limit stands. Thread over, back to explaining. --'''''[[User:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#023020&amp;quot;&amp;gt;DollarStoreBa'al&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User_talk:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#000080&amp;quot;&amp;gt;'''''converse'''''&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 14:46, 4 September 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Explain XKCD Discord/Social Media Server? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I was experiencing Cloudflare errors in the past 24 hours that had prevented me from accessing this website. It's working now, but I'm worried that something else would happen again. Would anybody be interested in organizing a group chat/server or something of the like outside of Explain XKCD? I would personally love if it was on Discord, as it's easy to use, convenient, is built great, and I use it often. If anybody else has suggestions, I'd be open to hear them! '''[[User:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:9pt;color:#3a795e&amp;quot;&amp;gt;42.book.addict&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:6pt;color:#ce5f15&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Talk to me!&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;''' 20:24, 12 September 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Me too. It greatly worried me. If you want, I can set up a discord server. Personally, I prefer discord as it's very simple and has a clean interface. Again, only if you're interested. --'''''[[User:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#023020&amp;quot;&amp;gt;DollarStoreBa'al&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User_talk:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#000080&amp;quot;&amp;gt;converse&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 15:38, 15 September 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::[https://discord.com/invite/zGEVanBBAx Here you go!] '''[[User:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:9pt;color:#3a795e&amp;quot;&amp;gt;42.book.addict&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:6pt;color:#ce5f15&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Talk to me!&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;''' 00:38, 16 September 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::NICE! I wonder if we should message Kynde and see if he'll add it to the global messages. The more people, the better. --'''''[[User:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#023020&amp;quot;&amp;gt;DollarStoreBa'al&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User_talk:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#000080&amp;quot;&amp;gt;converse&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 01:17, 16 September 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::I didn't want to influence your original choice, but it would have been nice if you'd have chosen something less 'commercial', as a platform. Hope it helps, just don't forget about everyone else! [[Special:Contributions/82.132.238.131|82.132.238.131]] 09:07, 16 September 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::::Discord is free. I feel it should be easy for everybody to join, even if they didn't already have discord. --'''''[[User:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#023020&amp;quot;&amp;gt;DollarStoreBa'al&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User_talk:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#000080&amp;quot;&amp;gt;converse&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 12:53, 16 September 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::&amp;quot;Freemium&amp;quot; would be a better description, with all the Nitro-mandating stuff. But I already deleted my more specific past observations about all that. And see no point in resurrecting my original Discord presence as you probably can do more chatting about the rest of us without too many random strangers like me turning up, whatever the other IP-onlies decide to do. ;) [[Special:Contributions/82.132.246.82|82.132.246.82]] 17:18, 17 September 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Updating the global message board===&lt;br /&gt;
::''Moved from [[User_talk:Kynde#Updating_the_global_message_board]]'' [[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 19:40, 16 September 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I am excited to announce that explainxkcd now has a discord server! I was wondering if you could add it to the global message board (idk what it's called, actually. The one with the incomplete explanations message.) to include the discord invite link? The more people who join, the better, just in case cloudflare decides to have those issues again. --'''''[[User:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#023020&amp;quot;&amp;gt;DollarStoreBa'al&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User_talk:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#000080&amp;quot;&amp;gt;converse&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 13:01, 16 September 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Hi. you did not include the link? Also I would like to know if other frequent editors think this is a great idea? Not all who edit here wish to be contactable on other platforms. I do understand where you wish the message to be though, and if this is a good idea we can put it there. I'm not certain what other people thinks though? --[[User:Kynde|Kynde]] ([[User talk:Kynde|talk]]) 13:12, 16 September 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::I, for one, think it's a good idea. It's managed by Tori, so it's in very good hands. The only thing I'm afraid of is that discussions may not take place here, but I don't think that's enough of a reason not to promote it.&lt;br /&gt;
::The link is at [[User:42.book.addict]], in the second notice. I think we should say something like&lt;br /&gt;
 In case this site goes down, we have created a Discord server as an emergency form of communication. (link)&lt;br /&gt;
::We aren't &amp;quot;excited to announce&amp;quot; a backup form of communication. Discussions must be public, not on external sites. This is merely a backup. I think  it can then be removed from the sitenotice after a month or less, and mentioned on another page somewhere else, discretely. [[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 15:23, 16 September 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Thanks for chiming in FaviFake. Can you find a good place for this, because I would like to link to a local page from the sitenotice. I do realize that people will have to go to this discord before problems arises, but I guess that is the way it ism and that wont change no matter how we announce it. --[[User:Kynde|Kynde]] ([[User talk:Kynde|talk]]) 15:49, 16 September 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::::But 42 does intend for this to be used as &amp;quot;a fun place to connect with each other&amp;quot;. Leaving it discrete would make it impossible for this to happen, because people won't see it. Also, for the record, FaviFake, 42 and I were. Multiple people. Me and her. That's how the English language works. --'''''[[User:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#023020&amp;quot;&amp;gt;DollarStoreBa'al&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User_talk:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#000080&amp;quot;&amp;gt;converse&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 16:41, 16 September 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Yes you two are the ones who wishes for it and FaviFake was the first to chime in. Don't patronize me please! --[[User:Kynde|Kynde]] ([[User talk:Kynde|talk]]) 16:44, 16 September 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::I have no idea what you're saying regarding the &amp;quot;English language&amp;quot;, but please refrain from saying... whatever that was.&lt;br /&gt;
 But 42 does intend for this to be used as &amp;quot;a fun place to connect with each other&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Could you stop talking on behalf of 42? I believe you've been asked many times not to do that. You can either tell us what '''you''' think, or let others speak for themselves. 42 isn't a goddess and is able to engage in this conversation without someone &amp;quot;defending&amp;quot; her opinions.&lt;br /&gt;
:::::I'll create [[explain xkcd:Discord]] but need to think more about how this is supposed to be pitched. I do not want people to be incentivised to use a private, inaccessible discord server to, for example, talk about the newest comic. --[[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 19:32, 16 September 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::I moved this discussions back here because it's relevant to the entire wiki, not just Kynde' talk.&lt;br /&gt;
:::::''Moved from [[User_talk:Kynde#Updating_the_global_message_board]]'' [[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 19:40, 16 September 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::Sorry, I was just trying to simultaneously defend both of our opinions and state the facts. Also, thank you to FaviFake for moving this conversation to the proposals. This seems to be happening with Kynde's talk page a lot recently. (that being twice, but I've never seen it happen before, soo...) --'''''[[User:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#023020&amp;quot;&amp;gt;DollarStoreBa'al&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User_talk:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#000080&amp;quot;&amp;gt;converse&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 20:02, 16 September 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Hi, it's me. The &amp;quot;global message board&amp;quot; DSB was referencing to is the [[MediaWiki:Sitenotice|site notice]]. If Kynde could add it in the format that FaviFake said, that would be great! Also, I had thought that the server ''could'' be a fun place for us to bond/talk, but that can obviously be conducted in DMs. FaviFake's reasoning for having all conversations on-site makes perfect sense to me. '''[[User:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:9pt;color:#3a795e&amp;quot;&amp;gt;42.book.addict&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:6pt;color:#ce5f15&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Talk to me!&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;''' 20:35, 16 September 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::So THAT'S what it's called! I am one of today's lucky 10,000. --'''''[[User:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#023020&amp;quot;&amp;gt;DollarStoreBa'al&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User_talk:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#000080&amp;quot;&amp;gt;converse&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 23:35, 16 September 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::I'm not sure if I'm wrong or not, but I think of the discord as 2 things: &lt;br /&gt;
*A backup form of communication&lt;br /&gt;
*An informal place to hang out with fellow readers and editors.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Again, please correct me if I'm wrong. --'''''[[User:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#023020&amp;quot;&amp;gt;DollarStoreBa'al&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User_talk:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#000080&amp;quot;&amp;gt;converse&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 15:23, 18 September 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Dark theme?==&lt;br /&gt;
I saw a post about this in the archives that went unanswered, so I'll ask it here: Why doesn't the wiki have a dark theme? I feel it would be very useful for those who don't want to be blinded by editing. Wikipedia's got one, and it looks great! --'''''[[User:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#023020&amp;quot;&amp;gt;DollarStoreBa'al&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User_talk:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#000080&amp;quot;&amp;gt;converse&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 15:27, 18 September 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Dark mode IS a thing. You need to create a common.css page to use it though. Copy paste in this to get dark mode (make sure to hit &amp;quot;Show preview&amp;quot; to test it out before you save!): &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt; /* NQH's totally cool and amazingly radical dark mode */&lt;br /&gt;
/* Licensed CC0-1.0, no rights reserved. */&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
/* Sets everything to dark background. */&lt;br /&gt;
body * {background-color: #111 !important; color: #DDD !important;}&lt;br /&gt;
div.mw-body, div.mw-body * {background-color: #222 !important;}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
/* Vector */&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
.mw-wiki-logo {background-color: #00000000 !important; filter: invert(100%);}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
/* Monobook */&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
div#column-one &amp;gt; div#p-cactions &amp;gt; div.pBody &amp;gt; ul &amp;gt; li &amp;gt; a {background-color: #222 !important;}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
/* Modern */&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
div#mw_header, div#mw_header h1#firstHeading {background-color: #000 !important;}&lt;br /&gt;
div#mw_content {background-color: #222 !important;}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
/* Cologne blue */&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
/* Diff. */&lt;br /&gt;
td.diff-context, td.diff-context * {color: #777 !important; border-color: #333 !important;}&lt;br /&gt;
td.diff-deletedline {border-color: #F33 !important;}&lt;br /&gt;
td.diff-addedline {border-color: #3F3 !important;}&lt;br /&gt;
del.diffchange-inline {color: #F55 !important;}&lt;br /&gt;
ins.diffchange-inline {color: #5F5 !important;}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
/* Numbers in history view. */&lt;br /&gt;
span.mw-plusminus-pos {color: #5F5 !important;}&lt;br /&gt;
span.mw-plusminus-neg {color: #F55 !important;}&lt;br /&gt;
strong.mw-plusminus-pos {color: #0F0 !important; font-size: 1.2em;}&lt;br /&gt;
strong.mw-plusminus-pos {color: #0F0 !important; font-size: 1.2em;}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
/* Links. */&lt;br /&gt;
a[href$=&amp;quot;redlink=1&amp;quot;] {color: #F00 !important; text-decoration: line-through !important;}&lt;br /&gt;
a:not([href$=&amp;quot;redlink=1&amp;quot;]) {color: #88F !important;}&lt;br /&gt;
a:visited:not([href$=&amp;quot;redlink=1&amp;quot;]) {color: #AAF !important;}&lt;br /&gt;
a:hover:not([href$=&amp;quot;redlink=1&amp;quot;]) {color: #AAF !important; text-decoration: underline !important; font-weight: bold !important;}&lt;br /&gt;
a:active:not([href$=&amp;quot;redlink=1&amp;quot;]) {color: #FFF !important; text-decoration: underline !important; font-weight: bold !important;} &amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
--'''[[User:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:9pt;color:#3a795e&amp;quot;&amp;gt;42.book.addict&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:6pt;color:#ce5f15&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Talk to me!&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;''' 19:01, 18 September 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::In response to DSB, in your userpage... The links being white... Which links? See the &amp;quot;/* Links. */&amp;quot; section. The various links are #F00 (red, the invalid ones), #88F (light blue), #AAF (lighter blue), or #FFF (white). If you don't like them, change them.&lt;br /&gt;
::The other things can probably be fixed if we know exactly what you're getting and what you actually expect. Also a good idea to check for typos/miscopying, via basic troubleshooting. [[Special:Contributions/82.132.246.204|82.132.246.204]] 22:43, 18 September 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::I got edit-conflicted with... seemingly no change. Anyway, I found a better version which I now use. It's much cleaner and looks like it belongs. Only issue is that the sidebar templates have inverted colors? But very minor. --'''''[[User:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#023020&amp;quot;&amp;gt;DollarStoreBa'al&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User_talk:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#000080&amp;quot;&amp;gt;converse&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 01:24, 19 September 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::CODE!!!&amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;/* WikimediaUI Dark Mode&lt;br /&gt;
 *&lt;br /&gt;
 * Wikimedia Design Team 2019-2021&lt;br /&gt;
 * Original authors:&lt;br /&gt;
 * - Volker E. – [[User:Volker_E._(WMF)]]&lt;br /&gt;
 * - Alex Hollender&lt;br /&gt;
 * - MusikAnimal&lt;br /&gt;
 * - Carolyn Li-Madeo&lt;br /&gt;
 * - Jdlrobson&lt;br /&gt;
 *&lt;br /&gt;
 * Original at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Volker_E._(WMF)/dark-mode.css&lt;br /&gt;
 * Version for Gadget CSS skin override usage only.&lt;br /&gt;
 * Basically removed of all interaction element styles and&lt;br /&gt;
 * set to `html` instead of JS injected `.client-dark-mode` class.&lt;br /&gt;
 *&lt;br /&gt;
 * Last updated: 2021-04-20&lt;br /&gt;
 *&lt;br /&gt;
 */&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
/** To prevent 'jumping' effect within #p-personal in Vector/Monobook. Overrides [[MediaWiki:Gadget-dark-mode-toggle-pagestyles.css]] **/&lt;br /&gt;
body.skin-vector-legacy :not(#pt-darkmode) + #pt-watchlist::before,&lt;br /&gt;
body.skin-monobook :not(#pt-darkmode) + #pt-watchlist::before {&lt;br /&gt;
	content: &amp;quot;Light mode&amp;quot;;&lt;br /&gt;
}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
@media screen {&lt;br /&gt;
	&lt;br /&gt;
/* set height for monobook and timeless, because the filter in FF needs dimensions to get it to apply */&lt;br /&gt;
html {&lt;br /&gt;
    height: 100%;&lt;br /&gt;
}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
/* Filter needs to reside on `html`, see https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T221425#5153917 */&lt;br /&gt;
html,&lt;br /&gt;
/* All other selectors have `filter` double-applied to turn back to “normal” by inheritance */&lt;br /&gt;
html img:not( .mw-invert ),&lt;br /&gt;
html video:not( .mw-invert ),&lt;br /&gt;
html ogvjs:not( .mw-invert ),&lt;br /&gt;
html svg:not( .mw-invert ),&lt;br /&gt;
html iframe:not( .mw-invert ),&lt;br /&gt;
html .mw-no-invert,&lt;br /&gt;
html .cdx-no-invert,&lt;br /&gt;
html td .diffchange,&lt;br /&gt;
html .wvui-typeahead-suggestion__thumbnail,&lt;br /&gt;
html .skin-minerva .mw-notification-visible .mw-notification-content,&lt;br /&gt;
html .oo-ui-searchWidget-results .oo-ui-iconElement-icon,&lt;br /&gt;
html .list-thumb,&lt;br /&gt;
/* Extensions */&lt;br /&gt;
html .media-viewer .image img,&lt;br /&gt;
html .media-viewer .mw-file-description img {&lt;br /&gt;
	filter: invert( 1 ) hue-rotate( 180deg );&lt;br /&gt;
}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
/* Reset overrides, needed where double application above isn't working. */&lt;br /&gt;
/* Vector modern */&lt;br /&gt;
html .skin-vector .mw-logo-wordmark,&lt;br /&gt;
html .skin-vector .mw-logo-tagline,&lt;br /&gt;
html .skin-timeless .mw-wiki-title &amp;gt; img,&lt;br /&gt;
html .wvui-icon svg,&lt;br /&gt;
html .mw-ext-score img,&lt;br /&gt;
html .skin-invert img,&lt;br /&gt;
html .skin-invert-image img,&lt;br /&gt;
html .mw-hiero-table img {&lt;br /&gt;
	filter: none;&lt;br /&gt;
}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
/* Backgrounds */&lt;br /&gt;
html table,&lt;br /&gt;
html table.ambox-content,&lt;br /&gt;
html table.toccolours,&lt;br /&gt;
html .mw-notification,&lt;br /&gt;
html .mwe-popups,&lt;br /&gt;
html .infobox,&lt;br /&gt;
html .toc,&lt;br /&gt;
html .thumbinner,&lt;br /&gt;
html figure[typeof~='mw:File/Thumb'],&lt;br /&gt;
html figure[typeof~='mw:File/Frame'],&lt;br /&gt;
html figure[typeof~='mw:File/Thumb'] &amp;gt; figcaption,&lt;br /&gt;
html figure[typeof~='mw:File/Frame'] &amp;gt; figcaption,&lt;br /&gt;
html .wikitable,&lt;br /&gt;
html .cbnnr-main,&lt;br /&gt;
html .cx-callout,&lt;br /&gt;
html .overlay.media-viewer,&lt;br /&gt;
html #simpleSearch,&lt;br /&gt;
html #simpleSearch #searchInput,&lt;br /&gt;
html #siteNotice #centralNotice .cnotice {&lt;br /&gt;
	background-color: #ddd;&lt;br /&gt;
}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
/* Borders */&lt;br /&gt;
html body,&lt;br /&gt;
html h1,&lt;br /&gt;
html h2,&lt;br /&gt;
html h3,&lt;br /&gt;
html h4,&lt;br /&gt;
html h5,&lt;br /&gt;
html h6,&lt;br /&gt;
html table.ambox-content,&lt;br /&gt;
html table.toccolours,&lt;br /&gt;
html .mw-notification,&lt;br /&gt;
html .infobox,&lt;br /&gt;
html .toc,&lt;br /&gt;
html .thumbinner,&lt;br /&gt;
html figure[typeof~='mw:File/Thumb'],&lt;br /&gt;
html figure[typeof~='mw:File/Frame'],&lt;br /&gt;
html figure[typeof~='mw:File/Thumb'] &amp;gt; figcaption,&lt;br /&gt;
html figure[typeof~='mw:File/Frame'] &amp;gt; figcaption,&lt;br /&gt;
html #mw-head,&lt;br /&gt;
html #mw-panel,&lt;br /&gt;
/* Vector 2022 uses a transparent border for margin collapsing&lt;br /&gt;
(T312822) so don't apply this rule there */&lt;br /&gt;
.skin-vector-legacy #content.mw-body,&lt;br /&gt;
html #simpleSearch,&lt;br /&gt;
html #simpleSearch #searchInput,&lt;br /&gt;
html #siteNotice #centralNotice .cnotice {&lt;br /&gt;
	border-color: #cdcbc8;&lt;br /&gt;
}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
/* Links */&lt;br /&gt;
/* Links: normal */&lt;br /&gt;
html a,&lt;br /&gt;
html .vector-menu-tabs li a,&lt;br /&gt;
/* Backwards compatible VectorTabs, deprecated in MW v1.35. */&lt;br /&gt;
html .vectorTabs li a,&lt;br /&gt;
html .toctogglelabel,&lt;br /&gt;
html .mw-parser-output a.external,&lt;br /&gt;
html .mw-parser-output a.extiw,&lt;br /&gt;
html .mw-parser-output a.extiw:active,&lt;br /&gt;
html #mw-panel .portal .body li a {&lt;br /&gt;
	/* color: #69f; Proposal below for level AA conformance, see also https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T233266&lt;br /&gt;
	   `#36c` is transformed by :root `filter` to be closer to chosen `#69f`. */&lt;br /&gt;
	color: #36c;&lt;br /&gt;
}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
/* Links: visited */&lt;br /&gt;
html a:visited,&lt;br /&gt;
html .mw-parser-output a.extiw:visited,&lt;br /&gt;
html #mw-panel .portal .body li a:visited {&lt;br /&gt;
	/* color: #709bbd; Proposal below uses to-be-standardized color from https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T213778 */&lt;br /&gt;
	color: #6b4ba1;&lt;br /&gt;
}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
/* Links: red */&lt;br /&gt;
html a.new,&lt;br /&gt;
html .vector-menu-tabs li.new a,&lt;br /&gt;
html .vectorTabs li.new a {&lt;br /&gt;
	color: #ff6e6e;&lt;br /&gt;
}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
/* ::: Special Element Treatments ::: */&lt;br /&gt;
/* Image thumbnails */&lt;br /&gt;
html .thumbimage,&lt;br /&gt;
html figure[typeof~='mw:File/Thumb'] &amp;gt; :not(figcaption) .mw-file-element,&lt;br /&gt;
html figure[typeof~='mw:File/Frame'] &amp;gt; :not(figcaption) .mw-file-element {&lt;br /&gt;
	border: 0;&lt;br /&gt;
}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
/* Content image (thumbnail) SVGs */&lt;br /&gt;
/* `*not( .mbox-image )` exception doesn't work for unclear reasons */&lt;br /&gt;
html .image img[ src*='svg' ],&lt;br /&gt;
html .mw-file-description img[ src*='svg' ],&lt;br /&gt;
html img[ src*='Wiktionary-logo'] {&lt;br /&gt;
	background-color: #fff;&lt;br /&gt;
	border-radius: 1px;&lt;br /&gt;
}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
/* Dealing with false positives from selector above */&lt;br /&gt;
html .mw-echo-ui-notificationItemWidget-icon img[ src*='svg' ],&lt;br /&gt;
html .mbox-image .image img[ src*='svg' ],&lt;br /&gt;
html .mbox-image .mw-file-description img[ src*='svg' ],&lt;br /&gt;
/* Emoji generated by [[Template:Emoji]] */&lt;br /&gt;
html .emoji .image img,&lt;br /&gt;
html .emoji .mw-file-description img,&lt;br /&gt;
/* Vote symbols on Talk pages */&lt;br /&gt;
html .image img[ alt^=&amp;quot;Symbol&amp;quot; ],&lt;br /&gt;
html .mw-file-description img[ alt^=&amp;quot;Symbol&amp;quot; ] {&lt;br /&gt;
	background-color: transparent;&lt;br /&gt;
}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
/* Page previews */&lt;br /&gt;
html .mwe-popups {&lt;br /&gt;
    box-shadow: 0 30px 90px -20px rgba( 0, 0, 0, 0.3 ), 0 0 1px #000;&lt;br /&gt;
}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
html .mwe-popups.flipped-y:after,&lt;br /&gt;
html .mwe-popups.flipped-x-y:after {&lt;br /&gt;
	border-top: 11px solid #ddd;&lt;br /&gt;
}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
html .mwe-popups.mwe-popups-no-image-pointer:after {&lt;br /&gt;
	border-bottom: 11px solid #ddd;&lt;br /&gt;
}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
/* Contributions menu */&lt;br /&gt;
html .cx-callout-1:after {&lt;br /&gt;
	border-bottom-color: #ddd;&lt;br /&gt;
}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
/* Mobile Wikipedia logo mobile header */&lt;br /&gt;
html .branding-box img {&lt;br /&gt;
	filter: brightness( 0 );&lt;br /&gt;
}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
@-moz-document url-prefix() {&lt;br /&gt;
    body {&lt;br /&gt;
        background: #000;&lt;br /&gt;
    }&lt;br /&gt;
}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
@-moz-document url-prefix() {   &lt;br /&gt;
	@supports (overflow-clip-margin: 1px) {     &lt;br /&gt;
		body {&lt;br /&gt;
			background: #fff;&lt;br /&gt;
		}   &lt;br /&gt;
	}&lt;br /&gt;
}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
--'''''[[User:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#023020&amp;quot;&amp;gt;DollarStoreBa'al&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User_talk:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#000080&amp;quot;&amp;gt;converse&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 13:27, 19 September 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Page Creation site notice for new accounts==&lt;br /&gt;
Many, many, '''''many''''' new people come around and ask other users about how to create their own user pages. Personally, I think we could stop the confusion by coding a different type of 'you do not have permission to create this page' error for new accounts, which would look something like this: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'To create new pages, your account must be at least a week old and have 50 edits. You can search for this page title in other pages, or search the related logs, but you do not have permission to create this page.' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Just a thought, in case admins can do that without Jeff's involvement. --'''''[[User:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#023020&amp;quot;&amp;gt;DollarStoreBa'al&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User_talk:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#000080&amp;quot;&amp;gt;converse&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 20:02, 30 September 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: I'd {{template|Actual citation needed}} on the &amp;quot;many&amp;quot;s, unless you're aware of off-site discussions about this one. It's actually pretty infrequent, so I feel you must be counting over several years, having found a number of historic examples dotted around on pages such as this. That said, it ''is'' currently as much an FAQ as anything else ([[explain xkcd:Editor FAQ#Why can't I create my user page and upload images?|as actually mentioned there]], for anyone who bothers to read it). And we do sometimes get a new-users, the ones freshly post-validated to create pages merrily 'helping out' all those they think need their help in that regard.&lt;br /&gt;
: Can I suggest that we do not have the exact number of edits so prominantly, though. Within the last day, as a matter of fact, we seem to have had someone making many useless edits (mostly of the form of adding extra spaces into seemingly random places within seemingly random articles), possibly in order to have created a new page of their own. And that's ''really'' not to the spirit of things. Inviting, or at least suggestively hinting, the possibility of near-vandalism (hopefully not ''actual'' vandalism) for the impatient who just see it as a 'target' to try to reach. And the truly and genuinely eager to contribute can easily have clocked up that number of edits to existing pages ''with no edit-tallying motive'' by the time the mandatory week has also expired.&lt;br /&gt;
: The caveat, I know, is that saying &amp;quot;a week and ''a certain number of edits''&amp;quot;, aluded to but unspecified, will have the some of the same uselessly-editing people chasing an arbitrarily high edit-tally in order to be 'ready' for the week finishing. But that kind of person is already of the wrong initial mindset. And people desperate to create new pages with perhaps little more than a week of having, in ''most other respects'', full editing rights (which is only marginally more than IPs like me have, as there only a few key places that I am prevented from editing) tend to find themselves likely to be contributing to the Category: Pages to Delete list (perhaps courtesy of more established editors).&lt;br /&gt;
: On balance, perhaps the page you mention should instead briefly contain a link to the existing FAQ section, via link text explaining that there ''are'' reasons, but &amp;quot;see here&amp;quot; for details, or similar non-specific wording. Anyone who hasn't read the FAQ could benefit from being aware that it exists. And if anything ever changes (rise or fall of the time or tally limits, even removal or addition of specific criteria), the FAQ will probably be sooner updated with the new details before anyone thinks to edit the 'error page' again (a particular page that long-established users will have rarely, if ever, seen). Assuming, of course, even that anyone can edit that level of page content right now. [[Special:Contributions/82.132.184.204|82.132.184.204]] 23:08, 30 September 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::I don’t have time to read ip's comment but i definitely think the number shouldn't be so public, and i don’t see a need. i would support a small editnoce for letting users know they have to vaguely contribute more. [[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 16:17, 1 October 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Some suggestions surrounding the use of the {{template|unsigned}} and {{template|unsigned ip}} templates. ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
;Where I just reference the {{template|unsigned}} template, there should also be an obvious extension of the same principle to the {{template|unsigned ip}} one as well.)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
These are some interelated proposals, that could be implemented singly/incrementally (as desired and agreed upon). But might deserve doing in 'one go', at least the agreed upon elements. I'm just putting each bit into different subsections for isolated discussion (or ignoring) of the specific merits/otherwise of each. [[Special:Contributions/2.98.65.8|2.98.65.8]] 21:33, 20 October 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
;TD;DR;s added, if you don't like the author's original verbosity. [[Special:Contributions/82.132.244.30|82.132.244.30]] 19:07, 12 November 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Aesthetic/semantic change===&lt;br /&gt;
Issue: Not often, but sometimes, comments that are 'unsigned'-tagged (with the words &amp;quot;please sign your comments with &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;~~~~&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;quot;) invokes retrospective use of &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;~~~~&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt; by those who take the words at face value. This ''can'' result in a (previously) 'unsigned' message having a later timestamp than its replies, or later 'top level' messages more immediately signed by their editors.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The more 'proper' way to replace an {{template|unsigned}} tag, for those that want to, would be to copy-paste a valid signature of the same type and replace the username(/IP) and datestamp as already (usually!) given in that initial pester-tag. But this is by no means made obvious in the above message.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Proposal: Wording to be changed to something like &amp;quot;in future, please sign your comments with &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;~~~~&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;quot;, or &amp;quot;this comment should have been signed with &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;~~~~&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;quot;. Or other wording, to be agreed upon, to make as snappy as the original (&amp;quot;was not signed with &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;~~~~&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;quot;). The aim is to omit the implicit request to anachrnistically sign, however.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Overall effect: Any change to the template(s) will transclude to what would probably be an overwhelming majority of Talk pages (at a guess), plus other 'discussion' pages like these Portal ones. But there's no change in functionality or any individual page-updating, just the slightly different text when viewing in future.&lt;br /&gt;
*Note1: the {{template|unsigned}} template already takes a (rarely used) third parameter, which overwrites the &amp;quot;please sign...&amp;quot; message (i.e. &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{unsigned|&amp;lt;username&amp;gt;|&amp;lt;timestamp&amp;gt;|&amp;lt;alternate message&amp;gt;}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;, and it'd still be overwritten exactly the same wherever that has been applied.&lt;br /&gt;
*Note2: it also would not rewrite the text given of any originally &amp;quot;subst:&amp;quot;ed version of the template, but that's a completely different issue.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Justification: The need may be slight, but it's also a trivial tweak to implement (or even to trial) with a marginal but maybe useful long-term gain. But we'll need a proper discussion of what wording to move to, or else that it's not necessary. [[Special:Contributions/2.98.65.8|2.98.65.8]] 21:33, 20 October 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: Case in point {{diff|389535|the few edits that led up to here}}. Didn't really 'spoil' any actual chronology but shows how easily it is obeyed wrongly. [[Special:Contributions/2.98.65.8|2.98.65.8]] 18:04, 24 October 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
;TL;DR;:Change the text from &amp;quot;please sign your comments with &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;~~~~&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;quot;, slightly. [[Special:Contributions/82.132.244.30|82.132.244.30]] 19:07, 12 November 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Additional templates to complement 'unsigned' ones===&lt;br /&gt;
Issue: Retrospective 'honest faking' of previously missing signatures is mildly awkward, as mentioned above. It's easy to get wrong, even easier to just not bother at all with it. (Either leave 'unsigned' or create the issue from the prior item.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Proposal: Complement the template usage &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;''un''&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;signed|&amp;lt;username&amp;gt;|&amp;lt;timestamp&amp;gt;}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt; with one that is &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;''retro''&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;signed|&amp;lt;username&amp;gt;|&amp;lt;timestamp&amp;gt;}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;. Take the same parameters (except the 'alternate pester text') but return just the effective &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;~~~~&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;-style format, now no longer with the 'please sign...'-type appended message.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are a number of possible uses for this:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
#''user1'' forgets to sign; ''user2'' spots this, invokes {{template|unsigned}} to it; ''user1'' '''acknowledges''' their goof, by simply changing the template-invocation of &amp;quot;unsigned&amp;quot; to &amp;quot;retrosigned&amp;quot; and the rendered page is left neater (any &amp;quot;whoops, my bad!&amp;quot; apologies can be given in the edit-comments, as unused third-parameter, etc, if they wish),&lt;br /&gt;
#''user1'' forgets to sign; ''user1'', themself, spots this (before anyone else) and applies this as easily as they would apply a {{template|unsigned}}. Slightly easier than 'honest faking' that involves the valid copypaste-method (again, with &amp;quot;whoops!, my bad!&amp;quot; opportunities, should they feel like it),&lt;br /&gt;
#''user1'' forgets to sign; ''user2'' spots this; knows that it's an oversight by a regular contributor who just slipped up, and there's no reason to make it a 'pester message'; so ''user2'' just goes straight to using Template:retrosigned, and doesn't bother with the 'pestering' or 'blaming' implications inherent in Template:unsigned),&lt;br /&gt;
#''user1'' forgot to sign ''...a decade ago or more!''; We know that (for example) User:Jeff is unlikely to benefit from being reminded/pestered/shamed, so it just seems better to let the more recent editor 'retrosign' any such example that gets discovered,&lt;br /&gt;
#or possibly, '''with care, ''and honesty'':''' someone, as ''newusername'', wishes to associate themselves with comments made by ''oldusername'', or even any given ''ip-address'' contrinution they previously used; that's something I wouldn't do myself, but I could see the appeal.&lt;br /&gt;
*Note1: my method (and that of others?) to edit in an 'unsigned'-tag is to copy the header info from the appropriate diff page's column, paste that text (containing datestamp and ID of contributor, together with some other textual cruft) as unsigned-tag parameters, rearrange edit (&amp;quot;timestamp&amp;quot; then &amp;quot;userid&amp;quot;, with a few extra characters, becomes &amp;quot;|userid|timestamp&amp;quot; parameters), the same method would entirely work with the retrosigned version too.&lt;br /&gt;
**This, however, does not contain the &amp;quot;(UTC)&amp;quot; timezone info that &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;~~~~&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt; would give by default, so a similarly direct retroactive 'fake' will also lack this. Eagle-eyed readers might pick up on this. Which isn't an issue that concerns me. (One could always manually append &amp;quot; (UTC)&amp;quot; to the second-param, or after the template itself, even if I don't think it worth the bother.)&lt;br /&gt;
*Note2: It doesn't reproduce the appearance of anyone's custom signature, if they had one that should have been invoked. But also a trivial differemce, having resolved the whole issue of &amp;quot;no longer being unsigned&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
**Should anyone ''really'' care to reproduce a custom/non-standard signature, they can still do so (on their behalf or someone else's). This is just the quick and easy&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Justification: The idea is to allow for the 'tidying up' of the front-facing pages with less convoluted and more honest back-end edits. I don't expect, or want, anyone to retrospectively convert historic 'unsigned' tags just for the sake of it, but it adds a tool to the kit of anyone who is already prepared to 'correct' these things (their own, or others) in any given page-source.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I'd potentially use it for long-standing editor's lapses (the &amp;quot;Template:retrosigned&amp;quot; version), to feel less guilty about apparently nagging them about it. Or upon myself (the &amp;quot;Template:retrosigned ip&amp;quot; version), if I slipped up, to feel less guilty for going back in and 'honestly faking' what I had forgotten to sign, but (as noted above) there are several other applicable uses. [[Special:Contributions/2.98.65.8|2.98.65.8]] 21:33, 20 October 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
;TL;DR;:Let there be &amp;quot;retrosigned&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;retrosigned ip&amp;quot; to be used where {{template|unsigned}} and {{template|unsigned ip}} are not (any longer) what is needed somewhere. [[Special:Contributions/82.132.244.30|82.132.244.30]] 19:07, 12 November 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Tracking parameter underutilisation===&lt;br /&gt;
Issue: Early implementation, and sometimes more recent, of the {{template|unsigned}} template may use its most basic &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{unsigned}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt; form with ''no parameters given''. This gives an 'error', of sorts, due to having no official check-and-fallback upon not being given the username parameter. The error is visual only, and ''may'' have been allowed/forced to happen as a way to force its correction (though, at least until recently, it sees not to have done this as much as it should have).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Other times, perhaps immediately after the first parameter (contributor name) started to be routinely added, &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{unsigned|username}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt; is used ''without the timestamp parameter'' that we now mostly take for granted.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
(While the current third parameter, the 'alternate &amp;quot;pease...&amp;quot; text' is entirely an optional and a mostly unused feature, future changes may require/encourage further elements (perhaps 'named parameters') and leave our default &amp;quot;unsigned|username|timestamp&amp;quot; format lacking.)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I've been known to update any discovered 'bare bones'-unsigned formats, if I find any in pages I edit. Someone else seems to have adopted it as a task of its own, recently. This relies upon spotting the non-standard (or at least non-modern) usages.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Additionally, there ''is'' the in getting the rather ugly &amp;lt;code&amp;gt; &amp;lt;small&amp;gt; -- [[User:{{{1}}}|{{{1}}}]] ([[User talk:{{{1}}}|talk]])  &amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:grey; white-space:nowrap;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;''(please sign your comments with &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;~~&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;~~)''&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt; 'error' for all no-param versions that exist.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Proposal: Firstly, just implement the 'catch' code upon the (lack of) first parameter. Make it 'fail cleanly', or at least less 'errorlike'. This is trivial to implement (i.e. &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{{1|}}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt; instead of &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{{1}}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;). (I'd do that right now, if I could.)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Secondly, within the 'failover' half of the 'non-parameter' parsing, give it a Category: membership.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I have several possible suggestions for the style of Category membership:&lt;br /&gt;
# If the 'userID' isn't given, perhaps &amp;quot;Category:Unsigned no-UserID&amp;quot;, if the 'timestamp' isn't given, &amp;quot;Category:Unsigned no-timestamp&amp;quot;, and any others.&lt;br /&gt;
#* Note: the system could be extended to other templates, such as &amp;quot;Category:Incomplete no-reason&amp;quot; or perhaps &amp;quot;Category:Comic no-image&amp;quot;, but that's not officially part of this suggestion.&lt;br /&gt;
# More simply, just have &amp;quot;Category:Unsigned-error&amp;quot;, without specifying. (Or even &amp;quot;Category:Template-error&amp;quot; for far more generalised use.)&lt;br /&gt;
# Differently specific, use the category re-indexing (something like &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;[[Category:Template-error|blah]]&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;) for handy grouping-with-differentiation&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Obviously, the appropriate category-page needs to be there to show any (and all) invocations. Similar to the [[:Category:Incomplete explanations]] one, etc, it would invite action to ''remove'' membership as examples are sorted.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Justification: This is a solution for 'meta-problems', really. Which 'category membership' option is used would define how much additional editing(/correcting) this might prompt for historic problems, as well as identifying improperly added new template-invocations. But it might be good to know exactly how wide or narrow a scope people might wish to apply to this, before going ahead and creating many new 'error' categories... one even just the single catch-all one. [[Special:Contributions/2.98.65.8|2.98.65.8]] 21:33, 20 October 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
;TL;DR;:Make it easier to find 'incompletely implemented' templates (initially the Unsigned ones), so they can be fixed by anyone who would like to. [[Special:Contributions/82.132.244.30|82.132.244.30]] 19:07, 12 November 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
This looks AI-generated. [[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 18:36, 12 November 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Really? Unless AIs are doing 'accidentally on purpose' typos, I think it just looks like someone with more ideas trying to burst out onto the page than they can easily (and accurately) summarise. And I'm also that type of person, so I can ''easily'' relate. There, but for the grace of &amp;lt;s&amp;gt;God&amp;lt;/s&amp;gt; any-unspecific-generalised-universal-force-of-non-deterministic-fate goes I! [[Special:Contributions/82.132.245.237|82.132.245.237]] 18:50, 12 November 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Added a &amp;quot;''Too Long; Didn't Read;''&amp;quot; summary to each, as I understand the intents. ;) Now I'm wondering if there are any other things I might do that for! [[Special:Contributions/82.132.244.30|82.132.244.30]] 19:07, 12 November 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Banning the phrase &amp;quot;WhatsApp&amp;quot;==&lt;br /&gt;
I've noticed that lately, much of our vandalism has come out of scamvertisements asking you to contact the scammers on WhatsApp. As I don't believe Randall has ever actually used WhatsApp, and as such it is unneeded, I feel we should just prevent any edits containing the word 'WhatsApp' from going through if the edit removes more than 90% of the page's byte count (let's be honest, nobody is going to delete that much from a page). --'''''[[User:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#023020&amp;quot;&amp;gt;DollarStoreBa'al&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User_talk:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#000080&amp;quot;&amp;gt;converse&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 17:37, 29 October 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:The standard protection is to have [[user:theusaf]] to refine/expand what theusafBOT reacts to. Which it seems they occasionally do.&lt;br /&gt;
:I don't know whether they're paying attention, but I'd hope they'd pick up on such things. Given that it's the Feedback/etc comics that regularly get spammed like this, I'd hope they'd at least try to see what someone else reverted in leiu, and adapt accordingly, when they get the time.&lt;br /&gt;
:I don't know the various sets of exact criteria in use (some seem generally obvious enough, key patterns and keywords involved) and I think something to at least start with &amp;quot;blanked page and replaced with ...&amp;quot;, on specific sets of pages, as an edit comment could be a good predictor with minimal false-positives. But I wouldn't want to explicitly suggest that (or your idea), lest the more attentive spammers made a trivial change to their future edit plans to by-pass it.&lt;br /&gt;
:...though I frankly think those responsible in this case don't care/think ''too'' much about it, it's more for all the other things I'd rather leave trivially unguessable how to get round. [[Special:Contributions/82.132.244.138|82.132.244.138]] 18:30, 29 October 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::I'll look into this. —[[User:Theusaf|theusaf]] ([[User talk:Theusaf|talk]]) 22:34, 6 November 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Hey look, an admin that isn't Kynde! That's... actually the first time I've seen an admin that isn't Kynde in person. Cool! &amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family: Times New Roman, serif; font-size: 16px;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;--'''''[[User:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#E3C6BE&amp;quot;&amp;gt;DollarStoreBa'al&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User Talk:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#CC9A8B&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Converse&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt; 17:15, 7 November 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::::Yeah, I'm not super active in the discussions, but I occasionally edit and check that by bot is still working and not destroying anything. The whatsapp check has been added. —[[User:Theusaf|theusaf]] ([[User talk:Theusaf|talk]]) 05:00, 13 November 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::*SKIBIDI-POP PA-DOOP TA-DA TAAAA!!!!* &amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family: Times New Roman, serif; font-size: 16px;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;--'''''[[User:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#E3C6BE&amp;quot;&amp;gt;DollarStoreBa'al&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User Talk:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#CC9A8B&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Converse&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt; 14:48, 13 November 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Adblock popup==&lt;br /&gt;
This wiki uses ads as a way to make money and keep the website up, and many people use adblockers (the absolute state of YT ads is insane). So, why don't we add one of those AdBlock popups that they have on some sites? Maybe the message could be: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{Header text|So, about that AdBlock...&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
explain xkcd uses ads to keep our server online. Please consider turning off your AdBlock so we can continue providing quality explanations. Thanks!}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This would be an optional thing and easily closable, but it could provide at least a bit of extra revenue. Maybe we could also make a 'thank you' screen for people who do actually turn off their adblocker (it would only pop up once, after they turn off the AdBlock): &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{Header text|Thank you for turning off your adblocker!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Sincerely, the explain xkcd community.}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What do you guys think? --'''''[[User:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#023020&amp;quot;&amp;gt;DollarStoreBa'al&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User_talk:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#000080&amp;quot;&amp;gt;converse&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 15:58, 30 October 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Adblockers often also can block anti-adblock popups, but sure, go ahead. I guess you could also ask for donations to run the site. Same caveat applies. - an adblock user. [[User:None|None]] ([[User talk:None|talk]]) 20:47, 14 December 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== categories template ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hear me out: I've been doing a lot of category adding to mostly files that are uncategorized (BTW, we have a 11,000-12,000 backlog of pages-any help (or maybe a bot!) would be greatly appreciated). I think that we should make a template called Category or &amp;quot;cat&amp;quot; so that we can add categories faster. Of course, HotCat exists, but it only renders when there are already existing categories. For all the uncategorized files/pages, we would have to manually add it in. My strategy currently is moving my mouse to the edit button, clicking it, hit return to make a whitespace (for organization), hitting CTRL-V, moving my mouse to the &amp;quot;Save changes&amp;quot; button, and clicking it. And that's only for the really repetitive ones, like the comic images or Hoverboard or Time. Does anybody have any thoughts/objections to this? Of course, we would still need to edit, but it would be a lot easier than typing out &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;[[Category:___]]&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt; IMHO. Additionally, I've studied up a bit of template code (Lua) and I've sort of fleshed out some code. I don't really know if it works, but if there's anybody more experienced feel free to look through it! I've included Pages to delete (ptd) and Helper comic images (hci) as examples. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{#ifeq:{{{1}}}|ptd|&lt;br /&gt;
  [[Category:Pages to delete]]&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{#ifeq:{{{1}}}|hci|&lt;br /&gt;
  {{#if:{{{2|}}}&lt;br /&gt;
    | [[Category:Helper comic images ({{{2}}})]]&lt;br /&gt;
    | [[Category:Helper comic images]]&lt;br /&gt;
  }}&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thanks, --'''[[User:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:9pt;color:#3a795e&amp;quot;&amp;gt;42.book.addict&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:6pt;color:#ce5f15&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Talk to me!&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;''' 10:17, 3 December 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:That's actually a good idea! So, it would be: &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{cat|Helper comic images (1190)}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;? That would be quite convenient. &amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family: Times New Roman, serif; font-size: 16px;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;--'''''[[User:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#FF0000&amp;quot;&amp;gt;DollarStoreBa'al&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User Talk:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#00873E&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Converse&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt; 20:53, 4 December 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::As written, I read it as...&lt;br /&gt;
::If &amp;quot;ptd&amp;quot; in the first spot, i.e. &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{cat|ptd}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;, that would give the Pages To Delete category.&lt;br /&gt;
::If &amp;quot;hci&amp;quot; in the first spot, i.e. &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{cat|hci}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;, then it would instead Helper Comic Images&lt;br /&gt;
::If &amp;quot;hci&amp;quot; in the first spot and a number in the second, i.e. &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{cat|hci|1234}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;, then it would instead give you Helper Comic Images (1234).&lt;br /&gt;
::There are maybe a few minor issues with it, as written. I'd use &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{{1|}}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;, for starters, and nest it so that any non-specified (including blank) param would give out an obvious mis-use error result. And you'd probably end up having &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{cat|&amp;lt;whatever&amp;gt;}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt; sitting in your paste buffer (or would &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{subst:cat|&amp;lt;whatever&amp;gt;}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt; be better?) exactly the same as you'd have had the basic Category, anyway.&lt;br /&gt;
::But I really wouldn't know where it sits in the [[1205: Is It Worth the Time?]] scale... Almost a &amp;quot;death by supernova neutrinos&amp;quot; issue, I suspect... ;) [[Special:Contributions/78.144.255.82|78.144.255.82]] 21:37, 4 December 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
: I would use a switch instead of an if, like &lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;includeonly&amp;gt;[[Category:{{subst:#switch:{{{1}}}&lt;br /&gt;
| ptd = Pages to delete&lt;br /&gt;
| hci = Helper comic images {{subst:#if: {{{2|}}} | ({{{2}}}) }}&lt;br /&gt;
| {{{1|}}}&lt;br /&gt;
}}]]&amp;lt;/includeonly&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
: It should be used with &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{subst:&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt; because otherwise the category won't be able to be removed normally, but it technically works without it. The substs before the ifs make the resulting wikitext nicer, as otherwise when the overall template is used with &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{subst:&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;, it inserts the if statements directly. Consequently, it must be enclosed in includeonly's to prevent the substitution from occurring when the template is saved. It will also default to inserting the category with the name of the first argument, but it is longer to type using the template like this (&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{subst:cat|All comics}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;) than just typing the category directly (&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;[[Category:All comics]]&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;).&lt;br /&gt;
:If having an obvious error message is desired, you could replace the default case (the &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{{1|}}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;) with something like &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;]] Invalid argument for [[Template:cat&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;. [[User:Firestar233|guess who]] ([[User talk:Firestar233|if you desire conversing]] | [[Special:Contributions/Firestar233|what i have done]]) 05:02, 16 December 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
All fo this sounds good! I don't have the time to look into this but Firestar233 is incredible with templates so i trust their code will work! [[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 18:41, 17 December 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== New Character Proposal for Kid Cueballs ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I'm somewhat new to editing, though I've been using this wiki for some time now. And I've noticed that with comics such as 3178, whenever a kid is represented by Cueball the transcript says &amp;quot;a Cueball like kid&amp;quot;  which is long and slightly annoying to read. So I propose giving the kid a name that's shorter and easier to use but still let's the reader know that a kid is being represented by Cueball:  Kidball. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thoughts? -- [[User:MikeTheNewGuy|MikeTheNewGuy]] ([[User talk:MikeTheNewGuy|talk]]) 13:25, 17 January 2026‎ (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
: Hi, Mike; welcome to ExplainXKCD. BTW, I added your signature to your comment.&lt;br /&gt;
: But, on-topic: this sounds like an interesting idea. But, in your mind, is this &amp;quot;Kidball&amp;quot; always the same kid, rather than a type of kid? Would you expect that if you see &amp;quot;Kidball&amp;quot; in a new comic he'll behave the same way? If not, then I wouldn't add this name. -- [[User:Dtgriscom|Dtgriscom]] ([[User talk:Dtgriscom|talk]]) 13:32, 17 January 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::Thanks for adding my signature, I’m gonna have to remember to do that. &lt;br /&gt;
::What I had in mind with Kidball was that most of the time he’s the same kid (since most of the time he only appears in Miss Lenhart’s class, at least that’s where he’s been the majority of the times I’ve seen him), but is occasionally used to represent someone else; in the same way that Cueball appears to be the same person most of the time, but Randall occasionally uses him to represent someone else.  And using “Kidball” in the explanations/transcripts might be more efficient than “a Cueball like kid”.&lt;br /&gt;
::And yes, if I saw him in a new comic, I would expect him to more or less behave the same way, unless it’s clear that he’s representing someone else.[[User:MikeTheNewGuy|MikeTheNewGuy]] ([[User talk:MikeTheNewGuy|talk]]) 18:04, 17 January 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::I'm not sure; let's see what others think. -- [[User:Dtgriscom|Dtgriscom]] ([[User talk:Dtgriscom|talk]]) 18:11, 17 January 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::I do think that he can and should be named, as he's very similar to [[Jill]], even if she has more personality than him. And Kidball is an amazing name! [[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 18:01, 23 January 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::::I concur. '''[[User:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:9pt;color:#A9C6CA&amp;quot;&amp;gt;42.book.addict&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:6pt;color:#516874&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Talk to me!&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;''' 21:57, 23 January 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Me too. I'm not trusting myself with the actual page creation, so somebody else will need to create it. (sorry, just don't want to mess things up) &amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family: Times New Roman, serif; font-size: 16px;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;--'''''[[User:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#023020&amp;quot;&amp;gt;DollarStoreBa'al&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]][[User Talk:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#000080&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Converse&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;]]'''''&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt; 22:51, 28 January 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::::I've made them. See [[Kidball]] and [[:Category:Comics featuring Kidball]]. I've also changed the header of this thread for more clarity. '''[[User:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:9pt;color:#A9C6CA&amp;quot;&amp;gt;42.book.addict&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:6pt;color:#516874&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Talk to me!&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;''' 01:40, 1 February 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Thanks! Anyone up for populating it? [[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 08:14, 1 February 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::I'll try to see if I can find the time (and motivation) to do so this week. '''[[User:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:9pt;color:#A9C6CA&amp;quot;&amp;gt;42.book.addict&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:6pt;color:#516874&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Talk to me!&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;''' 03:07, 2 February 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::I just went through [[:Category:Comics featuring children]] and added about 9 to [[:Category:Comics featuring Kidball]]. We're getting there! [[User:Maxcodes|Maxcodes]] ([[User talk:Maxcodes|talk]]) 14:34, 15 February 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Should comics with multiple Kidballs be placed in [[:Category:Multiple Cueballs]], or should a new category be created? [[User:Maxcodes|Maxcodes]] ([[User talk:Maxcodes|talk]]) 12:37, 15 February 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::: (First, I made it markup as a &amp;quot;visible category link&amp;quot;, as you intended, rather than the invisible category membership that normally happens, hope you don't mind.)&lt;br /&gt;
:::: A further question is if a comic was Multiple Cueballs, by dint of having a Cueball ''and'' a now-IDed-as-Kidball, is it still Multiple Cueballs? [[Special:Contributions/82.132.239.239|82.132.239.239]] 13:26, 15 February 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::: We've only just got to the point where we're naming this character Kidball; I'd say don't complicate the situation just yet. Too many categories makes the categories less useful. -- [[User:Dtgriscom|Dtgriscom]] ([[User talk:Dtgriscom|talk]]) 13:52, 15 February 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::: Children are rarely alone, normally being with other children and/or with one or one-or-more adults. So [[:Category:Comics featuring children]] covers Multiple Kidballs.&lt;br /&gt;
:::: I'd say that Multiple Cueballs is a notable 'common strangeness' that I think it's useful to continue note, for various reasons, but multiple non-Cueball characters (e.g. how [[1000]] has it, in-extremis) aren't worth all the various different character-specific 'multiple' categories. (And, yes, an adult Cueball and a Kidball should not be &amp;quot;Multiple Cueballs&amp;quot;.) [[Special:Contributions/81.179.199.253|81.179.199.253]] 18:29, 15 February 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Agreed. Multiple Cueballs is usually for unusual cases where there isn't a different main character other than cueball. A bald kid and a bald adult are two different people. [[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 16:52, 16 February 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
== Bring back mboxes! ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[https://mediawiki.org/wiki/Template:Mbox Mboxes] (do read that link) are message boxes that prompt editors to edit.&lt;br /&gt;
They say things such as, &amp;quot;'''Please help expand this page.'''&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
However, they aren't on this wiki!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
So, there are a few different templates resembling mboxes:&lt;br /&gt;
* {{template|notice}},&lt;br /&gt;
* {{template|notice2}},&lt;br /&gt;
* {{template|incomplete}}, and&lt;br /&gt;
* {{template|incomplete transcript}}&lt;br /&gt;
are just a few I've seen.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I just don't think this is the way! Also, I checked {{template|ambox}} and it said it was deleted. However, the proposal archive&lt;br /&gt;
isn't working and I can't check the reason. So I can't see why we aren't using them!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Here are a few arguments for mboxes:&lt;br /&gt;
* Mboxes can be different types, such as a notice or an alert, or even an incomplete notice, with a &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;type&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt; attribute.&lt;br /&gt;
* Mboxes are &amp;lt;abbr title=&amp;quot;Don't Repeat Yourself&amp;quot;&amp;gt;DRY&amp;lt;/abbr&amp;gt;, they're reusable.&lt;br /&gt;
* Mboxes are used on Wikipedia, and other sites I'm sure, so using them here will make it more comfortable for new editors coming from other sites such as Wikipedia.&lt;br /&gt;
* Using mboxes will make styling all alerts easier. (OK YES I ADMIT IT I WANT MY USER STYLES)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
So why aren't we using them? I'm thinking that if this topic gets enough support, we can bring mboxes back, and&lt;br /&gt;
start transitioning old alerts to mbox variants.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thank you for coming to my TED Talk. [[User:Maxcodes|Maxcodes]] ([[User talk:Maxcodes|talk]]) 14:38, 16 February 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:The discussion, as you said, is in the archive: [[explain_xkcd_talk:Community_portal/Proposals#Notice_templates]]. [[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 16:58, 16 February 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Transcripts ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
ATTENTION!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
THIS: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Blah blah '''BLAH'''&lt;br /&gt;
''BLAH blah blah''&lt;br /&gt;
Wordssss…………&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
(Fill in blahs with your own words! Choose your own adventure fun!)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Is not a transcript!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I’ve had the impression that transcripts were for blind people (well, not ''just'' blind people) and making transcripts like the one above is only making things harder for people who may read aloud for blind people. Use things like [bold text] or [italics] or [comic in red text].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Idk wh6 I wrote this it just been bothering me. {{unsigned ip|2600:4040:52f7:9a00:cdb5:8d4d:4a6c:9917|16:58, 24 February 2026 (UTC)}}&lt;br /&gt;
:I've always wondered who the transcripts are even for. Since both the comics and the transcripts are in the same medium, those who are blind wouldn't be able to see the transcript. I guess they could have it read to them, but it's still confusing. As far as I know, it's just a thing that very early editors used to do, and the tradition stuck. What's the reasoning behind the transcripts? --'''''[[User:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#3c2004&amp;quot;&amp;gt;DollarStoreBa'al&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User Talk:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#1E0F00&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Converse&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; (BLM)''''' 14:22, 2 March 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::There exists the {{w|screen reader}}, which (at least until you start to trust AI, and there ''are'' undoubtely some good AI ATs out there that do this, these days, but are trained more to help with RL situations, like &amp;quot;what items are on the shop shelf I'm currently standing in front of?&amp;quot;, not stick-figures and line-art...) can't do anything useful with the non-meta contents of an image but will happily speak out a transcript.&lt;br /&gt;
::It probably also helps, even if you don't need it spoken out for you, if you have a hankering of searching for a particular comic and you know some written words in it that might not ''necessarily'' be quoted verbatim in the Explanation. The text being all there in the Transcript section means you can get this site (or perhaps your caching search-engine of choice) to find it, without even relying on someone having decided to quote it directly elsewhere (which is often not good and/or necessary for an Explanation/Discussion/Trivia section contribution).&lt;br /&gt;
::If you're ''really'' lucky, you can even search for [https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?search=%22office+chair%22&amp;amp;title=Special%3ASearch&amp;amp;go=Go some random visual thing], as long as it's been mentioned, without relying upon it havng already had a thoroughly populated Category... That relies upon any useful example having the same exact wording in the Transcript (and/or Explanation), but it's better than if you don't have any Transcripts at all.&lt;br /&gt;
::There are other useful things, a bit less obvious. Yet perhaps you could argue the presence of the Transcript may not actually be that vital... I don't know if anyone here ''does'' even use a screen-reader (but is still interested in webcomics ...a very visual medium). And there are probably other ways to get the other other advantages of the Transcript. Perhaps we could just make sure ''everything'' currently Transcripted is added to the Explanation (though that seems wasteful, and might make the Explanation far ''less'' useful/readable, having to fight past the obligatory in-depth explanation of whether Cueball's arm is raised in a particular panel or not...). But currently the Transcript exists, for those that need (or like) it, and also anybody who doesn't can just ignore it.&lt;br /&gt;
::And unless you're going to fold ''all'' Transcripts into the rest of the Explanation, it seems rather strange to just stop creating them. Honestly, it's probably half the fun for some people. And even another 'First!'-brag for users to bag, without being actually so crass as to edit anything just to say &amp;quot;First!&amp;quot; ;) [[Special:Contributions/81.179.199.253|81.179.199.253]] 19:58, 2 March 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::I still do think that the people who need a screen reader would be interested in webcomics, although there probably exists a small population of people who are. Also, screen readers do not necessarily need to use AI in anything except for the voice. --'''''[[User:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#023020&amp;quot;&amp;gt;DollarStoreBa'al&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User Talk:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#09ff00&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Converse&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;  20:09, 2 March 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::::Not sure if you're agreeing with me or not there. You may have missed a &amp;quot;not&amp;quot; or something in there somewhere. And screen-readers don't need ''any'' AI (as we would currently expect it), although doubtless the last few years development of LLM/GenerativeAIs has probably improved them from 'dumb phonology' (with quirks that users would have to get use to) to actually saying things more eloquently and even correctly voice non-homophonic homographs correctly...&lt;br /&gt;
::::But, anyway, there's the other reasons for a Transcript, even if I don't know if anyone does bother to use SRs. [[Special:Contributions/81.179.199.253|81.179.199.253]] 20:45, 2 March 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::I did, indeed, accidentally miss a 'not'. I DON'T think that those who need screen readers would be interested in webcomics. --'''''[[User:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#023020&amp;quot;&amp;gt;DollarStoreBa'al&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User Talk:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#09ff00&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Converse&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;  20:55, 2 March 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::You'd be surprised. Just take a look at this discussion: https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php/explain_xkcd:Community_portal/Miscellaneous#Sightless_readers_offended_by_the_.22It.27s_.27cause_you.27re_dumb.22_tagline. [[User:Elektrizikekswerk|Elektrizikekswerk]] ([[User talk:Elektrizikekswerk|talk]]) 13:00, 9 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::...I stand corrected. Also, [[2134: Too Much Talking|I have an opinion]] about that discussion after reading it. --'''''[[User:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#023020&amp;quot;&amp;gt;DollarStoreBa'al&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User Talk:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#09ff00&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Converse&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;  13:57, 9 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==New search algorithm?==&lt;br /&gt;
I was searching for a specific comic based on some words from the transcript. I was looking for [[2134: Too Much Talking]] and was searching &amp;quot;new opinions&amp;quot;. INSTEAD of getting only results which had the phrase &amp;quot;new opinions&amp;quot;, I got every comic which had the word 'new' or 'opinion' ANYWHERE in its explanation or transcript. I got over 100 hits and had to go through each preview individually, which was quite annoying and took far too long. I think there should be a function or option that you could turn on which makes it so, when you search &amp;quot;new opinions&amp;quot;, it only displays pages with the search term and doesn't display anything which only contains a part of it. This happens every time I try to search. --'''''[[User:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#023020&amp;quot;&amp;gt;DollarStoreBa'al&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User Talk:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#09ff00&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Converse&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;  14:04, 9 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:You probably searched for (quote)&amp;lt;code&amp;gt;new opinions&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;(unquote), but you'll find that you'll get exactly what you wanted from (quote)&amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;quot;new opinions&amp;quot;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;(unquote) ''with'' the literal quotes.&lt;br /&gt;
:Like I did, by ending up on the page https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?search=%22new+opinions%22&amp;amp;title=Special%3ASearch&amp;amp;go=Go just now.&lt;br /&gt;
:Note that searches just for (quote)&amp;lt;code&amp;gt;new&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;(unquote) ''or'' just for (quote)&amp;lt;code&amp;gt;opinions&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;(unquote) return many (thousands!) of matches. (quote)&amp;lt;code&amp;gt;new opinions&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;(unquote) 'only' seems to return 42 examples (now including this page?). This would include examples of &amp;quot;opinion new&amp;quot; ordering or even totally separate uses like if any a phrase like &amp;quot;...relying upon old opinions, rather than new facts...&amp;quot; was used. An ''actual'' example, is the following search-result snippet:&lt;br /&gt;
::..., with no real bearing on most peoples' lives, a lot of people have strong '''opinions''' on the topic. One on side, people argue that planets should have a consiste ...with such debates, to the point of damaging their relationship, is nothing '''new''' for this couple.&lt;br /&gt;
:I don't know how we'd even update/change the search-algorithm.&lt;br /&gt;
:And, note, it'd annoy those who are already used to what subtle ways there are to be either more or less finicky in a desired search. Searching for mention of &amp;quot;dog leads&amp;quot;? The (unquoted) search for &amp;quot;dog lead&amp;quot; might be better to find &amp;quot;he has a dog on a lead&amp;quot; without (normally) getting pages that say something like &amp;quot;a heavy element, like lead&amp;quot;. A quoted-search, or an assumption that the user would have wanted a quoted-search, would miss the first example.&lt;br /&gt;
:There may be various other tricks and tips to search-formatting. The use of &amp;quot;+&amp;quot; before a particular term used to (on Google) force that as a required match, when it might have included &amp;quot;does not include...&amp;quot; on a page that contains every other word, just not that one.  But this site doesn't seem to have the full (traditional) Google-Fu behaviour, that also included things like (quote)&amp;lt;code&amp;gt;-dog lead&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;(unquote) that could get you (mostly) the metal or connecting cable references to lead without so.much of the additional pet-restraint homonym, but then the Google algorithm has also changed so much over the years (Natural Language Processing and even more AI-based methods, rather than a more obvious codified 'markup' to one's search terms where it was the user's initial knowledge that more limited the search, intentinally or otherwise). [[Special:Contributions/82.132.238.115|82.132.238.115]] 16:53, 9 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Excessive verbosity ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Should we have a category and community portal link to it for explanations which are considered excessively verbose to the point of deteriorating their usefulness to the readers? [[Special:Contributions/2603:800C:1200:596A:A08E:FCB1:F968:D433|2603:800C:1200:596A:A08E:FCB1:F968:D433]] 20:18, 15 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Define excessive. (Also: Define insufficient.) [[Special:Contributions/81.179.199.253|81.179.199.253]] 21:09, 15 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::He never even said &amp;quot;insufficient&amp;quot;. He said that making a whole essay as a response (I'll link some examples below) is a waste of time because all the text is overwhelming and it becomes harder to pick out the important parts. By the way, he may be referring to you, as you tend to make very long responses (read: not necessarily a bad thing).&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
::Some examples:&lt;br /&gt;
::*[https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:3231:_Lightning&amp;amp;curid=30046&amp;amp;diff=410387&amp;amp;oldid=410386 this edit by 81.179.199.253]&lt;br /&gt;
::*[https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:3232:_Countdown_Standard&amp;amp;curid=30051&amp;amp;diff=410328&amp;amp;oldid=410327 this edit by 81.179.199.253]&lt;br /&gt;
::*[https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:3231:_Lightning&amp;amp;curid=30046&amp;amp;diff=410157&amp;amp;oldid=410141 this edit by 82.132.238.12]&lt;br /&gt;
::--'''''[[User:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Times; color:#023020&amp;quot;&amp;gt;DollarStoreBa'al&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User_talk:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Times; color:#000080&amp;quot;&amp;gt;'''''converse'''''&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 21:18, 15 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Indeed. &amp;quot;Insufficient&amp;quot; was was seaid by me (IPv4), not IPv6. The point being that I'm not sure what amount of paring down would satisfy them, and what amount would be problematic to them.&lt;br /&gt;
:::If some information is there but looks superfluous to someone, they might remove it. If the information is not there but seems necessary, some other person might add it. And everyone has different ideas.&lt;br /&gt;
:::And in the two editing examples (and the example that wasn't me), they aren't even Explanation additions, which I'm sure (but will happily be corrected on) wasn't what the suggestion was about. Also, I make no apologies for being verbose enough to encopass a complicated issue, when I think it merits it, especially in Talk. There's also occasion to cut down/rationalise things (in Explanations), especially when multiple editors have added a concept here, an example there, a caveat at the end, etc, which might be best rewritten from scratch.&lt;br /&gt;
:::Face it, we who seek to &amp;quot;explain xkcd&amp;quot; have many things to say, whether we we're Nerd Sniped or just happen to think of something interesting but unmentioned. And those who wish xkcd to be explained may have many questions (even if they {{diff|410158|don't say what they are}}. Perhaps I personally err more on maintaining a verbosity (that can be skipped over by the impatient reader) rather than risk being too laconic (and leave out something that others would want/need to be said).&lt;br /&gt;
:::I consciously ''tried'' to convey all of what I've just said by just five words, you'll notice. Maybe ten words would have been better? [[Special:Contributions/81.179.199.253|81.179.199.253]] 00:10, 16 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::I did actually define it, plain as day! Excessive verbosity is &amp;quot;excessively verbose to the point of deteriorating [an explanation's] usefulness to the readers.&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;
::Please I know this has been something of a pattern for years now, and I don't know who all is involved or how many, of course, but could you please try showing some restraint? For example, when you're typing a long paragraph and you're not 100% sure it would make the explanation clearer or more helpful in some concrete way, would you please consider posting it on the talk page and asking others whether they think it should be added, or at least ask others for help with brevity? [[Special:Contributions/2603:800C:1200:596A:FDFE:A728:80A:5859|2603:800C:1200:596A:FDFE:A728:80A:5859]] 01:00, 17 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::They do have a point, IPv4. Many of your comments exceed 1,000 bytes in length, and most go above 500.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:::1)''&amp;quot;If some information is there but looks superfluous to someone, they might remove it.&amp;quot;'' Most people are probably going to be encouraged ''not'' to edit other people's comments (see [[User talk:42.book.addict#Editing other people's words?|here]])&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:::2)''&amp;quot;In the two editing examples, they aren't even explanation additions...&amp;quot;'' That's precisely the point. Large additions to explanations are fine, if it all relates to the comic in some way. Large talk page replies, however, are much harder to navigate.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:::3)''&amp;quot;Perhaps I personally err on maintaining a verbosity (that can be skipped over by the impatient reader) rather than risk being too laconic (and leave out something that others would want/need to be said).&amp;quot;'' The issue is that all the important things are sprinkled throughout your explanation and '''can't''' be skipped. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:::If you do insist on being as verbose as you are, perhaps it would be a good idea to add a TL;DR? Just a thought.--'''''[[User:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Times; color:#023020&amp;quot;&amp;gt;DollarStoreBa'al&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User_talk:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Times; color:#000080&amp;quot;&amp;gt;'''''converse'''''&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 13:19, 17 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::::Ahoy there, from IPv4-land, again. I think you're misreading something. You're talking about Talk: comments being overlong. I'm not sure anyone else is.&lt;br /&gt;
::::The OP says &amp;quot;...for '''explanations''' which are considered excessively verbose...&amp;quot; (my emphasis added). Only in the more recent &amp;quot;...would you please consider posting it on the talk page and...&amp;quot; suggestion is OP mentioning Talk:, and that's as a suggestion of doing that ''instead'' of being wordy in the Explanation.&lt;br /&gt;
::::I also disagree that my two highlighted additions ({{diff|410387|this}} and {{diff|410328|this}}) are overlong. Not as short as they could be, but only significantly so by not saying things I wanted to say. Whether I not I should have, is another matter.&lt;br /&gt;
::::Not much more to add, that hasn't already been mentioned. So I won't. Have a nice day! [[Special:Contributions/81.179.199.253|81.179.199.253]] 18:41, 17 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::((Hi, I'm not the above IPv4, but I am someone you used as an example. And I could respond to DSB's comments (that edit-conflicted with me writing the following), as I think they are arguments directed against me too, but that would add ''another half hour or more of writing, down-editing, reviewing, adding back in things that I should ''not'' have edited out, etc. So, instead, I'm just prepending this little blurb. But it seems like I'm of a like mind/''modus operandi'' as the other protagonist here. Though was reluctant to jump in to comment on this 'suggestion' right from the start. But here I am now. Sorry!))&lt;br /&gt;
:::No, sorry. You're still being subjective there, as already said by someone else. If people add more information, it's generally because they think that such information is missing. Or responding to comments (or interpretations) from others who hadn't already 'got it'.&lt;br /&gt;
:::I absolutely don't mind if my attempts to explain something are re-edited to be less wordy than I might have left them, though. That's the nature of wiki-editing. And, if someone removes or wrongly paraphrases something (of mine, or anyone else), I reserve the right to go back and make it correct once more.&lt;br /&gt;
:::The exception is with Talk comments:&lt;br /&gt;
:::#Other than totally removing something that totally violates site policy, you do ''not'' remove or edit someone else's Talk contribution, beyond any peripheral formatting (e.g. adding a missing signature, correcting a clear indentation misalignment or, with very great care, making it more readable as far as newlines, bulletpoints, tabulation, etc, if the OA cocked that up) and ''never'' change the substantive text... even for spelling.&lt;br /&gt;
:::#Things written in Talk are not part of the Explanation and should not be assumed to be read by anyone reading the Explanation.&lt;br /&gt;
:::#They also need not be as 'perfect' as one might try to write in an Explanation, be they either more jokey, full of spelling/grammar errors. This is not the &amp;quot;voice of the site, for we are legion&amp;quot;, but individually attributable (more or less) voices that may display confusion, authoritativeness, malapropriate terminology, the desire to say &amp;quot;FIRST!&amp;quot; and/or complaints about everyone else doing any or all the the other things.&lt;br /&gt;
:::#Should someone ''happen'' to make a cogent point in Talk, it almost never is suitable to just copypaste their exact words (less the signature - if there was any!) into the main Explanation (or even within the 'incomplete'-notification. If they thought it was ready for the Explanation, they'd have written it there, and probably used a different phrase (I write from experience, here!)&lt;br /&gt;
:::#And there is very little reason to go through the collaborative editing process on Talk, with multiple versions (and critiques) of the 'concept' text being left for everyone to see all the false starts and mis-steps and the like. When the ''very idea'' of the main Wiki page is that it's a collaborative editing place that gets refined to the best result it can be (or, maybe, just one of the 'least worst' ones), without all the messy re-versioning details on show (but still there in the History, for the curious).&lt;br /&gt;
:::(And I note that DSB highlit one of ''my'' Talk contributions, above, as an example of overloquaciousness... Strangely, one that {{diff|410161|looked somewhat appreciated}}, unless that was actually intended as sarcasm, but lacked sufficient markup to reveal that as its purpose. Yes, it was significantly longer than the first response (which I think was good, as far as it went), but I thought that *maybe* a few more details wouldn't go amiss. In leiu of possible further questions that might have occured without.)&lt;br /&gt;
:::So, no. I reject your request to 'discuss things in Talk, i  advance' any time I think I might not be adding a perfectly cromulant smattering of knowledge. I know that I will never write laconicallg enough to please every reader, especially without making it so streamlined that someone else will have to request (or fulfill) further expansion to it.&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;quot;Should we have a category&amp;quot;? Maybe. What are you thinking? Some template-led thing, used either like the {{template|Actual citation needed}} or {{template|incomplete}} ones, or somewhere betwixt the two, in application/functionality? What if some adds an &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{Excessive verbosity}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt; tag and someone disagrees enough to remove it again? Are we back to arguing it out in Talk (like we do already), and/or whole paragraphs being pre-emptively removed (like is done already), or are we supposed to stop doing that and instead populate the tag with 'reason=' information?&lt;br /&gt;
:::Not entirely sure what the &amp;quot;community portal link to it&amp;quot; is about, though. Adding a way to get to [[explain xkcd:Community portal/Proposals#Excessive verbosity|this section]]? Or adding a link to each tagged example ''from'' this section?&lt;br /&gt;
:::The observation, in several ways, needs further explanation and elaboration (totally unintended, but I ''just'' realised how ironic that is!). Can I (and my fellow word-technicians, such as the prior responder) possibly shave off a word or two? Probably. But I personally try (amongst other editing issues) to address inconsistencies and gaps in information that I see have not yet been addressed. If someone wants to improve on what I add, within a comic page, then they can. Better something there, imperfect, than just lacking because of the possibility of some arbitrary word-/paragraph-limit being breached due to my 'interference'. [[Special:Contributions/82.132.236.33|82.132.236.33]] 14:44, 17 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I created [[[[:Category:Excessive verbosity]]]] and mentioned it at the end of [[explain xkcd:Community portal]]. I have a plan to fill it with initially the 20-30 worst offending explanations using AI, but I need to run some experiments first. [[User:Liv2splain|Liv2splain]] ([[User talk:Liv2splain|talk]]) 08:59, 18 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:What actual criteria will assess the issue of &amp;quot;worst offending&amp;quot;, can I ask? I ask this seriously, but I might as well tell you that I predict that you won't have a cogent answer. Especially if you're going for the same enumeration as that graph that was created. [[Special:Contributions/81.179.199.253|81.179.199.253]] 20:55, 18 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::Whether the text is too verbose to serve the readers as a copyedit for brevity could. (By the way, did you know in the year 1600 the typical English written sentence had about 50 words?) [[User:Liv2splain|Liv2splain]] ([[User talk:Liv2splain|talk]]) 04:55, 23 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Poking my nose back in... Is the valuation then based upon something like &amp;quot;we asked 100 readers to rank the readability, and used IRV to produce the community-accepted order of best to worst&amp;quot;? Or &amp;quot;nominate your fifty worst examples, and the ones with most votes get looked at&amp;quot;, Either of those would be awkward to organise properly.&lt;br /&gt;
:::Or are we asking an AI (multiple times, and/or multiple AIs) to do this ranking, knowing that AIs are ineffably tied to their training data in ways that can be unpredictably spurious. (As an example, it could mark down anything written by an IP, having identified that as a key indicator, if given the option. Like the cases of AIs 'learning' to diagnosing illnesses based upon the presence of a measuring scale in a diagnostic photograph, or a certain type of acute medicine hospital name in the past treatment records.) What would it make of the sentence &amp;quot;Colourless green dreams sleep furiously&amp;quot;, and would it know if it is even a contextually apt statement or not, for any given usage?&lt;br /&gt;
:::The 50 words thing is interesting, if ''that's'' the key to your suggestion, but hardly a good scale for multiple reasons. Case in point: your first sentence is 16 words. It is brief. It also took me a while to realise it wasn't an accidentally unfinished &amp;quot;Whether &amp;lt;foo&amp;gt; could &amp;lt;bar&amp;gt;&amp;quot; enquiry, and a couple of other garden-path mis-steps, before realising its grammatic intent.&lt;br /&gt;
:::Counting words isn't enough. Short sentences more readable? (Or it is non-linear.) Correct horse battery staple! Must be grammatical, naturally. Not comic joke call-back. But what about punctuation? Commas in right places. Semi-colons: good or bad? Is this paragraph readable? All statements, four words. It is fun writing. But not easy, regardless. Fluid reading remains uncertain. Seems stilted to me. Sesquipedalian loquaciousness preponderantly undisallowed. You get the idea..?&lt;br /&gt;
:::The truth is that there's no easy (non-subjective) measure of readability, and whatever you do use to measure it may have little connection to understandability, practical meaning or actual accuracy/relevence, and attempts to enhance any or all of the latter may ''require'' some loss of mere 'brevity'. This is not to say that I consider my own contributions unimprovable, just that they (should) say what I intend them to say, and to the extent I intend to say them. [[Special:Contributions/82.132.238.56|82.132.238.56]] 10:16, 23 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Why not simply use the incomplete tag? My main contribution to this wiki in the last months was to cut down explanations to the point. If I stumble upon an explanation that I feel is too bloated but I don't have the time or energy to do it myself at that moment I add the incomplete tag, mention that the explanation needs to be shortened and done. Oftentimes I do it then myself some time later and remove the tag again. I don't see the point of a new category. Speaking of bloating up stuff... ;) [[User:Elektrizikekswerk|Elektrizikekswerk]] ([[User talk:Elektrizikekswerk|talk]]) 08:53, 23 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:I agree, for what it's worth. [[Special:Contributions/82.132.238.56|82.132.238.56]] 10:16, 23 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Agreed. It should simply say which part of the explanation needs works, and what exactly it needs. [[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 12:26, 25 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== possible new &amp;quot;superheroes&amp;quot; category ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
i don't edit this wiki very often, but i recently decided to make a &amp;quot;superheroes&amp;quot; category since i was surprised we didn't have one already. i've been going thru the archives and adding comics, but today i noticed a bunch of the edits were reverted by one person with the reason &amp;quot;no such category&amp;quot;. do i need to do something to get the category approved or were the reversions incorrect? [[Special:Contributions/216.145.71.130|216.145.71.130]] 21:03, 29 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:As the reverter, I'm suggesting that the way this is normally done is to notice the need and suggest that it is created, listing (at least some of) the cases.&lt;br /&gt;
:While anyone with page-creation capabilities (not you, and not me) can &amp;quot;unredlink&amp;quot; the category, it'd be useful to make sure it's not just being created because of one person's vague moment of inspiration.&lt;br /&gt;
:Not to say that you're unjustified, in this case, just that you hadn't gone any way to ''try'' to justify it. And it's better to do that. (The old phrase &amp;quot;better to ask forgiveness than permission&amp;quot; isn't really applicable here.) I'll happily help repopulate the new category, if and when it is decided to get created. Just it was being done the wrong way round.&lt;br /&gt;
:Someone else {{diff|411372|mentioned}} that its name might need rethinking, and that's one of the aspects. Yes, it can be renamed, but still much better to be right to start with.&lt;br /&gt;
:So I think it should be open to discussion... enough to convince someone else to make it a valid category, ''then'' start adding them back in again.&lt;br /&gt;
:If I've picked them all up, BTW, I think the following are your candidates:&lt;br /&gt;
:*[[273: Electromagnetic Spectrum]] - (just copied from below, not sure without checking... maybe Superman?)&lt;br /&gt;
:*[[663: Sagan-Man‎‎]] - &amp;quot;Sagan-Man&amp;quot;, as per title&lt;br /&gt;
:*[[700: Complexion‎‎]] - Batman&lt;br /&gt;
:*[[980: Money‎‎]] - Batman mentioned&lt;br /&gt;
:*[[1004: Batman‎‎]] - natch&lt;br /&gt;
:*[[1010: Etymology-Man‎‎]] - &amp;quot;Etymology-Man&amp;quot;, of course/&lt;br /&gt;
:*[[1012: Wrong Superhero‎‎]] - and again&lt;br /&gt;
:**[[:Category:Etymology-Man‎‎]] - and his own category (of just two appearances...)&lt;br /&gt;
:*[[1384: Krypton‎‎]] - Superman&lt;br /&gt;
:*[[1394: Superm*n‎‎]] -sprt-of Superman&lt;br /&gt;
:*[[1415: Ballooning]] - Spiderman&lt;br /&gt;
:*[[1434: Where Do Birds Go]] - Superman&lt;br /&gt;
:*(Feel free to edit in any more, anybody!)&lt;br /&gt;
:...so, along with any other finds, if it looks like we need [[:Category:Comics containing superheroes]] (or similar) then your existing work hasn't gone to waste. [[Special:Contributions/81.179.199.253|81.179.199.253]] 21:42, 29 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::for archiving's sake, there's also [[273: Electromagnetic Spectrum]], [[1415: Ballooning]], and [[1434: Where Do Birds Go]]. &lt;br /&gt;
::it would be nice to have character pages for specific superheroes like superman and batman (and, evidently, etymology-man), but &amp;quot;superheroes&amp;quot; in general is a topic, not a character. as for the name, it's in line with categories like [[:Category:Aliens]], [[:Category:Demons]], and [[:Category:Sysadmins]] which are plural and don't start with &amp;quot;comics featuring&amp;quot;. we do have [[:Category:Comics featuring children]], but it seems like an oddball to me (maybe because it's more of a meta-category for the characters page than one intended for casual browsing? dunno.)&lt;br /&gt;
::should we continue discussing this here, on the character page talk, or somewhere else? i must admit i don't understand the organization. [[Special:Contributions/216.145.71.130|216.145.71.130]] 22:09, 29 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::The wiki can be a bit inconsistent, because it's been going for a while and not everyone has gone with the same 'house style' (which may have changed over time, too). We have [[:Category:Comics with babies]], for example, and also [[:Category:Comics with cursed items]]. While there are various &amp;quot;Category:Comics featuring &amp;lt;named characters, both real and fictional&amp;gt;&amp;quot;, which would have more suited Etymology Man and could (if we so wish) serve for Batman, Superman, etc, individually.&lt;br /&gt;
:::I'm actually fairly ambivalent, but I think that it should at least have other voices agree on which way it all goes. Saves too much after-the-fact 'corrections'. But you don't want to be talking just to me about this, so I'll shut up now, and await some of the 'big hitter' accounts to weigh it all up. It doesn't need to be done right now. A couple more hours, at least... ;)[[Special:Contributions/81.179.199.253|81.179.199.253]] 22:40, 29 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:no response about where to talk about this yet, so i'm just going to loop the other comment in here. changing the name to be more indicative as well. [[Special:Contributions/64.189.140.8|64.189.140.8]] 07:20, 1 May 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Sounds like a nice category to me. [[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 09:22, 1 May 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Seems quite relevant to me. Don't really see an issue with using the category name &amp;quot;superheroes&amp;quot; [[User:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font:11pt Cormorant Garamond&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#4A86A6&amp;quot;&amp;gt;tor&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#C0728D&amp;quot;&amp;gt;i :3&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font:8pt Cormorant Garamond&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#7E7E7E&amp;quot;&amp;gt;talk &amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#C0728D&amp;quot;&amp;gt;to &amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#4A86A6&amp;quot;&amp;gt;me!&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 16:31, 1 May 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:here's the remaining ones i picked up:&lt;br /&gt;
:*[[1648: Famous Duos]] - batman and robin&lt;br /&gt;
:*[[1792: Bird/Plane/Superman]]&lt;br /&gt;
:*[[1848: Glacial Erratic]] - superman (title text)&lt;br /&gt;
:*[[1904: Research Risks]] - supervillains in general&lt;br /&gt;
:*[[1970: Name Dominoes]] - superman and batman (slightly up-right from the center)&lt;br /&gt;
:*[[2230: Versus Bracket]] - batman vs. superman and justice league vs. teen titans&lt;br /&gt;
:*[[2367: Masks]] - batman, spiderman, and mysterio (possibly scarecrow as well, no idea what his lore is)&lt;br /&gt;
:*[[2396: Wonder Woman 1984]]&lt;br /&gt;
:*[[3146: Fantastic Four]]&lt;br /&gt;
:[[Special:Contributions/151.141.68.154|151.141.68.154]] 19:21, 1 May 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::since there's been no further comments i went ahead and remade the category. if anyone with permissions can un-redlink it that'd be nice. [[Special:Contributions/64.189.140.61|64.189.140.61]] 00:49, 6 May 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::You ''didn't'' &amp;quot;remake the category&amp;quot; because, as you say, they're redlinked until someone has sufficient reason to unredlink them. That's not the way we do things here, as explained, or else anyone could do something like [[:Category:64.189.140.61 likes creating categories]] and expect it to be created without any consideration of need.&lt;br /&gt;
:::I'm not opposed to the category, in principle, but the only reason I'm ''not'' (re-)reverting all those pre-emptive new redlinks is because it's too much effort right now. Which is ''not'' the best reason for failing to uphold such practical standards. Well intentioned as you are (and I don't know why nobody else supported you by instating it 'properly'), ''some'' here may see your approach as akin to vandalism. [[Special:Contributions/82.132.237.108|82.132.237.108]] 10:28, 6 May 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::: I, unlike OP, have done quite a bit more ''preparatory'' work for the potential category.&lt;br /&gt;
::: See all the following edits:&lt;br /&gt;
::: *{{diff|411888|663: Sagan-Man}}, {{diff|411889|700: Complexion}}, {{diff|411890|980: Money}}, {{diff|411891|1004: Batman}}, {{diff|411892|1010: Etymology-Man}}, {{diff|411893|1012: Wrong Superhero}}, {{diff|411894|1384: Krypton}}, {{diff|411895|1394: Superm*n}}, {{diff|411896|1415: Ballooning}}, {{diff|411897|1434: Where Do Birds Go}}, {{diff|411898|1648: Famous Duos}}, {{diff|411899|1792: Bird/Plane/Superman}}, {{diff|411900|1848: Glacial Erratic}}, {{diff|411901|1904: Research Risks}}, {{diff|411902|1970: Name Dominoes}}, {{diff|411903|2230: Versus Bracket}}, {{diff|411904|2367: Masks}}, {{diff|411905|2396: Wonder Woman 1984}}, {{diff|411907|3146: Fantastic Four}} and {{diff|411908|Category:Etymology-Man}}&lt;br /&gt;
::: Note that I have done three things:&lt;br /&gt;
:::#Chosen the [[:Category:Comics featuring Superheroes]] variation, to match (among other more individually-aimed ones) the category name used in [[:Category:Comics featuring major characters‏‎]], [[:Category:Comics featuring minor characters‏‎]], [[:Category:Comics featuring politicians]] and [[:Category:Comics featuring real people‏‎]]. Consider this my official and reasoned suggestion for what the Category should be named. Subject to any further discussion on this matter (before implementation).&lt;br /&gt;
:::#* Yes, there are other inconsistencies to this. But then I'd also argue that [[:Category:Etymology-Man]] really should have echoed the standard that resulted in [[:Category:Comics featuring Kidball]], too, as well the same (more historically or not) for Knit Cap, Cueball, Little Bobby Tables, etc.&lt;br /&gt;
:::#I've added a 'category sort index' word, for grouping in the eventual automatic category listing. This is an optional extra, and I used &amp;quot;multiple&amp;quot; for those comics that weren't (easily) just one individual Superhero, but listed those that were involved in the next thing I did. If you prefer normal comic (or category) name-order, you could remove this pipe-option. Or, ideally, cut'n'paste it into any post-category comment just for editor referencing.&lt;br /&gt;
:::#I have (where it seemed necessary, which is most of the time) added an apprioriate editor-'comment' after the category. Because I can't use HTML comments ''within'' HTML comments, I've rendered these with &amp;quot;(!-- .. --)&amp;quot; surrounds, which need fixing to use &amp;amp;lt;/&amp;amp;gt; instead once the current commented-proposal surround is removed.&lt;br /&gt;
:::#*Note, im particular one of them... [[1904: Research Risks]], I think it was... where the comment made was that I don't think it qualified for Superhero, as it only references the concept of a Supervillain.&lt;br /&gt;
:::i.e. each (commented) placeholder should be easy to make into whatever (uncommented) implementation is agreed upon.&lt;br /&gt;
::: Now, ''please'', OP and everyone else, do not just revert (or otherwise apply) a currently non-existent category 'in the hope' that it's correct and someone with an account will just unredlink it for you as a 'done deal'. Even if I were an account-holder (of suitable, no onerous, vintage) I would not just 'make it happen' without at least some proper discussion. Can't speak for what named-users might do, off their own backs, naturally. My opinion (informed or otherwise) doesn't have any particular weight, and it's still possible I can't persuade anyone (who matters) to adopt all of my own suggestions. [[Special:Contributions/81.179.199.253|81.179.199.253]] 20:03, 6 May 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::::two account-holders said they approved of the idea. if this isn't proper discussion, what do you want me to do?&lt;br /&gt;
::::also, aside from flukes like [[:Category:Comics with cursed items]] (which should be changed imo), the &amp;quot;comics featuring&amp;quot; name is just to avoid clashing with character pages: for instance, we named it [[:Category:Comics featuring real people]] because [[:Category:Real people]] was taken. &amp;quot;Superheroes&amp;quot; isn't taken; we don't have any character pages for superheroes in the first place. [[:Category:Etymology-Man]] is a [[:Category:Miniseries|miniseries]] category, not a character category. (it has the same comics as a character category would have, granted, but it's not treated like one in any way -- hence the name!) [[Special:Contributions/64.189.140.56|64.189.140.56]] 04:13, 7 May 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::::Speaking for myself, I respect both Favi and tori's opinions, and I'm even (generally) in favour of this category. But nobody who ''can'' make it so that it isn't redlinking (simple enough... by now, even you could have done it, entirely on your own) has done so.&lt;br /&gt;
::::My (and others', it looks like) point has always been that it has for a long time been a fairly matter of fact process to announce &amp;quot;hey, I think ''this, this and this'' should be made to have ''that'' Category&amp;quot;, some minor discussion occur, refinements/additions considered, then it gets done. If it doesn't, it's because of lack of buy-in and nobody was convinced.&lt;br /&gt;
::::Some things still might get done far too hastily/improperly (various Category inconsistencies are 'obvious') and the Pages To Delete tags get rolled out (where page-renaming isn't sufficient), but Deletions are even rarer than Renames (in part because of the rights required to do so), and both are outweighed by the creation of instances of what might just be considered as 'personal pet project pages' by some. That way lies indefinite expansion and random 'forgotten' stubs left all over the place, so if I have one personally overriding attitude to this whole thing, it's that of caution. I'd rather remove a redlink (otyer than abset User and User Talk ones in signatures) than let it temptingly sit there inviting the next near-newbie to create it 'because they can' (as demonstrably happens with the User/User Talk ones, anyway), regardless&lt;br /&gt;
::::(I haven't yet even decided upon my ''own username'' that I might use, after maybe more than a decade contributing here, which probably tells you more about me than anything else. Can't speak for others still posting via IP, like yourself.)&lt;br /&gt;
::::This is not me 'pulling rank', I must add. I have no 'rank' to pull, by my own decision. I'm just a random IP (as are you/any others not named yet) who just tries to do my best to do what limited things I can do to make this site operate smoothly. It was supposed to be a simple explanation of the established community convention that has tended to work well enough, and was never supposed to become 'IP-vs-IP combat', and I really hope still isn't, despite our clearly conflicting drives on how to reach the same sort of 'final' ideal (minor details varying). And I've had my own fair share of &amp;quot;wouldn't it be nice to have &amp;lt;some feature&amp;gt;?&amp;quot; not going anywhere, which I live with because this isn't 'my' site but a community one. (A strange community, naturally, but one of the better ones, out of all those I dabble in.)&lt;br /&gt;
::::That's the long-winded reply only here to try to explain (my, at least) previous long-winded replies. I'll leave the whole &amp;quot;Comics featuring&amp;quot; stuff undiscussed (save that, by consistency, yes, if Etymology-Man had enough appearances to merit a character page, some rearranging probably wouldn't go amiss to do the same as &amp;quot;Cueball&amp;quot;!=&amp;quot;... featuring Cueball&amp;quot;, etc). It's not a full on &amp;quot;[[386: Duty Calls]]&amp;quot;-type scenario, but I thought it worth a 'quick' last note as to where I'm coming from. It wasn't supposed to be this long! Sorry for wasting everyone's time, though. Even the like-minded ones? [[Special:Contributions/82.132.237.17|82.132.237.17]] 14:49, 7 May 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Multiple Blondies, Merge Blondie/Lenhart ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Blondie]] can be three different people: the [[Blondie|generic Blondie]], [[Miss Lenhart]], and [[Mrs. Roberts]] (who only appeared in the [[1337 series]] and [[327: Exploits of a Mom]]). My proposal is to change Blondie's name to Miss Lenhart, but separate Mrs. Roberts and Blondie, as they are different people. Merging Miss Lenhart and Blondie would be similar to how [[Cutie]] and [[Megan]] were merged after Megan was named a few times. [[User:YZ100]] 00:57, 6 May 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Sounds good! I don't see why we'd need to keep using our own name when Randall has given her a different name. [[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 14:53, 9 May 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::Hmmm... not a lot of thought put in here, before the mass rejig actually happened. The same person who is explicitly a Math(s) teacher in some comics is also explicitly ''not'' into mathematics in [[1985: Meteorologist|at least one other]] (and instead has a Linguistics degree under her belt). Wish I'd said something, now, but I was already involved in the above discussion and didn't want to cause any more fuss than I had to. Oh well. Done now. (Or at least the 'easy' bit, but I suspect the other page-merging will be happening soon enough.) [[Special:Contributions/81.179.199.253|81.179.199.253]] 16:54, 9 May 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Well, that comic is particular because Blondie is used a news anchor. Iirc, Randall almost always uses either Cueball or Blondie to portray news anchors, and that comic had two news anchors so he had to use both. And even before the merger, the [[Miss Lenhart]] page said: &amp;quot;[https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Miss_Lenhart&amp;amp;oldid=409753 She may or may not represent the same character from comic to comic]&amp;quot;. I'll add that fun fact to the page though. [[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 19:35, 10 May 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::I agree with [[User:FaviFake]]. The only recurring characters in xkcd who represent the same character across comics are [[Black Hat]], [[Danish]], [[Beret Guy]], and technically [[White Hat]]. Miss Lenhart can do different things, and arguably it is possible for her to work part-time. But since xkcd doesn't have a fixed timeline, like in [[1139: Rubber and Glue]], [[1753: Thumb War]], or [[2869: Puzzles]], where people like Black Hat and [[Ponytail]] appear as kids, so it is possible for here to work as a news anchor in the past, if not part-time. The Miss Lenhart page says Cueball is used more commonly as a news anchor, and this could be because Lenhart works part-time. [[User:YZ100]] 21:12, 10 May 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::::I gave just ''one'' case, of several, where - similarly to &amp;quot;Rob is a Cueball, but a given Cueball isn't necessarily a/the Rob&amp;quot; - an aspect of character tied heavily to Miss Lenhart isn't one that agrees with all Blondies. My perspective remains that Miss Lenhart (when established as such) is notably as much a separate entity from generic-Blondie as Mrs Roberts is another, and we previously we had this decent distinction of definite-Misses Lenharts, definite-Mrs Robertses and all other generic Blondies that were neither suggested to be (at least part of the time) mathematics teachers nor hacker-moms.&lt;br /&gt;
::::Then there's the separate issue, in that same Meteorologist comic, that the Blondie/whoever (like Cueball) clearly isn't even really a News Anchor (part time or otherwise), and actual TV meteorologists/weather-presenters (even budding/probationary ones, who should have started off by being ''actual'' meteorologists who then are seen as suitable candidates to dip their toe into being a media personality) tend to be entirely different people from the journalists who present the news. The lesson is that justifying a positive truth from the the comics is tricky, but inconsistencies support various negative truths mmore practical&lt;br /&gt;
::::In the end, there's pretty much as much logic to consider all (ex-)Blondies to be Mrs. Roberts, ''instead''. Or, as a better combination of matches, some are Lenhart and some are Roberts. (Or, a better-match/lesser-mismatch, would leave at least some Blondies as still 'only' a generic Blondie) Though the decision has been made now, so I was only here to point out some of the various problems invoked but apparently not even considered. [[Special:Contributions/81.179.199.253|81.179.199.253]] 22:42, 10 May 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::In [[1985: Meteorologist]], Lenhart has a Linguistics degree and she teaches grammar in [[3229: Grammar]]. She isn't limited to just math, like how she teaches science in [[3132: Coastline Similarity]]. Besides, being a math teacher and a mathematician are not the same thing. [[User:YZ100]] 4:50, 12 May 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::: You are of course {{w|begging the question}}, by insisting that the person/people with a Linguistics/Grammar background is Miss Lenhart, ''then'' using that as further proof as to why you are correct to say they are all the same person. Try not to do that. [[Special:Contributions/82.132.221.157|82.132.221.157]] 13:37, 12 May 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Page for What if? questions ==&lt;br /&gt;
Let's make a page for What if? questions we all have and take some of those questions to send to Randall? This may also help revive the blog articles. Does anyone have any other ideas? [[User:YZ100|YZ100]] 4:38, 14 May 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:I think that Randall might be working on some other projects. Added a question onto [[User:FaviFake]]'s page in regards to whether or not What If? will be continued in the future. [[User:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font:11pt Cormorant Garamond&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#4A86A6&amp;quot;&amp;gt;tor&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#C0728D&amp;quot;&amp;gt;i :3&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font:8pt Cormorant Garamond&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#7E7E7E&amp;quot;&amp;gt;talk &amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#C0728D&amp;quot;&amp;gt;to &amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#4A86A6&amp;quot;&amp;gt;me!&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 19:00, 14 May 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:He doesn't really work on any projects like What if? 2 or What if? x10 anymore and the blag was discontinued. He works on the video series these days. But the whole point of What if? is for him to answer our questions. [[User:YZ100]] 22:43, 29 May 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Clearing up how to become a trusted user ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As a new user myself, the tiny section on why you can't make a user page yet is vague and annoying. Few edits? How many? Who makes you a trusted user, what is the process, etc are questions that many people ask. Just saying it would be nice for a better explanation on how to become a trusted user. Thanks :) [[User:Black Hat&amp;amp;#39;s Hat|Black Hat&amp;amp;#39;s Hat]] ([[User talk:Black Hat&amp;amp;#39;s Hat|talk]]) 18:08, 21 May 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Not that it is my decision on how to approach this, I (as you can see from my non-username status, being ''far'' from being an official 'trusted user') prefer the vague nature.&lt;br /&gt;
:If you define a line, then people will delibretely push right up to this line. Either in this kind of case where someone desires to get the enhanced abilities (for good or ill) and will do the exact minimum necessary to get to that point, or for limits of behaviour (such as being told &amp;quot;you may call your fellow forumites &amp;lt;beep&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;boop&amp;gt; or &amp;lt;censored&amp;gt;, but using &amp;lt;nastier word&amp;gt; is an instabanning offence&amp;gt;&amp;quot;).&lt;br /&gt;
:The actual criteria for page-creation abilities is not that difficult to achieve (and have been explicitly mentioned elsewhere), but is not just a single threashold. I might liken it to &amp;quot;it's better to travel hopefully than arrive&amp;quot;, in that until the ''very point'' that someone realises that they have accomplished the ability to create new pages (any new pages, not just their own userpages), you have probably eased yourself into how the site works and appreciated its general construction and will then only create new pages that they have some amount of genuine justification for wanting to create (to save others having to clear up after some &amp;quot;Template:Cool, I can create new pages!&amp;quot; splurge, or similar...)&lt;br /&gt;
:Ok, so it's not exactly a guaranteed method of getting a more considerate userbase, but it's better than automatically treating it as a [[3246: Speedrun]] and missing out on the more general atmosphere there is to be had here.&lt;br /&gt;
:Also, it doesn't at all stop you getting User Pages set up, ''right now''. You just need to mention that you'd like them - as you maybe just have done - and any pre-established user can decide that they're happy to create them for you... if that's all you want to actually create, then you might never do any more and just continue to edit exactly as you're currently editing.&lt;br /&gt;
:The point at which you realise that you ''can'' create new pages (you hit a redlink, by accident or curiosity, and get given the option to unredlink it ...whether or not you then go through with it) can then be just give you a fuzzy feeling and a realisation that you've 'arrived'.&lt;br /&gt;
:...but, again, this is just my view. Having seen many new users, and come to admire many of those that stuck around and have done great things. I would gladly see you as one of them, even if I would advise against undue impatience on the way to getting there. Having checked your activity, I ''will'' say that you're not ''too'' far off, but I'll not enumerate exactly how distant that point will be... That'd be like setting up a finishing tape and encouraging you to recklessly sprint for it. ;) [[Special:Contributions/81.179.199.253|81.179.199.253]] 20:49, 21 May 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::Makes sense ☃ [[User:Black Hat&amp;amp;#39;s Hat|Black Hat&amp;amp;#39;s Hat]] ([[User talk:Black Hat&amp;amp;#39;s Hat|talk]]) 17:48, 22 May 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== &amp;quot;It's 'cause you're dumb&amp;quot; ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In another conversation, I said: &amp;quot;Why is [[Black Hat]] saying it? He's a [[72: Classhole|classhole]], so he knows a better way to insult than just saying &amp;quot;It's 'cause you're dumb.&amp;quot; It would make more sense if [[Danish]] were saying it, as she was never given to be a classhole.&amp;quot; I stand by my statement. Either delete it or make Danish say it. [[User:YZ100|YZ100]] ([[User talk:YZ100|talk]]) 22:38, 29 May 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:I'd go for deleting it. I've never understood it. [[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 10:38, 30 May 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:If we are not going to make it make sense, remove it. Not only is it mean, but Randall himself celebrates knowledge in [[1053: Ten Thousand]]. Change it to something else. [[User:YZ100|YZ100]] ([[User talk:YZ100|talk]]) 00:00, 31 May 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:It does actually makes sense. It is humorous. It definitely has a long history, with there being comprehensive discussions about this ten years ago, and longer.&lt;br /&gt;
:But that's just my interpretation. Is the proposal that it 'just' be deleted (I'll let you work out how), or is that that you replace it with something else (ditto), whether that's someone else saying that, BH saying something else or a completely new scenario altogether?&lt;br /&gt;
:Whatever your wish, make some effort to convince people. [[Special:Contributions/81.179.199.253|81.179.199.253]] 00:59, 31 May 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::There's been talk about this about 12 years ago. Check [[explain xkcd talk:Community portal/Proposals]]. TL;DR is that this was the original motto decided on by the original creators of this blog back when it was a blog, and was moved over to the wiki when we made the migration to MediaWiki. I would not be against changing/deleting it, but this is certainly something of great significance in regards of our history and requires a clear consensus within the community. [[User:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font:11pt Cormorant Garamond&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#4A86A6&amp;quot;&amp;gt;tor&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#C0728D&amp;quot;&amp;gt;i :3&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font:8pt Cormorant Garamond&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#7E7E7E&amp;quot;&amp;gt;talk &amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#C0728D&amp;quot;&amp;gt;to &amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#4A86A6&amp;quot;&amp;gt;me!&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 01:01, 31 May 2026 (UTC)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>42.book.addict</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=explain_xkcd:Community_portal/Proposals&amp;diff=413982</id>
		<title>explain xkcd:Community portal/Proposals</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=explain_xkcd:Community_portal/Proposals&amp;diff=413982"/>
				<updated>2026-05-31T01:01:27Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;42.book.addict: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&amp;lt;noinclude&amp;gt;{{Community links}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{|-&lt;br /&gt;
|valign=&amp;quot;top&amp;quot; width=&amp;quot;100%&amp;quot;|[[File:Crystal Clear app ktip.png|left|120px]] &amp;lt;big&amp;gt;&amp;lt;big&amp;gt;&amp;lt;b&amp;gt;Proposals&amp;lt;/b&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/big&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/big&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Place for ideas and suggestions to improve the wiki's design and organization on general issues can be&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;incubated for later submission for consensus discussion. Be sure to check whether your proposal has already been submitted. &amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;{{AddNewSection|Page=Explain XKCD:Community portal/Proposals|Text=&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;(+post)&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
|}&amp;lt;/noinclude&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==ARCHIVED DISCUSSIONS==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;plainlinks&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;background:#edf6ff; border:1px solid #a7d7f9; margin:1em auto 1em auto; width:100%; font-size: 120%; padding: 0.5ex; text-align: center;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Most of the discussions on this page have been archived. The archive is available at '''[[explain xkcd talk:Community portal/Proposals]]'''.&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Removing unnecessary 3-comic categories? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I count eight categories on explainxkcd that satisfy the following properties: 1. They have only three comics in them. 2. They aren't really a comic series; they just feature or reference a comic theme. 3. They aren't Featuring some person or character. In short, they seem to have no real reason to exist. (They're [[:Category:Spice_Girls|t]][[:Category:Wind_turbine|h]]e[[:Category:Ender%27s_Game|s]]o[[:Category:FernGully|n]][[:Category:Giraffes|e]]s.) So my proposal: remove them. -[[User:Account|Account]] ([[User talk:Account|talk]]) 20:37, 9 November 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:In addition, there are [[:Category:Sketches|t]][[:Category:BSD|h]][[:Category:Emacs|i]][[:Category:Identity_Theft|r]][[:Category:Katamari_Damacy|t]][[:Category:Super_Bowl|e]][[:Category:The_Matrix|e]][[:Category:Tournament_bracket|n]][[:Category:Traffic_light| ]][[:Category:Trebuchet|m]][[:Category:Wingsuit|o]][[:Category:Euler_diagrams|r]][[:Category:Pedantic|e]] four-comic categories that also seem rather in need of deletion.&lt;br /&gt;
:: Shouldn't the community at least have some time to expand on these categories, in case they're currently incomplete? For example, [[:Category:The Matrix]] is on your list and now contains 7 strips, and [[:Category:Tournament bracket]] got its 5th entry after your post. Even if they're not, a theme category can save some typing in the search box (and is probably also cheaper in terms of server resources than all the searches it'll eliminate). [[User:Promethean|Promethean]] ([[User talk:Promethean|talk]]) 22:43, 21 November 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::So what do you think the limit should be for categories? Should we create a category when two comics mention the same topic? Three? --[[User:Account|Account]] ([[User talk:Account|talk]]) 16:28, 22 November 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::::Three seems reasonable to me, and I could see a case being made for two. Categories aren't expensive. [[User:Promethean|Promethean]] ([[User talk:Promethean|talk]]) 00:17, 23 November 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Three is only good when it's a series. If it's not a series, it should be 5 or 6 comics. We have too many categories. [[User:YZ100]] 23:07, 6 May 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== New transcript ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The transcripts in the comic pages are quite inconsistent, especially in the brackets where you have to describe what happens in the panels. If I understand correctly, the transcripts are for people to copy the text in the comic without having to type them out. If that's the case, then I think propose a new transcript. This transcript should have the comic with the words erased, and then the copy-pasteable words on top of that. Such a transcript would have no room for error, which would let anyone contribute to a seamless transcript.&lt;br /&gt;
:The aim of the transcript is to provide a text-only version of the comic that would allow someone who is visually impaired to use a text-to-speech converter to understand the comic and also in a machine readable format for searching (see the [[explain_xkcd:Editor_FAQ#What_is_the_format_of_the_transcript_section?|Editor FAQ]]). Anything using mark-up, images or anything other than plain text will interfere with this and so should be avoided in the transcript. [[User:A(l)Chemist|AlChemist]] ([[User talk:A(l)Chemist|talk]]) 18:22, 23 November 2019 (UTC)User_talk:DollarStoreBa'al&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Add title text and heading to transcript section ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It has always bothered me that the transcript did not include the title text since it contributes so much to the humor of the comics. Also, it looks to me like the comic heading is sometimes included as part of the transcript and sometimes left out. I checked the previous proposals and did not see any discussion of these issues. Please consider having a policy going forward of including the heading and the title text within the transcript. [[User:Rtanenbaum|Rtanenbaum]] ([[User talk:Rtanenbaum|talk]]) 22:43, 1 January 2020 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:To my understanding (and also others, see discussion directly above) one of the main points of the transcript is to make the comics searchable, the other is, to make it readable when images are not an option. In both cases the comic's name and the title text mentioned above and below the image should be sufficient. I personally think this convention is fine. [[User:Lupo|Lupo]] ([[User talk:Lupo|talk]]) 08:28, 2 January 2020 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Pardon me -- (and, '''&amp;lt;big&amp;gt;''thanks'' for your patience&amp;lt;/big&amp;gt;''') -- if this is too off-topic (/slash &amp;quot;boring&amp;quot;) or [[wikt:TMI|TMI]] (see {{w|Information overload#Web accuracy}} e.g.), '''...OR''' if this should have been posted elsewhere ...instead of here. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::IMHO the term '''&amp;quot;title text&amp;quot;''' is a misnomer. I think the term is used to refer to the little (or, '''BIG!''') pop-up -- (kinda like what is sometimes called a &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;quot;tooltip&amp;quot;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;, but ... aren't those usually pretty '''small?''') -- that appears when one &amp;quot;hovers&amp;quot; his mouse [pointer] over an XKCD cartoon. ...at least, according to '''the &amp;quot;Talk:&amp;quot; page section''' [[Template talk:comic#The template field called .22titletext.22]] which was added almost 3 years ago. I think that calling it a &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;quot;BONUS text&amp;quot;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt; would be even better than calling it a &amp;quot;caption&amp;quot;. However, [to me], '''either one''' of those terms would make sense ''WAY'' more than calling it a '''&amp;quot;title text&amp;quot;''' ... for reasons which are stated in the [Template] &amp;quot;Talk:&amp;quot; page section mentioned (and ... '''LINKED TO''') above.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;'''&amp;lt;big&amp;gt;Any Comments?  .  .  ''' *** Thanks! *** for listening!&amp;lt;/big&amp;gt; --[[User:Mike Schwartz|Mike Schwartz]] ([[User talk:Mike Schwartz|talk]]) 08:57, 7 April 2020 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Hi Mike, I see your point, and yes, something like &amp;quot;bonus text&amp;quot; might be a bit more descriptive.  But FWIW, I think the reason it's called &amp;quot;title text&amp;quot; is because that's the text that appears in the &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;[https://www.w3schools.com/tags/att_global_title.asp title]&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt; attribute of the HTML &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;[https://www.w3schools.com/tags/tag_img.asp &amp;amp;lt;img&amp;amp;gt;]&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt; tag of the comic's image on the xkcd.com site.  For example, at https://xkcd.com/2364/, the code for the comic image looks like this:&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;pre&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;img src=&amp;quot;//imgs.xkcd.com/comics/parity_conservation.png&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
     title=&amp;quot;Bloody Mary is made of antimatter. It explains so much.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
     alt=&amp;quot;Parity Conservation&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
     srcset=&amp;quot;//imgs.xkcd.com/comics/parity_conservation_2x.png 2x&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/pre&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:::In there, you can see the title text as &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;title=&amp;quot;Bloody Mary is made of antimatter. It explains so much.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;  See [[title text|here]] for more explanation about that, and some discussions about it [[explain xkcd:Community portal/Miscellaneous#Common mistake|here]].  – [[User:Yfmcpxpj|Yfmcpxpj]] ([[User talk:Yfmcpxpj|talk]]) 03:11, 29 September 2020 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::: While the current layout suits the first purpose (ease of search), I would argue that having the &amp;quot;title text&amp;quot; come before in the page layout, and in a completely different section, makes it fail the second (accessibility). Often the contents of the title text are a continuation of the humour in the strip, so it's about as useful as having the explanation ahead of the transcript as far as accessibility is concerned. My suggestion on this matter is to either a) move the transcript to the top of the content, maybe within a collapse section or b) not claim it for accessibility.&lt;br /&gt;
::: As for the secondary topic, I've seen it called &amp;quot;Author Text&amp;quot; before, as it is text by the author and most people won't care what the element attribute is named. [[Special:Contributions/64.114.211.89|64.114.211.89]] 06:55, 18 November 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Wikipedia links. ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I think the links to Wikipedia should have symbols, so it's not confusing which ones lead to other comic pages.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== It's time to remove the HTTPS lock icon ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Explainxkcd should do the same thing that browser makers have done: treat HTTPS as the modern standard, and mark HTTP as the deviation instead.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Here are appropriate replacement icons:&lt;br /&gt;
 * https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Unlock_Icon_Red_(32_bit).png&lt;br /&gt;
 * https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Unlock_Icon_Red_(4_bit).gif&lt;br /&gt;
- [[User:Frankie|Frankie]] ([[User talk:Frankie|talk]]) 12:49, 16 May 2020 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== New page for Randall's regular column in the New York Times ==&lt;br /&gt;
Randall Munroe has been writing and illustrating a monthly science column in the New York Times.  I suggest a page in this Wiki, indexing those columns.  For some reason the New York Times itself does not provide such an index.  If they ever do add one, we would still have a topic article here, similar to the one we have for the What If blog, that could link to their index.  --[[User:JohnB|JohnB]] ([[User talk:JohnB|talk]]) 00:47, 11 June 2020 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
------&lt;br /&gt;
=== New York Times column: Good Question ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Good Question''' is a more-or-less monthly column written and illustrated by '''[[Randall|Randall Munroe]]'''  in the '''[https://www.nytimes.com/section/science Science section of the New York Times]''', beginning in November 2019.  The columns give serious answers to science questions, in Munroe's inimitable style.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The New York Times website ordinarily requires registration, and its content is always protected by copyright.  Most particularly it is ''not'' under [http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.5/ Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 2.5 License] the way [[xkcd]] is.  The good news: anyone can register for a free digital subscription to the New York Times, with access to 'recent' Science articles among some others, but outside of that only five articles per month.  See [https://archive.nytimes.com/www.nytimes.com/info/help/freesearch.html Free Articles].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Unlike for many of their other regular columnists, the New York Times does not provide a clickable link either on the byline '''Randall Munroe''' or on the column title '''Good Question'''.  The following tables are intended to correct that omission.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+ New York Times columns ''by'' Randall Munroe&lt;br /&gt;
! Column !! Headline !! Byline !! Date&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! SCIENCE&lt;br /&gt;
| [https://www.nytimes.com/2019/08/13/science/what-makes-a-red-sky-at-night-and-at-morning.html What Makes a Red Sky at Night (and at Morning)]&lt;br /&gt;
| Randall Munroe&lt;br /&gt;
| Aug. 13, 2019&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! GOOD QUESTION&lt;br /&gt;
| [https://www.nytimes.com/2019/11/12/science/randall-munroe-moon.html If I Touched the Moon, What Would It Feel Like?]&lt;br /&gt;
| Randall Munroe&lt;br /&gt;
| Nov. 12, 2019&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! GOOD QUESTION&lt;br /&gt;
| [https://nytimes.com/2019/12/10/science/earth-size-mass.html Is Earth Getting Bigger Over Time?]&lt;br /&gt;
| Randall Munroe&lt;br /&gt;
| Dec. 10, 2019&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! GOOD QUESTION&lt;br /&gt;
| [https://www.nytimes.com/2020/01/21/science/human-running-speed-quadruped.html How Fast Can a Human Run?]&lt;br /&gt;
| Randall Munroe&lt;br /&gt;
| Jan. 21, 2020 / Feb. 7, 2020&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! GOOD QUESTION&lt;br /&gt;
| [https://www.nytimes.com/2020/02/17/science/worst-odor-smell-thioacetone.html What’s the World’s Worst Smell?]&lt;br /&gt;
| Randall Munroe&lt;br /&gt;
| Feb. 17, 2020 / Feb. 26, 2020&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! GOOD QUESTION&lt;br /&gt;
| [https://nytimes.com/2020/03/10/science/question-randall-munroe-bobsled-gravity.html What if Galileo Had Dropped Bobsleds From the Tower of Pisa?]&lt;br /&gt;
| Randall Munroe&lt;br /&gt;
| March 10, 2020&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! GOOD QUESTION&lt;br /&gt;
| [https://www.nytimes.com/2020/04/07/science/pulsar-xkcd-munroe-stars.html How’s the View From a Spinning Star?]&lt;br /&gt;
| Randall Munroe&lt;br /&gt;
| April 7, 2020&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! GOOD QUESTION&lt;br /&gt;
| [https://www.nytimes.com/2020/05/11/science/traffic-barrier-rice-krispies.html What’s the Sweetest, Crispiest Way to Stay Safe in a Car Crash?]&lt;br /&gt;
| Randall Munroe&lt;br /&gt;
| May 11, 2020&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! GOOD QUESTION&lt;br /&gt;
| [https://www.nytimes.com/2020/06/09/science/randall-munroe-question-eggs.html Can You Boil an Egg Too Long?]&lt;br /&gt;
| Randall Munroe&lt;br /&gt;
| June 9, 2020&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! GOOD QUESTION&lt;br /&gt;
| [https://www.nytimes.com/2020/07/07/science/neutrinos-snowball-randall-munroe.html Could You Make a Snowball of Neutrinos?]&lt;br /&gt;
| Randall Munroe&lt;br /&gt;
| July 7, 2020&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+ New York Times columns ''about'' Randall Munroe&lt;br /&gt;
! Column !! Headline !! Byline !! Date&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! LINK BY LINK&lt;br /&gt;
| [https://www.nytimes.com/2008/05/26/business/media/26link.html This Is Funny Only if You Know Unix]&lt;br /&gt;
| Noam Cohen&lt;br /&gt;
| May 26, 2008&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! BITS&lt;br /&gt;
| [https://bits.blogs.nytimes.com/2014/03/14/techs-favorite-cartoonist-enters-mainstream-publishing/ Tech’s Favorite Cartoonist Enters Mainstream Publishing]&lt;br /&gt;
| Noam Cohen&lt;br /&gt;
| March 14, 2014&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! SCIENCE&lt;br /&gt;
| [https://www.nytimes.com/2014/11/04/science/randall-munroe-the-creator-of-xkcd-explains-complexity-through-absurdity.html He’s Glad You Asked]&lt;br /&gt;
| Kenneth Chang&lt;br /&gt;
| Nov. 3, 2014&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! BOOKS&lt;br /&gt;
| [https://www.nytimes.com/2015/11/24/books/randall-munroe-explains-it-all-for-us.html Randall Munroe Explains It All for Us]&lt;br /&gt;
| Alexandra Alter&lt;br /&gt;
| Nov. 23, 2015&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! SCIENCE&lt;br /&gt;
| [https://www.nytimes.com/2016/03/22/science/randall-munroe-xkcd-science-textbook.html Randall Munroe, XKCD Creator, Goes Back to High School]&lt;br /&gt;
| Kenneth Chang&lt;br /&gt;
| March 21, 2016&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! SCIENCE&lt;br /&gt;
| [https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2016/03/18/science/document-Munroepages.html Randall Munroe of ‘XKCD’ Explains the Human Body, Elevators and the Saturn 5]&lt;br /&gt;
| (Actual pages from '''{{w|Thing_Explainer|Thing&amp;amp;nbsp;Explainer}}''')&lt;br /&gt;
| March 21, 2016&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
------&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: Looks goods to me, you should probably make that an article of its own, maybe [[New York Times: Good Question]]? --[[User:SlashMe|SlashMe]] ([[User talk:SlashMe|talk]]) 22:58, 10 July 2020 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: {{notice|I went and added the page, here: [[New York Times: Good Question]] --[[User:JohnB|JohnB]] ([[User talk:JohnB|talk]]) 02:42, 11 July 2020 (UTC)}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Bring back the {{rw}} template! please ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Can someone restore the &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{rw}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt; template? I insist on its existence. I further assure that it will be of much use. It was deleted by an admin. &amp;lt;span&amp;gt; — [[User:Sqrt-1|The &amp;lt;b&amp;gt;𝗦𝗾𝗿𝘁-𝟭&amp;lt;/b&amp;gt;]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Sqrt-1|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color: blue&amp;quot;&amp;gt;talk&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]] [[Special:Contributions/Sqrt-1|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color: blue&amp;quot;&amp;gt;stalk&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt; 06:10, 29 September 2020 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:nm, did it myself.&amp;lt;span&amp;gt; — [[User:Sqrt-1|The &amp;lt;b&amp;gt;𝗦𝗾𝗿𝘁-𝟭&amp;lt;/b&amp;gt;]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Sqrt-1|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color: blue&amp;quot;&amp;gt;talk&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]] [[Special:Contributions/Sqrt-1|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color: blue&amp;quot;&amp;gt;stalk&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt; 04:15, 1 October 2020 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Link to high-resolution images? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The wiki includes the &amp;quot;standard&amp;quot; resolution images, but would it be worth adding a link to the higher-resolution image on each page?  It appears that this could be automated in at least a strong majority of cases: if the standard image is ''xyzzy.png'', the hi-res one is ''xyzzy'''_2x'''.png'' . [[User:BunsenH|BunsenH]] ([[User talk:BunsenH|talk]]) 22:10, 1 October 2020 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Please stop adding this to the explanations. This is not needed.  [[User:Kynde|Kynde]] ([[User talk:Kynde|talk]]) 08:56, 6 October 2020 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::The high-resolution image was quite useful in parsing the &amp;quot;Amelia's Farm Fresh Cookies&amp;quot; comic. I'm not convinced that the hi-res images are commonly known. I've been reading xkcd for about 7 years and hadn't heard about them until I stumbled across a mention of them in one of the Discussions here. What is the harm in having a one-line ''link'' here? -- not, I emphasize, the actual image, which would take up a great deal of space. [[User:BunsenH|BunsenH]] ([[User talk:BunsenH|talk]]) 17:00, 7 October 2020 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::I didn't know about the high-resolution images either.  While it might be a bit repetitive to add a full sentence to every comic's explanation, I agree that having ''some'' easy way to link to the hi-res image on xkcd.com could be handy.  For example, maybe a &amp;quot;hi-res&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;2x&amp;quot; button before the &amp;quot;Next &amp;gt;&amp;quot; button above the comic in [[Template:comic]]?  That's a bit extreme, but I added an example template, derived from the existing [[Template:comic]], to demonstrate how that could work:&lt;br /&gt;
:::* Template: [[User:Yfmcpxpj/Template:comic 2x test]]&lt;br /&gt;
:::* Demo: [[User:Yfmcpxpj/Sandbox#2x comic template test]]&lt;br /&gt;
:::With those changes to the template, for all comics as of [[1084]] the &amp;quot;2x&amp;quot; button would automatically appear.  (No need to go back and change all comics.)  This assumes the images hosted on explainxkcd generally have the same filename as on xkcd.com, but there are optional parameters to override the filename or omit the &amp;quot;2x&amp;quot; button altogether for specific exceptions.  I'm not suggesting we actually go ahead and implement this; but if there was enough interest, an admin would be needed anyway, to make the changes within [[Template:comic]], which is currently protected.  – [[User:Yfmcpxpj|Yfmcpxpj]] ([[User talk:Yfmcpxpj|talk]]) 23:25, 11 October 2020 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::::FWIW, I like this. [[User:BunsenH|BunsenH]] ([[User talk:BunsenH|talk]]) 20:25, 12 October 2020 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::My proposal is that a bot should add it automatically to the description of each comic image when available so that it does not take up space anywhere and is easily accessible.&amp;lt;span&amp;gt; — [[User:Sqrt-1|The &amp;lt;b&amp;gt;𝗦𝗾𝗿𝘁-𝟭&amp;lt;/b&amp;gt;]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Sqrt-1|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color: blue&amp;quot;&amp;gt;talk&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]] [[Special:Contributions/Sqrt-1|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color: blue&amp;quot;&amp;gt;stalk&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt; 13:49, 8 February 2021 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Proposal to replace the top section with this... ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I have come up with a new design for the top section of all community portals...&lt;br /&gt;
It’s located here... https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=explain_xkcd:Sandbox&amp;amp;oldid=199882 &amp;lt;span&amp;gt; — [[User:Sqrt-1|The &amp;lt;b&amp;gt;𝗦𝗾𝗿𝘁-𝟭&amp;lt;/b&amp;gt;]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Sqrt-1|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color: blue&amp;quot;&amp;gt;talk&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]] [[Special:Contributions/Sqrt-1|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color: blue&amp;quot;&amp;gt;stalk&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt; 14:15, 15 October 2020 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;hr/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{|-&lt;br /&gt;
|valign=&amp;quot;top&amp;quot; width=&amp;quot;80%&amp;quot;|[[File:Crystal Clear app ktip.png|left|120px]] &amp;lt;big&amp;gt;&amp;lt;big&amp;gt;&amp;lt;b&amp;gt;Proposals&amp;lt;/b&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/big&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/big&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Ideas to improve the wiki's design and organization can be added here.&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt; {{AddNewSection|Page=Explain XKCD:Community portal/Proposals|Text=&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;(+post)&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|valign=&amp;quot;top&amp;quot; xalign=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot; width=&amp;quot;100%&amp;quot;|[[File:Crystal Clear app package settings blue.png|50px|link=https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php/explain_xkcd:Community_portal/Technical]][[File:Crystal Clear teamwork.png|50px|link=https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php/explain_xkcd:Community_portal/Coordination]][[File:Mop.svg|50px|link=https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php/explain_xkcd:Community_portal/Admin_requests]][[File:Internet-group-chat.svg|50px|link=https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php/explain_xkcd:Community_portal/Miscellaneous]]&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== I made a template for welcoming new users. ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{Welcome}}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;hr/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Any ideas? Suggestions? Objections?&amp;lt;span&amp;gt; — [[User:Sqrt-1|The &amp;lt;b&amp;gt;𝗦𝗾𝗿𝘁-𝟭&amp;lt;/b&amp;gt;]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Sqrt-1|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color: blue&amp;quot;&amp;gt;talk&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]] [[Special:Contributions/Sqrt-1|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color: blue&amp;quot;&amp;gt;stalk&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt; 16:35, 13 December 2020 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
: this is now in at the top of the Main Page --[[User:Jeff|&amp;lt;b&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;orange&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Jeff&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/b&amp;gt;]] ([[User talk:Jeff|talk]]) 16:38, 5 February 2021 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::Why? This looks like a template intended for (newly created) UserPages. And it replaces interesting data from the frontpage with something not useful for casual visitors (or even non-casual lurkers). I'd undo this change in an instant if I had authority to do so. ((The template looks good, to clarify, just obviously not intended to be in that location.)) [[Special:Contributions/141.101.76.154|141.101.76.154]] 01:36, 6 February 2021 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::[[User: Jeff|Jeff]] is the owner of explainxkcd you dingus. &amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;text-shadow:0 0 7px black&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[[User:Beanie|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-size:11pt;color:#dddddd&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Beanie&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt; &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;text-shadow:0 0 4px #000000&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[[User talk:Beanie|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-size:8pt;color:#dddddd&amp;quot;&amp;gt;talk&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 13:46, 18 June 2021 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== comic groups ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
i think we should have a tech problems list of comics ( as there are quite a few)&lt;br /&gt;
:We already have a category for it. [[:Category:Cueball_Computer_Problems]].&amp;lt;span&amp;gt; — [[User:Sqrt-1|The &amp;lt;b&amp;gt;𝗦𝗾𝗿𝘁-𝟭&amp;lt;/b&amp;gt;]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Sqrt-1|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color: blue&amp;quot;&amp;gt;talk&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]] [[Special:Contributions/Sqrt-1|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color: blue&amp;quot;&amp;gt;stalk&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt; 13:44, 8 February 2021 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Archiving interactive comics? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Has the possibility of archiving interactive comics been discussed? Of course, users can view them on the original website, but it’d be nice to have a working backup of sorts, especially considering some of the interactive comics haven’t aged too well in terms of compatibility or support (e.g. Umwelt displays a blank page for me.)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It probably wouldn’t be possible to do so directly from mediawiki, but I’d be happy to experiment with cloning a few of them on another server, or as simple PHP pages that could be embedded, if it would help. Most of the interactive comics appear to be implemented mostly in client side JS anyways, so replicating them shouldn’t be too bad.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Tague|Tague]] ([[User talk:Tague|talk]]) 13:12, 29 April 2021 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Replace head shots of characters in the wiki with these new and high quality head shots! ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
https://www.reddit.com/r/xkcd/comments/n2u28r/i_took_head_shots_of_the_reccuring_characters_and/&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
These are not only upscaled, but are all squares and have all the features of the characters.&amp;lt;span&amp;gt; — [[User:Sqrt-1|The &amp;lt;b&amp;gt;𝗦𝗾𝗿𝘁-𝟭&amp;lt;/b&amp;gt;]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Sqrt-1|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color: blue&amp;quot;&amp;gt;talk&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]] [[Special:Contributions/Sqrt-1|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color: blue&amp;quot;&amp;gt;stalk&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt; 03:33, 2 May 2021 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:I think you should do it (because higher quality = better) :] &amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;text-shadow:0 0 7px black&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[[User:Beanie|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-size:11pt;color:#dddddd&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Beanie&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt; &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;text-shadow:0 0 4px #000000&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[[User talk:Beanie|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-size:8pt;color:#dddddd&amp;quot;&amp;gt;talk&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 13:42, 18 June 2021 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::There seemed to be no objections, so I went ahead and did it.&amp;lt;span&amp;gt; — [[User:Sqrt-1|The &amp;lt;b&amp;gt;𝗦𝗾𝗿𝘁-𝟭&amp;lt;/b&amp;gt;]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Sqrt-1|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color: blue&amp;quot;&amp;gt;talk&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]] [[Special:Contributions/Sqrt-1|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color: blue&amp;quot;&amp;gt;stalk&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt; 12:40, 21 November 2021 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Cleaning up [[Special:WantedTemplates|Special: Wanted Templates]] ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I decided to take a look at the list of wanted templates. Imagine my surprise when I see that a lot of the templates wanted were mis-capitalizations or misspellings of existing templates. I hereby request permission to create redirect pages for some of the most popular errors. &lt;br /&gt;
I intend to do five, wait a week, and do another five as to not spam the wiki. I will not begin for a week, at which point I will only proceed if nobody has said no OR a moderator has said yes. May I proceed? [[User talk:Quillathe Siannodel|&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;{)|(}&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;]][[User:Quillathe_Siannodel|Quill]][[Special:Contributions/Quillathe_Siannodel|&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;{)|(}&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;]] 11:34, 15 May 2021 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Knit Cap ==&lt;br /&gt;
Sometimes Knit cap has long hair, sometimes short. Is Knit Cap meant to be a male character that sometimes has long hair, or is Knit Cap sometimes female? I want to clear this up before I finish editing [[1350: Lorenz]]. &amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;text-shadow:0 0 7px black&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[[User:Beanie|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-size:11pt;color:#dddddd&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Beanie&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt; &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;text-shadow:0 0 4px #000000&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[[User talk:Beanie|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-size:8pt;color:#dddddd&amp;quot;&amp;gt;talk&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 13:40, 18 June 2021 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Hm, in the 'Enemy Pikachu used theft' scene in [[1350: Lorenz]], Knit Cap's hair looks merely slightly unkempt. From this, I will assume that Knit Cap just sometimes has long hair and is always male. &amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;text-shadow:0 0 6px black&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[[User:Beanie|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-size:11pt;color:#dddddd&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Beanie&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt; &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;text-shadow:0 0 3px #000000&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[[User talk:Beanie|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-size:8pt;color:#dddddd&amp;quot;&amp;gt;talk&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 13:10, 21 June 2021 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::Ok, the official transcripts say that Knit Cap is 'A guy in a knit cap'. I will take that to mean that Knit Cap is definitely male.&lt;br /&gt;
:::(Sorry for necroposting) Knit cap is shown to represent Randall's wife in the &amp;quot;X years&amp;quot; series, I assume that they are thusly female. {{unsigned|B for brain|15:07, 29 March 2026}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== We still need to complete some explanations like this one: ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I think should change the banner shown at the top of every page to show a comic that is still incomplete, like Hoverboard or something. [[User:Sure|Sure]] ([[User talk:Sure|talk]]) 21:32, 30 August 2021 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Update MediaWiki ==&lt;br /&gt;
explainxkcd is running MediaWiki 1.30.0, which reached end-of-life in June 2019. There are likely security issues because of this, so please update MediaWiki to the latest version (or LTS) using the instructions here https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Manual:Upgrading [[User:Cam1170|Cam1170]] ([[User talk:Cam1170|talk]]) 19:41, 26 September 2021 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:It seems like the mysql is too outdated for the upgrade [[User:Starstar|Starstar]] ([[User talk:Starstar|talk]]) 17:37, 26 November 2021 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::Upgrade MySQL then[[User:Aaron Liu|Aaron Liu]] ([[User talk:Aaron Liu|talk]]) 03:16, 20 July 2022 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
Does anybody know how to contact an admin for this? I have no clue. [[User:Cam1170|Cam1170]] ([[User talk:Cam1170|talk]]) 03:25, 13 December 2022 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Allow Users to Edit their own talk page if not auto confimed ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I can edit this page, but I can't create my own talk page! [[User:Starstar|Starstar]] ([[User talk:Starstar|talk]]) 17:34, 26 November 2021 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Upgrade Icons ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The icons look quite old fashion (the ones on the sidebar and the ones above the editing text area), could they be replaced? [[User:Starstar|Starstar]] ([[User talk:Starstar|talk]]) 23:07, 26 November 2021 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:They probably could be, but changing icons the moment they're not absolutely cutting-edge just means using new icons that are as easily edged-out (as tastes change yet again), meanwhile annoying those who prefered the first set and rather wouldn't see a revolving door of ever-evolving aesthetics.&lt;br /&gt;
:If I had a vote, I'd say keep the simple glyphs we're used to. If any are not totally obvious (perhaps some would not be, without the text captions) consider revising, but I think you'll get less agreement on what new images to use than that which would advocate the retention of the current ones.&lt;br /&gt;
:Alternately, it would definitely be on-theme to find Randall-drawn illustrations to replace them all. But the constraints of adapting (say) any particular stick-figure-world depiction of randonmess to ''meaningfully'' replace the current Random Page icon (at the same scale!) might be less than optimal.[[Special:Contributions/172.70.162.57|172.70.162.57]] 01:08, 27 November 2021 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Make searchbar not case-sensitive ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The way the search bar is currently set, it only suggests comic links when what is being typed is capitalized (&amp;quot;Assigning Numbers&amp;quot; rather than &amp;quot;assigning numbers&amp;quot; for instance). Would be nice if we could make it not case-sensitive :D [[User:Char Latte49|Wielder of the Staple Gun]] ([[User talk:Char Latte49|talk]]) 02:48, 27 April 2022 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Good idea. [[User:Marethyu|⟨Winter is coming⟩ Marethyu]] ([[User talk:Marethyu|talk]]) 17:46, 5 May 2022 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Do not allow ordinary users to edit redirects that are just numbers ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This overrides the default page you're sent to when you check a comic; e.g. recently a vandal edited the page entitled &amp;quot;2614&amp;quot; so it overrode the actual page, [[2614: 2]] on the main page.&lt;br /&gt;
:The problem would be when creating a new page and the overrides are needed... [[User:Marethyu|⟨Winter is coming⟩ Marethyu]] ([[User talk:Marethyu|talk]]) 17:48, 5 May 2022 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== ExplainXKCD discord (or other platform)? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I'm just saying if we had instant messages, pings etc. there would be a lot faster reaction to vandals. &lt;br /&gt;
The community portal is hard to get attention from and comments are all very well and good but conversations on Discord could get very quick response, and people could request edits, organise page re-writing etc.&lt;br /&gt;
Idk if we can get &amp;quot;official&amp;quot; backing by anyone high up but we could make one anyways?&lt;br /&gt;
:The problem with platforms like Discord or others is that we can't guarantee that everyone has access to them; on the wiki, anyone can edit, while some people may not have access to discord or such. A possible solution would be having a sort of service built into the wiki, but not sure how that might be done. Besides, this is a wiki, not an xkcd chat site. This is a good idea, though. [[User:Marethyu|⟨Winter is coming⟩ Marethyu]] ([[User talk:Marethyu|talk]]) 17:43, 5 May 2022 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::Anyone can create a discord account like anyone can create an account on this wiki. You don't even need a dedicated client/app as it can run in browser. Just like the wiki. Just my two cents. [[User:Elektrizikekswerk|Elektrizikekswerk]] ([[User talk:Elektrizikekswerk|talk]]) 11:28, 20 May 2022 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Some user may not wish anyone to be able to contact them outside this wiki. You do not need an acount to edit this wiki... [[User:Kynde|Kynde]] ([[User talk:Kynde|talk]]) 17:14, 22 July 2022 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== So, I got a question about transcripts. ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A lot of comics show links (e.g.: all the ones with a drawing of wikipedia on it), and the transcripts don't really have a standard. In the transcript, should it be an actual link or just blue text or what? [[Special:Contributions/162.158.79.52|162.158.79.52]] 15:03, 2 June 2022 (UTC)Bumpf&lt;br /&gt;
:I'd say that if the linked thing (presuming it's a real linkable target!) is linked in the Explanation, it doesn't need to be (re)linked in the ostensibly flat-and-descriptive Transcript.&lt;br /&gt;
:And I know that some Transcripts are hypertext formatted to emulate the thing they are transcribed from (whether bolded, enbiggened, sub-/superscripted and and/or given the hue) but maybe ''primarily'' the &amp;quot;&amp;lt;code&amp;gt;[:Text that describes the text]&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;&amp;quot; should be explaining the details, in case the screen-reader (or text-searching algorithm grepping the Transcript text for &amp;quot;green text&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;superscript&amp;quot; instances can't quite work it out from the various style-tags that can be applied to that effect in so many an various ways.&lt;br /&gt;
:But this is IMO, I don't know if there's a specific policy about it, but it is how I've seen it vaguely applied... Not everywhere quite so consistently, though. [[Special:Contributions/172.70.91.128|172.70.91.128]] 20:28, 2 June 2022 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::We try to keep links and explanations out of the transcript. The link and the explanation goes in the explanation section above. [[User:Kynde|Kynde]] ([[User talk:Kynde|talk]]) 17:12, 22 July 2022 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Use 2X Images ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Apparently xkcd.com provides double-sized versions of almost every comic if you add '''_2x''' to the end of the image name. For instance,&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
https://imgs.xkcd.com/comics/watches.png&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
https://imgs.xkcd.com/comics/watches_2x.png&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Since we are in 2022 and computers can load high-resolution images just fine, and they are easier to read, I propose that this website should use the provided double-sized images. Really, I think Randall ought to be doing this himself as well. [[Special:Contributions/172.68.18.107|172.68.18.107]] 12:22, 17 August 2022 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:While I agree with using the higher quality images which are default on xkcd.com for many people, there has been [https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php/explain_xkcd:Community_portal/Proposals#Link_to_high-resolution_images.3F discussion] about this issue already. At the moment, the consensus seems to be to continue using the 'standard' size to 'use less space,' and instead link to the higher quality image on the image page. —[[User:Theusaf|theusaf]] ([[User talk:Theusaf|talk]]) 14:35, 17 August 2022 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I think I may have mentioned it on that link (or similar), but often when the 2x image is used (or even an unwise too wide image/unbreakable-line-of-content) the explainxkcd site cannot sensibly handle it and it forces the default 'page width' of stuff into a zoomed out narrower column to the left (including the margin-line normally inset a dozen or so pixels in from the right) so that browser-window can display the whole of this wide element.&lt;br /&gt;
::While &amp;quot;saving space&amp;quot; does apply to server resources and viewer download bandwidth/quotas (e.g.[https://imgs.xkcd.com/comics/unreliable_connection.png 53kb] vs [https://imgs.xkcd.com/comics/unreliable_connection_2x.png 109kb]) may seem insignificant, screen-space can be badly hit by this.&lt;br /&gt;
::The motherlode xkcd site has code behind it to (usually?) serve the right image for the right displays, but explainxkcd isn't currently equipped to do the same choose-and-provide (which would need ''both'' images uploaded to it and a revised {{template|comic}} implementation, once we work out the method it could use). And I've never seen any case where the 'low quality' comic is conversely too small and narrow to appreciate (though occasionally the larger one reveals minor drawing details that have been obscured by the downscaling), just when the _2x one makes everything ''else'' too small.&lt;br /&gt;
::...this may not apply to everyone's browser implementation, but it definitely happens, and consistently, on my usual Chrome and/or Firefox on Windows and/or Android platforms (according to which system I happen to be on at the time). [[Special:Contributions/172.70.162.147|172.70.162.147]] 21:20, 17 August 2022 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::ExplainXKCD actually does have the capability to do this. For example, see [[1079:_United_Shapes]]. It generates multiple images, automatically choosing one based on screen size (similar to how xkcd.com does it). The bot could use the `imagesize` parameter to keep the image within the page's width by using the 'standard' image size. This does add a button labeled &amp;quot;click to enlarge,&amp;quot; but if that is annoying, the comic template can be modified to hide that button if specified.&lt;br /&gt;
:::Here is what it might look like:&lt;br /&gt;
:::{{cot}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{User:Theusaf/Template:comic_2x&lt;br /&gt;
| number    = 2647&lt;br /&gt;
| date      = July 18, 2022&lt;br /&gt;
| title     = Capri Suns&lt;br /&gt;
| image     = capri_suns_2x.png&lt;br /&gt;
| titletext = [As security is dragging me away] &amp;quot;Come on, at least I didn't make the mistake in the other direction!&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| imagesize = 315x317px&lt;br /&gt;
| noexpand  = true&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cob}}&lt;br /&gt;
:::which is clearer than the original comic page and the same size. —[[User:Theusaf|theusaf]] ([[User talk:Theusaf|talk]]) 05:20, 18 August 2022 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::::As specificaly implemented above, I certainly see no immediate problem (need to check across machines/devices), but I suspect that part of the mechanism here is the &amp;quot;imagesize = 315x317px&amp;quot;, which seems like it would need (albeit by the page-create bot, algorithm8cally) to be tailored to the 'input' image, not always in this ratio). I'm not technically conversant with the nature of your back-end scripting and doubtless it's all possible (scripts can do almost anything... once you know that they (may) need to do them and rewritten them to catch all the contingencies ;) ), but I don't know know if that's something you've accounted for (e.g. test with a three/four-panel wide comic, or the Earth Temperature Timeline or whatever, and see if it can facilitate them all nicely). Not to mention that if theusafBOT goes offline, the manual-add instructions (as used prior to your replacing the prior functioning bot, for which I thank you) also need this extra step of user involvement to be done, whereas usually the fallback manual method needed little thought in this direction (or indeed however much carbon or silicon there is in the 'brain' involved) except for exceptional circumstances or those rare prior slip-ups by Randall.&lt;br /&gt;
::::I'm just going through the first obvious issue (to me), didn't mean to concentrate so many words on just this before even checking everything else! [[Special:Contributions/172.70.91.80|172.70.91.80]] 09:15, 18 August 2022 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Basically, on the backend, the bot will fetch both the small and the large images, and measure the size of the small image, which is what it will use for the &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;imagesize&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;. I have actually used this system in the past for this bot, but was told to revert it due to the &amp;quot;click comic to enlarge&amp;quot; text. As for if the bot goes offline, there is no problem with falling back to the small image, and if editors want to, I can also provide instructions for using the large image. I'm mostly just waiting to see what others think about this. Are there any other problems to consider? —[[User:Theusaf|theusaf]] ([[User talk:Theusaf|talk]]) 14:44, 18 August 2022 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== I'm making an App that collects web comics ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
My original idea was to use the rss feed present on xkcd, and other webcomic websites, but now im starting to wonder if there was a way to make a better service, that allowed users to maybe look at older comics, and explanations and such as well, and thats how i happened to come across explainxkcd.com. The RSS Feed for this website, would be pretty helpful, if it were like reddit's but apparently, the rss feed is only maintained for the home page. I was wondering if you guys provided that data through an API or something? Also are there wikis for other famous comics like this one? Any other suggestions and ideas for the app are welcome 🙌🙌.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Comics edited after their publication ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
many more comics have been changed than are in Category:Comics edited after their publication ! please add them (i already have done two i remember off the top of my head) [[Special:Contributions/172.70.134.223|172.70.134.223]] 12:56, 7 October 2022 (UTC)Bumpf&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== What if 2 book page creation ==&lt;br /&gt;
What if 2 has come out, but I don't know which page is to be created. There is already a comic under the same name. [[User:ClassicalGames|ClassicalGames]] ([[User talk:ClassicalGames|talk]]) 08:54, 3 May 2023 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Default to 3 Section Headings for Each Explanation: Non-Obvious Info, Recap, and Background Trivia ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This is a proposal that all new comic explanations should, by default, have 3 Sections:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''I. Explanation of the Non-Obvious''' (an actual explanation of the non-obvious elements of the comic for the average reader who might not understand the references/joke/relevant science)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''II. Full Recap'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''III. Background Trivia'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Most of us can agree that Category I is where the value of this website shines.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But today, all 3 of these categories of explanation are typically merged together, making it hard to find the Category I nuggets of goodness.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If we make these 3 section headings the default on every comic explanation, then this default will helpfully nudge editors to put the juiciest stuff up top, and not to clutter that section up with fluff or trivia.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
——&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As an example, take the recent comic #2878 about Astronomer Happiness and Supernova distance.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The main thing a lay reader would want to know — the Category I information — is…&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
..That the shape of the graph is probably a clever reference to a Light Curve, a type of supernova graph&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
..why astronomers like it when a supernova is close, and what happens when it gets too close&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Everything else in the (currently) very wordy explanation gets in the way of the lay reader finding out these two things. It’s a bunch of Category II and Category III info that makes it hard to tease out the Category I info. It’s not BAD information, but it’s sandpaper. It’s friction slowing down the average reader.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Obviously I could go in and edit this particular comic, and I often do this kind of edit, but I think this issue pops up for most explanations, so I think changing the standard default interface will help everyone put their contribution into the right section.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In sum, my proposal would elevate Category I info to the top of each explanation, so instead of full recaps, we get right into the explanation that is going to be most efficiently illuminating for the average, non-expert reader, answering the most common questions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Laser813|Laser813]] ([[User talk:Laser813|talk]]) 10:50, 12 January 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:In general (if I get dibs on the edit, or think I can legitimately re-edit/rearrange), I do try to go for &amp;quot;hook, line, sinker&amp;quot; format (i.e. establish the basics, relate that to what the comic shows, move on to any relevent speculations/extrapolations), very like your setup. Though it is often ''much'' too complicated (multi-layered, cross-disciplinary, etc, so that maybe it has to be interwoven 'mini explanations' per tabulated item) so I'm not sure how easy it would be to enforce a strict structure. I think there's merit to the principle, though. Assuming we can all agree what each comic needs focus on (apply that problem to the following proposal too!), as I've occasionally inserted a sort of &amp;quot;first you need to know &amp;lt;subject&amp;gt;&amp;quot; into an established cold-start explanation (&amp;quot;you see &amp;lt;foo&amp;gt;&amp;quot; only for a later editor to consider it more an afterthought and shuffle it to later (&amp;quot;you see &amp;lt;foo&amp;gt;&amp;quot; ... &amp;quot;&amp;lt;foo&amp;gt; is part of &amp;lt;subject&amp;gt;&amp;quot;), or variations on such layouts. Especially as different people have different ideas as to what's obvious/can be keyword-wikilinked and what needs more waffle to properly enlighten readers.&lt;br /&gt;
:Also, prosaic variation is a good thing. Too formulaic and it could be (whilst accurate) considered too robotic, so some leaway should really always be allowed as we collectively bash together a community interpretation and elaboration. Within communal guidelines, clearly. [[Special:Contributions/172.69.194.203|172.69.194.203]] 15:53, 12 January 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== FAQ Style Editing should be the norm ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Simply, we should experiment with more FAQ-style explanations. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We think of the top questions that the average reader might have about a comic, and we use those as bolded headers to explain the most curious/confusing/subtle/sciency parts of the comic.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The structure would be this (using a recent comic as an example)…&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Q: Why did Randall use this shape of graph?'''&lt;br /&gt;
A: It’s likely a clever reference to a Light Curve, a similarly shaped graph in the study of supernovae that…&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Q: Why do astronomers prefer it when supernovae are closer?'''&lt;br /&gt;
A: It makes it easier to glean information because…&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Laser813|Laser813]] ([[User talk:Laser813|talk]]) 10:50, 12 January 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== sidebar revamp ==&lt;br /&gt;
I think that the sidebar looks plain and it should have a new design. It could be voted on by users [[User:Moderator|Moderator]] ([[User talk:Moderator|talk]]) 02:16, 5 February 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:In leiu of you telling us what you think would be better, my starting vote is that I'm perfectly happy with that 'plain'. If it has the links I might need, why does it need a reskin? Or, worse, a functional revamp which probably removes the easy to use bits I was using already.&lt;br /&gt;
:...could you do a mock-up screenshot (or render equivalents directly in markup) of before/after side by side, at least? [[Special:Contributions/172.69.194.120|172.69.194.120]] 03:11, 5 February 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
My biggest problem is it doesn’t scroll down with you which can be a big pain [[User:Moderator|Moderator]] ([[User talk:Moderator|talk]]) 01:43, 6 February 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Don't know about anyone else, but (when not on a desktop) I read this on a tablet, in landscape, with the effective window quite short (ratio of 1:2 with width, approaching 1:3.5 with already narrowed onscreen keyboard popped up) and if I'm scrolled to the top I see nothing beyond Browse Comics.&lt;br /&gt;
:If we assume separate scroll-control on the sidebar, setting Main Page at the top of browser pane gives What Links Here at the bottom. Now, I rarely use the next three links (or at least reach those pages using them), and separate scrolling wouldn't stop me even seeing the even lower Ad bit (but it ''would'' defeat the entire purpose of the Ad, in that position, whether or not I bother to notice it these days).&lt;br /&gt;
:So whatever missing about you propose, I'm betting it would impact me. Perhaps not negatively, but I've seen enough awful assumptions about my screen-area in the name of scroll-free design. Including the &amp;quot;give us permission (or not) to give you cookies&amp;quot; popovers where it appears the actual buttons to confirm (or deny, or go somewhere to review and customise, if they have that option) are beyond the bottom of my screen. I can temporarily rotate the screen, of course, but often I just back out and don't bother in those cases. I wouldn't be reticent to rotate this site, on occasion, but ''I'd really rather not have to'', if I can be so selfish and stick-in-the-mud, because websites just are not good to use (even temporarily) in narrow-portait mode. (What's worse is the websites that detect I'm on a mobile platform and redesign styles/placements on-the-fly to 'fit portrait view', assuming a vertical smartphone, ''regardless'' of my actual viewport orientation, etc.)&lt;br /&gt;
:So, please, a hard no from me. Notwithstanding that just as solidly &amp;quot;always browse in portrait&amp;quot; people might be overjoyed at changes that would give ''them'' a better site design. But that's a tricky circle to square (or letterbox!), and not what you were suggesting anyway (now we know what it is). I just want to plea that any changes be made with a very good idea of all the knock-on effects of 'improving' certain edge-cases, especially when it comes to yet other edge-cases. [[Special:Contributions/172.70.85.23|172.70.85.23]] 10:29, 6 February 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
==New Logo and Banner Proposals==&lt;br /&gt;
:I have new logo and banner proposals for this site.&lt;br /&gt;
:They're made on Scratch, an all-ages block-based programming language, and are in the style of Right Click.&lt;br /&gt;
:Here they are!&lt;br /&gt;
:Logo proposal: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Logo_proposal_for_explain_xkcd.png&lt;br /&gt;
:Banner proposal: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Banner_proposal_for_explain_xkcd.png {{unsigned ip|172.69.71.37|01:54, 19 February 2024 (UTC)}}&lt;br /&gt;
::I can't see the xkcdicity of the logo, really. The banner is certainly flavourful in the right way (does it scale down well? ...is that what your use of Scratch is for, as opposed to standard static Photoshop/GIMP image editing?), but not sure it'll work better for the current top-left-of-page xkcd (with three xkcd figurses idling away, sat on the letters).&lt;br /&gt;
::Decent concept art for something else related, certainly. I could believe it was a Randall's-own  interactive comic front-end of some kind (which would make sense of the &amp;quot;play button&amp;quot; that is the &amp;quot;►&amp;quot;-bit). Given that it's now in a programming system already, have you tried making a drag'n'click game of the idea of linking/looping the blue-trail, and animating the hanging-on characters? [[Special:Contributions/172.70.90.29|172.70.90.29]] 13:34, 19 February 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::It's an arrow, not a play button. Get it right. {{unsigned ip|172.69.71.72|01:05, 20 February 2024 (UTC)}}&lt;br /&gt;
::::Hold your horses... I was just trying to find a good reason for the whatever-it-is triangle to be there (gave the example of a 'play' button in my speculated usefulness of it). And it isn't really obviously any more of an arrow (c.f. &amp;quot;→&amp;quot;), either. I like your(?) banner's use of xkcd-figures, just not sure where the logo exhibits any form of being xkcd-related, except by the literal reading of it.&lt;br /&gt;
::::Perhaps if it were &amp;quot;xkcd font&amp;quot; (i.e. artfully composited from actual samples of Randall's ALLCAPS comic-writing) then it wouldn't matter so much, but I just wouldn't say it was any more on-brand than the current logo/etc. This being intended as constructive criticism, I hope you understand. And there's more opinions than mine, so maybe I've indeed just missed some point that ''everyone else'' (especially named-users) have already realised. [[Special:Contributions/172.70.86.5|172.70.86.5]] 02:33, 20 February 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Regarding precision in the Unexplained popup ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Would it be possible to add an extra decimal point for the sake of precision? Currently, it shows that 0% of comics are unexplained, which is (as of 13:21 UTC on March 27, 2024) incorrect. It's a small thing, but it's rather annoying. {{unsigned ip|162.158.158.233|13:23, 27 March 2024 (UTC)}}&lt;br /&gt;
:With the current 2911 comics (give or take #404), 0.1% would be slightly under 3 comics. You'd need at least three before 0.1% appeared instead of the equally unuseful 0.0%.&lt;br /&gt;
:I'm of the &amp;quot;at least give everyone a week before you unilaterally declare it 'done'...&amp;quot; camp, so right now ''just'' the latest M/W/F comic incomplete would hover at a token 0.1%.&lt;br /&gt;
:(Actually, from two (0.06...% rounded up) to 4 (0.13...% rounded down. The good news is that it'll be almost seven years until two-rounded-up is insufficient, but also up to six-rounded-down is now &amp;quot;0.1%&amp;quot;, if I've not goofed the carries/etc.)&lt;br /&gt;
:If going to the trouble of editing it to 1DP, make it 2DP with ''exactly'' the same editing effort..?&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&amp;lt;!-- Edited version of current Main page source below here --&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;font size=5px&amp;gt;''Welcome to the '''explain [[xkcd]]''' wiki!''&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
We have an explanation for all [[:Category:All comics|'''{{#expr:{{PAGESINCAT:All comics|R}}-1}}''' xkcd comics]],&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;!-- Note: the -1 in the calculation above is to discount &amp;quot;comic&amp;quot; 404,&lt;br /&gt;
     which is not really a comic, even though we've categorised it so. --&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
and only {{PAGESINCAT:Incomplete explanations|R}}&lt;br /&gt;
({{#expr: {{PAGESINCAT:Incomplete explanations|R}} / {{LATESTCOMIC}} * 100 round 2}}%) [[:Category:Incomplete explanations|are incomplete]]. Help us finish them!&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&amp;lt;!-- Edited version of current Main page source above here --&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:(As of time of posting, the above says &amp;quot;only 2 (0.07%)&amp;quot;. From 0.0687049...% rounded up to 2DP.)&lt;br /&gt;
:Though given that we're only going to go into the future,{{Citation needed}} I suggest we can state the flat-out number. It's not now really going to be as scarily huge as it might have been, as the actual percentage becomes generally less significant.&lt;br /&gt;
:And, for niceness, give it a grammatically/factually agreeable form:&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&amp;lt;!-- exemplars start --&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
;General form:&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;... and {{#ifeq: &amp;lt;!-- count here --&amp;gt; | 0 | no | &amp;lt;!-- count here --&amp;gt; }} comic{{#ifeq: &amp;lt;!-- count here --&amp;gt; | 1 |  | s }} [[:Category:Incomplete explanations|{{#ifeq: &amp;lt;!-- count here --&amp;gt; | 1 | is | are }} incomplete]]. ...&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
;Zero cases (hardcoded):&lt;br /&gt;
:... and {{#ifeq: 0 | 0 | no | &amp;lt;!-- count here, unused --&amp;gt; }} comic{{#ifeq: 0 | 1 |  | s }} [[:Category:Incomplete explanations|{{#ifeq: 0 | 1 | is | are }} incomplete]]. ...&lt;br /&gt;
;One case (hardcoded):&lt;br /&gt;
:... and {{#ifeq: 1 | 0 | no | 1 }} comic{{#ifeq: 1 | 1 |  | s }} [[:Category:Incomplete explanations|{{#ifeq: 1 | 1 | is | are }} incomplete]]. ...&lt;br /&gt;
;Multiple cases (hardcoded):&lt;br /&gt;
:... and {{#ifeq: 42 | 0 | no | 42 }} comic{{#ifeq: 42 | 1 |  | s }} [[:Category:Incomplete explanations|{{#ifeq: 42 | 1 | is | are }} incomplete]]. ...&lt;br /&gt;
;Current cases (dynamic):&lt;br /&gt;
:... and {{#ifeq: {{PAGESINCAT:Incomplete explanations|R}} | 0 | none | {{PAGESINCAT:Incomplete explanations|R}} }} comic{{#ifeq: {{PAGESINCAT:Incomplete explanations|R}} | 1 |  | s }} [[:Category:Incomplete explanations|{{#ifeq: {{PAGESINCAT:Incomplete explanations|R}} | 1 | is | are }} incomplete]]. ...&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&amp;lt;!-- end of exemplars --&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:...easy to replicate to get &amp;quot;Help us finish them!&amp;quot; to change (upon a zero-test truth) to &amp;quot;But they all might be improvable!&amp;quot;. Or change the :Cat:Link to not even be a link when zero, with alternate phrasing dodged over to in order to avoid &amp;quot;no comics are incomplete&amp;quot; in other ways.&lt;br /&gt;
:I wrote the above for minimal nesting of overlapping conditions. You might prefer just to go with &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{#ifeq: &amp;lt;count&amp;gt; | 0 | &amp;lt;whole &amp;quot;zero cases&amp;quot; version&amp;gt; | {{#ifeq: &amp;lt;count&amp;gt; | 1 | &amp;lt;whole &amp;quot;single case&amp;quot; version&amp;gt; | &amp;lt;whole &amp;quot;plurality of cases&amp;quot; version&amp;gt; }} }}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt; - both approaches involve repetitions, but maybe this other one can be given a ''degree'' of wikimarkup-readability within each case, to take pity on future editors. [[Special:Contributions/172.70.160.166|172.70.160.166]] 16:02, 27 March 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Hear me out: What If? discussion page.  ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
That's it. That's my idea. Go crazy, everyone. [[User:Psychoticpotato|Psychoticpotato]] ([[User talk:Psychoticpotato|talk]]) 14:05, 4 April 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Yup, I've been thinking the same thing. I would like a page on each What If entry. [[User:Maplestrip|Maplestrip]] ([[User talk:Maplestrip|talk]]) 07:42, 8 April 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::I've thought about this, over the years. Having 'a page' (rather than the summary table, in the [[what if? (blog)|overview page]], etc) does sound more completist than what we currently have but I then tend to hit the main ontological problem...&lt;br /&gt;
::In the What-Ifs, Randall takes a 'simple' question and then ''explains'' the consequences. At length. A 'comic page' structure (starting with how we'd deal with the multiple midpoint images, so we would stray far from using the {{template|comic}} introduction) that followed the header(image,etc)/explanation/transcript/(trivia)/included-comments format would be silly and have many parts inappropriate. Remove the Transcript, for starters. ''Or'' need a mini-Transcript for each 'illustrative' image. (e.g. &amp;quot;:[Black Hat:] What if we tried more power?&amp;quot;, several times.)&lt;br /&gt;
::Is there an actual need to ''explain Randall's explanation..''? Because that's the only thing 'we' can do. Which is rather silly, and seems like it would take a small (entertainingly rambling) essay and expand it into a large (pedantically rambling) one.&lt;br /&gt;
::Or else we just straight-copy the What-If over here as a 'backup'-blag? Allowable, but not exactly a USP, there'll be Internet Archive and personal copies, should things go bad at Randall's end. Not really a noble-cause.&lt;br /&gt;
::My suggestion, as to how to cover the remaining &amp;quot;explanation gap&amp;quot; and provide a useful 'service' that's worthwhile maintaining, is ''maybe'' two What If? (Blag) sub-pages:&lt;br /&gt;
::#A place to collate all inter-text images (and hover-/title-texts), and Transcript them, for easy searching.&lt;br /&gt;
::#*e.g. when you know you want to refer to the &amp;quot;bomb to the eyeball&amp;quot; one (internally or for something external) but think you might not realise where you need to go to (the supernova neutrinos one!) just by scrolling a bare comic list.&lt;br /&gt;
::#*Or you'd like to see, at a glance, how many different places the Black Hat Try More Power running joke occurs.&lt;br /&gt;
::#*Even if you don't want to open the page itself (160+ 'comics' with say 5 images each, is an 800ish-image page, less rationalising 'repeats' to a single entry), it should at least give you a search result for &amp;quot;dry waterfall&amp;quot; that points you in the direction of the &amp;quot;Niagra Straw&amp;quot; one (and maybe others?).&lt;br /&gt;
::#*I could see these being brief Image/Titletext/Transcript/(optional explanatory context), but not enough material to make them separate comic-style-pages in their own right, right?&lt;br /&gt;
::#Something of the same 'collation page mechanism' for all those superscript-popup-'footnote' bits. Though I admit I'm not entirely sure for what purpose except that it just ''seems'' like a good &amp;quot;collection page&amp;quot; to maintain. Perhaps to offer updated onward-links if any of the originals suffer link-rot? (But then, that fate can occur to all non-popupped links, so maybe I've chosen the wrong thing to highlight.)&lt;br /&gt;
::...the question is, what do you want from it. Bear in mind that if you can creae pages here then you can set up what ''you'' think you'd like to see (e.g. for What-If#1, for starters) then get the community to assess it. Do it as a sub-page to your Userspace, maybe, as proof-of-concept.&lt;br /&gt;
::Just because it's not been seen as necessary so far, doesn't mean it's not necessary. I've thought about it a lot (not thst I'm in a position to inplement anything), but I've only decided that I don't see a need for a straight copy (others' views may differ on that) and not enough reason to pester for ''my'' 'ideas' to be fulfilled. But I aint 'in charge' here, and happily so. [[Special:Contributions/172.69.194.100|172.69.194.100]] 11:29, 8 April 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::You make a fair point. He did already explain in great detail what would happen if [x] scenario happened. It just seems like it would be nice to have a page exclusively for discussing all the ''What If'' articles. [[User:Psychoticpotato|Psychoticpotato]] ([[User talk:Psychoticpotato|talk]]) 20:49, 15 May 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::::People just need to make a draft or two and see what happens. Be sure to link a draft here if one is created, I would like to help on it. &amp;quot;I want to learn more and explore this scenario further&amp;quot; is a valid feeling to have. [[User:Maplestrip|Maplestrip]] ([[User talk:Maplestrip|talk]]) 07:34, 16 May 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Randall-ify the Captcha ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Let's have some fun:  Is it feasible to replace the Captcha with something &amp;quot;xkcd-ish&amp;quot; like &amp;quot;click on Randall's work&amp;quot; with a mix of XKCD stuff and generic pictures.  If not, how about a replacing it with a quiz like &amp;quot;which of the following IS [or IS NOT] xkcd character&amp;quot; with one obvious correct answer. [[Special:Contributions/172.68.26.75|172.68.26.75]] 16:11, 9 May 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:are YOU able to create a CAPTCHA from scratch? [[User:42.book.addict|42.book.addict]] ([[User talk:42.book.addict|talk]]) 15:59, 13 May 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::Choose any images that contain user-made CAPTCHAs from the following selection. [[User:Psychoticpotato|Psychoticpotato]] ([[User talk:Psychoticpotato|talk]]) 21:22, 13 May 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::We could also make captchas based on most of [[:Category:CAPTCHA|these]]. [[User:PDesbeginner|PDesbeginner]] ([[User talk:PDesbeginner|talk]]) 02:57, 11 September 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Incomplete Tag Vote ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I think each comic's discussion page should have a section to vote on whether the explanation is complete or not. How long do you think the voting period should be?[[User:PDesbeginner|PDesbeginner]] ([[User talk:PDesbeginner|talk]]) 03:42, 19 June 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Rather than a voting period, I think it would be ideal if people could &amp;quot;vote&amp;quot; on the completeness of an article at any time. As I go through all the old pages, I come across lots of pages that feel a little bit incomplete. It would be nice if we had a measurement of completion that wasn't binary. [[User:Maplestrip|Maplestrip]] ([[User talk:Maplestrip|talk]]) 10:16, 19 June 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::Feel free to add the incomplete tag again. But don't forget to mention WHY (either in the tag or the discussion or both) you think it's incomplete. :) The tag is mainly there so you can have a list of &amp;quot;incomplete&amp;quot; comics. A comic is either on that list or it isn't. This is pretty much binary. As for voting: If I think an explanation is complete and it bothers me that it's flagged as not I generally juts make a comment in the discussion asking if someone has still something to add or actually knows WHY it's still incomplete. If there's no response after a few days I delete the tag. There's no need to make a voting out of this. And if somone strongly disagrees to you there's always the &amp;quot;Undo&amp;quot;-link ;) [[User:Elektrizikekswerk|Elektrizikekswerk]] ([[User talk:Elektrizikekswerk|talk]]) 11:09, 19 June 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Sometimes I just feel &amp;quot;this could use more detail,&amp;quot; without specifically knowing what the detail would look like. This can be a problem when it's about explaining complicated science: the &amp;quot;completion&amp;quot; of a description of quantum mechanics that is readable by a novice, is very subjective. I am realizing the problem with the persistent voting idea tho: many people will vote something as &amp;quot;incomplete&amp;quot; but wouldn't come back to check on it later. [[User:Maplestrip|Maplestrip]] ([[User talk:Maplestrip|talk]]) 12:08, 19 June 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::::I'm more in the &amp;quot;less is more&amp;quot; camp. Most of my recent contributions to this wiki were deleting parts of bloated explanations: You don't need to explain quantum mechanics unless it's absolutely crucial for understanding the respective comic. Of course, if you are an expert in any given field, [[2501|it's hard to tell]] whether or not the current explanation is sufficient for a layperson and most contributors tend to write &amp;quot;too much&amp;quot;. Which is totally fine. People like me take care of the &amp;quot;too much&amp;quot;. ;) So, if you are an expert in quantum mechanics ignore &amp;quot;completed&amp;quot; comics about quantum mechanics. Surely you could contribute a lot to it but chances are high that most of it is unnecessary for the comic. Instead ask yourself if you need more information to understand that comic about biology. And if you do, add an incomplete and ask for that information ;) [[User:Elektrizikekswerk|Elektrizikekswerk]] ([[User talk:Elektrizikekswerk|talk]]) 12:31, 19 June 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:I've been here a long time, effectively back to when there were ''missing'' explanations (other than the &amp;quot;too new to have the barebones put in&amp;quot; ones, these days only seen when the current BOT is tardy or offline for some reason), and I've seen the Incomplete template change from the useful 'infill marker' to become a regular joke-tag of a similar nature to the Citation Needed. Yes, I agree that both of these (and the Because You're Dumb&amp;quot; tag) are perhaps a bit confusing for new users (like the one who badly edited out a link, just now, apparently thinking it was spam, because of the way it mentioned viagra), but I have grown to see them as community in-jokes (of various degrees of subtlety) that many people seem to appreciate under their current incarnations.&lt;br /&gt;
:We've recently removed the Main Page's more literal &amp;quot;there are # incomplete articles&amp;quot; announcement, which leaves the purpose of ''more accurately'' using the Incomplete tag a little less important. Apart from letting us dive into the (purported) list of Incomplete Explanations, one of the main ''serious'' purposes of the Incomplete tag is removed, leaving the now consistently employed purpose of doing a &amp;quot;Created by a THING OTHER THAN THE BOT&amp;quot; joke much more prominent.&lt;br /&gt;
:Really, all articles are potentially incomplete, still. Some more than others. Something big, like Hoverboard or Gravity, might truly have easter-eggs or subtle details as yet not properly commented upon, but there have been edits to ''double-digit'' comics recently which might be considered improvements. As such, there are really only two 'sensible' direct courses of action:&lt;br /&gt;
:#Completely remove the Incomplete tag, from use, as all pages are only ever as complete as the eye of any particular beholder, and the more recent pages are ''obviously'' incomplete by their being barely 15 minutes (or a day, or ''maybe'' a week) old. Or being so huge (or Time-like!) that they clearly still haven't been 'completely' documented. Maybe the BOT can add a Created By The Bot tag that gets wiped out by the first serious attempt at human editing, but if we wish to lose this part of our site culture so readily then why ever have it at all? A wikivote system is not really that accurate under these circumstances, for a number of reasons that I needn't explain, so go straight to assuming that any such 'vote' would pass, right from the off...&lt;br /&gt;
:#Embrace it for its THING OTHER THAN A BOT usage, alone. Don't be so eager to remove them just because you have no personal changes you'd wish to see. (Votes or not, there could always be another editor along in a minute who has, unlike the rest of you, picked up on an obscure visual pun rendered in what turns out to be hieroglyphs, or similar.) If we have to cull them (not a given!), then let it be an unstated rule (or a stated one?) that if there are more than (e.g.) half a dozen then the 'least amusing' may be removed by the first editor who wishes to express a critical opinion. Just the one at a time. No reinstating, no resurrection, no adding to old articles that never ever had a 'joke Incomplete' before, no entirely new joke (but you can refine what's there, to a degree), just a rolling (and not necessarily consecutive!) set of the &amp;quot;finest natjve explainxkcd wit&amp;quot;. Or at least the least objectionable surviving examples of same.&lt;br /&gt;
:As a practical guide, the &amp;quot;reason why you think it is Incomplete element&amp;quot; could be entirely served by in-line tags (the &amp;quot;What?&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;Why?&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;Date?&amp;quot; things you might see elsewhere). Perhaps we could even do ''both'' things by instead having a &amp;quot;Complete&amp;quot; tag ''explicitly'' for BOT-REPLACEMENT-type tomfoolery (and tongue-in-cheekness about Completion, as we might currently be about Incometeness) from the off. That might confuse the newbods, of course. At least until it doesn't, and then they're not newbods anymore...&lt;br /&gt;
:The companion tag, for Incomplete Transcript, is presumably going to serve as it currently does (as a still serious hint as to actual Incompleteness), albeit that I've noticed a trend for the first editor of a brand new published comic to (possibly ''after'' doing the BOT-replacement joke, or after the editor who did ''only'' that) go straight in and enTranscript it (to varying degrees of accuracy and completion), whether or not they also then remove that specific tag-template at the same time. It seems that some people are more comfortable at providing a ''Transcript''ion-service than they are at establishing even the seed of an Explanation. (Or they only have enough time to do the latter, to the level of detail they wish to achieve in the moment open to them.)&lt;br /&gt;
:This is, of course, a cultural issue. All the above (from me) is just my own perception of practical aspects, notwithstanding those opinions already expressed before that (and elsewhere). I don't speak for everyone. And, as a perpetual IP, technically I should say that I don't speak for ''anyone'', either... [[Special:Contributions/172.70.160.140|172.70.160.140]] 14:21, 19 June 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I like the idea of removing the Incomplete tag. What do you think? [[User:PDesbeginner|PDesbeginner]] ([[User talk:PDesbeginner|talk]]) 14:57, 19 June 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::I greatly approve of a &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{what}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt; tag, as a Wikipedian that's actually really funny. I would want to keep the Incomplete tag, as I think it has purpose, even if it no longer represents a goal to achieve. I think this website will never reach 100.00% completeness and that is good, actually. [[User:Maplestrip|Maplestrip]] ([[User talk:Maplestrip|talk]]) 14:05, 26 June 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::Okay. If someone wants to they can just ignore the incomplete tags. [[User:PDesbeginner|PDesbeginner]] ([[User talk:PDesbeginner|talk]]) 14:37, 28 June 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== &amp;quot;As of &amp;lt;now&amp;gt;&amp;quot;... ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What would be rather useful is an &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{As of now}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt; template (or similar wording, and perhaps an &amp;quot;as of now&amp;quot;-cased alternative for use mid-sentence). There are many articles that will have words along the lines of &amp;quot;this has not yet happened, as of August 2024&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;this situation is continuing, as of August 2024&amp;quot;. Every now and then, someone will come across one of these with an older date (perhaps only just out of date, perhaps years old) and [https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=1858:_4th_of_July&amp;amp;curid=20285&amp;amp;diff=348082&amp;amp;oldid=315524 edit it accordingly]. You could also seek them all out, deliberately, with a bit of effort in the search-bar.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
(Note that &amp;quot;as of&amp;quot; does not ''always'' need updating, there are non-dated examples such as in [[1074: Moon Landing#Trivia]], static transcript versions, like [[1071: Exoplanets#Transcript]] and other instances where the text &amp;quot;as of&amp;quot;, with or without a date, really does not need to be changed... but sometimes is anyway by a well-meaning passer-by.)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Sometimes, this can be done along with another useful edit/update/revision that is spotted, or is just one of the revisions that some other need for change conveniently allows. But it seems a bit vague to rely upon occasional attention.  Instead the template will implement something like &amp;quot;&amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;As of {{Monthyear}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;&amp;quot; (here having to use &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{#time:F Y}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;, ...&amp;quot;As of {{#time:F Y}}&amp;quot;...), though there's the possibility that a parameter-mediated switch can let it alternatively become a to-the-day-level format option (at which point you could even implement/calcuate something like {{template|Yesterday}} would be) or just to the year-level. (Or add {{template|As of this year}}, {{template|As of this month}} and {{template|As of this day}} separately.)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This would negate the need to ''just'' poke and prod any article that happened to 'need' updating every month (or year, or possible day). And to deal with the possibility that some of these cases might actually need to be edited because &amp;quot;as of&amp;quot; does ''not'' now apply, include within it a {{:Category:As of}} membership, letting anyone who is interested keep an eye on these aggregated 'As of's, ready to jump in there and change it to some straight up &amp;quot;Up until &amp;lt;fixed date&amp;gt;&amp;quot; equivalent should any one of them actually no longer apply.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
...obviously, I can't even begin to create the template page required, but I'd be happy to work on the exact wikimedia code required if anyone thinks it needs anything but the most basic transcluded formatting and doesn't know how. Open to discussion, and I'll tag on more if I happen to see that discussion developing. [[Special:Contributions/172.70.162.186|172.70.162.186]] 18:04, 4 August 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:As an addendum/change to my above suggestion, considering a simpler {{template|as of}} (and {{template|As of}}) which does ''no'' automagical continuous updating (just gives the &amp;quot;as of&amp;quot; literal on its own), but still guarantees &amp;quot;Category:As of&amp;quot; membership, so that it doesn't actively give wrong (new) date+circumstance relationships in the likes of [[1047: Approximations]]. In that, the several mentions of populations can safely stay as old years until someone rewrites the proposed value and assessment as well, but it still could be a task to pursue every new year after checking the Cat for likely comics needing a quick check'n'edit.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== “Grammar Bot” ==&lt;br /&gt;
I’m working on a python based bot written with the Pywiki library that aims to use the replace.py scripts to fix simple grammatical mistakes, e.g. correcting Citation needed placements, cleaning up extra spaces, etc. I will be posting the code in a few weeks after I finish it (I’m a bit busy at the moment with school and orchestra) so the entire community can view it. Any thoughts on the idea? Thanks. [[User:42.book.addict|42.book.addict]] ([[User talk:42.book.addict|talk]]) 21:05, 5 September 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:First thoughts are that there are going to be so many exceptions. I definitely agree with the idea of {{template|Citation needed}}s being made consistent (if only it weren't sometimes complicated{{Citation needed}}), as well as that of    mysterious    extra       spaces. But that's not really grammatical. Punctuation, in the first case. I fear a full (or even fragmentary) grammar-checker is going to be complicated and give many false positives.&lt;br /&gt;
:At least at first, perhaps have it ''report'' what it thinks it has found. You may discover definite times that it isn't necessary and it would indeed create new errors.&lt;br /&gt;
:At the very least, run it with two checklists: One to do an automatic replace.py and one to just report. Start with the first list empty. Introduce potential ones to the latter, review all the reports carefully, ''then'' move any sensible-looking ones to former.&lt;br /&gt;
:And have it not fighting other bots (particularly theusafBOT), perhaps selected users (e.g. the likes of Kynde, and of course yourself) or indeed itself (if it makes a change that might inadvertently trigger another 'check') by excluding such changes for a recheck/rechange. Keep a record of what it changed, so that if anybody reverts/recorrects something that seems to have gone wrong it doesn't force it 'wrong' again. At the simplest, give a whole page a decent time-out and/or number of subsequent limits before it ''considers'' a new change. Implement from the start the option of a 'whitelist' (of pages it can ignore) or 'blacklist' (of rules it shouldn't apply, or at least actively apply, to a given page), so you can quickly manually add a throttle-down by simple config-file rather than have to add in a code-kludge when something obviously (in hindsight!) needs correcting about the way it works. And also maybe throttle it to have no more than one bot-edit per hour (while starting from scratch) to not swamp the system and give the rest of us time to assess any errors it has made (and its successes!) - you can unstick that throttle later, when you consider it tested with all its backlog of microcorrections.&lt;br /&gt;
:...there are a few other guidelines I would suggest, but the cautiousness already present in the above approaches might mean that they are left as not so important. Just consider what ''could'' go wrong before unleashing it on our world.&lt;br /&gt;
:And all power to your elbow, it is of course something we all might have considered (I know I have... not that I have the login for it, but what really stopped me was knowing how badly I could mess it up by getting just one detail wrong if I tried it).&lt;br /&gt;
:Among changes/alerts I would have it make would be cases of {{template|cn}}, {{template|citation needed}}, etc, instead of the 'main' template. Plus []-links to either wikipedia pages (most of them should be {{template|w}}-templated) or explainxkcd.com pages (most of them should be [[]]ed), although there are even then some exceptions. It'd also be nice if it can identify all Talk (and Community Portal) contributions that were not signed (more complex, as some may be after the fact, or have been after several years and further editings). I know how I'd do all this, or think I do (only upon starting to do it can I be sure I've actually theorised it correctly!), but I mention this mostly to point out how ''you'' might want to cautiously implement ''your'' ideas. HTH. [[Special:Contributions/172.70.86.15|172.70.86.15]] 00:07, 6 September 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::you have made plenty of wonderful points that I clearly have not thought about-quite the critical oversight on my part. Is anyone interested in collaborating? I don’t think that my skills are good enough to satisfy all of those points. [[User:42.book.addict|42.book.addict]] ([[User talk:42.book.addict|talk]]) 01:06, 6 September 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::hello? Anybody? Please help… [[User:42.book.addict|42.book.addict]] ([[User talk:42.book.addict|talk]]) 17:38, 9 September 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::::I believe this would be a great idea and also an incredibly complicated feat. Randall is no stranger to using weird punctuation in comics or misspelled words. I think it would be neat if it weren't automated and just reported errors it found so we could manually fix them, which would make its development much easier, but at that point it's very similar to a series of search queries for misspelled words, which we can already do. I have no coding skills so I'm not going to be of help. [[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 17:33, 7 November 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
;Update&lt;br /&gt;
I have found a solution to fix most grammatical mistakes, I just need to make sure that it doesn’t correct character names like “Cueball”, not edit war with other bots, come up with a system to log the edits it makes so that it doesn’t revert again, and fix Citation needed templates. I already know how to make sure that it asks me before editing, so I want to create an account to test it out. Does anybody have ideas on what to name the bot? I don’t want to call it 42.book.addictBOT, since the username would be a bit clunky. ToriBOT could work, but I’m also open to any other names. Feel free to reply to this or reply to me on my talk page! '''[[User:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:9pt;color:#db97bf&amp;quot;&amp;gt;42.book.addict&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:6pt;color:#97b6db&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Talk to me!&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;''' 20:30, 29 November 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== &amp;quot;dark mode&amp;quot; ==&lt;br /&gt;
add dark mode [[User:CalibansCreations|'''&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#ff0000;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Caliban&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;''']] ([[User talk:CalibansCreations|talk]]) 09:54, 18 November 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:See [[User:Certified nqh/common.css]] or copy/paste my old [[User:42.book.addict/common.css|common.css]] page history into your common.css page: -42.book.addict [[Special:Contributions/172.69.134.208|172.69.134.208]] 16:10, 18 November 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::ha, thx tori, nqh's common.css works like a charm :) [[User:CalibansCreations|'''&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#ff0000;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Caliban&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;''']] ([[User talk:CalibansCreations|talk]]) 08:51, 21 November 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== reddit ==&lt;br /&gt;
Add reddit- Anonymous {{unsigned ip|172.71.214.80|08:31, 21 November 2024 (UTC)}}&lt;br /&gt;
:You probably need to explain what you mean by that. Add reddit discussions to here? Add this site to reddit? Add some simple link to one from the other? Something else? [[Special:Contributions/172.70.162.163|172.70.162.163]] 13:02, 21 November 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::&amp;gt;Add some simple link to one from the other?&lt;br /&gt;
::I have no idea what they meant either, but I hadn't thought of this! I could see the addition of a simple link to the comic template, like &amp;quot;https://reddit.com/r/xkcd/comments/{{PAGETITLE}&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;https://reddit.com/r/xkcd/search/?q={{PAGETITLE}&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
::I don't partecipate much in the r/xkcd subreddit, so i'm not sure if they have structured post titles or even if they posted all the comics, or if it's automated, but I think this could be cool! Some people will likely come from Reddit, so it would be a straightforward way for them to go back. Thoughts? {{unsigned|FaviFake|16:55, 11 January 2025 (UTC)}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== viewer ==&lt;br /&gt;
i propose to add random page to comic viewer {{unsigned ip|172.71.150.14|00:17, 25 February 2025 (UTC)}}&lt;br /&gt;
:There's already a &amp;quot;Random Page&amp;quot; link.&lt;br /&gt;
:If you mean (it's ambiguous!) a &amp;quot;Random Comic Page&amp;quot; link, then I'm not sure it's needed. There are so many &amp;quot;Comic pages&amp;quot; that it's a fairly good chance that you'll land on one of them for any given click, much more chance within two clicks. The likelihood of not getting a comic within ''three'' clicks will be tiny. Another way to do it is to just use the xkcd.com &amp;quot;Random&amp;quot; button, then (whichever comic you land on, which will be any but [[404]]), change the &amp;quot;xkcd.com&amp;quot; bit of the URL to &amp;quot;expxkcd.com&amp;quot; and... you end up here.&lt;br /&gt;
:If none of that really does what you want (especially if you mean something completely different from what I read it as), some more explanation would probably be appreciated. [[Special:Contributions/172.69.79.164|172.69.79.164]] 01:02, 25 February 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:If you want to make sure to land on all comics, you can go to &amp;quot;Special pages&amp;quot; on the sidebar, scroll down to &amp;quot;Random page in category&amp;quot;, and enter &amp;quot;All comics&amp;quot;. As far as I'm aware, there isn't really a way to automate this, so you have to keep inputting it manually. [[User:Firestar233|guess who]] ([[User talk:Firestar233|if you desire conversing]] | [[Special:Contributions/Firestar233|what i have done]]) 06:38, 25 February 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::I think they meant a button on the {{tl|comic}} template. Would it be technically possible to make it such that it works exacly like the one on the official site? --[[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 17:47, 25 February 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::It ''should'' be a matter of using [[Special:RandomInCategory/All Comics]], I think, but doesn't seem to work when I try that exact attempt. Perhaps mediawiki or the mediawiki extension is not updated enough, or else I'm getting my wikisyntax slightly wrong.&lt;br /&gt;
:::Functionally, though, where the website has its Random button, we have our &amp;quot;go to the xkcd.com original&amp;quot;, so more thought is needed before we just &amp;quot;add a button&amp;quot;. If we do, we want it where the 'mothership' website does, but we still ought to have our details-and-link-to-original given, and I like it as a (faux) button.&lt;br /&gt;
::: Perhaps the {{template|comic}}, where it currently has header 'buttons':&lt;br /&gt;
 [|&amp;lt;&amp;lt;] [Prev] [#9876 (Grune 32, 2525)] [Next] [&amp;gt;&amp;gt;|]&lt;br /&gt;
::: Needs to be changed to maybe:&lt;br /&gt;
       [ #9876 (Grune 32, 2525) ]&lt;br /&gt;
 [|&amp;lt;&amp;lt;] [Prev]   [Random]   [Next] [&amp;gt;&amp;gt;|]&lt;br /&gt;
:::...or equivalent. Haven't checked, but if it's a one-line table, can be easily made into a two-line one with colspan=3 (or 5?) in the right bit. If it's just centred, then it should come out Ok, in a simple way. But I'm not too keen on that change, really, and you'd need to actually have the Random-&amp;gt;Comic link working first, ''anyway''. So I'm giving you my opinions and (slightly lacking) knowledge, in case that can at least make for the better outcome than either nothing (though not sure that's bad!) or some half-hearted ideas from elsewhere. [[Special:Contributions/172.70.86.116|172.70.86.116]] 21:52, 25 February 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::: Unless someone can figure out the requests made by the random in category, a workaround could be to use a (pseudo)random number generator (mediawiki has a [https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Template:Random_number template] on their website) to get a random number in the range of 1 - {{template|LATESTCOMIC}} and put in a link to that comic number using &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;[[number]]&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
:::: Note: There already is a &amp;quot;Random&amp;quot; template, but it was just using random page and was blanked by the person who made it [[User:Firestar233|guess who]] ([[User talk:Firestar233|if you desire conversing]] | [[Special:Contributions/Firestar233|what i have done]]) 03:50, 26 February 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::{{Done|Done!!!}} &amp;amp;nbsp;I tried that wikimedia templaete but couldn't figure out how to make it work. I did it using Special:Random, hoping there aren't too many non-comic pages. Check [[{{LATESTCOMIC}}]] for an example of how it looks and works. --[[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 16:02, 23 April 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::thanks! (i hav an account now) [[User:Bb777|me, hi]] ([[User talk:Bb777|talk]]) 22:30, 25 April 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::No problem! There's also a special custom-designed navbar for the original comics: try clicking the &amp;quot;|&amp;lt;&amp;quot; button! (It's not complete yet, but i'm slowly finishing it!) --[[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 22:36, 25 April 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Contentious Topics Template ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I propose that we create a unified template to slap on contentious and possibly controversial comics, with a warning similar to the one I (and a couple other people added on) wrote in [[3073: Tariffs]]. Now, since I don’t know how to create a template and don’t understand how they work, this is my request for help. If you are available to help write it or have any tips for me, please contact me either in this thread or on my [[User talk:42.book.addict|talk page]]. Thanks! '''[[User:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:9pt;color:pink&amp;quot;&amp;gt;42.book.addict&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:6pt;color:#B1E4E3&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Talk to me!&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;''' 18:01, 16 April 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Hey, I just wanted to ask why you think a new template is needed. {{tl|notice2}} and {{tl|notice}} seem pretty solid. How would a new template differ from them? Btw, I switched the template in [[Talk:3073: Tariffs]] from {{tl|notice}} to {{tl|notice2}} so it's more like a warning, feel free to revert it if you prefer {{tl|notice}}. --[[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 16:56, 17 April 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::I read the idea (which I'm not too enamoured with, but wouldn't argue against either) as being to create a &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{contentious}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;-like template in its own right that (perhaps by using {{template|notice2}} within it) had a standard &amp;quot;This comic, and its explanation, covers a particularly contentious subject. Take even more care than usual when adding to or editing this Explanation/Talk Page&amp;quot; (or similar) text with it.&lt;br /&gt;
::It would probably also have the ability to add further (or alternate) info, by standard template parameters, in case you want to personalise it to the ''exact''nature of the contention.&lt;br /&gt;
::But, my reasons why I didn't volunteer my ideas immediately are:&lt;br /&gt;
::*It paints targets. Anybody who wants to can look at all &amp;quot;pages using the Contentious template&amp;quot; and then troll-bomb them ''specifically''&lt;br /&gt;
::*Looking at the Tariffs-comic warning, that's ''huge'', and catering for that with a &amp;quot;standard text + additional notes&amp;quot; would be awkward... if you really believe it should be so huge in the first place,&lt;br /&gt;
::*Just by being so obviously available, there'd be creep. &amp;quot;Hey, this comic talks disparagingly about Newton's belief in alchemy... Surely that needs a warning too!&amp;quot;, or start off with &amp;quot;Well, nobody's warning about our attitude to the US Senate in this comic, so I can be disparaging&amp;quot; which then practically forces another contentious-tagging (''possibly'' useful, but maybe in making a bolt for the barn door only ''after'' the horse has already made its own bolt through it) as it gets toned-down/-back again.&lt;br /&gt;
::And, though I also imagined the Tariff comic ''would'' get some push-back (there was some minor bits, but we seem to have kept it mature enough, IMO), it seems to be quiet. Can't say for sure it would have been without the warning it now has, but it survived ok before that was added. Hence why I'm ''meh'' about the very proposal. Hard cases make hard laws, and hard situations may prompt hard solutions. But I'm dubious about the actual case for the need. (As you say, we have 'freeform' notice+notice2, and I haven't seen proof even that was necessary as it was used.)&lt;br /&gt;
::But it would be trivial to implement, give or take some fine-tuning. I'll say that as a positive for the idea. Even if we never really use it as much as we could. [[Special:Contributions/162.158.216.83|162.158.216.83]] 20:35, 17 April 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Agreed. Maybe it's a good thing that we have to craft one for each comic we want to tag; this makes sure only actually contentious comics get tagged. An upside to having a specific template is that we wouldn't need to type &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;noinclude&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt; every time, to avoid it displaying on the transcluded talk page.--[[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 21:00, 17 April 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::::mm. all of these are good points. now that i think about it, copy-pasting old warnings and tweaking them as needed is probably better than creating a new template. '''[[User:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:9pt;color:pink&amp;quot;&amp;gt;42.book.addict&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:6pt;color:#B1E4E3&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Talk to me!&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;''' 16:45, 18 April 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Proposal for template page==&lt;br /&gt;
I was thinking that making a template page with instructions about what should and should not be included in which sections would make it easier for new editors to help. I have no idea how I would do this, though.[[User:BobcatInABox|BobcatInABox]] ([[User talk:BobcatInABox|talk]]) 11:49, 4 May 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Which particular template? Many templates ''do'' contain instructions (from basic to rather thorough), and some common ones are also gone into in the FAQ page. [[Special:Contributions/172.70.91.245|172.70.91.245]] 20:25, 4 May 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== The newest stuff goes at top ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I’ve been thinking the newest comments should go at top and replies are under the chose comment with a colon or more. Because every time someone makes a comment but not replying to you, you still get a message. So you only get notifications when someone replies to you. And the always get notifications not related to you is kind of annoying. [[User:Aprilfoolsupdate!|Aprilfoolsupdate!]] ([[User talk:Aprilfoolsupdate!|talk]]) 04:30, 15 May 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:(Ah, so you found it, before I even wrote my directions down on how to get here.)&lt;br /&gt;
:Not sure this helps.&lt;br /&gt;
:Firstly: Top-posting is &amp;lt;s&amp;gt;the work of the Devil... burn it! Burn it all!&amp;lt;/s&amp;gt; very hard to read.&lt;br /&gt;
::A: Because it's in totally the wrong order.&lt;br /&gt;
::Q: Why is Top Posting bad?&lt;br /&gt;
:(Yes, I know you want top-posting ''threads'' but retain bottom-posting ''thread replies'', but can you even imagine the chaos involved with people not properly realising what's top- and what's bottom-posted. Or inter-posted into an existing hierarchy? Not with this 'flatfile' structure, anyway.)&lt;br /&gt;
:Secondly: Does this count for headers (like &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;== The newest stuff goes at top ==&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;)? For 'no-colon' starter comments under a Discussion header? For both?&lt;br /&gt;
:Thirdly: what are we doing with all the past ''pages and pages'' of things that are (more or less..) consistently chronological and bottom-posted? To make new additions work, someone (and probably ''before'' the first commentator who wants to add a brand new one-line witicism to the top of any multi-year-idle page) has to go into every Discussion page (and more?) to reshuffle it all by whatever Top(ish)-Post Criteria are adopted.&lt;br /&gt;
:Fourthly: It wouldn't even change how frequently you get notifications. (Actually, it might make it worse, as inveterate bottom-posters have to be 'corrected' by the followers of the 'new rule', as well as for any actually idle pages that get redone as part of the &amp;quot;thirdly&amp;quot; point.) But I don't think Notifications are clever enough to imagine that a new section  ''above'' what you previously wrote doesn't possibly interest your registered &amp;quot;watch and notify&amp;quot; intent upon any given page.&lt;br /&gt;
:I have a Fifthly and Sixthly, too, but I assume I've made my general opinion quite clear. (And I noted that this is not the only Community Portal edit you made, just before arriving here. Will check the other in a moment.) [[Special:Contributions/172.68.229.142|172.68.229.142]] 06:19, 15 May 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::Never mind. I don’t even need to read the whole thing to know it is complicated. To many words {{unsigned|Aprilfoolsupdate|07:54, 15 May 2025 (UTC)}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Short version: It's complicated, confusing and troublesome to change to. &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;And won't even solve your problem.&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; [[Special:Contributions/172.70.160.197|172.70.160.197]] 12:22, 15 May 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Agree with this message but disagree with the proposal. --[[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 09:28, 18 May 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== By the Numbers ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Greetings all,&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
So we all know that Randall numbers each XKCD comic with an ordinal number in a simple ascending sequence. I have become exceedingly intrigued by the particular properties of numbers now, especially their factors and primes. The most recent prime-numbered comic is [[3109]] and we'll soon see another one with [[3119]]. Does Randall ascribe any meaning or humor to the numbers that happen to appear as the posts play out? He certainly celebrates special dates! As a math-humor-based comic, there certainly must be jokes or surprises hidden therein. I'm not sure I've noticed any yet, though. [[386]] is certainly notorious, though doesn't seem to have a direct sort of Intel connection. [[42]] is unremarkable. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I once read a novel with an autistic protagonist, and each chapter was assigned a prime number. I will henceforth be on the lookout for interesting numerical happenstance as Randall continues to post! Anyone else? [[User:Elizium23|Elizium23]] ([[User talk:Elizium23|talk]]) 08:56, 12 July 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Misc pages ==&lt;br /&gt;
I would like to propose the creation of an additional category for &amp;quot;miscellaneous pages&amp;quot; that aren't really comics, and which generally have a URL slug that's an English word or phrase instead of a number. This includes xkcd.com/YES and xkcd.com/NO, both of which currently have articles. It also includes these ones: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::''[Note by User:FaviFake: I organised this section and moved the links below]''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
...and others as they are found or recovered. If only we could access the forum thread mentioned on the YES and NO pages! I was able to find a link to the thread here, but it's inaccessible. A&lt;br /&gt;
It's the one labeled &amp;quot;Hidden pages on xkcd&amp;quot;: [https://web.archive.org/web/20170927200737/http://forums.xkcd.com/viewforum.php?f=2&amp;amp;sid=973b8a1dcd0a727a9177aa757108d4f6&amp;amp;start=250]. I was able to find the pages above via Reddit: [https://www.reddit.com/r/xkcd/comments/gixd96/what_are_all_the_hidden_pages_on_xkcd_that_you/] [https://www.reddit.com/r/xkcd/comments/35whzf/what/] --[[User:Rumbling7145|Rumbling7145]] ([[User talk:Rumbling7145|talk]]) 00:16, 11 March 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Update: I got into the forum page! [https://web.archive.org/web/20151206001238/http://forums.xkcd.com/viewtopic.php?f=2&amp;amp;t=110093] We can now add these pages to the list:&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Rumbling7145|Rumbling7145]] ([[User talk:Rumbling7145|talk]]) 23:37, 11 March 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;span id=&amp;quot;List of pages&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
===Pages===&lt;br /&gt;
* http://xkcd.com/yes {{Done|Created: [[YES]]}}&lt;br /&gt;
** http://xkcd.com/no {{Done|Created: [[NO]]}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* http://xkcd.com/nakedpictures {{Done|Created: [[nakedpictures]]}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* http://xkcd.com/spiral {{Done|Created: [[spiral]]}}&lt;br /&gt;
**Likely a reference to [[1488: Flowcharts]] (Which links to Spiral) and [[2322: ISO Paper Size Golden Spiral]], spirals above images of people and things&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* http://xkcd.com/burlap {{Done|Created: [[Burlap]]}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* http://xkcd.com/simplewriter {{Done|Created: [[Simple Writer]]}}&lt;br /&gt;
**Tool to Write Like [[Up Goer Five]] and [[Thing Explainer]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* http://xkcd.com/tree_prank&lt;br /&gt;
**This is so funny&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* http://xkcd.com/blue_eyes.html {{Done|Existing: [[Blue Eyes]]}}&lt;br /&gt;
** http://xkcd.com/solution.html, the solution to the problem (also found on [[Blue Eyes]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* http://xkcd.com/morphs ([https://web.archive.org/web/20130313175333/http://xkcd.com:80/morphs/ archive only] — [https://web.archive.org/web/20060219184352/http://www.xkcd.com:80/morphs/ earlier version with more text])&lt;br /&gt;
**&amp;quot;Using several pieces of imaging software, including Photoshop and an image morphing program, I make composite photos of people.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* http://xkcd.com/chesscoaster&lt;br /&gt;
**&amp;quot;People playing chess on roller coasters, inspired by this comic:&amp;quot; image&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* http://xkcd.com/kite&lt;br /&gt;
**&amp;quot;These are pictures I took by hanging cameras from kites, a hobby I've played with on and off over the years&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*https://xkcd.com/kite/kite_trick.jpg&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* http://xkcd.com/dot {{Done|Created: [[dot]]}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* http://xkcd.com/election ([https://web.archive.org/web/20141014075718/http://xkcd.com/election/ archive only])&lt;br /&gt;
**Used by randall for tracking elections, &amp;quot;it's the fastest analysis of the state of the race minute-by-minute&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* http://xkcd.com/event {{Done|Created: [[event]]}} (I still don't quite get it)&lt;br /&gt;
**There's an image on this site that a web browser fails to load, but when downloaded, Windows Photo Viewer can view the image.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* http://xkcd.com/now (redirect to [[1335: Now]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* http://xkcd.com/plus {{Done|Created: [[plus]]}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* http://xkcd.com/sub ([https://web.archive.org/web/20130111054027/http://xkcd.com/sub/ archive only]) — &amp;quot;The Sub Project&amp;quot;, a long explanation of how Randall and others build submarines?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* http://xkcd.com/temp ([https://web.archive.org/web/20061219193846/http://www.xkcd.com/temp/ archive only])&lt;br /&gt;
**This is super interesting! It lists other sub-directories. [https://web.archive.org/web/*/http://www.xkcd.com/temp/* These are the ones that survived in the archive]:&lt;br /&gt;
**http://xkcd.com/temp/email.txt ([https://web.archive.org/web/20100305065807/http://xkcd.com/temp/email.txt archive only]) — Seems to be an email exchange between Randall and someone else?&lt;br /&gt;
**http://xkcd.com:80/temp/euphoria.txt ([https://web.archive.org/web/20160401222138id_/http://xkcd.com:80/temp/euphoria.txt archive only]) — This says &amp;quot;&amp;lt;Sphere&amp;gt; Ok, that last Randall who said 'to clarify' was actually Randall, but pretty much none of the others were. Also no Sphere after this gets linked in chat a second time is actually Randall either. Randall is probably not there.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
**https://xkcd.com/temp/evidenceofidentity.txt ([https://web.archive.org/web/20201118232320/https://xkcd.com/temp/evidenceofidentity.txt archive only]) — &amp;quot;[Randall] Hello to everyone who waited in line to say hi to me on my How To book tour and specifically mentioned this chat!&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;[Sierra] Hello mr. probably not the real Randall :D [...]&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
***The rest are all images:&lt;br /&gt;
**http://www.xkcd.com/temp/humor/baby_mop.jpg ([https://web.archive.org/web/20070127045748/http://www.xkcd.com:80/temp/humor/baby_mop.jpg archive only])&lt;br /&gt;
**http://www.xkcd.com/temp/humor/darthswingset.jpg ([https://web.archive.org/web/20070127045624/http://www.xkcd.com:80/temp/humor/darthswingset.jpg archive only])&lt;br /&gt;
**http://www.xkcd.com/temp/humor/deb6d13b50a581304bac385c463b09c1.jpg ([https://web.archive.org/web/20070225103228/http://www.xkcd.com:80/temp/humor/deb6d13b50a581304bac385c463b09c1.jpg archive only])&lt;br /&gt;
**http://www.xkcd.com/temp/humor/Hacker%20Grave.jpg ([https://web.archive.org/web/20070213182708/http://www.xkcd.com:80/temp/humor/Hacker%20Grave.jpg archive only])&lt;br /&gt;
**http://www.xkcd.com/temp/humor/hotornot.jpg ([https://web.archive.org/web/20061219194445/http://www.xkcd.com:80/temp/humor/hotornot.jpg archive only])&lt;br /&gt;
**http://www.xkcd.com/temp/humor/how_rumors_start_office.jpg ([https://web.archive.org/web/20070111000437/http://www.xkcd.com:80/temp/humor/how_rumors_start_office.jpg archive only])&lt;br /&gt;
**http://www.xkcd.com/temp/humor/owned.jpg ([https://web.archive.org/web/20070228031547/http://www.xkcd.com:80/temp/humor/owned.jpg archive only])&lt;br /&gt;
**http://www.xkcd.com/temp/humor/shark.jpg ([https://web.archive.org/web/20061214082834/http://www.xkcd.com:80/temp/humor/shark.jpg archive only])&lt;br /&gt;
**http://www.xkcd.com/temp/humor/you_cannot_pass.jpg ([https://web.archive.org/web/20070323001005/http://www.xkcd.com:80/temp/humor/you_cannot_pass.jpg archive only])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* http://xkcd.com/test ([https://web.archive.org/web/20170510061033/https://xkcd.com/test/ archive only])&lt;br /&gt;
**This appears identical to the regular xkcd.com homepage, it returns a 404 as of today&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* http://xkcd.com/time (redirect to comic [[1190: Time]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* http://xkcd.com/twitter (redirect to https://x.com/xkcd)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* http://xkcd.com/cyborg.txt&lt;br /&gt;
**Interesting script. According to [https://blog.xkcd.com/2008/05/20/gps-cyborg-implant/ an old blag article], it is &amp;quot;a short Python script that uses a USB GPS device under Linux to help with navigation.  It doesn’t have maps or anything — it just gives distances and, while you’re moving, the direction to the destination (as in 'two o’clock').  It prints this info on the terminal and speaks it using speech synthesis.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* http://xkcd.com/channel.html ([https://web.archive.org/web/20141011002528/https://xkcd.com/channel.html archive only])&lt;br /&gt;
**I have no idea what this it. It's full of gibberish and Chinese text.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* http://xkcd.com/channel.txt ([https://web.archive.org/web/20141014083026/http://xkcd.com/channel.txt archive only])&lt;br /&gt;
** Same as above, but it downloads the file to the PC.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* http://xkcd.com/me.txt ([https://web.archive.org/web/20141014101900/http://xkcd.com:80/me.txt archive only])&lt;br /&gt;
**Only says &amp;quot;I am not in 1110.n01se.net anymore&amp;quot;. [https://www.reddit.com/r/xkcd/comments/5tqrew/xkcd_secret_page/ Learn more in this Reddit thread], in this [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EvLxOVYeo5w YouTube video of how it used to work], and in the [https://github.com/n01se/1110 GitHub for 1110.n01se.net]. I'm assuming Randall wanted to say that anyone who tries to impersonate him in the future isn't him?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* http://xkcd.com/why.txt ([https://web.archive.org/web/20180729163548/https://xkcd.com/why.txt archive only])&lt;br /&gt;
**Contains 33 THOUSAND &amp;quot;why&amp;quot; questions. May be related to [[1256: Questions]]? Very interesting!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* http://xkcd.com/bitcoin {{Done|Existing: [[Bitcoin address]]}}&lt;br /&gt;
**There's also this one, which we have dissected on the page [[Bitcoin address]] (very interesting read!)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* http://holistic.xkcd.com ([https://web.archive.org/web/20160304031258/http://holistic.xkcd.com/ archive only])&lt;br /&gt;
**&amp;quot;The XKCD Holistic Browser. Because we are all one. Type a web address and you'll be taken to one typed by someone else.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* https://aram.xkcd.com ([https://web.archive.org/web/20110816163403/http://aram.xkcd.com/ archive only])&lt;br /&gt;
**&amp;quot;This page is regenerated every day and may be NSFW. It shows a random result from a Google image search for IMG_????.jpg plus a random caption:&amp;quot; Seems it stopped working completely after a few years and got stuck one image&amp;amp;caption. Aram inspired [[Black Hat]], see his page for more.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* https://xkcd.com/verizon/ {{Done|Created: [[verizon]]}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* http://mail.xkcd.com ([https://web.archive.org/web/20120321204721/http://mail.xkcd.com/ archive only])&lt;br /&gt;
**Seems Randall set it up but never used it.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* https://xkcd.com/personal&lt;br /&gt;
**There was a /personal folder on xkcd, but it's been entirely wiped https://web.archive.org/web/*/https://xkcd.com/personal/*&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*https://xkcd.com/ngram-charts/ {{Done|Created: [[ngram charts]]}}&lt;br /&gt;
**Still online, but the images are missing even in [https://web.archive.org/web/20120225171410/http://xkcd.com:80/ngram-charts the archive]. &amp;quot;Some of the interesting charts I've come across while using Google Books ngrams (which analyzes the frequency of word use in their scanned books corpus over time)&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
* https://xkcd.com/color/rgb/&lt;br /&gt;
** https://xkcd.com/color/rgb.txt&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* http://68.57.186.221:8080/ ([https://web.archive.org/web/20041024201125/http://68.57.186.221:8080/ archive only])&lt;br /&gt;
** xkcd.com redirected to this at some points during 2004, this capture is from October 24th of 2004 specifically.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* https://throw.xkcd.com (only available [https://web.archive.org/web/20200919232527/throw.xkcd.com/ in the archive])&lt;br /&gt;
**This was likely hacked, see [https://www.reddit.com/r/xkcd/comments/iw9jsg/throwxkcdcom/ this Reddit thread]: ''&amp;quot;I emailed the xkcd.com webmaster, it was a testing URL he forgot to shut down. It's fixed now.&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* https://c.xkcd.com&lt;br /&gt;
**This is mostly all for comics with dynamic content. There are many subpages, see [https://www.reddit.com/r/xkcd/comments/j54lx3/does_anyone_know_what_cxkcdcom_is/ this reddit thread].&lt;br /&gt;
**https://c.xkcd.com/xb/feed&lt;br /&gt;
**http://c.xkcd.com/random/comic (redirects to random comic)&lt;br /&gt;
**https://c.xkcd.com/graph/1&lt;br /&gt;
**[https://www.reddit.com/r/xkcd/comments/j54lx3/does_anyone_know_what_cxkcdcom_is/ There are others].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* https://static.xkcd.com/ (404, not in archive. [http://web.archive.org/web/*/https://static.xkcd.com/* archived subpages])&lt;br /&gt;
** http://static.xkcd.com/bl.png ([http://web.archive.org/web/20070912213845/http://static.xkcd.com/bl.png archive only])&lt;br /&gt;
** http://static.xkcd.com/br.png ([http://web.archive.org/web/20070912213841/http://static.xkcd.com/br.png archive only])&lt;br /&gt;
** http://static.xkcd.com/favicon.ico ([http://web.archive.org/web/20071208203917/http://static.xkcd.com/favicon.ico archive only])&lt;br /&gt;
** http://static.xkcd.com/general.css ([http://web.archive.org/web/20071208203917/http://static.xkcd.com/general.css archive only])&lt;br /&gt;
** http://static.xkcd.com/ieonly.css ([http://web.archive.org/web/20070911163429/http://static.xkcd.com/ieonly.css archive only])&lt;br /&gt;
** http://static.xkcd.com/ml.png ([http://web.archive.org/web/20070912213838/http://static.xkcd.com/ml.png archive only])&lt;br /&gt;
** http://static.xkcd.com/mr.png ([http://web.archive.org/web/20070912213832/http://static.xkcd.com/mr.png archive only])&lt;br /&gt;
** http://static.xkcd.com/tl.png ([http://web.archive.org/web/20070912213828/http://static.xkcd.com/tl.png archive only])&lt;br /&gt;
** http://static.xkcd.com/tr.png ([http://web.archive.org/web/20070912213835/http://static.xkcd.com/tr.png archive only])&lt;br /&gt;
** http://www.static.xkcd.com/robots.txt ([http://web.archive.org/web/20070501000000*/http://www.static.xkcd.com/robots.txt archive only])&lt;br /&gt;
** https://almamater.xkcd.com/ ([http://web.archive.org/web/20130402215109/https://almamater.xkcd.com/ archive only])&lt;br /&gt;
:: https://almamater.xkcd.com/ ([http://web.archive.org/web/20150209005631/https://almamater.xkcd.com/ archive only])&lt;br /&gt;
:: and errors out: https://almamater.xkcd.com/ ([http://web.archive.org/web/20160528035956/https://almamater.xkcd.com/ archive only, errors out])&lt;br /&gt;
*** http://almamater.xkcd.com/best.csv ([http://web.archive.org/web/20130511122543/http://almamater.xkcd.com/best.csv archive only])&lt;br /&gt;
***See comic [[1193: Externalities]]&lt;br /&gt;
{{misc page}}&lt;br /&gt;
You can monitor the pages that are using this template (so the brand new webpage explanations) by going to [[Special:WhatLinksHere/Template:misc_page]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===How should we treat them?===&lt;br /&gt;
This is great! I think we should first create an article for each of them, and after we have a few articles then we can start to figure out a good name for the category and answer some questions, like:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Should we add a new parameter to the template for these non-comics? To do that, we would have to ask an admin to edit the {{tl|comic}} template to allow us to do that. We can ask Kynde, no big deal.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Some pages, like [[Blue Eyes]] and [[Bitcoin address]] are already in other categories, like [[:Category:Extra comics]] and [[:Category:Design of xkcd.com]]. Should we use the existing categories, or add a new one? How do we distinguish between, for example, [[Blue Eyes]], [[Bitcoin address]], and [[YES]], which are all in theory &amp;quot;misc pages&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Where should the new category be categorised?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*What title should we give for explanations of pages that don't have a name, like xkcd.com/dot? That one is just titled &amp;quot;xkcd.com/dot&amp;quot;, unlike pages like Blue Eyes and [[YES]]. Would it become &amp;quot;dot&amp;quot;, &amp;quot;Dot&amp;quot;, something else? Should we keep it coherent or base ourselves solely on the rendered title on the official site?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I love the idea! I currently don't have time, but I will create these pages eventually. If anyone else wants to chime in, please do! --[[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 16:11, 11 March 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;quot;Unnumbered publications&amp;quot;, or similar, could cover ''anything'' that wasn't xkcd.com/&amp;lt;digits&amp;gt;. Wouldn't cover replacements ([[2642: No One Was Hurt]] was originally 2642, for example), but that's a different class from deliberately off-series items. Also, given that often they are entirely non-image (the Yes and No), or straight text and multi-image (as per Blue Eyes, or other articles with a WhatIf-ish feel to them), I think calling them &amp;quot;comic&amp;quot;s is stretching the term.&lt;br /&gt;
:Though &amp;quot;miscellaneous pages&amp;quot; sort of covers this, I've a feeling that there's at least one... 'entity'... that is built upon multiple actual 'pages', but the list of candidates above doesn't contain any that look like they're what I'm vaguely thinking of. (Neither was it anything like the xkcd survey, or other interactive (numbered) comics, but maybe I'll bring it back to mind sooner rather than later.)&lt;br /&gt;
:As to the use of {{template|comic}}, I think we could spring to a (modified, 'inspired-by') template specifically for all these no-number/off-sequence explanation headers. Either explicit &amp;quot;prev=&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;next=&amp;quot; (per comic, ''could'' get quite mixed up if not kept uncontradictory) or a &amp;quot;position=&amp;quot; which could help maintain a list (and, from that, an auto-generated first/prev/next/last 'page ring') without having to subvert expectations of fitting in with the normal [[Template:LATESTCOMIC]] system.&lt;br /&gt;
:With the Comic template already equipped to deal with &amp;quot;no-number 'comics'&amp;quot;, there wouldn't (in the first instance) be much work needed to &amp;quot;decomic&amp;quot; the new copy, with the exact method of resequencing (if desired) as a parallel series being the biggest question. [[Special:Contributions/172.70.85.49|172.70.85.49]] 17:20, 11 March 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I'm not sure what the last sentenc means, but I like the idea of a new template! However, I don't think we should call the category &amp;quot;Unnumbered publications&amp;quot;. Isn't that just [[:Category:Extra comics]] but without comics [[Disappearing Sunday Update]] and [[No One Was Hurt]]? We should establish a criterion to add pages to this category and then figure out a name i think. --[[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 15:42, 12 March 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On this subject, is there any reason why it's [[YES]] and [[NO]] (currently the valid links) rather than [[Yes]] and [[No]] / [[yes]] and [[no]] (currently invalid links)? And I don't mean &amp;quot;why aren't there redirects?&amp;quot;, which I don't even think is the right way of resolving this, but what was the thinking? (Which then didn't result in [[DOT]], etc, so there's ''definitely'' some inconsistency, one way or another.) [[Special:Contributions/172.68.205.92|172.68.205.92]] 21:54, 17 March 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I don't see inconsistencies. The name of the browser tab for the yes page is &amp;quot;YES&amp;quot; by Randall, same for NO. Instead, the page for [[dot]] is called &amp;quot;xkcd.com/dot/&amp;quot;. We could use that, but that's likely not what Randall intended and might have been a coding oversight. --[[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 16:01, 18 March 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I've created the {{tl|misc page}} template for these pages and removed the incomplete template until we reach consensus on what to do with them. --[[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 14:40, 11 May 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ahem, I'd like to remind everyone that they can feel free to comment on the best way to manage these. Or if they should be included in the wiki at all. [[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 21:38, 17 August 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What if we just create a subcategory for These. It is xkcd so it should belong here. Should not be in the random queue but something like a button to get to these. {{unsigned ip|216.125.50.226|16:51, 18 March 2026 (UTC)}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== New page &amp;quot;Spiral&amp;quot; ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I found a new page at [http://xkcd.com/spiral xkcd/spiral]. what should I do? Thanks! &lt;br /&gt;
This is my first post, sorry it's not formatted correctly. -- [[Special:Contributions/73.169.159.188|73.169.159.188]] 00:27, 12 October 2025‎&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: Welcome. Good find! Any suggestions? -- [[User:Dtgriscom|Dtgriscom]] ([[User talk:Dtgriscom|talk]]) 01:47, 12 October 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::I've moved this over to Coordination and uploaded all images on spiral. I'll be making the page soon. '''[[User:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:9pt;color:#3a795e&amp;quot;&amp;gt;42.book.addict&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:6pt;color:#ce5f15&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Talk to me!&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;''' 05:04, 12 October 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Moving to correct location where we're discussing these pages. More discussion about how we should treat them is welcome! [[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 18:00, 13 October 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== [[:Category:Extra pages]] === &lt;br /&gt;
I've created a category called Extra pages for all of these pages. '''[[User:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:9pt;color:#3a795e&amp;quot;&amp;gt;42.book.addict&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:6pt;color:#ce5f15&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Talk to me!&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;''' 03:14, 5 November 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:So, right now we have &amp;quot;Category:Extra pages&amp;quot; ''and'' &amp;quot;Category:Extra comics&amp;quot;. Some ''are'' unnumbered comics (plus at least one &amp;quot;was a number, then replaced&amp;quot;) and some are 'merely' pages (with possible a fuzzy line between for 'pages' that show images-that-aren't-comics), perhaps we should be consistent between which are which, and how they relate to 'standard' numbered comics.&lt;br /&gt;
:For example, being an Extra Comics was (officially, but you could also manually add it) initiated by the &amp;quot;extra=yes&amp;quot; param to {{template|comic}}. This also (theoretically, problems with the randomness backend aside) adds them to the Random Comics link-choice, ''without'' adding them to the Comic List numbers (such that it states &amp;quot;we have #### comics&amp;quot;, where #### should not be different from the latest comic number, as recently established).&lt;br /&gt;
:Perhaps:&lt;br /&gt;
:*Make the comic template accept &amp;quot;extra=comic&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;extra=page&amp;quot;, instead of &amp;quot;extra=yes&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
:**Perhaps &amp;quot;extra=yes&amp;quot; 'remains' to default to one or the other? ...nah, just make sure all the current &amp;quot;=yes&amp;quot; ones are assigned beforehand.&lt;br /&gt;
:**&amp;quot;extra=no&amp;quot; just defaults back to behaviour without any &amp;quot;extra=&amp;quot; at all, of course, pretty much as currently.&lt;br /&gt;
:*Each of these new distinctions assigns to the 'Extra' category that fits it, but keeps it out of the All (numbered) Comics list, as being not numbered (and some not being 'comics')&lt;br /&gt;
:*Either ''just'' keep Extra Comics feeding to the Random Comic list (All Comics+Extra Comics, as we've painstakingly set it up to do, recently) or ''also'' include Extra Pages (it being AC+EC+EP in the Special:Random target list/whatever). TBD, depends upon whether you like a strictly &amp;quot;non-comic page&amp;quot; potentially popping up as a 'treat' for people.&lt;br /&gt;
:...that's all a ''little'' extra work. Some of which I could probably do right now (though maybe some pages are Protected against my input, haven't checked), but I think this needs discussion before doing any actual refining of the current setup.&lt;br /&gt;
:Might have been better to have proposed and discussed the Extra Pages details before starting that, too, but I'm happy to use this setup as a stepping stone given that it's been done already. [[Special:Contributions/82.132.244.89|82.132.244.89]] 14:20, 5 November 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Update on ngrams ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The images on the ngrams page appear to be generated dynamically. The original URLs are broken, but can be restored by changing &amp;quot;/chart&amp;quot; to &amp;quot;/graph&amp;quot;. This doesn't fix the HTML page, but it does render each of the 58 URLs accessible - see below.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
All graphs default to a corpus from 2009. Note that some graphs, such as the one noted &amp;quot;cherry picking&amp;quot; below, look very different using a more recent corpus.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* http://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=President+Lincoln%2CPresident+Roosevelt%2CPresident+Kennedy%2CPresident+Johnson%2CPresident+Nixon%2CPresident+Reagan%2CPresident+Bush&amp;amp;year_start=1780&amp;amp;year_end=2008&amp;amp;corpus=5&amp;amp;smoothing=3&lt;br /&gt;
* http://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=fuck&amp;amp;year_start=1700&amp;amp;year_end=2008&amp;amp;corpus=0&amp;amp;smoothing=3&lt;br /&gt;
* http://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=the+Great+War%2Cthe+World+War%2CWorld+War+I&amp;amp;year_start=1900&amp;amp;year_end=2000&amp;amp;corpus=0&amp;amp;smoothing=2&lt;br /&gt;
* http://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=christian%2Cchristianity&amp;amp;year_start=1700&amp;amp;year_end=2000&amp;amp;corpus=0&amp;amp;smoothing=3&lt;br /&gt;
* http://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=aliens%2C+predators&amp;amp;year_start=1750&amp;amp;year_end=2008&amp;amp;corpus=0&amp;amp;smoothing=1&lt;br /&gt;
* http://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=explosion+in+popularity&amp;amp;year_start=1900&amp;amp;year_end=2000&amp;amp;corpus=0&amp;amp;smoothing=3&lt;br /&gt;
* http://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=blue+line&amp;amp;year_start=1960&amp;amp;year_end=2008&amp;amp;corpus=0&amp;amp;smoothing=3&lt;br /&gt;
* http://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=upward+trend&amp;amp;year_start=1960&amp;amp;year_end=2008&amp;amp;corpus=0&amp;amp;smoothing=3&lt;br /&gt;
* http://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=gay%2Clesbian%2Cbisexual&amp;amp;year_start=1940&amp;amp;year_end=2008&amp;amp;corpus=0&amp;amp;smoothing=3&lt;br /&gt;
* http://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=Leviticus+18%2Cturn+the+other+cheek&amp;amp;year_start=1960&amp;amp;year_end=2000&amp;amp;corpus=5&amp;amp;smoothing=3 (cherry-picking)&lt;br /&gt;
* http://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=vegetarian&amp;amp;year_start=1750&amp;amp;year_end=2008&amp;amp;corpus=0&amp;amp;smoothing=1&lt;br /&gt;
* http://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=drunk&amp;amp;year_start=1750&amp;amp;year_end=2008&amp;amp;corpus=0&amp;amp;smoothing=1&lt;br /&gt;
* http://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=television%2C+tuberculosis&amp;amp;year_start=1750&amp;amp;year_end=2008&amp;amp;corpus=0&amp;amp;smoothing=1&lt;br /&gt;
* http://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=love%2Chope%2Cfaith%2C+sex&amp;amp;year_start=1750&amp;amp;year_end=2008&amp;amp;corpus=0&amp;amp;smoothing=1&lt;br /&gt;
* http://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=hope&amp;amp;year_start=1700&amp;amp;year_end=2008&amp;amp;corpus=6&amp;amp;smoothing=1&lt;br /&gt;
* http://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=entomology%2Cetymology&amp;amp;year_start=1900&amp;amp;year_end=2008&amp;amp;corpus=0&amp;amp;smoothing=3&lt;br /&gt;
* http://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=carriage%2Ccar%2Cautomobile&amp;amp;year_start=1700&amp;amp;year_end=2008&amp;amp;corpus=0&amp;amp;smoothing=3&lt;br /&gt;
* http://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=irregardless%2Cregardlessly%2Cunregarding&amp;amp;year_start=1800&amp;amp;year_end=2008&amp;amp;corpus=0&amp;amp;smoothing=3&lt;br /&gt;
* http://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=a+bird+in+the+hand%2Clive+by+the+sword%2Clook+before+you+leap%2Ca+penny+saved&amp;amp;year_start=1780&amp;amp;year_end=2008&amp;amp;corpus=0&amp;amp;smoothing=3&lt;br /&gt;
* http://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=war&amp;amp;year_start=1700&amp;amp;year_end=2008&amp;amp;corpus=0&amp;amp;smoothing=3&lt;br /&gt;
* http://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=Muslim%2CMoslem%2CMoslim%2CMussulman%2C+Moslam&amp;amp;year_start=1700&amp;amp;year_end=2008&amp;amp;corpus=0&amp;amp;smoothing=3&lt;br /&gt;
* http://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=Empire%2C+empire&amp;amp;year_start=1700&amp;amp;year_end=2008&amp;amp;corpus=6&amp;amp;smoothing=1&lt;br /&gt;
* http://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=decline%2Cprogress&amp;amp;year_start=1700&amp;amp;year_end=2008&amp;amp;corpus=6&amp;amp;smoothing=1&lt;br /&gt;
* http://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=progress&amp;amp;year_start=1700&amp;amp;year_end=2008&amp;amp;corpus=6&amp;amp;smoothing=1&lt;br /&gt;
* http://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=war&amp;amp;year_start=1700&amp;amp;year_end=2008&amp;amp;corpus=0&amp;amp;smoothing=1&lt;br /&gt;
* http://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=Rapture&amp;amp;year_start=1700&amp;amp;year_end=2008&amp;amp;corpus=0&amp;amp;smoothing=3&lt;br /&gt;
* http://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=history%2Cpast%2Cfuture&amp;amp;year_start=1700&amp;amp;year_end=2008&amp;amp;corpus=0&amp;amp;smoothing=3&lt;br /&gt;
* http://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=Star+Wars%2C+Star+Trek&amp;amp;year_start=1950&amp;amp;year_end=2008&amp;amp;corpus=0&amp;amp;smoothing=0&lt;br /&gt;
* http://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=Jesus+Christ&amp;amp;year_start=1720&amp;amp;year_end=2008&amp;amp;corpus=0&amp;amp;smoothing=3&lt;br /&gt;
* http://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=President&amp;amp;year_start=1780&amp;amp;year_end=2008&amp;amp;corpus=5&amp;amp;smoothing=3&lt;br /&gt;
* http://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=tyranny&amp;amp;year_start=1700&amp;amp;year_end=2000&amp;amp;corpus=0&amp;amp;smoothing=3&lt;br /&gt;
* http://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=power+to+the+people&amp;amp;year_start=1700&amp;amp;year_end=2000&amp;amp;corpus=0&amp;amp;smoothing=3&lt;br /&gt;
* http://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=flag&amp;amp;year_start=1700&amp;amp;year_end=2008&amp;amp;corpus=4&amp;amp;smoothing=3&lt;br /&gt;
* http://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=end+of+the+world&amp;amp;year_start=1700&amp;amp;year_end=2008&amp;amp;corpus=0&amp;amp;smoothing=3&lt;br /&gt;
* http://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=Bible+study&amp;amp;year_start=1800&amp;amp;year_end=2008&amp;amp;corpus=0&amp;amp;smoothing=3&lt;br /&gt;
* http://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=God+bless+America&amp;amp;year_start=1800&amp;amp;year_end=2008&amp;amp;corpus=0&amp;amp;smoothing=3&lt;br /&gt;
* http://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=merry+Christmas%2Chappy+holidays&amp;amp;year_start=1960&amp;amp;year_end=2008&amp;amp;corpus=0&amp;amp;smoothing=3&lt;br /&gt;
* http://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=Space&amp;amp;year_start=1700&amp;amp;year_end=2008&amp;amp;corpus=0&amp;amp;smoothing=1&lt;br /&gt;
* http://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=old+fashioned&amp;amp;year_start=1750&amp;amp;year_end=2008&amp;amp;corpus=0&amp;amp;smoothing=1&lt;br /&gt;
* http://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=sword%2C+gun&amp;amp;year_start=1700&amp;amp;year_end=2008&amp;amp;corpus=0&amp;amp;smoothing=1&lt;br /&gt;
* http://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=pirate&amp;amp;year_start=1700&amp;amp;year_end=2008&amp;amp;corpus=0&amp;amp;smoothing=1&lt;br /&gt;
* http://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=Ayn+Rand&amp;amp;year_start=1700&amp;amp;year_end=2008&amp;amp;corpus=0&amp;amp;smoothing=3&lt;br /&gt;
* http://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=Marx&amp;amp;year_start=1700&amp;amp;year_end=2008&amp;amp;corpus=0&amp;amp;smoothing=3&lt;br /&gt;
* http://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=Marx%2C+Marxy%2C+Marxist%2C+Marxiest&amp;amp;year_start=1850&amp;amp;year_end=2008&amp;amp;corpus=0&amp;amp;smoothing=0&lt;br /&gt;
* http://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=communism%2Ccommunist%2Csocialist&amp;amp;year_start=1830&amp;amp;year_end=2008&amp;amp;corpus=0&amp;amp;smoothing=1&lt;br /&gt;
* http://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=Russia%2C+USSR&amp;amp;year_start=1700&amp;amp;year_end=2008&amp;amp;corpus=0&amp;amp;smoothing=0&lt;br /&gt;
* http://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=savior%2CSavior&amp;amp;year_start=1720&amp;amp;year_end=2008&amp;amp;corpus=0&amp;amp;smoothing=3&lt;br /&gt;
* http://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=trend&amp;amp;year_start=1700&amp;amp;year_end=2008&amp;amp;corpus=0&amp;amp;smoothing=3&lt;br /&gt;
* http://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=girly&amp;amp;year_start=1900&amp;amp;year_end=2008&amp;amp;corpus=0&amp;amp;smoothing=3&lt;br /&gt;
* http://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=restroom%2C+bathroom%2C+toilet&amp;amp;year_start=1700&amp;amp;year_end=2008&amp;amp;corpus=0&amp;amp;smoothing=3&lt;br /&gt;
* http://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=pursuit+of+happiness&amp;amp;year_start=1700&amp;amp;year_end=2008&amp;amp;corpus=0&amp;amp;smoothing=3&lt;br /&gt;
* http://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=telechart%2Ctelephone%2Ctelegram%2Ctelevision%2Cradio%2Cinternet&amp;amp;year_start=1840&amp;amp;year_end=2008&amp;amp;corpus=0&amp;amp;smoothing=3&lt;br /&gt;
* http://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=king&amp;amp;year_start=1700&amp;amp;year_end=2008&amp;amp;corpus=0&amp;amp;smoothing=3&lt;br /&gt;
* http://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=science&amp;amp;year_start=1700&amp;amp;year_end=2008&amp;amp;corpus=0&amp;amp;smoothing=3&lt;br /&gt;
* http://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=decade&amp;amp;year_start=1780&amp;amp;year_end=2008&amp;amp;corpus=0&amp;amp;smoothing=3&lt;br /&gt;
* http://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=thousand&amp;amp;year_start=1700&amp;amp;year_end=2008&amp;amp;corpus=0&amp;amp;smoothing=3&lt;br /&gt;
* http://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=hundred%2Cthousand%2Cmillion%2Cbillion%2Ctrillion&amp;amp;year_start=1700&amp;amp;year_end=2008&amp;amp;corpus=0&amp;amp;smoothing=3&lt;br /&gt;
* http://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=jillion%2Czillion%2Cbazillion%2Ckazillion&amp;amp;year_start=1900&amp;amp;year_end=2008&amp;amp;corpus=0&amp;amp;smoothing=3&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Rumbling7145|Rumbling7145]] ([[User talk:Rumbling7145|talk]]) 16:14, 10 March 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Visual Editor?==&lt;br /&gt;
I, being a nerd in high school, edit on more than just this wiki. For example, I edit on Wikipedia. On Wikipedia, the default editing mode is a visual editor, which automatically converts your wikitext into the final product in real time. It's useful on many levels, and would save all of us a lot of time (I've spent at least 2 hours total fixing broken wikitext). I feel that using this tool would increase overall productivity in the wiki, and probably lessen the amount of people who are intimidated when attempting to edit, allowing more people to join and contribute to the community. --'''''[[User:DollarStoreBa'al |&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Atomic Age;font-size:12pt;color:red;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;DollarStoreBa'al&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:DollarStoreBa'al |'''''Converse''''']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;[[Special:Contributions/DollarStoreBa'al|'''''My life choices''''']] 22:43, 7 August 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Good luck telling that to jeff! --[[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 12:22, 8 August 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Ugh. Well, he's gotta come back eventually, right? He's paying for the domain, after all. --'''''[[User:DollarStoreBa'al |&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Atomic Age;font-size:12pt;color:red;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;DollarStoreBa'al&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:DollarStoreBa'al |'''''Converse''''']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;[[Special:Contributions/DollarStoreBa'al|'''''My life choices''''']] 16:43, 8 August 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Or maybe he just forgot and we actually don't want him to come back. Who knows! --[[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 16:45, 11 August 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Name one person who wants Jeff to just not come back. Either way, I want him back, and I suggested this just in case. This would also be really cool for me, as I joined after jeff's last known user page edit in 2018. --'''''[[User:DollarStoreBa'al |&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Atomic Age;font-size:12pt;color:red;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;DollarStoreBa'al&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:DollarStoreBa'al |'''''Converse''''']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;[[Special:Contributions/DollarStoreBa'al|'''''My life choices''''']] 23:31, 14 August 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Jeez that was a joke. Ofc I want him back lol. [[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 20:09, 15 August 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::still no response from Jeff or any of his friends on: Reddit, X/Twitter; GitHub; Bluesky; Mastodon; and email. Oh, and I asked some person on YouTube with the username lcarsos (as in the other 'crat on here) but I think that he deleted my comment on his video (multiple times). (just a little fyi) '''[[User:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:9pt;color:pink&amp;quot;&amp;gt;42.book.addict&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:6pt;color:#B1E4E3&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Talk to me!&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;''' 18:17, 19 August 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::Does he even remember this? Maybe they all got struck by lightning at the same time while calling someone who just sneezed and saying 'bless you'. --'''''[[User:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#023020&amp;quot;&amp;gt;DollarStoreBa'al&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User_talk:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#000080&amp;quot;&amp;gt;'''''converse'''''&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 16:28, 29 August 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Unicode emoji support==&lt;br /&gt;
This suggestion was made in response to the discussion above. I was completely unable to realize that FaviFake was joking. I feel that Unicode emojis would drastically improve the wiki and allow for more detailed conveyance of thoughts and feelings, and prevent catastrophic misunderstandings not unlike the one above. Other people have insulted me due to the fact that I was unable to convey enough emotion. --'''''[[User:DollarStoreBa'al |&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Atomic Age;font-size:12pt;color:red;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;DollarStoreBa'al&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:DollarStoreBa'al |'''''Converse''''']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;[[Special:Contributions/DollarStoreBa'al|'''''My life choices''''']] 17:18, 19 August 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Text-only media, like this, always has the issue of not being understood, but if someone forgets (or consciously declines) to put a &amp;quot;/s&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;;)&amp;quot; in there, they'll probably also not add an emoji.&lt;br /&gt;
:Of course, one person's very dry humour might go so far over the head of another person that not even a strong hint helps, whereas another's sense of fun might be so obvious that gilding the lilly even sends the ''wrong'' message about it. [[Special:Contributions/92.23.2.228|92.23.2.228]] 20:03, 19 August 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
: I don't understand your suggestion. 😕  The site appears to allow such emojis to be included; I just copied and pasted. There's also the HTML entity  option, e.g. &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;amp;amp;#128533;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;.  &amp;amp;#128533; Or are you asking that the site include code to make it easier to insert emojis? [[User:BunsenH|BunsenH]] ([[User talk:BunsenH|talk]]) 16:57, 29 August 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Custom User-based Signature Template ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
DollarStoreBa'al and I came up with a pretty interesting idea: a template called &amp;quot;sig&amp;quot; that can hold the signatures of other users. This is to allow users to have signatures longer than 255 characters, which is the hard limit set by MediaWiki. To call the template, we can use &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{sig|User:XYZ}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt; and encode the template with wikitext so that each user's signature can be pasted in without confusion. To make things even easier, users can adjust their signatures in Preferences to call this template so that the 4 tildes (&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;~~~~&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;) can still be employed. If enough positive feedback is received, I would love to work on it with the community. If anybody is interested in helping out, please mention it! The template could also function as a signature museum, where you can view other user's custom signatures and get inspiration. '''[[User:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:9pt;color:pink&amp;quot;&amp;gt;42.book.addict&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:6pt;color:#B1E4E3&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Talk to me!&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;''' 16:50, 29 August 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Update. I have found another solution. By creating a sig page, you can call &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{User:XYZ/sig}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;, which enables you to literally copy-paste whatever's in that page into another page. This was first discovered, I believe, by [[User:Omega/sig|User:Omega]]. I don't believe we need the template anymore, but the signature museum would still be cool! '''[[User:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font:9pt Cormorant Garamond&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#89CFF0&amp;quot;&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#FFB7CE&amp;quot;&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#D3D3D3&amp;quot;&amp;gt;.&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#FFB7CE&amp;quot;&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#89CFF0&amp;quot;&amp;gt;o&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#89CFF0&amp;quot;&amp;gt;o&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#FFB7CE&amp;quot;&amp;gt;k&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#D3D3D3&amp;quot;&amp;gt;.&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#FFB7CE&amp;quot;&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#89CFF0&amp;quot;&amp;gt;d&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#89CFF0&amp;quot;&amp;gt;d&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#FFB7CE&amp;quot;&amp;gt;i&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#D3D3D3&amp;quot;&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#FFB7CE&amp;quot;&amp;gt;t&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font:6pt Cormorant Garamond&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#89CFF0&amp;quot;&amp;gt;T&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#FFB7CE&amp;quot;&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#D3D3D3&amp;quot;&amp;gt;l&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#FFB7CE&amp;quot;&amp;gt;k&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#89CFF0&amp;quot;&amp;gt; &amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#89CFF0&amp;quot;&amp;gt;t&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#FFB7CE&amp;quot;&amp;gt;o&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#D3D3D3&amp;quot;&amp;gt; &amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#FFB7CE&amp;quot;&amp;gt;m&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#89CFF0&amp;quot;&amp;gt;e&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#89CFF0&amp;quot;&amp;gt;!&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;''' 19:10, 29 August 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::Not quite sure what it will do. Seems to me that for instance you and [[User:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#023020&amp;quot;&amp;gt;DollarStoreBa'al&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User_talk:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#000080&amp;quot;&amp;gt;'''''converse'''''&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; already have very advanced signatures (using Dollar's here as another example). My own preferences would be a normal signature, where it is easy to see who has made the comment and where the links takes me... But since you can already make this complicated signatures anyway, I'm not as such opposed to the idea. Am I correct in assuming I need to do something in order for this to be possible as the only active admin at the moment? As I will not come by here regularly, then let me know when there has been some relevant activity. Not just a reply to these questions here. But once some other than you two has chimed in. Else I might forget to come back to look! (I wrote this and then had an edit conflict with 42. So maybe this is not relevant anymore? But I will post it now none the less. But this was as a reply to the first proposal) [[User:Kynde|Kynde]] ([[User talk:Kynde|talk]]) 19:16, 29 August 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Hi Kynde. Yes, I believe that we don't need your assistance anymore. The need for a template is erased by the existence of /sig pages, and we can create a museum by ourselves. Thanks for trying and chiming in, though! '''[[User:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font:9pt Cormorant Garamond&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#89CFF0&amp;quot;&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#FFB7CE&amp;quot;&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#D3D3D3&amp;quot;&amp;gt;.&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#FFB7CE&amp;quot;&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#89CFF0&amp;quot;&amp;gt;o&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#89CFF0&amp;quot;&amp;gt;o&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#FFB7CE&amp;quot;&amp;gt;k&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#D3D3D3&amp;quot;&amp;gt;.&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#FFB7CE&amp;quot;&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#89CFF0&amp;quot;&amp;gt;d&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#89CFF0&amp;quot;&amp;gt;d&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#FFB7CE&amp;quot;&amp;gt;i&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#D3D3D3&amp;quot;&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#FFB7CE&amp;quot;&amp;gt;t&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font:6pt Cormorant Garamond&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#89CFF0&amp;quot;&amp;gt;T&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#FFB7CE&amp;quot;&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#D3D3D3&amp;quot;&amp;gt;l&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#FFB7CE&amp;quot;&amp;gt;k&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#89CFF0&amp;quot;&amp;gt; &amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#89CFF0&amp;quot;&amp;gt;t&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#FFB7CE&amp;quot;&amp;gt;o&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#D3D3D3&amp;quot;&amp;gt; &amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#FFB7CE&amp;quot;&amp;gt;m&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#89CFF0&amp;quot;&amp;gt;e&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#89CFF0&amp;quot;&amp;gt;!&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;''' 19:18, 29 August 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::::I do believe the template would work fine... that way it wouldn't show the full wikitext of the signature. --'''''[[User:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#023020&amp;quot;&amp;gt;DollarStoreBa'al&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User_talk:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#000080&amp;quot;&amp;gt;'''''converse'''''&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 19:46, 29 August 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
bad bad bad bad idea, the sig character limit is 255 for a reason, see {{w|WP:SIGLENGTH}}.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
a sig template is an even worse idea, because every instance of it will call #ifexist, an [https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Manual:$wgExpensiveParserFunctionLimit expensive parser function]. these make a page take even longer to load, which this wiki definitely does not need. also, expensive fucntions are capped at 500, so you're making a maximum of 500 signatures (not counting other templates). [[user:lett‪herebedarklight|raeb]] 04:50, 30 August 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:As well as the WP:SIGLENGTH bit, if anybody actually cares about the precedent set by 'mother Wikipedia' then various other dos-and-don'ts from {{w|Wikipedia:Signatures}} might well apply to some extant personal signatures, from the &amp;quot;don't make it look like it's not your signature&amp;quot; through to being inconsiderate of the colour-blind and those otherwise vision-limited.&lt;br /&gt;
:It also gives some nice demonstrations of what ''can'' be done (within reason). Though I still say that just because you can do something doesn't mean that you should. &amp;quot;Looks complicated, codes simply&amp;quot; would be my suggestion. Elegance of spirit, not a bloomin' juggernaut, if you're inclined to take my advice at all. You can still use personally distinctive signatures, and probably should. (Though, quite possibly, by the middle of next week, half the latest Talk comments are going to have orange-background. Don't care about that possibility, as much as I's like having vaguely recognisable namepage and timestamp bits to it that don't take effort to discern properly ''either'' when rendered ''or'' in raw code.) I have simple tastes, perhaps more than others... [[Special:Contributions/82.132.247.193|82.132.247.193]] 05:45, 30 August 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Fully agree with raeb here, the last thing we need is more server load.&lt;br /&gt;
:*If you transclude them, then there's the server load and maximum transclusion problem.&lt;br /&gt;
:*If you substitute the template each time, the issue of hard-to-parse editing views gets worse. It's already annoying having to mentally &amp;quot;remove&amp;quot; your html codes when adding a comment, and we also don't have the VE, which would hide the code.  [[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 13:52, 31 August 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::I got edit conflicted, dangit. Anyway, both your complaints are either invalid or could easily be solved. The #ifexist limit could easily be bypassed if we simply delete the signatures of people who haven't contributed in, say, 6 months. The wikitext complaint is also invalid. Using the template as a signature would simply show &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{User:XYZ/Sig}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;, '''not the wikitext required to display the signature.''' Sincerely, --'''''[[User:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#023020&amp;quot;&amp;gt;DollarStoreBa'al&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User_talk:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#000080&amp;quot;&amp;gt;'''''converse'''''&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 14:14, 3 September 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Hi&lt;br /&gt;
 simply delete the signatures of people who haven't contributed in, say, 6 months&lt;br /&gt;
:::''What?!''&lt;br /&gt;
:::Also, my 1st point wasn't mainly about #ifexist but about server load. It's as if you were adding the amount of code roughly equivalent to {{tl|incomplete}} to every single page you commented on, multiple times on the same page. This absolutely causes a ton of unnecessary server load. Imagine adding {{tl|incomplete}} hundreds of times to dozens and dozens of talk pages across the entire wiki. The software needs to keep all of them up-to-date. [[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 16:47, 3 September 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::::What's wrong with deleting signatures? They can just make a new one, and 6 months seems like a good cutoff for 'they aren't coming back.' I know Tori was away for more than 6 months, she's an exception. The server load is an issue though. Maybe we need to wait for that until Jeff is able to fix the current server issues. --'''''[[User:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#023020&amp;quot;&amp;gt;DollarStoreBa'al&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User_talk:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#000080&amp;quot;&amp;gt;'''''converse'''''&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 17:26, 3 September 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::I randomly drop in every 6–12 months, for what it's worth. [[User:Maplestrip|Maplestrip]] ([[User talk:Maplestrip|talk]]) 13:52, 5 September 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Why penalize people who only occasionally contribute? What does it buy us? -- [[User:Dtgriscom|Dtgriscom]] ([[User talk:Dtgriscom|talk]]) 17:49, 3 September 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::::DSB, the Template is a horrible idea, ok? I slept on it and after further reflection, it really doesn't add much. People can always subst in signatures through &amp;lt;nowki&amp;gt;{{_}}&amp;lt;/nowki&amp;gt;, and it'll also strain the server way too much. There's also a reason why sigs are capped at 255 characters-it'll become impossible to read talk pages if everyone had hulking 1000+ character sigs (like the one that I created). Please stop fixating so much on this specific idea. Also, it is quite rude to penalize people who only occasionally edit (and I don't want to be a special case or something like that-please stop treating me as some godly figure who is better than everyone else.) '''[[User:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:9pt;color:pink&amp;quot;&amp;gt;42.book.addict&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:6pt;color:#B1E4E3&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Talk to me!&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;''' 19:02, 3 September 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Yeah, you're right. The 255 character limit stands. Thread over, back to explaining. --'''''[[User:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#023020&amp;quot;&amp;gt;DollarStoreBa'al&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User_talk:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#000080&amp;quot;&amp;gt;'''''converse'''''&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 14:46, 4 September 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Explain XKCD Discord/Social Media Server? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I was experiencing Cloudflare errors in the past 24 hours that had prevented me from accessing this website. It's working now, but I'm worried that something else would happen again. Would anybody be interested in organizing a group chat/server or something of the like outside of Explain XKCD? I would personally love if it was on Discord, as it's easy to use, convenient, is built great, and I use it often. If anybody else has suggestions, I'd be open to hear them! '''[[User:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:9pt;color:#3a795e&amp;quot;&amp;gt;42.book.addict&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:6pt;color:#ce5f15&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Talk to me!&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;''' 20:24, 12 September 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Me too. It greatly worried me. If you want, I can set up a discord server. Personally, I prefer discord as it's very simple and has a clean interface. Again, only if you're interested. --'''''[[User:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#023020&amp;quot;&amp;gt;DollarStoreBa'al&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User_talk:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#000080&amp;quot;&amp;gt;converse&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 15:38, 15 September 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::[https://discord.com/invite/zGEVanBBAx Here you go!] '''[[User:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:9pt;color:#3a795e&amp;quot;&amp;gt;42.book.addict&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:6pt;color:#ce5f15&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Talk to me!&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;''' 00:38, 16 September 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::NICE! I wonder if we should message Kynde and see if he'll add it to the global messages. The more people, the better. --'''''[[User:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#023020&amp;quot;&amp;gt;DollarStoreBa'al&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User_talk:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#000080&amp;quot;&amp;gt;converse&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 01:17, 16 September 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::I didn't want to influence your original choice, but it would have been nice if you'd have chosen something less 'commercial', as a platform. Hope it helps, just don't forget about everyone else! [[Special:Contributions/82.132.238.131|82.132.238.131]] 09:07, 16 September 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::::Discord is free. I feel it should be easy for everybody to join, even if they didn't already have discord. --'''''[[User:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#023020&amp;quot;&amp;gt;DollarStoreBa'al&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User_talk:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#000080&amp;quot;&amp;gt;converse&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 12:53, 16 September 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::&amp;quot;Freemium&amp;quot; would be a better description, with all the Nitro-mandating stuff. But I already deleted my more specific past observations about all that. And see no point in resurrecting my original Discord presence as you probably can do more chatting about the rest of us without too many random strangers like me turning up, whatever the other IP-onlies decide to do. ;) [[Special:Contributions/82.132.246.82|82.132.246.82]] 17:18, 17 September 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Updating the global message board===&lt;br /&gt;
::''Moved from [[User_talk:Kynde#Updating_the_global_message_board]]'' [[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 19:40, 16 September 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I am excited to announce that explainxkcd now has a discord server! I was wondering if you could add it to the global message board (idk what it's called, actually. The one with the incomplete explanations message.) to include the discord invite link? The more people who join, the better, just in case cloudflare decides to have those issues again. --'''''[[User:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#023020&amp;quot;&amp;gt;DollarStoreBa'al&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User_talk:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#000080&amp;quot;&amp;gt;converse&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 13:01, 16 September 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Hi. you did not include the link? Also I would like to know if other frequent editors think this is a great idea? Not all who edit here wish to be contactable on other platforms. I do understand where you wish the message to be though, and if this is a good idea we can put it there. I'm not certain what other people thinks though? --[[User:Kynde|Kynde]] ([[User talk:Kynde|talk]]) 13:12, 16 September 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::I, for one, think it's a good idea. It's managed by Tori, so it's in very good hands. The only thing I'm afraid of is that discussions may not take place here, but I don't think that's enough of a reason not to promote it.&lt;br /&gt;
::The link is at [[User:42.book.addict]], in the second notice. I think we should say something like&lt;br /&gt;
 In case this site goes down, we have created a Discord server as an emergency form of communication. (link)&lt;br /&gt;
::We aren't &amp;quot;excited to announce&amp;quot; a backup form of communication. Discussions must be public, not on external sites. This is merely a backup. I think  it can then be removed from the sitenotice after a month or less, and mentioned on another page somewhere else, discretely. [[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 15:23, 16 September 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Thanks for chiming in FaviFake. Can you find a good place for this, because I would like to link to a local page from the sitenotice. I do realize that people will have to go to this discord before problems arises, but I guess that is the way it ism and that wont change no matter how we announce it. --[[User:Kynde|Kynde]] ([[User talk:Kynde|talk]]) 15:49, 16 September 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::::But 42 does intend for this to be used as &amp;quot;a fun place to connect with each other&amp;quot;. Leaving it discrete would make it impossible for this to happen, because people won't see it. Also, for the record, FaviFake, 42 and I were. Multiple people. Me and her. That's how the English language works. --'''''[[User:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#023020&amp;quot;&amp;gt;DollarStoreBa'al&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User_talk:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#000080&amp;quot;&amp;gt;converse&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 16:41, 16 September 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Yes you two are the ones who wishes for it and FaviFake was the first to chime in. Don't patronize me please! --[[User:Kynde|Kynde]] ([[User talk:Kynde|talk]]) 16:44, 16 September 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::I have no idea what you're saying regarding the &amp;quot;English language&amp;quot;, but please refrain from saying... whatever that was.&lt;br /&gt;
 But 42 does intend for this to be used as &amp;quot;a fun place to connect with each other&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Could you stop talking on behalf of 42? I believe you've been asked many times not to do that. You can either tell us what '''you''' think, or let others speak for themselves. 42 isn't a goddess and is able to engage in this conversation without someone &amp;quot;defending&amp;quot; her opinions.&lt;br /&gt;
:::::I'll create [[explain xkcd:Discord]] but need to think more about how this is supposed to be pitched. I do not want people to be incentivised to use a private, inaccessible discord server to, for example, talk about the newest comic. --[[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 19:32, 16 September 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::I moved this discussions back here because it's relevant to the entire wiki, not just Kynde' talk.&lt;br /&gt;
:::::''Moved from [[User_talk:Kynde#Updating_the_global_message_board]]'' [[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 19:40, 16 September 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::Sorry, I was just trying to simultaneously defend both of our opinions and state the facts. Also, thank you to FaviFake for moving this conversation to the proposals. This seems to be happening with Kynde's talk page a lot recently. (that being twice, but I've never seen it happen before, soo...) --'''''[[User:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#023020&amp;quot;&amp;gt;DollarStoreBa'al&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User_talk:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#000080&amp;quot;&amp;gt;converse&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 20:02, 16 September 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Hi, it's me. The &amp;quot;global message board&amp;quot; DSB was referencing to is the [[MediaWiki:Sitenotice|site notice]]. If Kynde could add it in the format that FaviFake said, that would be great! Also, I had thought that the server ''could'' be a fun place for us to bond/talk, but that can obviously be conducted in DMs. FaviFake's reasoning for having all conversations on-site makes perfect sense to me. '''[[User:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:9pt;color:#3a795e&amp;quot;&amp;gt;42.book.addict&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:6pt;color:#ce5f15&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Talk to me!&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;''' 20:35, 16 September 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::So THAT'S what it's called! I am one of today's lucky 10,000. --'''''[[User:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#023020&amp;quot;&amp;gt;DollarStoreBa'al&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User_talk:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#000080&amp;quot;&amp;gt;converse&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 23:35, 16 September 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::I'm not sure if I'm wrong or not, but I think of the discord as 2 things: &lt;br /&gt;
*A backup form of communication&lt;br /&gt;
*An informal place to hang out with fellow readers and editors.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Again, please correct me if I'm wrong. --'''''[[User:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#023020&amp;quot;&amp;gt;DollarStoreBa'al&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User_talk:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#000080&amp;quot;&amp;gt;converse&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 15:23, 18 September 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Dark theme?==&lt;br /&gt;
I saw a post about this in the archives that went unanswered, so I'll ask it here: Why doesn't the wiki have a dark theme? I feel it would be very useful for those who don't want to be blinded by editing. Wikipedia's got one, and it looks great! --'''''[[User:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#023020&amp;quot;&amp;gt;DollarStoreBa'al&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User_talk:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#000080&amp;quot;&amp;gt;converse&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 15:27, 18 September 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Dark mode IS a thing. You need to create a common.css page to use it though. Copy paste in this to get dark mode (make sure to hit &amp;quot;Show preview&amp;quot; to test it out before you save!): &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt; /* NQH's totally cool and amazingly radical dark mode */&lt;br /&gt;
/* Licensed CC0-1.0, no rights reserved. */&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
/* Sets everything to dark background. */&lt;br /&gt;
body * {background-color: #111 !important; color: #DDD !important;}&lt;br /&gt;
div.mw-body, div.mw-body * {background-color: #222 !important;}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
/* Vector */&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
.mw-wiki-logo {background-color: #00000000 !important; filter: invert(100%);}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
/* Monobook */&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
div#column-one &amp;gt; div#p-cactions &amp;gt; div.pBody &amp;gt; ul &amp;gt; li &amp;gt; a {background-color: #222 !important;}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
/* Modern */&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
div#mw_header, div#mw_header h1#firstHeading {background-color: #000 !important;}&lt;br /&gt;
div#mw_content {background-color: #222 !important;}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
/* Cologne blue */&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
/* Diff. */&lt;br /&gt;
td.diff-context, td.diff-context * {color: #777 !important; border-color: #333 !important;}&lt;br /&gt;
td.diff-deletedline {border-color: #F33 !important;}&lt;br /&gt;
td.diff-addedline {border-color: #3F3 !important;}&lt;br /&gt;
del.diffchange-inline {color: #F55 !important;}&lt;br /&gt;
ins.diffchange-inline {color: #5F5 !important;}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
/* Numbers in history view. */&lt;br /&gt;
span.mw-plusminus-pos {color: #5F5 !important;}&lt;br /&gt;
span.mw-plusminus-neg {color: #F55 !important;}&lt;br /&gt;
strong.mw-plusminus-pos {color: #0F0 !important; font-size: 1.2em;}&lt;br /&gt;
strong.mw-plusminus-pos {color: #0F0 !important; font-size: 1.2em;}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
/* Links. */&lt;br /&gt;
a[href$=&amp;quot;redlink=1&amp;quot;] {color: #F00 !important; text-decoration: line-through !important;}&lt;br /&gt;
a:not([href$=&amp;quot;redlink=1&amp;quot;]) {color: #88F !important;}&lt;br /&gt;
a:visited:not([href$=&amp;quot;redlink=1&amp;quot;]) {color: #AAF !important;}&lt;br /&gt;
a:hover:not([href$=&amp;quot;redlink=1&amp;quot;]) {color: #AAF !important; text-decoration: underline !important; font-weight: bold !important;}&lt;br /&gt;
a:active:not([href$=&amp;quot;redlink=1&amp;quot;]) {color: #FFF !important; text-decoration: underline !important; font-weight: bold !important;} &amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
--'''[[User:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:9pt;color:#3a795e&amp;quot;&amp;gt;42.book.addict&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:6pt;color:#ce5f15&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Talk to me!&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;''' 19:01, 18 September 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::In response to DSB, in your userpage... The links being white... Which links? See the &amp;quot;/* Links. */&amp;quot; section. The various links are #F00 (red, the invalid ones), #88F (light blue), #AAF (lighter blue), or #FFF (white). If you don't like them, change them.&lt;br /&gt;
::The other things can probably be fixed if we know exactly what you're getting and what you actually expect. Also a good idea to check for typos/miscopying, via basic troubleshooting. [[Special:Contributions/82.132.246.204|82.132.246.204]] 22:43, 18 September 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::I got edit-conflicted with... seemingly no change. Anyway, I found a better version which I now use. It's much cleaner and looks like it belongs. Only issue is that the sidebar templates have inverted colors? But very minor. --'''''[[User:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#023020&amp;quot;&amp;gt;DollarStoreBa'al&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User_talk:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#000080&amp;quot;&amp;gt;converse&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 01:24, 19 September 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::CODE!!!&amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;/* WikimediaUI Dark Mode&lt;br /&gt;
 *&lt;br /&gt;
 * Wikimedia Design Team 2019-2021&lt;br /&gt;
 * Original authors:&lt;br /&gt;
 * - Volker E. – [[User:Volker_E._(WMF)]]&lt;br /&gt;
 * - Alex Hollender&lt;br /&gt;
 * - MusikAnimal&lt;br /&gt;
 * - Carolyn Li-Madeo&lt;br /&gt;
 * - Jdlrobson&lt;br /&gt;
 *&lt;br /&gt;
 * Original at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Volker_E._(WMF)/dark-mode.css&lt;br /&gt;
 * Version for Gadget CSS skin override usage only.&lt;br /&gt;
 * Basically removed of all interaction element styles and&lt;br /&gt;
 * set to `html` instead of JS injected `.client-dark-mode` class.&lt;br /&gt;
 *&lt;br /&gt;
 * Last updated: 2021-04-20&lt;br /&gt;
 *&lt;br /&gt;
 */&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
/** To prevent 'jumping' effect within #p-personal in Vector/Monobook. Overrides [[MediaWiki:Gadget-dark-mode-toggle-pagestyles.css]] **/&lt;br /&gt;
body.skin-vector-legacy :not(#pt-darkmode) + #pt-watchlist::before,&lt;br /&gt;
body.skin-monobook :not(#pt-darkmode) + #pt-watchlist::before {&lt;br /&gt;
	content: &amp;quot;Light mode&amp;quot;;&lt;br /&gt;
}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
@media screen {&lt;br /&gt;
	&lt;br /&gt;
/* set height for monobook and timeless, because the filter in FF needs dimensions to get it to apply */&lt;br /&gt;
html {&lt;br /&gt;
    height: 100%;&lt;br /&gt;
}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
/* Filter needs to reside on `html`, see https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T221425#5153917 */&lt;br /&gt;
html,&lt;br /&gt;
/* All other selectors have `filter` double-applied to turn back to “normal” by inheritance */&lt;br /&gt;
html img:not( .mw-invert ),&lt;br /&gt;
html video:not( .mw-invert ),&lt;br /&gt;
html ogvjs:not( .mw-invert ),&lt;br /&gt;
html svg:not( .mw-invert ),&lt;br /&gt;
html iframe:not( .mw-invert ),&lt;br /&gt;
html .mw-no-invert,&lt;br /&gt;
html .cdx-no-invert,&lt;br /&gt;
html td .diffchange,&lt;br /&gt;
html .wvui-typeahead-suggestion__thumbnail,&lt;br /&gt;
html .skin-minerva .mw-notification-visible .mw-notification-content,&lt;br /&gt;
html .oo-ui-searchWidget-results .oo-ui-iconElement-icon,&lt;br /&gt;
html .list-thumb,&lt;br /&gt;
/* Extensions */&lt;br /&gt;
html .media-viewer .image img,&lt;br /&gt;
html .media-viewer .mw-file-description img {&lt;br /&gt;
	filter: invert( 1 ) hue-rotate( 180deg );&lt;br /&gt;
}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
/* Reset overrides, needed where double application above isn't working. */&lt;br /&gt;
/* Vector modern */&lt;br /&gt;
html .skin-vector .mw-logo-wordmark,&lt;br /&gt;
html .skin-vector .mw-logo-tagline,&lt;br /&gt;
html .skin-timeless .mw-wiki-title &amp;gt; img,&lt;br /&gt;
html .wvui-icon svg,&lt;br /&gt;
html .mw-ext-score img,&lt;br /&gt;
html .skin-invert img,&lt;br /&gt;
html .skin-invert-image img,&lt;br /&gt;
html .mw-hiero-table img {&lt;br /&gt;
	filter: none;&lt;br /&gt;
}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
/* Backgrounds */&lt;br /&gt;
html table,&lt;br /&gt;
html table.ambox-content,&lt;br /&gt;
html table.toccolours,&lt;br /&gt;
html .mw-notification,&lt;br /&gt;
html .mwe-popups,&lt;br /&gt;
html .infobox,&lt;br /&gt;
html .toc,&lt;br /&gt;
html .thumbinner,&lt;br /&gt;
html figure[typeof~='mw:File/Thumb'],&lt;br /&gt;
html figure[typeof~='mw:File/Frame'],&lt;br /&gt;
html figure[typeof~='mw:File/Thumb'] &amp;gt; figcaption,&lt;br /&gt;
html figure[typeof~='mw:File/Frame'] &amp;gt; figcaption,&lt;br /&gt;
html .wikitable,&lt;br /&gt;
html .cbnnr-main,&lt;br /&gt;
html .cx-callout,&lt;br /&gt;
html .overlay.media-viewer,&lt;br /&gt;
html #simpleSearch,&lt;br /&gt;
html #simpleSearch #searchInput,&lt;br /&gt;
html #siteNotice #centralNotice .cnotice {&lt;br /&gt;
	background-color: #ddd;&lt;br /&gt;
}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
/* Borders */&lt;br /&gt;
html body,&lt;br /&gt;
html h1,&lt;br /&gt;
html h2,&lt;br /&gt;
html h3,&lt;br /&gt;
html h4,&lt;br /&gt;
html h5,&lt;br /&gt;
html h6,&lt;br /&gt;
html table.ambox-content,&lt;br /&gt;
html table.toccolours,&lt;br /&gt;
html .mw-notification,&lt;br /&gt;
html .infobox,&lt;br /&gt;
html .toc,&lt;br /&gt;
html .thumbinner,&lt;br /&gt;
html figure[typeof~='mw:File/Thumb'],&lt;br /&gt;
html figure[typeof~='mw:File/Frame'],&lt;br /&gt;
html figure[typeof~='mw:File/Thumb'] &amp;gt; figcaption,&lt;br /&gt;
html figure[typeof~='mw:File/Frame'] &amp;gt; figcaption,&lt;br /&gt;
html #mw-head,&lt;br /&gt;
html #mw-panel,&lt;br /&gt;
/* Vector 2022 uses a transparent border for margin collapsing&lt;br /&gt;
(T312822) so don't apply this rule there */&lt;br /&gt;
.skin-vector-legacy #content.mw-body,&lt;br /&gt;
html #simpleSearch,&lt;br /&gt;
html #simpleSearch #searchInput,&lt;br /&gt;
html #siteNotice #centralNotice .cnotice {&lt;br /&gt;
	border-color: #cdcbc8;&lt;br /&gt;
}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
/* Links */&lt;br /&gt;
/* Links: normal */&lt;br /&gt;
html a,&lt;br /&gt;
html .vector-menu-tabs li a,&lt;br /&gt;
/* Backwards compatible VectorTabs, deprecated in MW v1.35. */&lt;br /&gt;
html .vectorTabs li a,&lt;br /&gt;
html .toctogglelabel,&lt;br /&gt;
html .mw-parser-output a.external,&lt;br /&gt;
html .mw-parser-output a.extiw,&lt;br /&gt;
html .mw-parser-output a.extiw:active,&lt;br /&gt;
html #mw-panel .portal .body li a {&lt;br /&gt;
	/* color: #69f; Proposal below for level AA conformance, see also https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T233266&lt;br /&gt;
	   `#36c` is transformed by :root `filter` to be closer to chosen `#69f`. */&lt;br /&gt;
	color: #36c;&lt;br /&gt;
}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
/* Links: visited */&lt;br /&gt;
html a:visited,&lt;br /&gt;
html .mw-parser-output a.extiw:visited,&lt;br /&gt;
html #mw-panel .portal .body li a:visited {&lt;br /&gt;
	/* color: #709bbd; Proposal below uses to-be-standardized color from https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T213778 */&lt;br /&gt;
	color: #6b4ba1;&lt;br /&gt;
}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
/* Links: red */&lt;br /&gt;
html a.new,&lt;br /&gt;
html .vector-menu-tabs li.new a,&lt;br /&gt;
html .vectorTabs li.new a {&lt;br /&gt;
	color: #ff6e6e;&lt;br /&gt;
}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
/* ::: Special Element Treatments ::: */&lt;br /&gt;
/* Image thumbnails */&lt;br /&gt;
html .thumbimage,&lt;br /&gt;
html figure[typeof~='mw:File/Thumb'] &amp;gt; :not(figcaption) .mw-file-element,&lt;br /&gt;
html figure[typeof~='mw:File/Frame'] &amp;gt; :not(figcaption) .mw-file-element {&lt;br /&gt;
	border: 0;&lt;br /&gt;
}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
/* Content image (thumbnail) SVGs */&lt;br /&gt;
/* `*not( .mbox-image )` exception doesn't work for unclear reasons */&lt;br /&gt;
html .image img[ src*='svg' ],&lt;br /&gt;
html .mw-file-description img[ src*='svg' ],&lt;br /&gt;
html img[ src*='Wiktionary-logo'] {&lt;br /&gt;
	background-color: #fff;&lt;br /&gt;
	border-radius: 1px;&lt;br /&gt;
}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
/* Dealing with false positives from selector above */&lt;br /&gt;
html .mw-echo-ui-notificationItemWidget-icon img[ src*='svg' ],&lt;br /&gt;
html .mbox-image .image img[ src*='svg' ],&lt;br /&gt;
html .mbox-image .mw-file-description img[ src*='svg' ],&lt;br /&gt;
/* Emoji generated by [[Template:Emoji]] */&lt;br /&gt;
html .emoji .image img,&lt;br /&gt;
html .emoji .mw-file-description img,&lt;br /&gt;
/* Vote symbols on Talk pages */&lt;br /&gt;
html .image img[ alt^=&amp;quot;Symbol&amp;quot; ],&lt;br /&gt;
html .mw-file-description img[ alt^=&amp;quot;Symbol&amp;quot; ] {&lt;br /&gt;
	background-color: transparent;&lt;br /&gt;
}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
/* Page previews */&lt;br /&gt;
html .mwe-popups {&lt;br /&gt;
    box-shadow: 0 30px 90px -20px rgba( 0, 0, 0, 0.3 ), 0 0 1px #000;&lt;br /&gt;
}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
html .mwe-popups.flipped-y:after,&lt;br /&gt;
html .mwe-popups.flipped-x-y:after {&lt;br /&gt;
	border-top: 11px solid #ddd;&lt;br /&gt;
}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
html .mwe-popups.mwe-popups-no-image-pointer:after {&lt;br /&gt;
	border-bottom: 11px solid #ddd;&lt;br /&gt;
}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
/* Contributions menu */&lt;br /&gt;
html .cx-callout-1:after {&lt;br /&gt;
	border-bottom-color: #ddd;&lt;br /&gt;
}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
/* Mobile Wikipedia logo mobile header */&lt;br /&gt;
html .branding-box img {&lt;br /&gt;
	filter: brightness( 0 );&lt;br /&gt;
}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
@-moz-document url-prefix() {&lt;br /&gt;
    body {&lt;br /&gt;
        background: #000;&lt;br /&gt;
    }&lt;br /&gt;
}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
@-moz-document url-prefix() {   &lt;br /&gt;
	@supports (overflow-clip-margin: 1px) {     &lt;br /&gt;
		body {&lt;br /&gt;
			background: #fff;&lt;br /&gt;
		}   &lt;br /&gt;
	}&lt;br /&gt;
}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
--'''''[[User:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#023020&amp;quot;&amp;gt;DollarStoreBa'al&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User_talk:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#000080&amp;quot;&amp;gt;converse&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 13:27, 19 September 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Page Creation site notice for new accounts==&lt;br /&gt;
Many, many, '''''many''''' new people come around and ask other users about how to create their own user pages. Personally, I think we could stop the confusion by coding a different type of 'you do not have permission to create this page' error for new accounts, which would look something like this: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'To create new pages, your account must be at least a week old and have 50 edits. You can search for this page title in other pages, or search the related logs, but you do not have permission to create this page.' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Just a thought, in case admins can do that without Jeff's involvement. --'''''[[User:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#023020&amp;quot;&amp;gt;DollarStoreBa'al&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User_talk:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#000080&amp;quot;&amp;gt;converse&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 20:02, 30 September 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: I'd {{template|Actual citation needed}} on the &amp;quot;many&amp;quot;s, unless you're aware of off-site discussions about this one. It's actually pretty infrequent, so I feel you must be counting over several years, having found a number of historic examples dotted around on pages such as this. That said, it ''is'' currently as much an FAQ as anything else ([[explain xkcd:Editor FAQ#Why can't I create my user page and upload images?|as actually mentioned there]], for anyone who bothers to read it). And we do sometimes get a new-users, the ones freshly post-validated to create pages merrily 'helping out' all those they think need their help in that regard.&lt;br /&gt;
: Can I suggest that we do not have the exact number of edits so prominantly, though. Within the last day, as a matter of fact, we seem to have had someone making many useless edits (mostly of the form of adding extra spaces into seemingly random places within seemingly random articles), possibly in order to have created a new page of their own. And that's ''really'' not to the spirit of things. Inviting, or at least suggestively hinting, the possibility of near-vandalism (hopefully not ''actual'' vandalism) for the impatient who just see it as a 'target' to try to reach. And the truly and genuinely eager to contribute can easily have clocked up that number of edits to existing pages ''with no edit-tallying motive'' by the time the mandatory week has also expired.&lt;br /&gt;
: The caveat, I know, is that saying &amp;quot;a week and ''a certain number of edits''&amp;quot;, aluded to but unspecified, will have the some of the same uselessly-editing people chasing an arbitrarily high edit-tally in order to be 'ready' for the week finishing. But that kind of person is already of the wrong initial mindset. And people desperate to create new pages with perhaps little more than a week of having, in ''most other respects'', full editing rights (which is only marginally more than IPs like me have, as there only a few key places that I am prevented from editing) tend to find themselves likely to be contributing to the Category: Pages to Delete list (perhaps courtesy of more established editors).&lt;br /&gt;
: On balance, perhaps the page you mention should instead briefly contain a link to the existing FAQ section, via link text explaining that there ''are'' reasons, but &amp;quot;see here&amp;quot; for details, or similar non-specific wording. Anyone who hasn't read the FAQ could benefit from being aware that it exists. And if anything ever changes (rise or fall of the time or tally limits, even removal or addition of specific criteria), the FAQ will probably be sooner updated with the new details before anyone thinks to edit the 'error page' again (a particular page that long-established users will have rarely, if ever, seen). Assuming, of course, even that anyone can edit that level of page content right now. [[Special:Contributions/82.132.184.204|82.132.184.204]] 23:08, 30 September 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::I don’t have time to read ip's comment but i definitely think the number shouldn't be so public, and i don’t see a need. i would support a small editnoce for letting users know they have to vaguely contribute more. [[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 16:17, 1 October 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Some suggestions surrounding the use of the {{template|unsigned}} and {{template|unsigned ip}} templates. ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
;Where I just reference the {{template|unsigned}} template, there should also be an obvious extension of the same principle to the {{template|unsigned ip}} one as well.)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
These are some interelated proposals, that could be implemented singly/incrementally (as desired and agreed upon). But might deserve doing in 'one go', at least the agreed upon elements. I'm just putting each bit into different subsections for isolated discussion (or ignoring) of the specific merits/otherwise of each. [[Special:Contributions/2.98.65.8|2.98.65.8]] 21:33, 20 October 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
;TD;DR;s added, if you don't like the author's original verbosity. [[Special:Contributions/82.132.244.30|82.132.244.30]] 19:07, 12 November 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Aesthetic/semantic change===&lt;br /&gt;
Issue: Not often, but sometimes, comments that are 'unsigned'-tagged (with the words &amp;quot;please sign your comments with &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;~~~~&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;quot;) invokes retrospective use of &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;~~~~&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt; by those who take the words at face value. This ''can'' result in a (previously) 'unsigned' message having a later timestamp than its replies, or later 'top level' messages more immediately signed by their editors.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The more 'proper' way to replace an {{template|unsigned}} tag, for those that want to, would be to copy-paste a valid signature of the same type and replace the username(/IP) and datestamp as already (usually!) given in that initial pester-tag. But this is by no means made obvious in the above message.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Proposal: Wording to be changed to something like &amp;quot;in future, please sign your comments with &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;~~~~&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;quot;, or &amp;quot;this comment should have been signed with &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;~~~~&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;quot;. Or other wording, to be agreed upon, to make as snappy as the original (&amp;quot;was not signed with &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;~~~~&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;quot;). The aim is to omit the implicit request to anachrnistically sign, however.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Overall effect: Any change to the template(s) will transclude to what would probably be an overwhelming majority of Talk pages (at a guess), plus other 'discussion' pages like these Portal ones. But there's no change in functionality or any individual page-updating, just the slightly different text when viewing in future.&lt;br /&gt;
*Note1: the {{template|unsigned}} template already takes a (rarely used) third parameter, which overwrites the &amp;quot;please sign...&amp;quot; message (i.e. &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{unsigned|&amp;lt;username&amp;gt;|&amp;lt;timestamp&amp;gt;|&amp;lt;alternate message&amp;gt;}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;, and it'd still be overwritten exactly the same wherever that has been applied.&lt;br /&gt;
*Note2: it also would not rewrite the text given of any originally &amp;quot;subst:&amp;quot;ed version of the template, but that's a completely different issue.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Justification: The need may be slight, but it's also a trivial tweak to implement (or even to trial) with a marginal but maybe useful long-term gain. But we'll need a proper discussion of what wording to move to, or else that it's not necessary. [[Special:Contributions/2.98.65.8|2.98.65.8]] 21:33, 20 October 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: Case in point {{diff|389535|the few edits that led up to here}}. Didn't really 'spoil' any actual chronology but shows how easily it is obeyed wrongly. [[Special:Contributions/2.98.65.8|2.98.65.8]] 18:04, 24 October 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
;TL;DR;:Change the text from &amp;quot;please sign your comments with &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;~~~~&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;quot;, slightly. [[Special:Contributions/82.132.244.30|82.132.244.30]] 19:07, 12 November 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Additional templates to complement 'unsigned' ones===&lt;br /&gt;
Issue: Retrospective 'honest faking' of previously missing signatures is mildly awkward, as mentioned above. It's easy to get wrong, even easier to just not bother at all with it. (Either leave 'unsigned' or create the issue from the prior item.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Proposal: Complement the template usage &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;''un''&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;signed|&amp;lt;username&amp;gt;|&amp;lt;timestamp&amp;gt;}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt; with one that is &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;''retro''&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;signed|&amp;lt;username&amp;gt;|&amp;lt;timestamp&amp;gt;}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;. Take the same parameters (except the 'alternate pester text') but return just the effective &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;~~~~&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;-style format, now no longer with the 'please sign...'-type appended message.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are a number of possible uses for this:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
#''user1'' forgets to sign; ''user2'' spots this, invokes {{template|unsigned}} to it; ''user1'' '''acknowledges''' their goof, by simply changing the template-invocation of &amp;quot;unsigned&amp;quot; to &amp;quot;retrosigned&amp;quot; and the rendered page is left neater (any &amp;quot;whoops, my bad!&amp;quot; apologies can be given in the edit-comments, as unused third-parameter, etc, if they wish),&lt;br /&gt;
#''user1'' forgets to sign; ''user1'', themself, spots this (before anyone else) and applies this as easily as they would apply a {{template|unsigned}}. Slightly easier than 'honest faking' that involves the valid copypaste-method (again, with &amp;quot;whoops!, my bad!&amp;quot; opportunities, should they feel like it),&lt;br /&gt;
#''user1'' forgets to sign; ''user2'' spots this; knows that it's an oversight by a regular contributor who just slipped up, and there's no reason to make it a 'pester message'; so ''user2'' just goes straight to using Template:retrosigned, and doesn't bother with the 'pestering' or 'blaming' implications inherent in Template:unsigned),&lt;br /&gt;
#''user1'' forgot to sign ''...a decade ago or more!''; We know that (for example) User:Jeff is unlikely to benefit from being reminded/pestered/shamed, so it just seems better to let the more recent editor 'retrosign' any such example that gets discovered,&lt;br /&gt;
#or possibly, '''with care, ''and honesty'':''' someone, as ''newusername'', wishes to associate themselves with comments made by ''oldusername'', or even any given ''ip-address'' contrinution they previously used; that's something I wouldn't do myself, but I could see the appeal.&lt;br /&gt;
*Note1: my method (and that of others?) to edit in an 'unsigned'-tag is to copy the header info from the appropriate diff page's column, paste that text (containing datestamp and ID of contributor, together with some other textual cruft) as unsigned-tag parameters, rearrange edit (&amp;quot;timestamp&amp;quot; then &amp;quot;userid&amp;quot;, with a few extra characters, becomes &amp;quot;|userid|timestamp&amp;quot; parameters), the same method would entirely work with the retrosigned version too.&lt;br /&gt;
**This, however, does not contain the &amp;quot;(UTC)&amp;quot; timezone info that &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;~~~~&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt; would give by default, so a similarly direct retroactive 'fake' will also lack this. Eagle-eyed readers might pick up on this. Which isn't an issue that concerns me. (One could always manually append &amp;quot; (UTC)&amp;quot; to the second-param, or after the template itself, even if I don't think it worth the bother.)&lt;br /&gt;
*Note2: It doesn't reproduce the appearance of anyone's custom signature, if they had one that should have been invoked. But also a trivial differemce, having resolved the whole issue of &amp;quot;no longer being unsigned&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
**Should anyone ''really'' care to reproduce a custom/non-standard signature, they can still do so (on their behalf or someone else's). This is just the quick and easy&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Justification: The idea is to allow for the 'tidying up' of the front-facing pages with less convoluted and more honest back-end edits. I don't expect, or want, anyone to retrospectively convert historic 'unsigned' tags just for the sake of it, but it adds a tool to the kit of anyone who is already prepared to 'correct' these things (their own, or others) in any given page-source.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I'd potentially use it for long-standing editor's lapses (the &amp;quot;Template:retrosigned&amp;quot; version), to feel less guilty about apparently nagging them about it. Or upon myself (the &amp;quot;Template:retrosigned ip&amp;quot; version), if I slipped up, to feel less guilty for going back in and 'honestly faking' what I had forgotten to sign, but (as noted above) there are several other applicable uses. [[Special:Contributions/2.98.65.8|2.98.65.8]] 21:33, 20 October 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
;TL;DR;:Let there be &amp;quot;retrosigned&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;retrosigned ip&amp;quot; to be used where {{template|unsigned}} and {{template|unsigned ip}} are not (any longer) what is needed somewhere. [[Special:Contributions/82.132.244.30|82.132.244.30]] 19:07, 12 November 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Tracking parameter underutilisation===&lt;br /&gt;
Issue: Early implementation, and sometimes more recent, of the {{template|unsigned}} template may use its most basic &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{unsigned}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt; form with ''no parameters given''. This gives an 'error', of sorts, due to having no official check-and-fallback upon not being given the username parameter. The error is visual only, and ''may'' have been allowed/forced to happen as a way to force its correction (though, at least until recently, it sees not to have done this as much as it should have).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Other times, perhaps immediately after the first parameter (contributor name) started to be routinely added, &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{unsigned|username}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt; is used ''without the timestamp parameter'' that we now mostly take for granted.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
(While the current third parameter, the 'alternate &amp;quot;pease...&amp;quot; text' is entirely an optional and a mostly unused feature, future changes may require/encourage further elements (perhaps 'named parameters') and leave our default &amp;quot;unsigned|username|timestamp&amp;quot; format lacking.)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I've been known to update any discovered 'bare bones'-unsigned formats, if I find any in pages I edit. Someone else seems to have adopted it as a task of its own, recently. This relies upon spotting the non-standard (or at least non-modern) usages.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Additionally, there ''is'' the in getting the rather ugly &amp;lt;code&amp;gt; &amp;lt;small&amp;gt; -- [[User:{{{1}}}|{{{1}}}]] ([[User talk:{{{1}}}|talk]])  &amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:grey; white-space:nowrap;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;''(please sign your comments with &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;~~&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;~~)''&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt; 'error' for all no-param versions that exist.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Proposal: Firstly, just implement the 'catch' code upon the (lack of) first parameter. Make it 'fail cleanly', or at least less 'errorlike'. This is trivial to implement (i.e. &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{{1|}}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt; instead of &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{{1}}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;). (I'd do that right now, if I could.)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Secondly, within the 'failover' half of the 'non-parameter' parsing, give it a Category: membership.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I have several possible suggestions for the style of Category membership:&lt;br /&gt;
# If the 'userID' isn't given, perhaps &amp;quot;Category:Unsigned no-UserID&amp;quot;, if the 'timestamp' isn't given, &amp;quot;Category:Unsigned no-timestamp&amp;quot;, and any others.&lt;br /&gt;
#* Note: the system could be extended to other templates, such as &amp;quot;Category:Incomplete no-reason&amp;quot; or perhaps &amp;quot;Category:Comic no-image&amp;quot;, but that's not officially part of this suggestion.&lt;br /&gt;
# More simply, just have &amp;quot;Category:Unsigned-error&amp;quot;, without specifying. (Or even &amp;quot;Category:Template-error&amp;quot; for far more generalised use.)&lt;br /&gt;
# Differently specific, use the category re-indexing (something like &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;[[Category:Template-error|blah]]&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;) for handy grouping-with-differentiation&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Obviously, the appropriate category-page needs to be there to show any (and all) invocations. Similar to the [[:Category:Incomplete explanations]] one, etc, it would invite action to ''remove'' membership as examples are sorted.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Justification: This is a solution for 'meta-problems', really. Which 'category membership' option is used would define how much additional editing(/correcting) this might prompt for historic problems, as well as identifying improperly added new template-invocations. But it might be good to know exactly how wide or narrow a scope people might wish to apply to this, before going ahead and creating many new 'error' categories... one even just the single catch-all one. [[Special:Contributions/2.98.65.8|2.98.65.8]] 21:33, 20 October 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
;TL;DR;:Make it easier to find 'incompletely implemented' templates (initially the Unsigned ones), so they can be fixed by anyone who would like to. [[Special:Contributions/82.132.244.30|82.132.244.30]] 19:07, 12 November 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
This looks AI-generated. [[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 18:36, 12 November 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Really? Unless AIs are doing 'accidentally on purpose' typos, I think it just looks like someone with more ideas trying to burst out onto the page than they can easily (and accurately) summarise. And I'm also that type of person, so I can ''easily'' relate. There, but for the grace of &amp;lt;s&amp;gt;God&amp;lt;/s&amp;gt; any-unspecific-generalised-universal-force-of-non-deterministic-fate goes I! [[Special:Contributions/82.132.245.237|82.132.245.237]] 18:50, 12 November 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Added a &amp;quot;''Too Long; Didn't Read;''&amp;quot; summary to each, as I understand the intents. ;) Now I'm wondering if there are any other things I might do that for! [[Special:Contributions/82.132.244.30|82.132.244.30]] 19:07, 12 November 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Banning the phrase &amp;quot;WhatsApp&amp;quot;==&lt;br /&gt;
I've noticed that lately, much of our vandalism has come out of scamvertisements asking you to contact the scammers on WhatsApp. As I don't believe Randall has ever actually used WhatsApp, and as such it is unneeded, I feel we should just prevent any edits containing the word 'WhatsApp' from going through if the edit removes more than 90% of the page's byte count (let's be honest, nobody is going to delete that much from a page). --'''''[[User:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#023020&amp;quot;&amp;gt;DollarStoreBa'al&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User_talk:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#000080&amp;quot;&amp;gt;converse&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 17:37, 29 October 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:The standard protection is to have [[user:theusaf]] to refine/expand what theusafBOT reacts to. Which it seems they occasionally do.&lt;br /&gt;
:I don't know whether they're paying attention, but I'd hope they'd pick up on such things. Given that it's the Feedback/etc comics that regularly get spammed like this, I'd hope they'd at least try to see what someone else reverted in leiu, and adapt accordingly, when they get the time.&lt;br /&gt;
:I don't know the various sets of exact criteria in use (some seem generally obvious enough, key patterns and keywords involved) and I think something to at least start with &amp;quot;blanked page and replaced with ...&amp;quot;, on specific sets of pages, as an edit comment could be a good predictor with minimal false-positives. But I wouldn't want to explicitly suggest that (or your idea), lest the more attentive spammers made a trivial change to their future edit plans to by-pass it.&lt;br /&gt;
:...though I frankly think those responsible in this case don't care/think ''too'' much about it, it's more for all the other things I'd rather leave trivially unguessable how to get round. [[Special:Contributions/82.132.244.138|82.132.244.138]] 18:30, 29 October 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::I'll look into this. —[[User:Theusaf|theusaf]] ([[User talk:Theusaf|talk]]) 22:34, 6 November 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Hey look, an admin that isn't Kynde! That's... actually the first time I've seen an admin that isn't Kynde in person. Cool! &amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family: Times New Roman, serif; font-size: 16px;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;--'''''[[User:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#E3C6BE&amp;quot;&amp;gt;DollarStoreBa'al&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User Talk:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#CC9A8B&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Converse&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt; 17:15, 7 November 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::::Yeah, I'm not super active in the discussions, but I occasionally edit and check that by bot is still working and not destroying anything. The whatsapp check has been added. —[[User:Theusaf|theusaf]] ([[User talk:Theusaf|talk]]) 05:00, 13 November 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::*SKIBIDI-POP PA-DOOP TA-DA TAAAA!!!!* &amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family: Times New Roman, serif; font-size: 16px;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;--'''''[[User:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#E3C6BE&amp;quot;&amp;gt;DollarStoreBa'al&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User Talk:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#CC9A8B&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Converse&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt; 14:48, 13 November 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Adblock popup==&lt;br /&gt;
This wiki uses ads as a way to make money and keep the website up, and many people use adblockers (the absolute state of YT ads is insane). So, why don't we add one of those AdBlock popups that they have on some sites? Maybe the message could be: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{Header text|So, about that AdBlock...&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
explain xkcd uses ads to keep our server online. Please consider turning off your AdBlock so we can continue providing quality explanations. Thanks!}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This would be an optional thing and easily closable, but it could provide at least a bit of extra revenue. Maybe we could also make a 'thank you' screen for people who do actually turn off their adblocker (it would only pop up once, after they turn off the AdBlock): &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{Header text|Thank you for turning off your adblocker!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Sincerely, the explain xkcd community.}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What do you guys think? --'''''[[User:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#023020&amp;quot;&amp;gt;DollarStoreBa'al&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User_talk:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#000080&amp;quot;&amp;gt;converse&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 15:58, 30 October 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Adblockers often also can block anti-adblock popups, but sure, go ahead. I guess you could also ask for donations to run the site. Same caveat applies. - an adblock user. [[User:None|None]] ([[User talk:None|talk]]) 20:47, 14 December 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== categories template ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hear me out: I've been doing a lot of category adding to mostly files that are uncategorized (BTW, we have a 11,000-12,000 backlog of pages-any help (or maybe a bot!) would be greatly appreciated). I think that we should make a template called Category or &amp;quot;cat&amp;quot; so that we can add categories faster. Of course, HotCat exists, but it only renders when there are already existing categories. For all the uncategorized files/pages, we would have to manually add it in. My strategy currently is moving my mouse to the edit button, clicking it, hit return to make a whitespace (for organization), hitting CTRL-V, moving my mouse to the &amp;quot;Save changes&amp;quot; button, and clicking it. And that's only for the really repetitive ones, like the comic images or Hoverboard or Time. Does anybody have any thoughts/objections to this? Of course, we would still need to edit, but it would be a lot easier than typing out &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;[[Category:___]]&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt; IMHO. Additionally, I've studied up a bit of template code (Lua) and I've sort of fleshed out some code. I don't really know if it works, but if there's anybody more experienced feel free to look through it! I've included Pages to delete (ptd) and Helper comic images (hci) as examples. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{#ifeq:{{{1}}}|ptd|&lt;br /&gt;
  [[Category:Pages to delete]]&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{#ifeq:{{{1}}}|hci|&lt;br /&gt;
  {{#if:{{{2|}}}&lt;br /&gt;
    | [[Category:Helper comic images ({{{2}}})]]&lt;br /&gt;
    | [[Category:Helper comic images]]&lt;br /&gt;
  }}&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thanks, --'''[[User:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:9pt;color:#3a795e&amp;quot;&amp;gt;42.book.addict&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:6pt;color:#ce5f15&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Talk to me!&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;''' 10:17, 3 December 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:That's actually a good idea! So, it would be: &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{cat|Helper comic images (1190)}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;? That would be quite convenient. &amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family: Times New Roman, serif; font-size: 16px;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;--'''''[[User:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#FF0000&amp;quot;&amp;gt;DollarStoreBa'al&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User Talk:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#00873E&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Converse&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt; 20:53, 4 December 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::As written, I read it as...&lt;br /&gt;
::If &amp;quot;ptd&amp;quot; in the first spot, i.e. &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{cat|ptd}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;, that would give the Pages To Delete category.&lt;br /&gt;
::If &amp;quot;hci&amp;quot; in the first spot, i.e. &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{cat|hci}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;, then it would instead Helper Comic Images&lt;br /&gt;
::If &amp;quot;hci&amp;quot; in the first spot and a number in the second, i.e. &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{cat|hci|1234}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;, then it would instead give you Helper Comic Images (1234).&lt;br /&gt;
::There are maybe a few minor issues with it, as written. I'd use &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{{1|}}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;, for starters, and nest it so that any non-specified (including blank) param would give out an obvious mis-use error result. And you'd probably end up having &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{cat|&amp;lt;whatever&amp;gt;}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt; sitting in your paste buffer (or would &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{subst:cat|&amp;lt;whatever&amp;gt;}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt; be better?) exactly the same as you'd have had the basic Category, anyway.&lt;br /&gt;
::But I really wouldn't know where it sits in the [[1205: Is It Worth the Time?]] scale... Almost a &amp;quot;death by supernova neutrinos&amp;quot; issue, I suspect... ;) [[Special:Contributions/78.144.255.82|78.144.255.82]] 21:37, 4 December 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
: I would use a switch instead of an if, like &lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;includeonly&amp;gt;[[Category:{{subst:#switch:{{{1}}}&lt;br /&gt;
| ptd = Pages to delete&lt;br /&gt;
| hci = Helper comic images {{subst:#if: {{{2|}}} | ({{{2}}}) }}&lt;br /&gt;
| {{{1|}}}&lt;br /&gt;
}}]]&amp;lt;/includeonly&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
: It should be used with &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{subst:&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt; because otherwise the category won't be able to be removed normally, but it technically works without it. The substs before the ifs make the resulting wikitext nicer, as otherwise when the overall template is used with &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{subst:&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;, it inserts the if statements directly. Consequently, it must be enclosed in includeonly's to prevent the substitution from occurring when the template is saved. It will also default to inserting the category with the name of the first argument, but it is longer to type using the template like this (&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{subst:cat|All comics}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;) than just typing the category directly (&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;[[Category:All comics]]&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;).&lt;br /&gt;
:If having an obvious error message is desired, you could replace the default case (the &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{{1|}}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;) with something like &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;]] Invalid argument for [[Template:cat&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;. [[User:Firestar233|guess who]] ([[User talk:Firestar233|if you desire conversing]] | [[Special:Contributions/Firestar233|what i have done]]) 05:02, 16 December 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
All fo this sounds good! I don't have the time to look into this but Firestar233 is incredible with templates so i trust their code will work! [[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 18:41, 17 December 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== New Character Proposal for Kid Cueballs ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I'm somewhat new to editing, though I've been using this wiki for some time now. And I've noticed that with comics such as 3178, whenever a kid is represented by Cueball the transcript says &amp;quot;a Cueball like kid&amp;quot;  which is long and slightly annoying to read. So I propose giving the kid a name that's shorter and easier to use but still let's the reader know that a kid is being represented by Cueball:  Kidball. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thoughts? -- [[User:MikeTheNewGuy|MikeTheNewGuy]] ([[User talk:MikeTheNewGuy|talk]]) 13:25, 17 January 2026‎ (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
: Hi, Mike; welcome to ExplainXKCD. BTW, I added your signature to your comment.&lt;br /&gt;
: But, on-topic: this sounds like an interesting idea. But, in your mind, is this &amp;quot;Kidball&amp;quot; always the same kid, rather than a type of kid? Would you expect that if you see &amp;quot;Kidball&amp;quot; in a new comic he'll behave the same way? If not, then I wouldn't add this name. -- [[User:Dtgriscom|Dtgriscom]] ([[User talk:Dtgriscom|talk]]) 13:32, 17 January 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::Thanks for adding my signature, I’m gonna have to remember to do that. &lt;br /&gt;
::What I had in mind with Kidball was that most of the time he’s the same kid (since most of the time he only appears in Miss Lenhart’s class, at least that’s where he’s been the majority of the times I’ve seen him), but is occasionally used to represent someone else; in the same way that Cueball appears to be the same person most of the time, but Randall occasionally uses him to represent someone else.  And using “Kidball” in the explanations/transcripts might be more efficient than “a Cueball like kid”.&lt;br /&gt;
::And yes, if I saw him in a new comic, I would expect him to more or less behave the same way, unless it’s clear that he’s representing someone else.[[User:MikeTheNewGuy|MikeTheNewGuy]] ([[User talk:MikeTheNewGuy|talk]]) 18:04, 17 January 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::I'm not sure; let's see what others think. -- [[User:Dtgriscom|Dtgriscom]] ([[User talk:Dtgriscom|talk]]) 18:11, 17 January 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::I do think that he can and should be named, as he's very similar to [[Jill]], even if she has more personality than him. And Kidball is an amazing name! [[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 18:01, 23 January 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::::I concur. '''[[User:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:9pt;color:#A9C6CA&amp;quot;&amp;gt;42.book.addict&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:6pt;color:#516874&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Talk to me!&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;''' 21:57, 23 January 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Me too. I'm not trusting myself with the actual page creation, so somebody else will need to create it. (sorry, just don't want to mess things up) &amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family: Times New Roman, serif; font-size: 16px;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;--'''''[[User:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#023020&amp;quot;&amp;gt;DollarStoreBa'al&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]][[User Talk:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#000080&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Converse&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;]]'''''&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt; 22:51, 28 January 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::::I've made them. See [[Kidball]] and [[:Category:Comics featuring Kidball]]. I've also changed the header of this thread for more clarity. '''[[User:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:9pt;color:#A9C6CA&amp;quot;&amp;gt;42.book.addict&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:6pt;color:#516874&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Talk to me!&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;''' 01:40, 1 February 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Thanks! Anyone up for populating it? [[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 08:14, 1 February 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::I'll try to see if I can find the time (and motivation) to do so this week. '''[[User:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:9pt;color:#A9C6CA&amp;quot;&amp;gt;42.book.addict&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:6pt;color:#516874&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Talk to me!&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;''' 03:07, 2 February 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::I just went through [[:Category:Comics featuring children]] and added about 9 to [[:Category:Comics featuring Kidball]]. We're getting there! [[User:Maxcodes|Maxcodes]] ([[User talk:Maxcodes|talk]]) 14:34, 15 February 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Should comics with multiple Kidballs be placed in [[:Category:Multiple Cueballs]], or should a new category be created? [[User:Maxcodes|Maxcodes]] ([[User talk:Maxcodes|talk]]) 12:37, 15 February 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::: (First, I made it markup as a &amp;quot;visible category link&amp;quot;, as you intended, rather than the invisible category membership that normally happens, hope you don't mind.)&lt;br /&gt;
:::: A further question is if a comic was Multiple Cueballs, by dint of having a Cueball ''and'' a now-IDed-as-Kidball, is it still Multiple Cueballs? [[Special:Contributions/82.132.239.239|82.132.239.239]] 13:26, 15 February 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::: We've only just got to the point where we're naming this character Kidball; I'd say don't complicate the situation just yet. Too many categories makes the categories less useful. -- [[User:Dtgriscom|Dtgriscom]] ([[User talk:Dtgriscom|talk]]) 13:52, 15 February 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::: Children are rarely alone, normally being with other children and/or with one or one-or-more adults. So [[:Category:Comics featuring children]] covers Multiple Kidballs.&lt;br /&gt;
:::: I'd say that Multiple Cueballs is a notable 'common strangeness' that I think it's useful to continue note, for various reasons, but multiple non-Cueball characters (e.g. how [[1000]] has it, in-extremis) aren't worth all the various different character-specific 'multiple' categories. (And, yes, an adult Cueball and a Kidball should not be &amp;quot;Multiple Cueballs&amp;quot;.) [[Special:Contributions/81.179.199.253|81.179.199.253]] 18:29, 15 February 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Agreed. Multiple Cueballs is usually for unusual cases where there isn't a different main character other than cueball. A bald kid and a bald adult are two different people. [[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 16:52, 16 February 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
== Bring back mboxes! ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[https://mediawiki.org/wiki/Template:Mbox Mboxes] (do read that link) are message boxes that prompt editors to edit.&lt;br /&gt;
They say things such as, &amp;quot;'''Please help expand this page.'''&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
However, they aren't on this wiki!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
So, there are a few different templates resembling mboxes:&lt;br /&gt;
* {{template|notice}},&lt;br /&gt;
* {{template|notice2}},&lt;br /&gt;
* {{template|incomplete}}, and&lt;br /&gt;
* {{template|incomplete transcript}}&lt;br /&gt;
are just a few I've seen.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I just don't think this is the way! Also, I checked {{template|ambox}} and it said it was deleted. However, the proposal archive&lt;br /&gt;
isn't working and I can't check the reason. So I can't see why we aren't using them!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Here are a few arguments for mboxes:&lt;br /&gt;
* Mboxes can be different types, such as a notice or an alert, or even an incomplete notice, with a &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;type&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt; attribute.&lt;br /&gt;
* Mboxes are &amp;lt;abbr title=&amp;quot;Don't Repeat Yourself&amp;quot;&amp;gt;DRY&amp;lt;/abbr&amp;gt;, they're reusable.&lt;br /&gt;
* Mboxes are used on Wikipedia, and other sites I'm sure, so using them here will make it more comfortable for new editors coming from other sites such as Wikipedia.&lt;br /&gt;
* Using mboxes will make styling all alerts easier. (OK YES I ADMIT IT I WANT MY USER STYLES)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
So why aren't we using them? I'm thinking that if this topic gets enough support, we can bring mboxes back, and&lt;br /&gt;
start transitioning old alerts to mbox variants.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thank you for coming to my TED Talk. [[User:Maxcodes|Maxcodes]] ([[User talk:Maxcodes|talk]]) 14:38, 16 February 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:The discussion, as you said, is in the archive: [[explain_xkcd_talk:Community_portal/Proposals#Notice_templates]]. [[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 16:58, 16 February 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Transcripts ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
ATTENTION!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
THIS: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Blah blah '''BLAH'''&lt;br /&gt;
''BLAH blah blah''&lt;br /&gt;
Wordssss…………&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
(Fill in blahs with your own words! Choose your own adventure fun!)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Is not a transcript!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I’ve had the impression that transcripts were for blind people (well, not ''just'' blind people) and making transcripts like the one above is only making things harder for people who may read aloud for blind people. Use things like [bold text] or [italics] or [comic in red text].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Idk wh6 I wrote this it just been bothering me. {{unsigned ip|2600:4040:52f7:9a00:cdb5:8d4d:4a6c:9917|16:58, 24 February 2026 (UTC)}}&lt;br /&gt;
:I've always wondered who the transcripts are even for. Since both the comics and the transcripts are in the same medium, those who are blind wouldn't be able to see the transcript. I guess they could have it read to them, but it's still confusing. As far as I know, it's just a thing that very early editors used to do, and the tradition stuck. What's the reasoning behind the transcripts? --'''''[[User:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#3c2004&amp;quot;&amp;gt;DollarStoreBa'al&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User Talk:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#1E0F00&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Converse&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; (BLM)''''' 14:22, 2 March 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::There exists the {{w|screen reader}}, which (at least until you start to trust AI, and there ''are'' undoubtely some good AI ATs out there that do this, these days, but are trained more to help with RL situations, like &amp;quot;what items are on the shop shelf I'm currently standing in front of?&amp;quot;, not stick-figures and line-art...) can't do anything useful with the non-meta contents of an image but will happily speak out a transcript.&lt;br /&gt;
::It probably also helps, even if you don't need it spoken out for you, if you have a hankering of searching for a particular comic and you know some written words in it that might not ''necessarily'' be quoted verbatim in the Explanation. The text being all there in the Transcript section means you can get this site (or perhaps your caching search-engine of choice) to find it, without even relying on someone having decided to quote it directly elsewhere (which is often not good and/or necessary for an Explanation/Discussion/Trivia section contribution).&lt;br /&gt;
::If you're ''really'' lucky, you can even search for [https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?search=%22office+chair%22&amp;amp;title=Special%3ASearch&amp;amp;go=Go some random visual thing], as long as it's been mentioned, without relying upon it havng already had a thoroughly populated Category... That relies upon any useful example having the same exact wording in the Transcript (and/or Explanation), but it's better than if you don't have any Transcripts at all.&lt;br /&gt;
::There are other useful things, a bit less obvious. Yet perhaps you could argue the presence of the Transcript may not actually be that vital... I don't know if anyone here ''does'' even use a screen-reader (but is still interested in webcomics ...a very visual medium). And there are probably other ways to get the other other advantages of the Transcript. Perhaps we could just make sure ''everything'' currently Transcripted is added to the Explanation (though that seems wasteful, and might make the Explanation far ''less'' useful/readable, having to fight past the obligatory in-depth explanation of whether Cueball's arm is raised in a particular panel or not...). But currently the Transcript exists, for those that need (or like) it, and also anybody who doesn't can just ignore it.&lt;br /&gt;
::And unless you're going to fold ''all'' Transcripts into the rest of the Explanation, it seems rather strange to just stop creating them. Honestly, it's probably half the fun for some people. And even another 'First!'-brag for users to bag, without being actually so crass as to edit anything just to say &amp;quot;First!&amp;quot; ;) [[Special:Contributions/81.179.199.253|81.179.199.253]] 19:58, 2 March 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::I still do think that the people who need a screen reader would be interested in webcomics, although there probably exists a small population of people who are. Also, screen readers do not necessarily need to use AI in anything except for the voice. --'''''[[User:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#023020&amp;quot;&amp;gt;DollarStoreBa'al&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User Talk:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#09ff00&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Converse&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;  20:09, 2 March 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::::Not sure if you're agreeing with me or not there. You may have missed a &amp;quot;not&amp;quot; or something in there somewhere. And screen-readers don't need ''any'' AI (as we would currently expect it), although doubtless the last few years development of LLM/GenerativeAIs has probably improved them from 'dumb phonology' (with quirks that users would have to get use to) to actually saying things more eloquently and even correctly voice non-homophonic homographs correctly...&lt;br /&gt;
::::But, anyway, there's the other reasons for a Transcript, even if I don't know if anyone does bother to use SRs. [[Special:Contributions/81.179.199.253|81.179.199.253]] 20:45, 2 March 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::I did, indeed, accidentally miss a 'not'. I DON'T think that those who need screen readers would be interested in webcomics. --'''''[[User:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#023020&amp;quot;&amp;gt;DollarStoreBa'al&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User Talk:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#09ff00&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Converse&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;  20:55, 2 March 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::You'd be surprised. Just take a look at this discussion: https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php/explain_xkcd:Community_portal/Miscellaneous#Sightless_readers_offended_by_the_.22It.27s_.27cause_you.27re_dumb.22_tagline. [[User:Elektrizikekswerk|Elektrizikekswerk]] ([[User talk:Elektrizikekswerk|talk]]) 13:00, 9 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::...I stand corrected. Also, [[2134: Too Much Talking|I have an opinion]] about that discussion after reading it. --'''''[[User:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#023020&amp;quot;&amp;gt;DollarStoreBa'al&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User Talk:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#09ff00&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Converse&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;  13:57, 9 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==New search algorithm?==&lt;br /&gt;
I was searching for a specific comic based on some words from the transcript. I was looking for [[2134: Too Much Talking]] and was searching &amp;quot;new opinions&amp;quot;. INSTEAD of getting only results which had the phrase &amp;quot;new opinions&amp;quot;, I got every comic which had the word 'new' or 'opinion' ANYWHERE in its explanation or transcript. I got over 100 hits and had to go through each preview individually, which was quite annoying and took far too long. I think there should be a function or option that you could turn on which makes it so, when you search &amp;quot;new opinions&amp;quot;, it only displays pages with the search term and doesn't display anything which only contains a part of it. This happens every time I try to search. --'''''[[User:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#023020&amp;quot;&amp;gt;DollarStoreBa'al&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User Talk:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#09ff00&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Converse&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;  14:04, 9 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:You probably searched for (quote)&amp;lt;code&amp;gt;new opinions&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;(unquote), but you'll find that you'll get exactly what you wanted from (quote)&amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;quot;new opinions&amp;quot;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;(unquote) ''with'' the literal quotes.&lt;br /&gt;
:Like I did, by ending up on the page https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?search=%22new+opinions%22&amp;amp;title=Special%3ASearch&amp;amp;go=Go just now.&lt;br /&gt;
:Note that searches just for (quote)&amp;lt;code&amp;gt;new&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;(unquote) ''or'' just for (quote)&amp;lt;code&amp;gt;opinions&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;(unquote) return many (thousands!) of matches. (quote)&amp;lt;code&amp;gt;new opinions&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;(unquote) 'only' seems to return 42 examples (now including this page?). This would include examples of &amp;quot;opinion new&amp;quot; ordering or even totally separate uses like if any a phrase like &amp;quot;...relying upon old opinions, rather than new facts...&amp;quot; was used. An ''actual'' example, is the following search-result snippet:&lt;br /&gt;
::..., with no real bearing on most peoples' lives, a lot of people have strong '''opinions''' on the topic. One on side, people argue that planets should have a consiste ...with such debates, to the point of damaging their relationship, is nothing '''new''' for this couple.&lt;br /&gt;
:I don't know how we'd even update/change the search-algorithm.&lt;br /&gt;
:And, note, it'd annoy those who are already used to what subtle ways there are to be either more or less finicky in a desired search. Searching for mention of &amp;quot;dog leads&amp;quot;? The (unquoted) search for &amp;quot;dog lead&amp;quot; might be better to find &amp;quot;he has a dog on a lead&amp;quot; without (normally) getting pages that say something like &amp;quot;a heavy element, like lead&amp;quot;. A quoted-search, or an assumption that the user would have wanted a quoted-search, would miss the first example.&lt;br /&gt;
:There may be various other tricks and tips to search-formatting. The use of &amp;quot;+&amp;quot; before a particular term used to (on Google) force that as a required match, when it might have included &amp;quot;does not include...&amp;quot; on a page that contains every other word, just not that one.  But this site doesn't seem to have the full (traditional) Google-Fu behaviour, that also included things like (quote)&amp;lt;code&amp;gt;-dog lead&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;(unquote) that could get you (mostly) the metal or connecting cable references to lead without so.much of the additional pet-restraint homonym, but then the Google algorithm has also changed so much over the years (Natural Language Processing and even more AI-based methods, rather than a more obvious codified 'markup' to one's search terms where it was the user's initial knowledge that more limited the search, intentinally or otherwise). [[Special:Contributions/82.132.238.115|82.132.238.115]] 16:53, 9 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Excessive verbosity ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Should we have a category and community portal link to it for explanations which are considered excessively verbose to the point of deteriorating their usefulness to the readers? [[Special:Contributions/2603:800C:1200:596A:A08E:FCB1:F968:D433|2603:800C:1200:596A:A08E:FCB1:F968:D433]] 20:18, 15 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Define excessive. (Also: Define insufficient.) [[Special:Contributions/81.179.199.253|81.179.199.253]] 21:09, 15 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::He never even said &amp;quot;insufficient&amp;quot;. He said that making a whole essay as a response (I'll link some examples below) is a waste of time because all the text is overwhelming and it becomes harder to pick out the important parts. By the way, he may be referring to you, as you tend to make very long responses (read: not necessarily a bad thing).&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
::Some examples:&lt;br /&gt;
::*[https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:3231:_Lightning&amp;amp;curid=30046&amp;amp;diff=410387&amp;amp;oldid=410386 this edit by 81.179.199.253]&lt;br /&gt;
::*[https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:3232:_Countdown_Standard&amp;amp;curid=30051&amp;amp;diff=410328&amp;amp;oldid=410327 this edit by 81.179.199.253]&lt;br /&gt;
::*[https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:3231:_Lightning&amp;amp;curid=30046&amp;amp;diff=410157&amp;amp;oldid=410141 this edit by 82.132.238.12]&lt;br /&gt;
::--'''''[[User:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Times; color:#023020&amp;quot;&amp;gt;DollarStoreBa'al&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User_talk:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Times; color:#000080&amp;quot;&amp;gt;'''''converse'''''&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 21:18, 15 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Indeed. &amp;quot;Insufficient&amp;quot; was was seaid by me (IPv4), not IPv6. The point being that I'm not sure what amount of paring down would satisfy them, and what amount would be problematic to them.&lt;br /&gt;
:::If some information is there but looks superfluous to someone, they might remove it. If the information is not there but seems necessary, some other person might add it. And everyone has different ideas.&lt;br /&gt;
:::And in the two editing examples (and the example that wasn't me), they aren't even Explanation additions, which I'm sure (but will happily be corrected on) wasn't what the suggestion was about. Also, I make no apologies for being verbose enough to encopass a complicated issue, when I think it merits it, especially in Talk. There's also occasion to cut down/rationalise things (in Explanations), especially when multiple editors have added a concept here, an example there, a caveat at the end, etc, which might be best rewritten from scratch.&lt;br /&gt;
:::Face it, we who seek to &amp;quot;explain xkcd&amp;quot; have many things to say, whether we we're Nerd Sniped or just happen to think of something interesting but unmentioned. And those who wish xkcd to be explained may have many questions (even if they {{diff|410158|don't say what they are}}. Perhaps I personally err more on maintaining a verbosity (that can be skipped over by the impatient reader) rather than risk being too laconic (and leave out something that others would want/need to be said).&lt;br /&gt;
:::I consciously ''tried'' to convey all of what I've just said by just five words, you'll notice. Maybe ten words would have been better? [[Special:Contributions/81.179.199.253|81.179.199.253]] 00:10, 16 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::I did actually define it, plain as day! Excessive verbosity is &amp;quot;excessively verbose to the point of deteriorating [an explanation's] usefulness to the readers.&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;
::Please I know this has been something of a pattern for years now, and I don't know who all is involved or how many, of course, but could you please try showing some restraint? For example, when you're typing a long paragraph and you're not 100% sure it would make the explanation clearer or more helpful in some concrete way, would you please consider posting it on the talk page and asking others whether they think it should be added, or at least ask others for help with brevity? [[Special:Contributions/2603:800C:1200:596A:FDFE:A728:80A:5859|2603:800C:1200:596A:FDFE:A728:80A:5859]] 01:00, 17 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::They do have a point, IPv4. Many of your comments exceed 1,000 bytes in length, and most go above 500.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:::1)''&amp;quot;If some information is there but looks superfluous to someone, they might remove it.&amp;quot;'' Most people are probably going to be encouraged ''not'' to edit other people's comments (see [[User talk:42.book.addict#Editing other people's words?|here]])&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:::2)''&amp;quot;In the two editing examples, they aren't even explanation additions...&amp;quot;'' That's precisely the point. Large additions to explanations are fine, if it all relates to the comic in some way. Large talk page replies, however, are much harder to navigate.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:::3)''&amp;quot;Perhaps I personally err on maintaining a verbosity (that can be skipped over by the impatient reader) rather than risk being too laconic (and leave out something that others would want/need to be said).&amp;quot;'' The issue is that all the important things are sprinkled throughout your explanation and '''can't''' be skipped. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:::If you do insist on being as verbose as you are, perhaps it would be a good idea to add a TL;DR? Just a thought.--'''''[[User:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Times; color:#023020&amp;quot;&amp;gt;DollarStoreBa'al&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User_talk:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Times; color:#000080&amp;quot;&amp;gt;'''''converse'''''&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 13:19, 17 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::::Ahoy there, from IPv4-land, again. I think you're misreading something. You're talking about Talk: comments being overlong. I'm not sure anyone else is.&lt;br /&gt;
::::The OP says &amp;quot;...for '''explanations''' which are considered excessively verbose...&amp;quot; (my emphasis added). Only in the more recent &amp;quot;...would you please consider posting it on the talk page and...&amp;quot; suggestion is OP mentioning Talk:, and that's as a suggestion of doing that ''instead'' of being wordy in the Explanation.&lt;br /&gt;
::::I also disagree that my two highlighted additions ({{diff|410387|this}} and {{diff|410328|this}}) are overlong. Not as short as they could be, but only significantly so by not saying things I wanted to say. Whether I not I should have, is another matter.&lt;br /&gt;
::::Not much more to add, that hasn't already been mentioned. So I won't. Have a nice day! [[Special:Contributions/81.179.199.253|81.179.199.253]] 18:41, 17 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::((Hi, I'm not the above IPv4, but I am someone you used as an example. And I could respond to DSB's comments (that edit-conflicted with me writing the following), as I think they are arguments directed against me too, but that would add ''another half hour or more of writing, down-editing, reviewing, adding back in things that I should ''not'' have edited out, etc. So, instead, I'm just prepending this little blurb. But it seems like I'm of a like mind/''modus operandi'' as the other protagonist here. Though was reluctant to jump in to comment on this 'suggestion' right from the start. But here I am now. Sorry!))&lt;br /&gt;
:::No, sorry. You're still being subjective there, as already said by someone else. If people add more information, it's generally because they think that such information is missing. Or responding to comments (or interpretations) from others who hadn't already 'got it'.&lt;br /&gt;
:::I absolutely don't mind if my attempts to explain something are re-edited to be less wordy than I might have left them, though. That's the nature of wiki-editing. And, if someone removes or wrongly paraphrases something (of mine, or anyone else), I reserve the right to go back and make it correct once more.&lt;br /&gt;
:::The exception is with Talk comments:&lt;br /&gt;
:::#Other than totally removing something that totally violates site policy, you do ''not'' remove or edit someone else's Talk contribution, beyond any peripheral formatting (e.g. adding a missing signature, correcting a clear indentation misalignment or, with very great care, making it more readable as far as newlines, bulletpoints, tabulation, etc, if the OA cocked that up) and ''never'' change the substantive text... even for spelling.&lt;br /&gt;
:::#Things written in Talk are not part of the Explanation and should not be assumed to be read by anyone reading the Explanation.&lt;br /&gt;
:::#They also need not be as 'perfect' as one might try to write in an Explanation, be they either more jokey, full of spelling/grammar errors. This is not the &amp;quot;voice of the site, for we are legion&amp;quot;, but individually attributable (more or less) voices that may display confusion, authoritativeness, malapropriate terminology, the desire to say &amp;quot;FIRST!&amp;quot; and/or complaints about everyone else doing any or all the the other things.&lt;br /&gt;
:::#Should someone ''happen'' to make a cogent point in Talk, it almost never is suitable to just copypaste their exact words (less the signature - if there was any!) into the main Explanation (or even within the 'incomplete'-notification. If they thought it was ready for the Explanation, they'd have written it there, and probably used a different phrase (I write from experience, here!)&lt;br /&gt;
:::#And there is very little reason to go through the collaborative editing process on Talk, with multiple versions (and critiques) of the 'concept' text being left for everyone to see all the false starts and mis-steps and the like. When the ''very idea'' of the main Wiki page is that it's a collaborative editing place that gets refined to the best result it can be (or, maybe, just one of the 'least worst' ones), without all the messy re-versioning details on show (but still there in the History, for the curious).&lt;br /&gt;
:::(And I note that DSB highlit one of ''my'' Talk contributions, above, as an example of overloquaciousness... Strangely, one that {{diff|410161|looked somewhat appreciated}}, unless that was actually intended as sarcasm, but lacked sufficient markup to reveal that as its purpose. Yes, it was significantly longer than the first response (which I think was good, as far as it went), but I thought that *maybe* a few more details wouldn't go amiss. In leiu of possible further questions that might have occured without.)&lt;br /&gt;
:::So, no. I reject your request to 'discuss things in Talk, i  advance' any time I think I might not be adding a perfectly cromulant smattering of knowledge. I know that I will never write laconicallg enough to please every reader, especially without making it so streamlined that someone else will have to request (or fulfill) further expansion to it.&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;quot;Should we have a category&amp;quot;? Maybe. What are you thinking? Some template-led thing, used either like the {{template|Actual citation needed}} or {{template|incomplete}} ones, or somewhere betwixt the two, in application/functionality? What if some adds an &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{Excessive verbosity}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt; tag and someone disagrees enough to remove it again? Are we back to arguing it out in Talk (like we do already), and/or whole paragraphs being pre-emptively removed (like is done already), or are we supposed to stop doing that and instead populate the tag with 'reason=' information?&lt;br /&gt;
:::Not entirely sure what the &amp;quot;community portal link to it&amp;quot; is about, though. Adding a way to get to [[explain xkcd:Community portal/Proposals#Excessive verbosity|this section]]? Or adding a link to each tagged example ''from'' this section?&lt;br /&gt;
:::The observation, in several ways, needs further explanation and elaboration (totally unintended, but I ''just'' realised how ironic that is!). Can I (and my fellow word-technicians, such as the prior responder) possibly shave off a word or two? Probably. But I personally try (amongst other editing issues) to address inconsistencies and gaps in information that I see have not yet been addressed. If someone wants to improve on what I add, within a comic page, then they can. Better something there, imperfect, than just lacking because of the possibility of some arbitrary word-/paragraph-limit being breached due to my 'interference'. [[Special:Contributions/82.132.236.33|82.132.236.33]] 14:44, 17 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I created [[[[:Category:Excessive verbosity]]]] and mentioned it at the end of [[explain xkcd:Community portal]]. I have a plan to fill it with initially the 20-30 worst offending explanations using AI, but I need to run some experiments first. [[User:Liv2splain|Liv2splain]] ([[User talk:Liv2splain|talk]]) 08:59, 18 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:What actual criteria will assess the issue of &amp;quot;worst offending&amp;quot;, can I ask? I ask this seriously, but I might as well tell you that I predict that you won't have a cogent answer. Especially if you're going for the same enumeration as that graph that was created. [[Special:Contributions/81.179.199.253|81.179.199.253]] 20:55, 18 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::Whether the text is too verbose to serve the readers as a copyedit for brevity could. (By the way, did you know in the year 1600 the typical English written sentence had about 50 words?) [[User:Liv2splain|Liv2splain]] ([[User talk:Liv2splain|talk]]) 04:55, 23 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Poking my nose back in... Is the valuation then based upon something like &amp;quot;we asked 100 readers to rank the readability, and used IRV to produce the community-accepted order of best to worst&amp;quot;? Or &amp;quot;nominate your fifty worst examples, and the ones with most votes get looked at&amp;quot;, Either of those would be awkward to organise properly.&lt;br /&gt;
:::Or are we asking an AI (multiple times, and/or multiple AIs) to do this ranking, knowing that AIs are ineffably tied to their training data in ways that can be unpredictably spurious. (As an example, it could mark down anything written by an IP, having identified that as a key indicator, if given the option. Like the cases of AIs 'learning' to diagnosing illnesses based upon the presence of a measuring scale in a diagnostic photograph, or a certain type of acute medicine hospital name in the past treatment records.) What would it make of the sentence &amp;quot;Colourless green dreams sleep furiously&amp;quot;, and would it know if it is even a contextually apt statement or not, for any given usage?&lt;br /&gt;
:::The 50 words thing is interesting, if ''that's'' the key to your suggestion, but hardly a good scale for multiple reasons. Case in point: your first sentence is 16 words. It is brief. It also took me a while to realise it wasn't an accidentally unfinished &amp;quot;Whether &amp;lt;foo&amp;gt; could &amp;lt;bar&amp;gt;&amp;quot; enquiry, and a couple of other garden-path mis-steps, before realising its grammatic intent.&lt;br /&gt;
:::Counting words isn't enough. Short sentences more readable? (Or it is non-linear.) Correct horse battery staple! Must be grammatical, naturally. Not comic joke call-back. But what about punctuation? Commas in right places. Semi-colons: good or bad? Is this paragraph readable? All statements, four words. It is fun writing. But not easy, regardless. Fluid reading remains uncertain. Seems stilted to me. Sesquipedalian loquaciousness preponderantly undisallowed. You get the idea..?&lt;br /&gt;
:::The truth is that there's no easy (non-subjective) measure of readability, and whatever you do use to measure it may have little connection to understandability, practical meaning or actual accuracy/relevence, and attempts to enhance any or all of the latter may ''require'' some loss of mere 'brevity'. This is not to say that I consider my own contributions unimprovable, just that they (should) say what I intend them to say, and to the extent I intend to say them. [[Special:Contributions/82.132.238.56|82.132.238.56]] 10:16, 23 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Why not simply use the incomplete tag? My main contribution to this wiki in the last months was to cut down explanations to the point. If I stumble upon an explanation that I feel is too bloated but I don't have the time or energy to do it myself at that moment I add the incomplete tag, mention that the explanation needs to be shortened and done. Oftentimes I do it then myself some time later and remove the tag again. I don't see the point of a new category. Speaking of bloating up stuff... ;) [[User:Elektrizikekswerk|Elektrizikekswerk]] ([[User talk:Elektrizikekswerk|talk]]) 08:53, 23 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:I agree, for what it's worth. [[Special:Contributions/82.132.238.56|82.132.238.56]] 10:16, 23 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Agreed. It should simply say which part of the explanation needs works, and what exactly it needs. [[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 12:26, 25 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== possible new &amp;quot;superheroes&amp;quot; category ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
i don't edit this wiki very often, but i recently decided to make a &amp;quot;superheroes&amp;quot; category since i was surprised we didn't have one already. i've been going thru the archives and adding comics, but today i noticed a bunch of the edits were reverted by one person with the reason &amp;quot;no such category&amp;quot;. do i need to do something to get the category approved or were the reversions incorrect? [[Special:Contributions/216.145.71.130|216.145.71.130]] 21:03, 29 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:As the reverter, I'm suggesting that the way this is normally done is to notice the need and suggest that it is created, listing (at least some of) the cases.&lt;br /&gt;
:While anyone with page-creation capabilities (not you, and not me) can &amp;quot;unredlink&amp;quot; the category, it'd be useful to make sure it's not just being created because of one person's vague moment of inspiration.&lt;br /&gt;
:Not to say that you're unjustified, in this case, just that you hadn't gone any way to ''try'' to justify it. And it's better to do that. (The old phrase &amp;quot;better to ask forgiveness than permission&amp;quot; isn't really applicable here.) I'll happily help repopulate the new category, if and when it is decided to get created. Just it was being done the wrong way round.&lt;br /&gt;
:Someone else {{diff|411372|mentioned}} that its name might need rethinking, and that's one of the aspects. Yes, it can be renamed, but still much better to be right to start with.&lt;br /&gt;
:So I think it should be open to discussion... enough to convince someone else to make it a valid category, ''then'' start adding them back in again.&lt;br /&gt;
:If I've picked them all up, BTW, I think the following are your candidates:&lt;br /&gt;
:*[[273: Electromagnetic Spectrum]] - (just copied from below, not sure without checking... maybe Superman?)&lt;br /&gt;
:*[[663: Sagan-Man‎‎]] - &amp;quot;Sagan-Man&amp;quot;, as per title&lt;br /&gt;
:*[[700: Complexion‎‎]] - Batman&lt;br /&gt;
:*[[980: Money‎‎]] - Batman mentioned&lt;br /&gt;
:*[[1004: Batman‎‎]] - natch&lt;br /&gt;
:*[[1010: Etymology-Man‎‎]] - &amp;quot;Etymology-Man&amp;quot;, of course/&lt;br /&gt;
:*[[1012: Wrong Superhero‎‎]] - and again&lt;br /&gt;
:**[[:Category:Etymology-Man‎‎]] - and his own category (of just two appearances...)&lt;br /&gt;
:*[[1384: Krypton‎‎]] - Superman&lt;br /&gt;
:*[[1394: Superm*n‎‎]] -sprt-of Superman&lt;br /&gt;
:*[[1415: Ballooning]] - Spiderman&lt;br /&gt;
:*[[1434: Where Do Birds Go]] - Superman&lt;br /&gt;
:*(Feel free to edit in any more, anybody!)&lt;br /&gt;
:...so, along with any other finds, if it looks like we need [[:Category:Comics containing superheroes]] (or similar) then your existing work hasn't gone to waste. [[Special:Contributions/81.179.199.253|81.179.199.253]] 21:42, 29 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::for archiving's sake, there's also [[273: Electromagnetic Spectrum]], [[1415: Ballooning]], and [[1434: Where Do Birds Go]]. &lt;br /&gt;
::it would be nice to have character pages for specific superheroes like superman and batman (and, evidently, etymology-man), but &amp;quot;superheroes&amp;quot; in general is a topic, not a character. as for the name, it's in line with categories like [[:Category:Aliens]], [[:Category:Demons]], and [[:Category:Sysadmins]] which are plural and don't start with &amp;quot;comics featuring&amp;quot;. we do have [[:Category:Comics featuring children]], but it seems like an oddball to me (maybe because it's more of a meta-category for the characters page than one intended for casual browsing? dunno.)&lt;br /&gt;
::should we continue discussing this here, on the character page talk, or somewhere else? i must admit i don't understand the organization. [[Special:Contributions/216.145.71.130|216.145.71.130]] 22:09, 29 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::The wiki can be a bit inconsistent, because it's been going for a while and not everyone has gone with the same 'house style' (which may have changed over time, too). We have [[:Category:Comics with babies]], for example, and also [[:Category:Comics with cursed items]]. While there are various &amp;quot;Category:Comics featuring &amp;lt;named characters, both real and fictional&amp;gt;&amp;quot;, which would have more suited Etymology Man and could (if we so wish) serve for Batman, Superman, etc, individually.&lt;br /&gt;
:::I'm actually fairly ambivalent, but I think that it should at least have other voices agree on which way it all goes. Saves too much after-the-fact 'corrections'. But you don't want to be talking just to me about this, so I'll shut up now, and await some of the 'big hitter' accounts to weigh it all up. It doesn't need to be done right now. A couple more hours, at least... ;)[[Special:Contributions/81.179.199.253|81.179.199.253]] 22:40, 29 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:no response about where to talk about this yet, so i'm just going to loop the other comment in here. changing the name to be more indicative as well. [[Special:Contributions/64.189.140.8|64.189.140.8]] 07:20, 1 May 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Sounds like a nice category to me. [[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 09:22, 1 May 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Seems quite relevant to me. Don't really see an issue with using the category name &amp;quot;superheroes&amp;quot; [[User:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font:11pt Cormorant Garamond&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#4A86A6&amp;quot;&amp;gt;tor&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#C0728D&amp;quot;&amp;gt;i :3&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font:8pt Cormorant Garamond&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#7E7E7E&amp;quot;&amp;gt;talk &amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#C0728D&amp;quot;&amp;gt;to &amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#4A86A6&amp;quot;&amp;gt;me!&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 16:31, 1 May 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:here's the remaining ones i picked up:&lt;br /&gt;
:*[[1648: Famous Duos]] - batman and robin&lt;br /&gt;
:*[[1792: Bird/Plane/Superman]]&lt;br /&gt;
:*[[1848: Glacial Erratic]] - superman (title text)&lt;br /&gt;
:*[[1904: Research Risks]] - supervillains in general&lt;br /&gt;
:*[[1970: Name Dominoes]] - superman and batman (slightly up-right from the center)&lt;br /&gt;
:*[[2230: Versus Bracket]] - batman vs. superman and justice league vs. teen titans&lt;br /&gt;
:*[[2367: Masks]] - batman, spiderman, and mysterio (possibly scarecrow as well, no idea what his lore is)&lt;br /&gt;
:*[[2396: Wonder Woman 1984]]&lt;br /&gt;
:*[[3146: Fantastic Four]]&lt;br /&gt;
:[[Special:Contributions/151.141.68.154|151.141.68.154]] 19:21, 1 May 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::since there's been no further comments i went ahead and remade the category. if anyone with permissions can un-redlink it that'd be nice. [[Special:Contributions/64.189.140.61|64.189.140.61]] 00:49, 6 May 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::You ''didn't'' &amp;quot;remake the category&amp;quot; because, as you say, they're redlinked until someone has sufficient reason to unredlink them. That's not the way we do things here, as explained, or else anyone could do something like [[:Category:64.189.140.61 likes creating categories]] and expect it to be created without any consideration of need.&lt;br /&gt;
:::I'm not opposed to the category, in principle, but the only reason I'm ''not'' (re-)reverting all those pre-emptive new redlinks is because it's too much effort right now. Which is ''not'' the best reason for failing to uphold such practical standards. Well intentioned as you are (and I don't know why nobody else supported you by instating it 'properly'), ''some'' here may see your approach as akin to vandalism. [[Special:Contributions/82.132.237.108|82.132.237.108]] 10:28, 6 May 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::: I, unlike OP, have done quite a bit more ''preparatory'' work for the potential category.&lt;br /&gt;
::: See all the following edits:&lt;br /&gt;
::: *{{diff|411888|663: Sagan-Man}}, {{diff|411889|700: Complexion}}, {{diff|411890|980: Money}}, {{diff|411891|1004: Batman}}, {{diff|411892|1010: Etymology-Man}}, {{diff|411893|1012: Wrong Superhero}}, {{diff|411894|1384: Krypton}}, {{diff|411895|1394: Superm*n}}, {{diff|411896|1415: Ballooning}}, {{diff|411897|1434: Where Do Birds Go}}, {{diff|411898|1648: Famous Duos}}, {{diff|411899|1792: Bird/Plane/Superman}}, {{diff|411900|1848: Glacial Erratic}}, {{diff|411901|1904: Research Risks}}, {{diff|411902|1970: Name Dominoes}}, {{diff|411903|2230: Versus Bracket}}, {{diff|411904|2367: Masks}}, {{diff|411905|2396: Wonder Woman 1984}}, {{diff|411907|3146: Fantastic Four}} and {{diff|411908|Category:Etymology-Man}}&lt;br /&gt;
::: Note that I have done three things:&lt;br /&gt;
:::#Chosen the [[:Category:Comics featuring Superheroes]] variation, to match (among other more individually-aimed ones) the category name used in [[:Category:Comics featuring major characters‏‎]], [[:Category:Comics featuring minor characters‏‎]], [[:Category:Comics featuring politicians]] and [[:Category:Comics featuring real people‏‎]]. Consider this my official and reasoned suggestion for what the Category should be named. Subject to any further discussion on this matter (before implementation).&lt;br /&gt;
:::#* Yes, there are other inconsistencies to this. But then I'd also argue that [[:Category:Etymology-Man]] really should have echoed the standard that resulted in [[:Category:Comics featuring Kidball]], too, as well the same (more historically or not) for Knit Cap, Cueball, Little Bobby Tables, etc.&lt;br /&gt;
:::#I've added a 'category sort index' word, for grouping in the eventual automatic category listing. This is an optional extra, and I used &amp;quot;multiple&amp;quot; for those comics that weren't (easily) just one individual Superhero, but listed those that were involved in the next thing I did. If you prefer normal comic (or category) name-order, you could remove this pipe-option. Or, ideally, cut'n'paste it into any post-category comment just for editor referencing.&lt;br /&gt;
:::#I have (where it seemed necessary, which is most of the time) added an apprioriate editor-'comment' after the category. Because I can't use HTML comments ''within'' HTML comments, I've rendered these with &amp;quot;(!-- .. --)&amp;quot; surrounds, which need fixing to use &amp;amp;lt;/&amp;amp;gt; instead once the current commented-proposal surround is removed.&lt;br /&gt;
:::#*Note, im particular one of them... [[1904: Research Risks]], I think it was... where the comment made was that I don't think it qualified for Superhero, as it only references the concept of a Supervillain.&lt;br /&gt;
:::i.e. each (commented) placeholder should be easy to make into whatever (uncommented) implementation is agreed upon.&lt;br /&gt;
::: Now, ''please'', OP and everyone else, do not just revert (or otherwise apply) a currently non-existent category 'in the hope' that it's correct and someone with an account will just unredlink it for you as a 'done deal'. Even if I were an account-holder (of suitable, no onerous, vintage) I would not just 'make it happen' without at least some proper discussion. Can't speak for what named-users might do, off their own backs, naturally. My opinion (informed or otherwise) doesn't have any particular weight, and it's still possible I can't persuade anyone (who matters) to adopt all of my own suggestions. [[Special:Contributions/81.179.199.253|81.179.199.253]] 20:03, 6 May 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::::two account-holders said they approved of the idea. if this isn't proper discussion, what do you want me to do?&lt;br /&gt;
::::also, aside from flukes like [[:Category:Comics with cursed items]] (which should be changed imo), the &amp;quot;comics featuring&amp;quot; name is just to avoid clashing with character pages: for instance, we named it [[:Category:Comics featuring real people]] because [[:Category:Real people]] was taken. &amp;quot;Superheroes&amp;quot; isn't taken; we don't have any character pages for superheroes in the first place. [[:Category:Etymology-Man]] is a [[:Category:Miniseries|miniseries]] category, not a character category. (it has the same comics as a character category would have, granted, but it's not treated like one in any way -- hence the name!) [[Special:Contributions/64.189.140.56|64.189.140.56]] 04:13, 7 May 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::::Speaking for myself, I respect both Favi and tori's opinions, and I'm even (generally) in favour of this category. But nobody who ''can'' make it so that it isn't redlinking (simple enough... by now, even you could have done it, entirely on your own) has done so.&lt;br /&gt;
::::My (and others', it looks like) point has always been that it has for a long time been a fairly matter of fact process to announce &amp;quot;hey, I think ''this, this and this'' should be made to have ''that'' Category&amp;quot;, some minor discussion occur, refinements/additions considered, then it gets done. If it doesn't, it's because of lack of buy-in and nobody was convinced.&lt;br /&gt;
::::Some things still might get done far too hastily/improperly (various Category inconsistencies are 'obvious') and the Pages To Delete tags get rolled out (where page-renaming isn't sufficient), but Deletions are even rarer than Renames (in part because of the rights required to do so), and both are outweighed by the creation of instances of what might just be considered as 'personal pet project pages' by some. That way lies indefinite expansion and random 'forgotten' stubs left all over the place, so if I have one personally overriding attitude to this whole thing, it's that of caution. I'd rather remove a redlink (otyer than abset User and User Talk ones in signatures) than let it temptingly sit there inviting the next near-newbie to create it 'because they can' (as demonstrably happens with the User/User Talk ones, anyway), regardless&lt;br /&gt;
::::(I haven't yet even decided upon my ''own username'' that I might use, after maybe more than a decade contributing here, which probably tells you more about me than anything else. Can't speak for others still posting via IP, like yourself.)&lt;br /&gt;
::::This is not me 'pulling rank', I must add. I have no 'rank' to pull, by my own decision. I'm just a random IP (as are you/any others not named yet) who just tries to do my best to do what limited things I can do to make this site operate smoothly. It was supposed to be a simple explanation of the established community convention that has tended to work well enough, and was never supposed to become 'IP-vs-IP combat', and I really hope still isn't, despite our clearly conflicting drives on how to reach the same sort of 'final' ideal (minor details varying). And I've had my own fair share of &amp;quot;wouldn't it be nice to have &amp;lt;some feature&amp;gt;?&amp;quot; not going anywhere, which I live with because this isn't 'my' site but a community one. (A strange community, naturally, but one of the better ones, out of all those I dabble in.)&lt;br /&gt;
::::That's the long-winded reply only here to try to explain (my, at least) previous long-winded replies. I'll leave the whole &amp;quot;Comics featuring&amp;quot; stuff undiscussed (save that, by consistency, yes, if Etymology-Man had enough appearances to merit a character page, some rearranging probably wouldn't go amiss to do the same as &amp;quot;Cueball&amp;quot;!=&amp;quot;... featuring Cueball&amp;quot;, etc). It's not a full on &amp;quot;[[386: Duty Calls]]&amp;quot;-type scenario, but I thought it worth a 'quick' last note as to where I'm coming from. It wasn't supposed to be this long! Sorry for wasting everyone's time, though. Even the like-minded ones? [[Special:Contributions/82.132.237.17|82.132.237.17]] 14:49, 7 May 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Multiple Blondies, Merge Blondie/Lenhart ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Blondie]] can be three different people: the [[Blondie|generic Blondie]], [[Miss Lenhart]], and [[Mrs. Roberts]] (who only appeared in the [[1337 series]] and [[327: Exploits of a Mom]]). My proposal is to change Blondie's name to Miss Lenhart, but separate Mrs. Roberts and Blondie, as they are different people. Merging Miss Lenhart and Blondie would be similar to how [[Cutie]] and [[Megan]] were merged after Megan was named a few times. [[User:YZ100]] 00:57, 6 May 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Sounds good! I don't see why we'd need to keep using our own name when Randall has given her a different name. [[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 14:53, 9 May 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::Hmmm... not a lot of thought put in here, before the mass rejig actually happened. The same person who is explicitly a Math(s) teacher in some comics is also explicitly ''not'' into mathematics in [[1985: Meteorologist|at least one other]] (and instead has a Linguistics degree under her belt). Wish I'd said something, now, but I was already involved in the above discussion and didn't want to cause any more fuss than I had to. Oh well. Done now. (Or at least the 'easy' bit, but I suspect the other page-merging will be happening soon enough.) [[Special:Contributions/81.179.199.253|81.179.199.253]] 16:54, 9 May 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Well, that comic is particular because Blondie is used a news anchor. Iirc, Randall almost always uses either Cueball or Blondie to portray news anchors, and that comic had two news anchors so he had to use both. And even before the merger, the [[Miss Lenhart]] page said: &amp;quot;[https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Miss_Lenhart&amp;amp;oldid=409753 She may or may not represent the same character from comic to comic]&amp;quot;. I'll add that fun fact to the page though. [[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 19:35, 10 May 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::I agree with [[User:FaviFake]]. The only recurring characters in xkcd who represent the same character across comics are [[Black Hat]], [[Danish]], [[Beret Guy]], and technically [[White Hat]]. Miss Lenhart can do different things, and arguably it is possible for her to work part-time. But since xkcd doesn't have a fixed timeline, like in [[1139: Rubber and Glue]], [[1753: Thumb War]], or [[2869: Puzzles]], where people like Black Hat and [[Ponytail]] appear as kids, so it is possible for here to work as a news anchor in the past, if not part-time. The Miss Lenhart page says Cueball is used more commonly as a news anchor, and this could be because Lenhart works part-time. [[User:YZ100]] 21:12, 10 May 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::::I gave just ''one'' case, of several, where - similarly to &amp;quot;Rob is a Cueball, but a given Cueball isn't necessarily a/the Rob&amp;quot; - an aspect of character tied heavily to Miss Lenhart isn't one that agrees with all Blondies. My perspective remains that Miss Lenhart (when established as such) is notably as much a separate entity from generic-Blondie as Mrs Roberts is another, and we previously we had this decent distinction of definite-Misses Lenharts, definite-Mrs Robertses and all other generic Blondies that were neither suggested to be (at least part of the time) mathematics teachers nor hacker-moms.&lt;br /&gt;
::::Then there's the separate issue, in that same Meteorologist comic, that the Blondie/whoever (like Cueball) clearly isn't even really a News Anchor (part time or otherwise), and actual TV meteorologists/weather-presenters (even budding/probationary ones, who should have started off by being ''actual'' meteorologists who then are seen as suitable candidates to dip their toe into being a media personality) tend to be entirely different people from the journalists who present the news. The lesson is that justifying a positive truth from the the comics is tricky, but inconsistencies support various negative truths mmore practical&lt;br /&gt;
::::In the end, there's pretty much as much logic to consider all (ex-)Blondies to be Mrs. Roberts, ''instead''. Or, as a better combination of matches, some are Lenhart and some are Roberts. (Or, a better-match/lesser-mismatch, would leave at least some Blondies as still 'only' a generic Blondie) Though the decision has been made now, so I was only here to point out some of the various problems invoked but apparently not even considered. [[Special:Contributions/81.179.199.253|81.179.199.253]] 22:42, 10 May 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::In [[1985: Meteorologist]], Lenhart has a Linguistics degree and she teaches grammar in [[3229: Grammar]]. She isn't limited to just math, like how she teaches science in [[3132: Coastline Similarity]]. Besides, being a math teacher and a mathematician are not the same thing. [[User:YZ100]] 4:50, 12 May 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::: You are of course {{w|begging the question}}, by insisting that the person/people with a Linguistics/Grammar background is Miss Lenhart, ''then'' using that as further proof as to why you are correct to say they are all the same person. Try not to do that. [[Special:Contributions/82.132.221.157|82.132.221.157]] 13:37, 12 May 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Page for What if? questions ==&lt;br /&gt;
Let's make a page for What if? questions we all have and take some of those questions to send to Randall? This may also help revive the blog articles. Does anyone have any other ideas? [[User:YZ100|YZ100]] 4:38, 14 May 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:I think that Randall might be working on some other projects. Added a question onto [[User:FaviFake]]'s page in regards to whether or not What If? will be continued in the future. [[User:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font:11pt Cormorant Garamond&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#4A86A6&amp;quot;&amp;gt;tor&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#C0728D&amp;quot;&amp;gt;i :3&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font:8pt Cormorant Garamond&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#7E7E7E&amp;quot;&amp;gt;talk &amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#C0728D&amp;quot;&amp;gt;to &amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#4A86A6&amp;quot;&amp;gt;me!&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 19:00, 14 May 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:He doesn't really work on any projects like What if? 2 or What if? x10 anymore and the blag was discontinued. He works on the video series these days. But the whole point of What if? is for him to answer our questions. [[User:YZ100]] 22:43, 29 May 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Clearing up how to become a trusted user ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As a new user myself, the tiny section on why you can't make a user page yet is vague and annoying. Few edits? How many? Who makes you a trusted user, what is the process, etc are questions that many people ask. Just saying it would be nice for a better explanation on how to become a trusted user. Thanks :) [[User:Black Hat&amp;amp;#39;s Hat|Black Hat&amp;amp;#39;s Hat]] ([[User talk:Black Hat&amp;amp;#39;s Hat|talk]]) 18:08, 21 May 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Not that it is my decision on how to approach this, I (as you can see from my non-username status, being ''far'' from being an official 'trusted user') prefer the vague nature.&lt;br /&gt;
:If you define a line, then people will delibretely push right up to this line. Either in this kind of case where someone desires to get the enhanced abilities (for good or ill) and will do the exact minimum necessary to get to that point, or for limits of behaviour (such as being told &amp;quot;you may call your fellow forumites &amp;lt;beep&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;boop&amp;gt; or &amp;lt;censored&amp;gt;, but using &amp;lt;nastier word&amp;gt; is an instabanning offence&amp;gt;&amp;quot;).&lt;br /&gt;
:The actual criteria for page-creation abilities is not that difficult to achieve (and have been explicitly mentioned elsewhere), but is not just a single threashold. I might liken it to &amp;quot;it's better to travel hopefully than arrive&amp;quot;, in that until the ''very point'' that someone realises that they have accomplished the ability to create new pages (any new pages, not just their own userpages), you have probably eased yourself into how the site works and appreciated its general construction and will then only create new pages that they have some amount of genuine justification for wanting to create (to save others having to clear up after some &amp;quot;Template:Cool, I can create new pages!&amp;quot; splurge, or similar...)&lt;br /&gt;
:Ok, so it's not exactly a guaranteed method of getting a more considerate userbase, but it's better than automatically treating it as a [[3246: Speedrun]] and missing out on the more general atmosphere there is to be had here.&lt;br /&gt;
:Also, it doesn't at all stop you getting User Pages set up, ''right now''. You just need to mention that you'd like them - as you maybe just have done - and any pre-established user can decide that they're happy to create them for you... if that's all you want to actually create, then you might never do any more and just continue to edit exactly as you're currently editing.&lt;br /&gt;
:The point at which you realise that you ''can'' create new pages (you hit a redlink, by accident or curiosity, and get given the option to unredlink it ...whether or not you then go through with it) can then be just give you a fuzzy feeling and a realisation that you've 'arrived'.&lt;br /&gt;
:...but, again, this is just my view. Having seen many new users, and come to admire many of those that stuck around and have done great things. I would gladly see you as one of them, even if I would advise against undue impatience on the way to getting there. Having checked your activity, I ''will'' say that you're not ''too'' far off, but I'll not enumerate exactly how distant that point will be... That'd be like setting up a finishing tape and encouraging you to recklessly sprint for it. ;) [[Special:Contributions/81.179.199.253|81.179.199.253]] 20:49, 21 May 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::Makes sense ☃ [[User:Black Hat&amp;amp;#39;s Hat|Black Hat&amp;amp;#39;s Hat]] ([[User talk:Black Hat&amp;amp;#39;s Hat|talk]]) 17:48, 22 May 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== &amp;quot;It's 'cause you're dumb&amp;quot; ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In another conversation, I said: &amp;quot;Why is [[Black Hat]] saying it? He's a [[72: Classhole|classhole]], so he knows a better way to insult than just saying &amp;quot;It's 'cause you're dumb.&amp;quot; It would make more sense if [[Danish]] were saying it, as she was never given to be a classhole.&amp;quot; I stand by my statement. Either delete it or make Danish say it. [[User:YZ100|YZ100]] ([[User talk:YZ100|talk]]) 22:38, 29 May 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:I'd go for deleting it. I've never understood it. [[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 10:38, 30 May 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:If we are not going to make it make sense, remove it. Not only is it mean, but Randall himself celebrates knowledge in [[1053: Ten Thousand]]. Change it to something else. [[User:YZ100|YZ100]] ([[User talk:YZ100|talk]]) 00:00, 31 May 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:It does actually makes sense. It is humorous. It definitely has a long history, with there being comprehensive discussions about this ten years ago, and longer.&lt;br /&gt;
:But that's just my interpretation. Is the proposal that it 'just' be deleted (I'll let you work out how), or is that that you replace it with something else (ditto), whether that's someone else saying that, BH saying something else or a completely new scenario altogether?&lt;br /&gt;
:Whatever your wish, make some effort to convince people. [[Special:Contributions/81.179.199.253|81.179.199.253]] 00:59, 31 May 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::There's been talk about this about 12 years ago. Check [[explain xkcd talk:Community portal/Proposals]]. TL;DR is that this was the original motto decided on by the original creators of this blog back when it was a blog, and was moved over to the wiki when we made the migration to MediaWiki. I would not be against changing/deleting it, but this is certainly something of great significance in regards of our history and requires a clear consensus within the community. [[User:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font:11pt Cormorant Garamond&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#4A86A6&amp;quot;&amp;gt;tor&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#C0728D&amp;quot;&amp;gt;i :3&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font:8pt Cormorant Garamond&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#7E7E7E&amp;quot;&amp;gt;talk &amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#C0728D&amp;quot;&amp;gt;to &amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#4A86A6&amp;quot;&amp;gt;me!&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 01:01, 31 May 2026 (UTC)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>42.book.addict</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=User_talk:FaviFake&amp;diff=412831</id>
		<title>User talk:FaviFake</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=User_talk:FaviFake&amp;diff=412831"/>
				<updated>2026-05-15T17:27:16Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;42.book.addict: /* &amp;quot;never reply again&amp;quot; */ new section&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[#jumpb|''(jump to bottom)'']]&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;big&amp;gt;&amp;lt;big&amp;gt;&amp;lt;big&amp;gt;&amp;lt;big&amp;gt;Hey there, feel free to '''[https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=User_talk:FaviFake&amp;amp;action=edit&amp;amp;section=new send me a message]''' :)&amp;lt;/big&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/big&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/big&amp;gt;&amp;lt;div style=&amp;quot;float:right;margin-left:10px;margin-bottom:10px;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;__TOC__&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/big&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Objects table ==&lt;br /&gt;
Thanks for replying. The current table in the main text looks good, but still it is a ''description'' or just ''enumeration'' of game objects, not an ''explanation'' (or in some cases: partly an explanation). Supposing we keep the current structure, it is possible to add explanations for the planet names in the '''Explanation''' column. For example, first sentence of the second paragraph is a good ''explanation'' for the Uzumaki planet's name. On the other hand, Andal has only a ''description'' (what it looks like and what features are present on the surface) and no ''explanation'' (that it refers to Animorphs series of books). There's also a question where one should put explanations of items and messages. Some do not need an explanation ('You found a stick'), but most do: what they mean and what they refer to, both in xkcd context (such as when there's a comic about the thing) and in general context. I hope you understand the difference between ''description'' and ''explanation''. Maybe there's also some misunderstanding resulting from a language barrier; English is not my native language.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What is also missing in the table are many structures or objects found on the planets and, most importantly, dialogues or monologous of the characters, which contain many puns and references, and also hints for the player. There's simply no place for them in the current structure. Making more columns may be messsy. That's why I proposed making several tables covering different aspects.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Please take my remarks as proposals to improve the structure and not as a criticism or request for you to make everything right and fill every cell of the table. I think we need to create a clear structure for everyone else to fill in with details; but also to provide good examples to follow.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Technical remarks:&lt;br /&gt;
* In my opinion, the filename column is not needed, it does not appear anywhere while playing, it's in source code only. Better remove it to have more horizontal space for the rest. The names given to the planets by the editors of the explanation page shown in the Description column are fine.&lt;br /&gt;
* Coordinates are also not useful for a regular player, who does not use some Javascript addition/cheats, maybe remove it as well; textual directions in '''Explanation''' column are sufficient.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
-- [[User:Malgond|Malgond]] ([[User talk:Malgond|talk]]) 19:59, 2 May 2023 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;gt; Thanks for replying. The current table in the main text looks good, but still it is a ''description'' or just ''enumeration'' of game objects, not an ''explanation'' (or in some cases: partly an explanation). Supposing we keep the current structure, it is possible to add explanations for the planet names in the '''Explanation''' column. For example, first sentence of the second paragraph is a good ''explanation'' for the Uzumaki planet's name. On the other hand, Andal has only a ''description'' (what it looks like and what features are present on the surface) and no ''explanation'' (that it refers to Animorphs series of books).&lt;br /&gt;
:Hey! Yeah, that's the state of the table ''right now'', and I 100% percent agree with everything you're saying here. All planets and items that need an explanation should be explained and not just described. I mostly just copied and pasted the &amp;quot;planet description/explanations&amp;quot; from the old list to the table: creating the table was way more painful than i thought. I was actually surprized to see that nobody explained what Andal referred to, but I don't know anything about it so more knowledgeable people will have to chip in on that&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;gt;There's also a question where one should put explanations of items and messages. Some do not need an explanation ('You found a stick'), but most do: what they mean and what they refer to, both in xkcd context (such as when there's a comic about the thing) and in general context. I hope you understand the difference between ''description'' and ''explanation''. &lt;br /&gt;
:I do! And I wish other people could help here. I'm not sure if you've seen it, but this is the banner i put above the table:&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''ALL ITEM EXPLANATIONS NEED TO BE TRANSFERRED FROM THE OLD PLANET LIST TO THE NEW TABLE'''&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
We are currently switching from a disorganized list (below, inside the green banner) to the new organized table, but the explanations for specific items are missing from the new table. Please help by copying the item explanations from the old list and adding them to the new table ''&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;in this format&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;:''&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;code&amp;gt;The item message &amp;amp;amp;ndash; &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;''Where to find it &amp;amp;amp;ndash; Explanation, such as references etc''&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Example: You found a cheese platter (Your tanks recharge faster) &amp;amp;ndash; ''Next to the cell tower &amp;amp;ndash; The cheese is a reference to [https://example.com 1234: Cheese]''&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''OTHER ISSUES:'''&lt;br /&gt;
* upgrades that end in &amp;quot;???&amp;quot; need to be replaced by the exact upgrade message shown to the user.&lt;br /&gt;
* the &amp;quot;Tiles (X, Y)&amp;quot; column for planet coordinates is empty&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:As you can see, the explanations should be put right next to the items and messages. Unfortunately no one has started to add them to the table yet&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;gt; Maybe there's also some misunderstanding resulting from a language barrier; English is not my native language.&lt;br /&gt;
:Your English is excellent :)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;gt; dialogues or monologous of the characters, which contain many puns and references, and also hints for the player. There's simply no place for them in the current structure. Making more columns may be messsy. That's why I proposed making several tables covering different aspects.&lt;br /&gt;
Almost all the dialogues are on the [[2765: Escape Speed/Transcript]] page, so I guess they should be added there. I don't know if they're already here, I haven't looked at it enough&lt;br /&gt;
:: The transcript is not the place for explanations. Puns and references shall be explained elsewhere. I continue working on the transcript but there's still quite a way to go. -- [[User:Malgond|Malgond]] ([[User talk:Malgond|talk]]) 5 May 2023&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;gt; Please take my remarks as proposals to improve the structure and not as a criticism or request for you to make everything right and fill every cell of the table. I think we need to create a clear structure for everyone else to fill in with details; but also to provide good examples to follow.&lt;br /&gt;
:Yeah; i totally get everything you said. In my last reply I think I was a bit too rude for some reason, maybe it's because I just finished the table and was tired.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;gt;* In my opinion, the filename column is not needed, it does not appear anywhere while playing, it's in source code only. Better remove it to have more horizontal space for the rest. The names given to the planets by the editors of the explanation page shown in the Description column are fine.&lt;br /&gt;
:* Coordinates are also not useful for a regular player, who does not use some Javascript addition/cheats, maybe remove it as well; textual directions in '''Explanation''' column are sufficient.&lt;br /&gt;
I was heavily inspired by the table in the [[2712: Gravity]] explanation, which included these. I kind of agree that the filename could be removed, and the filenames could be added to the planet name or explanation, i didn't think about that. About the tiles, someone might use them someday, but if the column keeps remaining empty, i don't mind seeing it disappear&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I really liked your ideas, if you don't mind I'll copy and paste this discussion in the actual comic discussion page and see what others think --[[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 21:37, 2 May 2023 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Update: I found a way and added all the coordinates, and moved the planet filenames to the Planet Name column to make more space for the other columns :)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::: Hi, what about dividing planets and objects like in [[User:Malgond/Drafts/Escape_Speed|my experiment]]? There's plenty of horizontal space for explanations and the entries are quite compact vertically. I also think about color-coding the different Types of game objects. -- [[User:Malgond|Malgond]] ([[User talk:Malgond|talk]]) 5 May 2023&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Hmm, I think it looks a little messy and maybe too complicated. Do any other comics have two different tables? Also, I'm personally not a fan of mixing items, landscapes, and people. I think most people reading the table are there to get an overview of the planets and what they contain. Do we really have to explain everything in such detail? [[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 14:09, 6 May 2023 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::We do not have to follow other explanations too closely, we could use a new form if it seems clearer and better. The current form has no place neither for explaining items nor for dialogues/monologues. More columns could be problematic (specifically in today's world of high and narrow screens of smartphones). Should we explain everything? Well, it us up to collective &amp;quot;us&amp;quot;. Personally, I would like someone explain a few puns/dialogues I do not understand.&lt;br /&gt;
:::::For now, there's only a handful of people still interested in somehow finishing the explanation for this huge comic. Maybe if we two can agree on some format we could put it in discussion page and ask for votes. (Discussion needs a cleanup, BTW). -- [[User:Malgond|Malgond]] ([[User talk:Malgond|talk]]) 22:00, 7 May 2023 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Hey, I'm back. I see you're enhancing your example table, and iI was wondering, do you plan to move your edits to the actual article after you're done and use the test to see how the formatting looks? Isn't it easier to just add them to the main page directly? Just wondering. If you want I can help you port them over :)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Keeping the contents of the table on your talk page and then porting them over afterwards could lead to a loss of information added after you started editing your user page [[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 13:11, 13 May 2023 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::I'm back too. Yes, I intend to put it in the main article, but I am a bit shy to replace a lot of your work; I've asked for opinions in the talk page. Let's see how it sorts out. Maybe someone has a still better idea. -- [[User:Malgond|Malgond]] ([[User talk:Malgond|talk]]) 21:50, 13 May 2023 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::Oh. I think the structure of the current table in the article is better than the one you've been working on: for example, it's easier to sort for items, is more compact, and is just one. Why don't you just add a &amp;quot;transcript&amp;quot; column like the table on [[2712: Gravity]] to put what things and people say, and add the rest of the information on the respective columns? Personally, I think you're making it a little bit too complicated. [[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 15:26, 14 May 2023 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Haltones ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;They're not **predominantly** gray, the two main colors are just white and black. Sometimes he uses the gray color just like when he uses any other color&amp;quot; ... It didn't say that they were predominantly grey(/'gray'), any more than it said that they'd be predominently black (as [[:Category:Comics with inverted brightness]], often, in preference to white). The point being that even the most &amp;quot;black and white&amp;quot; images aren't monochrome, but have degrees of grey at the boundaries, with smoothly antialiased boundaries between the full black of the line (or filled area) and the full white of the background (or inverted detail). You'll see this if you zoom in, with your favourite image editor. And very often in images with a default RGB colourspace, even if the effective pallette employed covers just greyscale values. But greys actually do feature a lot, too (often the first choice of non-black-and-white, for slight lessening of prominence, as opposed to 'red pen' ''increased'' visibility). So it's technically inaccurate to describe them as pretty much monochrome. But how to convey this in &amp;lt;...counts...&amp;gt; less than 157ish words? [[Special:Contributions/172.71.242.173|172.71.242.173]] 16:35, 17 May 2023 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:The wiki page says&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;quot;xkcd comics are usually plain, predominantly black-and-white line drawings, but sometimes they make use of hues beyond the usual monochrome colors, even if it is just red-penned annotations.&lt;br /&gt;
:I think it's enough, since, even if grey is more used than other non-monochrome colors, I don't believe it's so important that it needs to be included as a &amp;quot;third&amp;quot; main color. If Randall uses many bright colors, that he will obviously also use simpler hues of grey when needed. What do you think? [[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 16:51, 17 May 2023 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Aside from the antialising edging gradient, I just used the Random Page link and landed on [[1301: File Extensions|something with functional greys]], [[734: Outbreak|an unusual use of 'Post-It' yellow]], an unremarkably &amp;quot;just black pen&amp;quot; comic and then [[1788: Barge|more functional grey]]. I'd argue against &amp;quot;monochrome&amp;quot; as a description, as clearly there is more than just #000000 and #FFFFFF, often enough, in an actual fill-colour/broad-brush context. Even if that's #808080 or another no-hue shade. (I was expecting to land on a &amp;quot;grey pen&amp;quot; comic to assess, after enough clicks but, having seen what I got in the random first handful, I saw no need to go on.)&lt;br /&gt;
:And &amp;quot;monochrome&amp;quot; can be/often is coloured. Sepia photographs or &amp;quot;night vision&amp;quot; green displays are perfect examples of monochrome (with or without halftones/dithering/whatever). As is [[267: Choices: Part 4]] (other Choices comics may be considered &amp;quot;duotone&amp;quot;, in different ways).&lt;br /&gt;
:Maybe &amp;quot;...are often drawn as black shapes on white, or occasionally white shapes on a dark background, but may feature at least one additional highlighting shade or an even fuller colour pallette.&amp;quot; Does that sufficiently cover that whole breadth of use? [[Special:Contributions/172.70.86.154|172.70.86.154]] 19:48, 17 May 2023 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Childish slang. ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Agree with you on the recent change that you (generic 'you', not ''you'' 'you'!) sound infantile, any which way, upon use of the words mentioned. Which is how it was still said before the revert in that version of edit. But with &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;quot;pretty gay&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;retarded&amp;quot; are infantile and offensive slang for &amp;quot;foolish&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;contemptible&amp;quot;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;, you miss the point. Foolishness is just one distant contender for what &amp;quot;pretty gay&amp;quot; is often intended to mean (even if not actually being used for someone/something 'effeminate'). And &amp;quot;retarded&amp;quot; is more in the whole &amp;quot;thick, stupid, dumb&amp;quot; line of insult than &amp;quot;contemptible&amp;quot; (which is more &amp;quot;horrible, dislikable, repulsive&amp;quot;..?).&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;Personally, I also thought it better with not actually defining insults (correctly or otherwise), as it adds power to them. I can call someone a &amp;quot;numpty&amp;quot; in jest, for example, and colloquially that might be understood as the low-level insult (if that) which it is intended to be. But if I start to bandy around its {{wiktionary|numpty#Scots|dictionary definition}} then it becomes more of a seriously accusatory description.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;Just my opinion. Not really understanding the latest revert when it had seemed to be improved (if anything) in the version you reverted away. Just putting it there. I know you're doing a lot of editing (good stuff!) just wondering if you considered this one carefully enough in your obvious zeal. [[Special:Contributions/172.71.182.89|172.71.182.89]] 16:31, 28 May 2023 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Addendum. Meant to say, if you decide to undo/reform your own revert (I won't do it, but on the offchance you see my point), I'd have not said &amp;quot;''commonly'' used&amp;quot;. They're used in slang, but I don't think we can say how frequently they pop up. They're &amp;quot;used in slang&amp;quot; (and also not in slang, or at least not insulting slang, where &amp;quot;gay&amp;quot; has a long history of just meaning &amp;quot;happy&amp;quot;, whilst &amp;quot;retarded&amp;quot; is often to do with decceleration/minimised acceleration of physical systems) but I'm not sure they're no more than minority words in the whole world of such language. They depict a subset of insult-givers (like the character in the comic, for whom it adds a certain additional characterisation) amongst all the many and varied insult-givers, and Randall surely chose such semi-bowlderised terms to not have to write any of all the far worse words he might also have done. [[Special:Contributions/172.71.94.31|172.71.94.31]] 16:46, 28 May 2023 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== IP page to delete ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I didn't see your thinking about why the Deletion category was not needed there. And, believe me as an IP myself, I've never known anything useful being said on an IP's User or User Talk page. With that example not breaking the pattern any. [[Special:Contributions/172.70.85.131|172.70.85.131]] 00:41, 22 June 2023 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:I just don't think there's a reason to delete it, it's useful to have a previous talk page if the IP continues to edit and people want to communicate with them [[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 10:51, 30 June 2023 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::&amp;quot;The IP&amp;quot; is whichever one of 'us' happens to land on that particular Cloudflare route.&lt;br /&gt;
::I'm not going to go back and find out which IP it represents, to check if it's in their current stock of connected gateways, but it might not be. Or it was even (depending on date) a pre-Cloudflare 'straight' access unproxied and thus no longer seen, even if the exact same editor on the exact same IP lucked on ''their'' initial gateway.&lt;br /&gt;
::Certainly it won't map to a meaningful 'user', chances may even be that it doesn't map to ''any'' user. IP-version User/User Talk pages are anachronisms pretty much as soon as they're created. Or before, if based upon trying to contact an author of an older edit. I was on 172.70.85.131, above, but who knows (before I submit it) what this reply's sign-off will say.&lt;br /&gt;
::And a one-shot editor may never ever see the results of any conversation that was tried to be started. Whereas I ''might'' see any response, anywhere, that contextually makes it plain that they're talking about an edit I once made.&lt;br /&gt;
::Honestly, I think it'd be worthwhile checking ''every'' IP-focussed namespace page and archiving anything truly interesting that found itself in there in some other central location then condemning them all to deletion. Maybe, if possible, prevent their creation too. But I don't have the ability to do anything (except sift through them for any of the very rare gems of quality, but I wouldn't be able to do anything about it from there on in, so...&lt;br /&gt;
::...not gonna do anything more about it (I can't, other than reinstate the To Be Deleted  membership, whch I won't bother with), but I hope you understand my perspective on this. I've seen you become a very useful member of the community, who I generally respect for your input and tweaks to the site, and don't expect you to take instruction from li'l ol' me (not even working with an established identity). Just consider this as food for thought, and leave it at that if you wish. [[Special:Contributions/162.158.34.19|162.158.34.19]] 20:12, 30 June 2023 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== RTL/LTR: &amp;quot;...but I think it refers to me&amp;quot; ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Yeah, it does. The point being that we might not do anything about the smartarses who vandalise knowingly (and I don't see a problem with what you otherwise did), but when someone thinks ''they'' have unique and funny joke (along the lines of putting &amp;quot;Citation needed&amp;quot;s ''everywhere'') they might spot the comment and then realise how we've seen it all done before so refrain from the prank. I can't even recall how many times we have had to revert things, but best to put off the casual comedian, and it won't change the outcome either way for the dedicated vandal with their blood up and looking to cause trouble. [[Special:Contributions/141.101.98.107|141.101.98.107]] 20:00, 29 June 2023 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:I guess you're right, I just thought it was very clear for everyone that rendering an entire article unreadable was an act of pure vandalism, but I guess an editor comment doesn't hurt. [[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 10:53, 30 June 2023 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== The reason &amp;quot;the image size wasn't there&amp;quot;? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
...because it didn't need an image-size restriction, originally? Compare the [https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php/File:Miss_lenhart.png previous and current version sizes]. Nice to have a (''huge!'') high-res headshot, no doubt, but clearly that's why you found that it now needs artificially constraining... No actual mystery. [[Special:Contributions/172.70.85.63|172.70.85.63]] 17:16, 5 July 2023 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Yeah you're right, I just assumed every comic had the image size to be future-proof. The weird thing was that the &amp;quot;imagesize: &amp;quot; part was already there, but there was no value. Anyway, nothing important.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== I disagree with Oxford commas. ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;For breakfast I had some bread, toast, and jam.&amp;quot; - A legitimate(ish) case of &amp;quot;, and &amp;quot;. Or &amp;quot;I created the world, and saw that it was good.&amp;quot; I otherwise prefer to suscribe to replacing all non-final conjunctions in sequence with commas but ''not'' adding one before the ultimate (remaining) conjunction. That's like having &amp;quot;Fish, and chips&amp;quot;, where it isn't an actual afterthought. And best to rephrase or repunctuate (e.g. with super-listing semicolons to separate) if you have confusing comma-breakout clauses that ''so'' easily clash (or lead you down funny garden paths) with Oxford Commas. My opinion, but this is why syntax is clearer when leaving out OCs. [[Special:Contributions/172.70.85.93|172.70.85.93]] 13:59, 6 July 2023 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:I just think it's better to use it everywhere to avoid any possible confusion. If we used it half the time, it would be inconsistent. But it's no big deal.&lt;br /&gt;
::Similarly, no big deal. Except that it ''looked'' like an error. You've done a lot of useful changes, recently... A ''lot''... Which is not a bad thing, I must add. Occasionally I've seen what (I thought!) you intended to say, and I've helped out with a misplaced word or two. And I honestly do not feel like OCs read correctly in many circumstances. How would you even OC something like &amp;quot;...you should paint it red, yellow or, maybe, orange&amp;quot;?&lt;br /&gt;
::The comma already does a lot of heavy lifting, four or five different uses can occur in the same sentence, with it commonly doing duty as a sub-clause parenthetical (except without the clear open/close distinction of an actual parenthetical) ''as well as'' conjunction-replacement within a list. You will find many instances of non-OCed lists on the site. In fact I find the &amp;quot;Please note that all contributions to explain xkcd...&amp;quot; bit, below this edit box, to be the exception and not the rule.&lt;br /&gt;
::Anyhoo... I 'corrected' an example, but did not re'correct' it once you made it obvious what rule you were working to. I think you're less right than me, naturally, even if I wouldn't say that you're more wrong. ;) But I thought I'd make you a brief note of my thoughts rather than edit-warring the issue. Less brief, now, but I hope you still take it in good humour. (Oh, yeah, I'm sort of Ok with Oxford Spelling, insofar as it's mostly what I use naturally. Except for the &amp;quot;-ize&amp;quot; bit. That and their Comma are totally against how I was taught at school, a number of decades ago. :P ) [[Special:Contributions/172.71.242.71|172.71.242.71]] 15:26, 6 July 2023 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::You really seem to care about this a lot more than I do, if you want feel free to revert my edit back. I'm not even sure why we're here talking about commas lol&lt;br /&gt;
:::I'm no expert and I just like commas. Thanks for checking my edits, I think I've seen a few of your corrections. I have a lot of free time at the moment and I seem to like fixing up unorganized things here --[[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 21:42, 6 July 2023 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Science Girl/Hairbun ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You may have noted that several of the Talk pages attached to those you changed already had discussions about whether someone was Hairbun or (a possibly grown-up version of) Science Girl, and you had people like Kynde support the change ''to'' treating her as Science Girl. No skin off my nose, but I'm not sure your arguments are strong enough to support your broad sweep changes in that regard. I think I'd side with &amp;quot;bun with trailing hair&amp;quot; being SG (regardless of apparent age/maturity, as the description only really says ''usually'' a child, whether you take that as prescriptivist or descriptivist) but not enough that I'd reverse your considerable efforts in this matter. But on the off-chance that you hadn't noticed the prior discussions and conclusions, before making your own assessment. FYI, only. [[Special:Contributions/172.71.178.204|172.71.178.204]] 14:01, 7 July 2023 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I will properly reply to you tomorrow since it's midnight here. Btw thanks for letting me know these hyperlinks were rendered correctly, and for fixing my 1 typo &amp;lt;s&amp;gt;(after i corrected 100)&amp;lt;/s&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
::Guys, some things may be being taken too seriously. Assuming [https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=1608:_Hoverboard&amp;amp;diff=prev&amp;amp;oldid=317396 this was the 'one error'], yeah, the Pedant's Curse hits us all, that's the point. Easy to see how it was done (read as &amp;quot;a Category:Interactive...&amp;quot; rather than &amp;quot;an interactive&amp;quot;, or whatever). Happens to the best of us, when concentrating on loads of other things. Not sure about the Jill thing, at all, myself, but that discussion is probably for soewhere else. [[Special:Contributions/172.69.79.158|172.69.79.158]] 22:22, 7 July 2023 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Nonononono I wasn't serious when I thanked you about the typo, I was also just kidding. I was joking about how after I corrected a ton of typos I added one more.&lt;br /&gt;
:::On the main topic you brought up: I think Jill's main characteristics (I'll talk about why I renamed her) are that she is a child, she is usually interested in science, and has always one or two buns with trailing hair. [[Hairbun]] isn't as defined as Jill: she just has a bun. This is what the page [[Hairbun]] (written entirely by Kynde, I haven't reformatted to remove the bullet points yet), say about the bun:&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
:::*Her appearance, apart from her glasses, can also change.&lt;br /&gt;
:::**In 703: Honor Societies, 708: Sex Dice, 1511: Spice Girl, 1601: Isolation and in every instance in 1608: Hoverboard her hair looks somewhat different, curly and with some kind of ponytail, but since '''her main distinguishing characteristic is the hair bun''', these comics are included.&lt;br /&gt;
:::[...]&lt;br /&gt;
:::*There are some characters with hair buns that are not Hairbun:&lt;br /&gt;
:::**Since she is a grown woman, she should not be confused with Jill or any other small girls with hair bun like in 1584: Moments of Inspiration.&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
:::And on the Page for Jill, before I ever touched it, it said:&lt;br /&gt;
:::*As she is usually also clearly a child she usually cannot be confused with Hairbun&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
:::Kynde mentioned [[1511: Spice Girl]] and [[1601: Isolation]] as featuring Hairbun and not Jill, but they look exactly like a grown-up Jill. Plus, on the gallery section on [[Hairbun]] (I'm working on adding back a better one since the old one was kinda broken UPDATE 11:13, 8 July 2023 (UTC): Added the gallery back with vector images), this was the first picture of Hairbun:&lt;br /&gt;
:::[[File:Hair Bun Girl with curly hair and ponytail.png]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::So, to recap: Hairbun has always had a version with a bun with trailing hair, but it was inconsistent between comics, so I settled on Jill is a girl that always has trailing hair and Hairbun is an adult that sometimes has trailing hair.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::On the topic of renaming Jill:&lt;br /&gt;
:::*I searched the wiki for Jill and found 3 discussions. One of them ended up &amp;quot;why world we even create a page for that girl, there aren't many comics featuring her.&amp;quot;, but didn't criticize the name too much iirc&lt;br /&gt;
:::*We did the same thing for [[Danish]]. The only time she was given ''any'' name (&amp;quot;Danish in the sense of &amp;quot;darling&amp;quot; iirc), that was the name used.&lt;br /&gt;
:::*If we change our minds and Jill also becomes a woman, we don't have to remove the &amp;quot;girl&amp;quot; part.&lt;br /&gt;
:::*I'm not sure about this, but I think she's slowing being added more and more outside science comics.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Wow this was long --[[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 10:20, 8 July 2023 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== In reply to [https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=2794:_Alphabet_Notes&amp;amp;curid=26437&amp;amp;diff=321127&amp;amp;oldid=320916 this query]... ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There's {{w|Welsh orthography|the Welsh}}, at the very least! (Well, you did ask! Even if it's truly not so relevent. ;) ) [[Special:Contributions/172.70.86.159|172.70.86.159]] 11:29, 18 August 2023 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Lol. TIL! --[[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 20:13, 18 August 2023 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Plural animals ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Following on from Ferret-&amp;gt;Ferrets, what about the last remaining singular that is Category:Apatosaurus? (I must admit, all your edits/re-edits are making my head spin, as worthy as they often are, but this seems like the next logical step that I thought you might have done to finish that particular neatening job.) But I'll leave it up to you as to whether it's Apatosauruses, Apatosaurii or whatever else you might consider most appropriate... ;) [[Special:Contributions/172.70.85.98|172.70.85.98]] 10:15, 24 August 2023 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:I actually thought about it, and I came to the conclusion that I don't know what the plural of that word is. Feel free to research if there's a &amp;quot;right&amp;quot; word and rename that category :)&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;gt; (I must admit, all your edits/re-edits are making my head spin,&lt;br /&gt;
:Yeah I don't really organize everything I want to change beforehand, so whenever i notice a little thing is missing, I add it to every page that needs it. I guess it's easier to review my edits in bulk from a page's version history lol --[[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 10:53, 24 August 2023 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Community portal spam ==&lt;br /&gt;
The spammers seem to be deleting text from Community Portal. [[User:ConscriptGlossary|ConscriptGlossary]] ([[User talk:ConscriptGlossary|talk]]) 07:28, 3 November 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Thanks, but I couldn't find any recent example concerning me. Do you mind giving an example? --[[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 07:49, 3 November 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Possible Adminship? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hi FaviFake, I’m Victoria. I’m planning on reaching out to Jeff via Twitter/X because there’s a long list of things that only he can do. You can see the list at my [[User:42.book.addict#To_Do_List_for_Jeff|user page]]. One of these tasks is promoting more admins. Seeing as you are quite active, and have done quite a lot of edits (top 10 in CS score-wow!), would you like to be mentioned in my message as a possible admin candidate? [[User:42.book.addict|42.book.addict]] ([[User talk:42.book.addict|talk]]) 17:21, 3 November 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
: Oh hey, thanks for messaging me! I started caring a lot for this site about a year ago, went on a complete pause for a few months, and came back this week. You seem very active, love to see some new active users! I saw your message on the community portal saying you were trying to find a way to contact Jeff. That's actually something I've thought about doing for a long time but never actually tried since not even Davidy22 was able to contact him at one point iirc.&lt;br /&gt;
:Anyway, yes, I'd love to be an admin for this site since there are so many things I can't do as a user (i have my own to-do list, which includes 1) actually deleting pages in Pages to delete and 2) improving/fixing the comic templates and Main page).&lt;br /&gt;
: So yeah, I wish you good luck contacting him! My only advice is to use any possible way to (or to get someone else to) contact him without worrying too much about annoying him. His last contribution was more than a year ago, he can totally jump back in for a moment after being unreachable for so long. I really like your message, it's very well-written, now the hard part is getting it to him. Asking Davidy22 for his email address (or finding it online) sounds like a great idea to me. --[[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 22:12, 3 November 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Trivia below transcript ==&lt;br /&gt;
The FAQ page says that trivia is below transcript. I'm very sorry about this. [[User:ConscriptGlossary|ConscriptGlossary]] ([[User talk:ConscriptGlossary|talk]]) 00:41, 4 November 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Nono don't be sorry, you're totally right! I came back here after months of being offline and forgot about the order! I realised my mistake yesterday but didn't have the time to go look for the article to revert my edit. Please revert it if you get the chance to do it before me. [[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 04:53, 4 November 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::There, I should've fixed it now. I see you also reverted my edit, thanks! [[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 04:59, 4 November 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== On the Ghosts in the NavPane ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
When I saw 42's inclusion of Ghosts in the Character NavPane, I was pondering asking for Demons and Aliens (the blob-monster types, or near variations, from both UFO-ish comics and far-future) to be added alongside.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But I agree with you that they're not ''really'' minor characters. Yet I think they (all of them) deserve a slot there, as they are as much a feature as the (Animals/)Squirrels section. Originally thought to suggest &amp;quot;Groups&amp;quot; (could include &amp;quot;Multiple Cueballs&amp;quot; and even &amp;quot;Children&amp;quot; for groups with otherwise un-IDed child characters), which you could still ''also'' add (but for human-character groups only), but now thinking &amp;quot;Other Beings&amp;quot; could hold Ghosts, Demons and Aliens (maybe &amp;quot;Future Beings&amp;quot; separate from the latter, or at least the differently-futuristic &amp;quot;Floating Orbs&amp;quot; as ''another'' other classification category in there). As a section between Real People and Animals, I thought, unless it's decided best to put them after Animals.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Food for thought, anyway. You (and 42, and maybe others) may have your own ideas on this, and I wouldn't (and can't) spring my own ideas upon you by suddenly just editing the appropriate source. It probably needs discussion. I nearly put my earlier thoughts in the Community Portal area, but as you're personally active on this at the moment I thought it might be easier for you to ponder if I finally commited it to writing just here. (Feel free to move this contrib/advertise it wider, if you see fit.) [[Special:Contributions/172.70.91.62|172.70.91.62]] 14:19, 5 November 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Just popping in to add my 2 cents-I wholeheartedly agree with the idea of having “other beings” in the navbox. '''[[User:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:9pt;color:#db97bf&amp;quot;&amp;gt;42.book.addict&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:6pt;color:#97b6db&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Talk to me!&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;''' 16:02, 5 November 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::Hey there, thanks a lot for messaging me about this. I disagree with you for one specific reason: the navbox was initially supposed to catalogue the recurring characters in the comics which displayed more or less the same behaviours across comics, such as [[Black Hat]] and [[Beret Guy]]. It then expanded to include real people, such as politicians, which still remained the same characters across different comics. The animal section is different in that some of them are the same animals across comics (such as bobcats and red spiders, for example), but since we had to include them, we included EVERY animal, even when they were completely different every time, because it'd look weird if the only animals there were the specific ones i mentioned.&lt;br /&gt;
::If we included a section such as Other beings that includes ghosts, I believe it would be filled with characters that are not the same in every comic they appear in and the navbox would completely lose its intended purpose. --[[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 18:13, 7 November 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== (Whoops, forgot a header!) ...FYC ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you agree with {{diff|356369|these additions/changes}}, with or without other adjustments, I was wondering if you'd like to do the respective changes to the Incomplete Article category page, as I find it's semi-protected and I'm thus locked out from the edits that I thought I might duplicate there too (in my IP state – yes, I know I could change this, but I'm happier just to leave it up to you/whoever). Anyway, for your consideration. [[Special:Contributions/162.158.202.75|162.158.202.75]] 17:09, 10 November 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
: Done! Thanks. I removed a few technical details. --[[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 07:24, 16 November 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==The [[What If? chapters|''What If?'' article index]] project==&lt;br /&gt;
''The messages regarding the [[What If? chapters|''What If?'' article index]] project have been moved to '''[[Talk:What If? chapters]]'''. To add a new topic regarding the index, [https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:What_If?_chapters&amp;amp;action=edit&amp;amp;section=new click here].'' --[[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 09:15, 2 February 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Removed &amp;quot;Discussion&amp;quot; super-header. ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I had wondered, as (at that time) you hadn't bothered to remove any of the ''other'' equivalent super-headers. It looked a bit like an accidental select-and-cut, like sometimes editors do, given your actual edit was waaay down the other end of the page. (It was a bit too neat, not like the usual case of somehow snipping off just one of the &amp;quot;=&amp;quot;s, make a ==&amp;quot;header&amp;quot;== into a =&amp;quot;header=&amp;quot;=, effectively, but I've also seen similarly unmessy accidents happen, so your decent tightening up of the whitespace could have just as easily been a part of the same misclicking.)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I did check the companion pages, and they were all happyily as they (once) were. Note that the extra level of header ''does'' have use for (e.g.) putting a similar level of header at the bottom to give Archive, FAQ, etc, sections (not part of the now-top-levelisted points), or even such that we can have &amp;quot;for &amp;lt;foo&amp;gt;, see &amp;lt;otherPortal#section&amp;gt;&amp;quot; to gather things up with less repeats. Not to have their own subheaders (unless they, too, get so large that we have to further split them!), but to be seperate-but-appended like a Transcript (and maybe Trivia) section, regardless of how subheadered an in-depth Explanation gets. If we ever get that (and, really, we could do with a ''lot'' of archival for most of the Community Pages, and maybe some FAQing, for which I ''might'' suggest a subheadering to easily scan for... e.g. ... the situation with the MathML that seems to get revisited more often than not), then we probably need the superheaders back, unless we put messy indented-bullet-trees (at the top? with or without &amp;quot;expand&amp;quot;-hiding?) ''only'' for non-discussion items.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Not that I totally agree that &amp;quot;1.&amp;lt;many...&amp;gt;&amp;quot; (and the occasional &amp;quot;1.&amp;lt;something&amp;gt;.&amp;lt;subsubitem&amp;gt;&amp;quot; was unreadable, either, but ''so long'' as we don't have a further main(ish) header, of equal import, then ''maybe'' it's ok to do it your way. Just it seemed like a big decision to make, to cut out all the (admitedly untaken) options out of the equation.   ...And that is a summary of the mental arithmatic whizzing through my head when I had decided (on balance) that you'd probably just made an unknowing misedit that needed bringing back in line with the others. Just to explain the snap decision to undo your 'accident'. Not sure whether you'd been purposefully thinking about it for far longer, of course. Maybe even a couple of minutes! ;) [[Special:Contributions/172.71.178.58|172.71.178.58]] 14:53, 8 February 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I totally agree with everything you said! One day I noticed there was a useless superheader at the top which was making the TOC unnecessarily slightly harder to scan through. We should definitely bring it back if someone decides to organise the portals, but I figured since it was untouched for more than a decade, it's likely it won't happen in the near future. There was no need to explain the reasoning behind your revert, but I appreciate you reaching out! --[[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 16:06, 8 February 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==A simple Thank-you==&lt;br /&gt;
Thank you so much for expanding my knowledge of xkcd, the wiki, and wikis overall. That user page creation left a bit of a mark on me lol. I have found out that I have reached a high enough level to create user pages. I have created 2 user pages and 2 discussion pages for other worthy members of the community. Thank you for the very helpful advice, and thanks again for providing helpful information from the community. Sincerely, [[User:DollarStoreBa&amp;amp;#39;al|DollarStoreBa&amp;amp;#39;al]] ([[User talk:DollarStoreBa&amp;amp;#39;al|talk]]) 05:14, 27 February 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:No worries! I'm glad we have another active contributor &amp;lt;3 &amp;amp;nbsp; --[[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 16:09, 27 February 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::It's relevant to note that we only create User pages when people explicitly ask for them. On the other hand, '''User talk''' pages are created if you want to talk to that specific member privately. --[[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 16:14, 27 February 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Removing references to order of LiveJournal comics ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=1%3A_Barrel_-_Part_1&amp;amp;type=revision&amp;amp;diff=320394&amp;amp;oldid=320342 But WHY?]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
I'm very unhappy to realize you have deleted my hard work giving people a possibility to click through the first comics in the order they where released on livejournal. I have not checked them all, but I'm not happy that it has been deleted and would like to get it back. Pleas try to explain why you found it a good idea to remove this info from so many comics! I'm quite upset about it at the moment. And since you removed it would like you to restore it if you cannot make me see why! Seems there is also more info I put in that have been deleted? :-( --[[User:Kynde|Kynde]] ([[User talk:Kynde|talk]]) 19:31, 10 March 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:You are mistaken! I actually liked the idea of browsing the first comics in the original order ''so much'' that I moved it above the explanation! This means it's now much easier to browse them in the correct order, because the user is no longer required to scroll to the bottom of the page: the links are right below the comic.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I did this for all the 50ish comics. I think you might also have missed the &amp;quot;Original title&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;Original caption&amp;quot; parts of these first comics. In every one of these comics, right under the title (above the image) there's an &amp;quot;Original title&amp;quot;. Likewise, below every Title text there's now an &amp;quot;Original caption&amp;quot; part, which contains the LiveJournal caption. See for example comics [[4: Landscape (sketch)]] or [[8: Red spiders]]. I also added a link to the specific LiveJournal post both on the title and caption parts, so users can see them for themselves. Your hard work no longer sits in the hidden Trivia section, but is actually above everything else and easier to read and use!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I do think it's still not perfect, especially part to browse the comics. I'd like to create a custom template with real buttons (not just links) and an actual explanation of the situation, or maybe integrate it directly into the {{tl|comic}} template. But still, a much better solution than putting everything in the last section! --[[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 15:47, 11 March 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I'm sorry for the harsh words. Late that night I realized all my trivia info was deleted (did see the original title text was added), but did not realize that the info was relegated to a more prominent place. So I take back my comment, and instead now thank you for improving my work. Hope you accept this apology from a message written at a bad time. --[[User:Kynde|Kynde]] ([[User talk:Kynde|talk]]) 12:58, 12 March 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Of course! You were very polite. I'm glad you're still active in this wiki :) --[[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 15:16, 12 March 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::::Me to, so there at least is one active admin. Sadly I'm not very good at the tech stuff a&amp;lt;nd also do not have time to look into all kinds of wiki policies... Glad there are others like you who lift the mantle on those parts. We really need a guy like Davidy... --[[User:Kynde|Kynde]] ([[User talk:Kynde|talk]]) 20:12, 13 March 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::UPDATE: I moved the sentences above the ==Explanation==, so it should now be clearer. --[[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 18:01, 1 April 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Jill's renaming ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hi FaviFake &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Just came around to think about the renaming og Science Girl, that I created, to Jill. I really do not like it, and we do not generally give generic figures a name, Megan and Danish the exceptions. And because she is in a comic based on a children song, the name is clearly from the song not because the generic Science Girl is called Jill. Jill is not even used in the comic, only in the title text. You wrote there where no less than three discussions regarding this name change, agreeing with you. But they are not on the talk page of Science Girls page. I'm seriously considering changing it back, so let me know where these discussions are located. I also think it was a mistake to call Danish, Danish, but it beats calling her Black Hats girlfriend. It was just a nickname he used, and they killed the witness as no one must know... But that was done way before I began editing this page. --[[User:Kynde|Kynde]] ([[User talk:Kynde|talk]]) 16:21, 30 March 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Hey, thanks for your message! I'll respond tomorrow because I don't have time, but for now I just wanted to note somewhere (before I forget) that I looked though all 41 appearances and counted the times where science is the main theme of the comic. The result was that the majority of Jill appearences are not related to science. --[[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 20:07, 30 March 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Well I will have to check that but the first instance was included because it was a girl who where interested in science even though she doesn't look like ScienceGirl. And an adult version of her was included because it was science again. The question is of course if there are now a different girl... But I do not like the naming of her. We did refrain from naming Cueball Rob, and there was also someone who did not like Megan. But that I like now. I prefer keeping Danish, but do not like the reason why she got than name. And other generic characters have been given a name in some comics without we used this. And really feel it is wrong to name her after a children song just because she was in a comic about that song! --[[User:Kynde|Kynde]] ([[User talk:Kynde|talk]]) 09:26, 31 March 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{Outdent|::}}&lt;br /&gt;
Hey. &lt;br /&gt;
 And an adult version of her was included because it was science again.&lt;br /&gt;
I'm not entirely sure what you're referring to, but this would actually help my case! &amp;quot;Girl&amp;quot; implies she's either a teenager or a child. This means that, if you wanted to broaden her definition to also include &amp;quot;adult versions&amp;quot;, you'd have to use another name. Science Woman? Science Female Charachter? I think Jill is better: it sounds like a name a child would have, but doesn't prevent us from giving the name Jill to adult versions. If we change our minds and Jill also becomes a woman, we don't have to remove the &amp;quot;girl&amp;quot; part.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 We do not generally give '''generic figures''' a name&lt;br /&gt;
But I don't think she's a generic figure. In a bit more than a third of the comic appearences, she's specifically interested in science. This, to me, means she's likely the same person on most of the comics. SHe also has a similar behaviour.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Even if that weren't the case, we would still have to find a name for her that's generic enough, that represents her qualities, AND that's not a proper name. Or, we could just call her what Randall called her, &amp;quot;[[Jill]]&amp;quot;. There is precendent on this wiki for giving a name to a character based solely on one instance, where the name wasn't even intended: that's [[Danish]]. Even more: Danish was used by Randall as an adjective, but here Randall gave us a proper name!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 There where no less than three discussions regarding this name change, agreeing with you.&lt;br /&gt;
I didn't say they agreed with me. There was no consensus on all of them, iirc, mainly because few people partecipated. Yes, I remember they weren't on her talk page, which is weird, but they were somewhere else. I remember they were mostly even.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 The first instance was included [...] even though she doesn't look like Science Girl&lt;br /&gt;
That specific comic is an exception, in all other comics she has a bun with trailing hair. Randall may have drawn a ponytail because of the limited space. Anyways, as I said, the majority of the comics featuring her aren't mainly about science. (Of course, almost all Randall comics relate to science, but I counted comics where it was intented.)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 We did refrain from naming Cueball Rob&lt;br /&gt;
That's because there was consensus on the fact that Cueball is an everyman, while Rob is the same charachter.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 And really feel it is wrong to name her after a children song just because she was in a comic about that song!&lt;br /&gt;
Well that's the only mention of her name we have, even if it's unrelated. I like that she was named after a nursery rhyme, it fits her character, since she's a child.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 [...] I really do not like it, [...]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 [...] I do not like the naming of her. [...]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 [...] There was also someone who did not like Megan. But I like [Megan] now. [...]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 [...] I really '''feel''' it is wrong to name her after a children song [...]&lt;br /&gt;
I'm starting to see a trend here. Do you think it could be possible you're against the name change because you simply... don’t like how it sounds? I didn't like how &amp;quot;Science Girl&amp;quot; sounded, but that's not why I changed her name...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 15:34, 31 March 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Thanks for the reply. Sadly you could not show me any discussion about the name change. Only that you said there where. So that did not help. Yes maybe I used the same wording many time. Also not native English speaker so may have less options to express my meaning... What I do not like about Jill and using that comic to name her, is that I do not think that comic at all is representative of the character I had identified and named Science Girl. But I do agree that if there are several instances where she is represented as an adult it could be a problem. I only new her as adult in [[1520: Degree-Off]] and I can see this has been changes, although I believe this should be reverted as this is not hairbun bu Science Girl. I did not know it had been removed. In this [https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=1520:_Degree-Off&amp;amp;oldid=123879 version] she was named Science Girl] but it was removed without my knowing. And that she was an adult version was in this [https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Jill&amp;amp;oldid=123921 version]. --[[User:Kynde|Kynde]] ([[User talk:Kynde|talk]]) 16:35, 31 March 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::Looking at comics now, and just found this one, without looking for Jill and saw her here: [[2747: Presents for Biologists]]. To me the important thing is the interest in science and that the hairbun is not tight but with strings of hair hanging loose. So maybe the explanation to Jill should be changed to a young woman, often a child with a loose hairbun, not to be3 confused with the generic every woman Hairbun... Then Degree-Off is also clearly Jill. --[[User:Kynde|Kynde]] ([[User talk:Kynde|talk]]) 17:56, 31 March 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
{{Outdent|::}}&lt;br /&gt;
 Also not native English speaker so may have less options to express my meaning&lt;br /&gt;
I'm also not a native speaker, I'm Italian! :D I wasn't pointing out your choice of words but rather what you were trying to say, which is (I think?) that you don't like the name. Anyways:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 To me the important thing is the interest in science [...] So maybe the explanation to Jill should be changed to a young woman [...]&lt;br /&gt;
It seems your opinion has changed completely then! This is what [https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Jill&amp;amp;oldid=123921 you wrote] about [[Hairbun]] before I joined this wiki:&lt;br /&gt;
 ''Since she [Hairbun] is a '''grown woman''', she should not be confused with Science Girl or any other '''small girls''' with hair bun like in [[1584: Moments of Inspiration]].''&lt;br /&gt;
According to this logic in this comic:&lt;br /&gt;
* [[1520: Degree-Off]] - taller than other woman and man, so a woman → '''not Jill'''&lt;br /&gt;
* [[2747: Presents for Biologists]] - as tall as other woman and man, so a woman → '''not Jill'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Also, this would mean we'd have to rename Jill to someone else in a third or a fourth of her appearences.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 But I do agree that if there are several instances where she is represented as an adult it could be a problem&lt;br /&gt;
I agree! If there's one thing that I think everyone can agreen on is that we shoudn't call a grown woman a &amp;quot;girl&amp;quot;. And &amp;quot;Science Woman&amp;quot; sounds like a superhero.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
So, to avoid naming Hairbun '''based on how she looks''' and Jill '''based on her displayed interest''' (I'll remind you, you said in Hairbun's page that this is Hairbun:)&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Hair Bun Girl with curly hair and ponytail.png]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
...all i did was standardise the matter:&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Jill is a child OR girl that always has trailing hair''' (except 1 comic), and&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Hairbun is an adult that sometimes has trailing hair.'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I think any other definition would be incredibly confusing. --[[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 16:03, 1 April 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Well I originally put in degree off as Science Girl as she both looked and behaved like Science Girl. So I may have changed my mind. Cannot find the picture you said that I said was Hairbun? Maybe it was from before I introduced Science Girl. I have created both of these characters and then others have changed the explanation and the name. I also called her [https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Hairbun&amp;amp;oldid=88388 Hair Bun Girl], which I can now see it wrong since she was a woman, but again, not native English. Here is my first creation of [https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Jill&amp;amp;oldid=123862 Science Girl]. There where more than a year between, so maybe I changed my mind regarding which could be hairbun in between? I'm certainly more interested in having those characters with hairbun and dangling hair to be another than normal hairbun now. And would today have collected those that looks like that together. Also there are many instances of Jill where she do not have a speaking part, thus saying she is always interested in science doesn't fit with how she is listed now... It is difficult. --[[User:Kynde|Kynde]] ([[User talk:Kynde|talk]]) 12:57, 2 April 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Oh yeah that makes sense, I didn't consider the fact that Science Jirl was created possibly years after Hairbun. I'm not sure I understood your last sentence, about Jill not speaking? --[[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 14:26, 2 April 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::I think only a year after. But still. I meant that there are several instances with Jill where she do not have a speaking part in the comic, and thus cannot be said to have a special interest in science or her sharp wit. So if science should be her main indicator then she has to say something. But I do not really know how to make this as best as it could be. (Science Jirl, Jirl a combination of Jill and Girl ;-) --[[User:Kynde|Kynde]] ([[User talk:Kynde|talk]]) 12:46, 4 April 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::It'd be so funny if we settled on Science Jirl haha. --[[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 15:10, 4 April 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== As I can't edit it... ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Regarding the Editor FAQ:&lt;br /&gt;
 For headlines, you have to use wiki-style code. The simplest way is a preceding semicolon at the beginning of the line which causes the entire line to be rendered in bold.&lt;br /&gt;
...I might be tempted to say something like &amp;quot;This makes use of {{w|Help:Wikitext#Description_lists|Description List}} markup&amp;quot;, given how there are circumstances when a &amp;quot;;something:fuller description of something&amp;quot; is also actually useful. And then go on to say something about how this is functionally simpler than the actual (sub-)header use of =s, ==s, ===s, etc, (which you'd be advised to check what 'level' of (sub-)header you're already working in and go for the next level on from that) and would the usually be recorded in a Table Of Contents of either the page concerned or any page which it is transcluded within.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Except that we're going into really ''technical'' territory with the latter bit. Generally, ==s are for Explanation, Transcript, Trivia headers in comics, you could say. (The reason being is that the Main Page has a single-= header under which the Latest Comic is transcluded and so ==s are best to be inherited as transient sub-headers - but you don't need to say that... it's just an obvious reasong behind the stylistic decision.) Headering a section other than these, in a comic (such as a place for a Table Of Things, or similar) would generally be ===ed (or, rarely, ====ed, as a sub-sub-header of the Explanation/whatever). It is best to avoid any ===+ing at all in the Comic Talk page because, if the Comic page itself gets a TOC (some do, most don't, but all ''potentially'' could) then the transcluded Discussion gets (probably!) inadvertently and improperly added in. (You can force a NOTOC, and some other tricks, but I've never been able to find a NOTOCIFTRANSCLUDED-like thing, not without peppering noinclude sections around section headers, which is... getting ''far'' too complicated.) So, just saying &amp;quot;Don't use '==...'s in Talk Pages, stick to ';'s...&amp;quot; (even without the reasoning) might be an advisable statement.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Yeah, I'm giving you a lot of stuff here (I think you know all of it, actually), hopefully you can tease out some of the bits actually useful to suggest in the FAQ. :P [[Special:Contributions/172.68.205.164|172.68.205.164]] 21:52, 11 April 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Darnit, also meant to add that in the {{template|Citation needed}} explanation you wrote, could you change {{template|actual citation needed}} to {{template|Actual citation needed}}? The latter is the actual template, the former is just a redirect. No harm in ''using'' the redirect-needing ones (generally), but you might as well advertise the correct ones. Like you don't advertise {{template|cn}} or &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{template|fact}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt; (both -&amp;gt;{{template|Citation needed}}, as are {{template|citation needed}}, {{template|Citation Needed}} and other case-accomadating variations), though people still are able to use them. [[Special:Contributions/172.68.205.164|172.68.205.164]] 21:58, 11 April 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Sorry but you're gonna have to give me exactly what you want me to paste in the article, I haven't understood a word of what you said. I changed the actual cit needed thinghy--[[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 09:45, 12 April 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==User page creation==&lt;br /&gt;
I just wanted to say thanks again for making my user page! --[[User:Xnerkcd|xnerkcd]] ([[User talk:Xnerkcd|talk]]) 17:38, 13 April 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:No worries! --[[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 18:22, 13 April 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Admin==&lt;br /&gt;
What does an admin do? Are they just the people that can create pages?&lt;br /&gt;
:Not an admin, but they basically manage the wiki state-of-affairs and oversee day-to-day operation. Basically, a stepup from typical moderators. [[Special:Contributions/172.69.208.206|172.69.208.206]]&lt;br /&gt;
::I guess that's what they're ''supposed'' to do. Because of the status quo, they just sometimes pop back in and do stuff we can't. We can however create pages ourselves. --[[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 15:46, 15 April 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== A Barnstar For You :3 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| style=&amp;quot;border: 1px solid {{{border|gray}}}; background-color: {{{color|#fdffe7}}};&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|rowspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;vertical-align:top;&amp;quot; | {{#ifeq:{{{2|}}}|alt|[[File:Blueprint Barnstar 3.PNG|100px|border]]|[[File:Blueprint Barnstar 2.PNG|100px|border]]}}&lt;br /&gt;
|rowspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; |&lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;font-size: x-large; padding: 0; vertical-align: bottom; height: 1.1em;&amp;quot; | '''The Template Barnstar'''&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;vertical-align: top; border-top: 1px solid gray;&amp;quot; | Thanks for all of your work on improving the templates on here! '''[[User:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:9pt;color:pink&amp;quot;&amp;gt;42.book.addict&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:6pt;color:#B1E4E3&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Talk to me!&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;''' 20:01, 18 April 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
:Thanks so much! But [[User:Firestar233]] definitely deserves that award more than I do! He created the templates for the what if? index that are still incredibly useful! --[[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 20:31, 18 April 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==''Restructuring [[Header text]] as a table''==&lt;br /&gt;
''The messages regarding the [[Talk:Header text|''Header text'' reformatting]] project have been moved to '''[[Talk:Header text]]'''. To add a new topic regarding the projects, [https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:Header_text&amp;amp;action=edit&amp;amp;section=new click here].'' --[[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 09:15, 2 February 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== So, the HiddenCat..? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You do seem pleased that it works, but I can't work out what you've done by it (presuming it has effects upon a different page). And slightly worried by the additional redlinked category that the page now has. [[Special:Contributions/172.68.229.161|172.68.229.161]] 19:31, 5 May 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Sure. See {{mw|Help:Categories#Hidden_categories}}. I only applied it for the new All pages and the old All comics cats. --[[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 15:13, 6 May 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Solved the redlink (non-)issue by un-redlinking it (aka creating the cat). --[[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 15:55, 6 May 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Still less than wise as to what ''problem'' it solves, but I'm just happy that you're happy. ;)&lt;br /&gt;
::Also &amp;quot;The categories that a page is in are normally listed at the bottom of the page.&amp;quot; I'd have written as &amp;quot;The categories that a page &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;are&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; in are normally listed at the bottom of the page.&amp;quot;, to match &amp;quot;categories=&amp;gt;are&amp;quot; ''or'' &amp;quot;&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;Each category&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; that a page is in &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;is&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; normally listed at the bottom of the page.&amp;quot; to force &amp;quot;category=&amp;gt;is&amp;quot; agreement- but maybe that's a UK-English v.s. US-English thing. (Or just my particular regional sub-dialect of English (quite near me there's a place where &amp;quot;we was&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;I was&amp;quot; are considered 'correct' and another where &amp;quot;we were&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;I were&amp;quot; are, so there's easily room for such confusion, even though I'm a &amp;quot;we were&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;I was&amp;quot; person myself). Or just me be entirely mistaken about something!) [[Special:Contributions/172.68.205.187|172.68.205.187]] 20:52, 6 May 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;gt; ''Still less than wise as to what ''problem'' it solves&lt;br /&gt;
:::Solves the problem of displaying a category that should not be seen by users.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Also, your suggestion seems grammatically incorrect. The &amp;quot;is&amp;quot; you'd like to change to an &amp;quot;are&amp;quot; is referring to &amp;quot;a page&amp;quot;, not &amp;quot;categories&amp;quot;. You may want to read the sentence again. afaik, &amp;quot;a page is here&amp;quot; is correct and &amp;quot;a page are here&amp;quot; is incorrect. --[[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 14:18, 7 May 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Exclusive xkcd textbook comics ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hey uhhh does anyone know about [https://www.nytimes.com/2016/03/22/science/randall-munroe-xkcd-science-textbook.html this]? Should we make explanations for these?&lt;br /&gt;
--'''''[[User:DollarStoreBa'al |&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Atomic Age;font-size:12pt;color:red;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;DollarStoreBa'al&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:DollarStoreBa'al |'''''Converse''''']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;[[DSBContribs |'''''My life choices''''']] 20:48, 8 May 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Google's Ai says there are multiple exclusive comics for the textbook, but I've only been able to find Inside Body, shown here:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Inside Body.jpg|300px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;amp;nbsp;{{unsigned|DollarStoreBa'al|23:07, 8 May 2025‎}}&lt;br /&gt;
:Hey, I'm afraid you'll have to be more specific about what &amp;quot;this&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;these&amp;quot; are. You might be looking for this page: [[New York Times: Good Question]]. --[[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 15:06, 9 May 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::'This' links to a NYT article about randall munroe doing illustrations for a science textbook. Google's AI overview says there are three exclusive comic for this. I've only been able to find one. I'm asking if we should add explanations for these new comics. I have given it the temporary name 'Inside Body', since when I saved the image from the NYT article, the name 'Inside Body comic' was used.--'''''[[User:DollarStoreBa'al |&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Atomic Age;font-size:12pt;color:red;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;DollarStoreBa'al&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:DollarStoreBa'al |'''''Converse''''']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;[[DSBContribs |'''''My life choices''''']] 16:59, 9 May 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::upon further investigation, the article is on the page you linked to. My question is still whether we add an explanation for Inside Body. Also, do we add explanations for the other comics shown in the science textbook pages? --'''''[[User:DollarStoreBa'al |&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Atomic Age;font-size:12pt;color:red;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;DollarStoreBa'al&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:DollarStoreBa'al |'''''Converse''''']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;[[DSBContribs |'''''My life choices''''']] 17:02, 9 May 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::A large language model is one of the most unreliable sources of information. Unless you find any other site or person mentioning that there are exclusive xkcd comics on some textbooks, I don't think we should in any way create pages based on what a large language model generated. Can you find any actual sources?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::We might still explain that one specific comic, but this is not the right place to discuss this, we should use the community portals. Besides, there are many other comics in [[New York Times: Good Question]] that aren't explained. --[[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 17:06, 9 May 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== It's a date. ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I'm confused by {{diff|377635|the ISO Dates edit}}. First of all, as explained in my full revert's summary, lowercase are (mostly) reserved for time-placeholders and uppercase used for date-placeholder. And I checked a number of separate documentations and implementations where datetime format variations are described/configured, without finding even one that consistently reserved only &amp;quot;MM&amp;quot;, etc, for month, for disambiguation with time's equivalent &amp;quot;mm&amp;quot;-for-minutes, but lowercased everything else.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Secondly, the apparent reason for this edit did not mention this. (Perhaps an overzealous editor auto-correct? Except it/you 'missed a few' and came back to 'fix' them.) The reason actually suggests a sentence's meaning was previously reversed when it clearly was not.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I reverted to before both your edits and those which had prompted your mass-'correction'. Technically, this leaves the &amp;quot;US format in binary&amp;quot; incorrect, which was the only case-change that the prior editor had actually rationalised before you. An argument ''could'' be made that &amp;quot;mm/dd/yyyy&amp;quot; could be parsable as being &amp;quot;MM/DD/YYYY, but in binary&amp;quot;, like kb/kilobits is to kB/kilobytes... though that's not even how it's phrased and I'm sure that this should indeed be uppercased like it had been. I also think the other change, to the sentence, is more elegant (for the exact same meaning), but am allowing for a slight possibility that I'm wrong about that. As such, I'm letting you consider where we go from here. Revert my change (the latest, as I type) to re-'fix' things back into lowercase, if you have enough reason to, or reassess the things you blitzed and restore the &amp;quot;binary date&amp;quot; and/or rephrased &amp;quot;drop leading zeros&amp;quot; edits.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Any further discussion, on either original issue, I will leave between you and the other editor, though I thought I'd give you a direct nod about my full reasons why I nuked ''both'' changes, as you had apparently put far more effort into your contributions (for right or wrong). And I'm not currently unconvinced by ''their'' edits, but maybe you can take the opportunity to explain things better and switch my opinions over to your POV. [[Special:Contributions/172.68.229.44|172.68.229.44]] 04:05, 13 May 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Sure! I just made the table on that page sortable again. Microsoft has always used yyyy, dd, and MM in their settings, so I assumed that was the standard. Thanks!--[[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 14:55, 13 May 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== From Kynde's page ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::: And finally: the typos in the message you replied to were caused by my keyboard autocorrecting my words (my pc is broken). When you reply, do it on my talk page so we don't spam Kynde's. --[[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 12:44, 29 June 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
{{outdent|:::::}}&lt;br /&gt;
:Hello, I think you mistook another IP's recent comment as being from me-IP, from things said prior to the above. There are a few of us around, and I don't mind being mixed up with some of them (or vice-versa) that are similarly longterm maintainers of seemingly good intentions. Though I think that IP also used &amp;quot;propogate&amp;quot; instead of &amp;quot;propagate&amp;quot; (like I know I've got my own blindspots in spelling/grammar, and occasional tendency to lapse into dialect), which also amused me.&lt;br /&gt;
:As to your autocorrection-errors, it surprised me... In my experience, non-native but fluent of English don't let mistakes like that happen, and you're certainly up there with native speakers (il mio italiano è per lo più limitato a ciò che può fare un traduttore online... così!). I think it just looked... careless. Also, strangely induced errors.&lt;br /&gt;
:Don't let me discourage you, you've gone to a lot of trouble. Some things maybe necessary, some things maybe more just 'your own vision' that I could take or leave. Just that the &amp;quot;diff&amp;quot; page doesn't always align things to make it easy to compare old vs. new versions for anything more complicated than paragraphs/bullets/tabling to bullets/tabling/paragraphs or tabling/paragraphs/tables (as required). Complete rewrites don't help, even assuming that they accurate rewrites.&lt;br /&gt;
:...so, this is my response. From your invitation. Of course I can't speak for anyone else involved. [[Special:Contributions/92.23.2.228|92.23.2.228]] 18:17, 29 June 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Oh well, until you decide to create a proper account I will blindly assume every IP that uses parentheses and subclauses is the same exact person! You are everyone.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:: Grazie per il complimento; il mio inglese would be better if I cared about looking over every message I post. I usually only extensively proofread article changes. You're right, that specific mistake wasn't an auto correction, I just didn't want to explain everything, but I have time to kill so I guess I'll just do it. On mobile, i prefer using Gboard's glide typing feature, which can sometimes mistake two words even if their letters are almost completely different. You can look it up, it looks cool, though I doubt it'd be ergonomic to use on your tablet. That's why help became hello.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:: Amusingly, there's a grammar error in your reply that I'll let you find! --[[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 22:17, 30 June 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Rather than re-de-revert. ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{quote|The text &amp;quot;Don't remove this notice too soon&amp;quot; is there when there isn't a specific reason the page is incomplete. Now there is a clear moment when the page can be marked as complete. Not sure why you put back the PAGE CREATED BY thingy|{{diff|381894|Your re-revert}}}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It's not just &amp;quot;Don't remove the 'Don't remove this text too soon' text too soon&amp;quot;... It's contectually applying to the ''whole'' incompleteness tag. Now, I'm not saying that, without it, people will think it ok to remove the whole thing, but there's no reason to remove it until you're removing the whole thing as solved. What even is the benefit of doing so?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But, honestly, I restored it not for meta-ontological purposes, but because I was actually trying to counter the strange removal of the PAGE CREATED BY bit. I appreciate that you may think that it confuses new readers, and I daresay that it does (a little bit), but it probably confuses them more when some new comics have this time-honoured bit of site culture and some do not. Whereas they shouldn't really take too long to realise that:&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;quot;CREATED BY A BOT&amp;quot; is basically what it says on the tin, before any human has had a chance to ponder the newly added page,&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;quot;CREATED BY &amp;lt;A JOKE&amp;gt;&amp;quot; is a new article once the rabble have gotten to it,&lt;br /&gt;
** ...though, IMO, you should only normally change it as &amp;quot;first editor&amp;quot; (or &amp;quot;first editor with a good idea ror a joke to put there&amp;quot;) with something to contribute into the Explanation and/or Transcript (or will do momentarily), not ''just as a &amp;quot;FIRST!&amp;quot;-type thing then leave it...&lt;br /&gt;
** ...and you should think twice before changing someone else's joke to your own; perhaps refine it (oapply mild corrections to grammar/spelling/whatever it's trying to reference), but if you just totally &amp;quot;no, MY IDEA!&amp;quot; it, what's to stop the next person going &amp;quot;no, no, ''MY'' IDEA!!&amp;quot;? Just accept what's there (or tweak it, honourably), you'll perhaps be able to get (and keep for a reasonable time) the subtle 'bragging rights' to a future comic, if everyone plays nice and doesn't just entirely change it on a whim. Or remove it for no good reason, before the whole tag is considered superfluous anyway...&lt;br /&gt;
* If someone (like yourself) adds in an incomplete tag ''back'' into a previously 'presumed complete' page, that can happily stay without the BOT-inspired humour. Unless one feels like it, but actually adding the tag back in to pages, which (by wiki convention) are always open to being re-edited if you so wish,&lt;br /&gt;
** ...if I may say, adding an &amp;quot;incomplete|X and Y need doing to this page&amp;quot;, instead of just doing X and Y to the page, is a waste of edits. I appreciate there are some things you might not be able to actually do (explain something that currently confuses you, for example), but occasionally it's a request to trivially reformat something, and no obvious reason why you haven't just done the reformatting in this edit. If you haven't time to do it all now, it doesn't need a placeholder to make a note to yourself to come back and do it when you can..&lt;br /&gt;
** ...and, unless you've changed it since I last looked, there's at least one &amp;quot;X needs doing&amp;quot; that seems to have been done but the &amp;quot;X needs doing&amp;quot; tag is still there. Haven't been able to work out if ''not all'' X has been done (for some reason), or whoever did complete it left this tag (whether or not they've deleted othersz along the way). When I have time to to through it line-by-line (more work than to quickly write something like this, which is to explain things that are clearly not as self-evident as I had thought), maybe I'll be the one to remove the notice to that effect..&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I have no doubt that some of my thinkings around these matters (and various site traditions/conventions, which may predate me and do definitely prefate you) are perhaps a little strange. Similarly, I find some of your thinking strange. Or at least what I imagine is your thinkings, based upon your occasional doings. As it is practically impossible to cover all the various aspects of thought (or ideas about your aspects of thought) in an Edit Summary, especially one with &amp;quot;Reverting edit by...&amp;quot; filler already in it, this is to make up for the rather limited and compressed 'explanation' you perhaps had to make do with previously.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
And it's only my opinion, albeit based upon site consensus (messy and ever-changing as that is) that I've absorbed from my time here. Perhaps you wish to shift consensus, but I'd of course like you to at least know that ''this is what you're doing''. If you don't know this, your well-meaning attempts to restandardise the groupçsnhive mind may just be more confusing than productive. Perhaps you may want to say &amp;quot;I don't think we should &amp;lt;foo&amp;gt; any more&amp;quot;, rather than just de-&amp;lt;foo&amp;gt; everything without warning people that you might be treading on their metaphorical toes. Not that I can stop you, but every now and then I might be seeming to tread on your own toes (with no malicious intent), just because we're dancing to completely different beats. [[Special:Contributions/82.132.246.216|82.132.246.216]] 17:10, 25 July 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Hi!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 There's no reason to remove it until you're removing the whole thing as solved. What even is the benefit of doing so?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:That message is part of the default text for new comics. If someone has changed the incomplete tag, it's harder to notice that a specific reason has been created if the old text is still there. For these reasons, I believe editors are more likely to overlook what's written in the notice, thinking it only contains the default text.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 [H]onestly, I restored it not for meta-ontological purposes&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:What's a meta-ontological purpose?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 the strange removal of the PAGE CREATED BY bit. I appreciate that you may think that it confuses new readers, and I daresay that it does (a little bit), but it probably confuses them more when some new comics have this time-honoured bit of site culture and some do not.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Two things:&lt;br /&gt;
:1. The main reason I remove it is to avoid the above: editors thinking nobody pointed out specific page issues. And not just newer editors, even I sometimes miss an incomplete reason because I SEE THE ALL CAPS TEXT AND THINK NOBODY CHANGED IT. (im not screaming)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:2. Recently, I don't remove the joke from the LATESTCOMIC, unless it's really hard to see the actual incomplete reason.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &amp;quot;CREATED BY A BOT&amp;quot; is basically what it says on the tin, before any human has had a chance to ponder the newly added page,&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:That hasn't been the case for months now. Look at the OG versions of the pages. Editors are adding it wholesale.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 ...though, IMO, you should only normally change it as &amp;quot;first editor&amp;quot; (or &amp;quot;first editor with a good idea ror a joke to put there&amp;quot;) with something to contribute into the Explanation and/or Transcript (or will do momentarily), not just as a &amp;quot;FIRST!&amp;quot;-type thing then leave it...&lt;br /&gt;
 ...and you should think twice before changing someone else's joke to your own; perhaps refine it (oapply mild corrections to grammar/spelling/whatever it's trying to reference), but if you just totally &amp;quot;no, MY IDEA!&amp;quot; it, what's to stop the next person going &amp;quot;no, no, MY IDEA!!&amp;quot;? Just accept what's there (or tweak it, honourably), you'll perhaps be able to get (and keep for a reasonable time) the subtle 'bragging rights' to a future comic, if everyone plays nice and doesn't just entirely change it on a whim. Or remove it for no good reason, before the whole tag is considered superfluous anyway...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I haven't considered this type of edit warring before, and I'm happy to stay away from it. I'm not sure whether the &amp;quot;you&amp;quot; was referring to me specifically, because I only edited the CREATED BY once or twice (i mostly remove it when it's old or hides the real reason a page is incomplete).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 adding an &amp;quot;incomplete|X and Y need doing to this page&amp;quot;, instead of just doing X and Y to the page, is a waste of edits&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I've been trying to do that less recently&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 If you haven't time to do it all now, it doesn't need a placeholder to make a note to yourself to come back and do it when you can..&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I thought this use was accepted. I do it because if someone else gets there before me, they can do it themselves. Could you suggest other ways for saving these small-but-needed edits?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 unless you've changed it since I last looked, there's at least one &amp;quot;X needs doing&amp;quot; that seems to have been done but the &amp;quot;X needs doing&amp;quot; tag is still there.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I think I've always removed an incomplete tag I created myself for all comics that aren't the ~20 most recent if, after chacking the page, I notice the editor has forgotten (and I always check the edits within a few days unless im on vacation). Please feel free to remove all my or others' incomplete tags if you notice it's complete. I don't understand why you're saying you noticed one and seemingly didn't remove it? If the editor that fixes the page forgets, it's up to whoever notices first to remove it.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 Similarly, I find some of your thinking strange. Or at least what I imagine is your thinkings, based upon your occasional doings.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Yeah I don't think I've ever explained my removals of the CREATED BY things. To summarise:&lt;br /&gt;
:Reason number 1) editors thinking nobody pointed out specific page issues because they think it's still the default notice.&lt;br /&gt;
:Reason number 2) the comic is old&lt;br /&gt;
:Reason number 3) confuses new users, but in the last year or so I haven't worried about this because I removed the incomplete notices from the [[Main Page]]. Hopefully the newbies will look at the mainpage first.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 Perhaps you may want to say &amp;quot;I don't think we should &amp;lt;foo&amp;gt; any more&amp;quot;, rather than just de-&amp;lt;foo&amp;gt; everything without warning people that you might be treading on their metaphorical toes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:It's not that I want the tradition to stop, it's just that it gets in the way of productiveness. A notice is the most powerful thing we have to spread a message, and yet we use it as a joke which sometimes hides what's actually wrong with the page. I wish there were a way to keep the CREATED BY's and still allow for important notices to be highly visible. Currently, if I have to choose one, I choose the latter. Do you have any ideas about this? New templates, edits to the bot script, new fields for the existing template, a different notice type, etc? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Also, any thoughts on the topic above. Your suggestions are often a good start but then you stop replying :( ㅤ [[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 13:21, 26 July 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Ok, my prior reply seems to have been not posted, for reasons I can only guess (dodgy connection, looked like it happened but I moved on too quick, or didn't notice I'd landed on Edit Conflict, something like that?). But I've also been way too busy to actively ponder if you've not bothered to respond to me, in turn.&lt;br /&gt;
::Not going to recompose everything, at length, but Incomplete templates ''easily'' contain the original BOT text/user-version, as long as users don't go over-creative over it. Genuine reasons added to this are still visible. The BOT-original &amp;quot;don't delete this too soon&amp;quot; doesn't become any more superfluous than the now ubiquitous &amp;quot;editing it&amp;quot; link. For as long as the notice is 'new' on a new article, there's no reason at all to squeeze anything out in most circumstances. Don't underestimate the readership.&lt;br /&gt;
::If you're adding a box back in for an old article that has passed such 'newness' (or where there never was one), keep it as businesslike as you wish, of course.&lt;br /&gt;
::If you have a long, complicated list of things, it's probably a long, complicated article where you can site an Incomplete notice by the side of each troublesome item (as you have done).&lt;br /&gt;
::Not going any further, like pointing you back at innumerable 'classic' examples of it all just working (whether new users or old users took the necessary hints), as that was a lot of wasted work from last time I 'replied'. But it's all there in the back-pagesz if you care to look. [[Special:Contributions/82.132.245.128|82.132.245.128]] 16:45, 5 August 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Short and sweet reply, I like it! You should have a dodgy connection more often :D I seem to care about the notice much less than you do, so, sure; I'll keep it on relatively new articles and do whatever if it's older and doesn't still have the original. I still wish there were an easier solution, but it's just a notice. --[[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 10:53, 6 August 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Questions ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Dear FaviFake&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I posted a new question on the Randall question thing. I have no clue how to use the Wiki, but I still did my best to post a question. If I did it wrong please forgive me and I'll do my best next time. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
PS. The question I posted is all the way down, at least as I am writing now. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Little Timmy|Little Timmy]] ([[User talk:Little Timmy|talk]]) 01:30, 29 July 2025 (UTC)Little Timmy[[User:Little Timmy|Little Timmy]] ([[User talk:Little Timmy|talk]]) 01:30, 29 July 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:No worries, that was good. You can learn more about editing this wiki on [[explain xkcd:Editor FAQ]]. --[[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 08:50, 29 July 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==''Restoring the mini [[Comic series]]''==&lt;br /&gt;
''The messages regarding the [[Talk:Comic series|definition of a proper &amp;quot;comic series&amp;quot;]] have been moved to '''[[Talk:Comic series]]'''. To add a new topic regarding the comic series, [https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:Comic_series&amp;amp;action=edit&amp;amp;section=new click here].'' --[[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 14:46, 31 July 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
== Leaderboard ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Wow, you probably know already but I’m just re-reminding you that you fell out of 1st place. Keep up the good contributions! {{Special:ContributionScores/10/7/nosort,notools}} [[User:Aprilfoolsupdate!| &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;April&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;fools&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;update&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;!]]([[User talk:Aprilfoolsupdate!|talk]]) 09:57, 7 August 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Oh well, I surely care more about [[Special:ContributionScores#All time (Top 50)|this other list]]. Thanks! --[[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 13:09, 7 August 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I never knew this list existed! I wonder what’s behind it? The “well known” one is &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt; {{Special:ContributionScores/50/7/nosort,notools}} &amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt; I guess, but what’s the one for this list?[[User:Aprilfoolsupdate!| &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;April&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;fools&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;update&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;!]]([[User talk:Aprilfoolsupdate!|talk]]) 13:11, 7 August 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Who knows! Maybe Mediawiki has the answer. --[[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 13:20, 7 August 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Small Talk (Or Something Like That) ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hey, how's things going? Everything alright? Any wiki-wide events I missed? Really miss how things were before. -Tori '''[[User:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:9pt;color:pink&amp;quot;&amp;gt;42.book.addict&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:6pt;color:#B1E4E3&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Talk to me!&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;''' 15:51, 9 August 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Hi welcome back!!! The only interesting thing imo opinion is that Randall replied to me again, I'm not sure if you saw that, see my userpage. :) --[[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 16:39, 11 August 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Oh and the [[Comic series]] page was divided into main series and miniseries and is now just a list of transclusions so we don't have to keep 2 pages up to date. --[[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 16:41, 11 August 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== &amp;quot;I'll omit this part because I'm not sure it should be published.&amp;quot; ==&lt;br /&gt;
why? [[user:lett‪herebedarklight|raeb]] 09:28, 18 August 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:What? could you elaborate? --[[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 10:37, 19 August 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::randall's reply. the answer that starts &amp;quot;Most of those were inside jokes sent to friends [...]&amp;quot; [[user:lett‪herebedarklight|raeb]] 11:44, 19 August 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Oh right. Some have said it's a bit personal. Now that the sitewide banner's off I'll reinstate it. Thx. --[[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 10:40, 20 August 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::{{Done}} --[[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 10:42, 20 August 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== A rational rationale? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You know, some people complain about explanations being too long. Copying {{diff|384566|a swathe of wikipedia}} about twice as large as the original explanation text seems about as odd as initially deciding to removing that text (which linked to the page in question, for the curious) ''possibly'' because you personally didn't know about it. It's ok, not everyone does know, even native speakers, but also maybe the treatment originally given to that part could be reworded to slightly more compact. (I liked the flippant bit. But I wouldn't have said it quite like that, myself.) Yet there's some confusion over your underkill-then-overkill approach. And if I was going to rewrite it, it'd be more considered than either excising or copypasting. Could have just been left alone, though. [[Special:Contributions/82.132.237.85|82.132.237.85]] 17:27, 20 August 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:It said singular they was considered incorrect, iirc, which is not really the case nowadays. I did a bit of ce before pasting it; my logic was: either add it back correctly, or remove the wrong part. --[[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 15:28, 31 August 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Tori and I have an idea==&lt;br /&gt;
Please check the proposals board for an idea to subvert the 255 character signature limit. --'''''[[User:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#023020&amp;quot;&amp;gt;DollarStoreBa'al&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User_talk:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#000080&amp;quot;&amp;gt;'''''converse'''''&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 17:40, 29 August 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==[[:Template:comic discussion 1167]]==&lt;br /&gt;
Hi FaviFake. I was looking through the unused templates page to try to do some cleanup on here when I noticed a [[:Template:comic discussion 1167|template]] from back in 2013. You had originally tagged it as a page to delete, but then added a lot more to the template. Since it is still unused and I cannot surmise any purpose for it, I have re-tagged it. Would you mind explaining your thought process? Thanks, '''[[User:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:9pt;color:pink&amp;quot;&amp;gt;42.book.addict&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:6pt;color:#B1E4E3&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Talk to me!&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;''' 16:36, 10 September 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:I don't remember why I used it, probably as a sandbox. It's unnecessary, thanks for flagging it.--[[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 10:58, 13 September 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Contact Info Google Site==&lt;br /&gt;
Hi FaviFake, what is the URL for your Google Site of contact info? I remember that you had posted it on here, but I cannot find it. I was experiencing Cloudflare errors in the past 24 hours and was unable to contact anyone on Explain XKCD. I would greatly enjoy it if we had some other form of communication outside of here. Thanks. '''[[User:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:9pt;color:#3a795e&amp;quot;&amp;gt;42.book.addict&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:6pt;color:#ce5f15&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Talk to me!&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;''' 20:17, 12 September 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Oh, thank god it's back. I noticed the outage and it seems someone had posted about it on reddit.&lt;br /&gt;
:The website is https://sites.google.com/view/FaviFake, you can bookmark it if you want. I noticed you're also on Reddit (and Wikipedia iirc), so I might contact you there if there's a more serious outage. --[[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 10:58, 13 September 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== [[Hoverboard]] ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I glad that someone has looked at my changes to this game description.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I am sorry, however, that you disagree with my two main points.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Can we discuss?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I see no point in getting into a &amp;quot;reversion war&amp;quot; over comments to a comic.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Sprucegrouse|Sprucegrouse]] ([[User talk:Sprucegrouse|talk]]) 13:52, 4 October 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Of course. I simply think your version is too odd:&lt;br /&gt;
 The best way to enjoy this comic is just to play the game! (Just be sure that you play using a web browser other than Safari.) If you have not yet tried (hard) to play it &amp;quot;cold&amp;quot; already, do so now. Reading beyond this Alert first will deprive you of the best this game has to offer.&lt;br /&gt;
Mine:&lt;br /&gt;
 The best way to enjoy this comic is just to play the game! If you didn't do that already, reading anything below will spoil you from truly enjoying the comic.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I don’t see the need of specifying browsers, and the complex language you used, in a ''spoiler alert''. [[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 16:11, 4 October 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Comic list numbers. ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Had a look at all today's edits to the Comics-bar template, carefully, after making it fully correct. Though the other person apparently didn't spot it, and I didn't have enough space in the Explanation to say it in longhand, I think I need to appeal to you directly. Not ''entirely'' sure you realised what you were dealing with. Or you just have a weird idea of what's acceptibly correct.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If I'm actually wanting to look at the list that contains (say) comic 1500, I wouldn't find it by following the text &amp;quot;1500-&amp;lt;whatever&amp;gt;&amp;quot; that links to a 1501-2000 page. I would if I was followed the &amp;quot;&amp;lt;whatever&amp;gt;-1500&amp;quot; one, before that, that links to the explicitly 1001-1500 page. But quick scanning of the text might miss the obvious overlap and initially get you to explore only the latter. When you do, you get to the page that starts &amp;quot;2000, 1999, 1998, ...&amp;quot;, then you scroll down to the bottom to find that it ''doesn't'' have the desired 1500 after all. (Before you ask, there are possible reasons that you might want to view the ''list'' item, and deliberately didn't go to the [[1500]] explanation page itself.) The explanation &amp;quot;unnecessary specificity&amp;quot; is at least misleading, and that edit made the whole top-bar misleading.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
(Personally, I'd have gone with 1-499, 500-999, etc, even though the lack of a '0' makes the first one shorter. Each of them being (500n)+1 to 500(n+1), as it is, is also ok. But neither method is (500n) to 500(n+1), however you look at them.) [[Special:Contributions/81.179.195.93|81.179.195.93]] 18:44, 4 October 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Fine, sure. If someone is looking for exactly 1500, rounding it will be annoying for them, but I thought the nicer round numbers were more important than full correctness. But I don't mind, you can change it back. There are bigger fishes to fry. --[[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 21:26, 4 October 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::That's a very strange thought to have had, here in the home of mathematical nitpicking, nerd sniping, over-anaylsing and all-round adherence to the ideals of accuracy and/or precision. I'm just surprised that it spent so much time with a partial off-by-one error.&lt;br /&gt;
::Although I didn't actually personally notice it until one or more other people did and at least partially tried to fix it. I suppose we all have our blind spots! Though maybe this is one of those cases where some people, once they see the issue, [[2598: Graphic Designers|couldn't unsee it]]. [[Special:Contributions/81.179.195.93|81.179.195.93]] 22:28, 4 October 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==2==&lt;br /&gt;
`^ -_ /| /\ -\ /_ /` -\ -\ /` -` /\ %20 `^ ‘_ -`%20 -`|_ %20 |_ -` `’ -_ %20 ‘_ -’ /_ ‘_&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
^UP|DOWN -LEFT_RIGHT %20SPACE /DIAGDOWNLEFT \DIAGDOWNRIGHT `DIAGUPLEFT ‘DIAGUPRIGHT {{unsigned ip|204.137.100.1|21:45, 12 November 2025 (UTC)}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Ok, I've not worked out the exact symbolic logic, in use, but the plaintext is obvious. Then the significance of the tetragrams may be the final puzzle. (Sorry, Favi, they put this here. For whatever purpose.) [[Special:Contributions/82.132.245.223|82.132.245.223]] 22:30, 12 November 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:DOYOUNEEDHELP {{unsigned ip|204.137.100.1|22:48, 12 November 2025 (UTC)}}&lt;br /&gt;
::Personally, no&amp;lt;!-- Am awaiting GENAFZVFFVBA GUERR NAQ SBHE --&amp;gt;. Not sure about you, though. ;) [[Special:Contributions/82.132.245.223|82.132.245.223]] 00:21, 13 November 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::{{w|Beetle|HELP}}&lt;br /&gt;
::::Beetle? &amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family: Times New Roman, serif; font-size: 16px;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;--'''''[[User:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#E3C6BE&amp;quot;&amp;gt;DollarStoreBa'al&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User Talk:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#CC9A8B&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Converse&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt; 14:30, 13 November 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
wut [[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 14:36, 13 November 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:IAMNOTJUSTANYBODY [[Special:Contributions/204.137.100.1|204.137.100.1]] 14:43, 13 November 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::WAIT A SECOND I GET IT!!!! &amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family: Times New Roman, serif; font-size: 16px;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;--'''''[[User:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#E3C6BE&amp;quot;&amp;gt;DollarStoreBa'al&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User Talk:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#CC9A8B&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Converse&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt; 14:56, 13 November 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::Their hint wasn't about beetles, it was about the BEATles! 'I am not just anybody' is very deliberate wording. That wording happens to be used in the Beatles' Help! Look at the album cover for Help. It's quite memorable. Why? Because it uses FLAG SEMAPHORE. WHICH USES DIFFERENT ARM POSITIONS TO COMMUNICATE LETTERS. SPECIFICALLY, THERE ARE EIGHT DIFFERENT ARM POSITIONS. AND THERE ARE EIGHT SYMBOLS USED IN THAT CODE. AND, WHEN YOU LOOK AT THE {{w|Flag semaphore|FLAG SEMAPHORE WIKIPEDIA PAGE}}, IT HAS AN ALPHABET. AND WHEN YOU TRANSLATE IT, YOU GET:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::T R A N S M I S S I O N   T W O   O F   F O U R   W Q M W. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Wow that's intricate. Okay, we have two now. That took a while. &amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family: Times New Roman, serif; font-size: 16px;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;--'''''[[User:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#E3C6BE&amp;quot;&amp;gt;DollarStoreBa'al&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User Talk:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#CC9A8B&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Converse&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt; 15:13, 13 November 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::::Ah, right. I was still dealing with the backformation and plotting out the digrams on graph paper as two-element vectors (and misread the 'Q' as another 'O'). But of course everybody knows that ''HELP!'' {{w|Help!#Album cover|doesn't actually depict &amp;quot;HELP&amp;quot;}} [[Special:Contributions/82.132.245.223|82.132.245.223]] 16:12, 13 November 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Now we have XVERWQMW in total &amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family: Times New Roman, serif; font-size: 16px;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;--'''''[[User:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#E3C6BE&amp;quot;&amp;gt;DollarStoreBa'al&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User Talk:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#CC9A8B&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Converse&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt; 15:25, 13 November 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Is it you? ==&lt;br /&gt;
Are you {{w|User:FaviFake}}? I'm just here from enwiki. Further question: are you aware of a page like {{w|wikt:Wiktionary:Wiktionary for Wikipedians}} for this wiki that would explain the differences? I've been spending some time dealing with duplication of diffusing subcategories of [[:Category:Science]] and I'm slightly concerned that I haven't found an equivalent of {{w|WP:BOLD}} here so my actions might be somehow against how this wiki functions. Thanks for any help you might be able to give :) [[User:lp0 on fire|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color: #c56030&amp;quot;&amp;gt;lp0&amp;amp;nbsp;on&amp;amp;nbsp;fire&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;amp;nbsp;[[User talk:lp0 on fire|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color: #64cea0&amp;quot;&amp;gt;()&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]] 18:14, 27 November 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Yes, it is me! What do you mean &amp;quot;explain the differences&amp;quot;?&lt;br /&gt;
:Here, everyone is BOLD since we have so few active editors. Welcome! [[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 11:07, 29 November 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:(Waited for FF to reply, for once, before sticking my own nose in.)&lt;br /&gt;
:Philosophically, explainxkcd is very much Wikipedia-like (far more so than Wiktionary is, though that's a high bar that's easy to limbo under).&lt;br /&gt;
:The main exceptions are probably discovered by practice, if not explained via the FAQ or other related pages. We don't like citation-style or note-style linking (&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-color:#3366CC&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;amp;#91;#&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;amp;#93; or &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;&amp;amp;#91;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-color:#3366CC&amp;quot;&amp;gt;#&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;amp;#93;&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;), prefering more the 'prosaic'/inline version, and use {{template|Actual citation needed}}s for when they're lacking because {{template|Citation needed}} is only used 'humorously' (YMMV!). The general format of Comics pages is fairly well tied down to an easily checkable (or correctable) house-style, also described elsewhere.&lt;br /&gt;
:Also (outside of the individual Talk/Discussion comments, which are going to just be how the attributed author ended up doing it) the default is to go with how US-English (Randall's version) is spelled, rather than how UK-/Commonwealth-English may be spelt (if you even realise/realize it applies... but someone may be along later to 'correct' it if they think it's labelled/labeled incorrectly). I ''think'' Wikipedia tends to ask for only in-article consistency (and tied to where the article's focus in the Anglosphere might primarily be). Of course, if you're in the US (or have had your {{w|English as a second or foreign language|ESOL}} education via an americanized school, rather than an anglicised one), you only really need to worry about your random tyops. :p&lt;br /&gt;
:My main advice(/advise? - no, I think that noun is still the same... it's things like practice/practise I need to remember to change!) is to hold off on creating new pages (especially Categories and Templates), until having checked how(/if) it fits with the others (e.g. what's the correct &amp;quot;Category:[[List of] Comics [with|featuring] ]FOO&amp;quot; form for what you want), as it saves someone having to rename it. Or mark it for deletion.&lt;br /&gt;
:But some of my personal preferences/expectations might well be 'YMMV'. It's (like Wikipedia) a collaborative site where the (active) community might reshape some expectations or granted latitudes over time. [[Special:Contributions/82.132.237.174|82.132.237.174]] 14:58, 29 November 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::Thanks, those are both helpful responces (that was a genuine typo; the humo[u]r was initially unintentional) in their own ways. If someone couls look over just one or two of the edits where I removed [[:Category:Science]] from articles that were already in one or more subcategories and confirm my edits were helpful I'd be very grateful. I think I'll mostly stick to Wikipedia (I've finally got round to writing an article!) but I might edit here intermittently. [[User:lp0 on fire|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color: #c56030&amp;quot;&amp;gt;lp0&amp;amp;nbsp;on&amp;amp;nbsp;fire&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;amp;nbsp;[[User talk:lp0 on fire|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color: #64cea0&amp;quot;&amp;gt;()&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]] 19:54, 3 December 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::For what it's worth, as yet another random editor, I have at least looked at the first few of your 'Science removal' items. Where you're either replacing them with a 'more specialist science' or because that more specialist science was also already there. They mostly seemed like valid hierarchical changes (without delving into what cats were ''actually'' sub-cats of other cats), and certainly I don't think any that I wanted to bother change back again. Which is as good as you could hope, I'm sure. ;) [[Special:Contributions/78.144.255.82|78.144.255.82]] 20:20, 3 December 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== template coding? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hi FaviFake! I know that you're probably pretty busy IRL, but could you take a look at [[explain xkcd:Community portal/Proposals#categories template]] and the new comments at [[explain xkcd:Community portal/Technical#Main page comic number]]? They both involve templates, which I remember you're pretty good with (Template:What if and Template:book). If you could lend your expertise into helping to implement these, or just giving your thoughts, that would be greatly appreciated. Thank you so much! '''[[User:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:9pt;color:#3a795e&amp;quot;&amp;gt;42.book.addict&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:6pt;color:#ce5f15&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Talk to me!&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;''' 10:21, 3 December 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Incomplete template - the image seems broken ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hi FaviFake&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On most pages with the incomplete template the image of work in progress seems to be broken. But sometimes it is not. I have tried to look into it, but cannot see what is wrong. Was it you who added the image? And can you fix it? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Regards --[[User:Kynde|Kynde]] ([[User talk:Kynde|talk]]) 07:27, 20 January 2026 (UTC)--&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Hi... sorry to butt in, but see (sorry, long read) [[explain xkcd:Community portal/Technical#Interwiki media-linking errors.]] for one of several prior mentions of this (several people have noticed it) at least as far back as its mention in [[Talk:3191: Superstition]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I think the most immediate 'solution' is for someone to actually upload the used images (both green and blue) to this site. Then it won't go wrong due to whatever dodgy 'find and link' process is happening in the cross-site process.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I've also found that clicking on the &amp;quot;Refresh&amp;quot; button (just above an Explanation Page's break-out box for the Discussion) sometimes makes it work. Sometimes makes it stop working. Sometimes makes the one that works stop working and vice-versa, in the same step. But if we can avoid that entirely then it's probably better. [[Special:Contributions/92.23.11.33|92.23.11.33]] 14:58, 20 January 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Yeah, I'd hoped someone with upload privileges would take note and do the simple fix. Me and the last guy can't do that for you, of course.&lt;br /&gt;
:And my advice is to go for a raw 40x40px .png, or even .gif if you want to have fun with transparency/animation. Might be slightly larger file than the .svg ''or'' smaller (depends upon how unnecessarily inefficient it is, at markup level, SVGs tend to have unnecessary editor-specific info, etc), but if they're both going to be 40x40 in size (or whatever it is defined as), no point asking browsers or back-end to get a 400x400 image and dynamically scale it down all the time. Even the potentiallhly constant SVG rerendering is computationally unnecesary. Just because it's a fairly seemless process on computers with many more times the power of thirty years ago, it doesn't mean you shouldn't put a little thought into it. [[Special:Contributions/82.132.239.241|82.132.239.241]] 15:46, 20 January 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::Sure, feel free to do it if it hasn't been done already! [[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 17:39, 23 January 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Well, you/Kynde(/almost any other registered user likely to come by this page) needs to upload it... None of us IPs can, and it's truly a trivial thing to do.&lt;br /&gt;
:::If it helps, though, I've put the (40x40px) images in https://filebin.net/8s85i4hq9uch50u2 for you ('''that link lasts for about a week''').&lt;br /&gt;
:::Noting that they're each 4kb in size. While the SVG file from which it comes is 11kb (being text-tag markup, rather than an optimally compressed binary format), though a lot of that is SVG markup that isn't actually needed (or can be simplified), if you're into thinking about such things!&lt;br /&gt;
:::You could, of course, force yourself a 80x80 size PNG image from the original (probably still below 11kb - not that it matters, but I find such things interesting to consider) and force-scale this local version, in-situ, to show as 40x40 again. Might be slightly smoother/better for some people's browsers, though, even if it ends up looking virtually identical to native 40x40 in others. Also, you can easily colour-shift or otherwise mess about with the glyph (as SVG or not) to your heart's content for ''all kinds'' of new versions you could decide you need, even if wikicommons don't have something like that for you/us already.&lt;br /&gt;
:::Really, there's a whole lotta fun you can have with this... I actually envy you considering all the possible fine-tuning (or just skipping straight to the reupload (perhaps as &amp;quot;blue construction.png&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;green construction.png&amp;quot;) and then perhaps trivially editing the templates as necessary to pick these up rather than trying to grab the 'original' amboxes. (Actually, I could probably do the latter bit, post-upload, but I'm sure you don't need me to.) [[Special:Contributions/81.179.199.253|81.179.199.253]] 21:13, 23 January 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::::I was too late for the filebin :(&lt;br /&gt;
::::I don't see the 40x40px thing anymore so maybe someone did it already?[[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 07:44, 1 February 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::I think 42/Tori sorted it all out. (I could be wrong about who, but there were both 'hard' uploads and a small change to the template done by somebody. Checking the various history details would confirm who, but it certainly happened.) Doesn't stop other things like this going gaga, occasionally, but the two different 'under construction' images are certainly the ones that get used the most, i.e. across more of the most recent comic pages than anything else, so the occasional other cross-site image won't be as noticed. [[Special:Contributions/81.179.199.253|81.179.199.253]] 18:10, 1 February 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::Yup, I did it! Sorry for not notifying earlier... '''[[User:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:9pt;color:#A9C6CA&amp;quot;&amp;gt;42.book.addict&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:6pt;color:#516874&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Talk to me!&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;''' 03:06, 2 February 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{Links}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== The 'admin' complaint about Transcripts ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I agree with {{diff|407393|this thing you removed}} not being an Admin Request, but I think the meaning is understandable, if it (ironically) had been written better by the OP.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Some people are just creating the (initial) Transcripts with source (without the indent) like:&lt;br /&gt;
 Cueball is shown doing something.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &amp;quot;I like doing something!a&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 Something happens in the next panel.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 ...&lt;br /&gt;
...when it ought to be ''more'' like:&lt;br /&gt;
 :[In the first panel, Cueball is shown doing something.]&lt;br /&gt;
 :Cueball: I like doing something!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 :[In the second panel, something happens]&lt;br /&gt;
 :...&lt;br /&gt;
...or ''something'' like that. Exact transcriptive styles vary, but I'd normally go with the global use of :-indents (in part to prevent lines running into each other, without double-linefeeding), [bracketing] purely descriptive bits, ascribing quoted text to their source (which could also be [bracketed], especially if the style of text itself needs describing) and extra entirely blank linefeeds (normally) ''only'' between 'scene changes'/subsequent action-panels. That's basically what I'd do, in creating a 'first transcript', or correcting a more format-unfriendly one in the prior style, but I know you've probably got your own (subtly different, but just as acceptible to me) variation on the theme. It ''might'' even be written down somewhere (the FAQ?), perhaps better/more accurate than I have done here... I haven't even checked how authoritative my own 'remembered' style guide is, but if ever I personally start/fix a Transcript I'm ok with any useful-looking necessary (re)fixing that others may make where I've perhaps not adhered to everybody's higher expectations.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But sometimes the exact needs of a Transcript (especially for particularly large, interactive and/or animated comics, of the kinds that Randall occasionally likes to spring on us, and which we also like to have been sprung on with!) do end up straining the 'standard' format(s) of Transript. Plus I would never, personally, begrudge an individual who went to the trouble of (at least ''semi-''accurately) typing in a whole lot of bare-bones 'text' from the comic, around which someone else can add the more proper and ultimately necessary transcriptive notes. It's all good, in the end, and all further collaboration must start off from ''some'' basis, however rushed and incomplete it might seem.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
So, while I see where that particular editor was coming from. I wouldn't have written it like that myself. Nor with the same sort of exasperation/adm9nishment. (Nor would I take what I've tried, myself, to write above and suggest it be added to/supplanted on the FAQ... This is just from me to you, as it looks like I 'got' the linked-to issue a bit easier than you did. Or mistook it for what I've said, perhaps!) But, assuming I'm not wrong about the whole thing, I thought I'd give you my thoughts. For what they're worth. ;)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
...maybe now is the right time (as if it wasn't before!) for me to go and see what the FAQ (or other 'how to' guide) ''does'' actually say about Transcript-writing. I know I'll have read it, if it exists, but my head's more full of how it has been ''practically'' applied, over theyears, so I might have been long labouring under a more descriptivist standard than any prescriptivist one. :p  Still, HTH. [[Special:Contributions/82.132.239.97|82.132.239.97]] 13:47, 28 February 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
And, now having actually checked... the relevent [[explain_xkcd:Editor_FAQ#What_is_the_format_of_the_transcript_section.3F|FAQ section]] is a little less comprehensive than my 'summary', above, but anyone who has read it (and obeyed the instruction to check established comic pages to get more of the gist) is well on the way to being able to comply with the general requirements. Of course, those who haven't read/remembered this bit of FAQ (also unlikely to read the Community Portal thoroughly, or even ''this'' page) are probably going to continue to have the 'wrong' idea about how to write a Transcript, but there really is little that can be done (except maybe for named-accounts having individual Talk-page interventions, assuming they read even them!) except for what we normally do. - i.e. 'fix' things, as and when, and if the person we had to fix notices it then they might even pick up the better method for future times. If only by osmosis! But that's the kind of thing me and you already expect to happen, I think I'm correct in saying, for all kinds of things. Not ''just'' with Transcripts. Or, on those few occasions where we (and others) may even slightly disagree with each other, land upon a happy medium that works for all. :D [[Special:Contributions/82.132.239.97|82.132.239.97]] 14:05, 28 February 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Sure! [[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 23:03, 28 February 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::I think that the OP also refers to when we use &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;'''bold text'''&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt; to show bold text, such as in [[3120]]. [[User:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font:11pt Cormorant Garamond&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#5CA7CF&amp;quot;&amp;gt;tor&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#F08DB0&amp;quot;&amp;gt;i :3&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font:8pt Cormorant Garamond&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#9E9E9E&amp;quot;&amp;gt;talk &amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#F08DB0&amp;quot;&amp;gt;to &amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#5CA7CF&amp;quot;&amp;gt;me!&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 03:28, 1 March 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== &amp;quot;Per the discussion at the community portal, ...&amp;quot; ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Your likely right to do as you're doing, but... there ''was'' no discussion about the Blondie/Miss Lenhardt/etc thing. Are you mixing it up with the (unresolved) discussion about the Superheroes category, immediately above it?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I had no strong opinions about the grouping of Blondie/etc, merely don't feel comfortable about clearly misleading edit reasons. (Like just saying &amp;quot;grammar&amp;quot; for what was purely spelling/typo fixes, which happened again the other day, that I saw someone else do. Fair play for the correct correction, but still... Same with you mass re-edit. Probably valid, just looks a bit wrong.) [[Special:Contributions/82.132.246.233|82.132.246.233]] 15:29, 9 May 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Oh, I was calling it a discussion in the sense that it was on a talk page. I meant it as a way of saying, &amp;quot;given the reasons posted at the community portal, I'm doing etc.&amp;quot; I'll change the edit summary, thanks. [[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 15:33, 9 May 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== &amp;quot;never reply again&amp;quot; ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Is this just a gut feeling that you have, or is it because of the time that he's spent not replying to you? Just wondering about your thought process. Cheers, [[User:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font:11pt Cormorant Garamond&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#4A86A6&amp;quot;&amp;gt;tor&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#C0728D&amp;quot;&amp;gt;i :3&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font:8pt Cormorant Garamond&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#7E7E7E&amp;quot;&amp;gt;talk &amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#C0728D&amp;quot;&amp;gt;to &amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#4A86A6&amp;quot;&amp;gt;me!&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 17:27, 15 May 2026 (UTC)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>42.book.addict</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=explain_xkcd:Community_portal/Proposals&amp;diff=412700</id>
		<title>explain xkcd:Community portal/Proposals</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=explain_xkcd:Community_portal/Proposals&amp;diff=412700"/>
				<updated>2026-05-14T19:00:40Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;42.book.addict: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&amp;lt;noinclude&amp;gt;{{Community links}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{|-&lt;br /&gt;
|valign=&amp;quot;top&amp;quot; width=&amp;quot;100%&amp;quot;|[[File:Crystal Clear app ktip.png|left|120px]] &amp;lt;big&amp;gt;&amp;lt;big&amp;gt;&amp;lt;b&amp;gt;Proposals&amp;lt;/b&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/big&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/big&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Place for ideas and suggestions to improve the wiki's design and organization on general issues can be&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;incubated for later submission for consensus discussion. Be sure to check whether your proposal has already been submitted. &amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;{{AddNewSection|Page=Explain XKCD:Community portal/Proposals|Text=&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;(+post)&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
|}&amp;lt;/noinclude&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==ARCHIVED DISCUSSIONS==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;plainlinks&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;background:#edf6ff; border:1px solid #a7d7f9; margin:1em auto 1em auto; width:100%; font-size: 120%; padding: 0.5ex; text-align: center;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Most of the discussions on this page have been archived. The archive is available at '''[[explain xkcd talk:Community portal/Proposals]]'''.&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Removing unnecessary 3-comic categories? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I count eight categories on explainxkcd that satisfy the following properties: 1. They have only three comics in them. 2. They aren't really a comic series; they just feature or reference a comic theme. 3. They aren't Featuring some person or character. In short, they seem to have no real reason to exist. (They're [[:Category:Spice_Girls|t]][[:Category:Wind_turbine|h]]e[[:Category:Ender%27s_Game|s]]o[[:Category:FernGully|n]][[:Category:Giraffes|e]]s.) So my proposal: remove them. -[[User:Account|Account]] ([[User talk:Account|talk]]) 20:37, 9 November 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:In addition, there are [[:Category:Sketches|t]][[:Category:BSD|h]][[:Category:Emacs|i]][[:Category:Identity_Theft|r]][[:Category:Katamari_Damacy|t]][[:Category:Super_Bowl|e]][[:Category:The_Matrix|e]][[:Category:Tournament_bracket|n]][[:Category:Traffic_light| ]][[:Category:Trebuchet|m]][[:Category:Wingsuit|o]][[:Category:Euler_diagrams|r]][[:Category:Pedantic|e]] four-comic categories that also seem rather in need of deletion.&lt;br /&gt;
:: Shouldn't the community at least have some time to expand on these categories, in case they're currently incomplete? For example, [[:Category:The Matrix]] is on your list and now contains 7 strips, and [[:Category:Tournament bracket]] got its 5th entry after your post. Even if they're not, a theme category can save some typing in the search box (and is probably also cheaper in terms of server resources than all the searches it'll eliminate). [[User:Promethean|Promethean]] ([[User talk:Promethean|talk]]) 22:43, 21 November 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::So what do you think the limit should be for categories? Should we create a category when two comics mention the same topic? Three? --[[User:Account|Account]] ([[User talk:Account|talk]]) 16:28, 22 November 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::::Three seems reasonable to me, and I could see a case being made for two. Categories aren't expensive. [[User:Promethean|Promethean]] ([[User talk:Promethean|talk]]) 00:17, 23 November 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Three is only good when it's a series. If it's not a series, it should be 5 or 6 comics. We have too many categories. [[User:YZ100]] 23:07, 6 May 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== New transcript ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The transcripts in the comic pages are quite inconsistent, especially in the brackets where you have to describe what happens in the panels. If I understand correctly, the transcripts are for people to copy the text in the comic without having to type them out. If that's the case, then I think propose a new transcript. This transcript should have the comic with the words erased, and then the copy-pasteable words on top of that. Such a transcript would have no room for error, which would let anyone contribute to a seamless transcript.&lt;br /&gt;
:The aim of the transcript is to provide a text-only version of the comic that would allow someone who is visually impaired to use a text-to-speech converter to understand the comic and also in a machine readable format for searching (see the [[explain_xkcd:Editor_FAQ#What_is_the_format_of_the_transcript_section?|Editor FAQ]]). Anything using mark-up, images or anything other than plain text will interfere with this and so should be avoided in the transcript. [[User:A(l)Chemist|AlChemist]] ([[User talk:A(l)Chemist|talk]]) 18:22, 23 November 2019 (UTC)User_talk:DollarStoreBa'al&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Add title text and heading to transcript section ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It has always bothered me that the transcript did not include the title text since it contributes so much to the humor of the comics. Also, it looks to me like the comic heading is sometimes included as part of the transcript and sometimes left out. I checked the previous proposals and did not see any discussion of these issues. Please consider having a policy going forward of including the heading and the title text within the transcript. [[User:Rtanenbaum|Rtanenbaum]] ([[User talk:Rtanenbaum|talk]]) 22:43, 1 January 2020 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:To my understanding (and also others, see discussion directly above) one of the main points of the transcript is to make the comics searchable, the other is, to make it readable when images are not an option. In both cases the comic's name and the title text mentioned above and below the image should be sufficient. I personally think this convention is fine. [[User:Lupo|Lupo]] ([[User talk:Lupo|talk]]) 08:28, 2 January 2020 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Pardon me -- (and, '''&amp;lt;big&amp;gt;''thanks'' for your patience&amp;lt;/big&amp;gt;''') -- if this is too off-topic (/slash &amp;quot;boring&amp;quot;) or [[wikt:TMI|TMI]] (see {{w|Information overload#Web accuracy}} e.g.), '''...OR''' if this should have been posted elsewhere ...instead of here. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::IMHO the term '''&amp;quot;title text&amp;quot;''' is a misnomer. I think the term is used to refer to the little (or, '''BIG!''') pop-up -- (kinda like what is sometimes called a &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;quot;tooltip&amp;quot;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;, but ... aren't those usually pretty '''small?''') -- that appears when one &amp;quot;hovers&amp;quot; his mouse [pointer] over an XKCD cartoon. ...at least, according to '''the &amp;quot;Talk:&amp;quot; page section''' [[Template talk:comic#The template field called .22titletext.22]] which was added almost 3 years ago. I think that calling it a &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;quot;BONUS text&amp;quot;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt; would be even better than calling it a &amp;quot;caption&amp;quot;. However, [to me], '''either one''' of those terms would make sense ''WAY'' more than calling it a '''&amp;quot;title text&amp;quot;''' ... for reasons which are stated in the [Template] &amp;quot;Talk:&amp;quot; page section mentioned (and ... '''LINKED TO''') above.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;'''&amp;lt;big&amp;gt;Any Comments?  .  .  ''' *** Thanks! *** for listening!&amp;lt;/big&amp;gt; --[[User:Mike Schwartz|Mike Schwartz]] ([[User talk:Mike Schwartz|talk]]) 08:57, 7 April 2020 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Hi Mike, I see your point, and yes, something like &amp;quot;bonus text&amp;quot; might be a bit more descriptive.  But FWIW, I think the reason it's called &amp;quot;title text&amp;quot; is because that's the text that appears in the &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;[https://www.w3schools.com/tags/att_global_title.asp title]&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt; attribute of the HTML &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;[https://www.w3schools.com/tags/tag_img.asp &amp;amp;lt;img&amp;amp;gt;]&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt; tag of the comic's image on the xkcd.com site.  For example, at https://xkcd.com/2364/, the code for the comic image looks like this:&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;pre&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;img src=&amp;quot;//imgs.xkcd.com/comics/parity_conservation.png&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
     title=&amp;quot;Bloody Mary is made of antimatter. It explains so much.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
     alt=&amp;quot;Parity Conservation&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
     srcset=&amp;quot;//imgs.xkcd.com/comics/parity_conservation_2x.png 2x&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/pre&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:::In there, you can see the title text as &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;title=&amp;quot;Bloody Mary is made of antimatter. It explains so much.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;  See [[title text|here]] for more explanation about that, and some discussions about it [[explain xkcd:Community portal/Miscellaneous#Common mistake|here]].  – [[User:Yfmcpxpj|Yfmcpxpj]] ([[User talk:Yfmcpxpj|talk]]) 03:11, 29 September 2020 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::: While the current layout suits the first purpose (ease of search), I would argue that having the &amp;quot;title text&amp;quot; come before in the page layout, and in a completely different section, makes it fail the second (accessibility). Often the contents of the title text are a continuation of the humour in the strip, so it's about as useful as having the explanation ahead of the transcript as far as accessibility is concerned. My suggestion on this matter is to either a) move the transcript to the top of the content, maybe within a collapse section or b) not claim it for accessibility.&lt;br /&gt;
::: As for the secondary topic, I've seen it called &amp;quot;Author Text&amp;quot; before, as it is text by the author and most people won't care what the element attribute is named. [[Special:Contributions/64.114.211.89|64.114.211.89]] 06:55, 18 November 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Wikipedia links. ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I think the links to Wikipedia should have symbols, so it's not confusing which ones lead to other comic pages.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== It's time to remove the HTTPS lock icon ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Explainxkcd should do the same thing that browser makers have done: treat HTTPS as the modern standard, and mark HTTP as the deviation instead.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Here are appropriate replacement icons:&lt;br /&gt;
 * https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Unlock_Icon_Red_(32_bit).png&lt;br /&gt;
 * https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Unlock_Icon_Red_(4_bit).gif&lt;br /&gt;
- [[User:Frankie|Frankie]] ([[User talk:Frankie|talk]]) 12:49, 16 May 2020 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== New page for Randall's regular column in the New York Times ==&lt;br /&gt;
Randall Munroe has been writing and illustrating a monthly science column in the New York Times.  I suggest a page in this Wiki, indexing those columns.  For some reason the New York Times itself does not provide such an index.  If they ever do add one, we would still have a topic article here, similar to the one we have for the What If blog, that could link to their index.  --[[User:JohnB|JohnB]] ([[User talk:JohnB|talk]]) 00:47, 11 June 2020 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
------&lt;br /&gt;
=== New York Times column: Good Question ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Good Question''' is a more-or-less monthly column written and illustrated by '''[[Randall|Randall Munroe]]'''  in the '''[https://www.nytimes.com/section/science Science section of the New York Times]''', beginning in November 2019.  The columns give serious answers to science questions, in Munroe's inimitable style.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The New York Times website ordinarily requires registration, and its content is always protected by copyright.  Most particularly it is ''not'' under [http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.5/ Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 2.5 License] the way [[xkcd]] is.  The good news: anyone can register for a free digital subscription to the New York Times, with access to 'recent' Science articles among some others, but outside of that only five articles per month.  See [https://archive.nytimes.com/www.nytimes.com/info/help/freesearch.html Free Articles].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Unlike for many of their other regular columnists, the New York Times does not provide a clickable link either on the byline '''Randall Munroe''' or on the column title '''Good Question'''.  The following tables are intended to correct that omission.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+ New York Times columns ''by'' Randall Munroe&lt;br /&gt;
! Column !! Headline !! Byline !! Date&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! SCIENCE&lt;br /&gt;
| [https://www.nytimes.com/2019/08/13/science/what-makes-a-red-sky-at-night-and-at-morning.html What Makes a Red Sky at Night (and at Morning)]&lt;br /&gt;
| Randall Munroe&lt;br /&gt;
| Aug. 13, 2019&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! GOOD QUESTION&lt;br /&gt;
| [https://www.nytimes.com/2019/11/12/science/randall-munroe-moon.html If I Touched the Moon, What Would It Feel Like?]&lt;br /&gt;
| Randall Munroe&lt;br /&gt;
| Nov. 12, 2019&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! GOOD QUESTION&lt;br /&gt;
| [https://nytimes.com/2019/12/10/science/earth-size-mass.html Is Earth Getting Bigger Over Time?]&lt;br /&gt;
| Randall Munroe&lt;br /&gt;
| Dec. 10, 2019&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! GOOD QUESTION&lt;br /&gt;
| [https://www.nytimes.com/2020/01/21/science/human-running-speed-quadruped.html How Fast Can a Human Run?]&lt;br /&gt;
| Randall Munroe&lt;br /&gt;
| Jan. 21, 2020 / Feb. 7, 2020&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! GOOD QUESTION&lt;br /&gt;
| [https://www.nytimes.com/2020/02/17/science/worst-odor-smell-thioacetone.html What’s the World’s Worst Smell?]&lt;br /&gt;
| Randall Munroe&lt;br /&gt;
| Feb. 17, 2020 / Feb. 26, 2020&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! GOOD QUESTION&lt;br /&gt;
| [https://nytimes.com/2020/03/10/science/question-randall-munroe-bobsled-gravity.html What if Galileo Had Dropped Bobsleds From the Tower of Pisa?]&lt;br /&gt;
| Randall Munroe&lt;br /&gt;
| March 10, 2020&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! GOOD QUESTION&lt;br /&gt;
| [https://www.nytimes.com/2020/04/07/science/pulsar-xkcd-munroe-stars.html How’s the View From a Spinning Star?]&lt;br /&gt;
| Randall Munroe&lt;br /&gt;
| April 7, 2020&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! GOOD QUESTION&lt;br /&gt;
| [https://www.nytimes.com/2020/05/11/science/traffic-barrier-rice-krispies.html What’s the Sweetest, Crispiest Way to Stay Safe in a Car Crash?]&lt;br /&gt;
| Randall Munroe&lt;br /&gt;
| May 11, 2020&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! GOOD QUESTION&lt;br /&gt;
| [https://www.nytimes.com/2020/06/09/science/randall-munroe-question-eggs.html Can You Boil an Egg Too Long?]&lt;br /&gt;
| Randall Munroe&lt;br /&gt;
| June 9, 2020&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! GOOD QUESTION&lt;br /&gt;
| [https://www.nytimes.com/2020/07/07/science/neutrinos-snowball-randall-munroe.html Could You Make a Snowball of Neutrinos?]&lt;br /&gt;
| Randall Munroe&lt;br /&gt;
| July 7, 2020&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+ New York Times columns ''about'' Randall Munroe&lt;br /&gt;
! Column !! Headline !! Byline !! Date&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! LINK BY LINK&lt;br /&gt;
| [https://www.nytimes.com/2008/05/26/business/media/26link.html This Is Funny Only if You Know Unix]&lt;br /&gt;
| Noam Cohen&lt;br /&gt;
| May 26, 2008&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! BITS&lt;br /&gt;
| [https://bits.blogs.nytimes.com/2014/03/14/techs-favorite-cartoonist-enters-mainstream-publishing/ Tech’s Favorite Cartoonist Enters Mainstream Publishing]&lt;br /&gt;
| Noam Cohen&lt;br /&gt;
| March 14, 2014&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! SCIENCE&lt;br /&gt;
| [https://www.nytimes.com/2014/11/04/science/randall-munroe-the-creator-of-xkcd-explains-complexity-through-absurdity.html He’s Glad You Asked]&lt;br /&gt;
| Kenneth Chang&lt;br /&gt;
| Nov. 3, 2014&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! BOOKS&lt;br /&gt;
| [https://www.nytimes.com/2015/11/24/books/randall-munroe-explains-it-all-for-us.html Randall Munroe Explains It All for Us]&lt;br /&gt;
| Alexandra Alter&lt;br /&gt;
| Nov. 23, 2015&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! SCIENCE&lt;br /&gt;
| [https://www.nytimes.com/2016/03/22/science/randall-munroe-xkcd-science-textbook.html Randall Munroe, XKCD Creator, Goes Back to High School]&lt;br /&gt;
| Kenneth Chang&lt;br /&gt;
| March 21, 2016&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! SCIENCE&lt;br /&gt;
| [https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2016/03/18/science/document-Munroepages.html Randall Munroe of ‘XKCD’ Explains the Human Body, Elevators and the Saturn 5]&lt;br /&gt;
| (Actual pages from '''{{w|Thing_Explainer|Thing&amp;amp;nbsp;Explainer}}''')&lt;br /&gt;
| March 21, 2016&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
------&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: Looks goods to me, you should probably make that an article of its own, maybe [[New York Times: Good Question]]? --[[User:SlashMe|SlashMe]] ([[User talk:SlashMe|talk]]) 22:58, 10 July 2020 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: {{notice|I went and added the page, here: [[New York Times: Good Question]] --[[User:JohnB|JohnB]] ([[User talk:JohnB|talk]]) 02:42, 11 July 2020 (UTC)}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Bring back the {{rw}} template! please ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Can someone restore the &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{rw}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt; template? I insist on its existence. I further assure that it will be of much use. It was deleted by an admin. &amp;lt;span&amp;gt; — [[User:Sqrt-1|The &amp;lt;b&amp;gt;𝗦𝗾𝗿𝘁-𝟭&amp;lt;/b&amp;gt;]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Sqrt-1|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color: blue&amp;quot;&amp;gt;talk&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]] [[Special:Contributions/Sqrt-1|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color: blue&amp;quot;&amp;gt;stalk&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt; 06:10, 29 September 2020 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:nm, did it myself.&amp;lt;span&amp;gt; — [[User:Sqrt-1|The &amp;lt;b&amp;gt;𝗦𝗾𝗿𝘁-𝟭&amp;lt;/b&amp;gt;]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Sqrt-1|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color: blue&amp;quot;&amp;gt;talk&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]] [[Special:Contributions/Sqrt-1|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color: blue&amp;quot;&amp;gt;stalk&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt; 04:15, 1 October 2020 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Link to high-resolution images? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The wiki includes the &amp;quot;standard&amp;quot; resolution images, but would it be worth adding a link to the higher-resolution image on each page?  It appears that this could be automated in at least a strong majority of cases: if the standard image is ''xyzzy.png'', the hi-res one is ''xyzzy'''_2x'''.png'' . [[User:BunsenH|BunsenH]] ([[User talk:BunsenH|talk]]) 22:10, 1 October 2020 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Please stop adding this to the explanations. This is not needed.  [[User:Kynde|Kynde]] ([[User talk:Kynde|talk]]) 08:56, 6 October 2020 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::The high-resolution image was quite useful in parsing the &amp;quot;Amelia's Farm Fresh Cookies&amp;quot; comic. I'm not convinced that the hi-res images are commonly known. I've been reading xkcd for about 7 years and hadn't heard about them until I stumbled across a mention of them in one of the Discussions here. What is the harm in having a one-line ''link'' here? -- not, I emphasize, the actual image, which would take up a great deal of space. [[User:BunsenH|BunsenH]] ([[User talk:BunsenH|talk]]) 17:00, 7 October 2020 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::I didn't know about the high-resolution images either.  While it might be a bit repetitive to add a full sentence to every comic's explanation, I agree that having ''some'' easy way to link to the hi-res image on xkcd.com could be handy.  For example, maybe a &amp;quot;hi-res&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;2x&amp;quot; button before the &amp;quot;Next &amp;gt;&amp;quot; button above the comic in [[Template:comic]]?  That's a bit extreme, but I added an example template, derived from the existing [[Template:comic]], to demonstrate how that could work:&lt;br /&gt;
:::* Template: [[User:Yfmcpxpj/Template:comic 2x test]]&lt;br /&gt;
:::* Demo: [[User:Yfmcpxpj/Sandbox#2x comic template test]]&lt;br /&gt;
:::With those changes to the template, for all comics as of [[1084]] the &amp;quot;2x&amp;quot; button would automatically appear.  (No need to go back and change all comics.)  This assumes the images hosted on explainxkcd generally have the same filename as on xkcd.com, but there are optional parameters to override the filename or omit the &amp;quot;2x&amp;quot; button altogether for specific exceptions.  I'm not suggesting we actually go ahead and implement this; but if there was enough interest, an admin would be needed anyway, to make the changes within [[Template:comic]], which is currently protected.  – [[User:Yfmcpxpj|Yfmcpxpj]] ([[User talk:Yfmcpxpj|talk]]) 23:25, 11 October 2020 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::::FWIW, I like this. [[User:BunsenH|BunsenH]] ([[User talk:BunsenH|talk]]) 20:25, 12 October 2020 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::My proposal is that a bot should add it automatically to the description of each comic image when available so that it does not take up space anywhere and is easily accessible.&amp;lt;span&amp;gt; — [[User:Sqrt-1|The &amp;lt;b&amp;gt;𝗦𝗾𝗿𝘁-𝟭&amp;lt;/b&amp;gt;]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Sqrt-1|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color: blue&amp;quot;&amp;gt;talk&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]] [[Special:Contributions/Sqrt-1|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color: blue&amp;quot;&amp;gt;stalk&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt; 13:49, 8 February 2021 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Proposal to replace the top section with this... ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I have come up with a new design for the top section of all community portals...&lt;br /&gt;
It’s located here... https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=explain_xkcd:Sandbox&amp;amp;oldid=199882 &amp;lt;span&amp;gt; — [[User:Sqrt-1|The &amp;lt;b&amp;gt;𝗦𝗾𝗿𝘁-𝟭&amp;lt;/b&amp;gt;]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Sqrt-1|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color: blue&amp;quot;&amp;gt;talk&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]] [[Special:Contributions/Sqrt-1|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color: blue&amp;quot;&amp;gt;stalk&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt; 14:15, 15 October 2020 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;hr/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{|-&lt;br /&gt;
|valign=&amp;quot;top&amp;quot; width=&amp;quot;80%&amp;quot;|[[File:Crystal Clear app ktip.png|left|120px]] &amp;lt;big&amp;gt;&amp;lt;big&amp;gt;&amp;lt;b&amp;gt;Proposals&amp;lt;/b&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/big&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/big&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Ideas to improve the wiki's design and organization can be added here.&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt; {{AddNewSection|Page=Explain XKCD:Community portal/Proposals|Text=&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;(+post)&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|valign=&amp;quot;top&amp;quot; xalign=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot; width=&amp;quot;100%&amp;quot;|[[File:Crystal Clear app package settings blue.png|50px|link=https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php/explain_xkcd:Community_portal/Technical]][[File:Crystal Clear teamwork.png|50px|link=https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php/explain_xkcd:Community_portal/Coordination]][[File:Mop.svg|50px|link=https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php/explain_xkcd:Community_portal/Admin_requests]][[File:Internet-group-chat.svg|50px|link=https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php/explain_xkcd:Community_portal/Miscellaneous]]&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== I made a template for welcoming new users. ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{Welcome}}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;hr/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Any ideas? Suggestions? Objections?&amp;lt;span&amp;gt; — [[User:Sqrt-1|The &amp;lt;b&amp;gt;𝗦𝗾𝗿𝘁-𝟭&amp;lt;/b&amp;gt;]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Sqrt-1|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color: blue&amp;quot;&amp;gt;talk&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]] [[Special:Contributions/Sqrt-1|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color: blue&amp;quot;&amp;gt;stalk&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt; 16:35, 13 December 2020 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
: this is now in at the top of the Main Page --[[User:Jeff|&amp;lt;b&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;orange&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Jeff&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/b&amp;gt;]] ([[User talk:Jeff|talk]]) 16:38, 5 February 2021 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::Why? This looks like a template intended for (newly created) UserPages. And it replaces interesting data from the frontpage with something not useful for casual visitors (or even non-casual lurkers). I'd undo this change in an instant if I had authority to do so. ((The template looks good, to clarify, just obviously not intended to be in that location.)) [[Special:Contributions/141.101.76.154|141.101.76.154]] 01:36, 6 February 2021 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::[[User: Jeff|Jeff]] is the owner of explainxkcd you dingus. &amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;text-shadow:0 0 7px black&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[[User:Beanie|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-size:11pt;color:#dddddd&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Beanie&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt; &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;text-shadow:0 0 4px #000000&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[[User talk:Beanie|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-size:8pt;color:#dddddd&amp;quot;&amp;gt;talk&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 13:46, 18 June 2021 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== comic groups ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
i think we should have a tech problems list of comics ( as there are quite a few)&lt;br /&gt;
:We already have a category for it. [[:Category:Cueball_Computer_Problems]].&amp;lt;span&amp;gt; — [[User:Sqrt-1|The &amp;lt;b&amp;gt;𝗦𝗾𝗿𝘁-𝟭&amp;lt;/b&amp;gt;]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Sqrt-1|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color: blue&amp;quot;&amp;gt;talk&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]] [[Special:Contributions/Sqrt-1|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color: blue&amp;quot;&amp;gt;stalk&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt; 13:44, 8 February 2021 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Archiving interactive comics? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Has the possibility of archiving interactive comics been discussed? Of course, users can view them on the original website, but it’d be nice to have a working backup of sorts, especially considering some of the interactive comics haven’t aged too well in terms of compatibility or support (e.g. Umwelt displays a blank page for me.)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It probably wouldn’t be possible to do so directly from mediawiki, but I’d be happy to experiment with cloning a few of them on another server, or as simple PHP pages that could be embedded, if it would help. Most of the interactive comics appear to be implemented mostly in client side JS anyways, so replicating them shouldn’t be too bad.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Tague|Tague]] ([[User talk:Tague|talk]]) 13:12, 29 April 2021 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Replace head shots of characters in the wiki with these new and high quality head shots! ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
https://www.reddit.com/r/xkcd/comments/n2u28r/i_took_head_shots_of_the_reccuring_characters_and/&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
These are not only upscaled, but are all squares and have all the features of the characters.&amp;lt;span&amp;gt; — [[User:Sqrt-1|The &amp;lt;b&amp;gt;𝗦𝗾𝗿𝘁-𝟭&amp;lt;/b&amp;gt;]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Sqrt-1|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color: blue&amp;quot;&amp;gt;talk&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]] [[Special:Contributions/Sqrt-1|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color: blue&amp;quot;&amp;gt;stalk&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt; 03:33, 2 May 2021 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:I think you should do it (because higher quality = better) :] &amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;text-shadow:0 0 7px black&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[[User:Beanie|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-size:11pt;color:#dddddd&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Beanie&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt; &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;text-shadow:0 0 4px #000000&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[[User talk:Beanie|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-size:8pt;color:#dddddd&amp;quot;&amp;gt;talk&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 13:42, 18 June 2021 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::There seemed to be no objections, so I went ahead and did it.&amp;lt;span&amp;gt; — [[User:Sqrt-1|The &amp;lt;b&amp;gt;𝗦𝗾𝗿𝘁-𝟭&amp;lt;/b&amp;gt;]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Sqrt-1|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color: blue&amp;quot;&amp;gt;talk&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]] [[Special:Contributions/Sqrt-1|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color: blue&amp;quot;&amp;gt;stalk&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt; 12:40, 21 November 2021 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Cleaning up [[Special:WantedTemplates|Special: Wanted Templates]] ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I decided to take a look at the list of wanted templates. Imagine my surprise when I see that a lot of the templates wanted were mis-capitalizations or misspellings of existing templates. I hereby request permission to create redirect pages for some of the most popular errors. &lt;br /&gt;
I intend to do five, wait a week, and do another five as to not spam the wiki. I will not begin for a week, at which point I will only proceed if nobody has said no OR a moderator has said yes. May I proceed? [[User talk:Quillathe Siannodel|&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;{)|(}&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;]][[User:Quillathe_Siannodel|Quill]][[Special:Contributions/Quillathe_Siannodel|&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;{)|(}&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;]] 11:34, 15 May 2021 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Knit Cap ==&lt;br /&gt;
Sometimes Knit cap has long hair, sometimes short. Is Knit Cap meant to be a male character that sometimes has long hair, or is Knit Cap sometimes female? I want to clear this up before I finish editing [[1350: Lorenz]]. &amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;text-shadow:0 0 7px black&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[[User:Beanie|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-size:11pt;color:#dddddd&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Beanie&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt; &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;text-shadow:0 0 4px #000000&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[[User talk:Beanie|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-size:8pt;color:#dddddd&amp;quot;&amp;gt;talk&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 13:40, 18 June 2021 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Hm, in the 'Enemy Pikachu used theft' scene in [[1350: Lorenz]], Knit Cap's hair looks merely slightly unkempt. From this, I will assume that Knit Cap just sometimes has long hair and is always male. &amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;text-shadow:0 0 6px black&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[[User:Beanie|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-size:11pt;color:#dddddd&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Beanie&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt; &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;text-shadow:0 0 3px #000000&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[[User talk:Beanie|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-size:8pt;color:#dddddd&amp;quot;&amp;gt;talk&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 13:10, 21 June 2021 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::Ok, the official transcripts say that Knit Cap is 'A guy in a knit cap'. I will take that to mean that Knit Cap is definitely male.&lt;br /&gt;
:::(Sorry for necroposting) Knit cap is shown to represent Randall's wife in the &amp;quot;X years&amp;quot; series, I assume that they are thusly female. {{unsigned|B for brain|15:07, 29 March 2026}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== We still need to complete some explanations like this one: ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I think should change the banner shown at the top of every page to show a comic that is still incomplete, like Hoverboard or something. [[User:Sure|Sure]] ([[User talk:Sure|talk]]) 21:32, 30 August 2021 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Update MediaWiki ==&lt;br /&gt;
explainxkcd is running MediaWiki 1.30.0, which reached end-of-life in June 2019. There are likely security issues because of this, so please update MediaWiki to the latest version (or LTS) using the instructions here https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Manual:Upgrading [[User:Cam1170|Cam1170]] ([[User talk:Cam1170|talk]]) 19:41, 26 September 2021 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:It seems like the mysql is too outdated for the upgrade [[User:Starstar|Starstar]] ([[User talk:Starstar|talk]]) 17:37, 26 November 2021 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::Upgrade MySQL then[[User:Aaron Liu|Aaron Liu]] ([[User talk:Aaron Liu|talk]]) 03:16, 20 July 2022 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
Does anybody know how to contact an admin for this? I have no clue. [[User:Cam1170|Cam1170]] ([[User talk:Cam1170|talk]]) 03:25, 13 December 2022 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Allow Users to Edit their own talk page if not auto confimed ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I can edit this page, but I can't create my own talk page! [[User:Starstar|Starstar]] ([[User talk:Starstar|talk]]) 17:34, 26 November 2021 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Upgrade Icons ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The icons look quite old fashion (the ones on the sidebar and the ones above the editing text area), could they be replaced? [[User:Starstar|Starstar]] ([[User talk:Starstar|talk]]) 23:07, 26 November 2021 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:They probably could be, but changing icons the moment they're not absolutely cutting-edge just means using new icons that are as easily edged-out (as tastes change yet again), meanwhile annoying those who prefered the first set and rather wouldn't see a revolving door of ever-evolving aesthetics.&lt;br /&gt;
:If I had a vote, I'd say keep the simple glyphs we're used to. If any are not totally obvious (perhaps some would not be, without the text captions) consider revising, but I think you'll get less agreement on what new images to use than that which would advocate the retention of the current ones.&lt;br /&gt;
:Alternately, it would definitely be on-theme to find Randall-drawn illustrations to replace them all. But the constraints of adapting (say) any particular stick-figure-world depiction of randonmess to ''meaningfully'' replace the current Random Page icon (at the same scale!) might be less than optimal.[[Special:Contributions/172.70.162.57|172.70.162.57]] 01:08, 27 November 2021 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Make searchbar not case-sensitive ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The way the search bar is currently set, it only suggests comic links when what is being typed is capitalized (&amp;quot;Assigning Numbers&amp;quot; rather than &amp;quot;assigning numbers&amp;quot; for instance). Would be nice if we could make it not case-sensitive :D [[User:Char Latte49|Wielder of the Staple Gun]] ([[User talk:Char Latte49|talk]]) 02:48, 27 April 2022 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Good idea. [[User:Marethyu|⟨Winter is coming⟩ Marethyu]] ([[User talk:Marethyu|talk]]) 17:46, 5 May 2022 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Do not allow ordinary users to edit redirects that are just numbers ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This overrides the default page you're sent to when you check a comic; e.g. recently a vandal edited the page entitled &amp;quot;2614&amp;quot; so it overrode the actual page, [[2614: 2]] on the main page.&lt;br /&gt;
:The problem would be when creating a new page and the overrides are needed... [[User:Marethyu|⟨Winter is coming⟩ Marethyu]] ([[User talk:Marethyu|talk]]) 17:48, 5 May 2022 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== ExplainXKCD discord (or other platform)? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I'm just saying if we had instant messages, pings etc. there would be a lot faster reaction to vandals. &lt;br /&gt;
The community portal is hard to get attention from and comments are all very well and good but conversations on Discord could get very quick response, and people could request edits, organise page re-writing etc.&lt;br /&gt;
Idk if we can get &amp;quot;official&amp;quot; backing by anyone high up but we could make one anyways?&lt;br /&gt;
:The problem with platforms like Discord or others is that we can't guarantee that everyone has access to them; on the wiki, anyone can edit, while some people may not have access to discord or such. A possible solution would be having a sort of service built into the wiki, but not sure how that might be done. Besides, this is a wiki, not an xkcd chat site. This is a good idea, though. [[User:Marethyu|⟨Winter is coming⟩ Marethyu]] ([[User talk:Marethyu|talk]]) 17:43, 5 May 2022 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::Anyone can create a discord account like anyone can create an account on this wiki. You don't even need a dedicated client/app as it can run in browser. Just like the wiki. Just my two cents. [[User:Elektrizikekswerk|Elektrizikekswerk]] ([[User talk:Elektrizikekswerk|talk]]) 11:28, 20 May 2022 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Some user may not wish anyone to be able to contact them outside this wiki. You do not need an acount to edit this wiki... [[User:Kynde|Kynde]] ([[User talk:Kynde|talk]]) 17:14, 22 July 2022 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== So, I got a question about transcripts. ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A lot of comics show links (e.g.: all the ones with a drawing of wikipedia on it), and the transcripts don't really have a standard. In the transcript, should it be an actual link or just blue text or what? [[Special:Contributions/162.158.79.52|162.158.79.52]] 15:03, 2 June 2022 (UTC)Bumpf&lt;br /&gt;
:I'd say that if the linked thing (presuming it's a real linkable target!) is linked in the Explanation, it doesn't need to be (re)linked in the ostensibly flat-and-descriptive Transcript.&lt;br /&gt;
:And I know that some Transcripts are hypertext formatted to emulate the thing they are transcribed from (whether bolded, enbiggened, sub-/superscripted and and/or given the hue) but maybe ''primarily'' the &amp;quot;&amp;lt;code&amp;gt;[:Text that describes the text]&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;&amp;quot; should be explaining the details, in case the screen-reader (or text-searching algorithm grepping the Transcript text for &amp;quot;green text&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;superscript&amp;quot; instances can't quite work it out from the various style-tags that can be applied to that effect in so many an various ways.&lt;br /&gt;
:But this is IMO, I don't know if there's a specific policy about it, but it is how I've seen it vaguely applied... Not everywhere quite so consistently, though. [[Special:Contributions/172.70.91.128|172.70.91.128]] 20:28, 2 June 2022 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::We try to keep links and explanations out of the transcript. The link and the explanation goes in the explanation section above. [[User:Kynde|Kynde]] ([[User talk:Kynde|talk]]) 17:12, 22 July 2022 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Use 2X Images ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Apparently xkcd.com provides double-sized versions of almost every comic if you add '''_2x''' to the end of the image name. For instance,&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
https://imgs.xkcd.com/comics/watches.png&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
https://imgs.xkcd.com/comics/watches_2x.png&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Since we are in 2022 and computers can load high-resolution images just fine, and they are easier to read, I propose that this website should use the provided double-sized images. Really, I think Randall ought to be doing this himself as well. [[Special:Contributions/172.68.18.107|172.68.18.107]] 12:22, 17 August 2022 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:While I agree with using the higher quality images which are default on xkcd.com for many people, there has been [https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php/explain_xkcd:Community_portal/Proposals#Link_to_high-resolution_images.3F discussion] about this issue already. At the moment, the consensus seems to be to continue using the 'standard' size to 'use less space,' and instead link to the higher quality image on the image page. —[[User:Theusaf|theusaf]] ([[User talk:Theusaf|talk]]) 14:35, 17 August 2022 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I think I may have mentioned it on that link (or similar), but often when the 2x image is used (or even an unwise too wide image/unbreakable-line-of-content) the explainxkcd site cannot sensibly handle it and it forces the default 'page width' of stuff into a zoomed out narrower column to the left (including the margin-line normally inset a dozen or so pixels in from the right) so that browser-window can display the whole of this wide element.&lt;br /&gt;
::While &amp;quot;saving space&amp;quot; does apply to server resources and viewer download bandwidth/quotas (e.g.[https://imgs.xkcd.com/comics/unreliable_connection.png 53kb] vs [https://imgs.xkcd.com/comics/unreliable_connection_2x.png 109kb]) may seem insignificant, screen-space can be badly hit by this.&lt;br /&gt;
::The motherlode xkcd site has code behind it to (usually?) serve the right image for the right displays, but explainxkcd isn't currently equipped to do the same choose-and-provide (which would need ''both'' images uploaded to it and a revised {{template|comic}} implementation, once we work out the method it could use). And I've never seen any case where the 'low quality' comic is conversely too small and narrow to appreciate (though occasionally the larger one reveals minor drawing details that have been obscured by the downscaling), just when the _2x one makes everything ''else'' too small.&lt;br /&gt;
::...this may not apply to everyone's browser implementation, but it definitely happens, and consistently, on my usual Chrome and/or Firefox on Windows and/or Android platforms (according to which system I happen to be on at the time). [[Special:Contributions/172.70.162.147|172.70.162.147]] 21:20, 17 August 2022 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::ExplainXKCD actually does have the capability to do this. For example, see [[1079:_United_Shapes]]. It generates multiple images, automatically choosing one based on screen size (similar to how xkcd.com does it). The bot could use the `imagesize` parameter to keep the image within the page's width by using the 'standard' image size. This does add a button labeled &amp;quot;click to enlarge,&amp;quot; but if that is annoying, the comic template can be modified to hide that button if specified.&lt;br /&gt;
:::Here is what it might look like:&lt;br /&gt;
:::{{cot}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{User:Theusaf/Template:comic_2x&lt;br /&gt;
| number    = 2647&lt;br /&gt;
| date      = July 18, 2022&lt;br /&gt;
| title     = Capri Suns&lt;br /&gt;
| image     = capri_suns_2x.png&lt;br /&gt;
| titletext = [As security is dragging me away] &amp;quot;Come on, at least I didn't make the mistake in the other direction!&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| imagesize = 315x317px&lt;br /&gt;
| noexpand  = true&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cob}}&lt;br /&gt;
:::which is clearer than the original comic page and the same size. —[[User:Theusaf|theusaf]] ([[User talk:Theusaf|talk]]) 05:20, 18 August 2022 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::::As specificaly implemented above, I certainly see no immediate problem (need to check across machines/devices), but I suspect that part of the mechanism here is the &amp;quot;imagesize = 315x317px&amp;quot;, which seems like it would need (albeit by the page-create bot, algorithm8cally) to be tailored to the 'input' image, not always in this ratio). I'm not technically conversant with the nature of your back-end scripting and doubtless it's all possible (scripts can do almost anything... once you know that they (may) need to do them and rewritten them to catch all the contingencies ;) ), but I don't know know if that's something you've accounted for (e.g. test with a three/four-panel wide comic, or the Earth Temperature Timeline or whatever, and see if it can facilitate them all nicely). Not to mention that if theusafBOT goes offline, the manual-add instructions (as used prior to your replacing the prior functioning bot, for which I thank you) also need this extra step of user involvement to be done, whereas usually the fallback manual method needed little thought in this direction (or indeed however much carbon or silicon there is in the 'brain' involved) except for exceptional circumstances or those rare prior slip-ups by Randall.&lt;br /&gt;
::::I'm just going through the first obvious issue (to me), didn't mean to concentrate so many words on just this before even checking everything else! [[Special:Contributions/172.70.91.80|172.70.91.80]] 09:15, 18 August 2022 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Basically, on the backend, the bot will fetch both the small and the large images, and measure the size of the small image, which is what it will use for the &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;imagesize&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;. I have actually used this system in the past for this bot, but was told to revert it due to the &amp;quot;click comic to enlarge&amp;quot; text. As for if the bot goes offline, there is no problem with falling back to the small image, and if editors want to, I can also provide instructions for using the large image. I'm mostly just waiting to see what others think about this. Are there any other problems to consider? —[[User:Theusaf|theusaf]] ([[User talk:Theusaf|talk]]) 14:44, 18 August 2022 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== I'm making an App that collects web comics ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
My original idea was to use the rss feed present on xkcd, and other webcomic websites, but now im starting to wonder if there was a way to make a better service, that allowed users to maybe look at older comics, and explanations and such as well, and thats how i happened to come across explainxkcd.com. The RSS Feed for this website, would be pretty helpful, if it were like reddit's but apparently, the rss feed is only maintained for the home page. I was wondering if you guys provided that data through an API or something? Also are there wikis for other famous comics like this one? Any other suggestions and ideas for the app are welcome 🙌🙌.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Comics edited after their publication ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
many more comics have been changed than are in Category:Comics edited after their publication ! please add them (i already have done two i remember off the top of my head) [[Special:Contributions/172.70.134.223|172.70.134.223]] 12:56, 7 October 2022 (UTC)Bumpf&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== What if 2 book page creation ==&lt;br /&gt;
What if 2 has come out, but I don't know which page is to be created. There is already a comic under the same name. [[User:ClassicalGames|ClassicalGames]] ([[User talk:ClassicalGames|talk]]) 08:54, 3 May 2023 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Default to 3 Section Headings for Each Explanation: Non-Obvious Info, Recap, and Background Trivia ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This is a proposal that all new comic explanations should, by default, have 3 Sections:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''I. Explanation of the Non-Obvious''' (an actual explanation of the non-obvious elements of the comic for the average reader who might not understand the references/joke/relevant science)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''II. Full Recap'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''III. Background Trivia'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Most of us can agree that Category I is where the value of this website shines.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But today, all 3 of these categories of explanation are typically merged together, making it hard to find the Category I nuggets of goodness.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If we make these 3 section headings the default on every comic explanation, then this default will helpfully nudge editors to put the juiciest stuff up top, and not to clutter that section up with fluff or trivia.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
——&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As an example, take the recent comic #2878 about Astronomer Happiness and Supernova distance.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The main thing a lay reader would want to know — the Category I information — is…&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
..That the shape of the graph is probably a clever reference to a Light Curve, a type of supernova graph&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
..why astronomers like it when a supernova is close, and what happens when it gets too close&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Everything else in the (currently) very wordy explanation gets in the way of the lay reader finding out these two things. It’s a bunch of Category II and Category III info that makes it hard to tease out the Category I info. It’s not BAD information, but it’s sandpaper. It’s friction slowing down the average reader.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Obviously I could go in and edit this particular comic, and I often do this kind of edit, but I think this issue pops up for most explanations, so I think changing the standard default interface will help everyone put their contribution into the right section.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In sum, my proposal would elevate Category I info to the top of each explanation, so instead of full recaps, we get right into the explanation that is going to be most efficiently illuminating for the average, non-expert reader, answering the most common questions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Laser813|Laser813]] ([[User talk:Laser813|talk]]) 10:50, 12 January 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:In general (if I get dibs on the edit, or think I can legitimately re-edit/rearrange), I do try to go for &amp;quot;hook, line, sinker&amp;quot; format (i.e. establish the basics, relate that to what the comic shows, move on to any relevent speculations/extrapolations), very like your setup. Though it is often ''much'' too complicated (multi-layered, cross-disciplinary, etc, so that maybe it has to be interwoven 'mini explanations' per tabulated item) so I'm not sure how easy it would be to enforce a strict structure. I think there's merit to the principle, though. Assuming we can all agree what each comic needs focus on (apply that problem to the following proposal too!), as I've occasionally inserted a sort of &amp;quot;first you need to know &amp;lt;subject&amp;gt;&amp;quot; into an established cold-start explanation (&amp;quot;you see &amp;lt;foo&amp;gt;&amp;quot; only for a later editor to consider it more an afterthought and shuffle it to later (&amp;quot;you see &amp;lt;foo&amp;gt;&amp;quot; ... &amp;quot;&amp;lt;foo&amp;gt; is part of &amp;lt;subject&amp;gt;&amp;quot;), or variations on such layouts. Especially as different people have different ideas as to what's obvious/can be keyword-wikilinked and what needs more waffle to properly enlighten readers.&lt;br /&gt;
:Also, prosaic variation is a good thing. Too formulaic and it could be (whilst accurate) considered too robotic, so some leaway should really always be allowed as we collectively bash together a community interpretation and elaboration. Within communal guidelines, clearly. [[Special:Contributions/172.69.194.203|172.69.194.203]] 15:53, 12 January 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== FAQ Style Editing should be the norm ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Simply, we should experiment with more FAQ-style explanations. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We think of the top questions that the average reader might have about a comic, and we use those as bolded headers to explain the most curious/confusing/subtle/sciency parts of the comic.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The structure would be this (using a recent comic as an example)…&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Q: Why did Randall use this shape of graph?'''&lt;br /&gt;
A: It’s likely a clever reference to a Light Curve, a similarly shaped graph in the study of supernovae that…&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Q: Why do astronomers prefer it when supernovae are closer?'''&lt;br /&gt;
A: It makes it easier to glean information because…&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Laser813|Laser813]] ([[User talk:Laser813|talk]]) 10:50, 12 January 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== sidebar revamp ==&lt;br /&gt;
I think that the sidebar looks plain and it should have a new design. It could be voted on by users [[User:Moderator|Moderator]] ([[User talk:Moderator|talk]]) 02:16, 5 February 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:In leiu of you telling us what you think would be better, my starting vote is that I'm perfectly happy with that 'plain'. If it has the links I might need, why does it need a reskin? Or, worse, a functional revamp which probably removes the easy to use bits I was using already.&lt;br /&gt;
:...could you do a mock-up screenshot (or render equivalents directly in markup) of before/after side by side, at least? [[Special:Contributions/172.69.194.120|172.69.194.120]] 03:11, 5 February 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
My biggest problem is it doesn’t scroll down with you which can be a big pain [[User:Moderator|Moderator]] ([[User talk:Moderator|talk]]) 01:43, 6 February 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Don't know about anyone else, but (when not on a desktop) I read this on a tablet, in landscape, with the effective window quite short (ratio of 1:2 with width, approaching 1:3.5 with already narrowed onscreen keyboard popped up) and if I'm scrolled to the top I see nothing beyond Browse Comics.&lt;br /&gt;
:If we assume separate scroll-control on the sidebar, setting Main Page at the top of browser pane gives What Links Here at the bottom. Now, I rarely use the next three links (or at least reach those pages using them), and separate scrolling wouldn't stop me even seeing the even lower Ad bit (but it ''would'' defeat the entire purpose of the Ad, in that position, whether or not I bother to notice it these days).&lt;br /&gt;
:So whatever missing about you propose, I'm betting it would impact me. Perhaps not negatively, but I've seen enough awful assumptions about my screen-area in the name of scroll-free design. Including the &amp;quot;give us permission (or not) to give you cookies&amp;quot; popovers where it appears the actual buttons to confirm (or deny, or go somewhere to review and customise, if they have that option) are beyond the bottom of my screen. I can temporarily rotate the screen, of course, but often I just back out and don't bother in those cases. I wouldn't be reticent to rotate this site, on occasion, but ''I'd really rather not have to'', if I can be so selfish and stick-in-the-mud, because websites just are not good to use (even temporarily) in narrow-portait mode. (What's worse is the websites that detect I'm on a mobile platform and redesign styles/placements on-the-fly to 'fit portrait view', assuming a vertical smartphone, ''regardless'' of my actual viewport orientation, etc.)&lt;br /&gt;
:So, please, a hard no from me. Notwithstanding that just as solidly &amp;quot;always browse in portrait&amp;quot; people might be overjoyed at changes that would give ''them'' a better site design. But that's a tricky circle to square (or letterbox!), and not what you were suggesting anyway (now we know what it is). I just want to plea that any changes be made with a very good idea of all the knock-on effects of 'improving' certain edge-cases, especially when it comes to yet other edge-cases. [[Special:Contributions/172.70.85.23|172.70.85.23]] 10:29, 6 February 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
==New Logo and Banner Proposals==&lt;br /&gt;
:I have new logo and banner proposals for this site.&lt;br /&gt;
:They're made on Scratch, an all-ages block-based programming language, and are in the style of Right Click.&lt;br /&gt;
:Here they are!&lt;br /&gt;
:Logo proposal: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Logo_proposal_for_explain_xkcd.png&lt;br /&gt;
:Banner proposal: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Banner_proposal_for_explain_xkcd.png {{unsigned ip|172.69.71.37|01:54, 19 February 2024 (UTC)}}&lt;br /&gt;
::I can't see the xkcdicity of the logo, really. The banner is certainly flavourful in the right way (does it scale down well? ...is that what your use of Scratch is for, as opposed to standard static Photoshop/GIMP image editing?), but not sure it'll work better for the current top-left-of-page xkcd (with three xkcd figurses idling away, sat on the letters).&lt;br /&gt;
::Decent concept art for something else related, certainly. I could believe it was a Randall's-own  interactive comic front-end of some kind (which would make sense of the &amp;quot;play button&amp;quot; that is the &amp;quot;►&amp;quot;-bit). Given that it's now in a programming system already, have you tried making a drag'n'click game of the idea of linking/looping the blue-trail, and animating the hanging-on characters? [[Special:Contributions/172.70.90.29|172.70.90.29]] 13:34, 19 February 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::It's an arrow, not a play button. Get it right. {{unsigned ip|172.69.71.72|01:05, 20 February 2024 (UTC)}}&lt;br /&gt;
::::Hold your horses... I was just trying to find a good reason for the whatever-it-is triangle to be there (gave the example of a 'play' button in my speculated usefulness of it). And it isn't really obviously any more of an arrow (c.f. &amp;quot;→&amp;quot;), either. I like your(?) banner's use of xkcd-figures, just not sure where the logo exhibits any form of being xkcd-related, except by the literal reading of it.&lt;br /&gt;
::::Perhaps if it were &amp;quot;xkcd font&amp;quot; (i.e. artfully composited from actual samples of Randall's ALLCAPS comic-writing) then it wouldn't matter so much, but I just wouldn't say it was any more on-brand than the current logo/etc. This being intended as constructive criticism, I hope you understand. And there's more opinions than mine, so maybe I've indeed just missed some point that ''everyone else'' (especially named-users) have already realised. [[Special:Contributions/172.70.86.5|172.70.86.5]] 02:33, 20 February 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Regarding precision in the Unexplained popup ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Would it be possible to add an extra decimal point for the sake of precision? Currently, it shows that 0% of comics are unexplained, which is (as of 13:21 UTC on March 27, 2024) incorrect. It's a small thing, but it's rather annoying. {{unsigned ip|162.158.158.233|13:23, 27 March 2024 (UTC)}}&lt;br /&gt;
:With the current 2911 comics (give or take #404), 0.1% would be slightly under 3 comics. You'd need at least three before 0.1% appeared instead of the equally unuseful 0.0%.&lt;br /&gt;
:I'm of the &amp;quot;at least give everyone a week before you unilaterally declare it 'done'...&amp;quot; camp, so right now ''just'' the latest M/W/F comic incomplete would hover at a token 0.1%.&lt;br /&gt;
:(Actually, from two (0.06...% rounded up) to 4 (0.13...% rounded down. The good news is that it'll be almost seven years until two-rounded-up is insufficient, but also up to six-rounded-down is now &amp;quot;0.1%&amp;quot;, if I've not goofed the carries/etc.)&lt;br /&gt;
:If going to the trouble of editing it to 1DP, make it 2DP with ''exactly'' the same editing effort..?&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&amp;lt;!-- Edited version of current Main page source below here --&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;font size=5px&amp;gt;''Welcome to the '''explain [[xkcd]]''' wiki!''&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
We have an explanation for all [[:Category:All comics|'''{{#expr:{{PAGESINCAT:All comics|R}}-1}}''' xkcd comics]],&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;!-- Note: the -1 in the calculation above is to discount &amp;quot;comic&amp;quot; 404,&lt;br /&gt;
     which is not really a comic, even though we've categorised it so. --&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
and only {{PAGESINCAT:Incomplete explanations|R}}&lt;br /&gt;
({{#expr: {{PAGESINCAT:Incomplete explanations|R}} / {{LATESTCOMIC}} * 100 round 2}}%) [[:Category:Incomplete explanations|are incomplete]]. Help us finish them!&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&amp;lt;!-- Edited version of current Main page source above here --&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:(As of time of posting, the above says &amp;quot;only 2 (0.07%)&amp;quot;. From 0.0687049...% rounded up to 2DP.)&lt;br /&gt;
:Though given that we're only going to go into the future,{{Citation needed}} I suggest we can state the flat-out number. It's not now really going to be as scarily huge as it might have been, as the actual percentage becomes generally less significant.&lt;br /&gt;
:And, for niceness, give it a grammatically/factually agreeable form:&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&amp;lt;!-- exemplars start --&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
;General form:&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;... and {{#ifeq: &amp;lt;!-- count here --&amp;gt; | 0 | no | &amp;lt;!-- count here --&amp;gt; }} comic{{#ifeq: &amp;lt;!-- count here --&amp;gt; | 1 |  | s }} [[:Category:Incomplete explanations|{{#ifeq: &amp;lt;!-- count here --&amp;gt; | 1 | is | are }} incomplete]]. ...&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
;Zero cases (hardcoded):&lt;br /&gt;
:... and {{#ifeq: 0 | 0 | no | &amp;lt;!-- count here, unused --&amp;gt; }} comic{{#ifeq: 0 | 1 |  | s }} [[:Category:Incomplete explanations|{{#ifeq: 0 | 1 | is | are }} incomplete]]. ...&lt;br /&gt;
;One case (hardcoded):&lt;br /&gt;
:... and {{#ifeq: 1 | 0 | no | 1 }} comic{{#ifeq: 1 | 1 |  | s }} [[:Category:Incomplete explanations|{{#ifeq: 1 | 1 | is | are }} incomplete]]. ...&lt;br /&gt;
;Multiple cases (hardcoded):&lt;br /&gt;
:... and {{#ifeq: 42 | 0 | no | 42 }} comic{{#ifeq: 42 | 1 |  | s }} [[:Category:Incomplete explanations|{{#ifeq: 42 | 1 | is | are }} incomplete]]. ...&lt;br /&gt;
;Current cases (dynamic):&lt;br /&gt;
:... and {{#ifeq: {{PAGESINCAT:Incomplete explanations|R}} | 0 | none | {{PAGESINCAT:Incomplete explanations|R}} }} comic{{#ifeq: {{PAGESINCAT:Incomplete explanations|R}} | 1 |  | s }} [[:Category:Incomplete explanations|{{#ifeq: {{PAGESINCAT:Incomplete explanations|R}} | 1 | is | are }} incomplete]]. ...&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&amp;lt;!-- end of exemplars --&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:...easy to replicate to get &amp;quot;Help us finish them!&amp;quot; to change (upon a zero-test truth) to &amp;quot;But they all might be improvable!&amp;quot;. Or change the :Cat:Link to not even be a link when zero, with alternate phrasing dodged over to in order to avoid &amp;quot;no comics are incomplete&amp;quot; in other ways.&lt;br /&gt;
:I wrote the above for minimal nesting of overlapping conditions. You might prefer just to go with &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{#ifeq: &amp;lt;count&amp;gt; | 0 | &amp;lt;whole &amp;quot;zero cases&amp;quot; version&amp;gt; | {{#ifeq: &amp;lt;count&amp;gt; | 1 | &amp;lt;whole &amp;quot;single case&amp;quot; version&amp;gt; | &amp;lt;whole &amp;quot;plurality of cases&amp;quot; version&amp;gt; }} }}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt; - both approaches involve repetitions, but maybe this other one can be given a ''degree'' of wikimarkup-readability within each case, to take pity on future editors. [[Special:Contributions/172.70.160.166|172.70.160.166]] 16:02, 27 March 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Hear me out: What If? discussion page.  ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
That's it. That's my idea. Go crazy, everyone. [[User:Psychoticpotato|Psychoticpotato]] ([[User talk:Psychoticpotato|talk]]) 14:05, 4 April 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Yup, I've been thinking the same thing. I would like a page on each What If entry. [[User:Maplestrip|Maplestrip]] ([[User talk:Maplestrip|talk]]) 07:42, 8 April 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::I've thought about this, over the years. Having 'a page' (rather than the summary table, in the [[what if? (blog)|overview page]], etc) does sound more completist than what we currently have but I then tend to hit the main ontological problem...&lt;br /&gt;
::In the What-Ifs, Randall takes a 'simple' question and then ''explains'' the consequences. At length. A 'comic page' structure (starting with how we'd deal with the multiple midpoint images, so we would stray far from using the {{template|comic}} introduction) that followed the header(image,etc)/explanation/transcript/(trivia)/included-comments format would be silly and have many parts inappropriate. Remove the Transcript, for starters. ''Or'' need a mini-Transcript for each 'illustrative' image. (e.g. &amp;quot;:[Black Hat:] What if we tried more power?&amp;quot;, several times.)&lt;br /&gt;
::Is there an actual need to ''explain Randall's explanation..''? Because that's the only thing 'we' can do. Which is rather silly, and seems like it would take a small (entertainingly rambling) essay and expand it into a large (pedantically rambling) one.&lt;br /&gt;
::Or else we just straight-copy the What-If over here as a 'backup'-blag? Allowable, but not exactly a USP, there'll be Internet Archive and personal copies, should things go bad at Randall's end. Not really a noble-cause.&lt;br /&gt;
::My suggestion, as to how to cover the remaining &amp;quot;explanation gap&amp;quot; and provide a useful 'service' that's worthwhile maintaining, is ''maybe'' two What If? (Blag) sub-pages:&lt;br /&gt;
::#A place to collate all inter-text images (and hover-/title-texts), and Transcript them, for easy searching.&lt;br /&gt;
::#*e.g. when you know you want to refer to the &amp;quot;bomb to the eyeball&amp;quot; one (internally or for something external) but think you might not realise where you need to go to (the supernova neutrinos one!) just by scrolling a bare comic list.&lt;br /&gt;
::#*Or you'd like to see, at a glance, how many different places the Black Hat Try More Power running joke occurs.&lt;br /&gt;
::#*Even if you don't want to open the page itself (160+ 'comics' with say 5 images each, is an 800ish-image page, less rationalising 'repeats' to a single entry), it should at least give you a search result for &amp;quot;dry waterfall&amp;quot; that points you in the direction of the &amp;quot;Niagra Straw&amp;quot; one (and maybe others?).&lt;br /&gt;
::#*I could see these being brief Image/Titletext/Transcript/(optional explanatory context), but not enough material to make them separate comic-style-pages in their own right, right?&lt;br /&gt;
::#Something of the same 'collation page mechanism' for all those superscript-popup-'footnote' bits. Though I admit I'm not entirely sure for what purpose except that it just ''seems'' like a good &amp;quot;collection page&amp;quot; to maintain. Perhaps to offer updated onward-links if any of the originals suffer link-rot? (But then, that fate can occur to all non-popupped links, so maybe I've chosen the wrong thing to highlight.)&lt;br /&gt;
::...the question is, what do you want from it. Bear in mind that if you can creae pages here then you can set up what ''you'' think you'd like to see (e.g. for What-If#1, for starters) then get the community to assess it. Do it as a sub-page to your Userspace, maybe, as proof-of-concept.&lt;br /&gt;
::Just because it's not been seen as necessary so far, doesn't mean it's not necessary. I've thought about it a lot (not thst I'm in a position to inplement anything), but I've only decided that I don't see a need for a straight copy (others' views may differ on that) and not enough reason to pester for ''my'' 'ideas' to be fulfilled. But I aint 'in charge' here, and happily so. [[Special:Contributions/172.69.194.100|172.69.194.100]] 11:29, 8 April 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::You make a fair point. He did already explain in great detail what would happen if [x] scenario happened. It just seems like it would be nice to have a page exclusively for discussing all the ''What If'' articles. [[User:Psychoticpotato|Psychoticpotato]] ([[User talk:Psychoticpotato|talk]]) 20:49, 15 May 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::::People just need to make a draft or two and see what happens. Be sure to link a draft here if one is created, I would like to help on it. &amp;quot;I want to learn more and explore this scenario further&amp;quot; is a valid feeling to have. [[User:Maplestrip|Maplestrip]] ([[User talk:Maplestrip|talk]]) 07:34, 16 May 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Randall-ify the Captcha ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Let's have some fun:  Is it feasible to replace the Captcha with something &amp;quot;xkcd-ish&amp;quot; like &amp;quot;click on Randall's work&amp;quot; with a mix of XKCD stuff and generic pictures.  If not, how about a replacing it with a quiz like &amp;quot;which of the following IS [or IS NOT] xkcd character&amp;quot; with one obvious correct answer. [[Special:Contributions/172.68.26.75|172.68.26.75]] 16:11, 9 May 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:are YOU able to create a CAPTCHA from scratch? [[User:42.book.addict|42.book.addict]] ([[User talk:42.book.addict|talk]]) 15:59, 13 May 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::Choose any images that contain user-made CAPTCHAs from the following selection. [[User:Psychoticpotato|Psychoticpotato]] ([[User talk:Psychoticpotato|talk]]) 21:22, 13 May 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::We could also make captchas based on most of [[:Category:CAPTCHA|these]]. [[User:PDesbeginner|PDesbeginner]] ([[User talk:PDesbeginner|talk]]) 02:57, 11 September 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Incomplete Tag Vote ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I think each comic's discussion page should have a section to vote on whether the explanation is complete or not. How long do you think the voting period should be?[[User:PDesbeginner|PDesbeginner]] ([[User talk:PDesbeginner|talk]]) 03:42, 19 June 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Rather than a voting period, I think it would be ideal if people could &amp;quot;vote&amp;quot; on the completeness of an article at any time. As I go through all the old pages, I come across lots of pages that feel a little bit incomplete. It would be nice if we had a measurement of completion that wasn't binary. [[User:Maplestrip|Maplestrip]] ([[User talk:Maplestrip|talk]]) 10:16, 19 June 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::Feel free to add the incomplete tag again. But don't forget to mention WHY (either in the tag or the discussion or both) you think it's incomplete. :) The tag is mainly there so you can have a list of &amp;quot;incomplete&amp;quot; comics. A comic is either on that list or it isn't. This is pretty much binary. As for voting: If I think an explanation is complete and it bothers me that it's flagged as not I generally juts make a comment in the discussion asking if someone has still something to add or actually knows WHY it's still incomplete. If there's no response after a few days I delete the tag. There's no need to make a voting out of this. And if somone strongly disagrees to you there's always the &amp;quot;Undo&amp;quot;-link ;) [[User:Elektrizikekswerk|Elektrizikekswerk]] ([[User talk:Elektrizikekswerk|talk]]) 11:09, 19 June 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Sometimes I just feel &amp;quot;this could use more detail,&amp;quot; without specifically knowing what the detail would look like. This can be a problem when it's about explaining complicated science: the &amp;quot;completion&amp;quot; of a description of quantum mechanics that is readable by a novice, is very subjective. I am realizing the problem with the persistent voting idea tho: many people will vote something as &amp;quot;incomplete&amp;quot; but wouldn't come back to check on it later. [[User:Maplestrip|Maplestrip]] ([[User talk:Maplestrip|talk]]) 12:08, 19 June 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::::I'm more in the &amp;quot;less is more&amp;quot; camp. Most of my recent contributions to this wiki were deleting parts of bloated explanations: You don't need to explain quantum mechanics unless it's absolutely crucial for understanding the respective comic. Of course, if you are an expert in any given field, [[2501|it's hard to tell]] whether or not the current explanation is sufficient for a layperson and most contributors tend to write &amp;quot;too much&amp;quot;. Which is totally fine. People like me take care of the &amp;quot;too much&amp;quot;. ;) So, if you are an expert in quantum mechanics ignore &amp;quot;completed&amp;quot; comics about quantum mechanics. Surely you could contribute a lot to it but chances are high that most of it is unnecessary for the comic. Instead ask yourself if you need more information to understand that comic about biology. And if you do, add an incomplete and ask for that information ;) [[User:Elektrizikekswerk|Elektrizikekswerk]] ([[User talk:Elektrizikekswerk|talk]]) 12:31, 19 June 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:I've been here a long time, effectively back to when there were ''missing'' explanations (other than the &amp;quot;too new to have the barebones put in&amp;quot; ones, these days only seen when the current BOT is tardy or offline for some reason), and I've seen the Incomplete template change from the useful 'infill marker' to become a regular joke-tag of a similar nature to the Citation Needed. Yes, I agree that both of these (and the Because You're Dumb&amp;quot; tag) are perhaps a bit confusing for new users (like the one who badly edited out a link, just now, apparently thinking it was spam, because of the way it mentioned viagra), but I have grown to see them as community in-jokes (of various degrees of subtlety) that many people seem to appreciate under their current incarnations.&lt;br /&gt;
:We've recently removed the Main Page's more literal &amp;quot;there are # incomplete articles&amp;quot; announcement, which leaves the purpose of ''more accurately'' using the Incomplete tag a little less important. Apart from letting us dive into the (purported) list of Incomplete Explanations, one of the main ''serious'' purposes of the Incomplete tag is removed, leaving the now consistently employed purpose of doing a &amp;quot;Created by a THING OTHER THAN THE BOT&amp;quot; joke much more prominent.&lt;br /&gt;
:Really, all articles are potentially incomplete, still. Some more than others. Something big, like Hoverboard or Gravity, might truly have easter-eggs or subtle details as yet not properly commented upon, but there have been edits to ''double-digit'' comics recently which might be considered improvements. As such, there are really only two 'sensible' direct courses of action:&lt;br /&gt;
:#Completely remove the Incomplete tag, from use, as all pages are only ever as complete as the eye of any particular beholder, and the more recent pages are ''obviously'' incomplete by their being barely 15 minutes (or a day, or ''maybe'' a week) old. Or being so huge (or Time-like!) that they clearly still haven't been 'completely' documented. Maybe the BOT can add a Created By The Bot tag that gets wiped out by the first serious attempt at human editing, but if we wish to lose this part of our site culture so readily then why ever have it at all? A wikivote system is not really that accurate under these circumstances, for a number of reasons that I needn't explain, so go straight to assuming that any such 'vote' would pass, right from the off...&lt;br /&gt;
:#Embrace it for its THING OTHER THAN A BOT usage, alone. Don't be so eager to remove them just because you have no personal changes you'd wish to see. (Votes or not, there could always be another editor along in a minute who has, unlike the rest of you, picked up on an obscure visual pun rendered in what turns out to be hieroglyphs, or similar.) If we have to cull them (not a given!), then let it be an unstated rule (or a stated one?) that if there are more than (e.g.) half a dozen then the 'least amusing' may be removed by the first editor who wishes to express a critical opinion. Just the one at a time. No reinstating, no resurrection, no adding to old articles that never ever had a 'joke Incomplete' before, no entirely new joke (but you can refine what's there, to a degree), just a rolling (and not necessarily consecutive!) set of the &amp;quot;finest natjve explainxkcd wit&amp;quot;. Or at least the least objectionable surviving examples of same.&lt;br /&gt;
:As a practical guide, the &amp;quot;reason why you think it is Incomplete element&amp;quot; could be entirely served by in-line tags (the &amp;quot;What?&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;Why?&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;Date?&amp;quot; things you might see elsewhere). Perhaps we could even do ''both'' things by instead having a &amp;quot;Complete&amp;quot; tag ''explicitly'' for BOT-REPLACEMENT-type tomfoolery (and tongue-in-cheekness about Completion, as we might currently be about Incometeness) from the off. That might confuse the newbods, of course. At least until it doesn't, and then they're not newbods anymore...&lt;br /&gt;
:The companion tag, for Incomplete Transcript, is presumably going to serve as it currently does (as a still serious hint as to actual Incompleteness), albeit that I've noticed a trend for the first editor of a brand new published comic to (possibly ''after'' doing the BOT-replacement joke, or after the editor who did ''only'' that) go straight in and enTranscript it (to varying degrees of accuracy and completion), whether or not they also then remove that specific tag-template at the same time. It seems that some people are more comfortable at providing a ''Transcript''ion-service than they are at establishing even the seed of an Explanation. (Or they only have enough time to do the latter, to the level of detail they wish to achieve in the moment open to them.)&lt;br /&gt;
:This is, of course, a cultural issue. All the above (from me) is just my own perception of practical aspects, notwithstanding those opinions already expressed before that (and elsewhere). I don't speak for everyone. And, as a perpetual IP, technically I should say that I don't speak for ''anyone'', either... [[Special:Contributions/172.70.160.140|172.70.160.140]] 14:21, 19 June 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I like the idea of removing the Incomplete tag. What do you think? [[User:PDesbeginner|PDesbeginner]] ([[User talk:PDesbeginner|talk]]) 14:57, 19 June 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::I greatly approve of a &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{what}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt; tag, as a Wikipedian that's actually really funny. I would want to keep the Incomplete tag, as I think it has purpose, even if it no longer represents a goal to achieve. I think this website will never reach 100.00% completeness and that is good, actually. [[User:Maplestrip|Maplestrip]] ([[User talk:Maplestrip|talk]]) 14:05, 26 June 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::Okay. If someone wants to they can just ignore the incomplete tags. [[User:PDesbeginner|PDesbeginner]] ([[User talk:PDesbeginner|talk]]) 14:37, 28 June 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== &amp;quot;As of &amp;lt;now&amp;gt;&amp;quot;... ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What would be rather useful is an &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{As of now}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt; template (or similar wording, and perhaps an &amp;quot;as of now&amp;quot;-cased alternative for use mid-sentence). There are many articles that will have words along the lines of &amp;quot;this has not yet happened, as of August 2024&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;this situation is continuing, as of August 2024&amp;quot;. Every now and then, someone will come across one of these with an older date (perhaps only just out of date, perhaps years old) and [https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=1858:_4th_of_July&amp;amp;curid=20285&amp;amp;diff=348082&amp;amp;oldid=315524 edit it accordingly]. You could also seek them all out, deliberately, with a bit of effort in the search-bar.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
(Note that &amp;quot;as of&amp;quot; does not ''always'' need updating, there are non-dated examples such as in [[1074: Moon Landing#Trivia]], static transcript versions, like [[1071: Exoplanets#Transcript]] and other instances where the text &amp;quot;as of&amp;quot;, with or without a date, really does not need to be changed... but sometimes is anyway by a well-meaning passer-by.)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Sometimes, this can be done along with another useful edit/update/revision that is spotted, or is just one of the revisions that some other need for change conveniently allows. But it seems a bit vague to rely upon occasional attention.  Instead the template will implement something like &amp;quot;&amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;As of {{Monthyear}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;&amp;quot; (here having to use &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{#time:F Y}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;, ...&amp;quot;As of {{#time:F Y}}&amp;quot;...), though there's the possibility that a parameter-mediated switch can let it alternatively become a to-the-day-level format option (at which point you could even implement/calcuate something like {{template|Yesterday}} would be) or just to the year-level. (Or add {{template|As of this year}}, {{template|As of this month}} and {{template|As of this day}} separately.)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This would negate the need to ''just'' poke and prod any article that happened to 'need' updating every month (or year, or possible day). And to deal with the possibility that some of these cases might actually need to be edited because &amp;quot;as of&amp;quot; does ''not'' now apply, include within it a {{:Category:As of}} membership, letting anyone who is interested keep an eye on these aggregated 'As of's, ready to jump in there and change it to some straight up &amp;quot;Up until &amp;lt;fixed date&amp;gt;&amp;quot; equivalent should any one of them actually no longer apply.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
...obviously, I can't even begin to create the template page required, but I'd be happy to work on the exact wikimedia code required if anyone thinks it needs anything but the most basic transcluded formatting and doesn't know how. Open to discussion, and I'll tag on more if I happen to see that discussion developing. [[Special:Contributions/172.70.162.186|172.70.162.186]] 18:04, 4 August 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:As an addendum/change to my above suggestion, considering a simpler {{template|as of}} (and {{template|As of}}) which does ''no'' automagical continuous updating (just gives the &amp;quot;as of&amp;quot; literal on its own), but still guarantees &amp;quot;Category:As of&amp;quot; membership, so that it doesn't actively give wrong (new) date+circumstance relationships in the likes of [[1047: Approximations]]. In that, the several mentions of populations can safely stay as old years until someone rewrites the proposed value and assessment as well, but it still could be a task to pursue every new year after checking the Cat for likely comics needing a quick check'n'edit.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== “Grammar Bot” ==&lt;br /&gt;
I’m working on a python based bot written with the Pywiki library that aims to use the replace.py scripts to fix simple grammatical mistakes, e.g. correcting Citation needed placements, cleaning up extra spaces, etc. I will be posting the code in a few weeks after I finish it (I’m a bit busy at the moment with school and orchestra) so the entire community can view it. Any thoughts on the idea? Thanks. [[User:42.book.addict|42.book.addict]] ([[User talk:42.book.addict|talk]]) 21:05, 5 September 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:First thoughts are that there are going to be so many exceptions. I definitely agree with the idea of {{template|Citation needed}}s being made consistent (if only it weren't sometimes complicated{{Citation needed}}), as well as that of    mysterious    extra       spaces. But that's not really grammatical. Punctuation, in the first case. I fear a full (or even fragmentary) grammar-checker is going to be complicated and give many false positives.&lt;br /&gt;
:At least at first, perhaps have it ''report'' what it thinks it has found. You may discover definite times that it isn't necessary and it would indeed create new errors.&lt;br /&gt;
:At the very least, run it with two checklists: One to do an automatic replace.py and one to just report. Start with the first list empty. Introduce potential ones to the latter, review all the reports carefully, ''then'' move any sensible-looking ones to former.&lt;br /&gt;
:And have it not fighting other bots (particularly theusafBOT), perhaps selected users (e.g. the likes of Kynde, and of course yourself) or indeed itself (if it makes a change that might inadvertently trigger another 'check') by excluding such changes for a recheck/rechange. Keep a record of what it changed, so that if anybody reverts/recorrects something that seems to have gone wrong it doesn't force it 'wrong' again. At the simplest, give a whole page a decent time-out and/or number of subsequent limits before it ''considers'' a new change. Implement from the start the option of a 'whitelist' (of pages it can ignore) or 'blacklist' (of rules it shouldn't apply, or at least actively apply, to a given page), so you can quickly manually add a throttle-down by simple config-file rather than have to add in a code-kludge when something obviously (in hindsight!) needs correcting about the way it works. And also maybe throttle it to have no more than one bot-edit per hour (while starting from scratch) to not swamp the system and give the rest of us time to assess any errors it has made (and its successes!) - you can unstick that throttle later, when you consider it tested with all its backlog of microcorrections.&lt;br /&gt;
:...there are a few other guidelines I would suggest, but the cautiousness already present in the above approaches might mean that they are left as not so important. Just consider what ''could'' go wrong before unleashing it on our world.&lt;br /&gt;
:And all power to your elbow, it is of course something we all might have considered (I know I have... not that I have the login for it, but what really stopped me was knowing how badly I could mess it up by getting just one detail wrong if I tried it).&lt;br /&gt;
:Among changes/alerts I would have it make would be cases of {{template|cn}}, {{template|citation needed}}, etc, instead of the 'main' template. Plus []-links to either wikipedia pages (most of them should be {{template|w}}-templated) or explainxkcd.com pages (most of them should be [[]]ed), although there are even then some exceptions. It'd also be nice if it can identify all Talk (and Community Portal) contributions that were not signed (more complex, as some may be after the fact, or have been after several years and further editings). I know how I'd do all this, or think I do (only upon starting to do it can I be sure I've actually theorised it correctly!), but I mention this mostly to point out how ''you'' might want to cautiously implement ''your'' ideas. HTH. [[Special:Contributions/172.70.86.15|172.70.86.15]] 00:07, 6 September 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::you have made plenty of wonderful points that I clearly have not thought about-quite the critical oversight on my part. Is anyone interested in collaborating? I don’t think that my skills are good enough to satisfy all of those points. [[User:42.book.addict|42.book.addict]] ([[User talk:42.book.addict|talk]]) 01:06, 6 September 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::hello? Anybody? Please help… [[User:42.book.addict|42.book.addict]] ([[User talk:42.book.addict|talk]]) 17:38, 9 September 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::::I believe this would be a great idea and also an incredibly complicated feat. Randall is no stranger to using weird punctuation in comics or misspelled words. I think it would be neat if it weren't automated and just reported errors it found so we could manually fix them, which would make its development much easier, but at that point it's very similar to a series of search queries for misspelled words, which we can already do. I have no coding skills so I'm not going to be of help. [[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 17:33, 7 November 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
;Update&lt;br /&gt;
I have found a solution to fix most grammatical mistakes, I just need to make sure that it doesn’t correct character names like “Cueball”, not edit war with other bots, come up with a system to log the edits it makes so that it doesn’t revert again, and fix Citation needed templates. I already know how to make sure that it asks me before editing, so I want to create an account to test it out. Does anybody have ideas on what to name the bot? I don’t want to call it 42.book.addictBOT, since the username would be a bit clunky. ToriBOT could work, but I’m also open to any other names. Feel free to reply to this or reply to me on my talk page! '''[[User:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:9pt;color:#db97bf&amp;quot;&amp;gt;42.book.addict&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:6pt;color:#97b6db&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Talk to me!&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;''' 20:30, 29 November 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== &amp;quot;dark mode&amp;quot; ==&lt;br /&gt;
add dark mode [[User:CalibansCreations|'''&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#ff0000;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Caliban&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;''']] ([[User talk:CalibansCreations|talk]]) 09:54, 18 November 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:See [[User:Certified nqh/common.css]] or copy/paste my old [[User:42.book.addict/common.css|common.css]] page history into your common.css page: -42.book.addict [[Special:Contributions/172.69.134.208|172.69.134.208]] 16:10, 18 November 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::ha, thx tori, nqh's common.css works like a charm :) [[User:CalibansCreations|'''&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#ff0000;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Caliban&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;''']] ([[User talk:CalibansCreations|talk]]) 08:51, 21 November 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== reddit ==&lt;br /&gt;
Add reddit- Anonymous {{unsigned ip|172.71.214.80|08:31, 21 November 2024 (UTC)}}&lt;br /&gt;
:You probably need to explain what you mean by that. Add reddit discussions to here? Add this site to reddit? Add some simple link to one from the other? Something else? [[Special:Contributions/172.70.162.163|172.70.162.163]] 13:02, 21 November 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::&amp;gt;Add some simple link to one from the other?&lt;br /&gt;
::I have no idea what they meant either, but I hadn't thought of this! I could see the addition of a simple link to the comic template, like &amp;quot;https://reddit.com/r/xkcd/comments/{{PAGETITLE}&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;https://reddit.com/r/xkcd/search/?q={{PAGETITLE}&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
::I don't partecipate much in the r/xkcd subreddit, so i'm not sure if they have structured post titles or even if they posted all the comics, or if it's automated, but I think this could be cool! Some people will likely come from Reddit, so it would be a straightforward way for them to go back. Thoughts? {{unsigned|FaviFake|16:55, 11 January 2025 (UTC)}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== viewer ==&lt;br /&gt;
i propose to add random page to comic viewer {{unsigned ip|172.71.150.14|00:17, 25 February 2025 (UTC)}}&lt;br /&gt;
:There's already a &amp;quot;Random Page&amp;quot; link.&lt;br /&gt;
:If you mean (it's ambiguous!) a &amp;quot;Random Comic Page&amp;quot; link, then I'm not sure it's needed. There are so many &amp;quot;Comic pages&amp;quot; that it's a fairly good chance that you'll land on one of them for any given click, much more chance within two clicks. The likelihood of not getting a comic within ''three'' clicks will be tiny. Another way to do it is to just use the xkcd.com &amp;quot;Random&amp;quot; button, then (whichever comic you land on, which will be any but [[404]]), change the &amp;quot;xkcd.com&amp;quot; bit of the URL to &amp;quot;expxkcd.com&amp;quot; and... you end up here.&lt;br /&gt;
:If none of that really does what you want (especially if you mean something completely different from what I read it as), some more explanation would probably be appreciated. [[Special:Contributions/172.69.79.164|172.69.79.164]] 01:02, 25 February 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:If you want to make sure to land on all comics, you can go to &amp;quot;Special pages&amp;quot; on the sidebar, scroll down to &amp;quot;Random page in category&amp;quot;, and enter &amp;quot;All comics&amp;quot;. As far as I'm aware, there isn't really a way to automate this, so you have to keep inputting it manually. [[User:Firestar233|guess who]] ([[User talk:Firestar233|if you desire conversing]] | [[Special:Contributions/Firestar233|what i have done]]) 06:38, 25 February 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::I think they meant a button on the {{tl|comic}} template. Would it be technically possible to make it such that it works exacly like the one on the official site? --[[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 17:47, 25 February 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::It ''should'' be a matter of using [[Special:RandomInCategory/All Comics]], I think, but doesn't seem to work when I try that exact attempt. Perhaps mediawiki or the mediawiki extension is not updated enough, or else I'm getting my wikisyntax slightly wrong.&lt;br /&gt;
:::Functionally, though, where the website has its Random button, we have our &amp;quot;go to the xkcd.com original&amp;quot;, so more thought is needed before we just &amp;quot;add a button&amp;quot;. If we do, we want it where the 'mothership' website does, but we still ought to have our details-and-link-to-original given, and I like it as a (faux) button.&lt;br /&gt;
::: Perhaps the {{template|comic}}, where it currently has header 'buttons':&lt;br /&gt;
 [|&amp;lt;&amp;lt;] [Prev] [#9876 (Grune 32, 2525)] [Next] [&amp;gt;&amp;gt;|]&lt;br /&gt;
::: Needs to be changed to maybe:&lt;br /&gt;
       [ #9876 (Grune 32, 2525) ]&lt;br /&gt;
 [|&amp;lt;&amp;lt;] [Prev]   [Random]   [Next] [&amp;gt;&amp;gt;|]&lt;br /&gt;
:::...or equivalent. Haven't checked, but if it's a one-line table, can be easily made into a two-line one with colspan=3 (or 5?) in the right bit. If it's just centred, then it should come out Ok, in a simple way. But I'm not too keen on that change, really, and you'd need to actually have the Random-&amp;gt;Comic link working first, ''anyway''. So I'm giving you my opinions and (slightly lacking) knowledge, in case that can at least make for the better outcome than either nothing (though not sure that's bad!) or some half-hearted ideas from elsewhere. [[Special:Contributions/172.70.86.116|172.70.86.116]] 21:52, 25 February 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::: Unless someone can figure out the requests made by the random in category, a workaround could be to use a (pseudo)random number generator (mediawiki has a [https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Template:Random_number template] on their website) to get a random number in the range of 1 - {{template|LATESTCOMIC}} and put in a link to that comic number using &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;[[number]]&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
:::: Note: There already is a &amp;quot;Random&amp;quot; template, but it was just using random page and was blanked by the person who made it [[User:Firestar233|guess who]] ([[User talk:Firestar233|if you desire conversing]] | [[Special:Contributions/Firestar233|what i have done]]) 03:50, 26 February 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::{{Done|Done!!!}} &amp;amp;nbsp;I tried that wikimedia templaete but couldn't figure out how to make it work. I did it using Special:Random, hoping there aren't too many non-comic pages. Check [[{{LATESTCOMIC}}]] for an example of how it looks and works. --[[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 16:02, 23 April 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::thanks! (i hav an account now) [[User:Bb777|me, hi]] ([[User talk:Bb777|talk]]) 22:30, 25 April 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::No problem! There's also a special custom-designed navbar for the original comics: try clicking the &amp;quot;|&amp;lt;&amp;quot; button! (It's not complete yet, but i'm slowly finishing it!) --[[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 22:36, 25 April 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Contentious Topics Template ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I propose that we create a unified template to slap on contentious and possibly controversial comics, with a warning similar to the one I (and a couple other people added on) wrote in [[3073: Tariffs]]. Now, since I don’t know how to create a template and don’t understand how they work, this is my request for help. If you are available to help write it or have any tips for me, please contact me either in this thread or on my [[User talk:42.book.addict|talk page]]. Thanks! '''[[User:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:9pt;color:pink&amp;quot;&amp;gt;42.book.addict&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:6pt;color:#B1E4E3&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Talk to me!&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;''' 18:01, 16 April 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Hey, I just wanted to ask why you think a new template is needed. {{tl|notice2}} and {{tl|notice}} seem pretty solid. How would a new template differ from them? Btw, I switched the template in [[Talk:3073: Tariffs]] from {{tl|notice}} to {{tl|notice2}} so it's more like a warning, feel free to revert it if you prefer {{tl|notice}}. --[[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 16:56, 17 April 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::I read the idea (which I'm not too enamoured with, but wouldn't argue against either) as being to create a &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{contentious}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;-like template in its own right that (perhaps by using {{template|notice2}} within it) had a standard &amp;quot;This comic, and its explanation, covers a particularly contentious subject. Take even more care than usual when adding to or editing this Explanation/Talk Page&amp;quot; (or similar) text with it.&lt;br /&gt;
::It would probably also have the ability to add further (or alternate) info, by standard template parameters, in case you want to personalise it to the ''exact''nature of the contention.&lt;br /&gt;
::But, my reasons why I didn't volunteer my ideas immediately are:&lt;br /&gt;
::*It paints targets. Anybody who wants to can look at all &amp;quot;pages using the Contentious template&amp;quot; and then troll-bomb them ''specifically''&lt;br /&gt;
::*Looking at the Tariffs-comic warning, that's ''huge'', and catering for that with a &amp;quot;standard text + additional notes&amp;quot; would be awkward... if you really believe it should be so huge in the first place,&lt;br /&gt;
::*Just by being so obviously available, there'd be creep. &amp;quot;Hey, this comic talks disparagingly about Newton's belief in alchemy... Surely that needs a warning too!&amp;quot;, or start off with &amp;quot;Well, nobody's warning about our attitude to the US Senate in this comic, so I can be disparaging&amp;quot; which then practically forces another contentious-tagging (''possibly'' useful, but maybe in making a bolt for the barn door only ''after'' the horse has already made its own bolt through it) as it gets toned-down/-back again.&lt;br /&gt;
::And, though I also imagined the Tariff comic ''would'' get some push-back (there was some minor bits, but we seem to have kept it mature enough, IMO), it seems to be quiet. Can't say for sure it would have been without the warning it now has, but it survived ok before that was added. Hence why I'm ''meh'' about the very proposal. Hard cases make hard laws, and hard situations may prompt hard solutions. But I'm dubious about the actual case for the need. (As you say, we have 'freeform' notice+notice2, and I haven't seen proof even that was necessary as it was used.)&lt;br /&gt;
::But it would be trivial to implement, give or take some fine-tuning. I'll say that as a positive for the idea. Even if we never really use it as much as we could. [[Special:Contributions/162.158.216.83|162.158.216.83]] 20:35, 17 April 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Agreed. Maybe it's a good thing that we have to craft one for each comic we want to tag; this makes sure only actually contentious comics get tagged. An upside to having a specific template is that we wouldn't need to type &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;noinclude&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt; every time, to avoid it displaying on the transcluded talk page.--[[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 21:00, 17 April 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::::mm. all of these are good points. now that i think about it, copy-pasting old warnings and tweaking them as needed is probably better than creating a new template. '''[[User:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:9pt;color:pink&amp;quot;&amp;gt;42.book.addict&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:6pt;color:#B1E4E3&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Talk to me!&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;''' 16:45, 18 April 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Proposal for template page==&lt;br /&gt;
I was thinking that making a template page with instructions about what should and should not be included in which sections would make it easier for new editors to help. I have no idea how I would do this, though.[[User:BobcatInABox|BobcatInABox]] ([[User talk:BobcatInABox|talk]]) 11:49, 4 May 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Which particular template? Many templates ''do'' contain instructions (from basic to rather thorough), and some common ones are also gone into in the FAQ page. [[Special:Contributions/172.70.91.245|172.70.91.245]] 20:25, 4 May 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== The newest stuff goes at top ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I’ve been thinking the newest comments should go at top and replies are under the chose comment with a colon or more. Because every time someone makes a comment but not replying to you, you still get a message. So you only get notifications when someone replies to you. And the always get notifications not related to you is kind of annoying. [[User:Aprilfoolsupdate!|Aprilfoolsupdate!]] ([[User talk:Aprilfoolsupdate!|talk]]) 04:30, 15 May 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:(Ah, so you found it, before I even wrote my directions down on how to get here.)&lt;br /&gt;
:Not sure this helps.&lt;br /&gt;
:Firstly: Top-posting is &amp;lt;s&amp;gt;the work of the Devil... burn it! Burn it all!&amp;lt;/s&amp;gt; very hard to read.&lt;br /&gt;
::A: Because it's in totally the wrong order.&lt;br /&gt;
::Q: Why is Top Posting bad?&lt;br /&gt;
:(Yes, I know you want top-posting ''threads'' but retain bottom-posting ''thread replies'', but can you even imagine the chaos involved with people not properly realising what's top- and what's bottom-posted. Or inter-posted into an existing hierarchy? Not with this 'flatfile' structure, anyway.)&lt;br /&gt;
:Secondly: Does this count for headers (like &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;== The newest stuff goes at top ==&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;)? For 'no-colon' starter comments under a Discussion header? For both?&lt;br /&gt;
:Thirdly: what are we doing with all the past ''pages and pages'' of things that are (more or less..) consistently chronological and bottom-posted? To make new additions work, someone (and probably ''before'' the first commentator who wants to add a brand new one-line witicism to the top of any multi-year-idle page) has to go into every Discussion page (and more?) to reshuffle it all by whatever Top(ish)-Post Criteria are adopted.&lt;br /&gt;
:Fourthly: It wouldn't even change how frequently you get notifications. (Actually, it might make it worse, as inveterate bottom-posters have to be 'corrected' by the followers of the 'new rule', as well as for any actually idle pages that get redone as part of the &amp;quot;thirdly&amp;quot; point.) But I don't think Notifications are clever enough to imagine that a new section  ''above'' what you previously wrote doesn't possibly interest your registered &amp;quot;watch and notify&amp;quot; intent upon any given page.&lt;br /&gt;
:I have a Fifthly and Sixthly, too, but I assume I've made my general opinion quite clear. (And I noted that this is not the only Community Portal edit you made, just before arriving here. Will check the other in a moment.) [[Special:Contributions/172.68.229.142|172.68.229.142]] 06:19, 15 May 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::Never mind. I don’t even need to read the whole thing to know it is complicated. To many words {{unsigned|Aprilfoolsupdate|07:54, 15 May 2025 (UTC)}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Short version: It's complicated, confusing and troublesome to change to. &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;And won't even solve your problem.&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; [[Special:Contributions/172.70.160.197|172.70.160.197]] 12:22, 15 May 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Agree with this message but disagree with the proposal. --[[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 09:28, 18 May 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== By the Numbers ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Greetings all,&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
So we all know that Randall numbers each XKCD comic with an ordinal number in a simple ascending sequence. I have become exceedingly intrigued by the particular properties of numbers now, especially their factors and primes. The most recent prime-numbered comic is [[3109]] and we'll soon see another one with [[3119]]. Does Randall ascribe any meaning or humor to the numbers that happen to appear as the posts play out? He certainly celebrates special dates! As a math-humor-based comic, there certainly must be jokes or surprises hidden therein. I'm not sure I've noticed any yet, though. [[386]] is certainly notorious, though doesn't seem to have a direct sort of Intel connection. [[42]] is unremarkable. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I once read a novel with an autistic protagonist, and each chapter was assigned a prime number. I will henceforth be on the lookout for interesting numerical happenstance as Randall continues to post! Anyone else? [[User:Elizium23|Elizium23]] ([[User talk:Elizium23|talk]]) 08:56, 12 July 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Misc pages ==&lt;br /&gt;
I would like to propose the creation of an additional category for &amp;quot;miscellaneous pages&amp;quot; that aren't really comics, and which generally have a URL slug that's an English word or phrase instead of a number. This includes xkcd.com/YES and xkcd.com/NO, both of which currently have articles. It also includes these ones: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::''[Note by User:FaviFake: I organised this section and moved the links below]''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
...and others as they are found or recovered. If only we could access the forum thread mentioned on the YES and NO pages! I was able to find a link to the thread here, but it's inaccessible. A&lt;br /&gt;
It's the one labeled &amp;quot;Hidden pages on xkcd&amp;quot;: [https://web.archive.org/web/20170927200737/http://forums.xkcd.com/viewforum.php?f=2&amp;amp;sid=973b8a1dcd0a727a9177aa757108d4f6&amp;amp;start=250]. I was able to find the pages above via Reddit: [https://www.reddit.com/r/xkcd/comments/gixd96/what_are_all_the_hidden_pages_on_xkcd_that_you/] [https://www.reddit.com/r/xkcd/comments/35whzf/what/] --[[User:Rumbling7145|Rumbling7145]] ([[User talk:Rumbling7145|talk]]) 00:16, 11 March 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Update: I got into the forum page! [https://web.archive.org/web/20151206001238/http://forums.xkcd.com/viewtopic.php?f=2&amp;amp;t=110093] We can now add these pages to the list:&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Rumbling7145|Rumbling7145]] ([[User talk:Rumbling7145|talk]]) 23:37, 11 March 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;span id=&amp;quot;List of pages&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
===Pages===&lt;br /&gt;
* http://xkcd.com/yes {{Done|Created: [[YES]]}}&lt;br /&gt;
** http://xkcd.com/no {{Done|Created: [[NO]]}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* http://xkcd.com/nakedpictures {{Done|Created: [[nakedpictures]]}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* http://xkcd.com/spiral {{Done|Created: [[spiral]]}}&lt;br /&gt;
**Likely a reference to [[1488: Flowcharts]] (Which links to Spiral) and [[2322: ISO Paper Size Golden Spiral]], spirals above images of people and things&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* http://xkcd.com/burlap {{Done|Created: [[Burlap]]}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* http://xkcd.com/simplewriter {{Done|Created: [[Simple Writer]]}}&lt;br /&gt;
**Tool to Write Like [[Up Goer Five]] and [[Thing Explainer]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* http://xkcd.com/tree_prank&lt;br /&gt;
**This is so funny&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* http://xkcd.com/blue_eyes.html {{Done|Existing: [[Blue Eyes]]}}&lt;br /&gt;
** http://xkcd.com/solution.html, the solution to the problem (also found on [[Blue Eyes]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* http://xkcd.com/morphs ([https://web.archive.org/web/20130313175333/http://xkcd.com:80/morphs/ archive only] — [https://web.archive.org/web/20060219184352/http://www.xkcd.com:80/morphs/ earlier version with more text])&lt;br /&gt;
**&amp;quot;Using several pieces of imaging software, including Photoshop and an image morphing program, I make composite photos of people.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* http://xkcd.com/chesscoaster&lt;br /&gt;
**&amp;quot;People playing chess on roller coasters, inspired by this comic:&amp;quot; image&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* http://xkcd.com/kite&lt;br /&gt;
**&amp;quot;These are pictures I took by hanging cameras from kites, a hobby I've played with on and off over the years&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*https://xkcd.com/kite/kite_trick.jpg&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* http://xkcd.com/dot {{Done|Created: [[dot]]}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* http://xkcd.com/election ([https://web.archive.org/web/20141014075718/http://xkcd.com/election/ archive only])&lt;br /&gt;
**Used by randall for tracking elections, &amp;quot;it's the fastest analysis of the state of the race minute-by-minute&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* http://xkcd.com/event {{Done|Created: [[event]]}} (I still don't quite get it)&lt;br /&gt;
**There's an image on this site that a web browser fails to load, but when downloaded, Windows Photo Viewer can view the image.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* http://xkcd.com/now (redirect to [[1335: Now]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* http://xkcd.com/plus {{Done|Created: [[plus]]}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* http://xkcd.com/sub ([https://web.archive.org/web/20130111054027/http://xkcd.com/sub/ archive only]) — &amp;quot;The Sub Project&amp;quot;, a long explanation of how Randall and others build submarines?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* http://xkcd.com/temp ([https://web.archive.org/web/20061219193846/http://www.xkcd.com/temp/ archive only])&lt;br /&gt;
**This is super interesting! It lists other sub-directories. [https://web.archive.org/web/*/http://www.xkcd.com/temp/* These are the ones that survived in the archive]:&lt;br /&gt;
**http://xkcd.com/temp/email.txt ([https://web.archive.org/web/20100305065807/http://xkcd.com/temp/email.txt archive only]) — Seems to be an email exchange between Randall and someone else?&lt;br /&gt;
**http://xkcd.com:80/temp/euphoria.txt ([https://web.archive.org/web/20160401222138id_/http://xkcd.com:80/temp/euphoria.txt archive only]) — This says &amp;quot;&amp;lt;Sphere&amp;gt; Ok, that last Randall who said 'to clarify' was actually Randall, but pretty much none of the others were. Also no Sphere after this gets linked in chat a second time is actually Randall either. Randall is probably not there.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
**https://xkcd.com/temp/evidenceofidentity.txt ([https://web.archive.org/web/20201118232320/https://xkcd.com/temp/evidenceofidentity.txt archive only]) — &amp;quot;[Randall] Hello to everyone who waited in line to say hi to me on my How To book tour and specifically mentioned this chat!&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;[Sierra] Hello mr. probably not the real Randall :D [...]&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
***The rest are all images:&lt;br /&gt;
**http://www.xkcd.com/temp/humor/baby_mop.jpg ([https://web.archive.org/web/20070127045748/http://www.xkcd.com:80/temp/humor/baby_mop.jpg archive only])&lt;br /&gt;
**http://www.xkcd.com/temp/humor/darthswingset.jpg ([https://web.archive.org/web/20070127045624/http://www.xkcd.com:80/temp/humor/darthswingset.jpg archive only])&lt;br /&gt;
**http://www.xkcd.com/temp/humor/deb6d13b50a581304bac385c463b09c1.jpg ([https://web.archive.org/web/20070225103228/http://www.xkcd.com:80/temp/humor/deb6d13b50a581304bac385c463b09c1.jpg archive only])&lt;br /&gt;
**http://www.xkcd.com/temp/humor/Hacker%20Grave.jpg ([https://web.archive.org/web/20070213182708/http://www.xkcd.com:80/temp/humor/Hacker%20Grave.jpg archive only])&lt;br /&gt;
**http://www.xkcd.com/temp/humor/hotornot.jpg ([https://web.archive.org/web/20061219194445/http://www.xkcd.com:80/temp/humor/hotornot.jpg archive only])&lt;br /&gt;
**http://www.xkcd.com/temp/humor/how_rumors_start_office.jpg ([https://web.archive.org/web/20070111000437/http://www.xkcd.com:80/temp/humor/how_rumors_start_office.jpg archive only])&lt;br /&gt;
**http://www.xkcd.com/temp/humor/owned.jpg ([https://web.archive.org/web/20070228031547/http://www.xkcd.com:80/temp/humor/owned.jpg archive only])&lt;br /&gt;
**http://www.xkcd.com/temp/humor/shark.jpg ([https://web.archive.org/web/20061214082834/http://www.xkcd.com:80/temp/humor/shark.jpg archive only])&lt;br /&gt;
**http://www.xkcd.com/temp/humor/you_cannot_pass.jpg ([https://web.archive.org/web/20070323001005/http://www.xkcd.com:80/temp/humor/you_cannot_pass.jpg archive only])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* http://xkcd.com/test ([https://web.archive.org/web/20170510061033/https://xkcd.com/test/ archive only])&lt;br /&gt;
**This appears identical to the regular xkcd.com homepage, it returns a 404 as of today&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* http://xkcd.com/time (redirect to comic [[1190: Time]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* http://xkcd.com/twitter (redirect to https://x.com/xkcd)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* http://xkcd.com/cyborg.txt&lt;br /&gt;
**Interesting script. According to [https://blog.xkcd.com/2008/05/20/gps-cyborg-implant/ an old blag article], it is &amp;quot;a short Python script that uses a USB GPS device under Linux to help with navigation.  It doesn’t have maps or anything — it just gives distances and, while you’re moving, the direction to the destination (as in 'two o’clock').  It prints this info on the terminal and speaks it using speech synthesis.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* http://xkcd.com/channel.html ([https://web.archive.org/web/20141011002528/https://xkcd.com/channel.html archive only])&lt;br /&gt;
**I have no idea what this it. It's full of gibberish and Chinese text.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* http://xkcd.com/channel.txt ([https://web.archive.org/web/20141014083026/http://xkcd.com/channel.txt archive only])&lt;br /&gt;
** Same as above, but it downloads the file to the PC.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* http://xkcd.com/me.txt ([https://web.archive.org/web/20141014101900/http://xkcd.com:80/me.txt archive only])&lt;br /&gt;
**Only says &amp;quot;I am not in 1110.n01se.net anymore&amp;quot;. [https://www.reddit.com/r/xkcd/comments/5tqrew/xkcd_secret_page/ Learn more in this Reddit thread], in this [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EvLxOVYeo5w YouTube video of how it used to work], and in the [https://github.com/n01se/1110 GitHub for 1110.n01se.net]. I'm assuming Randall wanted to say that anyone who tries to impersonate him in the future isn't him?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* http://xkcd.com/why.txt ([https://web.archive.org/web/20180729163548/https://xkcd.com/why.txt archive only])&lt;br /&gt;
**Contains 33 THOUSAND &amp;quot;why&amp;quot; questions. May be related to [[1256: Questions]]? Very interesting!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* http://xkcd.com/bitcoin {{Done|Existing: [[Bitcoin address]]}}&lt;br /&gt;
**There's also this one, which we have dissected on the page [[Bitcoin address]] (very interesting read!)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* http://holistic.xkcd.com ([https://web.archive.org/web/20160304031258/http://holistic.xkcd.com/ archive only])&lt;br /&gt;
**&amp;quot;The XKCD Holistic Browser. Because we are all one. Type a web address and you'll be taken to one typed by someone else.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* https://aram.xkcd.com ([https://web.archive.org/web/20110816163403/http://aram.xkcd.com/ archive only])&lt;br /&gt;
**&amp;quot;This page is regenerated every day and may be NSFW. It shows a random result from a Google image search for IMG_????.jpg plus a random caption:&amp;quot; Seems it stopped working completely after a few years and got stuck one image&amp;amp;caption. Aram inspired [[Black Hat]], see his page for more.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* https://xkcd.com/verizon/ {{Done|Created: [[verizon]]}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* http://mail.xkcd.com ([https://web.archive.org/web/20120321204721/http://mail.xkcd.com/ archive only])&lt;br /&gt;
**Seems Randall set it up but never used it.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* https://xkcd.com/personal&lt;br /&gt;
**There was a /personal folder on xkcd, but it's been entirely wiped https://web.archive.org/web/*/https://xkcd.com/personal/*&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*https://xkcd.com/ngram-charts/ {{Done|Created: [[ngram charts]]}}&lt;br /&gt;
**Still online, but the images are missing even in [https://web.archive.org/web/20120225171410/http://xkcd.com:80/ngram-charts the archive]. &amp;quot;Some of the interesting charts I've come across while using Google Books ngrams (which analyzes the frequency of word use in their scanned books corpus over time)&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
* https://xkcd.com/color/rgb/&lt;br /&gt;
** https://xkcd.com/color/rgb.txt&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* http://68.57.186.221:8080/ ([https://web.archive.org/web/20041024201125/http://68.57.186.221:8080/ archive only])&lt;br /&gt;
** xkcd.com redirected to this at some points during 2004, this capture is from October 24th of 2004 specifically.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* https://throw.xkcd.com (only available [https://web.archive.org/web/20200919232527/throw.xkcd.com/ in the archive])&lt;br /&gt;
**This was likely hacked, see [https://www.reddit.com/r/xkcd/comments/iw9jsg/throwxkcdcom/ this Reddit thread]: ''&amp;quot;I emailed the xkcd.com webmaster, it was a testing URL he forgot to shut down. It's fixed now.&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* https://c.xkcd.com&lt;br /&gt;
**This is mostly all for comics with dynamic content. There are many subpages, see [https://www.reddit.com/r/xkcd/comments/j54lx3/does_anyone_know_what_cxkcdcom_is/ this reddit thread].&lt;br /&gt;
**https://c.xkcd.com/xb/feed&lt;br /&gt;
**http://c.xkcd.com/random/comic (redirects to random comic)&lt;br /&gt;
**https://c.xkcd.com/graph/1&lt;br /&gt;
**[https://www.reddit.com/r/xkcd/comments/j54lx3/does_anyone_know_what_cxkcdcom_is/ There are others].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* https://static.xkcd.com/ (404, not in archive. [http://web.archive.org/web/*/https://static.xkcd.com/* archived subpages])&lt;br /&gt;
** http://static.xkcd.com/bl.png ([http://web.archive.org/web/20070912213845/http://static.xkcd.com/bl.png archive only])&lt;br /&gt;
** http://static.xkcd.com/br.png ([http://web.archive.org/web/20070912213841/http://static.xkcd.com/br.png archive only])&lt;br /&gt;
** http://static.xkcd.com/favicon.ico ([http://web.archive.org/web/20071208203917/http://static.xkcd.com/favicon.ico archive only])&lt;br /&gt;
** http://static.xkcd.com/general.css ([http://web.archive.org/web/20071208203917/http://static.xkcd.com/general.css archive only])&lt;br /&gt;
** http://static.xkcd.com/ieonly.css ([http://web.archive.org/web/20070911163429/http://static.xkcd.com/ieonly.css archive only])&lt;br /&gt;
** http://static.xkcd.com/ml.png ([http://web.archive.org/web/20070912213838/http://static.xkcd.com/ml.png archive only])&lt;br /&gt;
** http://static.xkcd.com/mr.png ([http://web.archive.org/web/20070912213832/http://static.xkcd.com/mr.png archive only])&lt;br /&gt;
** http://static.xkcd.com/tl.png ([http://web.archive.org/web/20070912213828/http://static.xkcd.com/tl.png archive only])&lt;br /&gt;
** http://static.xkcd.com/tr.png ([http://web.archive.org/web/20070912213835/http://static.xkcd.com/tr.png archive only])&lt;br /&gt;
** http://www.static.xkcd.com/robots.txt ([http://web.archive.org/web/20070501000000*/http://www.static.xkcd.com/robots.txt archive only])&lt;br /&gt;
** https://almamater.xkcd.com/ ([http://web.archive.org/web/20130402215109/https://almamater.xkcd.com/ archive only])&lt;br /&gt;
:: https://almamater.xkcd.com/ ([http://web.archive.org/web/20150209005631/https://almamater.xkcd.com/ archive only])&lt;br /&gt;
:: and errors out: https://almamater.xkcd.com/ ([http://web.archive.org/web/20160528035956/https://almamater.xkcd.com/ archive only, errors out])&lt;br /&gt;
*** http://almamater.xkcd.com/best.csv ([http://web.archive.org/web/20130511122543/http://almamater.xkcd.com/best.csv archive only])&lt;br /&gt;
***See comic [[1193: Externalities]]&lt;br /&gt;
{{misc page}}&lt;br /&gt;
You can monitor the pages that are using this template (so the brand new webpage explanations) by going to [[Special:WhatLinksHere/Template:misc_page]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===How should we treat them?===&lt;br /&gt;
This is great! I think we should first create an article for each of them, and after we have a few articles then we can start to figure out a good name for the category and answer some questions, like:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Should we add a new parameter to the template for these non-comics? To do that, we would have to ask an admin to edit the {{tl|comic}} template to allow us to do that. We can ask Kynde, no big deal.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Some pages, like [[Blue Eyes]] and [[Bitcoin address]] are already in other categories, like [[:Category:Extra comics]] and [[:Category:Design of xkcd.com]]. Should we use the existing categories, or add a new one? How do we distinguish between, for example, [[Blue Eyes]], [[Bitcoin address]], and [[YES]], which are all in theory &amp;quot;misc pages&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Where should the new category be categorised?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*What title should we give for explanations of pages that don't have a name, like xkcd.com/dot? That one is just titled &amp;quot;xkcd.com/dot&amp;quot;, unlike pages like Blue Eyes and [[YES]]. Would it become &amp;quot;dot&amp;quot;, &amp;quot;Dot&amp;quot;, something else? Should we keep it coherent or base ourselves solely on the rendered title on the official site?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I love the idea! I currently don't have time, but I will create these pages eventually. If anyone else wants to chime in, please do! --[[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 16:11, 11 March 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;quot;Unnumbered publications&amp;quot;, or similar, could cover ''anything'' that wasn't xkcd.com/&amp;lt;digits&amp;gt;. Wouldn't cover replacements ([[2642: No One Was Hurt]] was originally 2642, for example), but that's a different class from deliberately off-series items. Also, given that often they are entirely non-image (the Yes and No), or straight text and multi-image (as per Blue Eyes, or other articles with a WhatIf-ish feel to them), I think calling them &amp;quot;comic&amp;quot;s is stretching the term.&lt;br /&gt;
:Though &amp;quot;miscellaneous pages&amp;quot; sort of covers this, I've a feeling that there's at least one... 'entity'... that is built upon multiple actual 'pages', but the list of candidates above doesn't contain any that look like they're what I'm vaguely thinking of. (Neither was it anything like the xkcd survey, or other interactive (numbered) comics, but maybe I'll bring it back to mind sooner rather than later.)&lt;br /&gt;
:As to the use of {{template|comic}}, I think we could spring to a (modified, 'inspired-by') template specifically for all these no-number/off-sequence explanation headers. Either explicit &amp;quot;prev=&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;next=&amp;quot; (per comic, ''could'' get quite mixed up if not kept uncontradictory) or a &amp;quot;position=&amp;quot; which could help maintain a list (and, from that, an auto-generated first/prev/next/last 'page ring') without having to subvert expectations of fitting in with the normal [[Template:LATESTCOMIC]] system.&lt;br /&gt;
:With the Comic template already equipped to deal with &amp;quot;no-number 'comics'&amp;quot;, there wouldn't (in the first instance) be much work needed to &amp;quot;decomic&amp;quot; the new copy, with the exact method of resequencing (if desired) as a parallel series being the biggest question. [[Special:Contributions/172.70.85.49|172.70.85.49]] 17:20, 11 March 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I'm not sure what the last sentenc means, but I like the idea of a new template! However, I don't think we should call the category &amp;quot;Unnumbered publications&amp;quot;. Isn't that just [[:Category:Extra comics]] but without comics [[Disappearing Sunday Update]] and [[No One Was Hurt]]? We should establish a criterion to add pages to this category and then figure out a name i think. --[[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 15:42, 12 March 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On this subject, is there any reason why it's [[YES]] and [[NO]] (currently the valid links) rather than [[Yes]] and [[No]] / [[yes]] and [[no]] (currently invalid links)? And I don't mean &amp;quot;why aren't there redirects?&amp;quot;, which I don't even think is the right way of resolving this, but what was the thinking? (Which then didn't result in [[DOT]], etc, so there's ''definitely'' some inconsistency, one way or another.) [[Special:Contributions/172.68.205.92|172.68.205.92]] 21:54, 17 March 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I don't see inconsistencies. The name of the browser tab for the yes page is &amp;quot;YES&amp;quot; by Randall, same for NO. Instead, the page for [[dot]] is called &amp;quot;xkcd.com/dot/&amp;quot;. We could use that, but that's likely not what Randall intended and might have been a coding oversight. --[[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 16:01, 18 March 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I've created the {{tl|misc page}} template for these pages and removed the incomplete template until we reach consensus on what to do with them. --[[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 14:40, 11 May 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ahem, I'd like to remind everyone that they can feel free to comment on the best way to manage these. Or if they should be included in the wiki at all. [[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 21:38, 17 August 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What if we just create a subcategory for These. It is xkcd so it should belong here. Should not be in the random queue but something like a button to get to these. {{unsigned ip|216.125.50.226|16:51, 18 March 2026 (UTC)}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== New page &amp;quot;Spiral&amp;quot; ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I found a new page at [http://xkcd.com/spiral xkcd/spiral]. what should I do? Thanks! &lt;br /&gt;
This is my first post, sorry it's not formatted correctly. -- [[Special:Contributions/73.169.159.188|73.169.159.188]] 00:27, 12 October 2025‎&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: Welcome. Good find! Any suggestions? -- [[User:Dtgriscom|Dtgriscom]] ([[User talk:Dtgriscom|talk]]) 01:47, 12 October 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::I've moved this over to Coordination and uploaded all images on spiral. I'll be making the page soon. '''[[User:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:9pt;color:#3a795e&amp;quot;&amp;gt;42.book.addict&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:6pt;color:#ce5f15&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Talk to me!&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;''' 05:04, 12 October 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Moving to correct location where we're discussing these pages. More discussion about how we should treat them is welcome! [[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 18:00, 13 October 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== [[:Category:Extra pages]] === &lt;br /&gt;
I've created a category called Extra pages for all of these pages. '''[[User:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:9pt;color:#3a795e&amp;quot;&amp;gt;42.book.addict&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:6pt;color:#ce5f15&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Talk to me!&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;''' 03:14, 5 November 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:So, right now we have &amp;quot;Category:Extra pages&amp;quot; ''and'' &amp;quot;Category:Extra comics&amp;quot;. Some ''are'' unnumbered comics (plus at least one &amp;quot;was a number, then replaced&amp;quot;) and some are 'merely' pages (with possible a fuzzy line between for 'pages' that show images-that-aren't-comics), perhaps we should be consistent between which are which, and how they relate to 'standard' numbered comics.&lt;br /&gt;
:For example, being an Extra Comics was (officially, but you could also manually add it) initiated by the &amp;quot;extra=yes&amp;quot; param to {{template|comic}}. This also (theoretically, problems with the randomness backend aside) adds them to the Random Comics link-choice, ''without'' adding them to the Comic List numbers (such that it states &amp;quot;we have #### comics&amp;quot;, where #### should not be different from the latest comic number, as recently established).&lt;br /&gt;
:Perhaps:&lt;br /&gt;
:*Make the comic template accept &amp;quot;extra=comic&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;extra=page&amp;quot;, instead of &amp;quot;extra=yes&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
:**Perhaps &amp;quot;extra=yes&amp;quot; 'remains' to default to one or the other? ...nah, just make sure all the current &amp;quot;=yes&amp;quot; ones are assigned beforehand.&lt;br /&gt;
:**&amp;quot;extra=no&amp;quot; just defaults back to behaviour without any &amp;quot;extra=&amp;quot; at all, of course, pretty much as currently.&lt;br /&gt;
:*Each of these new distinctions assigns to the 'Extra' category that fits it, but keeps it out of the All (numbered) Comics list, as being not numbered (and some not being 'comics')&lt;br /&gt;
:*Either ''just'' keep Extra Comics feeding to the Random Comic list (All Comics+Extra Comics, as we've painstakingly set it up to do, recently) or ''also'' include Extra Pages (it being AC+EC+EP in the Special:Random target list/whatever). TBD, depends upon whether you like a strictly &amp;quot;non-comic page&amp;quot; potentially popping up as a 'treat' for people.&lt;br /&gt;
:...that's all a ''little'' extra work. Some of which I could probably do right now (though maybe some pages are Protected against my input, haven't checked), but I think this needs discussion before doing any actual refining of the current setup.&lt;br /&gt;
:Might have been better to have proposed and discussed the Extra Pages details before starting that, too, but I'm happy to use this setup as a stepping stone given that it's been done already. [[Special:Contributions/82.132.244.89|82.132.244.89]] 14:20, 5 November 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Update on ngrams ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The images on the ngrams page appear to be generated dynamically. The original URLs are broken, but can be restored by changing &amp;quot;/chart&amp;quot; to &amp;quot;/graph&amp;quot;. This doesn't fix the HTML page, but it does render each of the 58 URLs accessible - see below.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
All graphs default to a corpus from 2009. Note that some graphs, such as the one noted &amp;quot;cherry picking&amp;quot; below, look very different using a more recent corpus.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* http://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=President+Lincoln%2CPresident+Roosevelt%2CPresident+Kennedy%2CPresident+Johnson%2CPresident+Nixon%2CPresident+Reagan%2CPresident+Bush&amp;amp;year_start=1780&amp;amp;year_end=2008&amp;amp;corpus=5&amp;amp;smoothing=3&lt;br /&gt;
* http://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=fuck&amp;amp;year_start=1700&amp;amp;year_end=2008&amp;amp;corpus=0&amp;amp;smoothing=3&lt;br /&gt;
* http://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=the+Great+War%2Cthe+World+War%2CWorld+War+I&amp;amp;year_start=1900&amp;amp;year_end=2000&amp;amp;corpus=0&amp;amp;smoothing=2&lt;br /&gt;
* http://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=christian%2Cchristianity&amp;amp;year_start=1700&amp;amp;year_end=2000&amp;amp;corpus=0&amp;amp;smoothing=3&lt;br /&gt;
* http://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=aliens%2C+predators&amp;amp;year_start=1750&amp;amp;year_end=2008&amp;amp;corpus=0&amp;amp;smoothing=1&lt;br /&gt;
* http://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=explosion+in+popularity&amp;amp;year_start=1900&amp;amp;year_end=2000&amp;amp;corpus=0&amp;amp;smoothing=3&lt;br /&gt;
* http://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=blue+line&amp;amp;year_start=1960&amp;amp;year_end=2008&amp;amp;corpus=0&amp;amp;smoothing=3&lt;br /&gt;
* http://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=upward+trend&amp;amp;year_start=1960&amp;amp;year_end=2008&amp;amp;corpus=0&amp;amp;smoothing=3&lt;br /&gt;
* http://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=gay%2Clesbian%2Cbisexual&amp;amp;year_start=1940&amp;amp;year_end=2008&amp;amp;corpus=0&amp;amp;smoothing=3&lt;br /&gt;
* http://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=Leviticus+18%2Cturn+the+other+cheek&amp;amp;year_start=1960&amp;amp;year_end=2000&amp;amp;corpus=5&amp;amp;smoothing=3 (cherry-picking)&lt;br /&gt;
* http://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=vegetarian&amp;amp;year_start=1750&amp;amp;year_end=2008&amp;amp;corpus=0&amp;amp;smoothing=1&lt;br /&gt;
* http://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=drunk&amp;amp;year_start=1750&amp;amp;year_end=2008&amp;amp;corpus=0&amp;amp;smoothing=1&lt;br /&gt;
* http://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=television%2C+tuberculosis&amp;amp;year_start=1750&amp;amp;year_end=2008&amp;amp;corpus=0&amp;amp;smoothing=1&lt;br /&gt;
* http://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=love%2Chope%2Cfaith%2C+sex&amp;amp;year_start=1750&amp;amp;year_end=2008&amp;amp;corpus=0&amp;amp;smoothing=1&lt;br /&gt;
* http://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=hope&amp;amp;year_start=1700&amp;amp;year_end=2008&amp;amp;corpus=6&amp;amp;smoothing=1&lt;br /&gt;
* http://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=entomology%2Cetymology&amp;amp;year_start=1900&amp;amp;year_end=2008&amp;amp;corpus=0&amp;amp;smoothing=3&lt;br /&gt;
* http://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=carriage%2Ccar%2Cautomobile&amp;amp;year_start=1700&amp;amp;year_end=2008&amp;amp;corpus=0&amp;amp;smoothing=3&lt;br /&gt;
* http://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=irregardless%2Cregardlessly%2Cunregarding&amp;amp;year_start=1800&amp;amp;year_end=2008&amp;amp;corpus=0&amp;amp;smoothing=3&lt;br /&gt;
* http://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=a+bird+in+the+hand%2Clive+by+the+sword%2Clook+before+you+leap%2Ca+penny+saved&amp;amp;year_start=1780&amp;amp;year_end=2008&amp;amp;corpus=0&amp;amp;smoothing=3&lt;br /&gt;
* http://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=war&amp;amp;year_start=1700&amp;amp;year_end=2008&amp;amp;corpus=0&amp;amp;smoothing=3&lt;br /&gt;
* http://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=Muslim%2CMoslem%2CMoslim%2CMussulman%2C+Moslam&amp;amp;year_start=1700&amp;amp;year_end=2008&amp;amp;corpus=0&amp;amp;smoothing=3&lt;br /&gt;
* http://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=Empire%2C+empire&amp;amp;year_start=1700&amp;amp;year_end=2008&amp;amp;corpus=6&amp;amp;smoothing=1&lt;br /&gt;
* http://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=decline%2Cprogress&amp;amp;year_start=1700&amp;amp;year_end=2008&amp;amp;corpus=6&amp;amp;smoothing=1&lt;br /&gt;
* http://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=progress&amp;amp;year_start=1700&amp;amp;year_end=2008&amp;amp;corpus=6&amp;amp;smoothing=1&lt;br /&gt;
* http://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=war&amp;amp;year_start=1700&amp;amp;year_end=2008&amp;amp;corpus=0&amp;amp;smoothing=1&lt;br /&gt;
* http://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=Rapture&amp;amp;year_start=1700&amp;amp;year_end=2008&amp;amp;corpus=0&amp;amp;smoothing=3&lt;br /&gt;
* http://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=history%2Cpast%2Cfuture&amp;amp;year_start=1700&amp;amp;year_end=2008&amp;amp;corpus=0&amp;amp;smoothing=3&lt;br /&gt;
* http://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=Star+Wars%2C+Star+Trek&amp;amp;year_start=1950&amp;amp;year_end=2008&amp;amp;corpus=0&amp;amp;smoothing=0&lt;br /&gt;
* http://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=Jesus+Christ&amp;amp;year_start=1720&amp;amp;year_end=2008&amp;amp;corpus=0&amp;amp;smoothing=3&lt;br /&gt;
* http://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=President&amp;amp;year_start=1780&amp;amp;year_end=2008&amp;amp;corpus=5&amp;amp;smoothing=3&lt;br /&gt;
* http://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=tyranny&amp;amp;year_start=1700&amp;amp;year_end=2000&amp;amp;corpus=0&amp;amp;smoothing=3&lt;br /&gt;
* http://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=power+to+the+people&amp;amp;year_start=1700&amp;amp;year_end=2000&amp;amp;corpus=0&amp;amp;smoothing=3&lt;br /&gt;
* http://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=flag&amp;amp;year_start=1700&amp;amp;year_end=2008&amp;amp;corpus=4&amp;amp;smoothing=3&lt;br /&gt;
* http://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=end+of+the+world&amp;amp;year_start=1700&amp;amp;year_end=2008&amp;amp;corpus=0&amp;amp;smoothing=3&lt;br /&gt;
* http://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=Bible+study&amp;amp;year_start=1800&amp;amp;year_end=2008&amp;amp;corpus=0&amp;amp;smoothing=3&lt;br /&gt;
* http://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=God+bless+America&amp;amp;year_start=1800&amp;amp;year_end=2008&amp;amp;corpus=0&amp;amp;smoothing=3&lt;br /&gt;
* http://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=merry+Christmas%2Chappy+holidays&amp;amp;year_start=1960&amp;amp;year_end=2008&amp;amp;corpus=0&amp;amp;smoothing=3&lt;br /&gt;
* http://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=Space&amp;amp;year_start=1700&amp;amp;year_end=2008&amp;amp;corpus=0&amp;amp;smoothing=1&lt;br /&gt;
* http://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=old+fashioned&amp;amp;year_start=1750&amp;amp;year_end=2008&amp;amp;corpus=0&amp;amp;smoothing=1&lt;br /&gt;
* http://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=sword%2C+gun&amp;amp;year_start=1700&amp;amp;year_end=2008&amp;amp;corpus=0&amp;amp;smoothing=1&lt;br /&gt;
* http://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=pirate&amp;amp;year_start=1700&amp;amp;year_end=2008&amp;amp;corpus=0&amp;amp;smoothing=1&lt;br /&gt;
* http://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=Ayn+Rand&amp;amp;year_start=1700&amp;amp;year_end=2008&amp;amp;corpus=0&amp;amp;smoothing=3&lt;br /&gt;
* http://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=Marx&amp;amp;year_start=1700&amp;amp;year_end=2008&amp;amp;corpus=0&amp;amp;smoothing=3&lt;br /&gt;
* http://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=Marx%2C+Marxy%2C+Marxist%2C+Marxiest&amp;amp;year_start=1850&amp;amp;year_end=2008&amp;amp;corpus=0&amp;amp;smoothing=0&lt;br /&gt;
* http://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=communism%2Ccommunist%2Csocialist&amp;amp;year_start=1830&amp;amp;year_end=2008&amp;amp;corpus=0&amp;amp;smoothing=1&lt;br /&gt;
* http://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=Russia%2C+USSR&amp;amp;year_start=1700&amp;amp;year_end=2008&amp;amp;corpus=0&amp;amp;smoothing=0&lt;br /&gt;
* http://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=savior%2CSavior&amp;amp;year_start=1720&amp;amp;year_end=2008&amp;amp;corpus=0&amp;amp;smoothing=3&lt;br /&gt;
* http://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=trend&amp;amp;year_start=1700&amp;amp;year_end=2008&amp;amp;corpus=0&amp;amp;smoothing=3&lt;br /&gt;
* http://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=girly&amp;amp;year_start=1900&amp;amp;year_end=2008&amp;amp;corpus=0&amp;amp;smoothing=3&lt;br /&gt;
* http://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=restroom%2C+bathroom%2C+toilet&amp;amp;year_start=1700&amp;amp;year_end=2008&amp;amp;corpus=0&amp;amp;smoothing=3&lt;br /&gt;
* http://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=pursuit+of+happiness&amp;amp;year_start=1700&amp;amp;year_end=2008&amp;amp;corpus=0&amp;amp;smoothing=3&lt;br /&gt;
* http://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=telechart%2Ctelephone%2Ctelegram%2Ctelevision%2Cradio%2Cinternet&amp;amp;year_start=1840&amp;amp;year_end=2008&amp;amp;corpus=0&amp;amp;smoothing=3&lt;br /&gt;
* http://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=king&amp;amp;year_start=1700&amp;amp;year_end=2008&amp;amp;corpus=0&amp;amp;smoothing=3&lt;br /&gt;
* http://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=science&amp;amp;year_start=1700&amp;amp;year_end=2008&amp;amp;corpus=0&amp;amp;smoothing=3&lt;br /&gt;
* http://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=decade&amp;amp;year_start=1780&amp;amp;year_end=2008&amp;amp;corpus=0&amp;amp;smoothing=3&lt;br /&gt;
* http://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=thousand&amp;amp;year_start=1700&amp;amp;year_end=2008&amp;amp;corpus=0&amp;amp;smoothing=3&lt;br /&gt;
* http://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=hundred%2Cthousand%2Cmillion%2Cbillion%2Ctrillion&amp;amp;year_start=1700&amp;amp;year_end=2008&amp;amp;corpus=0&amp;amp;smoothing=3&lt;br /&gt;
* http://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=jillion%2Czillion%2Cbazillion%2Ckazillion&amp;amp;year_start=1900&amp;amp;year_end=2008&amp;amp;corpus=0&amp;amp;smoothing=3&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Rumbling7145|Rumbling7145]] ([[User talk:Rumbling7145|talk]]) 16:14, 10 March 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Visual Editor?==&lt;br /&gt;
I, being a nerd in high school, edit on more than just this wiki. For example, I edit on Wikipedia. On Wikipedia, the default editing mode is a visual editor, which automatically converts your wikitext into the final product in real time. It's useful on many levels, and would save all of us a lot of time (I've spent at least 2 hours total fixing broken wikitext). I feel that using this tool would increase overall productivity in the wiki, and probably lessen the amount of people who are intimidated when attempting to edit, allowing more people to join and contribute to the community. --'''''[[User:DollarStoreBa'al |&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Atomic Age;font-size:12pt;color:red;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;DollarStoreBa'al&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:DollarStoreBa'al |'''''Converse''''']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;[[Special:Contributions/DollarStoreBa'al|'''''My life choices''''']] 22:43, 7 August 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Good luck telling that to jeff! --[[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 12:22, 8 August 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Ugh. Well, he's gotta come back eventually, right? He's paying for the domain, after all. --'''''[[User:DollarStoreBa'al |&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Atomic Age;font-size:12pt;color:red;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;DollarStoreBa'al&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:DollarStoreBa'al |'''''Converse''''']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;[[Special:Contributions/DollarStoreBa'al|'''''My life choices''''']] 16:43, 8 August 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Or maybe he just forgot and we actually don't want him to come back. Who knows! --[[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 16:45, 11 August 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Name one person who wants Jeff to just not come back. Either way, I want him back, and I suggested this just in case. This would also be really cool for me, as I joined after jeff's last known user page edit in 2018. --'''''[[User:DollarStoreBa'al |&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Atomic Age;font-size:12pt;color:red;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;DollarStoreBa'al&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:DollarStoreBa'al |'''''Converse''''']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;[[Special:Contributions/DollarStoreBa'al|'''''My life choices''''']] 23:31, 14 August 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Jeez that was a joke. Ofc I want him back lol. [[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 20:09, 15 August 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::still no response from Jeff or any of his friends on: Reddit, X/Twitter; GitHub; Bluesky; Mastodon; and email. Oh, and I asked some person on YouTube with the username lcarsos (as in the other 'crat on here) but I think that he deleted my comment on his video (multiple times). (just a little fyi) '''[[User:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:9pt;color:pink&amp;quot;&amp;gt;42.book.addict&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:6pt;color:#B1E4E3&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Talk to me!&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;''' 18:17, 19 August 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::Does he even remember this? Maybe they all got struck by lightning at the same time while calling someone who just sneezed and saying 'bless you'. --'''''[[User:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#023020&amp;quot;&amp;gt;DollarStoreBa'al&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User_talk:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#000080&amp;quot;&amp;gt;'''''converse'''''&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 16:28, 29 August 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Unicode emoji support==&lt;br /&gt;
This suggestion was made in response to the discussion above. I was completely unable to realize that FaviFake was joking. I feel that Unicode emojis would drastically improve the wiki and allow for more detailed conveyance of thoughts and feelings, and prevent catastrophic misunderstandings not unlike the one above. Other people have insulted me due to the fact that I was unable to convey enough emotion. --'''''[[User:DollarStoreBa'al |&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Atomic Age;font-size:12pt;color:red;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;DollarStoreBa'al&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:DollarStoreBa'al |'''''Converse''''']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;[[Special:Contributions/DollarStoreBa'al|'''''My life choices''''']] 17:18, 19 August 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Text-only media, like this, always has the issue of not being understood, but if someone forgets (or consciously declines) to put a &amp;quot;/s&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;;)&amp;quot; in there, they'll probably also not add an emoji.&lt;br /&gt;
:Of course, one person's very dry humour might go so far over the head of another person that not even a strong hint helps, whereas another's sense of fun might be so obvious that gilding the lilly even sends the ''wrong'' message about it. [[Special:Contributions/92.23.2.228|92.23.2.228]] 20:03, 19 August 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
: I don't understand your suggestion. 😕  The site appears to allow such emojis to be included; I just copied and pasted. There's also the HTML entity  option, e.g. &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;amp;amp;#128533;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;.  &amp;amp;#128533; Or are you asking that the site include code to make it easier to insert emojis? [[User:BunsenH|BunsenH]] ([[User talk:BunsenH|talk]]) 16:57, 29 August 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Custom User-based Signature Template ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
DollarStoreBa'al and I came up with a pretty interesting idea: a template called &amp;quot;sig&amp;quot; that can hold the signatures of other users. This is to allow users to have signatures longer than 255 characters, which is the hard limit set by MediaWiki. To call the template, we can use &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{sig|User:XYZ}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt; and encode the template with wikitext so that each user's signature can be pasted in without confusion. To make things even easier, users can adjust their signatures in Preferences to call this template so that the 4 tildes (&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;~~~~&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;) can still be employed. If enough positive feedback is received, I would love to work on it with the community. If anybody is interested in helping out, please mention it! The template could also function as a signature museum, where you can view other user's custom signatures and get inspiration. '''[[User:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:9pt;color:pink&amp;quot;&amp;gt;42.book.addict&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:6pt;color:#B1E4E3&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Talk to me!&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;''' 16:50, 29 August 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Update. I have found another solution. By creating a sig page, you can call &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{User:XYZ/sig}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;, which enables you to literally copy-paste whatever's in that page into another page. This was first discovered, I believe, by [[User:Omega/sig|User:Omega]]. I don't believe we need the template anymore, but the signature museum would still be cool! '''[[User:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font:9pt Cormorant Garamond&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#89CFF0&amp;quot;&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#FFB7CE&amp;quot;&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#D3D3D3&amp;quot;&amp;gt;.&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#FFB7CE&amp;quot;&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#89CFF0&amp;quot;&amp;gt;o&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#89CFF0&amp;quot;&amp;gt;o&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#FFB7CE&amp;quot;&amp;gt;k&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#D3D3D3&amp;quot;&amp;gt;.&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#FFB7CE&amp;quot;&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#89CFF0&amp;quot;&amp;gt;d&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#89CFF0&amp;quot;&amp;gt;d&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#FFB7CE&amp;quot;&amp;gt;i&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#D3D3D3&amp;quot;&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#FFB7CE&amp;quot;&amp;gt;t&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font:6pt Cormorant Garamond&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#89CFF0&amp;quot;&amp;gt;T&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#FFB7CE&amp;quot;&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#D3D3D3&amp;quot;&amp;gt;l&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#FFB7CE&amp;quot;&amp;gt;k&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#89CFF0&amp;quot;&amp;gt; &amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#89CFF0&amp;quot;&amp;gt;t&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#FFB7CE&amp;quot;&amp;gt;o&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#D3D3D3&amp;quot;&amp;gt; &amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#FFB7CE&amp;quot;&amp;gt;m&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#89CFF0&amp;quot;&amp;gt;e&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#89CFF0&amp;quot;&amp;gt;!&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;''' 19:10, 29 August 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::Not quite sure what it will do. Seems to me that for instance you and [[User:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#023020&amp;quot;&amp;gt;DollarStoreBa'al&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User_talk:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#000080&amp;quot;&amp;gt;'''''converse'''''&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; already have very advanced signatures (using Dollar's here as another example). My own preferences would be a normal signature, where it is easy to see who has made the comment and where the links takes me... But since you can already make this complicated signatures anyway, I'm not as such opposed to the idea. Am I correct in assuming I need to do something in order for this to be possible as the only active admin at the moment? As I will not come by here regularly, then let me know when there has been some relevant activity. Not just a reply to these questions here. But once some other than you two has chimed in. Else I might forget to come back to look! (I wrote this and then had an edit conflict with 42. So maybe this is not relevant anymore? But I will post it now none the less. But this was as a reply to the first proposal) [[User:Kynde|Kynde]] ([[User talk:Kynde|talk]]) 19:16, 29 August 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Hi Kynde. Yes, I believe that we don't need your assistance anymore. The need for a template is erased by the existence of /sig pages, and we can create a museum by ourselves. Thanks for trying and chiming in, though! '''[[User:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font:9pt Cormorant Garamond&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#89CFF0&amp;quot;&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#FFB7CE&amp;quot;&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#D3D3D3&amp;quot;&amp;gt;.&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#FFB7CE&amp;quot;&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#89CFF0&amp;quot;&amp;gt;o&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#89CFF0&amp;quot;&amp;gt;o&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#FFB7CE&amp;quot;&amp;gt;k&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#D3D3D3&amp;quot;&amp;gt;.&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#FFB7CE&amp;quot;&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#89CFF0&amp;quot;&amp;gt;d&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#89CFF0&amp;quot;&amp;gt;d&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#FFB7CE&amp;quot;&amp;gt;i&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#D3D3D3&amp;quot;&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#FFB7CE&amp;quot;&amp;gt;t&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font:6pt Cormorant Garamond&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#89CFF0&amp;quot;&amp;gt;T&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#FFB7CE&amp;quot;&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#D3D3D3&amp;quot;&amp;gt;l&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#FFB7CE&amp;quot;&amp;gt;k&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#89CFF0&amp;quot;&amp;gt; &amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#89CFF0&amp;quot;&amp;gt;t&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#FFB7CE&amp;quot;&amp;gt;o&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#D3D3D3&amp;quot;&amp;gt; &amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#FFB7CE&amp;quot;&amp;gt;m&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#89CFF0&amp;quot;&amp;gt;e&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#89CFF0&amp;quot;&amp;gt;!&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;''' 19:18, 29 August 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::::I do believe the template would work fine... that way it wouldn't show the full wikitext of the signature. --'''''[[User:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#023020&amp;quot;&amp;gt;DollarStoreBa'al&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User_talk:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#000080&amp;quot;&amp;gt;'''''converse'''''&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 19:46, 29 August 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
bad bad bad bad idea, the sig character limit is 255 for a reason, see {{w|WP:SIGLENGTH}}.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
a sig template is an even worse idea, because every instance of it will call #ifexist, an [https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Manual:$wgExpensiveParserFunctionLimit expensive parser function]. these make a page take even longer to load, which this wiki definitely does not need. also, expensive fucntions are capped at 500, so you're making a maximum of 500 signatures (not counting other templates). [[user:lett‪herebedarklight|raeb]] 04:50, 30 August 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:As well as the WP:SIGLENGTH bit, if anybody actually cares about the precedent set by 'mother Wikipedia' then various other dos-and-don'ts from {{w|Wikipedia:Signatures}} might well apply to some extant personal signatures, from the &amp;quot;don't make it look like it's not your signature&amp;quot; through to being inconsiderate of the colour-blind and those otherwise vision-limited.&lt;br /&gt;
:It also gives some nice demonstrations of what ''can'' be done (within reason). Though I still say that just because you can do something doesn't mean that you should. &amp;quot;Looks complicated, codes simply&amp;quot; would be my suggestion. Elegance of spirit, not a bloomin' juggernaut, if you're inclined to take my advice at all. You can still use personally distinctive signatures, and probably should. (Though, quite possibly, by the middle of next week, half the latest Talk comments are going to have orange-background. Don't care about that possibility, as much as I's like having vaguely recognisable namepage and timestamp bits to it that don't take effort to discern properly ''either'' when rendered ''or'' in raw code.) I have simple tastes, perhaps more than others... [[Special:Contributions/82.132.247.193|82.132.247.193]] 05:45, 30 August 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Fully agree with raeb here, the last thing we need is more server load.&lt;br /&gt;
:*If you transclude them, then there's the server load and maximum transclusion problem.&lt;br /&gt;
:*If you substitute the template each time, the issue of hard-to-parse editing views gets worse. It's already annoying having to mentally &amp;quot;remove&amp;quot; your html codes when adding a comment, and we also don't have the VE, which would hide the code.  [[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 13:52, 31 August 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::I got edit conflicted, dangit. Anyway, both your complaints are either invalid or could easily be solved. The #ifexist limit could easily be bypassed if we simply delete the signatures of people who haven't contributed in, say, 6 months. The wikitext complaint is also invalid. Using the template as a signature would simply show &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{User:XYZ/Sig}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;, '''not the wikitext required to display the signature.''' Sincerely, --'''''[[User:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#023020&amp;quot;&amp;gt;DollarStoreBa'al&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User_talk:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#000080&amp;quot;&amp;gt;'''''converse'''''&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 14:14, 3 September 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Hi&lt;br /&gt;
 simply delete the signatures of people who haven't contributed in, say, 6 months&lt;br /&gt;
:::''What?!''&lt;br /&gt;
:::Also, my 1st point wasn't mainly about #ifexist but about server load. It's as if you were adding the amount of code roughly equivalent to {{tl|incomplete}} to every single page you commented on, multiple times on the same page. This absolutely causes a ton of unnecessary server load. Imagine adding {{tl|incomplete}} hundreds of times to dozens and dozens of talk pages across the entire wiki. The software needs to keep all of them up-to-date. [[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 16:47, 3 September 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::::What's wrong with deleting signatures? They can just make a new one, and 6 months seems like a good cutoff for 'they aren't coming back.' I know Tori was away for more than 6 months, she's an exception. The server load is an issue though. Maybe we need to wait for that until Jeff is able to fix the current server issues. --'''''[[User:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#023020&amp;quot;&amp;gt;DollarStoreBa'al&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User_talk:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#000080&amp;quot;&amp;gt;'''''converse'''''&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 17:26, 3 September 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::I randomly drop in every 6–12 months, for what it's worth. [[User:Maplestrip|Maplestrip]] ([[User talk:Maplestrip|talk]]) 13:52, 5 September 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Why penalize people who only occasionally contribute? What does it buy us? -- [[User:Dtgriscom|Dtgriscom]] ([[User talk:Dtgriscom|talk]]) 17:49, 3 September 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::::DSB, the Template is a horrible idea, ok? I slept on it and after further reflection, it really doesn't add much. People can always subst in signatures through &amp;lt;nowki&amp;gt;{{_}}&amp;lt;/nowki&amp;gt;, and it'll also strain the server way too much. There's also a reason why sigs are capped at 255 characters-it'll become impossible to read talk pages if everyone had hulking 1000+ character sigs (like the one that I created). Please stop fixating so much on this specific idea. Also, it is quite rude to penalize people who only occasionally edit (and I don't want to be a special case or something like that-please stop treating me as some godly figure who is better than everyone else.) '''[[User:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:9pt;color:pink&amp;quot;&amp;gt;42.book.addict&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:6pt;color:#B1E4E3&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Talk to me!&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;''' 19:02, 3 September 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Yeah, you're right. The 255 character limit stands. Thread over, back to explaining. --'''''[[User:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#023020&amp;quot;&amp;gt;DollarStoreBa'al&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User_talk:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#000080&amp;quot;&amp;gt;'''''converse'''''&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 14:46, 4 September 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Explain XKCD Discord/Social Media Server? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I was experiencing Cloudflare errors in the past 24 hours that had prevented me from accessing this website. It's working now, but I'm worried that something else would happen again. Would anybody be interested in organizing a group chat/server or something of the like outside of Explain XKCD? I would personally love if it was on Discord, as it's easy to use, convenient, is built great, and I use it often. If anybody else has suggestions, I'd be open to hear them! '''[[User:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:9pt;color:#3a795e&amp;quot;&amp;gt;42.book.addict&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:6pt;color:#ce5f15&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Talk to me!&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;''' 20:24, 12 September 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Me too. It greatly worried me. If you want, I can set up a discord server. Personally, I prefer discord as it's very simple and has a clean interface. Again, only if you're interested. --'''''[[User:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#023020&amp;quot;&amp;gt;DollarStoreBa'al&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User_talk:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#000080&amp;quot;&amp;gt;converse&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 15:38, 15 September 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::[https://discord.com/invite/zGEVanBBAx Here you go!] '''[[User:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:9pt;color:#3a795e&amp;quot;&amp;gt;42.book.addict&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:6pt;color:#ce5f15&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Talk to me!&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;''' 00:38, 16 September 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::NICE! I wonder if we should message Kynde and see if he'll add it to the global messages. The more people, the better. --'''''[[User:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#023020&amp;quot;&amp;gt;DollarStoreBa'al&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User_talk:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#000080&amp;quot;&amp;gt;converse&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 01:17, 16 September 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::I didn't want to influence your original choice, but it would have been nice if you'd have chosen something less 'commercial', as a platform. Hope it helps, just don't forget about everyone else! [[Special:Contributions/82.132.238.131|82.132.238.131]] 09:07, 16 September 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::::Discord is free. I feel it should be easy for everybody to join, even if they didn't already have discord. --'''''[[User:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#023020&amp;quot;&amp;gt;DollarStoreBa'al&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User_talk:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#000080&amp;quot;&amp;gt;converse&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 12:53, 16 September 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::&amp;quot;Freemium&amp;quot; would be a better description, with all the Nitro-mandating stuff. But I already deleted my more specific past observations about all that. And see no point in resurrecting my original Discord presence as you probably can do more chatting about the rest of us without too many random strangers like me turning up, whatever the other IP-onlies decide to do. ;) [[Special:Contributions/82.132.246.82|82.132.246.82]] 17:18, 17 September 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Updating the global message board===&lt;br /&gt;
::''Moved from [[User_talk:Kynde#Updating_the_global_message_board]]'' [[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 19:40, 16 September 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I am excited to announce that explainxkcd now has a discord server! I was wondering if you could add it to the global message board (idk what it's called, actually. The one with the incomplete explanations message.) to include the discord invite link? The more people who join, the better, just in case cloudflare decides to have those issues again. --'''''[[User:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#023020&amp;quot;&amp;gt;DollarStoreBa'al&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User_talk:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#000080&amp;quot;&amp;gt;converse&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 13:01, 16 September 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Hi. you did not include the link? Also I would like to know if other frequent editors think this is a great idea? Not all who edit here wish to be contactable on other platforms. I do understand where you wish the message to be though, and if this is a good idea we can put it there. I'm not certain what other people thinks though? --[[User:Kynde|Kynde]] ([[User talk:Kynde|talk]]) 13:12, 16 September 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::I, for one, think it's a good idea. It's managed by Tori, so it's in very good hands. The only thing I'm afraid of is that discussions may not take place here, but I don't think that's enough of a reason not to promote it.&lt;br /&gt;
::The link is at [[User:42.book.addict]], in the second notice. I think we should say something like&lt;br /&gt;
 In case this site goes down, we have created a Discord server as an emergency form of communication. (link)&lt;br /&gt;
::We aren't &amp;quot;excited to announce&amp;quot; a backup form of communication. Discussions must be public, not on external sites. This is merely a backup. I think  it can then be removed from the sitenotice after a month or less, and mentioned on another page somewhere else, discretely. [[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 15:23, 16 September 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Thanks for chiming in FaviFake. Can you find a good place for this, because I would like to link to a local page from the sitenotice. I do realize that people will have to go to this discord before problems arises, but I guess that is the way it ism and that wont change no matter how we announce it. --[[User:Kynde|Kynde]] ([[User talk:Kynde|talk]]) 15:49, 16 September 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::::But 42 does intend for this to be used as &amp;quot;a fun place to connect with each other&amp;quot;. Leaving it discrete would make it impossible for this to happen, because people won't see it. Also, for the record, FaviFake, 42 and I were. Multiple people. Me and her. That's how the English language works. --'''''[[User:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#023020&amp;quot;&amp;gt;DollarStoreBa'al&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User_talk:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#000080&amp;quot;&amp;gt;converse&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 16:41, 16 September 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Yes you two are the ones who wishes for it and FaviFake was the first to chime in. Don't patronize me please! --[[User:Kynde|Kynde]] ([[User talk:Kynde|talk]]) 16:44, 16 September 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::I have no idea what you're saying regarding the &amp;quot;English language&amp;quot;, but please refrain from saying... whatever that was.&lt;br /&gt;
 But 42 does intend for this to be used as &amp;quot;a fun place to connect with each other&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Could you stop talking on behalf of 42? I believe you've been asked many times not to do that. You can either tell us what '''you''' think, or let others speak for themselves. 42 isn't a goddess and is able to engage in this conversation without someone &amp;quot;defending&amp;quot; her opinions.&lt;br /&gt;
:::::I'll create [[explain xkcd:Discord]] but need to think more about how this is supposed to be pitched. I do not want people to be incentivised to use a private, inaccessible discord server to, for example, talk about the newest comic. --[[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 19:32, 16 September 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::I moved this discussions back here because it's relevant to the entire wiki, not just Kynde' talk.&lt;br /&gt;
:::::''Moved from [[User_talk:Kynde#Updating_the_global_message_board]]'' [[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 19:40, 16 September 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::Sorry, I was just trying to simultaneously defend both of our opinions and state the facts. Also, thank you to FaviFake for moving this conversation to the proposals. This seems to be happening with Kynde's talk page a lot recently. (that being twice, but I've never seen it happen before, soo...) --'''''[[User:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#023020&amp;quot;&amp;gt;DollarStoreBa'al&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User_talk:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#000080&amp;quot;&amp;gt;converse&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 20:02, 16 September 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Hi, it's me. The &amp;quot;global message board&amp;quot; DSB was referencing to is the [[MediaWiki:Sitenotice|site notice]]. If Kynde could add it in the format that FaviFake said, that would be great! Also, I had thought that the server ''could'' be a fun place for us to bond/talk, but that can obviously be conducted in DMs. FaviFake's reasoning for having all conversations on-site makes perfect sense to me. '''[[User:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:9pt;color:#3a795e&amp;quot;&amp;gt;42.book.addict&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:6pt;color:#ce5f15&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Talk to me!&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;''' 20:35, 16 September 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::So THAT'S what it's called! I am one of today's lucky 10,000. --'''''[[User:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#023020&amp;quot;&amp;gt;DollarStoreBa'al&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User_talk:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#000080&amp;quot;&amp;gt;converse&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 23:35, 16 September 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::I'm not sure if I'm wrong or not, but I think of the discord as 2 things: &lt;br /&gt;
*A backup form of communication&lt;br /&gt;
*An informal place to hang out with fellow readers and editors.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Again, please correct me if I'm wrong. --'''''[[User:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#023020&amp;quot;&amp;gt;DollarStoreBa'al&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User_talk:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#000080&amp;quot;&amp;gt;converse&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 15:23, 18 September 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Dark theme?==&lt;br /&gt;
I saw a post about this in the archives that went unanswered, so I'll ask it here: Why doesn't the wiki have a dark theme? I feel it would be very useful for those who don't want to be blinded by editing. Wikipedia's got one, and it looks great! --'''''[[User:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#023020&amp;quot;&amp;gt;DollarStoreBa'al&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User_talk:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#000080&amp;quot;&amp;gt;converse&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 15:27, 18 September 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Dark mode IS a thing. You need to create a common.css page to use it though. Copy paste in this to get dark mode (make sure to hit &amp;quot;Show preview&amp;quot; to test it out before you save!): &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt; /* NQH's totally cool and amazingly radical dark mode */&lt;br /&gt;
/* Licensed CC0-1.0, no rights reserved. */&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
/* Sets everything to dark background. */&lt;br /&gt;
body * {background-color: #111 !important; color: #DDD !important;}&lt;br /&gt;
div.mw-body, div.mw-body * {background-color: #222 !important;}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
/* Vector */&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
.mw-wiki-logo {background-color: #00000000 !important; filter: invert(100%);}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
/* Monobook */&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
div#column-one &amp;gt; div#p-cactions &amp;gt; div.pBody &amp;gt; ul &amp;gt; li &amp;gt; a {background-color: #222 !important;}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
/* Modern */&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
div#mw_header, div#mw_header h1#firstHeading {background-color: #000 !important;}&lt;br /&gt;
div#mw_content {background-color: #222 !important;}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
/* Cologne blue */&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
/* Diff. */&lt;br /&gt;
td.diff-context, td.diff-context * {color: #777 !important; border-color: #333 !important;}&lt;br /&gt;
td.diff-deletedline {border-color: #F33 !important;}&lt;br /&gt;
td.diff-addedline {border-color: #3F3 !important;}&lt;br /&gt;
del.diffchange-inline {color: #F55 !important;}&lt;br /&gt;
ins.diffchange-inline {color: #5F5 !important;}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
/* Numbers in history view. */&lt;br /&gt;
span.mw-plusminus-pos {color: #5F5 !important;}&lt;br /&gt;
span.mw-plusminus-neg {color: #F55 !important;}&lt;br /&gt;
strong.mw-plusminus-pos {color: #0F0 !important; font-size: 1.2em;}&lt;br /&gt;
strong.mw-plusminus-pos {color: #0F0 !important; font-size: 1.2em;}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
/* Links. */&lt;br /&gt;
a[href$=&amp;quot;redlink=1&amp;quot;] {color: #F00 !important; text-decoration: line-through !important;}&lt;br /&gt;
a:not([href$=&amp;quot;redlink=1&amp;quot;]) {color: #88F !important;}&lt;br /&gt;
a:visited:not([href$=&amp;quot;redlink=1&amp;quot;]) {color: #AAF !important;}&lt;br /&gt;
a:hover:not([href$=&amp;quot;redlink=1&amp;quot;]) {color: #AAF !important; text-decoration: underline !important; font-weight: bold !important;}&lt;br /&gt;
a:active:not([href$=&amp;quot;redlink=1&amp;quot;]) {color: #FFF !important; text-decoration: underline !important; font-weight: bold !important;} &amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
--'''[[User:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:9pt;color:#3a795e&amp;quot;&amp;gt;42.book.addict&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:6pt;color:#ce5f15&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Talk to me!&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;''' 19:01, 18 September 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::In response to DSB, in your userpage... The links being white... Which links? See the &amp;quot;/* Links. */&amp;quot; section. The various links are #F00 (red, the invalid ones), #88F (light blue), #AAF (lighter blue), or #FFF (white). If you don't like them, change them.&lt;br /&gt;
::The other things can probably be fixed if we know exactly what you're getting and what you actually expect. Also a good idea to check for typos/miscopying, via basic troubleshooting. [[Special:Contributions/82.132.246.204|82.132.246.204]] 22:43, 18 September 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::I got edit-conflicted with... seemingly no change. Anyway, I found a better version which I now use. It's much cleaner and looks like it belongs. Only issue is that the sidebar templates have inverted colors? But very minor. --'''''[[User:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#023020&amp;quot;&amp;gt;DollarStoreBa'al&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User_talk:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#000080&amp;quot;&amp;gt;converse&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 01:24, 19 September 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::CODE!!!&amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;/* WikimediaUI Dark Mode&lt;br /&gt;
 *&lt;br /&gt;
 * Wikimedia Design Team 2019-2021&lt;br /&gt;
 * Original authors:&lt;br /&gt;
 * - Volker E. – [[User:Volker_E._(WMF)]]&lt;br /&gt;
 * - Alex Hollender&lt;br /&gt;
 * - MusikAnimal&lt;br /&gt;
 * - Carolyn Li-Madeo&lt;br /&gt;
 * - Jdlrobson&lt;br /&gt;
 *&lt;br /&gt;
 * Original at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Volker_E._(WMF)/dark-mode.css&lt;br /&gt;
 * Version for Gadget CSS skin override usage only.&lt;br /&gt;
 * Basically removed of all interaction element styles and&lt;br /&gt;
 * set to `html` instead of JS injected `.client-dark-mode` class.&lt;br /&gt;
 *&lt;br /&gt;
 * Last updated: 2021-04-20&lt;br /&gt;
 *&lt;br /&gt;
 */&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
/** To prevent 'jumping' effect within #p-personal in Vector/Monobook. Overrides [[MediaWiki:Gadget-dark-mode-toggle-pagestyles.css]] **/&lt;br /&gt;
body.skin-vector-legacy :not(#pt-darkmode) + #pt-watchlist::before,&lt;br /&gt;
body.skin-monobook :not(#pt-darkmode) + #pt-watchlist::before {&lt;br /&gt;
	content: &amp;quot;Light mode&amp;quot;;&lt;br /&gt;
}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
@media screen {&lt;br /&gt;
	&lt;br /&gt;
/* set height for monobook and timeless, because the filter in FF needs dimensions to get it to apply */&lt;br /&gt;
html {&lt;br /&gt;
    height: 100%;&lt;br /&gt;
}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
/* Filter needs to reside on `html`, see https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T221425#5153917 */&lt;br /&gt;
html,&lt;br /&gt;
/* All other selectors have `filter` double-applied to turn back to “normal” by inheritance */&lt;br /&gt;
html img:not( .mw-invert ),&lt;br /&gt;
html video:not( .mw-invert ),&lt;br /&gt;
html ogvjs:not( .mw-invert ),&lt;br /&gt;
html svg:not( .mw-invert ),&lt;br /&gt;
html iframe:not( .mw-invert ),&lt;br /&gt;
html .mw-no-invert,&lt;br /&gt;
html .cdx-no-invert,&lt;br /&gt;
html td .diffchange,&lt;br /&gt;
html .wvui-typeahead-suggestion__thumbnail,&lt;br /&gt;
html .skin-minerva .mw-notification-visible .mw-notification-content,&lt;br /&gt;
html .oo-ui-searchWidget-results .oo-ui-iconElement-icon,&lt;br /&gt;
html .list-thumb,&lt;br /&gt;
/* Extensions */&lt;br /&gt;
html .media-viewer .image img,&lt;br /&gt;
html .media-viewer .mw-file-description img {&lt;br /&gt;
	filter: invert( 1 ) hue-rotate( 180deg );&lt;br /&gt;
}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
/* Reset overrides, needed where double application above isn't working. */&lt;br /&gt;
/* Vector modern */&lt;br /&gt;
html .skin-vector .mw-logo-wordmark,&lt;br /&gt;
html .skin-vector .mw-logo-tagline,&lt;br /&gt;
html .skin-timeless .mw-wiki-title &amp;gt; img,&lt;br /&gt;
html .wvui-icon svg,&lt;br /&gt;
html .mw-ext-score img,&lt;br /&gt;
html .skin-invert img,&lt;br /&gt;
html .skin-invert-image img,&lt;br /&gt;
html .mw-hiero-table img {&lt;br /&gt;
	filter: none;&lt;br /&gt;
}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
/* Backgrounds */&lt;br /&gt;
html table,&lt;br /&gt;
html table.ambox-content,&lt;br /&gt;
html table.toccolours,&lt;br /&gt;
html .mw-notification,&lt;br /&gt;
html .mwe-popups,&lt;br /&gt;
html .infobox,&lt;br /&gt;
html .toc,&lt;br /&gt;
html .thumbinner,&lt;br /&gt;
html figure[typeof~='mw:File/Thumb'],&lt;br /&gt;
html figure[typeof~='mw:File/Frame'],&lt;br /&gt;
html figure[typeof~='mw:File/Thumb'] &amp;gt; figcaption,&lt;br /&gt;
html figure[typeof~='mw:File/Frame'] &amp;gt; figcaption,&lt;br /&gt;
html .wikitable,&lt;br /&gt;
html .cbnnr-main,&lt;br /&gt;
html .cx-callout,&lt;br /&gt;
html .overlay.media-viewer,&lt;br /&gt;
html #simpleSearch,&lt;br /&gt;
html #simpleSearch #searchInput,&lt;br /&gt;
html #siteNotice #centralNotice .cnotice {&lt;br /&gt;
	background-color: #ddd;&lt;br /&gt;
}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
/* Borders */&lt;br /&gt;
html body,&lt;br /&gt;
html h1,&lt;br /&gt;
html h2,&lt;br /&gt;
html h3,&lt;br /&gt;
html h4,&lt;br /&gt;
html h5,&lt;br /&gt;
html h6,&lt;br /&gt;
html table.ambox-content,&lt;br /&gt;
html table.toccolours,&lt;br /&gt;
html .mw-notification,&lt;br /&gt;
html .infobox,&lt;br /&gt;
html .toc,&lt;br /&gt;
html .thumbinner,&lt;br /&gt;
html figure[typeof~='mw:File/Thumb'],&lt;br /&gt;
html figure[typeof~='mw:File/Frame'],&lt;br /&gt;
html figure[typeof~='mw:File/Thumb'] &amp;gt; figcaption,&lt;br /&gt;
html figure[typeof~='mw:File/Frame'] &amp;gt; figcaption,&lt;br /&gt;
html #mw-head,&lt;br /&gt;
html #mw-panel,&lt;br /&gt;
/* Vector 2022 uses a transparent border for margin collapsing&lt;br /&gt;
(T312822) so don't apply this rule there */&lt;br /&gt;
.skin-vector-legacy #content.mw-body,&lt;br /&gt;
html #simpleSearch,&lt;br /&gt;
html #simpleSearch #searchInput,&lt;br /&gt;
html #siteNotice #centralNotice .cnotice {&lt;br /&gt;
	border-color: #cdcbc8;&lt;br /&gt;
}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
/* Links */&lt;br /&gt;
/* Links: normal */&lt;br /&gt;
html a,&lt;br /&gt;
html .vector-menu-tabs li a,&lt;br /&gt;
/* Backwards compatible VectorTabs, deprecated in MW v1.35. */&lt;br /&gt;
html .vectorTabs li a,&lt;br /&gt;
html .toctogglelabel,&lt;br /&gt;
html .mw-parser-output a.external,&lt;br /&gt;
html .mw-parser-output a.extiw,&lt;br /&gt;
html .mw-parser-output a.extiw:active,&lt;br /&gt;
html #mw-panel .portal .body li a {&lt;br /&gt;
	/* color: #69f; Proposal below for level AA conformance, see also https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T233266&lt;br /&gt;
	   `#36c` is transformed by :root `filter` to be closer to chosen `#69f`. */&lt;br /&gt;
	color: #36c;&lt;br /&gt;
}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
/* Links: visited */&lt;br /&gt;
html a:visited,&lt;br /&gt;
html .mw-parser-output a.extiw:visited,&lt;br /&gt;
html #mw-panel .portal .body li a:visited {&lt;br /&gt;
	/* color: #709bbd; Proposal below uses to-be-standardized color from https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T213778 */&lt;br /&gt;
	color: #6b4ba1;&lt;br /&gt;
}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
/* Links: red */&lt;br /&gt;
html a.new,&lt;br /&gt;
html .vector-menu-tabs li.new a,&lt;br /&gt;
html .vectorTabs li.new a {&lt;br /&gt;
	color: #ff6e6e;&lt;br /&gt;
}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
/* ::: Special Element Treatments ::: */&lt;br /&gt;
/* Image thumbnails */&lt;br /&gt;
html .thumbimage,&lt;br /&gt;
html figure[typeof~='mw:File/Thumb'] &amp;gt; :not(figcaption) .mw-file-element,&lt;br /&gt;
html figure[typeof~='mw:File/Frame'] &amp;gt; :not(figcaption) .mw-file-element {&lt;br /&gt;
	border: 0;&lt;br /&gt;
}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
/* Content image (thumbnail) SVGs */&lt;br /&gt;
/* `*not( .mbox-image )` exception doesn't work for unclear reasons */&lt;br /&gt;
html .image img[ src*='svg' ],&lt;br /&gt;
html .mw-file-description img[ src*='svg' ],&lt;br /&gt;
html img[ src*='Wiktionary-logo'] {&lt;br /&gt;
	background-color: #fff;&lt;br /&gt;
	border-radius: 1px;&lt;br /&gt;
}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
/* Dealing with false positives from selector above */&lt;br /&gt;
html .mw-echo-ui-notificationItemWidget-icon img[ src*='svg' ],&lt;br /&gt;
html .mbox-image .image img[ src*='svg' ],&lt;br /&gt;
html .mbox-image .mw-file-description img[ src*='svg' ],&lt;br /&gt;
/* Emoji generated by [[Template:Emoji]] */&lt;br /&gt;
html .emoji .image img,&lt;br /&gt;
html .emoji .mw-file-description img,&lt;br /&gt;
/* Vote symbols on Talk pages */&lt;br /&gt;
html .image img[ alt^=&amp;quot;Symbol&amp;quot; ],&lt;br /&gt;
html .mw-file-description img[ alt^=&amp;quot;Symbol&amp;quot; ] {&lt;br /&gt;
	background-color: transparent;&lt;br /&gt;
}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
/* Page previews */&lt;br /&gt;
html .mwe-popups {&lt;br /&gt;
    box-shadow: 0 30px 90px -20px rgba( 0, 0, 0, 0.3 ), 0 0 1px #000;&lt;br /&gt;
}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
html .mwe-popups.flipped-y:after,&lt;br /&gt;
html .mwe-popups.flipped-x-y:after {&lt;br /&gt;
	border-top: 11px solid #ddd;&lt;br /&gt;
}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
html .mwe-popups.mwe-popups-no-image-pointer:after {&lt;br /&gt;
	border-bottom: 11px solid #ddd;&lt;br /&gt;
}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
/* Contributions menu */&lt;br /&gt;
html .cx-callout-1:after {&lt;br /&gt;
	border-bottom-color: #ddd;&lt;br /&gt;
}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
/* Mobile Wikipedia logo mobile header */&lt;br /&gt;
html .branding-box img {&lt;br /&gt;
	filter: brightness( 0 );&lt;br /&gt;
}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
@-moz-document url-prefix() {&lt;br /&gt;
    body {&lt;br /&gt;
        background: #000;&lt;br /&gt;
    }&lt;br /&gt;
}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
@-moz-document url-prefix() {   &lt;br /&gt;
	@supports (overflow-clip-margin: 1px) {     &lt;br /&gt;
		body {&lt;br /&gt;
			background: #fff;&lt;br /&gt;
		}   &lt;br /&gt;
	}&lt;br /&gt;
}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
--'''''[[User:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#023020&amp;quot;&amp;gt;DollarStoreBa'al&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User_talk:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#000080&amp;quot;&amp;gt;converse&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 13:27, 19 September 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Page Creation site notice for new accounts==&lt;br /&gt;
Many, many, '''''many''''' new people come around and ask other users about how to create their own user pages. Personally, I think we could stop the confusion by coding a different type of 'you do not have permission to create this page' error for new accounts, which would look something like this: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'To create new pages, your account must be at least a week old and have 50 edits. You can search for this page title in other pages, or search the related logs, but you do not have permission to create this page.' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Just a thought, in case admins can do that without Jeff's involvement. --'''''[[User:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#023020&amp;quot;&amp;gt;DollarStoreBa'al&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User_talk:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#000080&amp;quot;&amp;gt;converse&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 20:02, 30 September 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: I'd {{template|Actual citation needed}} on the &amp;quot;many&amp;quot;s, unless you're aware of off-site discussions about this one. It's actually pretty infrequent, so I feel you must be counting over several years, having found a number of historic examples dotted around on pages such as this. That said, it ''is'' currently as much an FAQ as anything else ([[explain xkcd:Editor FAQ#Why can't I create my user page and upload images?|as actually mentioned there]], for anyone who bothers to read it). And we do sometimes get a new-users, the ones freshly post-validated to create pages merrily 'helping out' all those they think need their help in that regard.&lt;br /&gt;
: Can I suggest that we do not have the exact number of edits so prominantly, though. Within the last day, as a matter of fact, we seem to have had someone making many useless edits (mostly of the form of adding extra spaces into seemingly random places within seemingly random articles), possibly in order to have created a new page of their own. And that's ''really'' not to the spirit of things. Inviting, or at least suggestively hinting, the possibility of near-vandalism (hopefully not ''actual'' vandalism) for the impatient who just see it as a 'target' to try to reach. And the truly and genuinely eager to contribute can easily have clocked up that number of edits to existing pages ''with no edit-tallying motive'' by the time the mandatory week has also expired.&lt;br /&gt;
: The caveat, I know, is that saying &amp;quot;a week and ''a certain number of edits''&amp;quot;, aluded to but unspecified, will have the some of the same uselessly-editing people chasing an arbitrarily high edit-tally in order to be 'ready' for the week finishing. But that kind of person is already of the wrong initial mindset. And people desperate to create new pages with perhaps little more than a week of having, in ''most other respects'', full editing rights (which is only marginally more than IPs like me have, as there only a few key places that I am prevented from editing) tend to find themselves likely to be contributing to the Category: Pages to Delete list (perhaps courtesy of more established editors).&lt;br /&gt;
: On balance, perhaps the page you mention should instead briefly contain a link to the existing FAQ section, via link text explaining that there ''are'' reasons, but &amp;quot;see here&amp;quot; for details, or similar non-specific wording. Anyone who hasn't read the FAQ could benefit from being aware that it exists. And if anything ever changes (rise or fall of the time or tally limits, even removal or addition of specific criteria), the FAQ will probably be sooner updated with the new details before anyone thinks to edit the 'error page' again (a particular page that long-established users will have rarely, if ever, seen). Assuming, of course, even that anyone can edit that level of page content right now. [[Special:Contributions/82.132.184.204|82.132.184.204]] 23:08, 30 September 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::I don’t have time to read ip's comment but i definitely think the number shouldn't be so public, and i don’t see a need. i would support a small editnoce for letting users know they have to vaguely contribute more. [[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 16:17, 1 October 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Some suggestions surrounding the use of the {{template|unsigned}} and {{template|unsigned ip}} templates. ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
;Where I just reference the {{template|unsigned}} template, there should also be an obvious extension of the same principle to the {{template|unsigned ip}} one as well.)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
These are some interelated proposals, that could be implemented singly/incrementally (as desired and agreed upon). But might deserve doing in 'one go', at least the agreed upon elements. I'm just putting each bit into different subsections for isolated discussion (or ignoring) of the specific merits/otherwise of each. [[Special:Contributions/2.98.65.8|2.98.65.8]] 21:33, 20 October 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
;TD;DR;s added, if you don't like the author's original verbosity. [[Special:Contributions/82.132.244.30|82.132.244.30]] 19:07, 12 November 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Aesthetic/semantic change===&lt;br /&gt;
Issue: Not often, but sometimes, comments that are 'unsigned'-tagged (with the words &amp;quot;please sign your comments with &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;~~~~&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;quot;) invokes retrospective use of &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;~~~~&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt; by those who take the words at face value. This ''can'' result in a (previously) 'unsigned' message having a later timestamp than its replies, or later 'top level' messages more immediately signed by their editors.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The more 'proper' way to replace an {{template|unsigned}} tag, for those that want to, would be to copy-paste a valid signature of the same type and replace the username(/IP) and datestamp as already (usually!) given in that initial pester-tag. But this is by no means made obvious in the above message.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Proposal: Wording to be changed to something like &amp;quot;in future, please sign your comments with &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;~~~~&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;quot;, or &amp;quot;this comment should have been signed with &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;~~~~&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;quot;. Or other wording, to be agreed upon, to make as snappy as the original (&amp;quot;was not signed with &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;~~~~&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;quot;). The aim is to omit the implicit request to anachrnistically sign, however.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Overall effect: Any change to the template(s) will transclude to what would probably be an overwhelming majority of Talk pages (at a guess), plus other 'discussion' pages like these Portal ones. But there's no change in functionality or any individual page-updating, just the slightly different text when viewing in future.&lt;br /&gt;
*Note1: the {{template|unsigned}} template already takes a (rarely used) third parameter, which overwrites the &amp;quot;please sign...&amp;quot; message (i.e. &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{unsigned|&amp;lt;username&amp;gt;|&amp;lt;timestamp&amp;gt;|&amp;lt;alternate message&amp;gt;}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;, and it'd still be overwritten exactly the same wherever that has been applied.&lt;br /&gt;
*Note2: it also would not rewrite the text given of any originally &amp;quot;subst:&amp;quot;ed version of the template, but that's a completely different issue.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Justification: The need may be slight, but it's also a trivial tweak to implement (or even to trial) with a marginal but maybe useful long-term gain. But we'll need a proper discussion of what wording to move to, or else that it's not necessary. [[Special:Contributions/2.98.65.8|2.98.65.8]] 21:33, 20 October 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: Case in point {{diff|389535|the few edits that led up to here}}. Didn't really 'spoil' any actual chronology but shows how easily it is obeyed wrongly. [[Special:Contributions/2.98.65.8|2.98.65.8]] 18:04, 24 October 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
;TL;DR;:Change the text from &amp;quot;please sign your comments with &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;~~~~&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;quot;, slightly. [[Special:Contributions/82.132.244.30|82.132.244.30]] 19:07, 12 November 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Additional templates to complement 'unsigned' ones===&lt;br /&gt;
Issue: Retrospective 'honest faking' of previously missing signatures is mildly awkward, as mentioned above. It's easy to get wrong, even easier to just not bother at all with it. (Either leave 'unsigned' or create the issue from the prior item.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Proposal: Complement the template usage &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;''un''&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;signed|&amp;lt;username&amp;gt;|&amp;lt;timestamp&amp;gt;}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt; with one that is &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;''retro''&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;signed|&amp;lt;username&amp;gt;|&amp;lt;timestamp&amp;gt;}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;. Take the same parameters (except the 'alternate pester text') but return just the effective &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;~~~~&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;-style format, now no longer with the 'please sign...'-type appended message.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are a number of possible uses for this:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
#''user1'' forgets to sign; ''user2'' spots this, invokes {{template|unsigned}} to it; ''user1'' '''acknowledges''' their goof, by simply changing the template-invocation of &amp;quot;unsigned&amp;quot; to &amp;quot;retrosigned&amp;quot; and the rendered page is left neater (any &amp;quot;whoops, my bad!&amp;quot; apologies can be given in the edit-comments, as unused third-parameter, etc, if they wish),&lt;br /&gt;
#''user1'' forgets to sign; ''user1'', themself, spots this (before anyone else) and applies this as easily as they would apply a {{template|unsigned}}. Slightly easier than 'honest faking' that involves the valid copypaste-method (again, with &amp;quot;whoops!, my bad!&amp;quot; opportunities, should they feel like it),&lt;br /&gt;
#''user1'' forgets to sign; ''user2'' spots this; knows that it's an oversight by a regular contributor who just slipped up, and there's no reason to make it a 'pester message'; so ''user2'' just goes straight to using Template:retrosigned, and doesn't bother with the 'pestering' or 'blaming' implications inherent in Template:unsigned),&lt;br /&gt;
#''user1'' forgot to sign ''...a decade ago or more!''; We know that (for example) User:Jeff is unlikely to benefit from being reminded/pestered/shamed, so it just seems better to let the more recent editor 'retrosign' any such example that gets discovered,&lt;br /&gt;
#or possibly, '''with care, ''and honesty'':''' someone, as ''newusername'', wishes to associate themselves with comments made by ''oldusername'', or even any given ''ip-address'' contrinution they previously used; that's something I wouldn't do myself, but I could see the appeal.&lt;br /&gt;
*Note1: my method (and that of others?) to edit in an 'unsigned'-tag is to copy the header info from the appropriate diff page's column, paste that text (containing datestamp and ID of contributor, together with some other textual cruft) as unsigned-tag parameters, rearrange edit (&amp;quot;timestamp&amp;quot; then &amp;quot;userid&amp;quot;, with a few extra characters, becomes &amp;quot;|userid|timestamp&amp;quot; parameters), the same method would entirely work with the retrosigned version too.&lt;br /&gt;
**This, however, does not contain the &amp;quot;(UTC)&amp;quot; timezone info that &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;~~~~&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt; would give by default, so a similarly direct retroactive 'fake' will also lack this. Eagle-eyed readers might pick up on this. Which isn't an issue that concerns me. (One could always manually append &amp;quot; (UTC)&amp;quot; to the second-param, or after the template itself, even if I don't think it worth the bother.)&lt;br /&gt;
*Note2: It doesn't reproduce the appearance of anyone's custom signature, if they had one that should have been invoked. But also a trivial differemce, having resolved the whole issue of &amp;quot;no longer being unsigned&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
**Should anyone ''really'' care to reproduce a custom/non-standard signature, they can still do so (on their behalf or someone else's). This is just the quick and easy&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Justification: The idea is to allow for the 'tidying up' of the front-facing pages with less convoluted and more honest back-end edits. I don't expect, or want, anyone to retrospectively convert historic 'unsigned' tags just for the sake of it, but it adds a tool to the kit of anyone who is already prepared to 'correct' these things (their own, or others) in any given page-source.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I'd potentially use it for long-standing editor's lapses (the &amp;quot;Template:retrosigned&amp;quot; version), to feel less guilty about apparently nagging them about it. Or upon myself (the &amp;quot;Template:retrosigned ip&amp;quot; version), if I slipped up, to feel less guilty for going back in and 'honestly faking' what I had forgotten to sign, but (as noted above) there are several other applicable uses. [[Special:Contributions/2.98.65.8|2.98.65.8]] 21:33, 20 October 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
;TL;DR;:Let there be &amp;quot;retrosigned&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;retrosigned ip&amp;quot; to be used where {{template|unsigned}} and {{template|unsigned ip}} are not (any longer) what is needed somewhere. [[Special:Contributions/82.132.244.30|82.132.244.30]] 19:07, 12 November 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Tracking parameter underutilisation===&lt;br /&gt;
Issue: Early implementation, and sometimes more recent, of the {{template|unsigned}} template may use its most basic &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{unsigned}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt; form with ''no parameters given''. This gives an 'error', of sorts, due to having no official check-and-fallback upon not being given the username parameter. The error is visual only, and ''may'' have been allowed/forced to happen as a way to force its correction (though, at least until recently, it sees not to have done this as much as it should have).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Other times, perhaps immediately after the first parameter (contributor name) started to be routinely added, &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{unsigned|username}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt; is used ''without the timestamp parameter'' that we now mostly take for granted.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
(While the current third parameter, the 'alternate &amp;quot;pease...&amp;quot; text' is entirely an optional and a mostly unused feature, future changes may require/encourage further elements (perhaps 'named parameters') and leave our default &amp;quot;unsigned|username|timestamp&amp;quot; format lacking.)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I've been known to update any discovered 'bare bones'-unsigned formats, if I find any in pages I edit. Someone else seems to have adopted it as a task of its own, recently. This relies upon spotting the non-standard (or at least non-modern) usages.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Additionally, there ''is'' the in getting the rather ugly &amp;lt;code&amp;gt; &amp;lt;small&amp;gt; -- [[User:{{{1}}}|{{{1}}}]] ([[User talk:{{{1}}}|talk]])  &amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:grey; white-space:nowrap;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;''(please sign your comments with &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;~~&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;~~)''&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt; 'error' for all no-param versions that exist.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Proposal: Firstly, just implement the 'catch' code upon the (lack of) first parameter. Make it 'fail cleanly', or at least less 'errorlike'. This is trivial to implement (i.e. &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{{1|}}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt; instead of &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{{1}}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;). (I'd do that right now, if I could.)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Secondly, within the 'failover' half of the 'non-parameter' parsing, give it a Category: membership.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I have several possible suggestions for the style of Category membership:&lt;br /&gt;
# If the 'userID' isn't given, perhaps &amp;quot;Category:Unsigned no-UserID&amp;quot;, if the 'timestamp' isn't given, &amp;quot;Category:Unsigned no-timestamp&amp;quot;, and any others.&lt;br /&gt;
#* Note: the system could be extended to other templates, such as &amp;quot;Category:Incomplete no-reason&amp;quot; or perhaps &amp;quot;Category:Comic no-image&amp;quot;, but that's not officially part of this suggestion.&lt;br /&gt;
# More simply, just have &amp;quot;Category:Unsigned-error&amp;quot;, without specifying. (Or even &amp;quot;Category:Template-error&amp;quot; for far more generalised use.)&lt;br /&gt;
# Differently specific, use the category re-indexing (something like &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;[[Category:Template-error|blah]]&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;) for handy grouping-with-differentiation&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Obviously, the appropriate category-page needs to be there to show any (and all) invocations. Similar to the [[:Category:Incomplete explanations]] one, etc, it would invite action to ''remove'' membership as examples are sorted.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Justification: This is a solution for 'meta-problems', really. Which 'category membership' option is used would define how much additional editing(/correcting) this might prompt for historic problems, as well as identifying improperly added new template-invocations. But it might be good to know exactly how wide or narrow a scope people might wish to apply to this, before going ahead and creating many new 'error' categories... one even just the single catch-all one. [[Special:Contributions/2.98.65.8|2.98.65.8]] 21:33, 20 October 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
;TL;DR;:Make it easier to find 'incompletely implemented' templates (initially the Unsigned ones), so they can be fixed by anyone who would like to. [[Special:Contributions/82.132.244.30|82.132.244.30]] 19:07, 12 November 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
This looks AI-generated. [[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 18:36, 12 November 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Really? Unless AIs are doing 'accidentally on purpose' typos, I think it just looks like someone with more ideas trying to burst out onto the page than they can easily (and accurately) summarise. And I'm also that type of person, so I can ''easily'' relate. There, but for the grace of &amp;lt;s&amp;gt;God&amp;lt;/s&amp;gt; any-unspecific-generalised-universal-force-of-non-deterministic-fate goes I! [[Special:Contributions/82.132.245.237|82.132.245.237]] 18:50, 12 November 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Added a &amp;quot;''Too Long; Didn't Read;''&amp;quot; summary to each, as I understand the intents. ;) Now I'm wondering if there are any other things I might do that for! [[Special:Contributions/82.132.244.30|82.132.244.30]] 19:07, 12 November 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Banning the phrase &amp;quot;WhatsApp&amp;quot;==&lt;br /&gt;
I've noticed that lately, much of our vandalism has come out of scamvertisements asking you to contact the scammers on WhatsApp. As I don't believe Randall has ever actually used WhatsApp, and as such it is unneeded, I feel we should just prevent any edits containing the word 'WhatsApp' from going through if the edit removes more than 90% of the page's byte count (let's be honest, nobody is going to delete that much from a page). --'''''[[User:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#023020&amp;quot;&amp;gt;DollarStoreBa'al&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User_talk:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#000080&amp;quot;&amp;gt;converse&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 17:37, 29 October 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:The standard protection is to have [[user:theusaf]] to refine/expand what theusafBOT reacts to. Which it seems they occasionally do.&lt;br /&gt;
:I don't know whether they're paying attention, but I'd hope they'd pick up on such things. Given that it's the Feedback/etc comics that regularly get spammed like this, I'd hope they'd at least try to see what someone else reverted in leiu, and adapt accordingly, when they get the time.&lt;br /&gt;
:I don't know the various sets of exact criteria in use (some seem generally obvious enough, key patterns and keywords involved) and I think something to at least start with &amp;quot;blanked page and replaced with ...&amp;quot;, on specific sets of pages, as an edit comment could be a good predictor with minimal false-positives. But I wouldn't want to explicitly suggest that (or your idea), lest the more attentive spammers made a trivial change to their future edit plans to by-pass it.&lt;br /&gt;
:...though I frankly think those responsible in this case don't care/think ''too'' much about it, it's more for all the other things I'd rather leave trivially unguessable how to get round. [[Special:Contributions/82.132.244.138|82.132.244.138]] 18:30, 29 October 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::I'll look into this. —[[User:Theusaf|theusaf]] ([[User talk:Theusaf|talk]]) 22:34, 6 November 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Hey look, an admin that isn't Kynde! That's... actually the first time I've seen an admin that isn't Kynde in person. Cool! &amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family: Times New Roman, serif; font-size: 16px;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;--'''''[[User:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#E3C6BE&amp;quot;&amp;gt;DollarStoreBa'al&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User Talk:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#CC9A8B&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Converse&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt; 17:15, 7 November 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::::Yeah, I'm not super active in the discussions, but I occasionally edit and check that by bot is still working and not destroying anything. The whatsapp check has been added. —[[User:Theusaf|theusaf]] ([[User talk:Theusaf|talk]]) 05:00, 13 November 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::*SKIBIDI-POP PA-DOOP TA-DA TAAAA!!!!* &amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family: Times New Roman, serif; font-size: 16px;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;--'''''[[User:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#E3C6BE&amp;quot;&amp;gt;DollarStoreBa'al&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User Talk:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#CC9A8B&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Converse&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt; 14:48, 13 November 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Adblock popup==&lt;br /&gt;
This wiki uses ads as a way to make money and keep the website up, and many people use adblockers (the absolute state of YT ads is insane). So, why don't we add one of those AdBlock popups that they have on some sites? Maybe the message could be: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{Header text|So, about that AdBlock...&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
explain xkcd uses ads to keep our server online. Please consider turning off your AdBlock so we can continue providing quality explanations. Thanks!}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This would be an optional thing and easily closable, but it could provide at least a bit of extra revenue. Maybe we could also make a 'thank you' screen for people who do actually turn off their adblocker (it would only pop up once, after they turn off the AdBlock): &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{Header text|Thank you for turning off your adblocker!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Sincerely, the explain xkcd community.}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What do you guys think? --'''''[[User:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#023020&amp;quot;&amp;gt;DollarStoreBa'al&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User_talk:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#000080&amp;quot;&amp;gt;converse&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 15:58, 30 October 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Adblockers often also can block anti-adblock popups, but sure, go ahead. I guess you could also ask for donations to run the site. Same caveat applies. - an adblock user. [[User:None|None]] ([[User talk:None|talk]]) 20:47, 14 December 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== categories template ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hear me out: I've been doing a lot of category adding to mostly files that are uncategorized (BTW, we have a 11,000-12,000 backlog of pages-any help (or maybe a bot!) would be greatly appreciated). I think that we should make a template called Category or &amp;quot;cat&amp;quot; so that we can add categories faster. Of course, HotCat exists, but it only renders when there are already existing categories. For all the uncategorized files/pages, we would have to manually add it in. My strategy currently is moving my mouse to the edit button, clicking it, hit return to make a whitespace (for organization), hitting CTRL-V, moving my mouse to the &amp;quot;Save changes&amp;quot; button, and clicking it. And that's only for the really repetitive ones, like the comic images or Hoverboard or Time. Does anybody have any thoughts/objections to this? Of course, we would still need to edit, but it would be a lot easier than typing out &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;[[Category:___]]&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt; IMHO. Additionally, I've studied up a bit of template code (Lua) and I've sort of fleshed out some code. I don't really know if it works, but if there's anybody more experienced feel free to look through it! I've included Pages to delete (ptd) and Helper comic images (hci) as examples. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{#ifeq:{{{1}}}|ptd|&lt;br /&gt;
  [[Category:Pages to delete]]&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{#ifeq:{{{1}}}|hci|&lt;br /&gt;
  {{#if:{{{2|}}}&lt;br /&gt;
    | [[Category:Helper comic images ({{{2}}})]]&lt;br /&gt;
    | [[Category:Helper comic images]]&lt;br /&gt;
  }}&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thanks, --'''[[User:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:9pt;color:#3a795e&amp;quot;&amp;gt;42.book.addict&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:6pt;color:#ce5f15&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Talk to me!&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;''' 10:17, 3 December 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:That's actually a good idea! So, it would be: &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{cat|Helper comic images (1190)}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;? That would be quite convenient. &amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family: Times New Roman, serif; font-size: 16px;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;--'''''[[User:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#FF0000&amp;quot;&amp;gt;DollarStoreBa'al&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User Talk:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#00873E&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Converse&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt; 20:53, 4 December 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::As written, I read it as...&lt;br /&gt;
::If &amp;quot;ptd&amp;quot; in the first spot, i.e. &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{cat|ptd}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;, that would give the Pages To Delete category.&lt;br /&gt;
::If &amp;quot;hci&amp;quot; in the first spot, i.e. &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{cat|hci}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;, then it would instead Helper Comic Images&lt;br /&gt;
::If &amp;quot;hci&amp;quot; in the first spot and a number in the second, i.e. &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{cat|hci|1234}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;, then it would instead give you Helper Comic Images (1234).&lt;br /&gt;
::There are maybe a few minor issues with it, as written. I'd use &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{{1|}}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;, for starters, and nest it so that any non-specified (including blank) param would give out an obvious mis-use error result. And you'd probably end up having &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{cat|&amp;lt;whatever&amp;gt;}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt; sitting in your paste buffer (or would &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{subst:cat|&amp;lt;whatever&amp;gt;}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt; be better?) exactly the same as you'd have had the basic Category, anyway.&lt;br /&gt;
::But I really wouldn't know where it sits in the [[1205: Is It Worth the Time?]] scale... Almost a &amp;quot;death by supernova neutrinos&amp;quot; issue, I suspect... ;) [[Special:Contributions/78.144.255.82|78.144.255.82]] 21:37, 4 December 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
: I would use a switch instead of an if, like &lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;includeonly&amp;gt;[[Category:{{subst:#switch:{{{1}}}&lt;br /&gt;
| ptd = Pages to delete&lt;br /&gt;
| hci = Helper comic images {{subst:#if: {{{2|}}} | ({{{2}}}) }}&lt;br /&gt;
| {{{1|}}}&lt;br /&gt;
}}]]&amp;lt;/includeonly&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
: It should be used with &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{subst:&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt; because otherwise the category won't be able to be removed normally, but it technically works without it. The substs before the ifs make the resulting wikitext nicer, as otherwise when the overall template is used with &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{subst:&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;, it inserts the if statements directly. Consequently, it must be enclosed in includeonly's to prevent the substitution from occurring when the template is saved. It will also default to inserting the category with the name of the first argument, but it is longer to type using the template like this (&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{subst:cat|All comics}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;) than just typing the category directly (&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;[[Category:All comics]]&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;).&lt;br /&gt;
:If having an obvious error message is desired, you could replace the default case (the &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{{1|}}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;) with something like &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;]] Invalid argument for [[Template:cat&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;. [[User:Firestar233|guess who]] ([[User talk:Firestar233|if you desire conversing]] | [[Special:Contributions/Firestar233|what i have done]]) 05:02, 16 December 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
All fo this sounds good! I don't have the time to look into this but Firestar233 is incredible with templates so i trust their code will work! [[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 18:41, 17 December 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== New Character Proposal for Kid Cueballs ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I'm somewhat new to editing, though I've been using this wiki for some time now. And I've noticed that with comics such as 3178, whenever a kid is represented by Cueball the transcript says &amp;quot;a Cueball like kid&amp;quot;  which is long and slightly annoying to read. So I propose giving the kid a name that's shorter and easier to use but still let's the reader know that a kid is being represented by Cueball:  Kidball. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thoughts? -- [[User:MikeTheNewGuy|MikeTheNewGuy]] ([[User talk:MikeTheNewGuy|talk]]) 13:25, 17 January 2026‎ (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
: Hi, Mike; welcome to ExplainXKCD. BTW, I added your signature to your comment.&lt;br /&gt;
: But, on-topic: this sounds like an interesting idea. But, in your mind, is this &amp;quot;Kidball&amp;quot; always the same kid, rather than a type of kid? Would you expect that if you see &amp;quot;Kidball&amp;quot; in a new comic he'll behave the same way? If not, then I wouldn't add this name. -- [[User:Dtgriscom|Dtgriscom]] ([[User talk:Dtgriscom|talk]]) 13:32, 17 January 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::Thanks for adding my signature, I’m gonna have to remember to do that. &lt;br /&gt;
::What I had in mind with Kidball was that most of the time he’s the same kid (since most of the time he only appears in Miss Lenhart’s class, at least that’s where he’s been the majority of the times I’ve seen him), but is occasionally used to represent someone else; in the same way that Cueball appears to be the same person most of the time, but Randall occasionally uses him to represent someone else.  And using “Kidball” in the explanations/transcripts might be more efficient than “a Cueball like kid”.&lt;br /&gt;
::And yes, if I saw him in a new comic, I would expect him to more or less behave the same way, unless it’s clear that he’s representing someone else.[[User:MikeTheNewGuy|MikeTheNewGuy]] ([[User talk:MikeTheNewGuy|talk]]) 18:04, 17 January 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::I'm not sure; let's see what others think. -- [[User:Dtgriscom|Dtgriscom]] ([[User talk:Dtgriscom|talk]]) 18:11, 17 January 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::I do think that he can and should be named, as he's very similar to [[Jill]], even if she has more personality than him. And Kidball is an amazing name! [[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 18:01, 23 January 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::::I concur. '''[[User:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:9pt;color:#A9C6CA&amp;quot;&amp;gt;42.book.addict&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:6pt;color:#516874&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Talk to me!&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;''' 21:57, 23 January 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Me too. I'm not trusting myself with the actual page creation, so somebody else will need to create it. (sorry, just don't want to mess things up) &amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family: Times New Roman, serif; font-size: 16px;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;--'''''[[User:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#023020&amp;quot;&amp;gt;DollarStoreBa'al&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]][[User Talk:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#000080&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Converse&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;]]'''''&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt; 22:51, 28 January 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::::I've made them. See [[Kidball]] and [[:Category:Comics featuring Kidball]]. I've also changed the header of this thread for more clarity. '''[[User:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:9pt;color:#A9C6CA&amp;quot;&amp;gt;42.book.addict&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:6pt;color:#516874&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Talk to me!&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;''' 01:40, 1 February 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Thanks! Anyone up for populating it? [[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 08:14, 1 February 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::I'll try to see if I can find the time (and motivation) to do so this week. '''[[User:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:9pt;color:#A9C6CA&amp;quot;&amp;gt;42.book.addict&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:6pt;color:#516874&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Talk to me!&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;''' 03:07, 2 February 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::I just went through [[:Category:Comics featuring children]] and added about 9 to [[:Category:Comics featuring Kidball]]. We're getting there! [[User:Maxcodes|Maxcodes]] ([[User talk:Maxcodes|talk]]) 14:34, 15 February 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Should comics with multiple Kidballs be placed in [[:Category:Multiple Cueballs]], or should a new category be created? [[User:Maxcodes|Maxcodes]] ([[User talk:Maxcodes|talk]]) 12:37, 15 February 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::: (First, I made it markup as a &amp;quot;visible category link&amp;quot;, as you intended, rather than the invisible category membership that normally happens, hope you don't mind.)&lt;br /&gt;
:::: A further question is if a comic was Multiple Cueballs, by dint of having a Cueball ''and'' a now-IDed-as-Kidball, is it still Multiple Cueballs? [[Special:Contributions/82.132.239.239|82.132.239.239]] 13:26, 15 February 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::: We've only just got to the point where we're naming this character Kidball; I'd say don't complicate the situation just yet. Too many categories makes the categories less useful. -- [[User:Dtgriscom|Dtgriscom]] ([[User talk:Dtgriscom|talk]]) 13:52, 15 February 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::: Children are rarely alone, normally being with other children and/or with one or one-or-more adults. So [[:Category:Comics featuring children]] covers Multiple Kidballs.&lt;br /&gt;
:::: I'd say that Multiple Cueballs is a notable 'common strangeness' that I think it's useful to continue note, for various reasons, but multiple non-Cueball characters (e.g. how [[1000]] has it, in-extremis) aren't worth all the various different character-specific 'multiple' categories. (And, yes, an adult Cueball and a Kidball should not be &amp;quot;Multiple Cueballs&amp;quot;.) [[Special:Contributions/81.179.199.253|81.179.199.253]] 18:29, 15 February 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Agreed. Multiple Cueballs is usually for unusual cases where there isn't a different main character other than cueball. A bald kid and a bald adult are two different people. [[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 16:52, 16 February 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
== Bring back mboxes! ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[https://mediawiki.org/wiki/Template:Mbox Mboxes] (do read that link) are message boxes that prompt editors to edit.&lt;br /&gt;
They say things such as, &amp;quot;'''Please help expand this page.'''&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
However, they aren't on this wiki!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
So, there are a few different templates resembling mboxes:&lt;br /&gt;
* {{template|notice}},&lt;br /&gt;
* {{template|notice2}},&lt;br /&gt;
* {{template|incomplete}}, and&lt;br /&gt;
* {{template|incomplete transcript}}&lt;br /&gt;
are just a few I've seen.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I just don't think this is the way! Also, I checked {{template|ambox}} and it said it was deleted. However, the proposal archive&lt;br /&gt;
isn't working and I can't check the reason. So I can't see why we aren't using them!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Here are a few arguments for mboxes:&lt;br /&gt;
* Mboxes can be different types, such as a notice or an alert, or even an incomplete notice, with a &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;type&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt; attribute.&lt;br /&gt;
* Mboxes are &amp;lt;abbr title=&amp;quot;Don't Repeat Yourself&amp;quot;&amp;gt;DRY&amp;lt;/abbr&amp;gt;, they're reusable.&lt;br /&gt;
* Mboxes are used on Wikipedia, and other sites I'm sure, so using them here will make it more comfortable for new editors coming from other sites such as Wikipedia.&lt;br /&gt;
* Using mboxes will make styling all alerts easier. (OK YES I ADMIT IT I WANT MY USER STYLES)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
So why aren't we using them? I'm thinking that if this topic gets enough support, we can bring mboxes back, and&lt;br /&gt;
start transitioning old alerts to mbox variants.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thank you for coming to my TED Talk. [[User:Maxcodes|Maxcodes]] ([[User talk:Maxcodes|talk]]) 14:38, 16 February 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:The discussion, as you said, is in the archive: [[explain_xkcd_talk:Community_portal/Proposals#Notice_templates]]. [[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 16:58, 16 February 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Transcripts ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
ATTENTION!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
THIS: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Blah blah '''BLAH'''&lt;br /&gt;
''BLAH blah blah''&lt;br /&gt;
Wordssss…………&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
(Fill in blahs with your own words! Choose your own adventure fun!)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Is not a transcript!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I’ve had the impression that transcripts were for blind people (well, not ''just'' blind people) and making transcripts like the one above is only making things harder for people who may read aloud for blind people. Use things like [bold text] or [italics] or [comic in red text].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Idk wh6 I wrote this it just been bothering me. {{unsigned ip|2600:4040:52f7:9a00:cdb5:8d4d:4a6c:9917|16:58, 24 February 2026 (UTC)}}&lt;br /&gt;
:I've always wondered who the transcripts are even for. Since both the comics and the transcripts are in the same medium, those who are blind wouldn't be able to see the transcript. I guess they could have it read to them, but it's still confusing. As far as I know, it's just a thing that very early editors used to do, and the tradition stuck. What's the reasoning behind the transcripts? --'''''[[User:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#3c2004&amp;quot;&amp;gt;DollarStoreBa'al&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User Talk:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#1E0F00&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Converse&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; (BLM)''''' 14:22, 2 March 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::There exists the {{w|screen reader}}, which (at least until you start to trust AI, and there ''are'' undoubtely some good AI ATs out there that do this, these days, but are trained more to help with RL situations, like &amp;quot;what items are on the shop shelf I'm currently standing in front of?&amp;quot;, not stick-figures and line-art...) can't do anything useful with the non-meta contents of an image but will happily speak out a transcript.&lt;br /&gt;
::It probably also helps, even if you don't need it spoken out for you, if you have a hankering of searching for a particular comic and you know some written words in it that might not ''necessarily'' be quoted verbatim in the Explanation. The text being all there in the Transcript section means you can get this site (or perhaps your caching search-engine of choice) to find it, without even relying on someone having decided to quote it directly elsewhere (which is often not good and/or necessary for an Explanation/Discussion/Trivia section contribution).&lt;br /&gt;
::If you're ''really'' lucky, you can even search for [https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?search=%22office+chair%22&amp;amp;title=Special%3ASearch&amp;amp;go=Go some random visual thing], as long as it's been mentioned, without relying upon it havng already had a thoroughly populated Category... That relies upon any useful example having the same exact wording in the Transcript (and/or Explanation), but it's better than if you don't have any Transcripts at all.&lt;br /&gt;
::There are other useful things, a bit less obvious. Yet perhaps you could argue the presence of the Transcript may not actually be that vital... I don't know if anyone here ''does'' even use a screen-reader (but is still interested in webcomics ...a very visual medium). And there are probably other ways to get the other other advantages of the Transcript. Perhaps we could just make sure ''everything'' currently Transcripted is added to the Explanation (though that seems wasteful, and might make the Explanation far ''less'' useful/readable, having to fight past the obligatory in-depth explanation of whether Cueball's arm is raised in a particular panel or not...). But currently the Transcript exists, for those that need (or like) it, and also anybody who doesn't can just ignore it.&lt;br /&gt;
::And unless you're going to fold ''all'' Transcripts into the rest of the Explanation, it seems rather strange to just stop creating them. Honestly, it's probably half the fun for some people. And even another 'First!'-brag for users to bag, without being actually so crass as to edit anything just to say &amp;quot;First!&amp;quot; ;) [[Special:Contributions/81.179.199.253|81.179.199.253]] 19:58, 2 March 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::I still do think that the people who need a screen reader would be interested in webcomics, although there probably exists a small population of people who are. Also, screen readers do not necessarily need to use AI in anything except for the voice. --'''''[[User:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#023020&amp;quot;&amp;gt;DollarStoreBa'al&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User Talk:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#09ff00&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Converse&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;  20:09, 2 March 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::::Not sure if you're agreeing with me or not there. You may have missed a &amp;quot;not&amp;quot; or something in there somewhere. And screen-readers don't need ''any'' AI (as we would currently expect it), although doubtless the last few years development of LLM/GenerativeAIs has probably improved them from 'dumb phonology' (with quirks that users would have to get use to) to actually saying things more eloquently and even correctly voice non-homophonic homographs correctly...&lt;br /&gt;
::::But, anyway, there's the other reasons for a Transcript, even if I don't know if anyone does bother to use SRs. [[Special:Contributions/81.179.199.253|81.179.199.253]] 20:45, 2 March 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::I did, indeed, accidentally miss a 'not'. I DON'T think that those who need screen readers would be interested in webcomics. --'''''[[User:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#023020&amp;quot;&amp;gt;DollarStoreBa'al&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User Talk:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#09ff00&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Converse&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;  20:55, 2 March 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::You'd be surprised. Just take a look at this discussion: https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php/explain_xkcd:Community_portal/Miscellaneous#Sightless_readers_offended_by_the_.22It.27s_.27cause_you.27re_dumb.22_tagline. [[User:Elektrizikekswerk|Elektrizikekswerk]] ([[User talk:Elektrizikekswerk|talk]]) 13:00, 9 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::...I stand corrected. Also, [[2134: Too Much Talking|I have an opinion]] about that discussion after reading it. --'''''[[User:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#023020&amp;quot;&amp;gt;DollarStoreBa'al&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User Talk:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#09ff00&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Converse&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;  13:57, 9 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==New search algorithm?==&lt;br /&gt;
I was searching for a specific comic based on some words from the transcript. I was looking for [[2134: Too Much Talking]] and was searching &amp;quot;new opinions&amp;quot;. INSTEAD of getting only results which had the phrase &amp;quot;new opinions&amp;quot;, I got every comic which had the word 'new' or 'opinion' ANYWHERE in its explanation or transcript. I got over 100 hits and had to go through each preview individually, which was quite annoying and took far too long. I think there should be a function or option that you could turn on which makes it so, when you search &amp;quot;new opinions&amp;quot;, it only displays pages with the search term and doesn't display anything which only contains a part of it. This happens every time I try to search. --'''''[[User:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#023020&amp;quot;&amp;gt;DollarStoreBa'al&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User Talk:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#09ff00&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Converse&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;  14:04, 9 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:You probably searched for (quote)&amp;lt;code&amp;gt;new opinions&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;(unquote), but you'll find that you'll get exactly what you wanted from (quote)&amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;quot;new opinions&amp;quot;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;(unquote) ''with'' the literal quotes.&lt;br /&gt;
:Like I did, by ending up on the page https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?search=%22new+opinions%22&amp;amp;title=Special%3ASearch&amp;amp;go=Go just now.&lt;br /&gt;
:Note that searches just for (quote)&amp;lt;code&amp;gt;new&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;(unquote) ''or'' just for (quote)&amp;lt;code&amp;gt;opinions&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;(unquote) return many (thousands!) of matches. (quote)&amp;lt;code&amp;gt;new opinions&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;(unquote) 'only' seems to return 42 examples (now including this page?). This would include examples of &amp;quot;opinion new&amp;quot; ordering or even totally separate uses like if any a phrase like &amp;quot;...relying upon old opinions, rather than new facts...&amp;quot; was used. An ''actual'' example, is the following search-result snippet:&lt;br /&gt;
::..., with no real bearing on most peoples' lives, a lot of people have strong '''opinions''' on the topic. One on side, people argue that planets should have a consiste ...with such debates, to the point of damaging their relationship, is nothing '''new''' for this couple.&lt;br /&gt;
:I don't know how we'd even update/change the search-algorithm.&lt;br /&gt;
:And, note, it'd annoy those who are already used to what subtle ways there are to be either more or less finicky in a desired search. Searching for mention of &amp;quot;dog leads&amp;quot;? The (unquoted) search for &amp;quot;dog lead&amp;quot; might be better to find &amp;quot;he has a dog on a lead&amp;quot; without (normally) getting pages that say something like &amp;quot;a heavy element, like lead&amp;quot;. A quoted-search, or an assumption that the user would have wanted a quoted-search, would miss the first example.&lt;br /&gt;
:There may be various other tricks and tips to search-formatting. The use of &amp;quot;+&amp;quot; before a particular term used to (on Google) force that as a required match, when it might have included &amp;quot;does not include...&amp;quot; on a page that contains every other word, just not that one.  But this site doesn't seem to have the full (traditional) Google-Fu behaviour, that also included things like (quote)&amp;lt;code&amp;gt;-dog lead&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;(unquote) that could get you (mostly) the metal or connecting cable references to lead without so.much of the additional pet-restraint homonym, but then the Google algorithm has also changed so much over the years (Natural Language Processing and even more AI-based methods, rather than a more obvious codified 'markup' to one's search terms where it was the user's initial knowledge that more limited the search, intentinally or otherwise). [[Special:Contributions/82.132.238.115|82.132.238.115]] 16:53, 9 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Excessive verbosity ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Should we have a category and community portal link to it for explanations which are considered excessively verbose to the point of deteriorating their usefulness to the readers? [[Special:Contributions/2603:800C:1200:596A:A08E:FCB1:F968:D433|2603:800C:1200:596A:A08E:FCB1:F968:D433]] 20:18, 15 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Define excessive. (Also: Define insufficient.) [[Special:Contributions/81.179.199.253|81.179.199.253]] 21:09, 15 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::He never even said &amp;quot;insufficient&amp;quot;. He said that making a whole essay as a response (I'll link some examples below) is a waste of time because all the text is overwhelming and it becomes harder to pick out the important parts. By the way, he may be referring to you, as you tend to make very long responses (read: not necessarily a bad thing).&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
::Some examples:&lt;br /&gt;
::*[https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:3231:_Lightning&amp;amp;curid=30046&amp;amp;diff=410387&amp;amp;oldid=410386 this edit by 81.179.199.253]&lt;br /&gt;
::*[https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:3232:_Countdown_Standard&amp;amp;curid=30051&amp;amp;diff=410328&amp;amp;oldid=410327 this edit by 81.179.199.253]&lt;br /&gt;
::*[https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:3231:_Lightning&amp;amp;curid=30046&amp;amp;diff=410157&amp;amp;oldid=410141 this edit by 82.132.238.12]&lt;br /&gt;
::--'''''[[User:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Times; color:#023020&amp;quot;&amp;gt;DollarStoreBa'al&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User_talk:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Times; color:#000080&amp;quot;&amp;gt;'''''converse'''''&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 21:18, 15 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Indeed. &amp;quot;Insufficient&amp;quot; was was seaid by me (IPv4), not IPv6. The point being that I'm not sure what amount of paring down would satisfy them, and what amount would be problematic to them.&lt;br /&gt;
:::If some information is there but looks superfluous to someone, they might remove it. If the information is not there but seems necessary, some other person might add it. And everyone has different ideas.&lt;br /&gt;
:::And in the two editing examples (and the example that wasn't me), they aren't even Explanation additions, which I'm sure (but will happily be corrected on) wasn't what the suggestion was about. Also, I make no apologies for being verbose enough to encopass a complicated issue, when I think it merits it, especially in Talk. There's also occasion to cut down/rationalise things (in Explanations), especially when multiple editors have added a concept here, an example there, a caveat at the end, etc, which might be best rewritten from scratch.&lt;br /&gt;
:::Face it, we who seek to &amp;quot;explain xkcd&amp;quot; have many things to say, whether we we're Nerd Sniped or just happen to think of something interesting but unmentioned. And those who wish xkcd to be explained may have many questions (even if they {{diff|410158|don't say what they are}}. Perhaps I personally err more on maintaining a verbosity (that can be skipped over by the impatient reader) rather than risk being too laconic (and leave out something that others would want/need to be said).&lt;br /&gt;
:::I consciously ''tried'' to convey all of what I've just said by just five words, you'll notice. Maybe ten words would have been better? [[Special:Contributions/81.179.199.253|81.179.199.253]] 00:10, 16 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::I did actually define it, plain as day! Excessive verbosity is &amp;quot;excessively verbose to the point of deteriorating [an explanation's] usefulness to the readers.&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;
::Please I know this has been something of a pattern for years now, and I don't know who all is involved or how many, of course, but could you please try showing some restraint? For example, when you're typing a long paragraph and you're not 100% sure it would make the explanation clearer or more helpful in some concrete way, would you please consider posting it on the talk page and asking others whether they think it should be added, or at least ask others for help with brevity? [[Special:Contributions/2603:800C:1200:596A:FDFE:A728:80A:5859|2603:800C:1200:596A:FDFE:A728:80A:5859]] 01:00, 17 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::They do have a point, IPv4. Many of your comments exceed 1,000 bytes in length, and most go above 500.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:::1)''&amp;quot;If some information is there but looks superfluous to someone, they might remove it.&amp;quot;'' Most people are probably going to be encouraged ''not'' to edit other people's comments (see [[User talk:42.book.addict#Editing other people's words?|here]])&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:::2)''&amp;quot;In the two editing examples, they aren't even explanation additions...&amp;quot;'' That's precisely the point. Large additions to explanations are fine, if it all relates to the comic in some way. Large talk page replies, however, are much harder to navigate.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:::3)''&amp;quot;Perhaps I personally err on maintaining a verbosity (that can be skipped over by the impatient reader) rather than risk being too laconic (and leave out something that others would want/need to be said).&amp;quot;'' The issue is that all the important things are sprinkled throughout your explanation and '''can't''' be skipped. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:::If you do insist on being as verbose as you are, perhaps it would be a good idea to add a TL;DR? Just a thought.--'''''[[User:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Times; color:#023020&amp;quot;&amp;gt;DollarStoreBa'al&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User_talk:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Times; color:#000080&amp;quot;&amp;gt;'''''converse'''''&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 13:19, 17 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::::Ahoy there, from IPv4-land, again. I think you're misreading something. You're talking about Talk: comments being overlong. I'm not sure anyone else is.&lt;br /&gt;
::::The OP says &amp;quot;...for '''explanations''' which are considered excessively verbose...&amp;quot; (my emphasis added). Only in the more recent &amp;quot;...would you please consider posting it on the talk page and...&amp;quot; suggestion is OP mentioning Talk:, and that's as a suggestion of doing that ''instead'' of being wordy in the Explanation.&lt;br /&gt;
::::I also disagree that my two highlighted additions ({{diff|410387|this}} and {{diff|410328|this}}) are overlong. Not as short as they could be, but only significantly so by not saying things I wanted to say. Whether I not I should have, is another matter.&lt;br /&gt;
::::Not much more to add, that hasn't already been mentioned. So I won't. Have a nice day! [[Special:Contributions/81.179.199.253|81.179.199.253]] 18:41, 17 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::((Hi, I'm not the above IPv4, but I am someone you used as an example. And I could respond to DSB's comments (that edit-conflicted with me writing the following), as I think they are arguments directed against me too, but that would add ''another half hour or more of writing, down-editing, reviewing, adding back in things that I should ''not'' have edited out, etc. So, instead, I'm just prepending this little blurb. But it seems like I'm of a like mind/''modus operandi'' as the other protagonist here. Though was reluctant to jump in to comment on this 'suggestion' right from the start. But here I am now. Sorry!))&lt;br /&gt;
:::No, sorry. You're still being subjective there, as already said by someone else. If people add more information, it's generally because they think that such information is missing. Or responding to comments (or interpretations) from others who hadn't already 'got it'.&lt;br /&gt;
:::I absolutely don't mind if my attempts to explain something are re-edited to be less wordy than I might have left them, though. That's the nature of wiki-editing. And, if someone removes or wrongly paraphrases something (of mine, or anyone else), I reserve the right to go back and make it correct once more.&lt;br /&gt;
:::The exception is with Talk comments:&lt;br /&gt;
:::#Other than totally removing something that totally violates site policy, you do ''not'' remove or edit someone else's Talk contribution, beyond any peripheral formatting (e.g. adding a missing signature, correcting a clear indentation misalignment or, with very great care, making it more readable as far as newlines, bulletpoints, tabulation, etc, if the OA cocked that up) and ''never'' change the substantive text... even for spelling.&lt;br /&gt;
:::#Things written in Talk are not part of the Explanation and should not be assumed to be read by anyone reading the Explanation.&lt;br /&gt;
:::#They also need not be as 'perfect' as one might try to write in an Explanation, be they either more jokey, full of spelling/grammar errors. This is not the &amp;quot;voice of the site, for we are legion&amp;quot;, but individually attributable (more or less) voices that may display confusion, authoritativeness, malapropriate terminology, the desire to say &amp;quot;FIRST!&amp;quot; and/or complaints about everyone else doing any or all the the other things.&lt;br /&gt;
:::#Should someone ''happen'' to make a cogent point in Talk, it almost never is suitable to just copypaste their exact words (less the signature - if there was any!) into the main Explanation (or even within the 'incomplete'-notification. If they thought it was ready for the Explanation, they'd have written it there, and probably used a different phrase (I write from experience, here!)&lt;br /&gt;
:::#And there is very little reason to go through the collaborative editing process on Talk, with multiple versions (and critiques) of the 'concept' text being left for everyone to see all the false starts and mis-steps and the like. When the ''very idea'' of the main Wiki page is that it's a collaborative editing place that gets refined to the best result it can be (or, maybe, just one of the 'least worst' ones), without all the messy re-versioning details on show (but still there in the History, for the curious).&lt;br /&gt;
:::(And I note that DSB highlit one of ''my'' Talk contributions, above, as an example of overloquaciousness... Strangely, one that {{diff|410161|looked somewhat appreciated}}, unless that was actually intended as sarcasm, but lacked sufficient markup to reveal that as its purpose. Yes, it was significantly longer than the first response (which I think was good, as far as it went), but I thought that *maybe* a few more details wouldn't go amiss. In leiu of possible further questions that might have occured without.)&lt;br /&gt;
:::So, no. I reject your request to 'discuss things in Talk, i  advance' any time I think I might not be adding a perfectly cromulant smattering of knowledge. I know that I will never write laconicallg enough to please every reader, especially without making it so streamlined that someone else will have to request (or fulfill) further expansion to it.&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;quot;Should we have a category&amp;quot;? Maybe. What are you thinking? Some template-led thing, used either like the {{template|Actual citation needed}} or {{template|incomplete}} ones, or somewhere betwixt the two, in application/functionality? What if some adds an &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{Excessive verbosity}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt; tag and someone disagrees enough to remove it again? Are we back to arguing it out in Talk (like we do already), and/or whole paragraphs being pre-emptively removed (like is done already), or are we supposed to stop doing that and instead populate the tag with 'reason=' information?&lt;br /&gt;
:::Not entirely sure what the &amp;quot;community portal link to it&amp;quot; is about, though. Adding a way to get to [[explain xkcd:Community portal/Proposals#Excessive verbosity|this section]]? Or adding a link to each tagged example ''from'' this section?&lt;br /&gt;
:::The observation, in several ways, needs further explanation and elaboration (totally unintended, but I ''just'' realised how ironic that is!). Can I (and my fellow word-technicians, such as the prior responder) possibly shave off a word or two? Probably. But I personally try (amongst other editing issues) to address inconsistencies and gaps in information that I see have not yet been addressed. If someone wants to improve on what I add, within a comic page, then they can. Better something there, imperfect, than just lacking because of the possibility of some arbitrary word-/paragraph-limit being breached due to my 'interference'. [[Special:Contributions/82.132.236.33|82.132.236.33]] 14:44, 17 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I created [[[[:Category:Excessive verbosity]]]] and mentioned it at the end of [[explain xkcd:Community portal]]. I have a plan to fill it with initially the 20-30 worst offending explanations using AI, but I need to run some experiments first. [[User:Liv2splain|Liv2splain]] ([[User talk:Liv2splain|talk]]) 08:59, 18 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:What actual criteria will assess the issue of &amp;quot;worst offending&amp;quot;, can I ask? I ask this seriously, but I might as well tell you that I predict that you won't have a cogent answer. Especially if you're going for the same enumeration as that graph that was created. [[Special:Contributions/81.179.199.253|81.179.199.253]] 20:55, 18 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::Whether the text is too verbose to serve the readers as a copyedit for brevity could. (By the way, did you know in the year 1600 the typical English written sentence had about 50 words?) [[User:Liv2splain|Liv2splain]] ([[User talk:Liv2splain|talk]]) 04:55, 23 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Poking my nose back in... Is the valuation then based upon something like &amp;quot;we asked 100 readers to rank the readability, and used IRV to produce the community-accepted order of best to worst&amp;quot;? Or &amp;quot;nominate your fifty worst examples, and the ones with most votes get looked at&amp;quot;, Either of those would be awkward to organise properly.&lt;br /&gt;
:::Or are we asking an AI (multiple times, and/or multiple AIs) to do this ranking, knowing that AIs are ineffably tied to their training data in ways that can be unpredictably spurious. (As an example, it could mark down anything written by an IP, having identified that as a key indicator, if given the option. Like the cases of AIs 'learning' to diagnosing illnesses based upon the presence of a measuring scale in a diagnostic photograph, or a certain type of acute medicine hospital name in the past treatment records.) What would it make of the sentence &amp;quot;Colourless green dreams sleep furiously&amp;quot;, and would it know if it is even a contextually apt statement or not, for any given usage?&lt;br /&gt;
:::The 50 words thing is interesting, if ''that's'' the key to your suggestion, but hardly a good scale for multiple reasons. Case in point: your first sentence is 16 words. It is brief. It also took me a while to realise it wasn't an accidentally unfinished &amp;quot;Whether &amp;lt;foo&amp;gt; could &amp;lt;bar&amp;gt;&amp;quot; enquiry, and a couple of other garden-path mis-steps, before realising its grammatic intent.&lt;br /&gt;
:::Counting words isn't enough. Short sentences more readable? (Or it is non-linear.) Correct horse battery staple! Must be grammatical, naturally. Not comic joke call-back. But what about punctuation? Commas in right places. Semi-colons: good or bad? Is this paragraph readable? All statements, four words. It is fun writing. But not easy, regardless. Fluid reading remains uncertain. Seems stilted to me. Sesquipedalian loquaciousness preponderantly undisallowed. You get the idea..?&lt;br /&gt;
:::The truth is that there's no easy (non-subjective) measure of readability, and whatever you do use to measure it may have little connection to understandability, practical meaning or actual accuracy/relevence, and attempts to enhance any or all of the latter may ''require'' some loss of mere 'brevity'. This is not to say that I consider my own contributions unimprovable, just that they (should) say what I intend them to say, and to the extent I intend to say them. [[Special:Contributions/82.132.238.56|82.132.238.56]] 10:16, 23 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Why not simply use the incomplete tag? My main contribution to this wiki in the last months was to cut down explanations to the point. If I stumble upon an explanation that I feel is too bloated but I don't have the time or energy to do it myself at that moment I add the incomplete tag, mention that the explanation needs to be shortened and done. Oftentimes I do it then myself some time later and remove the tag again. I don't see the point of a new category. Speaking of bloating up stuff... ;) [[User:Elektrizikekswerk|Elektrizikekswerk]] ([[User talk:Elektrizikekswerk|talk]]) 08:53, 23 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:I agree, for what it's worth. [[Special:Contributions/82.132.238.56|82.132.238.56]] 10:16, 23 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Agreed. It should simply say which part of the explanation needs works, and what exactly it needs. [[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 12:26, 25 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== possible new &amp;quot;superheroes&amp;quot; category ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
i don't edit this wiki very often, but i recently decided to make a &amp;quot;superheroes&amp;quot; category since i was surprised we didn't have one already. i've been going thru the archives and adding comics, but today i noticed a bunch of the edits were reverted by one person with the reason &amp;quot;no such category&amp;quot;. do i need to do something to get the category approved or were the reversions incorrect? [[Special:Contributions/216.145.71.130|216.145.71.130]] 21:03, 29 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:As the reverter, I'm suggesting that the way this is normally done is to notice the need and suggest that it is created, listing (at least some of) the cases.&lt;br /&gt;
:While anyone with page-creation capabilities (not you, and not me) can &amp;quot;unredlink&amp;quot; the category, it'd be useful to make sure it's not just being created because of one person's vague moment of inspiration.&lt;br /&gt;
:Not to say that you're unjustified, in this case, just that you hadn't gone any way to ''try'' to justify it. And it's better to do that. (The old phrase &amp;quot;better to ask forgiveness than permission&amp;quot; isn't really applicable here.) I'll happily help repopulate the new category, if and when it is decided to get created. Just it was being done the wrong way round.&lt;br /&gt;
:Someone else {{diff|411372|mentioned}} that its name might need rethinking, and that's one of the aspects. Yes, it can be renamed, but still much better to be right to start with.&lt;br /&gt;
:So I think it should be open to discussion... enough to convince someone else to make it a valid category, ''then'' start adding them back in again.&lt;br /&gt;
:If I've picked them all up, BTW, I think the following are your candidates:&lt;br /&gt;
:*[[273: Electromagnetic Spectrum]] - (just copied from below, not sure without checking... maybe Superman?)&lt;br /&gt;
:*[[663: Sagan-Man‎‎]] - &amp;quot;Sagan-Man&amp;quot;, as per title&lt;br /&gt;
:*[[700: Complexion‎‎]] - Batman&lt;br /&gt;
:*[[980: Money‎‎]] - Batman mentioned&lt;br /&gt;
:*[[1004: Batman‎‎]] - natch&lt;br /&gt;
:*[[1010: Etymology-Man‎‎]] - &amp;quot;Etymology-Man&amp;quot;, of course/&lt;br /&gt;
:*[[1012: Wrong Superhero‎‎]] - and again&lt;br /&gt;
:**[[:Category:Etymology-Man‎‎]] - and his own category (of just two appearances...)&lt;br /&gt;
:*[[1384: Krypton‎‎]] - Superman&lt;br /&gt;
:*[[1394: Superm*n‎‎]] -sprt-of Superman&lt;br /&gt;
:*[[1415: Ballooning]] - Spiderman&lt;br /&gt;
:*[[1434: Where Do Birds Go]] - Superman&lt;br /&gt;
:*(Feel free to edit in any more, anybody!)&lt;br /&gt;
:...so, along with any other finds, if it looks like we need [[:Category:Comics containing superheroes]] (or similar) then your existing work hasn't gone to waste. [[Special:Contributions/81.179.199.253|81.179.199.253]] 21:42, 29 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::for archiving's sake, there's also [[273: Electromagnetic Spectrum]], [[1415: Ballooning]], and [[1434: Where Do Birds Go]]. &lt;br /&gt;
::it would be nice to have character pages for specific superheroes like superman and batman (and, evidently, etymology-man), but &amp;quot;superheroes&amp;quot; in general is a topic, not a character. as for the name, it's in line with categories like [[:Category:Aliens]], [[:Category:Demons]], and [[:Category:Sysadmins]] which are plural and don't start with &amp;quot;comics featuring&amp;quot;. we do have [[:Category:Comics featuring children]], but it seems like an oddball to me (maybe because it's more of a meta-category for the characters page than one intended for casual browsing? dunno.)&lt;br /&gt;
::should we continue discussing this here, on the character page talk, or somewhere else? i must admit i don't understand the organization. [[Special:Contributions/216.145.71.130|216.145.71.130]] 22:09, 29 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::The wiki can be a bit inconsistent, because it's been going for a while and not everyone has gone with the same 'house style' (which may have changed over time, too). We have [[:Category:Comics with babies]], for example, and also [[:Category:Comics with cursed items]]. While there are various &amp;quot;Category:Comics featuring &amp;lt;named characters, both real and fictional&amp;gt;&amp;quot;, which would have more suited Etymology Man and could (if we so wish) serve for Batman, Superman, etc, individually.&lt;br /&gt;
:::I'm actually fairly ambivalent, but I think that it should at least have other voices agree on which way it all goes. Saves too much after-the-fact 'corrections'. But you don't want to be talking just to me about this, so I'll shut up now, and await some of the 'big hitter' accounts to weigh it all up. It doesn't need to be done right now. A couple more hours, at least... ;)[[Special:Contributions/81.179.199.253|81.179.199.253]] 22:40, 29 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:no response about where to talk about this yet, so i'm just going to loop the other comment in here. changing the name to be more indicative as well. [[Special:Contributions/64.189.140.8|64.189.140.8]] 07:20, 1 May 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Sounds like a nice category to me. [[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 09:22, 1 May 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Seems quite relevant to me. Don't really see an issue with using the category name &amp;quot;superheroes&amp;quot; [[User:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font:11pt Cormorant Garamond&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#4A86A6&amp;quot;&amp;gt;tor&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#C0728D&amp;quot;&amp;gt;i :3&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font:8pt Cormorant Garamond&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#7E7E7E&amp;quot;&amp;gt;talk &amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#C0728D&amp;quot;&amp;gt;to &amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#4A86A6&amp;quot;&amp;gt;me!&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 16:31, 1 May 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:here's the remaining ones i picked up:&lt;br /&gt;
:*[[1648: Famous Duos]] - batman and robin&lt;br /&gt;
:*[[1792: Bird/Plane/Superman]]&lt;br /&gt;
:*[[1848: Glacial Erratic]] - superman (title text)&lt;br /&gt;
:*[[1904: Research Risks]] - supervillains in general&lt;br /&gt;
:*[[1970: Name Dominoes]] - superman and batman (slightly up-right from the center)&lt;br /&gt;
:*[[2230: Versus Bracket]] - batman vs. superman and justice league vs. teen titans&lt;br /&gt;
:*[[2367: Masks]] - batman, spiderman, and mysterio (possibly scarecrow as well, no idea what his lore is)&lt;br /&gt;
:*[[2396: Wonder Woman 1984]]&lt;br /&gt;
:*[[3146: Fantastic Four]]&lt;br /&gt;
:[[Special:Contributions/151.141.68.154|151.141.68.154]] 19:21, 1 May 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::since there's been no further comments i went ahead and remade the category. if anyone with permissions can un-redlink it that'd be nice. [[Special:Contributions/64.189.140.61|64.189.140.61]] 00:49, 6 May 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::You ''didn't'' &amp;quot;remake the category&amp;quot; because, as you say, they're redlinked until someone has sufficient reason to unredlink them. That's not the way we do things here, as explained, or else anyone could do something like [[:Category:64.189.140.61 likes creating categories]] and expect it to be created without any consideration of need.&lt;br /&gt;
:::I'm not opposed to the category, in principle, but the only reason I'm ''not'' (re-)reverting all those pre-emptive new redlinks is because it's too much effort right now. Which is ''not'' the best reason for failing to uphold such practical standards. Well intentioned as you are (and I don't know why nobody else supported you by instating it 'properly'), ''some'' here may see your approach as akin to vandalism. [[Special:Contributions/82.132.237.108|82.132.237.108]] 10:28, 6 May 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::: I, unlike OP, have done quite a bit more ''preparatory'' work for the potential category.&lt;br /&gt;
::: See all the following edits:&lt;br /&gt;
::: *{{diff|411888|663: Sagan-Man}}, {{diff|411889|700: Complexion}}, {{diff|411890|980: Money}}, {{diff|411891|1004: Batman}}, {{diff|411892|1010: Etymology-Man}}, {{diff|411893|1012: Wrong Superhero}}, {{diff|411894|1384: Krypton}}, {{diff|411895|1394: Superm*n}}, {{diff|411896|1415: Ballooning}}, {{diff|411897|1434: Where Do Birds Go}}, {{diff|411898|1648: Famous Duos}}, {{diff|411899|1792: Bird/Plane/Superman}}, {{diff|411900|1848: Glacial Erratic}}, {{diff|411901|1904: Research Risks}}, {{diff|411902|1970: Name Dominoes}}, {{diff|411903|2230: Versus Bracket}}, {{diff|411904|2367: Masks}}, {{diff|411905|2396: Wonder Woman 1984}}, {{diff|411907|3146: Fantastic Four}} and {{diff|411908|Category:Etymology-Man}}&lt;br /&gt;
::: Note that I have done three things:&lt;br /&gt;
:::#Chosen the [[:Category:Comics featuring Superheroes]] variation, to match (among other more individually-aimed ones) the category name used in [[:Category:Comics featuring major characters‏‎]], [[:Category:Comics featuring minor characters‏‎]], [[:Category:Comics featuring politicians]] and [[:Category:Comics featuring real people‏‎]]. Consider this my official and reasoned suggestion for what the Category should be named. Subject to any further discussion on this matter (before implementation).&lt;br /&gt;
:::#* Yes, there are other inconsistencies to this. But then I'd also argue that [[:Category:Etymology-Man]] really should have echoed the standard that resulted in [[:Category:Comics featuring Kidball]], too, as well the same (more historically or not) for Knit Cap, Cueball, Little Bobby Tables, etc.&lt;br /&gt;
:::#I've added a 'category sort index' word, for grouping in the eventual automatic category listing. This is an optional extra, and I used &amp;quot;multiple&amp;quot; for those comics that weren't (easily) just one individual Superhero, but listed those that were involved in the next thing I did. If you prefer normal comic (or category) name-order, you could remove this pipe-option. Or, ideally, cut'n'paste it into any post-category comment just for editor referencing.&lt;br /&gt;
:::#I have (where it seemed necessary, which is most of the time) added an apprioriate editor-'comment' after the category. Because I can't use HTML comments ''within'' HTML comments, I've rendered these with &amp;quot;(!-- .. --)&amp;quot; surrounds, which need fixing to use &amp;amp;lt;/&amp;amp;gt; instead once the current commented-proposal surround is removed.&lt;br /&gt;
:::#*Note, im particular one of them... [[1904: Research Risks]], I think it was... where the comment made was that I don't think it qualified for Superhero, as it only references the concept of a Supervillain.&lt;br /&gt;
:::i.e. each (commented) placeholder should be easy to make into whatever (uncommented) implementation is agreed upon.&lt;br /&gt;
::: Now, ''please'', OP and everyone else, do not just revert (or otherwise apply) a currently non-existent category 'in the hope' that it's correct and someone with an account will just unredlink it for you as a 'done deal'. Even if I were an account-holder (of suitable, no onerous, vintage) I would not just 'make it happen' without at least some proper discussion. Can't speak for what named-users might do, off their own backs, naturally. My opinion (informed or otherwise) doesn't have any particular weight, and it's still possible I can't persuade anyone (who matters) to adopt all of my own suggestions. [[Special:Contributions/81.179.199.253|81.179.199.253]] 20:03, 6 May 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::::two account-holders said they approved of the idea. if this isn't proper discussion, what do you want me to do?&lt;br /&gt;
::::also, aside from flukes like [[:Category:Comics with cursed items]] (which should be changed imo), the &amp;quot;comics featuring&amp;quot; name is just to avoid clashing with character pages: for instance, we named it [[:Category:Comics featuring real people]] because [[:Category:Real people]] was taken. &amp;quot;Superheroes&amp;quot; isn't taken; we don't have any character pages for superheroes in the first place. [[:Category:Etymology-Man]] is a [[:Category:Miniseries|miniseries]] category, not a character category. (it has the same comics as a character category would have, granted, but it's not treated like one in any way -- hence the name!) [[Special:Contributions/64.189.140.56|64.189.140.56]] 04:13, 7 May 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::::Speaking for myself, I respect both Favi and tori's opinions, and I'm even (generally) in favour of this category. But nobody who ''can'' make it so that it isn't redlinking (simple enough... by now, even you could have done it, entirely on your own) has done so.&lt;br /&gt;
::::My (and others', it looks like) point has always been that it has for a long time been a fairly matter of fact process to announce &amp;quot;hey, I think ''this, this and this'' should be made to have ''that'' Category&amp;quot;, some minor discussion occur, refinements/additions considered, then it gets done. If it doesn't, it's because of lack of buy-in and nobody was convinced.&lt;br /&gt;
::::Some things still might get done far too hastily/improperly (various Category inconsistencies are 'obvious') and the Pages To Delete tags get rolled out (where page-renaming isn't sufficient), but Deletions are even rarer than Renames (in part because of the rights required to do so), and both are outweighed by the creation of instances of what might just be considered as 'personal pet project pages' by some. That way lies indefinite expansion and random 'forgotten' stubs left all over the place, so if I have one personally overriding attitude to this whole thing, it's that of caution. I'd rather remove a redlink (otyer than abset User and User Talk ones in signatures) than let it temptingly sit there inviting the next near-newbie to create it 'because they can' (as demonstrably happens with the User/User Talk ones, anyway), regardless&lt;br /&gt;
::::(I haven't yet even decided upon my ''own username'' that I might use, after maybe more than a decade contributing here, which probably tells you more about me than anything else. Can't speak for others still posting via IP, like yourself.)&lt;br /&gt;
::::This is not me 'pulling rank', I must add. I have no 'rank' to pull, by my own decision. I'm just a random IP (as are you/any others not named yet) who just tries to do my best to do what limited things I can do to make this site operate smoothly. It was supposed to be a simple explanation of the established community convention that has tended to work well enough, and was never supposed to become 'IP-vs-IP combat', and I really hope still isn't, despite our clearly conflicting drives on how to reach the same sort of 'final' ideal (minor details varying). And I've had my own fair share of &amp;quot;wouldn't it be nice to have &amp;lt;some feature&amp;gt;?&amp;quot; not going anywhere, which I live with because this isn't 'my' site but a community one. (A strange community, naturally, but one of the better ones, out of all those I dabble in.)&lt;br /&gt;
::::That's the long-winded reply only here to try to explain (my, at least) previous long-winded replies. I'll leave the whole &amp;quot;Comics featuring&amp;quot; stuff undiscussed (save that, by consistency, yes, if Etymology-Man had enough appearances to merit a character page, some rearranging probably wouldn't go amiss to do the same as &amp;quot;Cueball&amp;quot;!=&amp;quot;... featuring Cueball&amp;quot;, etc). It's not a full on &amp;quot;[[386: Duty Calls]]&amp;quot;-type scenario, but I thought it worth a 'quick' last note as to where I'm coming from. It wasn't supposed to be this long! Sorry for wasting everyone's time, though. Even the like-minded ones? [[Special:Contributions/82.132.237.17|82.132.237.17]] 14:49, 7 May 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Multiple Blondies, Merge Blondie/Lenhart ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Blondie]] can be three different people: the [[Blondie|generic Blondie]], [[Miss Lenhart]], and [[Mrs. Roberts]] (who only appeared in the [[1337 series]] and [[327: Exploits of a Mom]]). My proposal is to change Blondie's name to Miss Lenhart, but separate Mrs. Roberts and Blondie, as they are different people. Merging Miss Lenhart and Blondie would be similar to how [[Cutie]] and [[Megan]] were merged after Megan was named a few times. [[User:YZ100]] 00:57, 6 May 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Sounds good! I don't see why we'd need to keep using our own name when Randall has given her a different name. [[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 14:53, 9 May 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::Hmmm... not a lot of thought put in here, before the mass rejig actually happened. The same person who is explicitly a Math(s) teacher in some comics is also explicitly ''not'' into mathematics in [[1985: Meteorologist|at least one other]] (and instead has a Linguistics degree under her belt). Wish I'd said something, now, but I was already involved in the above discussion and didn't want to cause any more fuss than I had to. Oh well. Done now. (Or at least the 'easy' bit, but I suspect the other page-merging will be happening soon enough.) [[Special:Contributions/81.179.199.253|81.179.199.253]] 16:54, 9 May 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Well, that comic is particular because Blondie is used a news anchor. Iirc, Randall almost always uses either Cueball or Blondie to portray news anchors, and that comic had two news anchors so he had to use both. And even before the merger, the [[Miss Lenhart]] page said: &amp;quot;[https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Miss_Lenhart&amp;amp;oldid=409753 She may or may not represent the same character from comic to comic]&amp;quot;. I'll add that fun fact to the page though. [[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 19:35, 10 May 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::I agree with [[User:FaviFake]]. The only recurring characters in xkcd who represent the same character across comics are [[Black Hat]], [[Danish]], [[Beret Guy]], and technically [[White Hat]]. Miss Lenhart can do different things, and arguably it is possible for her to work part-time. But since xkcd doesn't have a fixed timeline, like in [[1139: Rubber and Glue]], [[1753: Thumb War]], or [[2869: Puzzles]], where people like Black Hat and [[Ponytail]] appear as kids, so it is possible for here to work as a news anchor in the past, if not part-time. The Miss Lenhart page says Cueball is used more commonly as a news anchor, and this could be because Lenhart works part-time. [[User:YZ100]] 21:12, 10 May 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::::I gave just ''one'' case, of several, where - similarly to &amp;quot;Rob is a Cueball, but a given Cueball isn't necessarily a/the Rob&amp;quot; - an aspect of character tied heavily to Miss Lenhart isn't one that agrees with all Blondies. My perspective remains that Miss Lenhart (when established as such) is notably as much a separate entity from generic-Blondie as Mrs Roberts is another, and we previously we had this decent distinction of definite-Misses Lenharts, definite-Mrs Robertses and all other generic Blondies that were neither suggested to be (at least part of the time) mathematics teachers nor hacker-moms.&lt;br /&gt;
::::Then there's the separate issue, in that same Meteorologist comic, that the Blondie/whoever (like Cueball) clearly isn't even really a News Anchor (part time or otherwise), and actual TV meteorologists/weather-presenters (even budding/probationary ones, who should have started off by being ''actual'' meteorologists who then are seen as suitable candidates to dip their toe into being a media personality) tend to be entirely different people from the journalists who present the news. The lesson is that justifying a positive truth from the the comics is tricky, but inconsistencies support various negative truths mmore practical&lt;br /&gt;
::::In the end, there's pretty much as much logic to consider all (ex-)Blondies to be Mrs. Roberts, ''instead''. Or, as a better combination of matches, some are Lenhart and some are Roberts. (Or, a better-match/lesser-mismatch, would leave at least some Blondies as still 'only' a generic Blondie) Though the decision has been made now, so I was only here to point out some of the various problems invoked but apparently not even considered. [[Special:Contributions/81.179.199.253|81.179.199.253]] 22:42, 10 May 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::In [[1985: Meteorologist]], Lenhart has a Linguistics degree and she teaches grammar in [[3229: Grammar]]. She isn't limited to just math, like how she teaches science in [[3132: Coastline Similarity]]. Besides, being a math teacher and a mathematician are not the same thing. [[User:YZ100]] 4:50, 12 May 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::: You are of course {{w|begging the question}}, by insisting that the person/people with a Linguistics/Grammar background is Miss Lenhart, ''then'' using that as further proof as to why you are correct to say they are all the same person. Try not to do that. [[Special:Contributions/82.132.221.157|82.132.221.157]] 13:37, 12 May 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Page for What if? questions ==&lt;br /&gt;
Let's make a page for What if? questions we all have and take some of those questions to send to Randall? This may also help revive the blog articles. Does anyone have any other ideas? [[User:YZ100|YZ100]] 4:38, 14 May 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:I think that Randall might be working on some other projects. Added a question onto [[User:FaviFake]]'s page in regards to whether or not What If? will be continued in the future. [[User:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font:11pt Cormorant Garamond&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#4A86A6&amp;quot;&amp;gt;tor&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#C0728D&amp;quot;&amp;gt;i :3&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font:8pt Cormorant Garamond&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#7E7E7E&amp;quot;&amp;gt;talk &amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#C0728D&amp;quot;&amp;gt;to &amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#4A86A6&amp;quot;&amp;gt;me!&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 19:00, 14 May 2026 (UTC)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>42.book.addict</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=User:FaviFake&amp;diff=412699</id>
		<title>User:FaviFake</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=User:FaviFake&amp;diff=412699"/>
				<updated>2026-05-14T18:57:53Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;42.book.addict: /* Your suggestions! What should I ask next? */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;Score: {{#cscore:FaviFake|score}} ({{#cscore:FaviFake|pages}} pages edited and {{#cscore:FaviFake|changes}} total edits)&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{notice|&amp;lt;big&amp;gt;Since Randall answered my latest questions, I sent him another list of questions, but he hasn't replied as of 24/1/26&amp;lt;/big&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Hey everyone! I got in touch with [[Randall Munroe]] himself!! Here's what you need to know.'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;big&amp;gt;{{TOC}}&amp;lt;/big&amp;gt;I emailed him to ask for the official release date of [[36: Scientists]] (see [[36: Scientists#Trivia|the trivia for more info]]). Surprisingly, he got back to me! You can read the full conversation below. I'll keep you posted if I receive more messages! You can [https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=User:FaviFake&amp;amp;action=watch add this page to your watchlist] to keep track of it. I haven't received his explicit permission to feature his messages in full, so initially i hid his messages. I've now published the contents of his emails, since he hasn't responded to my request to make them public. My emails have not been altered, but in the copy-pasting, links have been removed. These emails were all hyperlinked, I now added back only a few links.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In his second email, Randall expressed willingness to answer a few more questions, particularly simpler, administrative questions (like the one he answered already), but kindly explained he prefers to avoid too much meta-commentary. Because I didn't want to come up with every question and I wanted to hear everyone, I'll try to send him some that you want, if he agrees to receiving more! You can [[#Your suggestions! What should I ask next?|add your suggestions here!]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Even if he doesn't answer all these questions, we could also use this page for other things. I'm also planning to create a page on this wiki containing '''everything''' we don't know about xkcd, using these questions. '''So, keep posting your questions!''' In the future, this could become:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*A list of everything we can research extremely in-depth, if someone wants to help the wiki that way.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*A list of quick questions to ask him when someone meets him in person, at a book tour for example.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*A page for people who want to read about things we don't know and is interested in xkcd mysteries.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;background-color:#9eff9e;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span font-size:1.4em;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;'''&amp;lt;big&amp;gt;&amp;lt;big&amp;gt;&amp;amp;nbsp; [https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title{{=}}User:FaviFake&amp;amp;action{{=}}edit&amp;amp;section{{=}}2 CLICK HERE TO ADD NEW QUESTION'''  (scroll to bottom)]&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/big&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/big&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Email thread==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;plainlinks&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
!Question from the Explain xkcd wiki regarding one of your comics&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Email thread - 4 messages — Here's a [https://imgur.com/a/2StTkvJ screenshot of one of the emails], if you need some sort of proof.&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|'''FaviFake''' &amp;lt;[email redacted]@gmail.com&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
!14 February 2025 at 19:16 CET&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| colspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; |To: Randall Munroe &amp;lt;[Randall's email redacted]@gmail.com&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| colspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; |&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hi,&lt;br /&gt;
I'm an editor at explainxkcd.com, which you probably know is the wiki that explains all your comics and provides as much info as possible on them.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In pursuit of that goal, we have always had an unsolved mystery only you can solve. Comic [[36: Scientists]] was originally posted as a duplicate of comic [[10: Pi Equals]]. You corrected this sometime between April 23, 2006 and July 5, 2006 , when the current version showed up in the web archive (see the two links). The comic looks like one of your old drawings.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
So, explain xkcd thinks that when you realized your mistake (over three months after it was originally posted), you probably found an old unused drawing and posted it, to not make it stand out compared to the other comics from that time. This all means we have no date for this comic, since it could've been posted anytime between the two dates mentioned above. You can read more about this here. (If you're interested, we have a more comprehensive history of your webcomic here.)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Could you kindly help us figure this out by checking when you released comic #[[36]], so we can add an official date to it? This is one of the only official comics which we don't know the date of.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Kind regards,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;FaviFake&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;editor @ explain xkcd&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
''[In the copy-pasting, links have been removed. These emails were all hyperlinked, I now added back only a few links.]''&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|'''Randall Munroe''' [Randall's email redacted]&lt;br /&gt;
!14 February 2025 at 22:20 CET&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| colspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; |To: FaviFake &amp;lt;[email redacted]@gmail.com&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| colspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; |&lt;br /&gt;
FaviFake,&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I had totally forgotten about this! Checking my logs, I believe I swapped it in on April 28th.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thank you for your tireless documentation effort :)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Warmest wishes,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Randall&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|'''FaviFake''' &amp;lt;[email redacted]@gmail.com&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
!15 February 2025 at 17:39 CET&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| colspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; |To: Randall Munroe &amp;lt;[Randall's email redacted]@gmail.com&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| colspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; |Hello Randall,&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thank you so much for your response!! I'm certain the rest of the community will be thrilled to have an official answer.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Unfortunately, this is by far not the only &amp;quot;unsolved mystery&amp;quot; we have encountered in our research of your comic. Because we don't get to talk to you very often, I'd like to ask you if you can answer more of our many questions, if you're up for it. Of course, I do not want to annoy you or waste your time, so please let me know if this is something you'd enjoy! I will try to keep the questions entertaining for you.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Kind regards,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;FaviFake&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|'''Randall Munroe''' &amp;lt;[Randall's email redacted]@gmail.com&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
!17 February 2025 at 19:02 CET&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| colspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; |To: FaviFake &amp;lt;[email redacted]@gmail.com&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| colspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; |FaviFake,&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You're welcome to send over questions, although I can't promise any answers so please don't put too much time into it!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I've always tried to resist the temptation to do too much explaining or meta-commentary in general, partly because once you start breaking the fourth wall, it can be hard to stop, and partly because I've found those boundaries are helpful for keeping me focused.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But if you want to send over some of your questions, I can see if there are at least a few of them that I can answer—at least some of the simpler, more administrative ones.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
And seriously, my heartfelt thanks to you and everyone there. It's such a privilege to make something that people think is worth so much effort to explain &amp;lt;3&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
—Randall&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|'''FaviFake''' &amp;lt;[email redacted]@gmail.com&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
!20 February 2025 at 18:07&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| colspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; |To: Randall Munroe &amp;lt;[Randall's email redacted]@gmail.com&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| colspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; |Randall,&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thank you for the kind words!! I really appreciate the offer. Next time, I'm thinking of asking the community for other simple and administrative questions, because I'm sure I don't represent everyone. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
(Also, would it be okay to feature your responses on our wiki?)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I had drafted the paragraphs below in advance and I'm not sure if they fall outside the boundaries you mentioned, but I figured I’d ask anyway since this is a topic the other editors are very curious about. Of course, no worries if you’d rather not get into the details! We have plenty of simpler questions we can't answer ourselves. Here you go:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On June 17, 2009, you released [[Conservation]] (along with IBM's accompanying blog post), the first comic created with IBM for their &amp;quot;A Smarter Planet&amp;quot; blog. You used the filename conservation.png, as usual. On August 11, 2009, the second comic of the series, [[Prescriptions]], was released (with its blog post), but this time you used an unusual filename: ibm_hc_1.png.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We initially believed these were the only comics you created, mainly because they were the only ones featured on your page xkcd.com/asmarterplanet, but a little over a month ago we discovered two additional never-before-seen comics by experimenting with the image URLs for [[ibm_hc_2]].png and [[ibm_hc_3]].png. We believe you created these two comics as part of the IBM partnership, but for some reason they were never released publicly and were only accessible from imgs.xkcd.com. (Interestingly enough, they are still available!)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Any additional info you can give us would help a ton! For example: their titles, when they were drawn or supposed to be released, or why they were never officially published. Thank you!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
—FaviFake&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''I wanted to also hear what ''you'' wanted to ask! Randall asked for simpler, administrative questions (like the one he answered), and not ones that required too much explaining. Please add your suggestions to the section below! If you have thoughts, [[User talk:FaviFake#Contacting Randall Munroe|send them to me on my talk page]]!''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''Since I still hadn't heard back, I sent another email with a few of the quickest and smaller questions below.]''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|'''FaviFake''' &amp;lt;[email redacted]@gmail.com&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
!13 March 2025 at 19:40&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| colspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; |To: Randall Munroe &amp;lt;[Randall's email redacted]@gmail.com&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| colspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; |Hello Randall,&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hope you're doing well! I'm just following up since it’s been a little while.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the meantime, we gathered some simpler and more administrative questions from the community—ones that might be easier to answer than the previous one. Below are just a few of them—let me know if you'd be up for answering any!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*When did you release [[Blue Eyes]]: The Hardest Login Puzzle in the World? This is one of the comics that don't have a confirmed release date.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*In comic [[1572: xkcd Survey]], you published a Google Form and said that &amp;quot;everyone's responses will be posted [...] to create an interesting data set for people to play with&amp;quot;. However, due to the large number of responses, you encountered technical problems and didn't release the results. Could you confirm the reason for the delay and whether we should expect to see the responses in the future?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Up until comic #[[1674]], you provided official transcripts for new comics in the JSON interface. In 2016, you stopped. Could you explain why?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*What was/is the purpose of pages such as xkcd.com/yes, xkcd.com/burlap, xkcd.com/dot, and [https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php/explain_xkcd:Community_portal/Proposals#List_of_pages others]?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thanks again for your time, and no worries if you’re too busy! We truly appreciate any insights you can share.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Kind regards,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;FaviFake&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
Four months after my last email, '''HE REPLIED!'''&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|'''Randall Munroe''' &amp;lt;[Randall's email redacted]@gmail.com&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
! 9 July 2025 at 13:34&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| colspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; |To: FaviFake &amp;lt;[email redacted]@gmail.com&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| colspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; |&lt;br /&gt;
FaviFake,&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Sorry for the extremely long delay here, but I wanted to send you replies to some of these! &amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#500050;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;In the meantime, we gathered some simpler and more administrative questions from the community—ones that might be easier to answer than the previous one. Below are just a few of them—let me know if you'd be up for answering any!&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&amp;lt;div style=&amp;quot;color:#500050;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;On June 17, 2009, you released [[Conservation]] (along with IBM's accompanying blog post), the first comic created with IBM for their &amp;quot;A Smarter Planet&amp;quot; blog. You used the filename conservation.png, as usual. On August 11, 2009, the second comic of the series, [[Prescriptions]], was released (with its blog post), but this time you used an unusual filename: ibm_hc_1.png.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We initially believed these were the only comics you created, mainly because they were the only ones featured on your page xkcd.com/asmarterplanet, but a little over a month ago we discovered two additional never-before-seen comics by experimenting with the image URLs for [[ibm_hc_2]].png and [[ibm_hc_3]].png. We believe you created these two comics as part of the IBM partnership, but for some reason they were never released publicly and were only accessible from imgs.xkcd.com. (Interestingly enough, they are still available!)&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I had forgotten about these! These were other draft comics I drew for the project, and I put them in that folder to transfer them, but IIRC the project involved a lot of organizational moving parts, and for administrative reasons those comics didn't end up getting published. I believe I never gave them titles.&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#500050;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;When did you release Blue Eyes: The Hardest Login Puzzle in the World? This is one of the comics that don't have a confirmed release date.&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;Unfortunately, I don't have an easy way to answer that one!&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#500050;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;In comic [[1572: xkcd Survey]], you published a Google Form and said that &amp;quot;everyone's responses will be posted [...] to create an interesting data set for people to play with&amp;quot;. However, due to the large number of responses, you encountered technical problems and didn't release the results. Could you confirm the reason for the delay and whether we should expect to see the responses in the future?&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;Haha, I got a fun message from the Google Forms administrators that day. Apparently they were in the middle of updating to a new system on the day I posted the comic, and I provided an extremely unexpected—and profoundly unwelcome—load test. But they were very nice about it and we eventually managed to recover most of the data.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
I haven't found a way to release it that I'm comfortable with. I tried to ask about frivolous stuff that wouldn't provide easy fodder for shoddy social science, but I found that for almost any correlation pair in the dataset, you could immediately project a half dozen intriguing, serious, and contradictory theories onto the data. People were incredibly thoughtful and detailed in their responses to my silly questions, which made me want to be very careful with how I used their data. I still might find a way to release selections from it, because it's a fascinating dataset, but only if I'm confident that I'm not enabling bad science or betraying anyone's trust.&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#500050;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Up until comic #1674, you provided official transcripts for new comics in the JSON interface. In 2016, you stopped. Could you explain why?&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;The transcripts were initially submitted by readers through Ryan North's OhNoRobot project, moderated and edited by some friends of mine through a custom system they set up. They eventually ended up often simply writing the transcripts themselves. It ended up being a lot of work to ask of volunteers, and eventually infrastructure updates were needed while the people involved were busy with other things, so I let them stop updating rather than trying to recruit more people.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
I'd love to start offering transcripts again, and hope to do so at some point soon, hopefully in a way that indicates they're from a third party without creating too much spam potential. As I'm sure you know from doing transcripts on the wiki, translating a comic to text can involve a lot of additional creative decisions—it's a different medium, after all!—so I want to make them available for accessibility while ideally clarifying that they're written from the point of view of a reader, to avoid making readers feel like they NEED to read both versions to see everything that I meant to include!&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#500050;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;What was/is the purpose of pages such as [https://xkcd.com/yes xkcd.com/yes], [https://xkcd.com/burlap xkcd.com/burlap], [https://xkcd.com/dot xkcd.com/dot], and [[explain xkcd:Community portal/Proposals#List of pages|others]]?&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;Most of those were inside jokes sent to friends, but [https://xkcd.com/dot xkcd.com/dot] is an improvised migraine test! Since I was a kid, I've occasionally gotten the type of migraine that starts with blind spots in the vision. They can be hard to tell apart from sun glare at first, but I found I could tell whether I was having one by looking at a blinking dot to see if it disappeared—which would tell me I needed to take painkillers ASAP. I made that gif and put it on my website for easy access from wherever I was at the time. Thankfully, the migraines have gotten less frequent over the years, but I still have to use that page occasionally.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I hope that's helpful!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Best wishes,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Randall&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I replied:&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|'''FaviFake''' &amp;lt;[email redacted]@gmail.com&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
!3 September 2025 at 11:13&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| colspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; |To: Randall Munroe &amp;lt;[Randall's email redacted]@gmail.com&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| colspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; |Randall,&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thanks so much for responding to these! We've already added them to the wiki. I also apologise for taking so long to reply; I seem to be exceptionally skilled at involuntary procrastination.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You didn’t explicitly say you wanted more questions, but I'll risk asking anyway :)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1. Before xkcd.com, you posted your comics on LiveJournal. When you launched xkcd.com, you uploaded the backlog of 41 comics from LiveJournal in a seemingly random order. Was there a reason for this? For example, did you intentionally assign number 7 to your first comic, Girl sleeping, and number 1 to your fifth comic, Barrel - Part 1?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2. Why was the xkcd warning removed? Four hours after comic Earth Temperature Timeline was released, the warning and footnote disappeared. A new footnote appeared three weeks later, but the warning never came back. We speculated it was related to the comic's sudden surge in popularity, but we're not sure why it wasn't reinstated.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3. The old LiveJournal caption for comic Godel, Escher, Kurt Halsey mentioned other comics in the series. Unfortunately, the image and link to the &amp;quot;full series&amp;quot; weren’t archived. Is there more to this comic than what’s now available, or was the LiveJournal version simply an excerpt?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
4. Three years ago, Matthew Smoot said that the xkcd store was &amp;quot;closed indefinitely due to supply chain issues&amp;quot;, but recently it was announced that it will be opening soon! What happened?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thank you again for your time and generosity!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Kind regards,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;FaviFake&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I'll update this page if he responds.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Your suggestions! What should I ask next?==&lt;br /&gt;
Remember, he said only simple questions. I'm assuming he'd like questions similar to the ones he replied to (short, sweet, no explaining needed), or questions that shouldn't require him to explain his comic too much. '''What's something relatively important that we don't know and that only Randall can answer?'''{{notice|&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Format your suggestions like this:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 '''&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;'''QUESTION? --~~~~''' &amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;'''&lt;br /&gt;
 '''&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;:Explain in more detail your question.&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;'''&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;'''&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;::Discuss it and vote --~~~~&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;'''&lt;br /&gt;
[https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title{{=}}User:FaviFake&amp;amp;action{{=}}edit&amp;amp;section{{=}}2 '''CLICK HERE''' TO ADD A NEW QUESTION (scroll to bottom)] }}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{Done}}'''[[ibm_hc_2]] and [[ibm_hc_3]] (newly-discovered comics) and comic [[36: Scientists]]''' --[[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 16:34, 21 February 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:I asked this one already, because I assume it's the most important one right now. You can [[#Email thread|see my question above]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{Done}} '''Why were the first comics [[LiveJournal|uploaded seemingly at random]]? --[[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 21:51, 22 February 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Initially, randall posted his comics to LiveJournal ([[LiveJournal|learn more here]]). The new xkcd website opened on January 1, 2006, and the backlog of 41 comics from LiveJournal from [[1: Barrel - Part 1]] to [[44: Love]] was transferred on the same day, but in a completely different order. The only comic that has the same number on both sites is [[3: Island (sketch)]], while all the other comics were uploaded seemingly at random. Also, only eleven of the original comic titles were reused of the new site, and even among the last eleven comics posted on both sites, only six used the same title.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{Done}}'''When was [[Blue Eyes]] released? --[[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 11:01, 23 February 2025 (UTC)'''&lt;br /&gt;
:[[xkcd]]'s [[Blue Eyes]] puzzle is a logic puzzle posted around the same time as comic [[169: Words that End in GRY]]. [[Randall]] calls it &amp;quot;The Hardest Logic Puzzle in the World&amp;quot; on its page, but whether it really is the hardest is up to speculation. This is incorrect, as the comic was available long before October 11, 2006. The earliest date we have is [https://web.archive.org/web/20041024201125/http://68.57.186.221:8080/ October 24th, 2004] (see fourth link on the page), and the earliest version of the comic is from [https://web.archive.org/web/20041109034300/http://68.57.186.221:8080/blue_eyes.html November 4th, 2004]. Additionally, both the puzzle [https://xkcd.com/solution.html and the solution] (here's an [https://web.archive.org/web/20061102070433/https://xkcd.com/solution.html earlier version of the solution])were modified and updated several times since its release.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{Done}}'''What happened to the transcripts in the JSON interface? --[[User:Kynde|Kynde]] ([[User talk:Kynde|talk]]) 17:38, 23 February 2025 (UTC)''' &lt;br /&gt;
:On the [https://xkcd.com/about/ about] page of xkcd there is a description of where:&lt;br /&gt;
 Is there an interface for automated systems to access comics and metadata?&lt;br /&gt;
:Read more here [[Transcript]]. And on this page there is a [[Transcript#End%20of%20transcripts|description]] about how the json info got messed up after [[1608: Hoverboard]] and how they completely ended after [[1677: Contrails]] which had the transcript of [[1674: Adult]].&lt;br /&gt;
:I would like to know if he noticed the messed up order of the transcript and if that was why he choose to end it completely? --[[User:Kynde|Kynde]] ([[User talk:Kynde|talk]]) 17:38, 23 February 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::This imo is one the best questions we've gotten! Very technical and doesn't require him to explain any of his comics! Thanks [[User:Kynde|Kynde]]! Do you have more questions like this one? --[[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 18:31, 25 February 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Thanks. I was frustrated about this at some time. Not any other questions right now of this kind. --[[User:Kynde|Kynde]] ([[User talk:Kynde|talk]]) 13:54, 26 February 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Why has there not been any new what if since comet ice? --[[Special:Contributions/162.158.41.44|162.158.41.44]] 17:14, 24 February 2025 (UTC)'''&lt;br /&gt;
::Don't really see why we need to ask him this, A. This isn't related to the wiki, and B. They wanted short, administrative questions [[Special:Contributions/172.71.30.168|172.71.30.168]] 17:26, 24 February 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::I kinda like this one! A: I think it's partially relevant, we have [[what if? (blog)#Release schedule|and entire section dedicated]] to analysing the release schedule of new articles. B. That's true, but at least it's shorter than most other ones. Not a terrible question imo. --[[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 18:31, 25 February 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::::I feel like the answer would either be unsatisfying, or unsurprising. Releasing too many articles may disincentivize people from buying the books, the YouTube page is better marketing, people aren't asking interesting questions, the increased popularity of the article has led to too many questions being asked and it becomes increasingly unfair to answer one over the other. There's a possible litany of reasons without considering other more personal reasons that Randall may not want to share. Also, (and this is my completely unfair opinion) I personally feel like any question asking &amp;quot;why?&amp;quot; is meta-commentary and out of scope. It also feels like entitlement when you ask why someone isn't giving you even more stuff for free. [[Special:Contributions/172.69.23.94|172.69.23.94]] 19:25, 3 March 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Yeah no you're right. Btw, the first part of your answer is great, you should consider adding it to the blog page! (or I can do if you don't mind)  [[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 19:47, 3 March 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::Thank you! I don't mind you adding it, but I also don't want to burden you with it. I'll look the page over and see where it might fit. I appreciate you fielding the brunt of the community in this matter! [[Special:Contributions/172.69.22.57|172.69.22.57]] 21:16, 3 March 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::Since you didn't add it, [[what if? (blog)#Sporadic releases|I did]]! --[[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 16:47, 23 March 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::It's because the email that the ''What If?'' suggestions go to is wrong. [[User:B_for_brain|B for brain]] ([[User_talk:B_for_brain|talk]]) ([https://www.youtube.com/@bforbrain youtube channel] [https://bforbrain.weebly.com/ wobsite (supposed to be a blag)]) 18:24, 20 March 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::Wait what? Please explain, I didn't know about this! What do you mean? --[[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 21:00, 20 March 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::::Try submitting a &amp;quot;What if?&amp;quot; suggestion yourself – you'll get an email from whatever email service you use saying that the email &amp;quot;Doesn't exist&amp;quot;. [[User:B_for_brain|B for brain]] ([[User_talk:B_for_brain|talk]]) ([https://www.youtube.com/@bforbrain youtube channel] [https://bforbrain.weebly.com/ wobsite (supposed to be a blag)]) 17:35, 24 March 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::::Thanks! I didn't know about this. I'll add an incomplete notice. --[[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 17:41, 24 March 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Why has the [[Blag]] stopped.? --[[User:Kynde|Kynde]] ([[User talk:Kynde|talk]]) 14:11, 26 February 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Seemed like it was a good place to write extra info, but it has been removed from the links on the front page 2023 even though the [https://blog.xkcd.com/ page] still exist.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Do you read explainxkcd.com? --[[Special:Contributions/172.68.174.146|172.68.174.146]] 19:01, 27 February 2025 (UTC)''' &lt;br /&gt;
:We've probably all wondered:  Does he ever read the wiki?  if so,  there are many directions this could go.  Like:  Has he ever posted anonymously (this could be asked without necessarily identifying which posts were his)?  Ever find a explanation and laugh at how wrong it was?  Ever find a explanation that had a funnier interpretation then he intended? &lt;br /&gt;
::Discuss it and vote - I doubt that counts as &amp;quot;administrative&amp;quot; but by not referencing any particular comic, we definitely avoid the &amp;quot;questions shouldn't require him to explain his comic more than he has already done.&amp;quot; part.  Anyway, feel free to reword/add parts/delete parts/hack the question up in whatever way you want.  Consider this just me posting the idea for a question, and letting you guys do whatever you want with the idea   --[[Special:Contributions/172.68.174.146|172.68.174.146]] 19:01, 27 February 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::I do not think we should ask this. He has at least once referred to explain xkcd, so he do know of it. But I think that for his own sake, he stays clear of it as best as he can. ;-) -- [[User:Kynde|Kynde]] ([[User talk:Kynde|talk]]) 19:20, 10 March 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{Done}} '''[[24]]'s original caption claimed to have more to it, but the link isn't archived. Is there more? [[user talk:lett‪herebedarklight|youtu.be/miLcaqq2Zpk]] 01:23, 4 March 2025 (UTC)'''&lt;br /&gt;
::I wonder if he'd want to talk about it, since he's now deleted his LiveJournal reply regarding the broken link. But would be easy to answer if there wasn't more. --[[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 18:08, 4 March 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''In [[2256: Bad Map Projection: South America]], which eleven islands are representing what I assume are the Philippines and Indonesia? --[[Special:Contributions/104.23.187.145|104.23.187.145]] 13:45, 1 March 2025 (UTC)'''&lt;br /&gt;
:Luzon, Samar, Mindanao, Sumatra, Java, Borneo, Sulawesi, and New Guinea seem pretty obvious, but what are the other three islands?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''In [[2951: Bad Map Projection: Exterior Kansas]], assuming you didn't draw the map freehand, what function did you use to convert (actual distance from center point) to (distance from center point in the projection)? --[[Special:Contributions/104.23.187.145|104.23.187.145]] 13:45, 1 March 2025 (UTC)'''&lt;br /&gt;
:This information would be helpful for adding more states, territories, countries, and/or landmasses to the map.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Does he know that if a=1,b=2,c=3, etc. then x+k+c+d=42?[[User:Thehydraclone|Thehydraclone]] ([[User talk:Thehydraclone|talk]]) 19:49, 2 March 2025 (UTC)'''&lt;br /&gt;
:(Answer to life, the universe, and everything)&lt;br /&gt;
::[https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php/xkcd#:~:text=However%2C%20according%20to%20Randall%20himself%2C%20this%20is%20a%20coincidence This might be relevant], if you can find a citation for it...&lt;br /&gt;
::Not very important question but very easy to answer and trivial, i like it. --[[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 15:59, 3 March 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::But I think this has already been debated wildly and he has explained why he chose this name extensively, and it seems like it was not for that reason. I find it very interesting though, but it also only works for English alfabet, in Denmark we do not use W when saying the alfabet (although we have it for loan words. We also call it Weekend in Denmark. That is an official Danish word). But the X would thus be one less and the sum 41 ;-) I do realize that he of course would have used the English alfabet, so if he actually looked for this he would also get 42. -- [[User:Kynde|Kynde]] ([[User talk:Kynde|talk]]) 19:20, 10 March 2025 (UTC) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''There's a hidden search box in [https://xkcd.com xkcd.com]'s source code. --[[User:Bytesizeinfo.com|Bytesizeinfo.com]]''' &lt;br /&gt;
:It's commented out, but you can reenable it with your browser's inspect tool, and it still seems to work. (It's in the footer, if you want to try.) Why is it commented out? It seems like a useful tool.&lt;br /&gt;
::Interesting! I had noticed it was there on older archives but didn't know it was just commented out. --[[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 18:08, 4 March 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{Done}}'''What was/is the purpose of https://xkcd.com/yes/ and https://xkcd.com/no/? [[user talk:lett‪herebedarklight|youtu.be/miLcaqq2Zpk]] 03:32, 5 March 2025 (UTC)'''&lt;br /&gt;
::Wait what? I've never seen these pages before! Are there any others? --[[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 21:30, 8 March 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::When I learnt of them, I tried various others (e.g. &amp;quot;.../maybe&amp;quot;), to no avail. But maybe there's something non-Yes/Noish that goes along with those two, thematically. So far, though, I've not worked out what they might be. [[Special:Contributions/162.158.33.252|162.158.33.252]] 00:08, 9 March 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::::I looked into it! There are other pages, but the xkcd forum link is broken and not archived. (See more info on the two pages, i just created, [[NO]] and [[YES]].) --[[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 12:33, 9 March 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{Done}}'''Are results from the [[xkcd Survey]] ever going to be released? --[[Special:Contributions/172.71.254.92|172.71.254.92]] 01:53, 9 March 2025 (UTC)''' &lt;br /&gt;
:In xkcd.com/[[1572]] there was a survey. Randall said that he would release the data, but it crashed google forms. Is there any way to get it back, and if so, will he finally release it?&lt;br /&gt;
::Interesting! I didn't know. Very good question, thanks! --[[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 12:33, 9 March 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Did you know that the chatroom in [[xkcloud]]; euphoria.io is living and growing under a new domain, leet.nu? [[User:Elaine Roberts|Elaine Roberts]] ([[User talk:Elaine Roberts|talk]]) 19:21, 11 March 2025 (UTC)'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''What checkmate did you intend to depict in [[1112: Think Logically]]?''' [[Special:Contributions/162.158.167.40|162.158.167.40]] 07:04, 10 March 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:We suspect scholar's mate, but there is at least one other possibility, specifically a variant of fool's mate (since Cueball could be moving his pawns towards Knit Cap Guy's king).&lt;br /&gt;
::Did he really choose to depict a specific strategy? Is the assumption based on the board pieces at the end, or on the number of moves, or both? --[[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 15:11, 10 March 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Is the board setup in [[3045: AlphaMove]] based on playing AlphaMove against a specific chess engine? If so, which one?''' -unsigned!&lt;br /&gt;
::Can you elaborate? What's a board setup, what dow e exactly not know? --[[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 16:14, 11 March 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Seems to me, it simply means &amp;quot;has that playing position (i.e. the current state) been reached by pitting 'the algorithm' vs. any particular ''genuine'' chess-engine&amp;quot;. (Or otherwise. The alternative, presumably, that it was a 'hand-crafted' response on Randall's part... Or possibly a volunteer from amongst his acquaintances, either knowing something of what they'd be pitted against or not.)&lt;br /&gt;
:::I suspect the answer will be frightfully unremarkable (if available ''and'' given), but I could also see it being a useful throw-it-in. (Better than [[4: Landscape (sketch)|&amp;quot;why's there a river running through the ocean?&amp;quot;]], anyway ;) ) [[Special:Contributions/141.101.99.163|141.101.99.163]] 16:49, 11 March 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::::Ah gotcha. Doesn't seem interesting imo but is small enough. --[[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 15:22, 12 March 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Machine details -- [[User:HyperBirbN3rd|HyperBirbN3rd]]''' &lt;br /&gt;
:Is [[Machine]] going to have a finalized state? If so, when?&lt;br /&gt;
::Not sure this is easy enough to answer. He'd have to explain his intentions, which i don't think he published --[[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 18:31, 25 February 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Does the hexadecimal &amp;quot;pointers&amp;quot; in [[138: Pointers]] mean anything?--[[User:Bb777|me, hi]] ([[User talk:Bb777|talk]]) 18:07, 29 March 2025 (UTC)''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Why did you rename comic #[[786]]'s image to ''exoplanets_2010.png'' instead of uploading comic #[[1071]]'s image as ''exoplanets_2012.png''?''' --[[User:Winter1760|Winter1760]] ([[User talk:Winter1760|talk]]) 17:11, 5 April 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Is [[2638: Extended NFPA Hazard Diamond]] supposed to represent anything at all? [[User:Bb777|me, hi]] ([[User talk:Bb777|talk]]) 17:57, 5 April 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Why were the xkcd [[Forums]] shut down for good? --[[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 07:25, 22 July 2025 (UTC)'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''What was/is the purpose of the [[explain xkcd:Community portal/Proposals#List of pages|other pages we found]]? --[[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 08:46, 22 July 2025 (UTC)'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;!--ADD NEW SUGGESTIONS ABOVE THIS LINE --&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;background-color:#9eff9e;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span font-size:1.4em;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;'''&amp;lt;big&amp;gt;&amp;lt;big&amp;gt;&amp;amp;nbsp; [https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title{{=}}User:FaviFake&amp;amp;action{{=}}edit&amp;amp;section{{=}}2 CLICK HERE TO ADD NEW QUESTION'''  (scroll to bottom)]&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/big&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/big&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Out-of-scope questions===&lt;br /&gt;
{{notice|&amp;lt;big&amp;gt;&amp;lt;big&amp;gt;These questions are more like interview questions.&amp;lt;/big&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/big&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;He said he'd answer simple questions. I'm assuming he'd like questions similar to the one he replied to (short, sweet,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;no explaining needed), or questions that shouldn't require him to explain his comic more than he has already done.}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Why was what if? article ''[https://web.archive.org/web/20161205191559/http://what-if.xkcd.com/153 Peptides] deleted?'' --[[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 16:34, 21 February 2025 (UTC)'''&lt;br /&gt;
:[[what if? (blog)]] is a blog written by [[Randall]] with entries posted occasionally. On December 5, 2016, the article ''[https://web.archive.org/web/20161205191559/http://what-if.xkcd.com/153 Peptides]'' was published as number {{what if|153|153}}. However, it was [https://web.archive.org/web/20161206171630/http://what-if.xkcd.com/153/ removed the following day] and was replaced by a notice: &amp;quot;''Whoops. This article is still in progress. An early draft was unintentionally posted here thanks to Randall's &amp;lt;b&amp;gt;[http://xkcd.com/1597/ troubled approach to git]&amp;lt;/b&amp;gt;, and it took a little bit to get everything sorted out and rolled back. Sorry for the mixup!&amp;quot;''. No finished version of the article was ever published, and the URL was later reused for ''{{what if|153|Hide the Atmosphere}}''.&lt;br /&gt;
::I this this one is very interesting, but it might not be as administrative and short as Randall wants. He'd need to explain the reason why it wasn't published and why it looks like a complete article, not a &amp;quot;draft&amp;quot;. Anyone agree? --[[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 16:34, 21 February 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Copy paste from my reply below which I wrote first: &amp;quot;I'm not quite sure he likes questions about things he actually wished to delete... I mean seriously he tried to hide it but we got hold of it anyway?&amp;quot; --[[User:Kynde|Kynde]] ([[User talk:Kynde|talk]]) 17:26, 23 February 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::::Yeah you're right, I didn't think about that --[[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 18:31, 25 February 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''What happened to [[Five-Minute Comics: Part 4]]? --[[User:CalibansCreations|'''&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#ff0000;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Caliban&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;''']] ([[User talk:CalibansCreations|talk]]) 17:49, 22 February 2025 (UTC)'''&lt;br /&gt;
:A lost xkcd comic. He accidentally posted this instead of [[940]], and then erased all evidence of its existence by redirecting the direct image URL to a notice claiming it was a minor glitch in the universe. I'd get deleting the image outright, but just replacing it with what is essentially a sign to stop looking for it? Kinda weird. Also, how many more of these 5MCs has he made that are potentially lost media?&lt;br /&gt;
::I like this one, but I'm not sure if it's as simple as he'd like. He'd need to explain why he created the comic, which he almost never does. But there might be a way to ask it in a way that allows him to reply without revealing too much info. Btw, you seem very active on this wiki, do you have anything else in mind? --[[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 20:11, 22 February 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::I'm not quite sure he likes questions about things he actually wished to delete... I mean seriously he tried to hide it but we got hold of it anyway? Also we know why he drew these, it was a game he played with family. He just did not mean to post the fourth one. There might be more, but he only posted the three because he could not cope with the cancer of his wife and did not whish to give up his schedule. So as he could not draw three comics fast enough for that week he used these instead. Asking into this would also remind him of his wife's cancer. I vote no to this as an e-mail to Randall!  [[User:Kynde|Kynde]] ([[User talk:Kynde|talk]]) 17:24, 23 February 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Why was [[No One Was Hurt]] replaced? [[Special:Contributions/172.68.71.112|172.68.71.112]] 15:44, 24 February 2025 (UTC)'''&lt;br /&gt;
:[[No One Was Hurt]] was a comic that was replaced by Comic 2642, and while it's reasonable to assume that it's probably in response to some... unfortunate irl events, for documentation it would be nice to have an official, confirmed answer &lt;br /&gt;
::I'm not sure he'd like it, after all, he deleted it, so he might not want to talk about it more --[[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 18:31, 25 February 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Will we get more 5-part sagas? --[[User:CalibansCreations|'''&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#ff0000;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Caliban&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;''']] ([[User talk:CalibansCreations|talk]]) 11:44, 23 February 2025 (UTC)'''&lt;br /&gt;
:Like [[Choices]], [[The Race]], etc.&lt;br /&gt;
:::Not sure about this one, feels like we should be focusing on exclusively wiki data and such, this isn't an interview. [[Special:Contributions/172.71.30.168|172.71.30.168]] 17:28, 24 February 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::::Agree with IP, but it's not the worst question we've gotten. --[[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 18:31, 25 February 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''What inspired you to make [[Time]]? {{unsigned ip|141.101.109.166}}'''&lt;br /&gt;
::Frankly I don't see this one either, see the one above [[Special:Contributions/172.71.30.168|172.71.30.168]] 17:26, 24 February 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Yup, definitely out of scope. --[[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 18:31, 25 February 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Are there comics you'd like to update in light of recent developments? [[Special:Contributions/172.71.102.216|172.71.102.216]] 13:52, 25 February 2025 (UTC)'''&lt;br /&gt;
:Are there any existing comics you would like to update / sequel in light of recent developments (environmental, political, webtrends, demographic)? :The first thing that comes to mind is that 2024 was the first year above 1.5C over the pre-industrial average. [https://news.slashdot.org/story/25/01/10/0426254/2024-was-the-first-year-above-15c-of-global-warming-scientists-say].&lt;br /&gt;
::This is an interview question, not a simple question — read the notice above --[[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 18:31, 25 February 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Just wanted to note that some geography comics might be worth asking about [[User:XKCD Teaches Science|XKCD Teaches Science]] ([[User talk:XKCD Teaches Science|talk]]) 03:27, 24 February 2025 (UTC)''' &lt;br /&gt;
:I remember browsing pages on this wiki about 6 months ago and noticing that there were many explainations of maps or map like things where editors weren't sure which small islands or small countries since comic drawing is obviously not perfect. I don't remember which comics exactly and don't have time today to investigate, but I figured this observation is worth noting.&lt;br /&gt;
::I'm not sure i get what you're saying. What are you suggesting we ask Randall, exactly (if he answers)? --[[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 18:31, 25 February 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Did they notice?''' -unsigned!&lt;br /&gt;
:I noticed that in [[1529: Bracket]] 'Jeff Gordan' was changed to 'Jeff Gordon' but apparently nobody noticed. When was the comic fixed?&lt;br /&gt;
:: Who knows! Good catch. This is not the correct page to talk about it, but I have mentioned it in the comic page. You can use the Wayback Machine to check when it was changed [[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 20:56, 7 March 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Why have you drawn fewer multiple-panel comics recently?''' [[Special:Contributions/172.70.214.113|172.70.214.113]] 07:38, 9 March 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Why are some of the april fools' comics late? - [[Special:Contributions/172.71.146.108|172.71.146.108]] 18:55, 22 February 2025 (UTC)'''&amp;lt;!--&lt;br /&gt;
i mean why ''are''. sorry, typo - [[Special:Contributions/172.71.146.108|172.71.146.108]] 18:56, 22 February 2025 (UTC)--&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;!--(You were entitled to correct it, but I'm leaving it as is.) /Commented out &amp;amp; fixed by FaviFake--&amp;gt;I'm fairly sure we've had this answered already (&amp;quot;things just weren't quite ready/more testing was needed&amp;quot;) for some of the more technical ones, in some other place. Whether we can get more detail and for ''every'' not-on-time might be a matter of him having to remember the precise circumstances. And I also would feel uncomfortable if this turned into &amp;quot;why was &amp;lt;random non-April Fool comic&amp;gt; late?&amp;quot;. Or early. (When doing Rightpondian book-tours, sometimes surprisingly early, but every now and then it seems he manages to release them from his native Leftpondia even early here in the Rightpondian day.) But this is far too much detail (and far too much expectation), of no importance so long as he continues to average out at three regular comics a week and ''if he wants to'', and ''when he can'', anything a bit more special.&lt;br /&gt;
:Consider this a downvote on bothering him with this question, but that's of course only my opinion, in leiu of anything more constructive to add (&amp;quot;What's your favourite cheese..?&amp;quot;) [[Special:Contributions/172.69.79.190|172.69.79.190]] 19:42, 22 February 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::I agree with the second IP on this one! Unless there's a particular comic for which the delay was very important (do you have any in mind?), I don't think this is going to be of much interest to him. --[[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 20:11, 22 February 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Why was there no special thing for comic [[3000]]? [[User:DollarStoreBa&amp;amp;#39;al|DollarStoreBa&amp;amp;#39;al]] ([[User talk:DollarStoreBa&amp;amp;#39;al|talk]]) 17:34, 24 February 2025 (UTC)'''&lt;br /&gt;
:This is something major as normally he makes special comics for these types of milestones, but the comic proceeded as if nothing happened. Why? &lt;br /&gt;
::A fair question, but a bit of a lower priority than anything else we can throw at Randall. [[Special:Contributions/172.71.26.43|172.71.26.43]] 17:44, 24 February 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::I am still curious about this, though. If no other question is deemed as important, this is a good one to ask IMO. [[User:Trogdor147|Trogdor147]] ([[User_talk:Trogdor147|talk]]) 21:32, 24 February 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''In the xkcd email subscription, there is an address at the bottom, it being (68 Harrison Ave Ste 605 PMB 75312, Boston, MA, 02111-1929, US). If it something you are comfortable saying, what is this address? '''  [[User:Little Timmy|Little Timmy]] 1:26, 28 July 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:: Seems to just be a mail drop, presumably one he uses for official xkcd business. [https://www.legalzoom.com/business/business-operations/lz-virtual-mail-overview.html] [[Special:Contributions/137.25.230.78|137.25.230.78]] 07:19, 29 July 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Agreed. Also, if it weren't a mail drop, we really shouldn't know the answer to this question. --[[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 08:42, 29 July 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''What was channel.html and channel.txt?'''&lt;br /&gt;
:For a few years there was a hidden subdomain under xkcd.com/channel.html that provided you with about 600kb of &amp;quot;junk&amp;quot; data  but seemed to be organized in some information carrying way (obeyed Zipf's law.) What was it????? this mystery is haunting me so much i wrote this on a mobile device. [[Special:Contributions/2600:387:f:7716::9|2600:387:f:7716::9]] 00:13, 4 August 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Revised comics'''&lt;br /&gt;
:On comic [[851]], he linked to a newer version in the header, saying &amp;quot;I don't get do-overs,&amp;quot; but later, in [[1365]] for example, mistakes were fixed and revised. Is there anything that led to this, and can 851 be replaced with the updated version?[[Special:Contributions/174.174.4.79|174.174.4.79]] 17:12, 6 August 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Re: transcripts'''&lt;br /&gt;
:On Randall's bluesky account, the alt-text on the comics provides a transcript. Why is this not in the api?[[Special:Contributions/174.174.4.79|174.174.4.79]] 17:12, 6 August 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''What If? Discontinued?'''&lt;br /&gt;
:The last What If? blog article was published on December 6th, 2022. Are there still questions being submitted and will there be new articles in the future? [[User:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font:11pt Cormorant Garamond&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#4A86A6&amp;quot;&amp;gt;tor&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#C0728D&amp;quot;&amp;gt;i :3&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font:8pt Cormorant Garamond&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#7E7E7E&amp;quot;&amp;gt;talk &amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#C0728D&amp;quot;&amp;gt;to &amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#4A86A6&amp;quot;&amp;gt;me!&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 18:57, 14 May 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::I presume that some time was dedicated towards making the 10th Anniversary edition and some more time on uploading all articles onto YouTube, but it would be great if we could look into his head and see a rough timeline at the very least. [[User:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font:11pt Cormorant Garamond&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#4A86A6&amp;quot;&amp;gt;tor&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#C0728D&amp;quot;&amp;gt;i :3&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font:8pt Cormorant Garamond&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#7E7E7E&amp;quot;&amp;gt;talk &amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#C0728D&amp;quot;&amp;gt;to &amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#4A86A6&amp;quot;&amp;gt;me!&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 18:57, 14 May 2026 (UTC)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>42.book.addict</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=User_talk:DollarStoreBa%27al/Snadbocks&amp;diff=412698</id>
		<title>User talk:DollarStoreBa'al/Snadbocks</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=User_talk:DollarStoreBa%27al/Snadbocks&amp;diff=412698"/>
				<updated>2026-05-14T18:53:40Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;42.book.addict: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Ok kynde. Here's the solution. Go ahead. Delete this too. Delete all my subpages!&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Pages to delete]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Current &amp;quot;Snadbocks&amp;quot; content. ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I can see ''what'' you've done, but not why. And I'm a bit hazy as to how. (Though where and when are at least obvious enough! ;) )&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You've managed to put &amp;quot;newline escape-codes&amp;quot; (\n) in. If you're serious about those, then replace them all with more literal linefeeds (though just getting rid of most of them woupd at least make it readable as a mostly run-on sentence).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
And your &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;a href=…&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;s, &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;img …&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;s, etc, are using &amp;quot;escaped quotes&amp;quot; (\&amp;quot;) that don't let the HTML markup work (also, I'd stick to Wiki Markup wherever possible, i.e. &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;[&amp;lt;url here&amp;gt; text of link]&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt; for links). The first thing to do is at least change \&amp;quot; to just &amp;quot;, in all cases, but knowing what you want to do and rewriting the markup in Wiki-form ''without'' the HTML-legacy (wherever it's not strictly the same thing, anyway) would be the best solution.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I'm taking it that you've ripped this whole sort-of-Marked-Up code from elsewhere, in a way that has &amp;quot;sanitised&amp;quot; the literals from the original. It looks interesting (especially if it is your story it's telling, but... dates in 2007..? ...that's actually before you were born, right? ...or at least ''very'' young), yet I'm wondering whether it (despite the dalliences with the {{template|comic}} template) is really something you mean to legitimately be here, even as a future part of your main User:-page.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
(ETA: Oh, wait... Having read it more thoroughly, you've ripped it off Randall's blag, or similar..? I thought I recognised that hand! Still, you've managed to 'rip it wrong' ''and'' I don't think we're looking to put the whole Randallian corpus, here... Comics, yes; What-Ifs, a fairly recent addition; Strange 'sometimes Comic-like' xkcd.com pages... meh... Blag-stuff and wider-world stuff is getting into stalking territory, and this isn't really an alt.fan.randall.monroe type thing, it's at root an xkcd-Comic-Explainer.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If I knew for certain what you were trying to do, I might even be able to help you (beyond the 'quick corrections' I give above). It just looks like messing about, though. Despite knowing that you've rslecently (in particular) done a few intensive (and useful!) things more in the spirit of this wiki. [[Special:Contributions/82.132.239.11|82.132.239.11]] 17:16, 6 December 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:It's a webpage on xkcd.com I found. Thanks for letting me know that not ''everything'' needs to go here. I tried getting a head-start by copy-pasting the HTML source code from the page. &amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family: Times New Roman, serif; font-size: 16px;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;--'''''[[User:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#FF0000&amp;quot;&amp;gt;DollarStoreBa'al&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User Talk:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#00873E&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Converse&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt; 15:23, 10 December 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Sorry, but what's the point of copying in your enwiki page onto explain xkcd? I am almost certain that nobody is all that interested in this and you could very well just link the page onto your main user page for people to read if they really want to. No need in causing more confusion with cross-wiki porting. [[User:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font:11pt Cormorant Garamond&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#4A86A6&amp;quot;&amp;gt;tor&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#C0728D&amp;quot;&amp;gt;i :3&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font:8pt Cormorant Garamond&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#7E7E7E&amp;quot;&amp;gt;talk &amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#C0728D&amp;quot;&amp;gt;to &amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#4A86A6&amp;quot;&amp;gt;me!&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 17:28, 11 May 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:A futile attempt to unite things just a bit. I was planning to swap all the actual content out with the current content on my expxkcd page, but I ran into some wikitext troubles and had to pause. --'''''[[User:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Times; color:#023020&amp;quot;&amp;gt;DollarStoreBa'al&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User_talk:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Times; color:#000080&amp;quot;&amp;gt;'''''converse'''''&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 17:01, 14 May 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::I see no point in trying to &amp;quot;unite&amp;quot; two completely separate communities. Just because enwiki and explain xkcd run MediaWiki software doesn't mean that we should merge the two of them. Is there really a need to have a unnecessarily complicated (and quite unreadable) userpage that most people won't read? I'm all for customizing user pages and having info readily available on there but even this seems a bit much to me. [[User:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font:11pt Cormorant Garamond&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#4A86A6&amp;quot;&amp;gt;tor&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#C0728D&amp;quot;&amp;gt;i :3&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font:8pt Cormorant Garamond&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#7E7E7E&amp;quot;&amp;gt;talk &amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#C0728D&amp;quot;&amp;gt;to &amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#4A86A6&amp;quot;&amp;gt;me!&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 18:53, 14 May 2026 (UTC)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>42.book.addict</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:1243:_Snare&amp;diff=412305</id>
		<title>Talk:1243: Snare</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:1243:_Snare&amp;diff=412305"/>
				<updated>2026-05-11T17:31:40Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;42.book.addict: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Any HUMAN-BUILD space station must be the ISS, but maybe Black Hat knows about some alien space station he wants to catch? [[User:Kshksh|kshksh]] ([[User talk:Kshksh|talk]]) 14:45, 6 July 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Incidentally, St. Louis is about 300 miles from Chicago, so the shaft would be 40 miles short.&lt;br /&gt;
:It depends on how large the giant ring is. 20 mile radius would put it adjacent. Also, &amp;quot;outside&amp;quot; Chicago is flexible.&lt;br /&gt;
:More importantly, [[Black Hat]] is such a jerk. He builds a freaking {{w|space elevator}} but only uses it for a particularly silly kind of evil. - [[User:Frankie|Frankie]] ([[User talk:Frankie|talk]]) 14:26, 26 July 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
By the way, what is [[Black Hat]] sitting at?  It looks like there is open laptop on desk, but he uses separate keyboard in a special shelf... --[[User:JakubNarebski|JakubNarebski]] ([[User talk:JakubNarebski|talk]]) 15:06, 26 July 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:It's entirely possible that he has exactly that. My mother uses an ergonomic keyboard instead of the crappy, built-in one on the laptop. Her desk has a keyboard shelf, so that's where the ergonomic one goes. [[Special:Contributions/68.231.138.149|68.231.138.149]] 18:05, 26 July 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I don't believe in ergonomic keyboards, but look at what laptops have instead of keyboard. I'm usually using standard keyboard instead of built-in one and I don't believe I'm alone. Also note that as a hacker, [[Black Hat]] probably needs lots of special symbols, which may be missing or on nonstandard positions on laptop keyboard (he is hacker, isn't he?). -- [[User:Hkmaly|Hkmaly]] ([[User talk:Hkmaly|talk]]) 11:51, 27 July 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::Regardless of whether or not you believe in them, ergonomic keyboards exist. [[Special:Contributions/76.106.251.87|76.106.251.87]] 14:43, 27 July 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Existence of keyboards which are CALLED ergonomic is fact. The bit I don't believe in is that they really are ergonomic, that is, significantly better to write on that standard keyboards. Which is subjective. On the other hand, I don't think that ANYONE would argue that the built-in laptop keyboards are better to write on that standard keyboards. -- [[User:Hkmaly|Hkmaly]] ([[User talk:Hkmaly|talk]]) 13:02, 22 March 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
;Real giant ring observed over Chicago today.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A smoke ring from an exploded transformer.&lt;br /&gt;
I honestly think this could have inspired the comic.&lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.reddit.com/r/WTF/comments/1j2idy/the_power_went_out_in_my_whole_neighborhood_and/ on reddit]&lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.kbtx.com/home/headlines/Power-Outage-in-College-Station--217039531.html on the news]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Special:Contributions/92.204.27.3|92.204.27.3]] 11:31, 26 July 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Funny, I immediately flashed on the world's largest electromagnet, delivered today to the Fermilab facility in Batavia IL, which is just outside Chicago: http://chicago.cbslocal.com/2013/07/26/massive-electromagnet-completes-arduous-trip-to-fermilab/ [[User:Gardnertoo|Gardnertoo]] ([[User talk:Gardnertoo|talk]]) 20:15, 26 July 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If he would like to catch one of the other space stations he would probably not say he wants to catch an &amp;lt;b&amp;gt;international&amp;lt;/b&amp;gt; station, because they are only national projects. {{unsigned ip|91.45.17.43}}&lt;br /&gt;
: I think that both &amp;quot;AN international space station&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;Not necessarily MY collection&amp;quot; is something he says to avoid blame. It is obvious that he's going to catch the ISS and put her in HIS collection, but he's not confessing to it. -- [[User:Hkmaly|Hkmaly]] ([[User talk:Hkmaly|talk]]) 13:02, 22 March 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Am I the only one who finds the connection to the Gateway Arch Momument and Tevatron dubious? There is no explanation of the type of winch, and the ring is specifically 'lying in a field'. Maybe the could be included as possibilities, but to say that the structures are 'probably' the ones referred to is false in my opinion.--[[User:Pudder|Pudder]] ([[User talk:Pudder|talk]]) 12:15, 18 December 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
: I precisely agree. I will make the change now. {{unsigned ip|173.245.54.20}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I think it would be quite a daunting task to put a space station in a display case... [[User:625571b7-aa66-4f98-ac5c-92464cfb4ed8|625571b7-aa66-4f98-ac5c-92464cfb4ed8]] ([[User talk:625571b7-aa66-4f98-ac5c-92464cfb4ed8|talk]]) 21:03, 12 March 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
\_ Talk about daunting tasks -- You've gotta admire the sheer logistics Black Hat would have to overcome for catching 'a' space station as described: &lt;br /&gt;
First, finding a superstrong, pliable material to a) catch, slow down, and hold a space station originally moving at orbital speeds; and b) finding enough of it to create a mesh field large enough to catch something that size. Second, to have a pole of enough strength to hold the large ring (and accompanying mesh) upright when lifted, but not be so heavy as to be too difficult to winch from a fixed point on the ground. Next, to have it all survive high-altitude winds and freezing temperatures when erected, and finally: reentry! Bringing anything back from LEO will undoubtedly encounter friction with the atmosphere. &lt;br /&gt;
That dude's got mad skills if he can pull even half of those things off. -Electro- [[Special:Contributions/108.162.221.203|108.162.221.203]] 08:56, 17 July 2018 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We need a new page on butterfly nets. [[User:QATEKLYXM|Klyxm]] ([[User talk:QATEKLYXM|talk]]) 10:14, 5 March 2018 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
12&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I thought the title-text might mean that Black Hat was going to give the ISS as a gift... Maybe to Danish? [[User:Eebop|Eebop]] ([[User talk:Eebop|talk]]) 19:13, 29 May 2021 (UTC) [[User:eebop|eebop]] ([[User talk:eebop|talk]]) 12:11 29 March 2021 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Can't wait for multiple international space stations to start popping up in like 15 years and this comic will be interpeted in a very different way or something etc etc (insert witty commentary here) [[Special:Contributions/110.145.224.178|110.145.224.178]] 05:57, 23 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Maybe Black hat is trying to catch the Death Star. {{unsigned ip|68.187.4.2]} 16:07, 11 May 2026 (UTC)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>42.book.addict</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:2131:_Emojidome&amp;diff=412304</id>
		<title>Talk:2131: Emojidome</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:2131:_Emojidome&amp;diff=412304"/>
				<updated>2026-05-11T17:30:59Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;42.book.addict: not a comment.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&amp;lt;!--Please sign your posts with ~~~~ and don't delete this text. New comments should be added at the bottom.--&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I've checked the network tab and console - nothing really seems to happen when you vote, which may be something we want to put on the explanation tomorrow - Myxoh&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I suspect the real april fools joke is going to come on Wednesday when xkdc posts an app showing us our psychological profiles that they are now selling to marketing companies after data-mining our emotional preferences to marketing firms - Nosajimiki&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
@Nosajimiki: psychological profiles of xkcd fans. That might be some interesting marketing. - 5Cincinatus&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
@Myxoh: I came here to see if anyone else had noticed this! But, I do also see a websocket connection to emojidome.xkcd.com, I bet it's counting votes that way.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There is a websocket connection. A message is sent every time you vote. It looks like there are also status update messages every second (saying which emoji currently has exactly how many votes, i suspect this changes the amount of hearts that show up), and &amp;quot;bracket start&amp;quot; messages every so often. The bracket start message seems to contain hundreds of upcoming emoji pairs. Edit: a bracket start is sent at the start of every match (so every ~30 seconds). It also contains logs of which messages to show for previous matches, and which emoji are currently battling.[[Special:Contributions/172.69.138.10|172.69.138.10]] 16:30, 1 April 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There seems to be nothing stopping me from clicking multiple times. Do you think it actually counts it all those times? Can I click-spam to say &amp;quot;this is much better&amp;quot;? [[User:Fabian42|Fabian42]] ([[User talk:Fabian42|talk]]) 16:48, 1 April 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Randall just confirmed that you can vote multiple times, although if you click too fasr you get rate limited. (*warning: generic ip address assigned to phone data.*) [[Special:Contributions/172.69.70.47|172.69.70.47]] 22:35, 1 April 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Where did he confirm that? [[Special:Contributions/162.158.93.105|162.158.93.105]] 10:44, 2 April 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Well this is fun. Look like there are 512 symbols, meaning 256 first-round contests. The first round would take (at 38 seconds / round) ~2.7 hours. The remaining rounds, from an estimate of geometric progression, would just under double this, meaning this comic will run for ~ 5 hours until we have our winner... ~alexandicity [[Special:Contributions/172.69.226.177|172.69.226.177]] 16:51, 1 April 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Did he just add a scroll bar to the previous matches? I didn't notice it earlier [[Special:Contributions/162.158.255.148|162.158.255.148]] 18:17, 1 April 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Nope, you were able to scroll before, too. At least about 2 hours ago. [[User:Fabian42|Fabian42]] ([[User talk:Fabian42|talk]]) 18:20, 1 April 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
While some of the recaps of past battles are generic (taco vs sandwich: &amp;quot;One for the history books&amp;quot;), many seem to be specifically written for the battle (light bulb vs candle: &amp;quot;Some would argue that this one was settled in the 1800s&amp;quot;). I wonder if/how much this will continue into round 2.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Round two has just begun, and the timeout has been bumped to 60 seconds. --[[User:Anarcat|Anarcat]] ([[User talk:Anarcat|talk]]) 18:41, 1 April 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:If that trend continues, the full competition will take pretty close to 24 hours. [[User:Fabian42|Fabian42]] ([[User talk:Fabian42|talk]]) 18:45, 1 April 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:It looks like it's 1:14/round, which is double what the time was in round one. Will round three be 2:28? 1:51?&lt;br /&gt;
::It's just over 1:15/round from the history JSON (plus some hundredths of a second, but it appears 1:15 is the intent)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Hadn't looked there. Round one concluded at 18:39:20-ish, 9560 seconds from 16:00:00. At 256 battles, that's 37.34 seconds/battle. However, it looks like the first battle ended at 15:59:57, which would add about 40 seconds, 9600 seconds/256=37.5 seconds exactly. Doubling for round 2 gives 75 seconds.&lt;br /&gt;
::2 minutes 30 seconds per battle now. Looks like each round will be 2 hours 40 minutes long.&lt;br /&gt;
:: Well it is after 5:00 PST and round 4 just started - and this thing is at exactly 5 minutes a round - which means another 160 minutes for the round.  Will see in 2 hours and 40 minutes if the times go up to minutes. --[[Special:Contributions/172.69.33.65|172.69.33.65]] 00:25, 2 April 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
And while the match-ups winners are typically colored, and underlined, the losers are endgame grey.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Has anyone determined if multiple-voting is actually counted? For me at least the vote button fades back to gray after I click it, which implies you can/should click it again, but that may not actually be processed. We might add a clarification about that to the explanation. [[User:Jerodast|- jerodast]] ([[User talk:Jerodast|talk]]) 19:01, 1 April 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
: A reddit user on the r/xkcd thread (https://www.reddit.com/r/xkcd/comments/b84at1/xkcd_2131_emojidome_script_src2131comicjs/) claims to have attempted &amp;quot;vote stuffing via the console&amp;quot; with no noticeable change in vote totals. So it looks like it may be sending it client-side, but only counting the vote once server-side  --l&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Just few minutes ago there was message in &amp;quot;fun facts&amp;quot; that you can click multiple times, although it's not counted if you click too many times (or something like that). I guess that vote stuffing was too much. -- [[User:Hkmaly|Hkmaly]] ([[User talk:Hkmaly|talk]]) 22:34, 1 April 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It would appear that we are supposed to believe the commentary is live, and unscripted:&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot; {&amp;quot;This one is a true test of the audience today.&amp;quot;,&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Just to stress this again. Live commentary, folks. Completely unscripted and coming in hot.} &amp;quot;--[[Special:Contributions/162.158.79.173|162.158.79.173]] 19:20, 1 April 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:It's clearly live because the result of a previous round is affecting the next round's commentary - and the combinatorial explosion would prohibit that from being remotely plausible.  We're watching live comedy here! [[User:SteveBaker|SteveBaker]] ([[User talk:SteveBaker|talk]]) 19:30, 1 April 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
: On the dog vs. wolf, he said &amp;quot;Again, we are getting a lot of questions on this today. This is live commentary, folks.&amp;quot; Proof I guess. HI RANDALL! [[Special:Contributions/172.68.189.241|172.68.189.241]] 19:31, 1 April 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Is there really anything we can put for the transcript? [[Special:Contributions/172.68.189.241|172.68.189.241]] 19:25, 1 April 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
: We can go into the socket data and pull out the commentary for each matchup.  -- [[User:Bobson|Bobson]] ([[User talk:Bobson|talk]]) 04:05, 2 April 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Any ideas on how the commentary is done? It seems to sort of match the emojis.&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Svízel přítula|Svízel přítula]] ([[User talk:Svízel přítula|talk]]) 19:31, 1 April 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
: It seems that Randall is commentating this live, as he periodically says it's live in the robot commentator text. See above. [[Special:Contributions/172.68.189.241|172.68.189.241]] 19:36, 1 April 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::Perhaps not &amp;quot;live&amp;quot; as each round 2 matchup was known 160 minutes before it was voted on. He could comment on the battle itself, and/or provide a comment if one or the other combatant won. I think he's a couple hours ahead of us.&lt;br /&gt;
::: I dunno. Whenever a new battle starts, there is a default message, that is soon replaced by a more pertinent message. That seems to suggest that he's doing it on the fly. [[User:9yz|9yz]] ([[User talk:9yz|talk]]) 20:03, 1 April 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::::If that's live, Randall, and if you see this, give us a shout-out as proof. -Brent&lt;br /&gt;
::::: Just because it ''says'' it's live, doesn't mean that it really is.  It's also possible that the actual clicks are being ignored and the reported numbers are all pre-generated.  Much less likely than that it's actually counting and Randall is inserting commentary live (with default messages when he doesn't), but possible. -- [[User:Bobson|Bobson]] ([[User talk:Bobson|talk]]) 12:50, 2 April 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
: He updated the title text to thank volunteers for commentating, so I guess we know that the commentary was live, just not necessarily all Randall. [[User:Moosenonny10|Moosenonny10]] ([[User talk:Moosenonny10|talk]]) 14:34, 3 April 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This is a quick piece of python to see the json results (and commentary):&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;import json, urllib.request&lt;br /&gt;
d = json.loads(urllib.request.urlopen(&amp;quot;https://emojidome.xkcd.com/2131/socket  &amp;quot;).read().decode('utf-8'))&lt;br /&gt;
for g in d['bracket']['played'][0]:&lt;br /&gt;
  c1, c2 = g['game']&lt;br /&gt;
  print(f&amp;quot;{c1['score']} {c1['competitor']}-{c2['competitor']} {c2['score']}&amp;quot;)&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Tammo80|Tammo80]] ([[User talk:Tammo80|talk]]) 19:42, 1 April 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
: or if you want to see the vote count live in browser: https://emojidome.playcode.io/ -Andy 22:01, April 2019&lt;br /&gt;
:: Awesome, thank you [[User:9yz|9yz]] ([[User talk:9yz|talk]]) 20:23, 1 April 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There must be some kind of manipulation going on with the votes. There is NO WAY the poop emoji would lose to the skull emoji in round two. It was my guess for the winner &amp;gt;:( [[Special:Contributions/162.158.106.138|162.158.106.138]] 20:50, 1 April 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
: And the 100 emoji just lost to the shiny heart. :(&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Well, there's the comment &amp;quot;How do you know for sure that your votes are doing anything?&amp;quot;. For my side because every single one I voted for lost so far. Well, I'm not a lucky charm, apparently... [[Special:Contributions/141.101.104.11|141.101.104.11]] 10:14, 2 April 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The second round bracket was released, but is hidden behind the bottom nav buttons: https://xkcd.com/2131/emojidome_bracket_256.png --[[User:Thefallen138|Thefallen138]] ([[User talk:Thefallen138|talk]]) 20:56, 1 April 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
And now the third round has begun. Strangely, the bracket is not visible yet: https://xkcd.com/2131/emojidome_bracket_128.png. The delay has been bump to something above two minutes as well. --[[User:Anarcat|Anarcat]] ([[User talk:Anarcat|talk]]) 21:21, 1 April 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: It's here https://xkcd.com/2131/emojidome_bracket_round_3.png [[Special:Contributions/162.158.107.79|162.158.107.79]] 21:41, 1 April 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:: It seems to be he overwrote round_3.png with round_4.png (at least its the same picture)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Both the Emojidome and counter were brought together in iframes https://ducakedhare.co.uk/emojidome.html [[Special:Contributions/141.101.99.17|141.101.99.17]] 23:39, 1 April 2019 (UTC)taikedz&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Anyone have an IRC room for Emojidome discussion? [[Special:Contributions/162.158.146.10|162.158.146.10]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
So disappointed he left out the egg plant... :D --[[User:Kynde|Kynde]] ([[User talk:Kynde|talk]]) 12:27, 2 April 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Despite Spaaaaaaaaace winning the battle 🌌 (36285) vs 🚝 (17405), the current bracket chart https://xkcd.com/2131/emojidome_bracket_round_3.png shows 🚝 as having won. [[Special:Contributions/108.162.242.13|108.162.242.13]] 13:23, 2 April 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What if the April Fools joke of the whole bracket is that the &amp;quot;Vote&amp;quot; buttons were actually switched and all the losers are actually the winners??? [[Special:Contributions/172.68.59.84|172.68.59.84]] 15:24, 2 April 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In case the websocket ever goes down, here are the data: https://pastebin.com/YYgPS1FC&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Svízel přítula|Svízel přítula]] ([[User talk:Svízel přítula|talk]]) 19:22, 2 April 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Is that a Kingdom Hearts reference I see? - Bench&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
;&amp;quot;Emoji&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;emojis&amp;quot; as the plural? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Due to the nature of the Japanese language, &amp;quot;emoji&amp;quot; is technically both the plural and the singular - however, the improper form &amp;quot;emojis&amp;quot; is used more as a plural frequently nowadays among English speakers. Which form should this explanation use? --[[User:Youforgotthisthing|Youforgotthisthing]] ([[User talk:Youforgotthisthing|talk]]) 22:27, 1 April 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
: For clarity, I think we should use emoji as the singular and emojis as the plural. I'm going to go fix this. [[User:9yz|9yz]] ([[User talk:9yz|talk]]) 19:34, 2 April 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The &amp;quot;friends in Australia&amp;quot; comment was made during the last round's wink vs upside down smile battle. This is probably a pun on how Australia is on the other side of the world from America; I don't think Randall was seriously saying he witnessed an influx of Australians inbound. [[Special:Contributions/108.162.219.82|108.162.219.82]] 00:47, 2 April 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
;Draws &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What would happen if any of the fights resulted in a draw? (same number of votes for both)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Given the # of matchups, it's not actually that unlikely.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We should try to test this. Gotta keep Randall on his feet!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Pretty sure one early on resulted in a tie.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: The very first round was 0-0.  I guess no one refreshed at exactly the right minute to see it. --[[User:Bobson|Bobson]] ([[User talk:Bobson|talk]]) 04:05, 2 April 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: Actually, Birthday Cake vs Cupcake was a tie at 3658:3658. Birthday Cake advanced. I wonder why? (from the socket: [{&amp;quot;score&amp;quot;:3658,&amp;quot;competitor&amp;quot;:&amp;quot;ðŸŽ‚&amp;quot;},{&amp;quot;score&amp;quot;:3658,&amp;quot;competitor&amp;quot;:&amp;quot;ðŸ§&amp;quot;}]) [[Special:Contributions/162.158.106.138|162.158.106.138]] 04:54, 2 April 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Is Birthday Cake vs. Cupcake the draw referenced at the end of the &amp;quot;How it worked&amp;quot; section? Can we please have names added to all the emoji in the explanation text; I have never found a way to blow up emoji to a visible size, so frequently find I can't see them clearly enough to identify them, and in that bit at the end of &amp;quot;How it worked&amp;quot;, the first one isn't rendering on my computer anyway. I'm guessing that the other is the birthday cake; really, I have come to hate emoji because they are so tiny. At least Randall made them nice and big on the voting screens. [[User:Yngvadottir|Yngvadottir]] ([[User talk:Yngvadottir|talk]]) 18:27, 2 April 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I had assumed that the &amp;quot;score&amp;quot; was a not simple count of vote clicks - I'd imagine (especially with all the autoclicking etc) that the raw votes would be gigantic numbers.  So it could be that these were not draws when calculated to full precision - just that the API was only sending out a rounded number?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
;Emoji Fonts &lt;br /&gt;
Having an emoji font is required to see emoji displayed on sites such as http://srv-01.valo.media/ . If anybody else is looking for a way to display these, there's a good free emoji font available here:&lt;br /&gt;
https://github.com/eosrei/twemoji-color-font&lt;br /&gt;
It includes a script to replace the default Windows emoji fonts to get them to display properly on windows. Unfortunately it's only black-and-white in chrome. If anybody knows any better options, please let me know!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: For Ubuntu Linux users:  sudo apt install fonts-noto-color-emoji   -- then restart Chrome/Firefox.&lt;br /&gt;
: [[User:SteveBaker|SteveBaker]] ([[User talk:SteveBaker|talk]]) 11:29, 2 April 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
  &lt;br /&gt;
::I'm on Android here &amp;amp; many of the emoji do not show up. Notably, this includes the hedgehog, which... is not in the emoji set of any of my Android devices. Could somebody please add the emoji names next to their pictograms, where they appear the explanation? [[User:ProphetZarquon|ProphetZarquon]] ([[User talk:ProphetZarquon|talk]]) 04:16, 3 April 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Tested on an iPad, a Mac and a PC, a lot of emoji are still appearing as black rectangles. [[User:Herobrine|Herobrine]] ([[User talk:Herobrine|talk]]) 07:09, 6 April 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
;Commentary Transcript ;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I've written a script that pulls the commentary history and transforms it into a wiki table.  It's up to date as of right now, and I'll run it again in the morning and one last time after the final round.  If you have formatting suggestions, just put them here and I'll incorporate it when I regenerate the table.  -- [[User:Bobson|Bobson]] ([[User talk:Bobson|talk]]) 04:58, 2 April 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: Wonderful, thank you! Could you perhaps make the winner bold (or underlined like in the comic)?  -Andy&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
;Successful Ballot-stuffing? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As I type this, I'm watching owl blast past 180000 votes in the owl-octopus bout. That means that in about 10 minutes, owl has earned more votes than all the votes earned in the entirety of any other individual bout. I could be totally off-base, but that seems vaguely suspicious to me. [[Special:Contributions/162.158.214.82|162.158.214.82]] 05:28, 2 April 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I concur: that is highly suspicious. Fortunately, nothing of importance is at stake here, even if you were really pulling for the octopus. At this moment, we're ±10 minutes into bee vs pineapple and nothing comparable has happened. It may be an isolated incident. [[Special:Contributions/162.158.106.144|162.158.106.144]] 05:50, 2 April 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I've seen enough hentai to...what? The *owl* has won? O RLY? I demand a recount! [[Special:Contributions/141.101.105.6|141.101.105.6]] 08:10, 2 April 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
YOLO. You Obviously Like Owls. [[Special:Contributions/141.101.104.11|141.101.104.11]] 10:11, 2 April 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For the violin vs the curling stone ('classical vs house'), the stone was ahead, but in the last four minutes I spammed my discord server to vote and we just got it over the line. - fudgeforlife&lt;br /&gt;
: Rrrr. :angry face:  I love curling, and of course I wanted the stone to win. With curling no-one complains if I fall asleep watching. But with classical music everyone complains... [[Special:Contributions/141.101.104.89|141.101.104.89]] 12:49, 2 April 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
: A similar thing happened for the &amp;quot;scared cat vs devil&amp;quot; bout - those two were consistently nearly tied until about T-10 minutes, whereupon the devil voting rate spiked and devil finished ~12000 votes ahead. The &amp;quot;cat vs hedgehog&amp;quot; bout was also similar - hedgehog had a consistent lead of ~1000 votes until about T-10 minutes, when the hedgehog voting rates spiked and hedgehog ended up finishing ~10000 votes ahead.[[Special:Contributions/162.158.214.28|162.158.214.28]] 14:39, 2 April 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What? It's possible the owl cheated? IT'S POSSIBLE OCTOPUS TOTALLY SHOULD HAVE WON IF THE MATCH WAS LEGITIMATE? [[Special:Contributions/162.158.75.226|162.158.75.226]] 12:02, 2 April 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I love how owl getting 200 000 votes in 20 minutes is causing all this controversy when crayon got 40 000 in 75 seconds --[[User:Maple42|Maple42]] ([[User talk:Maple42|talk]]) 18:54, 2 April 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
;Avocado quote citation &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I'm not sure where to put this. The &amp;quot;I like avocados because they taste pretty good and also they come with a cool wood ball you get to keep&amp;quot; quote is from here: https://twitter.com/jitka/status/236240801926086656 . [[Special:Contributions/172.69.33.41|172.69.33.41]] 07:15, 2 April 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
;How sure are we the voting is real &lt;br /&gt;
I'm no expert at all, but it there any way that the websites that shows the number of votes live etc. can test whether these votes are real, or something Randall has pre-programmed? Not that I would not believe he was willing to stay up for the duration of this day, but it is an April Fools' Day comic, so he is completely &amp;quot;allowed&amp;quot; to have decided him self who should win all matched and have made up the commentaries in advance. Yes it would take along time, but not longer than doing it on the fly. It could just be that joke on us, that our votes does nothing and we just see how Randall has decided the dome should end. Can anyone go in to this, and explain why it is as it is either way (for sure made up, for sure real or uncertain if real or fake)? (PS I dislike these sections in the commentaries, but there are already 6...) --[[User:Kynde|Kynde]] ([[User talk:Kynde|talk]]) 12:27, 2 April 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It should be noted that Milky Way won over Maglev by a long shot, but the bracket shows otherwise. - Brent [[Special:Contributions/172.69.50.58|172.69.50.58]] 13:14, 2 April 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
;Which picture should we use for the comic &lt;br /&gt;
The current picture shown is not relevant. That is only shown to web crawlers that pick new images up. Does anyone have a picture of the very first match? Not sure that is relevant either. Anything in between could be used. like this:&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:2131_Emojidome_example.png|800px]] &lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Kynde|Kynde]] ([[User talk:Kynde|talk]]) 12:43, 2 April 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:I’m assuming there’ll be a picture at the end. Show that when it finishes. [[User:Netherin5|“That Guy from the Netherlands”]] ([[User talk:Netherin5|talk]]) 13:53, 2 April 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::I added the current picture originally as a temporary solution since the bot didn't upload one. No one commented on the image so I kept it though I considered using something like this: [[File:emojidome_blank.png|400px]]&lt;br /&gt;
::--[[User:Asdf|Asdf]] ([[User talk:Asdf|talk]]) 14:17, 2 April 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Right now, for me at least, the comic shows [https://imgs.xkcd.com/comics/emojidome.png this image] with the hover-text &amp;quot;Thank you to the xkcd April 1st volunteers/commentators, including @Chromakode, Kevin, @Aiiane, Patrick, Kat, Reuven, @cotrone, @bstaffin, @zigdon, schwal, Stereo, and everyone who voted!&amp;quot; Just another option, though that image doesn't explain the comic set-out during the competition. [[Special:Contributions/172.68.133.84|172.68.133.84]] 19:12, 2 April 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Yes for sure we should use that now.  I should have thought of that. Can see it has already been uploaded, but it takes long time, hours, from these pictures have been changed to the change can be seen ion the site. I have no idea why, but have experienced it several times, so later today the final picture should be ready. --[[User:Kynde|Kynde]] ([[User talk:Kynde|talk]]) 18:17, 2 April 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::If we do that, we should add example pictures in the explanation of what it actually looked like during the competition. I vote for yours, Kynde. [[Special:Contributions/172.68.133.84|172.68.133.84]] 19:11, 2 April 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::I added Kynde's image in the &amp;quot;How it worked&amp;quot; section as it is useful for people who missed the competition. --[[User:Asdf|Asdf]] ([[User talk:Asdf|talk]]) 19:22, 2 April 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::::Great, I also added it to the transcript section and transcribed the dynamic part of the image. As well as the final image, which is not on-line and added the error image we had to begin at the bottom of the transcript and kept that transcript as well. Tanscript is more or less done I think.--[[User:Kynde|Kynde]] ([[User talk:Kynde|talk]]) 21:29, 2 April 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
;References and jokes in the commentary &lt;br /&gt;
Should we start explaining some of the robot announcer's commentary lines? Some of them are clear references to things. For example, the &amp;quot;Kickpuncher vs. Punchkicker&amp;quot; line is a reference to Community (Kickpuncher is a character in an in-universe film series, and Punchkicker is one of the characters' OC based on it.)&lt;br /&gt;
:Maybe make extra pages like has been done for several of the previous years huge comics, especially April Fools' comics. And yes it would be interesting to explain them... But that is a huge job. --[[User:Kynde|Kynde]] ([[User talk:Kynde|talk]]) 13:17, 2 April 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
;Errors &lt;br /&gt;
There’s a mistake in the bracket, the genome won but is grayed out [[User:Netherin5|“That Guy from the Netherlands”]] ([[User talk:Netherin5|talk]]) 13:14, 2 April 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Same with stars vs flying saucer --[[User:Kynde|Kynde]] ([[User talk:Kynde|talk]]) 13:17, 2 April 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::The genome has been corrected, but not the stars. --[[User:Kynde|Kynde]] ([[User talk:Kynde|talk]]) 13:48, 2 April 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Yeah - stars is currently duelling volcano - but the bracket shows that stars was eliminated by monorail.  This kinda suggests that the bracket is being manually generated! [[User:SteveBaker|SteveBaker]] ([[User talk:SteveBaker|talk]]) 13:59, 2 April 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
Speaking of errors, hearts no longer show up on mobile. [[User:Netherin5|“That Guy from the Netherlands”]] ([[User talk:Netherin5|talk]]) 14:31, 2 April 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:I think that was intentional, as, at least in my experience, the comic was a massive battery hit. [[Special:Contributions/108.162.241.4|108.162.241.4]] 17:11, 2 April 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Disappointed no one thought to get the egg to at least the second round. [[Special:Contributions/162.158.255.142|162.158.255.142]] 15:27, 2 April 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: Many of the rounds were incredibly close - even the final was won by just a couple of percent.  It was rare for there to be an overwhelming majority on either side.  But it's incredible that 1,393,048 votes were cast in the final...given that all those people had to be there over just the 26 minute voting timeslot.   I presume explainxkcd was taken down by overwhelming traffic? [[User:SteveBaker|SteveBaker]] ([[User talk:SteveBaker|talk]]) 16:44, 2 April 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Why are brackets relevent to this time of year. &lt;br /&gt;
The FA Cup has reached the semi-final, the Champions League and UEFA have reached the qarter finals. The European Rugby Champions Cup and European Challenge have reached the semi-finals. [[User:Arachrah|Arachrah]] ([[User talk:Arachrah|talk]]) 17:02, 2 April 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:March Madness is under way, he has referenced this before, it is in the explanation. Do not post at the top but at the bottom, for continuity. I moved your post down here where it belonged --[[User:Kynde|Kynde]] ([[User talk:Kynde|talk]]) 21:27, 2 April 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
So it is to do with boxing hares. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the mentioning of eggplant and peach, peaches represent butts, not the female sex organs. At least that is the far more common usage, including but not limited to the gay community. https://knowyourmeme.com/memes/peach-emoji-%F0%9F%8D%91&lt;br /&gt;
[[Special:Contributions/172.68.54.76|172.68.54.76]] 16:50, 3 April 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
;Stuffing &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Did anyone else noticed these comments :&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*Honeybees vs. colony collapse disorder&lt;br /&gt;
*I’m looking at the totals, and this one is extremely close.&lt;br /&gt;
*🦠 fans need to click more and faster!&lt;br /&gt;
*I mean, 🐝 fans need to keep clicking!&lt;br /&gt;
*Fun fact: You can click more than once, although if you click too much it ignores you.&lt;br /&gt;
*No! Save the bees!&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
I'm quite curious as to how many people did those 1.4 million clicks in final ! --[[Special:Contributions/172.69.226.131|172.69.226.131]] 11:43, 3 April 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
;random object battles in popular culture! &lt;br /&gt;
Hee hee! All I could think of during this was the [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1n1YjN6z-7Q old Laurie Anderson recording about which thing was more macho] [[User:Jonwchgo|Jonwchgo]] ([[User talk:Jonwchgo|talk]]) 14:19, 3 April 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
;possible refrence? &lt;br /&gt;
is the &amp;quot;spaaaaaaaaaaaace&amp;quot; a refrence to Portal 2? - [[Special:Contributions/172.71.146.130|172.71.146.130]] 03:26, 20 February 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
according to google emoji kitchen hedgehog+milkyway=[[File:hedgehog-mikyway.png]] {{unsigned|Bb777|18:31, 29 March 2025}}&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>42.book.addict</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:1235:_Settled&amp;diff=412303</id>
		<title>Talk:1235: Settled</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:1235:_Settled&amp;diff=412303"/>
				<updated>2026-05-11T17:30:37Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;42.book.addict: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;I wouldn't be so sure, considering for example the number of times {{w|Loch Ness Monster}} was photographed. Note the case of 2004. On the other hand ... yes, it is going to be harder disprove some sighting if there is 20 videos from it instead of 30 eye witnesses. The secret services probably don't exactly like it - much harder to cover it too. Especially if 5 of those are on youtube before they get there. -- [[User:Hkmaly|Hkmaly]] ([[User talk:Hkmaly|talk]]) 08:20, 8 July 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Assuming within a given timespan a factor of lets say 10000 &amp;quot;ready to use&amp;quot; cameras being around at a given place, we would expect an equal factor of photos. So the only thing speaking agains this is that maybe at the places in question, there are not more people around, but a factor of 10000 less.{{unsigned ip|213.61.9.75}}&lt;br /&gt;
::Probably everyone's got their nose burried in their smart-phone, Twittering about what they think of the Haggis they had last night, instead of taking in the view.  Thus nobody takes any photos ''at all''... [[Special:Contributions/178.98.181.133|178.98.181.133]] 14:15, 8 July 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
Unless your phone is equipped with a PPC (protected phenomenon chip), which almost all phones are required to carry by the CIA. Every time someone takes a picture of one of the protected phenomenon the chip recognizes the image and replaces it with a kitten. Why else do you think there are so many pictures of kittens on the internet?  --[[User:Shine|Shine]] ([[User talk:Shine|talk]]) 14:31, 8 July 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::PPC is not needed nor is any phenomenon disproved thanks to the development of image editing software like gimp and photoshop. If I were to post authentic photographic proof that Big Foot shot Kennedy, most people wouldn't take it seriously.  In fact, according to rule 34, now that I've mentioned it, there must be porn of it. The kittens are just more entertaining. Oh god, now it will have kittens in it.  [[User:Db|db]] ([[User talk:Db|talk]]) 15:15, 17 November 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::What would the PPC chip replace in your Bigfoot/JFK photo?  Would a kitten be firing a rifle at another kitten dressed like a president? [[Special:Contributions/2600:387:F:835:0:0:0:7|2600:387:F:835:0:0:0:7]] 00:37, 22 December 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Overlay this graph with the that of access to the tools and knowledge required to make highly convincing hoaxes (probably a few % by now, and rising rapidly) and you have the very quick period of time in which photographic evidence was convincing. Video is slightly more convincing, but I think even the window for convincing video is coming to a close. There was basically about a decade or so in which a considerable number of people could instantly make proof of a paranormal event if one were to occur. Anything older was too old for a sufficient number of decent-quality cameras to exist, and anything newer could've been made in Photoshop by a normal person. Seeing as camera hardware and optics are fundamentally more difficult things to improve on than image-editing and video-editing software, we may come to a point in the near future where no commonly available camera hardware can produce evidence that couldn't just as easily be a hoax. [[Special:Contributions/199.27.133.105|199.27.133.105]] 23:55, 4 January 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:What happens then if an image is from an actual event like an earth quake or an actual happening which could be believed, then something strange happens, like a picture which is plausable, but it is from another incident / happening / situaton. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; I remember a polar bear on an ice floe some years ago. The image / picture was valid, not an hoax, but the context used was not true. The polar bear was filmed and climbed on the ice to use it as a raft (the bear was lazy). The hoax context was to show the Arctic is declinig. Also true but the mix of the facts led to misuse of information and creating discussions not needed for the case. The point is, any picture which could be an evidence, could also be misused leading to distrust and by that no picture or videos can be true/trusted. Not all pictuers can be investigated by an expert, and not every expert can be trusted. There is a ring going on here. The only solution I can think of, is to be critical to information and hoping you do not miss the true facts floating around however strange the are. There are definately gosts around in the world, since there are human beeings with imaginations. Even if one are not told or believe there is a gost somewhere, some people see it / feel it, others don't. Does this mean it exists or not, or does this mean it exists and not everyone can see it. Or does this mean it exists, some see it and others not because the gost wants it like this. No matter what answer comes up here, it will be wrong. A picture cannot prove it and therefor it does not exist... But then again something might happen proving to others it does exist. Something cannot be two things at the exact same time. Well it can, ... the cat, the space cat, Schroedinger's, it is dead and alive at the same time, since we do not know it. If it is dead, and we believe it is alive, is it then a goast or just not dead, or is it so far away that it has been dead for a long time, or did it never exist. Again, no mattter what evidence is here, it can be proven differntly or at least discussed differently. [[Special:Contributions/173.245.53.232|173.245.53.232]] 23:42, 12 May 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If vampires don't show up in mirrors, there's a decent chance they can't be seen in photos either. [[Special:Contributions/172.70.86.68|172.70.86.68]] 19:37, 13 February 2022 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Might be true in silver-based photography (which is why silver-based mirrors of antiquity wouldn't reflect them/would reflect the light from beyond them that they supposedly block... it's like 'quantum' or something?) but then how much silver (silver-solder?) is used in a digital camera?&lt;br /&gt;
:(That's my headcanon, and I'm sticking to it. Or perhaps I'm a vampire trying to muddy the waters.) [[Special:Contributions/172.70.90.173|172.70.90.173]] 23:16, 13 February 2022 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The graph shown here is incorrect, as many people are children that don’t have phones or cameras, and not everyone that owns a phone carries it around all of the time. However, for the many people that do, they may not act fast enough pulling out their phones. Therefore, we can assume that around a quarter to half of the time, these things can be caught on camera. If we think of the case of Loch Ness monster in Loch Ness, sun reflecting off of water, or that photos taken of things underwater and photos taken underwater can be very grainy and low quality, and thus not provide enough evidence to prove these exist. Another thing that must be taken into account is lighting quality. Too much light or not enough light can lower photo quality and not allow such photos to show the monster or entity in question. Many pictures may be blurry, and thus unable to provide suitable evidence, and considering that people will shake when frightened, the amount of blurry pictures can be expected to increase drastically when photographing things like ghosts and Bigfoot. More still may be faked, as people may want to become famous on social media by posting pictures of Nessie, Bigfoot, and the like. They may want to sell a product, spread misinformation, or just have fun by trolling people. If we were to test every image of a supposed entity, computers may find that one blurry image is real, or one grainy photo of a silhouette, a low quality image. Experts and computers may provide false negatives or false positives, either accidentally or with intention. Videos may be considered, as they are easier to make not blurry, fix lighting, and the like, but with the current capacity of artificial intelligence, anyone can spit out videos of just about anything. As the number of people carrying phones and cameras continues to rise, we still cannot expect these entities to be proven or disproven anytime soon, but common sense, science, and just straight up thinking about the facts allows us to dismiss any allegations of Bigfoot, the Loch Ness Monster, poltergeists, and the like. -Summer Glau {{unsigned ip|68.187.4.2}} 16:32, 11 May 2026 (UTC)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>42.book.addict</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Template_talk:Round_corners&amp;diff=412302</id>
		<title>Template talk:Round corners</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Template_talk:Round_corners&amp;diff=412302"/>
				<updated>2026-05-11T17:29:22Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;42.book.addict: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;''It's so pretty...'' --'''''[[User:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Times; color:#023020&amp;quot;&amp;gt;DollarStoreBa'al&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User_talk:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Times; color:#000080&amp;quot;&amp;gt;'''''converse'''''&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 16:36, 10 May 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What is the point of this template? I do not see it used in any other page and it only links to your &amp;quot;snadbocks&amp;quot; page, which was originally ported over from enwiki (and thus quite useless). [[User:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font:11pt Cormorant Garamond&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#4A86A6&amp;quot;&amp;gt;tor&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#C0728D&amp;quot;&amp;gt;i :3&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font:8pt Cormorant Garamond&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#7E7E7E&amp;quot;&amp;gt;talk &amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#C0728D&amp;quot;&amp;gt;to &amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#4A86A6&amp;quot;&amp;gt;me!&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 17:29, 11 May 2026 (UTC)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>42.book.addict</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=User_talk:DollarStoreBa%27al/Snadbocks&amp;diff=412301</id>
		<title>User talk:DollarStoreBa'al/Snadbocks</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=User_talk:DollarStoreBa%27al/Snadbocks&amp;diff=412301"/>
				<updated>2026-05-11T17:28:22Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;42.book.addict: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Ok kynde. Here's the solution. Go ahead. Delete this too. Delete all my subpages!&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Pages to delete]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Current &amp;quot;Snadbocks&amp;quot; content. ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I can see ''what'' you've done, but not why. And I'm a bit hazy as to how. (Though where and when are at least obvious enough! ;) )&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You've managed to put &amp;quot;newline escape-codes&amp;quot; (\n) in. If you're serious about those, then replace them all with more literal linefeeds (though just getting rid of most of them woupd at least make it readable as a mostly run-on sentence).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
And your &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;a href=…&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;s, &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;img …&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;s, etc, are using &amp;quot;escaped quotes&amp;quot; (\&amp;quot;) that don't let the HTML markup work (also, I'd stick to Wiki Markup wherever possible, i.e. &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;[&amp;lt;url here&amp;gt; text of link]&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt; for links). The first thing to do is at least change \&amp;quot; to just &amp;quot;, in all cases, but knowing what you want to do and rewriting the markup in Wiki-form ''without'' the HTML-legacy (wherever it's not strictly the same thing, anyway) would be the best solution.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I'm taking it that you've ripped this whole sort-of-Marked-Up code from elsewhere, in a way that has &amp;quot;sanitised&amp;quot; the literals from the original. It looks interesting (especially if it is your story it's telling, but... dates in 2007..? ...that's actually before you were born, right? ...or at least ''very'' young), yet I'm wondering whether it (despite the dalliences with the {{template|comic}} template) is really something you mean to legitimately be here, even as a future part of your main User:-page.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
(ETA: Oh, wait... Having read it more thoroughly, you've ripped it off Randall's blag, or similar..? I thought I recognised that hand! Still, you've managed to 'rip it wrong' ''and'' I don't think we're looking to put the whole Randallian corpus, here... Comics, yes; What-Ifs, a fairly recent addition; Strange 'sometimes Comic-like' xkcd.com pages... meh... Blag-stuff and wider-world stuff is getting into stalking territory, and this isn't really an alt.fan.randall.monroe type thing, it's at root an xkcd-Comic-Explainer.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If I knew for certain what you were trying to do, I might even be able to help you (beyond the 'quick corrections' I give above). It just looks like messing about, though. Despite knowing that you've rslecently (in particular) done a few intensive (and useful!) things more in the spirit of this wiki. [[Special:Contributions/82.132.239.11|82.132.239.11]] 17:16, 6 December 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:It's a webpage on xkcd.com I found. Thanks for letting me know that not ''everything'' needs to go here. I tried getting a head-start by copy-pasting the HTML source code from the page. &amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family: Times New Roman, serif; font-size: 16px;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;--'''''[[User:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#FF0000&amp;quot;&amp;gt;DollarStoreBa'al&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User Talk:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#00873E&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Converse&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt; 15:23, 10 December 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Sorry, but what's the point of copying in your enwiki page onto explain xkcd? I am almost certain that nobody is all that interested in this and you could very well just link the page onto your main user page for people to read if they really want to. No need in causing more confusion with cross-wiki porting. [[User:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font:11pt Cormorant Garamond&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#4A86A6&amp;quot;&amp;gt;tor&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#C0728D&amp;quot;&amp;gt;i :3&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font:8pt Cormorant Garamond&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#7E7E7E&amp;quot;&amp;gt;talk &amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#C0728D&amp;quot;&amp;gt;to &amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#4A86A6&amp;quot;&amp;gt;me!&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 17:28, 11 May 2026 (UTC)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>42.book.addict</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=what_if%3F_articles&amp;diff=412300</id>
		<title>what if? articles</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=what_if%3F_articles&amp;diff=412300"/>
				<updated>2026-05-11T17:24:27Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;42.book.addict: Undo revision 412095 by 2001:56A:FE12:8E00:8072:A843:A66F:C176 (talk) i will...start working on this once i'm not SWAMPED with finals...&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&amp;lt;noinclude&amp;gt;{{DISPLAYTITLE:''what if?'' articles}}For other instances of this title, see [[What If (disambiguation)]].''&amp;lt;!--&amp;lt;/noinclude&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
==Article index==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;noinclude&amp;gt;--&amp;gt;&amp;lt;noinclude&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{incomplete|The 10th Anniversary Edition annotations have not been added yet. If you have the book and can help, please see the [[Talk:what if? articles#10th_Anniversary_Annotations|Talk Page]] for more info!}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/noinclude&amp;gt;&amp;lt;!--&amp;lt;div style=&amp;quot;display:none;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;__TOC__&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;--&amp;gt;This is an index of all articles featured in Randall Munroe's ''what if?'' [[what if? (blog)|blog]] and [[:Category:Books|book series]]. For each article, the original question and a summary of Randall's answer are provided. If an article is available on the blog, you can click the title to read it in full. You can use the columns to sort the table alphabetically, by release date on the blog or YouTube, or by chapter in the books. The thumbnail is only available for articles published on the blog. If the title of a blog article differs from the one in the book, the latter will be provided in the Book column. A much simpler list that doesn't include book-exclusive articles can be found in the [https://what-if.xkcd.com/archive archive section] of the blog. Similar articles by Randall have also been [[New York Times: Good Question|published in the New York Times]].&amp;lt;noinclude&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Incomplete explanations| ]]&amp;lt;/noinclude&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div style=&amp;quot;clear: both&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;sortable wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
! rowspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; scope=&amp;quot;col&amp;quot; class=&amp;quot;unsortable&amp;quot; |  Thumbnail&lt;br /&gt;
! rowspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; scope=&amp;quot;col&amp;quot; data-sort-type=text|  Title&lt;br /&gt;
! rowspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; scope=&amp;quot;col&amp;quot; data-sort-type=text|  Reader's question&lt;br /&gt;
! rowspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; scope=&amp;quot;col&amp;quot; class=&amp;quot;unsortable&amp;quot; |  Summary of Randall's answer&lt;br /&gt;
! colspan=&amp;quot;3&amp;quot;|                                  Article available in... &amp;lt;noinclude&amp;gt;&amp;lt;!--&amp;lt;/noinclude&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;background-color:#FFFF00;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;noinclude&amp;gt;--&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/noinclude&amp;gt;&amp;amp;nbsp;''(click to sort)''&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;lt;noinclude&amp;gt;&amp;lt;!--&amp;lt;/noinclude&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;noinclude&amp;gt;--&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/noinclude&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! scope=&amp;quot;col&amp;quot; data-sort-type=number |           Blog&lt;br /&gt;
! scope=&amp;quot;col&amp;quot; data-sort-type=number |           Books&lt;br /&gt;
! scope=&amp;quot;col&amp;quot; data-sort-type=number |           YouTube&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| rowspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; |[[File:Relativistic Baseball.png|100px]]&lt;br /&gt;
| rowspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; |'''{{What If|1|Relativistic Baseball}}'''&lt;br /&gt;
| rowspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; |''&amp;quot;What would happen if you tried to hit a baseball pitched at 90% the speed of light?&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;—Ellen McManis&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
| rowspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; |The ball would create plasma and reach home plate in about 70 nanoseconds. The result would be some kind of nuclear explosion, destroying everything about a mile from the field. A ruling of &amp;quot;{{w|hit by pitch}}&amp;quot; could be interpreted in this situation.&lt;br /&gt;
| rowspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot;{{blog|1|2012|07|10}}&lt;br /&gt;
| rowspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot;{{book|1|2}}&lt;br /&gt;
|{{book|5|2024|02|06|3EI08o-IGYk|What if you threw a baseball at nearly light speed?}}&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|{{book|14|short-video=yes|2025|10|28|Uj10jGq2O8o|What if you tried to hit a baseball pitched at 90% the speed of light?}}&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:SAT Guessing.png|100px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|'''{{What If|2|SAT Guessing}}'''&lt;br /&gt;
|''&amp;quot;What if everyone who took the SAT guessed on every multiple-choice question? How many perfect scores would there be?&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;—Rob Balder&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|No one would get a perfect score. The odds of guessing correctly on every question would be less than the odds of every living ex-president at that time and the main cast of [[:Category:Firefly|Firefly]] getting struck by lightning on the same day. To put this as a number, the odds of this happening would be less than 1/10^100 (one {{w|googol}}).&lt;br /&gt;
|{{blog|2|2012|07|10|7d early}}&lt;br /&gt;
|{{book|1|66}}&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:Yoda.png|100px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|'''{{What If|3|Yoda}}'''&lt;br /&gt;
|''&amp;quot;How much Force power can Yoda output?&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;—Ryan Finnie&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|Yoda can output about 19.2 kilowatts, or 25 horsepower. &amp;quot;Yoda power&amp;quot; would cost about $2/hour.&lt;br /&gt;
|{{blog|3|2012|07|17}}&lt;br /&gt;
|{{book|1|32}}&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:A Moles of Moles.png|100px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|'''{{What If|4|A Mole of Moles}}'''&lt;br /&gt;
|''&amp;quot;What would happen if you were to gather a mole (unit of measurement) of moles (the small furry critter) in one place?&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;—Sean Rice&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|In physics, a {{w|mole (unit)|mole}} is a number that equals approximately 6.022 × 10&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;23&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;. If this amount of moles (the furry animals) were put in space, they would form a sphere a little bit larger than our Moon with about the same gravity as Pluto. The surface would freeze and trap the interior warmth, causing geysers of hot meat and methane.&lt;br /&gt;
|{{blog|4|2012|07|24}}&lt;br /&gt;
|{{book|1|10}}&lt;br /&gt;
|{{book|29|2025|8|19|lLlwvmu1ZeA|What if you had a mole of moles?}}&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:Robot Apocalypse.png|100px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|'''{{What If|5|Robot Apocalypse}}'''&lt;br /&gt;
|''&amp;quot;What if there was a robot apocalypse? How long would humanity last?&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;—Rob Lombino&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|Humanity would most likely survive. Most robots can easily be subdued because technology hasn’t been developed enough to allow them to walk, evade being destroyed, and kill us efficiently. They could decide to use our nuclear weapons, but that would hurt them more than us.&lt;br /&gt;
|{{blog|5|2012|07|31}}&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:Glass Half Empty.png|100px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|'''{{What If|6|Glass Half Empty}}'''&lt;br /&gt;
|''&amp;quot;What if a glass of water was, all of a sudden, literally half empty?&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;—Vittorio Iacovella&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|If the vacuum were on the bottom half, it would explode, but if it were on the top half, the air rushes in and it becomes normal water.&lt;br /&gt;
|{{blog|6|2012|08|07}}&lt;br /&gt;
|{{book|1|26}}&lt;br /&gt;
|{{book|16|2024|09|24|0EytSWiKrFg|What if a glass of water were LITERALLY half empty?}}&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:Everybody Out.png|100px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|'''{{What If|7|Everybody Out}}'''&lt;br /&gt;
|''&amp;quot;Is there enough energy to move the entire current human population off-planet?&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;—Adam&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|No, at least not without starving to death quickly and leaving our pets, belongings, and everything else behind. The best way to do it is either with a space tether or to ride the shockwave of a nuclear bomb, but the former lacks a good material and the latter is literally ''riding the shockwave of a nuclear bomb''. In any case, highly impractical.&lt;br /&gt;
|{{blog|7|2012|08|14}}&lt;br /&gt;
|{{book|1|35}}&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| rowspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; |[[File:Everybody Jump.png|100px]]&lt;br /&gt;
| rowspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; |'''{{What If|8|Everybody Jump}}'''&lt;br /&gt;
| rowspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; |''&amp;quot;What would happen if everyone on e&amp;lt;!--DO NOT CAPITALISE THE &amp;quot;E&amp;quot;: This is how it's written on the site, it should not be changed.--&amp;gt;arth stood as close to each other as they could and jumped, everyone landing on the ground at the same instant?&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;—Thomas Bennett (and many others)&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
| rowspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; |Earth would be unaffected, but almost all humans would probably be wiped out, due to the congestion of everybody being in one place at once. Utilities and everything requiring human oversight would eventually fail because no one was maintaining them. If airports became functional, only the largest would be able to efficiently get everybody home. Only the people at the edges of the giant crowd would be able to escape, with the rest almost certainly dying due to suffocation. The Earth would then be a lawless wasteland, with a severely diminished population trying to restore humanity to its former glory.&lt;br /&gt;
| rowspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; {{blog|8|2012|08|21}}&lt;br /&gt;
| rowspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; {{book|1|9}}&lt;br /&gt;
|{{book|9|2024|04|16|p2M8Y0z9Rl0|What if everyone jumped at once?}}&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|{{book|17|short-video=yes|2025|11|25|Ny9m2l6h478|What if everyone on Earth was in the same place and jumped at the same time?}}&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:Soul Mates.png|100px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|'''{{What If|9|Soul Mates}}'''&lt;br /&gt;
|''&amp;quot;What if everyone actually had only one soul mate, a random person somewhere in the world?&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;—Benjamin Staffin&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|Assuming the soul mate can exist at any time, there is a high chance that you would not find your soul mate. Around 100 billion humans have ever existed, but only 8 billion of those people are alive today. This means that there is an over 90% chance that your soul mate is long dead. This is made worse by the fact that people will also be born in the future, and your soul mate could live very far in the future. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Even if it is assumed that someone's soul mate must be alive while they are alive, there's still a very low chance of finding your soul mate due to the sheer amount of people in the world. Even if you find them, they may speak another language and be unable to understand you. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Jobs would also be affected, with very social jobs such as waiters, cashiers, or traffic guards being highly sought-after.&lt;br /&gt;
|{{blog|9|2012|08|28}}&lt;br /&gt;
|{{book|1|6}}&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:Cassini.png|100px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|'''{{What If|10|Cassini}}'''&lt;br /&gt;
|''&amp;quot;What would the world be like if the land masses were spread out the same way as now - only rotated by an angle of 90 degrees?&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;—Socke&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|Hard to tell with any sort of certainty, but North America remains the same (just flipped, so Canada is tropical), South America becomes more like Europe before this question, Asia is flipped just like North America was, Europe becomes more like southeast Asia, Africa's climate is essentially rotated 90 degrees and East Africa gets a lot more tornadoes, Australia is colder and wetter, and Antarctica becomes a tropical rainforest. Of course, the biosphere collapses due to the shuffling and the ice caps (prematurely) melt, while also making certain wildlife appear elsewhere than normal.&lt;br /&gt;
|{{blog|10|2012|09|04}}&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|{{book|23|2025|04|01|WH4g1ptJ-70|What if the Earth rotated 90 degrees?}}&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:Droppings.png|100px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|'''{{What If|11|Droppings}}'''&lt;br /&gt;
|''&amp;quot;If you went outside and lay down on your back with your mouth open, how long would you have to wait until a bird pooped in it?&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;—Adrienne Olson&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|Assuming an even distribution of all birds across the Earth's surface and a frequency of 1 poop per hour, it would take you about 195 years on average. However, those assumptions are unrealistic: It would probably be closer to a few hours if you were laying under an area where large amounts of birds are common, such as a power line or tree.&lt;br /&gt;
|{{blog|11|2012|09|11}}&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:Raindrop.png|100px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|'''{{What If|12|Raindrop}}'''&lt;br /&gt;
|''&amp;quot;What if a rainstorm dropped all of its water in a single giant drop?&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;—Michael McNeill&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|The surrounding area would be obliterated via the violent rush of crushing water, causing flash flooding in the surrounding area. There would be mass confusion for many following years.&lt;br /&gt;
|{{blog|12|2012|09|18}}&lt;br /&gt;
|{{book|1|65}}&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:Laser Pointer.png|100px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|'''{{What If|13|Laser Pointer}}'''&lt;br /&gt;
|''&amp;quot;If every person on Earth aimed a laser pointer at the Moon at the same time, would it change color?&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;—Peter Lipowicz&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|It would take lots of power, but yes, assuming you want to drain the Earth's oil and cover Asia in megawatt lasers. Going even further in power level fries the Earth and launches the Moon into the solar system.&lt;br /&gt;
|{{blog|13|2012|09|25}}&lt;br /&gt;
|{{book|1|7}}&lt;br /&gt;
|{{book|18|2024|11|05|JqFSGkFPipM|What if everyone pointed a laser at the m&amp;lt;!--DO NOT CAPITALISE THE &amp;quot;m&amp;quot;: This is how it's written on the site, it should not be changed.--&amp;gt;oon?}}&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| rowspan=&amp;quot;7&amp;quot; |[[File:Short Answer Section.png|100px]]&lt;br /&gt;
| rowspan=&amp;quot;7&amp;quot; |'''{{What If|14|Short Answer Section}}'''&lt;br /&gt;
|''&amp;quot;How long would the Sun last if a giant water hose were focused upon it?&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;—Austin Dickey&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|The Sun would actually burn brighter due to water being mostly hydrogen (main fusion fuel of stars) and eventually become a black hole with all the mass of the water.&lt;br /&gt;
| rowspan=&amp;quot;7&amp;quot;{{blog|14|2012|10|02}}&lt;br /&gt;
| rowspan=&amp;quot;7&amp;quot; |&lt;br /&gt;
| rowspan=&amp;quot;7&amp;quot; |&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''&amp;quot;What if you shined a flashlight (or a laser) into a sphere made of one-way mirror glass?&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;—Chase Montgomery&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|One-way glass does not exist. The light shines through just like normal glass.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''&amp;quot;If Michael Phelps could hold his breath indefinitely, how long would it take for him to reach the lowest point in the ocean and back if he swam straight down and then straight back up?&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;—Jimmy Morey&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|Michael Phelps would die somewhere between 100 and 400 meters of depth. If he were immune to pressure, then it would take 3 hours to swim to the bottom of the Marianas Trench and back.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''&amp;quot;In the first Superman movie, Superman flies around Earth so fast that it begins turning in the opposite direction. This somehow turns back time [... ] How much energy would someone flying around the Earth have to exert in order to reverse the Earth's rotation?&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;—Aidan Blake&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|Superman wasn't pushing the Earth. He was flying {{w|Superluminal motion|superluminally}} and was thus travelling back through time.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''&amp;quot;How fast would you have to go in your car to run a red light claiming that it appeared green to you due to the Doppler Effect?&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;—Yitzi Turniansky&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|The {{w|Doppler Effect}} is when waves (such as light or sound) change based on movement or position. You would need to go about one sixth of the {{w|speed of light}}.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''&amp;quot;What would happen if you opened a portal between Boston (sea level) and Mexico City (elev. 8000+ feet)?&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;—Jake G.&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|There would be winds of 440 mph (708 km/h) sucking Boston into Mexico City.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''&amp;quot;When my wife and I started dating she invited me over for dinner at one time. Her kitchen had something called Bauhaus chairs, which are full of holes, approx 5-6 millimeters in diameter in both back and seat. During this lovely dinner I was forced to liberate a small portion of wind and was relieved that I managed to do so very discretely. Only to find that the chair I sat on converted the successful silence into a perfect, and loud, flute note. We were both (luckily) amazed and surprised and I have often wondered what the odds are for something like that happening. We kept the chairs for five years but despite laborious attempts it couldn't be reproduced.&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;—R. D.&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|This... isn’t actually a question, but thank you for sharing!&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:Mariana Trench Explosion.png|100px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|'''{{What If|15|Mariana Trench Explosion}}'''&lt;br /&gt;
|''&amp;quot;What if you exploded a nuclear bomb (say, the Tsar Bomba) at the bottom of the Marianas Trench?&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;—Evin Sellin&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|Surprisingly, not much! Large waves already disappear quickly when created by surface explosions, and moving the detonation underwater only lessens the effect. If you exploded a Tsar Bomba at the bottom of the Mariana Trench, the resulting eruption would create massive bubbles before turning into warm water and debris. &lt;br /&gt;
|{{blog|15|2012|10|09}}&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| rowspan=&amp;quot;6&amp;quot; |[[File:Today's topic- Lightning.png|100px]]&lt;br /&gt;
| rowspan=&amp;quot;6&amp;quot; |'''{{What If|16|Today's topic: Lightning}}'''&lt;br /&gt;
|''&amp;quot;How dangerous is it to be in a pool during a thunderstorm?&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;—Jay Gengelbach&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|Pretty dangerous, as if the pool was hit, 20,000 amps of electricity from the lightning bolt would spread across the surface and shock you. Randall recommends that one should stay at least 12 meters away from a pool during a thunderstorm.&lt;br /&gt;
| rowspan=&amp;quot;6&amp;quot;{{blog|16|2012|10|16}}&lt;br /&gt;
| rowspan=&amp;quot;6&amp;quot;{{book|1|19|Lightning}}&lt;br /&gt;
| rowspan=&amp;quot;6&amp;quot; |&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''&amp;quot;What would happen if you were taking a shower or standing under a waterfall when you were struck by lightning?&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;—Same3Chords&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|The droplets of water wouldn’t be dangerous, but a tub of water or any puddle you stand in ''will'' be dangerous.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''&amp;quot;What would happen if you were in a boat, plane or a submarine that got hit by lightning?&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;—Soobnauce&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|A boat would be as safe as a car if it had a cabin and lightning protection, while a submarine would be completely safe. The plane was not mentioned.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''&amp;quot;What if you were changing the light at the top of a radio tower and lightning struck? Or what if you were doing a backflip? Or standing in a graphite field? Or looking straight up at the bolt?&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;—Danny Wedul&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|You would get shocked normally if you were on a radio tower, doing a backflip, or looking straight up (which would also damage your eyes). These all don’t matter much. Randall doesn’t know what a graphite field is and chose not to answer that part of the question.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''&amp;quot;What would happen if lightning struck a bullet in midair?&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;—Timothy Campbell&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|The bullet might be heated a little bit, but it’s travelling too fast to have any impact.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''&amp;quot;What if you were flashing your BIOS during a thunderstorm and you got hit by lightning?&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;—NJSG&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|It would bring you to “Microsoft BOB®”, “Gateway 2000 Edition”.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:Green Cows.png|100px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|'''{{What If|17|Green Cows}}'''&lt;br /&gt;
|''&amp;quot;If cows could photosynthesize, how much less food would they need?&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;—Anonymous&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|They would need 4% less food. There simply isn't enough area on the cow for photosynthesis to provide all its energy requirements.&lt;br /&gt;
|{{blog|17|2012|10|23}}&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:BB Gun.png|100px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|'''{{What If|18|BB Gun}}'''&lt;br /&gt;
|''&amp;quot;In Armageddon, a NASA guy comments that a plan to shoot a laser at the asteroid is like “shooting a b.b. gun at a freight train.” What would it take to stop an out-of-control freight train using only b.b. guns?&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;—Charles James O'Keefe&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|This would normally be impossible. However, with enough people shooting the train, it can happen. This would require about 100,000 people shooting, distributed over 2 kilometers of track, each firing a few dozen rounds once the train comes close enough. This would, eventually, be enough to bring the train to a stop.&lt;br /&gt;
|{{blog|18|2012|10|30}}&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:Tie Vote.png|100px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|'''{{What If|19|Tie Vote}}'''&lt;br /&gt;
|''&amp;quot;What if there's LITERALLY a tie?&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;—Nate Silver (&amp;lt;span class=&amp;quot;plainlinks&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[https://twitter.com/fivethirtyeight/status/154434288287363072 '''Twitter, January 4th, 2012''']&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;)&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|In the case of each candidate getting the exact same amount of votes on Election Day, most states would randomly pick one, whether it be through tossing a coin, drawing a name or straws. The chances of this happening in 9 battleground states would be about equal to the elector drawing a name from a hat, then being smashed by a bale of cocaine by drug smugglers and obliterated by a meteorite impact while being swept away in a tornado.&lt;br /&gt;
|{{blog|19|2012|11|06}}&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:Diamond.png|100px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|'''{{What If|20|Diamond}}'''&lt;br /&gt;
|''&amp;quot;If a meteor made out of diamond and 100 feet in diameter was traveling at the speed of light and hit the e&amp;lt;!--DO NOT CAPITALISE THE &amp;quot;E&amp;quot;: This is how it's written on the site, it should not be changed.--&amp;gt;arth, what would happen to it?&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;—Aidan Smith, Age 8, via his father Jeff&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|Nothing made of matter can travel at the speed of light, but at the closest speed observed (99.99999999999999999999951% of the speed of light, the speed of the {{w|Oh-My-God particle}}), the Earth would explode with enough force to impact the entire inner Solar System.&lt;br /&gt;
|{{blog|20|2012|11|13}}&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:Machine Gun Jetpack.png|100px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|'''{{What If|21|Machine Gun Jetpack}}'''&lt;br /&gt;
|''&amp;quot;Is it possible to build a jetpack using downward firing machine guns?&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;—Rob B&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|You'd need a Russian 30 mm rotary cannon to do it optimally, and the excessive force would definitely hurt you. If you braced the rider, created an aerodynamic craft strong enough to survive the acceleration, and cooled the craft, you'd be able to jump mountains.&lt;br /&gt;
|{{blog|21|2012|11|20}}&lt;br /&gt;
|{{book|1|14|Machine-Gun Jetpack}}&lt;br /&gt;
|{{book|36|2026|2|10|IdlQsjq5vKo|What if you made a jetpack using rifles?}}&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:Cost of Pennies.png|100px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|'''{{What If|22|Cost of Pennies}}'''&lt;br /&gt;
|''&amp;quot;If you carry a penny in your coin tray, how long would it take for that penny to cost you more than a cent in extra gas?&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;—Leto Atreides&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|140,000 miles if gas was the only cost involved. The exercise of picking up the penny can prolong your lifespan, but you've wasted valuable seconds reading this article.&lt;br /&gt;
|{{blog|22|2012|11|27}}&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| rowspan=&amp;quot;7&amp;quot; |[[File:Short Answer Section II.png|100px]]&lt;br /&gt;
| rowspan=&amp;quot;7&amp;quot; |'''{{What If|23|Short Answer Section II}}'''&lt;br /&gt;
|''&amp;quot;If my printer could literally print out money, would it have that big an effect on the world?&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;—Derek O’Brien&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
| Using the printer, you could make about 200 million dollars per year, depending on the type of printer. This would actually be the perfect sweet spot for you, as it would be enough to make you very, very rich, but not enough to have any effect on the world. The United States [https://www.bep.gov/currency/production-figures/annual-production-reports prints approximately $160 billion per year], so $200 million a year would be nothing more than a drop in the bucket.&lt;br /&gt;
| rowspan=&amp;quot;7&amp;quot;{{blog|23|2012|12|04}}&lt;br /&gt;
| rowspan=&amp;quot;7&amp;quot;{{book|1|18|Short-Answer Section}}&lt;br /&gt;
| rowspan=&amp;quot;7&amp;quot; |&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''&amp;quot;What would happen if you exploded a nuclear bomb in the eye of a hurricane? Would the storm cell be immediately vaporized?&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;—Rupert Bainbridge (and hundreds of others)&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|No. Dr. Christopher Landsea of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration has [https://www.aoml.noaa.gov/hrd-faq/#hurricane-mitigation:~:text=Stop%20a%20Hurricane%3F-,Nuclear%20Weapons,-Adding%20Hygroscopic%20Particles published a response] explaining why it wouldn't work.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''&amp;quot;If everyone put little turbine generators on the downspouts of their houses and businesses, how much power would we generate? Would we ever generate enough power to offset the cost of the generators?&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;—Damien&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|If it's very rainy, it would generate 800 watts of power, which isn't enough to offset the cost of the generators.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''&amp;quot;Using only pronounceable letter combinations, how long would names have to be to give each star in the universe a unique one word name?&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;—Seamus Johnson&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|About 24 characters.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''&amp;quot;I bike to class sometimes. It's annoying biking in the wintertime, because it's so cold. How fast would I have to bike for my skin to warm up the way a spacecraft heats up during reentry?&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;—David Nai&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|You'd have to bike at about 200 m/s, which would make your commute very fast indeed. However, the amount of energy required to bike at that speed would cause you to die from overexertion. This might work if you didn't exert any energy, however.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''&amp;quot;How much physical space does the internet take up?&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;—Max L&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|Using humanity's total produced storage space from the last few years as an upper bound, and assuming 3.5&amp;quot; drives, the Internet is less than the size of an oil tank.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''&amp;quot;What if you strapped C4 to a boomerang? Could this be an effective weapon, or would it be as stupid as it sounds?&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;—Chad Macziewski&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|Strapping C4 to a boomerang does not sound like an effective weapon. The weapon as depicted in the image would have terrible aerodynamics, and would not fly an easily predictable trajectory. C4 is, by itself, an inert substance which would need some form of detonator to actually explode, in which case it would depend upon how you set it up (e.g. timer or inertial trigger) and at what point in its flight this would activate. ''If'' this happened as it returns (or flies past, if thrown reasonably correctly but being unable or unwilling to catch it), it might kill or injure the thrower and/or those nearby. There were many unstated details as to how the proposal would be implemented, as Randall lampshades in his open answer.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:Model Rockets.png|100px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|'''{{What If|24|Model Rockets}}'''&lt;br /&gt;
|''&amp;quot;How many model rocket engines would it take to launch a real rocket into space?&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;—Greg Schock, PA&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|It would take about 65,000, but they’d have to be layered in a cone shape with about 30 stages so the vehicle has thrust for long enough. It could carry 60 kg, much of that spent on all the parts of the rocket that aren't the engine.  And this contraption would not attain orbital velocity, but rapidly fall back to Earth after briefly leaving the atmosphere.  Accelerating to orbital velocity is a whole other class of problem and cannot be achieved using model rocket engines in any practical way.&lt;br /&gt;
|{{blog|24|2012|12|11}}&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:Three Wise Men.png|100px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|'''{{What If|25|Three Wise Men}}'''&lt;br /&gt;
|''&amp;quot;The story of the three wise men got me wondering: What if you did walk towards a star at a fixed speed? What path would you trace on the Earth? Does it converge to a fixed cycle?&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;—N. Murdoch&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|No, but the paths they would take would make some really cool patterns due to various factors, such as the Earth's rotation and its position changing in its orbit around the Sun.&lt;br /&gt;
|{{blog|25|2012|12|18}}&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|{{book|22|2025|03|04|YL2VNtus4xk|What if the wise men kept walking after Jesus’s birth?}}&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:Leap Seconds.png|100px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|'''{{What If|26|Leap Seconds}}'''&lt;br /&gt;
|''&amp;quot;Every now and then we have to insert a leap second because the Earth’s rotation is slowing down. Could we speed up Earth’s rotation, so that we do not need Leap Seconds?&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;—Anton (Berlin, Germany)&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|The only real way to do this is by hitting Earth with asteroids; all other ideas would be too difficult or wouldn’t work. With 50,000 planets B-612 hitting the Earth each second and a few assumptions, we could stop worrying about leap seconds (mostly because it would deliver the energy of about one dinosaur-killer asteroid every couple days, wiping out life on Earth quite quickly)&lt;br /&gt;
|{{blog|26|2012|12|31|6d late}}&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:Death Rates.png|100px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|'''{{What If|27|Death Rates}}'''&lt;br /&gt;
|''&amp;quot;If one randomly chosen extra person were to die each second somewhere on Earth, what impact would it have on the world population?&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;—Guy Petzall&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|The world population would continue to grow, though 40% more slowly. Pilots, drivers, and surgeons would die en route and mid-operation, but these would be comparable to usual accident rates and handled fairly easily.&lt;br /&gt;
|{{blog|27|2013|01|08|1d late}}&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:Steak Drop.png|100px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|'''{{What If|28|Steak Drop}}'''&lt;br /&gt;
|''&amp;quot;From what height would you need to drop a steak for it to be cooked when it hit the ground?&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;—Alex Lahey&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|From the very edge of the atmosphere, but even in that case it might not be fully cooked, as the steak will have to pass through parts of the atmosphere that are freezing cold and the parts of the fall where heat is being applied are more likely to char and disintegrate the steak than cook it.&lt;br /&gt;
|{{blog|28|2013|01|15}}&lt;br /&gt;
|{{book|1|23}}&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| rowspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; |[[File:Spent Fuel Pool.png|100px]]&lt;br /&gt;
| rowspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; |'''{{What If|29|Spent Fuel Pool}}'''&lt;br /&gt;
| rowspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; |''&amp;quot;What if I took a swim in a typical spent nuclear fuel pool? Would I need to dive to actually experience a fatal amount of radiation? How long could I stay safely at the surface?&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;—Jonathan Bastien-Filiatrault&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
| rowspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; |As long as you don't touch strange things and you don't swim too close to the fuel rods, it would be just like a regular pool. Except for the fact you would never make it to the pool, as the guards would notice and shoot you to death.&lt;br /&gt;
| rowspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; {{blog|29|2013|01|22}}&lt;br /&gt;
| rowspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; {{book|1|3}}&lt;br /&gt;
|{{book|8|2024|04|02|EFRUL7vKdU8|What if you swam in a nuclear storage pool?}}&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|{{book|16|short-video=yes|2025|11|18|vBfR2Zb0dkc|Could you swim in a spent nuclear fuel pool?}}&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:Interplanetary Cessna.png|100px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|'''{{What If|30|Interplanetary Cessna}}'''&lt;br /&gt;
|''&amp;quot;What would happen if you tried to fly a normal Earth airplane above different Solar System bodies?&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;—Glen Chiacchieri&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|Most of the Solar System bodies lack atmospheres and thus cannot be flown over. An airplane close enough to the sun to try to fly in its atmosphere would be instantaneously vaporized. It would be difficult to fly on Mars because the atmosphere is thin enough that a plane like the hypothetical Cessna must travel at Mach 1 to stay aloft, which would make the momentum too high for such a plane to steer properly, so you would crash. Jupiter's gravity is too strong, so the plane would sink into the atmosphere, tumbling in the high winds, until the increasing pressure crushed it. The remaining gas giants have weaker gravity, but still have nowhere to land, so you would eventually freeze, tumble and be crushed. Titan and Venus are the best bets, but Titan is cold, so the pilot would freeze to death, and Venus is full of sulfuric acid, which would cause the plane to burn up.&lt;br /&gt;
|{{blog|30|2013|01|29}}&lt;br /&gt;
|{{book|1|30}}&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:FedEx Bandwidth.png|100px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|'''{{What If|31|FedEx Bandwidth}}'''&lt;br /&gt;
|''&amp;quot;When - if ever - will the bandwidth of the Internet surpass that of FedEx?&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;—Johan Öbrink&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|Probably never, unless the Internet's transfer rate grows faster than storage rates, the Internet won't surpass an army of FedEx trucks. However, the ping times would be ''absurd''.&lt;br /&gt;
|{{blog|31|2013|02|05}}&lt;br /&gt;
|{{book|1|44}}&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| rowspan=&amp;quot;3&amp;quot; |[[File:Hubble.png|100px]]&lt;br /&gt;
| rowspan=&amp;quot;3&amp;quot; |'''{{What If|32|Hubble}}'''&lt;br /&gt;
| rowspan=&amp;quot;3&amp;quot; |''&amp;quot;If the Hubble telescope were aimed at the Earth, how detailed would the images be?&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;—Kyle Rankin&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
| rowspan=&amp;quot;3&amp;quot; |Very blurry because Hubble isn't able to rotate fast enough to track the surface of the Earth. Hubble is the wrong tool for the job, you're thinking of a spy satellite.&lt;br /&gt;
| rowspan=&amp;quot;3&amp;quot; {{blog|32|2013|02|12}}&lt;br /&gt;
| rowspan=&amp;quot;3&amp;quot; |&lt;br /&gt;
|{{book|1|2023|11|29|2LSyizrk8-0|What if we aimed the Hubble Telescope at Earth?}}&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|{{book|10|short-video=yes|2025|09|16|TgA0lXEW7dw|Could the Hubble take a photo of you?}}&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|{{book|11|short-video=yes|2025|09|23|i6e4NnFnQi0|How detailed would the Hubbles images be if it looked at Earth?}}&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:Ships.png|100px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|'''{{What If|33|Ships}}'''&lt;br /&gt;
|''&amp;quot;How much would the sea level fall if every ship were removed all at once from the Earth's waters?&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;—Michael Toje&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|The sea level would fall by about 6 microns, slightly more than the diameter of a strand of spider silk. However, since the oceans are currently rising at about 3.3 millimeters per year due to global warming, the water would be back up to its original average level in 16 hours.&lt;br /&gt;
|{{blog|33|2013|02|19}}&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:what if? Twitter.png|100px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|'''{{What If|34|Twitter}}'''&lt;br /&gt;
|''&amp;quot;How many unique English tweets are possible? How long would it take for the population of the world to read them all out loud?&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;—Eric H., Hopatcong, NJ&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|Since there are 2 * 10&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;46&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; meaningful English tweets, reading them all would take 10,000 &amp;quot;eternal years&amp;quot;, with an eternal day being the length of time needed to wear down a 100-mile mountain if a bird scraped 1 grain every thousand years.&lt;br /&gt;
|{{blog|34|2013|02|26}}&lt;br /&gt;
|{{book|1|50}}&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:Hair Dryer.png|100px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|'''{{What If|35|Hair Dryer}}'''&lt;br /&gt;
|''&amp;quot;What would happen if a hair dryer with continuous power was turned on and put in an airtight 1x1x1 meter box?&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;—Nathan Terrell&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|The box would heat up to about 60°C. This is hot enough to burn out a normal hair dryer. For an indestructible hair dryer, incrementing the power would heat it further until the containing box melted, which would happen by the 187 MW mark for most materials. If both the hair dryer and the box were indestructible, incrementing the power would heat it further until the ground starts melting, and around the 20 GW mark, it would eventually create updrafts and bounce around everywhere. Turning it off and on again (to 11 PW) would launch it out of the sky in glowing fury.&lt;br /&gt;
|{{blog|35|2013|03|05}}&lt;br /&gt;
|{{book|1|11}}&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:Cornstarch.png|100px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|'''{{What If|36|Cornstarch}}'''&lt;br /&gt;
|''&amp;quot;How much cornstarch can I rinse down the drain before unpleasant things start to happen?&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;—Anna R., Fort Wayne, IN&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|It depends what you consider unpleasant. Your sink will clog and your house will flood with oobleck, but if you really really like cornstarch then nothing unpleasant will happen.&lt;br /&gt;
|{{blog|36|2013|03|12}}&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:Supersonic Stereo.png|100px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|'''{{What If|37|Supersonic Stereo}}'''&lt;br /&gt;
|''&amp;quot;What if you somehow managed to make a stereo travel at twice the speed of sound, would it sound backwards to someone who was just casually sitting somewhere as it flies by?&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;—Tim Currie&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|Assuming the stereo is indestructible, yes. Although with a ballistic launch, you’d only get it supersonic for less than a second, it would spend just a few seconds within hearing range, and the backwards music you'd hear would be mixed with music sounding at half speed as the stereo departs.&lt;br /&gt;
|{{blog|37|2013|03|19}}&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:what if? Voyager.png|100px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|'''{{What If|38|Voyager}}'''&lt;br /&gt;
|''&amp;quot;With today's technology, would it be possible to launch an unmanned mission to retrieve Voyager I?&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;—Elliot Bennett&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|You could ''reach'' Voyager I with some well-timed gravity assists from Jupiter and Saturn, but getting back would require an ''absurd'' amount of fuel. You could use ion fields to require less fuel, but they also produce less thrust.&lt;br /&gt;
|{{blog|38|2013|03|26}}&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:Hockey Puck.png|100px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|'''{{What If|39|Hockey Puck}}'''&lt;br /&gt;
|''&amp;quot;How hard would a puck have to be shot to be able to knock the goalie himself backwards into the net?&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;—Tom&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|This can't really happen, due to the size and weight difference between the goalie and a hockey puck. You'd need to fire an object at Mach 8 to knock the goalie back, but firing a puck at that speed would char the puck while air resistance would slow it down. If a hockey puck actually reached the goalie at such a high speed, it would have a similar effect to hitting a cake with a tomato as hard as you can.&lt;br /&gt;
|{{blog|39|2013|04|02}}&lt;br /&gt;
|{{book|1|24}}&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:Pressure Cooker.png|100px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|'''{{What If|40|Pressure Cooker}}'''&lt;br /&gt;
|''&amp;quot;Am I right to be afraid of pressure cookers? What's the worst thing that can happen if you misuse a pressure cooker in an ordinary kitchen?&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;—Delphine Lourtau&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|Ordinarily, the worst that can happen is the lid blowing off and superheated liquid spraying everywhere, but you can use one to make {{w|Dioxygen difluoride}}, which is much worse.&lt;br /&gt;
|{{blog|40|2013|04|9}}&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:Go West.png|100px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|'''{{What If|41|Go West}}'''&lt;br /&gt;
|''&amp;quot;If everybody in the US drove west, could we temporarily halt continental drift?&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;—Derek&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|No. While technically the car fleet could reverse the momentum of the North American plate, the continental drift is being powered by the forces in the Earth's mantle, and these forces outmatch the car fleet by millions of times.&lt;br /&gt;
|{{blog|41|2013|04|16}}&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:Longest Sunset.png|100px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|'''{{What If|42|Longest Sunset}}'''&lt;br /&gt;
|''&amp;quot;What is the longest possible sunset you can experience while driving, assuming we are obeying the speed limit and driving on paved roads?&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;—Michael Berg&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|The longest way you can experience a sunset while driving is on certain roads in Norway and Finland around the winter solstice for 95 minutes, as this is where the best method to outpace the Sun works (outpacing {{w|Terminator (solar)|the terminator}}). The answer references comic [[162: Angular Momentum]].&lt;br /&gt;
|{{blog|42|201304|23}}&lt;br /&gt;
|{{book|1|52}}&lt;br /&gt;
|{{book|32|2025|10|21|U8F7UNK9jco|Can you drive west to lengthen the sunset?}}&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:Train Loop.png|100px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|'''{{What If|43|Train Loop}}'''&lt;br /&gt;
|''&amp;quot;Could a high-speed train run through a vertical loop, like a rollercoaster, with the passengers staying comfortable?&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;—Gero Walter&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|Even if we change the requirements to just the passengers surviving, this isn't plausible. A train can't complete a full loop without the loop being too small, making the train move too fast and making every passenger die from the g-forces involved.&lt;br /&gt;
|{{blog|43|2013|04|30}}&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:High Throw.png|100px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|'''{{What If|44|High Throw}}'''&lt;br /&gt;
|''&amp;quot;How high can a human throw something?&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;—Irish Dave on the Isle of Man&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|Based on estimations and aerodynamics calculations, Aroldis Chapman (holder of the record for fastest pitch) could probably throw up to 16 giraffes (80 m) high if he were using a golf ball. Unless you count letting go of balloons, of course.&lt;br /&gt;
|{{blog|44|2013|05|07}}&lt;br /&gt;
|{{book|1|38}}&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:ISS Music Video.png|100px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|'''{{What If|45|ISS Music Video}}'''&lt;br /&gt;
|''&amp;quot;Is [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KaOC9danxNo '''this'''] the most expensive music video ever?&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;—Various Yout&amp;lt;!-- don't change it, that's how it's written on the site --&amp;gt;ube commenters&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|No. If the construction cost of the setpiece is how this is measured, then it would be U2's &amp;quot;Last Night on Earth&amp;quot; on a section of Interstate Highway. If not, then it doesn't even come close to Thriller.&lt;br /&gt;
|{{blog|45|2013|05|14}}&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:Bowling Ball.png|100px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|'''{{What If|46|Bowling Ball}}'''&lt;br /&gt;
|''&amp;quot;I've been told that if the Earth were shrunk down to the size of a bowling ball, it would be smoother than said bowling ball. My question is, what would a bowling ball look like if it were blown up to the size of the Earth?&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;—Seth C.&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|A bowling ball the size of the Earth would be much less dense, and have much less gravity. The surface bumps and ridges would be much smaller than those on Earth with a maximally rough ball having peaks of roughly 200 m. The finger holes, on the other hand, would be huge, about a thousand km across and several thousand km deep. Due to this, the finger holes would collapse. causing eruptions of hydrocarbons and scars similar to those on the Moon.&lt;br /&gt;
|{{blog|46|2013|05|21}}&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:Alien Astronomers.png|100px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|'''{{What If|47|Alien Astronomers}}'''&lt;br /&gt;
|''&amp;quot;Let's assume there's life on the the nearest habitable exoplanet and that they have technology comparable to ours. If they looked at our star right now, what would they see?&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;—Chuck H.&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|They wouldn't be able to see us very well. Radio waves fade quickly in space and we've stopped sending out as many of them. If they happened to pick up, they would only get a message similar to the [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wow!_signal Wow! Signal]. The best message they could see is visible light, as the water and weather on Earth's surface would be a telltale marker of some form of life.&lt;br /&gt;
|{{blog|47|2013|05|28}}&lt;br /&gt;
|{{book|1|28}}&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:Sunset on the British Empire.png|100px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|'''{{What If|48|Sunset on the British Empire}}'''&lt;br /&gt;
|''&amp;quot;When (if ever) did the Sun finally set on the British Empire?&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;—Kurt Amundson&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|If the British Empire kept the borders it had when the question was written, it would continue to experience eternal sunshine for many thousands of years until a total eclipse hits the Pitcairn Islands at the right time. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
However, in 2025, after the publication of this article, [https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/live/clyvv04wk8zt the UK signed a treaty to give the British Indian Ocean Territory to Mauritius]. Once the treaty is ratified, and the territory is officially handed over, the Sun can finally set on the British Empire.&lt;br /&gt;
|{{blog|48|2013|06|04}}&lt;br /&gt;
|{{book|1|60}}&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:Sunless Earth.png|100px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|'''{{What If|49|Sunless Earth}}'''&lt;br /&gt;
|''&amp;quot;What would happen to the Earth if the Sun suddenly switched off?&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;—Many, many readers&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|We would see a variety of benefits across our lives such as the elimination of time zones, more reliable satellites, easier astronomy, and safer wild parsnip, but the downside is we would all freeze and die.&lt;br /&gt;
|{{blog|49|2013|06|11}}&lt;br /&gt;
|{{book|1|57}}&lt;br /&gt;
|{{book|24|2025|04|15|X7sbn9LMZOg| What if the s&amp;lt;!--DO NOT CAPITALISE THE &amp;quot;s&amp;quot;: This is how it's written on the site, it should not be changed.--&amp;gt;un suddenly went out?}}&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:Extreme Boating.png|100px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|'''{{What If|50|Extreme Boating}}'''&lt;br /&gt;
|''&amp;quot;What would it be like to navigate a rowboat through a lake of mercury? What about bromine? Liquid gallium? Liquid tungsten? Liquid nitrogen? Liquid helium?&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;—Nicholas Aron&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|It would be difficult to row the boat on mercury because it's very dense. Bromine smells terrible and is highly toxic. Gallium would dissolve an aluminium boat. Liquid tungsten would incinerate you instantly. Liquid nitrogen would kill you either by suffocation or hypothermia. Liquid helium's superfluid properties would sink your boat, but at least you'd hear the “third sound” as you die.&lt;br /&gt;
|{{blog|50|2013|06|18}}&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:Free Fall.png|100px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|'''{{What If|51|Free Fall}}'''&lt;br /&gt;
|''&amp;quot;What place on Earth would allow you to freefall the longest by jumping off it? What about using a squirrel suit?&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;—Dhash Shrivathsa&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|It takes 26 seconds to fall from the top of {{w|Mount Thor}} into a pit of cotton candy at the bottom of the cliff. The record for the longest wingsuit glide is 3 minutes and 20 seconds, from the {{w|Eiger}} – enough time for Joey Chestnut and Takeru Kobayashi to eat 45 hot dogs.&lt;br /&gt;
|{{blog|51|2013|06|25}}&lt;br /&gt;
|{{book|1|45}}&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:Bouncy Balls.png|100px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|'''{{What If|52|Bouncy Balls}}'''&lt;br /&gt;
|''&amp;quot;What if one were to drop 3,000 bouncy balls from a seven story parking structure onto a person walking on the sidewalk below? Should the person survive, what would be the number of bouncy balls needed to kill them? What injuries would occur and what would the associated crimes be?&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;—Ginger Bread&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|If you dropped 3000 balls as stated, the balls would spread out like a cloud, and most of them would miss, with the remainder striking the target separately from one another. Around 3,000,000 balls would be enough to either crush a person or bury them too deep for them to get out. Death would occur and you would be charged with manslaughter or murder.&lt;br /&gt;
|{{blog|52|2013|07|02}}&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| rowspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; |[[File:Drain the Oceans.png|100px]]&lt;br /&gt;
| rowspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; |'''{{What If|53|Drain the Oceans}}'''&lt;br /&gt;
| rowspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; |''&amp;quot;How quickly would the ocean's drain if a circular portal 10 meters in radius leading into space was created at the bottom of Challenger Deep, the deepest spot in the ocean? How would the Earth change as the water is being drained?&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;—Ted M.&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
| rowspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; |Hundreds of thousands of years, so you'll need a bigger portal. As their basins are cut off, many shallow seas and a few deep trenches remain, leaving much of Earth still covered with water. Massive, unpredictable environmental changes would probably wipe out mankind. If they didn't, the Dutch would take over the world, no longer preoccupied with preventing their lands from flooding as they are now.&lt;br /&gt;
| rowspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; {{blog|53|2013|07|09}}&lt;br /&gt;
| rowspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; {{book|1|48}}&lt;br /&gt;
|{{book|12|2024|06|18|Jpy55EgMQgY|What if you drained the oceans?}}&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|{{book|17|short-video=yes|2025|12|16|aMshLs0YCTQ|What if you drained the oceans?}}&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| rowspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; |[[File:Drain the Oceans Part II.png|100px]]&lt;br /&gt;
| rowspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; |'''{{What If|54|Drain the Oceans: Part II}}'''&lt;br /&gt;
| rowspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; |''&amp;quot;Supposing you did '''{{what if|53|Drain the Oceans}}''', and dumped the water on top of the Curiosity rover, how would Mars change as the water accumulated?&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;—Iain&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
| rowspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; |The water would fill the {{w|Valles Marineris}}, eventually leaving only {{w|Olympus Mons}} and some other small islands. The sea would ultimately freeze over, become covered in dust, and migrate to permafrost at the poles. In the meantime, the Netherlands would colonize Mars through the portal.  The video additionally mentions that the greenhouse gas effects caused by all the new water might keep Mars's oceans liquid.&lt;br /&gt;
| rowspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; {{blog|54|2013|07|16}}&lt;br /&gt;
| rowspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; {{book|1|49}}&lt;br /&gt;
|{{book|14|2024|08|13|FkUNHhVbQ1Q|What if we teleported the oceans to Mars?}}&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|{{book|18|short-video=yes|2025|12|23|2p305nzcVQE|What if we teleported the oceans to Mars?}}&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:Random Sneeze Call.png|100px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|'''{{What If|55|Random Sneeze Call}}'''&lt;br /&gt;
|''&amp;quot;If you call a random phone number and say &amp;quot;God bless you&amp;quot;, what are the chances that the person who answers just sneezed? On average, not just in spring or fall.&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;—Mimi&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|The chances they just sneezed are 1 in 40000. There's also a 1 in a billion chance that the person you called just murdered someone, a 1 in 10 trillion chance they've just been killed by lightning, and – if five people spend a day trying this by calling random people – another 1 in 10 trillion chance that you and the other person called each other simultaneously. &lt;br /&gt;
|{{blog|55|2013|07|23}}&lt;br /&gt;
|{{book|1|53}}&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:Restraining an Airplane.png|100px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|'''{{What If|56|Restraining an Airplane}}'''&lt;br /&gt;
|''&amp;quot;If you wanted to anchor an airplane into the ground so it wouldn't be able to take off, what would the rope have to be made out of?&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;—Connor Childerhose&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|A steel cable an inch thick, the lines of an army of thosands of fishermen, or the hair of 20 people. Hair has the highest tensile strength of any material in your body.&lt;br /&gt;
|{{blog|56|2013|07|30}}&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:Dropping a Mountain.png|100px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|'''{{What If|57|Dropping a Mountain}}'''&lt;br /&gt;
|''&amp;quot;What if a huge mountain—Denali, say—had the bottom inch of its base disappear? What would happen from the impact of the mountain falling 1 inch? What about 1 foot? What if the mountain's base were raised to the present height of the summit, and then the whole thing were allowed to drop to the e&amp;lt;!--DO NOT CAPITALISE THE &amp;quot;E&amp;quot;: This is how it's written on the site, it should not be changed.--&amp;gt;arth?&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;—John-Clark Levin&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|An inch or a foot wouldn't do much, it would only feel like a 3.5 magnitude earthquake. Dropped from its own height, Denali would cause a magnitude 7 earthquake and crush coal to diamonds. Dropped from the edge of Earth's gravity well, that's just a large asteroid (roughly 10% of the energy of the Chicxulub impact that caused the {{w|Cretaceous-Paleogene extinction event}}) and it would cause firestorms and an impact winter. If you removed it from Earth's gravity well but still tried to &amp;quot;drop&amp;quot; it, it might crash into Mars instead.&lt;br /&gt;
|{{blog|57|2013|08|06}}&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| rowspan=&amp;quot;3&amp;quot; |[[File:Orbital Speed.png|100px]]&lt;br /&gt;
| rowspan=&amp;quot;3&amp;quot; |'''{{What If|58|Orbital Speed}}'''&lt;br /&gt;
|''&amp;quot;What if a spacecraft slowed down on re-entry to just a few miles per hour using rocket boosters like the Mars-sky-crane? Would it negate the need for a heat shield?&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;—Brian&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
| rowspan=&amp;quot;3&amp;quot; |No, because you need to go 8 km/s to stay in orbit, and it would take impossible amounts of fuel to slow down. The Curiosity rover used a heat shield for most of its deceleration and then used the sky crane for finer maneuvering relatively close to the ground.&lt;br /&gt;
| rowspan=&amp;quot;3&amp;quot;{{blog|58|2013|08|12|1d early}}&lt;br /&gt;
| rowspan=&amp;quot;3&amp;quot;{{book|1|43}}&lt;br /&gt;
| rowspan=&amp;quot;3&amp;quot; |&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''&amp;quot;Is it possible for a spacecraft to control its reentry in such a way that it avoids the atmospheric compression and thus would not require the expensive (and relatively fragile) heat shield on the outside?&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;—Christopher Mallow&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''&amp;quot;Could a (small) rocket (with payload) be lifted to a high point in the atmosphere where it would only need a small rocket to get to escape velocity?&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;—Kenny Van de Maele&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| rowspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; |[[File:Updating a Printed Wikipedia.png|100px]]&lt;br /&gt;
| rowspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; |'''{{What If|59|Updating a Printed Wikipedia}}'''&lt;br /&gt;
| rowspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; |''&amp;quot;If you had a printed version of the whole of (say, the English) Wikipedia, how many printers would you need in order to keep up with the changes made to the live version?&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;—Susanne Könings&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
| rowspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; |You'd need six printers, but if using an ink printer, costs would rack up to $500,000 a month, dwarfing paper and maintenance costs. You'd need to file away past versions in case they were reverted (restored), which would be a nightmare.&lt;br /&gt;
| rowspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; {{blog|59|2013|08|20|1d late}}&lt;br /&gt;
| rowspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; {{book|1|58}}&lt;br /&gt;
|{{book|13|2024|7|9|RgBYohJ7mIk|What if you tried to print Wikipedia?}}&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|{{book|19|short-video=yes|2026|01|27|WQTNLuhfkwk|What if you printed all of Wikipedia?}}&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:Signs of Life.png|100px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|'''{{What If|60|Signs of Life}}'''&lt;br /&gt;
|''&amp;quot;If you could teleport to a random place of the surface of the Earth, what are the odds that you'll see signs of intelligent life?&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;—Borislav Stanimirov&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|70% of the time you would end up in the ocean. Restricting yourself to land, you'd see farmlands or dirt roads about 20-25% of the time (6-7% overall). But if it’s night, you can see satellites just by looking up.&lt;br /&gt;
|{{blog|60|2013|08|27}}&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:Speed Bump.png|100px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|'''{{What If|61|Speed Bump}}'''&lt;br /&gt;
|''&amp;quot;How fast can you hit a speed bump while driving and live?&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;—Myrlin Barber&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|At highway speeds, you could wreck your tires and suspension. Around 150-300 mph, the aerodynamics of a typical sedan will cause it to flip and crash before even reaching the speed bump. At 90% the speed of light, you could face a billion-dollar speeding ticket.&lt;br /&gt;
|{{blog|61|2013|09|03}}&lt;br /&gt;
|{{book|1|41}}&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:Falling With Helium.png|100px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|'''{{What If|62|Falling With Helium}}'''&lt;br /&gt;
|''&amp;quot;What if I jumped out of an airplane with a couple of tanks of helium and one huge, un-inflated balloon? Then, while falling, I release the helium and fill the balloon. How long of a fall would I need in order for the balloon to slow me enough that I could land safely?&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;—Colin Rowe&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|You would need either an air-filled balloon at least 10 to 20 meters across to slow your fall, or 10 helium tanks that are 250 cubic feet. You'd only have a few minutes though, and starting from a higher place will not help much due to your higher terminal velocity in the thin atmosphere.&lt;br /&gt;
|{{blog|62|2013|09|10}}&lt;br /&gt;
|{{book|1|34}}&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:Google's Datacenters on Punch Cards.png|100px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|'''{{What If|63|Google's Datacenters on Punch Cards}}'''&lt;br /&gt;
|''&amp;quot;If all digital data were stored on punch cards, how big would Google's data warehouse be?&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;—James Zetlin&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|Using electric consumption and datacenter spending as a measuring stick, Google probably has around 1-2 million servers, which equates to around 15 exabytes (or 15,000,000,000,000,000,000 bytes). Assuming a punch card holds 80 characters, all of that data comes out a pile of punch cards that could cover New England to a depth of 4.5 kilometers/2.8 miles, 3x deeper than the ice sheets that covered the region during the most recent ice age.&lt;br /&gt;
|{{blog|63|2013|09|17}}&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:Rising Steadily.png|100px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|'''{{What If|64|Rising Steadily}}'''&lt;br /&gt;
|''&amp;quot;If you suddenly began rising steadily at one foot per second, how exactly would you die? Would you freeze or suffocate first? Or something else?&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;—Rebecca B&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|A nudist would survive for five hours, then succumb to the cold. With a good coat, one would survive for seven, even plausibly eight, until reaching the low-oxygen {{w|death zone}} and suffocating. However, your corpse would outlast the Earth as it was swallowed by the Sun.&lt;br /&gt;
|{{blog|64|2013|09|24}}&lt;br /&gt;
|{{book|1|15}}&lt;br /&gt;
|{{book|37|2026|3|3|oTzW-mTQd5w|What if you floated upwards 1 ft every second?}}&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:Twitter Timeline Height.png|100px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|'''{{What If|65|Twitter Timeline Height}}'''&lt;br /&gt;
|''&amp;quot;If our Twitter timelines (tweets by the people we follow) actually extended off the screen in both directions, how tall would they be?&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;—Anonymous&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|It's difficult to pin down an &amp;quot;average&amp;quot; for Twitter timeline lengths, as it greatly depends on how many people you follow and whom. An estimate by Diego Basch and the Tweet rate as of 2013 suggests that if everyone followed everyone, the section timeline extending to the past would have 345 billion tweets and be 8,000,000 kilometers (5,000,000 miles) tall. Using extrapolation techniques similar to those used in the {{w|German tank problem}}, the future and past timelines combined would likely contain 690 billion tweets.&lt;br /&gt;
|{{blog|65|2013|10|01}}&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:500 MPH.png|100px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|'''{{What If|66|500 MPH}}'''&lt;br /&gt;
|''&amp;quot;If winds reached 500 mph, would it pick up a human?&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;—Grey Flynn, age 7, Stoneham, MA&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|500 mph winds are more than fast enough to pick up a person and propel them through the air. The speed at which the wind starts being able to pick up and propel a person is around 120 mph. In fact, 500 mph winds are so fast that they only occur on Earth in extreme situations like the immediate vicinity of an erupting volcano or the aftermath of a major asteroid impact at which point wind speed would only be one of many dangers to human survival.&lt;br /&gt;
|{{blog|66|2013|10|08}}&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| rowspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; |[[File:Expanding Earth.png|100px]]&lt;br /&gt;
| rowspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; |'''{{What If|67|Expanding Earth}}'''&lt;br /&gt;
| rowspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; |''&amp;quot;How long would it take for people to notice their weight gain if the mean radius of the world expanded by 1cm every second? (Assuming the average composition of rock were maintained.)&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;—Dennis O’Donnell&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
| rowspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; |After a month, the gain would be measurable but within the normal variation of gravity. After a year, it would be more prominent at 5%. Humans could survive with difficulty for a decade, but even in specially-built environments, they would succumb within a century as air itself became toxic from atmospheric pressure. After a few centuries, the Moon would fall into the Roche limit and crumble into rings.&lt;br /&gt;
| rowspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; {{blog|67|2013|10|15}}&lt;br /&gt;
| rowspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; {{book|1|55}}&lt;br /&gt;
|{{book|17|2024|10|15|-1-ldW4kpLM|What if Earth grew 1cm every second?}}&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|{{book|6|short-video=yes|2025|08|05|5k8ciEx__5w|Circumference pop quiz!}}&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:Little Planet.png|100px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|'''{{What If|68|Little Planet}}'''&lt;br /&gt;
|''&amp;quot;If an asteroid was very small but supermassive, could you really live on it like the Little Prince?&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;—Samantha Harper&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|Technically, yes. However, there would be major challenges. For one, gravity would be at full strength at your feet, but only 25% strength at your head, giving the illusion that you're being stretched. You would only need to be able to dunk a basketball to jump out of the gravity well, or you could alternatively sprint at 5 meters per second; if you don't make it to that point, you would enter a highly irregular orbit during which tidal forces would pull on your body in strange ways.&lt;br /&gt;
|{{blog|68|2013|10|22}}&lt;br /&gt;
|{{book|1|22}}&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:Facebook of the Dead.png|100px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|'''{{What If|69|Facebook of the Dead}}'''&lt;br /&gt;
|''&amp;quot;When, if ever, will Facebook contain more profiles of dead people than of living ones?&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;—Emily Dunham&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|This depends on if Facebook stays popular or declines in popularity over time. In the former case, the dead would only outnumber the living well into the 2100s; while in the latter, this happens around 2060. Facebook can afford to keep all our data indefinitely, but there are ethical questions.&lt;br /&gt;
|{{blog|69|2013|10|29}}&lt;br /&gt;
|{{book|1|59}}&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:The Constant Groundskeeper.png|100px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|'''{{What If|70|The Constant Groundskeeper}}'''&lt;br /&gt;
|''&amp;quot;How big of a lawn would you have to have so that when you finished mowing you'd need to start over because the grass has grown?&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;—Nick Nelson&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|A normal, standard-issue mower running for 10 hours straight could cut an area of 25,000 square meters, or 27,000 yards; the ideal frequency to cut your lawn is once every 10 days, which means that 0.25 km² of lawn can be maintained by 10 hours of mowing every day [or 0.6 km² by mowing it constantly]. Using a much faster mower commissioned by the magazine ''Top Gear'' that is used all day, every day, it could cut an adult male cougar's home range (which [https://wdfw.wa.gov/species-habitats/species/puma-concolor#:~:text=Adult%20male%20cougars%20roam%20widely,terrain%2C%20and%20availability%20of%20prey. the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife] reports as 50-150 square miles or 130-390 square kilometers).&lt;br /&gt;
|{{blog|70|2013|11|05}}&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:Stirring Tea.png|100px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|'''{{What If|71|Stirring Tea}}'''&lt;br /&gt;
|''&amp;quot;I was absentmindedly stirring a cup of hot tea, when I got to thinking, &amp;quot;aren't I actually adding kinetic energy into this cup?&amp;quot; I know that stirring does help to cool down the tea, but what if I were to stir it faster? Would I be able to boil a cup of water by stirring?&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;—Will Evans&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|No, not really. It would take at least 1 horsepower (a lot for a person stirring), and reducing the power would just make it cool faster. Stirring faster and faster would cause a vacuum to form and stirring to become ineffective (and the tea would splash out everywhere).&lt;br /&gt;
|{{blog|71|2013|11|12}}&lt;br /&gt;
|{{book|1|61}}&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:Loneliest Human.png|100px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|'''{{What If|72|Loneliest Human}}'''&lt;br /&gt;
|''&amp;quot;What is the furthest one human being has ever been from every other living person? Were they lonely?&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;—Bryan J. McCarter&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|The most well-documented candidates are the six Apollo astronauts piloting the Command Module orbiting the Moon while their fellow astronauts descended on the surface, at most 3585 km away. Antarctic explorers and pre-colonialism Polynesian explorers have a shot, but there's no good evidence of specific people who beat the Apollo record. Astronauts Mike Collins and Al Worden said they were not at all lonely, the latter even enjoying his solitude.&lt;br /&gt;
|{{blog|72|2013|11|19}}&lt;br /&gt;
|{{book|1|63}}&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:Lethal Neutrinos.png|100px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|'''{{What If|73|Lethal Neutrinos}}'''&lt;br /&gt;
|''&amp;quot;How close would you have to be to a supernova to get a lethal dose of neutrino radiation?&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;—(Overheard in a physics department)&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|Neutrinos are subatomic particles that barely interact with the universe at all, so it's hard to imagine a scenario where they could harm you, even in a supernova. But at about 2.3 AU, or a little farther than Mars is from the Sun, even the neutrinos would be dense enough to kill you. On the other hand, if you were that close, you were probably inside the star that created the supernova, in which case ''[[#115|Into the Sun]]'' would apply.&lt;br /&gt;
|{{blog|73|2013|11|26}}&lt;br /&gt;
|{{book|1|39}}&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:Soda Planet.png|100px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|'''{{What If|74|Soda Planet}}'''&lt;br /&gt;
|''&amp;quot;How much of the Earth's currently-existing water has ever been turned into a soft drink at some point in its history?&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;—Brian Roelofs&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|Humans have likely consumed 6.5 trillion liters or 1.7 trillion gallons of soda ever, based on estimates of population growth and popularity of soda. Assuming humanity has drunk 100 trillion liters (26 trillion gallons) of water, it is reasonable to conclude that only 0.0000005% of Earth's current water reservoir has been turned into a soft drink. However, considering how long water takes to cycle around and certain prehistoric life forms, the water in the average soda was likely once consumed by a dinosaur.&lt;br /&gt;
|{{blog|74|2013|12|03}}&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:Phone Keypad.png|100px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|'''{{What If|75|Phone Keypad}}'''&lt;br /&gt;
|''&amp;quot;I use one of those old phones where you type with numbers—for example, to type &amp;quot;Y&amp;quot;, you press 9 three times. Some words have consecutive letters on the same number. When they do, you have to pause between letters, making those words annoying to type. What English word has the most consecutive letters on the same key?&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;—Stewart Bishop&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|According to Randall, the English word with the most consecutive letters on the same key is &amp;quot;Nonmonogamous&amp;quot;. This would require you to type the 6 key (MNO) 16 times without stopping, in order to type 'nonmono'. With every letter included, typing this word would require pressing the 2, 4, 7, and 8 keys once each, and the 6 key a nice, even 20 times. However, Randall is wrong. The actual word with most consecutive letters on the same key is 'nonmonomolecular'. In order to type 'nonmonomo', you need to hit the 6 key a full 20 times. However, typing the full word wouldn't add any more presses of the 6 key, so it takes the same amount of 6 to type the full word as nonmonogamous.&lt;br /&gt;
|{{blog|75|2013|12|10}}&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:Reading Every Book.png|100px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|'''{{What If|76|Reading Every Book}}'''&lt;br /&gt;
|''&amp;quot;At what point in human history were there too many (English) books to be able to read them all in one lifetime?&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;—Gregory Willmot&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|About the 1500s, as the population of active English writers reached a few hundred, meaning you would never be able to catch up (using the average word count for a few famous authors as a baseline). You might not want to read them, anyways.&lt;br /&gt;
|{{blog|76|2013|12|17}}&lt;br /&gt;
|{{book|2|10}}&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:Growth Rate.png|100px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|'''{{What If|77|Growth Rate}}'''&lt;br /&gt;
|''&amp;quot;What height would humans reach if we kept growing through our whole development period (i.e. till late teens/early twenties) at the same pace as we do during our first month?&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;—Maria&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|We would reach 10 to 12 meters at age 20, though the human body is not scalable to those heights, as our bone structure is too thin, while our hearts wouldn't be able to pump the blood around.&lt;br /&gt;
|{{blog|77|2013|12|31|7d late}}&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:T-rex Calories.png|100px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|'''{{What If|78|T-rex Calories}}'''&lt;br /&gt;
|''&amp;quot;If a T-rex were released in New York City, how many humans/day would it need to consume to get its needed calorie intake?&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;—Tony Schmitz&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|Estimates vary, but the T-rex was estimated to need 40,000 calories per day. Ryan North of Dinosaur Comics tells us that the average 80 kg/175 pound human [http://www.topatoco.com/merchant.mvc?Screen=PROD&amp;amp;Store_Code=TO&amp;amp;Product_Code=QW-PERSON&amp;amp;Category_Code=QW contains 110,000 calories]. Therefore, a T-rex would need to eat someone every 2 days or so. On the other hand, a T-rex wouldn't necessarily have to use humans specifically as a food source and could instead eat 80 hamburgers a day.&lt;br /&gt;
|{{blog|78|2014|01|07}}&lt;br /&gt;
|{{book|2|7|T. Rex Calories}}&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:Lake Tea.png|100px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|'''{{What If|79|Lake Tea}}'''&lt;br /&gt;
|''&amp;quot;What if we were to dump all the tea in the world into the Great Lakes? How strong, compared to a regular cup of tea, would the lake tea be?&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;—Alex Burman&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|An average cup of tea requires 2 grams of tea per 100 mL of water, and to make proper tea out of the Great Lakes, you would need 450 billion tons of tea for the Great Lakes' 22,600 cubic kilometers/5400 cubic miles of water. A total year's supply of tea is only 4.8 million tons, which would make tea about as strong as 2 drops in a bathtub. To make proper lake tea, you could use Wular Lake in Kashmir or Ullswater in UK's lake district, due to the volume of both being small enough for the tea to work. Heating those lakes to proper steeping temperature would likely be quite difficult, so Boiling Lake in Dominica or Frying Pan Lake in New Zealand could also be good candidates as they're already hot.&lt;br /&gt;
|{{blog|79|2014|01|14}}&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:Pile of Viruses.png|100px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|'''{{What If|80|Pile of Viruses}}'''&lt;br /&gt;
|''&amp;quot;What if every virus in the world were collected into one area? How much volume would they take up and what would they look like?&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;—Dave&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|''Human'' viruses would fill about ten oil drums. ''All'' viruses would form a wet heap the size of a small mountain, with a texture resembling pus or meat slurry. The viruses are likely to have a small angle of repose, so to avoid having the pile collapse and flood the surrounding area, all the viruses could instead be contained in 150 football stadiums.&lt;br /&gt;
|{{blog|80|2014|01|21}}&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:Catch!.png|100px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|'''{{What If|81|Catch!}}'''&lt;br /&gt;
|''&amp;quot;Is there any way to fire a gun so that the bullet flies through the air and can then be safely caught by hand? e.g. shooter is at sea level and catcher is up a mountain at the extreme range of the gun.&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;—Ed Hui, London&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|Yes, eventually the bullet would come to a maximum height, at which point you could grab the bullet before it fell down. You'd need to grip it firmly, because the bullet would still have its rotational momentum and might jump out of your hand. A larger bullet would require a larger height to catch it at, and even then, it would still be difficult to grab. Of course, this is illegal and can injure you or other people.&lt;br /&gt;
|{{blog|81|2014|01|28}}&lt;br /&gt;
|{{book|2|12}}&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:Hitting a comet.png|100px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|'''{{What If|82|Hitting a comet}}'''&lt;br /&gt;
|''&amp;quot;Astrophysicists are always saying things like &amp;quot;This mission to this comet is equivalent to throwing a baseball from New York and hitting a particular window in San Francisco.&amp;quot; Are they really equivalent?&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;—Tom Foster&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|The baseball thing is much harder. You'd have to hit it out of the atmosphere, and a baseball is too small to do that. Even if you could, it's still not a fair comparison because astrophysicists are allowed to refine their approach as they close in on the target, which you can't do with a thrown baseball. It turns out that the comet mission requires about the same level of precision as laser eye surgery.&lt;br /&gt;
|{{blog|82|2014|02|05|1d late}}&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:Star Sand.png|100px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|'''{{What If|83|Star Sand}}'''&lt;br /&gt;
|''&amp;quot;If you made a beach using grains the proportionate size of the stars in the Milky Way, what would that beach look like?&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;—Jeff Wartes&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|Although red giants aren't as common as Sun-like stars or red dwarfs, they would form a stretch of gravel that went on for miles due to their large relative volume. 99% of all stars would form a small patch of sand.&lt;br /&gt;
|{{blog|83|2014|02|11|1d early}}&lt;br /&gt;
|{{book|2|16}}&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:Paint the Earth.png|100px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|'''{{What If|84|Paint the Earth}}'''&lt;br /&gt;
|''&amp;quot;Has humanity produced enough paint to cover the entire land area of the Earth?&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;—Josh (Bolton, MA)&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|There isn't enough paint to go around. The total estimated amount of produced paint, a trillion litres, is only enough to paint as much as the land area of Russia.&lt;br /&gt;
|{{blog|84|2014|02|18}}&lt;br /&gt;
|{{book|2|14}}&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:Rocket Golf.png|100px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|'''{{What If|85|Rocket Golf}}'''&lt;br /&gt;
|''&amp;quot;Assuming that you have a spaceship in orbit around the Earth, could you propel your ship to speeds exceeding escape velocity by hitting golf balls in the other direction? If so, how many golf balls would be required to reach the Moon?&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;—Dan (Kanata, Ontario)&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|A person theoretically ''could'' propel your ship using golf balls, but, assuming they are being fired at 226 mph (363 km/h), the fastest world record, the amount of golf balls needed for this would be around the size of Earth and wouldn't even get you to the Moon. (An ordinary golfer hitting the ball at 120 mph (50 km/h) would need a bag of golf balls bigger than the solar system that would collapse into a black hole and be even more unusable.) You'd need a potato cannon fueled by acetylene firing golf balls at 310 mph (500 km/h) which reduces the size of the golf mass to 150 miles (240 kilometers). This would be incredibly costly and firing them faster would essentially be the same as building a normal rocket.&lt;br /&gt;
|{{blog|85|2014|02|25}}&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:Far-Traveling Objects.png|100px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|'''{{What If|86|Far-Traveling Objects}}'''&lt;br /&gt;
|''&amp;quot;In terms of human-made objects, has Voyager 1 travelled the farthest distance? It's certainly the farthest from Earth we know about. But what about the edge of ultracentrifuges, or generator turbines that have been running for years, for example?&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;—Matt Russell&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|There are a few different frames of reference you can look at, but in normal terms Mariner 10 has traveled much farther than Voyager 1. It's travelled a couple of light-days around the Sun, while the Voyager probes have only travelled a dozen light-hours.&lt;br /&gt;
|{{blog|86|2014|03|04}}&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:Enforced by Radar.png|100px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|'''{{What If|87|Enforced by Radar}}'''&lt;br /&gt;
|''&amp;quot;I've occasionally seen &amp;quot;radar enforced&amp;quot; on speed limit signs, and I can't help but ask: How intense would radio waves have to be to stop a car from going over the speed limit, and what would happen if this were attempted?&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;—Joausc&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|Radio waves are generally ''very weak''. You'd need the collective energy of trillions of cell phones just to levitate a snow flake. To stop a car, you'd need at least 2 trillion joules of radiation, which would vaporize the car and everything else around it.&lt;br /&gt;
|{{blog|87|2014|03|11}}&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:Soda Sequestration.png|100px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|'''{{What If|88|Soda Sequestration}}'''&lt;br /&gt;
|''&amp;quot;How much CO2 is contained in the world's stock of bottled fizzy drinks? How much soda would be needed to bring atmospheric CO2 back to preindustrial levels?&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;—Brandon Seah&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|There are currently 400 parts of carbon dioxide per million. To bring it down to pre-Industrial levels, you'd need 450 quadrillion cans of soda, each being able to hold 2.2 grams of CO2. This would cover Earth's land 10 times over.&lt;br /&gt;
|{{blog|88|2014|03|18}}&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:Tungsten Countertop.png|100px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|'''{{What If|89|Tungsten Countertop}}'''&lt;br /&gt;
|''&amp;quot;How far would a tungsten countertop descend if I dropped it into the Sun?&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;—Michael Leuchtenburg&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|Tungsten has the highest melting point of any element, but even tungsten would melt before it got too far. If you protected it with a heat shield, it would get destroyed all the same by the battering of the particles in the Sun's atmosphere. It could possibly penetrate the surface if it was larger, but as it stands, it wouldn't get past the outer layers.&lt;br /&gt;
|{{blog|89|2014|03|25}}&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:Great Tree, Great Axe.png|100px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|'''{{What If|90|Great Tree, Great Axe}}'''&lt;br /&gt;
|''&amp;quot;If all the seas were one sea,''&lt;br /&gt;
''What a great sea that would be!''&lt;br /&gt;
''If all the trees were one tree,''&lt;br /&gt;
''What a great tree that would be!''&lt;br /&gt;
''If all the men were one man,''&lt;br /&gt;
''What a great man that would be!''&lt;br /&gt;
''If all the axes were one axe,''&lt;br /&gt;
''What a great axe that would be!''&lt;br /&gt;
''And if the great man took the great axe,''&lt;br /&gt;
''And cut down the great tree,''&lt;br /&gt;
''And let if fall into the great sea,''&lt;br /&gt;
''What a great splish-splash that would be!''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''... How great would all of these things be?&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;—John Eifert (quoting a ''Mother Goose'' rhyme)&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|The seas would be a little bigger than the Pacific Ocean. Trees can't grow taller than about 130 meters naturally, and would physically crush itself if above a few kilometers tall. Ignoring these restraints, the tree would be about 75 km tall with trunk diameter of 2 km. Ignoring human size restraints, the person would be close to 3 km tall. The axe would be about 500 meters long and relatively the size of a flimsy hatchet. It may take a few weeks to chop down the tree and the impact would create a tsunami that probably wouldn't wipe out the human race, but would be likely the deadliest single disaster in our history.&lt;br /&gt;
|{{blog|90|2014|04|03|2d late}}&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:Faucet Power.png|100px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|'''{{What If|91|Faucet Power}}'''&lt;br /&gt;
|''&amp;quot;I just moved into a new apartment. It includes hot water but I have to pay the electric bill. So being a person on a budget ... what's the best way to use my free faucet to generate electricity?&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;—David Axel Kurtz&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|A small hydroelectric dam in the bathtub would yield about $0.25 per month of electricity, but the best option would probably be to bottle and sell your tap water, yielding about $38 million per year at $1.50 per bottle.&lt;br /&gt;
|{{blog|91|2014|04|08|2d early}}&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:One-Second Day.png|100px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|'''{{What If|92|One-Second Day}}'''&lt;br /&gt;
|''&amp;quot;What would happen if the Earth's rotation were sped up until a day only lasted one second?&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;—Dylan&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|Everything on Earth would die, but if it happened when the Moon crosses the plane of the Earth, then everything in the Solar System will die (whether there is a difference is debatable).&lt;br /&gt;
|{{blog|92|2014|04|15}}&lt;br /&gt;
|{{book|2|21}}&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:Windshield Raindrops.png|100px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|'''{{What If|93|Windshield Raindrops}}'''&lt;br /&gt;
|''&amp;quot;At what speed would you have to drive for rain to shatter your windshield?&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;—Daniel Butler&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|Water droplets in air are normally lighter than the air, so this wouldn't happen under normal circumstances. However, at supersonic speeds, the water droplet would jet away from the impact point on the windshield at Mach 18. It wouldn't shatter the windshield, but it would slowly batter it away. If you really want to have your windshield broken by precipitation, it would probably be easier to find a hailstorm and drive under it.&lt;br /&gt;
|{{blog|93|2014|04|22}}&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| rowspan=&amp;quot;3&amp;quot; |[[File:Billion-Story Building.png|100px]]&lt;br /&gt;
| rowspan=&amp;quot;3&amp;quot; |'''{{What If|94|Billion-Story Building}}'''&lt;br /&gt;
| rowspan=&amp;quot;3&amp;quot; |''&amp;quot;My daughter — age 4.5 — maintains she wants a billion-story building. It turns out not only is that hard to help her appreciate this size, I am not at all able to explain all of the other difficulties you'd have to overcome.&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;—Keira, via Steve Brodovicz, Media, PA &amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
| rowspan=&amp;quot;3&amp;quot; |The tower would be far too big to support itself under its own weight. The tower would also extend past the Moon. The sheer amount of elevators needed would provide little to no room for actual usable space. Additionally, space junk would be a large problem, as there is a high probability that space junk would collide with the tower. &lt;br /&gt;
| rowspan=&amp;quot;3&amp;quot; {{blog|94|2014|04|29}}&lt;br /&gt;
| rowspan=&amp;quot;3&amp;quot; {{book|2|22}}&lt;br /&gt;
|{{book|21|2025|02|11|Z_xJ40QXu7Q|What if you built a billion-story building?}}&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|{{book|21|short-video=yes|2026|02|17|J-E8rjWR9rM|What if we built a billion-story building?}}&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|{{book|22|short-video=yes|2026|02|24|oMtAHGv-DU4|How many elevators would you need in a billion-story building?}}&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:Pyramid Energy.png|100px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|'''{{What If|95|Pyramid Energy}}'''&lt;br /&gt;
|''&amp;quot;What took more energy, the building of the Great Pyramid of Giza or the Apollo Mission? If we could convert the energy to build the Great Pyramid, would it be enough to send a rocket to the Moon and back?&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;—Michael Marmol&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|The Apollo Program took about the same manpower as the building of the Great Pyramids, but physics wise, the Great Pyramid only contains 10&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;12&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; joules of gravitational potential energy. A single Saturn V rocket's fuel has 20 times more energy.&lt;br /&gt;
|{{blog|95|2014|05|06}}&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:$2 Undecillion Lawsuit.png|100px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|'''{{What If|96|$2 Undecillion Lawsuit}}'''&lt;br /&gt;
|''&amp;quot;What if Au Bon Pain lost '''[http://www.loweringthebar.net/2014/05/2-undecillion-dollar-demand.html this lawsuit]''' and had to pay the plaintiff $2 undecillion?&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;—Kevin Underhill&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|The debt would be incredibly great, to the point that everything ever created by man does not have enough value to pay it off. For comparison, former solicitor general Ted Olson leaked that he charges $1600 per hour for his services. Even if every habitable planet in the Milky Way had a population of 8 billion Ted Olsons, and you hired all of them for a thousand generations, the cost would still be lower than if you lost.&lt;br /&gt;
|{{blog|96|2014|05|14|1d late}}&lt;br /&gt;
|{{book|2|23}}&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:Burning Pollen.png|100px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|'''{{What If|97|Burning Pollen}}'''&lt;br /&gt;
|''&amp;quot;What if you were to somehow ignite the pollen that floats around in the air in spring? Other than being a really bad idea, what effect would it have?&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;—Jessica Thornburg&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|It would just warm up the air by a very tiny bit, but only because it's so thinly spread. Gathering all of it from a large enough region into one pile could equal a nuclear weapon.&lt;br /&gt;
|{{blog|97|2014|05|20|1d early}}&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:Blood Alcohol.png|100px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|'''{{What If|98|Blood Alcohol}}'''&lt;br /&gt;
|''&amp;quot;Could you get drunk from drinking a drunk person's blood?&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;—Fiona Byrne&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|No, you can't. Alcohol in a drunk person's blood would be very diluted and by the time you drank the 14 glasses needed to get drunk, you would've vomited on the account of drinking blood. That aside, you could also get iron overload as well as various blood-borne diseases.&lt;br /&gt;
|{{blog|98|2014|05|27}}&lt;br /&gt;
|{{book|2|42}}&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:Starlings.png|100px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|'''{{What If|99|Starlings}}'''&lt;br /&gt;
|''&amp;quot;I was watching '''[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eakKfY5aHmY this video]''' and was wondering: How many birds there would need to be for gravity to take over and force them into a gargantuan ball of birds?&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;—Justin Basinger&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|Each bird is 85 grams, with a density of around 43 grams per square meter. Because of this, the air would be 25 times stronger than the starlings and the substance governing the collapse. The air would have to be bigger than the Earth to collapse the starlings and the starlings themselves would need to be bigger than the Solar System. They would then promptly turn into a star.&lt;br /&gt;
|{{blog|99|2014|06|03}}&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:WWII Films.png|100px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|'''{{What If|100|WWII Films}}'''&lt;br /&gt;
|''&amp;quot;Did WWII last longer than the total length of movies about WWII? For that matter, which war has the highest movie time:war time ratio?&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;—Becky&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|Assuming the average run time of a WWII film was 95 minutes, the combined length was 300 days, meaning World War II was longer than the movies 7 times over. The two most likely candidates for highest movie:war ratio are the Indo-Pakistani war, which lasted 13 days and has 5 catalogued films about it, and the Anglo-Zanzibar war, which only lasted 38 minutes but lacked any films. In 2015, someone took Randall's advice and made [https://www.imdb.com/title/tt5954666/ Zanzibar], a short film (31 minutes) that takes the record.&lt;br /&gt;
|{{blog|100|2014|06|11|1d late}}&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:Plastic Dinosaurs.png|100px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|'''{{What If|101|Plastic Dinosaurs}}'''&lt;br /&gt;
|''&amp;quot;As plastic is made from oil and oil is made from dead dinosaurs, how much actual real dinosaur is there in a plastic dinosaur?&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;—Steve Lydford&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|Contrary to the name, oil is not made of dead dinosaurs, mostly being composed of marine plankton and algae. Geology is complicated, but the gist is that only a small fraction of a plastic dinosaur toy could've come from dinosaur oil, and depending on the location, it may contain none at all.&lt;br /&gt;
|{{blog|101|2014|06|18}}&lt;br /&gt;
|{{book|2|26}}&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:Keyboard Power.png|100px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|'''{{What If|102|Keyboard Power}}'''&lt;br /&gt;
|''&amp;quot;As a writer, I'm wondering what would be the cumulative energy of the hundreds of thousands of keystrokes required to write a novel.&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;—Nicholas Dickner&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|Writing one full novel would provide enough energy to run a laptop for 15 seconds. If each novel takes you six months, this would save a fraction of a penny of electricity. To keep a laptop working on just keyboard power, you'd need to write a novel every ten seconds, and to run a microwave would require one novel per second. Typing fast enough to do either would require your fingers to move at relativistic speeds with similar destructive nuclear consequences of objects doing so to those described in {{what if|1|Relativistic Baseball}}.&lt;br /&gt;
|{{blog|102|2014|06|25}}&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|{{book|34|2025|12|02|0L44GEJ5pLE|Can you power your computer by typing?}}&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:Vanishing Water.png|100px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|'''{{What If|103|Vanishing Water}}'''&lt;br /&gt;
|''&amp;quot;What would happen if all the bodies of water on Earth magically disappeared?&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;—Joanna Xu&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|If all water vanished, the first to notice would be anybody currently in the ocean, and over the course of a minute, they would all fall, some of them dying but some surviving with minor injuries. After this, all marine life will have perished. Humans follow soon after as the water cycle would've stopped, collapsing global infrustructure and killing every plant and person by dehydration. The end of the water cycle also leads to a runaway greenhouse effect later on.&lt;br /&gt;
|{{blog|103|2014|07|02}}&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:Global Snow.png|100px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|'''{{What If|104|Global Snow}}'''&lt;br /&gt;
|''&amp;quot;From my seven-year-old son: How many snowflakes would it take to cover the entire world in six feet of snow? (I don't know why six feet...but that's what he asked.)&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;—Jed Scott&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|Snow isn't very dense, and 1 inch of rain would lead to a foot or more of snow. Factoring in snow compressing throughout the day, you would need a mole of snowflakes to cover the Earth in 6 feet in snow.&lt;br /&gt;
|{{blog|104|2014|07|09}}&lt;br /&gt;
|{{book|2|59}}&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:Cannibalism.png|100px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|'''{{What If|105|Cannibalism}}'''&lt;br /&gt;
|''&amp;quot;How long could the human race survive on only cannibalism?&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;—Quinn Shaffer&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|If half of the world eats the other half, then it would take about 32 months before it came down to 2 people. However, this is also a very efficient way to get a {{w|Transmissible spongiform encephalopathy|prion disease}}. &lt;br /&gt;
|{{blog|105|2014|07|16}}&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|{{book|31|2025|09|30|PUtI3xoaHx0|Could we survive eating only humans?}}&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:Ink Molecules.png|100px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|'''{{What If|106|Ink Molecules}}'''&lt;br /&gt;
|''&amp;quot;Suppose you were to print, in 12 point text, the numeral 1 using a common cheap ink-jet printer. How many molecules of the ink would be used? At what numerical value would the number printed approximately equal the number of ink molecules used?&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;—David Pelkey&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|You'd use about 100,000,000,000,000,000 molecules.&lt;br /&gt;
|{{blog|106|2014|07|23}}&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:Letter to Mom.png|100px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|'''{{What If|107|Letter to Mom}}'''&lt;br /&gt;
|''&amp;quot;What’s the fastest way to get a hand-written letter from my place in Chicago to my mother in New Jersey?&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;—Tim&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|An ICBM would take 12-15 minutes to cross the distance. While that is the best method, a few other methods come close. The Concorde would only take 30 minutes, while firing something with a rail gun down a vacuum tube would take only 10-20 minutes.&lt;br /&gt;
|{{blog|107|2014|07|30}}&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:Expensive Shoebox.png|100px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|'''{{What If|108|Expensive Shoebox}}'''&lt;br /&gt;
|''&amp;quot;What would be the most expensive way to fill a size 11 shoebox (e.g. with 64 GB MicroSD cards all full of legally purchased music)?&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;—Rick Lewis&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|There are many options (precious materials, hard drugs, physical file storage, etc.), but they all cap out at ~$2,000,000,000. That amount of platinum would be worth $13 million, while diamonds, Adcetris and LSD would be valued around 1-2 billion. A shoebox full of plutonium would be worth $3 billion, but since it would also have a mass of about 300 kg, which is well over the critical mass, monetary value is unlikely to be its most relevant property to anyone in its immediate vicinity. If the US Treasury ever decides to mint a trillion dollar coin, it could probably then fit in a shoebox, as could a check for an arbitrarily large sum.&lt;br /&gt;
|{{blog|108|2014|08|13|7d late}}&lt;br /&gt;
|{{book|2|31}}&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:Into the Blue.png|100px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|'''{{What If|109|Into the Blue}}'''&lt;br /&gt;
|''&amp;quot;If I shot an infinitely strong laser beam into the sky at a random point, how much damage would it do?&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;—Garrett D.&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|Infinitely powerful laser beams do not exist, and if they did, they would vaporize the air and destroy everything like in the ''[[what if? (blog)|what if?]]'' article ''{{what if|13|Laser Pointer}}''. That being said, if it were truly random, it would be aimed at Earth 50% of the time. If you miss the Earth, 89,999 times out of 90,000, your beam will pass right out of the galaxy without hitting anything. When it does hit something, it will almost always be the Sun or the Moon.&lt;br /&gt;
|{{blog|109|2014|08|20}}&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:Walking New York.png|100px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|'''{{What If|110|Walking New York}}'''&lt;br /&gt;
|''&amp;quot;Could a person walk the entire city of NY in their lifetime? (including inside apartments)&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;—Asif Shamir&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|Based on estimates of US Postal Service carriers and their travel times, we know that walking every street in NYC would probably take 14 years. Assuming it takes about 25 seconds to enter an apartment building, leave, and go to the next one, it would only take an additional 10 years to visit every apartment. However, under [http://ypdcrime.com/penal.law/article140.htm New York Penal Code], the punishment would take 2 million years or 2,000 millenia to finish.&lt;br /&gt;
|{{blog|110|2014|08|27}}&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:All the Money.png|100px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|'''{{What If|111|All the Money}}'''&lt;br /&gt;
|''&amp;quot;People sometimes say &amp;quot;If I had all the money in the world ...&amp;quot; in order to discuss what they would do if they had no financial constraints. I'm curious, though, what would happen if one person had all of the world's money?&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;—Daniel Pino&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|Currency only makes up a fraction of Earth's money, and it's unlikely people would agree to your sudden claims of ownership over all of the land, nor would they let you spend the actual currency you have. Said currency would quickly crush you, as most of its weight is in coinage. You could build a structure to contain the coins, but this would violate NYC building codes.&lt;br /&gt;
|{{blog|111|2014|09|02|1d early}}&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|{{book|25|2025|05|06|saj7b5C6TCM|What if you literally had all the money in the world?}}&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:Balloon Car.png|100px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|'''{{What If|112|Balloon Car}}'''&lt;br /&gt;
|''&amp;quot;My 12-year-old daughter is proposing an interesting project. She is planning to attach a number of helium balloons to a chair, which in turn would be tethered by means of a rope to a Ferrari. Her 13-year-old friend would then drive the Ferrari around, while she sits in the chair enjoying uninterrupted views of the countryside. Leaving aside the legal and insurance difficulties, my daughter is keen to know the maximum speed that she could expect to attain, and how many helium balloons would be required.&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;—Phil Rodgers, Cambridge, UK&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|A balloon just big enough to lift you would be pushed down by the wind, and a balloon big enough to counteract that would lift up the car along with you. The way to achieve this result is [https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=parasailing parasailing].&lt;br /&gt;
|{{blog|112|2014|09|17|8d late}}&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:Visit Every State.png|100px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|'''{{What If|113|Visit Every State}}'''&lt;br /&gt;
|''&amp;quot;How fast could you visit all 50 states?&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;—as discussed by Stephen Von Worley &amp;lt;span class=&amp;quot;plainlinks&amp;quot;&amp;gt;on [http://www.datapointed.net/2012/08/fastest-route-to-visit-all-fifty-united-states/ '''''Data Pointed''''']&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|It would take you 160 hours by car, 39 hours by landing a private jet in each state, and 18 hours by F-22 fighter jet and helicopter landing in each state. However, if you relax the requirement to land in each state and simply count entering the state's airspace as &amp;quot;visiting&amp;quot; it, you can do it in around 7 hours with an SR-71 Blackbird. If we allow satellite orbits, you can do it in just over 6 hours with five orbits, assuming your satellite makes a course correction on each orbit.&lt;br /&gt;
|{{blog|113|2014|09|24}}&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:Antimatter.png|100px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|'''{{What If|114|Antimatter}}'''&lt;br /&gt;
|''&amp;quot;What if everything was antimatter, EXCEPT Earth?&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;—Sean Gallagher&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|It would wipe out all life on Earth, but surprisingly slower than you might expect. The annihilation of antimatter entering the atmosphere would add enough extra heat to create a runaway greenhouse effect and make Earth similar to Venus. We would be in much more danger from meteorites, with dinosaur-killer equivalents hitting the upper atmosphere every few months.&lt;br /&gt;
|{{blog|114|2014|10|01}}&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| rowspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; |[[File:Into the Sun.png|100px]]&lt;br /&gt;
| rowspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; |'''{{What If|115|Into the Sun}}'''&lt;br /&gt;
| rowspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; |''&amp;quot;When I was about 8 years old, shoveling snow on a freezing day in Colorado, I wished that I could be instantly transported to the surface of the Sun, just for a nanosecond, then instantly transported back. I figured this would be long enough to warm me up but not long enough to harm me. What would actually happen?&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;—AJ, Kansas City&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
| rowspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; |You would not be warmed if you went to the surface, as the energy received by your skin would be minimal. You would maybe see a bright flash of light. The core, on the other hand, would vaporize you, as the energy delivered there would be able to give you a second-degree burn after 1 femtosecond (1 millionth of a nanosecond) in the core.&lt;br /&gt;
| rowspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; {{blog|115|2014|10|08}}&lt;br /&gt;
| rowspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; {{book|2|61}}&lt;br /&gt;
|{{book|15|2024|09|03|UXA-Af-JeCE|Could you survive a nanosecond on the Sun?}}&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|{{book|20|short-video=yes|2026|02|03|m1aMh7z8Y7I|What if you teleported to the Sun?}}&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| rowspan=&amp;quot;3&amp;quot; |[[File:No-Rules NASCAR.png|100px]]&lt;br /&gt;
| rowspan=&amp;quot;3&amp;quot; |'''{{What If|116|No-Rules NASCAR}}'''&lt;br /&gt;
| rowspan=&amp;quot;3&amp;quot; |''&amp;quot;If you stripped away all the rules of car racing and had a contest which was simply to get a human being around a track 200 times as fast as possible, what strategy would win? Let's say the racer has to survive.&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;—Hunter Freyer&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
| rowspan=&amp;quot;3&amp;quot; |If the rider has to survive, 90 minutes is the limit based on human G-force tolerances. If survival is not a priority, you'd build a particle accelerator.&lt;br /&gt;
| rowspan=&amp;quot;3&amp;quot; {{blog|116|2014|10|15}}&lt;br /&gt;
| rowspan=&amp;quot;3&amp;quot; {{book|2|35}}&lt;br /&gt;
|{{book|3|2023|12|19|JcXpCyPc2Xw|What if NASCAR had no rules?}}&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|{{book|8|short-video=yes|2025|08|26|eSPcp-tfGbA|How fast could a human accellerate (while staying alive)?}}&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|{{book|9|short-video=yes|2025|09|02|rgUfcFAPicY|How fast could a vehicle go around a track - but the racer does not have to survive.}}&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:Distant Death.png|100px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|'''{{What If|117|Distant Death}}'''&lt;br /&gt;
|''&amp;quot;What is the farthest from Earth that any Earth thing has died?&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;—Amy from NZ&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|The farthest that any human has died is about 167 kilometers. In terms of any living thing, however, bacterial spores on Voyager 1 are dying every few months, setting a new record each time.&lt;br /&gt;
|{{blog|117|2014|10|23|1d late}}&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:Physical Salary.png|100px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|'''{{What If|118|Physical Salary}}'''&lt;br /&gt;
|''&amp;quot;What if people's incomes appeared around them as cash in real time? How much would you need to make to be in real trouble?&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;—Julia Anderson, Albuquerque, NM&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|At minimum US wage, a worker would earn about one water bottle of mixed coins per day. A CEO would earn about 600 such bottles per day, and the coins would accumulate on the floor at a rate of about 0.5 inches per day. Mark Zuckerberg would earn 25 such bottles ''per second'', and the coins would bury him if he sat still for an hour.&lt;br /&gt;
|{{blog|118|2014|10|30}}&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| rowspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; |[[File:Laser Umbrella.png|100px]]&lt;br /&gt;
| rowspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; |'''{{What If|119|Laser Umbrella}}'''&lt;br /&gt;
| rowspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; |''&amp;quot;Stopping rain from falling on something with an umbrella or a tent is boring. What if you tried to stop rain with a laser that targeted and vaporized each incoming droplet before it could come within ten feet of the ground?&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;—Zach Wheeler&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
| rowspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; |It's doable in theory, but the energy required to completely vaporize a raindrop (rather than merely splattering it) is high enough that your surroundings would get dangerously hot. Targeting the droplets might be possible with adaptive optics, but it would require a complicated device. You could try firing rapidly in random directions instead, but your high-powered laser might go several hundred meters without hitting a raindrop, which would endanger your local neighborhood.&lt;br /&gt;
| rowspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot;{{blog|119|2014|11|13|7d late}}&lt;br /&gt;
| rowspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot;{{book|2|37}}&lt;br /&gt;
|{{book|6|2024|02|20|zgBTwtg7H8E|Could you make an umbrella out of lasers?}}&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|{{book|15|short-video=yes|2025|11|4|xA9aqKGBeOs|Could you use a laser as an umbrella?}}&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:Alternate Universe What Ifs.png|100px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|'''{{What If|120|Alternate Universe What Ifs}}'''&lt;br /&gt;
|''&amp;quot;Dispatches from a horrifying alternate universe&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
|Excerpts from ''what if?'' articles written in a world which, thankfully, is not the one we live in.&lt;br /&gt;
|{{blog|120|2014|11|20}}&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:Frozen Rivers.png|100px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|'''{{What If|121|Frozen Rivers}}'''&lt;br /&gt;
|''&amp;quot;What would happen if all of the rivers in the US were instantly frozen in the middle of the summer?&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;—Zoe Cutler&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|Anywhere with rain or snowmelt would be horrifically flooded, and ice would break, then dam up rivers, forming huge lakes. Humanity would be worse for the wear, but all in all fine. Places where electricity is gotten using a hydroelectric dam may be out of power for a bit, but the flow of water would return in time.&lt;br /&gt;
|{{blog|121|2014|12|11}} 14d late)&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:Lava Lamp.png|100px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|'''{{What If|122|Lava Lamp}}'''&lt;br /&gt;
|''&amp;quot;What if I made a lava lamp out of real lava? What could I use as a clear medium? How close could I stand to watch it?&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;—Kathy Johnstone, 6th Grade Teacher (via a student)&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|You would need to use a metal or gemstone with a very high heat tolerance. You could possibly use sapphire or some sort of transparent or translucent tungsten, but the clear medium would eventually fog up and prevent you from seeing the lava. The lava would solidify after approximately a minute without some way to continuously heat it.&lt;br /&gt;
|{{blog|122|2014|12|18}}&lt;br /&gt;
|{{book|2|40}}&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:Fairy Demographics.png|100px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|'''{{What If|123|Fairy Demographics}}'''&lt;br /&gt;
|''&amp;quot;How many fairies would fly around, if each fairy is born from the first laugh of a child and fairies were immortal?&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;—Mira Kühn, Germany&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|If fairies appeared with the first laugh of a ''homo sapiens'', there would be around 100 billion fairies, and they, depending on their size, would probably be considered no more than a common pest. Because of their high population, however, they would probably be considered a major part of the ecosystems where they resided.&lt;br /&gt;
|{{blog|123|2015|01|01|7d late}}&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| rowspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; |[[File:Lunar Swimming.png|100px]]&lt;br /&gt;
| rowspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; |'''{{What If|124|Lunar Swimming}}'''&lt;br /&gt;
| rowspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; |''&amp;quot;What if there was a lake on the Moon? What would it be like to swim in it? Presuming that it is sheltered in a regular atmosphere, in some giant dome or something.&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;—Kim Holder&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
| rowspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; |It would be super-cool, given that lower gravity would increase the size of splashes and the height of jumps.&lt;br /&gt;
| rowspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; {{blog|124|2015|01|08}}&lt;br /&gt;
| rowspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; |&lt;br /&gt;
|{{book|20|2024|12|24|aIIBBj6KR-Y|What if we put a pool on the m&amp;lt;!--DO NOT CAPITALISE THE &amp;quot;m&amp;quot;: This is how it's written on the site, it should not be changed.--&amp;gt;oon?}}&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|{{book|7|short-video=yes|2025|08|12|mtTbwHzhUiM|Petition to send a swimming pool to the moon!}}&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:Bowling Ball 2.png|100px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|'''{{What If|125|Bowling Ball}}'''&lt;br /&gt;
|''&amp;quot;You are in a boat directly over the Mariana Trench. If you drop a 7kg bowling ball over the side, how long would it take to hit the bottom?&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;—Doug Carter&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|It would take two hours and 20 minutes.&lt;br /&gt;
|{{blog|125|2015|01|15}}&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:Stairs (What If?).png|100px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|'''{{What If|126|Stairs}}'''&lt;br /&gt;
|''&amp;quot;If you made an elevator that would go to space (like the one you mentioned in the '''{{what if|94|billion-story building}}''') and built a staircase up (assuming regulated air pressure) about how long would it take to climb to the top?&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;—Ethan Annas&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|It would take about half a day by motorcycle, or a week or two for a professional stair-climber. If going on foot, you'd also need to carry a huge backpack stuffed with nothing but sticks of butter in order to get your daily caloric intake (including the energy expended from climbing the stairs).&lt;br /&gt;
|{{blog|126|2015|01|22}}&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:Tug of War.png|100px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|'''{{What If|127|Tug of War}}'''&lt;br /&gt;
|''&amp;quot;Would it be possible for two teams in a tug-o-war to overcome the ultimate tensile strength of an iron rod and pull it apart? How big would the teams have to be?&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;—Markus Andersen&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|Two teams of 25 people each would be able to rip a half-inch iron bar apart: tug-o-war is a very dangerous game, as there's so much force being exerted on the rope. The theoretical upper limit of a game is 100,000 players each, pulling a 200-mile–long rope made of graphite ribbons.&lt;br /&gt;
|{{blog|127|2015|01|28|1d early}}&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:Zippo Phone.png|100px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|'''{{What If|128|Zippo Phone}}'''&lt;br /&gt;
|''&amp;quot;What in my pocket actually contains more energy, my Zippo or my smartphone? What would be the best way of getting the energy from one to the other? And since I am already feeling like Bilbo in this one, is there anything else in my pocket that would have unexpected amounts of stored energy?&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;—Ian Cummings&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|The Zippo has more energy than your phone battery, but your hand would have even more, when burned as fuel.&lt;br /&gt;
|{{blog|128|2015|02|05|1d late}}&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:Black Hole Moon.png|100px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|'''{{What If|129|Black Hole Moon}}'''&lt;br /&gt;
|''&amp;quot;What would happen if the Moon were replaced with an equivalently-massed black hole? If it's possible, what would a lunar (&amp;quot;holar&amp;quot;?) eclipse look like?&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;—Matt&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|Not much would change. A black hole of the Moon's mass would be the size of a sand grain, but gravitational effects would still be more or less the same here on Earth. There would be no moonlight, which would make the Earth a bit colder and mess with some nocturnal animals. You wouldn't see any lunar eclipses due to the tiny size of the Moon. It would only cause significant problems if humans were on the moon at the time.&lt;br /&gt;
|{{blog|129|2015|02|12}}&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|{{book|28|2025|07|08|UQgw50GQu1A|What if the moon turned into a black hole?}}&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:Snow Removal.png|100px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|'''{{What If|130|Snow Removal}}'''&lt;br /&gt;
|''&amp;quot;I've long thought about putting a flamethrower on the front of a car to melt snow and ice before you drive across it. Now I've realized that a flamethrower is impractical, but what about a high-powered microwave emitter?&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;—Matt Van Opens&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|The flamethrower is more practical because microwaves don't heat ice very well. The microwave beam would require the power output of three aircraft carriers, and the flamethrower would have a gas mileage of 17 feet per gallon. If you were to drive on the highway for an hour using this method, it would burn 18,635 gallons of gasoline, worth $40,000 to $50,000.&lt;br /&gt;
|{{blog|130|2015|02|19}}&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|{{book|26|2025|05|27|WYf9-xfm6t8|What if you used a flamethrower as a snowblower?}}&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:Microwaves.png|100px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|'''{{What If|131|Microwaves}}'''&lt;br /&gt;
|''&amp;quot;I have had a particular problem for as long as I can remember. Any time I attempt to heat left over Chinese food in a microwave, it fails to heat completely through somewhere. Usually the center but not always and usually rice, but often it will be a small section of meat. It's baffling and has made me automatically adjust heating times to over 2 minutes. In most cases this tends to heat the bowl or plate more than the food. So I suppose the question is what is the optimal time to heat left over Chinese food in the microwave, how about an 800 watt microwave?&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;—James&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|The first cause of this issue is that the wave pattern of microwaves create 'dead spots' where the food isn't heated. Secondly, melted ice causes some parts to cook while the rest is still defrosting. Use a lower power level, stir your food partway through microwaving, and let it sit for a few minutes before you eat it. This allows the heat to spread evenly.&lt;br /&gt;
|{{blog|131|2015|02|27|1d late}}&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:Hotter than Average.png|100px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|'''{{What If|132|Hotter than Average}}'''&lt;br /&gt;
|''&amp;quot;I saw a sign at a hot springs tub saying &amp;quot;Caution: Water is hotter than average&amp;quot; with water at about 39°C. Although they were presumably trying to say &amp;quot;hotter than the average swimming pool,&amp;quot; this got me wondering: What is the average temperature of all water on the Earth’s surface, and how does that temperature compare to 39°C?&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;—Graham Ward&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|The water average is the year-round average air temperature. By saying the water is &amp;quot;hotter than average&amp;quot;, they're implying the water in the pool is not tied to it. Give the signmakers some credit.&lt;br /&gt;
|{{blog|132|2015|03|07|1d late}}&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:Flagpole.png|100px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|'''{{What If|133|Flagpole}}'''&lt;br /&gt;
|''&amp;quot;So, you're falling from a height above the tallest building in your town, and you don't have a parachute. But wait! Partway down the side of that skyscraper there's a flagpole sticking out, sans flag! You angle your descent and grab the pole just long enough to swing around so that when you let go you're now heading back up toward the sky. As gravity slows you and brings you to a halt, you reach the top of the skyscraper, where you reach out and pull yourself to safety. What's the likelihood this could happen?&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;—Rex Ungericht&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|It would be impossible, even a gymnast's arms would be ripped off from the force.&lt;br /&gt;
|{{blog|133|2015|03|17|3d late}}&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:Space Burial.png|100px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|'''{{What If|134|Space Burial}}'''&lt;br /&gt;
|''&amp;quot;I've often joked I'd like to have my remains put into orbit. Not in a &amp;quot;scatter my ashes&amp;quot; sense, but, like, &amp;quot;throw my naked corpse out the airlock&amp;quot; sense. Honestly, my main motivation is to baffle someone in the distant future, but it's an interesting scientific question: what would happen to my body in orbit over the course of years, decades or centuries?&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;—Tim in Fremont&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|Even before you were launched, your body would dry out very quickly. In low orbit, your body would fall to Earth and be burned from atmospheric re-entry. In a higher orbit, it would be destroyed from space debris. In high orbit, you could last for a few centuries. If your body was ever found it would mean there are a lot of people travelling around: making bodies pretty common.&lt;br /&gt;
|{{blog|134|2015|03|28|4d late}}&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:Digging Downward.png|100px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|'''{{What If|135|Digging Downward}}'''&lt;br /&gt;
|''&amp;quot;What would happen if I dug straight down, at a speed of 1 foot per second? What would kill me first?&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;—Jack Kaunis&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|To remove all that soil, the energy required would heat up the surrounding beyond fatal levels pretty quickly. Immune to the heat, you could survive for one to two hours, as oxygen becomes toxic at depths higher than 5 kilometers.&lt;br /&gt;
|{{blog|135|2015|04|05|1d late}}&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|{{book|38|2026|4|11|https://r7B0MzvwDcA|What if you kept digging downward?}}&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:Spiders vs. the Sun.png|100px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|'''{{What If|136|Spiders vs. the Sun}}'''&lt;br /&gt;
|''&amp;quot;Which has a greater gravitational pull on me: the Sun, or spiders? Granted, the Sun is much bigger, but it is also much further away, and as I learned in high school physics, the gravitational force is proportional to the square of the distance.&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;—Marina Fleming&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|The Sun, by 13 orders of magnitude (the Sun is very big). But spiders are a lot more scary. &lt;br /&gt;
|{{blog|136|2015|04|12}}&lt;br /&gt;
|{{book|2|44}}&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:New Horizons.png|100px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|'''{{What If|137|New Horizons}}'''&lt;br /&gt;
|''&amp;quot;What if New Horizons hits my car?&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;—Robin Sheat&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
| ''Note: This question was created before ''New Horizons'' passed by Pluto.'' This is extremely unlikely.  The ''New Horizons'' probe is quite large, but is considered small for a spacecraft. If it crashed into your car, there would be serious consequences. However, if it did, NASA would be on the hook to replace your car, along with most of your neighbourhood, and clean up the radioactive mess. &lt;br /&gt;
|{{blog|137|2015|07|14|2m 25d late}}&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:Jupiter Submarine.png|100px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|'''{{What If|138|Jupiter Submarine}}'''&lt;br /&gt;
|''&amp;quot;What if you released a submarine into Jupiter's atmosphere? Would it eventually reach a point where it would float? Could it navigate?&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;—KTH&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|No. Before it got to the point where it could float, the submarine would be crushed by the high pressure and melted by the high temperature. This is because gasses behave differently to fluids: the point where things can float is at a much higher pressure. &lt;br /&gt;
|{{blog|138|2015|07|28|7d late}}&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:Jupiter Descending.png|100px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|'''{{What If|139|Jupiter Descending}}'''&lt;br /&gt;
|''&amp;quot;If you did '''{{what if|138|fall into Jupiter's atmosphere in a submarine}}''', what would it actually look like? What would you see before you melted or burned up?&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;—Ada Munroe&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|There's not a whole lot to go on here; we have some data and educated guesses about what's going inside these gas giants, but we haven't sent any probes equipped with operational cameras into a gas giant so we don't really know. A book by Michael Carroll suggests that there is a layer between the upper ammonia haze and lower ammonium hydrosulfide clouds, that could provide some good views, and if so, the view would be similar to Earth's atmosphere in that clouds and fellow submarines would fade into blue.&lt;br /&gt;
|{{blog|139|2015|08|04}}&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:Proton Earth, Electron Moon.png|100px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|'''{{What If|140|Proton Earth, Electron Moon}}'''&lt;br /&gt;
|''&amp;quot;What if the Earth were made entirely of protons, and the Moon were made entirely of electrons?&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;—Noah Williams&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|There would be so much energy packed into one space that it would create a black hole as massive as the observable universe that would expand outwards at the speed of light. Because of the charge from the electrons, it would be a {{w|naked singularity}}, a black hole with infinite mass that allows light to escape.&lt;br /&gt;
|{{blog|140|2015|09|18|1m 7d late}}&lt;br /&gt;
|{{book|2|48}}&lt;br /&gt;
|{{book|30|2025|9|9|DiWFXv9N0Vs|What if the Moon were made entirely of electrons?}}&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:Sunbeam.png|100px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|'''{{What If|141|Sunbeam}}'''&lt;br /&gt;
|''&amp;quot;What if all of the s&amp;lt;!--DO NOT CAPITALISE THE &amp;quot;s&amp;quot;: This is how it's written on the site, it should not be changed.--&amp;gt;un's output of visible light were bundled up into a laser-like beam that had a diameter of around 1m once it reaches Earth?&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;—Max Schäfer&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|According to Randall, parts of the atmosphere would be heated to millions of degrees, and the bubble of destruction would wrap around the Earth before it even reached the other side. The light reflected off the Moon would be hot enough to burn you to death. If the beam couldn't track the Earth, part of it would survive as the Earth orbited out of the way. If the beam reached another planetary system, it could heat up the surface of some distant exoplanets.  However, this conclusion depends on the precise nature of the &amp;quot;bundling up&amp;quot;.  If this &amp;quot;bundling&amp;quot; is accomplished via passive optics such as lenses and mirrors, then the temperature (and geometry) of the incoming beam will be restricted according to all the optics principles described in &amp;quot;Fire from Moonlight&amp;quot;, and under no circumstances would any part of Earth's atmosphere or surface exceed 5000 K, due to the laws of thermodynamics.  If, however, the &amp;quot;bundling&amp;quot; consists of an &amp;quot;active&amp;quot; procedure of generating electricity via PV panels, and then powering actual laser emitters with it (not just &amp;quot;laser-like&amp;quot;) - which doesn't sound like Max's conception - then yes, the narrow beam of essentially &amp;quot;infinite&amp;quot; temperature and consequent destruction that Randall describes could indeed occur.   &lt;br /&gt;
|{{blog|141|2016|01|12|3m 18d late}}&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|{{book|33|2025|11|11|qu8nx1qUwEU|What if ALL the sun’s power was focused in one place?}}&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:Space Jetta.png|100px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|'''{{What If|142|Space Jetta}}'''&lt;br /&gt;
|''&amp;quot;What if I tried to re-enter the atmosphere in my car? (a 2000 VW Jetta TDI). Would it do more environmental damage than it is already apparently doing?&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;—Casey Berg&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|The effect of the car's re-entry itself on the environment is going to be small, verging on negligible.  The effect of ceasing its usage to burn hydrocarbon fuel for the remainder of the car's life is likely significantly greater than the re-entry, but in practice also negligible.  The main non-negligible environmental effect might be from the launch mechanism that was used to get into orbit in the first place, although even this effect, at current rocket launch rates, is still tiny compared to global air travel or ground-based automobile usage.&lt;br /&gt;
|{{blog|142|2016|01|20|1d late}}&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:Europa Water Siphon.png|100px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|'''{{What If|143|Europa Water Siphon}}'''&lt;br /&gt;
|''&amp;quot;What if you built a siphon from the oceans on Europa to Earth? Would it flow once it's set up? (We have an idea for selling bottled Europa water.)&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;—A group of Google Search SREs&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|No, at least not with a siphon.  Siphons can only pull water upward to a height where the air pressure feeding water into one side of the siphon equals the weight of the water falling out the other side (creating negative pressure, trying to form a vacuum, which nature abhors).  This effect requires a gravitational field and an atmosphere, but cannot be used to pump water above the local atmosphere, and hence out of the local gravity well, under any circumstances - including on Europa.&lt;br /&gt;
|{{blog|143|2016|01|26|1d early}}&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:Saliva Pool.png|100px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|'''{{What If|144|Saliva Pool}}'''&lt;br /&gt;
|''&amp;quot;How long would it take for a single person to fill up an entire swimming pool with their own saliva?&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;—Mary Griffin, 9th grade&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|For an Olympic pool, it would take you 8,345 years. In order to finish by the present day, you'd need to start during the invention of agriculture.&lt;br /&gt;
|{{blog|144|2016|02|02}}&lt;br /&gt;
|{{book|2|53}}&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:Fire From Moonlight.png|100px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|'''{{What If|145|Fire From Moonlight}}'''&lt;br /&gt;
|''&amp;quot;Can you use a magnifying glass and moonlight to light a fire?&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;—Rogier Spoor&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|Unfortunately, it is not possible to summarize Randall's article succinctly, because most of his explanation is completely irrelevant to the question.  Randall's answer is effectively &amp;quot;No, and here are a set of correct principles of optics that do not support my claim.&amp;quot;  The correct answer is &amp;quot;Yes, just like it is possible to start a fire with sunlight reflected off anything else, because the temperature/wavelength/energy of light does not change (substantially) when it is reflected, and the temperature of visible sunlight is around 5000 to 6000 K.&amp;quot;  (The obvious assumption about the intent behind Rogier's question is that &amp;quot;moonlight&amp;quot; refers to the reflected sunlight, and not the Moon's own surface emission of longwave infrared radiation with a temperature of 300 - 400 K, which we can't see - but this should really be clarified by Rogier.)&lt;br /&gt;
|{{blog|145|2016|02|09}}&lt;br /&gt;
|{{book|2|51}}&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:Stop Jupiter.png|100px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|'''{{What If|146|Stop Jupiter}}'''&lt;br /&gt;
|''&amp;quot;I understand that the ''New Horizons'' craft used gravity assist from Jupiter to increase its speed on the way to Pluto. I also understand that by doing this, Jupiter slowed down very slightly. How many flyby runs would it take to stop Jupiter completely?&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;—Dillon&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|Even if we were to throw Earth at Jupiter, this could never happen, because Jupiter is much more massive than Earth. Gravity assists are like bouncing a tennis ball off a train, and to stop the train, you'd need an awfully large tennis ball. &amp;lt;!-- or, as per https://what-if.xkcd.com/18, a *lot* of them... ;) --&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|{{blog|146|2016|02|16}}&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:Niagara Straw.png|100px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|'''{{What If|147|Niagara Straw}}'''&lt;br /&gt;
|''&amp;quot;What would happen if one tried to funnel Niagara Falls through a straw?&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;—David Gwizdala&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|In order to funnel Niagara Falls through a straw, you'd need to accelerate the water to one-quarter light speed, and no machine exists that's capable of doing that. If you tried, at 1300 m/s, the water would reach the maximum speed it can be accelerated to by pressure, and the flow would become choked if the momentum of the water hasn't already broken the acceleration device by that point. You would also get in a lot of trouble with the authorities for messing with the flow rate of Niagara Falls, since that's forbidden by a US/Canada treaty. If you somehow could actually do it, the resulting waterjet would have the power output of a small star, and would boil away the oceans and wipe out all life on Earth.&lt;br /&gt;
|{{blog|147|2016|02|26}} 3d late)&lt;br /&gt;
|{{book|2|55}}&lt;br /&gt;
|{{book|27|2025|06|17|pfbzrrcQZjs|What if you funneled Niagara Falls through a straw?}}&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:Eat the Sun.png|100px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|'''{{What If|148|Eat the Sun}}'''&lt;br /&gt;
|''&amp;quot;What percentage of the Sun's heat (per day) does the population of Earth eat in calories per year? What changes could be made to our diets for the amount of calories to equal the energy of the Sun?&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;—James Mitchell&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|0.000000000065%. This is such a ridiculously small portion of the Sun's heat exhaust, that we cannot increase our personal calory intake enough to compensate. Instead we need to add more persons. A lot of them in fact. So many that we need to spread them - and the food that they eat - out throughout not just our galaxy but multiple galaxies. Otherwise, the food alone would be massive enough to turn into a black hole.&lt;br /&gt;
|{{blog|148|2016|03|12|8d late}}&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:Pizza Bird.png|100px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|'''{{What If|149|Pizza Bird}}'''&lt;br /&gt;
|''&amp;quot;My boyfriend recently took a flight on a plane with wifi, and while he was up there, wistfully asked if I could send him a pizza. I jokingly sent him a photo of a parrot holding a pizza slice in its beak. Obviously, my boyfriend had to go without pizza until he landed at JFK. But this raised the question: could a bird deliver a standard 20&amp;quot; New York-style cheese pizza in a box? And if so, what kind of bird would it take?&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;—Tina Nguyen&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|After careful analysis of wing types, relative weights, and pizza grabbing mechanisms, it is deduced that even the most compatible bird - the eagle - would be hard-pressed to deliver a pizza to an airliner, the relative speed being the largest hurdle. However, delivery to a house - where the relative speed is not so much of a problem - would be possible, though the pizza might be found a slice or two short.&lt;br /&gt;
|{{blog|149|2016|03|26|7d late}}&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:Tatooine Rainbow.png|100px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|'''{{What If|150|Tatooine Rainbow}}'''&lt;br /&gt;
|''&amp;quot;Since rainbows are caused by the refraction of the sunlight by tiny droplets of rainwater, what would rainbow look like on Earth if we had two suns like Tatooine?&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;—Raga&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|Each sun is the source of not just one rainbow, but a whole series of rainbows of diminishing intensity; the elusive 5th order rainbow had apparently been pictured at the time of publication. A planet with two suns would consequently have two series of rainbows. A solar system arranged like Tatooine would have to be circumbinary, which limits the separation of the two rainbow series to about 20 degrees. As the main rainbow is 84 degrees across, this leads to the conclusion that the rainbows would always be overlapping.&lt;br /&gt;
|{{blog|150|2016|05|23|1m 21d late}}&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:Sun Bug.png|100px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|'''{{What If|151|Sun Bug}}'''&lt;br /&gt;
|''&amp;quot;How many fireflies would it take to match the brightness of the Sun?&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;—Luke Doty&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|30 nonillion fireflies (3 with 31 zeroes after it), which is surprisingly small on the astronomical scale. Counterintuitively, it turns out a single firefly actually glows brighter than an equivalent mass of Sun. However, there are logistical problems with organizing that many fireflies, as you need to arrange them so that they're not blocking each others' lights. You can try to simplify it by just using one very large firefly, but it would be larger than the entire Solar System and immediately collapse into the biggest black hole in the universe.&lt;br /&gt;
|{{blog|151|2016|07|21|1m 23d late}}&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:Flood Death Valley.png|100px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|'''{{What If|152|Flood Death Valley}}'''&lt;br /&gt;
|''&amp;quot;Since Death Valley is below sea level could we dig a hole to the ocean and fill it up with water?&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;—Nick Traeden&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|Basically, yes. But there is a lot of digging, and the end result would be quite similar to the Salton Sea which is characterized as &amp;quot;gross&amp;quot; (technical term). Also, heat world records would likely move elsewhere.&lt;br /&gt;
|{{blog|152|2016|10|18|2m 21d late}}&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''The thumbnail for this blog article wasn't archived.''&lt;br /&gt;
|'''&amp;lt;span class=&amp;quot;plainlinks&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[https://web.archive.org/web/20161205191559/http://what-if.xkcd.com/153 Peptides]&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;'''&lt;br /&gt;
|''&amp;quot;What is the longest English word you can spell using the one letter abbreviations of the 20 genetic amino acids? What about the three letter abbreviations? What would the resultant peptides look like?&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;—Kira (Lysine-Isoleucine-Arginine-Alanine) Guth&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|For any peptides, 19 letters is the highest possible, that being the word &amp;quot;interdepartmentally&amp;quot;. For naturally existing peptides in the human body, 8 letters is the highest known. Examples of 8 letters are: GRISETTE, DATELESS, REVERSAL.&lt;br /&gt;
|{{blog|153|2016|12|05|notAvailable=Draft published by mistake and deleted. [[what if? (blog)#Peptides incident|Learn why]].}}&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:Hide the Atmosphere.png|100px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|'''{{What If|153|Hide the Atmosphere}}'''&lt;br /&gt;
|''&amp;quot;Earth’s atmosphere is really thin compared to the radius of the Earth. How big a hole do I need to dig before people suffocate?&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;—Sam Burke&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|The hole would need to be very big. Under the right circumstances, a five-mile hole over the entire state of Texas might suffice.&lt;br /&gt;
|{{blog|153|2017|01|30|3m 5d late}}&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:Coast-to-Coast Coasting.png|100px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|'''{{What If|154|Coast-to-Coast Coasting}}'''&lt;br /&gt;
|''&amp;quot;What if the entire continental US was on a decreasing slope from West to East. How steep would the slope have to be to sustain the momentum needed to ride a bicycle the entire distance without pedaling?&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;—Brandon Rooks&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|The ramp would need to be five miles high (eight kilometres) to make this possible, and that would be at a speed slower than walking. You would also need oxygen for the first third of the way down.&lt;br /&gt;
|{{blog|154|2017|02|08|9d late}}&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:Toaster vs. Freezer.png|100px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|'''{{What If|155|Toaster vs. Freezer}}'''&lt;br /&gt;
|''&amp;quot;Would a toaster still work in a freezer?&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;—&amp;lt;span class=&amp;quot;plainlinks&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[https://maximumfun.org/podcasts/my-brother-my-brother-and-me/ '''My Brother, My Brother, and Me'''], [https://maximumfun.org/episodes/my-brother-my-brother-and-me/mbmbam-343-sauce-doctors-blessing/ '''Episode 343'''], discussing a &amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;Yahoo Answers question&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|As a superior being, the Toaster casts its gaze upon lowly humans and hrumphs at their bickering about such measly temperature variations as 40C. The Toaster regularly reaches 600C and thus, to it - much like to the Fire - everything else is cold, be it room temperature or freezer temperature. Winnipeg locals have it easy and can try this for themselves, as long as they can stave off the wolves.&lt;br /&gt;
|{{blog|155|2017|02|28|13d late}}&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:Electrofishing for Whales.png|100px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|'''{{What If|156|Electrofishing for Whales}}'''&lt;br /&gt;
|''&amp;quot;I used to work on a fisheries crew where we would use an electro-fisher backpack to momentarily stun small fish (30 - 100 mm length) so we could scoop them up with nets to identify and measure them. The larger fish tended to be stunned for slightly longer because of their larger surface area but I don't imagine this relationship would be maintained for very large animals. Could you electrofish for a blue whale? At what voltage would you have have to set the e-fisher?&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;—Madeline Cooper&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|Electrofishing has long-term effects on fish and especially dolphins. Larger animals, especially mammals, are likely to die rather than just get stunned. But it is also harder to get any effect in saltwater, which explains why electrofishing is mainly done in rivers and lakes, compared to fresh water. This means it wouldn't work on blue whales.&lt;br /&gt;
|{{blog|156|2017|03|09|2d late}}&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:Earth-Moon Fire Pole.png|100px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|'''{{What If|157|Earth-Moon Fire Pole}}'''&lt;br /&gt;
|''&amp;quot;My son (5y) asked me today: If there were a kind of a fireman's pole from the Moon down to the Earth, how long would it take to slide all the way from the Moon to the Earth?&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;—Ramon Schönborn, Germany&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|This set-up would face many challenges, but these would be the different domains of the slowest extreme sport: climbing out of the Moon's gravity, accelerating through the middle transfer phase, and then decelerating to your supersonic arrival on Earth.&lt;br /&gt;
|{{blog|157|2018|03|21|1y 2m 5d late}}&lt;br /&gt;
|{{book|2|58}}&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:Hot Banana.png|100px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|'''{{What If|158|Hot Banana}}'''&lt;br /&gt;
|''&amp;quot;I heard that bananas are radioactive. If they are radioactive, then they radiate energy. How many bananas would you need to power a house?&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;—Kang Ji&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|Bananas are not very radioactive, so it would take an absurdly large number, 300 quadrillion, which is enough to bury New York City in a skyscraper-tall pile of bananas. It would be much more energy efficient to simply burn the bananas as fuel, so that you could power a house with 10 bunches a day (or New York City with a pile the size of Liberty Island a week). The fact that you can do that would also make the huge pile of bananas needed to generate power with radioactivity a huge fire (and explosion) hazard, so just burning the bananas is safer as well.&lt;br /&gt;
|{{blog|158|2022|05|04|3y 11m 7d late}}&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:Hailstones.png|100px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|'''{{What If|159|Hailstones}}'''&lt;br /&gt;
|''&amp;quot;My 4 year old son and I were wondering about soccer ball sized hail today. How much damage would a hail storm with size 5 soccer ball sized hail do?&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;—Michael Grill&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|Hailstones get increasingly dangerous as they get larger, as their increased weight cancels their air resistance, allowing them to reach a higher terminal velocity while still carrying all that mass. Regular hailstones are too slow and light to be lethal, but a soccer ball-sized hailstone would hit at around 140 mph, capable of punching straight through the roof of a car or building. Fortunately, no hailstone on record has ever been that big, although storms can on occasion produce hailstones large enough to damage cars, and in rare cases even kill people.&lt;br /&gt;
|{{blog|159|2022|07|05|1m 30d late}}&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''This blog article doesn't have a thumbnail.''&lt;br /&gt;
|'''{{What If|160|Transatlantic Car Rental}}'''&lt;br /&gt;
|''&amp;quot;My daughter recently received her driver's permit in the US, and aspires to visit mainland Europe someday. She has learned enough about the rules of the road to know never to drive into the ocean; however, she jokingly suggested that given a sufficient quantity of rental cars, she could eventually get to Europe by driving east repeatedly. The question is, how many vehicles would it take to build a car-bridge across the Atlantic?&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;—Eric Munson&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|You'd need approximately a billion plus a trillion cars to pull this off. Also, in addition to destroying global ocean circulation and creating an illegal naval blockade, this is definitely a violation of her rental car agreement. Also, organizing a fleet of that many rental cars would be difficult.&lt;br /&gt;
|{{blog|160|2022|09|06|1m 26d late}}&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''This blog article doesn't have a thumbnail.''&lt;br /&gt;
|'''{{What If|161|Star Ownership}}'''&lt;br /&gt;
|''&amp;quot;If every country's airspace extended up forever, which country would own the largest percentage of the galaxy at any given time?&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;—Reuven Lazarus&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|Given that the South pole (of Earth) points towards the Milky way centre, most of the galaxy will wind up in the air-space (space-space?) of countries of the southern hemisphere. However, due to Earth's rotation around its axis, the nadir of the galaxy core (on Earth) will constantly shift. Given that Australia is the largest of the southern countries, Australia will most often be the Rulers of the Universe. Northern hemisphere jurisdictions, such as New Jersey, will have to contend with some pretty nifty black holes and possibly murderous exoplanets.&lt;br /&gt;
|{{blog|161|2022|11|01|1m 19d late}}&lt;br /&gt;
|{{book|2|24}}&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''This blog article doesn't have a thumbnail.''&lt;br /&gt;
|'''{{What If|162|Comet Ice}}'''&lt;br /&gt;
|''&amp;quot;Could I cool down the Earth by capturing a comet and dropping it in the ocean, like an ice cube in a glass of water?&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;—Daniel Becker&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|Only if you had a magical sky-crane that could cancel the comet's initial kinetic energy during capture, then slowly lower it to the ground without converting all of its gravitational potential energy back into more kinetic energy.  Converting that potential energy into electricity to substitute for existing fossil fuel power plants would reduce CO2 emissions, but the effect of that substitution on global temperatures is uncertain and likely negligible.  Meanwhile, the amount of ice in a comet that could be used to cool the oceans directly is also less than one would expect from its size, since comets are not solid.  Overall, the answer is effectively &amp;quot;no&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
|{{blog|162|2022|12|06|29d late}}&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| rowspan=&amp;quot;3&amp;quot; |&lt;br /&gt;
| rowspan=&amp;quot;3&amp;quot; |'''Global Windstorm'''&lt;br /&gt;
| rowspan=&amp;quot;3&amp;quot; |''&amp;quot;What would happen if the Earth and all terrestrial objects suddenly stopped spinning, but the atmosphere retained its velocity?&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;—Andrew Brown&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
| rowspan=&amp;quot;3&amp;quot; |Everyone would die. Then, the wind would destroy everything, with gusts blowing more than 1,000 mph (1,600 km/h) around the equator, killing 85% of the world population. The highest winds would only last a few minutes, but that would be enough to vaporise most human structures. Bunkers would be useless, because, even if your bunker were stuck to the ground hard, others would not be as strong and would hit yours at 1,000 mph. However, most of the researchers at the {{w|Amundsen–Scott South Pole Station}} would be completely fine. The wind blast would then become a heat blast with scorching temperatures and create global thunderstorms in moist areas. After a while, the Earth would gradually start to regain its rotational velocity thanks to the Moon.&lt;br /&gt;
| rowspan=&amp;quot;3&amp;quot; |&lt;br /&gt;
| rowspan=&amp;quot;3&amp;quot; {{book|1|1}}&lt;br /&gt;
|{{book|4|2024|01|09|gp5G1QG6cXc|What if Earth suddenly stopped spinning?}}&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|{{book|12|short-video=yes|2025|10|07|19gun1mffWs|What would happen to the population if the Earth suddenly stopped spinning?}}&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|{{book|13|short-video=yes|2025|10|14|ERieN5pee7A|What would happen to the Earth if it suddenly stopped spinning?}}&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| rowspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; |&lt;br /&gt;
| rowspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; |'''Weird (and Worrying) Questions from the What If? Inbox, #1'''&lt;br /&gt;
| colspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; |''&amp;quot;Would it be possible to get your teeth to such a cold temperature that they would shatter upon drinking a hot cup of coffee?&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;—Shelby Hebert&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
| rowspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; |&lt;br /&gt;
| rowspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot;{{book|1|4}}&lt;br /&gt;
| rowspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; |&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| colspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; |''&amp;quot;How many houses are burned down in the United States every year? What would be the easiest way to increase that number by a significant amount (say, at least 15%)?&amp;quot;''&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;—Anonymous&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|'''New York–Style Time Machine'''&lt;br /&gt;
|''&amp;quot;I assume when you travel back in time you end up at the same spot on the Earth’s surface. At least, that’s how it worked in the Back to the Future movies. If so, what would it be like if you traveled back in time, starting in Times Square, New York, 1000 years? 10,000 years? 100,000 years? 1,000,000 years? 1,000,000,000 years? What about foward in time 1,000,000 years?&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;—Mark Dettling&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
*1,000 years back, you'd see many chestnut trees, wolves, and passenger pigeons.&lt;br /&gt;
*10,000 years back, the ground would be mostly bedrock, with large chunks of ice and dropped boulders, called glacial erratics.&lt;br /&gt;
*100,000 years back, several islands were pushed upwards by the ice. You would see many now-extinct species, such as Canis dirus, Smilodon fatalis, and Arctodus.&lt;br /&gt;
*1,000,000 years back, you'd see relatives of hyenas called Chasmaporthetes.&lt;br /&gt;
*1,000,000,000 years back would be no plants or animals, only single-celled organisms in the ocean.&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|{{book|1|5}}&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|'''Periodic Wall of the Elements'''&lt;br /&gt;
|''&amp;quot;What would happen if you made a periodic table out of cube-shaped bricks, where each brick was made of the corresponding element?&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;—Andy Connolly&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|The top two rows wouldn't be too dangerous to build if you can deal with the fluorine setting almost everything else on fire without setting yourself on fire or exposing yourself to corrosive reaction products like hydrofluoric acid, but the rest of the periodic table would seriously injure or kill you. In the third row, the phosphorus, sulfur and chlorine would also catch on fire and make toxic gas. In the fourth row, the potassium would add to the ongoing fire, which would ignite the arsenic making highly toxic arsenic trioxide. Bromine and selenium would also contribute to the toxic compounds produced in the fire, while also making it smell horrible. The fifth row would be similar to the fourth while also including technetium, which is moderately radioactive. In the sixth row, elements with short half-lives would destroy the building you were in as well as causing nuclear fallout to fall nearby. Past the sixth row, the entire city you were in would be destroyed in a nuclear explosion, and the fallout would contaminate the Earth with thousands of times more radioactivity than the Chernobyl disaster.&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|{{book|1|8}}&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| rowspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; |&lt;br /&gt;
| rowspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; |'''Weird (and Worrying) Questions from the What If? Inbox, #2'''&lt;br /&gt;
| colspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; |''&amp;quot;Would dumping anti-matter into the Chernobyl reactor when it was melting down stop the meltdown?&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;—AJ&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
| rowspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; |&lt;br /&gt;
| rowspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot;{{book|1|12}}&lt;br /&gt;
| rowspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; |&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| colspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; |''&amp;quot;Is it possible to cry so much you dehydrate yourself?&amp;quot;''&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;—Karl Wildermuth&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| rowspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; |&lt;br /&gt;
| rowspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; |'''The Last Human Light'''&lt;br /&gt;
| rowspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; |''&amp;quot;If every human somehow simply disappeared from the face of the Earth, how long would it be before the last artificial light source would go out?&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;—Alan&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
| rowspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; |Anything that depends on the power grid will go out in a few hours after the fossil fuel plants stop getting supplied with fuel because the sudden reduction in working power plants will cause cascade failures leading to a blackout without human guidance. Lights powered by diesel generators will stay on until the fuel runs out, probably in a matter of months at most. Lights powered by geothermal plants, wind turbines and hydroelectric dams will run until their power source has a mechanical failure, possibly for several years. Battery powered lights will go out in a decade or two at most due to self discharge of the batteries. Lights powered by nuclear reactors will go out fairly quickly because the SCRAM would get triggered by the loss of external power. The Curiosity rover would have lights that could theoretically work for over a century if only someone was there to turn them on. Solar powered emergency call boxes have lights that would stay on until the electronics degrade, possibly as long as a century. Radioactive waste that was mixed with glass to facilitate shielding, transportation and storage will glow for centuries due to Cherenkov radiation.&lt;br /&gt;
| rowspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; |&lt;br /&gt;
| rowspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; {{book|1|13}}&lt;br /&gt;
|{{book|11|2024|05|28|8fADp43wJwU|If all humans died, when would the last light go out?}}&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|{{book|5|short-video=yes|2025|07|29|kNry0bf7eC0|Could this be the last surviving human light source?}}&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| rowspan=&amp;quot;3&amp;quot; |&lt;br /&gt;
| rowspan=&amp;quot;3&amp;quot; |'''Weird (and Worrying) Questions from the What If? Inbox, #3'''&lt;br /&gt;
| colspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; |''&amp;quot;Given humanity’s current knowledge and capabilities, is it possible to build a new star?&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;—Jeff Gordon&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
| rowspan=&amp;quot;3&amp;quot; |&lt;br /&gt;
| rowspan=&amp;quot;3&amp;quot;{{book|1|16}}&lt;br /&gt;
| rowspan=&amp;quot;3&amp;quot; |&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| colspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; |''&amp;quot;What sort of logistic anomalies would you encounter in trying to raise an army of apes?&amp;quot;''&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;—Kevin&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| colspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; |''&amp;quot;If people had wheels and could fly, how would we differentiate them from airplanes?&amp;quot;''&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;—Anonymous&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| rowspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; |&lt;br /&gt;
| rowspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; |'''Orbital Submarine'''&lt;br /&gt;
| rowspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; |''&amp;quot;How long would a nuclear submarine last in orbit?&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;—Jason Lathbury&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
| rowspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; |Submarines are, unsurprisingly, very good at being watertight. This would mean that, mostly, air would stay within the submarine for a time. However, a nuclear submarine is able to stay under for so long because it can convert seawater into oxygen. With no seawater, no oxygen is made, which means that eventually they will run out of air. Getting back into the atmosphere would be tricky. Firing all of a submarine's missiles backwards (i.e. towards the ship) with their detonators removed would produce just enough force for the sub to deorbit and reenter the atmosphere. At that point, the heat and forces of reentry would rip the submarine apart, similar to the {{w|Space Shuttle Challenger disaster}}. &lt;br /&gt;
| rowspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; |&lt;br /&gt;
| rowspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; {{book|1|17}}&lt;br /&gt;
|{{book|7|2024|03|05|EsUBRd1O2dU|Would a Submarine Work as a Spaceship?}}&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|{{book|4|short-video=yes|2025|07|22|sFTRRdHqZIQ|Why Space Is Actually Warm!}}&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| rowspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; |&lt;br /&gt;
| rowspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; |'''Weird (and Worrying) Questions from the What If? Inbox, #4'''&lt;br /&gt;
| colspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; |''&amp;quot;Would it be possible to stop a volcano eruption by placing a bomb (thermobaric or nuclear) underneath the surface?&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;—Tomasz Gruszka&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
| rowspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; |&lt;br /&gt;
| rowspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot;{{book|1|20}}&lt;br /&gt;
| rowspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; |&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| colspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; |''&amp;quot;A friend of mine is convinced that there is sound in space. There isn’t, right?&amp;quot;''&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;—Aaron Smith&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|'''Human Computer'''&lt;br /&gt;
|''&amp;quot;How much computing power could we achieve if the entire world population stopped whatever we are doing right now and started doing calculations? How would it compare to a modern-day computer or smartphone?&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;—Mateusz Knorps&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|The combined computing power of all devices surpassed the power of all humans in 1977.&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|{{book|1|21}}&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|'''Common Cold'''&lt;br /&gt;
|''&amp;quot;If everyone on the planet stayed away from each other for a couple of weeks, wouldn't the common cold virus be wiped out?&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;—Sarah Ewart&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|In theory, this would work. In practice, it wouldn't for a simple reason: Some people have compromised immune systems. These people's bodies can be a safe haven for rhinoviruses, which would mean the common cold, would quickly spread through the population again. The world's food supplies would also be an issue, as people may need to eat foods not designed to be eaten directly (i.e. raw grain). Many systems would shut down as people wouldn't be there to maintain them. Many millions would be stranded in places like Antarctica or the Sahara Desert, which would lead to many deaths. In effect, the scenario would be similar to 'Everybody Jump'.&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|{{book|1|25}}&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| rowspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; |&lt;br /&gt;
| rowspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; |'''Weird (and Worrying) Questions from the What If? Inbox, #5'''&lt;br /&gt;
| colspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; |''&amp;quot; If global warming puts us in danger through temperature rise, and super-volcanos put us into danger of global cooling, shouldn’t those two dangers balance each other out?&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;—Florian Seidl-Schulz&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
| rowspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; |&lt;br /&gt;
| rowspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot;{{book|1|27}}&lt;br /&gt;
| rowspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; |&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| colspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; |''&amp;quot;How fast would a human have to run in order to be cut in half at the bellybutton by a cheese-cutting wire?&amp;quot;''&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;—Jon Merrill&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|'''No More DNA'''&lt;br /&gt;
|''&amp;quot;This may be a bit gruesome, but... if someone's DNA suddenly vanished, how long would that person last?&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;—Nina Charest&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|You could live for several hours or days before succumbing to infection or systemwide organ failure.&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|{{book|1|29}}&lt;br /&gt;
|{{book|35|2026|01|20|s3oLIDaElaE|How long would you survive with no DNA?}}&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| rowspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; |&lt;br /&gt;
| rowspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; |'''Weird (and Worrying) Questions from the What If? Inbox, #6'''&lt;br /&gt;
| colspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; |''&amp;quot;What is the total nutritional value (calories, fat, vitamins, minerals, etc.) of the average human body?&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;—Justin Risner&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
| rowspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; |&lt;br /&gt;
| rowspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot;{{book|1|31}}&lt;br /&gt;
| rowspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; |&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| colspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; |''&amp;quot;What temperature would a chainsaw (or other cutting implement) need to be at to instantly cauterize any injuries inflicted with it?&amp;quot;''&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;—Sylvia Gallagher&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|'''Flyover States'''&lt;br /&gt;
|''&amp;quot;Which US state is actually flown over the most?&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;—Jesse Ruderman&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|Somewhat surprisingly, Virginia, due to a large amount of flights from Toronto to the Carribbean/South America. Despite it having many major airports, including most of those serving DC, there are also many major airports which have routes passing over Virginia, such as KATL and KJFK. &lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|{{book|1|33}}&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| rowspan=&amp;quot;3&amp;quot; |&lt;br /&gt;
| rowspan=&amp;quot;3&amp;quot; |'''Weird (and Worrying) Questions from the What If? Inbox, #7'''&lt;br /&gt;
| colspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; |''&amp;quot;In Thor the main character is at one point spinning his hammer so fast that he creates a strong tornado. Would this be possible in real life?&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;—Davor&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
| rowspan=&amp;quot;3&amp;quot; |&lt;br /&gt;
| rowspan=&amp;quot;3&amp;quot;{{book|1|36}}&lt;br /&gt;
| rowspan=&amp;quot;3&amp;quot; |&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| colspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; |''&amp;quot;If you saved a whole life’s worth of kissing and used all that suction power on one single kiss, how much suction force would that single kiss have?&amp;quot;''&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;—Jonatan Lindström&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| colspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; |''&amp;quot;How many nuclear missiles would have to be launched at the United States to turn it into a complete wasteland?&amp;quot;''&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;—Anonymous&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|'''Self-Fertilization'''&lt;br /&gt;
|''&amp;quot;I read about some researchers who were trying to produce sperm from bone marrow stem cells. If a woman were to have sperm cells made from her own stem cells and impregnate herself, what would be her relationship to her daughter?&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;—R Scott LaMorte&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|As the child is coming from, effectively, two parents with identical DNA, there would be many genetic defects, similar to being inbred. As there is no father to contribute a Y chromosome, the child is guaranteed to be a girl. &lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|{{book|1|37}}&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| rowspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; |&lt;br /&gt;
| rowspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; |'''Weird (and Worrying) Questions from the What If? Inbox, #8'''&lt;br /&gt;
| colspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; |''&amp;quot;A toxin blocks the ability of the nephron tubule reabsorption but does not affect filtration. What are the possible short-term effects of this toxin?&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;—Mary&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
| rowspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; |&lt;br /&gt;
| rowspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot;{{book|1|40}}&lt;br /&gt;
| rowspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; |&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| colspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; |''&amp;quot;If a Venus fly trap could eat a person, about how long would it take for the human to be fully de-juiced and absorbed?&amp;quot;''&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;—Jonathan Wang&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|'''Lost Immortals'''&lt;br /&gt;
|''&amp;quot;If two immortal people were placed on opposite sides of an uninhabited Earthlike planet, how long would it take them to find each other? 100,000 years? 1,000,000 years? 100,000,000,000 years?&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;—Ethan Lake&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|Depending on strategy and terrain, a few years to a few decades.&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|{{book|1|42}}&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| rowspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; |&lt;br /&gt;
| rowspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; |'''Weird (and Worrying) Questions from the What If? Inbox, #9'''&lt;br /&gt;
| colspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; |''&amp;quot;Could you survive a tidal wave by submerging yourself in an in-ground pool?&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;—Chris Muska&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
| rowspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; |&lt;br /&gt;
| rowspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot;{{book|1|46}}&lt;br /&gt;
| rowspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; |&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| colspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; |''&amp;quot;If you are in free fall and your parachute fails, but you have a Slinky with extremely convenient mass, tension, etc., would it be''&lt;br /&gt;
possible to save yourself by throwing the Slinky upward while holding on to one end of it?&amp;quot;&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;—Varadarajan Srinivasan&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|'''Sparta'''&lt;br /&gt;
|''&amp;quot;In the movie 300 they shoot arrows up into the sky and they seemingly blot out the s&amp;lt;!--DO NOT CAPITALISE THE &amp;quot;s&amp;quot;: This is how it's written on the site, it should not be changed.--&amp;gt;un. Is this possible, and how many arrows would it take?&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;—Anna Newell&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|300 arrows per second with densely packed archers could blot out 99% of the Sun's light. If the Sun were low in the horizon, you could more effectively block sunlight with less arrows. However, this would have little to no effect on the opponent, unless it required solar panels.&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|{{book|1|47}}&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|'''Lego Bridge'''&lt;br /&gt;
|''&amp;quot;How many Lego bricks would it take to build a bridge capable of carrying traffic from London to New York? Have that many Lego bricks been manufactured?&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;—Jerry Petersen&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|Enough bricks have been manufactured to connect London and New York, but the bridge would not be structurally sound enough to stay together for very long.&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|{{book|1|51}}&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| rowspan=&amp;quot;3&amp;quot; |&lt;br /&gt;
| rowspan=&amp;quot;3&amp;quot; |'''Weird (and Worrying) Questions from the What If? Inbox, #10'''&lt;br /&gt;
| colspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; |''&amp;quot;What is the probability that if I am stabbed by a knife in my torso that it won’t hit anything vital and I’ll live?&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;—Thomas&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
| rowspan=&amp;quot;3&amp;quot; |&lt;br /&gt;
| rowspan=&amp;quot;3&amp;quot;{{book|1|54}}&lt;br /&gt;
| rowspan=&amp;quot;3&amp;quot; |&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| colspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; |''&amp;quot;If I were on a motorbike and do a jump off a quarter pipe ramp, how fast would I need to be moving to safely deploy and land using the parachute?&amp;quot;''&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;—Anonymous&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| colspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; |''&amp;quot;What if every day, every human had a 1 percent chance of being turned into a turkey, and every turkey had a 1 percent chance of&lt;br /&gt;
being turned into a human?&amp;quot;''&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;—Kenneth&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|'''Weightless Arrow'''&lt;br /&gt;
|''&amp;quot;Assuming a zero-gravity environment with an atmosphere identical to Earth's, how long would it take the friction of air to stop an arrow fired from a bow? Would it eventually come to a standstill and hover in midair?&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;—Mark Estano&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|It would stop at about 5 to 10 kilometers.&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|{{book|1|56}}&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| rowspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; |&lt;br /&gt;
| rowspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; |'''All the Lightning'''&lt;br /&gt;
| rowspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; |''&amp;quot;If all the lightning strikes happening in the world on any given day all happened in the same place at once, what would happen to that place?&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;—Trevor Jones&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
| rowspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; |A typical lightning strike delivers enough energy to power a residential house for about 2 days. Hence, even in lightning-prone regions the power delivered to the ground by the sun outweighs the power delivered to the ground by lightning by a factor of a million. Assuming that the lightning bolts come down in parallel, our bundle (containing about a million bolts) would be around 6 meters in diameter. It would deliver about two atomic bombs worth of energy to the air and ground, leaving a crater the size of a basketball court. Inside the channel, the air would turn into high energy plasma. The light and heat from the bolt would spontaneously ignite surfaces for miles around while the shockwave would flatten trees and demolish buildings. A copper cable a meter in diameter could in theory conduct the brief surge of current from the bolt without melting, however anything on the other end of the cable wouldn't be able to conduct it properly.&lt;br /&gt;
| rowspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; |&lt;br /&gt;
| rowspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; {{book|1|62}}&lt;br /&gt;
|{{book|10|2024|05|07|fs28lEq9smw|What if all the lightning on Earth struck the same place at once?}}&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|{{book|3|short-video=yes|2025|07|15|_efsqO-4OoQ|Could We Harvest Power From Lightning?}}&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| rowspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; |&lt;br /&gt;
| rowspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; |'''Weird (and Worrying) Questions from the What If? Inbox, #11'''&lt;br /&gt;
| colspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; |''&amp;quot;What if everyone in Great Britain went to one of the coasts and started paddling? Could they move the island at all?&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;—Ellen Eubanks&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
| rowspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; |&lt;br /&gt;
| rowspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot;{{book|1|64}}&lt;br /&gt;
| rowspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; |&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| colspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; |''&amp;quot;Are fire tornadoes possible?&amp;quot;''&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;—Seth Wishman&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|'''Neutron Bullet'''&lt;br /&gt;
|''&amp;quot;If a bullet with the density of a neutron star were fired from a handgun (ignoring the how) at the Earth's surface, would the Earth be destroyed?&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;—Charlotte Ainsworth&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|No. The bullet would fall through the ground and stop in the center of the Earth.&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|{{book|1|67}}&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| rowspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; |&lt;br /&gt;
| rowspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; |'''Weird (and Worrying) Questions from the What If? Inbox, #12'''&lt;br /&gt;
| colspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; |''&amp;quot;What if I swallow a tick that has Lyme disease? Will my stomach acid kill the tick and the borreliosis, or would I get Lyme disease from the inside out?&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;—Christopher Vogel&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
| rowspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; |&lt;br /&gt;
| rowspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot;{{book|1|68}}&lt;br /&gt;
| rowspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; |&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| colspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; |''&amp;quot;Assuming a relatively uniform resonant frequency in a passenger jet, how many cats, meowing at what resonant frequency of said jet, would be required to &amp;quot;bring it down&amp;quot;?&amp;quot;&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;—Brittany&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| rowspan=&amp;quot;3&amp;quot; |&lt;br /&gt;
| rowspan=&amp;quot;3&amp;quot; |'''Richter 15'''&lt;br /&gt;
| rowspan=&amp;quot;3&amp;quot; |''&amp;quot;What if a Richter magnitude 15 earthquake were to hit America at, let's say, New York City? What about a Richter 20? 25?&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;—Alec Farid&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
| rowspan=&amp;quot;3&amp;quot; |A magnitude 15 earthquake would destroy the Earth, but going higher won't make much difference. You can actually go lower than 0, though.&lt;br /&gt;
| rowspan=&amp;quot;3&amp;quot; |&lt;br /&gt;
| rowspan=&amp;quot;3&amp;quot; {{book|1|69}}&lt;br /&gt;
|{{book|2|2023|12|05|e3uk7jU3RHo|What would a magnitude 15 earthquake be like?}}&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|{{book|1|short-video=yes|2025|06|24|wBLVmEZV2Oc|How high could the magnitude of Earthquakes go?}}&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|{{book|2|short-video=yes|2025|07|01|FKXVs4UteSc|Is there such a thing as a magnitude 0 earthquake?}}&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|'''Soupiter'''&lt;br /&gt;
|''&amp;quot;What would happen if the Solar System was filled with soup out to Jupiter?&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;—Amelia&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|The soup would collapse into a very large black hole and devour the Milky Way, though we would feel mostly fine for the first 10 to 15 minutes.&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|{{book|2|1}}&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|'''Helicopter Ride'''&lt;br /&gt;
|''&amp;quot;What if you were hanging on a helicopter blade by your hands and then someone turned it on?&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;—Corban Blanset&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|Without any grip assistance, you'd fall off before it completed its first revolution. With handholds, your body would instead fall off of your arms. Assuming no issues with staying on the wing, there would be more problems to follow. The helicopter, as it spooled up, would begin violently wobbling due to the constantly changing center of gravity before flipping itself, destroying both you and the pilot in a massive fireball. &lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|{{book|2|2}}&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|'''Dangerously Cold'''&lt;br /&gt;
|''&amp;quot;Would there be any danger from standing next to a large object that was 0 Kelvin?&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;—Christopher&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|There wouldn't be a lot of direct danger from the cube itself, though it would make you feel cold. The bigger danger would be from liquid oxygen condensing and igniting flammable objects. It would take a while to reheat the cube&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|{{book|2|3}}&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|'''Ironic Vaporization'''&lt;br /&gt;
|''&amp;quot;What if we somehow evaporated a solid block of iron on {{asic|ear|th''}}''?&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;—Cooper C.&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|The cube would ignite whatever is near it and deposit large quantities of iron flakes downwind. However, it wouldn't make a huge impact on the total amount of atmospheric iron.&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|{{book|2|4}}&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|'''Cosmic Road Trip'''&lt;br /&gt;
|''&amp;quot;If the universe stopped expanding right now, how long would it take for a human to drive a car all the way to the edge of the universe?&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;—Sam H-H&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|First off, a human can't do this. Assuming a normal crash rate, an average human driver wouldn't make it past Mars without crashing. Even truck drivers, a field where the crash rate is much lower, wouldn't make it past Jupiter. Using a self-driving car, however, would negate this. It would take an incredibly long time, on the order of approximately 480 quadrillion years if you're driving at a steady pace of 65 miles per hour. Assuming you want to keep your car functional, you would go through 30 quintillion oil changes. Assuming a reasonable 33 MPG highway mileage, the amount of gasoline needed would be similar to the Moon in size. You would also need 10^17 tons of snacks. Entertainment would be another issue. If every person who has ever lived had 150 friends/acquaintances, listening to a real-time podcast of someone's life, all from the perspective of a different friend/acquaintance, you would need to re-watch them all 150 times to make it to the edge of the observable universe. Once you get there, there would be no Earth to come back to. &lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|{{book|2|5}}&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|'''Pigeon Chair'''&lt;br /&gt;
|''&amp;quot;How many pigeons would it require in order to lift the average person and launch a chair to the height of Australia's Q1 skyscraper?&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;—Nick Evans&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|The optimal method for using the least amount of pigeons would be to use a multi-stage system of sorts. A group of pigeons would lift you about 10 feet, before dropping you as another group swoops in to take their place. However, even with this system, the number of pigeons would be large enough that the Earth would be pulled into the pigeons by gravity instead of the other way around. In other words, if you want to get to the top of Australia's Q1 skyscraper, use an elevator.&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|{{book|2|6}}&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|rowspan=&amp;quot;11&amp;quot;|&lt;br /&gt;
|rowspan=&amp;quot;11&amp;quot;|'''Short Answers #1'''&lt;br /&gt;
|''&amp;quot;What if your blood became liquid uranium? Would you die from radiation, lack of oxygen, or something else?&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;—Thomas Chattaway&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|You would die Having-no-Blood-and-Being-Full-of-Molten-Uranium Syndrome. Also known as Jeff's Disease.&lt;br /&gt;
|rowspan=&amp;quot;11&amp;quot;|&lt;br /&gt;
|rowspan=&amp;quot;11&amp;quot;{{book|2|6.5}} (S1)&lt;br /&gt;
|rowspan=&amp;quot;11&amp;quot;|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''&amp;quot;Could someone have an anime-style attack where they created a sword out of air? I'm not talking about an air blade, but something like cooling the air enough so that you had solid air to attack people.&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;—Emma&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|Theoretically yes, but it would be extremely impractical. The temperature to turn oxygen solid is very low, and even with proper insulation it would still cause frostbite. It would also be very weak and very soft, and would sublimate quickly, basically making it useless for all intents and purposes, except for PR.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''&amp;quot;How much water do you have to drink to become 99 percent water?&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;—LyraxH&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|About 500 gallons of water.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''&amp;quot;What would we see if we attached a lightweight camera to a balloon and let it fly away?&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;—Raymond Peng&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|We would see a balloon slowly flying away, fading into the sky. It would be quite pretty. Though next time we should probably attach a transmitter. &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''&amp;quot;How many calories does Mario burn a day?&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;—Daniel and Xavier Hovley&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|Mario starved to death in late 1985.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''&amp;quot;If a snake unhinged its jaw and swallowed a balloon whole, could/would the balloon carry the snake up?&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;—Freezachu&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|No.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''&amp;quot;If you were to jump out of an airplane that was traveling at Mach 880980 that was 100,00 feet above ground in New York City, with skydiving gear, could you survive?&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;—Jack Catten&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|rowspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot;|No, you would die.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''&amp;quot;If there was no water on Earth, would we all live?&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;—Karen&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''&amp;quot;Is it possible to make a homemade jetpack?&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;—Azhari Zadil&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|It's very easy to make one that works once; much harder to make it work more.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''&amp;quot;I was wondering whether there's a way to use my welder as a defibrillator? (The specific model I own is an Impax IM-ARC140 arc welder.)&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;—Łukasz Grabowski&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|No, and you probably shouldn't be allowed to use it as an arc welder either.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''&amp;quot;What if all atoms on Earth were expanded to the size of a grape? Would we survive?&lt;br /&gt;
|I don't know how to answer this with science, but now I want grapes.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|'''Geyser'''&lt;br /&gt;
|''&amp;quot;If one were to stand on top of the Old Faithful geyser in Yellowstone National Park, at what speed would they be launched upwards and what injuries would they likely sustain?&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;—Catherine McGrath&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|If you positioned yourself in just the right way, and used an umbrella to catch as much lift as possible, you could be launched hundreds of feet in the air.  Unsurprisingly, you'd receive severe burns and almost certainly die.  Surprisingly, however, you would be far from the first person to get severe burns from the geysers.&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|{{book|2|8}}&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|'''Pew, Pew, Pew'''&lt;br /&gt;
|''&amp;quot;If you shot a ridiculously powerful gun/{{asic|la|zer''}}'' would it go off the edge of the world in a straight line or curve around the world?&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;—Maelor&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|The beam would go off the edge of the world, except under certain circumstances.&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|{{book|2|9}}&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|rowspan=&amp;quot;4&amp;quot;|&lt;br /&gt;
|rowspan=&amp;quot;4&amp;quot;|'''Weird &amp;amp; Worrying #1'''&lt;br /&gt;
|colspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot;|''&amp;quot;Can bees or other animals go to hell? Or can they murder other bees without consequences?&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;—Sadie Kim&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|rowspan=&amp;quot;4&amp;quot;|&lt;br /&gt;
|rowspan=&amp;quot;4&amp;quot;{{book|2|10.5}} (W1)&lt;br /&gt;
|rowspan=&amp;quot;4&amp;quot;|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|colspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot;|''&amp;quot;How many mirrors reflecting (sun)light would it take to kill, or at least, injure somebody?&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;—Eli Collinge&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|colspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot;|''&amp;quot;If you had to remove the tonsils of a giant, what would be the safest way for you to do it? The surgeon is a normal human.&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;—Tirzah&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|colspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot;|''&amp;quot;What would it take to defeat Air Force One with a drone???&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;—Anonymous&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|'''Banana Church'''&lt;br /&gt;
|''&amp;quot;Can all the world's bananas fit inside of all of the world's churches? My friends have had this argument for a little over 10 years now.&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;—Jonas&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|Yes. They would likely only fill the churches to 6 inches deep. For the bananas to be unable to fit, each person would need to eat a 1 foot by 1 foot by 2 meter crate's worth of bananas per year. &lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|{{book|2|11}}&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|'''Lose Weight the Slow and Incredibly Difficult Way'''&lt;br /&gt;
|''&amp;quot;I want to lose 20 pounds. How much of the Earth's mass would I have to &amp;quot;relocate&amp;quot; to space in order to achieve my goal?&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;—Ryan Murphy&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|You would have to remove 85% of the Earth's mass. However, due to the increase in density in the mantle, you would actually gain weight until you've removed about half the Earth's diameter. An image of what it would look like is shown in [[2575: What If? 2]], where a potato peeler is used to remove the crust of the Earth.&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|{{book|2|13}}&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|'''Jupiter Comes to Town'''&lt;br /&gt;
|''&amp;quot;Dear Randall, what would happen if you shrunk Jupiter down to the size of a house and placed in a neighborhood, say, replacing a house?&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;—Zachary&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|Assuming density stayed the same when you shrunk Jupiter down, the biggest issue would be that the gravity that keeps its hot interior together would no longer exist, essentially creating a giant fireball that would turn into a mushroom cloud, and eventually spread out into a big cool cloud. This would, effectively, be the reverse of the formation of Jupiter, which started as clouds before being compressed into a small hot ball.&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|{{book|2|15}}&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|'''Swing Set'''&lt;br /&gt;
|''&amp;quot;How tall can a swing set be while still being powered by a human pumping their legs? Is it possible to build a swing set tall enough to launch the rider into space if they jump at the right time? (Assuming the human has enough energy, which my 5-year-old seems to have.)&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;—Joe Coyle&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|This is impossible due to the fact that, by pumping the legs, you are essentially pushing against the crossbar of the swing set. A string which is too long will result in a very low amount of force being delivered to the crossbar, lowering the maximum angle you can swing relative to the base of the curve. Calculations show that the optimal crossbar height to gain the most angle relative to the ground is approximately 8 feet.&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|{{book|2|17}}&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|'''Airliner Catapult'''&lt;br /&gt;
|''&amp;quot;My friend is a commercial airline pilot. She says that a significant amount of fuel is spent on takeoff. To save fuel, why couldn't we launch airplanes using catapult systems like on aircraft carriers (calibrated to normal human accelerations)? Could significant amounts of fossil fuels be saved if the catapults could be run by some other clean energy? I'm imagining a rope ... one end tied to the airplane, the other tied to a large boulder at the edge of a cliff. Just push the boulder off the cliff!&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;—Brady Barkey&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|It's not a completely ridiculous idea, but the most practical issue is that you'd have to extend the roughly mile-long runway several times more to take full advantage of it.  Using the proposed rope-and-cliff system, you'd need to use a thousand ton weight dropped at the height of a super tall skyscraper - of course, if you used something heavier, like the 80,000-ton Washington Monument, you wouldn't need to drop it as far.&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|{{book|2|18}}&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|rowspan=&amp;quot;14&amp;quot;|&lt;br /&gt;
|rowspan=&amp;quot;14&amp;quot;|'''Short Answers #2'''&lt;br /&gt;
|''&amp;quot;Billy the Clown is running out of cash, so in order to raise money, he devises his newest trick: He will inflate, by mouth, a standard-size party balloon until the material (some form of indestructible rubber) is just one atom thick. How large would the inflated party balloon be?&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;—Alan Fong&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|It's a total mystery why Billy is running out of cash.&lt;br /&gt;
|rowspan=&amp;quot;14&amp;quot;|&lt;br /&gt;
|rowspan=&amp;quot;14&amp;quot;{{book|2|18.5}} (S2)&lt;br /&gt;
|rowspan=&amp;quot;14&amp;quot;|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''&amp;quot;How many leaf blowers would it take to move a standard SUV&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;—Ashley H.&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|Somewhere around 1-2 dozen leaf blowers would do the trick. However, it would be very impractical, consume a lot of fuel, and the acceleration would be very slow. Many more leaf blowers would be needed to accelerate the car at a reasonable rate.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''&amp;quot;If you put a vacuum at extremely high suction and aimed it at a normal BMW sedan, what would happen?&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;—Anonymous&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|Nothing. Cars, even small ones like sedans, are far too large and heavy to be affected by a vacuum, even a very large and powerful one.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''&amp;quot;On a warm summer evening, when you sit outside with a light on, you can be sure that bugs will be attracted to the light. Then why is it that these same bugs don't fly toward the biggest and strongest lamp of them all, namely the Sun, during the day?&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;—Anonymous&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|Those who did would die and not be able to produce offspring with the same traits.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''&amp;quot;If you collected all of the guns in the world and put them on one side of the Earth, then shot the all simultaneously, would it move the Earth?&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;—Nathan&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|It would not move the Earth, but it would make the other side a nicer place to live.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''&amp;quot;What would happen if you microwaved a small microwave, while the smaller one was on as well?&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;—Micheal&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|Randall gave the meme answer of 'You would no longer be welcome in that IKEA.' In reality, this would almost certainly lead to some dire consequences. Microwaves contain sensitive electronics which would be damaged from excess heat{{cn}}, leaving the microwave functionally useless. Most microwaves are also made of metal, which is known for exploding when exposed to microwaves. This is the same principle that causes forks to explode when placed in one. &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''&amp;quot;If you're jumping on a trampoline, how fast would your body have to be going to:&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;'''A.''' Break all bones on impact&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;'''B.''' Make your body go though the tiny holes of the mesh.&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;—Micah Lane&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;lt;ol style=&amp;quot;list-style-type: upper-alpha&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;li&amp;gt;Breaking all of the bones in your body would be hard because a lot of them are very small, but it would be fast enough that the trampoline wouldn't make much of a difference.&amp;lt;/li&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;li&amp;gt;This can't happen, no matter how fast you're going.&amp;lt;/li&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/ol&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''&amp;quot;I have a Nothing Grenade™. When detonated, it instantly replaces itself with a sphere of perfect vacuum 2 meters across. What would actually happen when it went off?&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;—Dave H.&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|As the two-meter vacuum circle appeared, the surrounding air would rapidly fill in the sudden gap. Almost instantaneously, the air would collide and expand out with enough force to possibly kill a human and damage small structures such as bookshelves or walls. In other words, you basically have a regular grenade. &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''&amp;quot;Is space hot or cold?&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;—Isaac&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|The answer to this is complicated. Temperature is a measurement of the speed of particles. In space, having no air resistance, particles move incredibly fast. However, because it's a vacuum, there are almost no particles. This is a similar principle to the reason you don't get burned when welding sparks touch your skin. They're so small they do basically nothing to you. As there are almost no particles to impact you, space is the hottest place you can freeze to death.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''&amp;quot;How many bones can you remove from the human body while allowing the human to continue living? Asking for a friend.&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;—Chris Rakeman&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|That person is not your friend.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''&amp;quot;What would happen if you put a human under a g-force of 417 Gs for twenty seconds?&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;—Nythill&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|The human is guaranteed to die. Scientific tests have shown that, despite the human body's ability to withstand g-forces into the hundreds for very short periods of time (a car crash may exceed 100 Gs of force), going over 18 Gs for a long period of time is likely to cause the human to black out and quickly die, as the force would prevent blood from being able to flow through a human body properly. This is the same reason why bugs are unable to move after hitting a car on the highway, even if they survive. &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''&amp;quot;Where or how can one commit a murder and not be prosecuted for it?&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;—Kunai Dhawan&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|Theoretically, in a section of Yellowstone National Park, where {{w|Zone of Death (Yellowstone)|a jury would have to be formed from a non-existent population}}. In practice, you'd definitely still be prosecuted for committing a murder there.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''&amp;quot;I read today that insects make at least $57 billion a year for the US economy. If we were to pay every single insect in the United States equally for their economic contribution, how much would each insect get?&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;—Hannah McDonald&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|Each insect would get $0.0000029.&lt;br /&gt;
Broken down:&lt;br /&gt;
*$18 billion to flies, including mosquitoes&lt;br /&gt;
*$16 billion to bees, wasps, and ants&lt;br /&gt;
*$10 billion to beetles&lt;br /&gt;
*$7 billion to thrips&lt;br /&gt;
*$1 billion to butterflies and moths&lt;br /&gt;
*$1 billion to true bugs&lt;br /&gt;
*$4 billion to all other insects&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''&amp;quot;What, in today's world and yesterday's world, does it mean to be human, in all social and biological factors?&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;—Seth Carrol&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|You meant to submit this to ''Why If?: Deeply Ungrammatical Answers to Unanswerable Philosophical Questions''.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|'''Slow Dinosaur Apocalypse'''&lt;br /&gt;
|''&amp;quot;What if an object like the Chicxulub impactor hit e&amp;lt;!--DO NOT CAPITALISE THE &amp;quot;E&amp;quot;: This is how it's written on the site, it should not be changed.--&amp;gt;arth with a relatively low relative speed of (let's say) 3 mph&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;—Beni von Alemann&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|Even though the meteor is slow, it's still very big. The impactor would not create a crater, but would instead create a weird effect which makes the rock flow like water, creating a large &amp;quot;space dirt pancake&amp;quot; about the same diameter as the Chicxulub impact Crater. If {{w|Jurassic Park}} were a real place, it could certainly cause a dinosaur extinction over there, if dropped on it. &lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|{{book|2|19}}&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|'''Elemental Worlds'''&lt;br /&gt;
|''&amp;quot;What if Mercury (the planet) were entirely made of mercury (the element)? What if Ceres was made of cerium? Uranus made of uranium? Neptune made of neptunium? What about Pluto made of plutonium?&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;—Anonymous&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|Earth would (mostly) be fine. Mercury, uranium, neptunium, plutonium, and cerium would all replace the old planets. Changes are as follows:&lt;br /&gt;
*Pluto would be visible to the naked eye&lt;br /&gt;
*Ceres would be visible to the naked eye&lt;br /&gt;
*Mercury would be visible to the naked eye&lt;br /&gt;
*Uranus would look a fairly bright star in the night sky&lt;br /&gt;
*''When Neptune hits your eye, like a big pizza pie, that's an x-ray..''&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|{{book|2|20}}&lt;br /&gt;
| &amp;lt;!-- i think there was a minutephysics video about this question --&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|'''Tire Rubber'''&lt;br /&gt;
|''&amp;quot;Rubber tires on millions of cars and trucks start with about ½&amp;quot; tread and end up bald. Rubber should be everywhere, or at least our highways should be made thicker. Where's the rubber?&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;—Fred&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|An average tire sheds about 1.6 liters of rubber over the course of its lifetime (from new to bald). If all tire rubber stuck to the road, it would rise by about a third of a millimeter per year. However, most tire rubber shavings are small enough to drift through the air, or for rain and wind to wash them off the road. Tire rubber is more than enough to cause environmental disruption and it's one of the leading causes of microplastics in our oceans. &lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|{{book|2|25}}&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|rowspan=&amp;quot;10&amp;quot;|&lt;br /&gt;
|rowspan=&amp;quot;10&amp;quot;|'''Short Answers #3'''&lt;br /&gt;
|''&amp;quot;How long do you think two people would have to kiss continuously before they had no lips left?&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;—Asli&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|That's not how lips work&lt;br /&gt;
|rowspan=&amp;quot;10&amp;quot;|&lt;br /&gt;
|rowspan=&amp;quot;10&amp;quot;{{book|2|26.5}} (S3)&lt;br /&gt;
|rowspan=&amp;quot;10&amp;quot;|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''&amp;quot;My college friend and I have had this debate for years now: If you put a million hungry ants in a glass cube with one human, who's more likely to walk out alive?&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;—Eric Bowman&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|The human would try to break out of the cube, and probably succeed. Although disgusted, the human would probably be fine. Ants generally do not eat meat, preferring leaves and other foliage. If they escaped, both the human and the ants would go after the person who put them in the glass box. If they did not escape, both the human and the ants would eventually die of suffocation, assuming no air holes were installed. &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''&amp;quot;What if all of humanity set all of their differences aside and work together to level out the Earth into a perfect sphere?&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;—Erik Andersen&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|This would quickly create new differences. Even if some magical force were employed to keep humanity centered on making the earth a perfect sphere, it would take many years and be almost impossible to do. Because the Earth is an oblate spheroid, and not a sphere as-is, a lot of land would need to be displaced in order to create a perfect sphere. There would need to be somewhere to put all the water in the oceans, which would need to be removed, and a way to move large amounts of land very long distances. Many cities would be buried, such as Amsterdam (average elevation -6.6').&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''&amp;quot;People talk a lot about a space elevator or a building that would reach into low orbit to save time and resources getting things into space. This is going to sound incredibly stupid, but why has no one proposed building a road into space? Since orbit is generally considered to be 62 miles out, would it be possible to build a 62-mile-high mountain somewhere in the United States? Colorado would be my suggestion, since it has a low population density and is about a mile above sea level already.&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;—Brian&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|Where are you going to get the materials to build the mountain? Also, Colorado has a lot of people in it. If we ignore the logistical implications, it still won't work. Cars take in air from various orifices to cool, among other things, the engine. No matter whether you have a gas, electric, hybrid or hydrogen car, the lack of air would cause the motors to quickly overheat.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''&amp;quot;If I shot a rocket and a bullet through Jupiter's center, would they come out the other side?&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;—James Wilson&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|No, as the leading theory is that Jupiter has a solid core. Shooting a bullet through the center would simply cause the bullet to collide with the core of the planet.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''&amp;quot;What if Mount Everest magically turned into pure lava? What would happen to life; would we all die?&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;—Ian&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|We would mostly be okay.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''&amp;quot;Can you fall down into the Mariana Trench, or would you just swim over it?&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;—Rodolfo Estrella&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|You can do both of those things. Assuming what he was trying to say was &amp;quot;Can you swim over the Marianas Trench without falling into it?&amp;quot; the answer is that you would just swim directly over it.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''&amp;quot;I play Dungeons &amp;amp; Dragons, and my DM doesn't want to let us use the Gust of Wind spell to push wind into the sails of a ship and make it move. Her argument is that you can't use this spell to move a ship because someone on a sailboat can't aim a fan at the sail to propel the boat. We argue that since the spell doesn't push you backward when you use it, then we should be able to use it to make the ship sail. She says she'll allow it only if you say so.&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;—Georgia Paterson and Allison Adams&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|Since the spell doesn't push you backwards, it should work. If the spell pushed you backwards, you would just have to aim the spell backwards.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''&amp;quot;What if I struck a match on Titan? Would it light if there's no oxygen?&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;—Ethan Fitzgibbon&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
| While the match would light initially due to the small amount of oxidizer in a matchhead (typically {{w|potassium chlorate}}, in a safety match), it would quickly dissipate due to the lack of oxygen to titan's atmosphere.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''&amp;quot;I posted a question on social media asking what would be the smallest change that would create the biggest disaster. One of the responses I got said &amp;quot;if every atom gained 1 proton.&amp;quot; So my question for you is, what would happen if every atom gained 1 proton?&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;—Olivia Caputo&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|The Earth would become one big, very explosive science experiment. Stable atoms would become unstable, releasing large amounts of energy all at once. Brain matter would cease to be brain matter, and cells would no longer be cells. This would lead to everything dying at once. At least we wouldn't need to experience it.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|'''Suction Aquarium'''&lt;br /&gt;
|''&amp;quot;When I was a child, I discovered that if I took a container into the swimming pool, I could fill it with water and then bring the container (open-end down) to the surface of the water, and the water level in my container was higher than the water level in the pool. What would happen if you tried to do this with a giant container and the ocean? Could you create a giant aquarium on top of the water that the animals could swim in and out of freely? Maybe an irregularly shaped container that you would walk around on to get closer to the fish?&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;—Caroline Collett&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|It would work, but the water level would slowly lower back to sea level over time. However, this process can be accelerated by whale farts. I am not joking.&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|{{book|2|27}}&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|'''Earth Eye'''&lt;br /&gt;
|''&amp;quot;If the Earth were a massive eye, how far would it see?&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;—Alasdir&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|Its 'resolution' would be over 500 million times better than a normal human eye. It would be able to see the color of a shirt worn on Mars. It could also see incredibly far objects, such as some of the most distant galaxies that haven't been {{w|redshift}}ed to the point of being infrared. However, a planet-sized eye would be inconvenient, as it would certainly go blind from the Sun and could be damaged from nearby stars as well.&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|{{book|2|28}}&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|'''Build Rome in a Day'''&lt;br /&gt;
|''&amp;quot;How many people would it take to build Rome in a day?&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;—Lauren&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
| It would take anywhere between 15 minutes and 150 minutes with the whole Earth working.&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|{{book|2|29}}&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|'''Mariana Trench Tube'''&lt;br /&gt;
|''&amp;quot;If I put an indestructible 20-meter-wide glass tube in the ocean that goes all the way down to the deepest part of the ocean, what would it be like to stand at the bottom? Assuming the s&amp;lt;!--DO NOT CAPITALISE THE &amp;quot;s&amp;quot;: This is how it's written on the site, it should not be changed.--&amp;gt;un goes directly overhead.&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;—Zoki Čulo&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|You would likely see many new and undiscovered species. You would also be incredibly cold as the freezing waters of the deep would cool the glass. Getting up would be another problem entirely. If you didn't use an elevator, you could break the glass. That would create a geyser, accelerating you upwards at lethal G-forces. Once you reach the surface, you would fly high into the air before crashing back down into the ocean. Also, you would be heralded as a hero by a lot of marine biologists.&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|{{book|2|30}}&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|'''MRI Compass'''&lt;br /&gt;
|''&amp;quot;Why don't compasses point toward the nearest hospital because of the magnetic fields created by MRI machines?&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;—D. Hughes&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|They actually do, but only within ~10 meters.&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|{{book|2|32}}&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|'''Ancestor Fraction'''&lt;br /&gt;
|''&amp;quot;I noticed recently that the number of people within a family tree increases exponentially with each generation: I have 2 parents, 4 grandparents, 8 great-grandparents, and so on. Which got me thinking—are most people descended from the majority of Homo sapiens who have ever lived? If not, what fraction of all the people that have ever lived am I descended from?&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;—Seamus&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|Likely between 2-3 twenty-fourths of all humans who have ever lived.&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|{{book|2|33}}&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|'''Bird Car'''&lt;br /&gt;
|''&amp;quot;I'm a lowly college student stuck in a car without AC. As such, the windows are down most of the time when I'm driving, and I started thinking: If a bird happens to match my speed and direction perfectly, and I swerve to catch the bird in my car ... what happens next, other than an angry bird? Does the bird stay right where it was? Fly into the windshield? Drop into the seat? My roommate and I disagree. Any help settling this would really make all our lives easier.&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;—Hunter W.&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
| The bird would fall onto the seat at an angle, and then would fly out of the window (hopefully).&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|{{book|2|34}}&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|rowspan=&amp;quot;4&amp;quot;|&lt;br /&gt;
|rowspan=&amp;quot;4&amp;quot;|'''Weird &amp;amp; Worrying #2'''&lt;br /&gt;
|colspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot;|''&amp;quot;What would happen if you put the end of a vacuum hose up to your eye and turned on the vacuum?&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;—Kitty Greer&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|rowspan=&amp;quot;4&amp;quot;|&lt;br /&gt;
|rowspan=&amp;quot;4&amp;quot;{{book|2|35.5}} (W2)&lt;br /&gt;
|rowspan=&amp;quot;4&amp;quot;|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|colspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot;|''&amp;quot;Is it possible to hold your arm straight out of a car window and punch a mailbox clean off its pole? Could you do it without breaking your hand?&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;—Ty Gwennap&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|colspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot;|''&amp;quot;If people's teeth kept growing, but when they were fully grown they come off and are swallowed, how long would it take before it causes any problems?&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;—Valen M.&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|colspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot;|''&amp;quot;In a defensive situation, how much epinephrine (in a EpiPen) would it take to subdue a possible attacker?&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;—Henry M.&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|'''Vacuum Tube Smartphone'''&lt;br /&gt;
|''&amp;quot;What if my phone was based on vacuum tubes? How big would it be?&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;—Johnny&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
| The phone would be about the size of one to five city blocks, and would melt its way through the Earth's crust. Conversely, the UNIVAC constructed with modern electrical components would be smaller than a grain of salt.&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|{{book|2|36}}&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|'''Eat a Cloud'''&lt;br /&gt;
|''&amp;quot;Could a person eat a whole cloud?&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;—Tak&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|Not unless you can squeeze the air out first. If you don't you will burp out more cloud than you ate.&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|{{book|2|38}}&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|'''Tall Sunsets'''&lt;br /&gt;
|''&amp;quot;Let's say that two people of different heights (159 cm and 206 cm) stand beside each other while looking at the sunset. How much longer will the taller person be able to see the s&amp;lt;!--DO NOT CAPITALISE THE &amp;quot;s&amp;quot;: This is how it's written on the site, it should not be changed.--&amp;gt;un than the shorter one?&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;—Rasmus Bunde Nielson&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|Over a second longer.&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|{{book|2|39}}&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|'''Sisyphean Refrigerators'''&lt;br /&gt;
|''&amp;quot;Suppose everyone with a fridge or a freezer opened them at the same time, outdoors. Would that amount of cooling be able to noticeably change the temperature? If not, how many fridges would it take to lower the temperature, say, 5 degrees F? What about even lower?&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;—Nicholas Mittica&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|Refrigerators don't work like that, and would likely increase global temperatures by 0.3 degrees celsius. The infinite spite of Hades is surprisingly green.&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|{{book|2|41}}&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|'''Basketball Earth'''&lt;br /&gt;
|''&amp;quot;You know how when you spin a basketball on your finger you hit the side to make it go faster and balance it? If a meteor passes close enough to the e&amp;lt;!--DO NOT CAPITALISE THE &amp;quot;E&amp;quot;: This is how it's written on the site, it should not be changed.--&amp;gt;arth, can it make the Earth spin faster like your hand does the basketball?&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;—Zayne Freshley&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|Yes.&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|{{book|2|43}}&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|- &amp;lt;!-- my shift keys started acting up here, so expect some capitalization errors --&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|'''Inhale a Person'''&lt;br /&gt;
|''&amp;quot;If house dust comprises up to 80 percent dead skin, how many people worth of skin does a person consume/inhale in a lifetime?&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;—Greg&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|You could inhale at most 3 gallons of human skin in a lifetime, and dust is not mostly dead skin. Instead it is a cursed salad of soil, pollen, cotton fibers, crumbs, powdered sugar, glitter, pet hair and dander, plastic, soot, human or animal hair, flour, glass, smoke, mites, and various miscellaneous gunk. &lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|{{book|2|45}}&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|'''Candy Crush Lightning'''&lt;br /&gt;
|''&amp;quot;How many Wint-O-Green Life Savers would it take to create a life-size lightning bolt if you crushed them&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;—Violet M.&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|Billions&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|{{book|2|46}}&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|rowspan=&amp;quot;13&amp;quot;|&lt;br /&gt;
|rowspan=&amp;quot;13&amp;quot;|'''Short Answers #4'''&lt;br /&gt;
|''&amp;quot;Can humans safely eat rabid creatures?&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;—Winston&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|No.&lt;br /&gt;
|rowspan=&amp;quot;13&amp;quot;|&lt;br /&gt;
|rowspan=&amp;quot;13&amp;quot;{{book|2|46.5}} (S4)&lt;br /&gt;
|rowspan=&amp;quot;13&amp;quot;|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''&amp;quot;What if the Earth's core suddenly stopped producing heat?&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;—Laura&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|We would be mostly fine. While one may picture a scenario similar to ''The Core'', the difference would only be noticed long after you're gone, so you don't really need to worry about it :)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''&amp;quot;Could humanity, with our current technology, destroy the Moon?&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;—Tyler&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|No.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''&amp;quot;Can global warming cause the Earth's magnetic fields to weaken?&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;—Pavaki&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|No.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''&amp;quot;If you used a laser, would you be able to bake something?&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;—Andrew Liu&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|Yes.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''&amp;quot;What if Earth was sliced in half, like an apple? Where should you be such that you have the best chance of survival?&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;—Anonymous&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|You should be holding the object that's slicing the Earth.&amp;lt;!-- The answer here is just a picture, this is an attempt at describing how I see it --&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''&amp;quot;What would happen if a person dropped into a pool full of jellyfish?&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;—Lorenzo Belotti&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|It depends on the species.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''&amp;quot;Would it be possible to make a house floor into a massive air hockey table, so you could move heavy furniture across the room?&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;—Jacob Wood&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|Yes, and now I know what my next home improvement project will be.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''&amp;quot;My 7-year-old son asked us over dinner recently at which point potatoes melt (I assume in a vacuum). Please advise.&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;—Steffen&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|Potatoes don't really melt at any temperature. Also, do you automatically add 'in a vacuum' to anything your son says?&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''&amp;quot;Would a pigeon be able to make it to space if it was not affected by gravity?&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;—Nick Evans&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|No. The air in the upper atmosphere is too thin to breathe and too cold&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''&amp;quot;If you were flying blind through the Milky Way what would be the odds of hitting a star or planet?&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;—David&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|If you flew edge-on, it would be about 1 in 10 billion.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''&amp;quot;On various bodies in our Solar System (feel free to group any that are equivalent), roughly how long could you survive on the surface (for gas giants, assume you are on a magical platform at some point in the atmosphere that you could reasonably treat as the surface) with nothing but an infinite air supply and warm winter clothing? That is, no helmet, no pressure suit, just a nose-and-mouth air mask attached to a magic air generator, and clothing that would be suitable for, say, Chicago in winter. (No cute tricks like using the magic air supply to generate heat or whatever.)&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;—Melissa Trible&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
*Earth: 100-ish years&lt;br /&gt;
*Venus: Weeks to months&lt;br /&gt;
*Everywhere else: Minutes to hours&lt;br /&gt;
Venus would be great if it weren't for the sulfuric acid.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''&amp;quot;What would happen if someone dropped an anvil on you from space?&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;—Sam Stiehl&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|About the same as if someone dropped an anvil on you from a building.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|'''Toasty Warm'''&lt;br /&gt;
|''&amp;quot;What if I want to heat my house using toasters. How many do I need?&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;—Peter Ahlström&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|Not many, because the house would quickly catch on fire.&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|{{book|2|47}}&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|'''Eyeball'''&lt;br /&gt;
|''&amp;quot;If I pulled out my eyeball and aimed it so that it was looking into my other eyeball, what would I see (assuming the nerves and veins remain undamaged)&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;—Lenka&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|You would see an eye superimposed with your head and the background of the room overlapping.&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|{{book|2|49}}&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|'''Japan Runs an Errand'''&lt;br /&gt;
|''&amp;quot;If ALL of Japan's islands disappear, would it affect Earth's natural phenomena (plates, oceans, hurricanes, climate, and so on)?&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;—Miyu Uchida&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|Yes, it most certainly would. The sea of Japan would mix with the Pacific ocean now that the wall that separated them is gone. This would cause unpredictable changes to those currents, affecting many life forms who live in that area. Japan, though being small, weighs quite a lot, and the sudden removal of all that weight would cause massive shifts in ocean levels. Depending on the region, some sea levels would rise/fall by up to a foot, causing mass panic for cities that now have a sudden risk of flooding at a moment's notice. Tsunamis would devastate the Korean Peninsula, Hawaii, and the west coast of America. &lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|{{book|2|50}}&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|'''Read All the Laws'''&lt;br /&gt;
|''&amp;quot;If a person wanted to read all of the governing documents that apply to them—from the federal and state constitutions, treaties, agency-issued regulations, federal and state laws, local ordinances, etc.—how many pages would they have to read?&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;—Keith Yearman&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|Between 145000 and 12.3 million pages.&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|{{book|2|52}}&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|rowspan=&amp;quot;3&amp;quot;|&lt;br /&gt;
|rowspan=&amp;quot;3&amp;quot;|'''Weird &amp;amp; Worrying #3'''&lt;br /&gt;
|colspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot;|''&amp;quot;If I were to jump into a container of liquid nitrogen (or dispose of a body that way), how deep would it have to be for me/them to shatter into frozen pieces at the bottom?&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;—Stella Wohnig&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|rowspan=&amp;quot;3&amp;quot;|&lt;br /&gt;
|rowspan=&amp;quot;3&amp;quot;{{book|2|52.5}} (W3)&lt;br /&gt;
|rowspan=&amp;quot;3&amp;quot;|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|colspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot;|''&amp;quot;What would happen to you if a colony of ants suddenly appeared in you bloodstream all at once?&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;—Matt, on behalf of Declan&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|colspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot;|''&amp;quot;If Harry Potter forgets where the invisible entrance to Platform 9¾ is, how long would he have to crash into walls randomly before discovering it?&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;—Max Planker&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|'''Snowball'''&lt;br /&gt;
|''&amp;quot;What if I tried to roll a snowball from the top of Mount Everest? How big would the snowball be by the time it reached the bottom and how long would it take?&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;—Michaeline Yates&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|It would remain about the same size, or it could cause an avalanche. Since the peak of {{w|Mount Everest}} is above the clouds, it is very dry there. For a snowball to grow, wet snow is required. The result would be similar to rolling a hamburger down. &lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|{{book|2|54}}&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|'''Walking Backward in Time'''&lt;br /&gt;
|''&amp;quot;What if you decided to walk from Austin, Texas, to New York City, but every step takes you back thirty days?&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;—Jojo Yawson&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
| The sky would flicker at 50 Hz, and you would arrive around 300,000 years in the past.&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|{{book|2|56}}&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|'''Ammonia Tube'''&lt;br /&gt;
|''&amp;quot;What would happen if you fed ammonia into your stomach through a tube? How fast must the flow rate be to burn your stomach from the heat released? What would the newly created chlorine gas do to your stomach?&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;—Becca&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|{{w|Ammonia}} is an {{w|EPA list of extremely hazardous substances|extremely hazardous substance}} and pumping it into your abdomen would result in a painful death due to ammonia toxicity. However, at the very least, some of it would be neutralized with your stomach acid.&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|{{book|2|57}}&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|rowspan=&amp;quot;7&amp;quot;|&lt;br /&gt;
|rowspan=&amp;quot;7&amp;quot;|'''Short Answers #5'''&lt;br /&gt;
|''&amp;quot;Could life evolve in a constantly running microwave?&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;—Abby Doth&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|No.&lt;br /&gt;
|rowspan=&amp;quot;7&amp;quot;|&lt;br /&gt;
|rowspan=&amp;quot;7&amp;quot;{{book|2|58.5}} (S5)&lt;br /&gt;
|rowspan=&amp;quot;7&amp;quot;|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''&amp;quot;Tonight at my work as an ER nurse in the emergency room, a patient (high on methamphetamine) asked for a cup of water. I returned with a paper cup of water, which the patient promptly threw at my head, missing me but hitting the wall in such an improbable way that the open top of the cup impacted the wall and the cup contained/diminished most of the subsequent splatter. It occurred to me that it might be possible to throw a cup of water hard enough that the container of water would go through the wall. Is this possible?&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;—Pete&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|Anything will go through a wall if you throw it hard enough&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''&amp;quot;How slow would you have to chew in order to be able to infinitely consume breadsticks?&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;—Miller Broughton&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|You would have to divide each breadstick into 20 bites, chewing each bite 200 times at 1 chew per second.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''&amp;quot;If you were somehow to remove the white and yolk from inside an eggshell (chicken), and replace them with helium, would the eggshell float in the air?&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;—Elizabeth&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|No. An eggshell weighs more than the air it displaces.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''&amp;quot;What would stars smell like, if it were possible to smell them?&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;—Finn Ellis&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|Due to the free hydrogen molecules floating around in there, it would taste incredibly sour. It would also smell like burning rubber, as stars are made up of the same components.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''&amp;quot;What is the average size for every man-made object on the planet?&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;—Max Carver&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|Not too big, not too small. About average.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''&amp;quot;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;lt;wbr&amp;gt;E&amp;quot;''&amp;lt;!-- 960 E's --&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;—Nate Yu&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|I feel you, Nate. [Editor's note: Nate's &amp;quot;question&amp;quot; is composed of 960 letters E]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|'''Dog Overload'''&lt;br /&gt;
|''&amp;quot;Assuming 1 out of every 4 people has a 5-year-old dog, and the dog reproduces once every year, with 5 puppies, and the puppies start reproducing at 5 and stop at 15 and die at 20, how long would it take for the Earth to be flooded with puppies, assuming we have all the food, water, and oxygen to sustain them?&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;—Griffin&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|This is unrealistic right from the start. This assumes the total dog population is 2 billion, which is well above current estimates. A timeline of major events and milestones is listed below. &lt;br /&gt;
*After one year, there are enough dogs for everyone to have at least one.&lt;br /&gt;
*After 5 years, every human has an average of 6 or 7 dogs. &lt;br /&gt;
*After 11 years, Disney releases ''101 Dalmations per Capita'', after there are 101 dogs per person&lt;br /&gt;
*After 15 years, the first dogs die, but the death is fully insignificant.&lt;br /&gt;
*After 20 years, dogs would only be about 1 meter apart on average.&lt;br /&gt;
*After 25-30 years, the dogs begin to stack.&lt;br /&gt;
*At about 40 years, the exponential growth is &amp;quot;stable&amp;quot;. The population is multiplying by about 1.6578 each year.&lt;br /&gt;
*After 65 years, the population of dogs reaches 1 mol&lt;br /&gt;
*After 110 years, the dogs start to undergo relativistic collapse&lt;br /&gt;
*After 150 years, the dogs are bigger than the solar system.&lt;br /&gt;
*After 197 years, the expansion of the dog sphere surpasses 1''c''&lt;br /&gt;
*After 200 years, the dogs reach sirius.&lt;br /&gt;
*After 250 years, the dogs envelop the milky way.&lt;br /&gt;
*After 330 years, the dogs reach the edge of the observable universe.&lt;br /&gt;
*After 417 years, Disney releases ''10&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;101&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; Dalmations.''&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|{{book|2|60}}&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|'''Sunscreen'''&lt;br /&gt;
|''&amp;quot;Assuming that SPF works as it purports, what SPF would you need for a 1-hour trip to the surface of the s&amp;lt;!--DO NOT CAPITALISE THE &amp;quot;s&amp;quot;: This is how it's written on the site, it should not be changed.--&amp;gt;un?&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;—Brian and Max Parker&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|You would need SPF 3,200,000 or a giant blob of sunscreen. Despite its name, sunscreen only protects against some types of radiation from the Sun. No amount is going to be adequate protection if you are right inside the Sun. Also, sunscreen, being a gel, would evaporate when exposed to vacuum. When exposed to the plasma of the coronal surface or the Sun's interior, it would quickly ionize along with anything inside it, becoming plasma like the rest of the Sun.&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|{{book|2|62}}&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|'''Walking on the Sun'''&lt;br /&gt;
|''&amp;quot;After the Sun runs out of fuel, it will become a white dwarf and slowly cool. When will it be cool enough to touch?&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;—Jabari Garland&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|The Sun will cool to room temperature in about 20 billion years. However, getting there to actually touch it is the hard part. The immense gravity the changed star still has would create a major problem for any attempt to land on and touch it. Even the most powerful propulsion would not be able to escape the pull of the Sun's gravity, making it nigh impossible for any currently theorised craft to reach the Sun and survive, let alone let you touch it 'safely'.&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|{{book|2|63}}&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|'''Lemon Drops and Gumdrops'''&lt;br /&gt;
|''&amp;quot;What if all the raindrops were lemon drops and gumdrops?&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;—Shuo Peskoe-Yang&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|Replacing all rain in the world would have devastating conseqeunces, especially with such dry candies as lemon drops and gumdrops. The water cycle would be destroyed, arable land would become unusable, and the ocean the would dry up. Humanity would perish in this wasteland-like scenario, probably hopped up on sugar.&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|{{book|2|64}}&lt;br /&gt;
| &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|'''Bonus Chapter'''&lt;br /&gt;
|''&amp;quot;..&amp;lt;!-- This is how it's written in the book, don't turn it into an ellipsis --&amp;gt;.but what if we tried even ''more'' power?&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;—Randall Munroe&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
| This is a continuation of {{what if|13|13: Laser Pointer}}. Adding even more power than the end of that article would heat the air so much that the lasers would stop themselves long before reaching the Moon. Even if we managed to get them to hit the Moon, the plasma created would be so hot that it would stop anyway.&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|{{book|3|70}}&lt;br /&gt;
|{{book|19|2024|12|03|jgafb8G7i4o|But what if we tried MORE power?}}&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|}&amp;lt;noinclude&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;span id=&amp;quot;Editors&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;big&amp;gt;&amp;lt;big&amp;gt;'''Editors'''&amp;lt;/big&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/big&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt; ㅤ ''[[#Article index|(jump back to table)]]''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
These templates are used in this table: {{tl|what if}}, {{tl|What If}}, {{tl|book}}, {{tl|blog}}.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;big&amp;gt;'''Add YouTube video'''&amp;lt;/big&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{book|YT-NUMBER|YYYY|MM|DD|&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;SeaGreen&amp;quot;&amp;gt;'''''&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;HTTPS://LINK&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;'''''&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;|VIDEO-TITLE}}&lt;br /&gt;
 '''EXAMPLE:''' &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{book|&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;SeaGreen&amp;quot;&amp;gt;'''''2'''''&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;|&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;SeaGreen&amp;quot;&amp;gt;'''''2022'''''&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;|&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;SeaGreen&amp;quot;&amp;gt;'''''12'''''&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;|&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;SeaGreen&amp;quot;&amp;gt;'''''31'''''&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;|&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;SeaGreen&amp;quot;&amp;gt;'''''https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2LSyNhb5Y'''''&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;|&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;SeaGreen&amp;quot;&amp;gt;'''''What if everyone pointed a laser at the m&amp;lt;!--DO NOT CAPITALISE THE &amp;quot;m&amp;quot;: This is how it's written on the site, it should not be changed.--&amp;gt;oon?'''''&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;big&amp;gt;'''Add book chapter'''&amp;lt;/big&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For the first [[What If? (book)|What If? book]]:&lt;br /&gt;
 &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{book|&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;SeaGreen&amp;quot;&amp;gt;'''''1'''''&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;|&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;SeaGreen&amp;quot;&amp;gt;'''''CHAPTER-NUMBER'''''&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For the second [[What If? 2]] book:&lt;br /&gt;
 &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{book|&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;SeaGreen&amp;quot;&amp;gt;'''''2'''''&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;|&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;SeaGreen&amp;quot;&amp;gt;'''''CHAPTER-NUMBER'''''&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
 '''EXAMPLE:'''&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{book|&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;SeaGreen&amp;quot;&amp;gt;'''''2'''''&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;|&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;SeaGreen&amp;quot;&amp;gt;'''''69'''''&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If an article is available exclusively on the third book ([[What If? 10th Anniversary Edition]]) and not in the first two, use this:&lt;br /&gt;
 &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{book|&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;SeaGreen&amp;quot;&amp;gt;'''''3'''''&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;|&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;SeaGreen&amp;quot;&amp;gt;'''''CHAPTER-NUMBER'''''&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;big&amp;gt;'''Link to a ''what if?'' article'''&amp;lt;/big&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On this wiki, an easy way to link to a given ''what if?'' article is by using the {{Template|what if}} template. Copy and paste the text below, correcting the number and title (highlighted in green) to get this result:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 '''EXAMPLE:'''&lt;br /&gt;
 See the &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;''[[what if? (blog)|what if?]]'' article ''{{what if|&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;SeaGreen&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ins&amp;gt;'''''158'''''&amp;lt;/ins&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;|&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;SeaGreen&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ins&amp;gt;'''''Hot Banana'''''&amp;lt;/ins&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;}}&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;''&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
 '''RESULTS IN:'''&lt;br /&gt;
 See the ''[[what if? (blog)|what if?]]'' article ''{{what if|158|Hot Banana}}''.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
NOTE: Since the blog releases are now random, please write a comment on [[{{LATESTCOMIC}}#Discussion|the newest comic's talk page]] to announce that a new ''what if?'' article is out.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;big&amp;gt;'''Add name of reader who asked the question.'''&amp;lt;/big&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Here's how to add the name(s) to any question on the table. For example, this...&lt;br /&gt;
 &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;|''&amp;quot;What if all the raindrops were lemon drops and gumdrops?&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
|Human civilization would collapse, and we would all die.&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
... becomes this:&lt;br /&gt;
 &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;|''&amp;quot;What if all the raindrops were lemon drops and gumdrops?&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;'''—'''&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;SeaGreen&amp;quot;&amp;gt;'''''InsertNamesHere'''''&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|Human civilization would collapse, and we would all die.&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Copy the code and replace the green part! (NOTE: It uses the em-dash, not a normal hyphen, so don't replace the dash, or use &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;amp;amp;mdash;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;.) Transcribe it exactly as it is written on the website or book, including parenthesis and age, if given by Randall. '''Protip for desktop users:''' the text looks ALL CAPS on the site, but if you copy and paste it, it's in normal Sentence Case. You can simply copy and paste.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''[[#Article index|(jump back to table)]]''&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;span id=&amp;quot;bottom&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{| style=&amp;quot;border: 1px solid {{{border|gray}}}; background-color: {{{color|#fdffe7}}};&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|rowspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;vertical-align:middle;&amp;quot; | {{{{{|safesubst:}}}#ifeq:{{{2}}}|alt|[[File:What If Barnstar.jpeg|100px]]|[[File:What If Barnstar.jpeg|100px]]}}&lt;br /&gt;
|rowspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; |&lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;font-size: x-large; padding: 0; vertical-align: middle; height: 1.1em;&amp;quot; | '''The What If? Project Barnstar'''&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;&amp;quot; | &amp;lt;div style=&amp;quot;font-family: Cormorant Garamond&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-size:5pt;color:black&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;background-color:#9eff9e;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:green; font-size:1.4em;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;'''&amp;amp;nbsp;✓'''&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;big&amp;gt;&amp;amp;nbsp;'''Added:&amp;amp;nbsp;'''&amp;lt;/big&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt; All ~140 book-exclusive articles, each color-coded by book; reader question and Randall's answer for almost all ~70 [[What If? 2]]-exclusive articles; EVERY YouTube video and its associated article; over new 130 thumbnails uploaded; new article from [[What If? 10th Anniversary Edition|the new book]] and the [[what if? (blog)#top|deleted article]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;background-color:#9eff9e;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:green; font-size:1.4em;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;'''&amp;amp;nbsp;✓'''&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;big&amp;gt;&amp;amp;nbsp;'''Changes:&amp;amp;nbsp;'''&amp;lt;/big&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt; Merged columns No., Release date, and Weeks since last release; every column now easily sortable; columns Blog, Book (new), and YouTube (new) now use {{template|blog}} and {{template|book}} and are color-coded; split ''Short-Answer Sections'' into different cells; title bold and question italics and quoted!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Great Job to everyone who helped out on this project! If you helped out explain the articles or build the table, feel free to sign here: '''[[User:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:5pt;color:#A9C6CA&amp;quot;&amp;gt;42.book.addict&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:2pt;color:#516874&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Talk to me!&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;''' 17:44, 14 February 2025 (UTC), [[User:WriterArtistCoder|WriterArtistCoder]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:WriterArtistCoder|talk to me]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 21:56, 11 March 2025 (UTC), [[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 15:53, 12 March 2025 (UTC) --'''''[[User:DollarStoreBa'al |&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Atomic Age;font-size:5pt;color:red;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;DollarStoreBa'al&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:DollarStoreBa'al |'''''Converse''''']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;[[DSBContribs |'''''My life choices''''']] 23:30, 14 June 2025 (UTC&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:What If?| 9]]{{xkcdmeta}}&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>42.book.addict</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:3240:_Bottle&amp;diff=411540</id>
		<title>Talk:3240: Bottle</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:3240:_Bottle&amp;diff=411540"/>
				<updated>2026-05-01T19:15:10Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;42.book.addict: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&amp;lt;!-- Please sign your posts with ~~~~ and don't delete this text. New comments should be added at the bottom. --&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
First P0st! [[Special:Contributions/2A02:6B6F:E226:B00:70BF:8626:D782:45BE|2A02:6B6F:E226:B00:70BF:8626:D782:45BE]] 18:40, 1 May 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
So... is the meniscus drawn correctly, given the difference in shape of the front vs the back of the bottle???  [[User:BorQhue del Sol|BorQhue del Sol]] ([[User talk:BorQhue del Sol|talk]]) 18:54, 1 May 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Left-hand threads on bottle. Why? --[[User:PRR|PRR]] ([[User talk:PRR|talk]]) 18:49, 1 May 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
this transcript is a work of art. [[user:lett‪herebedarklight|raeb]] 18:54, 1 May 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Is part of the joke of the alt text the fact that he could easily fit into the bottle at his current age? [[Special:Contributions/24.244.70.174|24.244.70.174]] 18:58, 1 May 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If he sailed in when he was very young, does that mean the ship grew up with beret guy? [[User:Commercialegg|Commercialegg]] ([[User talk:Commercialegg|talk]]) 18:59, 1 May 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:That does seem to be what he's implying. When he sailed in, the boat must have been small enough to get through the bottleneck. [[User:Barmar|Barmar]] ([[User talk:Barmar|talk]]) 19:15, 1 May 2026 (UTC)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>42.book.addict</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=3240:_Bottle&amp;diff=411538</id>
		<title>3240: Bottle</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=3240:_Bottle&amp;diff=411538"/>
				<updated>2026-05-01T19:14:54Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;42.book.addict: + 4 categories using HotCat&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{comic&lt;br /&gt;
| number    = 3240&lt;br /&gt;
| date      = May 1, 2026&lt;br /&gt;
| title     = Bottle&lt;br /&gt;
| image     = bottle_2x.png&lt;br /&gt;
| imagesize = 581x235px&lt;br /&gt;
| noexpand  = true&lt;br /&gt;
| titletext = &amp;quot;I know it seems impossible, but the trick is that I sailed in here when I was very young.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Explanation==&lt;br /&gt;
{{incomplete|This page was bottled recently. Don't remove the cork too soon.}}&lt;br /&gt;
This comic shows a life sized ship in a bottle sailing along other sail boats in the sea. The humor comes from the surreality of the situation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In this comic, [[Beret Guy]] is inside a [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Impossible_bottle#Ship_in_a_bottle ship in a bottle]. A common question when one sees one is &amp;quot;how was it put inside the bottle&amp;quot;, due to the small size of the opening in the bottle compared to the ship. The answer is that the ship was assembled within the bottle. The title text alludes to this, by saying that Beret Guy grew up inside the bottle to fit (however, this is nonsensical, as he could likely fit into the bottle anyway).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Transcript==&lt;br /&gt;
{{incomplete transcript|Don't remove this notice too soon.}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[Three small single-masted sailboats are shown, all sailing towards the right. On the left, Cueball and Megan are in one boat; Cueball is near the stern, possibly holding the tiller, while Megan is aft of the mast. In the middle, Beret Guy is aft of the mast in a boat that's inside a giant bottle, with a cork plugging the spout. On the right, Ponytail is sitting right behind of the mast of the third boat. All the boats are sitting on the water with ripples on the surface. Due to diffraction, the waster level behind the bottle appears to be lower than the rest.]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{comic discussion}}&amp;lt;noinclude&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Comics featuring Cueball]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Comics featuring Megan]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Comics featuring Beret Guy]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Comics featuring Ponytail]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>42.book.addict</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=explain_xkcd:Community_portal/Proposals&amp;diff=411512</id>
		<title>explain xkcd:Community portal/Proposals</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=explain_xkcd:Community_portal/Proposals&amp;diff=411512"/>
				<updated>2026-05-01T16:31:54Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;42.book.addict: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&amp;lt;noinclude&amp;gt;{{Community links}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{|-&lt;br /&gt;
|valign=&amp;quot;top&amp;quot; width=&amp;quot;100%&amp;quot;|[[File:Crystal Clear app ktip.png|left|120px]] &amp;lt;big&amp;gt;&amp;lt;big&amp;gt;&amp;lt;b&amp;gt;Proposals&amp;lt;/b&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/big&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/big&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Place for ideas and suggestions to improve the wiki's design and organization on general issues can be&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;incubated for later submission for consensus discussion. Be sure to check whether your proposal has already been submitted. &amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;{{AddNewSection|Page=Explain XKCD:Community portal/Proposals|Text=&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;(+post)&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
|}&amp;lt;/noinclude&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==ARCHIVED DISCUSSIONS==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;plainlinks&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;background:#edf6ff; border:1px solid #a7d7f9; margin:1em auto 1em auto; width:100%; font-size: 120%; padding: 0.5ex; text-align: center;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Most of the discussions on this page have been archived. The archive is available at '''[[explain xkcd talk:Community portal/Proposals]]'''.&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Removing unnecessary 3-comic categories? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I count eight categories on explainxkcd that satisfy the following properties: 1. They have only three comics in them. 2. They aren't really a comic series; they just feature or reference a comic theme. 3. They aren't Featuring some person or character. In short, they seem to have no real reason to exist. (They're [[:Category:Spice_Girls|t]][[:Category:Wind_turbine|h]]e[[:Category:Ender%27s_Game|s]]o[[:Category:FernGully|n]][[:Category:Giraffes|e]]s.) So my proposal: remove them. -[[User:Account|Account]] ([[User talk:Account|talk]]) 20:37, 9 November 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:In addition, there are [[:Category:Sketches|t]][[:Category:BSD|h]][[:Category:Emacs|i]][[:Category:Identity_Theft|r]][[:Category:Katamari_Damacy|t]][[:Category:Super_Bowl|e]][[:Category:The_Matrix|e]][[:Category:Tournament_bracket|n]][[:Category:Traffic_light| ]][[:Category:Trebuchet|m]][[:Category:Wingsuit|o]][[:Category:Euler_diagrams|r]][[:Category:Pedantic|e]] four-comic categories that also seem rather in need of deletion.&lt;br /&gt;
:: Shouldn't the community at least have some time to expand on these categories, in case they're currently incomplete? For example, [[:Category:The Matrix]] is on your list and now contains 7 strips, and [[:Category:Tournament bracket]] got its 5th entry after your post. Even if they're not, a theme category can save some typing in the search box (and is probably also cheaper in terms of server resources than all the searches it'll eliminate). [[User:Promethean|Promethean]] ([[User talk:Promethean|talk]]) 22:43, 21 November 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::So what do you think the limit should be for categories? Should we create a category when two comics mention the same topic? Three? --[[User:Account|Account]] ([[User talk:Account|talk]]) 16:28, 22 November 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::::Three seems reasonable to me, and I could see a case being made for two. Categories aren't expensive. [[User:Promethean|Promethean]] ([[User talk:Promethean|talk]]) 00:17, 23 November 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== New transcript ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The transcripts in the comic pages are quite inconsistent, especially in the brackets where you have to describe what happens in the panels. If I understand correctly, the transcripts are for people to copy the text in the comic without having to type them out. If that's the case, then I think propose a new transcript. This transcript should have the comic with the words erased, and then the copy-pasteable words on top of that. Such a transcript would have no room for error, which would let anyone contribute to a seamless transcript.&lt;br /&gt;
:The aim of the transcript is to provide a text-only version of the comic that would allow someone who is visually impaired to use a text-to-speech converter to understand the comic and also in a machine readable format for searching (see the [[explain_xkcd:Editor_FAQ#What_is_the_format_of_the_transcript_section?|Editor FAQ]]). Anything using mark-up, images or anything other than plain text will interfere with this and so should be avoided in the transcript. [[User:A(l)Chemist|AlChemist]] ([[User talk:A(l)Chemist|talk]]) 18:22, 23 November 2019 (UTC)User_talk:DollarStoreBa'al&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Add title text and heading to transcript section ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It has always bothered me that the transcript did not include the title text since it contributes so much to the humor of the comics. Also, it looks to me like the comic heading is sometimes included as part of the transcript and sometimes left out. I checked the previous proposals and did not see any discussion of these issues. Please consider having a policy going forward of including the heading and the title text within the transcript. [[User:Rtanenbaum|Rtanenbaum]] ([[User talk:Rtanenbaum|talk]]) 22:43, 1 January 2020 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:To my understanding (and also others, see discussion directly above) one of the main points of the transcript is to make the comics searchable, the other is, to make it readable when images are not an option. In both cases the comic's name and the title text mentioned above and below the image should be sufficient. I personally think this convention is fine. [[User:Lupo|Lupo]] ([[User talk:Lupo|talk]]) 08:28, 2 January 2020 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Pardon me -- (and, '''&amp;lt;big&amp;gt;''thanks'' for your patience&amp;lt;/big&amp;gt;''') -- if this is too off-topic (/slash &amp;quot;boring&amp;quot;) or [[wikt:TMI|TMI]] (see {{w|Information overload#Web accuracy}} e.g.), '''...OR''' if this should have been posted elsewhere ...instead of here. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::IMHO the term '''&amp;quot;title text&amp;quot;''' is a misnomer. I think the term is used to refer to the little (or, '''BIG!''') pop-up -- (kinda like what is sometimes called a &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;quot;tooltip&amp;quot;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;, but ... aren't those usually pretty '''small?''') -- that appears when one &amp;quot;hovers&amp;quot; his mouse [pointer] over an XKCD cartoon. ...at least, according to '''the &amp;quot;Talk:&amp;quot; page section''' [[Template talk:comic#The template field called .22titletext.22]] which was added almost 3 years ago. I think that calling it a &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;quot;BONUS text&amp;quot;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt; would be even better than calling it a &amp;quot;caption&amp;quot;. However, [to me], '''either one''' of those terms would make sense ''WAY'' more than calling it a '''&amp;quot;title text&amp;quot;''' ... for reasons which are stated in the [Template] &amp;quot;Talk:&amp;quot; page section mentioned (and ... '''LINKED TO''') above.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;'''&amp;lt;big&amp;gt;Any Comments?  .  .  ''' *** Thanks! *** for listening!&amp;lt;/big&amp;gt; --[[User:Mike Schwartz|Mike Schwartz]] ([[User talk:Mike Schwartz|talk]]) 08:57, 7 April 2020 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Hi Mike, I see your point, and yes, something like &amp;quot;bonus text&amp;quot; might be a bit more descriptive.  But FWIW, I think the reason it's called &amp;quot;title text&amp;quot; is because that's the text that appears in the &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;[https://www.w3schools.com/tags/att_global_title.asp title]&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt; attribute of the HTML &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;[https://www.w3schools.com/tags/tag_img.asp &amp;amp;lt;img&amp;amp;gt;]&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt; tag of the comic's image on the xkcd.com site.  For example, at https://xkcd.com/2364/, the code for the comic image looks like this:&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;pre&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;img src=&amp;quot;//imgs.xkcd.com/comics/parity_conservation.png&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
     title=&amp;quot;Bloody Mary is made of antimatter. It explains so much.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
     alt=&amp;quot;Parity Conservation&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
     srcset=&amp;quot;//imgs.xkcd.com/comics/parity_conservation_2x.png 2x&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/pre&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:::In there, you can see the title text as &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;title=&amp;quot;Bloody Mary is made of antimatter. It explains so much.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;  See [[title text|here]] for more explanation about that, and some discussions about it [[explain xkcd:Community portal/Miscellaneous#Common mistake|here]].  – [[User:Yfmcpxpj|Yfmcpxpj]] ([[User talk:Yfmcpxpj|talk]]) 03:11, 29 September 2020 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::: While the current layout suits the first purpose (ease of search), I would argue that having the &amp;quot;title text&amp;quot; come before in the page layout, and in a completely different section, makes it fail the second (accessibility). Often the contents of the title text are a continuation of the humour in the strip, so it's about as useful as having the explanation ahead of the transcript as far as accessibility is concerned. My suggestion on this matter is to either a) move the transcript to the top of the content, maybe within a collapse section or b) not claim it for accessibility.&lt;br /&gt;
::: As for the secondary topic, I've seen it called &amp;quot;Author Text&amp;quot; before, as it is text by the author and most people won't care what the element attribute is named. [[Special:Contributions/64.114.211.89|64.114.211.89]] 06:55, 18 November 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Wikipedia links. ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I think the links to Wikipedia should have symbols, so it's not confusing which ones lead to other comic pages.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== It's time to remove the HTTPS lock icon ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Explainxkcd should do the same thing that browser makers have done: treat HTTPS as the modern standard, and mark HTTP as the deviation instead.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Here are appropriate replacement icons:&lt;br /&gt;
 * https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Unlock_Icon_Red_(32_bit).png&lt;br /&gt;
 * https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Unlock_Icon_Red_(4_bit).gif&lt;br /&gt;
- [[User:Frankie|Frankie]] ([[User talk:Frankie|talk]]) 12:49, 16 May 2020 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== New page for Randall's regular column in the New York Times ==&lt;br /&gt;
Randall Munroe has been writing and illustrating a monthly science column in the New York Times.  I suggest a page in this Wiki, indexing those columns.  For some reason the New York Times itself does not provide such an index.  If they ever do add one, we would still have a topic article here, similar to the one we have for the What If blog, that could link to their index.  --[[User:JohnB|JohnB]] ([[User talk:JohnB|talk]]) 00:47, 11 June 2020 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
------&lt;br /&gt;
=== New York Times column: Good Question ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Good Question''' is a more-or-less monthly column written and illustrated by '''[[Randall|Randall Munroe]]'''  in the '''[https://www.nytimes.com/section/science Science section of the New York Times]''', beginning in November 2019.  The columns give serious answers to science questions, in Munroe's inimitable style.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The New York Times website ordinarily requires registration, and its content is always protected by copyright.  Most particularly it is ''not'' under [http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.5/ Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 2.5 License] the way [[xkcd]] is.  The good news: anyone can register for a free digital subscription to the New York Times, with access to 'recent' Science articles among some others, but outside of that only five articles per month.  See [https://archive.nytimes.com/www.nytimes.com/info/help/freesearch.html Free Articles].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Unlike for many of their other regular columnists, the New York Times does not provide a clickable link either on the byline '''Randall Munroe''' or on the column title '''Good Question'''.  The following tables are intended to correct that omission.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+ New York Times columns ''by'' Randall Munroe&lt;br /&gt;
! Column !! Headline !! Byline !! Date&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! SCIENCE&lt;br /&gt;
| [https://www.nytimes.com/2019/08/13/science/what-makes-a-red-sky-at-night-and-at-morning.html What Makes a Red Sky at Night (and at Morning)]&lt;br /&gt;
| Randall Munroe&lt;br /&gt;
| Aug. 13, 2019&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! GOOD QUESTION&lt;br /&gt;
| [https://www.nytimes.com/2019/11/12/science/randall-munroe-moon.html If I Touched the Moon, What Would It Feel Like?]&lt;br /&gt;
| Randall Munroe&lt;br /&gt;
| Nov. 12, 2019&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! GOOD QUESTION&lt;br /&gt;
| [https://nytimes.com/2019/12/10/science/earth-size-mass.html Is Earth Getting Bigger Over Time?]&lt;br /&gt;
| Randall Munroe&lt;br /&gt;
| Dec. 10, 2019&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! GOOD QUESTION&lt;br /&gt;
| [https://www.nytimes.com/2020/01/21/science/human-running-speed-quadruped.html How Fast Can a Human Run?]&lt;br /&gt;
| Randall Munroe&lt;br /&gt;
| Jan. 21, 2020 / Feb. 7, 2020&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! GOOD QUESTION&lt;br /&gt;
| [https://www.nytimes.com/2020/02/17/science/worst-odor-smell-thioacetone.html What’s the World’s Worst Smell?]&lt;br /&gt;
| Randall Munroe&lt;br /&gt;
| Feb. 17, 2020 / Feb. 26, 2020&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! GOOD QUESTION&lt;br /&gt;
| [https://nytimes.com/2020/03/10/science/question-randall-munroe-bobsled-gravity.html What if Galileo Had Dropped Bobsleds From the Tower of Pisa?]&lt;br /&gt;
| Randall Munroe&lt;br /&gt;
| March 10, 2020&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! GOOD QUESTION&lt;br /&gt;
| [https://www.nytimes.com/2020/04/07/science/pulsar-xkcd-munroe-stars.html How’s the View From a Spinning Star?]&lt;br /&gt;
| Randall Munroe&lt;br /&gt;
| April 7, 2020&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! GOOD QUESTION&lt;br /&gt;
| [https://www.nytimes.com/2020/05/11/science/traffic-barrier-rice-krispies.html What’s the Sweetest, Crispiest Way to Stay Safe in a Car Crash?]&lt;br /&gt;
| Randall Munroe&lt;br /&gt;
| May 11, 2020&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! GOOD QUESTION&lt;br /&gt;
| [https://www.nytimes.com/2020/06/09/science/randall-munroe-question-eggs.html Can You Boil an Egg Too Long?]&lt;br /&gt;
| Randall Munroe&lt;br /&gt;
| June 9, 2020&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! GOOD QUESTION&lt;br /&gt;
| [https://www.nytimes.com/2020/07/07/science/neutrinos-snowball-randall-munroe.html Could You Make a Snowball of Neutrinos?]&lt;br /&gt;
| Randall Munroe&lt;br /&gt;
| July 7, 2020&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+ New York Times columns ''about'' Randall Munroe&lt;br /&gt;
! Column !! Headline !! Byline !! Date&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! LINK BY LINK&lt;br /&gt;
| [https://www.nytimes.com/2008/05/26/business/media/26link.html This Is Funny Only if You Know Unix]&lt;br /&gt;
| Noam Cohen&lt;br /&gt;
| May 26, 2008&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! BITS&lt;br /&gt;
| [https://bits.blogs.nytimes.com/2014/03/14/techs-favorite-cartoonist-enters-mainstream-publishing/ Tech’s Favorite Cartoonist Enters Mainstream Publishing]&lt;br /&gt;
| Noam Cohen&lt;br /&gt;
| March 14, 2014&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! SCIENCE&lt;br /&gt;
| [https://www.nytimes.com/2014/11/04/science/randall-munroe-the-creator-of-xkcd-explains-complexity-through-absurdity.html He’s Glad You Asked]&lt;br /&gt;
| Kenneth Chang&lt;br /&gt;
| Nov. 3, 2014&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! BOOKS&lt;br /&gt;
| [https://www.nytimes.com/2015/11/24/books/randall-munroe-explains-it-all-for-us.html Randall Munroe Explains It All for Us]&lt;br /&gt;
| Alexandra Alter&lt;br /&gt;
| Nov. 23, 2015&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! SCIENCE&lt;br /&gt;
| [https://www.nytimes.com/2016/03/22/science/randall-munroe-xkcd-science-textbook.html Randall Munroe, XKCD Creator, Goes Back to High School]&lt;br /&gt;
| Kenneth Chang&lt;br /&gt;
| March 21, 2016&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! SCIENCE&lt;br /&gt;
| [https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2016/03/18/science/document-Munroepages.html Randall Munroe of ‘XKCD’ Explains the Human Body, Elevators and the Saturn 5]&lt;br /&gt;
| (Actual pages from '''{{w|Thing_Explainer|Thing&amp;amp;nbsp;Explainer}}''')&lt;br /&gt;
| March 21, 2016&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
------&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: Looks goods to me, you should probably make that an article of its own, maybe [[New York Times: Good Question]]? --[[User:SlashMe|SlashMe]] ([[User talk:SlashMe|talk]]) 22:58, 10 July 2020 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: {{notice|I went and added the page, here: [[New York Times: Good Question]] --[[User:JohnB|JohnB]] ([[User talk:JohnB|talk]]) 02:42, 11 July 2020 (UTC)}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Bring back the {{rw}} template! please ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Can someone restore the &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{rw}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt; template? I insist on its existence. I further assure that it will be of much use. It was deleted by an admin. &amp;lt;span&amp;gt; — [[User:Sqrt-1|The &amp;lt;b&amp;gt;𝗦𝗾𝗿𝘁-𝟭&amp;lt;/b&amp;gt;]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Sqrt-1|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color: blue&amp;quot;&amp;gt;talk&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]] [[Special:Contributions/Sqrt-1|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color: blue&amp;quot;&amp;gt;stalk&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt; 06:10, 29 September 2020 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:nm, did it myself.&amp;lt;span&amp;gt; — [[User:Sqrt-1|The &amp;lt;b&amp;gt;𝗦𝗾𝗿𝘁-𝟭&amp;lt;/b&amp;gt;]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Sqrt-1|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color: blue&amp;quot;&amp;gt;talk&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]] [[Special:Contributions/Sqrt-1|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color: blue&amp;quot;&amp;gt;stalk&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt; 04:15, 1 October 2020 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Link to high-resolution images? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The wiki includes the &amp;quot;standard&amp;quot; resolution images, but would it be worth adding a link to the higher-resolution image on each page?  It appears that this could be automated in at least a strong majority of cases: if the standard image is ''xyzzy.png'', the hi-res one is ''xyzzy'''_2x'''.png'' . [[User:BunsenH|BunsenH]] ([[User talk:BunsenH|talk]]) 22:10, 1 October 2020 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Please stop adding this to the explanations. This is not needed.  [[User:Kynde|Kynde]] ([[User talk:Kynde|talk]]) 08:56, 6 October 2020 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::The high-resolution image was quite useful in parsing the &amp;quot;Amelia's Farm Fresh Cookies&amp;quot; comic. I'm not convinced that the hi-res images are commonly known. I've been reading xkcd for about 7 years and hadn't heard about them until I stumbled across a mention of them in one of the Discussions here. What is the harm in having a one-line ''link'' here? -- not, I emphasize, the actual image, which would take up a great deal of space. [[User:BunsenH|BunsenH]] ([[User talk:BunsenH|talk]]) 17:00, 7 October 2020 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::I didn't know about the high-resolution images either.  While it might be a bit repetitive to add a full sentence to every comic's explanation, I agree that having ''some'' easy way to link to the hi-res image on xkcd.com could be handy.  For example, maybe a &amp;quot;hi-res&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;2x&amp;quot; button before the &amp;quot;Next &amp;gt;&amp;quot; button above the comic in [[Template:comic]]?  That's a bit extreme, but I added an example template, derived from the existing [[Template:comic]], to demonstrate how that could work:&lt;br /&gt;
:::* Template: [[User:Yfmcpxpj/Template:comic 2x test]]&lt;br /&gt;
:::* Demo: [[User:Yfmcpxpj/Sandbox#2x comic template test]]&lt;br /&gt;
:::With those changes to the template, for all comics as of [[1084]] the &amp;quot;2x&amp;quot; button would automatically appear.  (No need to go back and change all comics.)  This assumes the images hosted on explainxkcd generally have the same filename as on xkcd.com, but there are optional parameters to override the filename or omit the &amp;quot;2x&amp;quot; button altogether for specific exceptions.  I'm not suggesting we actually go ahead and implement this; but if there was enough interest, an admin would be needed anyway, to make the changes within [[Template:comic]], which is currently protected.  – [[User:Yfmcpxpj|Yfmcpxpj]] ([[User talk:Yfmcpxpj|talk]]) 23:25, 11 October 2020 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::::FWIW, I like this. [[User:BunsenH|BunsenH]] ([[User talk:BunsenH|talk]]) 20:25, 12 October 2020 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::My proposal is that a bot should add it automatically to the description of each comic image when available so that it does not take up space anywhere and is easily accessible.&amp;lt;span&amp;gt; — [[User:Sqrt-1|The &amp;lt;b&amp;gt;𝗦𝗾𝗿𝘁-𝟭&amp;lt;/b&amp;gt;]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Sqrt-1|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color: blue&amp;quot;&amp;gt;talk&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]] [[Special:Contributions/Sqrt-1|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color: blue&amp;quot;&amp;gt;stalk&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt; 13:49, 8 February 2021 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Proposal to replace the top section with this... ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I have come up with a new design for the top section of all community portals...&lt;br /&gt;
It’s located here... https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=explain_xkcd:Sandbox&amp;amp;oldid=199882 &amp;lt;span&amp;gt; — [[User:Sqrt-1|The &amp;lt;b&amp;gt;𝗦𝗾𝗿𝘁-𝟭&amp;lt;/b&amp;gt;]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Sqrt-1|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color: blue&amp;quot;&amp;gt;talk&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]] [[Special:Contributions/Sqrt-1|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color: blue&amp;quot;&amp;gt;stalk&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt; 14:15, 15 October 2020 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;hr/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{|-&lt;br /&gt;
|valign=&amp;quot;top&amp;quot; width=&amp;quot;80%&amp;quot;|[[File:Crystal Clear app ktip.png|left|120px]] &amp;lt;big&amp;gt;&amp;lt;big&amp;gt;&amp;lt;b&amp;gt;Proposals&amp;lt;/b&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/big&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/big&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Ideas to improve the wiki's design and organization can be added here.&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt; {{AddNewSection|Page=Explain XKCD:Community portal/Proposals|Text=&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;(+post)&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|valign=&amp;quot;top&amp;quot; xalign=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot; width=&amp;quot;100%&amp;quot;|[[File:Crystal Clear app package settings blue.png|50px|link=https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php/explain_xkcd:Community_portal/Technical]][[File:Crystal Clear teamwork.png|50px|link=https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php/explain_xkcd:Community_portal/Coordination]][[File:Mop.svg|50px|link=https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php/explain_xkcd:Community_portal/Admin_requests]][[File:Internet-group-chat.svg|50px|link=https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php/explain_xkcd:Community_portal/Miscellaneous]]&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== I made a template for welcoming new users. ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{Welcome}}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;hr/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Any ideas? Suggestions? Objections?&amp;lt;span&amp;gt; — [[User:Sqrt-1|The &amp;lt;b&amp;gt;𝗦𝗾𝗿𝘁-𝟭&amp;lt;/b&amp;gt;]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Sqrt-1|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color: blue&amp;quot;&amp;gt;talk&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]] [[Special:Contributions/Sqrt-1|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color: blue&amp;quot;&amp;gt;stalk&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt; 16:35, 13 December 2020 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
: this is now in at the top of the Main Page --[[User:Jeff|&amp;lt;b&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;orange&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Jeff&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/b&amp;gt;]] ([[User talk:Jeff|talk]]) 16:38, 5 February 2021 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::Why? This looks like a template intended for (newly created) UserPages. And it replaces interesting data from the frontpage with something not useful for casual visitors (or even non-casual lurkers). I'd undo this change in an instant if I had authority to do so. ((The template looks good, to clarify, just obviously not intended to be in that location.)) [[Special:Contributions/141.101.76.154|141.101.76.154]] 01:36, 6 February 2021 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::[[User: Jeff|Jeff]] is the owner of explainxkcd you dingus. &amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;text-shadow:0 0 7px black&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[[User:Beanie|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-size:11pt;color:#dddddd&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Beanie&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt; &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;text-shadow:0 0 4px #000000&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[[User talk:Beanie|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-size:8pt;color:#dddddd&amp;quot;&amp;gt;talk&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 13:46, 18 June 2021 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== comic groups ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
i think we should have a tech problems list of comics ( as there are quite a few)&lt;br /&gt;
:We already have a category for it. [[:Category:Cueball_Computer_Problems]].&amp;lt;span&amp;gt; — [[User:Sqrt-1|The &amp;lt;b&amp;gt;𝗦𝗾𝗿𝘁-𝟭&amp;lt;/b&amp;gt;]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Sqrt-1|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color: blue&amp;quot;&amp;gt;talk&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]] [[Special:Contributions/Sqrt-1|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color: blue&amp;quot;&amp;gt;stalk&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt; 13:44, 8 February 2021 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Archiving interactive comics? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Has the possibility of archiving interactive comics been discussed? Of course, users can view them on the original website, but it’d be nice to have a working backup of sorts, especially considering some of the interactive comics haven’t aged too well in terms of compatibility or support (e.g. Umwelt displays a blank page for me.)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It probably wouldn’t be possible to do so directly from mediawiki, but I’d be happy to experiment with cloning a few of them on another server, or as simple PHP pages that could be embedded, if it would help. Most of the interactive comics appear to be implemented mostly in client side JS anyways, so replicating them shouldn’t be too bad.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Tague|Tague]] ([[User talk:Tague|talk]]) 13:12, 29 April 2021 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Replace head shots of characters in the wiki with these new and high quality head shots! ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
https://www.reddit.com/r/xkcd/comments/n2u28r/i_took_head_shots_of_the_reccuring_characters_and/&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
These are not only upscaled, but are all squares and have all the features of the characters.&amp;lt;span&amp;gt; — [[User:Sqrt-1|The &amp;lt;b&amp;gt;𝗦𝗾𝗿𝘁-𝟭&amp;lt;/b&amp;gt;]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Sqrt-1|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color: blue&amp;quot;&amp;gt;talk&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]] [[Special:Contributions/Sqrt-1|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color: blue&amp;quot;&amp;gt;stalk&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt; 03:33, 2 May 2021 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:I think you should do it (because higher quality = better) :] &amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;text-shadow:0 0 7px black&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[[User:Beanie|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-size:11pt;color:#dddddd&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Beanie&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt; &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;text-shadow:0 0 4px #000000&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[[User talk:Beanie|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-size:8pt;color:#dddddd&amp;quot;&amp;gt;talk&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 13:42, 18 June 2021 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::There seemed to be no objections, so I went ahead and did it.&amp;lt;span&amp;gt; — [[User:Sqrt-1|The &amp;lt;b&amp;gt;𝗦𝗾𝗿𝘁-𝟭&amp;lt;/b&amp;gt;]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Sqrt-1|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color: blue&amp;quot;&amp;gt;talk&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]] [[Special:Contributions/Sqrt-1|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color: blue&amp;quot;&amp;gt;stalk&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt; 12:40, 21 November 2021 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Cleaning up [[Special:WantedTemplates|Special: Wanted Templates]] ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I decided to take a look at the list of wanted templates. Imagine my surprise when I see that a lot of the templates wanted were mis-capitalizations or misspellings of existing templates. I hereby request permission to create redirect pages for some of the most popular errors. &lt;br /&gt;
I intend to do five, wait a week, and do another five as to not spam the wiki. I will not begin for a week, at which point I will only proceed if nobody has said no OR a moderator has said yes. May I proceed? [[User talk:Quillathe Siannodel|&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;{)|(}&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;]][[User:Quillathe_Siannodel|Quill]][[Special:Contributions/Quillathe_Siannodel|&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;{)|(}&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;]] 11:34, 15 May 2021 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Knit Cap ==&lt;br /&gt;
Sometimes Knit cap has long hair, sometimes short. Is Knit Cap meant to be a male character that sometimes has long hair, or is Knit Cap sometimes female? I want to clear this up before I finish editing [[1350: Lorenz]]. &amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;text-shadow:0 0 7px black&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[[User:Beanie|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-size:11pt;color:#dddddd&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Beanie&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt; &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;text-shadow:0 0 4px #000000&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[[User talk:Beanie|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-size:8pt;color:#dddddd&amp;quot;&amp;gt;talk&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 13:40, 18 June 2021 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Hm, in the 'Enemy Pikachu used theft' scene in [[1350: Lorenz]], Knit Cap's hair looks merely slightly unkempt. From this, I will assume that Knit Cap just sometimes has long hair and is always male. &amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;text-shadow:0 0 6px black&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[[User:Beanie|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-size:11pt;color:#dddddd&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Beanie&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt; &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;text-shadow:0 0 3px #000000&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[[User talk:Beanie|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-size:8pt;color:#dddddd&amp;quot;&amp;gt;talk&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 13:10, 21 June 2021 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::Ok, the official transcripts say that Knit Cap is 'A guy in a knit cap'. I will take that to mean that Knit Cap is definitely male.&lt;br /&gt;
:::(Sorry for necroposting) Knit cap is shown to represent Randall's wife in the &amp;quot;X years&amp;quot; series, I assume that they are thusly female. {{unsigned|B for brain|15:07, 29 March 2026}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== We still need to complete some explanations like this one: ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I think should change the banner shown at the top of every page to show a comic that is still incomplete, like Hoverboard or something. [[User:Sure|Sure]] ([[User talk:Sure|talk]]) 21:32, 30 August 2021 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Update MediaWiki ==&lt;br /&gt;
explainxkcd is running MediaWiki 1.30.0, which reached end-of-life in June 2019. There are likely security issues because of this, so please update MediaWiki to the latest version (or LTS) using the instructions here https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Manual:Upgrading [[User:Cam1170|Cam1170]] ([[User talk:Cam1170|talk]]) 19:41, 26 September 2021 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:It seems like the mysql is too outdated for the upgrade [[User:Starstar|Starstar]] ([[User talk:Starstar|talk]]) 17:37, 26 November 2021 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::Upgrade MySQL then[[User:Aaron Liu|Aaron Liu]] ([[User talk:Aaron Liu|talk]]) 03:16, 20 July 2022 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
Does anybody know how to contact an admin for this? I have no clue. [[User:Cam1170|Cam1170]] ([[User talk:Cam1170|talk]]) 03:25, 13 December 2022 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Allow Users to Edit their own talk page if not auto confimed ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I can edit this page, but I can't create my own talk page! [[User:Starstar|Starstar]] ([[User talk:Starstar|talk]]) 17:34, 26 November 2021 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Upgrade Icons ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The icons look quite old fashion (the ones on the sidebar and the ones above the editing text area), could they be replaced? [[User:Starstar|Starstar]] ([[User talk:Starstar|talk]]) 23:07, 26 November 2021 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:They probably could be, but changing icons the moment they're not absolutely cutting-edge just means using new icons that are as easily edged-out (as tastes change yet again), meanwhile annoying those who prefered the first set and rather wouldn't see a revolving door of ever-evolving aesthetics.&lt;br /&gt;
:If I had a vote, I'd say keep the simple glyphs we're used to. If any are not totally obvious (perhaps some would not be, without the text captions) consider revising, but I think you'll get less agreement on what new images to use than that which would advocate the retention of the current ones.&lt;br /&gt;
:Alternately, it would definitely be on-theme to find Randall-drawn illustrations to replace them all. But the constraints of adapting (say) any particular stick-figure-world depiction of randonmess to ''meaningfully'' replace the current Random Page icon (at the same scale!) might be less than optimal.[[Special:Contributions/172.70.162.57|172.70.162.57]] 01:08, 27 November 2021 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Make searchbar not case-sensitive ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The way the search bar is currently set, it only suggests comic links when what is being typed is capitalized (&amp;quot;Assigning Numbers&amp;quot; rather than &amp;quot;assigning numbers&amp;quot; for instance). Would be nice if we could make it not case-sensitive :D [[User:Char Latte49|Wielder of the Staple Gun]] ([[User talk:Char Latte49|talk]]) 02:48, 27 April 2022 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Good idea. [[User:Marethyu|⟨Winter is coming⟩ Marethyu]] ([[User talk:Marethyu|talk]]) 17:46, 5 May 2022 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Do not allow ordinary users to edit redirects that are just numbers ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This overrides the default page you're sent to when you check a comic; e.g. recently a vandal edited the page entitled &amp;quot;2614&amp;quot; so it overrode the actual page, [[2614: 2]] on the main page.&lt;br /&gt;
:The problem would be when creating a new page and the overrides are needed... [[User:Marethyu|⟨Winter is coming⟩ Marethyu]] ([[User talk:Marethyu|talk]]) 17:48, 5 May 2022 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== ExplainXKCD discord (or other platform)? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I'm just saying if we had instant messages, pings etc. there would be a lot faster reaction to vandals. &lt;br /&gt;
The community portal is hard to get attention from and comments are all very well and good but conversations on Discord could get very quick response, and people could request edits, organise page re-writing etc.&lt;br /&gt;
Idk if we can get &amp;quot;official&amp;quot; backing by anyone high up but we could make one anyways?&lt;br /&gt;
:The problem with platforms like Discord or others is that we can't guarantee that everyone has access to them; on the wiki, anyone can edit, while some people may not have access to discord or such. A possible solution would be having a sort of service built into the wiki, but not sure how that might be done. Besides, this is a wiki, not an xkcd chat site. This is a good idea, though. [[User:Marethyu|⟨Winter is coming⟩ Marethyu]] ([[User talk:Marethyu|talk]]) 17:43, 5 May 2022 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::Anyone can create a discord account like anyone can create an account on this wiki. You don't even need a dedicated client/app as it can run in browser. Just like the wiki. Just my two cents. [[User:Elektrizikekswerk|Elektrizikekswerk]] ([[User talk:Elektrizikekswerk|talk]]) 11:28, 20 May 2022 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Some user may not wish anyone to be able to contact them outside this wiki. You do not need an acount to edit this wiki... [[User:Kynde|Kynde]] ([[User talk:Kynde|talk]]) 17:14, 22 July 2022 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== So, I got a question about transcripts. ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A lot of comics show links (e.g.: all the ones with a drawing of wikipedia on it), and the transcripts don't really have a standard. In the transcript, should it be an actual link or just blue text or what? [[Special:Contributions/162.158.79.52|162.158.79.52]] 15:03, 2 June 2022 (UTC)Bumpf&lt;br /&gt;
:I'd say that if the linked thing (presuming it's a real linkable target!) is linked in the Explanation, it doesn't need to be (re)linked in the ostensibly flat-and-descriptive Transcript.&lt;br /&gt;
:And I know that some Transcripts are hypertext formatted to emulate the thing they are transcribed from (whether bolded, enbiggened, sub-/superscripted and and/or given the hue) but maybe ''primarily'' the &amp;quot;&amp;lt;code&amp;gt;[:Text that describes the text]&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;&amp;quot; should be explaining the details, in case the screen-reader (or text-searching algorithm grepping the Transcript text for &amp;quot;green text&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;superscript&amp;quot; instances can't quite work it out from the various style-tags that can be applied to that effect in so many an various ways.&lt;br /&gt;
:But this is IMO, I don't know if there's a specific policy about it, but it is how I've seen it vaguely applied... Not everywhere quite so consistently, though. [[Special:Contributions/172.70.91.128|172.70.91.128]] 20:28, 2 June 2022 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::We try to keep links and explanations out of the transcript. The link and the explanation goes in the explanation section above. [[User:Kynde|Kynde]] ([[User talk:Kynde|talk]]) 17:12, 22 July 2022 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Use 2X Images ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Apparently xkcd.com provides double-sized versions of almost every comic if you add '''_2x''' to the end of the image name. For instance,&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
https://imgs.xkcd.com/comics/watches.png&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
https://imgs.xkcd.com/comics/watches_2x.png&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Since we are in 2022 and computers can load high-resolution images just fine, and they are easier to read, I propose that this website should use the provided double-sized images. Really, I think Randall ought to be doing this himself as well. [[Special:Contributions/172.68.18.107|172.68.18.107]] 12:22, 17 August 2022 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:While I agree with using the higher quality images which are default on xkcd.com for many people, there has been [https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php/explain_xkcd:Community_portal/Proposals#Link_to_high-resolution_images.3F discussion] about this issue already. At the moment, the consensus seems to be to continue using the 'standard' size to 'use less space,' and instead link to the higher quality image on the image page. —[[User:Theusaf|theusaf]] ([[User talk:Theusaf|talk]]) 14:35, 17 August 2022 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I think I may have mentioned it on that link (or similar), but often when the 2x image is used (or even an unwise too wide image/unbreakable-line-of-content) the explainxkcd site cannot sensibly handle it and it forces the default 'page width' of stuff into a zoomed out narrower column to the left (including the margin-line normally inset a dozen or so pixels in from the right) so that browser-window can display the whole of this wide element.&lt;br /&gt;
::While &amp;quot;saving space&amp;quot; does apply to server resources and viewer download bandwidth/quotas (e.g.[https://imgs.xkcd.com/comics/unreliable_connection.png 53kb] vs [https://imgs.xkcd.com/comics/unreliable_connection_2x.png 109kb]) may seem insignificant, screen-space can be badly hit by this.&lt;br /&gt;
::The motherlode xkcd site has code behind it to (usually?) serve the right image for the right displays, but explainxkcd isn't currently equipped to do the same choose-and-provide (which would need ''both'' images uploaded to it and a revised {{template|comic}} implementation, once we work out the method it could use). And I've never seen any case where the 'low quality' comic is conversely too small and narrow to appreciate (though occasionally the larger one reveals minor drawing details that have been obscured by the downscaling), just when the _2x one makes everything ''else'' too small.&lt;br /&gt;
::...this may not apply to everyone's browser implementation, but it definitely happens, and consistently, on my usual Chrome and/or Firefox on Windows and/or Android platforms (according to which system I happen to be on at the time). [[Special:Contributions/172.70.162.147|172.70.162.147]] 21:20, 17 August 2022 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::ExplainXKCD actually does have the capability to do this. For example, see [[1079:_United_Shapes]]. It generates multiple images, automatically choosing one based on screen size (similar to how xkcd.com does it). The bot could use the `imagesize` parameter to keep the image within the page's width by using the 'standard' image size. This does add a button labeled &amp;quot;click to enlarge,&amp;quot; but if that is annoying, the comic template can be modified to hide that button if specified.&lt;br /&gt;
:::Here is what it might look like:&lt;br /&gt;
:::{{cot}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{User:Theusaf/Template:comic_2x&lt;br /&gt;
| number    = 2647&lt;br /&gt;
| date      = July 18, 2022&lt;br /&gt;
| title     = Capri Suns&lt;br /&gt;
| image     = capri_suns_2x.png&lt;br /&gt;
| titletext = [As security is dragging me away] &amp;quot;Come on, at least I didn't make the mistake in the other direction!&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| imagesize = 315x317px&lt;br /&gt;
| noexpand  = true&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cob}}&lt;br /&gt;
:::which is clearer than the original comic page and the same size. —[[User:Theusaf|theusaf]] ([[User talk:Theusaf|talk]]) 05:20, 18 August 2022 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::::As specificaly implemented above, I certainly see no immediate problem (need to check across machines/devices), but I suspect that part of the mechanism here is the &amp;quot;imagesize = 315x317px&amp;quot;, which seems like it would need (albeit by the page-create bot, algorithm8cally) to be tailored to the 'input' image, not always in this ratio). I'm not technically conversant with the nature of your back-end scripting and doubtless it's all possible (scripts can do almost anything... once you know that they (may) need to do them and rewritten them to catch all the contingencies ;) ), but I don't know know if that's something you've accounted for (e.g. test with a three/four-panel wide comic, or the Earth Temperature Timeline or whatever, and see if it can facilitate them all nicely). Not to mention that if theusafBOT goes offline, the manual-add instructions (as used prior to your replacing the prior functioning bot, for which I thank you) also need this extra step of user involvement to be done, whereas usually the fallback manual method needed little thought in this direction (or indeed however much carbon or silicon there is in the 'brain' involved) except for exceptional circumstances or those rare prior slip-ups by Randall.&lt;br /&gt;
::::I'm just going through the first obvious issue (to me), didn't mean to concentrate so many words on just this before even checking everything else! [[Special:Contributions/172.70.91.80|172.70.91.80]] 09:15, 18 August 2022 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Basically, on the backend, the bot will fetch both the small and the large images, and measure the size of the small image, which is what it will use for the &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;imagesize&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;. I have actually used this system in the past for this bot, but was told to revert it due to the &amp;quot;click comic to enlarge&amp;quot; text. As for if the bot goes offline, there is no problem with falling back to the small image, and if editors want to, I can also provide instructions for using the large image. I'm mostly just waiting to see what others think about this. Are there any other problems to consider? —[[User:Theusaf|theusaf]] ([[User talk:Theusaf|talk]]) 14:44, 18 August 2022 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== I'm making an App that collects web comics ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
My original idea was to use the rss feed present on xkcd, and other webcomic websites, but now im starting to wonder if there was a way to make a better service, that allowed users to maybe look at older comics, and explanations and such as well, and thats how i happened to come across explainxkcd.com. The RSS Feed for this website, would be pretty helpful, if it were like reddit's but apparently, the rss feed is only maintained for the home page. I was wondering if you guys provided that data through an API or something? Also are there wikis for other famous comics like this one? Any other suggestions and ideas for the app are welcome 🙌🙌.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Comics edited after their publication ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
many more comics have been changed than are in Category:Comics edited after their publication ! please add them (i already have done two i remember off the top of my head) [[Special:Contributions/172.70.134.223|172.70.134.223]] 12:56, 7 October 2022 (UTC)Bumpf&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== What if 2 book page creation ==&lt;br /&gt;
What if 2 has come out, but I don't know which page is to be created. There is already a comic under the same name. [[User:ClassicalGames|ClassicalGames]] ([[User talk:ClassicalGames|talk]]) 08:54, 3 May 2023 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Default to 3 Section Headings for Each Explanation: Non-Obvious Info, Recap, and Background Trivia ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This is a proposal that all new comic explanations should, by default, have 3 Sections:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''I. Explanation of the Non-Obvious''' (an actual explanation of the non-obvious elements of the comic for the average reader who might not understand the references/joke/relevant science)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''II. Full Recap'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''III. Background Trivia'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Most of us can agree that Category I is where the value of this website shines.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But today, all 3 of these categories of explanation are typically merged together, making it hard to find the Category I nuggets of goodness.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If we make these 3 section headings the default on every comic explanation, then this default will helpfully nudge editors to put the juiciest stuff up top, and not to clutter that section up with fluff or trivia.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
——&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As an example, take the recent comic #2878 about Astronomer Happiness and Supernova distance.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The main thing a lay reader would want to know — the Category I information — is…&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
..That the shape of the graph is probably a clever reference to a Light Curve, a type of supernova graph&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
..why astronomers like it when a supernova is close, and what happens when it gets too close&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Everything else in the (currently) very wordy explanation gets in the way of the lay reader finding out these two things. It’s a bunch of Category II and Category III info that makes it hard to tease out the Category I info. It’s not BAD information, but it’s sandpaper. It’s friction slowing down the average reader.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Obviously I could go in and edit this particular comic, and I often do this kind of edit, but I think this issue pops up for most explanations, so I think changing the standard default interface will help everyone put their contribution into the right section.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In sum, my proposal would elevate Category I info to the top of each explanation, so instead of full recaps, we get right into the explanation that is going to be most efficiently illuminating for the average, non-expert reader, answering the most common questions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Laser813|Laser813]] ([[User talk:Laser813|talk]]) 10:50, 12 January 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:In general (if I get dibs on the edit, or think I can legitimately re-edit/rearrange), I do try to go for &amp;quot;hook, line, sinker&amp;quot; format (i.e. establish the basics, relate that to what the comic shows, move on to any relevent speculations/extrapolations), very like your setup. Though it is often ''much'' too complicated (multi-layered, cross-disciplinary, etc, so that maybe it has to be interwoven 'mini explanations' per tabulated item) so I'm not sure how easy it would be to enforce a strict structure. I think there's merit to the principle, though. Assuming we can all agree what each comic needs focus on (apply that problem to the following proposal too!), as I've occasionally inserted a sort of &amp;quot;first you need to know &amp;lt;subject&amp;gt;&amp;quot; into an established cold-start explanation (&amp;quot;you see &amp;lt;foo&amp;gt;&amp;quot; only for a later editor to consider it more an afterthought and shuffle it to later (&amp;quot;you see &amp;lt;foo&amp;gt;&amp;quot; ... &amp;quot;&amp;lt;foo&amp;gt; is part of &amp;lt;subject&amp;gt;&amp;quot;), or variations on such layouts. Especially as different people have different ideas as to what's obvious/can be keyword-wikilinked and what needs more waffle to properly enlighten readers.&lt;br /&gt;
:Also, prosaic variation is a good thing. Too formulaic and it could be (whilst accurate) considered too robotic, so some leaway should really always be allowed as we collectively bash together a community interpretation and elaboration. Within communal guidelines, clearly. [[Special:Contributions/172.69.194.203|172.69.194.203]] 15:53, 12 January 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== FAQ Style Editing should be the norm ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Simply, we should experiment with more FAQ-style explanations. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We think of the top questions that the average reader might have about a comic, and we use those as bolded headers to explain the most curious/confusing/subtle/sciency parts of the comic.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The structure would be this (using a recent comic as an example)…&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Q: Why did Randall use this shape of graph?'''&lt;br /&gt;
A: It’s likely a clever reference to a Light Curve, a similarly shaped graph in the study of supernovae that…&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Q: Why do astronomers prefer it when supernovae are closer?'''&lt;br /&gt;
A: It makes it easier to glean information because…&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Laser813|Laser813]] ([[User talk:Laser813|talk]]) 10:50, 12 January 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== sidebar revamp ==&lt;br /&gt;
I think that the sidebar looks plain and it should have a new design. It could be voted on by users [[User:Moderator|Moderator]] ([[User talk:Moderator|talk]]) 02:16, 5 February 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:In leiu of you telling us what you think would be better, my starting vote is that I'm perfectly happy with that 'plain'. If it has the links I might need, why does it need a reskin? Or, worse, a functional revamp which probably removes the easy to use bits I was using already.&lt;br /&gt;
:...could you do a mock-up screenshot (or render equivalents directly in markup) of before/after side by side, at least? [[Special:Contributions/172.69.194.120|172.69.194.120]] 03:11, 5 February 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
My biggest problem is it doesn’t scroll down with you which can be a big pain [[User:Moderator|Moderator]] ([[User talk:Moderator|talk]]) 01:43, 6 February 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Don't know about anyone else, but (when not on a desktop) I read this on a tablet, in landscape, with the effective window quite short (ratio of 1:2 with width, approaching 1:3.5 with already narrowed onscreen keyboard popped up) and if I'm scrolled to the top I see nothing beyond Browse Comics.&lt;br /&gt;
:If we assume separate scroll-control on the sidebar, setting Main Page at the top of browser pane gives What Links Here at the bottom. Now, I rarely use the next three links (or at least reach those pages using them), and separate scrolling wouldn't stop me even seeing the even lower Ad bit (but it ''would'' defeat the entire purpose of the Ad, in that position, whether or not I bother to notice it these days).&lt;br /&gt;
:So whatever missing about you propose, I'm betting it would impact me. Perhaps not negatively, but I've seen enough awful assumptions about my screen-area in the name of scroll-free design. Including the &amp;quot;give us permission (or not) to give you cookies&amp;quot; popovers where it appears the actual buttons to confirm (or deny, or go somewhere to review and customise, if they have that option) are beyond the bottom of my screen. I can temporarily rotate the screen, of course, but often I just back out and don't bother in those cases. I wouldn't be reticent to rotate this site, on occasion, but ''I'd really rather not have to'', if I can be so selfish and stick-in-the-mud, because websites just are not good to use (even temporarily) in narrow-portait mode. (What's worse is the websites that detect I'm on a mobile platform and redesign styles/placements on-the-fly to 'fit portrait view', assuming a vertical smartphone, ''regardless'' of my actual viewport orientation, etc.)&lt;br /&gt;
:So, please, a hard no from me. Notwithstanding that just as solidly &amp;quot;always browse in portrait&amp;quot; people might be overjoyed at changes that would give ''them'' a better site design. But that's a tricky circle to square (or letterbox!), and not what you were suggesting anyway (now we know what it is). I just want to plea that any changes be made with a very good idea of all the knock-on effects of 'improving' certain edge-cases, especially when it comes to yet other edge-cases. [[Special:Contributions/172.70.85.23|172.70.85.23]] 10:29, 6 February 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
==New Logo and Banner Proposals==&lt;br /&gt;
:I have new logo and banner proposals for this site.&lt;br /&gt;
:They're made on Scratch, an all-ages block-based programming language, and are in the style of Right Click.&lt;br /&gt;
:Here they are!&lt;br /&gt;
:Logo proposal: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Logo_proposal_for_explain_xkcd.png&lt;br /&gt;
:Banner proposal: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Banner_proposal_for_explain_xkcd.png {{unsigned ip|172.69.71.37|01:54, 19 February 2024 (UTC)}}&lt;br /&gt;
::I can't see the xkcdicity of the logo, really. The banner is certainly flavourful in the right way (does it scale down well? ...is that what your use of Scratch is for, as opposed to standard static Photoshop/GIMP image editing?), but not sure it'll work better for the current top-left-of-page xkcd (with three xkcd figurses idling away, sat on the letters).&lt;br /&gt;
::Decent concept art for something else related, certainly. I could believe it was a Randall's-own  interactive comic front-end of some kind (which would make sense of the &amp;quot;play button&amp;quot; that is the &amp;quot;►&amp;quot;-bit). Given that it's now in a programming system already, have you tried making a drag'n'click game of the idea of linking/looping the blue-trail, and animating the hanging-on characters? [[Special:Contributions/172.70.90.29|172.70.90.29]] 13:34, 19 February 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::It's an arrow, not a play button. Get it right. {{unsigned ip|172.69.71.72|01:05, 20 February 2024 (UTC)}}&lt;br /&gt;
::::Hold your horses... I was just trying to find a good reason for the whatever-it-is triangle to be there (gave the example of a 'play' button in my speculated usefulness of it). And it isn't really obviously any more of an arrow (c.f. &amp;quot;→&amp;quot;), either. I like your(?) banner's use of xkcd-figures, just not sure where the logo exhibits any form of being xkcd-related, except by the literal reading of it.&lt;br /&gt;
::::Perhaps if it were &amp;quot;xkcd font&amp;quot; (i.e. artfully composited from actual samples of Randall's ALLCAPS comic-writing) then it wouldn't matter so much, but I just wouldn't say it was any more on-brand than the current logo/etc. This being intended as constructive criticism, I hope you understand. And there's more opinions than mine, so maybe I've indeed just missed some point that ''everyone else'' (especially named-users) have already realised. [[Special:Contributions/172.70.86.5|172.70.86.5]] 02:33, 20 February 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Regarding precision in the Unexplained popup ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Would it be possible to add an extra decimal point for the sake of precision? Currently, it shows that 0% of comics are unexplained, which is (as of 13:21 UTC on March 27, 2024) incorrect. It's a small thing, but it's rather annoying. {{unsigned ip|162.158.158.233|13:23, 27 March 2024 (UTC)}}&lt;br /&gt;
:With the current 2911 comics (give or take #404), 0.1% would be slightly under 3 comics. You'd need at least three before 0.1% appeared instead of the equally unuseful 0.0%.&lt;br /&gt;
:I'm of the &amp;quot;at least give everyone a week before you unilaterally declare it 'done'...&amp;quot; camp, so right now ''just'' the latest M/W/F comic incomplete would hover at a token 0.1%.&lt;br /&gt;
:(Actually, from two (0.06...% rounded up) to 4 (0.13...% rounded down. The good news is that it'll be almost seven years until two-rounded-up is insufficient, but also up to six-rounded-down is now &amp;quot;0.1%&amp;quot;, if I've not goofed the carries/etc.)&lt;br /&gt;
:If going to the trouble of editing it to 1DP, make it 2DP with ''exactly'' the same editing effort..?&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&amp;lt;!-- Edited version of current Main page source below here --&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;font size=5px&amp;gt;''Welcome to the '''explain [[xkcd]]''' wiki!''&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
We have an explanation for all [[:Category:All comics|'''{{#expr:{{PAGESINCAT:All comics|R}}-1}}''' xkcd comics]],&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;!-- Note: the -1 in the calculation above is to discount &amp;quot;comic&amp;quot; 404,&lt;br /&gt;
     which is not really a comic, even though we've categorised it so. --&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
and only {{PAGESINCAT:Incomplete explanations|R}}&lt;br /&gt;
({{#expr: {{PAGESINCAT:Incomplete explanations|R}} / {{LATESTCOMIC}} * 100 round 2}}%) [[:Category:Incomplete explanations|are incomplete]]. Help us finish them!&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&amp;lt;!-- Edited version of current Main page source above here --&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:(As of time of posting, the above says &amp;quot;only 2 (0.07%)&amp;quot;. From 0.0687049...% rounded up to 2DP.)&lt;br /&gt;
:Though given that we're only going to go into the future,{{Citation needed}} I suggest we can state the flat-out number. It's not now really going to be as scarily huge as it might have been, as the actual percentage becomes generally less significant.&lt;br /&gt;
:And, for niceness, give it a grammatically/factually agreeable form:&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&amp;lt;!-- exemplars start --&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
;General form:&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;... and {{#ifeq: &amp;lt;!-- count here --&amp;gt; | 0 | no | &amp;lt;!-- count here --&amp;gt; }} comic{{#ifeq: &amp;lt;!-- count here --&amp;gt; | 1 |  | s }} [[:Category:Incomplete explanations|{{#ifeq: &amp;lt;!-- count here --&amp;gt; | 1 | is | are }} incomplete]]. ...&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
;Zero cases (hardcoded):&lt;br /&gt;
:... and {{#ifeq: 0 | 0 | no | &amp;lt;!-- count here, unused --&amp;gt; }} comic{{#ifeq: 0 | 1 |  | s }} [[:Category:Incomplete explanations|{{#ifeq: 0 | 1 | is | are }} incomplete]]. ...&lt;br /&gt;
;One case (hardcoded):&lt;br /&gt;
:... and {{#ifeq: 1 | 0 | no | 1 }} comic{{#ifeq: 1 | 1 |  | s }} [[:Category:Incomplete explanations|{{#ifeq: 1 | 1 | is | are }} incomplete]]. ...&lt;br /&gt;
;Multiple cases (hardcoded):&lt;br /&gt;
:... and {{#ifeq: 42 | 0 | no | 42 }} comic{{#ifeq: 42 | 1 |  | s }} [[:Category:Incomplete explanations|{{#ifeq: 42 | 1 | is | are }} incomplete]]. ...&lt;br /&gt;
;Current cases (dynamic):&lt;br /&gt;
:... and {{#ifeq: {{PAGESINCAT:Incomplete explanations|R}} | 0 | none | {{PAGESINCAT:Incomplete explanations|R}} }} comic{{#ifeq: {{PAGESINCAT:Incomplete explanations|R}} | 1 |  | s }} [[:Category:Incomplete explanations|{{#ifeq: {{PAGESINCAT:Incomplete explanations|R}} | 1 | is | are }} incomplete]]. ...&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&amp;lt;!-- end of exemplars --&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:...easy to replicate to get &amp;quot;Help us finish them!&amp;quot; to change (upon a zero-test truth) to &amp;quot;But they all might be improvable!&amp;quot;. Or change the :Cat:Link to not even be a link when zero, with alternate phrasing dodged over to in order to avoid &amp;quot;no comics are incomplete&amp;quot; in other ways.&lt;br /&gt;
:I wrote the above for minimal nesting of overlapping conditions. You might prefer just to go with &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{#ifeq: &amp;lt;count&amp;gt; | 0 | &amp;lt;whole &amp;quot;zero cases&amp;quot; version&amp;gt; | {{#ifeq: &amp;lt;count&amp;gt; | 1 | &amp;lt;whole &amp;quot;single case&amp;quot; version&amp;gt; | &amp;lt;whole &amp;quot;plurality of cases&amp;quot; version&amp;gt; }} }}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt; - both approaches involve repetitions, but maybe this other one can be given a ''degree'' of wikimarkup-readability within each case, to take pity on future editors. [[Special:Contributions/172.70.160.166|172.70.160.166]] 16:02, 27 March 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Hear me out: What If? discussion page.  ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
That's it. That's my idea. Go crazy, everyone. [[User:Psychoticpotato|Psychoticpotato]] ([[User talk:Psychoticpotato|talk]]) 14:05, 4 April 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Yup, I've been thinking the same thing. I would like a page on each What If entry. [[User:Maplestrip|Maplestrip]] ([[User talk:Maplestrip|talk]]) 07:42, 8 April 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::I've thought about this, over the years. Having 'a page' (rather than the summary table, in the [[what if? (blog)|overview page]], etc) does sound more completist than what we currently have but I then tend to hit the main ontological problem...&lt;br /&gt;
::In the What-Ifs, Randall takes a 'simple' question and then ''explains'' the consequences. At length. A 'comic page' structure (starting with how we'd deal with the multiple midpoint images, so we would stray far from using the {{template|comic}} introduction) that followed the header(image,etc)/explanation/transcript/(trivia)/included-comments format would be silly and have many parts inappropriate. Remove the Transcript, for starters. ''Or'' need a mini-Transcript for each 'illustrative' image. (e.g. &amp;quot;:[Black Hat:] What if we tried more power?&amp;quot;, several times.)&lt;br /&gt;
::Is there an actual need to ''explain Randall's explanation..''? Because that's the only thing 'we' can do. Which is rather silly, and seems like it would take a small (entertainingly rambling) essay and expand it into a large (pedantically rambling) one.&lt;br /&gt;
::Or else we just straight-copy the What-If over here as a 'backup'-blag? Allowable, but not exactly a USP, there'll be Internet Archive and personal copies, should things go bad at Randall's end. Not really a noble-cause.&lt;br /&gt;
::My suggestion, as to how to cover the remaining &amp;quot;explanation gap&amp;quot; and provide a useful 'service' that's worthwhile maintaining, is ''maybe'' two What If? (Blag) sub-pages:&lt;br /&gt;
::#A place to collate all inter-text images (and hover-/title-texts), and Transcript them, for easy searching.&lt;br /&gt;
::#*e.g. when you know you want to refer to the &amp;quot;bomb to the eyeball&amp;quot; one (internally or for something external) but think you might not realise where you need to go to (the supernova neutrinos one!) just by scrolling a bare comic list.&lt;br /&gt;
::#*Or you'd like to see, at a glance, how many different places the Black Hat Try More Power running joke occurs.&lt;br /&gt;
::#*Even if you don't want to open the page itself (160+ 'comics' with say 5 images each, is an 800ish-image page, less rationalising 'repeats' to a single entry), it should at least give you a search result for &amp;quot;dry waterfall&amp;quot; that points you in the direction of the &amp;quot;Niagra Straw&amp;quot; one (and maybe others?).&lt;br /&gt;
::#*I could see these being brief Image/Titletext/Transcript/(optional explanatory context), but not enough material to make them separate comic-style-pages in their own right, right?&lt;br /&gt;
::#Something of the same 'collation page mechanism' for all those superscript-popup-'footnote' bits. Though I admit I'm not entirely sure for what purpose except that it just ''seems'' like a good &amp;quot;collection page&amp;quot; to maintain. Perhaps to offer updated onward-links if any of the originals suffer link-rot? (But then, that fate can occur to all non-popupped links, so maybe I've chosen the wrong thing to highlight.)&lt;br /&gt;
::...the question is, what do you want from it. Bear in mind that if you can creae pages here then you can set up what ''you'' think you'd like to see (e.g. for What-If#1, for starters) then get the community to assess it. Do it as a sub-page to your Userspace, maybe, as proof-of-concept.&lt;br /&gt;
::Just because it's not been seen as necessary so far, doesn't mean it's not necessary. I've thought about it a lot (not thst I'm in a position to inplement anything), but I've only decided that I don't see a need for a straight copy (others' views may differ on that) and not enough reason to pester for ''my'' 'ideas' to be fulfilled. But I aint 'in charge' here, and happily so. [[Special:Contributions/172.69.194.100|172.69.194.100]] 11:29, 8 April 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::You make a fair point. He did already explain in great detail what would happen if [x] scenario happened. It just seems like it would be nice to have a page exclusively for discussing all the ''What If'' articles. [[User:Psychoticpotato|Psychoticpotato]] ([[User talk:Psychoticpotato|talk]]) 20:49, 15 May 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::::People just need to make a draft or two and see what happens. Be sure to link a draft here if one is created, I would like to help on it. &amp;quot;I want to learn more and explore this scenario further&amp;quot; is a valid feeling to have. [[User:Maplestrip|Maplestrip]] ([[User talk:Maplestrip|talk]]) 07:34, 16 May 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Randall-ify the Captcha ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Let's have some fun:  Is it feasible to replace the Captcha with something &amp;quot;xkcd-ish&amp;quot; like &amp;quot;click on Randall's work&amp;quot; with a mix of XKCD stuff and generic pictures.  If not, how about a replacing it with a quiz like &amp;quot;which of the following IS [or IS NOT] xkcd character&amp;quot; with one obvious correct answer. [[Special:Contributions/172.68.26.75|172.68.26.75]] 16:11, 9 May 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:are YOU able to create a CAPTCHA from scratch? [[User:42.book.addict|42.book.addict]] ([[User talk:42.book.addict|talk]]) 15:59, 13 May 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::Choose any images that contain user-made CAPTCHAs from the following selection. [[User:Psychoticpotato|Psychoticpotato]] ([[User talk:Psychoticpotato|talk]]) 21:22, 13 May 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::We could also make captchas based on most of [[:Category:CAPTCHA|these]]. [[User:PDesbeginner|PDesbeginner]] ([[User talk:PDesbeginner|talk]]) 02:57, 11 September 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Incomplete Tag Vote ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I think each comic's discussion page should have a section to vote on whether the explanation is complete or not. How long do you think the voting period should be?[[User:PDesbeginner|PDesbeginner]] ([[User talk:PDesbeginner|talk]]) 03:42, 19 June 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Rather than a voting period, I think it would be ideal if people could &amp;quot;vote&amp;quot; on the completeness of an article at any time. As I go through all the old pages, I come across lots of pages that feel a little bit incomplete. It would be nice if we had a measurement of completion that wasn't binary. [[User:Maplestrip|Maplestrip]] ([[User talk:Maplestrip|talk]]) 10:16, 19 June 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::Feel free to add the incomplete tag again. But don't forget to mention WHY (either in the tag or the discussion or both) you think it's incomplete. :) The tag is mainly there so you can have a list of &amp;quot;incomplete&amp;quot; comics. A comic is either on that list or it isn't. This is pretty much binary. As for voting: If I think an explanation is complete and it bothers me that it's flagged as not I generally juts make a comment in the discussion asking if someone has still something to add or actually knows WHY it's still incomplete. If there's no response after a few days I delete the tag. There's no need to make a voting out of this. And if somone strongly disagrees to you there's always the &amp;quot;Undo&amp;quot;-link ;) [[User:Elektrizikekswerk|Elektrizikekswerk]] ([[User talk:Elektrizikekswerk|talk]]) 11:09, 19 June 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Sometimes I just feel &amp;quot;this could use more detail,&amp;quot; without specifically knowing what the detail would look like. This can be a problem when it's about explaining complicated science: the &amp;quot;completion&amp;quot; of a description of quantum mechanics that is readable by a novice, is very subjective. I am realizing the problem with the persistent voting idea tho: many people will vote something as &amp;quot;incomplete&amp;quot; but wouldn't come back to check on it later. [[User:Maplestrip|Maplestrip]] ([[User talk:Maplestrip|talk]]) 12:08, 19 June 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::::I'm more in the &amp;quot;less is more&amp;quot; camp. Most of my recent contributions to this wiki were deleting parts of bloated explanations: You don't need to explain quantum mechanics unless it's absolutely crucial for understanding the respective comic. Of course, if you are an expert in any given field, [[2501|it's hard to tell]] whether or not the current explanation is sufficient for a layperson and most contributors tend to write &amp;quot;too much&amp;quot;. Which is totally fine. People like me take care of the &amp;quot;too much&amp;quot;. ;) So, if you are an expert in quantum mechanics ignore &amp;quot;completed&amp;quot; comics about quantum mechanics. Surely you could contribute a lot to it but chances are high that most of it is unnecessary for the comic. Instead ask yourself if you need more information to understand that comic about biology. And if you do, add an incomplete and ask for that information ;) [[User:Elektrizikekswerk|Elektrizikekswerk]] ([[User talk:Elektrizikekswerk|talk]]) 12:31, 19 June 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:I've been here a long time, effectively back to when there were ''missing'' explanations (other than the &amp;quot;too new to have the barebones put in&amp;quot; ones, these days only seen when the current BOT is tardy or offline for some reason), and I've seen the Incomplete template change from the useful 'infill marker' to become a regular joke-tag of a similar nature to the Citation Needed. Yes, I agree that both of these (and the Because You're Dumb&amp;quot; tag) are perhaps a bit confusing for new users (like the one who badly edited out a link, just now, apparently thinking it was spam, because of the way it mentioned viagra), but I have grown to see them as community in-jokes (of various degrees of subtlety) that many people seem to appreciate under their current incarnations.&lt;br /&gt;
:We've recently removed the Main Page's more literal &amp;quot;there are # incomplete articles&amp;quot; announcement, which leaves the purpose of ''more accurately'' using the Incomplete tag a little less important. Apart from letting us dive into the (purported) list of Incomplete Explanations, one of the main ''serious'' purposes of the Incomplete tag is removed, leaving the now consistently employed purpose of doing a &amp;quot;Created by a THING OTHER THAN THE BOT&amp;quot; joke much more prominent.&lt;br /&gt;
:Really, all articles are potentially incomplete, still. Some more than others. Something big, like Hoverboard or Gravity, might truly have easter-eggs or subtle details as yet not properly commented upon, but there have been edits to ''double-digit'' comics recently which might be considered improvements. As such, there are really only two 'sensible' direct courses of action:&lt;br /&gt;
:#Completely remove the Incomplete tag, from use, as all pages are only ever as complete as the eye of any particular beholder, and the more recent pages are ''obviously'' incomplete by their being barely 15 minutes (or a day, or ''maybe'' a week) old. Or being so huge (or Time-like!) that they clearly still haven't been 'completely' documented. Maybe the BOT can add a Created By The Bot tag that gets wiped out by the first serious attempt at human editing, but if we wish to lose this part of our site culture so readily then why ever have it at all? A wikivote system is not really that accurate under these circumstances, for a number of reasons that I needn't explain, so go straight to assuming that any such 'vote' would pass, right from the off...&lt;br /&gt;
:#Embrace it for its THING OTHER THAN A BOT usage, alone. Don't be so eager to remove them just because you have no personal changes you'd wish to see. (Votes or not, there could always be another editor along in a minute who has, unlike the rest of you, picked up on an obscure visual pun rendered in what turns out to be hieroglyphs, or similar.) If we have to cull them (not a given!), then let it be an unstated rule (or a stated one?) that if there are more than (e.g.) half a dozen then the 'least amusing' may be removed by the first editor who wishes to express a critical opinion. Just the one at a time. No reinstating, no resurrection, no adding to old articles that never ever had a 'joke Incomplete' before, no entirely new joke (but you can refine what's there, to a degree), just a rolling (and not necessarily consecutive!) set of the &amp;quot;finest natjve explainxkcd wit&amp;quot;. Or at least the least objectionable surviving examples of same.&lt;br /&gt;
:As a practical guide, the &amp;quot;reason why you think it is Incomplete element&amp;quot; could be entirely served by in-line tags (the &amp;quot;What?&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;Why?&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;Date?&amp;quot; things you might see elsewhere). Perhaps we could even do ''both'' things by instead having a &amp;quot;Complete&amp;quot; tag ''explicitly'' for BOT-REPLACEMENT-type tomfoolery (and tongue-in-cheekness about Completion, as we might currently be about Incometeness) from the off. That might confuse the newbods, of course. At least until it doesn't, and then they're not newbods anymore...&lt;br /&gt;
:The companion tag, for Incomplete Transcript, is presumably going to serve as it currently does (as a still serious hint as to actual Incompleteness), albeit that I've noticed a trend for the first editor of a brand new published comic to (possibly ''after'' doing the BOT-replacement joke, or after the editor who did ''only'' that) go straight in and enTranscript it (to varying degrees of accuracy and completion), whether or not they also then remove that specific tag-template at the same time. It seems that some people are more comfortable at providing a ''Transcript''ion-service than they are at establishing even the seed of an Explanation. (Or they only have enough time to do the latter, to the level of detail they wish to achieve in the moment open to them.)&lt;br /&gt;
:This is, of course, a cultural issue. All the above (from me) is just my own perception of practical aspects, notwithstanding those opinions already expressed before that (and elsewhere). I don't speak for everyone. And, as a perpetual IP, technically I should say that I don't speak for ''anyone'', either... [[Special:Contributions/172.70.160.140|172.70.160.140]] 14:21, 19 June 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I like the idea of removing the Incomplete tag. What do you think? [[User:PDesbeginner|PDesbeginner]] ([[User talk:PDesbeginner|talk]]) 14:57, 19 June 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::I greatly approve of a &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{what}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt; tag, as a Wikipedian that's actually really funny. I would want to keep the Incomplete tag, as I think it has purpose, even if it no longer represents a goal to achieve. I think this website will never reach 100.00% completeness and that is good, actually. [[User:Maplestrip|Maplestrip]] ([[User talk:Maplestrip|talk]]) 14:05, 26 June 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::Okay. If someone wants to they can just ignore the incomplete tags. [[User:PDesbeginner|PDesbeginner]] ([[User talk:PDesbeginner|talk]]) 14:37, 28 June 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== &amp;quot;As of &amp;lt;now&amp;gt;&amp;quot;... ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What would be rather useful is an &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{As of now}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt; template (or similar wording, and perhaps an &amp;quot;as of now&amp;quot;-cased alternative for use mid-sentence). There are many articles that will have words along the lines of &amp;quot;this has not yet happened, as of August 2024&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;this situation is continuing, as of August 2024&amp;quot;. Every now and then, someone will come across one of these with an older date (perhaps only just out of date, perhaps years old) and [https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=1858:_4th_of_July&amp;amp;curid=20285&amp;amp;diff=348082&amp;amp;oldid=315524 edit it accordingly]. You could also seek them all out, deliberately, with a bit of effort in the search-bar.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
(Note that &amp;quot;as of&amp;quot; does not ''always'' need updating, there are non-dated examples such as in [[1074: Moon Landing#Trivia]], static transcript versions, like [[1071: Exoplanets#Transcript]] and other instances where the text &amp;quot;as of&amp;quot;, with or without a date, really does not need to be changed... but sometimes is anyway by a well-meaning passer-by.)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Sometimes, this can be done along with another useful edit/update/revision that is spotted, or is just one of the revisions that some other need for change conveniently allows. But it seems a bit vague to rely upon occasional attention.  Instead the template will implement something like &amp;quot;&amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;As of {{Monthyear}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;&amp;quot; (here having to use &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{#time:F Y}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;, ...&amp;quot;As of {{#time:F Y}}&amp;quot;...), though there's the possibility that a parameter-mediated switch can let it alternatively become a to-the-day-level format option (at which point you could even implement/calcuate something like {{template|Yesterday}} would be) or just to the year-level. (Or add {{template|As of this year}}, {{template|As of this month}} and {{template|As of this day}} separately.)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This would negate the need to ''just'' poke and prod any article that happened to 'need' updating every month (or year, or possible day). And to deal with the possibility that some of these cases might actually need to be edited because &amp;quot;as of&amp;quot; does ''not'' now apply, include within it a {{:Category:As of}} membership, letting anyone who is interested keep an eye on these aggregated 'As of's, ready to jump in there and change it to some straight up &amp;quot;Up until &amp;lt;fixed date&amp;gt;&amp;quot; equivalent should any one of them actually no longer apply.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
...obviously, I can't even begin to create the template page required, but I'd be happy to work on the exact wikimedia code required if anyone thinks it needs anything but the most basic transcluded formatting and doesn't know how. Open to discussion, and I'll tag on more if I happen to see that discussion developing. [[Special:Contributions/172.70.162.186|172.70.162.186]] 18:04, 4 August 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:As an addendum/change to my above suggestion, considering a simpler {{template|as of}} (and {{template|As of}}) which does ''no'' automagical continuous updating (just gives the &amp;quot;as of&amp;quot; literal on its own), but still guarantees &amp;quot;Category:As of&amp;quot; membership, so that it doesn't actively give wrong (new) date+circumstance relationships in the likes of [[1047: Approximations]]. In that, the several mentions of populations can safely stay as old years until someone rewrites the proposed value and assessment as well, but it still could be a task to pursue every new year after checking the Cat for likely comics needing a quick check'n'edit.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== “Grammar Bot” ==&lt;br /&gt;
I’m working on a python based bot written with the Pywiki library that aims to use the replace.py scripts to fix simple grammatical mistakes, e.g. correcting Citation needed placements, cleaning up extra spaces, etc. I will be posting the code in a few weeks after I finish it (I’m a bit busy at the moment with school and orchestra) so the entire community can view it. Any thoughts on the idea? Thanks. [[User:42.book.addict|42.book.addict]] ([[User talk:42.book.addict|talk]]) 21:05, 5 September 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:First thoughts are that there are going to be so many exceptions. I definitely agree with the idea of {{template|Citation needed}}s being made consistent (if only it weren't sometimes complicated{{Citation needed}}), as well as that of    mysterious    extra       spaces. But that's not really grammatical. Punctuation, in the first case. I fear a full (or even fragmentary) grammar-checker is going to be complicated and give many false positives.&lt;br /&gt;
:At least at first, perhaps have it ''report'' what it thinks it has found. You may discover definite times that it isn't necessary and it would indeed create new errors.&lt;br /&gt;
:At the very least, run it with two checklists: One to do an automatic replace.py and one to just report. Start with the first list empty. Introduce potential ones to the latter, review all the reports carefully, ''then'' move any sensible-looking ones to former.&lt;br /&gt;
:And have it not fighting other bots (particularly theusafBOT), perhaps selected users (e.g. the likes of Kynde, and of course yourself) or indeed itself (if it makes a change that might inadvertently trigger another 'check') by excluding such changes for a recheck/rechange. Keep a record of what it changed, so that if anybody reverts/recorrects something that seems to have gone wrong it doesn't force it 'wrong' again. At the simplest, give a whole page a decent time-out and/or number of subsequent limits before it ''considers'' a new change. Implement from the start the option of a 'whitelist' (of pages it can ignore) or 'blacklist' (of rules it shouldn't apply, or at least actively apply, to a given page), so you can quickly manually add a throttle-down by simple config-file rather than have to add in a code-kludge when something obviously (in hindsight!) needs correcting about the way it works. And also maybe throttle it to have no more than one bot-edit per hour (while starting from scratch) to not swamp the system and give the rest of us time to assess any errors it has made (and its successes!) - you can unstick that throttle later, when you consider it tested with all its backlog of microcorrections.&lt;br /&gt;
:...there are a few other guidelines I would suggest, but the cautiousness already present in the above approaches might mean that they are left as not so important. Just consider what ''could'' go wrong before unleashing it on our world.&lt;br /&gt;
:And all power to your elbow, it is of course something we all might have considered (I know I have... not that I have the login for it, but what really stopped me was knowing how badly I could mess it up by getting just one detail wrong if I tried it).&lt;br /&gt;
:Among changes/alerts I would have it make would be cases of {{template|cn}}, {{template|citation needed}}, etc, instead of the 'main' template. Plus []-links to either wikipedia pages (most of them should be {{template|w}}-templated) or explainxkcd.com pages (most of them should be [[]]ed), although there are even then some exceptions. It'd also be nice if it can identify all Talk (and Community Portal) contributions that were not signed (more complex, as some may be after the fact, or have been after several years and further editings). I know how I'd do all this, or think I do (only upon starting to do it can I be sure I've actually theorised it correctly!), but I mention this mostly to point out how ''you'' might want to cautiously implement ''your'' ideas. HTH. [[Special:Contributions/172.70.86.15|172.70.86.15]] 00:07, 6 September 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::you have made plenty of wonderful points that I clearly have not thought about-quite the critical oversight on my part. Is anyone interested in collaborating? I don’t think that my skills are good enough to satisfy all of those points. [[User:42.book.addict|42.book.addict]] ([[User talk:42.book.addict|talk]]) 01:06, 6 September 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::hello? Anybody? Please help… [[User:42.book.addict|42.book.addict]] ([[User talk:42.book.addict|talk]]) 17:38, 9 September 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::::I believe this would be a great idea and also an incredibly complicated feat. Randall is no stranger to using weird punctuation in comics or misspelled words. I think it would be neat if it weren't automated and just reported errors it found so we could manually fix them, which would make its development much easier, but at that point it's very similar to a series of search queries for misspelled words, which we can already do. I have no coding skills so I'm not going to be of help. [[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 17:33, 7 November 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
;Update&lt;br /&gt;
I have found a solution to fix most grammatical mistakes, I just need to make sure that it doesn’t correct character names like “Cueball”, not edit war with other bots, come up with a system to log the edits it makes so that it doesn’t revert again, and fix Citation needed templates. I already know how to make sure that it asks me before editing, so I want to create an account to test it out. Does anybody have ideas on what to name the bot? I don’t want to call it 42.book.addictBOT, since the username would be a bit clunky. ToriBOT could work, but I’m also open to any other names. Feel free to reply to this or reply to me on my talk page! '''[[User:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:9pt;color:#db97bf&amp;quot;&amp;gt;42.book.addict&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:6pt;color:#97b6db&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Talk to me!&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;''' 20:30, 29 November 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== &amp;quot;dark mode&amp;quot; ==&lt;br /&gt;
add dark mode [[User:CalibansCreations|'''&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#ff0000;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Caliban&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;''']] ([[User talk:CalibansCreations|talk]]) 09:54, 18 November 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:See [[User:Certified nqh/common.css]] or copy/paste my old [[User:42.book.addict/common.css|common.css]] page history into your common.css page: -42.book.addict [[Special:Contributions/172.69.134.208|172.69.134.208]] 16:10, 18 November 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::ha, thx tori, nqh's common.css works like a charm :) [[User:CalibansCreations|'''&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#ff0000;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Caliban&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;''']] ([[User talk:CalibansCreations|talk]]) 08:51, 21 November 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== reddit ==&lt;br /&gt;
Add reddit- Anonymous {{unsigned ip|172.71.214.80|08:31, 21 November 2024 (UTC)}}&lt;br /&gt;
:You probably need to explain what you mean by that. Add reddit discussions to here? Add this site to reddit? Add some simple link to one from the other? Something else? [[Special:Contributions/172.70.162.163|172.70.162.163]] 13:02, 21 November 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::&amp;gt;Add some simple link to one from the other?&lt;br /&gt;
::I have no idea what they meant either, but I hadn't thought of this! I could see the addition of a simple link to the comic template, like &amp;quot;https://reddit.com/r/xkcd/comments/{{PAGETITLE}&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;https://reddit.com/r/xkcd/search/?q={{PAGETITLE}&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
::I don't partecipate much in the r/xkcd subreddit, so i'm not sure if they have structured post titles or even if they posted all the comics, or if it's automated, but I think this could be cool! Some people will likely come from Reddit, so it would be a straightforward way for them to go back. Thoughts? {{unsigned|FaviFake|16:55, 11 January 2025 (UTC)}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== viewer ==&lt;br /&gt;
i propose to add random page to comic viewer {{unsigned ip|172.71.150.14|00:17, 25 February 2025 (UTC)}}&lt;br /&gt;
:There's already a &amp;quot;Random Page&amp;quot; link.&lt;br /&gt;
:If you mean (it's ambiguous!) a &amp;quot;Random Comic Page&amp;quot; link, then I'm not sure it's needed. There are so many &amp;quot;Comic pages&amp;quot; that it's a fairly good chance that you'll land on one of them for any given click, much more chance within two clicks. The likelihood of not getting a comic within ''three'' clicks will be tiny. Another way to do it is to just use the xkcd.com &amp;quot;Random&amp;quot; button, then (whichever comic you land on, which will be any but [[404]]), change the &amp;quot;xkcd.com&amp;quot; bit of the URL to &amp;quot;expxkcd.com&amp;quot; and... you end up here.&lt;br /&gt;
:If none of that really does what you want (especially if you mean something completely different from what I read it as), some more explanation would probably be appreciated. [[Special:Contributions/172.69.79.164|172.69.79.164]] 01:02, 25 February 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:If you want to make sure to land on all comics, you can go to &amp;quot;Special pages&amp;quot; on the sidebar, scroll down to &amp;quot;Random page in category&amp;quot;, and enter &amp;quot;All comics&amp;quot;. As far as I'm aware, there isn't really a way to automate this, so you have to keep inputting it manually. [[User:Firestar233|guess who]] ([[User talk:Firestar233|if you desire conversing]] | [[Special:Contributions/Firestar233|what i have done]]) 06:38, 25 February 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::I think they meant a button on the {{tl|comic}} template. Would it be technically possible to make it such that it works exacly like the one on the official site? --[[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 17:47, 25 February 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::It ''should'' be a matter of using [[Special:RandomInCategory/All Comics]], I think, but doesn't seem to work when I try that exact attempt. Perhaps mediawiki or the mediawiki extension is not updated enough, or else I'm getting my wikisyntax slightly wrong.&lt;br /&gt;
:::Functionally, though, where the website has its Random button, we have our &amp;quot;go to the xkcd.com original&amp;quot;, so more thought is needed before we just &amp;quot;add a button&amp;quot;. If we do, we want it where the 'mothership' website does, but we still ought to have our details-and-link-to-original given, and I like it as a (faux) button.&lt;br /&gt;
::: Perhaps the {{template|comic}}, where it currently has header 'buttons':&lt;br /&gt;
 [|&amp;lt;&amp;lt;] [Prev] [#9876 (Grune 32, 2525)] [Next] [&amp;gt;&amp;gt;|]&lt;br /&gt;
::: Needs to be changed to maybe:&lt;br /&gt;
       [ #9876 (Grune 32, 2525) ]&lt;br /&gt;
 [|&amp;lt;&amp;lt;] [Prev]   [Random]   [Next] [&amp;gt;&amp;gt;|]&lt;br /&gt;
:::...or equivalent. Haven't checked, but if it's a one-line table, can be easily made into a two-line one with colspan=3 (or 5?) in the right bit. If it's just centred, then it should come out Ok, in a simple way. But I'm not too keen on that change, really, and you'd need to actually have the Random-&amp;gt;Comic link working first, ''anyway''. So I'm giving you my opinions and (slightly lacking) knowledge, in case that can at least make for the better outcome than either nothing (though not sure that's bad!) or some half-hearted ideas from elsewhere. [[Special:Contributions/172.70.86.116|172.70.86.116]] 21:52, 25 February 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::: Unless someone can figure out the requests made by the random in category, a workaround could be to use a (pseudo)random number generator (mediawiki has a [https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Template:Random_number template] on their website) to get a random number in the range of 1 - {{template|LATESTCOMIC}} and put in a link to that comic number using &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;[[number]]&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
:::: Note: There already is a &amp;quot;Random&amp;quot; template, but it was just using random page and was blanked by the person who made it [[User:Firestar233|guess who]] ([[User talk:Firestar233|if you desire conversing]] | [[Special:Contributions/Firestar233|what i have done]]) 03:50, 26 February 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::{{Done|Done!!!}} &amp;amp;nbsp;I tried that wikimedia templaete but couldn't figure out how to make it work. I did it using Special:Random, hoping there aren't too many non-comic pages. Check [[{{LATESTCOMIC}}]] for an example of how it looks and works. --[[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 16:02, 23 April 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::thanks! (i hav an account now) [[User:Bb777|me, hi]] ([[User talk:Bb777|talk]]) 22:30, 25 April 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::No problem! There's also a special custom-designed navbar for the original comics: try clicking the &amp;quot;|&amp;lt;&amp;quot; button! (It's not complete yet, but i'm slowly finishing it!) --[[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 22:36, 25 April 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Contentious Topics Template ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I propose that we create a unified template to slap on contentious and possibly controversial comics, with a warning similar to the one I (and a couple other people added on) wrote in [[3073: Tariffs]]. Now, since I don’t know how to create a template and don’t understand how they work, this is my request for help. If you are available to help write it or have any tips for me, please contact me either in this thread or on my [[User talk:42.book.addict|talk page]]. Thanks! '''[[User:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:9pt;color:pink&amp;quot;&amp;gt;42.book.addict&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:6pt;color:#B1E4E3&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Talk to me!&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;''' 18:01, 16 April 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Hey, I just wanted to ask why you think a new template is needed. {{tl|notice2}} and {{tl|notice}} seem pretty solid. How would a new template differ from them? Btw, I switched the template in [[Talk:3073: Tariffs]] from {{tl|notice}} to {{tl|notice2}} so it's more like a warning, feel free to revert it if you prefer {{tl|notice}}. --[[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 16:56, 17 April 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::I read the idea (which I'm not too enamoured with, but wouldn't argue against either) as being to create a &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{contentious}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;-like template in its own right that (perhaps by using {{template|notice2}} within it) had a standard &amp;quot;This comic, and its explanation, covers a particularly contentious subject. Take even more care than usual when adding to or editing this Explanation/Talk Page&amp;quot; (or similar) text with it.&lt;br /&gt;
::It would probably also have the ability to add further (or alternate) info, by standard template parameters, in case you want to personalise it to the ''exact''nature of the contention.&lt;br /&gt;
::But, my reasons why I didn't volunteer my ideas immediately are:&lt;br /&gt;
::*It paints targets. Anybody who wants to can look at all &amp;quot;pages using the Contentious template&amp;quot; and then troll-bomb them ''specifically''&lt;br /&gt;
::*Looking at the Tariffs-comic warning, that's ''huge'', and catering for that with a &amp;quot;standard text + additional notes&amp;quot; would be awkward... if you really believe it should be so huge in the first place,&lt;br /&gt;
::*Just by being so obviously available, there'd be creep. &amp;quot;Hey, this comic talks disparagingly about Newton's belief in alchemy... Surely that needs a warning too!&amp;quot;, or start off with &amp;quot;Well, nobody's warning about our attitude to the US Senate in this comic, so I can be disparaging&amp;quot; which then practically forces another contentious-tagging (''possibly'' useful, but maybe in making a bolt for the barn door only ''after'' the horse has already made its own bolt through it) as it gets toned-down/-back again.&lt;br /&gt;
::And, though I also imagined the Tariff comic ''would'' get some push-back (there was some minor bits, but we seem to have kept it mature enough, IMO), it seems to be quiet. Can't say for sure it would have been without the warning it now has, but it survived ok before that was added. Hence why I'm ''meh'' about the very proposal. Hard cases make hard laws, and hard situations may prompt hard solutions. But I'm dubious about the actual case for the need. (As you say, we have 'freeform' notice+notice2, and I haven't seen proof even that was necessary as it was used.)&lt;br /&gt;
::But it would be trivial to implement, give or take some fine-tuning. I'll say that as a positive for the idea. Even if we never really use it as much as we could. [[Special:Contributions/162.158.216.83|162.158.216.83]] 20:35, 17 April 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Agreed. Maybe it's a good thing that we have to craft one for each comic we want to tag; this makes sure only actually contentious comics get tagged. An upside to having a specific template is that we wouldn't need to type &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;noinclude&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt; every time, to avoid it displaying on the transcluded talk page.--[[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 21:00, 17 April 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::::mm. all of these are good points. now that i think about it, copy-pasting old warnings and tweaking them as needed is probably better than creating a new template. '''[[User:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:9pt;color:pink&amp;quot;&amp;gt;42.book.addict&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:6pt;color:#B1E4E3&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Talk to me!&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;''' 16:45, 18 April 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Proposal for template page==&lt;br /&gt;
I was thinking that making a template page with instructions about what should and should not be included in which sections would make it easier for new editors to help. I have no idea how I would do this, though.[[User:BobcatInABox|BobcatInABox]] ([[User talk:BobcatInABox|talk]]) 11:49, 4 May 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Which particular template? Many templates ''do'' contain instructions (from basic to rather thorough), and some common ones are also gone into in the FAQ page. [[Special:Contributions/172.70.91.245|172.70.91.245]] 20:25, 4 May 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== The newest stuff goes at top ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I’ve been thinking the newest comments should go at top and replies are under the chose comment with a colon or more. Because every time someone makes a comment but not replying to you, you still get a message. So you only get notifications when someone replies to you. And the always get notifications not related to you is kind of annoying. [[User:Aprilfoolsupdate!|Aprilfoolsupdate!]] ([[User talk:Aprilfoolsupdate!|talk]]) 04:30, 15 May 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:(Ah, so you found it, before I even wrote my directions down on how to get here.)&lt;br /&gt;
:Not sure this helps.&lt;br /&gt;
:Firstly: Top-posting is &amp;lt;s&amp;gt;the work of the Devil... burn it! Burn it all!&amp;lt;/s&amp;gt; very hard to read.&lt;br /&gt;
::A: Because it's in totally the wrong order.&lt;br /&gt;
::Q: Why is Top Posting bad?&lt;br /&gt;
:(Yes, I know you want top-posting ''threads'' but retain bottom-posting ''thread replies'', but can you even imagine the chaos involved with people not properly realising what's top- and what's bottom-posted. Or inter-posted into an existing hierarchy? Not with this 'flatfile' structure, anyway.)&lt;br /&gt;
:Secondly: Does this count for headers (like &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;== The newest stuff goes at top ==&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;)? For 'no-colon' starter comments under a Discussion header? For both?&lt;br /&gt;
:Thirdly: what are we doing with all the past ''pages and pages'' of things that are (more or less..) consistently chronological and bottom-posted? To make new additions work, someone (and probably ''before'' the first commentator who wants to add a brand new one-line witicism to the top of any multi-year-idle page) has to go into every Discussion page (and more?) to reshuffle it all by whatever Top(ish)-Post Criteria are adopted.&lt;br /&gt;
:Fourthly: It wouldn't even change how frequently you get notifications. (Actually, it might make it worse, as inveterate bottom-posters have to be 'corrected' by the followers of the 'new rule', as well as for any actually idle pages that get redone as part of the &amp;quot;thirdly&amp;quot; point.) But I don't think Notifications are clever enough to imagine that a new section  ''above'' what you previously wrote doesn't possibly interest your registered &amp;quot;watch and notify&amp;quot; intent upon any given page.&lt;br /&gt;
:I have a Fifthly and Sixthly, too, but I assume I've made my general opinion quite clear. (And I noted that this is not the only Community Portal edit you made, just before arriving here. Will check the other in a moment.) [[Special:Contributions/172.68.229.142|172.68.229.142]] 06:19, 15 May 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::Never mind. I don’t even need to read the whole thing to know it is complicated. To many words {{unsigned|Aprilfoolsupdate|07:54, 15 May 2025 (UTC)}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Short version: It's complicated, confusing and troublesome to change to. &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;And won't even solve your problem.&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; [[Special:Contributions/172.70.160.197|172.70.160.197]] 12:22, 15 May 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Agree with this message but disagree with the proposal. --[[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 09:28, 18 May 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== By the Numbers ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Greetings all,&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
So we all know that Randall numbers each XKCD comic with an ordinal number in a simple ascending sequence. I have become exceedingly intrigued by the particular properties of numbers now, especially their factors and primes. The most recent prime-numbered comic is [[3109]] and we'll soon see another one with [[3119]]. Does Randall ascribe any meaning or humor to the numbers that happen to appear as the posts play out? He certainly celebrates special dates! As a math-humor-based comic, there certainly must be jokes or surprises hidden therein. I'm not sure I've noticed any yet, though. [[386]] is certainly notorious, though doesn't seem to have a direct sort of Intel connection. [[42]] is unremarkable. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I once read a novel with an autistic protagonist, and each chapter was assigned a prime number. I will henceforth be on the lookout for interesting numerical happenstance as Randall continues to post! Anyone else? [[User:Elizium23|Elizium23]] ([[User talk:Elizium23|talk]]) 08:56, 12 July 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Misc pages ==&lt;br /&gt;
I would like to propose the creation of an additional category for &amp;quot;miscellaneous pages&amp;quot; that aren't really comics, and which generally have a URL slug that's an English word or phrase instead of a number. This includes xkcd.com/YES and xkcd.com/NO, both of which currently have articles. It also includes these ones: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::''[Note by User:FaviFake: I organised this section and moved the links below]''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
...and others as they are found or recovered. If only we could access the forum thread mentioned on the YES and NO pages! I was able to find a link to the thread here, but it's inaccessible. A&lt;br /&gt;
It's the one labeled &amp;quot;Hidden pages on xkcd&amp;quot;: [https://web.archive.org/web/20170927200737/http://forums.xkcd.com/viewforum.php?f=2&amp;amp;sid=973b8a1dcd0a727a9177aa757108d4f6&amp;amp;start=250]. I was able to find the pages above via Reddit: [https://www.reddit.com/r/xkcd/comments/gixd96/what_are_all_the_hidden_pages_on_xkcd_that_you/] [https://www.reddit.com/r/xkcd/comments/35whzf/what/] --[[User:Rumbling7145|Rumbling7145]] ([[User talk:Rumbling7145|talk]]) 00:16, 11 March 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Update: I got into the forum page! [https://web.archive.org/web/20151206001238/http://forums.xkcd.com/viewtopic.php?f=2&amp;amp;t=110093] We can now add these pages to the list:&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Rumbling7145|Rumbling7145]] ([[User talk:Rumbling7145|talk]]) 23:37, 11 March 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;span id=&amp;quot;List of pages&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
===Pages===&lt;br /&gt;
* http://xkcd.com/yes {{Done|Created: [[YES]]}}&lt;br /&gt;
** http://xkcd.com/no {{Done|Created: [[NO]]}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* http://xkcd.com/nakedpictures {{Done|Created: [[nakedpictures]]}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* http://xkcd.com/spiral {{Done|Created: [[spiral]]}}&lt;br /&gt;
**Likely a reference to [[1488: Flowcharts]] (Which links to Spiral) and [[2322: ISO Paper Size Golden Spiral]], spirals above images of people and things&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* http://xkcd.com/burlap {{Done|Created: [[Burlap]]}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* http://xkcd.com/simplewriter {{Done|Created: [[Simple Writer]]}}&lt;br /&gt;
**Tool to Write Like [[Up Goer Five]] and [[Thing Explainer]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* http://xkcd.com/tree_prank&lt;br /&gt;
**This is so funny&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* http://xkcd.com/blue_eyes.html {{Done|Existing: [[Blue Eyes]]}}&lt;br /&gt;
** http://xkcd.com/solution.html, the solution to the problem (also found on [[Blue Eyes]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* http://xkcd.com/morphs ([https://web.archive.org/web/20130313175333/http://xkcd.com:80/morphs/ archive only] — [https://web.archive.org/web/20060219184352/http://www.xkcd.com:80/morphs/ earlier version with more text])&lt;br /&gt;
**&amp;quot;Using several pieces of imaging software, including Photoshop and an image morphing program, I make composite photos of people.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* http://xkcd.com/chesscoaster&lt;br /&gt;
**&amp;quot;People playing chess on roller coasters, inspired by this comic:&amp;quot; image&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* http://xkcd.com/kite&lt;br /&gt;
**&amp;quot;These are pictures I took by hanging cameras from kites, a hobby I've played with on and off over the years&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*https://xkcd.com/kite/kite_trick.jpg&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* http://xkcd.com/dot {{Done|Created: [[dot]]}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* http://xkcd.com/election ([https://web.archive.org/web/20141014075718/http://xkcd.com/election/ archive only])&lt;br /&gt;
**Used by randall for tracking elections, &amp;quot;it's the fastest analysis of the state of the race minute-by-minute&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* http://xkcd.com/event {{Done|Created: [[event]]}} (I still don't quite get it)&lt;br /&gt;
**There's an image on this site that a web browser fails to load, but when downloaded, Windows Photo Viewer can view the image.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* http://xkcd.com/now (redirect to [[1335: Now]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* http://xkcd.com/plus {{Done|Created: [[plus]]}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* http://xkcd.com/sub ([https://web.archive.org/web/20130111054027/http://xkcd.com/sub/ archive only]) — &amp;quot;The Sub Project&amp;quot;, a long explanation of how Randall and others build submarines?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* http://xkcd.com/temp ([https://web.archive.org/web/20061219193846/http://www.xkcd.com/temp/ archive only])&lt;br /&gt;
**This is super interesting! It lists other sub-directories. [https://web.archive.org/web/*/http://www.xkcd.com/temp/* These are the ones that survived in the archive]:&lt;br /&gt;
**http://xkcd.com/temp/email.txt ([https://web.archive.org/web/20100305065807/http://xkcd.com/temp/email.txt archive only]) — Seems to be an email exchange between Randall and someone else?&lt;br /&gt;
**http://xkcd.com:80/temp/euphoria.txt ([https://web.archive.org/web/20160401222138id_/http://xkcd.com:80/temp/euphoria.txt archive only]) — This says &amp;quot;&amp;lt;Sphere&amp;gt; Ok, that last Randall who said 'to clarify' was actually Randall, but pretty much none of the others were. Also no Sphere after this gets linked in chat a second time is actually Randall either. Randall is probably not there.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
**https://xkcd.com/temp/evidenceofidentity.txt ([https://web.archive.org/web/20201118232320/https://xkcd.com/temp/evidenceofidentity.txt archive only]) — &amp;quot;[Randall] Hello to everyone who waited in line to say hi to me on my How To book tour and specifically mentioned this chat!&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;[Sierra] Hello mr. probably not the real Randall :D [...]&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
***The rest are all images:&lt;br /&gt;
**http://www.xkcd.com/temp/humor/baby_mop.jpg ([https://web.archive.org/web/20070127045748/http://www.xkcd.com:80/temp/humor/baby_mop.jpg archive only])&lt;br /&gt;
**http://www.xkcd.com/temp/humor/darthswingset.jpg ([https://web.archive.org/web/20070127045624/http://www.xkcd.com:80/temp/humor/darthswingset.jpg archive only])&lt;br /&gt;
**http://www.xkcd.com/temp/humor/deb6d13b50a581304bac385c463b09c1.jpg ([https://web.archive.org/web/20070225103228/http://www.xkcd.com:80/temp/humor/deb6d13b50a581304bac385c463b09c1.jpg archive only])&lt;br /&gt;
**http://www.xkcd.com/temp/humor/Hacker%20Grave.jpg ([https://web.archive.org/web/20070213182708/http://www.xkcd.com:80/temp/humor/Hacker%20Grave.jpg archive only])&lt;br /&gt;
**http://www.xkcd.com/temp/humor/hotornot.jpg ([https://web.archive.org/web/20061219194445/http://www.xkcd.com:80/temp/humor/hotornot.jpg archive only])&lt;br /&gt;
**http://www.xkcd.com/temp/humor/how_rumors_start_office.jpg ([https://web.archive.org/web/20070111000437/http://www.xkcd.com:80/temp/humor/how_rumors_start_office.jpg archive only])&lt;br /&gt;
**http://www.xkcd.com/temp/humor/owned.jpg ([https://web.archive.org/web/20070228031547/http://www.xkcd.com:80/temp/humor/owned.jpg archive only])&lt;br /&gt;
**http://www.xkcd.com/temp/humor/shark.jpg ([https://web.archive.org/web/20061214082834/http://www.xkcd.com:80/temp/humor/shark.jpg archive only])&lt;br /&gt;
**http://www.xkcd.com/temp/humor/you_cannot_pass.jpg ([https://web.archive.org/web/20070323001005/http://www.xkcd.com:80/temp/humor/you_cannot_pass.jpg archive only])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* http://xkcd.com/test ([https://web.archive.org/web/20170510061033/https://xkcd.com/test/ archive only])&lt;br /&gt;
**This appears identical to the regular xkcd.com homepage, it returns a 404 as of today&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* http://xkcd.com/time (redirect to comic [[1190: Time]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* http://xkcd.com/twitter (redirect to https://x.com/xkcd)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* http://xkcd.com/cyborg.txt&lt;br /&gt;
**Interesting script. According to [https://blog.xkcd.com/2008/05/20/gps-cyborg-implant/ an old blag article], it is &amp;quot;a short Python script that uses a USB GPS device under Linux to help with navigation.  It doesn’t have maps or anything — it just gives distances and, while you’re moving, the direction to the destination (as in 'two o’clock').  It prints this info on the terminal and speaks it using speech synthesis.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* http://xkcd.com/channel.html ([https://web.archive.org/web/20141011002528/https://xkcd.com/channel.html archive only])&lt;br /&gt;
**I have no idea what this it. It's full of gibberish and Chinese text.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* http://xkcd.com/channel.txt ([https://web.archive.org/web/20141014083026/http://xkcd.com/channel.txt archive only])&lt;br /&gt;
** Same as above, but it downloads the file to the PC.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* http://xkcd.com/me.txt ([https://web.archive.org/web/20141014101900/http://xkcd.com:80/me.txt archive only])&lt;br /&gt;
**Only says &amp;quot;I am not in 1110.n01se.net anymore&amp;quot;. [https://www.reddit.com/r/xkcd/comments/5tqrew/xkcd_secret_page/ Learn more in this Reddit thread], in this [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EvLxOVYeo5w YouTube video of how it used to work], and in the [https://github.com/n01se/1110 GitHub for 1110.n01se.net]. I'm assuming Randall wanted to say that anyone who tries to impersonate him in the future isn't him?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* http://xkcd.com/why.txt ([https://web.archive.org/web/20180729163548/https://xkcd.com/why.txt archive only])&lt;br /&gt;
**Contains 33 THOUSAND &amp;quot;why&amp;quot; questions. May be related to [[1256: Questions]]? Very interesting!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* http://xkcd.com/bitcoin {{Done|Existing: [[Bitcoin address]]}}&lt;br /&gt;
**There's also this one, which we have dissected on the page [[Bitcoin address]] (very interesting read!)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* http://holistic.xkcd.com ([https://web.archive.org/web/20160304031258/http://holistic.xkcd.com/ archive only])&lt;br /&gt;
**&amp;quot;The XKCD Holistic Browser. Because we are all one. Type a web address and you'll be taken to one typed by someone else.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* https://aram.xkcd.com ([https://web.archive.org/web/20110816163403/http://aram.xkcd.com/ archive only])&lt;br /&gt;
**&amp;quot;This page is regenerated every day and may be NSFW. It shows a random result from a Google image search for IMG_????.jpg plus a random caption:&amp;quot; Seems it stopped working completely after a few years and got stuck one image&amp;amp;caption. Aram inspired [[Black Hat]], see his page for more.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* https://xkcd.com/verizon/ {{Done|Created: [[verizon]]}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* http://mail.xkcd.com ([https://web.archive.org/web/20120321204721/http://mail.xkcd.com/ archive only])&lt;br /&gt;
**Seems Randall set it up but never used it.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* https://xkcd.com/personal&lt;br /&gt;
**There was a /personal folder on xkcd, but it's been entirely wiped https://web.archive.org/web/*/https://xkcd.com/personal/*&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*https://xkcd.com/ngram-charts/ {{Done|Created: [[ngram charts]]}}&lt;br /&gt;
**Still online, but the images are missing even in [https://web.archive.org/web/20120225171410/http://xkcd.com:80/ngram-charts the archive]. &amp;quot;Some of the interesting charts I've come across while using Google Books ngrams (which analyzes the frequency of word use in their scanned books corpus over time)&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
* https://xkcd.com/color/rgb/&lt;br /&gt;
** https://xkcd.com/color/rgb.txt&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* http://68.57.186.221:8080/ ([https://web.archive.org/web/20041024201125/http://68.57.186.221:8080/ archive only])&lt;br /&gt;
** xkcd.com redirected to this at some points during 2004, this capture is from October 24th of 2004 specifically.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* https://throw.xkcd.com (only available [https://web.archive.org/web/20200919232527/throw.xkcd.com/ in the archive])&lt;br /&gt;
**This was likely hacked, see [https://www.reddit.com/r/xkcd/comments/iw9jsg/throwxkcdcom/ this Reddit thread]: ''&amp;quot;I emailed the xkcd.com webmaster, it was a testing URL he forgot to shut down. It's fixed now.&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* https://c.xkcd.com&lt;br /&gt;
**This is mostly all for comics with dynamic content. There are many subpages, see [https://www.reddit.com/r/xkcd/comments/j54lx3/does_anyone_know_what_cxkcdcom_is/ this reddit thread].&lt;br /&gt;
**https://c.xkcd.com/xb/feed&lt;br /&gt;
**http://c.xkcd.com/random/comic (redirects to random comic)&lt;br /&gt;
**https://c.xkcd.com/graph/1&lt;br /&gt;
**[https://www.reddit.com/r/xkcd/comments/j54lx3/does_anyone_know_what_cxkcdcom_is/ There are others].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* https://static.xkcd.com/ (404, not in archive. [http://web.archive.org/web/*/https://static.xkcd.com/* archived subpages])&lt;br /&gt;
** http://static.xkcd.com/bl.png ([http://web.archive.org/web/20070912213845/http://static.xkcd.com/bl.png archive only])&lt;br /&gt;
** http://static.xkcd.com/br.png ([http://web.archive.org/web/20070912213841/http://static.xkcd.com/br.png archive only])&lt;br /&gt;
** http://static.xkcd.com/favicon.ico ([http://web.archive.org/web/20071208203917/http://static.xkcd.com/favicon.ico archive only])&lt;br /&gt;
** http://static.xkcd.com/general.css ([http://web.archive.org/web/20071208203917/http://static.xkcd.com/general.css archive only])&lt;br /&gt;
** http://static.xkcd.com/ieonly.css ([http://web.archive.org/web/20070911163429/http://static.xkcd.com/ieonly.css archive only])&lt;br /&gt;
** http://static.xkcd.com/ml.png ([http://web.archive.org/web/20070912213838/http://static.xkcd.com/ml.png archive only])&lt;br /&gt;
** http://static.xkcd.com/mr.png ([http://web.archive.org/web/20070912213832/http://static.xkcd.com/mr.png archive only])&lt;br /&gt;
** http://static.xkcd.com/tl.png ([http://web.archive.org/web/20070912213828/http://static.xkcd.com/tl.png archive only])&lt;br /&gt;
** http://static.xkcd.com/tr.png ([http://web.archive.org/web/20070912213835/http://static.xkcd.com/tr.png archive only])&lt;br /&gt;
** http://www.static.xkcd.com/robots.txt ([http://web.archive.org/web/20070501000000*/http://www.static.xkcd.com/robots.txt archive only])&lt;br /&gt;
** https://almamater.xkcd.com/ ([http://web.archive.org/web/20130402215109/https://almamater.xkcd.com/ archive only])&lt;br /&gt;
:: https://almamater.xkcd.com/ ([http://web.archive.org/web/20150209005631/https://almamater.xkcd.com/ archive only])&lt;br /&gt;
:: and errors out: https://almamater.xkcd.com/ ([http://web.archive.org/web/20160528035956/https://almamater.xkcd.com/ archive only, errors out])&lt;br /&gt;
*** http://almamater.xkcd.com/best.csv ([http://web.archive.org/web/20130511122543/http://almamater.xkcd.com/best.csv archive only])&lt;br /&gt;
***See comic [[1193: Externalities]]&lt;br /&gt;
{{misc page}}&lt;br /&gt;
You can monitor the pages that are using this template (so the brand new webpage explanations) by going to [[Special:WhatLinksHere/Template:misc_page]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===How should we treat them?===&lt;br /&gt;
This is great! I think we should first create an article for each of them, and after we have a few articles then we can start to figure out a good name for the category and answer some questions, like:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Should we add a new parameter to the template for these non-comics? To do that, we would have to ask an admin to edit the {{tl|comic}} template to allow us to do that. We can ask Kynde, no big deal.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Some pages, like [[Blue Eyes]] and [[Bitcoin address]] are already in other categories, like [[:Category:Extra comics]] and [[:Category:Design of xkcd.com]]. Should we use the existing categories, or add a new one? How do we distinguish between, for example, [[Blue Eyes]], [[Bitcoin address]], and [[YES]], which are all in theory &amp;quot;misc pages&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Where should the new category be categorised?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*What title should we give for explanations of pages that don't have a name, like xkcd.com/dot? That one is just titled &amp;quot;xkcd.com/dot&amp;quot;, unlike pages like Blue Eyes and [[YES]]. Would it become &amp;quot;dot&amp;quot;, &amp;quot;Dot&amp;quot;, something else? Should we keep it coherent or base ourselves solely on the rendered title on the official site?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I love the idea! I currently don't have time, but I will create these pages eventually. If anyone else wants to chime in, please do! --[[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 16:11, 11 March 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;quot;Unnumbered publications&amp;quot;, or similar, could cover ''anything'' that wasn't xkcd.com/&amp;lt;digits&amp;gt;. Wouldn't cover replacements ([[2642: No One Was Hurt]] was originally 2642, for example), but that's a different class from deliberately off-series items. Also, given that often they are entirely non-image (the Yes and No), or straight text and multi-image (as per Blue Eyes, or other articles with a WhatIf-ish feel to them), I think calling them &amp;quot;comic&amp;quot;s is stretching the term.&lt;br /&gt;
:Though &amp;quot;miscellaneous pages&amp;quot; sort of covers this, I've a feeling that there's at least one... 'entity'... that is built upon multiple actual 'pages', but the list of candidates above doesn't contain any that look like they're what I'm vaguely thinking of. (Neither was it anything like the xkcd survey, or other interactive (numbered) comics, but maybe I'll bring it back to mind sooner rather than later.)&lt;br /&gt;
:As to the use of {{template|comic}}, I think we could spring to a (modified, 'inspired-by') template specifically for all these no-number/off-sequence explanation headers. Either explicit &amp;quot;prev=&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;next=&amp;quot; (per comic, ''could'' get quite mixed up if not kept uncontradictory) or a &amp;quot;position=&amp;quot; which could help maintain a list (and, from that, an auto-generated first/prev/next/last 'page ring') without having to subvert expectations of fitting in with the normal [[Template:LATESTCOMIC]] system.&lt;br /&gt;
:With the Comic template already equipped to deal with &amp;quot;no-number 'comics'&amp;quot;, there wouldn't (in the first instance) be much work needed to &amp;quot;decomic&amp;quot; the new copy, with the exact method of resequencing (if desired) as a parallel series being the biggest question. [[Special:Contributions/172.70.85.49|172.70.85.49]] 17:20, 11 March 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I'm not sure what the last sentenc means, but I like the idea of a new template! However, I don't think we should call the category &amp;quot;Unnumbered publications&amp;quot;. Isn't that just [[:Category:Extra comics]] but without comics [[Disappearing Sunday Update]] and [[No One Was Hurt]]? We should establish a criterion to add pages to this category and then figure out a name i think. --[[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 15:42, 12 March 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On this subject, is there any reason why it's [[YES]] and [[NO]] (currently the valid links) rather than [[Yes]] and [[No]] / [[yes]] and [[no]] (currently invalid links)? And I don't mean &amp;quot;why aren't there redirects?&amp;quot;, which I don't even think is the right way of resolving this, but what was the thinking? (Which then didn't result in [[DOT]], etc, so there's ''definitely'' some inconsistency, one way or another.) [[Special:Contributions/172.68.205.92|172.68.205.92]] 21:54, 17 March 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I don't see inconsistencies. The name of the browser tab for the yes page is &amp;quot;YES&amp;quot; by Randall, same for NO. Instead, the page for [[dot]] is called &amp;quot;xkcd.com/dot/&amp;quot;. We could use that, but that's likely not what Randall intended and might have been a coding oversight. --[[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 16:01, 18 March 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I've created the {{tl|misc page}} template for these pages and removed the incomplete template until we reach consensus on what to do with them. --[[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 14:40, 11 May 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ahem, I'd like to remind everyone that they can feel free to comment on the best way to manage these. Or if they should be included in the wiki at all. [[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 21:38, 17 August 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What if we just create a subcategory for These. It is xkcd so it should belong here. Should not be in the random queue but something like a button to get to these. {{unsigned ip|216.125.50.226|16:51, 18 March 2026 (UTC)}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== New page &amp;quot;Spiral&amp;quot; ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I found a new page at [http://xkcd.com/spiral xkcd/spiral]. what should I do? Thanks! &lt;br /&gt;
This is my first post, sorry it's not formatted correctly. -- [[Special:Contributions/73.169.159.188|73.169.159.188]] 00:27, 12 October 2025‎&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: Welcome. Good find! Any suggestions? -- [[User:Dtgriscom|Dtgriscom]] ([[User talk:Dtgriscom|talk]]) 01:47, 12 October 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::I've moved this over to Coordination and uploaded all images on spiral. I'll be making the page soon. '''[[User:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:9pt;color:#3a795e&amp;quot;&amp;gt;42.book.addict&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:6pt;color:#ce5f15&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Talk to me!&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;''' 05:04, 12 October 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Moving to correct location where we're discussing these pages. More discussion about how we should treat them is welcome! [[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 18:00, 13 October 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== [[:Category:Extra pages]] === &lt;br /&gt;
I've created a category called Extra pages for all of these pages. '''[[User:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:9pt;color:#3a795e&amp;quot;&amp;gt;42.book.addict&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:6pt;color:#ce5f15&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Talk to me!&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;''' 03:14, 5 November 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:So, right now we have &amp;quot;Category:Extra pages&amp;quot; ''and'' &amp;quot;Category:Extra comics&amp;quot;. Some ''are'' unnumbered comics (plus at least one &amp;quot;was a number, then replaced&amp;quot;) and some are 'merely' pages (with possible a fuzzy line between for 'pages' that show images-that-aren't-comics), perhaps we should be consistent between which are which, and how they relate to 'standard' numbered comics.&lt;br /&gt;
:For example, being an Extra Comics was (officially, but you could also manually add it) initiated by the &amp;quot;extra=yes&amp;quot; param to {{template|comic}}. This also (theoretically, problems with the randomness backend aside) adds them to the Random Comics link-choice, ''without'' adding them to the Comic List numbers (such that it states &amp;quot;we have #### comics&amp;quot;, where #### should not be different from the latest comic number, as recently established).&lt;br /&gt;
:Perhaps:&lt;br /&gt;
:*Make the comic template accept &amp;quot;extra=comic&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;extra=page&amp;quot;, instead of &amp;quot;extra=yes&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
:**Perhaps &amp;quot;extra=yes&amp;quot; 'remains' to default to one or the other? ...nah, just make sure all the current &amp;quot;=yes&amp;quot; ones are assigned beforehand.&lt;br /&gt;
:**&amp;quot;extra=no&amp;quot; just defaults back to behaviour without any &amp;quot;extra=&amp;quot; at all, of course, pretty much as currently.&lt;br /&gt;
:*Each of these new distinctions assigns to the 'Extra' category that fits it, but keeps it out of the All (numbered) Comics list, as being not numbered (and some not being 'comics')&lt;br /&gt;
:*Either ''just'' keep Extra Comics feeding to the Random Comic list (All Comics+Extra Comics, as we've painstakingly set it up to do, recently) or ''also'' include Extra Pages (it being AC+EC+EP in the Special:Random target list/whatever). TBD, depends upon whether you like a strictly &amp;quot;non-comic page&amp;quot; potentially popping up as a 'treat' for people.&lt;br /&gt;
:...that's all a ''little'' extra work. Some of which I could probably do right now (though maybe some pages are Protected against my input, haven't checked), but I think this needs discussion before doing any actual refining of the current setup.&lt;br /&gt;
:Might have been better to have proposed and discussed the Extra Pages details before starting that, too, but I'm happy to use this setup as a stepping stone given that it's been done already. [[Special:Contributions/82.132.244.89|82.132.244.89]] 14:20, 5 November 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Update on ngrams ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The images on the ngrams page appear to be generated dynamically. The original URLs are broken, but can be restored by changing &amp;quot;/chart&amp;quot; to &amp;quot;/graph&amp;quot;. This doesn't fix the HTML page, but it does render each of the 58 URLs accessible - see below.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
All graphs default to a corpus from 2009. Note that some graphs, such as the one noted &amp;quot;cherry picking&amp;quot; below, look very different using a more recent corpus.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* http://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=President+Lincoln%2CPresident+Roosevelt%2CPresident+Kennedy%2CPresident+Johnson%2CPresident+Nixon%2CPresident+Reagan%2CPresident+Bush&amp;amp;year_start=1780&amp;amp;year_end=2008&amp;amp;corpus=5&amp;amp;smoothing=3&lt;br /&gt;
* http://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=fuck&amp;amp;year_start=1700&amp;amp;year_end=2008&amp;amp;corpus=0&amp;amp;smoothing=3&lt;br /&gt;
* http://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=the+Great+War%2Cthe+World+War%2CWorld+War+I&amp;amp;year_start=1900&amp;amp;year_end=2000&amp;amp;corpus=0&amp;amp;smoothing=2&lt;br /&gt;
* http://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=christian%2Cchristianity&amp;amp;year_start=1700&amp;amp;year_end=2000&amp;amp;corpus=0&amp;amp;smoothing=3&lt;br /&gt;
* http://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=aliens%2C+predators&amp;amp;year_start=1750&amp;amp;year_end=2008&amp;amp;corpus=0&amp;amp;smoothing=1&lt;br /&gt;
* http://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=explosion+in+popularity&amp;amp;year_start=1900&amp;amp;year_end=2000&amp;amp;corpus=0&amp;amp;smoothing=3&lt;br /&gt;
* http://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=blue+line&amp;amp;year_start=1960&amp;amp;year_end=2008&amp;amp;corpus=0&amp;amp;smoothing=3&lt;br /&gt;
* http://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=upward+trend&amp;amp;year_start=1960&amp;amp;year_end=2008&amp;amp;corpus=0&amp;amp;smoothing=3&lt;br /&gt;
* http://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=gay%2Clesbian%2Cbisexual&amp;amp;year_start=1940&amp;amp;year_end=2008&amp;amp;corpus=0&amp;amp;smoothing=3&lt;br /&gt;
* http://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=Leviticus+18%2Cturn+the+other+cheek&amp;amp;year_start=1960&amp;amp;year_end=2000&amp;amp;corpus=5&amp;amp;smoothing=3 (cherry-picking)&lt;br /&gt;
* http://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=vegetarian&amp;amp;year_start=1750&amp;amp;year_end=2008&amp;amp;corpus=0&amp;amp;smoothing=1&lt;br /&gt;
* http://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=drunk&amp;amp;year_start=1750&amp;amp;year_end=2008&amp;amp;corpus=0&amp;amp;smoothing=1&lt;br /&gt;
* http://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=television%2C+tuberculosis&amp;amp;year_start=1750&amp;amp;year_end=2008&amp;amp;corpus=0&amp;amp;smoothing=1&lt;br /&gt;
* http://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=love%2Chope%2Cfaith%2C+sex&amp;amp;year_start=1750&amp;amp;year_end=2008&amp;amp;corpus=0&amp;amp;smoothing=1&lt;br /&gt;
* http://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=hope&amp;amp;year_start=1700&amp;amp;year_end=2008&amp;amp;corpus=6&amp;amp;smoothing=1&lt;br /&gt;
* http://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=entomology%2Cetymology&amp;amp;year_start=1900&amp;amp;year_end=2008&amp;amp;corpus=0&amp;amp;smoothing=3&lt;br /&gt;
* http://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=carriage%2Ccar%2Cautomobile&amp;amp;year_start=1700&amp;amp;year_end=2008&amp;amp;corpus=0&amp;amp;smoothing=3&lt;br /&gt;
* http://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=irregardless%2Cregardlessly%2Cunregarding&amp;amp;year_start=1800&amp;amp;year_end=2008&amp;amp;corpus=0&amp;amp;smoothing=3&lt;br /&gt;
* http://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=a+bird+in+the+hand%2Clive+by+the+sword%2Clook+before+you+leap%2Ca+penny+saved&amp;amp;year_start=1780&amp;amp;year_end=2008&amp;amp;corpus=0&amp;amp;smoothing=3&lt;br /&gt;
* http://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=war&amp;amp;year_start=1700&amp;amp;year_end=2008&amp;amp;corpus=0&amp;amp;smoothing=3&lt;br /&gt;
* http://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=Muslim%2CMoslem%2CMoslim%2CMussulman%2C+Moslam&amp;amp;year_start=1700&amp;amp;year_end=2008&amp;amp;corpus=0&amp;amp;smoothing=3&lt;br /&gt;
* http://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=Empire%2C+empire&amp;amp;year_start=1700&amp;amp;year_end=2008&amp;amp;corpus=6&amp;amp;smoothing=1&lt;br /&gt;
* http://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=decline%2Cprogress&amp;amp;year_start=1700&amp;amp;year_end=2008&amp;amp;corpus=6&amp;amp;smoothing=1&lt;br /&gt;
* http://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=progress&amp;amp;year_start=1700&amp;amp;year_end=2008&amp;amp;corpus=6&amp;amp;smoothing=1&lt;br /&gt;
* http://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=war&amp;amp;year_start=1700&amp;amp;year_end=2008&amp;amp;corpus=0&amp;amp;smoothing=1&lt;br /&gt;
* http://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=Rapture&amp;amp;year_start=1700&amp;amp;year_end=2008&amp;amp;corpus=0&amp;amp;smoothing=3&lt;br /&gt;
* http://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=history%2Cpast%2Cfuture&amp;amp;year_start=1700&amp;amp;year_end=2008&amp;amp;corpus=0&amp;amp;smoothing=3&lt;br /&gt;
* http://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=Star+Wars%2C+Star+Trek&amp;amp;year_start=1950&amp;amp;year_end=2008&amp;amp;corpus=0&amp;amp;smoothing=0&lt;br /&gt;
* http://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=Jesus+Christ&amp;amp;year_start=1720&amp;amp;year_end=2008&amp;amp;corpus=0&amp;amp;smoothing=3&lt;br /&gt;
* http://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=President&amp;amp;year_start=1780&amp;amp;year_end=2008&amp;amp;corpus=5&amp;amp;smoothing=3&lt;br /&gt;
* http://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=tyranny&amp;amp;year_start=1700&amp;amp;year_end=2000&amp;amp;corpus=0&amp;amp;smoothing=3&lt;br /&gt;
* http://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=power+to+the+people&amp;amp;year_start=1700&amp;amp;year_end=2000&amp;amp;corpus=0&amp;amp;smoothing=3&lt;br /&gt;
* http://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=flag&amp;amp;year_start=1700&amp;amp;year_end=2008&amp;amp;corpus=4&amp;amp;smoothing=3&lt;br /&gt;
* http://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=end+of+the+world&amp;amp;year_start=1700&amp;amp;year_end=2008&amp;amp;corpus=0&amp;amp;smoothing=3&lt;br /&gt;
* http://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=Bible+study&amp;amp;year_start=1800&amp;amp;year_end=2008&amp;amp;corpus=0&amp;amp;smoothing=3&lt;br /&gt;
* http://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=God+bless+America&amp;amp;year_start=1800&amp;amp;year_end=2008&amp;amp;corpus=0&amp;amp;smoothing=3&lt;br /&gt;
* http://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=merry+Christmas%2Chappy+holidays&amp;amp;year_start=1960&amp;amp;year_end=2008&amp;amp;corpus=0&amp;amp;smoothing=3&lt;br /&gt;
* http://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=Space&amp;amp;year_start=1700&amp;amp;year_end=2008&amp;amp;corpus=0&amp;amp;smoothing=1&lt;br /&gt;
* http://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=old+fashioned&amp;amp;year_start=1750&amp;amp;year_end=2008&amp;amp;corpus=0&amp;amp;smoothing=1&lt;br /&gt;
* http://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=sword%2C+gun&amp;amp;year_start=1700&amp;amp;year_end=2008&amp;amp;corpus=0&amp;amp;smoothing=1&lt;br /&gt;
* http://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=pirate&amp;amp;year_start=1700&amp;amp;year_end=2008&amp;amp;corpus=0&amp;amp;smoothing=1&lt;br /&gt;
* http://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=Ayn+Rand&amp;amp;year_start=1700&amp;amp;year_end=2008&amp;amp;corpus=0&amp;amp;smoothing=3&lt;br /&gt;
* http://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=Marx&amp;amp;year_start=1700&amp;amp;year_end=2008&amp;amp;corpus=0&amp;amp;smoothing=3&lt;br /&gt;
* http://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=Marx%2C+Marxy%2C+Marxist%2C+Marxiest&amp;amp;year_start=1850&amp;amp;year_end=2008&amp;amp;corpus=0&amp;amp;smoothing=0&lt;br /&gt;
* http://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=communism%2Ccommunist%2Csocialist&amp;amp;year_start=1830&amp;amp;year_end=2008&amp;amp;corpus=0&amp;amp;smoothing=1&lt;br /&gt;
* http://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=Russia%2C+USSR&amp;amp;year_start=1700&amp;amp;year_end=2008&amp;amp;corpus=0&amp;amp;smoothing=0&lt;br /&gt;
* http://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=savior%2CSavior&amp;amp;year_start=1720&amp;amp;year_end=2008&amp;amp;corpus=0&amp;amp;smoothing=3&lt;br /&gt;
* http://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=trend&amp;amp;year_start=1700&amp;amp;year_end=2008&amp;amp;corpus=0&amp;amp;smoothing=3&lt;br /&gt;
* http://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=girly&amp;amp;year_start=1900&amp;amp;year_end=2008&amp;amp;corpus=0&amp;amp;smoothing=3&lt;br /&gt;
* http://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=restroom%2C+bathroom%2C+toilet&amp;amp;year_start=1700&amp;amp;year_end=2008&amp;amp;corpus=0&amp;amp;smoothing=3&lt;br /&gt;
* http://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=pursuit+of+happiness&amp;amp;year_start=1700&amp;amp;year_end=2008&amp;amp;corpus=0&amp;amp;smoothing=3&lt;br /&gt;
* http://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=telechart%2Ctelephone%2Ctelegram%2Ctelevision%2Cradio%2Cinternet&amp;amp;year_start=1840&amp;amp;year_end=2008&amp;amp;corpus=0&amp;amp;smoothing=3&lt;br /&gt;
* http://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=king&amp;amp;year_start=1700&amp;amp;year_end=2008&amp;amp;corpus=0&amp;amp;smoothing=3&lt;br /&gt;
* http://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=science&amp;amp;year_start=1700&amp;amp;year_end=2008&amp;amp;corpus=0&amp;amp;smoothing=3&lt;br /&gt;
* http://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=decade&amp;amp;year_start=1780&amp;amp;year_end=2008&amp;amp;corpus=0&amp;amp;smoothing=3&lt;br /&gt;
* http://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=thousand&amp;amp;year_start=1700&amp;amp;year_end=2008&amp;amp;corpus=0&amp;amp;smoothing=3&lt;br /&gt;
* http://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=hundred%2Cthousand%2Cmillion%2Cbillion%2Ctrillion&amp;amp;year_start=1700&amp;amp;year_end=2008&amp;amp;corpus=0&amp;amp;smoothing=3&lt;br /&gt;
* http://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=jillion%2Czillion%2Cbazillion%2Ckazillion&amp;amp;year_start=1900&amp;amp;year_end=2008&amp;amp;corpus=0&amp;amp;smoothing=3&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Rumbling7145|Rumbling7145]] ([[User talk:Rumbling7145|talk]]) 16:14, 10 March 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Visual Editor?==&lt;br /&gt;
I, being a nerd in high school, edit on more than just this wiki. For example, I edit on Wikipedia. On Wikipedia, the default editing mode is a visual editor, which automatically converts your wikitext into the final product in real time. It's useful on many levels, and would save all of us a lot of time (I've spent at least 2 hours total fixing broken wikitext). I feel that using this tool would increase overall productivity in the wiki, and probably lessen the amount of people who are intimidated when attempting to edit, allowing more people to join and contribute to the community. --'''''[[User:DollarStoreBa'al |&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Atomic Age;font-size:12pt;color:red;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;DollarStoreBa'al&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:DollarStoreBa'al |'''''Converse''''']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;[[Special:Contributions/DollarStoreBa'al|'''''My life choices''''']] 22:43, 7 August 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Good luck telling that to jeff! --[[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 12:22, 8 August 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Ugh. Well, he's gotta come back eventually, right? He's paying for the domain, after all. --'''''[[User:DollarStoreBa'al |&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Atomic Age;font-size:12pt;color:red;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;DollarStoreBa'al&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:DollarStoreBa'al |'''''Converse''''']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;[[Special:Contributions/DollarStoreBa'al|'''''My life choices''''']] 16:43, 8 August 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Or maybe he just forgot and we actually don't want him to come back. Who knows! --[[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 16:45, 11 August 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Name one person who wants Jeff to just not come back. Either way, I want him back, and I suggested this just in case. This would also be really cool for me, as I joined after jeff's last known user page edit in 2018. --'''''[[User:DollarStoreBa'al |&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Atomic Age;font-size:12pt;color:red;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;DollarStoreBa'al&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:DollarStoreBa'al |'''''Converse''''']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;[[Special:Contributions/DollarStoreBa'al|'''''My life choices''''']] 23:31, 14 August 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Jeez that was a joke. Ofc I want him back lol. [[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 20:09, 15 August 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::still no response from Jeff or any of his friends on: Reddit, X/Twitter; GitHub; Bluesky; Mastodon; and email. Oh, and I asked some person on YouTube with the username lcarsos (as in the other 'crat on here) but I think that he deleted my comment on his video (multiple times). (just a little fyi) '''[[User:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:9pt;color:pink&amp;quot;&amp;gt;42.book.addict&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:6pt;color:#B1E4E3&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Talk to me!&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;''' 18:17, 19 August 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::Does he even remember this? Maybe they all got struck by lightning at the same time while calling someone who just sneezed and saying 'bless you'. --'''''[[User:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#023020&amp;quot;&amp;gt;DollarStoreBa'al&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User_talk:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#000080&amp;quot;&amp;gt;'''''converse'''''&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 16:28, 29 August 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Unicode emoji support==&lt;br /&gt;
This suggestion was made in response to the discussion above. I was completely unable to realize that FaviFake was joking. I feel that Unicode emojis would drastically improve the wiki and allow for more detailed conveyance of thoughts and feelings, and prevent catastrophic misunderstandings not unlike the one above. Other people have insulted me due to the fact that I was unable to convey enough emotion. --'''''[[User:DollarStoreBa'al |&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Atomic Age;font-size:12pt;color:red;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;DollarStoreBa'al&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:DollarStoreBa'al |'''''Converse''''']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;[[Special:Contributions/DollarStoreBa'al|'''''My life choices''''']] 17:18, 19 August 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Text-only media, like this, always has the issue of not being understood, but if someone forgets (or consciously declines) to put a &amp;quot;/s&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;;)&amp;quot; in there, they'll probably also not add an emoji.&lt;br /&gt;
:Of course, one person's very dry humour might go so far over the head of another person that not even a strong hint helps, whereas another's sense of fun might be so obvious that gilding the lilly even sends the ''wrong'' message about it. [[Special:Contributions/92.23.2.228|92.23.2.228]] 20:03, 19 August 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
: I don't understand your suggestion. 😕  The site appears to allow such emojis to be included; I just copied and pasted. There's also the HTML entity  option, e.g. &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;amp;amp;#128533;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;.  &amp;amp;#128533; Or are you asking that the site include code to make it easier to insert emojis? [[User:BunsenH|BunsenH]] ([[User talk:BunsenH|talk]]) 16:57, 29 August 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Custom User-based Signature Template ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
DollarStoreBa'al and I came up with a pretty interesting idea: a template called &amp;quot;sig&amp;quot; that can hold the signatures of other users. This is to allow users to have signatures longer than 255 characters, which is the hard limit set by MediaWiki. To call the template, we can use &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{sig|User:XYZ}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt; and encode the template with wikitext so that each user's signature can be pasted in without confusion. To make things even easier, users can adjust their signatures in Preferences to call this template so that the 4 tildes (&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;~~~~&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;) can still be employed. If enough positive feedback is received, I would love to work on it with the community. If anybody is interested in helping out, please mention it! The template could also function as a signature museum, where you can view other user's custom signatures and get inspiration. '''[[User:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:9pt;color:pink&amp;quot;&amp;gt;42.book.addict&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:6pt;color:#B1E4E3&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Talk to me!&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;''' 16:50, 29 August 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Update. I have found another solution. By creating a sig page, you can call &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{User:XYZ/sig}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;, which enables you to literally copy-paste whatever's in that page into another page. This was first discovered, I believe, by [[User:Omega/sig|User:Omega]]. I don't believe we need the template anymore, but the signature museum would still be cool! '''[[User:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font:9pt Cormorant Garamond&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#89CFF0&amp;quot;&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#FFB7CE&amp;quot;&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#D3D3D3&amp;quot;&amp;gt;.&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#FFB7CE&amp;quot;&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#89CFF0&amp;quot;&amp;gt;o&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#89CFF0&amp;quot;&amp;gt;o&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#FFB7CE&amp;quot;&amp;gt;k&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#D3D3D3&amp;quot;&amp;gt;.&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#FFB7CE&amp;quot;&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#89CFF0&amp;quot;&amp;gt;d&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#89CFF0&amp;quot;&amp;gt;d&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#FFB7CE&amp;quot;&amp;gt;i&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#D3D3D3&amp;quot;&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#FFB7CE&amp;quot;&amp;gt;t&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font:6pt Cormorant Garamond&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#89CFF0&amp;quot;&amp;gt;T&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#FFB7CE&amp;quot;&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#D3D3D3&amp;quot;&amp;gt;l&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#FFB7CE&amp;quot;&amp;gt;k&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#89CFF0&amp;quot;&amp;gt; &amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#89CFF0&amp;quot;&amp;gt;t&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#FFB7CE&amp;quot;&amp;gt;o&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#D3D3D3&amp;quot;&amp;gt; &amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#FFB7CE&amp;quot;&amp;gt;m&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#89CFF0&amp;quot;&amp;gt;e&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#89CFF0&amp;quot;&amp;gt;!&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;''' 19:10, 29 August 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::Not quite sure what it will do. Seems to me that for instance you and [[User:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#023020&amp;quot;&amp;gt;DollarStoreBa'al&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User_talk:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#000080&amp;quot;&amp;gt;'''''converse'''''&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; already have very advanced signatures (using Dollar's here as another example). My own preferences would be a normal signature, where it is easy to see who has made the comment and where the links takes me... But since you can already make this complicated signatures anyway, I'm not as such opposed to the idea. Am I correct in assuming I need to do something in order for this to be possible as the only active admin at the moment? As I will not come by here regularly, then let me know when there has been some relevant activity. Not just a reply to these questions here. But once some other than you two has chimed in. Else I might forget to come back to look! (I wrote this and then had an edit conflict with 42. So maybe this is not relevant anymore? But I will post it now none the less. But this was as a reply to the first proposal) [[User:Kynde|Kynde]] ([[User talk:Kynde|talk]]) 19:16, 29 August 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Hi Kynde. Yes, I believe that we don't need your assistance anymore. The need for a template is erased by the existence of /sig pages, and we can create a museum by ourselves. Thanks for trying and chiming in, though! '''[[User:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font:9pt Cormorant Garamond&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#89CFF0&amp;quot;&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#FFB7CE&amp;quot;&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#D3D3D3&amp;quot;&amp;gt;.&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#FFB7CE&amp;quot;&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#89CFF0&amp;quot;&amp;gt;o&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#89CFF0&amp;quot;&amp;gt;o&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#FFB7CE&amp;quot;&amp;gt;k&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#D3D3D3&amp;quot;&amp;gt;.&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#FFB7CE&amp;quot;&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#89CFF0&amp;quot;&amp;gt;d&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#89CFF0&amp;quot;&amp;gt;d&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#FFB7CE&amp;quot;&amp;gt;i&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#D3D3D3&amp;quot;&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#FFB7CE&amp;quot;&amp;gt;t&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font:6pt Cormorant Garamond&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#89CFF0&amp;quot;&amp;gt;T&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#FFB7CE&amp;quot;&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#D3D3D3&amp;quot;&amp;gt;l&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#FFB7CE&amp;quot;&amp;gt;k&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#89CFF0&amp;quot;&amp;gt; &amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#89CFF0&amp;quot;&amp;gt;t&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#FFB7CE&amp;quot;&amp;gt;o&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#D3D3D3&amp;quot;&amp;gt; &amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#FFB7CE&amp;quot;&amp;gt;m&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#89CFF0&amp;quot;&amp;gt;e&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#89CFF0&amp;quot;&amp;gt;!&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;''' 19:18, 29 August 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::::I do believe the template would work fine... that way it wouldn't show the full wikitext of the signature. --'''''[[User:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#023020&amp;quot;&amp;gt;DollarStoreBa'al&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User_talk:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#000080&amp;quot;&amp;gt;'''''converse'''''&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 19:46, 29 August 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
bad bad bad bad idea, the sig character limit is 255 for a reason, see {{w|WP:SIGLENGTH}}.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
a sig template is an even worse idea, because every instance of it will call #ifexist, an [https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Manual:$wgExpensiveParserFunctionLimit expensive parser function]. these make a page take even longer to load, which this wiki definitely does not need. also, expensive fucntions are capped at 500, so you're making a maximum of 500 signatures (not counting other templates). [[user:lett‪herebedarklight|raeb]] 04:50, 30 August 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:As well as the WP:SIGLENGTH bit, if anybody actually cares about the precedent set by 'mother Wikipedia' then various other dos-and-don'ts from {{w|Wikipedia:Signatures}} might well apply to some extant personal signatures, from the &amp;quot;don't make it look like it's not your signature&amp;quot; through to being inconsiderate of the colour-blind and those otherwise vision-limited.&lt;br /&gt;
:It also gives some nice demonstrations of what ''can'' be done (within reason). Though I still say that just because you can do something doesn't mean that you should. &amp;quot;Looks complicated, codes simply&amp;quot; would be my suggestion. Elegance of spirit, not a bloomin' juggernaut, if you're inclined to take my advice at all. You can still use personally distinctive signatures, and probably should. (Though, quite possibly, by the middle of next week, half the latest Talk comments are going to have orange-background. Don't care about that possibility, as much as I's like having vaguely recognisable namepage and timestamp bits to it that don't take effort to discern properly ''either'' when rendered ''or'' in raw code.) I have simple tastes, perhaps more than others... [[Special:Contributions/82.132.247.193|82.132.247.193]] 05:45, 30 August 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Fully agree with raeb here, the last thing we need is more server load.&lt;br /&gt;
:*If you transclude them, then there's the server load and maximum transclusion problem.&lt;br /&gt;
:*If you substitute the template each time, the issue of hard-to-parse editing views gets worse. It's already annoying having to mentally &amp;quot;remove&amp;quot; your html codes when adding a comment, and we also don't have the VE, which would hide the code.  [[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 13:52, 31 August 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::I got edit conflicted, dangit. Anyway, both your complaints are either invalid or could easily be solved. The #ifexist limit could easily be bypassed if we simply delete the signatures of people who haven't contributed in, say, 6 months. The wikitext complaint is also invalid. Using the template as a signature would simply show &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{User:XYZ/Sig}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;, '''not the wikitext required to display the signature.''' Sincerely, --'''''[[User:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#023020&amp;quot;&amp;gt;DollarStoreBa'al&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User_talk:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#000080&amp;quot;&amp;gt;'''''converse'''''&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 14:14, 3 September 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Hi&lt;br /&gt;
 simply delete the signatures of people who haven't contributed in, say, 6 months&lt;br /&gt;
:::''What?!''&lt;br /&gt;
:::Also, my 1st point wasn't mainly about #ifexist but about server load. It's as if you were adding the amount of code roughly equivalent to {{tl|incomplete}} to every single page you commented on, multiple times on the same page. This absolutely causes a ton of unnecessary server load. Imagine adding {{tl|incomplete}} hundreds of times to dozens and dozens of talk pages across the entire wiki. The software needs to keep all of them up-to-date. [[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 16:47, 3 September 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::::What's wrong with deleting signatures? They can just make a new one, and 6 months seems like a good cutoff for 'they aren't coming back.' I know Tori was away for more than 6 months, she's an exception. The server load is an issue though. Maybe we need to wait for that until Jeff is able to fix the current server issues. --'''''[[User:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#023020&amp;quot;&amp;gt;DollarStoreBa'al&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User_talk:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#000080&amp;quot;&amp;gt;'''''converse'''''&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 17:26, 3 September 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::I randomly drop in every 6–12 months, for what it's worth. [[User:Maplestrip|Maplestrip]] ([[User talk:Maplestrip|talk]]) 13:52, 5 September 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Why penalize people who only occasionally contribute? What does it buy us? -- [[User:Dtgriscom|Dtgriscom]] ([[User talk:Dtgriscom|talk]]) 17:49, 3 September 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::::DSB, the Template is a horrible idea, ok? I slept on it and after further reflection, it really doesn't add much. People can always subst in signatures through &amp;lt;nowki&amp;gt;{{_}}&amp;lt;/nowki&amp;gt;, and it'll also strain the server way too much. There's also a reason why sigs are capped at 255 characters-it'll become impossible to read talk pages if everyone had hulking 1000+ character sigs (like the one that I created). Please stop fixating so much on this specific idea. Also, it is quite rude to penalize people who only occasionally edit (and I don't want to be a special case or something like that-please stop treating me as some godly figure who is better than everyone else.) '''[[User:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:9pt;color:pink&amp;quot;&amp;gt;42.book.addict&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:6pt;color:#B1E4E3&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Talk to me!&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;''' 19:02, 3 September 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Yeah, you're right. The 255 character limit stands. Thread over, back to explaining. --'''''[[User:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#023020&amp;quot;&amp;gt;DollarStoreBa'al&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User_talk:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#000080&amp;quot;&amp;gt;'''''converse'''''&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 14:46, 4 September 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Explain XKCD Discord/Social Media Server? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I was experiencing Cloudflare errors in the past 24 hours that had prevented me from accessing this website. It's working now, but I'm worried that something else would happen again. Would anybody be interested in organizing a group chat/server or something of the like outside of Explain XKCD? I would personally love if it was on Discord, as it's easy to use, convenient, is built great, and I use it often. If anybody else has suggestions, I'd be open to hear them! '''[[User:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:9pt;color:#3a795e&amp;quot;&amp;gt;42.book.addict&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:6pt;color:#ce5f15&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Talk to me!&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;''' 20:24, 12 September 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Me too. It greatly worried me. If you want, I can set up a discord server. Personally, I prefer discord as it's very simple and has a clean interface. Again, only if you're interested. --'''''[[User:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#023020&amp;quot;&amp;gt;DollarStoreBa'al&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User_talk:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#000080&amp;quot;&amp;gt;converse&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 15:38, 15 September 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::[https://discord.com/invite/zGEVanBBAx Here you go!] '''[[User:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:9pt;color:#3a795e&amp;quot;&amp;gt;42.book.addict&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:6pt;color:#ce5f15&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Talk to me!&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;''' 00:38, 16 September 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::NICE! I wonder if we should message Kynde and see if he'll add it to the global messages. The more people, the better. --'''''[[User:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#023020&amp;quot;&amp;gt;DollarStoreBa'al&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User_talk:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#000080&amp;quot;&amp;gt;converse&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 01:17, 16 September 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::I didn't want to influence your original choice, but it would have been nice if you'd have chosen something less 'commercial', as a platform. Hope it helps, just don't forget about everyone else! [[Special:Contributions/82.132.238.131|82.132.238.131]] 09:07, 16 September 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::::Discord is free. I feel it should be easy for everybody to join, even if they didn't already have discord. --'''''[[User:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#023020&amp;quot;&amp;gt;DollarStoreBa'al&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User_talk:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#000080&amp;quot;&amp;gt;converse&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 12:53, 16 September 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::&amp;quot;Freemium&amp;quot; would be a better description, with all the Nitro-mandating stuff. But I already deleted my more specific past observations about all that. And see no point in resurrecting my original Discord presence as you probably can do more chatting about the rest of us without too many random strangers like me turning up, whatever the other IP-onlies decide to do. ;) [[Special:Contributions/82.132.246.82|82.132.246.82]] 17:18, 17 September 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Updating the global message board===&lt;br /&gt;
::''Moved from [[User_talk:Kynde#Updating_the_global_message_board]]'' [[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 19:40, 16 September 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I am excited to announce that explainxkcd now has a discord server! I was wondering if you could add it to the global message board (idk what it's called, actually. The one with the incomplete explanations message.) to include the discord invite link? The more people who join, the better, just in case cloudflare decides to have those issues again. --'''''[[User:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#023020&amp;quot;&amp;gt;DollarStoreBa'al&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User_talk:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#000080&amp;quot;&amp;gt;converse&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 13:01, 16 September 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Hi. you did not include the link? Also I would like to know if other frequent editors think this is a great idea? Not all who edit here wish to be contactable on other platforms. I do understand where you wish the message to be though, and if this is a good idea we can put it there. I'm not certain what other people thinks though? --[[User:Kynde|Kynde]] ([[User talk:Kynde|talk]]) 13:12, 16 September 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::I, for one, think it's a good idea. It's managed by Tori, so it's in very good hands. The only thing I'm afraid of is that discussions may not take place here, but I don't think that's enough of a reason not to promote it.&lt;br /&gt;
::The link is at [[User:42.book.addict]], in the second notice. I think we should say something like&lt;br /&gt;
 In case this site goes down, we have created a Discord server as an emergency form of communication. (link)&lt;br /&gt;
::We aren't &amp;quot;excited to announce&amp;quot; a backup form of communication. Discussions must be public, not on external sites. This is merely a backup. I think  it can then be removed from the sitenotice after a month or less, and mentioned on another page somewhere else, discretely. [[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 15:23, 16 September 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Thanks for chiming in FaviFake. Can you find a good place for this, because I would like to link to a local page from the sitenotice. I do realize that people will have to go to this discord before problems arises, but I guess that is the way it ism and that wont change no matter how we announce it. --[[User:Kynde|Kynde]] ([[User talk:Kynde|talk]]) 15:49, 16 September 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::::But 42 does intend for this to be used as &amp;quot;a fun place to connect with each other&amp;quot;. Leaving it discrete would make it impossible for this to happen, because people won't see it. Also, for the record, FaviFake, 42 and I were. Multiple people. Me and her. That's how the English language works. --'''''[[User:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#023020&amp;quot;&amp;gt;DollarStoreBa'al&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User_talk:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#000080&amp;quot;&amp;gt;converse&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 16:41, 16 September 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Yes you two are the ones who wishes for it and FaviFake was the first to chime in. Don't patronize me please! --[[User:Kynde|Kynde]] ([[User talk:Kynde|talk]]) 16:44, 16 September 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::I have no idea what you're saying regarding the &amp;quot;English language&amp;quot;, but please refrain from saying... whatever that was.&lt;br /&gt;
 But 42 does intend for this to be used as &amp;quot;a fun place to connect with each other&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Could you stop talking on behalf of 42? I believe you've been asked many times not to do that. You can either tell us what '''you''' think, or let others speak for themselves. 42 isn't a goddess and is able to engage in this conversation without someone &amp;quot;defending&amp;quot; her opinions.&lt;br /&gt;
:::::I'll create [[explain xkcd:Discord]] but need to think more about how this is supposed to be pitched. I do not want people to be incentivised to use a private, inaccessible discord server to, for example, talk about the newest comic. --[[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 19:32, 16 September 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::I moved this discussions back here because it's relevant to the entire wiki, not just Kynde' talk.&lt;br /&gt;
:::::''Moved from [[User_talk:Kynde#Updating_the_global_message_board]]'' [[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 19:40, 16 September 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::Sorry, I was just trying to simultaneously defend both of our opinions and state the facts. Also, thank you to FaviFake for moving this conversation to the proposals. This seems to be happening with Kynde's talk page a lot recently. (that being twice, but I've never seen it happen before, soo...) --'''''[[User:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#023020&amp;quot;&amp;gt;DollarStoreBa'al&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User_talk:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#000080&amp;quot;&amp;gt;converse&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 20:02, 16 September 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Hi, it's me. The &amp;quot;global message board&amp;quot; DSB was referencing to is the [[MediaWiki:Sitenotice|site notice]]. If Kynde could add it in the format that FaviFake said, that would be great! Also, I had thought that the server ''could'' be a fun place for us to bond/talk, but that can obviously be conducted in DMs. FaviFake's reasoning for having all conversations on-site makes perfect sense to me. '''[[User:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:9pt;color:#3a795e&amp;quot;&amp;gt;42.book.addict&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:6pt;color:#ce5f15&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Talk to me!&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;''' 20:35, 16 September 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::So THAT'S what it's called! I am one of today's lucky 10,000. --'''''[[User:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#023020&amp;quot;&amp;gt;DollarStoreBa'al&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User_talk:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#000080&amp;quot;&amp;gt;converse&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 23:35, 16 September 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::I'm not sure if I'm wrong or not, but I think of the discord as 2 things: &lt;br /&gt;
*A backup form of communication&lt;br /&gt;
*An informal place to hang out with fellow readers and editors.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Again, please correct me if I'm wrong. --'''''[[User:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#023020&amp;quot;&amp;gt;DollarStoreBa'al&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User_talk:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#000080&amp;quot;&amp;gt;converse&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 15:23, 18 September 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Dark theme?==&lt;br /&gt;
I saw a post about this in the archives that went unanswered, so I'll ask it here: Why doesn't the wiki have a dark theme? I feel it would be very useful for those who don't want to be blinded by editing. Wikipedia's got one, and it looks great! --'''''[[User:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#023020&amp;quot;&amp;gt;DollarStoreBa'al&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User_talk:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#000080&amp;quot;&amp;gt;converse&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 15:27, 18 September 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Dark mode IS a thing. You need to create a common.css page to use it though. Copy paste in this to get dark mode (make sure to hit &amp;quot;Show preview&amp;quot; to test it out before you save!): &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt; /* NQH's totally cool and amazingly radical dark mode */&lt;br /&gt;
/* Licensed CC0-1.0, no rights reserved. */&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
/* Sets everything to dark background. */&lt;br /&gt;
body * {background-color: #111 !important; color: #DDD !important;}&lt;br /&gt;
div.mw-body, div.mw-body * {background-color: #222 !important;}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
/* Vector */&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
.mw-wiki-logo {background-color: #00000000 !important; filter: invert(100%);}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
/* Monobook */&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
div#column-one &amp;gt; div#p-cactions &amp;gt; div.pBody &amp;gt; ul &amp;gt; li &amp;gt; a {background-color: #222 !important;}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
/* Modern */&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
div#mw_header, div#mw_header h1#firstHeading {background-color: #000 !important;}&lt;br /&gt;
div#mw_content {background-color: #222 !important;}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
/* Cologne blue */&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
/* Diff. */&lt;br /&gt;
td.diff-context, td.diff-context * {color: #777 !important; border-color: #333 !important;}&lt;br /&gt;
td.diff-deletedline {border-color: #F33 !important;}&lt;br /&gt;
td.diff-addedline {border-color: #3F3 !important;}&lt;br /&gt;
del.diffchange-inline {color: #F55 !important;}&lt;br /&gt;
ins.diffchange-inline {color: #5F5 !important;}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
/* Numbers in history view. */&lt;br /&gt;
span.mw-plusminus-pos {color: #5F5 !important;}&lt;br /&gt;
span.mw-plusminus-neg {color: #F55 !important;}&lt;br /&gt;
strong.mw-plusminus-pos {color: #0F0 !important; font-size: 1.2em;}&lt;br /&gt;
strong.mw-plusminus-pos {color: #0F0 !important; font-size: 1.2em;}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
/* Links. */&lt;br /&gt;
a[href$=&amp;quot;redlink=1&amp;quot;] {color: #F00 !important; text-decoration: line-through !important;}&lt;br /&gt;
a:not([href$=&amp;quot;redlink=1&amp;quot;]) {color: #88F !important;}&lt;br /&gt;
a:visited:not([href$=&amp;quot;redlink=1&amp;quot;]) {color: #AAF !important;}&lt;br /&gt;
a:hover:not([href$=&amp;quot;redlink=1&amp;quot;]) {color: #AAF !important; text-decoration: underline !important; font-weight: bold !important;}&lt;br /&gt;
a:active:not([href$=&amp;quot;redlink=1&amp;quot;]) {color: #FFF !important; text-decoration: underline !important; font-weight: bold !important;} &amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
--'''[[User:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:9pt;color:#3a795e&amp;quot;&amp;gt;42.book.addict&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:6pt;color:#ce5f15&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Talk to me!&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;''' 19:01, 18 September 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::In response to DSB, in your userpage... The links being white... Which links? See the &amp;quot;/* Links. */&amp;quot; section. The various links are #F00 (red, the invalid ones), #88F (light blue), #AAF (lighter blue), or #FFF (white). If you don't like them, change them.&lt;br /&gt;
::The other things can probably be fixed if we know exactly what you're getting and what you actually expect. Also a good idea to check for typos/miscopying, via basic troubleshooting. [[Special:Contributions/82.132.246.204|82.132.246.204]] 22:43, 18 September 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::I got edit-conflicted with... seemingly no change. Anyway, I found a better version which I now use. It's much cleaner and looks like it belongs. Only issue is that the sidebar templates have inverted colors? But very minor. --'''''[[User:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#023020&amp;quot;&amp;gt;DollarStoreBa'al&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User_talk:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#000080&amp;quot;&amp;gt;converse&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 01:24, 19 September 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::CODE!!!&amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;/* WikimediaUI Dark Mode&lt;br /&gt;
 *&lt;br /&gt;
 * Wikimedia Design Team 2019-2021&lt;br /&gt;
 * Original authors:&lt;br /&gt;
 * - Volker E. – [[User:Volker_E._(WMF)]]&lt;br /&gt;
 * - Alex Hollender&lt;br /&gt;
 * - MusikAnimal&lt;br /&gt;
 * - Carolyn Li-Madeo&lt;br /&gt;
 * - Jdlrobson&lt;br /&gt;
 *&lt;br /&gt;
 * Original at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Volker_E._(WMF)/dark-mode.css&lt;br /&gt;
 * Version for Gadget CSS skin override usage only.&lt;br /&gt;
 * Basically removed of all interaction element styles and&lt;br /&gt;
 * set to `html` instead of JS injected `.client-dark-mode` class.&lt;br /&gt;
 *&lt;br /&gt;
 * Last updated: 2021-04-20&lt;br /&gt;
 *&lt;br /&gt;
 */&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
/** To prevent 'jumping' effect within #p-personal in Vector/Monobook. Overrides [[MediaWiki:Gadget-dark-mode-toggle-pagestyles.css]] **/&lt;br /&gt;
body.skin-vector-legacy :not(#pt-darkmode) + #pt-watchlist::before,&lt;br /&gt;
body.skin-monobook :not(#pt-darkmode) + #pt-watchlist::before {&lt;br /&gt;
	content: &amp;quot;Light mode&amp;quot;;&lt;br /&gt;
}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
@media screen {&lt;br /&gt;
	&lt;br /&gt;
/* set height for monobook and timeless, because the filter in FF needs dimensions to get it to apply */&lt;br /&gt;
html {&lt;br /&gt;
    height: 100%;&lt;br /&gt;
}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
/* Filter needs to reside on `html`, see https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T221425#5153917 */&lt;br /&gt;
html,&lt;br /&gt;
/* All other selectors have `filter` double-applied to turn back to “normal” by inheritance */&lt;br /&gt;
html img:not( .mw-invert ),&lt;br /&gt;
html video:not( .mw-invert ),&lt;br /&gt;
html ogvjs:not( .mw-invert ),&lt;br /&gt;
html svg:not( .mw-invert ),&lt;br /&gt;
html iframe:not( .mw-invert ),&lt;br /&gt;
html .mw-no-invert,&lt;br /&gt;
html .cdx-no-invert,&lt;br /&gt;
html td .diffchange,&lt;br /&gt;
html .wvui-typeahead-suggestion__thumbnail,&lt;br /&gt;
html .skin-minerva .mw-notification-visible .mw-notification-content,&lt;br /&gt;
html .oo-ui-searchWidget-results .oo-ui-iconElement-icon,&lt;br /&gt;
html .list-thumb,&lt;br /&gt;
/* Extensions */&lt;br /&gt;
html .media-viewer .image img,&lt;br /&gt;
html .media-viewer .mw-file-description img {&lt;br /&gt;
	filter: invert( 1 ) hue-rotate( 180deg );&lt;br /&gt;
}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
/* Reset overrides, needed where double application above isn't working. */&lt;br /&gt;
/* Vector modern */&lt;br /&gt;
html .skin-vector .mw-logo-wordmark,&lt;br /&gt;
html .skin-vector .mw-logo-tagline,&lt;br /&gt;
html .skin-timeless .mw-wiki-title &amp;gt; img,&lt;br /&gt;
html .wvui-icon svg,&lt;br /&gt;
html .mw-ext-score img,&lt;br /&gt;
html .skin-invert img,&lt;br /&gt;
html .skin-invert-image img,&lt;br /&gt;
html .mw-hiero-table img {&lt;br /&gt;
	filter: none;&lt;br /&gt;
}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
/* Backgrounds */&lt;br /&gt;
html table,&lt;br /&gt;
html table.ambox-content,&lt;br /&gt;
html table.toccolours,&lt;br /&gt;
html .mw-notification,&lt;br /&gt;
html .mwe-popups,&lt;br /&gt;
html .infobox,&lt;br /&gt;
html .toc,&lt;br /&gt;
html .thumbinner,&lt;br /&gt;
html figure[typeof~='mw:File/Thumb'],&lt;br /&gt;
html figure[typeof~='mw:File/Frame'],&lt;br /&gt;
html figure[typeof~='mw:File/Thumb'] &amp;gt; figcaption,&lt;br /&gt;
html figure[typeof~='mw:File/Frame'] &amp;gt; figcaption,&lt;br /&gt;
html .wikitable,&lt;br /&gt;
html .cbnnr-main,&lt;br /&gt;
html .cx-callout,&lt;br /&gt;
html .overlay.media-viewer,&lt;br /&gt;
html #simpleSearch,&lt;br /&gt;
html #simpleSearch #searchInput,&lt;br /&gt;
html #siteNotice #centralNotice .cnotice {&lt;br /&gt;
	background-color: #ddd;&lt;br /&gt;
}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
/* Borders */&lt;br /&gt;
html body,&lt;br /&gt;
html h1,&lt;br /&gt;
html h2,&lt;br /&gt;
html h3,&lt;br /&gt;
html h4,&lt;br /&gt;
html h5,&lt;br /&gt;
html h6,&lt;br /&gt;
html table.ambox-content,&lt;br /&gt;
html table.toccolours,&lt;br /&gt;
html .mw-notification,&lt;br /&gt;
html .infobox,&lt;br /&gt;
html .toc,&lt;br /&gt;
html .thumbinner,&lt;br /&gt;
html figure[typeof~='mw:File/Thumb'],&lt;br /&gt;
html figure[typeof~='mw:File/Frame'],&lt;br /&gt;
html figure[typeof~='mw:File/Thumb'] &amp;gt; figcaption,&lt;br /&gt;
html figure[typeof~='mw:File/Frame'] &amp;gt; figcaption,&lt;br /&gt;
html #mw-head,&lt;br /&gt;
html #mw-panel,&lt;br /&gt;
/* Vector 2022 uses a transparent border for margin collapsing&lt;br /&gt;
(T312822) so don't apply this rule there */&lt;br /&gt;
.skin-vector-legacy #content.mw-body,&lt;br /&gt;
html #simpleSearch,&lt;br /&gt;
html #simpleSearch #searchInput,&lt;br /&gt;
html #siteNotice #centralNotice .cnotice {&lt;br /&gt;
	border-color: #cdcbc8;&lt;br /&gt;
}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
/* Links */&lt;br /&gt;
/* Links: normal */&lt;br /&gt;
html a,&lt;br /&gt;
html .vector-menu-tabs li a,&lt;br /&gt;
/* Backwards compatible VectorTabs, deprecated in MW v1.35. */&lt;br /&gt;
html .vectorTabs li a,&lt;br /&gt;
html .toctogglelabel,&lt;br /&gt;
html .mw-parser-output a.external,&lt;br /&gt;
html .mw-parser-output a.extiw,&lt;br /&gt;
html .mw-parser-output a.extiw:active,&lt;br /&gt;
html #mw-panel .portal .body li a {&lt;br /&gt;
	/* color: #69f; Proposal below for level AA conformance, see also https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T233266&lt;br /&gt;
	   `#36c` is transformed by :root `filter` to be closer to chosen `#69f`. */&lt;br /&gt;
	color: #36c;&lt;br /&gt;
}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
/* Links: visited */&lt;br /&gt;
html a:visited,&lt;br /&gt;
html .mw-parser-output a.extiw:visited,&lt;br /&gt;
html #mw-panel .portal .body li a:visited {&lt;br /&gt;
	/* color: #709bbd; Proposal below uses to-be-standardized color from https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T213778 */&lt;br /&gt;
	color: #6b4ba1;&lt;br /&gt;
}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
/* Links: red */&lt;br /&gt;
html a.new,&lt;br /&gt;
html .vector-menu-tabs li.new a,&lt;br /&gt;
html .vectorTabs li.new a {&lt;br /&gt;
	color: #ff6e6e;&lt;br /&gt;
}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
/* ::: Special Element Treatments ::: */&lt;br /&gt;
/* Image thumbnails */&lt;br /&gt;
html .thumbimage,&lt;br /&gt;
html figure[typeof~='mw:File/Thumb'] &amp;gt; :not(figcaption) .mw-file-element,&lt;br /&gt;
html figure[typeof~='mw:File/Frame'] &amp;gt; :not(figcaption) .mw-file-element {&lt;br /&gt;
	border: 0;&lt;br /&gt;
}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
/* Content image (thumbnail) SVGs */&lt;br /&gt;
/* `*not( .mbox-image )` exception doesn't work for unclear reasons */&lt;br /&gt;
html .image img[ src*='svg' ],&lt;br /&gt;
html .mw-file-description img[ src*='svg' ],&lt;br /&gt;
html img[ src*='Wiktionary-logo'] {&lt;br /&gt;
	background-color: #fff;&lt;br /&gt;
	border-radius: 1px;&lt;br /&gt;
}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
/* Dealing with false positives from selector above */&lt;br /&gt;
html .mw-echo-ui-notificationItemWidget-icon img[ src*='svg' ],&lt;br /&gt;
html .mbox-image .image img[ src*='svg' ],&lt;br /&gt;
html .mbox-image .mw-file-description img[ src*='svg' ],&lt;br /&gt;
/* Emoji generated by [[Template:Emoji]] */&lt;br /&gt;
html .emoji .image img,&lt;br /&gt;
html .emoji .mw-file-description img,&lt;br /&gt;
/* Vote symbols on Talk pages */&lt;br /&gt;
html .image img[ alt^=&amp;quot;Symbol&amp;quot; ],&lt;br /&gt;
html .mw-file-description img[ alt^=&amp;quot;Symbol&amp;quot; ] {&lt;br /&gt;
	background-color: transparent;&lt;br /&gt;
}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
/* Page previews */&lt;br /&gt;
html .mwe-popups {&lt;br /&gt;
    box-shadow: 0 30px 90px -20px rgba( 0, 0, 0, 0.3 ), 0 0 1px #000;&lt;br /&gt;
}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
html .mwe-popups.flipped-y:after,&lt;br /&gt;
html .mwe-popups.flipped-x-y:after {&lt;br /&gt;
	border-top: 11px solid #ddd;&lt;br /&gt;
}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
html .mwe-popups.mwe-popups-no-image-pointer:after {&lt;br /&gt;
	border-bottom: 11px solid #ddd;&lt;br /&gt;
}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
/* Contributions menu */&lt;br /&gt;
html .cx-callout-1:after {&lt;br /&gt;
	border-bottom-color: #ddd;&lt;br /&gt;
}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
/* Mobile Wikipedia logo mobile header */&lt;br /&gt;
html .branding-box img {&lt;br /&gt;
	filter: brightness( 0 );&lt;br /&gt;
}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
@-moz-document url-prefix() {&lt;br /&gt;
    body {&lt;br /&gt;
        background: #000;&lt;br /&gt;
    }&lt;br /&gt;
}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
@-moz-document url-prefix() {   &lt;br /&gt;
	@supports (overflow-clip-margin: 1px) {     &lt;br /&gt;
		body {&lt;br /&gt;
			background: #fff;&lt;br /&gt;
		}   &lt;br /&gt;
	}&lt;br /&gt;
}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
--'''''[[User:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#023020&amp;quot;&amp;gt;DollarStoreBa'al&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User_talk:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#000080&amp;quot;&amp;gt;converse&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 13:27, 19 September 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Page Creation site notice for new accounts==&lt;br /&gt;
Many, many, '''''many''''' new people come around and ask other users about how to create their own user pages. Personally, I think we could stop the confusion by coding a different type of 'you do not have permission to create this page' error for new accounts, which would look something like this: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'To create new pages, your account must be at least a week old and have 50 edits. You can search for this page title in other pages, or search the related logs, but you do not have permission to create this page.' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Just a thought, in case admins can do that without Jeff's involvement. --'''''[[User:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#023020&amp;quot;&amp;gt;DollarStoreBa'al&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User_talk:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#000080&amp;quot;&amp;gt;converse&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 20:02, 30 September 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: I'd {{template|Actual citation needed}} on the &amp;quot;many&amp;quot;s, unless you're aware of off-site discussions about this one. It's actually pretty infrequent, so I feel you must be counting over several years, having found a number of historic examples dotted around on pages such as this. That said, it ''is'' currently as much an FAQ as anything else ([[explain xkcd:Editor FAQ#Why can't I create my user page and upload images?|as actually mentioned there]], for anyone who bothers to read it). And we do sometimes get a new-users, the ones freshly post-validated to create pages merrily 'helping out' all those they think need their help in that regard.&lt;br /&gt;
: Can I suggest that we do not have the exact number of edits so prominantly, though. Within the last day, as a matter of fact, we seem to have had someone making many useless edits (mostly of the form of adding extra spaces into seemingly random places within seemingly random articles), possibly in order to have created a new page of their own. And that's ''really'' not to the spirit of things. Inviting, or at least suggestively hinting, the possibility of near-vandalism (hopefully not ''actual'' vandalism) for the impatient who just see it as a 'target' to try to reach. And the truly and genuinely eager to contribute can easily have clocked up that number of edits to existing pages ''with no edit-tallying motive'' by the time the mandatory week has also expired.&lt;br /&gt;
: The caveat, I know, is that saying &amp;quot;a week and ''a certain number of edits''&amp;quot;, aluded to but unspecified, will have the some of the same uselessly-editing people chasing an arbitrarily high edit-tally in order to be 'ready' for the week finishing. But that kind of person is already of the wrong initial mindset. And people desperate to create new pages with perhaps little more than a week of having, in ''most other respects'', full editing rights (which is only marginally more than IPs like me have, as there only a few key places that I am prevented from editing) tend to find themselves likely to be contributing to the Category: Pages to Delete list (perhaps courtesy of more established editors).&lt;br /&gt;
: On balance, perhaps the page you mention should instead briefly contain a link to the existing FAQ section, via link text explaining that there ''are'' reasons, but &amp;quot;see here&amp;quot; for details, or similar non-specific wording. Anyone who hasn't read the FAQ could benefit from being aware that it exists. And if anything ever changes (rise or fall of the time or tally limits, even removal or addition of specific criteria), the FAQ will probably be sooner updated with the new details before anyone thinks to edit the 'error page' again (a particular page that long-established users will have rarely, if ever, seen). Assuming, of course, even that anyone can edit that level of page content right now. [[Special:Contributions/82.132.184.204|82.132.184.204]] 23:08, 30 September 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::I don’t have time to read ip's comment but i definitely think the number shouldn't be so public, and i don’t see a need. i would support a small editnoce for letting users know they have to vaguely contribute more. [[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 16:17, 1 October 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Some suggestions surrounding the use of the {{template|unsigned}} and {{template|unsigned ip}} templates. ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
;Where I just reference the {{template|unsigned}} template, there should also be an obvious extension of the same principle to the {{template|unsigned ip}} one as well.)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
These are some interelated proposals, that could be implemented singly/incrementally (as desired and agreed upon). But might deserve doing in 'one go', at least the agreed upon elements. I'm just putting each bit into different subsections for isolated discussion (or ignoring) of the specific merits/otherwise of each. [[Special:Contributions/2.98.65.8|2.98.65.8]] 21:33, 20 October 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
;TD;DR;s added, if you don't like the author's original verbosity. [[Special:Contributions/82.132.244.30|82.132.244.30]] 19:07, 12 November 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Aesthetic/semantic change===&lt;br /&gt;
Issue: Not often, but sometimes, comments that are 'unsigned'-tagged (with the words &amp;quot;please sign your comments with &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;~~~~&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;quot;) invokes retrospective use of &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;~~~~&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt; by those who take the words at face value. This ''can'' result in a (previously) 'unsigned' message having a later timestamp than its replies, or later 'top level' messages more immediately signed by their editors.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The more 'proper' way to replace an {{template|unsigned}} tag, for those that want to, would be to copy-paste a valid signature of the same type and replace the username(/IP) and datestamp as already (usually!) given in that initial pester-tag. But this is by no means made obvious in the above message.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Proposal: Wording to be changed to something like &amp;quot;in future, please sign your comments with &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;~~~~&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;quot;, or &amp;quot;this comment should have been signed with &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;~~~~&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;quot;. Or other wording, to be agreed upon, to make as snappy as the original (&amp;quot;was not signed with &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;~~~~&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;quot;). The aim is to omit the implicit request to anachrnistically sign, however.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Overall effect: Any change to the template(s) will transclude to what would probably be an overwhelming majority of Talk pages (at a guess), plus other 'discussion' pages like these Portal ones. But there's no change in functionality or any individual page-updating, just the slightly different text when viewing in future.&lt;br /&gt;
*Note1: the {{template|unsigned}} template already takes a (rarely used) third parameter, which overwrites the &amp;quot;please sign...&amp;quot; message (i.e. &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{unsigned|&amp;lt;username&amp;gt;|&amp;lt;timestamp&amp;gt;|&amp;lt;alternate message&amp;gt;}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;, and it'd still be overwritten exactly the same wherever that has been applied.&lt;br /&gt;
*Note2: it also would not rewrite the text given of any originally &amp;quot;subst:&amp;quot;ed version of the template, but that's a completely different issue.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Justification: The need may be slight, but it's also a trivial tweak to implement (or even to trial) with a marginal but maybe useful long-term gain. But we'll need a proper discussion of what wording to move to, or else that it's not necessary. [[Special:Contributions/2.98.65.8|2.98.65.8]] 21:33, 20 October 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: Case in point {{diff|389535|the few edits that led up to here}}. Didn't really 'spoil' any actual chronology but shows how easily it is obeyed wrongly. [[Special:Contributions/2.98.65.8|2.98.65.8]] 18:04, 24 October 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
;TL;DR;:Change the text from &amp;quot;please sign your comments with &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;~~~~&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;quot;, slightly. [[Special:Contributions/82.132.244.30|82.132.244.30]] 19:07, 12 November 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Additional templates to complement 'unsigned' ones===&lt;br /&gt;
Issue: Retrospective 'honest faking' of previously missing signatures is mildly awkward, as mentioned above. It's easy to get wrong, even easier to just not bother at all with it. (Either leave 'unsigned' or create the issue from the prior item.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Proposal: Complement the template usage &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;''un''&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;signed|&amp;lt;username&amp;gt;|&amp;lt;timestamp&amp;gt;}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt; with one that is &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;''retro''&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;signed|&amp;lt;username&amp;gt;|&amp;lt;timestamp&amp;gt;}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;. Take the same parameters (except the 'alternate pester text') but return just the effective &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;~~~~&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;-style format, now no longer with the 'please sign...'-type appended message.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are a number of possible uses for this:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
#''user1'' forgets to sign; ''user2'' spots this, invokes {{template|unsigned}} to it; ''user1'' '''acknowledges''' their goof, by simply changing the template-invocation of &amp;quot;unsigned&amp;quot; to &amp;quot;retrosigned&amp;quot; and the rendered page is left neater (any &amp;quot;whoops, my bad!&amp;quot; apologies can be given in the edit-comments, as unused third-parameter, etc, if they wish),&lt;br /&gt;
#''user1'' forgets to sign; ''user1'', themself, spots this (before anyone else) and applies this as easily as they would apply a {{template|unsigned}}. Slightly easier than 'honest faking' that involves the valid copypaste-method (again, with &amp;quot;whoops!, my bad!&amp;quot; opportunities, should they feel like it),&lt;br /&gt;
#''user1'' forgets to sign; ''user2'' spots this; knows that it's an oversight by a regular contributor who just slipped up, and there's no reason to make it a 'pester message'; so ''user2'' just goes straight to using Template:retrosigned, and doesn't bother with the 'pestering' or 'blaming' implications inherent in Template:unsigned),&lt;br /&gt;
#''user1'' forgot to sign ''...a decade ago or more!''; We know that (for example) User:Jeff is unlikely to benefit from being reminded/pestered/shamed, so it just seems better to let the more recent editor 'retrosign' any such example that gets discovered,&lt;br /&gt;
#or possibly, '''with care, ''and honesty'':''' someone, as ''newusername'', wishes to associate themselves with comments made by ''oldusername'', or even any given ''ip-address'' contrinution they previously used; that's something I wouldn't do myself, but I could see the appeal.&lt;br /&gt;
*Note1: my method (and that of others?) to edit in an 'unsigned'-tag is to copy the header info from the appropriate diff page's column, paste that text (containing datestamp and ID of contributor, together with some other textual cruft) as unsigned-tag parameters, rearrange edit (&amp;quot;timestamp&amp;quot; then &amp;quot;userid&amp;quot;, with a few extra characters, becomes &amp;quot;|userid|timestamp&amp;quot; parameters), the same method would entirely work with the retrosigned version too.&lt;br /&gt;
**This, however, does not contain the &amp;quot;(UTC)&amp;quot; timezone info that &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;~~~~&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt; would give by default, so a similarly direct retroactive 'fake' will also lack this. Eagle-eyed readers might pick up on this. Which isn't an issue that concerns me. (One could always manually append &amp;quot; (UTC)&amp;quot; to the second-param, or after the template itself, even if I don't think it worth the bother.)&lt;br /&gt;
*Note2: It doesn't reproduce the appearance of anyone's custom signature, if they had one that should have been invoked. But also a trivial differemce, having resolved the whole issue of &amp;quot;no longer being unsigned&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
**Should anyone ''really'' care to reproduce a custom/non-standard signature, they can still do so (on their behalf or someone else's). This is just the quick and easy&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Justification: The idea is to allow for the 'tidying up' of the front-facing pages with less convoluted and more honest back-end edits. I don't expect, or want, anyone to retrospectively convert historic 'unsigned' tags just for the sake of it, but it adds a tool to the kit of anyone who is already prepared to 'correct' these things (their own, or others) in any given page-source.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I'd potentially use it for long-standing editor's lapses (the &amp;quot;Template:retrosigned&amp;quot; version), to feel less guilty about apparently nagging them about it. Or upon myself (the &amp;quot;Template:retrosigned ip&amp;quot; version), if I slipped up, to feel less guilty for going back in and 'honestly faking' what I had forgotten to sign, but (as noted above) there are several other applicable uses. [[Special:Contributions/2.98.65.8|2.98.65.8]] 21:33, 20 October 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
;TL;DR;:Let there be &amp;quot;retrosigned&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;retrosigned ip&amp;quot; to be used where {{template|unsigned}} and {{template|unsigned ip}} are not (any longer) what is needed somewhere. [[Special:Contributions/82.132.244.30|82.132.244.30]] 19:07, 12 November 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Tracking parameter underutilisation===&lt;br /&gt;
Issue: Early implementation, and sometimes more recent, of the {{template|unsigned}} template may use its most basic &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{unsigned}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt; form with ''no parameters given''. This gives an 'error', of sorts, due to having no official check-and-fallback upon not being given the username parameter. The error is visual only, and ''may'' have been allowed/forced to happen as a way to force its correction (though, at least until recently, it sees not to have done this as much as it should have).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Other times, perhaps immediately after the first parameter (contributor name) started to be routinely added, &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{unsigned|username}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt; is used ''without the timestamp parameter'' that we now mostly take for granted.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
(While the current third parameter, the 'alternate &amp;quot;pease...&amp;quot; text' is entirely an optional and a mostly unused feature, future changes may require/encourage further elements (perhaps 'named parameters') and leave our default &amp;quot;unsigned|username|timestamp&amp;quot; format lacking.)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I've been known to update any discovered 'bare bones'-unsigned formats, if I find any in pages I edit. Someone else seems to have adopted it as a task of its own, recently. This relies upon spotting the non-standard (or at least non-modern) usages.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Additionally, there ''is'' the in getting the rather ugly &amp;lt;code&amp;gt; &amp;lt;small&amp;gt; -- [[User:{{{1}}}|{{{1}}}]] ([[User talk:{{{1}}}|talk]])  &amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:grey; white-space:nowrap;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;''(please sign your comments with &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;~~&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;~~)''&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt; 'error' for all no-param versions that exist.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Proposal: Firstly, just implement the 'catch' code upon the (lack of) first parameter. Make it 'fail cleanly', or at least less 'errorlike'. This is trivial to implement (i.e. &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{{1|}}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt; instead of &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{{1}}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;). (I'd do that right now, if I could.)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Secondly, within the 'failover' half of the 'non-parameter' parsing, give it a Category: membership.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I have several possible suggestions for the style of Category membership:&lt;br /&gt;
# If the 'userID' isn't given, perhaps &amp;quot;Category:Unsigned no-UserID&amp;quot;, if the 'timestamp' isn't given, &amp;quot;Category:Unsigned no-timestamp&amp;quot;, and any others.&lt;br /&gt;
#* Note: the system could be extended to other templates, such as &amp;quot;Category:Incomplete no-reason&amp;quot; or perhaps &amp;quot;Category:Comic no-image&amp;quot;, but that's not officially part of this suggestion.&lt;br /&gt;
# More simply, just have &amp;quot;Category:Unsigned-error&amp;quot;, without specifying. (Or even &amp;quot;Category:Template-error&amp;quot; for far more generalised use.)&lt;br /&gt;
# Differently specific, use the category re-indexing (something like &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;[[Category:Template-error|blah]]&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;) for handy grouping-with-differentiation&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Obviously, the appropriate category-page needs to be there to show any (and all) invocations. Similar to the [[:Category:Incomplete explanations]] one, etc, it would invite action to ''remove'' membership as examples are sorted.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Justification: This is a solution for 'meta-problems', really. Which 'category membership' option is used would define how much additional editing(/correcting) this might prompt for historic problems, as well as identifying improperly added new template-invocations. But it might be good to know exactly how wide or narrow a scope people might wish to apply to this, before going ahead and creating many new 'error' categories... one even just the single catch-all one. [[Special:Contributions/2.98.65.8|2.98.65.8]] 21:33, 20 October 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
;TL;DR;:Make it easier to find 'incompletely implemented' templates (initially the Unsigned ones), so they can be fixed by anyone who would like to. [[Special:Contributions/82.132.244.30|82.132.244.30]] 19:07, 12 November 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
This looks AI-generated. [[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 18:36, 12 November 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Really? Unless AIs are doing 'accidentally on purpose' typos, I think it just looks like someone with more ideas trying to burst out onto the page than they can easily (and accurately) summarise. And I'm also that type of person, so I can ''easily'' relate. There, but for the grace of &amp;lt;s&amp;gt;God&amp;lt;/s&amp;gt; any-unspecific-generalised-universal-force-of-non-deterministic-fate goes I! [[Special:Contributions/82.132.245.237|82.132.245.237]] 18:50, 12 November 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Added a &amp;quot;''Too Long; Didn't Read;''&amp;quot; summary to each, as I understand the intents. ;) Now I'm wondering if there are any other things I might do that for! [[Special:Contributions/82.132.244.30|82.132.244.30]] 19:07, 12 November 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Banning the phrase &amp;quot;WhatsApp&amp;quot;==&lt;br /&gt;
I've noticed that lately, much of our vandalism has come out of scamvertisements asking you to contact the scammers on WhatsApp. As I don't believe Randall has ever actually used WhatsApp, and as such it is unneeded, I feel we should just prevent any edits containing the word 'WhatsApp' from going through if the edit removes more than 90% of the page's byte count (let's be honest, nobody is going to delete that much from a page). --'''''[[User:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#023020&amp;quot;&amp;gt;DollarStoreBa'al&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User_talk:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#000080&amp;quot;&amp;gt;converse&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 17:37, 29 October 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:The standard protection is to have [[user:theusaf]] to refine/expand what theusafBOT reacts to. Which it seems they occasionally do.&lt;br /&gt;
:I don't know whether they're paying attention, but I'd hope they'd pick up on such things. Given that it's the Feedback/etc comics that regularly get spammed like this, I'd hope they'd at least try to see what someone else reverted in leiu, and adapt accordingly, when they get the time.&lt;br /&gt;
:I don't know the various sets of exact criteria in use (some seem generally obvious enough, key patterns and keywords involved) and I think something to at least start with &amp;quot;blanked page and replaced with ...&amp;quot;, on specific sets of pages, as an edit comment could be a good predictor with minimal false-positives. But I wouldn't want to explicitly suggest that (or your idea), lest the more attentive spammers made a trivial change to their future edit plans to by-pass it.&lt;br /&gt;
:...though I frankly think those responsible in this case don't care/think ''too'' much about it, it's more for all the other things I'd rather leave trivially unguessable how to get round. [[Special:Contributions/82.132.244.138|82.132.244.138]] 18:30, 29 October 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::I'll look into this. —[[User:Theusaf|theusaf]] ([[User talk:Theusaf|talk]]) 22:34, 6 November 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Hey look, an admin that isn't Kynde! That's... actually the first time I've seen an admin that isn't Kynde in person. Cool! &amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family: Times New Roman, serif; font-size: 16px;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;--'''''[[User:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#E3C6BE&amp;quot;&amp;gt;DollarStoreBa'al&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User Talk:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#CC9A8B&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Converse&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt; 17:15, 7 November 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::::Yeah, I'm not super active in the discussions, but I occasionally edit and check that by bot is still working and not destroying anything. The whatsapp check has been added. —[[User:Theusaf|theusaf]] ([[User talk:Theusaf|talk]]) 05:00, 13 November 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::*SKIBIDI-POP PA-DOOP TA-DA TAAAA!!!!* &amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family: Times New Roman, serif; font-size: 16px;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;--'''''[[User:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#E3C6BE&amp;quot;&amp;gt;DollarStoreBa'al&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User Talk:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#CC9A8B&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Converse&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt; 14:48, 13 November 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Adblock popup==&lt;br /&gt;
This wiki uses ads as a way to make money and keep the website up, and many people use adblockers (the absolute state of YT ads is insane). So, why don't we add one of those AdBlock popups that they have on some sites? Maybe the message could be: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{Header text|So, about that AdBlock...&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
explain xkcd uses ads to keep our server online. Please consider turning off your AdBlock so we can continue providing quality explanations. Thanks!}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This would be an optional thing and easily closable, but it could provide at least a bit of extra revenue. Maybe we could also make a 'thank you' screen for people who do actually turn off their adblocker (it would only pop up once, after they turn off the AdBlock): &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{Header text|Thank you for turning off your adblocker!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Sincerely, the explain xkcd community.}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What do you guys think? --'''''[[User:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#023020&amp;quot;&amp;gt;DollarStoreBa'al&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User_talk:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#000080&amp;quot;&amp;gt;converse&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 15:58, 30 October 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Adblockers often also can block anti-adblock popups, but sure, go ahead. I guess you could also ask for donations to run the site. Same caveat applies. - an adblock user. [[User:None|None]] ([[User talk:None|talk]]) 20:47, 14 December 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== categories template ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hear me out: I've been doing a lot of category adding to mostly files that are uncategorized (BTW, we have a 11,000-12,000 backlog of pages-any help (or maybe a bot!) would be greatly appreciated). I think that we should make a template called Category or &amp;quot;cat&amp;quot; so that we can add categories faster. Of course, HotCat exists, but it only renders when there are already existing categories. For all the uncategorized files/pages, we would have to manually add it in. My strategy currently is moving my mouse to the edit button, clicking it, hit return to make a whitespace (for organization), hitting CTRL-V, moving my mouse to the &amp;quot;Save changes&amp;quot; button, and clicking it. And that's only for the really repetitive ones, like the comic images or Hoverboard or Time. Does anybody have any thoughts/objections to this? Of course, we would still need to edit, but it would be a lot easier than typing out &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;[[Category:___]]&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt; IMHO. Additionally, I've studied up a bit of template code (Lua) and I've sort of fleshed out some code. I don't really know if it works, but if there's anybody more experienced feel free to look through it! I've included Pages to delete (ptd) and Helper comic images (hci) as examples. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{#ifeq:{{{1}}}|ptd|&lt;br /&gt;
  [[Category:Pages to delete]]&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{#ifeq:{{{1}}}|hci|&lt;br /&gt;
  {{#if:{{{2|}}}&lt;br /&gt;
    | [[Category:Helper comic images ({{{2}}})]]&lt;br /&gt;
    | [[Category:Helper comic images]]&lt;br /&gt;
  }}&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thanks, --'''[[User:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:9pt;color:#3a795e&amp;quot;&amp;gt;42.book.addict&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:6pt;color:#ce5f15&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Talk to me!&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;''' 10:17, 3 December 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:That's actually a good idea! So, it would be: &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{cat|Helper comic images (1190)}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;? That would be quite convenient. &amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family: Times New Roman, serif; font-size: 16px;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;--'''''[[User:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#FF0000&amp;quot;&amp;gt;DollarStoreBa'al&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User Talk:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#00873E&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Converse&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt; 20:53, 4 December 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::As written, I read it as...&lt;br /&gt;
::If &amp;quot;ptd&amp;quot; in the first spot, i.e. &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{cat|ptd}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;, that would give the Pages To Delete category.&lt;br /&gt;
::If &amp;quot;hci&amp;quot; in the first spot, i.e. &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{cat|hci}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;, then it would instead Helper Comic Images&lt;br /&gt;
::If &amp;quot;hci&amp;quot; in the first spot and a number in the second, i.e. &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{cat|hci|1234}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;, then it would instead give you Helper Comic Images (1234).&lt;br /&gt;
::There are maybe a few minor issues with it, as written. I'd use &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{{1|}}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;, for starters, and nest it so that any non-specified (including blank) param would give out an obvious mis-use error result. And you'd probably end up having &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{cat|&amp;lt;whatever&amp;gt;}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt; sitting in your paste buffer (or would &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{subst:cat|&amp;lt;whatever&amp;gt;}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt; be better?) exactly the same as you'd have had the basic Category, anyway.&lt;br /&gt;
::But I really wouldn't know where it sits in the [[1205: Is It Worth the Time?]] scale... Almost a &amp;quot;death by supernova neutrinos&amp;quot; issue, I suspect... ;) [[Special:Contributions/78.144.255.82|78.144.255.82]] 21:37, 4 December 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
: I would use a switch instead of an if, like &lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;includeonly&amp;gt;[[Category:{{subst:#switch:{{{1}}}&lt;br /&gt;
| ptd = Pages to delete&lt;br /&gt;
| hci = Helper comic images {{subst:#if: {{{2|}}} | ({{{2}}}) }}&lt;br /&gt;
| {{{1|}}}&lt;br /&gt;
}}]]&amp;lt;/includeonly&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
: It should be used with &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{subst:&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt; because otherwise the category won't be able to be removed normally, but it technically works without it. The substs before the ifs make the resulting wikitext nicer, as otherwise when the overall template is used with &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{subst:&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;, it inserts the if statements directly. Consequently, it must be enclosed in includeonly's to prevent the substitution from occurring when the template is saved. It will also default to inserting the category with the name of the first argument, but it is longer to type using the template like this (&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{subst:cat|All comics}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;) than just typing the category directly (&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;[[Category:All comics]]&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;).&lt;br /&gt;
:If having an obvious error message is desired, you could replace the default case (the &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{{1|}}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;) with something like &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;]] Invalid argument for [[Template:cat&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;. [[User:Firestar233|guess who]] ([[User talk:Firestar233|if you desire conversing]] | [[Special:Contributions/Firestar233|what i have done]]) 05:02, 16 December 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
All fo this sounds good! I don't have the time to look into this but Firestar233 is incredible with templates so i trust their code will work! [[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 18:41, 17 December 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== New Character Proposal for Kid Cueballs ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I'm somewhat new to editing, though I've been using this wiki for some time now. And I've noticed that with comics such as 3178, whenever a kid is represented by Cueball the transcript says &amp;quot;a Cueball like kid&amp;quot;  which is long and slightly annoying to read. So I propose giving the kid a name that's shorter and easier to use but still let's the reader know that a kid is being represented by Cueball:  Kidball. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thoughts? -- [[User:MikeTheNewGuy|MikeTheNewGuy]] ([[User talk:MikeTheNewGuy|talk]]) 13:25, 17 January 2026‎ (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
: Hi, Mike; welcome to ExplainXKCD. BTW, I added your signature to your comment.&lt;br /&gt;
: But, on-topic: this sounds like an interesting idea. But, in your mind, is this &amp;quot;Kidball&amp;quot; always the same kid, rather than a type of kid? Would you expect that if you see &amp;quot;Kidball&amp;quot; in a new comic he'll behave the same way? If not, then I wouldn't add this name. -- [[User:Dtgriscom|Dtgriscom]] ([[User talk:Dtgriscom|talk]]) 13:32, 17 January 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::Thanks for adding my signature, I’m gonna have to remember to do that. &lt;br /&gt;
::What I had in mind with Kidball was that most of the time he’s the same kid (since most of the time he only appears in Miss Lenhart’s class, at least that’s where he’s been the majority of the times I’ve seen him), but is occasionally used to represent someone else; in the same way that Cueball appears to be the same person most of the time, but Randall occasionally uses him to represent someone else.  And using “Kidball” in the explanations/transcripts might be more efficient than “a Cueball like kid”.&lt;br /&gt;
::And yes, if I saw him in a new comic, I would expect him to more or less behave the same way, unless it’s clear that he’s representing someone else.[[User:MikeTheNewGuy|MikeTheNewGuy]] ([[User talk:MikeTheNewGuy|talk]]) 18:04, 17 January 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::I'm not sure; let's see what others think. -- [[User:Dtgriscom|Dtgriscom]] ([[User talk:Dtgriscom|talk]]) 18:11, 17 January 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::I do think that he can and should be named, as he's very similar to [[Jill]], even if she has more personality than him. And Kidball is an amazing name! [[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 18:01, 23 January 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::::I concur. '''[[User:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:9pt;color:#A9C6CA&amp;quot;&amp;gt;42.book.addict&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:6pt;color:#516874&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Talk to me!&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;''' 21:57, 23 January 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Me too. I'm not trusting myself with the actual page creation, so somebody else will need to create it. (sorry, just don't want to mess things up) &amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family: Times New Roman, serif; font-size: 16px;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;--'''''[[User:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#023020&amp;quot;&amp;gt;DollarStoreBa'al&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]][[User Talk:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#000080&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Converse&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;]]'''''&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt; 22:51, 28 January 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::::I've made them. See [[Kidball]] and [[:Category:Comics featuring Kidball]]. I've also changed the header of this thread for more clarity. '''[[User:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:9pt;color:#A9C6CA&amp;quot;&amp;gt;42.book.addict&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:6pt;color:#516874&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Talk to me!&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;''' 01:40, 1 February 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Thanks! Anyone up for populating it? [[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 08:14, 1 February 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::I'll try to see if I can find the time (and motivation) to do so this week. '''[[User:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:9pt;color:#A9C6CA&amp;quot;&amp;gt;42.book.addict&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:6pt;color:#516874&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Talk to me!&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;''' 03:07, 2 February 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::I just went through [[:Category:Comics featuring children]] and added about 9 to [[:Category:Comics featuring Kidball]]. We're getting there! [[User:Maxcodes|Maxcodes]] ([[User talk:Maxcodes|talk]]) 14:34, 15 February 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Should comics with multiple Kidballs be placed in [[:Category:Multiple Cueballs]], or should a new category be created? [[User:Maxcodes|Maxcodes]] ([[User talk:Maxcodes|talk]]) 12:37, 15 February 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::: (First, I made it markup as a &amp;quot;visible category link&amp;quot;, as you intended, rather than the invisible category membership that normally happens, hope you don't mind.)&lt;br /&gt;
:::: A further question is if a comic was Multiple Cueballs, by dint of having a Cueball ''and'' a now-IDed-as-Kidball, is it still Multiple Cueballs? [[Special:Contributions/82.132.239.239|82.132.239.239]] 13:26, 15 February 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::: We've only just got to the point where we're naming this character Kidball; I'd say don't complicate the situation just yet. Too many categories makes the categories less useful. -- [[User:Dtgriscom|Dtgriscom]] ([[User talk:Dtgriscom|talk]]) 13:52, 15 February 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::: Children are rarely alone, normally being with other children and/or with one or one-or-more adults. So [[:Category:Comics featuring children]] covers Multiple Kidballs.&lt;br /&gt;
:::: I'd say that Multiple Cueballs is a notable 'common strangeness' that I think it's useful to continue note, for various reasons, but multiple non-Cueball characters (e.g. how [[1000]] has it, in-extremis) aren't worth all the various different character-specific 'multiple' categories. (And, yes, an adult Cueball and a Kidball should not be &amp;quot;Multiple Cueballs&amp;quot;.) [[Special:Contributions/81.179.199.253|81.179.199.253]] 18:29, 15 February 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Agreed. Multiple Cueballs is usually for unusual cases where there isn't a different main character other than cueball. A bald kid and a bald adult are two different people. [[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 16:52, 16 February 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
== Bring back mboxes! ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[https://mediawiki.org/wiki/Template:Mbox Mboxes] (do read that link) are message boxes that prompt editors to edit.&lt;br /&gt;
They say things such as, &amp;quot;'''Please help expand this page.'''&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
However, they aren't on this wiki!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
So, there are a few different templates resembling mboxes:&lt;br /&gt;
* {{template|notice}},&lt;br /&gt;
* {{template|notice2}},&lt;br /&gt;
* {{template|incomplete}}, and&lt;br /&gt;
* {{template|incomplete transcript}}&lt;br /&gt;
are just a few I've seen.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I just don't think this is the way! Also, I checked {{template|ambox}} and it said it was deleted. However, the proposal archive&lt;br /&gt;
isn't working and I can't check the reason. So I can't see why we aren't using them!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Here are a few arguments for mboxes:&lt;br /&gt;
* Mboxes can be different types, such as a notice or an alert, or even an incomplete notice, with a &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;type&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt; attribute.&lt;br /&gt;
* Mboxes are &amp;lt;abbr title=&amp;quot;Don't Repeat Yourself&amp;quot;&amp;gt;DRY&amp;lt;/abbr&amp;gt;, they're reusable.&lt;br /&gt;
* Mboxes are used on Wikipedia, and other sites I'm sure, so using them here will make it more comfortable for new editors coming from other sites such as Wikipedia.&lt;br /&gt;
* Using mboxes will make styling all alerts easier. (OK YES I ADMIT IT I WANT MY USER STYLES)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
So why aren't we using them? I'm thinking that if this topic gets enough support, we can bring mboxes back, and&lt;br /&gt;
start transitioning old alerts to mbox variants.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thank you for coming to my TED Talk. [[User:Maxcodes|Maxcodes]] ([[User talk:Maxcodes|talk]]) 14:38, 16 February 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:The discussion, as you said, is in the archive: [[explain_xkcd_talk:Community_portal/Proposals#Notice_templates]]. [[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 16:58, 16 February 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Transcripts ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
ATTENTION!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
THIS: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Blah blah '''BLAH'''&lt;br /&gt;
''BLAH blah blah''&lt;br /&gt;
Wordssss…………&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
(Fill in blahs with your own words! Choose your own adventure fun!)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Is not a transcript!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I’ve had the impression that transcripts were for blind people (well, not ''just'' blind people) and making transcripts like the one above is only making things harder for people who may read aloud for blind people. Use things like [bold text] or [italics] or [comic in red text].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Idk wh6 I wrote this it just been bothering me. {{unsigned ip|2600:4040:52f7:9a00:cdb5:8d4d:4a6c:9917|16:58, 24 February 2026 (UTC)}}&lt;br /&gt;
:I've always wondered who the transcripts are even for. Since both the comics and the transcripts are in the same medium, those who are blind wouldn't be able to see the transcript. I guess they could have it read to them, but it's still confusing. As far as I know, it's just a thing that very early editors used to do, and the tradition stuck. What's the reasoning behind the transcripts? --'''''[[User:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#3c2004&amp;quot;&amp;gt;DollarStoreBa'al&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User Talk:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#1E0F00&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Converse&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; (BLM)''''' 14:22, 2 March 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::There exists the {{w|screen reader}}, which (at least until you start to trust AI, and there ''are'' undoubtely some good AI ATs out there that do this, these days, but are trained more to help with RL situations, like &amp;quot;what items are on the shop shelf I'm currently standing in front of?&amp;quot;, not stick-figures and line-art...) can't do anything useful with the non-meta contents of an image but will happily speak out a transcript.&lt;br /&gt;
::It probably also helps, even if you don't need it spoken out for you, if you have a hankering of searching for a particular comic and you know some written words in it that might not ''necessarily'' be quoted verbatim in the Explanation. The text being all there in the Transcript section means you can get this site (or perhaps your caching search-engine of choice) to find it, without even relying on someone having decided to quote it directly elsewhere (which is often not good and/or necessary for an Explanation/Discussion/Trivia section contribution).&lt;br /&gt;
::If you're ''really'' lucky, you can even search for [https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?search=%22office+chair%22&amp;amp;title=Special%3ASearch&amp;amp;go=Go some random visual thing], as long as it's been mentioned, without relying upon it havng already had a thoroughly populated Category... That relies upon any useful example having the same exact wording in the Transcript (and/or Explanation), but it's better than if you don't have any Transcripts at all.&lt;br /&gt;
::There are other useful things, a bit less obvious. Yet perhaps you could argue the presence of the Transcript may not actually be that vital... I don't know if anyone here ''does'' even use a screen-reader (but is still interested in webcomics ...a very visual medium). And there are probably other ways to get the other other advantages of the Transcript. Perhaps we could just make sure ''everything'' currently Transcripted is added to the Explanation (though that seems wasteful, and might make the Explanation far ''less'' useful/readable, having to fight past the obligatory in-depth explanation of whether Cueball's arm is raised in a particular panel or not...). But currently the Transcript exists, for those that need (or like) it, and also anybody who doesn't can just ignore it.&lt;br /&gt;
::And unless you're going to fold ''all'' Transcripts into the rest of the Explanation, it seems rather strange to just stop creating them. Honestly, it's probably half the fun for some people. And even another 'First!'-brag for users to bag, without being actually so crass as to edit anything just to say &amp;quot;First!&amp;quot; ;) [[Special:Contributions/81.179.199.253|81.179.199.253]] 19:58, 2 March 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::I still do think that the people who need a screen reader would be interested in webcomics, although there probably exists a small population of people who are. Also, screen readers do not necessarily need to use AI in anything except for the voice. --'''''[[User:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#023020&amp;quot;&amp;gt;DollarStoreBa'al&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User Talk:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#09ff00&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Converse&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;  20:09, 2 March 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::::Not sure if you're agreeing with me or not there. You may have missed a &amp;quot;not&amp;quot; or something in there somewhere. And screen-readers don't need ''any'' AI (as we would currently expect it), although doubtless the last few years development of LLM/GenerativeAIs has probably improved them from 'dumb phonology' (with quirks that users would have to get use to) to actually saying things more eloquently and even correctly voice non-homophonic homographs correctly...&lt;br /&gt;
::::But, anyway, there's the other reasons for a Transcript, even if I don't know if anyone does bother to use SRs. [[Special:Contributions/81.179.199.253|81.179.199.253]] 20:45, 2 March 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::I did, indeed, accidentally miss a 'not'. I DON'T think that those who need screen readers would be interested in webcomics. --'''''[[User:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#023020&amp;quot;&amp;gt;DollarStoreBa'al&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User Talk:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#09ff00&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Converse&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;  20:55, 2 March 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::You'd be surprised. Just take a look at this discussion: https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php/explain_xkcd:Community_portal/Miscellaneous#Sightless_readers_offended_by_the_.22It.27s_.27cause_you.27re_dumb.22_tagline. [[User:Elektrizikekswerk|Elektrizikekswerk]] ([[User talk:Elektrizikekswerk|talk]]) 13:00, 9 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::...I stand corrected. Also, [[2134: Too Much Talking|I have an opinion]] about that discussion after reading it. --'''''[[User:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#023020&amp;quot;&amp;gt;DollarStoreBa'al&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User Talk:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#09ff00&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Converse&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;  13:57, 9 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==New search algorithm?==&lt;br /&gt;
I was searching for a specific comic based on some words from the transcript. I was looking for [[2134: Too Much Talking]] and was searching &amp;quot;new opinions&amp;quot;. INSTEAD of getting only results which had the phrase &amp;quot;new opinions&amp;quot;, I got every comic which had the word 'new' or 'opinion' ANYWHERE in its explanation or transcript. I got over 100 hits and had to go through each preview individually, which was quite annoying and took far too long. I think there should be a function or option that you could turn on which makes it so, when you search &amp;quot;new opinions&amp;quot;, it only displays pages with the search term and doesn't display anything which only contains a part of it. This happens every time I try to search. --'''''[[User:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#023020&amp;quot;&amp;gt;DollarStoreBa'al&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User Talk:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#09ff00&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Converse&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;  14:04, 9 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:You probably searched for (quote)&amp;lt;code&amp;gt;new opinions&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;(unquote), but you'll find that you'll get exactly what you wanted from (quote)&amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;quot;new opinions&amp;quot;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;(unquote) ''with'' the literal quotes.&lt;br /&gt;
:Like I did, by ending up on the page https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?search=%22new+opinions%22&amp;amp;title=Special%3ASearch&amp;amp;go=Go just now.&lt;br /&gt;
:Note that searches just for (quote)&amp;lt;code&amp;gt;new&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;(unquote) ''or'' just for (quote)&amp;lt;code&amp;gt;opinions&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;(unquote) return many (thousands!) of matches. (quote)&amp;lt;code&amp;gt;new opinions&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;(unquote) 'only' seems to return 42 examples (now including this page?). This would include examples of &amp;quot;opinion new&amp;quot; ordering or even totally separate uses like if any a phrase like &amp;quot;...relying upon old opinions, rather than new facts...&amp;quot; was used. An ''actual'' example, is the following search-result snippet:&lt;br /&gt;
::..., with no real bearing on most peoples' lives, a lot of people have strong '''opinions''' on the topic. One on side, people argue that planets should have a consiste ...with such debates, to the point of damaging their relationship, is nothing '''new''' for this couple.&lt;br /&gt;
:I don't know how we'd even update/change the search-algorithm.&lt;br /&gt;
:And, note, it'd annoy those who are already used to what subtle ways there are to be either more or less finicky in a desired search. Searching for mention of &amp;quot;dog leads&amp;quot;? The (unquoted) search for &amp;quot;dog lead&amp;quot; might be better to find &amp;quot;he has a dog on a lead&amp;quot; without (normally) getting pages that say something like &amp;quot;a heavy element, like lead&amp;quot;. A quoted-search, or an assumption that the user would have wanted a quoted-search, would miss the first example.&lt;br /&gt;
:There may be various other tricks and tips to search-formatting. The use of &amp;quot;+&amp;quot; before a particular term used to (on Google) force that as a required match, when it might have included &amp;quot;does not include...&amp;quot; on a page that contains every other word, just not that one.  But this site doesn't seem to have the full (traditional) Google-Fu behaviour, that also included things like (quote)&amp;lt;code&amp;gt;-dog lead&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;(unquote) that could get you (mostly) the metal or connecting cable references to lead without so.much of the additional pet-restraint homonym, but then the Google algorithm has also changed so much over the years (Natural Language Processing and even more AI-based methods, rather than a more obvious codified 'markup' to one's search terms where it was the user's initial knowledge that more limited the search, intentinally or otherwise). [[Special:Contributions/82.132.238.115|82.132.238.115]] 16:53, 9 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Excessive verbosity ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Should we have a category and community portal link to it for explanations which are considered excessively verbose to the point of deteriorating their usefulness to the readers? [[Special:Contributions/2603:800C:1200:596A:A08E:FCB1:F968:D433|2603:800C:1200:596A:A08E:FCB1:F968:D433]] 20:18, 15 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Define excessive. (Also: Define insufficient.) [[Special:Contributions/81.179.199.253|81.179.199.253]] 21:09, 15 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::He never even said &amp;quot;insufficient&amp;quot;. He said that making a whole essay as a response (I'll link some examples below) is a waste of time because all the text is overwhelming and it becomes harder to pick out the important parts. By the way, he may be referring to you, as you tend to make very long responses (read: not necessarily a bad thing).&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
::Some examples:&lt;br /&gt;
::*[https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:3231:_Lightning&amp;amp;curid=30046&amp;amp;diff=410387&amp;amp;oldid=410386 this edit by 81.179.199.253]&lt;br /&gt;
::*[https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:3232:_Countdown_Standard&amp;amp;curid=30051&amp;amp;diff=410328&amp;amp;oldid=410327 this edit by 81.179.199.253]&lt;br /&gt;
::*[https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:3231:_Lightning&amp;amp;curid=30046&amp;amp;diff=410157&amp;amp;oldid=410141 this edit by 82.132.238.12]&lt;br /&gt;
::--'''''[[User:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Times; color:#023020&amp;quot;&amp;gt;DollarStoreBa'al&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User_talk:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Times; color:#000080&amp;quot;&amp;gt;'''''converse'''''&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 21:18, 15 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Indeed. &amp;quot;Insufficient&amp;quot; was was seaid by me (IPv4), not IPv6. The point being that I'm not sure what amount of paring down would satisfy them, and what amount would be problematic to them.&lt;br /&gt;
:::If some information is there but looks superfluous to someone, they might remove it. If the information is not there but seems necessary, some other person might add it. And everyone has different ideas.&lt;br /&gt;
:::And in the two editing examples (and the example that wasn't me), they aren't even Explanation additions, which I'm sure (but will happily be corrected on) wasn't what the suggestion was about. Also, I make no apologies for being verbose enough to encopass a complicated issue, when I think it merits it, especially in Talk. There's also occasion to cut down/rationalise things (in Explanations), especially when multiple editors have added a concept here, an example there, a caveat at the end, etc, which might be best rewritten from scratch.&lt;br /&gt;
:::Face it, we who seek to &amp;quot;explain xkcd&amp;quot; have many things to say, whether we we're Nerd Sniped or just happen to think of something interesting but unmentioned. And those who wish xkcd to be explained may have many questions (even if they {{diff|410158|don't say what they are}}. Perhaps I personally err more on maintaining a verbosity (that can be skipped over by the impatient reader) rather than risk being too laconic (and leave out something that others would want/need to be said).&lt;br /&gt;
:::I consciously ''tried'' to convey all of what I've just said by just five words, you'll notice. Maybe ten words would have been better? [[Special:Contributions/81.179.199.253|81.179.199.253]] 00:10, 16 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::I did actually define it, plain as day! Excessive verbosity is &amp;quot;excessively verbose to the point of deteriorating [an explanation's] usefulness to the readers.&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;
::Please I know this has been something of a pattern for years now, and I don't know who all is involved or how many, of course, but could you please try showing some restraint? For example, when you're typing a long paragraph and you're not 100% sure it would make the explanation clearer or more helpful in some concrete way, would you please consider posting it on the talk page and asking others whether they think it should be added, or at least ask others for help with brevity? [[Special:Contributions/2603:800C:1200:596A:FDFE:A728:80A:5859|2603:800C:1200:596A:FDFE:A728:80A:5859]] 01:00, 17 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::They do have a point, IPv4. Many of your comments exceed 1,000 bytes in length, and most go above 500.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:::1)''&amp;quot;If some information is there but looks superfluous to someone, they might remove it.&amp;quot;'' Most people are probably going to be encouraged ''not'' to edit other people's comments (see [[User talk:42.book.addict#Editing other people's words?|here]])&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:::2)''&amp;quot;In the two editing examples, they aren't even explanation additions...&amp;quot;'' That's precisely the point. Large additions to explanations are fine, if it all relates to the comic in some way. Large talk page replies, however, are much harder to navigate.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:::3)''&amp;quot;Perhaps I personally err on maintaining a verbosity (that can be skipped over by the impatient reader) rather than risk being too laconic (and leave out something that others would want/need to be said).&amp;quot;'' The issue is that all the important things are sprinkled throughout your explanation and '''can't''' be skipped. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:::If you do insist on being as verbose as you are, perhaps it would be a good idea to add a TL;DR? Just a thought.--'''''[[User:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Times; color:#023020&amp;quot;&amp;gt;DollarStoreBa'al&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User_talk:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Times; color:#000080&amp;quot;&amp;gt;'''''converse'''''&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 13:19, 17 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::::Ahoy there, from IPv4-land, again. I think you're misreading something. You're talking about Talk: comments being overlong. I'm not sure anyone else is.&lt;br /&gt;
::::The OP says &amp;quot;...for '''explanations''' which are considered excessively verbose...&amp;quot; (my emphasis added). Only in the more recent &amp;quot;...would you please consider posting it on the talk page and...&amp;quot; suggestion is OP mentioning Talk:, and that's as a suggestion of doing that ''instead'' of being wordy in the Explanation.&lt;br /&gt;
::::I also disagree that my two highlighted additions ({{diff|410387|this}} and {{diff|410328|this}}) are overlong. Not as short as they could be, but only significantly so by not saying things I wanted to say. Whether I not I should have, is another matter.&lt;br /&gt;
::::Not much more to add, that hasn't already been mentioned. So I won't. Have a nice day! [[Special:Contributions/81.179.199.253|81.179.199.253]] 18:41, 17 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::((Hi, I'm not the above IPv4, but I am someone you used as an example. And I could respond to DSB's comments (that edit-conflicted with me writing the following), as I think they are arguments directed against me too, but that would add ''another half hour or more of writing, down-editing, reviewing, adding back in things that I should ''not'' have edited out, etc. So, instead, I'm just prepending this little blurb. But it seems like I'm of a like mind/''modus operandi'' as the other protagonist here. Though was reluctant to jump in to comment on this 'suggestion' right from the start. But here I am now. Sorry!))&lt;br /&gt;
:::No, sorry. You're still being subjective there, as already said by someone else. If people add more information, it's generally because they think that such information is missing. Or responding to comments (or interpretations) from others who hadn't already 'got it'.&lt;br /&gt;
:::I absolutely don't mind if my attempts to explain something are re-edited to be less wordy than I might have left them, though. That's the nature of wiki-editing. And, if someone removes or wrongly paraphrases something (of mine, or anyone else), I reserve the right to go back and make it correct once more.&lt;br /&gt;
:::The exception is with Talk comments:&lt;br /&gt;
:::#Other than totally removing something that totally violates site policy, you do ''not'' remove or edit someone else's Talk contribution, beyond any peripheral formatting (e.g. adding a missing signature, correcting a clear indentation misalignment or, with very great care, making it more readable as far as newlines, bulletpoints, tabulation, etc, if the OA cocked that up) and ''never'' change the substantive text... even for spelling.&lt;br /&gt;
:::#Things written in Talk are not part of the Explanation and should not be assumed to be read by anyone reading the Explanation.&lt;br /&gt;
:::#They also need not be as 'perfect' as one might try to write in an Explanation, be they either more jokey, full of spelling/grammar errors. This is not the &amp;quot;voice of the site, for we are legion&amp;quot;, but individually attributable (more or less) voices that may display confusion, authoritativeness, malapropriate terminology, the desire to say &amp;quot;FIRST!&amp;quot; and/or complaints about everyone else doing any or all the the other things.&lt;br /&gt;
:::#Should someone ''happen'' to make a cogent point in Talk, it almost never is suitable to just copypaste their exact words (less the signature - if there was any!) into the main Explanation (or even within the 'incomplete'-notification. If they thought it was ready for the Explanation, they'd have written it there, and probably used a different phrase (I write from experience, here!)&lt;br /&gt;
:::#And there is very little reason to go through the collaborative editing process on Talk, with multiple versions (and critiques) of the 'concept' text being left for everyone to see all the false starts and mis-steps and the like. When the ''very idea'' of the main Wiki page is that it's a collaborative editing place that gets refined to the best result it can be (or, maybe, just one of the 'least worst' ones), without all the messy re-versioning details on show (but still there in the History, for the curious).&lt;br /&gt;
:::(And I note that DSB highlit one of ''my'' Talk contributions, above, as an example of overloquaciousness... Strangely, one that {{diff|410161|looked somewhat appreciated}}, unless that was actually intended as sarcasm, but lacked sufficient markup to reveal that as its purpose. Yes, it was significantly longer than the first response (which I think was good, as far as it went), but I thought that *maybe* a few more details wouldn't go amiss. In leiu of possible further questions that might have occured without.)&lt;br /&gt;
:::So, no. I reject your request to 'discuss things in Talk, i  advance' any time I think I might not be adding a perfectly cromulant smattering of knowledge. I know that I will never write laconicallg enough to please every reader, especially without making it so streamlined that someone else will have to request (or fulfill) further expansion to it.&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;quot;Should we have a category&amp;quot;? Maybe. What are you thinking? Some template-led thing, used either like the {{template|Actual citation needed}} or {{template|incomplete}} ones, or somewhere betwixt the two, in application/functionality? What if some adds an &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{Excessive verbosity}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt; tag and someone disagrees enough to remove it again? Are we back to arguing it out in Talk (like we do already), and/or whole paragraphs being pre-emptively removed (like is done already), or are we supposed to stop doing that and instead populate the tag with 'reason=' information?&lt;br /&gt;
:::Not entirely sure what the &amp;quot;community portal link to it&amp;quot; is about, though. Adding a way to get to [[explain xkcd:Community portal/Proposals#Excessive verbosity|this section]]? Or adding a link to each tagged example ''from'' this section?&lt;br /&gt;
:::The observation, in several ways, needs further explanation and elaboration (totally unintended, but I ''just'' realised how ironic that is!). Can I (and my fellow word-technicians, such as the prior responder) possibly shave off a word or two? Probably. But I personally try (amongst other editing issues) to address inconsistencies and gaps in information that I see have not yet been addressed. If someone wants to improve on what I add, within a comic page, then they can. Better something there, imperfect, than just lacking because of the possibility of some arbitrary word-/paragraph-limit being breached due to my 'interference'. [[Special:Contributions/82.132.236.33|82.132.236.33]] 14:44, 17 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I created [[[[:Category:Excessive verbosity]]]] and mentioned it at the end of [[explain xkcd:Community portal]]. I have a plan to fill it with initially the 20-30 worst offending explanations using AI, but I need to run some experiments first. [[User:Liv2splain|Liv2splain]] ([[User talk:Liv2splain|talk]]) 08:59, 18 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:What actual criteria will assess the issue of &amp;quot;worst offending&amp;quot;, can I ask? I ask this seriously, but I might as well tell you that I predict that you won't have a cogent answer. Especially if you're going for the same enumeration as that graph that was created. [[Special:Contributions/81.179.199.253|81.179.199.253]] 20:55, 18 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::Whether the text is too verbose to serve the readers as a copyedit for brevity could. (By the way, did you know in the year 1600 the typical English written sentence had about 50 words?) [[User:Liv2splain|Liv2splain]] ([[User talk:Liv2splain|talk]]) 04:55, 23 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Poking my nose back in... Is the valuation then based upon something like &amp;quot;we asked 100 readers to rank the readability, and used IRV to produce the community-accepted order of best to worst&amp;quot;? Or &amp;quot;nominate your fifty worst examples, and the ones with most votes get looked at&amp;quot;, Either of those would be awkward to organise properly.&lt;br /&gt;
:::Or are we asking an AI (multiple times, and/or multiple AIs) to do this ranking, knowing that AIs are ineffably tied to their training data in ways that can be unpredictably spurious. (As an example, it could mark down anything written by an IP, having identified that as a key indicator, if given the option. Like the cases of AIs 'learning' to diagnosing illnesses based upon the presence of a measuring scale in a diagnostic photograph, or a certain type of acute medicine hospital name in the past treatment records.) What would it make of the sentence &amp;quot;Colourless green dreams sleep furiously&amp;quot;, and would it know if it is even a contextually apt statement or not, for any given usage?&lt;br /&gt;
:::The 50 words thing is interesting, if ''that's'' the key to your suggestion, but hardly a good scale for multiple reasons. Case in point: your first sentence is 16 words. It is brief. It also took me a while to realise it wasn't an accidentally unfinished &amp;quot;Whether &amp;lt;foo&amp;gt; could &amp;lt;bar&amp;gt;&amp;quot; enquiry, and a couple of other garden-path mis-steps, before realising its grammatic intent.&lt;br /&gt;
:::Counting words isn't enough. Short sentences more readable? (Or it is non-linear.) Correct horse battery staple! Must be grammatical, naturally. Not comic joke call-back. But what about punctuation? Commas in right places. Semi-colons: good or bad? Is this paragraph readable? All statements, four words. It is fun writing. But not easy, regardless. Fluid reading remains uncertain. Seems stilted to me. Sesquipedalian loquaciousness preponderantly undisallowed. You get the idea..?&lt;br /&gt;
:::The truth is that there's no easy (non-subjective) measure of readability, and whatever you do use to measure it may have little connection to understandability, practical meaning or actual accuracy/relevence, and attempts to enhance any or all of the latter may ''require'' some loss of mere 'brevity'. This is not to say that I consider my own contributions unimprovable, just that they (should) say what I intend them to say, and to the extent I intend to say them. [[Special:Contributions/82.132.238.56|82.132.238.56]] 10:16, 23 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Why not simply use the incomplete tag? My main contribution to this wiki in the last months was to cut down explanations to the point. If I stumble upon an explanation that I feel is too bloated but I don't have the time or energy to do it myself at that moment I add the incomplete tag, mention that the explanation needs to be shortened and done. Oftentimes I do it then myself some time later and remove the tag again. I don't see the point of a new category. Speaking of bloating up stuff... ;) [[User:Elektrizikekswerk|Elektrizikekswerk]] ([[User talk:Elektrizikekswerk|talk]]) 08:53, 23 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:I agree, for what it's worth. [[Special:Contributions/82.132.238.56|82.132.238.56]] 10:16, 23 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Agreed. It should simply say which part of the explanation needs works, and what exactly it needs. [[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 12:26, 25 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== possible new &amp;quot;superheroes&amp;quot; category ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
i don't edit this wiki very often, but i recently decided to make a &amp;quot;superheroes&amp;quot; category since i was surprised we didn't have one already. i've been going thru the archives and adding comics, but today i noticed a bunch of the edits were reverted by one person with the reason &amp;quot;no such category&amp;quot;. do i need to do something to get the category approved or were the reversions incorrect? [[Special:Contributions/216.145.71.130|216.145.71.130]] 21:03, 29 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:As the reverter, I'm suggesting that the way this is normally done is to notice the need and suggest that it is created, listing (at least some of) the cases.&lt;br /&gt;
:While anyone with page-creation capabilities (not you, and not me) can &amp;quot;unredlink&amp;quot; the category, it'd be useful to make sure it's not just being created because of one person's vague moment of inspiration.&lt;br /&gt;
:Not to say that you're unjustified, in this case, just that you hadn't gone any way to ''try'' to justify it. And it's better to do that. (The old phrase &amp;quot;better to ask forgiveness than permission&amp;quot; isn't really applicable here.) I'll happily help repopulate the new category, if and when it is decided to get created. Just it was being done the wrong way round.&lt;br /&gt;
:Someone else {{diff|411372|mentioned}} that its name might need rethinking, and that's one of the aspects. Yes, it can be renamed, but still much better to be right to start with.&lt;br /&gt;
:So I think it should be open to discussion... enough to convince someone else to make it a valid category, ''then'' start adding them back in again.&lt;br /&gt;
:If I've picked them all up, BTW, I think the following are your candidates:&lt;br /&gt;
:*[[273: Electromagnetic Spectrum]] - (just copied from below, not sure without checking... maybe Superman?)&lt;br /&gt;
:*[[663: Sagan-Man‎‎]] - &amp;quot;Sagan-Man&amp;quot;, as per title&lt;br /&gt;
:*[[700: Complexion‎‎]] - Batman&lt;br /&gt;
:*[[980: Money‎‎]] - Batman mentioned&lt;br /&gt;
:*[[1004: Batman‎‎]] - natch&lt;br /&gt;
:*[[1010: Etymology-Man‎‎]] - &amp;quot;Etymology-Man&amp;quot;, of course/&lt;br /&gt;
:*[[1012: Wrong Superhero‎‎]] - and again&lt;br /&gt;
:**[[:Category:Etymology-Man‎‎]] - and his own category (of just two appearances...)&lt;br /&gt;
:*[[1384: Krypton‎‎]] - Superman&lt;br /&gt;
:*[[1394: Superm*n‎‎]] -sprt-of Superman&lt;br /&gt;
:*[[1415: Ballooning]] - Spiderman&lt;br /&gt;
:*[[1434: Where Do Birds Go]] - Superman&lt;br /&gt;
:*(Feel free to edit in any more, anybody!)&lt;br /&gt;
:...so, along with any other finds, if it looks like we need [[:Category:Comics containing superheroes]] (or similar) then your existing work hasn't gone to waste. [[Special:Contributions/81.179.199.253|81.179.199.253]] 21:42, 29 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::for archiving's sake, there's also [[273: Electromagnetic Spectrum]], [[1415: Ballooning]], and [[1434: Where Do Birds Go]]. &lt;br /&gt;
::it would be nice to have character pages for specific superheroes like superman and batman (and, evidently, etymology-man), but &amp;quot;superheroes&amp;quot; in general is a topic, not a character. as for the name, it's in line with categories like [[:Category:Aliens]], [[:Category:Demons]], and [[:Category:Sysadmins]] which are plural and don't start with &amp;quot;comics featuring&amp;quot;. we do have [[:Category:Comics featuring children]], but it seems like an oddball to me (maybe because it's more of a meta-category for the characters page than one intended for casual browsing? dunno.)&lt;br /&gt;
::should we continue discussing this here, on the character page talk, or somewhere else? i must admit i don't understand the organization. [[Special:Contributions/216.145.71.130|216.145.71.130]] 22:09, 29 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::The wiki can be a bit inconsistent, because it's been going for a while and not everyone has gone with the same 'house style' (which may have changed over time, too). We have [[:Category:Comics with babies]], for example, and also [[:Category:Comics with cursed items]]. While there are various &amp;quot;Category:Comics featuring &amp;lt;named characters, both real and fictional&amp;gt;&amp;quot;, which would have more suited Etymology Man and could (if we so wish) serve for Batman, Superman, etc, individually.&lt;br /&gt;
:::I'm actually fairly ambivalent, but I think that it should at least have other voices agree on which way it all goes. Saves too much after-the-fact 'corrections'. But you don't want to be talking just to me about this, so I'll shut up now, and await some of the 'big hitter' accounts to weigh it all up. It doesn't need to be done right now. A couple more hours, at least... ;)[[Special:Contributions/81.179.199.253|81.179.199.253]] 22:40, 29 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:no response about where to talk about this yet, so i'm just going to loop the other comment in here. changing the name to be more indicative as well. [[Special:Contributions/64.189.140.8|64.189.140.8]] 07:20, 1 May 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Sounds like a nice category to me. [[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 09:22, 1 May 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Seems quite relevant to me. Don't really see an issue with using the category name &amp;quot;superheroes&amp;quot; [[User:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font:11pt Cormorant Garamond&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#4A86A6&amp;quot;&amp;gt;tor&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#C0728D&amp;quot;&amp;gt;i :3&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font:8pt Cormorant Garamond&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#7E7E7E&amp;quot;&amp;gt;talk &amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#C0728D&amp;quot;&amp;gt;to &amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#4A86A6&amp;quot;&amp;gt;me!&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 16:31, 1 May 2026 (UTC)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>42.book.addict</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=User:Ilios2357&amp;diff=411232</id>
		<title>User:Ilios2357</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=User:Ilios2357&amp;diff=411232"/>
				<updated>2026-04-27T23:40:43Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;42.book.addict: user has reached out to me and expressed their desire to have these pages deleted&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
 '''Hey! My name is Cain.''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I have no preference on pronouns.&lt;br /&gt;
The username is old, and a deadname. Please do not refer to me as Ilios.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Pages to delete]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>42.book.addict</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=User_talk:Ilios2357&amp;diff=411231</id>
		<title>User talk:Ilios2357</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=User_talk:Ilios2357&amp;diff=411231"/>
				<updated>2026-04-27T23:40:32Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;42.book.addict: user has reached out to me and expressed their desire to have these pages deleted&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Would you like to keep this user page? If you do not wish to continue using this username, feel free to create a new account (and let me know so that I can appropriately mark down your user page). [[User:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font:11pt Cormorant Garamond&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#4A86A6&amp;quot;&amp;gt;tor&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#C0728D&amp;quot;&amp;gt;i :3&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font:8pt Cormorant Garamond&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#7E7E7E&amp;quot;&amp;gt;talk &amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#C0728D&amp;quot;&amp;gt;to &amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#4A86A6&amp;quot;&amp;gt;me!&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 03:03, 27 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
you can do that? yeah, sure! [[User:Ilios2357|Cain-In-Vain]] ([[User talk:Ilios2357|talk]]) 10:59, 27 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
New account made :D [[User:Cain In Vain|Cain In Vain]] ([[User talk:Cain In Vain|talk]]) 11:01, 27 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Pages to delete]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>42.book.addict</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=User_talk:Ilios2357&amp;diff=411218</id>
		<title>User talk:Ilios2357</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=User_talk:Ilios2357&amp;diff=411218"/>
				<updated>2026-04-27T17:17:06Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;42.book.addict: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Would you like to keep this user page? If you do not wish to continue using this username, feel free to create a new account (and let me know so that I can appropriately mark down your user page). [[User:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font:11pt Cormorant Garamond&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#4A86A6&amp;quot;&amp;gt;tor&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#C0728D&amp;quot;&amp;gt;i :3&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font:8pt Cormorant Garamond&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#7E7E7E&amp;quot;&amp;gt;talk &amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#C0728D&amp;quot;&amp;gt;to &amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#4A86A6&amp;quot;&amp;gt;me!&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 03:03, 27 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
you can do that? yeah, sure! [[User:Ilios2357|Cain-In-Vain]] ([[User talk:Ilios2357|talk]]) 10:59, 27 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
New account made :D [[User:Cain In Vain|Cain In Vain]] ([[User talk:Cain In Vain|talk]]) 11:01, 27 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Pages to delete]] &amp;lt;!-- Unsure as to whether or not to delete this page, perhaps we should keep it as some form of documentation? Ultimately up to the user.--&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>42.book.addict</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=User:Ilios2357&amp;diff=411217</id>
		<title>User:Ilios2357</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=User:Ilios2357&amp;diff=411217"/>
				<updated>2026-04-27T17:16:10Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;42.book.addict: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
 '''Hey! My name is Cain.''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I have no preference on pronouns.&lt;br /&gt;
The username is old, and a deadname. Please do not refer to me as Ilios.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Pages to delete]]&amp;lt;!-- this category needs to be reviewed/clarified - the user is active and using this page, but simultaneously *may* not want to use this named-account (Update as of 4/27: user has made a new account, but was ambiguous as to whether or not they would like to have this page deleted. Keeping tag up until further clarification)--&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>42.book.addict</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=User_talk:Ilios2357&amp;diff=411188</id>
		<title>User talk:Ilios2357</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=User_talk:Ilios2357&amp;diff=411188"/>
				<updated>2026-04-27T03:03:03Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;42.book.addict: Created page with &amp;quot;Would you like to keep this user page? If you do not wish to continue using this username, feel free to create a new account (and let me know so that I can appropriately mark...&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Would you like to keep this user page? If you do not wish to continue using this username, feel free to create a new account (and let me know so that I can appropriately mark down your user page). [[User:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font:11pt Cormorant Garamond&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#4A86A6&amp;quot;&amp;gt;tor&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#C0728D&amp;quot;&amp;gt;i :3&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font:8pt Cormorant Garamond&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#7E7E7E&amp;quot;&amp;gt;talk &amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#C0728D&amp;quot;&amp;gt;to &amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#4A86A6&amp;quot;&amp;gt;me!&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 03:03, 27 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>42.book.addict</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=User:42.book.addict&amp;diff=411187</id>
		<title>User:42.book.addict</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=User:42.book.addict&amp;diff=411187"/>
				<updated>2026-04-27T03:01:17Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;42.book.addict: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{notice|I have reached out to [[User:Jeff|Jeff]]-the owner of this wiki and the only active (sort of) ‘crat-via Gmail and X. Hopefully he responds soon! You can see my To-Do List for him at the bottom of my user page. If there is anything else you think is important, please add to it. I am also considering asking him for adminship, for I am pretty active and available, as well as very dedicated towards this project. What do you think? &lt;br /&gt;
TL;DR-emailed/tweeted to [[User:Jeff|Jeff]], asked him to do some very important things, I want to become an admin, please give me your thoughts.&lt;br /&gt;
Update (4/22/2026): Sometimes I wonder if I should find a way to hack his account...}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{notice|I've created a Discord server for Explain XKCD! Join it at [https://discord.com/invite/zGEVanBBAx discord.gg/zGEVanBBAx]! I intend for it to be a backup format for us to communicate in the case of a server outage, to coordinate online, and to have fun connecting with each other!}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{notice|If you ever wish to reach out to me, contact me on Discord/Twitter (@42.book.addict) or email (tooori.cc@gmail.com)!}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hi! If you see this, you have reached my user page! My name's Victoria, although you can call me Tori for short. I’m 15, live in California, love reading, and started reading Randall’s works (What If?, Thing Explainer, XKCD) in 2018. I started editing on Feb. 1, 2024. I've done {{#cscore:42.book.addict|changes}} changes across {{#cscore:42.book.addict|pages}} pages, bringing to a total of {{#cscore:42.book.addict|score}} point contribution score. See my [[User:42.book.addict/userbox|userboxes]]! &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==My Loves==&lt;br /&gt;
*{{w|Hatsune Miku|Hatsune Miku &amp;lt;33}}&lt;br /&gt;
*{{w|Kasane Teto}}&lt;br /&gt;
*Classical music ({{w|Beethoven}}, {{w|Mozart}}, {{w|Shostakovich}})&lt;br /&gt;
*Reading (i read an entire scientific encyclopaedia during the lockdown :3)&lt;br /&gt;
**although not so much anymore because i’ve been too busy&lt;br /&gt;
*ao3 yuri&lt;br /&gt;
*Pokémon cards (i have a pretty solid portfolio/collection)&lt;br /&gt;
*Bluey (yes, i enjoy watching a preschool show. sue me.)&lt;br /&gt;
*Science&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://www.youtube.com/@rachie rachie]&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://www.twitch.tv/shxtou shoto]&lt;br /&gt;
*MCSR Ranked&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==To Do List==&lt;br /&gt;
*learn to use the goddamned preview button &lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:green; font-size:1.5em;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;✓&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;amp;nbsp;'''{{{1|Done}}}'''&lt;br /&gt;
*get a life&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;red&amp;quot;&amp;gt;✗&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt; '''impossible'''&lt;br /&gt;
*create a bot that fixes grammatical mistakes through the Pywiki library&lt;br /&gt;
**&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{citation needed}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;, extra periods/commas/spaces/whitespace &lt;br /&gt;
**'''In progress'''&lt;br /&gt;
*clean out the maintenance report pages&lt;br /&gt;
*Use the summary box more often&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:green; font-size:1.5em;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;✓&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;amp;nbsp;'''{{{1|Done}}}'''&lt;br /&gt;
*finish up [[2288: Collector's Edition]]&lt;br /&gt;
*Whittle down [[Special:WhatLinksHere/Template:Actual_citation_needed|Template:Actual Citation Needed]]&lt;br /&gt;
*Whatever's on [[explain_xkcd:Community_portal/Coordination#To_do_list|here]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Special:UnusedTemplates]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Special:WantedCategories]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Special:WantedFiles]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Special:WantedPages]]&lt;br /&gt;
*create table of 10th anniversary annotations in what if? chapters&lt;br /&gt;
*find out how to hack jeff's account&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==List of Big Projects==&lt;br /&gt;
*What If? chapter explanation completion&lt;br /&gt;
*upload all loot files of [[2288: Collector's Edition]]&lt;br /&gt;
:*'''In progress'''&lt;br /&gt;
*Categorize all uncategorized files&lt;br /&gt;
:*'''In progress'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Log==&lt;br /&gt;
*yayyyyy only 3 months on the wiki and already 43rd place in overall editing for the entire history of this wiki! also, first admin beat in edit count! more edits to come! (5/14/2024)&lt;br /&gt;
*42nd place-the answer to life, the universe and everything else (5/16/2024)&lt;br /&gt;
*what on earth did I do that made my contribution score jump 70 points (9/24/2024)&lt;br /&gt;
*''must…figure…out…how…to…set…up…a…custom…sig (collapses after fighting with wikitext)'' (9/26/2024)&lt;br /&gt;
*300 edits in a month! (10/1/2024, 2:13 PM PST) &lt;br /&gt;
*broke my right wrist and yet I’m still editing this wiki at the hospital-what the hell am I doing with my life. (10/1/2024, 5:24 PM PST) &lt;br /&gt;
*'''1000. EFFING. EDITS. YESSSSSSSSS.''' (I’m doing this edit with a damn cast 😭-I really need to take a break.) (10/1/2024, 6:20 PM PST) &lt;br /&gt;
*wow, i did a 10 mile hike. i’m proud of myself. (10/13/2024) &lt;br /&gt;
*organized user page, made a separate userbox page. (10/15/2024) &lt;br /&gt;
*new sig, can’t use it due to “HTML tag errors”. gave out 2 barnstars, got both user/discussion pages protected. vandal count:  31! (10/25/2024) &lt;br /&gt;
*just realized that it’s because my sig is way too damn long (10/30/2024) &lt;br /&gt;
*AHHHHHHH [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7aG7tmL5lJ0 WHITEPINE 3] CAME OUT AND I MISSED THE LIVESTREAM (happy halloween! 🎃) (10/31/2024) &lt;br /&gt;
:*Anddddd I also missed Episode 4 (''smh'') (12/16/2024)&lt;br /&gt;
*I have fixed my sig! 255 characters-exactly at the max. '''[[User:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:9pt;color:#db97bf&amp;quot;&amp;gt;42.book.addict&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:6pt;color:#97b6db&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Talk to me!&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;''' (11/04/2024) &lt;br /&gt;
*Pulled an all-nighter to finish a Geo project-would’ve been absolute hell if I was editing in between. Hiatus is still on, just wanted to add this It’s 5:29 AM right now. (11/21/2024) &lt;br /&gt;
*''In New York,'' &lt;br /&gt;
''Concrete jungle where dreams are made of,'' &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
''Theres nothing you can’t do,'' &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
''Now you’re in New York,'' &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
''these streets will make you feel brand new,'' &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
''the lights will inspire you,'' &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
''lets hear it for New York, New York, New York'' &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
(I’m on vacation in New York! The skyline’s very pretty :3) (11/28/2024) &lt;br /&gt;
*Oh wow, over 1K pages edited! (12/06/2024) &lt;br /&gt;
*It's {{w|Beethoven#Life and career|Beethoven's}} birthday today! (12/16/2024) &lt;br /&gt;
::''Happy Birthday to you; Happy Birthday to you; Happy Birthday dear Ludwig; Happy Birthday to you!''&lt;br /&gt;
*2000 Edits! 🎉 Thank you so much to everyone who has been with me throughout this journey! (01/08/2025) &lt;br /&gt;
*holy shit the {{w|January 2025 Southern California wildfires|wildfires}} in socal look really bad (01/09/2025) &lt;br /&gt;
*i have decided to fully embrace {{w|WP:FUCK}} after a sleepless night’s worth of reflection. let the peace and zen commence (haha jk i’m freaking out over some family members in Santa Monica scarily close to the Palisades fire) (01/11/2025) &lt;br /&gt;
*oh wow-10th overall place in edits! what a surprise-i didn't expect i would reach it in less than a year (01/20/2025) &lt;br /&gt;
*to be honest, I started editing about a year ago because I was too scared to join the “real” English Wikipedia and decided to join this small community to learn about Wikipedia policy by lurking around for a year, getting the hang of using templates, wikitext, etc. Also because xkcd is cool. I think that I’ll create an English Wikipedia account on the anniversary of my joining of explain xkcd, Feb. 1, and split my attention between both here and on WP. I’m also doing some research on what WikiProjects I could join, if y’all have any recommendations based on what little y’all know about me I’ll be willing to listen to them. Lore’s over, back to editing! (01/22/2025)  &lt;br /&gt;
*back! (even if it’s only for a bit to take care of the vandalism issue that cropped up after randall published [[Tariffs|tariffs]]) (04/08/2025)&lt;br /&gt;
*Jeff tweeted on September 3rd...he still hasn't responded to any of my emails or tweets :C (09/12/2025)&lt;br /&gt;
*it's been a while, huh? (11/10/2025)&lt;br /&gt;
*12,319 uncategorized comic images left... Happy Thanksgiving! (11/27/2025)&lt;br /&gt;
:*...can I finish it all by Christmas? If I ''do'' finish it up all by myself, I would take #1 on the All-Time editing leaderboard by at least 3,000+ more edits and some 8,000+ pages (11/28/2025)&lt;br /&gt;
*wow-I've made over 1,100 edits this week...can't believe that just a year ago I was celebrating my 1,000th edit C: (12/1/2025)&lt;br /&gt;
*learned how to close tags properly in html today!! (03/18/2026)&lt;br /&gt;
*happy trans visibility day!! (03/31/2026)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Vandal Counter==&lt;br /&gt;
[https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=User:42.book.addict&amp;amp;offset=&amp;amp;limit=500&amp;amp;action=history 4][https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=User_talk:42.book.addict&amp;amp;offset=&amp;amp;limit=500&amp;amp;action=history 9] times! (I’m going to take it as a sign that my impact on this wiki is positive enough to be recognized and singled out by vandals)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==To Do List for [[User:Jeff|Jeff]]==&lt;br /&gt;
*Update the MySQL and MediaWiki software (technical and security ease) &lt;br /&gt;
*Promote another ‘crat (this is sort of needed if we want to be able to keep this wiki going and have active admins) &lt;br /&gt;
*Promote some more active admins (both [[User:Dtgriscom|Dtgriscom]] and [[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] are candidates, maybe me?) &lt;br /&gt;
*Find out the root cause behind all of these [[explain_xkcd:Community_portal/Technical#the_site_is_collapsing|errors]] (preventative measures-I suspect unupdated MediaWiki software makes this wiki vulnerable to hacks and DDoS attacks) &lt;br /&gt;
*Give TheusafBOT bot status (no-brainier) &lt;br /&gt;
*De-sysop [[User:Markhurd|Markhurd]], [[User:Lcarsos|Lcarsos]], [[User:Mynotoar|Mynotoar]], [[User:Dgbrt|Dgbrt]], maybe [[User:Philosopher|Philosopher]] and other inactive admins (this list is only admins who haven’t edited in over 2 years) (preventative measures, [[User:Markhurd]] had deleted the Main Page once years after he was reported to have passed away) &lt;br /&gt;
*Fix email confirmation (account reclaims and notifications) &lt;br /&gt;
*Fix broken RSS Feed (broken ampersand, need server access to change &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;amp;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt; to &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;amp;amp;amp;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;) &lt;br /&gt;
*Restore server access to [[User:Davidy22]] (general maintenance from a technical admin)&lt;br /&gt;
*Fix Contribution Scores to exclude all Minor Edits&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Subpages==&lt;br /&gt;
*[[User:42.book.addict/common.css]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[User:42.book.addict/common.js]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[User:42.book.addict/sandbox]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[User:42.book.addict/sig]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[User:42.book.addict/userbox]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[User talk:42.book.addict/archive]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Signature History and Catalogue ==&lt;br /&gt;
'''Huge''' thanks to [[User:Omega|Omega]] for the framework of this signature! User &amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:serif&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[[User:Bubblegum|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#00BFFF&amp;quot;&amp;gt;bubblegum&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]-[[User_talk:Bubblegum|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#BF7FFF&amp;quot;&amp;gt;talk&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]|[[Special:Contributions/Bubblegum|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#FF7FFF&amp;quot;&amp;gt;contribs&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt; also inspired this sig.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Apparently, MediaWiki doesn’t allow you to have an sig longer than 255 characters. I’ll try my best to compact it, but if anybody has suggestions or would like to help, I will '''absolutely''' accept it. V1 is 490 characters, V2 is 345 characters, V3 is 255 characters (just at the limit, had to compromise contributions). V4 is 253 characters and with the same layout of V3 but with a color change to reflect spring and summer colors. V5 is an autumn/fall based signature, while V6 is a winter themed signature. V7 is an updated signature to clear up confusion about my name. See notes (''I know that this is probably just for my own self-reference'') for my details.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
V1: &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;span title=“…would I make a good admin? If you think so, drop me a message!” style=&amp;quot;font-family: Cormorant Garamond&amp;quot;&amp;gt;'''[[User:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-size:10pt;color:#db97bf&amp;quot;&amp;gt;42.book.addict&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-size:7pt;color:#97b6db&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Talk to me!&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]] [[User:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=“font-size:7pt;color:#00000”&amp;gt;|&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]] [[Special:Contributions/42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-size:7pt;color: #b069db&amp;quot;&amp;gt;What I’ve Done&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
V2: &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond&amp;quot;&amp;gt;'''[[User:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-size:10pt;color:#db97bf&amp;quot;&amp;gt;42.book.addict&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-size:7pt;color:#97b6db&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Talk to me! | &amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]][[Special:Contributions/42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-size:7pt;color:#b069db&amp;quot;&amp;gt;| What I’ve Done&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
V3: &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[User:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:9pt;color:#db97bf&amp;quot;&amp;gt;42.book.addict&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:6pt;color:#97b6db&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Talk to me!&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
V4: &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Notes: Spring/Summer signature (flowery/bright colors) &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[User:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:9pt;color:pink&amp;quot;&amp;gt;42.book.addict&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:6pt;color:#B1E4E3&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Talk to me!&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
V5: &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Notes: Autumn signature (colors reminiscent of fall foliage) &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[User:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:9pt;color:#3a795e&amp;quot;&amp;gt;42.book.addict&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:6pt;color:#ce5f15&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Talk to me!&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
V6: &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Notes: Winter signature (the cool and icy colors of this signature are similar to each other and show the blending of colors when covered in ice and snow during winter) &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[User:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:9pt;color:#A9C6CA&amp;quot;&amp;gt;42.book.addict&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:6pt;color:#516874&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Talk to me!&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
V7: &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Notes: Updated Standard Signature (tired of this whole 42/tori/book.addict thing) &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[User:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:9pt;color:#db97bf&amp;quot;&amp;gt;tori :3&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:6pt;color:#97b6db&amp;quot;&amp;gt;talk to me!&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
V8: &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Notes: TRANS PRIDE YIPPEE (unusable due to character limit (1068&amp;gt;255)) &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[User:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font:9pt Cormorant Garamond&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#89CFF0&amp;quot;&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#FFB7CE&amp;quot;&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#D3D3D3&amp;quot;&amp;gt;.&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#FFB7CE&amp;quot;&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#89CFF0&amp;quot;&amp;gt;o&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#89CFF0&amp;quot;&amp;gt;o&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#FFB7CE&amp;quot;&amp;gt;k&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#D3D3D3&amp;quot;&amp;gt;.&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#FFB7CE&amp;quot;&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#89CFF0&amp;quot;&amp;gt;d&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#89CFF0&amp;quot;&amp;gt;d&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#FFB7CE&amp;quot;&amp;gt;i&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#D3D3D3&amp;quot;&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#FFB7CE&amp;quot;&amp;gt;t&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font:6pt Cormorant Garamond&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#89CFF0&amp;quot;&amp;gt;T&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#FFB7CE&amp;quot;&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#D3D3D3&amp;quot;&amp;gt;l&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#FFB7CE&amp;quot;&amp;gt;k&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#89CFF0&amp;quot;&amp;gt; &amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#89CFF0&amp;quot;&amp;gt;t&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#FFB7CE&amp;quot;&amp;gt;o&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#D3D3D3&amp;quot;&amp;gt; &amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#FFB7CE&amp;quot;&amp;gt;m&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#89CFF0&amp;quot;&amp;gt;e&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#89CFF0&amp;quot;&amp;gt;!&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Current: &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[User:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font:9pt Cormorant Garamond&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#89CFF0&amp;quot;&amp;gt;tor&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#FFB7CE&amp;quot;&amp;gt;i :3&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font:6pt Cormorant Garamond&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#D3D3D3&amp;quot;&amp;gt;talk &amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#FFB7CE&amp;quot;&amp;gt;to &amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#89CFF0&amp;quot;&amp;gt;me!&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]'''&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>42.book.addict</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:678:_Researcher_Translation&amp;diff=411009</id>
		<title>Talk:678: Researcher Translation</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:678:_Researcher_Translation&amp;diff=411009"/>
				<updated>2026-04-23T18:49:13Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;42.book.addict: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;This does explain a lot, doesn't it? --[[User:Jolbucley|Jolbucley]] ([[User talk:Jolbucley|talk]]) 03:40, 29 January 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Why is this explanation so pessimistic, I don't think this is what Randall was trying to get at. -{{unsigned|Vctr|01:18, 4 April 2015 (UTC)}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
By 2001, we should have lunar colonies and manned missions to the outer planets... [[User:Danshoham|Mountain Hikes]] ([[User talk:Danshoham|talk]]) 01:07, 17 December 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
No in 2001 we should have had Spaceships capable of committing murder and regular flights to the moon. Not sure if you would consider that mission to Europa/Jupiter successful. [[Special:Contributions/108.162.216.166|108.162.216.166]] 12:06, 2 August 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The first commercial fusion plant is indefinitely 20+ years away? We will ‘’’eventually’’’ get flying cars, lunar colonies, and energy-efficient commercial fusion plants, at least within this century. It has been heavily proven that commercial fusion plants will be technologically capable to deliver energy at a rate above 100% of the energy put into it. Sure, in December ‘09, it was indefinitely 20+ years, but now that estimate is now definite, as thirteen years have come by and research has been done. [[User:SilverTheTerribleMathematician|SilverTheTerribleMathematician]] ([[User talk:SilverTheTerribleMathematician|talk]]) 06:25, 8 December 2022 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Humanity has made some development in our research of fusion technologies. The first fusion device was the H bomb, and now we have multiple designs which can controllably heat and pressurize heavy varieties of hydrogen enough to fuse into helium. You may be right that this moves fusion into the 10 year category of &amp;quot;not finished inventing yet&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I am more pessimistic, It is a long journey from momentary positive energy (more energy from fusion than from the laser that powered it, but not more than the energy needed to power the laser, and also not productively captured) to sustained power generation at scales similar to fission plants. Given the enormous difficulty of developing materials that can handle the heat and pressure and can  capture the surplus energy to make it productive. These materials also have to cheap and abundant enough to compete with other energy sources and fulfill global demand.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Language is fun. while an indefinite amount of time can mean essentially *forever*, it can also just be an unspecified amount of time. It's never aliens-until some day (we hope) it is. Fusion power plants are forever 20+ years away-until some day (we hope) it's all ready except the business details.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Special:Contributions/69.204.108.174|69.204.108.174]] 01:54, 23 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>42.book.addict</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:678:_Researcher_Translation&amp;diff=411008</id>
		<title>Talk:678: Researcher Translation</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:678:_Researcher_Translation&amp;diff=411008"/>
				<updated>2026-04-23T18:49:00Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;42.book.addict: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;This does explain a lot, doesn't it? --[[User:Jolbucley|Jolbucley]] ([[User talk:Jolbucley|talk]]) 03:40, 29 January 2014 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Why is this explanation so pessimistic, I don't think this is what Randall was trying to get at. -{{unsinged|Vctr|01:18, 4 April 2015 (UTC)}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
By 2001, we should have lunar colonies and manned missions to the outer planets... [[User:Danshoham|Mountain Hikes]] ([[User talk:Danshoham|talk]]) 01:07, 17 December 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
No in 2001 we should have had Spaceships capable of committing murder and regular flights to the moon. Not sure if you would consider that mission to Europa/Jupiter successful. [[Special:Contributions/108.162.216.166|108.162.216.166]] 12:06, 2 August 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The first commercial fusion plant is indefinitely 20+ years away? We will ‘’’eventually’’’ get flying cars, lunar colonies, and energy-efficient commercial fusion plants, at least within this century. It has been heavily proven that commercial fusion plants will be technologically capable to deliver energy at a rate above 100% of the energy put into it. Sure, in December ‘09, it was indefinitely 20+ years, but now that estimate is now definite, as thirteen years have come by and research has been done. [[User:SilverTheTerribleMathematician|SilverTheTerribleMathematician]] ([[User talk:SilverTheTerribleMathematician|talk]]) 06:25, 8 December 2022 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Humanity has made some development in our research of fusion technologies. The first fusion device was the H bomb, and now we have multiple designs which can controllably heat and pressurize heavy varieties of hydrogen enough to fuse into helium. You may be right that this moves fusion into the 10 year category of &amp;quot;not finished inventing yet&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I am more pessimistic, It is a long journey from momentary positive energy (more energy from fusion than from the laser that powered it, but not more than the energy needed to power the laser, and also not productively captured) to sustained power generation at scales similar to fission plants. Given the enormous difficulty of developing materials that can handle the heat and pressure and can  capture the surplus energy to make it productive. These materials also have to cheap and abundant enough to compete with other energy sources and fulfill global demand.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Language is fun. while an indefinite amount of time can mean essentially *forever*, it can also just be an unspecified amount of time. It's never aliens-until some day (we hope) it is. Fusion power plants are forever 20+ years away-until some day (we hope) it's all ready except the business details.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Special:Contributions/69.204.108.174|69.204.108.174]] 01:54, 23 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>42.book.addict</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:what_if%3F_articles&amp;diff=411007</id>
		<title>Talk:what if? articles</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:what_if%3F_articles&amp;diff=411007"/>
				<updated>2026-04-23T18:47:03Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;42.book.addict: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{TOC}}Note: I moved over the discussion page from my [[User talk:FaviFake|talk page]], which is where the merger of the two what if? indexes was initially coordinated and organized. Most of the topics below were originally created on [[User talk:FaviFake]]. Thanks! --[[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 09:21, 2 February 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
==Introduction to coordinate the merger==&lt;br /&gt;
Hey! This is intended to be a space to coordinate the merging of the two tables. I see that [[User:1234231587678]] and [[User:Apollo11]] have been helping us create the two tables! I'm messaging you to coordinate a little bit. Since we're the 3 most active editors, let's coordinate!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
My idea for the table was the following: there would be one single sortable table instead of two, and the information density would be very high. There were the columns I had in mind:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* N&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Date (the date YYYY-MM-DD, and then includes week after prev. article)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Thumbnail&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Title (hyperlinked)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Reader's question&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Randall's answer&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Book - in something like this format: '''WI?2, n. 40''' (BOOK1,2,3, nr. ARTICLE NUMBER), which is easily sortable by book - for unnumbered, use the assumed number with an asterisk like this: 69* - this column would also be color coded, by book - this would also contain the title in the book if different - empty when not in any book&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* YT (the date YYYY-MM-DD, and then a hyperlinked link with the YT title. if the title is the same, don't repeat it) empty when not on YT&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I realise my mistake was listing the things we had to do together with the huge task, merging the tables! So what happened is you both contributed, but each of you contribued to a different table. In an attempt to solve this, i have created my own table, which is ready to receive the two additional columns!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''I believe this third table (available at [[User:FaviFake]]) is the best option for us to work on the index together, so that once it has the 2 additional columns and contains all the articles, we can put it on the blog page and delete the [[What If? chapters]] table. What do you think?'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I have also made other adjustments:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Made the Date column nowrap, so the date doesn't wrap around, and made the first column (N) centered and '''bold'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Turned each Reader's question cell italic, and added quotation marks to the start and end of each cell. Ex: HOW OLD? becomes ''&amp;quot;HOW OLD?&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* In the Randall's answer column, split the rows into one per question. For example, if there are 5 bullet points in 1 cell, split the &amp;quot;Reader's question&amp;quot; and the &amp;quot;Randall's answer&amp;quot; columns into 5 rows for that particular Article so that each question has its own mini-row.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Added file link to all rows so you can just click to go straight to the upload file page.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;lt;s&amp;gt;'''Downgrade''': titles aren't hyperlinked&amp;lt;/s&amp;gt; -  {{Done}} Update: I manually hyperlinked all of them!&lt;br /&gt;
'''&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Downgrade''': the last ~100 articles are missing. I'll try to add them the day after tomorrow! --[[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 17:06, 17 January 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Regarding the additional 2 columns: I've been thinking a lot about how we should do them. I see 4 options:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:*'''Option 1: Separate Tables''' - separate tables for the YouTube video information and book information, and link articles across tables using the &amp;quot;N&amp;quot; column (or another unique identifier like the title). Advantages: Keeps sorting straightforward in each table. Maintains the integrity of your original table while allowing for sorting by videos and books in their respective tables. Flexible for adding future metadata. Disadvantages: Requires users to cross-reference between tables, which can be inconvenient.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:*'''Option 2: Expand Rows with Sub-Rows''' - How it works: For each article, add one or two additional sub-rows (One for YouTube video information (e.g., YT video number, link, title, thumbnail), and one for book information (e.g., book number, article number, title, color-coded cell). Advantages: Keeps all information together, visually grouped by article. Makes it easy to see all data without leaving the main table. Disadvantages: Sub-rows might disrupt column sorting. Could make the table visually cluttered for articles with both video and book.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:*'''Option 3: Additional Columns''' - new columns for: (FIRST COLUMN) YouTube video number, link, title, and thumbnail, and, (SECOND COLUMN) Book name, article number, title, and color-coding. Advantages: Sorting by videos or books is easy. Keeps all information in a single row. Disadvantages: The table becomes much wider, which can reduce readability on smaller screens. Many empty cells for articles without video or book.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I've also thought about using a template. What do you think of the idea of a creating a template like these:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{Done}} UPDATE: i did create the templates! See the top of [[User:FaviFake]]! &amp;lt;s&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{yt|YTNUMBER (1, 2, 3, etc)|YTLINK|VIDEOTITLE (optional)}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:It would be used in the column that we still need to create. It would also colour the cell in '''red'''. I was also thinking of doing a similar thing for the What If? books:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{bk|WHICH-BOOK|CHAPTER-NUMBER|CHAPTER-TITLE (if different)}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:For example, it would look like this (This one would also colour the cell based on the book, e.g., green for WI?1, yellow for WI?2, blue for WI10th ed.):&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{book|2|69|Jellyfish}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 What If? 2, chapter '''69: Jellyfish'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Would someone be able to create something like this? I know nothing about templates, and i doubt I'll be able to ask chatgpt to do everything for me correctly. --[[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 10:28, 18 January 2025 (UTC)&amp;lt;s&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/s&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
==1234231587678==&lt;br /&gt;
::I saw your message, and this would be a good idea to coordinate. Maybe also add the missing &amp;quot;Peptides&amp;quot; that was accidentally released on the blog, as index 153 (i think) or have two articles with the same index number, just putting &amp;quot;current&amp;quot; for the current article. --[[User:1234231587678|1234231587678]] ([[User talk:1234231587678|talk]]) 20:47, 17 January 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Also I think the &amp;quot;0w later&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;1w later&amp;quot; on the comics looks a bit odd, maybe remove them entirely? The dates are already present. --[[User:1234231587678|1234231587678]] ([[User talk:1234231587678|talk]]) 20:49, 17 January 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Thanks for replying! I LOVE the idea of inserting the Peptides article directly in the index. It would technically make it a little less official, but I'm all for it. It looks and feels like a proper article.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::I also fully agree with you regarding the '''1w later''' line! I do like the idea of seeing the frequency right from the index, but it's too much right now. My idea is to remove the &amp;quot;1w later&amp;quot; part, but leave it in for the articles that aren't released a week after the previous one. For example, this would keep the '''2w later''' and '''0w later''' lines for the articles that have them, but declutter the date cells of the &amp;quot;normal&amp;quot; ones. What do you think?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::I can't do it right now, but it should be easy. We can also delay it until all articles are on the table, so we only have to do it once. Btw, I hope to get all the articles on the table by the day after tomorrow or the day after that. Meanwhile, you or other editors can add the 2 columns (Book and YT)! --[[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 22:14, 17 January 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I currently don't have the books, so can't help with that, but I've added a few YT videos. Also the book template seems to be buggy (and/or a WIP), so I removed it from the 1st article. ALSO, the YT template display {5}&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;th&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; instead of 5th; weird. --[[User:1234231587678|1234231587678]] ([[User talk:1234231587678|talk]]) 15:13, 19 January 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Thank you so much! I fixed the YT template, let me know if there are any other issues. Also, you '''can''' help with books, even if you don't have them! All you need to do is look at the page [[What If? chapters]], which catalogues every chapter of every book. The &amp;lt;s&amp;gt;[[Template:book]]&amp;lt;/s&amp;gt; i was trying to create is broken because I gave up trying to make it work (1h and 20min of my life wasted). Anyways, we now have 4 different templates, one for each book (the fourth is a placeholder!): [[Template:book1]], [[Template:book2]], [[Template:book3]], [[Template:book4]]. There are instructions on hot to use them on their page. Please continue adding the videos and the books if you can! This is exactly what we need! --[[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 15:18, 19 January 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Apollo11==&lt;br /&gt;
This a big page so I’m not sure I’m in the right spot (also typing one handed so sorry for mistakes). I like the table on you page, however I did notice it’s missing which book it’s in and the YouTube channel. I love how the one I edited was formatted, I think if you added that table to your existing table it’d be perfect. I would also add a page number for the books. [[User:Apollo11|Apollo11]] ([[User talk:Apollo11|talk]]) 16:34, 18 January 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ok just saw the three options. I’d go with either 1 or 3. 1 would look the best and probably be easiest to find what you’re looking for as long as your have links to the other tables very clear. What I would do is have a table with title, and where to find the article (blog, book 1, book 2, YouTube). Then have a 4 tables, one for each, where you can go more in depth about each article, date, explanation, jokes, things like that. Option 3 would be the simplest, and if that’s what you wanna do, I’d have the simplest things on the left and the more complicated things on the right. So the date and title would be in the left and the e explanation would be far to the right. You’ve probably been thinking about this a lot longer than me so I’m probably missing something, so please tell me if I’m wrong abo it anything. Also if my comment is in the wrong spot feel free to move me to the right conversation. I’d love to help in anyway!! Just give me directions and I’ll do by best!! [[User:Apollo11|Apollo11]] ([[User talk:Apollo11|talk]]) 16:58, 18 January 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: Thanks so much for your interest! I thought about it a lot today, and i landed on 1, huge, information-laden table. I think having 3 or 4 tables would be too confusing and too hard to navigate. Plus, i think i found a good way to avoid making the table too wide. I added a few articles to showcase it. I don't have a lot of time to do all of them. Regarding the page number, I used the chapter number since it's easier for people who don't own the books.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: &amp;gt; I’d love to help in anyway!! Just give me directions and I’ll do by best!!&lt;br /&gt;
: Love it! You can do everything that's listed at the top of [[User:FaviFake]], but the first one might be more annoying to do on a phone (I'm not sure where you're editing from, actually). If you don't understand something on that page, please do let me know. I promise i'll answer quicker next time. ;)  --[[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 20:03, 19 January 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:: Looks great!! I’ll get on it sometime early next week!! (Ftr I’m usually on a phone but sometimes I’ll go over to a computer for bigger projects, like added links and full researched paragraphs) [[User:Apollo11|Apollo11]] ([[User talk:Apollo11|talk]]) 20:56, 19 January 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::: Amazing! I hope I'll have added all the missing articles by the day after tomorrow. --[[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 21:30, 19 January 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Adding the book-exclusive articles==&lt;br /&gt;
I noticed that there’s not a column for if the article is in the blog. I also don't think some of the ones in the book that aren’t on the blog are in there. Please correct me if I’m wrong. [[User:Apollo11|Apollo11]] ([[User talk:Apollo11|talk]]) 18:17, 21 January 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Yeah, I’ve noticed that some of the What If? Chapters aren’t in the table. I think that we should add them in too '''[[User:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:9pt;color:#A9C6CA&amp;quot;&amp;gt;42.book.addict&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:6pt;color:#516874&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Talk to me!&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;''' 18:42, 21 January 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Thank you all for pointing it out! And again sorry it took me so long, I'm not good at prioritising. (but at least today i did something! I fixed both the YouTube template, there are new instructions on [[User:FaviFake]], and the book templates when used in merged cells. Anyways!)&lt;br /&gt;
::I had forgotten the other table also contained the book-exclusive questions! Of course we should add them! We need to think about this before doing anything though. I have so many questions!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*In what order do we put them? Unfortunately, the chapter of the book are mixed between non-excusive and exclusive.&lt;br /&gt;
*Do we need all the columns?&lt;br /&gt;
 N	Date	Thumbnail	Title	Reader's question	Randall's answer	Books	YouTube&lt;br /&gt;
**What happens to the unnecessary columns? We could merge them, but I'm not sure whether the sorting will work if we merge them.&lt;br /&gt;
*Should we change the columns, so that the '''blog number''' column is more similar to the '''Book''' and '''YouTube''' columns? Or are blog articles more important because they fill all the cells, while book-exclusives don't have all the same info?&lt;br /&gt;
*Is there ANY way you can think of to make the insertion of these articles into the existing index seamless? I'm usually on the side of one big index instead of many little indexes, but I'm having a hard time figuring this out. One of the main reasons I wanted to do this project was so that people wouldn't need to move between 2 different tables to see all articles.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::One way could be to just add all book-exclusive articles, each in their own row, in a big dump on the release date of the book. Even tho it would technically be in chronological order, i don't really like the idea. Please send all your thought! There must me something I'm not thinking of, or something I've been thinking wrong about! --[[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 18:10, 22 January 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::* What order do we put them in&lt;br /&gt;
:: I would do it in the same order as the other table, blog articles first in chronological, what if chapters in chapter order. I believe the YouTube channel is all old questions, but if he posts a new one, then put that below the books.&lt;br /&gt;
::* change blog columns&lt;br /&gt;
::I think you should move the blog date and number to after randalls answer, similar to the books, and for the date for book exclusives maybe jus the book release date? Or NA.&lt;br /&gt;
::* unessery colums&lt;br /&gt;
:: Example?&lt;br /&gt;
::* Seamless integration&lt;br /&gt;
::Just stick them on the bottom, the exact same way you’d put another blog article on the bottom.&lt;br /&gt;
::I think that covers it all? [[User:Apollo11|Apollo11]] ([[User talk:Apollo11|talk]]) 19:15, 22 January 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Sticking the chapters at the end was the same idea I had, and I think that we can just put (What If? Exclusive) inside the date part of the table. '''[[User:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:9pt;color:#A9C6CA&amp;quot;&amp;gt;42.book.addict&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:6pt;color:#516874&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Talk to me!&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;''' 19:22, 22 January 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Thanks for replying so quickly! I don't have time right now to read everything but I can already tell that this is much easier than I thought it would be. I'll answer tomorrow. Before i start overthinking everything: What would you put inside the columns thumbnail, Question, and Answer? Just empty? I'm trying to think of something useful.&lt;br /&gt;
::::Also, what do you think of merging the N (blog) column and the Date columns, just like we do with the YouTube column? Would there be any downsides?&lt;br /&gt;
:::: I hope I'm not preventing it edits by not adding the articles quickly, in the meantime you can help by adding YT videos, now that the template works! --[[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 21:31, 22 January 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::: I think that the YT videos are all added? At least the blog ones and not the What If? exclusive ones. Or maybe Restricted Mode on my home wifi is blocking some. But I think that it’s all done? Tried my best anyways '''[[User:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:9pt;color:#A9C6CA&amp;quot;&amp;gt;42.book.addict&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:6pt;color:#516874&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Talk to me!&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;''' 03:52, 23 January 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::This is great news, thanks! I didn't know there were YouTube videos on book-exclusive articles! I'll get started, this is my plan:&lt;br /&gt;
::::::*The book articles are positioned like the old [[What If? chapters]] table.&lt;br /&gt;
::::::*New column setup:&lt;br /&gt;
 Thumbnail	Title	Reader's question	Randall's answer	'''Blog (this contains both N and Date)'''	Books	YouTube&lt;br /&gt;
::::::*The sometimes-unnecessary columns are left empty.&lt;br /&gt;
::::::*The '''Blog''' column is more similar to the '''Book''' and '''YouTube''' columns: it has a template and colors the cell light blue.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::I feel great about this! We're getting near the finish line. --[[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 15:36, 23 January 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::I think that I added all the What If? And What If? 2 chapters to the table for the ones that were copied from the blog '''[[User:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:9pt;color:#A9C6CA&amp;quot;&amp;gt;42.book.addict&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:6pt;color:#516874&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Talk to me!&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;''' 23:48, 23 January 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::Love it! I hope i'll be able to add some of the missing articles today, but i might not be able to do them all (or any at all). --[[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 18:01, 24 January 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::{{Done}}  I did it! You can now add the missing YT videos :) {{unsigned|FaviFake|20:49, 24 January 2025 (UTC)}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::::Doing it now! '''[[User:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:9pt;color:#A9C6CA&amp;quot;&amp;gt;42.book.addict&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:6pt;color:#516874&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Talk to me!&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;''' 21:24, 24 January 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::::based on the 20 videos that I can see on the YT channel, ALL YT VIDEOS HAVE BEEN ADDED! '''[[User:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:9pt;color:#A9C6CA&amp;quot;&amp;gt;42.book.addict&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:6pt;color:#516874&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Talk to me!&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;''' 21:39, 24 January 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::::::We actually did it! Now all that's left are the explanations, which i'm sure people will prefer doing over merging 2 wikipedia tables. There's just one small problem: I searched for &amp;quot;Featured in What If?,&amp;quot; and instead of 69 results, i got 67. This means two of the articles that are both in the book and in the blog haven't been added. Do you think you could figure out which ones? I also checked the other book and the YouTube videos, and they're all there, it's just the first book. Again, thank you so much for all your work, it would've likely taken weeks to get to this point without your efforts!  --[[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 11:21, 25 January 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
ok, i’ll poke around and see if i can find them. also, I GOT WHAT IF? 10TH ANNIVERSARY! i can add the bonus chapter that is at the end-it’s basically “what if we tried more power” when blasting away at the moon with lasers. '''[[User:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:9pt;color:#A9C6CA&amp;quot;&amp;gt;42.book.addict&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:6pt;color:#516874&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Talk to me!&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;''' 21:22, 25 January 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Congrats on the book! I didn't buy it because i have the original, it's great that someone here owns it. Can you describe in a little more detail the last chapter? I don't understand a few things: does the second YouTube video say exactly the same thing as the blog article? Why are there two videos about 1 article? Or is the second YT video only about the Bonus Chapter in the book, which goes even further than the blog article? Is that bonus chapter not in any other book or blog? Thanks! --[[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 11:13, 26 January 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Also, is the chapter only called Bonus Chapter, or does it also have other names? --[[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 18:15, 26 January 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Sorting &amp;quot;Chapter xx..&amp;quot;==&lt;br /&gt;
Hi... An alternative to the way you are lead-zeroing the text cell's numeric suffix, for sorting purposes, which is what I think {{diff|363528|this is all about}}, would be to do so something like:&lt;br /&gt;
 ... || data-sort-value={{{1}}} | Chapter {{{1}}} || ...&lt;br /&gt;
Should be able to deal with any numeric value, while still rendering it simply as &amp;quot;Chapelter 1&amp;quot;/&amp;quot;Chapter 10&amp;quot;/&amp;quot;Chapter 100&amp;quot;/ etc, but adding ''data-sort-type=&amp;quot;number&amp;quot;'' to the header cell might even be able to sort not-quite-numbers, should a future book ever do chapters like  &amp;quot;... 7, 7a, 9, 10, 11, 12, 12b, 14, ...&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;Perhaps even ''data-sort-value=&amp;lt;booknumber&amp;gt;.&amp;lt;chapternumber&amp;gt;'' would be useful. Though you'd have to use the sufficient-leading-zeroes method, again, and could start at 1.0000001 ''just'' in case there's ever a million (but not more than 10mil-1) chapters in a future bookbut would probably be useful to sort all book-contained items, across all books but not interleaved.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;I'll let you consider if/what you find it more useful. And perhaps check if I've given you the right table markup options by going and checking the Help:Sorting Tables/whatever pages. ;) [[Special:Contributions/141.101.99.107|141.101.99.107]] 00:01, 26 January 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I agree that the current method isn't great, and I'm very glad to see there's another, better way. Unfortunately, I don't really understand most of what you said. BUT! You seem very experienced and I don't have a lot of time, so it would be perfect if you could edit directly the templates/table/cells/whatever needs to be changed. The best option is to remove the leading zeroes and still make the sorting work, for the blog, books, and YT templates. If you (or someone else) could do that, it'd be wonderful. Please feel free to try it yourself if you want! --[[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 11:13, 26 January 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== weird table bugs ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
hey favifake, i found two bugs that i don’t really know how to fix in the table: one of them is in regard to the what if 2 template, whenever it has a “S2” or a “W1” “chapter” it gives an error. the second bug can be found on the laser pointer row-i added the what if? 10th anniversary template, but the yt template doesn’t “fit” (for lack of a better word) with the table. could you dig into these and try to figure out what has gone wrong? thanks! '''[[User:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:9pt;color:#A9C6CA&amp;quot;&amp;gt;42.book.addict&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:6pt;color:#516874&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Talk to me!&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;''' 00:55, 26 January 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Hey 42! I saw what you were trying to do, i think i fixed it now? I removed the '''book3''' template from the original '''Laser Pointer''' row because all original articles are technically in the 10th Ann. book. (i added &amp;quot;exclusively on&amp;quot; to the '''book3''' template to make it clearer). Regarding the other S1 bug, i don't know why but it seems fixed now?? I saw the error just a few hours ago and now it works. I have no idea what happened. Let me know if it reappears or something. --[[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 11:13, 26 January 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Without going in and trying it myself, is this because of the &amp;quot;trying to zero-pad a number&amp;quot; thing (as given a possible alternative, above), because it can't test if &amp;lt;usually number, in this case text&amp;gt; is greater/less than &amp;lt;static number&amp;gt;?&lt;br /&gt;
:Quick-fix (not doing anything else new) would need the test enclosed with an isthisanumber? test (if so, do zero-padding testing, etc; if not, maybe don't try).&lt;br /&gt;
:Exactly how S2/W1 sorts (or doesn't) using the sorting data (bare number only!) and/or the forced data type as number (to do its best for what numeric data it is presented, despite occasional non-numeric interloping characters), would need testing.&lt;br /&gt;
:Or I misunderstand. But, ''if'' I don't, maybe this is useful additional pointer to a solution/acceptance of the problem. [[Special:Contributions/172.71.178.123|172.71.178.123]] 01:21, 26 January 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::IP user, I answered above. :) --[[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 11:13, 26 January 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
== Interesting streamlined 'table furniture', but... ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
...I'm wondering about the current (slight) usage differences between:&lt;br /&gt;
 style=&amp;quot;text-align:center&amp;quot; | {{{1}}}&lt;br /&gt;
and:&lt;br /&gt;
 style=&amp;quot;white-space:nowrap&amp;quot; |&lt;br /&gt;
Do you need to add the Param1 to the nowrap/remove if from the text-alignment?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
And what if someone wanted no-wrap+centre at the same time? There maybe ''are'' ways to combine &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{ac|&amp;lt;foo&amp;gt;}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{nw}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;, but it seems non-trivial to to do. (Unless you make a &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{nwac}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;, but then where do you end?) I'm wondering if you should try it without the |-character.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Let's see if that ''could'' work:&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;margin:auto&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+ Test&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! Foo !! Bar !! Baz&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Normal text of a normal style || style=&amp;quot;text-align:center&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;white-space:nowrap&amp;quot; | This is as if using variations &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{ac|&amp;lt;foo&amp;gt;}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{nw}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt; as rendered without the pipe-character or inconsistent parameter, which is tricky to demonstrate with the actual templates.|| More normal text of a normal style&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Normal text of a normal style || style=&amp;quot;text-align:center&amp;quot; | style=&amp;quot;white-space:nowrap&amp;quot; | This is how &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{ac|{{nw}} &amp;lt;foo&amp;gt;}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt; might look || More normal text of a normal style&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Normal text of a normal style || {{ac|{{nw}} This is how &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{ac|{{nw}} &amp;lt;foo&amp;gt;}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt; ''does'' look, using the current state of the templates.&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;s&amp;gt;''NB. Why is it in bold? Is that a normal feature of a style of text-align:center?''&amp;lt;/s&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
| More normal text of a normal style&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Normal text of a normal style || style=&amp;quot;white-space:nowrap&amp;quot; | style=&amp;quot;text-align:center&amp;quot; | This is how &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{nw}} {{ac|&amp;lt;foo&amp;gt;}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt; might look || More normal text of a normal style&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Normal text of a normal style || {{nw}} {{ac|This is how &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{nw}} {{ac|&amp;lt;foo&amp;gt;}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt; ''does'' look, using the current state of the templates.}}&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;s&amp;gt;''Also goes bold, I notice!''&amp;lt;/s&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
| More normal text of a normal style&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
So, yes, it looks like it might be better to just remove the pipe (or pipe-and-param) and rely on the table-writer to just put in the relevent bare style-giving {{}} (or {{}}s) before the pipe. (I must look into why there's unexpected boldness. I don't know if that comes from the way you templated it or as an associated function of the aligh-center style. But it doesn't appear when I do it 'raw'.) Anyway, food for thought, over to you. It looks like I ''could'' edit your templates, but that might be rude, and would of course instantly break whatever it is you're currently using them (singly) for. That's the ''What If?'' table, I suppose? Anyway, you can both 'fix' how they work and adjust how they are invoked, rather than leaving me to guess about the latter. ;) [[Special:Contributions/162.158.74.49|162.158.74.49]] 19:04, 17 January 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:PS: Yes, I have just checked, and, yes you've added (apparently ''after'' I saw and copied the original {{template|ac}} for my own testing and emulating purposes!) the bolding to the aligh-centering template. That part of the mystery is solved! :P [[Special:Contributions/162.158.74.49|162.158.74.49]] 19:10, 17 January 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:PPS: I know what happened. I copied the (slightly '''formatted''') 'plaintext' as it appeared in the template. If I'd have edited it and copied the wikisource then I'd have grabbed the &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;'''formatted''&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt; as you already had it by the time I passed by. Don't mind me, it was just something that made me wonder. Probably moreso than the thing that I was ''actually'' trying to prod and poke and solve! IOW: Ignore me. On this bit, at least! [[Special:Contributions/172.68.205.151|172.68.205.151]] 19:32, 17 January 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I love how interested you are about this! Honestly i'm not really sure what exactly it is you're asking, but you seem very smart so do whatever you want! My only request is that the {{:ac}} thing keeps working as expected, so i don't have to change the table again. I had forgotten about the {{:nw}} thing, you can delete it or change it or do anything else, I don't use it anymore. Feel free to add to the documentation that these are just for 1 table and might break everything if used anywhere else. Or, if they already work everywhere, great! I remember I created them expecting the entire page to be destroyed when used, and being pleasantly surprised when they worked. So yeah go wild! --[[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 21:19, 17 January 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::I'm not going to make any change without taking time to check your tables and making sure the appropriate change doesn't inflict damage on your attempts to curate the tables you're probably using it for.&lt;br /&gt;
:::But, in short, I understand that you're streamlining the (often longwinded) style=&amp;quot;&amp;quot; statements, an admirble task. In the structure of &amp;quot;| cell || another cell || etc&amp;quot;, you're doing something to save from having to do cumbersome &amp;quot;| cell || style=&amp;quot;this-style: that; that-style: that; the-other-style: the.other&amp;quot; | another cell || etc&amp;quot;, all of which makes editing 'difficult'. (I tend to do such things in Notepad, or whatever separate text editor I have, which lets me add temporary whitespace and use with no-wrap on the markup while I'm working on it, rather than in this textbox editor.)&lt;br /&gt;
::: But the single-pipe that formats the cell isn't a ''great'' difficulty to maintain (indeed, it is useful to line up). As such I'd suggest &amp;quot;| cell || &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{??}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt; | another cell || etc&amp;quot; would be as good. i.e. leave the pipe (intended for the table-cell) out of the template. For the no-wrap version, that's easy enough. Though I do understand that you want to put bold-format about the cell contents, so that's why you give it as a param and explicitly bold the Param1 as you pass it back out.&lt;br /&gt;
::: Maybe the solution to ''that'' is to also add (to the style, along with the text-align:center) the &amp;quot;font-weight: bold&amp;quot; doublet. Then &amp;quot;... || &amp;lt;format(s), as templates and/or raw&amp;gt; | Cell Text || ...&amp;quot; doesn't ''need'' to 'enclose' the Cell Text in any way.&lt;br /&gt;
::: But making the change from something that expects to transclude the &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;range of the template&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; &amp;quot;... || &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;format | Cell Text&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; || ...&amp;quot; to &amp;quot;... || &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;format&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; | Cell Text || ...&amp;quot; obviously requires that each and every table-cell item that uses &amp;quot;... || &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{template|Cell Text}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt; || ...&amp;quot; to be converted to &amp;quot;... || &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{template}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt; | Cell Text || ...&amp;quot;, or... it'll definitely not work as it was originally set.&lt;br /&gt;
::: Anyway, that's just my own vision of how you can do what you seem to have wanted to, without introducing more complications. As the cell-formatting gladly accepts multiple statements of the form style=&amp;quot;...&amp;quot; (it adds &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;style=&amp;quot;...&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;...&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;...&amp;quot;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt; together, much as &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;style=&amp;quot;...; ...; ...&amp;quot;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt; does), an editor now has complete freedom to compound the two format-templates you created. And any additional ones that might be useful. Such ones to usefully colour cell backgrounds as red/yellow/green (for use on the various Confusion Tables), something that I sometimes take a couple of goes to do... not least because I habitually spell 'color' as 'colour'..! ;)&lt;br /&gt;
::: ...but that's just to explain so that (should you/anybody else wish to follow my own instincts on the matter), you have some decent idea of what I'm getting at. There are probably other ways of doing it. Templates can be made to detect and extract pipes, so that &amp;quot;... || &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{template1|{{templete2|Cell Text}}}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; || ...&amp;quot; ''or'' &amp;quot;... || &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{template2|{{templete1|Cell Text}}}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; || ...&amp;quot; would equally produce &amp;quot;... || &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;templateOneOrTwoFormat templateTwoOrOneFormat | Cell Text&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; || ...&amp;quot;, but that would take a degree of of unwieldy parameter-processing functions (that I'd have to work out, probably would involve some subst-function, but might depend upon what's available in the installed mediawiki version). I just think you could avoid all that trouble! [[Special:Contributions/162.158.74.118|162.158.74.118]] 22:51, 17 January 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Forgot to say, that for what you want to use it for, there's ''another'' way:&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;margin:auto&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+ Example 2&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! Number (Centered) !! Foo !! Bar (Centered) !! Baz&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! 1&lt;br /&gt;
| Normal text of a normal style&lt;br /&gt;
! Some text of whatever size (centered)&lt;br /&gt;
| More normal text of a normal style&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! 2&lt;br /&gt;
| Normal text of a normal style&lt;br /&gt;
! Some text of whatever size (also centered, though not so obviously so)&lt;br /&gt;
| More normal text of a normal style&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
:::... This is only possible by newlining each new cell, in the example (you can't do &amp;quot;! cell || cell !! cell || cell&amp;quot;, you have to line-break it as you change from &amp;quot;!&amp;quot;-/&amp;quot;|&amp;quot;-starting cell-groups), but it isn't really so great a loss to do so.&lt;br /&gt;
:::The &amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; class gives these 'header cells' a different background too, but (if you really don't like that) it that can be adjusted in various other ways (including with scope=&amp;quot;col&amp;quot;, I think), or you can leave the wikitable class off (it centres and bolds, but doesn't give cell-borders) and re-add the whole-table bordering style that this now leaves out. But you really don't want me listing ''every'' idea I had, just this one was the other (template-free) option to enforcing centre-aligning bold text on ''certain'' cells. [[Special:Contributions/162.158.74.119|162.158.74.119]] 23:09, 17 January 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Huh, I was actually thinking of doing the opposite of what you're suggesting: include even more pipes inside the template so the editor is cleaner and easier to use. (UPDATE: this probably worse than the other option you gave at the end, see below). So instead of this: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 |-&lt;br /&gt;
 &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;| {{ac|4}} || &amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::You would just use this:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 |-&lt;br /&gt;
 &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{ac|4}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::And it would contain all the pipes needed. I guess then we would have to update the documentation to point out that this template's use case is extremely narrow. Also, if you want to see how it is currently used, the table is on my user page! That's the only place where it's used&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Since you seem very interested in templates, What do you think of the idea of a creating a template like these:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{yt|YTNUMBER (1, 2, 3, etc)|YTLINK|VIDEOTITLE (optional)}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::It would be used in the column that we still need to create. It would also colour the cell in '''red'''. I was also thinking of doing a similar thing for the What If? books:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{bk|WHICH-BOOK|CHAPTER-NUMBER|CHAPTER-TITLE (if different)}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::For example, it would look like this: (This one would also colour the cell based on the book, e.g., green for WI?1, yellow for WI?2, blue for WI10th ed.)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{book|2|69|Jellyfish}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 What If? 2, chapter '''69: Jellyfish'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Would you be able to create something like this? I know nothing about templates, and i doubt I'll be able to ask chatgpt to do everything for me correctly. --[[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 07:16, 18 January 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::&amp;gt; Forgot to say, that for what you want to use it for, there's ''another'' way:&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Oh, i think i had forgotten to read this part!! This seems very interesting! I should try that, since it seems much simpler. --[[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 10:10, 18 January 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::'''Update:''' {{Done}} I applied your suggestion, now the numbers are in their own row:&lt;br /&gt;
 |-&lt;br /&gt;
 !1&lt;br /&gt;
 | The rest of the table&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 10:33, 18 January 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== What If Chapters ==&lt;br /&gt;
Hey FaviFake, there are some What If? Chapters that aren’t included in the blog. Are we going to add them to the table? '''[[User:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:9pt;color:#A9C6CA&amp;quot;&amp;gt;42.book.addict&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:6pt;color:#516874&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Talk to me!&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;''' 17:41, 22 January 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Great timing! You sent me this message while i was in the process of replying to the question. I'm not good at prioritising, I should've definitely responded before doing other edits. Check out my &amp;lt;s&amp;gt;list of questions for y'all&amp;lt;/s&amp;gt; reply above! --[[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 18:10, 22 January 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== YouTube template ==&lt;br /&gt;
Hey FaviFake, on the &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{yt}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt; template, you asked for help on fixing the code of the template. What help do you need to “improve” it? I’m willing to help now that I’m not sick, as I was last week. '''[[User:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:9pt;color:#A9C6CA&amp;quot;&amp;gt;42.book.addict&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:6pt;color:#516874&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Talk to me!&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;''' 18:35, 19 January 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Thank you! Glad to hear you're healthy. That message was mostly a joke, but it is in fact barely held together. (Try modifying the hyperlink that's displayed when a title isn't provided, somehow what you add gets duplicated??) If you have the time and know how to make it more reliable and easily editable in the future, please do! I am honstly scared to touch it fearing it might explode.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Buuut, to be fair there is one template that i desperately needed help with, and that is [[:Template:book]]. I wasted a ton of time to try to get it to change the cell background, and it never worked, so i decided to create [[Template:book1]], [[Template:book2]], [[Template:book3]], [[Template:book4]], and these do work beaytifully, but are harder to edit in bulk. (I still have profound hatred towards [[Template:book]]...). If you actually manage to do what i wanted (which i'm not sure is even clear after the all the mess i've made... ask me if you can't figure it out!), I would be very grateful. PS. I'm not sure if i should warn you, given my very low ability to create templates, but it's definitely not easy, imo.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I'm not sure how skilled you are at template editing, so if you want, you can absolutely continue uploading the What If? thumbnails like you did a few days ago! I just added [[User:FaviFake|a new batch of articles]] (about 60) thanks to some annoyingly complex jailbreaking of Google's NotebookLM. The new table of course includes the quick 100px link to upload a file. Again, thanks for reaching out! --[[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 19:04, 19 January 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::The YT link appears to be going to &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;[[whatever the name of the YouTube video is called]]&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt; and not acting as a [youtube.com filler thingy] linking to a YouTube video. I’m going to hit the books on template writing and try to see if I can do anything about it. Cheers! '''[[User:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:9pt;color:#A9C6CA&amp;quot;&amp;gt;42.book.addict&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:6pt;color:#516874&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Talk to me!&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;''' 03:11, 21 January 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Oh great, that's broken too. I didn't even realise it. Thanks!--[[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 04:57, 21 January 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Partly because you've removed the bit about how to better sort the book-column elements, but are using the same trick in the youtube-column, and partly because it's easier (more on that in a moment), I've just modified the {{template|yt}} to give it the sort value (of article number) directly. Have not removed the expression test to make &amp;quot;6th video ...&amp;quot; into &amp;quot;06th video ...&amp;quot;, for sorting purposes, but I feel confident that you ''can'' do that (and remove the comment about making it give &amp;quot;006th video ...&amp;quot;, in future, should that become necessary) if you now so wish.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:For the books, I was thinking that if, instead of &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;=&amp;quot;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{{1|0}}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;quot;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;, you could maybe use &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;=&amp;quot;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{#expr:10000+{{{1|0}}}}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;quot;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt; for ''What If?'' (in {{template|book1}}) and &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;=&amp;quot;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{#expr:20000+{{{1|0}}}}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;quot;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt; for ''What If? 2'' (in {{template|book2}}), to let it sort by book ''and then'' chapter within book...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:For ''What If? 10th Anniversary Edition'' ({{template|book3}}), I was thinking if you could make the added-to number 11000. Though anything from above 10000+&amp;lt;last chapter number&amp;gt; and below 20000-&amp;lt;last chapter number&amp;gt; would do (and 15000 would work), it leaves room to make any appearance of the 15th anniversary, 20th anniversary, 42nd anniversary, ..., 95th anniversary be able to use the mnemonic offsets of 11500+, 12000+, 14200+, ..., 19500+.. ;) Obviously, it would need revamping if there becomes a centenary edition of Book 1 (or any version of it ever gets ''so many'' &amp;quot;bonus chapters&amp;quot; that it breaks out of its own sequence into the next extant anniversary edition. But you'd need to start adding 100 newly-numbered chapters ''per year'' to do that, so probably not likely. But, right now, the sorting on the &amp;quot;Exclusive to ''What If? 10th Anniversary Edition''&amp;quot; line sorts ''before'' the &amp;quot;NNth chapter of ''What If?''&amp;quot; lines. The above should fix that...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:And the format can be used for other (future?) books and their (possible) reissues: For ''What If? '''N''''', reissued '''YY''' years after the original, that's the number &amp;quot;NYY00&amp;quot;, to which you add the chapter number. Fairly futureproofed, but if Randall ''ever'' publishes anything that makes you need to make the offset &amp;quot;NNYYY000&amp;quot; (e.g. for the quarter-of-a-millenium reissue of ''What If? 15'', having a total of 512 chapters being 15250000+[1..512]) then I reckon the requisite changes will be easy enough to handle as and when, swapping in the expanded offset. And... hey... if they're still being written, ''and'' published, then I can only hope I'm still around to be able to add that edition to my bookshelf!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:You could even redo the {{template|book}} idea (parameters of ...|book=#|chapter=#|optional:edition=#?|...) to only ever need to maintain the one source with ''all'' this flexibility. You've already got experience (by the 1st/2nd/3rd/Nth code) with what's needed to translate Book Number(+Edition Number, if applicable) into unique background colour codes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The big problem, though, is still the non-numeric chapter 'numbers' in ''WI?2''. I have two (or three) different thoughts about that.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:*For only the numeric bits (currently, in the test for less-than-10, etc; in the above for within the &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;data-sort-value=&amp;quot;...&amp;quot;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;) you might want to switch &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{{1|0}}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt; with &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{#if:{{#ifexpr:{{{1|0}}}}}|99|{{{1|0}}}}}{{{1|0}}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;... This should test the param1 value for being a valid value (or missing, when you already make it zero... though not sure for what circumstance you should consider it validly missing) and using it if it is so, or else using the value &amp;quot;99&amp;quot; (or you could have &amp;quot;0&amp;quot;, or &amp;quot;0.5&amp;quot;, or whatever floats your boat). Then at least you'd get ''a'' value (that doesn't cause errors), though it probably wouldn't be sorted very precisely (though appear just after/before all other chapters of the book).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:*The other idea is to use &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{{effectiveChapter|{{{1|0}}}}}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;, then you can append a parameter of &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;...|effectiveChapter=11.5}}&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt; to a non-numeric one sitting between actual chapters 11 and 12 (I haven't checked if that's an actual example, but imagine it is...). Also, for multiple items on page-chapter, you could even have =11.51, =11.52, =11.53, etc, to retain order within the book and ''upon the page''... (You could also give effectiveChapter as &amp;quot;NYYCC(.optional)&amp;quot; format, direct, for ''all'' what if? Numbers, YYearly-editions and CChapters (with possibly sub-positions), come to that, but I don't see that as any simpler a solution as building it in.)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:*The third option would be to use (for hidden sorting-only purpose, mostly) a value of P(.optionalDecimal) either as another numeric parameter or a named one, with P as ''page number'', not chapter number. But, given how hardback vs. paperback (or just another imprint, not necessarily even a Anniversary redo, but I've got the UK edition with an additional UK foreword) ''might'' effect page numbers and/or where end-of-pages interupts any given chapter internals, it's possible that this is not consistent enough. But food for thought, maybe. Only needs to be definitively done once (or thoroughly checked and shuffled along as nevessary if redone to include other changes that require consistency).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Any of that make sense? Hopefully I've at least given you enough examples to ponder, where not immediately obvious. I'd ''really'' rather not change all your hard work just for the sake of a minor cosmetic change with a possibly major set of retouches, which is one of the reasons why I thought I'd do just the basic Youtube 'sort assisting' bit and let those of you who have already had so much 'fun' (tweaking the table formats) decide if and how you make full use of it. Assuming it isn't (differently) broken, for whatever reason may crop up, it shouldn't be a problem if you do nothing at all more with it (either in the {{template|yt}} or {{template|book#}}s). [[Special:Contributions/172.71.241.26|172.71.241.26]] 14:38, 28 January 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Thank you so much! Would you mind if I moved your message to [[Talk:What If? chapters]], to group everything regarding the index in one place?&amp;lt;!-- Do as you wish, it's your Talk namespace, here, and *if* you can make it halfway readable then you can display it where you like, on my behalf. You (and Firestar) made decent use of my ideas, which I had no time to get into the actual implementation of. Signed: that IP again.--&amp;gt; &amp;lt;!--Got it! Thank you. Signed: FaviFake--&amp;gt; Anyways:&lt;br /&gt;
*I did the thing on the yt and {{template|blog}} one and it works!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 For the books, I was thinking that if, instead of &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;=&amp;quot;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{{1|0}}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;quot;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;, you could maybe use &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;=&amp;quot;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{#expr:10000+{{{1|0}}}}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;quot;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt; for ''What If?'' (in {{template|book1}}) and &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;=&amp;quot;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{#expr:20000+{{{1|0}}}}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;quot;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt; for ''What If? 2'' (in {{template|book2}}), to let it sort by book ''and then'' chapter within book...&lt;br /&gt;
*Done! Thanks! For ({{template|book3}}) i used 30000 to have the chapter in chronological order.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 You could even redo the {{template|book}} idea&lt;br /&gt;
*Sorry but I'm not touching that... ''thing'' anymore. That template traumatized me (jk! if you want to try fixing it i'd be very happy)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 For only the numeric bits (currently, in the test for less-than-10, etc; in the above for within the &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;data-sort-value=&amp;quot;...&amp;quot;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;) you might want to switch &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{{1|0}}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt; with &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{#if:{{#ifexpr:{{{1|0}}}}}|99|{{{1|0}}}}}{{{1|0}}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;... This should test the param1 value for being a valid value (or missing, when you already make it zero... though not sure for what circumstance you should consider it validly missing) &lt;br /&gt;
*I'm not sure why that's needed (and also how to actually implement it). What happens if the value is invalid? it seems to work. Or is it required for the other improvements you suggested?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 The other idea is...&lt;br /&gt;
 The third option would be...&lt;br /&gt;
*Yeah this seems pretty hard to solve easily (which is why i'd love it if you did it!). I guess it'll stay slightly broken until it becomes a bigger issue. --[[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 16:54, 28 January 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::It seems like you just forgot to escape pipe characters in the [[Template:book|book template]] in the table within the switch statement, so it just interpreted the non-formatting statements to be a case grouped with the next 'actual' case [[User:Firestar233|guess who]] ([[User talk:Firestar233|if you desire conversing]] | [[Special:Contributions/Firestar233|what i have done]]) 07:23, 29 January 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::BTW I fixed the book template. It should now appear the same as the other templates, and even work with the youtube template [[User:Firestar233|guess who]] ([[User talk:Firestar233|if you desire conversing]] | [[Special:Contributions/Firestar233|what i have done]]) 09:13, 29 January 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::OMG THANK YOU SO MUCH!!! IT ACTUALLY WORKS! What! How! Why!&lt;br /&gt;
:::Thanks so much for fixing the template! I can't describe how glad I am to see it working as (and even better than) I wanted. My life is finally complete. I have switched to using your template in the index.&lt;br /&gt;
:::The reason there was a YT link in one of the {{template|book}} documentation examples is because I was going insane and likely pasted it there by accident. From what I can tell, you seem to have set up {{template|book}} so well that {{template|book}} accepts a YouTube link as input, while the {{template|yt}} template it's based on doesn't if used by itself (requires only the ID). I love this! Since we're gonna have many YT videos to add, it's great to have a much simpler option which doesn't require extracting the ID of the video. Is there a way you could maybe incorporate this improvement into {{template|yt}} itself? Or maybe you're 10 steps ahead of me and you've already done it (which wouldn't surprise me given the amount of wizardry you used on these bad boys!), and I just didn't notice. Please let me know! And again, thank you so much!!! --[[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 17:56, 29 January 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Also, since you've already rendered 4 templates useless thanks to your improvements, why not also add {{template|yt}} to the list of pages to delete, by incorporating it into {{template|book}}? This, unlike {{template|book}}, is absolutely not needed, and I also have no idea if it's as easy as a simple copy-and-paste, or if it requires more work. If it's the latter, please don't do it if you don't want to! I'm just throwing ideas around! --[[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 18:04, 29 January 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
That IP, here. I (think) I fixed the sorting ''and'' error-fallback issues. I think (without trying to roll back to how you had it) you 'broke the sort' by putting in line-feeds (maybe double-ones), that messed up the table/cell handling. Then you broke the handling by commenting out too much (you needed to &amp;quot;&amp;lt; ! - -&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;- - &amp;gt;&amp;quot;, without spaces, without crossing the quotes and |ing boundaries in data-sort-value=&amp;quot;...&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;...&amp;quot; and the 'release', by pipe symbol, to cell-contents).&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Recommented for it to work normally, first without the new 'sort assistance' and then with again. Had a look at the error-catcher (went down a blind alley, at first) and made it an explicit &amp;quot;catch all other inputs&amp;quot; for the errororing display, which I formatted in a more obvious manner ''and'' forced to sort to the start. (Well, almost the start. It puts empty cells with no sorting 'ahead' of even the -999 value I made it give any error-caught cells.)&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;If it were me, I'd be happy to have {{template|yt}} entirely separate from the {{template|book}} handling. It is mnemonically confusing and adds needless (and possibly error-prone) &amp;quot;if we have far too many params for Book template, feed it all into the Youtube template&amp;quot;. Unless you're folding the ''whole'' Youtube template into the body of the Book one (even more work to maintain/debug), it's just adding complication for both server and editors who feel forced to use it. The beauty of the monolithic Book template is that (otherwise identical) &amp;quot;Book N, chapter C, optional new title T&amp;quot; information is trivially similar between different Ns. But it's not my project.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;I'll have a dig about in maybe how to have a table sort &amp;quot;valueless&amp;quot; cells (in reality the empty value of cell absolutely without anything in it) beyond the sort-valued ones. The 'easiest' means I could imagine is to accept &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{book|0}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;, needing no further params, to create a &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;data-sort-value=&amp;quot;999999&amp;quot; |''&amp;lt;blank&amp;gt;''&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt; cell-definition, and have every book-column cell without a book-reference explicitly use that (ditto for &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{yt|0}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt; to have the same pre-trap to it). But seems wasteful. A template &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{empty}}, or even something like {{e}},&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt; (without checking if either of those are free names) could also just give us this behaviour straight off, of course. It's potentially a lot of fuss to make consistent and flexible enough, either way.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;But what I already did probably also needs to be checked for more edge-conditions... I may still have to tweak things when I have a better chance of catching errors (very difficult, on a tablet), and quicker. [[Special:Contributions/172.70.162.196|172.70.162.196]] 21:32, 29 January 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:I also think that the book template shouldn't be used for the videos, on the basis that youtube is not a book.&lt;br /&gt;
:for the default cell, it would probably take no arguments (i.e. just &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{yt}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;), and it would also probably be it's own template rather than implemented on each template. However, I have done some digging, and empty cells (cells with no sort value) are given a value of &amp;quot;-infinity&amp;quot;, so they sort as the absolute minimum no matter what sort method is used (which means always at the top when sorting ascending). I have been looking to find a way to make a row always sort to the bottom regardless of sort order if the column that is sorted has an empty/valueless cell at that row, but if it exists, it is not documented.&lt;br /&gt;
:Interestingly, it is possible to sort by many columns at once by shift-clicking the second column after sorting the first column, and the rows will be sorted within the first sorting. it might be useful for sorting by chapter within each book [[User:Firestar233|guess who]] ([[User talk:Firestar233|if you desire conversing]] | [[Special:Contributions/Firestar233|what i have done]]) 06:51, 30 January 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::Yes, a book (or youtube) template could default to whatever seems suitable as sort-value without params, but it might be more obvious if explicitly book(/video) zero. Or caught by &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{book|nobook=yet}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;, or whatever. I'm trying to think what looks least confusing to future editors (those expanding/editing the table, and/or template(s)), but conflicted about what to anticipate.&lt;br /&gt;
::I had indeed been looking to see if the -infinity thing could be overriden by a column header defined &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;blank-sort-value=&amp;quot;999999&amp;quot;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt; sort of thing. If nothing else, you'd expect there to be a perceived need to sort a range of cells so that explicit negative and explicit positive contents, either by actual cell value or data-sort-value, to sit either side of blank cells... Not ''all'' the time, as sorting to show blanks ''separate'' from filled rows with actual zeroes is also useful, but it seems to useful not to have been suggested as a configurable change.&lt;br /&gt;
::The booknumber*A_LARGE_NUMBER offset to the chapter number is probably one of the most useful ways to sort by (primarily) book, then chapter, as it takes just one click. (I believe clicking the secondary and then clicking the primary does the same job as clicking the primary and shift-clicking the primary.) I see so little use to doing a primary sort by chapter (with or without secondary sorting by books, or any other column's detail), to interleave all chapter 1s and so on, that having a &amp;quot;book #&amp;quot; column and a &amp;quot;chapter(/page) #&amp;quot; column (two cells in sequence easily created by the book template, and could also handle the double-blank needed by book=none implementation, if we went that route) would be just complicating matters in an unnecessary manner. (As opposed to how we've complicated matters in a 'necessary' one!)&lt;br /&gt;
::Good catch on bringing the BOOK+CHAPTER sort value out of the #switch, BTW, as I was debating how much of the switch-statement I could treat as generic and not need repeating. (My original idea for the 10th Anniversary version of Book 1 to be effectively &amp;quot;Book1.1&amp;quot; made me still want to option of overriding the N*10000 as being 3=&amp;gt;11000 instead of =&amp;gt;30000, but that could ''still'' be implemented by a bit of &amp;quot;(if N=3, 1.1, else N) times 10000&amp;quot; pre-logic, ''or'' by handling &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{book|1.10|...}} instead of {{book|3|...}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;. Anyway, not important, either way.)&lt;br /&gt;
::...all this is why I left Favi (and you/others) get on with the original restructuring effort without jumping in (despite having two of the three books, and having seen all the youtubes). I had plenty of ideas of what to do, but did not want to restructure anything from what seemed to be a happy little project with its own momentum and targets. I finally gave in when I noticed an impasse being hit, with errors and confusion, to which I since ''hope'' I have provided a net reduction in both. Though it's only the first of these about which I'm fairly confident. ;) Anyway, perhaps I'm sliding back to my position on the sidelines, now... [[Special:Contributions/172.70.91.245|172.70.91.245]] 11:20, 30 January 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::These comments are great and extremely detailed, thank you! Thanks to your efforts I was able to retire these templates: book1, book2, book3, book4, and yt, so now we only have the huge {{template|book}} template and {{template|blog}}. I kinda agree with IP that it might not be future-proof, but I don't really see a reason to believe we'll add 2 more parameters to the book-specific columns. And even then, it's not that hard to update the template. But please do let me know if you can think of other issues with the current implementation! --[[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 19:50, 30 January 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
I've added a minor feature to the template so that we can see which short video one is. For example, the &amp;quot;everyone jump&amp;quot; short is the 17th one posted, so it now displays on the table as &amp;quot;17th Short video, on 2025‑11‑25: What if everyone on Earth was in the same place and jumped at the same time?&amp;quot;. Hope it helps! [[User:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font:11pt Cormorant Garamond&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#5CA7CF&amp;quot;&amp;gt;tor&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#F08DB0&amp;quot;&amp;gt;i :3&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font:8pt Cormorant Garamond&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#9E9E9E&amp;quot;&amp;gt;talk &amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#F08DB0&amp;quot;&amp;gt;to &amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#5CA7CF&amp;quot;&amp;gt;me!&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 17:38, 11 February 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Thanks! Initially i didn't add it to allow column sorting to work only for videos, but now that there are many shorts the number is definitely neeeded somehwere :) [[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 20:39, 13 February 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== tldr ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
hey favifake! i just came back from a 5 day yosemite trip, that’s why i have been awol for that time. could you please really quick give me a tldr of what has been going on in the past couple days? i see that we finished the index, but i’m just wondering if there’s anything else. thanks! '''[[User:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:9pt;color:#A9C6CA&amp;quot;&amp;gt;42.book.addict&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:6pt;color:#516874&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Talk to me!&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;''' 02:52, 1 February 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Welcome back! We now only use the {{template|book}} and {{template|blog}} templates, all the others have been merged into {{template|book}} by the incredible [[User:Firestar233]], the templates are much more solid, they also added all the questions and almost all the what if? 2-exclusive chapters. So now we're only missing the questions from the first book and an explanation for the third's bonus chapter (which you own!). I don't have much time, but you can look at the history of the templates and the main what if chapters page, and also this talk section. There's also a to-do list above the index! --[[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 18:32, 1 February 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::ok, great! i'll try to work on the chapter explainations once i find the time '''[[User:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:9pt;color:#A9C6CA&amp;quot;&amp;gt;42.book.addict&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:6pt;color:#516874&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Talk to me!&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;''' 21:04, 1 February 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Amazing! Thanks for your help. If you're interested, I've just added a simple (yet boring) task:&lt;br /&gt;
:::*''&amp;quot;Need to add the name(s) of the readers who asked each questions. It's easy! The instructions are in the ''[[What If? chapters#Editors|Editors section]]''!&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
:::If you have time, the names are missing for some book-exclusive articles and the blog articles. --[[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 10:59, 2 February 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Table for smaller screens ==&lt;br /&gt;
Do we think we should list out who asked each question in the table? [[User:Firestar233|guess who]] ([[User talk:Firestar233|if you desire conversing]] | [[Special:Contributions/Firestar233|what i have done]]) 03:09, 2 February 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:If so (and I'm not sure it's necessary), please not as an extra column. Already it's squeezing what's there down, something chronic. At least on my current screen, right now. &lt;br /&gt;
:*The thumbnail column can't get smaller (unless we use smaller/downscaled thukbnails, of course, but there's a limit to that)&lt;br /&gt;
:*The title column (of the first non-hdader is &amp;quot;Relatacistic(Newline)Baseball&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
:*The &amp;quot;Reader's(Newline)question&amp;quot; column goes &amp;quot;(quote)What would(Newline)happen if you(Newline)(...etc)&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
:*The &amp;quot;Randall's answer&amp;quot; column is positively spacious (no doubt forced to be so by the &amp;quot;Too short!&amp;quot; infoboxes), letting it read &amp;quot;The ball would create plasma and(Newline)reach home plate by about 70(Newline)(...etc)&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
:*The three columns for Blog/Book/Vid couldn't be narrower and make sense.&lt;br /&gt;
:If the questioner is to be asked, set it after the question (same cell, maybe horizontal rule).&lt;br /&gt;
:In fact, what do you think of the following layout modification?&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;sortable wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
!Title&lt;br /&gt;
!Question / Answer&lt;br /&gt;
!Blog&lt;br /&gt;
!Books&lt;br /&gt;
!YouTube&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|'''{{what if|1|Relativistic Baseball}}'''&lt;br /&gt;
 [[File:Relativistic Baseball.png|100px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|''&amp;quot;What would happen if you tried to hit a baseball pitched at 90% the speed of light?&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Ellen McManis&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
The ball would create plasma and reach home plate by about 70 nanoseconds. The result would be some kind of nuclear explosion, destroying everything about a mile from the field. A ruling of &amp;quot;{{w|hit by pitch}}&amp;quot; could be interpreted in this situation.&lt;br /&gt;
|{{blog|1|2012|07|10}}&lt;br /&gt;
|{{book|1|2}}&lt;br /&gt;
|{{book|5|2024|02|06|3EI08o-IGYk|What if you threw a baseball at nearly light speed?}}&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|'''{{what if|2|SAT Guessing}}'''&lt;br /&gt;
 [[File:SAT Guessing.png|100px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|''&amp;quot;What if everyone who took the SAT guessed on every multiple-choice question? How many perfect scores would there be?&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Rob Balder&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
No one would get a perfect score. The odds of guessing correctly on every question would be less than the odds of every ex-living president at that time and the main cast of [[:Category:Firefly|Firefly]] getting struck by lightning on the same day.&lt;br /&gt;
|{{blog|2|2012|07|10|7d early}}&lt;br /&gt;
|{{book|1|66}}&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
:Saves trouble of having emphatically unsortable columns, this way, being mere continuations of the cell contents we ''do'' want to sort. Assuming we don't decide we want to sort by &amp;quot;Firstname(s) Lastname&amp;quot; (or &amp;quot;Lastname, Firstname(s)&amp;quot;), as well as by sorting by &amp;quot;What would...&amp;quot; / &amp;quot;What if...&amp;quot; / &amp;quot;How much...&amp;quot; / &amp;quot;Is there...&amp;quot;ness, etc. But that's another step with another answer to it. (e.g. a &amp;quot;By&amp;quot; column with data-sort-value=&amp;quot;Lastname, Firstname(s)&amp;quot; defined but ''no visible content''... It'll be as minimally thin as &amp;quot;By&amp;quot; and the sort-glyph allows, only minimally squeezing the other columns. ...if that's more desirous than merely 'data-sort-value'ing the Question(/Name)/Answer field by name (whatever format), and finding little real reason to sort the &amp;quot;How&amp;quot;s from the &amp;quot;What&amp;quot;s from the &amp;quot;Is&amp;quot;s. But that's something that deserves more thought!)&lt;br /&gt;
:But what I ''do'' highly suggest (at least add the &amp;quot;Who&amp;quot; after the &amp;quot;Question&amp;quot;, same cell, and looks nice with right-align; on top of that, cell-mergering like this, ''probably'' with the horizontal rule markup in the Q&amp;amp;A divide) looks good to me.&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;quot;Relativistic Baseball&amp;quot;(noNewline!) and &amp;quot;(quote)What would happen if you tried to hit a&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;(Newline, etc...)&amp;quot; is how the example table pans out in Preview, which is an improvement for readability.&lt;br /&gt;
:I won't pre-emptimptively assume you're ok with this plan, but (if it seems the idea is liked/not disliked), when I have the time to do it I could blitz this (or any other consensus change of similar radicality, that gets proposed instead) later on (at least 12 hours from now, maybe a full day...). I'll do what I can to fill (or visibly format, if already there) such authors as I'm not left totally stumped about for whatever nazcent reason. Sound good to y'all? ;) [[Special:Contributions/141.101.98.190|141.101.98.190]] 05:00, 2 February 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Thanks for your suggestions! These are my thoughts:&lt;br /&gt;
 Do we think we should list out who asked each question in the table?&lt;br /&gt;
::Yes! I thought about doing this after you commented each reader after the question, but didn't have the time. The ay you went about adding them makes it very easy to create a &amp;quot;find-and-replace&amp;quot; to do it for all cells at once.This is how I'd do it:&lt;br /&gt;
:: &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;''&amp;quot;Question?&amp;quot;''&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:: &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;—Rob Balder&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 In fact, what do you think of the following layout modification?&lt;br /&gt;
 [...] cell-mergering like this, ''probably'' with the horizontal rule markup in the Q&amp;amp;A divide) looks good to me.&lt;br /&gt;
::I don't really like it and I don't think it's needed, mainly because it only looks good on a small screen. Meanwhile, on a normal-sized desk monitor, it makes the table '''almost twice as tall''' on my end. I don't think we should optimise for smaller screens and disregard other users with a larger screen real estate. If you find any other way to improve the table on both screen sizes, please do let us know!&lt;br /&gt;
 (e.g. a &amp;quot;By&amp;quot; column with data-sort-value=&amp;quot;Lastname, Firstname(s)&amp;quot; defined but ''no visible content''... It'll be as minimally thin as &amp;quot;By&amp;quot; and the sort-glyph allows, only minimally squeezing the other columns.&lt;br /&gt;
::I don't really like this idea, seems confusing for the end user (why is there an empty column?), doesn't add so much value, and needs to be maintained. If someone wants to sort by reader alphabetically, they'll likely find a way to isolate the '''&amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;—Rob Balder&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;''' part.&lt;br /&gt;
 But what I ''do'' highly suggest (at least add the &amp;quot;Who&amp;quot; after the &amp;quot;Question&amp;quot;, same cell, and looks nice with right-align [...]&lt;br /&gt;
::Love that! See above.&lt;br /&gt;
::--[[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 09:01, 2 February 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I formatted them! All the ones that were added as comments in the table are now visible. I also added this to-do, mainly for blog posts:&lt;br /&gt;
::*Need to add the name(s) of the readers who asked each questions. It's easy! The instructions are in the ''[[What If? chapters#Editors|Editors section]]''!&lt;br /&gt;
::--[[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 10:57, 2 February 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Regarding &amp;quot;...on a normal-sized desk monitor, it makes the table '''almost twice as tall''' on my end.&amp;quot; my display (non-desktop) has ultra-wide aspect ratio (when landscape; I rarely use portrait for browsing because then web-pages are scaled to unreadable levels).&lt;br /&gt;
:::With side-by-side Q and A columns, the &amp;quot;Too small&amp;quot; warning box dictates the minimum width of the Answer column, making the Question column even more narrow (when you take the minimum width of the thumbnail out of the horizontal space, then the title and the three &amp;quot;occurance&amp;quot; columns fight for what remains) than it might otherwise need to be. (If/when we remove ''all'' these hints to edit longer answer-'summaries', the table will doubtless realign its contents to a more equitable share of width between columns.)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Most often, this still results in (non-short) &amp;quot;Answer&amp;quot; columns being longer than they need to be, and forcing the whole row to be vertically wasteful. An opposite case (such as replicated below) does it with the Question having to have excessive linefeeds, being less readable (needs scrolling to read it all) and leaving a vast desert of blankness in the cell to its immediate right.&lt;br /&gt;
:::Isolating just the Q and A columns (to remove other confounding factors, for most displays except maybe phones-in-portrait - which is already an abominable mode and I find most websites look ''far'' more unreadable in ultra-tall-portrait orientation, so I generally avoid doing that on my tablet) and manually adding the line-breaks I see, you get:&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;sortable wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;quot;When my wife&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;and I started&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;dating she&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;invited me over&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;for dinner at one&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;time. Her&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;kitchen had&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;something&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;called Bauhaus&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;chairs, which are&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;full of holes,&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;approx 5-6&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;millimeters in&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;diameter in both&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;back and seat.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;During this&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;lovely dinner I&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;was forced to&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;liberate a small&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;portion of wind&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;and was relieved&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;that I managed&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;to do so very&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;discretely. Only&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;to find that the&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;chair I sat on&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;converted the&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;successful&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;silence into a&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;perfect, and&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;loud, flute note.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;We were both&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;(luckily) amazed&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;and surprised&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;and I have often&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;wondered what&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;the odds are for&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;something like&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;that happening.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;We kept the&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;chairs for five&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;years but&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;despite laborious&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;attempts it&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;couldn't be&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;reproduced.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|This... isn’t actually a question, but&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;thank you for sharing!&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
:::Integrating the row into the above-suggested format of table, we get (showing just that single combined Q+A cell, minus any &amp;quot;by&amp;quot;-line), the following:&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;sortable wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;quot;When my wife and I started dating she invited&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;me over for dinner at one time. Her kitchen had&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;something called Bauhaus chairs, which are full&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;of holes, approx 5-6 millimeters in&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;diameter in both back and seat. During this lovely dinner I&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;was forced to liberate a small portion of wind&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;and was relieved that I managed to do so very&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;discretely. Only to find that the chair I sat on&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;converted the successful silence into a perfect,&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;and loud, flute note. We were both (luckily)&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;amazed and surprised and I have often&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;wondered what the odds are for something like&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;that happening. We kept the chairs for five&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;years but despite laborious attempts it couldn't be reproduced.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
This... isn’t actually a question, but thank you&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;for sharing!&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
:::Yes, the non-Q&amp;amp;A cells (which I've left out, just there) are still comparatively empty (especially as &amp;quot;Relativistic Baseball&amp;quot; isn't forced into two lines, and even the final three columns don't need quite as many linefeeds between them ...you could probably narrow them further by forcing some linebreaks back into them, giving even more width to Q+A column), but they're actually often ''less'' empty because they aren't as artifically tall as a function of =max(height(question),height(answer)), instead being =height(wider(question+answer)). The conversion to not force a short question to inhabit a desolately empty cell as long as narrowly squashed answer, ''and'' a short answer to be as long as an even more narrowly squashed question, seems to be more wasteful of space than to give combined Q&amp;amp;A far more width and let it be ''exactly'' as long as it needs to be for both to fill it (being the crux of the row, the rest being 'annotations' to the paragraphed question/answer interplay).&lt;br /&gt;
:::Though I'm not next to my own desktop display, right now, I can tell you that the space-wasting I'm showing is notable (though not quite so egregious) there, too, and I had already thought to try out (at least for a Preview) a Q+A column.&lt;br /&gt;
:::I wasn't, at that time, even thinking of thumbnail+title columns merging (which would help even more), but I'm sorely tempted now. Whether or not Q+A merging is accepted by the wider set of editors. Merging title+thumbnail ''could'' trivially let the Q-column expand maybe to double its current width, depending upon the other dynamics involved in apportioning rendered width and height. [[Special:Contributions/172.70.90.9|172.70.90.9]] 13:00, 2 February 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Ok, for reference: The desktop machine has the following line-feeds for the above example, as ''currently'' shown in the Thumbnail|Title|Question|Answer|... format:&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;sortable wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;quot;When my wife and I started dating she invited me&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;over for dinner at one time. Her kitchen&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;had something called Bauhaus chairs, which are full of&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;holes, approx 5-6 millimeters in diameter in both&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;back and seat. During this lovely dinner I was forced&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;to liberate a small portion of wind and was relieved&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;that I managed to do so very discretely. Only to find&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;that the chair I sat on converted the successful&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;silence into a perfect, and loud, flute note. We were&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;both (luckily) amazed and surprised and I have often&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;wondered what the odds are for something like that&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;happening. We kept the chairs for five years but&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;despite laborious attempts it couldn't be&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;reproduced.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|This... isn’t actually a question, but thank you for sharing!(Single line!)&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
:::Testing the above-suggested format of table, we get:&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;sortable wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;quot;When my wife and I started dating she invited me over for dinner at one time. Her kitchen had something called Bauhaus&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;chairs, which are full of holes, approx 5-6 millimeters in diameter in both back and seat. During this lovely dinner I was&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;forced to liberate a small portion of wind and was relieved that I managed to do so very discretely. Only to find that the&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;chair I sat on converted the successful silence into a perfect, and loud, flute note. We were both (luckily) amazed and surprised&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;and I have often wondered what the odds are for something like that happening. We kept the chairs for five years but&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;despite laborious attempts it couldn't be reproduced.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
This... isn’t actually a question, but thank you for sharing!&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
:::Again, produces shorter (and more readable?) rows. In this particularly extreme example, at least. [[Special:Contributions/162.158.74.49|162.158.74.49]] 14:25, 2 February 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::::Thanks for your answer, these are my thoughts:&lt;br /&gt;
 the &amp;quot;Too small&amp;quot; warning box dictates the minimum width of the Answer column, making the Question column even more narrow [...] than it might otherwise need to be&lt;br /&gt;
::::*I hadn't thought of that, but still: if the issue is mainly caused by these notices, it's very easy to replace them with something else that doesn't force the column to be too wide.&lt;br /&gt;
  I generally avoid doing that on my tablet&lt;br /&gt;
::::*Oh, you're still the same IP as before! Hey there! My point ''wasn't'' that your idea wouldn't benefit small-sized screens like tablets (because it does, as you proved!), but that we should mainly focus on desktop users, which is how most readers that aren't on their phones will use the index. I don't like the idea of making the experience worse for everyone except tablet users (and phone users, but i can't imagine someone browsing such a huge index on their phones, so i don't think we should consider them). I'd love it you could improve the experience for both types of devices!&lt;br /&gt;
 &amp;quot;When my wife and I started dating she invited me over for dinner at one time. Her kitchen&lt;br /&gt;
::::*I think that's a bad example because the question is 4x the normal question length and there is no answer. I don't think we'd want to optimise the index so that that specific article looks better but most other articles don't.&lt;br /&gt;
::::*I think the perfect example of how it will one day look is article 2, with the question being slightly shorter than the answer, and that difference being balanced by the name of the reader who asked the question:&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;sortable wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
!class=&amp;quot;unsortable&amp;quot;|Thumbnail&lt;br /&gt;
!Title&lt;br /&gt;
!Reader's question&lt;br /&gt;
!class=&amp;quot;unsortable&amp;quot;|Randall's answer&lt;br /&gt;
!Blog&lt;br /&gt;
!Books&lt;br /&gt;
!YouTube&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:SAT Guessing.png|100px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|'''{{what if|2|SAT Guessing}}'''&lt;br /&gt;
|''&amp;quot;What if everyone who took the SAT guessed on every multiple-choice question? How many perfect scores would there be?&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;—This is a name&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|No one would get a perfect score. The odds of guessing correctly on every question would be less than the odds of every ex-living president at that time and the main cast of [[:Category:Firefly|Firefly]] getting struck by lightning on the same day.&lt;br /&gt;
|{{blog|2|2012|07|10|7d early}}&lt;br /&gt;
|{{book|1|66}}&lt;br /&gt;
|{{book|16|2024|09|24|0EytSWiKrFg|What if example?}}&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
::::*This specific example, which is how most articles do/will look hopefully, is '''~45% shorter''' than [[#Question askers|your example]] and thus wastes much less space on my screen size.&lt;br /&gt;
 the final three columns don't need quite as many linefeeds between them ...you could probably narrow them further by forcing some linebreaks back into them [...]&lt;br /&gt;
::::*If they need linebreaks, doesn't that mean that their column would be the most narrow one? I thought mediawiki balanced the table pretty well.&lt;br /&gt;
 thumbnail+title columns merging (which would help even more), but I'm sorely tempted now&lt;br /&gt;
::::*But I think this idea has the same problem, looking too tall on desktops and beautiful on a tablet. I wouldn't want to ruin the UX of desktop users to favour tablet users, but i'd love a way to improve both!&lt;br /&gt;
::::*Also, I'd like to one day make the thumbnail bigger, because currently it's too small in my opinion. But if i increased its size right now, it would force every row to be even taller, which would waste space on desktop (and, of course, save space on small screens, or at least not make that big of a difference). --[[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 17:04, 2 February 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::::Is there a &amp;quot;mobile&amp;quot; version/url for this site? because there might be a way to make the table try to display a different layout if it's on the mobile url/version or if the screen is too small, but that would require putting complicated expressions in every row and in the header columns. [[User:Firestar233|guess who]] ([[User talk:Firestar233|if you desire conversing]] | [[Special:Contributions/Firestar233|what i have done]]) 20:53, 3 February 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Yeah I had thought of doing a similar thing, maybe have two pages with different coding and use complex transclusions to keep the content the same? But I wouldn’t even know where to begin with that. But you're the wiki-editing wizard here. --[[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 17:50, 4 February 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::As I predicted, now that most columns are filled, on my screen they're almost the same width! I think it'd be even more balanced if we removed the notices --[[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 15:44, 31 March 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== adding what if? 10th ann   ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
as most of you know, the what if? 10th anniversary edition is basically an updated version of what if?, compete with red annotations and a bonus chapter that i need to get around to explaining. since it has all the original what if? chapters, should we add a red 10th anniversary box under each green what if? box? '''[[User:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:9pt;color:#A9C6CA&amp;quot;&amp;gt;42.book.addict&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:6pt;color:#516874&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Talk to me!&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;''' 16:12, 3 February 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Yeah I realized it was just small annotations after i created the template and now I've changed the 10th ann. one to say ''Featured '''exclusively''' on the 3rd ed. etc.'' Not sure if that's enough, could also be much longer since it's only used on 1 row, but we definitely shouldn't add the template to every other article, (would break the style= html tag). Someone should still mention that articles on the first book are all available on the 3rd (and add more info) on both '''[[what if? (blog)]]''' and '''[[What If? 10th Anniversary Edition]]'''.&lt;br /&gt;
:Don't worry too much about explaining it, it can just be a couple of sentences. People can watch the video if they want details. Thanks for your work!{{unsigned|FaviFake|09:57, 3 February 2025 (UTC)}} &amp;lt;!-- I'm so bad at this! I love how both IP and Firestar rushed to add my signature hahaha --&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The fact that the 10th Anniversary ed (&amp;quot;book3&amp;quot;, in original nomenclature) was basically a bonus-chapter version of the original (&amp;quot;book1&amp;quot;), was behind my suggestion that book|3 should sort-value itself as between book|1 articles and the completely new book|2, but there are severl ways of doing it (including maybe using something akin to {{w|Template:Diagonal split header}} for book|1 (assumed to also be book|3) rendering. [[Special:Contributions/162.158.38.96|162.158.38.96]] 21:08, 3 February 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::That's interesting, I didn't know that existed! I wonder if there's a less repetitive and/or space-efficient way of expressing the same message (&amp;quot;this is on both&amp;quot;), but idk. (look, I remembered to sign this time!) --[[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 17:43, 4 February 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::another question: should i be updating the explanations to be accurate as of 2024? many of the red annotations contain corrections or updates. '''[[User:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:9pt;color:#A9C6CA&amp;quot;&amp;gt;42.book.addict&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:6pt;color:#516874&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Talk to me!&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;''' 16:08, 4 February 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
That's interesting! I like the idea of adding them, but I can't seem to find a nice way to add them:&lt;br /&gt;
*We could add them to the existing explanation, but that would be weird because half of the blog articles, which are public on the site, don't have these additions.&lt;br /&gt;
*We could add them to the book column, but it'd likely get too big, and we would need to figure out a way to make the template do that.&lt;br /&gt;
*We could create a duplicate row of every red-annotated article, even if they're on the blog, but that would be confusing and might clutter the index.&lt;br /&gt;
*We could create a new column, but we already have too many.&lt;br /&gt;
*Also, we'd need to figure out how to add them. Do we want to make the text red like in the book? Should we use a new/old template for that?&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 17:43, 4 February 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== By what measure is anything &amp;quot;too short&amp;quot;. ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I am very close to just removing all the &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{notice|Too short}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt; additions, on the basis that this seems to be a purely subjective measure. The only reason I haven't is because they'll probably just be added back in again (with no more reasoning than before). But, if anyone wants more information, everyone already knows where they can find the ''full'' text (or narrated video) that gives it, while a summary is a summary. [[Special:Contributions/172.70.85.49|172.70.85.49]] 20:28, 19 March 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:The reason I add them is because I'd like people browsing the index to be able to glance at a question and read its summary. I try to check the original article to see if there are any important things we missed and point them out. But if, after reading through an article, you find that our summary is clear and '''fully answers''' the question, you can remove it. I started adding these because some early summaries were way too short, just 5-10 words, and mostly didn't answer the question. For example, if an answer is &amp;quot;We would all die&amp;quot;, that doesn't answer the question, but &amp;quot;The radiation from the nuclear bomb would be so pervasive that we would all die in 2 years&amp;quot; does.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Of course people can just read all ~250 articles, but if someone just wants the answer quickly, we offer that. Please feel free to remove them from answers that are already complete, but not all of them.--[[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 16:48, 20 March 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Reviewing the current first five &amp;quot;Too short&amp;quot; complaints, IMO you cannot get much more fully answered without expanding the &amp;quot;summary&amp;quot; to basically going through the article's in-depth explanation and copying/paraphrasing it. Which seems to me to miss the point.&lt;br /&gt;
::Parallel requests for rewording/better phrasing I can understand (if I thought that any change I made in that direction was going to stand when it got &amp;quot;made longer&amp;quot;, I might even try to help out in that direction), but I'm still none the wiser why they are too short.&lt;br /&gt;
::Answering a question of &amp;quot;How long/heavy/bright/fast is &amp;lt;foo&amp;gt;?&amp;quot; shouldn't need more than a simple &amp;quot;it is &amp;lt;measurement&amp;gt;, given &amp;lt;caveat&amp;gt;&amp;quot;, in most cases. Maybe a couple of those if there's different caveats, or add why it would end the world if you even ''had'' such a &amp;lt;foo&amp;gt;. &amp;quot;Could I/we/humanity &amp;lt;bar&amp;gt;?&amp;quot; probably doesn't need much more than &amp;quot;[Yes/No], but &amp;lt;unexpected thing...&amp;gt;&amp;quot; And I'm not sure if it's still there, because I'm not going to recheck it all, but at one point I noted at least one short-question/short-answer that had a longer 'summary' than the answer given.&lt;br /&gt;
::I like words. I need to expend effort to not use more of them, myself, and am quite pleased if I ''can'' satisfactorily say what I'm trying to say in a succint manner. (i.e. not like this...) But I'm still none the wiser what (lower) thresholds there are in this situation. I'm going to consider if I can help, here, but not right this moment. [[Special:Contributions/172.71.241.122|172.71.241.122]] 20:29, 20 March 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Oooh you're the same IP! I didn't recognise you.&lt;br /&gt;
 Reviewing the current first five &amp;quot;Too short&amp;quot; complaints, IMO you cannot get much more fully answered without expanding the &amp;quot;summary&amp;quot; to basically going through the article's in-depth explanation and copying/paraphrasing it. Which seems to me to miss the point.&lt;br /&gt;
:::Sounds good. If the explanation is satisfactory and mentions everything except things like the methodology used and minor &amp;quot;sub-answers&amp;quot;, feel free to remove the notices!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
  &amp;quot;How long/heavy/bright/fast is &amp;lt;foo&amp;gt;?&amp;quot; shouldn't need more than a simple &amp;quot;it is &amp;lt;measurement&amp;gt;, given &amp;lt;caveat&amp;gt;&amp;quot;, in most cases. Maybe a couple of those if there's different caveats, or add why it would end the world if you even had such a &amp;lt;foo&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
:::Agreed!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &amp;quot;Could I/we/humanity &amp;lt;bar&amp;gt;?&amp;quot; probably doesn't need much more than &amp;quot;[Yes/No], but &amp;lt;unexpected thing...&amp;gt;&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
:::Agree, but usually the entire article revolves around that unexpected thing, so i think we should summarise that too. Agin, feel free to remove the ones you're sure can't be made any longer in a useful way At the start, I added a lot and didn't have time to go read the article for each one! --[[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 15:56, 21 March 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Alternate universe What-Ifs ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Should we make the explanation for Alternate universe What-Ifs a separate page? Explaining every section in this article might be too long, and if the other explanations are anything to go by, an explanation that fits would be considered too short. [[Special:Contributions/172.68.174.147|172.68.174.147]] 06:09, 21 March 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:I think we should definitely explain it, but maybe it's better if we keep it in the table? Why'd you want to split into another page?&lt;br /&gt;
:Also, the short-answer articles aren't too short. If you look at [https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php/What_If%3F_chapters#:~:text=Short Answer Section II Short%20Answer%20Section%20II], for example, it explanations are very short, and rightfully so. --[[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 15:49, 21 March 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== What about Good Question? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There does appear to be a *fourth* &amp;quot;What If?&amp;quot; thing Randall has done that is seemingly only documented at [[New York Times: Good Question]]; the New York Times's [https://www.nytimes.com/column/good-question-randall-munroe-xkcd Good Question], which does appear to maybe have some chapter reposts (i.e. Cosmic Road Trip/&amp;quot;How Long Is the Drive to the Edge of the Universe?&amp;quot;). My question is, is this worth documenting on this page in specific? [[User:Adrmcr|Adrmcr]] ([[User talk:Adrmcr|talk]]) 18:36, 21 March 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Oh, right, I had forgotten about that page! I like the idea of doing something with it, it's currently almost impossible to find. To give it more visibility, I think we could move its contents here. I'm not sure if we should add them to the existing table or put them in a new section, maybe at the bottom. I could see something like this working:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;sortable wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
! rowspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; scope=&amp;quot;col&amp;quot; class=&amp;quot;unsortable&amp;quot; |  Thumbnail&lt;br /&gt;
! rowspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; scope=&amp;quot;col&amp;quot; data-sort-type=text|  Title&lt;br /&gt;
! rowspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; scope=&amp;quot;col&amp;quot; data-sort-type=text|  question&lt;br /&gt;
! rowspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; scope=&amp;quot;col&amp;quot; class=&amp;quot;unsortable&amp;quot; |  Randall's answer&lt;br /&gt;
! colspan=&amp;quot;3&amp;quot;|                                  Article available in... &amp;lt;noinclude&amp;gt;&amp;lt;!--&amp;lt;/noinclude&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;background-color:#FFFF00;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;noinclude&amp;gt;--&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/noinclude&amp;gt;&amp;amp;nbsp;''(click to sort)''&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;lt;noinclude&amp;gt;&amp;lt;!--&amp;lt;/noinclude&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;noinclude&amp;gt;--&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/noinclude&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! scope=&amp;quot;col&amp;quot; data-sort-type=number |           Blog&lt;br /&gt;
! scope=&amp;quot;col&amp;quot; data-sort-type=number |           Books&lt;br /&gt;
! scope=&amp;quot;col&amp;quot; data-sort-type=number |           YouTube&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| rowspan=&amp;quot;7&amp;quot; |&lt;br /&gt;
| rowspan=&amp;quot;7&amp;quot; |'''Good Question'''&lt;br /&gt;
|[https://www.nytimes.com/column/good-question-randall-munroe-xkcd ''&amp;quot;How Long Is the Drive to the Edge of the Universe?&amp;quot;'']&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;—Randall Munroe&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Cras sagittis lacus sit amet porta vulputate.&lt;br /&gt;
|1st &amp;quot;[https://www.nytimes.com/column/good-question-randall-munroe-xkcd Good Question]&amp;quot; NYT article, on 2012‑07‑10&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[https://www.nytimes.com/column/good-question-randall-munroe-xkcd ''&amp;quot;Shark or Orca: Which Should You Fear More?&amp;quot;'']&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;—Randall Munroe&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|rutrum eros id, tincidunt neque. Integer hendrerit magna ac nibh fringilla, &lt;br /&gt;
|2nd &amp;quot;[https://www.nytimes.com/column/good-question-randall-munroe-xkcd Good Question]&amp;quot; NYT article, on 2012‑07‑10&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[https://www.nytimes.com/column/good-question-randall-munroe-xkcd ''&amp;quot;	How Many Languages Could a Child Speak?&amp;quot;'']&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;—Randall Munroe&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|non venenatis lacus hendrerit. Pellentesque ullamcorper dolor eget nunc gravida, nec euismod risus efficitur. &lt;br /&gt;
|3rd &amp;quot;[https://www.nytimes.com/column/good-question-randall-munroe-xkcd Good Question]&amp;quot; NYT article, on 2012‑07‑10&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The old page could become a redirect to the new section/NYT table. --[[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 08:49, 22 March 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::Anyone? --[[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 16:56, 23 March 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Striking a match on Titan - additional ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Depends on how you read it, but try to strike a safety match ''on'' Titan probably would do nothing at all (just like if you tried to strike it on a bit of Earth rock, here on the surface of Earth), as it needs the chemicals in the striking-strip to (in small amounts) combine with the oxidiser in the match-head coating to spark up and ''then'' prompt the relatively slower-burning process that leads to the atmosphere-fed burning of the 'stick'.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This means that striker+match reaction will also work in most situations (including underwater and in vacuum), though of course may then fail to get significant amount of post-striking ignition to continue. As non-safety/strike-anywhere ones will, given the friction (hmmm... would you get good friction off of the ice-boulders of Titan?).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But coating your matchheads with wax (or manufactured with a suitable coating) is advisable for 'survival kit' matches, to prevent infusion of water to 'dampen the squib'. Would be interesting to know to what degree the anoxic atmosphere of Titan might seep in and similarly suppress the various types of ready-to-react compounds, before even the lack of free oxygen ends the intended flare-up. [[Special:Contributions/172.71.26.37|172.71.26.37]] 10:19, 29 March 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Uhh, what article are you talking about? This info could be useful to add in the index! --[[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 15:06, 29 March 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::Easily searchable (or made visible as per my recent change), it's not the only &amp;quot;match&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;Titan&amp;quot; reference, but there aren't so many of either that you need to check much further than the first appearance of either, probably.&lt;br /&gt;
::But, as you ask, it's in the Book 2 &amp;quot;Short Answers #3&amp;quot; collection (the penultimate one of that grouping). And, now that I've reached home, I can also tell you that it's pp.141-142 in the UK hardback edition (whether or not that's identical/near to your own copy's appearance of it).&lt;br /&gt;
::However, no ''more'' info needs to be added, IMO. I changed the prior edit (not sure who/which IP did it, without checking, but their edit popped it up on my own radar as worthy of minor refinement) to just say that it's oxidiser, not just &amp;quot;oxygen&amp;quot; (there's oxygen in the &amp;quot;stick&amp;quot; and any other &amp;quot;head&amp;quot;-coatings applied, but basically incidental to the initial ignition when it's the oxidiser component that primarily contributes to that). And, to my mild and gratifying surprise, now find that this is pretty much exactly what the Short Answer says (except in 'Merkin form of &amp;quot;oxidizer&amp;quot; - so now, I think to myself, did I write my edit in Leftpondian (as I should, just because Noah Webster wanted to be a Lexicographical Edgelord), or Rightpondian (as is my default habit, because that's how I was educated)... need to check that!), in the form of a summary which ''our'' summary pretty much matches&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;&amp;amp;#91;[[559: No Pun Intended|''NPI!'']]&amp;amp;#93;&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; in all useful ways.&lt;br /&gt;
::I added the stuff here, about the Safety Match detail, as a bonus bit of info for anyone who cares to scan down here to know this additional thing that I happen to know (but not necessarily explain well?)... Randall does not go that far into the details in his book-answer (he does divert into a footnote about KClO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; being used in airliner oxygen masks, but that's beyond the scope of adding here, and he totally avoids the safety/strike-anywhere distinctions). Adding the above to the Explanation Table would be overkill, and misrepresent Randall's original format to no real benefit (except maybe some curious pyromaniacs, on Earth or elsewhere) [[Special:Contributions/172.69.195.179|172.69.195.179]] 16:58, 29 March 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== A bit disappointed in the lack of progress ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I mean, I understand that this is a volunteer project and I can't force people to work on this thing, hell, I don't even have the time to fill out most of the pages even if I HAVE read the What IF in question. However, it's still a bit disheartening to see so many &amp;quot;too shorts&amp;quot; even after several weeks. [[Special:Contributions/172.69.208.133|172.69.208.133]] 12:32, 17 April 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:If it was up to me, I'd solve the issue of too many &amp;quot;Too short&amp;quot;s by... deleting the unnecessary &amp;quot;Too short&amp;quot;s... I have no desire to expand the sufficient summaries with much longer reruns of the full answers. [[Special:Contributions/162.158.216.168|162.158.216.168]] 15:39, 17 April 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::I think the progress we made is still a lot, considering the state the index was previously. Also, it's not the only incomplete thing, there are about other 80 incomplete pages here. Also, as I said a while back:&lt;br /&gt;
::If the explanation is satisfactory and mentions everything except things like the methodology used and minor &amp;quot;sub-answers&amp;quot;, please remove the notices! &amp;quot;Could I/we/humanity &amp;lt;bar&amp;gt;?&amp;quot; probably doesn't need much more than &amp;quot;[Yes/No], but &amp;lt;unexpected thing...&amp;gt;&amp;quot;. Agree, but usually the entire article revolves around that unexpected thing, so i think we should summarise that too. Again, feel free to remove the ones you're ''sure'' can't be made any longer in a useful way. At the start of the project, I added a lot and didn't have time to go read the article for each one! --[[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 17:03, 17 April 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== &amp;quot;nonmonomolecular&amp;quot; and peptides ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
About &amp;quot;the longest sequence of letters using one number key&amp;quot;: Yamaki, Sahori B. et al.'s article published on 15 March, 2005 in ''Journal of Colloid and Interface Science'' volume 283, issue 2 on pages 464–471 titled ''Morphological and structural characteristics of diazo dyes at the air–water interface: in situ Brewster angle microscopy and polarized UV/vis analysis'' uses &amp;quot;nonmonomolecular&amp;quot; (with neither hyphens nor dashes nor anything else), a word with 9 consecutive letters using the 6 key a total of 20 times. The word also has [[:wikt:nonmonomolecular|an article on Wiktionary]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
About the peptides: &amp;quot;Glycylglycylglycyl[…]glycine&amp;quot; and other spelled-out amino acid sequences (like titin's) status as a word is dubious. If we assume they are all considerable as words, there is no upper limit on peptide sequence word length (e. g. &amp;quot;glycyl&amp;quot; adds 6 to the length and 0 to the count of unallowed letters (U, B, X, O, J, Z), &amp;quot;phenylalanyl&amp;quot; adds 12 and 0, respectively, etc.). [[Special:Contributions/172.70.39.208|172.70.39.208]] 21:21, 27 April 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Great! You can add all that in the explanation in the main table :D &amp;amp;nbsp; --[[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 14:32, 28 April 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Contact Randall (or his team): link rot on &amp;quot;Pressure Cooker&amp;quot; What if? page ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On this page: https://what-if.xkcd.com/40/ &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There's a link ostensibly to an article about O2F2, link text is &amp;quot;Another article&amp;quot;. It goes to lateralscience.com. Unfortunately, the original site there has been replaced by a domain squatter advertising online casinos. I don't know how to contact Mr. Munroe to tell him. [[User:Nitpicking|Nitpicking]] ([[User talk:Nitpicking|talk]]) 20:23, 12 May 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:You can just shoot him an email at his personal address: rmunroe@gmail.com &amp;amp;nbsp; --[[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 15:03, 13 May 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== 10th Anniversary Annotations ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hello, new here. I honestly have no idea what I am doing. But I read the 10th anniversary edition of ''[[What If?]]'', and one annotation, in the same chapter, added dimethylmercury far off to the right, and about halfway up the y axis. [[User:Majordesmosnerd|Majordesmosnerd]] ([[User talk:Majordesmosnerd|talk]]) 22:18, 19 March 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:We as a community have not decided what to do with annotations, as there are many of them scattered throughout the book and it would be a painstaking process to document them all. I would like invite further discussion about this so we can come to a consensus. [[User:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font:11pt Cormorant Garamond&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#4A86A6&amp;quot;&amp;gt;tor&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#C0728D&amp;quot;&amp;gt;i :3&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font:8pt Cormorant Garamond&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#7E7E7E&amp;quot;&amp;gt;talk &amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#C0728D&amp;quot;&amp;gt;to &amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#4A86A6&amp;quot;&amp;gt;me!&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 01:05, 20 March 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::Agree it'd be nice to have them documented somewhere! [[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 12:21, 4 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::How would we format it? Do we want to make a new template for these annotations? I'd be willing to go through my book if I can find the time for it between all my work. [[User:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font:11pt Cormorant Garamond&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#4A86A6&amp;quot;&amp;gt;tor&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#C0728D&amp;quot;&amp;gt;i :3&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font:8pt Cormorant Garamond&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#7E7E7E&amp;quot;&amp;gt;talk &amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#C0728D&amp;quot;&amp;gt;to &amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#4A86A6&amp;quot;&amp;gt;me!&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 19:41, 5 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::::Maybe a second table somewhere else on the page, with a link from the main table (in the book column?) that goes to the second table, so a user can jump between them when they see the little &amp;quot;see annotations!&amp;quot; link in the book column? (or another column?) I've already filled the table with anchors, so for example to jump to chapter 34 of the second book just can just type [[#2-34]] and it'll take you there. Or for the blog, type any number like [[#55]]. I'm not sure how we should format the annotations, maybe copy the text around it (coloured black like normal text) and make the annotations bold? Or create a {{tl|red}} template that just makes the text of the annotation red. It could work! Unfortunately i don't have the book, i bought the first one :( ㅤ [[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 16:06, 7 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::I think that a second page would be smart. We could do something like &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;[[what if? articles/Annotations]]&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt; with a table: page number, chapter, transcript, and I'll see if I can find the images for the actual annotations somewhere. As for formatting, I think we should do black text for describing any doodles that Randall made, then red text for the actual annotation itself. Let me know if you have any other concerns. [[User:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font:11pt Cormorant Garamond&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#4A86A6&amp;quot;&amp;gt;tor&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#C0728D&amp;quot;&amp;gt;i :3&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font:8pt Cormorant Garamond&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#7E7E7E&amp;quot;&amp;gt;talk &amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#C0728D&amp;quot;&amp;gt;to &amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#4A86A6&amp;quot;&amp;gt;me!&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 16:28, 15 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::Sure, sounds good. The reason I was thinking of doing it all in the same page is that readers could jump back and forth from the explanation of the annotations to the explanation of the chapter and vice versa, without having to reload the page. [[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 19:36, 17 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::So a different table, but on the same page on a different section? That can work for me. [[User:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font:11pt Cormorant Garamond&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#4A86A6&amp;quot;&amp;gt;tor&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#C0728D&amp;quot;&amp;gt;i :3&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font:8pt Cormorant Garamond&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#7E7E7E&amp;quot;&amp;gt;talk &amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#C0728D&amp;quot;&amp;gt;to &amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#4A86A6&amp;quot;&amp;gt;me!&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 18:49, 19 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::Yeah exactly! [[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 08:26, 21 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
== new youtube short ==&lt;br /&gt;
Add why is the sky blue youtube channel short that is on xkcd what if channel. {{unsigned ip|185.88.42.163|12:58, 23 April 2026 (UTC)}}&lt;br /&gt;
:on it! please remember to sign your comments with &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;~~~~&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt; in the future, thanks! [[User:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font:11pt Cormorant Garamond&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#4A86A6&amp;quot;&amp;gt;tor&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#C0728D&amp;quot;&amp;gt;i :3&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font:8pt Cormorant Garamond&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#7E7E7E&amp;quot;&amp;gt;talk &amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#C0728D&amp;quot;&amp;gt;to &amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#4A86A6&amp;quot;&amp;gt;me!&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 18:47, 23 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>42.book.addict</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=User:42.book.addict&amp;diff=410894</id>
		<title>User:42.book.addict</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=User:42.book.addict&amp;diff=410894"/>
				<updated>2026-04-22T16:57:30Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;42.book.addict: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{notice|I have reached out to [[User:Jeff|Jeff]]-the owner of this wiki and the only active (sort of) ‘crat-via Gmail and X. Hopefully he responds soon! You can see my To-Do List for him at the bottom of my user page. If there is anything else you think is important, please add to it. I am also considering asking him for adminship, for I am pretty active and available, as well as very dedicated towards this project. What do you think? &lt;br /&gt;
TL;DR-emailed/tweeted to [[User:Jeff|Jeff]], asked him to do some very important things, I want to become an admin, please give me your thoughts.&lt;br /&gt;
Update (4/22/2026): Sometimes I wonder if I should find a way to hack his account...}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{notice|I've created a Discord server for Explain XKCD! Join it at [https://discord.com/invite/zGEVanBBAx discord.gg/zGEVanBBAx]! I intend for it to be a backup format for us to communicate in the case of a server outage, to coordinate online, and to have fun connecting with each other!}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{notice|If you ever wish to reach out to me, contact me on Discord/Twitter (@42.book.addict) or email (tooori.cc@gmail.com)!}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hi! If you see this, you have reached my user page! My name's Victoria, although you can call me Tori for short. I’m 15, live in California, love reading, and started reading Randall’s works (What If?, Thing Explainer, XKCD) in 2018. I started editing on Feb. 1, 2024. I've done {{#cscore:42.book.addict|changes}} changes across {{#cscore:42.book.addict|pages}} pages, bringing to a total of {{#cscore:42.book.addict|score}} point contribution score. See my [[User:42.book.addict/userbox|userboxes]]! &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==My Loves==&lt;br /&gt;
*{{w|Hatsune Miku|Hatsune Miku &amp;lt;33}}&lt;br /&gt;
*{{w|Kasane Teto}}&lt;br /&gt;
*Classical music ({{w|Beethoven}}, {{w|Mozart}}, {{w|Shostakovich}})&lt;br /&gt;
*Reading (i read an entire scientific encyclopaedia during the lockdown :3)&lt;br /&gt;
**although not so much anymore because i’ve been too busy&lt;br /&gt;
*ao3 yuri&lt;br /&gt;
*Pokémon cards (i have a pretty solid portfolio/collection)&lt;br /&gt;
*Bluey (yes, i enjoy watching a preschool show. sue me.)&lt;br /&gt;
*Science&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://www.youtube.com/@rachie rachie]&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://www.twitch.tv/shxtou shoto]&lt;br /&gt;
*MCSR Ranked&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==To Do List==&lt;br /&gt;
*learn to use the goddamned preview button &lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:green; font-size:1.5em;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;✓&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;amp;nbsp;'''{{{1|Done}}}'''&lt;br /&gt;
*get a life&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;red&amp;quot;&amp;gt;✗&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt; '''impossible'''&lt;br /&gt;
*create a bot that fixes grammatical mistakes through the Pywiki library&lt;br /&gt;
**&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{citation needed}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;, extra periods/commas/spaces/whitespace &lt;br /&gt;
**'''In progress'''&lt;br /&gt;
*clean out the maintenance report pages&lt;br /&gt;
*Use the summary box more often&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:green; font-size:1.5em;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;✓&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;amp;nbsp;'''{{{1|Done}}}'''&lt;br /&gt;
*finish up [[2288: Collector's Edition]]&lt;br /&gt;
*Whittle down [[Special:WhatLinksHere/Template:Actual_citation_needed|Template:Actual Citation Needed]]&lt;br /&gt;
*Whatever's on [[explain_xkcd:Community_portal/Coordination#To_do_list|here]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Special:UnusedTemplates]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Special:WantedCategories]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Special:WantedFiles]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Special:WantedPages]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==List of Big Projects==&lt;br /&gt;
*What If? chapter explanation completion&lt;br /&gt;
*upload all loot files of [[2288: Collector's Edition]]&lt;br /&gt;
:*'''In progress'''&lt;br /&gt;
*Categorize all uncategorized files&lt;br /&gt;
:*'''In progress'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Log==&lt;br /&gt;
*yayyyyy only 3 months on the wiki and already 43rd place in overall editing for the entire history of this wiki! also, first admin beat in edit count! more edits to come! (5/14/2024)&lt;br /&gt;
*42nd place-the answer to life, the universe and everything else (5/16/2024)&lt;br /&gt;
*what on earth did I do that made my contribution score jump 70 points (9/24/2024)&lt;br /&gt;
*''must…figure…out…how…to…set…up…a…custom…sig (collapses after fighting with wikitext)'' (9/26/2024)&lt;br /&gt;
*300 edits in a month! (10/1/2024, 2:13 PM PST) &lt;br /&gt;
*broke my right wrist and yet I’m still editing this wiki at the hospital-what the hell am I doing with my life. (10/1/2024, 5:24 PM PST) &lt;br /&gt;
*'''1000. EFFING. EDITS. YESSSSSSSSS.''' (I’m doing this edit with a damn cast 😭-I really need to take a break.) (10/1/2024, 6:20 PM PST) &lt;br /&gt;
*wow, i did a 10 mile hike. i’m proud of myself. (10/13/2024) &lt;br /&gt;
*organized user page, made a separate userbox page. (10/15/2024) &lt;br /&gt;
*new sig, can’t use it due to “HTML tag errors”. gave out 2 barnstars, got both user/discussion pages protected. vandal count:  31! (10/25/2024) &lt;br /&gt;
*just realized that it’s because my sig is way too damn long (10/30/2024) &lt;br /&gt;
*AHHHHHHH [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7aG7tmL5lJ0 WHITEPINE 3] CAME OUT AND I MISSED THE LIVESTREAM (happy halloween! 🎃) (10/31/2024) &lt;br /&gt;
:*Anddddd I also missed Episode 4 (''smh'') (12/16/2024)&lt;br /&gt;
*I have fixed my sig! 255 characters-exactly at the max. '''[[User:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:9pt;color:#db97bf&amp;quot;&amp;gt;42.book.addict&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:6pt;color:#97b6db&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Talk to me!&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;''' (11/04/2024) &lt;br /&gt;
*Pulled an all-nighter to finish a Geo project-would’ve been absolute hell if I was editing in between. Hiatus is still on, just wanted to add this It’s 5:29 AM right now. (11/21/2024) &lt;br /&gt;
*''In New York,'' &lt;br /&gt;
''Concrete jungle where dreams are made of,'' &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
''Theres nothing you can’t do,'' &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
''Now you’re in New York,'' &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
''these streets will make you feel brand new,'' &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
''the lights will inspire you,'' &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
''lets hear it for New York, New York, New York'' &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
(I’m on vacation in New York! The skyline’s very pretty :3) (11/28/2024) &lt;br /&gt;
*Oh wow, over 1K pages edited! (12/06/2024) &lt;br /&gt;
*It's {{w|Beethoven#Life and career|Beethoven's}} birthday today! (12/16/2024) &lt;br /&gt;
::''Happy Birthday to you; Happy Birthday to you; Happy Birthday dear Ludwig; Happy Birthday to you!''&lt;br /&gt;
*2000 Edits! 🎉 Thank you so much to everyone who has been with me throughout this journey! (01/08/2025) &lt;br /&gt;
*holy shit the {{w|January 2025 Southern California wildfires|wildfires}} in socal look really bad (01/09/2025) &lt;br /&gt;
*i have decided to fully embrace {{w|WP:FUCK}} after a sleepless night’s worth of reflection. let the peace and zen commence (haha jk i’m freaking out over some family members in Santa Monica scarily close to the Palisades fire) (01/11/2025) &lt;br /&gt;
*oh wow-10th overall place in edits! what a surprise-i didn't expect i would reach it in less than a year (01/20/2025) &lt;br /&gt;
*to be honest, I started editing about a year ago because I was too scared to join the “real” English Wikipedia and decided to join this small community to learn about Wikipedia policy by lurking around for a year, getting the hang of using templates, wikitext, etc. Also because xkcd is cool. I think that I’ll create an English Wikipedia account on the anniversary of my joining of explain xkcd, Feb. 1, and split my attention between both here and on WP. I’m also doing some research on what WikiProjects I could join, if y’all have any recommendations based on what little y’all know about me I’ll be willing to listen to them. Lore’s over, back to editing! (01/22/2025)  &lt;br /&gt;
*back! (even if it’s only for a bit to take care of the vandalism issue that cropped up after randall published [[Tariffs|tariffs]]) (04/08/2025)&lt;br /&gt;
*Jeff tweeted on September 3rd...he still hasn't responded to any of my emails or tweets :C (09/12/2025)&lt;br /&gt;
*it's been a while, huh? (11/10/2025)&lt;br /&gt;
*12,319 uncategorized comic images left... Happy Thanksgiving! (11/27/2025)&lt;br /&gt;
:*...can I finish it all by Christmas? If I ''do'' finish it up all by myself, I would take #1 on the All-Time editing leaderboard by at least 3,000+ more edits and some 8,000+ pages (11/28/2025)&lt;br /&gt;
*wow-I've made over 1,100 edits this week...can't believe that just a year ago I was celebrating my 1,000th edit C: (12/1/2025)&lt;br /&gt;
*learned how to close tags properly in html today!! (03/18/2026)&lt;br /&gt;
*happy trans visibility day!! (03/31/2026)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Vandal Counter==&lt;br /&gt;
[https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=User:42.book.addict&amp;amp;offset=&amp;amp;limit=500&amp;amp;action=history 4][https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=User_talk:42.book.addict&amp;amp;offset=&amp;amp;limit=500&amp;amp;action=history 9] times! (I’m going to take it as a sign that my impact on this wiki is positive enough to be recognized and singled out by vandals)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==To Do List for [[User:Jeff|Jeff]]==&lt;br /&gt;
*Update the MySQL and MediaWiki software (technical and security ease) &lt;br /&gt;
*Promote another ‘crat (this is sort of needed if we want to be able to keep this wiki going and have active admins) &lt;br /&gt;
*Promote some more active admins (both [[User:Dtgriscom|Dtgriscom]] and [[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] are candidates, maybe me?) &lt;br /&gt;
*Find out the root cause behind all of these [[explain_xkcd:Community_portal/Technical#the_site_is_collapsing|errors]] (preventative measures-I suspect unupdated MediaWiki software makes this wiki vulnerable to hacks and DDoS attacks) &lt;br /&gt;
*Give TheusafBOT bot status (no-brainier) &lt;br /&gt;
*De-sysop [[User:Markhurd|Markhurd]], [[User:Lcarsos|Lcarsos]], [[User:Mynotoar|Mynotoar]], [[User:Dgbrt|Dgbrt]], maybe [[User:Philosopher|Philosopher]] and other inactive admins (this list is only admins who haven’t edited in over 2 years) (preventative measures, [[User:Markhurd]] had deleted the Main Page once years after he was reported to have passed away) &lt;br /&gt;
*Fix email confirmation (account reclaims and notifications) &lt;br /&gt;
*Fix broken RSS Feed (broken ampersand, need server access to change &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;amp;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt; to &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;amp;amp;amp;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;) &lt;br /&gt;
*Restore server access to [[User:Davidy22]] (general maintenance from a technical admin)&lt;br /&gt;
*Fix Contribution Scores to exclude all Minor Edits&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Subpages==&lt;br /&gt;
*[[User:42.book.addict/common.css]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[User:42.book.addict/common.js]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[User:42.book.addict/sandbox]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[User:42.book.addict/sig]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[User:42.book.addict/userbox]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[User talk:42.book.addict/archive]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Signature History and Catalogue ==&lt;br /&gt;
'''Huge''' thanks to [[User:Omega|Omega]] for the framework of this signature! User &amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:serif&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[[User:Bubblegum|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#00BFFF&amp;quot;&amp;gt;bubblegum&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]-[[User_talk:Bubblegum|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#BF7FFF&amp;quot;&amp;gt;talk&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]|[[Special:Contributions/Bubblegum|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#FF7FFF&amp;quot;&amp;gt;contribs&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt; also inspired this sig.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Apparently, MediaWiki doesn’t allow you to have an sig longer than 255 characters. I’ll try my best to compact it, but if anybody has suggestions or would like to help, I will '''absolutely''' accept it. V1 is 490 characters, V2 is 345 characters, V3 is 255 characters (just at the limit, had to compromise contributions). V4 is 253 characters and with the same layout of V3 but with a color change to reflect spring and summer colors. V5 is an autumn/fall based signature, while V6 is a winter themed signature. V7 is an updated signature to clear up confusion about my name. See notes (''I know that this is probably just for my own self-reference'') for my details.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
V1: &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;span title=“…would I make a good admin? If you think so, drop me a message!” style=&amp;quot;font-family: Cormorant Garamond&amp;quot;&amp;gt;'''[[User:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-size:10pt;color:#db97bf&amp;quot;&amp;gt;42.book.addict&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-size:7pt;color:#97b6db&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Talk to me!&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]] [[User:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=“font-size:7pt;color:#00000”&amp;gt;|&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]] [[Special:Contributions/42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-size:7pt;color: #b069db&amp;quot;&amp;gt;What I’ve Done&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
V2: &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond&amp;quot;&amp;gt;'''[[User:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-size:10pt;color:#db97bf&amp;quot;&amp;gt;42.book.addict&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-size:7pt;color:#97b6db&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Talk to me! | &amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]][[Special:Contributions/42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-size:7pt;color:#b069db&amp;quot;&amp;gt;| What I’ve Done&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
V3: &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[User:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:9pt;color:#db97bf&amp;quot;&amp;gt;42.book.addict&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:6pt;color:#97b6db&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Talk to me!&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
V4: &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Notes: Spring/Summer signature (flowery/bright colors) &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[User:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:9pt;color:pink&amp;quot;&amp;gt;42.book.addict&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:6pt;color:#B1E4E3&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Talk to me!&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
V5: &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Notes: Autumn signature (colors reminiscent of fall foliage) &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[User:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:9pt;color:#3a795e&amp;quot;&amp;gt;42.book.addict&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:6pt;color:#ce5f15&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Talk to me!&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
V6: &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Notes: Winter signature (the cool and icy colors of this signature are similar to each other and show the blending of colors when covered in ice and snow during winter) &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[User:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:9pt;color:#A9C6CA&amp;quot;&amp;gt;42.book.addict&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:6pt;color:#516874&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Talk to me!&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
V7: &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Notes: Updated Standard Signature (tired of this whole 42/tori/book.addict thing) &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[User:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:9pt;color:#db97bf&amp;quot;&amp;gt;tori :3&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:6pt;color:#97b6db&amp;quot;&amp;gt;talk to me!&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
V8: &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Notes: TRANS PRIDE YIPPEE (unusable due to character limit (1068&amp;gt;255)) &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[User:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font:9pt Cormorant Garamond&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#89CFF0&amp;quot;&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#FFB7CE&amp;quot;&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#D3D3D3&amp;quot;&amp;gt;.&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#FFB7CE&amp;quot;&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#89CFF0&amp;quot;&amp;gt;o&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#89CFF0&amp;quot;&amp;gt;o&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#FFB7CE&amp;quot;&amp;gt;k&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#D3D3D3&amp;quot;&amp;gt;.&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#FFB7CE&amp;quot;&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#89CFF0&amp;quot;&amp;gt;d&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#89CFF0&amp;quot;&amp;gt;d&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#FFB7CE&amp;quot;&amp;gt;i&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#D3D3D3&amp;quot;&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#FFB7CE&amp;quot;&amp;gt;t&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font:6pt Cormorant Garamond&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#89CFF0&amp;quot;&amp;gt;T&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#FFB7CE&amp;quot;&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#D3D3D3&amp;quot;&amp;gt;l&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#FFB7CE&amp;quot;&amp;gt;k&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#89CFF0&amp;quot;&amp;gt; &amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#89CFF0&amp;quot;&amp;gt;t&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#FFB7CE&amp;quot;&amp;gt;o&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#D3D3D3&amp;quot;&amp;gt; &amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#FFB7CE&amp;quot;&amp;gt;m&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#89CFF0&amp;quot;&amp;gt;e&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#89CFF0&amp;quot;&amp;gt;!&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Current: &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[User:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font:9pt Cormorant Garamond&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#89CFF0&amp;quot;&amp;gt;tor&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#FFB7CE&amp;quot;&amp;gt;i :3&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font:6pt Cormorant Garamond&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#D3D3D3&amp;quot;&amp;gt;talk &amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#FFB7CE&amp;quot;&amp;gt;to &amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#89CFF0&amp;quot;&amp;gt;me!&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]'''&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>42.book.addict</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:3230:_Overton&amp;diff=410807</id>
		<title>Talk:3230: Overton</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:3230:_Overton&amp;diff=410807"/>
				<updated>2026-04-21T16:25:45Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;42.book.addict: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&amp;lt;!-- Please sign your posts with ~~~~ and don't delete this text. New comments should be added at the bottom. --&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
4 January 1960 – 30 June 2003 {{unsigned ip|77.87.241.9|18:34, 8 April 2026}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Someday this cartoon will be politically inappropriate.  [[Special:Contributions/64.201.132.210|64.201.132.210]] 19:16, 8 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
: ^ Absolutely. [[Special:Contributions/66.154.219.123|66.154.219.123]] 21:16, 8 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
randall posting a politics-related comic? which could be construed as discontent with the current political landscape? inb4 somebody &amp;lt;s&amp;gt;bashes&amp;lt;/s&amp;gt; complains at kynde again - [[User:Vaedez|Vaedez]] ([[User talk:Vaedez|talk]]) 22:15, 8 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I think it's worth noting that the window keeps updating to the right. [[Special:Contributions/50.47.108.55|50.47.108.55]] 02:22, 9 April 2026 (UTC) Ale10ander&lt;br /&gt;
: Only if you consider dates to go from left to right instead of any other direction. [[Special:Contributions/2A02:C7C:7344:4C00:BC19:A5A4:14E8:E888|2A02:C7C:7344:4C00:BC19:A5A4:14E8:E888]] 08:27, 9 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Well, in English (Which both the comic and this website are written in), that is usually the case, and always is on gravestones. The implication is quite obvious. Blatant, even, when you consider the state of politics today, especially in Randall's home country. [[Special:Contributions/2A00:23EE:2378:B3DB:A4E2:4E65:9C3C:659F|2A00:23EE:2378:B3DB:A4E2:4E65:9C3C:659F]] 12:56, 17 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What's the next death date? 2027? (Just guessin) [[User:Cream Starlight|Cream S.L.]] ([[User talk:Cream Starlight|talk]] / [[Special:Contributions/Cream_Starlight|contribs]]) 03:33, 9 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Does he keep dying because he's gone over a ton?  (1 ton = 2000 lbs) {{unsigned ip|2607:fb91:bd8a:8e2f:858d:1e1b:f461:5f6e|04:35, 9 April 2026 (UTC)}}&lt;br /&gt;
:Too heavy even the time is altered, i see [[User:Cream Starlight|Cream S.L.]] ([[User talk:Cream Starlight|talk]] / [[Special:Contributions/Cream_Starlight|contribs]]) 05:53, 9 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:F.Y.I.: 1 ton = 2,000 ''or'' 2,204.6 ''or'' 2,240 pounds, at least.&lt;br /&gt;
:Also it can be 40, 42 or 60 cubic feet (amongst others). Or 12,000 British Thermal Units-per-Hour. And, at least colloquially, I might use it to describe 100 ''miles per hour'' or GB£100. [[Special:Contributions/82.132.238.115|82.132.238.115]] 16:02, 9 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Reincarnation - Can someone suggest a suitable Buddhist or Hindu text as citation for them multiple lifes? [[Special:Contributions/87.129.222.20|87.129.222.20]] 06:39, 9 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:The windows are overlapping, so no this is not a reference to reincarnation. [[User:Zmatt|Zmatt]] ([[User talk:Zmatt|talk]]) 16:00, 9 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:: Are they French windows, or sash windows? [[Special:Contributions/82.13.184.33|82.13.184.33]] 10:00, 10 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::I only read this in relation to the Dalai Lama so idk if it changes in other forms of Buddhism, but [https://tibetanbuddhistencyclopedia.com/en/index.php?title=Emanation_before_the_passing_away_of_the_predecessor_(ma-dhey_tulku) You can have multiple reincarnations in overlapping windows] in certain cases, although I doubt those cases apply here [[User:Brontosaurus|Brontosaurus]] ([[User talk:Brontosaurus|talk]]) 22:24, 10 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::: If we're wandering into off-topic philosophical musings... If reincarnations are allowed to overlap, we could **all**, every single one of us, be reincarnations of the same person. This would mean that if you hurt someone, you're only hurting yourself, if you help someone, you're helping your past/future self... but also that all sex is really just masturbation. [[Special:Contributions/2607:F2C0:F00F:8C00:0:0:0:CB9|2607:F2C0:F00F:8C00:0:0:0:CB9]] 21:12, 20 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::: A kind of soul-like {{w|one-electron universe}}, you mean? [[Special:Contributions/81.179.199.253|81.179.199.253]] 00:06, 21 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::::Read &amp;quot;The Egg&amp;quot; by Andy Weir! It's a really good short story that talks about this kind of reincarnation. [[User:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font:11pt Cormorant Garamond&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#4A86A6&amp;quot;&amp;gt;tor&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#C0728D&amp;quot;&amp;gt;i :3&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font:8pt Cormorant Garamond&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#7E7E7E&amp;quot;&amp;gt;talk &amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#C0728D&amp;quot;&amp;gt;to &amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#4A86A6&amp;quot;&amp;gt;me!&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 16:25, 21 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For what it's worth, though Wikipedia currently describes Overton as a &amp;quot;political scientist,&amp;quot; that is likely to shift soon. (That is to say, unless someone makes a compelling case on the Talk page, I'm going to change his description to &amp;quot;political activist,&amp;quot; which I think is more accurate to someone who never had a political science degree, never had academic employment, and worked as an electrical engineer before working at an activist think tank.) [[Special:Contributions/38.69.197.145|38.69.197.145]] 12:33, 9 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
: Does that mean that the Overton Window Overton Window has moved? [[Special:Contributions/82.13.184.33|82.13.184.33]] 13:16, 9 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In case anyone wants to check:  [https://www.findagrave.com/memorial/122681438/joseph_paul-overton/photo#view-photo=94839436 Here's a pic of his grave] {{unsigned ip|74.87.89.226|18:04, 9 April 2026 (UTC)}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Just want to say that I think the title text is true. Randall will probably find that, in a few months time, the Sun will no longer be in his face, but the cycle will repeat on an annual basis. I have a similar window. [[User:Jeremyp|Jeremyp]] ([[User talk:Jeremyp|talk]]) 19:18, 9 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
;Significance of the Dates&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Many of the dates in listed correspond to major geopolitical events concerning US military and diplomatic policy. They may also correspond to milestone events in US domestic politics. This is an attempt to compile some of the key events that the comic may be referencing.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*1965:&lt;br /&gt;
**The beginning of Operation Rolling Thunder, the US ground invasion of Vietnam. &lt;br /&gt;
**President LBJ signs the Voting Rights Act of 1965&lt;br /&gt;
*- 2011:&lt;br /&gt;
**US special forces kill Osama Bin Laden&lt;br /&gt;
**NATO forces without the US intervene in the Libyan Civil War leading to the ouster of Muammar Gaddafi.&lt;br /&gt;
**More widely, protests spread accross the Middle East and North Africa, dubbed the Arab Spring&lt;br /&gt;
**The last of the US combat forces stationed in Iraq are withdrawn. &lt;br /&gt;
**The Occuppy Wall Street movement begins.&lt;br /&gt;
*1973: &lt;br /&gt;
**The United States signs the Paris Peace Accords, withdrawing from the Vietnam conflict and claiming the war was over&lt;br /&gt;
**The United States Congress overrides a presidential veto to pass the War Powers Resolution, limiting the ability of future presidents to wage war without Congressional approval&lt;br /&gt;
**The Watergate Scandal breaks.&lt;br /&gt;
**Roe v Wade. &lt;br /&gt;
*- 2018:&lt;br /&gt;
**President Donald Trump unilaterally withdraws the United States from the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action, aka the Iran Nuclear Deal.&lt;br /&gt;
**Congress reverses many of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act's reporting and compliance requirements for all but the largest US banks. &lt;br /&gt;
*1982: &lt;br /&gt;
**Israel violates a 1981 U.S. Brokered ceasefire agreement and invades Lebanon. In response the United States spearheads the establishment of a peacekeeping force to protect Beirut, the Multinational Force in Lebanon.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;wbr/&amp;gt;{{unsigned|In-Sanity|22:16, 8 April 2026}}&lt;br /&gt;
:Unfortunately, I suspect that you could easily find such events for absolutely ''every'' year across that range... Unless you narrow down the choices to just something current (i.e. specifically the ones related to current Middle East events, I suppose), which are going to be less frequent but perhaps specifically in Randall's mind.&lt;br /&gt;
:(Oh, and I slightly re-reformatted your amended contribution, presuming that you meant it to look a bit more like it is now.)&lt;br /&gt;
:I was wondering if there was a mathematical pattern to the numbers, myself. [[Special:Contributions/81.179.199.253|81.179.199.253]] 23:00, 8 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;sunlight is not generally influenced by social attitudes&amp;quot; - Please tell that to the people sitting by the windows and controlling the shades on the airplane and in my workplace. [[User:SammyChips|SammyChips]] ([[User talk:SammyChips|talk]]) 22:05, 13 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What is the basis for the claim that &amp;quot;the most recent updated death time should be in 2023&amp;quot;? I think that paragraph should be removed. [[Special:Contributions/174.53.211.85|174.53.211.85]] 19:41, 15 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
i thought both years had increased by five every change but looking at it again, that isn't true. like at all. there's no actual consistency. so the 2023 claim was wrong, yeah. however the part of it that points out that the comic implies that overton has risen from the dead since the last time the window moved still stands [[Special:Contributions/147.219.84.214|147.219.84.214]] 13:24, 21 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Doesmunroe, like, just keep editing this everytime the &amp;quot;Overton window&amp;quot; moce [[Special:Contributions/73.15.242.202|73.15.242.202]] 01:31, 17 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>42.book.addict</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:what_if%3F_articles&amp;diff=410643</id>
		<title>Talk:what if? articles</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:what_if%3F_articles&amp;diff=410643"/>
				<updated>2026-04-19T18:49:53Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;42.book.addict: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{TOC}}Note: I moved over the discussion page from my [[User talk:FaviFake|talk page]], which is where the merger of the two what if? indexes was initially coordinated and organized. Most of the topics below were originally created on [[User talk:FaviFake]]. Thanks! --[[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 09:21, 2 February 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
==Introduction to coordinate the merger==&lt;br /&gt;
Hey! This is intended to be a space to coordinate the merging of the two tables. I see that [[User:1234231587678]] and [[User:Apollo11]] have been helping us create the two tables! I'm messaging you to coordinate a little bit. Since we're the 3 most active editors, let's coordinate!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
My idea for the table was the following: there would be one single sortable table instead of two, and the information density would be very high. There were the columns I had in mind:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* N&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Date (the date YYYY-MM-DD, and then includes week after prev. article)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Thumbnail&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Title (hyperlinked)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Reader's question&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Randall's answer&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Book - in something like this format: '''WI?2, n. 40''' (BOOK1,2,3, nr. ARTICLE NUMBER), which is easily sortable by book - for unnumbered, use the assumed number with an asterisk like this: 69* - this column would also be color coded, by book - this would also contain the title in the book if different - empty when not in any book&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* YT (the date YYYY-MM-DD, and then a hyperlinked link with the YT title. if the title is the same, don't repeat it) empty when not on YT&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I realise my mistake was listing the things we had to do together with the huge task, merging the tables! So what happened is you both contributed, but each of you contribued to a different table. In an attempt to solve this, i have created my own table, which is ready to receive the two additional columns!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''I believe this third table (available at [[User:FaviFake]]) is the best option for us to work on the index together, so that once it has the 2 additional columns and contains all the articles, we can put it on the blog page and delete the [[What If? chapters]] table. What do you think?'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I have also made other adjustments:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Made the Date column nowrap, so the date doesn't wrap around, and made the first column (N) centered and '''bold'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Turned each Reader's question cell italic, and added quotation marks to the start and end of each cell. Ex: HOW OLD? becomes ''&amp;quot;HOW OLD?&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* In the Randall's answer column, split the rows into one per question. For example, if there are 5 bullet points in 1 cell, split the &amp;quot;Reader's question&amp;quot; and the &amp;quot;Randall's answer&amp;quot; columns into 5 rows for that particular Article so that each question has its own mini-row.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Added file link to all rows so you can just click to go straight to the upload file page.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;lt;s&amp;gt;'''Downgrade''': titles aren't hyperlinked&amp;lt;/s&amp;gt; -  {{Done}} Update: I manually hyperlinked all of them!&lt;br /&gt;
'''&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Downgrade''': the last ~100 articles are missing. I'll try to add them the day after tomorrow! --[[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 17:06, 17 January 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Regarding the additional 2 columns: I've been thinking a lot about how we should do them. I see 4 options:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:*'''Option 1: Separate Tables''' - separate tables for the YouTube video information and book information, and link articles across tables using the &amp;quot;N&amp;quot; column (or another unique identifier like the title). Advantages: Keeps sorting straightforward in each table. Maintains the integrity of your original table while allowing for sorting by videos and books in their respective tables. Flexible for adding future metadata. Disadvantages: Requires users to cross-reference between tables, which can be inconvenient.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:*'''Option 2: Expand Rows with Sub-Rows''' - How it works: For each article, add one or two additional sub-rows (One for YouTube video information (e.g., YT video number, link, title, thumbnail), and one for book information (e.g., book number, article number, title, color-coded cell). Advantages: Keeps all information together, visually grouped by article. Makes it easy to see all data without leaving the main table. Disadvantages: Sub-rows might disrupt column sorting. Could make the table visually cluttered for articles with both video and book.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:*'''Option 3: Additional Columns''' - new columns for: (FIRST COLUMN) YouTube video number, link, title, and thumbnail, and, (SECOND COLUMN) Book name, article number, title, and color-coding. Advantages: Sorting by videos or books is easy. Keeps all information in a single row. Disadvantages: The table becomes much wider, which can reduce readability on smaller screens. Many empty cells for articles without video or book.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I've also thought about using a template. What do you think of the idea of a creating a template like these:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{Done}} UPDATE: i did create the templates! See the top of [[User:FaviFake]]! &amp;lt;s&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{yt|YTNUMBER (1, 2, 3, etc)|YTLINK|VIDEOTITLE (optional)}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:It would be used in the column that we still need to create. It would also colour the cell in '''red'''. I was also thinking of doing a similar thing for the What If? books:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{bk|WHICH-BOOK|CHAPTER-NUMBER|CHAPTER-TITLE (if different)}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:For example, it would look like this (This one would also colour the cell based on the book, e.g., green for WI?1, yellow for WI?2, blue for WI10th ed.):&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{book|2|69|Jellyfish}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 What If? 2, chapter '''69: Jellyfish'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Would someone be able to create something like this? I know nothing about templates, and i doubt I'll be able to ask chatgpt to do everything for me correctly. --[[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 10:28, 18 January 2025 (UTC)&amp;lt;s&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/s&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
==1234231587678==&lt;br /&gt;
::I saw your message, and this would be a good idea to coordinate. Maybe also add the missing &amp;quot;Peptides&amp;quot; that was accidentally released on the blog, as index 153 (i think) or have two articles with the same index number, just putting &amp;quot;current&amp;quot; for the current article. --[[User:1234231587678|1234231587678]] ([[User talk:1234231587678|talk]]) 20:47, 17 January 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Also I think the &amp;quot;0w later&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;1w later&amp;quot; on the comics looks a bit odd, maybe remove them entirely? The dates are already present. --[[User:1234231587678|1234231587678]] ([[User talk:1234231587678|talk]]) 20:49, 17 January 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Thanks for replying! I LOVE the idea of inserting the Peptides article directly in the index. It would technically make it a little less official, but I'm all for it. It looks and feels like a proper article.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::I also fully agree with you regarding the '''1w later''' line! I do like the idea of seeing the frequency right from the index, but it's too much right now. My idea is to remove the &amp;quot;1w later&amp;quot; part, but leave it in for the articles that aren't released a week after the previous one. For example, this would keep the '''2w later''' and '''0w later''' lines for the articles that have them, but declutter the date cells of the &amp;quot;normal&amp;quot; ones. What do you think?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::I can't do it right now, but it should be easy. We can also delay it until all articles are on the table, so we only have to do it once. Btw, I hope to get all the articles on the table by the day after tomorrow or the day after that. Meanwhile, you or other editors can add the 2 columns (Book and YT)! --[[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 22:14, 17 January 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I currently don't have the books, so can't help with that, but I've added a few YT videos. Also the book template seems to be buggy (and/or a WIP), so I removed it from the 1st article. ALSO, the YT template display {5}&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;th&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; instead of 5th; weird. --[[User:1234231587678|1234231587678]] ([[User talk:1234231587678|talk]]) 15:13, 19 January 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Thank you so much! I fixed the YT template, let me know if there are any other issues. Also, you '''can''' help with books, even if you don't have them! All you need to do is look at the page [[What If? chapters]], which catalogues every chapter of every book. The &amp;lt;s&amp;gt;[[Template:book]]&amp;lt;/s&amp;gt; i was trying to create is broken because I gave up trying to make it work (1h and 20min of my life wasted). Anyways, we now have 4 different templates, one for each book (the fourth is a placeholder!): [[Template:book1]], [[Template:book2]], [[Template:book3]], [[Template:book4]]. There are instructions on hot to use them on their page. Please continue adding the videos and the books if you can! This is exactly what we need! --[[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 15:18, 19 January 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Apollo11==&lt;br /&gt;
This a big page so I’m not sure I’m in the right spot (also typing one handed so sorry for mistakes). I like the table on you page, however I did notice it’s missing which book it’s in and the YouTube channel. I love how the one I edited was formatted, I think if you added that table to your existing table it’d be perfect. I would also add a page number for the books. [[User:Apollo11|Apollo11]] ([[User talk:Apollo11|talk]]) 16:34, 18 January 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ok just saw the three options. I’d go with either 1 or 3. 1 would look the best and probably be easiest to find what you’re looking for as long as your have links to the other tables very clear. What I would do is have a table with title, and where to find the article (blog, book 1, book 2, YouTube). Then have a 4 tables, one for each, where you can go more in depth about each article, date, explanation, jokes, things like that. Option 3 would be the simplest, and if that’s what you wanna do, I’d have the simplest things on the left and the more complicated things on the right. So the date and title would be in the left and the e explanation would be far to the right. You’ve probably been thinking about this a lot longer than me so I’m probably missing something, so please tell me if I’m wrong abo it anything. Also if my comment is in the wrong spot feel free to move me to the right conversation. I’d love to help in anyway!! Just give me directions and I’ll do by best!! [[User:Apollo11|Apollo11]] ([[User talk:Apollo11|talk]]) 16:58, 18 January 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: Thanks so much for your interest! I thought about it a lot today, and i landed on 1, huge, information-laden table. I think having 3 or 4 tables would be too confusing and too hard to navigate. Plus, i think i found a good way to avoid making the table too wide. I added a few articles to showcase it. I don't have a lot of time to do all of them. Regarding the page number, I used the chapter number since it's easier for people who don't own the books.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: &amp;gt; I’d love to help in anyway!! Just give me directions and I’ll do by best!!&lt;br /&gt;
: Love it! You can do everything that's listed at the top of [[User:FaviFake]], but the first one might be more annoying to do on a phone (I'm not sure where you're editing from, actually). If you don't understand something on that page, please do let me know. I promise i'll answer quicker next time. ;)  --[[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 20:03, 19 January 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:: Looks great!! I’ll get on it sometime early next week!! (Ftr I’m usually on a phone but sometimes I’ll go over to a computer for bigger projects, like added links and full researched paragraphs) [[User:Apollo11|Apollo11]] ([[User talk:Apollo11|talk]]) 20:56, 19 January 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::: Amazing! I hope I'll have added all the missing articles by the day after tomorrow. --[[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 21:30, 19 January 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Adding the book-exclusive articles==&lt;br /&gt;
I noticed that there’s not a column for if the article is in the blog. I also don't think some of the ones in the book that aren’t on the blog are in there. Please correct me if I’m wrong. [[User:Apollo11|Apollo11]] ([[User talk:Apollo11|talk]]) 18:17, 21 January 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Yeah, I’ve noticed that some of the What If? Chapters aren’t in the table. I think that we should add them in too '''[[User:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:9pt;color:#A9C6CA&amp;quot;&amp;gt;42.book.addict&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:6pt;color:#516874&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Talk to me!&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;''' 18:42, 21 January 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Thank you all for pointing it out! And again sorry it took me so long, I'm not good at prioritising. (but at least today i did something! I fixed both the YouTube template, there are new instructions on [[User:FaviFake]], and the book templates when used in merged cells. Anyways!)&lt;br /&gt;
::I had forgotten the other table also contained the book-exclusive questions! Of course we should add them! We need to think about this before doing anything though. I have so many questions!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*In what order do we put them? Unfortunately, the chapter of the book are mixed between non-excusive and exclusive.&lt;br /&gt;
*Do we need all the columns?&lt;br /&gt;
 N	Date	Thumbnail	Title	Reader's question	Randall's answer	Books	YouTube&lt;br /&gt;
**What happens to the unnecessary columns? We could merge them, but I'm not sure whether the sorting will work if we merge them.&lt;br /&gt;
*Should we change the columns, so that the '''blog number''' column is more similar to the '''Book''' and '''YouTube''' columns? Or are blog articles more important because they fill all the cells, while book-exclusives don't have all the same info?&lt;br /&gt;
*Is there ANY way you can think of to make the insertion of these articles into the existing index seamless? I'm usually on the side of one big index instead of many little indexes, but I'm having a hard time figuring this out. One of the main reasons I wanted to do this project was so that people wouldn't need to move between 2 different tables to see all articles.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::One way could be to just add all book-exclusive articles, each in their own row, in a big dump on the release date of the book. Even tho it would technically be in chronological order, i don't really like the idea. Please send all your thought! There must me something I'm not thinking of, or something I've been thinking wrong about! --[[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 18:10, 22 January 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::* What order do we put them in&lt;br /&gt;
:: I would do it in the same order as the other table, blog articles first in chronological, what if chapters in chapter order. I believe the YouTube channel is all old questions, but if he posts a new one, then put that below the books.&lt;br /&gt;
::* change blog columns&lt;br /&gt;
::I think you should move the blog date and number to after randalls answer, similar to the books, and for the date for book exclusives maybe jus the book release date? Or NA.&lt;br /&gt;
::* unessery colums&lt;br /&gt;
:: Example?&lt;br /&gt;
::* Seamless integration&lt;br /&gt;
::Just stick them on the bottom, the exact same way you’d put another blog article on the bottom.&lt;br /&gt;
::I think that covers it all? [[User:Apollo11|Apollo11]] ([[User talk:Apollo11|talk]]) 19:15, 22 January 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Sticking the chapters at the end was the same idea I had, and I think that we can just put (What If? Exclusive) inside the date part of the table. '''[[User:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:9pt;color:#A9C6CA&amp;quot;&amp;gt;42.book.addict&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:6pt;color:#516874&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Talk to me!&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;''' 19:22, 22 January 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Thanks for replying so quickly! I don't have time right now to read everything but I can already tell that this is much easier than I thought it would be. I'll answer tomorrow. Before i start overthinking everything: What would you put inside the columns thumbnail, Question, and Answer? Just empty? I'm trying to think of something useful.&lt;br /&gt;
::::Also, what do you think of merging the N (blog) column and the Date columns, just like we do with the YouTube column? Would there be any downsides?&lt;br /&gt;
:::: I hope I'm not preventing it edits by not adding the articles quickly, in the meantime you can help by adding YT videos, now that the template works! --[[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 21:31, 22 January 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::: I think that the YT videos are all added? At least the blog ones and not the What If? exclusive ones. Or maybe Restricted Mode on my home wifi is blocking some. But I think that it’s all done? Tried my best anyways '''[[User:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:9pt;color:#A9C6CA&amp;quot;&amp;gt;42.book.addict&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:6pt;color:#516874&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Talk to me!&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;''' 03:52, 23 January 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::This is great news, thanks! I didn't know there were YouTube videos on book-exclusive articles! I'll get started, this is my plan:&lt;br /&gt;
::::::*The book articles are positioned like the old [[What If? chapters]] table.&lt;br /&gt;
::::::*New column setup:&lt;br /&gt;
 Thumbnail	Title	Reader's question	Randall's answer	'''Blog (this contains both N and Date)'''	Books	YouTube&lt;br /&gt;
::::::*The sometimes-unnecessary columns are left empty.&lt;br /&gt;
::::::*The '''Blog''' column is more similar to the '''Book''' and '''YouTube''' columns: it has a template and colors the cell light blue.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::I feel great about this! We're getting near the finish line. --[[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 15:36, 23 January 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::I think that I added all the What If? And What If? 2 chapters to the table for the ones that were copied from the blog '''[[User:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:9pt;color:#A9C6CA&amp;quot;&amp;gt;42.book.addict&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:6pt;color:#516874&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Talk to me!&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;''' 23:48, 23 January 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::Love it! I hope i'll be able to add some of the missing articles today, but i might not be able to do them all (or any at all). --[[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 18:01, 24 January 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::{{Done}}  I did it! You can now add the missing YT videos :) {{unsigned|FaviFake|20:49, 24 January 2025 (UTC)}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::::Doing it now! '''[[User:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:9pt;color:#A9C6CA&amp;quot;&amp;gt;42.book.addict&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:6pt;color:#516874&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Talk to me!&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;''' 21:24, 24 January 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::::based on the 20 videos that I can see on the YT channel, ALL YT VIDEOS HAVE BEEN ADDED! '''[[User:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:9pt;color:#A9C6CA&amp;quot;&amp;gt;42.book.addict&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:6pt;color:#516874&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Talk to me!&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;''' 21:39, 24 January 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::::::We actually did it! Now all that's left are the explanations, which i'm sure people will prefer doing over merging 2 wikipedia tables. There's just one small problem: I searched for &amp;quot;Featured in What If?,&amp;quot; and instead of 69 results, i got 67. This means two of the articles that are both in the book and in the blog haven't been added. Do you think you could figure out which ones? I also checked the other book and the YouTube videos, and they're all there, it's just the first book. Again, thank you so much for all your work, it would've likely taken weeks to get to this point without your efforts!  --[[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 11:21, 25 January 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
ok, i’ll poke around and see if i can find them. also, I GOT WHAT IF? 10TH ANNIVERSARY! i can add the bonus chapter that is at the end-it’s basically “what if we tried more power” when blasting away at the moon with lasers. '''[[User:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:9pt;color:#A9C6CA&amp;quot;&amp;gt;42.book.addict&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:6pt;color:#516874&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Talk to me!&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;''' 21:22, 25 January 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Congrats on the book! I didn't buy it because i have the original, it's great that someone here owns it. Can you describe in a little more detail the last chapter? I don't understand a few things: does the second YouTube video say exactly the same thing as the blog article? Why are there two videos about 1 article? Or is the second YT video only about the Bonus Chapter in the book, which goes even further than the blog article? Is that bonus chapter not in any other book or blog? Thanks! --[[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 11:13, 26 January 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Also, is the chapter only called Bonus Chapter, or does it also have other names? --[[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 18:15, 26 January 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Sorting &amp;quot;Chapter xx..&amp;quot;==&lt;br /&gt;
Hi... An alternative to the way you are lead-zeroing the text cell's numeric suffix, for sorting purposes, which is what I think {{diff|363528|this is all about}}, would be to do so something like:&lt;br /&gt;
 ... || data-sort-value={{{1}}} | Chapter {{{1}}} || ...&lt;br /&gt;
Should be able to deal with any numeric value, while still rendering it simply as &amp;quot;Chapelter 1&amp;quot;/&amp;quot;Chapter 10&amp;quot;/&amp;quot;Chapter 100&amp;quot;/ etc, but adding ''data-sort-type=&amp;quot;number&amp;quot;'' to the header cell might even be able to sort not-quite-numbers, should a future book ever do chapters like  &amp;quot;... 7, 7a, 9, 10, 11, 12, 12b, 14, ...&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;Perhaps even ''data-sort-value=&amp;lt;booknumber&amp;gt;.&amp;lt;chapternumber&amp;gt;'' would be useful. Though you'd have to use the sufficient-leading-zeroes method, again, and could start at 1.0000001 ''just'' in case there's ever a million (but not more than 10mil-1) chapters in a future bookbut would probably be useful to sort all book-contained items, across all books but not interleaved.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;I'll let you consider if/what you find it more useful. And perhaps check if I've given you the right table markup options by going and checking the Help:Sorting Tables/whatever pages. ;) [[Special:Contributions/141.101.99.107|141.101.99.107]] 00:01, 26 January 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I agree that the current method isn't great, and I'm very glad to see there's another, better way. Unfortunately, I don't really understand most of what you said. BUT! You seem very experienced and I don't have a lot of time, so it would be perfect if you could edit directly the templates/table/cells/whatever needs to be changed. The best option is to remove the leading zeroes and still make the sorting work, for the blog, books, and YT templates. If you (or someone else) could do that, it'd be wonderful. Please feel free to try it yourself if you want! --[[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 11:13, 26 January 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== weird table bugs ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
hey favifake, i found two bugs that i don’t really know how to fix in the table: one of them is in regard to the what if 2 template, whenever it has a “S2” or a “W1” “chapter” it gives an error. the second bug can be found on the laser pointer row-i added the what if? 10th anniversary template, but the yt template doesn’t “fit” (for lack of a better word) with the table. could you dig into these and try to figure out what has gone wrong? thanks! '''[[User:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:9pt;color:#A9C6CA&amp;quot;&amp;gt;42.book.addict&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:6pt;color:#516874&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Talk to me!&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;''' 00:55, 26 January 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Hey 42! I saw what you were trying to do, i think i fixed it now? I removed the '''book3''' template from the original '''Laser Pointer''' row because all original articles are technically in the 10th Ann. book. (i added &amp;quot;exclusively on&amp;quot; to the '''book3''' template to make it clearer). Regarding the other S1 bug, i don't know why but it seems fixed now?? I saw the error just a few hours ago and now it works. I have no idea what happened. Let me know if it reappears or something. --[[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 11:13, 26 January 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Without going in and trying it myself, is this because of the &amp;quot;trying to zero-pad a number&amp;quot; thing (as given a possible alternative, above), because it can't test if &amp;lt;usually number, in this case text&amp;gt; is greater/less than &amp;lt;static number&amp;gt;?&lt;br /&gt;
:Quick-fix (not doing anything else new) would need the test enclosed with an isthisanumber? test (if so, do zero-padding testing, etc; if not, maybe don't try).&lt;br /&gt;
:Exactly how S2/W1 sorts (or doesn't) using the sorting data (bare number only!) and/or the forced data type as number (to do its best for what numeric data it is presented, despite occasional non-numeric interloping characters), would need testing.&lt;br /&gt;
:Or I misunderstand. But, ''if'' I don't, maybe this is useful additional pointer to a solution/acceptance of the problem. [[Special:Contributions/172.71.178.123|172.71.178.123]] 01:21, 26 January 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::IP user, I answered above. :) --[[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 11:13, 26 January 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
== Interesting streamlined 'table furniture', but... ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
...I'm wondering about the current (slight) usage differences between:&lt;br /&gt;
 style=&amp;quot;text-align:center&amp;quot; | {{{1}}}&lt;br /&gt;
and:&lt;br /&gt;
 style=&amp;quot;white-space:nowrap&amp;quot; |&lt;br /&gt;
Do you need to add the Param1 to the nowrap/remove if from the text-alignment?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
And what if someone wanted no-wrap+centre at the same time? There maybe ''are'' ways to combine &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{ac|&amp;lt;foo&amp;gt;}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{nw}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;, but it seems non-trivial to to do. (Unless you make a &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{nwac}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;, but then where do you end?) I'm wondering if you should try it without the |-character.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Let's see if that ''could'' work:&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;margin:auto&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+ Test&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! Foo !! Bar !! Baz&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Normal text of a normal style || style=&amp;quot;text-align:center&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;white-space:nowrap&amp;quot; | This is as if using variations &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{ac|&amp;lt;foo&amp;gt;}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{nw}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt; as rendered without the pipe-character or inconsistent parameter, which is tricky to demonstrate with the actual templates.|| More normal text of a normal style&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Normal text of a normal style || style=&amp;quot;text-align:center&amp;quot; | style=&amp;quot;white-space:nowrap&amp;quot; | This is how &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{ac|{{nw}} &amp;lt;foo&amp;gt;}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt; might look || More normal text of a normal style&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Normal text of a normal style || {{ac|{{nw}} This is how &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{ac|{{nw}} &amp;lt;foo&amp;gt;}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt; ''does'' look, using the current state of the templates.&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;s&amp;gt;''NB. Why is it in bold? Is that a normal feature of a style of text-align:center?''&amp;lt;/s&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
| More normal text of a normal style&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Normal text of a normal style || style=&amp;quot;white-space:nowrap&amp;quot; | style=&amp;quot;text-align:center&amp;quot; | This is how &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{nw}} {{ac|&amp;lt;foo&amp;gt;}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt; might look || More normal text of a normal style&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Normal text of a normal style || {{nw}} {{ac|This is how &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{nw}} {{ac|&amp;lt;foo&amp;gt;}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt; ''does'' look, using the current state of the templates.}}&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;s&amp;gt;''Also goes bold, I notice!''&amp;lt;/s&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
| More normal text of a normal style&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
So, yes, it looks like it might be better to just remove the pipe (or pipe-and-param) and rely on the table-writer to just put in the relevent bare style-giving {{}} (or {{}}s) before the pipe. (I must look into why there's unexpected boldness. I don't know if that comes from the way you templated it or as an associated function of the aligh-center style. But it doesn't appear when I do it 'raw'.) Anyway, food for thought, over to you. It looks like I ''could'' edit your templates, but that might be rude, and would of course instantly break whatever it is you're currently using them (singly) for. That's the ''What If?'' table, I suppose? Anyway, you can both 'fix' how they work and adjust how they are invoked, rather than leaving me to guess about the latter. ;) [[Special:Contributions/162.158.74.49|162.158.74.49]] 19:04, 17 January 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:PS: Yes, I have just checked, and, yes you've added (apparently ''after'' I saw and copied the original {{template|ac}} for my own testing and emulating purposes!) the bolding to the aligh-centering template. That part of the mystery is solved! :P [[Special:Contributions/162.158.74.49|162.158.74.49]] 19:10, 17 January 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:PPS: I know what happened. I copied the (slightly '''formatted''') 'plaintext' as it appeared in the template. If I'd have edited it and copied the wikisource then I'd have grabbed the &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;'''formatted''&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt; as you already had it by the time I passed by. Don't mind me, it was just something that made me wonder. Probably moreso than the thing that I was ''actually'' trying to prod and poke and solve! IOW: Ignore me. On this bit, at least! [[Special:Contributions/172.68.205.151|172.68.205.151]] 19:32, 17 January 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I love how interested you are about this! Honestly i'm not really sure what exactly it is you're asking, but you seem very smart so do whatever you want! My only request is that the {{:ac}} thing keeps working as expected, so i don't have to change the table again. I had forgotten about the {{:nw}} thing, you can delete it or change it or do anything else, I don't use it anymore. Feel free to add to the documentation that these are just for 1 table and might break everything if used anywhere else. Or, if they already work everywhere, great! I remember I created them expecting the entire page to be destroyed when used, and being pleasantly surprised when they worked. So yeah go wild! --[[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 21:19, 17 January 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::I'm not going to make any change without taking time to check your tables and making sure the appropriate change doesn't inflict damage on your attempts to curate the tables you're probably using it for.&lt;br /&gt;
:::But, in short, I understand that you're streamlining the (often longwinded) style=&amp;quot;&amp;quot; statements, an admirble task. In the structure of &amp;quot;| cell || another cell || etc&amp;quot;, you're doing something to save from having to do cumbersome &amp;quot;| cell || style=&amp;quot;this-style: that; that-style: that; the-other-style: the.other&amp;quot; | another cell || etc&amp;quot;, all of which makes editing 'difficult'. (I tend to do such things in Notepad, or whatever separate text editor I have, which lets me add temporary whitespace and use with no-wrap on the markup while I'm working on it, rather than in this textbox editor.)&lt;br /&gt;
::: But the single-pipe that formats the cell isn't a ''great'' difficulty to maintain (indeed, it is useful to line up). As such I'd suggest &amp;quot;| cell || &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{??}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt; | another cell || etc&amp;quot; would be as good. i.e. leave the pipe (intended for the table-cell) out of the template. For the no-wrap version, that's easy enough. Though I do understand that you want to put bold-format about the cell contents, so that's why you give it as a param and explicitly bold the Param1 as you pass it back out.&lt;br /&gt;
::: Maybe the solution to ''that'' is to also add (to the style, along with the text-align:center) the &amp;quot;font-weight: bold&amp;quot; doublet. Then &amp;quot;... || &amp;lt;format(s), as templates and/or raw&amp;gt; | Cell Text || ...&amp;quot; doesn't ''need'' to 'enclose' the Cell Text in any way.&lt;br /&gt;
::: But making the change from something that expects to transclude the &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;range of the template&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; &amp;quot;... || &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;format | Cell Text&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; || ...&amp;quot; to &amp;quot;... || &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;format&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; | Cell Text || ...&amp;quot; obviously requires that each and every table-cell item that uses &amp;quot;... || &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{template|Cell Text}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt; || ...&amp;quot; to be converted to &amp;quot;... || &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{template}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt; | Cell Text || ...&amp;quot;, or... it'll definitely not work as it was originally set.&lt;br /&gt;
::: Anyway, that's just my own vision of how you can do what you seem to have wanted to, without introducing more complications. As the cell-formatting gladly accepts multiple statements of the form style=&amp;quot;...&amp;quot; (it adds &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;style=&amp;quot;...&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;...&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;...&amp;quot;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt; together, much as &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;style=&amp;quot;...; ...; ...&amp;quot;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt; does), an editor now has complete freedom to compound the two format-templates you created. And any additional ones that might be useful. Such ones to usefully colour cell backgrounds as red/yellow/green (for use on the various Confusion Tables), something that I sometimes take a couple of goes to do... not least because I habitually spell 'color' as 'colour'..! ;)&lt;br /&gt;
::: ...but that's just to explain so that (should you/anybody else wish to follow my own instincts on the matter), you have some decent idea of what I'm getting at. There are probably other ways of doing it. Templates can be made to detect and extract pipes, so that &amp;quot;... || &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{template1|{{templete2|Cell Text}}}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; || ...&amp;quot; ''or'' &amp;quot;... || &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{template2|{{templete1|Cell Text}}}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; || ...&amp;quot; would equally produce &amp;quot;... || &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;templateOneOrTwoFormat templateTwoOrOneFormat | Cell Text&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; || ...&amp;quot;, but that would take a degree of of unwieldy parameter-processing functions (that I'd have to work out, probably would involve some subst-function, but might depend upon what's available in the installed mediawiki version). I just think you could avoid all that trouble! [[Special:Contributions/162.158.74.118|162.158.74.118]] 22:51, 17 January 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Forgot to say, that for what you want to use it for, there's ''another'' way:&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;margin:auto&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+ Example 2&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! Number (Centered) !! Foo !! Bar (Centered) !! Baz&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! 1&lt;br /&gt;
| Normal text of a normal style&lt;br /&gt;
! Some text of whatever size (centered)&lt;br /&gt;
| More normal text of a normal style&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! 2&lt;br /&gt;
| Normal text of a normal style&lt;br /&gt;
! Some text of whatever size (also centered, though not so obviously so)&lt;br /&gt;
| More normal text of a normal style&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
:::... This is only possible by newlining each new cell, in the example (you can't do &amp;quot;! cell || cell !! cell || cell&amp;quot;, you have to line-break it as you change from &amp;quot;!&amp;quot;-/&amp;quot;|&amp;quot;-starting cell-groups), but it isn't really so great a loss to do so.&lt;br /&gt;
:::The &amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; class gives these 'header cells' a different background too, but (if you really don't like that) it that can be adjusted in various other ways (including with scope=&amp;quot;col&amp;quot;, I think), or you can leave the wikitable class off (it centres and bolds, but doesn't give cell-borders) and re-add the whole-table bordering style that this now leaves out. But you really don't want me listing ''every'' idea I had, just this one was the other (template-free) option to enforcing centre-aligning bold text on ''certain'' cells. [[Special:Contributions/162.158.74.119|162.158.74.119]] 23:09, 17 January 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Huh, I was actually thinking of doing the opposite of what you're suggesting: include even more pipes inside the template so the editor is cleaner and easier to use. (UPDATE: this probably worse than the other option you gave at the end, see below). So instead of this: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 |-&lt;br /&gt;
 &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;| {{ac|4}} || &amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::You would just use this:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 |-&lt;br /&gt;
 &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{ac|4}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::And it would contain all the pipes needed. I guess then we would have to update the documentation to point out that this template's use case is extremely narrow. Also, if you want to see how it is currently used, the table is on my user page! That's the only place where it's used&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Since you seem very interested in templates, What do you think of the idea of a creating a template like these:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{yt|YTNUMBER (1, 2, 3, etc)|YTLINK|VIDEOTITLE (optional)}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::It would be used in the column that we still need to create. It would also colour the cell in '''red'''. I was also thinking of doing a similar thing for the What If? books:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{bk|WHICH-BOOK|CHAPTER-NUMBER|CHAPTER-TITLE (if different)}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::For example, it would look like this: (This one would also colour the cell based on the book, e.g., green for WI?1, yellow for WI?2, blue for WI10th ed.)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{book|2|69|Jellyfish}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 What If? 2, chapter '''69: Jellyfish'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Would you be able to create something like this? I know nothing about templates, and i doubt I'll be able to ask chatgpt to do everything for me correctly. --[[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 07:16, 18 January 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::&amp;gt; Forgot to say, that for what you want to use it for, there's ''another'' way:&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Oh, i think i had forgotten to read this part!! This seems very interesting! I should try that, since it seems much simpler. --[[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 10:10, 18 January 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::'''Update:''' {{Done}} I applied your suggestion, now the numbers are in their own row:&lt;br /&gt;
 |-&lt;br /&gt;
 !1&lt;br /&gt;
 | The rest of the table&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 10:33, 18 January 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== What If Chapters ==&lt;br /&gt;
Hey FaviFake, there are some What If? Chapters that aren’t included in the blog. Are we going to add them to the table? '''[[User:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:9pt;color:#A9C6CA&amp;quot;&amp;gt;42.book.addict&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:6pt;color:#516874&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Talk to me!&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;''' 17:41, 22 January 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Great timing! You sent me this message while i was in the process of replying to the question. I'm not good at prioritising, I should've definitely responded before doing other edits. Check out my &amp;lt;s&amp;gt;list of questions for y'all&amp;lt;/s&amp;gt; reply above! --[[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 18:10, 22 January 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== YouTube template ==&lt;br /&gt;
Hey FaviFake, on the &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{yt}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt; template, you asked for help on fixing the code of the template. What help do you need to “improve” it? I’m willing to help now that I’m not sick, as I was last week. '''[[User:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:9pt;color:#A9C6CA&amp;quot;&amp;gt;42.book.addict&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:6pt;color:#516874&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Talk to me!&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;''' 18:35, 19 January 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Thank you! Glad to hear you're healthy. That message was mostly a joke, but it is in fact barely held together. (Try modifying the hyperlink that's displayed when a title isn't provided, somehow what you add gets duplicated??) If you have the time and know how to make it more reliable and easily editable in the future, please do! I am honstly scared to touch it fearing it might explode.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Buuut, to be fair there is one template that i desperately needed help with, and that is [[:Template:book]]. I wasted a ton of time to try to get it to change the cell background, and it never worked, so i decided to create [[Template:book1]], [[Template:book2]], [[Template:book3]], [[Template:book4]], and these do work beaytifully, but are harder to edit in bulk. (I still have profound hatred towards [[Template:book]]...). If you actually manage to do what i wanted (which i'm not sure is even clear after the all the mess i've made... ask me if you can't figure it out!), I would be very grateful. PS. I'm not sure if i should warn you, given my very low ability to create templates, but it's definitely not easy, imo.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I'm not sure how skilled you are at template editing, so if you want, you can absolutely continue uploading the What If? thumbnails like you did a few days ago! I just added [[User:FaviFake|a new batch of articles]] (about 60) thanks to some annoyingly complex jailbreaking of Google's NotebookLM. The new table of course includes the quick 100px link to upload a file. Again, thanks for reaching out! --[[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 19:04, 19 January 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::The YT link appears to be going to &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;[[whatever the name of the YouTube video is called]]&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt; and not acting as a [youtube.com filler thingy] linking to a YouTube video. I’m going to hit the books on template writing and try to see if I can do anything about it. Cheers! '''[[User:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:9pt;color:#A9C6CA&amp;quot;&amp;gt;42.book.addict&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:6pt;color:#516874&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Talk to me!&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;''' 03:11, 21 January 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Oh great, that's broken too. I didn't even realise it. Thanks!--[[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 04:57, 21 January 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Partly because you've removed the bit about how to better sort the book-column elements, but are using the same trick in the youtube-column, and partly because it's easier (more on that in a moment), I've just modified the {{template|yt}} to give it the sort value (of article number) directly. Have not removed the expression test to make &amp;quot;6th video ...&amp;quot; into &amp;quot;06th video ...&amp;quot;, for sorting purposes, but I feel confident that you ''can'' do that (and remove the comment about making it give &amp;quot;006th video ...&amp;quot;, in future, should that become necessary) if you now so wish.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:For the books, I was thinking that if, instead of &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;=&amp;quot;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{{1|0}}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;quot;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;, you could maybe use &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;=&amp;quot;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{#expr:10000+{{{1|0}}}}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;quot;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt; for ''What If?'' (in {{template|book1}}) and &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;=&amp;quot;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{#expr:20000+{{{1|0}}}}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;quot;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt; for ''What If? 2'' (in {{template|book2}}), to let it sort by book ''and then'' chapter within book...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:For ''What If? 10th Anniversary Edition'' ({{template|book3}}), I was thinking if you could make the added-to number 11000. Though anything from above 10000+&amp;lt;last chapter number&amp;gt; and below 20000-&amp;lt;last chapter number&amp;gt; would do (and 15000 would work), it leaves room to make any appearance of the 15th anniversary, 20th anniversary, 42nd anniversary, ..., 95th anniversary be able to use the mnemonic offsets of 11500+, 12000+, 14200+, ..., 19500+.. ;) Obviously, it would need revamping if there becomes a centenary edition of Book 1 (or any version of it ever gets ''so many'' &amp;quot;bonus chapters&amp;quot; that it breaks out of its own sequence into the next extant anniversary edition. But you'd need to start adding 100 newly-numbered chapters ''per year'' to do that, so probably not likely. But, right now, the sorting on the &amp;quot;Exclusive to ''What If? 10th Anniversary Edition''&amp;quot; line sorts ''before'' the &amp;quot;NNth chapter of ''What If?''&amp;quot; lines. The above should fix that...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:And the format can be used for other (future?) books and their (possible) reissues: For ''What If? '''N''''', reissued '''YY''' years after the original, that's the number &amp;quot;NYY00&amp;quot;, to which you add the chapter number. Fairly futureproofed, but if Randall ''ever'' publishes anything that makes you need to make the offset &amp;quot;NNYYY000&amp;quot; (e.g. for the quarter-of-a-millenium reissue of ''What If? 15'', having a total of 512 chapters being 15250000+[1..512]) then I reckon the requisite changes will be easy enough to handle as and when, swapping in the expanded offset. And... hey... if they're still being written, ''and'' published, then I can only hope I'm still around to be able to add that edition to my bookshelf!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:You could even redo the {{template|book}} idea (parameters of ...|book=#|chapter=#|optional:edition=#?|...) to only ever need to maintain the one source with ''all'' this flexibility. You've already got experience (by the 1st/2nd/3rd/Nth code) with what's needed to translate Book Number(+Edition Number, if applicable) into unique background colour codes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The big problem, though, is still the non-numeric chapter 'numbers' in ''WI?2''. I have two (or three) different thoughts about that.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:*For only the numeric bits (currently, in the test for less-than-10, etc; in the above for within the &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;data-sort-value=&amp;quot;...&amp;quot;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;) you might want to switch &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{{1|0}}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt; with &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{#if:{{#ifexpr:{{{1|0}}}}}|99|{{{1|0}}}}}{{{1|0}}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;... This should test the param1 value for being a valid value (or missing, when you already make it zero... though not sure for what circumstance you should consider it validly missing) and using it if it is so, or else using the value &amp;quot;99&amp;quot; (or you could have &amp;quot;0&amp;quot;, or &amp;quot;0.5&amp;quot;, or whatever floats your boat). Then at least you'd get ''a'' value (that doesn't cause errors), though it probably wouldn't be sorted very precisely (though appear just after/before all other chapters of the book).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:*The other idea is to use &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{{effectiveChapter|{{{1|0}}}}}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;, then you can append a parameter of &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;...|effectiveChapter=11.5}}&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt; to a non-numeric one sitting between actual chapters 11 and 12 (I haven't checked if that's an actual example, but imagine it is...). Also, for multiple items on page-chapter, you could even have =11.51, =11.52, =11.53, etc, to retain order within the book and ''upon the page''... (You could also give effectiveChapter as &amp;quot;NYYCC(.optional)&amp;quot; format, direct, for ''all'' what if? Numbers, YYearly-editions and CChapters (with possibly sub-positions), come to that, but I don't see that as any simpler a solution as building it in.)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:*The third option would be to use (for hidden sorting-only purpose, mostly) a value of P(.optionalDecimal) either as another numeric parameter or a named one, with P as ''page number'', not chapter number. But, given how hardback vs. paperback (or just another imprint, not necessarily even a Anniversary redo, but I've got the UK edition with an additional UK foreword) ''might'' effect page numbers and/or where end-of-pages interupts any given chapter internals, it's possible that this is not consistent enough. But food for thought, maybe. Only needs to be definitively done once (or thoroughly checked and shuffled along as nevessary if redone to include other changes that require consistency).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Any of that make sense? Hopefully I've at least given you enough examples to ponder, where not immediately obvious. I'd ''really'' rather not change all your hard work just for the sake of a minor cosmetic change with a possibly major set of retouches, which is one of the reasons why I thought I'd do just the basic Youtube 'sort assisting' bit and let those of you who have already had so much 'fun' (tweaking the table formats) decide if and how you make full use of it. Assuming it isn't (differently) broken, for whatever reason may crop up, it shouldn't be a problem if you do nothing at all more with it (either in the {{template|yt}} or {{template|book#}}s). [[Special:Contributions/172.71.241.26|172.71.241.26]] 14:38, 28 January 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Thank you so much! Would you mind if I moved your message to [[Talk:What If? chapters]], to group everything regarding the index in one place?&amp;lt;!-- Do as you wish, it's your Talk namespace, here, and *if* you can make it halfway readable then you can display it where you like, on my behalf. You (and Firestar) made decent use of my ideas, which I had no time to get into the actual implementation of. Signed: that IP again.--&amp;gt; &amp;lt;!--Got it! Thank you. Signed: FaviFake--&amp;gt; Anyways:&lt;br /&gt;
*I did the thing on the yt and {{template|blog}} one and it works!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 For the books, I was thinking that if, instead of &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;=&amp;quot;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{{1|0}}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;quot;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;, you could maybe use &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;=&amp;quot;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{#expr:10000+{{{1|0}}}}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;quot;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt; for ''What If?'' (in {{template|book1}}) and &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;=&amp;quot;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{#expr:20000+{{{1|0}}}}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;quot;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt; for ''What If? 2'' (in {{template|book2}}), to let it sort by book ''and then'' chapter within book...&lt;br /&gt;
*Done! Thanks! For ({{template|book3}}) i used 30000 to have the chapter in chronological order.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 You could even redo the {{template|book}} idea&lt;br /&gt;
*Sorry but I'm not touching that... ''thing'' anymore. That template traumatized me (jk! if you want to try fixing it i'd be very happy)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 For only the numeric bits (currently, in the test for less-than-10, etc; in the above for within the &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;data-sort-value=&amp;quot;...&amp;quot;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;) you might want to switch &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{{1|0}}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt; with &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{#if:{{#ifexpr:{{{1|0}}}}}|99|{{{1|0}}}}}{{{1|0}}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;... This should test the param1 value for being a valid value (or missing, when you already make it zero... though not sure for what circumstance you should consider it validly missing) &lt;br /&gt;
*I'm not sure why that's needed (and also how to actually implement it). What happens if the value is invalid? it seems to work. Or is it required for the other improvements you suggested?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 The other idea is...&lt;br /&gt;
 The third option would be...&lt;br /&gt;
*Yeah this seems pretty hard to solve easily (which is why i'd love it if you did it!). I guess it'll stay slightly broken until it becomes a bigger issue. --[[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 16:54, 28 January 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::It seems like you just forgot to escape pipe characters in the [[Template:book|book template]] in the table within the switch statement, so it just interpreted the non-formatting statements to be a case grouped with the next 'actual' case [[User:Firestar233|guess who]] ([[User talk:Firestar233|if you desire conversing]] | [[Special:Contributions/Firestar233|what i have done]]) 07:23, 29 January 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::BTW I fixed the book template. It should now appear the same as the other templates, and even work with the youtube template [[User:Firestar233|guess who]] ([[User talk:Firestar233|if you desire conversing]] | [[Special:Contributions/Firestar233|what i have done]]) 09:13, 29 January 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::OMG THANK YOU SO MUCH!!! IT ACTUALLY WORKS! What! How! Why!&lt;br /&gt;
:::Thanks so much for fixing the template! I can't describe how glad I am to see it working as (and even better than) I wanted. My life is finally complete. I have switched to using your template in the index.&lt;br /&gt;
:::The reason there was a YT link in one of the {{template|book}} documentation examples is because I was going insane and likely pasted it there by accident. From what I can tell, you seem to have set up {{template|book}} so well that {{template|book}} accepts a YouTube link as input, while the {{template|yt}} template it's based on doesn't if used by itself (requires only the ID). I love this! Since we're gonna have many YT videos to add, it's great to have a much simpler option which doesn't require extracting the ID of the video. Is there a way you could maybe incorporate this improvement into {{template|yt}} itself? Or maybe you're 10 steps ahead of me and you've already done it (which wouldn't surprise me given the amount of wizardry you used on these bad boys!), and I just didn't notice. Please let me know! And again, thank you so much!!! --[[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 17:56, 29 January 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Also, since you've already rendered 4 templates useless thanks to your improvements, why not also add {{template|yt}} to the list of pages to delete, by incorporating it into {{template|book}}? This, unlike {{template|book}}, is absolutely not needed, and I also have no idea if it's as easy as a simple copy-and-paste, or if it requires more work. If it's the latter, please don't do it if you don't want to! I'm just throwing ideas around! --[[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 18:04, 29 January 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
That IP, here. I (think) I fixed the sorting ''and'' error-fallback issues. I think (without trying to roll back to how you had it) you 'broke the sort' by putting in line-feeds (maybe double-ones), that messed up the table/cell handling. Then you broke the handling by commenting out too much (you needed to &amp;quot;&amp;lt; ! - -&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;- - &amp;gt;&amp;quot;, without spaces, without crossing the quotes and |ing boundaries in data-sort-value=&amp;quot;...&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;...&amp;quot; and the 'release', by pipe symbol, to cell-contents).&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Recommented for it to work normally, first without the new 'sort assistance' and then with again. Had a look at the error-catcher (went down a blind alley, at first) and made it an explicit &amp;quot;catch all other inputs&amp;quot; for the errororing display, which I formatted in a more obvious manner ''and'' forced to sort to the start. (Well, almost the start. It puts empty cells with no sorting 'ahead' of even the -999 value I made it give any error-caught cells.)&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;If it were me, I'd be happy to have {{template|yt}} entirely separate from the {{template|book}} handling. It is mnemonically confusing and adds needless (and possibly error-prone) &amp;quot;if we have far too many params for Book template, feed it all into the Youtube template&amp;quot;. Unless you're folding the ''whole'' Youtube template into the body of the Book one (even more work to maintain/debug), it's just adding complication for both server and editors who feel forced to use it. The beauty of the monolithic Book template is that (otherwise identical) &amp;quot;Book N, chapter C, optional new title T&amp;quot; information is trivially similar between different Ns. But it's not my project.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;I'll have a dig about in maybe how to have a table sort &amp;quot;valueless&amp;quot; cells (in reality the empty value of cell absolutely without anything in it) beyond the sort-valued ones. The 'easiest' means I could imagine is to accept &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{book|0}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;, needing no further params, to create a &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;data-sort-value=&amp;quot;999999&amp;quot; |''&amp;lt;blank&amp;gt;''&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt; cell-definition, and have every book-column cell without a book-reference explicitly use that (ditto for &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{yt|0}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt; to have the same pre-trap to it). But seems wasteful. A template &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{empty}}, or even something like {{e}},&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt; (without checking if either of those are free names) could also just give us this behaviour straight off, of course. It's potentially a lot of fuss to make consistent and flexible enough, either way.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;But what I already did probably also needs to be checked for more edge-conditions... I may still have to tweak things when I have a better chance of catching errors (very difficult, on a tablet), and quicker. [[Special:Contributions/172.70.162.196|172.70.162.196]] 21:32, 29 January 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:I also think that the book template shouldn't be used for the videos, on the basis that youtube is not a book.&lt;br /&gt;
:for the default cell, it would probably take no arguments (i.e. just &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{yt}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;), and it would also probably be it's own template rather than implemented on each template. However, I have done some digging, and empty cells (cells with no sort value) are given a value of &amp;quot;-infinity&amp;quot;, so they sort as the absolute minimum no matter what sort method is used (which means always at the top when sorting ascending). I have been looking to find a way to make a row always sort to the bottom regardless of sort order if the column that is sorted has an empty/valueless cell at that row, but if it exists, it is not documented.&lt;br /&gt;
:Interestingly, it is possible to sort by many columns at once by shift-clicking the second column after sorting the first column, and the rows will be sorted within the first sorting. it might be useful for sorting by chapter within each book [[User:Firestar233|guess who]] ([[User talk:Firestar233|if you desire conversing]] | [[Special:Contributions/Firestar233|what i have done]]) 06:51, 30 January 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::Yes, a book (or youtube) template could default to whatever seems suitable as sort-value without params, but it might be more obvious if explicitly book(/video) zero. Or caught by &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{book|nobook=yet}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;, or whatever. I'm trying to think what looks least confusing to future editors (those expanding/editing the table, and/or template(s)), but conflicted about what to anticipate.&lt;br /&gt;
::I had indeed been looking to see if the -infinity thing could be overriden by a column header defined &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;blank-sort-value=&amp;quot;999999&amp;quot;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt; sort of thing. If nothing else, you'd expect there to be a perceived need to sort a range of cells so that explicit negative and explicit positive contents, either by actual cell value or data-sort-value, to sit either side of blank cells... Not ''all'' the time, as sorting to show blanks ''separate'' from filled rows with actual zeroes is also useful, but it seems to useful not to have been suggested as a configurable change.&lt;br /&gt;
::The booknumber*A_LARGE_NUMBER offset to the chapter number is probably one of the most useful ways to sort by (primarily) book, then chapter, as it takes just one click. (I believe clicking the secondary and then clicking the primary does the same job as clicking the primary and shift-clicking the primary.) I see so little use to doing a primary sort by chapter (with or without secondary sorting by books, or any other column's detail), to interleave all chapter 1s and so on, that having a &amp;quot;book #&amp;quot; column and a &amp;quot;chapter(/page) #&amp;quot; column (two cells in sequence easily created by the book template, and could also handle the double-blank needed by book=none implementation, if we went that route) would be just complicating matters in an unnecessary manner. (As opposed to how we've complicated matters in a 'necessary' one!)&lt;br /&gt;
::Good catch on bringing the BOOK+CHAPTER sort value out of the #switch, BTW, as I was debating how much of the switch-statement I could treat as generic and not need repeating. (My original idea for the 10th Anniversary version of Book 1 to be effectively &amp;quot;Book1.1&amp;quot; made me still want to option of overriding the N*10000 as being 3=&amp;gt;11000 instead of =&amp;gt;30000, but that could ''still'' be implemented by a bit of &amp;quot;(if N=3, 1.1, else N) times 10000&amp;quot; pre-logic, ''or'' by handling &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{book|1.10|...}} instead of {{book|3|...}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;. Anyway, not important, either way.)&lt;br /&gt;
::...all this is why I left Favi (and you/others) get on with the original restructuring effort without jumping in (despite having two of the three books, and having seen all the youtubes). I had plenty of ideas of what to do, but did not want to restructure anything from what seemed to be a happy little project with its own momentum and targets. I finally gave in when I noticed an impasse being hit, with errors and confusion, to which I since ''hope'' I have provided a net reduction in both. Though it's only the first of these about which I'm fairly confident. ;) Anyway, perhaps I'm sliding back to my position on the sidelines, now... [[Special:Contributions/172.70.91.245|172.70.91.245]] 11:20, 30 January 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::These comments are great and extremely detailed, thank you! Thanks to your efforts I was able to retire these templates: book1, book2, book3, book4, and yt, so now we only have the huge {{template|book}} template and {{template|blog}}. I kinda agree with IP that it might not be future-proof, but I don't really see a reason to believe we'll add 2 more parameters to the book-specific columns. And even then, it's not that hard to update the template. But please do let me know if you can think of other issues with the current implementation! --[[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 19:50, 30 January 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
I've added a minor feature to the template so that we can see which short video one is. For example, the &amp;quot;everyone jump&amp;quot; short is the 17th one posted, so it now displays on the table as &amp;quot;17th Short video, on 2025‑11‑25: What if everyone on Earth was in the same place and jumped at the same time?&amp;quot;. Hope it helps! [[User:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font:11pt Cormorant Garamond&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#5CA7CF&amp;quot;&amp;gt;tor&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#F08DB0&amp;quot;&amp;gt;i :3&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font:8pt Cormorant Garamond&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#9E9E9E&amp;quot;&amp;gt;talk &amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#F08DB0&amp;quot;&amp;gt;to &amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#5CA7CF&amp;quot;&amp;gt;me!&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 17:38, 11 February 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Thanks! Initially i didn't add it to allow column sorting to work only for videos, but now that there are many shorts the number is definitely neeeded somehwere :) [[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 20:39, 13 February 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== tldr ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
hey favifake! i just came back from a 5 day yosemite trip, that’s why i have been awol for that time. could you please really quick give me a tldr of what has been going on in the past couple days? i see that we finished the index, but i’m just wondering if there’s anything else. thanks! '''[[User:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:9pt;color:#A9C6CA&amp;quot;&amp;gt;42.book.addict&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:6pt;color:#516874&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Talk to me!&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;''' 02:52, 1 February 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Welcome back! We now only use the {{template|book}} and {{template|blog}} templates, all the others have been merged into {{template|book}} by the incredible [[User:Firestar233]], the templates are much more solid, they also added all the questions and almost all the what if? 2-exclusive chapters. So now we're only missing the questions from the first book and an explanation for the third's bonus chapter (which you own!). I don't have much time, but you can look at the history of the templates and the main what if chapters page, and also this talk section. There's also a to-do list above the index! --[[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 18:32, 1 February 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::ok, great! i'll try to work on the chapter explainations once i find the time '''[[User:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:9pt;color:#A9C6CA&amp;quot;&amp;gt;42.book.addict&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:6pt;color:#516874&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Talk to me!&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;''' 21:04, 1 February 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Amazing! Thanks for your help. If you're interested, I've just added a simple (yet boring) task:&lt;br /&gt;
:::*''&amp;quot;Need to add the name(s) of the readers who asked each questions. It's easy! The instructions are in the ''[[What If? chapters#Editors|Editors section]]''!&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
:::If you have time, the names are missing for some book-exclusive articles and the blog articles. --[[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 10:59, 2 February 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Table for smaller screens ==&lt;br /&gt;
Do we think we should list out who asked each question in the table? [[User:Firestar233|guess who]] ([[User talk:Firestar233|if you desire conversing]] | [[Special:Contributions/Firestar233|what i have done]]) 03:09, 2 February 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:If so (and I'm not sure it's necessary), please not as an extra column. Already it's squeezing what's there down, something chronic. At least on my current screen, right now. &lt;br /&gt;
:*The thumbnail column can't get smaller (unless we use smaller/downscaled thukbnails, of course, but there's a limit to that)&lt;br /&gt;
:*The title column (of the first non-hdader is &amp;quot;Relatacistic(Newline)Baseball&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
:*The &amp;quot;Reader's(Newline)question&amp;quot; column goes &amp;quot;(quote)What would(Newline)happen if you(Newline)(...etc)&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
:*The &amp;quot;Randall's answer&amp;quot; column is positively spacious (no doubt forced to be so by the &amp;quot;Too short!&amp;quot; infoboxes), letting it read &amp;quot;The ball would create plasma and(Newline)reach home plate by about 70(Newline)(...etc)&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
:*The three columns for Blog/Book/Vid couldn't be narrower and make sense.&lt;br /&gt;
:If the questioner is to be asked, set it after the question (same cell, maybe horizontal rule).&lt;br /&gt;
:In fact, what do you think of the following layout modification?&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;sortable wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
!Title&lt;br /&gt;
!Question / Answer&lt;br /&gt;
!Blog&lt;br /&gt;
!Books&lt;br /&gt;
!YouTube&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|'''{{what if|1|Relativistic Baseball}}'''&lt;br /&gt;
 [[File:Relativistic Baseball.png|100px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|''&amp;quot;What would happen if you tried to hit a baseball pitched at 90% the speed of light?&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Ellen McManis&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
The ball would create plasma and reach home plate by about 70 nanoseconds. The result would be some kind of nuclear explosion, destroying everything about a mile from the field. A ruling of &amp;quot;{{w|hit by pitch}}&amp;quot; could be interpreted in this situation.&lt;br /&gt;
|{{blog|1|2012|07|10}}&lt;br /&gt;
|{{book|1|2}}&lt;br /&gt;
|{{book|5|2024|02|06|3EI08o-IGYk|What if you threw a baseball at nearly light speed?}}&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|'''{{what if|2|SAT Guessing}}'''&lt;br /&gt;
 [[File:SAT Guessing.png|100px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|''&amp;quot;What if everyone who took the SAT guessed on every multiple-choice question? How many perfect scores would there be?&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Rob Balder&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
No one would get a perfect score. The odds of guessing correctly on every question would be less than the odds of every ex-living president at that time and the main cast of [[:Category:Firefly|Firefly]] getting struck by lightning on the same day.&lt;br /&gt;
|{{blog|2|2012|07|10|7d early}}&lt;br /&gt;
|{{book|1|66}}&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
:Saves trouble of having emphatically unsortable columns, this way, being mere continuations of the cell contents we ''do'' want to sort. Assuming we don't decide we want to sort by &amp;quot;Firstname(s) Lastname&amp;quot; (or &amp;quot;Lastname, Firstname(s)&amp;quot;), as well as by sorting by &amp;quot;What would...&amp;quot; / &amp;quot;What if...&amp;quot; / &amp;quot;How much...&amp;quot; / &amp;quot;Is there...&amp;quot;ness, etc. But that's another step with another answer to it. (e.g. a &amp;quot;By&amp;quot; column with data-sort-value=&amp;quot;Lastname, Firstname(s)&amp;quot; defined but ''no visible content''... It'll be as minimally thin as &amp;quot;By&amp;quot; and the sort-glyph allows, only minimally squeezing the other columns. ...if that's more desirous than merely 'data-sort-value'ing the Question(/Name)/Answer field by name (whatever format), and finding little real reason to sort the &amp;quot;How&amp;quot;s from the &amp;quot;What&amp;quot;s from the &amp;quot;Is&amp;quot;s. But that's something that deserves more thought!)&lt;br /&gt;
:But what I ''do'' highly suggest (at least add the &amp;quot;Who&amp;quot; after the &amp;quot;Question&amp;quot;, same cell, and looks nice with right-align; on top of that, cell-mergering like this, ''probably'' with the horizontal rule markup in the Q&amp;amp;A divide) looks good to me.&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;quot;Relativistic Baseball&amp;quot;(noNewline!) and &amp;quot;(quote)What would happen if you tried to hit a&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;(Newline, etc...)&amp;quot; is how the example table pans out in Preview, which is an improvement for readability.&lt;br /&gt;
:I won't pre-emptimptively assume you're ok with this plan, but (if it seems the idea is liked/not disliked), when I have the time to do it I could blitz this (or any other consensus change of similar radicality, that gets proposed instead) later on (at least 12 hours from now, maybe a full day...). I'll do what I can to fill (or visibly format, if already there) such authors as I'm not left totally stumped about for whatever nazcent reason. Sound good to y'all? ;) [[Special:Contributions/141.101.98.190|141.101.98.190]] 05:00, 2 February 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Thanks for your suggestions! These are my thoughts:&lt;br /&gt;
 Do we think we should list out who asked each question in the table?&lt;br /&gt;
::Yes! I thought about doing this after you commented each reader after the question, but didn't have the time. The ay you went about adding them makes it very easy to create a &amp;quot;find-and-replace&amp;quot; to do it for all cells at once.This is how I'd do it:&lt;br /&gt;
:: &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;''&amp;quot;Question?&amp;quot;''&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:: &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;—Rob Balder&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 In fact, what do you think of the following layout modification?&lt;br /&gt;
 [...] cell-mergering like this, ''probably'' with the horizontal rule markup in the Q&amp;amp;A divide) looks good to me.&lt;br /&gt;
::I don't really like it and I don't think it's needed, mainly because it only looks good on a small screen. Meanwhile, on a normal-sized desk monitor, it makes the table '''almost twice as tall''' on my end. I don't think we should optimise for smaller screens and disregard other users with a larger screen real estate. If you find any other way to improve the table on both screen sizes, please do let us know!&lt;br /&gt;
 (e.g. a &amp;quot;By&amp;quot; column with data-sort-value=&amp;quot;Lastname, Firstname(s)&amp;quot; defined but ''no visible content''... It'll be as minimally thin as &amp;quot;By&amp;quot; and the sort-glyph allows, only minimally squeezing the other columns.&lt;br /&gt;
::I don't really like this idea, seems confusing for the end user (why is there an empty column?), doesn't add so much value, and needs to be maintained. If someone wants to sort by reader alphabetically, they'll likely find a way to isolate the '''&amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;—Rob Balder&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;''' part.&lt;br /&gt;
 But what I ''do'' highly suggest (at least add the &amp;quot;Who&amp;quot; after the &amp;quot;Question&amp;quot;, same cell, and looks nice with right-align [...]&lt;br /&gt;
::Love that! See above.&lt;br /&gt;
::--[[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 09:01, 2 February 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I formatted them! All the ones that were added as comments in the table are now visible. I also added this to-do, mainly for blog posts:&lt;br /&gt;
::*Need to add the name(s) of the readers who asked each questions. It's easy! The instructions are in the ''[[What If? chapters#Editors|Editors section]]''!&lt;br /&gt;
::--[[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 10:57, 2 February 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Regarding &amp;quot;...on a normal-sized desk monitor, it makes the table '''almost twice as tall''' on my end.&amp;quot; my display (non-desktop) has ultra-wide aspect ratio (when landscape; I rarely use portrait for browsing because then web-pages are scaled to unreadable levels).&lt;br /&gt;
:::With side-by-side Q and A columns, the &amp;quot;Too small&amp;quot; warning box dictates the minimum width of the Answer column, making the Question column even more narrow (when you take the minimum width of the thumbnail out of the horizontal space, then the title and the three &amp;quot;occurance&amp;quot; columns fight for what remains) than it might otherwise need to be. (If/when we remove ''all'' these hints to edit longer answer-'summaries', the table will doubtless realign its contents to a more equitable share of width between columns.)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Most often, this still results in (non-short) &amp;quot;Answer&amp;quot; columns being longer than they need to be, and forcing the whole row to be vertically wasteful. An opposite case (such as replicated below) does it with the Question having to have excessive linefeeds, being less readable (needs scrolling to read it all) and leaving a vast desert of blankness in the cell to its immediate right.&lt;br /&gt;
:::Isolating just the Q and A columns (to remove other confounding factors, for most displays except maybe phones-in-portrait - which is already an abominable mode and I find most websites look ''far'' more unreadable in ultra-tall-portrait orientation, so I generally avoid doing that on my tablet) and manually adding the line-breaks I see, you get:&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;sortable wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;quot;When my wife&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;and I started&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;dating she&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;invited me over&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;for dinner at one&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;time. Her&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;kitchen had&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;something&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;called Bauhaus&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;chairs, which are&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;full of holes,&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;approx 5-6&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;millimeters in&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;diameter in both&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;back and seat.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;During this&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;lovely dinner I&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;was forced to&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;liberate a small&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;portion of wind&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;and was relieved&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;that I managed&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;to do so very&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;discretely. Only&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;to find that the&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;chair I sat on&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;converted the&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;successful&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;silence into a&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;perfect, and&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;loud, flute note.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;We were both&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;(luckily) amazed&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;and surprised&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;and I have often&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;wondered what&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;the odds are for&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;something like&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;that happening.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;We kept the&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;chairs for five&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;years but&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;despite laborious&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;attempts it&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;couldn't be&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;reproduced.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|This... isn’t actually a question, but&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;thank you for sharing!&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
:::Integrating the row into the above-suggested format of table, we get (showing just that single combined Q+A cell, minus any &amp;quot;by&amp;quot;-line), the following:&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;sortable wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;quot;When my wife and I started dating she invited&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;me over for dinner at one time. Her kitchen had&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;something called Bauhaus chairs, which are full&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;of holes, approx 5-6 millimeters in&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;diameter in both back and seat. During this lovely dinner I&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;was forced to liberate a small portion of wind&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;and was relieved that I managed to do so very&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;discretely. Only to find that the chair I sat on&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;converted the successful silence into a perfect,&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;and loud, flute note. We were both (luckily)&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;amazed and surprised and I have often&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;wondered what the odds are for something like&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;that happening. We kept the chairs for five&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;years but despite laborious attempts it couldn't be reproduced.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
This... isn’t actually a question, but thank you&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;for sharing!&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
:::Yes, the non-Q&amp;amp;A cells (which I've left out, just there) are still comparatively empty (especially as &amp;quot;Relativistic Baseball&amp;quot; isn't forced into two lines, and even the final three columns don't need quite as many linefeeds between them ...you could probably narrow them further by forcing some linebreaks back into them, giving even more width to Q+A column), but they're actually often ''less'' empty because they aren't as artifically tall as a function of =max(height(question),height(answer)), instead being =height(wider(question+answer)). The conversion to not force a short question to inhabit a desolately empty cell as long as narrowly squashed answer, ''and'' a short answer to be as long as an even more narrowly squashed question, seems to be more wasteful of space than to give combined Q&amp;amp;A far more width and let it be ''exactly'' as long as it needs to be for both to fill it (being the crux of the row, the rest being 'annotations' to the paragraphed question/answer interplay).&lt;br /&gt;
:::Though I'm not next to my own desktop display, right now, I can tell you that the space-wasting I'm showing is notable (though not quite so egregious) there, too, and I had already thought to try out (at least for a Preview) a Q+A column.&lt;br /&gt;
:::I wasn't, at that time, even thinking of thumbnail+title columns merging (which would help even more), but I'm sorely tempted now. Whether or not Q+A merging is accepted by the wider set of editors. Merging title+thumbnail ''could'' trivially let the Q-column expand maybe to double its current width, depending upon the other dynamics involved in apportioning rendered width and height. [[Special:Contributions/172.70.90.9|172.70.90.9]] 13:00, 2 February 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Ok, for reference: The desktop machine has the following line-feeds for the above example, as ''currently'' shown in the Thumbnail|Title|Question|Answer|... format:&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;sortable wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;quot;When my wife and I started dating she invited me&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;over for dinner at one time. Her kitchen&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;had something called Bauhaus chairs, which are full of&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;holes, approx 5-6 millimeters in diameter in both&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;back and seat. During this lovely dinner I was forced&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;to liberate a small portion of wind and was relieved&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;that I managed to do so very discretely. Only to find&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;that the chair I sat on converted the successful&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;silence into a perfect, and loud, flute note. We were&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;both (luckily) amazed and surprised and I have often&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;wondered what the odds are for something like that&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;happening. We kept the chairs for five years but&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;despite laborious attempts it couldn't be&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;reproduced.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|This... isn’t actually a question, but thank you for sharing!(Single line!)&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
:::Testing the above-suggested format of table, we get:&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;sortable wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;quot;When my wife and I started dating she invited me over for dinner at one time. Her kitchen had something called Bauhaus&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;chairs, which are full of holes, approx 5-6 millimeters in diameter in both back and seat. During this lovely dinner I was&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;forced to liberate a small portion of wind and was relieved that I managed to do so very discretely. Only to find that the&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;chair I sat on converted the successful silence into a perfect, and loud, flute note. We were both (luckily) amazed and surprised&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;and I have often wondered what the odds are for something like that happening. We kept the chairs for five years but&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;despite laborious attempts it couldn't be reproduced.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
This... isn’t actually a question, but thank you for sharing!&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
:::Again, produces shorter (and more readable?) rows. In this particularly extreme example, at least. [[Special:Contributions/162.158.74.49|162.158.74.49]] 14:25, 2 February 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::::Thanks for your answer, these are my thoughts:&lt;br /&gt;
 the &amp;quot;Too small&amp;quot; warning box dictates the minimum width of the Answer column, making the Question column even more narrow [...] than it might otherwise need to be&lt;br /&gt;
::::*I hadn't thought of that, but still: if the issue is mainly caused by these notices, it's very easy to replace them with something else that doesn't force the column to be too wide.&lt;br /&gt;
  I generally avoid doing that on my tablet&lt;br /&gt;
::::*Oh, you're still the same IP as before! Hey there! My point ''wasn't'' that your idea wouldn't benefit small-sized screens like tablets (because it does, as you proved!), but that we should mainly focus on desktop users, which is how most readers that aren't on their phones will use the index. I don't like the idea of making the experience worse for everyone except tablet users (and phone users, but i can't imagine someone browsing such a huge index on their phones, so i don't think we should consider them). I'd love it you could improve the experience for both types of devices!&lt;br /&gt;
 &amp;quot;When my wife and I started dating she invited me over for dinner at one time. Her kitchen&lt;br /&gt;
::::*I think that's a bad example because the question is 4x the normal question length and there is no answer. I don't think we'd want to optimise the index so that that specific article looks better but most other articles don't.&lt;br /&gt;
::::*I think the perfect example of how it will one day look is article 2, with the question being slightly shorter than the answer, and that difference being balanced by the name of the reader who asked the question:&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;sortable wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
!class=&amp;quot;unsortable&amp;quot;|Thumbnail&lt;br /&gt;
!Title&lt;br /&gt;
!Reader's question&lt;br /&gt;
!class=&amp;quot;unsortable&amp;quot;|Randall's answer&lt;br /&gt;
!Blog&lt;br /&gt;
!Books&lt;br /&gt;
!YouTube&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:SAT Guessing.png|100px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|'''{{what if|2|SAT Guessing}}'''&lt;br /&gt;
|''&amp;quot;What if everyone who took the SAT guessed on every multiple-choice question? How many perfect scores would there be?&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;—This is a name&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|No one would get a perfect score. The odds of guessing correctly on every question would be less than the odds of every ex-living president at that time and the main cast of [[:Category:Firefly|Firefly]] getting struck by lightning on the same day.&lt;br /&gt;
|{{blog|2|2012|07|10|7d early}}&lt;br /&gt;
|{{book|1|66}}&lt;br /&gt;
|{{book|16|2024|09|24|0EytSWiKrFg|What if example?}}&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
::::*This specific example, which is how most articles do/will look hopefully, is '''~45% shorter''' than [[#Question askers|your example]] and thus wastes much less space on my screen size.&lt;br /&gt;
 the final three columns don't need quite as many linefeeds between them ...you could probably narrow them further by forcing some linebreaks back into them [...]&lt;br /&gt;
::::*If they need linebreaks, doesn't that mean that their column would be the most narrow one? I thought mediawiki balanced the table pretty well.&lt;br /&gt;
 thumbnail+title columns merging (which would help even more), but I'm sorely tempted now&lt;br /&gt;
::::*But I think this idea has the same problem, looking too tall on desktops and beautiful on a tablet. I wouldn't want to ruin the UX of desktop users to favour tablet users, but i'd love a way to improve both!&lt;br /&gt;
::::*Also, I'd like to one day make the thumbnail bigger, because currently it's too small in my opinion. But if i increased its size right now, it would force every row to be even taller, which would waste space on desktop (and, of course, save space on small screens, or at least not make that big of a difference). --[[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 17:04, 2 February 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::::Is there a &amp;quot;mobile&amp;quot; version/url for this site? because there might be a way to make the table try to display a different layout if it's on the mobile url/version or if the screen is too small, but that would require putting complicated expressions in every row and in the header columns. [[User:Firestar233|guess who]] ([[User talk:Firestar233|if you desire conversing]] | [[Special:Contributions/Firestar233|what i have done]]) 20:53, 3 February 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Yeah I had thought of doing a similar thing, maybe have two pages with different coding and use complex transclusions to keep the content the same? But I wouldn’t even know where to begin with that. But you're the wiki-editing wizard here. --[[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 17:50, 4 February 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::As I predicted, now that most columns are filled, on my screen they're almost the same width! I think it'd be even more balanced if we removed the notices --[[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 15:44, 31 March 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== adding what if? 10th ann   ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
as most of you know, the what if? 10th anniversary edition is basically an updated version of what if?, compete with red annotations and a bonus chapter that i need to get around to explaining. since it has all the original what if? chapters, should we add a red 10th anniversary box under each green what if? box? '''[[User:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:9pt;color:#A9C6CA&amp;quot;&amp;gt;42.book.addict&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:6pt;color:#516874&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Talk to me!&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;''' 16:12, 3 February 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Yeah I realized it was just small annotations after i created the template and now I've changed the 10th ann. one to say ''Featured '''exclusively''' on the 3rd ed. etc.'' Not sure if that's enough, could also be much longer since it's only used on 1 row, but we definitely shouldn't add the template to every other article, (would break the style= html tag). Someone should still mention that articles on the first book are all available on the 3rd (and add more info) on both '''[[what if? (blog)]]''' and '''[[What If? 10th Anniversary Edition]]'''.&lt;br /&gt;
:Don't worry too much about explaining it, it can just be a couple of sentences. People can watch the video if they want details. Thanks for your work!{{unsigned|FaviFake|09:57, 3 February 2025 (UTC)}} &amp;lt;!-- I'm so bad at this! I love how both IP and Firestar rushed to add my signature hahaha --&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The fact that the 10th Anniversary ed (&amp;quot;book3&amp;quot;, in original nomenclature) was basically a bonus-chapter version of the original (&amp;quot;book1&amp;quot;), was behind my suggestion that book|3 should sort-value itself as between book|1 articles and the completely new book|2, but there are severl ways of doing it (including maybe using something akin to {{w|Template:Diagonal split header}} for book|1 (assumed to also be book|3) rendering. [[Special:Contributions/162.158.38.96|162.158.38.96]] 21:08, 3 February 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::That's interesting, I didn't know that existed! I wonder if there's a less repetitive and/or space-efficient way of expressing the same message (&amp;quot;this is on both&amp;quot;), but idk. (look, I remembered to sign this time!) --[[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 17:43, 4 February 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::another question: should i be updating the explanations to be accurate as of 2024? many of the red annotations contain corrections or updates. '''[[User:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:9pt;color:#A9C6CA&amp;quot;&amp;gt;42.book.addict&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:6pt;color:#516874&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Talk to me!&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;''' 16:08, 4 February 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
That's interesting! I like the idea of adding them, but I can't seem to find a nice way to add them:&lt;br /&gt;
*We could add them to the existing explanation, but that would be weird because half of the blog articles, which are public on the site, don't have these additions.&lt;br /&gt;
*We could add them to the book column, but it'd likely get too big, and we would need to figure out a way to make the template do that.&lt;br /&gt;
*We could create a duplicate row of every red-annotated article, even if they're on the blog, but that would be confusing and might clutter the index.&lt;br /&gt;
*We could create a new column, but we already have too many.&lt;br /&gt;
*Also, we'd need to figure out how to add them. Do we want to make the text red like in the book? Should we use a new/old template for that?&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 17:43, 4 February 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== By what measure is anything &amp;quot;too short&amp;quot;. ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I am very close to just removing all the &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{notice|Too short}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt; additions, on the basis that this seems to be a purely subjective measure. The only reason I haven't is because they'll probably just be added back in again (with no more reasoning than before). But, if anyone wants more information, everyone already knows where they can find the ''full'' text (or narrated video) that gives it, while a summary is a summary. [[Special:Contributions/172.70.85.49|172.70.85.49]] 20:28, 19 March 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:The reason I add them is because I'd like people browsing the index to be able to glance at a question and read its summary. I try to check the original article to see if there are any important things we missed and point them out. But if, after reading through an article, you find that our summary is clear and '''fully answers''' the question, you can remove it. I started adding these because some early summaries were way too short, just 5-10 words, and mostly didn't answer the question. For example, if an answer is &amp;quot;We would all die&amp;quot;, that doesn't answer the question, but &amp;quot;The radiation from the nuclear bomb would be so pervasive that we would all die in 2 years&amp;quot; does.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Of course people can just read all ~250 articles, but if someone just wants the answer quickly, we offer that. Please feel free to remove them from answers that are already complete, but not all of them.--[[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 16:48, 20 March 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Reviewing the current first five &amp;quot;Too short&amp;quot; complaints, IMO you cannot get much more fully answered without expanding the &amp;quot;summary&amp;quot; to basically going through the article's in-depth explanation and copying/paraphrasing it. Which seems to me to miss the point.&lt;br /&gt;
::Parallel requests for rewording/better phrasing I can understand (if I thought that any change I made in that direction was going to stand when it got &amp;quot;made longer&amp;quot;, I might even try to help out in that direction), but I'm still none the wiser why they are too short.&lt;br /&gt;
::Answering a question of &amp;quot;How long/heavy/bright/fast is &amp;lt;foo&amp;gt;?&amp;quot; shouldn't need more than a simple &amp;quot;it is &amp;lt;measurement&amp;gt;, given &amp;lt;caveat&amp;gt;&amp;quot;, in most cases. Maybe a couple of those if there's different caveats, or add why it would end the world if you even ''had'' such a &amp;lt;foo&amp;gt;. &amp;quot;Could I/we/humanity &amp;lt;bar&amp;gt;?&amp;quot; probably doesn't need much more than &amp;quot;[Yes/No], but &amp;lt;unexpected thing...&amp;gt;&amp;quot; And I'm not sure if it's still there, because I'm not going to recheck it all, but at one point I noted at least one short-question/short-answer that had a longer 'summary' than the answer given.&lt;br /&gt;
::I like words. I need to expend effort to not use more of them, myself, and am quite pleased if I ''can'' satisfactorily say what I'm trying to say in a succint manner. (i.e. not like this...) But I'm still none the wiser what (lower) thresholds there are in this situation. I'm going to consider if I can help, here, but not right this moment. [[Special:Contributions/172.71.241.122|172.71.241.122]] 20:29, 20 March 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Oooh you're the same IP! I didn't recognise you.&lt;br /&gt;
 Reviewing the current first five &amp;quot;Too short&amp;quot; complaints, IMO you cannot get much more fully answered without expanding the &amp;quot;summary&amp;quot; to basically going through the article's in-depth explanation and copying/paraphrasing it. Which seems to me to miss the point.&lt;br /&gt;
:::Sounds good. If the explanation is satisfactory and mentions everything except things like the methodology used and minor &amp;quot;sub-answers&amp;quot;, feel free to remove the notices!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
  &amp;quot;How long/heavy/bright/fast is &amp;lt;foo&amp;gt;?&amp;quot; shouldn't need more than a simple &amp;quot;it is &amp;lt;measurement&amp;gt;, given &amp;lt;caveat&amp;gt;&amp;quot;, in most cases. Maybe a couple of those if there's different caveats, or add why it would end the world if you even had such a &amp;lt;foo&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
:::Agreed!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &amp;quot;Could I/we/humanity &amp;lt;bar&amp;gt;?&amp;quot; probably doesn't need much more than &amp;quot;[Yes/No], but &amp;lt;unexpected thing...&amp;gt;&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
:::Agree, but usually the entire article revolves around that unexpected thing, so i think we should summarise that too. Agin, feel free to remove the ones you're sure can't be made any longer in a useful way At the start, I added a lot and didn't have time to go read the article for each one! --[[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 15:56, 21 March 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Alternate universe What-Ifs ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Should we make the explanation for Alternate universe What-Ifs a separate page? Explaining every section in this article might be too long, and if the other explanations are anything to go by, an explanation that fits would be considered too short. [[Special:Contributions/172.68.174.147|172.68.174.147]] 06:09, 21 March 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:I think we should definitely explain it, but maybe it's better if we keep it in the table? Why'd you want to split into another page?&lt;br /&gt;
:Also, the short-answer articles aren't too short. If you look at [https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php/What_If%3F_chapters#:~:text=Short Answer Section II Short%20Answer%20Section%20II], for example, it explanations are very short, and rightfully so. --[[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 15:49, 21 March 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== What about Good Question? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There does appear to be a *fourth* &amp;quot;What If?&amp;quot; thing Randall has done that is seemingly only documented at [[New York Times: Good Question]]; the New York Times's [https://www.nytimes.com/column/good-question-randall-munroe-xkcd Good Question], which does appear to maybe have some chapter reposts (i.e. Cosmic Road Trip/&amp;quot;How Long Is the Drive to the Edge of the Universe?&amp;quot;). My question is, is this worth documenting on this page in specific? [[User:Adrmcr|Adrmcr]] ([[User talk:Adrmcr|talk]]) 18:36, 21 March 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Oh, right, I had forgotten about that page! I like the idea of doing something with it, it's currently almost impossible to find. To give it more visibility, I think we could move its contents here. I'm not sure if we should add them to the existing table or put them in a new section, maybe at the bottom. I could see something like this working:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;sortable wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
! rowspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; scope=&amp;quot;col&amp;quot; class=&amp;quot;unsortable&amp;quot; |  Thumbnail&lt;br /&gt;
! rowspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; scope=&amp;quot;col&amp;quot; data-sort-type=text|  Title&lt;br /&gt;
! rowspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; scope=&amp;quot;col&amp;quot; data-sort-type=text|  question&lt;br /&gt;
! rowspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; scope=&amp;quot;col&amp;quot; class=&amp;quot;unsortable&amp;quot; |  Randall's answer&lt;br /&gt;
! colspan=&amp;quot;3&amp;quot;|                                  Article available in... &amp;lt;noinclude&amp;gt;&amp;lt;!--&amp;lt;/noinclude&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;background-color:#FFFF00;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;noinclude&amp;gt;--&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/noinclude&amp;gt;&amp;amp;nbsp;''(click to sort)''&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;lt;noinclude&amp;gt;&amp;lt;!--&amp;lt;/noinclude&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;noinclude&amp;gt;--&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/noinclude&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! scope=&amp;quot;col&amp;quot; data-sort-type=number |           Blog&lt;br /&gt;
! scope=&amp;quot;col&amp;quot; data-sort-type=number |           Books&lt;br /&gt;
! scope=&amp;quot;col&amp;quot; data-sort-type=number |           YouTube&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| rowspan=&amp;quot;7&amp;quot; |&lt;br /&gt;
| rowspan=&amp;quot;7&amp;quot; |'''Good Question'''&lt;br /&gt;
|[https://www.nytimes.com/column/good-question-randall-munroe-xkcd ''&amp;quot;How Long Is the Drive to the Edge of the Universe?&amp;quot;'']&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;—Randall Munroe&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Cras sagittis lacus sit amet porta vulputate.&lt;br /&gt;
|1st &amp;quot;[https://www.nytimes.com/column/good-question-randall-munroe-xkcd Good Question]&amp;quot; NYT article, on 2012‑07‑10&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[https://www.nytimes.com/column/good-question-randall-munroe-xkcd ''&amp;quot;Shark or Orca: Which Should You Fear More?&amp;quot;'']&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;—Randall Munroe&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|rutrum eros id, tincidunt neque. Integer hendrerit magna ac nibh fringilla, &lt;br /&gt;
|2nd &amp;quot;[https://www.nytimes.com/column/good-question-randall-munroe-xkcd Good Question]&amp;quot; NYT article, on 2012‑07‑10&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[https://www.nytimes.com/column/good-question-randall-munroe-xkcd ''&amp;quot;	How Many Languages Could a Child Speak?&amp;quot;'']&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;—Randall Munroe&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|non venenatis lacus hendrerit. Pellentesque ullamcorper dolor eget nunc gravida, nec euismod risus efficitur. &lt;br /&gt;
|3rd &amp;quot;[https://www.nytimes.com/column/good-question-randall-munroe-xkcd Good Question]&amp;quot; NYT article, on 2012‑07‑10&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The old page could become a redirect to the new section/NYT table. --[[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 08:49, 22 March 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::Anyone? --[[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 16:56, 23 March 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Striking a match on Titan - additional ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Depends on how you read it, but try to strike a safety match ''on'' Titan probably would do nothing at all (just like if you tried to strike it on a bit of Earth rock, here on the surface of Earth), as it needs the chemicals in the striking-strip to (in small amounts) combine with the oxidiser in the match-head coating to spark up and ''then'' prompt the relatively slower-burning process that leads to the atmosphere-fed burning of the 'stick'.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This means that striker+match reaction will also work in most situations (including underwater and in vacuum), though of course may then fail to get significant amount of post-striking ignition to continue. As non-safety/strike-anywhere ones will, given the friction (hmmm... would you get good friction off of the ice-boulders of Titan?).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But coating your matchheads with wax (or manufactured with a suitable coating) is advisable for 'survival kit' matches, to prevent infusion of water to 'dampen the squib'. Would be interesting to know to what degree the anoxic atmosphere of Titan might seep in and similarly suppress the various types of ready-to-react compounds, before even the lack of free oxygen ends the intended flare-up. [[Special:Contributions/172.71.26.37|172.71.26.37]] 10:19, 29 March 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Uhh, what article are you talking about? This info could be useful to add in the index! --[[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 15:06, 29 March 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::Easily searchable (or made visible as per my recent change), it's not the only &amp;quot;match&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;Titan&amp;quot; reference, but there aren't so many of either that you need to check much further than the first appearance of either, probably.&lt;br /&gt;
::But, as you ask, it's in the Book 2 &amp;quot;Short Answers #3&amp;quot; collection (the penultimate one of that grouping). And, now that I've reached home, I can also tell you that it's pp.141-142 in the UK hardback edition (whether or not that's identical/near to your own copy's appearance of it).&lt;br /&gt;
::However, no ''more'' info needs to be added, IMO. I changed the prior edit (not sure who/which IP did it, without checking, but their edit popped it up on my own radar as worthy of minor refinement) to just say that it's oxidiser, not just &amp;quot;oxygen&amp;quot; (there's oxygen in the &amp;quot;stick&amp;quot; and any other &amp;quot;head&amp;quot;-coatings applied, but basically incidental to the initial ignition when it's the oxidiser component that primarily contributes to that). And, to my mild and gratifying surprise, now find that this is pretty much exactly what the Short Answer says (except in 'Merkin form of &amp;quot;oxidizer&amp;quot; - so now, I think to myself, did I write my edit in Leftpondian (as I should, just because Noah Webster wanted to be a Lexicographical Edgelord), or Rightpondian (as is my default habit, because that's how I was educated)... need to check that!), in the form of a summary which ''our'' summary pretty much matches&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;&amp;amp;#91;[[559: No Pun Intended|''NPI!'']]&amp;amp;#93;&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; in all useful ways.&lt;br /&gt;
::I added the stuff here, about the Safety Match detail, as a bonus bit of info for anyone who cares to scan down here to know this additional thing that I happen to know (but not necessarily explain well?)... Randall does not go that far into the details in his book-answer (he does divert into a footnote about KClO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; being used in airliner oxygen masks, but that's beyond the scope of adding here, and he totally avoids the safety/strike-anywhere distinctions). Adding the above to the Explanation Table would be overkill, and misrepresent Randall's original format to no real benefit (except maybe some curious pyromaniacs, on Earth or elsewhere) [[Special:Contributions/172.69.195.179|172.69.195.179]] 16:58, 29 March 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== A bit disappointed in the lack of progress ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I mean, I understand that this is a volunteer project and I can't force people to work on this thing, hell, I don't even have the time to fill out most of the pages even if I HAVE read the What IF in question. However, it's still a bit disheartening to see so many &amp;quot;too shorts&amp;quot; even after several weeks. [[Special:Contributions/172.69.208.133|172.69.208.133]] 12:32, 17 April 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:If it was up to me, I'd solve the issue of too many &amp;quot;Too short&amp;quot;s by... deleting the unnecessary &amp;quot;Too short&amp;quot;s... I have no desire to expand the sufficient summaries with much longer reruns of the full answers. [[Special:Contributions/162.158.216.168|162.158.216.168]] 15:39, 17 April 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::I think the progress we made is still a lot, considering the state the index was previously. Also, it's not the only incomplete thing, there are about other 80 incomplete pages here. Also, as I said a while back:&lt;br /&gt;
::If the explanation is satisfactory and mentions everything except things like the methodology used and minor &amp;quot;sub-answers&amp;quot;, please remove the notices! &amp;quot;Could I/we/humanity &amp;lt;bar&amp;gt;?&amp;quot; probably doesn't need much more than &amp;quot;[Yes/No], but &amp;lt;unexpected thing...&amp;gt;&amp;quot;. Agree, but usually the entire article revolves around that unexpected thing, so i think we should summarise that too. Again, feel free to remove the ones you're ''sure'' can't be made any longer in a useful way. At the start of the project, I added a lot and didn't have time to go read the article for each one! --[[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 17:03, 17 April 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== &amp;quot;nonmonomolecular&amp;quot; and peptides ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
About &amp;quot;the longest sequence of letters using one number key&amp;quot;: Yamaki, Sahori B. et al.'s article published on 15 March, 2005 in ''Journal of Colloid and Interface Science'' volume 283, issue 2 on pages 464–471 titled ''Morphological and structural characteristics of diazo dyes at the air–water interface: in situ Brewster angle microscopy and polarized UV/vis analysis'' uses &amp;quot;nonmonomolecular&amp;quot; (with neither hyphens nor dashes nor anything else), a word with 9 consecutive letters using the 6 key a total of 20 times. The word also has [[:wikt:nonmonomolecular|an article on Wiktionary]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
About the peptides: &amp;quot;Glycylglycylglycyl[…]glycine&amp;quot; and other spelled-out amino acid sequences (like titin's) status as a word is dubious. If we assume they are all considerable as words, there is no upper limit on peptide sequence word length (e. g. &amp;quot;glycyl&amp;quot; adds 6 to the length and 0 to the count of unallowed letters (U, B, X, O, J, Z), &amp;quot;phenylalanyl&amp;quot; adds 12 and 0, respectively, etc.). [[Special:Contributions/172.70.39.208|172.70.39.208]] 21:21, 27 April 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Great! You can add all that in the explanation in the main table :D &amp;amp;nbsp; --[[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 14:32, 28 April 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Contact Randall (or his team): link rot on &amp;quot;Pressure Cooker&amp;quot; What if? page ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On this page: https://what-if.xkcd.com/40/ &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There's a link ostensibly to an article about O2F2, link text is &amp;quot;Another article&amp;quot;. It goes to lateralscience.com. Unfortunately, the original site there has been replaced by a domain squatter advertising online casinos. I don't know how to contact Mr. Munroe to tell him. [[User:Nitpicking|Nitpicking]] ([[User talk:Nitpicking|talk]]) 20:23, 12 May 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:You can just shoot him an email at his personal address: rmunroe@gmail.com &amp;amp;nbsp; --[[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 15:03, 13 May 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== 10th Anniversary Annotations ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hello, new here. I honestly have no idea what I am doing. But I read the 10th anniversary edition of ''[[What If?]]'', and one annotation, in the same chapter, added dimethylmercury far off to the right, and about halfway up the y axis. [[User:Majordesmosnerd|Majordesmosnerd]] ([[User talk:Majordesmosnerd|talk]]) 22:18, 19 March 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:We as a community have not decided what to do with annotations, as there are many of them scattered throughout the book and it would be a painstaking process to document them all. I would like invite further discussion about this so we can come to a consensus. [[User:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font:11pt Cormorant Garamond&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#4A86A6&amp;quot;&amp;gt;tor&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#C0728D&amp;quot;&amp;gt;i :3&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font:8pt Cormorant Garamond&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#7E7E7E&amp;quot;&amp;gt;talk &amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#C0728D&amp;quot;&amp;gt;to &amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#4A86A6&amp;quot;&amp;gt;me!&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 01:05, 20 March 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::Agree it'd be nice to have them documented somewhere! [[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 12:21, 4 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::How would we format it? Do we want to make a new template for these annotations? I'd be willing to go through my book if I can find the time for it between all my work. [[User:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font:11pt Cormorant Garamond&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#4A86A6&amp;quot;&amp;gt;tor&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#C0728D&amp;quot;&amp;gt;i :3&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font:8pt Cormorant Garamond&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#7E7E7E&amp;quot;&amp;gt;talk &amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#C0728D&amp;quot;&amp;gt;to &amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#4A86A6&amp;quot;&amp;gt;me!&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 19:41, 5 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::::Maybe a second table somewhere else on the page, with a link from the main table (in the book column?) that goes to the second table, so a user can jump between them when they see the little &amp;quot;see annotations!&amp;quot; link in the book column? (or another column?) I've already filled the table with anchors, so for example to jump to chapter 34 of the second book just can just type [[#2-34]] and it'll take you there. Or for the blog, type any number like [[#55]]. I'm not sure how we should format the annotations, maybe copy the text around it (coloured black like normal text) and make the annotations bold? Or create a {{tl|red}} template that just makes the text of the annotation red. It could work! Unfortunately i don't have the book, i bought the first one :( ㅤ [[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 16:06, 7 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::I think that a second page would be smart. We could do something like &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;[[what if? articles/Annotations]]&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt; with a table: page number, chapter, transcript, and I'll see if I can find the images for the actual annotations somewhere. As for formatting, I think we should do black text for describing any doodles that Randall made, then red text for the actual annotation itself. Let me know if you have any other concerns. [[User:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font:11pt Cormorant Garamond&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#4A86A6&amp;quot;&amp;gt;tor&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#C0728D&amp;quot;&amp;gt;i :3&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font:8pt Cormorant Garamond&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#7E7E7E&amp;quot;&amp;gt;talk &amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#C0728D&amp;quot;&amp;gt;to &amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#4A86A6&amp;quot;&amp;gt;me!&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 16:28, 15 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::Sure, sounds good. The reason I was thinking of doing it all in the same page is that readers could jump back and forth from the explanation of the annotations to the explanation of the chapter and vice versa, without having to reload the page. [[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 19:36, 17 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::So a different table, but on the same page on a different section? That can work for me. [[User:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font:11pt Cormorant Garamond&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#4A86A6&amp;quot;&amp;gt;tor&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#C0728D&amp;quot;&amp;gt;i :3&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font:8pt Cormorant Garamond&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#7E7E7E&amp;quot;&amp;gt;talk &amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#C0728D&amp;quot;&amp;gt;to &amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#4A86A6&amp;quot;&amp;gt;me!&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 18:49, 19 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>42.book.addict</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:what_if%3F_articles&amp;diff=410367</id>
		<title>Talk:what if? articles</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:what_if%3F_articles&amp;diff=410367"/>
				<updated>2026-04-15T16:28:31Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;42.book.addict: /* 10th Anniversary Annotations */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{TOC}}Note: I moved over the discussion page from my [[User talk:FaviFake|talk page]], which is where the merger of the two what if? indexes was initially coordinated and organized. Most of the topics below were originally created on [[User talk:FaviFake]]. Thanks! --[[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 09:21, 2 February 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
==Introduction to coordinate the merger==&lt;br /&gt;
Hey! This is intended to be a space to coordinate the merging of the two tables. I see that [[User:1234231587678]] and [[User:Apollo11]] have been helping us create the two tables! I'm messaging you to coordinate a little bit. Since we're the 3 most active editors, let's coordinate!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
My idea for the table was the following: there would be one single sortable table instead of two, and the information density would be very high. There were the columns I had in mind:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* N&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Date (the date YYYY-MM-DD, and then includes week after prev. article)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Thumbnail&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Title (hyperlinked)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Reader's question&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Randall's answer&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Book - in something like this format: '''WI?2, n. 40''' (BOOK1,2,3, nr. ARTICLE NUMBER), which is easily sortable by book - for unnumbered, use the assumed number with an asterisk like this: 69* - this column would also be color coded, by book - this would also contain the title in the book if different - empty when not in any book&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* YT (the date YYYY-MM-DD, and then a hyperlinked link with the YT title. if the title is the same, don't repeat it) empty when not on YT&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I realise my mistake was listing the things we had to do together with the huge task, merging the tables! So what happened is you both contributed, but each of you contribued to a different table. In an attempt to solve this, i have created my own table, which is ready to receive the two additional columns!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''I believe this third table (available at [[User:FaviFake]]) is the best option for us to work on the index together, so that once it has the 2 additional columns and contains all the articles, we can put it on the blog page and delete the [[What If? chapters]] table. What do you think?'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I have also made other adjustments:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Made the Date column nowrap, so the date doesn't wrap around, and made the first column (N) centered and '''bold'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Turned each Reader's question cell italic, and added quotation marks to the start and end of each cell. Ex: HOW OLD? becomes ''&amp;quot;HOW OLD?&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* In the Randall's answer column, split the rows into one per question. For example, if there are 5 bullet points in 1 cell, split the &amp;quot;Reader's question&amp;quot; and the &amp;quot;Randall's answer&amp;quot; columns into 5 rows for that particular Article so that each question has its own mini-row.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Added file link to all rows so you can just click to go straight to the upload file page.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;lt;s&amp;gt;'''Downgrade''': titles aren't hyperlinked&amp;lt;/s&amp;gt; -  {{Done}} Update: I manually hyperlinked all of them!&lt;br /&gt;
'''&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Downgrade''': the last ~100 articles are missing. I'll try to add them the day after tomorrow! --[[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 17:06, 17 January 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Regarding the additional 2 columns: I've been thinking a lot about how we should do them. I see 4 options:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:*'''Option 1: Separate Tables''' - separate tables for the YouTube video information and book information, and link articles across tables using the &amp;quot;N&amp;quot; column (or another unique identifier like the title). Advantages: Keeps sorting straightforward in each table. Maintains the integrity of your original table while allowing for sorting by videos and books in their respective tables. Flexible for adding future metadata. Disadvantages: Requires users to cross-reference between tables, which can be inconvenient.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:*'''Option 2: Expand Rows with Sub-Rows''' - How it works: For each article, add one or two additional sub-rows (One for YouTube video information (e.g., YT video number, link, title, thumbnail), and one for book information (e.g., book number, article number, title, color-coded cell). Advantages: Keeps all information together, visually grouped by article. Makes it easy to see all data without leaving the main table. Disadvantages: Sub-rows might disrupt column sorting. Could make the table visually cluttered for articles with both video and book.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:*'''Option 3: Additional Columns''' - new columns for: (FIRST COLUMN) YouTube video number, link, title, and thumbnail, and, (SECOND COLUMN) Book name, article number, title, and color-coding. Advantages: Sorting by videos or books is easy. Keeps all information in a single row. Disadvantages: The table becomes much wider, which can reduce readability on smaller screens. Many empty cells for articles without video or book.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I've also thought about using a template. What do you think of the idea of a creating a template like these:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{Done}} UPDATE: i did create the templates! See the top of [[User:FaviFake]]! &amp;lt;s&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{yt|YTNUMBER (1, 2, 3, etc)|YTLINK|VIDEOTITLE (optional)}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:It would be used in the column that we still need to create. It would also colour the cell in '''red'''. I was also thinking of doing a similar thing for the What If? books:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{bk|WHICH-BOOK|CHAPTER-NUMBER|CHAPTER-TITLE (if different)}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:For example, it would look like this (This one would also colour the cell based on the book, e.g., green for WI?1, yellow for WI?2, blue for WI10th ed.):&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{book|2|69|Jellyfish}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 What If? 2, chapter '''69: Jellyfish'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Would someone be able to create something like this? I know nothing about templates, and i doubt I'll be able to ask chatgpt to do everything for me correctly. --[[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 10:28, 18 January 2025 (UTC)&amp;lt;s&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/s&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
==1234231587678==&lt;br /&gt;
::I saw your message, and this would be a good idea to coordinate. Maybe also add the missing &amp;quot;Peptides&amp;quot; that was accidentally released on the blog, as index 153 (i think) or have two articles with the same index number, just putting &amp;quot;current&amp;quot; for the current article. --[[User:1234231587678|1234231587678]] ([[User talk:1234231587678|talk]]) 20:47, 17 January 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Also I think the &amp;quot;0w later&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;1w later&amp;quot; on the comics looks a bit odd, maybe remove them entirely? The dates are already present. --[[User:1234231587678|1234231587678]] ([[User talk:1234231587678|talk]]) 20:49, 17 January 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Thanks for replying! I LOVE the idea of inserting the Peptides article directly in the index. It would technically make it a little less official, but I'm all for it. It looks and feels like a proper article.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::I also fully agree with you regarding the '''1w later''' line! I do like the idea of seeing the frequency right from the index, but it's too much right now. My idea is to remove the &amp;quot;1w later&amp;quot; part, but leave it in for the articles that aren't released a week after the previous one. For example, this would keep the '''2w later''' and '''0w later''' lines for the articles that have them, but declutter the date cells of the &amp;quot;normal&amp;quot; ones. What do you think?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::I can't do it right now, but it should be easy. We can also delay it until all articles are on the table, so we only have to do it once. Btw, I hope to get all the articles on the table by the day after tomorrow or the day after that. Meanwhile, you or other editors can add the 2 columns (Book and YT)! --[[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 22:14, 17 January 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I currently don't have the books, so can't help with that, but I've added a few YT videos. Also the book template seems to be buggy (and/or a WIP), so I removed it from the 1st article. ALSO, the YT template display {5}&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;th&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; instead of 5th; weird. --[[User:1234231587678|1234231587678]] ([[User talk:1234231587678|talk]]) 15:13, 19 January 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Thank you so much! I fixed the YT template, let me know if there are any other issues. Also, you '''can''' help with books, even if you don't have them! All you need to do is look at the page [[What If? chapters]], which catalogues every chapter of every book. The &amp;lt;s&amp;gt;[[Template:book]]&amp;lt;/s&amp;gt; i was trying to create is broken because I gave up trying to make it work (1h and 20min of my life wasted). Anyways, we now have 4 different templates, one for each book (the fourth is a placeholder!): [[Template:book1]], [[Template:book2]], [[Template:book3]], [[Template:book4]]. There are instructions on hot to use them on their page. Please continue adding the videos and the books if you can! This is exactly what we need! --[[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 15:18, 19 January 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Apollo11==&lt;br /&gt;
This a big page so I’m not sure I’m in the right spot (also typing one handed so sorry for mistakes). I like the table on you page, however I did notice it’s missing which book it’s in and the YouTube channel. I love how the one I edited was formatted, I think if you added that table to your existing table it’d be perfect. I would also add a page number for the books. [[User:Apollo11|Apollo11]] ([[User talk:Apollo11|talk]]) 16:34, 18 January 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ok just saw the three options. I’d go with either 1 or 3. 1 would look the best and probably be easiest to find what you’re looking for as long as your have links to the other tables very clear. What I would do is have a table with title, and where to find the article (blog, book 1, book 2, YouTube). Then have a 4 tables, one for each, where you can go more in depth about each article, date, explanation, jokes, things like that. Option 3 would be the simplest, and if that’s what you wanna do, I’d have the simplest things on the left and the more complicated things on the right. So the date and title would be in the left and the e explanation would be far to the right. You’ve probably been thinking about this a lot longer than me so I’m probably missing something, so please tell me if I’m wrong abo it anything. Also if my comment is in the wrong spot feel free to move me to the right conversation. I’d love to help in anyway!! Just give me directions and I’ll do by best!! [[User:Apollo11|Apollo11]] ([[User talk:Apollo11|talk]]) 16:58, 18 January 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: Thanks so much for your interest! I thought about it a lot today, and i landed on 1, huge, information-laden table. I think having 3 or 4 tables would be too confusing and too hard to navigate. Plus, i think i found a good way to avoid making the table too wide. I added a few articles to showcase it. I don't have a lot of time to do all of them. Regarding the page number, I used the chapter number since it's easier for people who don't own the books.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: &amp;gt; I’d love to help in anyway!! Just give me directions and I’ll do by best!!&lt;br /&gt;
: Love it! You can do everything that's listed at the top of [[User:FaviFake]], but the first one might be more annoying to do on a phone (I'm not sure where you're editing from, actually). If you don't understand something on that page, please do let me know. I promise i'll answer quicker next time. ;)  --[[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 20:03, 19 January 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:: Looks great!! I’ll get on it sometime early next week!! (Ftr I’m usually on a phone but sometimes I’ll go over to a computer for bigger projects, like added links and full researched paragraphs) [[User:Apollo11|Apollo11]] ([[User talk:Apollo11|talk]]) 20:56, 19 January 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::: Amazing! I hope I'll have added all the missing articles by the day after tomorrow. --[[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 21:30, 19 January 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Adding the book-exclusive articles==&lt;br /&gt;
I noticed that there’s not a column for if the article is in the blog. I also don't think some of the ones in the book that aren’t on the blog are in there. Please correct me if I’m wrong. [[User:Apollo11|Apollo11]] ([[User talk:Apollo11|talk]]) 18:17, 21 January 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Yeah, I’ve noticed that some of the What If? Chapters aren’t in the table. I think that we should add them in too '''[[User:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:9pt;color:#A9C6CA&amp;quot;&amp;gt;42.book.addict&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:6pt;color:#516874&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Talk to me!&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;''' 18:42, 21 January 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Thank you all for pointing it out! And again sorry it took me so long, I'm not good at prioritising. (but at least today i did something! I fixed both the YouTube template, there are new instructions on [[User:FaviFake]], and the book templates when used in merged cells. Anyways!)&lt;br /&gt;
::I had forgotten the other table also contained the book-exclusive questions! Of course we should add them! We need to think about this before doing anything though. I have so many questions!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*In what order do we put them? Unfortunately, the chapter of the book are mixed between non-excusive and exclusive.&lt;br /&gt;
*Do we need all the columns?&lt;br /&gt;
 N	Date	Thumbnail	Title	Reader's question	Randall's answer	Books	YouTube&lt;br /&gt;
**What happens to the unnecessary columns? We could merge them, but I'm not sure whether the sorting will work if we merge them.&lt;br /&gt;
*Should we change the columns, so that the '''blog number''' column is more similar to the '''Book''' and '''YouTube''' columns? Or are blog articles more important because they fill all the cells, while book-exclusives don't have all the same info?&lt;br /&gt;
*Is there ANY way you can think of to make the insertion of these articles into the existing index seamless? I'm usually on the side of one big index instead of many little indexes, but I'm having a hard time figuring this out. One of the main reasons I wanted to do this project was so that people wouldn't need to move between 2 different tables to see all articles.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::One way could be to just add all book-exclusive articles, each in their own row, in a big dump on the release date of the book. Even tho it would technically be in chronological order, i don't really like the idea. Please send all your thought! There must me something I'm not thinking of, or something I've been thinking wrong about! --[[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 18:10, 22 January 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::* What order do we put them in&lt;br /&gt;
:: I would do it in the same order as the other table, blog articles first in chronological, what if chapters in chapter order. I believe the YouTube channel is all old questions, but if he posts a new one, then put that below the books.&lt;br /&gt;
::* change blog columns&lt;br /&gt;
::I think you should move the blog date and number to after randalls answer, similar to the books, and for the date for book exclusives maybe jus the book release date? Or NA.&lt;br /&gt;
::* unessery colums&lt;br /&gt;
:: Example?&lt;br /&gt;
::* Seamless integration&lt;br /&gt;
::Just stick them on the bottom, the exact same way you’d put another blog article on the bottom.&lt;br /&gt;
::I think that covers it all? [[User:Apollo11|Apollo11]] ([[User talk:Apollo11|talk]]) 19:15, 22 January 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Sticking the chapters at the end was the same idea I had, and I think that we can just put (What If? Exclusive) inside the date part of the table. '''[[User:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:9pt;color:#A9C6CA&amp;quot;&amp;gt;42.book.addict&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:6pt;color:#516874&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Talk to me!&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;''' 19:22, 22 January 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Thanks for replying so quickly! I don't have time right now to read everything but I can already tell that this is much easier than I thought it would be. I'll answer tomorrow. Before i start overthinking everything: What would you put inside the columns thumbnail, Question, and Answer? Just empty? I'm trying to think of something useful.&lt;br /&gt;
::::Also, what do you think of merging the N (blog) column and the Date columns, just like we do with the YouTube column? Would there be any downsides?&lt;br /&gt;
:::: I hope I'm not preventing it edits by not adding the articles quickly, in the meantime you can help by adding YT videos, now that the template works! --[[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 21:31, 22 January 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::: I think that the YT videos are all added? At least the blog ones and not the What If? exclusive ones. Or maybe Restricted Mode on my home wifi is blocking some. But I think that it’s all done? Tried my best anyways '''[[User:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:9pt;color:#A9C6CA&amp;quot;&amp;gt;42.book.addict&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:6pt;color:#516874&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Talk to me!&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;''' 03:52, 23 January 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::This is great news, thanks! I didn't know there were YouTube videos on book-exclusive articles! I'll get started, this is my plan:&lt;br /&gt;
::::::*The book articles are positioned like the old [[What If? chapters]] table.&lt;br /&gt;
::::::*New column setup:&lt;br /&gt;
 Thumbnail	Title	Reader's question	Randall's answer	'''Blog (this contains both N and Date)'''	Books	YouTube&lt;br /&gt;
::::::*The sometimes-unnecessary columns are left empty.&lt;br /&gt;
::::::*The '''Blog''' column is more similar to the '''Book''' and '''YouTube''' columns: it has a template and colors the cell light blue.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::I feel great about this! We're getting near the finish line. --[[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 15:36, 23 January 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::I think that I added all the What If? And What If? 2 chapters to the table for the ones that were copied from the blog '''[[User:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:9pt;color:#A9C6CA&amp;quot;&amp;gt;42.book.addict&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:6pt;color:#516874&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Talk to me!&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;''' 23:48, 23 January 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::Love it! I hope i'll be able to add some of the missing articles today, but i might not be able to do them all (or any at all). --[[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 18:01, 24 January 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::{{Done}}  I did it! You can now add the missing YT videos :) {{unsigned|FaviFake|20:49, 24 January 2025 (UTC)}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::::Doing it now! '''[[User:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:9pt;color:#A9C6CA&amp;quot;&amp;gt;42.book.addict&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:6pt;color:#516874&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Talk to me!&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;''' 21:24, 24 January 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::::based on the 20 videos that I can see on the YT channel, ALL YT VIDEOS HAVE BEEN ADDED! '''[[User:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:9pt;color:#A9C6CA&amp;quot;&amp;gt;42.book.addict&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:6pt;color:#516874&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Talk to me!&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;''' 21:39, 24 January 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::::::We actually did it! Now all that's left are the explanations, which i'm sure people will prefer doing over merging 2 wikipedia tables. There's just one small problem: I searched for &amp;quot;Featured in What If?,&amp;quot; and instead of 69 results, i got 67. This means two of the articles that are both in the book and in the blog haven't been added. Do you think you could figure out which ones? I also checked the other book and the YouTube videos, and they're all there, it's just the first book. Again, thank you so much for all your work, it would've likely taken weeks to get to this point without your efforts!  --[[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 11:21, 25 January 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
ok, i’ll poke around and see if i can find them. also, I GOT WHAT IF? 10TH ANNIVERSARY! i can add the bonus chapter that is at the end-it’s basically “what if we tried more power” when blasting away at the moon with lasers. '''[[User:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:9pt;color:#A9C6CA&amp;quot;&amp;gt;42.book.addict&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:6pt;color:#516874&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Talk to me!&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;''' 21:22, 25 January 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Congrats on the book! I didn't buy it because i have the original, it's great that someone here owns it. Can you describe in a little more detail the last chapter? I don't understand a few things: does the second YouTube video say exactly the same thing as the blog article? Why are there two videos about 1 article? Or is the second YT video only about the Bonus Chapter in the book, which goes even further than the blog article? Is that bonus chapter not in any other book or blog? Thanks! --[[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 11:13, 26 January 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Also, is the chapter only called Bonus Chapter, or does it also have other names? --[[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 18:15, 26 January 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Sorting &amp;quot;Chapter xx..&amp;quot;==&lt;br /&gt;
Hi... An alternative to the way you are lead-zeroing the text cell's numeric suffix, for sorting purposes, which is what I think {{diff|363528|this is all about}}, would be to do so something like:&lt;br /&gt;
 ... || data-sort-value={{{1}}} | Chapter {{{1}}} || ...&lt;br /&gt;
Should be able to deal with any numeric value, while still rendering it simply as &amp;quot;Chapelter 1&amp;quot;/&amp;quot;Chapter 10&amp;quot;/&amp;quot;Chapter 100&amp;quot;/ etc, but adding ''data-sort-type=&amp;quot;number&amp;quot;'' to the header cell might even be able to sort not-quite-numbers, should a future book ever do chapters like  &amp;quot;... 7, 7a, 9, 10, 11, 12, 12b, 14, ...&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;Perhaps even ''data-sort-value=&amp;lt;booknumber&amp;gt;.&amp;lt;chapternumber&amp;gt;'' would be useful. Though you'd have to use the sufficient-leading-zeroes method, again, and could start at 1.0000001 ''just'' in case there's ever a million (but not more than 10mil-1) chapters in a future bookbut would probably be useful to sort all book-contained items, across all books but not interleaved.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;I'll let you consider if/what you find it more useful. And perhaps check if I've given you the right table markup options by going and checking the Help:Sorting Tables/whatever pages. ;) [[Special:Contributions/141.101.99.107|141.101.99.107]] 00:01, 26 January 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I agree that the current method isn't great, and I'm very glad to see there's another, better way. Unfortunately, I don't really understand most of what you said. BUT! You seem very experienced and I don't have a lot of time, so it would be perfect if you could edit directly the templates/table/cells/whatever needs to be changed. The best option is to remove the leading zeroes and still make the sorting work, for the blog, books, and YT templates. If you (or someone else) could do that, it'd be wonderful. Please feel free to try it yourself if you want! --[[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 11:13, 26 January 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== weird table bugs ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
hey favifake, i found two bugs that i don’t really know how to fix in the table: one of them is in regard to the what if 2 template, whenever it has a “S2” or a “W1” “chapter” it gives an error. the second bug can be found on the laser pointer row-i added the what if? 10th anniversary template, but the yt template doesn’t “fit” (for lack of a better word) with the table. could you dig into these and try to figure out what has gone wrong? thanks! '''[[User:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:9pt;color:#A9C6CA&amp;quot;&amp;gt;42.book.addict&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:6pt;color:#516874&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Talk to me!&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;''' 00:55, 26 January 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Hey 42! I saw what you were trying to do, i think i fixed it now? I removed the '''book3''' template from the original '''Laser Pointer''' row because all original articles are technically in the 10th Ann. book. (i added &amp;quot;exclusively on&amp;quot; to the '''book3''' template to make it clearer). Regarding the other S1 bug, i don't know why but it seems fixed now?? I saw the error just a few hours ago and now it works. I have no idea what happened. Let me know if it reappears or something. --[[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 11:13, 26 January 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Without going in and trying it myself, is this because of the &amp;quot;trying to zero-pad a number&amp;quot; thing (as given a possible alternative, above), because it can't test if &amp;lt;usually number, in this case text&amp;gt; is greater/less than &amp;lt;static number&amp;gt;?&lt;br /&gt;
:Quick-fix (not doing anything else new) would need the test enclosed with an isthisanumber? test (if so, do zero-padding testing, etc; if not, maybe don't try).&lt;br /&gt;
:Exactly how S2/W1 sorts (or doesn't) using the sorting data (bare number only!) and/or the forced data type as number (to do its best for what numeric data it is presented, despite occasional non-numeric interloping characters), would need testing.&lt;br /&gt;
:Or I misunderstand. But, ''if'' I don't, maybe this is useful additional pointer to a solution/acceptance of the problem. [[Special:Contributions/172.71.178.123|172.71.178.123]] 01:21, 26 January 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::IP user, I answered above. :) --[[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 11:13, 26 January 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
== Interesting streamlined 'table furniture', but... ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
...I'm wondering about the current (slight) usage differences between:&lt;br /&gt;
 style=&amp;quot;text-align:center&amp;quot; | {{{1}}}&lt;br /&gt;
and:&lt;br /&gt;
 style=&amp;quot;white-space:nowrap&amp;quot; |&lt;br /&gt;
Do you need to add the Param1 to the nowrap/remove if from the text-alignment?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
And what if someone wanted no-wrap+centre at the same time? There maybe ''are'' ways to combine &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{ac|&amp;lt;foo&amp;gt;}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{nw}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;, but it seems non-trivial to to do. (Unless you make a &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{nwac}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;, but then where do you end?) I'm wondering if you should try it without the |-character.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Let's see if that ''could'' work:&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;margin:auto&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+ Test&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! Foo !! Bar !! Baz&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Normal text of a normal style || style=&amp;quot;text-align:center&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;white-space:nowrap&amp;quot; | This is as if using variations &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{ac|&amp;lt;foo&amp;gt;}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{nw}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt; as rendered without the pipe-character or inconsistent parameter, which is tricky to demonstrate with the actual templates.|| More normal text of a normal style&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Normal text of a normal style || style=&amp;quot;text-align:center&amp;quot; | style=&amp;quot;white-space:nowrap&amp;quot; | This is how &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{ac|{{nw}} &amp;lt;foo&amp;gt;}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt; might look || More normal text of a normal style&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Normal text of a normal style || {{ac|{{nw}} This is how &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{ac|{{nw}} &amp;lt;foo&amp;gt;}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt; ''does'' look, using the current state of the templates.&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;s&amp;gt;''NB. Why is it in bold? Is that a normal feature of a style of text-align:center?''&amp;lt;/s&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
| More normal text of a normal style&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Normal text of a normal style || style=&amp;quot;white-space:nowrap&amp;quot; | style=&amp;quot;text-align:center&amp;quot; | This is how &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{nw}} {{ac|&amp;lt;foo&amp;gt;}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt; might look || More normal text of a normal style&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Normal text of a normal style || {{nw}} {{ac|This is how &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{nw}} {{ac|&amp;lt;foo&amp;gt;}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt; ''does'' look, using the current state of the templates.}}&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;s&amp;gt;''Also goes bold, I notice!''&amp;lt;/s&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
| More normal text of a normal style&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
So, yes, it looks like it might be better to just remove the pipe (or pipe-and-param) and rely on the table-writer to just put in the relevent bare style-giving {{}} (or {{}}s) before the pipe. (I must look into why there's unexpected boldness. I don't know if that comes from the way you templated it or as an associated function of the aligh-center style. But it doesn't appear when I do it 'raw'.) Anyway, food for thought, over to you. It looks like I ''could'' edit your templates, but that might be rude, and would of course instantly break whatever it is you're currently using them (singly) for. That's the ''What If?'' table, I suppose? Anyway, you can both 'fix' how they work and adjust how they are invoked, rather than leaving me to guess about the latter. ;) [[Special:Contributions/162.158.74.49|162.158.74.49]] 19:04, 17 January 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:PS: Yes, I have just checked, and, yes you've added (apparently ''after'' I saw and copied the original {{template|ac}} for my own testing and emulating purposes!) the bolding to the aligh-centering template. That part of the mystery is solved! :P [[Special:Contributions/162.158.74.49|162.158.74.49]] 19:10, 17 January 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:PPS: I know what happened. I copied the (slightly '''formatted''') 'plaintext' as it appeared in the template. If I'd have edited it and copied the wikisource then I'd have grabbed the &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;'''formatted''&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt; as you already had it by the time I passed by. Don't mind me, it was just something that made me wonder. Probably moreso than the thing that I was ''actually'' trying to prod and poke and solve! IOW: Ignore me. On this bit, at least! [[Special:Contributions/172.68.205.151|172.68.205.151]] 19:32, 17 January 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I love how interested you are about this! Honestly i'm not really sure what exactly it is you're asking, but you seem very smart so do whatever you want! My only request is that the {{:ac}} thing keeps working as expected, so i don't have to change the table again. I had forgotten about the {{:nw}} thing, you can delete it or change it or do anything else, I don't use it anymore. Feel free to add to the documentation that these are just for 1 table and might break everything if used anywhere else. Or, if they already work everywhere, great! I remember I created them expecting the entire page to be destroyed when used, and being pleasantly surprised when they worked. So yeah go wild! --[[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 21:19, 17 January 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::I'm not going to make any change without taking time to check your tables and making sure the appropriate change doesn't inflict damage on your attempts to curate the tables you're probably using it for.&lt;br /&gt;
:::But, in short, I understand that you're streamlining the (often longwinded) style=&amp;quot;&amp;quot; statements, an admirble task. In the structure of &amp;quot;| cell || another cell || etc&amp;quot;, you're doing something to save from having to do cumbersome &amp;quot;| cell || style=&amp;quot;this-style: that; that-style: that; the-other-style: the.other&amp;quot; | another cell || etc&amp;quot;, all of which makes editing 'difficult'. (I tend to do such things in Notepad, or whatever separate text editor I have, which lets me add temporary whitespace and use with no-wrap on the markup while I'm working on it, rather than in this textbox editor.)&lt;br /&gt;
::: But the single-pipe that formats the cell isn't a ''great'' difficulty to maintain (indeed, it is useful to line up). As such I'd suggest &amp;quot;| cell || &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{??}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt; | another cell || etc&amp;quot; would be as good. i.e. leave the pipe (intended for the table-cell) out of the template. For the no-wrap version, that's easy enough. Though I do understand that you want to put bold-format about the cell contents, so that's why you give it as a param and explicitly bold the Param1 as you pass it back out.&lt;br /&gt;
::: Maybe the solution to ''that'' is to also add (to the style, along with the text-align:center) the &amp;quot;font-weight: bold&amp;quot; doublet. Then &amp;quot;... || &amp;lt;format(s), as templates and/or raw&amp;gt; | Cell Text || ...&amp;quot; doesn't ''need'' to 'enclose' the Cell Text in any way.&lt;br /&gt;
::: But making the change from something that expects to transclude the &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;range of the template&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; &amp;quot;... || &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;format | Cell Text&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; || ...&amp;quot; to &amp;quot;... || &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;format&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; | Cell Text || ...&amp;quot; obviously requires that each and every table-cell item that uses &amp;quot;... || &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{template|Cell Text}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt; || ...&amp;quot; to be converted to &amp;quot;... || &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{template}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt; | Cell Text || ...&amp;quot;, or... it'll definitely not work as it was originally set.&lt;br /&gt;
::: Anyway, that's just my own vision of how you can do what you seem to have wanted to, without introducing more complications. As the cell-formatting gladly accepts multiple statements of the form style=&amp;quot;...&amp;quot; (it adds &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;style=&amp;quot;...&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;...&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;...&amp;quot;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt; together, much as &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;style=&amp;quot;...; ...; ...&amp;quot;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt; does), an editor now has complete freedom to compound the two format-templates you created. And any additional ones that might be useful. Such ones to usefully colour cell backgrounds as red/yellow/green (for use on the various Confusion Tables), something that I sometimes take a couple of goes to do... not least because I habitually spell 'color' as 'colour'..! ;)&lt;br /&gt;
::: ...but that's just to explain so that (should you/anybody else wish to follow my own instincts on the matter), you have some decent idea of what I'm getting at. There are probably other ways of doing it. Templates can be made to detect and extract pipes, so that &amp;quot;... || &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{template1|{{templete2|Cell Text}}}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; || ...&amp;quot; ''or'' &amp;quot;... || &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{template2|{{templete1|Cell Text}}}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; || ...&amp;quot; would equally produce &amp;quot;... || &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;templateOneOrTwoFormat templateTwoOrOneFormat | Cell Text&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; || ...&amp;quot;, but that would take a degree of of unwieldy parameter-processing functions (that I'd have to work out, probably would involve some subst-function, but might depend upon what's available in the installed mediawiki version). I just think you could avoid all that trouble! [[Special:Contributions/162.158.74.118|162.158.74.118]] 22:51, 17 January 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Forgot to say, that for what you want to use it for, there's ''another'' way:&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;margin:auto&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+ Example 2&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! Number (Centered) !! Foo !! Bar (Centered) !! Baz&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! 1&lt;br /&gt;
| Normal text of a normal style&lt;br /&gt;
! Some text of whatever size (centered)&lt;br /&gt;
| More normal text of a normal style&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! 2&lt;br /&gt;
| Normal text of a normal style&lt;br /&gt;
! Some text of whatever size (also centered, though not so obviously so)&lt;br /&gt;
| More normal text of a normal style&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
:::... This is only possible by newlining each new cell, in the example (you can't do &amp;quot;! cell || cell !! cell || cell&amp;quot;, you have to line-break it as you change from &amp;quot;!&amp;quot;-/&amp;quot;|&amp;quot;-starting cell-groups), but it isn't really so great a loss to do so.&lt;br /&gt;
:::The &amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; class gives these 'header cells' a different background too, but (if you really don't like that) it that can be adjusted in various other ways (including with scope=&amp;quot;col&amp;quot;, I think), or you can leave the wikitable class off (it centres and bolds, but doesn't give cell-borders) and re-add the whole-table bordering style that this now leaves out. But you really don't want me listing ''every'' idea I had, just this one was the other (template-free) option to enforcing centre-aligning bold text on ''certain'' cells. [[Special:Contributions/162.158.74.119|162.158.74.119]] 23:09, 17 January 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Huh, I was actually thinking of doing the opposite of what you're suggesting: include even more pipes inside the template so the editor is cleaner and easier to use. (UPDATE: this probably worse than the other option you gave at the end, see below). So instead of this: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 |-&lt;br /&gt;
 &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;| {{ac|4}} || &amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::You would just use this:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 |-&lt;br /&gt;
 &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{ac|4}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::And it would contain all the pipes needed. I guess then we would have to update the documentation to point out that this template's use case is extremely narrow. Also, if you want to see how it is currently used, the table is on my user page! That's the only place where it's used&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Since you seem very interested in templates, What do you think of the idea of a creating a template like these:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{yt|YTNUMBER (1, 2, 3, etc)|YTLINK|VIDEOTITLE (optional)}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::It would be used in the column that we still need to create. It would also colour the cell in '''red'''. I was also thinking of doing a similar thing for the What If? books:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{bk|WHICH-BOOK|CHAPTER-NUMBER|CHAPTER-TITLE (if different)}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::For example, it would look like this: (This one would also colour the cell based on the book, e.g., green for WI?1, yellow for WI?2, blue for WI10th ed.)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{book|2|69|Jellyfish}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 What If? 2, chapter '''69: Jellyfish'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Would you be able to create something like this? I know nothing about templates, and i doubt I'll be able to ask chatgpt to do everything for me correctly. --[[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 07:16, 18 January 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::&amp;gt; Forgot to say, that for what you want to use it for, there's ''another'' way:&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Oh, i think i had forgotten to read this part!! This seems very interesting! I should try that, since it seems much simpler. --[[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 10:10, 18 January 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::'''Update:''' {{Done}} I applied your suggestion, now the numbers are in their own row:&lt;br /&gt;
 |-&lt;br /&gt;
 !1&lt;br /&gt;
 | The rest of the table&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 10:33, 18 January 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== What If Chapters ==&lt;br /&gt;
Hey FaviFake, there are some What If? Chapters that aren’t included in the blog. Are we going to add them to the table? '''[[User:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:9pt;color:#A9C6CA&amp;quot;&amp;gt;42.book.addict&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:6pt;color:#516874&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Talk to me!&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;''' 17:41, 22 January 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Great timing! You sent me this message while i was in the process of replying to the question. I'm not good at prioritising, I should've definitely responded before doing other edits. Check out my &amp;lt;s&amp;gt;list of questions for y'all&amp;lt;/s&amp;gt; reply above! --[[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 18:10, 22 January 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== YouTube template ==&lt;br /&gt;
Hey FaviFake, on the &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{yt}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt; template, you asked for help on fixing the code of the template. What help do you need to “improve” it? I’m willing to help now that I’m not sick, as I was last week. '''[[User:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:9pt;color:#A9C6CA&amp;quot;&amp;gt;42.book.addict&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:6pt;color:#516874&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Talk to me!&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;''' 18:35, 19 January 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Thank you! Glad to hear you're healthy. That message was mostly a joke, but it is in fact barely held together. (Try modifying the hyperlink that's displayed when a title isn't provided, somehow what you add gets duplicated??) If you have the time and know how to make it more reliable and easily editable in the future, please do! I am honstly scared to touch it fearing it might explode.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Buuut, to be fair there is one template that i desperately needed help with, and that is [[:Template:book]]. I wasted a ton of time to try to get it to change the cell background, and it never worked, so i decided to create [[Template:book1]], [[Template:book2]], [[Template:book3]], [[Template:book4]], and these do work beaytifully, but are harder to edit in bulk. (I still have profound hatred towards [[Template:book]]...). If you actually manage to do what i wanted (which i'm not sure is even clear after the all the mess i've made... ask me if you can't figure it out!), I would be very grateful. PS. I'm not sure if i should warn you, given my very low ability to create templates, but it's definitely not easy, imo.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I'm not sure how skilled you are at template editing, so if you want, you can absolutely continue uploading the What If? thumbnails like you did a few days ago! I just added [[User:FaviFake|a new batch of articles]] (about 60) thanks to some annoyingly complex jailbreaking of Google's NotebookLM. The new table of course includes the quick 100px link to upload a file. Again, thanks for reaching out! --[[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 19:04, 19 January 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::The YT link appears to be going to &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;[[whatever the name of the YouTube video is called]]&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt; and not acting as a [youtube.com filler thingy] linking to a YouTube video. I’m going to hit the books on template writing and try to see if I can do anything about it. Cheers! '''[[User:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:9pt;color:#A9C6CA&amp;quot;&amp;gt;42.book.addict&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:6pt;color:#516874&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Talk to me!&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;''' 03:11, 21 January 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Oh great, that's broken too. I didn't even realise it. Thanks!--[[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 04:57, 21 January 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Partly because you've removed the bit about how to better sort the book-column elements, but are using the same trick in the youtube-column, and partly because it's easier (more on that in a moment), I've just modified the {{template|yt}} to give it the sort value (of article number) directly. Have not removed the expression test to make &amp;quot;6th video ...&amp;quot; into &amp;quot;06th video ...&amp;quot;, for sorting purposes, but I feel confident that you ''can'' do that (and remove the comment about making it give &amp;quot;006th video ...&amp;quot;, in future, should that become necessary) if you now so wish.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:For the books, I was thinking that if, instead of &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;=&amp;quot;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{{1|0}}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;quot;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;, you could maybe use &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;=&amp;quot;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{#expr:10000+{{{1|0}}}}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;quot;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt; for ''What If?'' (in {{template|book1}}) and &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;=&amp;quot;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{#expr:20000+{{{1|0}}}}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;quot;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt; for ''What If? 2'' (in {{template|book2}}), to let it sort by book ''and then'' chapter within book...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:For ''What If? 10th Anniversary Edition'' ({{template|book3}}), I was thinking if you could make the added-to number 11000. Though anything from above 10000+&amp;lt;last chapter number&amp;gt; and below 20000-&amp;lt;last chapter number&amp;gt; would do (and 15000 would work), it leaves room to make any appearance of the 15th anniversary, 20th anniversary, 42nd anniversary, ..., 95th anniversary be able to use the mnemonic offsets of 11500+, 12000+, 14200+, ..., 19500+.. ;) Obviously, it would need revamping if there becomes a centenary edition of Book 1 (or any version of it ever gets ''so many'' &amp;quot;bonus chapters&amp;quot; that it breaks out of its own sequence into the next extant anniversary edition. But you'd need to start adding 100 newly-numbered chapters ''per year'' to do that, so probably not likely. But, right now, the sorting on the &amp;quot;Exclusive to ''What If? 10th Anniversary Edition''&amp;quot; line sorts ''before'' the &amp;quot;NNth chapter of ''What If?''&amp;quot; lines. The above should fix that...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:And the format can be used for other (future?) books and their (possible) reissues: For ''What If? '''N''''', reissued '''YY''' years after the original, that's the number &amp;quot;NYY00&amp;quot;, to which you add the chapter number. Fairly futureproofed, but if Randall ''ever'' publishes anything that makes you need to make the offset &amp;quot;NNYYY000&amp;quot; (e.g. for the quarter-of-a-millenium reissue of ''What If? 15'', having a total of 512 chapters being 15250000+[1..512]) then I reckon the requisite changes will be easy enough to handle as and when, swapping in the expanded offset. And... hey... if they're still being written, ''and'' published, then I can only hope I'm still around to be able to add that edition to my bookshelf!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:You could even redo the {{template|book}} idea (parameters of ...|book=#|chapter=#|optional:edition=#?|...) to only ever need to maintain the one source with ''all'' this flexibility. You've already got experience (by the 1st/2nd/3rd/Nth code) with what's needed to translate Book Number(+Edition Number, if applicable) into unique background colour codes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The big problem, though, is still the non-numeric chapter 'numbers' in ''WI?2''. I have two (or three) different thoughts about that.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:*For only the numeric bits (currently, in the test for less-than-10, etc; in the above for within the &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;data-sort-value=&amp;quot;...&amp;quot;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;) you might want to switch &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{{1|0}}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt; with &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{#if:{{#ifexpr:{{{1|0}}}}}|99|{{{1|0}}}}}{{{1|0}}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;... This should test the param1 value for being a valid value (or missing, when you already make it zero... though not sure for what circumstance you should consider it validly missing) and using it if it is so, or else using the value &amp;quot;99&amp;quot; (or you could have &amp;quot;0&amp;quot;, or &amp;quot;0.5&amp;quot;, or whatever floats your boat). Then at least you'd get ''a'' value (that doesn't cause errors), though it probably wouldn't be sorted very precisely (though appear just after/before all other chapters of the book).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:*The other idea is to use &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{{effectiveChapter|{{{1|0}}}}}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;, then you can append a parameter of &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;...|effectiveChapter=11.5}}&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt; to a non-numeric one sitting between actual chapters 11 and 12 (I haven't checked if that's an actual example, but imagine it is...). Also, for multiple items on page-chapter, you could even have =11.51, =11.52, =11.53, etc, to retain order within the book and ''upon the page''... (You could also give effectiveChapter as &amp;quot;NYYCC(.optional)&amp;quot; format, direct, for ''all'' what if? Numbers, YYearly-editions and CChapters (with possibly sub-positions), come to that, but I don't see that as any simpler a solution as building it in.)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:*The third option would be to use (for hidden sorting-only purpose, mostly) a value of P(.optionalDecimal) either as another numeric parameter or a named one, with P as ''page number'', not chapter number. But, given how hardback vs. paperback (or just another imprint, not necessarily even a Anniversary redo, but I've got the UK edition with an additional UK foreword) ''might'' effect page numbers and/or where end-of-pages interupts any given chapter internals, it's possible that this is not consistent enough. But food for thought, maybe. Only needs to be definitively done once (or thoroughly checked and shuffled along as nevessary if redone to include other changes that require consistency).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Any of that make sense? Hopefully I've at least given you enough examples to ponder, where not immediately obvious. I'd ''really'' rather not change all your hard work just for the sake of a minor cosmetic change with a possibly major set of retouches, which is one of the reasons why I thought I'd do just the basic Youtube 'sort assisting' bit and let those of you who have already had so much 'fun' (tweaking the table formats) decide if and how you make full use of it. Assuming it isn't (differently) broken, for whatever reason may crop up, it shouldn't be a problem if you do nothing at all more with it (either in the {{template|yt}} or {{template|book#}}s). [[Special:Contributions/172.71.241.26|172.71.241.26]] 14:38, 28 January 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Thank you so much! Would you mind if I moved your message to [[Talk:What If? chapters]], to group everything regarding the index in one place?&amp;lt;!-- Do as you wish, it's your Talk namespace, here, and *if* you can make it halfway readable then you can display it where you like, on my behalf. You (and Firestar) made decent use of my ideas, which I had no time to get into the actual implementation of. Signed: that IP again.--&amp;gt; &amp;lt;!--Got it! Thank you. Signed: FaviFake--&amp;gt; Anyways:&lt;br /&gt;
*I did the thing on the yt and {{template|blog}} one and it works!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 For the books, I was thinking that if, instead of &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;=&amp;quot;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{{1|0}}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;quot;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;, you could maybe use &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;=&amp;quot;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{#expr:10000+{{{1|0}}}}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;quot;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt; for ''What If?'' (in {{template|book1}}) and &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;=&amp;quot;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{#expr:20000+{{{1|0}}}}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;quot;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt; for ''What If? 2'' (in {{template|book2}}), to let it sort by book ''and then'' chapter within book...&lt;br /&gt;
*Done! Thanks! For ({{template|book3}}) i used 30000 to have the chapter in chronological order.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 You could even redo the {{template|book}} idea&lt;br /&gt;
*Sorry but I'm not touching that... ''thing'' anymore. That template traumatized me (jk! if you want to try fixing it i'd be very happy)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 For only the numeric bits (currently, in the test for less-than-10, etc; in the above for within the &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;data-sort-value=&amp;quot;...&amp;quot;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;) you might want to switch &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{{1|0}}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt; with &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{#if:{{#ifexpr:{{{1|0}}}}}|99|{{{1|0}}}}}{{{1|0}}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;... This should test the param1 value for being a valid value (or missing, when you already make it zero... though not sure for what circumstance you should consider it validly missing) &lt;br /&gt;
*I'm not sure why that's needed (and also how to actually implement it). What happens if the value is invalid? it seems to work. Or is it required for the other improvements you suggested?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 The other idea is...&lt;br /&gt;
 The third option would be...&lt;br /&gt;
*Yeah this seems pretty hard to solve easily (which is why i'd love it if you did it!). I guess it'll stay slightly broken until it becomes a bigger issue. --[[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 16:54, 28 January 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::It seems like you just forgot to escape pipe characters in the [[Template:book|book template]] in the table within the switch statement, so it just interpreted the non-formatting statements to be a case grouped with the next 'actual' case [[User:Firestar233|guess who]] ([[User talk:Firestar233|if you desire conversing]] | [[Special:Contributions/Firestar233|what i have done]]) 07:23, 29 January 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::BTW I fixed the book template. It should now appear the same as the other templates, and even work with the youtube template [[User:Firestar233|guess who]] ([[User talk:Firestar233|if you desire conversing]] | [[Special:Contributions/Firestar233|what i have done]]) 09:13, 29 January 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::OMG THANK YOU SO MUCH!!! IT ACTUALLY WORKS! What! How! Why!&lt;br /&gt;
:::Thanks so much for fixing the template! I can't describe how glad I am to see it working as (and even better than) I wanted. My life is finally complete. I have switched to using your template in the index.&lt;br /&gt;
:::The reason there was a YT link in one of the {{template|book}} documentation examples is because I was going insane and likely pasted it there by accident. From what I can tell, you seem to have set up {{template|book}} so well that {{template|book}} accepts a YouTube link as input, while the {{template|yt}} template it's based on doesn't if used by itself (requires only the ID). I love this! Since we're gonna have many YT videos to add, it's great to have a much simpler option which doesn't require extracting the ID of the video. Is there a way you could maybe incorporate this improvement into {{template|yt}} itself? Or maybe you're 10 steps ahead of me and you've already done it (which wouldn't surprise me given the amount of wizardry you used on these bad boys!), and I just didn't notice. Please let me know! And again, thank you so much!!! --[[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 17:56, 29 January 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Also, since you've already rendered 4 templates useless thanks to your improvements, why not also add {{template|yt}} to the list of pages to delete, by incorporating it into {{template|book}}? This, unlike {{template|book}}, is absolutely not needed, and I also have no idea if it's as easy as a simple copy-and-paste, or if it requires more work. If it's the latter, please don't do it if you don't want to! I'm just throwing ideas around! --[[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 18:04, 29 January 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
That IP, here. I (think) I fixed the sorting ''and'' error-fallback issues. I think (without trying to roll back to how you had it) you 'broke the sort' by putting in line-feeds (maybe double-ones), that messed up the table/cell handling. Then you broke the handling by commenting out too much (you needed to &amp;quot;&amp;lt; ! - -&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;- - &amp;gt;&amp;quot;, without spaces, without crossing the quotes and |ing boundaries in data-sort-value=&amp;quot;...&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;...&amp;quot; and the 'release', by pipe symbol, to cell-contents).&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Recommented for it to work normally, first without the new 'sort assistance' and then with again. Had a look at the error-catcher (went down a blind alley, at first) and made it an explicit &amp;quot;catch all other inputs&amp;quot; for the errororing display, which I formatted in a more obvious manner ''and'' forced to sort to the start. (Well, almost the start. It puts empty cells with no sorting 'ahead' of even the -999 value I made it give any error-caught cells.)&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;If it were me, I'd be happy to have {{template|yt}} entirely separate from the {{template|book}} handling. It is mnemonically confusing and adds needless (and possibly error-prone) &amp;quot;if we have far too many params for Book template, feed it all into the Youtube template&amp;quot;. Unless you're folding the ''whole'' Youtube template into the body of the Book one (even more work to maintain/debug), it's just adding complication for both server and editors who feel forced to use it. The beauty of the monolithic Book template is that (otherwise identical) &amp;quot;Book N, chapter C, optional new title T&amp;quot; information is trivially similar between different Ns. But it's not my project.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;I'll have a dig about in maybe how to have a table sort &amp;quot;valueless&amp;quot; cells (in reality the empty value of cell absolutely without anything in it) beyond the sort-valued ones. The 'easiest' means I could imagine is to accept &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{book|0}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;, needing no further params, to create a &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;data-sort-value=&amp;quot;999999&amp;quot; |''&amp;lt;blank&amp;gt;''&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt; cell-definition, and have every book-column cell without a book-reference explicitly use that (ditto for &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{yt|0}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt; to have the same pre-trap to it). But seems wasteful. A template &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{empty}}, or even something like {{e}},&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt; (without checking if either of those are free names) could also just give us this behaviour straight off, of course. It's potentially a lot of fuss to make consistent and flexible enough, either way.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;But what I already did probably also needs to be checked for more edge-conditions... I may still have to tweak things when I have a better chance of catching errors (very difficult, on a tablet), and quicker. [[Special:Contributions/172.70.162.196|172.70.162.196]] 21:32, 29 January 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:I also think that the book template shouldn't be used for the videos, on the basis that youtube is not a book.&lt;br /&gt;
:for the default cell, it would probably take no arguments (i.e. just &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{yt}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;), and it would also probably be it's own template rather than implemented on each template. However, I have done some digging, and empty cells (cells with no sort value) are given a value of &amp;quot;-infinity&amp;quot;, so they sort as the absolute minimum no matter what sort method is used (which means always at the top when sorting ascending). I have been looking to find a way to make a row always sort to the bottom regardless of sort order if the column that is sorted has an empty/valueless cell at that row, but if it exists, it is not documented.&lt;br /&gt;
:Interestingly, it is possible to sort by many columns at once by shift-clicking the second column after sorting the first column, and the rows will be sorted within the first sorting. it might be useful for sorting by chapter within each book [[User:Firestar233|guess who]] ([[User talk:Firestar233|if you desire conversing]] | [[Special:Contributions/Firestar233|what i have done]]) 06:51, 30 January 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::Yes, a book (or youtube) template could default to whatever seems suitable as sort-value without params, but it might be more obvious if explicitly book(/video) zero. Or caught by &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{book|nobook=yet}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;, or whatever. I'm trying to think what looks least confusing to future editors (those expanding/editing the table, and/or template(s)), but conflicted about what to anticipate.&lt;br /&gt;
::I had indeed been looking to see if the -infinity thing could be overriden by a column header defined &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;blank-sort-value=&amp;quot;999999&amp;quot;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt; sort of thing. If nothing else, you'd expect there to be a perceived need to sort a range of cells so that explicit negative and explicit positive contents, either by actual cell value or data-sort-value, to sit either side of blank cells... Not ''all'' the time, as sorting to show blanks ''separate'' from filled rows with actual zeroes is also useful, but it seems to useful not to have been suggested as a configurable change.&lt;br /&gt;
::The booknumber*A_LARGE_NUMBER offset to the chapter number is probably one of the most useful ways to sort by (primarily) book, then chapter, as it takes just one click. (I believe clicking the secondary and then clicking the primary does the same job as clicking the primary and shift-clicking the primary.) I see so little use to doing a primary sort by chapter (with or without secondary sorting by books, or any other column's detail), to interleave all chapter 1s and so on, that having a &amp;quot;book #&amp;quot; column and a &amp;quot;chapter(/page) #&amp;quot; column (two cells in sequence easily created by the book template, and could also handle the double-blank needed by book=none implementation, if we went that route) would be just complicating matters in an unnecessary manner. (As opposed to how we've complicated matters in a 'necessary' one!)&lt;br /&gt;
::Good catch on bringing the BOOK+CHAPTER sort value out of the #switch, BTW, as I was debating how much of the switch-statement I could treat as generic and not need repeating. (My original idea for the 10th Anniversary version of Book 1 to be effectively &amp;quot;Book1.1&amp;quot; made me still want to option of overriding the N*10000 as being 3=&amp;gt;11000 instead of =&amp;gt;30000, but that could ''still'' be implemented by a bit of &amp;quot;(if N=3, 1.1, else N) times 10000&amp;quot; pre-logic, ''or'' by handling &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{book|1.10|...}} instead of {{book|3|...}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;. Anyway, not important, either way.)&lt;br /&gt;
::...all this is why I left Favi (and you/others) get on with the original restructuring effort without jumping in (despite having two of the three books, and having seen all the youtubes). I had plenty of ideas of what to do, but did not want to restructure anything from what seemed to be a happy little project with its own momentum and targets. I finally gave in when I noticed an impasse being hit, with errors and confusion, to which I since ''hope'' I have provided a net reduction in both. Though it's only the first of these about which I'm fairly confident. ;) Anyway, perhaps I'm sliding back to my position on the sidelines, now... [[Special:Contributions/172.70.91.245|172.70.91.245]] 11:20, 30 January 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::These comments are great and extremely detailed, thank you! Thanks to your efforts I was able to retire these templates: book1, book2, book3, book4, and yt, so now we only have the huge {{template|book}} template and {{template|blog}}. I kinda agree with IP that it might not be future-proof, but I don't really see a reason to believe we'll add 2 more parameters to the book-specific columns. And even then, it's not that hard to update the template. But please do let me know if you can think of other issues with the current implementation! --[[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 19:50, 30 January 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
I've added a minor feature to the template so that we can see which short video one is. For example, the &amp;quot;everyone jump&amp;quot; short is the 17th one posted, so it now displays on the table as &amp;quot;17th Short video, on 2025‑11‑25: What if everyone on Earth was in the same place and jumped at the same time?&amp;quot;. Hope it helps! [[User:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font:11pt Cormorant Garamond&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#5CA7CF&amp;quot;&amp;gt;tor&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#F08DB0&amp;quot;&amp;gt;i :3&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font:8pt Cormorant Garamond&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#9E9E9E&amp;quot;&amp;gt;talk &amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#F08DB0&amp;quot;&amp;gt;to &amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#5CA7CF&amp;quot;&amp;gt;me!&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 17:38, 11 February 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Thanks! Initially i didn't add it to allow column sorting to work only for videos, but now that there are many shorts the number is definitely neeeded somehwere :) [[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 20:39, 13 February 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== tldr ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
hey favifake! i just came back from a 5 day yosemite trip, that’s why i have been awol for that time. could you please really quick give me a tldr of what has been going on in the past couple days? i see that we finished the index, but i’m just wondering if there’s anything else. thanks! '''[[User:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:9pt;color:#A9C6CA&amp;quot;&amp;gt;42.book.addict&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:6pt;color:#516874&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Talk to me!&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;''' 02:52, 1 February 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Welcome back! We now only use the {{template|book}} and {{template|blog}} templates, all the others have been merged into {{template|book}} by the incredible [[User:Firestar233]], the templates are much more solid, they also added all the questions and almost all the what if? 2-exclusive chapters. So now we're only missing the questions from the first book and an explanation for the third's bonus chapter (which you own!). I don't have much time, but you can look at the history of the templates and the main what if chapters page, and also this talk section. There's also a to-do list above the index! --[[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 18:32, 1 February 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::ok, great! i'll try to work on the chapter explainations once i find the time '''[[User:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:9pt;color:#A9C6CA&amp;quot;&amp;gt;42.book.addict&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:6pt;color:#516874&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Talk to me!&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;''' 21:04, 1 February 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Amazing! Thanks for your help. If you're interested, I've just added a simple (yet boring) task:&lt;br /&gt;
:::*''&amp;quot;Need to add the name(s) of the readers who asked each questions. It's easy! The instructions are in the ''[[What If? chapters#Editors|Editors section]]''!&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
:::If you have time, the names are missing for some book-exclusive articles and the blog articles. --[[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 10:59, 2 February 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Table for smaller screens ==&lt;br /&gt;
Do we think we should list out who asked each question in the table? [[User:Firestar233|guess who]] ([[User talk:Firestar233|if you desire conversing]] | [[Special:Contributions/Firestar233|what i have done]]) 03:09, 2 February 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:If so (and I'm not sure it's necessary), please not as an extra column. Already it's squeezing what's there down, something chronic. At least on my current screen, right now. &lt;br /&gt;
:*The thumbnail column can't get smaller (unless we use smaller/downscaled thukbnails, of course, but there's a limit to that)&lt;br /&gt;
:*The title column (of the first non-hdader is &amp;quot;Relatacistic(Newline)Baseball&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
:*The &amp;quot;Reader's(Newline)question&amp;quot; column goes &amp;quot;(quote)What would(Newline)happen if you(Newline)(...etc)&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
:*The &amp;quot;Randall's answer&amp;quot; column is positively spacious (no doubt forced to be so by the &amp;quot;Too short!&amp;quot; infoboxes), letting it read &amp;quot;The ball would create plasma and(Newline)reach home plate by about 70(Newline)(...etc)&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
:*The three columns for Blog/Book/Vid couldn't be narrower and make sense.&lt;br /&gt;
:If the questioner is to be asked, set it after the question (same cell, maybe horizontal rule).&lt;br /&gt;
:In fact, what do you think of the following layout modification?&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;sortable wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
!Title&lt;br /&gt;
!Question / Answer&lt;br /&gt;
!Blog&lt;br /&gt;
!Books&lt;br /&gt;
!YouTube&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|'''{{what if|1|Relativistic Baseball}}'''&lt;br /&gt;
 [[File:Relativistic Baseball.png|100px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|''&amp;quot;What would happen if you tried to hit a baseball pitched at 90% the speed of light?&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Ellen McManis&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
The ball would create plasma and reach home plate by about 70 nanoseconds. The result would be some kind of nuclear explosion, destroying everything about a mile from the field. A ruling of &amp;quot;{{w|hit by pitch}}&amp;quot; could be interpreted in this situation.&lt;br /&gt;
|{{blog|1|2012|07|10}}&lt;br /&gt;
|{{book|1|2}}&lt;br /&gt;
|{{book|5|2024|02|06|3EI08o-IGYk|What if you threw a baseball at nearly light speed?}}&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|'''{{what if|2|SAT Guessing}}'''&lt;br /&gt;
 [[File:SAT Guessing.png|100px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|''&amp;quot;What if everyone who took the SAT guessed on every multiple-choice question? How many perfect scores would there be?&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Rob Balder&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
No one would get a perfect score. The odds of guessing correctly on every question would be less than the odds of every ex-living president at that time and the main cast of [[:Category:Firefly|Firefly]] getting struck by lightning on the same day.&lt;br /&gt;
|{{blog|2|2012|07|10|7d early}}&lt;br /&gt;
|{{book|1|66}}&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
:Saves trouble of having emphatically unsortable columns, this way, being mere continuations of the cell contents we ''do'' want to sort. Assuming we don't decide we want to sort by &amp;quot;Firstname(s) Lastname&amp;quot; (or &amp;quot;Lastname, Firstname(s)&amp;quot;), as well as by sorting by &amp;quot;What would...&amp;quot; / &amp;quot;What if...&amp;quot; / &amp;quot;How much...&amp;quot; / &amp;quot;Is there...&amp;quot;ness, etc. But that's another step with another answer to it. (e.g. a &amp;quot;By&amp;quot; column with data-sort-value=&amp;quot;Lastname, Firstname(s)&amp;quot; defined but ''no visible content''... It'll be as minimally thin as &amp;quot;By&amp;quot; and the sort-glyph allows, only minimally squeezing the other columns. ...if that's more desirous than merely 'data-sort-value'ing the Question(/Name)/Answer field by name (whatever format), and finding little real reason to sort the &amp;quot;How&amp;quot;s from the &amp;quot;What&amp;quot;s from the &amp;quot;Is&amp;quot;s. But that's something that deserves more thought!)&lt;br /&gt;
:But what I ''do'' highly suggest (at least add the &amp;quot;Who&amp;quot; after the &amp;quot;Question&amp;quot;, same cell, and looks nice with right-align; on top of that, cell-mergering like this, ''probably'' with the horizontal rule markup in the Q&amp;amp;A divide) looks good to me.&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;quot;Relativistic Baseball&amp;quot;(noNewline!) and &amp;quot;(quote)What would happen if you tried to hit a&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;(Newline, etc...)&amp;quot; is how the example table pans out in Preview, which is an improvement for readability.&lt;br /&gt;
:I won't pre-emptimptively assume you're ok with this plan, but (if it seems the idea is liked/not disliked), when I have the time to do it I could blitz this (or any other consensus change of similar radicality, that gets proposed instead) later on (at least 12 hours from now, maybe a full day...). I'll do what I can to fill (or visibly format, if already there) such authors as I'm not left totally stumped about for whatever nazcent reason. Sound good to y'all? ;) [[Special:Contributions/141.101.98.190|141.101.98.190]] 05:00, 2 February 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Thanks for your suggestions! These are my thoughts:&lt;br /&gt;
 Do we think we should list out who asked each question in the table?&lt;br /&gt;
::Yes! I thought about doing this after you commented each reader after the question, but didn't have the time. The ay you went about adding them makes it very easy to create a &amp;quot;find-and-replace&amp;quot; to do it for all cells at once.This is how I'd do it:&lt;br /&gt;
:: &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;''&amp;quot;Question?&amp;quot;''&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:: &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;—Rob Balder&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 In fact, what do you think of the following layout modification?&lt;br /&gt;
 [...] cell-mergering like this, ''probably'' with the horizontal rule markup in the Q&amp;amp;A divide) looks good to me.&lt;br /&gt;
::I don't really like it and I don't think it's needed, mainly because it only looks good on a small screen. Meanwhile, on a normal-sized desk monitor, it makes the table '''almost twice as tall''' on my end. I don't think we should optimise for smaller screens and disregard other users with a larger screen real estate. If you find any other way to improve the table on both screen sizes, please do let us know!&lt;br /&gt;
 (e.g. a &amp;quot;By&amp;quot; column with data-sort-value=&amp;quot;Lastname, Firstname(s)&amp;quot; defined but ''no visible content''... It'll be as minimally thin as &amp;quot;By&amp;quot; and the sort-glyph allows, only minimally squeezing the other columns.&lt;br /&gt;
::I don't really like this idea, seems confusing for the end user (why is there an empty column?), doesn't add so much value, and needs to be maintained. If someone wants to sort by reader alphabetically, they'll likely find a way to isolate the '''&amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;—Rob Balder&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;''' part.&lt;br /&gt;
 But what I ''do'' highly suggest (at least add the &amp;quot;Who&amp;quot; after the &amp;quot;Question&amp;quot;, same cell, and looks nice with right-align [...]&lt;br /&gt;
::Love that! See above.&lt;br /&gt;
::--[[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 09:01, 2 February 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I formatted them! All the ones that were added as comments in the table are now visible. I also added this to-do, mainly for blog posts:&lt;br /&gt;
::*Need to add the name(s) of the readers who asked each questions. It's easy! The instructions are in the ''[[What If? chapters#Editors|Editors section]]''!&lt;br /&gt;
::--[[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 10:57, 2 February 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Regarding &amp;quot;...on a normal-sized desk monitor, it makes the table '''almost twice as tall''' on my end.&amp;quot; my display (non-desktop) has ultra-wide aspect ratio (when landscape; I rarely use portrait for browsing because then web-pages are scaled to unreadable levels).&lt;br /&gt;
:::With side-by-side Q and A columns, the &amp;quot;Too small&amp;quot; warning box dictates the minimum width of the Answer column, making the Question column even more narrow (when you take the minimum width of the thumbnail out of the horizontal space, then the title and the three &amp;quot;occurance&amp;quot; columns fight for what remains) than it might otherwise need to be. (If/when we remove ''all'' these hints to edit longer answer-'summaries', the table will doubtless realign its contents to a more equitable share of width between columns.)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Most often, this still results in (non-short) &amp;quot;Answer&amp;quot; columns being longer than they need to be, and forcing the whole row to be vertically wasteful. An opposite case (such as replicated below) does it with the Question having to have excessive linefeeds, being less readable (needs scrolling to read it all) and leaving a vast desert of blankness in the cell to its immediate right.&lt;br /&gt;
:::Isolating just the Q and A columns (to remove other confounding factors, for most displays except maybe phones-in-portrait - which is already an abominable mode and I find most websites look ''far'' more unreadable in ultra-tall-portrait orientation, so I generally avoid doing that on my tablet) and manually adding the line-breaks I see, you get:&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;sortable wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;quot;When my wife&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;and I started&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;dating she&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;invited me over&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;for dinner at one&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;time. Her&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;kitchen had&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;something&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;called Bauhaus&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;chairs, which are&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;full of holes,&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;approx 5-6&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;millimeters in&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;diameter in both&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;back and seat.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;During this&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;lovely dinner I&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;was forced to&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;liberate a small&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;portion of wind&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;and was relieved&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;that I managed&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;to do so very&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;discretely. Only&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;to find that the&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;chair I sat on&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;converted the&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;successful&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;silence into a&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;perfect, and&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;loud, flute note.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;We were both&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;(luckily) amazed&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;and surprised&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;and I have often&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;wondered what&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;the odds are for&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;something like&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;that happening.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;We kept the&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;chairs for five&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;years but&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;despite laborious&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;attempts it&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;couldn't be&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;reproduced.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|This... isn’t actually a question, but&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;thank you for sharing!&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
:::Integrating the row into the above-suggested format of table, we get (showing just that single combined Q+A cell, minus any &amp;quot;by&amp;quot;-line), the following:&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;sortable wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;quot;When my wife and I started dating she invited&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;me over for dinner at one time. Her kitchen had&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;something called Bauhaus chairs, which are full&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;of holes, approx 5-6 millimeters in&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;diameter in both back and seat. During this lovely dinner I&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;was forced to liberate a small portion of wind&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;and was relieved that I managed to do so very&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;discretely. Only to find that the chair I sat on&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;converted the successful silence into a perfect,&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;and loud, flute note. We were both (luckily)&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;amazed and surprised and I have often&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;wondered what the odds are for something like&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;that happening. We kept the chairs for five&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;years but despite laborious attempts it couldn't be reproduced.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
This... isn’t actually a question, but thank you&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;for sharing!&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
:::Yes, the non-Q&amp;amp;A cells (which I've left out, just there) are still comparatively empty (especially as &amp;quot;Relativistic Baseball&amp;quot; isn't forced into two lines, and even the final three columns don't need quite as many linefeeds between them ...you could probably narrow them further by forcing some linebreaks back into them, giving even more width to Q+A column), but they're actually often ''less'' empty because they aren't as artifically tall as a function of =max(height(question),height(answer)), instead being =height(wider(question+answer)). The conversion to not force a short question to inhabit a desolately empty cell as long as narrowly squashed answer, ''and'' a short answer to be as long as an even more narrowly squashed question, seems to be more wasteful of space than to give combined Q&amp;amp;A far more width and let it be ''exactly'' as long as it needs to be for both to fill it (being the crux of the row, the rest being 'annotations' to the paragraphed question/answer interplay).&lt;br /&gt;
:::Though I'm not next to my own desktop display, right now, I can tell you that the space-wasting I'm showing is notable (though not quite so egregious) there, too, and I had already thought to try out (at least for a Preview) a Q+A column.&lt;br /&gt;
:::I wasn't, at that time, even thinking of thumbnail+title columns merging (which would help even more), but I'm sorely tempted now. Whether or not Q+A merging is accepted by the wider set of editors. Merging title+thumbnail ''could'' trivially let the Q-column expand maybe to double its current width, depending upon the other dynamics involved in apportioning rendered width and height. [[Special:Contributions/172.70.90.9|172.70.90.9]] 13:00, 2 February 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Ok, for reference: The desktop machine has the following line-feeds for the above example, as ''currently'' shown in the Thumbnail|Title|Question|Answer|... format:&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;sortable wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;quot;When my wife and I started dating she invited me&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;over for dinner at one time. Her kitchen&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;had something called Bauhaus chairs, which are full of&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;holes, approx 5-6 millimeters in diameter in both&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;back and seat. During this lovely dinner I was forced&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;to liberate a small portion of wind and was relieved&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;that I managed to do so very discretely. Only to find&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;that the chair I sat on converted the successful&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;silence into a perfect, and loud, flute note. We were&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;both (luckily) amazed and surprised and I have often&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;wondered what the odds are for something like that&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;happening. We kept the chairs for five years but&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;despite laborious attempts it couldn't be&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;reproduced.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|This... isn’t actually a question, but thank you for sharing!(Single line!)&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
:::Testing the above-suggested format of table, we get:&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;sortable wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;quot;When my wife and I started dating she invited me over for dinner at one time. Her kitchen had something called Bauhaus&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;chairs, which are full of holes, approx 5-6 millimeters in diameter in both back and seat. During this lovely dinner I was&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;forced to liberate a small portion of wind and was relieved that I managed to do so very discretely. Only to find that the&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;chair I sat on converted the successful silence into a perfect, and loud, flute note. We were both (luckily) amazed and surprised&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;and I have often wondered what the odds are for something like that happening. We kept the chairs for five years but&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;despite laborious attempts it couldn't be reproduced.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
This... isn’t actually a question, but thank you for sharing!&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
:::Again, produces shorter (and more readable?) rows. In this particularly extreme example, at least. [[Special:Contributions/162.158.74.49|162.158.74.49]] 14:25, 2 February 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::::Thanks for your answer, these are my thoughts:&lt;br /&gt;
 the &amp;quot;Too small&amp;quot; warning box dictates the minimum width of the Answer column, making the Question column even more narrow [...] than it might otherwise need to be&lt;br /&gt;
::::*I hadn't thought of that, but still: if the issue is mainly caused by these notices, it's very easy to replace them with something else that doesn't force the column to be too wide.&lt;br /&gt;
  I generally avoid doing that on my tablet&lt;br /&gt;
::::*Oh, you're still the same IP as before! Hey there! My point ''wasn't'' that your idea wouldn't benefit small-sized screens like tablets (because it does, as you proved!), but that we should mainly focus on desktop users, which is how most readers that aren't on their phones will use the index. I don't like the idea of making the experience worse for everyone except tablet users (and phone users, but i can't imagine someone browsing such a huge index on their phones, so i don't think we should consider them). I'd love it you could improve the experience for both types of devices!&lt;br /&gt;
 &amp;quot;When my wife and I started dating she invited me over for dinner at one time. Her kitchen&lt;br /&gt;
::::*I think that's a bad example because the question is 4x the normal question length and there is no answer. I don't think we'd want to optimise the index so that that specific article looks better but most other articles don't.&lt;br /&gt;
::::*I think the perfect example of how it will one day look is article 2, with the question being slightly shorter than the answer, and that difference being balanced by the name of the reader who asked the question:&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;sortable wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
!class=&amp;quot;unsortable&amp;quot;|Thumbnail&lt;br /&gt;
!Title&lt;br /&gt;
!Reader's question&lt;br /&gt;
!class=&amp;quot;unsortable&amp;quot;|Randall's answer&lt;br /&gt;
!Blog&lt;br /&gt;
!Books&lt;br /&gt;
!YouTube&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:SAT Guessing.png|100px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|'''{{what if|2|SAT Guessing}}'''&lt;br /&gt;
|''&amp;quot;What if everyone who took the SAT guessed on every multiple-choice question? How many perfect scores would there be?&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;—This is a name&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|No one would get a perfect score. The odds of guessing correctly on every question would be less than the odds of every ex-living president at that time and the main cast of [[:Category:Firefly|Firefly]] getting struck by lightning on the same day.&lt;br /&gt;
|{{blog|2|2012|07|10|7d early}}&lt;br /&gt;
|{{book|1|66}}&lt;br /&gt;
|{{book|16|2024|09|24|0EytSWiKrFg|What if example?}}&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
::::*This specific example, which is how most articles do/will look hopefully, is '''~45% shorter''' than [[#Question askers|your example]] and thus wastes much less space on my screen size.&lt;br /&gt;
 the final three columns don't need quite as many linefeeds between them ...you could probably narrow them further by forcing some linebreaks back into them [...]&lt;br /&gt;
::::*If they need linebreaks, doesn't that mean that their column would be the most narrow one? I thought mediawiki balanced the table pretty well.&lt;br /&gt;
 thumbnail+title columns merging (which would help even more), but I'm sorely tempted now&lt;br /&gt;
::::*But I think this idea has the same problem, looking too tall on desktops and beautiful on a tablet. I wouldn't want to ruin the UX of desktop users to favour tablet users, but i'd love a way to improve both!&lt;br /&gt;
::::*Also, I'd like to one day make the thumbnail bigger, because currently it's too small in my opinion. But if i increased its size right now, it would force every row to be even taller, which would waste space on desktop (and, of course, save space on small screens, or at least not make that big of a difference). --[[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 17:04, 2 February 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::::Is there a &amp;quot;mobile&amp;quot; version/url for this site? because there might be a way to make the table try to display a different layout if it's on the mobile url/version or if the screen is too small, but that would require putting complicated expressions in every row and in the header columns. [[User:Firestar233|guess who]] ([[User talk:Firestar233|if you desire conversing]] | [[Special:Contributions/Firestar233|what i have done]]) 20:53, 3 February 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Yeah I had thought of doing a similar thing, maybe have two pages with different coding and use complex transclusions to keep the content the same? But I wouldn’t even know where to begin with that. But you're the wiki-editing wizard here. --[[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 17:50, 4 February 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::As I predicted, now that most columns are filled, on my screen they're almost the same width! I think it'd be even more balanced if we removed the notices --[[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 15:44, 31 March 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== adding what if? 10th ann   ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
as most of you know, the what if? 10th anniversary edition is basically an updated version of what if?, compete with red annotations and a bonus chapter that i need to get around to explaining. since it has all the original what if? chapters, should we add a red 10th anniversary box under each green what if? box? '''[[User:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:9pt;color:#A9C6CA&amp;quot;&amp;gt;42.book.addict&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:6pt;color:#516874&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Talk to me!&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;''' 16:12, 3 February 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Yeah I realized it was just small annotations after i created the template and now I've changed the 10th ann. one to say ''Featured '''exclusively''' on the 3rd ed. etc.'' Not sure if that's enough, could also be much longer since it's only used on 1 row, but we definitely shouldn't add the template to every other article, (would break the style= html tag). Someone should still mention that articles on the first book are all available on the 3rd (and add more info) on both '''[[what if? (blog)]]''' and '''[[What If? 10th Anniversary Edition]]'''.&lt;br /&gt;
:Don't worry too much about explaining it, it can just be a couple of sentences. People can watch the video if they want details. Thanks for your work!{{unsigned|FaviFake|09:57, 3 February 2025 (UTC)}} &amp;lt;!-- I'm so bad at this! I love how both IP and Firestar rushed to add my signature hahaha --&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The fact that the 10th Anniversary ed (&amp;quot;book3&amp;quot;, in original nomenclature) was basically a bonus-chapter version of the original (&amp;quot;book1&amp;quot;), was behind my suggestion that book|3 should sort-value itself as between book|1 articles and the completely new book|2, but there are severl ways of doing it (including maybe using something akin to {{w|Template:Diagonal split header}} for book|1 (assumed to also be book|3) rendering. [[Special:Contributions/162.158.38.96|162.158.38.96]] 21:08, 3 February 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::That's interesting, I didn't know that existed! I wonder if there's a less repetitive and/or space-efficient way of expressing the same message (&amp;quot;this is on both&amp;quot;), but idk. (look, I remembered to sign this time!) --[[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 17:43, 4 February 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::another question: should i be updating the explanations to be accurate as of 2024? many of the red annotations contain corrections or updates. '''[[User:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:9pt;color:#A9C6CA&amp;quot;&amp;gt;42.book.addict&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:6pt;color:#516874&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Talk to me!&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;''' 16:08, 4 February 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
That's interesting! I like the idea of adding them, but I can't seem to find a nice way to add them:&lt;br /&gt;
*We could add them to the existing explanation, but that would be weird because half of the blog articles, which are public on the site, don't have these additions.&lt;br /&gt;
*We could add them to the book column, but it'd likely get too big, and we would need to figure out a way to make the template do that.&lt;br /&gt;
*We could create a duplicate row of every red-annotated article, even if they're on the blog, but that would be confusing and might clutter the index.&lt;br /&gt;
*We could create a new column, but we already have too many.&lt;br /&gt;
*Also, we'd need to figure out how to add them. Do we want to make the text red like in the book? Should we use a new/old template for that?&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 17:43, 4 February 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== By what measure is anything &amp;quot;too short&amp;quot;. ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I am very close to just removing all the &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{notice|Too short}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt; additions, on the basis that this seems to be a purely subjective measure. The only reason I haven't is because they'll probably just be added back in again (with no more reasoning than before). But, if anyone wants more information, everyone already knows where they can find the ''full'' text (or narrated video) that gives it, while a summary is a summary. [[Special:Contributions/172.70.85.49|172.70.85.49]] 20:28, 19 March 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:The reason I add them is because I'd like people browsing the index to be able to glance at a question and read its summary. I try to check the original article to see if there are any important things we missed and point them out. But if, after reading through an article, you find that our summary is clear and '''fully answers''' the question, you can remove it. I started adding these because some early summaries were way too short, just 5-10 words, and mostly didn't answer the question. For example, if an answer is &amp;quot;We would all die&amp;quot;, that doesn't answer the question, but &amp;quot;The radiation from the nuclear bomb would be so pervasive that we would all die in 2 years&amp;quot; does.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Of course people can just read all ~250 articles, but if someone just wants the answer quickly, we offer that. Please feel free to remove them from answers that are already complete, but not all of them.--[[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 16:48, 20 March 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Reviewing the current first five &amp;quot;Too short&amp;quot; complaints, IMO you cannot get much more fully answered without expanding the &amp;quot;summary&amp;quot; to basically going through the article's in-depth explanation and copying/paraphrasing it. Which seems to me to miss the point.&lt;br /&gt;
::Parallel requests for rewording/better phrasing I can understand (if I thought that any change I made in that direction was going to stand when it got &amp;quot;made longer&amp;quot;, I might even try to help out in that direction), but I'm still none the wiser why they are too short.&lt;br /&gt;
::Answering a question of &amp;quot;How long/heavy/bright/fast is &amp;lt;foo&amp;gt;?&amp;quot; shouldn't need more than a simple &amp;quot;it is &amp;lt;measurement&amp;gt;, given &amp;lt;caveat&amp;gt;&amp;quot;, in most cases. Maybe a couple of those if there's different caveats, or add why it would end the world if you even ''had'' such a &amp;lt;foo&amp;gt;. &amp;quot;Could I/we/humanity &amp;lt;bar&amp;gt;?&amp;quot; probably doesn't need much more than &amp;quot;[Yes/No], but &amp;lt;unexpected thing...&amp;gt;&amp;quot; And I'm not sure if it's still there, because I'm not going to recheck it all, but at one point I noted at least one short-question/short-answer that had a longer 'summary' than the answer given.&lt;br /&gt;
::I like words. I need to expend effort to not use more of them, myself, and am quite pleased if I ''can'' satisfactorily say what I'm trying to say in a succint manner. (i.e. not like this...) But I'm still none the wiser what (lower) thresholds there are in this situation. I'm going to consider if I can help, here, but not right this moment. [[Special:Contributions/172.71.241.122|172.71.241.122]] 20:29, 20 March 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Oooh you're the same IP! I didn't recognise you.&lt;br /&gt;
 Reviewing the current first five &amp;quot;Too short&amp;quot; complaints, IMO you cannot get much more fully answered without expanding the &amp;quot;summary&amp;quot; to basically going through the article's in-depth explanation and copying/paraphrasing it. Which seems to me to miss the point.&lt;br /&gt;
:::Sounds good. If the explanation is satisfactory and mentions everything except things like the methodology used and minor &amp;quot;sub-answers&amp;quot;, feel free to remove the notices!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
  &amp;quot;How long/heavy/bright/fast is &amp;lt;foo&amp;gt;?&amp;quot; shouldn't need more than a simple &amp;quot;it is &amp;lt;measurement&amp;gt;, given &amp;lt;caveat&amp;gt;&amp;quot;, in most cases. Maybe a couple of those if there's different caveats, or add why it would end the world if you even had such a &amp;lt;foo&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
:::Agreed!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &amp;quot;Could I/we/humanity &amp;lt;bar&amp;gt;?&amp;quot; probably doesn't need much more than &amp;quot;[Yes/No], but &amp;lt;unexpected thing...&amp;gt;&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
:::Agree, but usually the entire article revolves around that unexpected thing, so i think we should summarise that too. Agin, feel free to remove the ones you're sure can't be made any longer in a useful way At the start, I added a lot and didn't have time to go read the article for each one! --[[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 15:56, 21 March 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Alternate universe What-Ifs ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Should we make the explanation for Alternate universe What-Ifs a separate page? Explaining every section in this article might be too long, and if the other explanations are anything to go by, an explanation that fits would be considered too short. [[Special:Contributions/172.68.174.147|172.68.174.147]] 06:09, 21 March 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:I think we should definitely explain it, but maybe it's better if we keep it in the table? Why'd you want to split into another page?&lt;br /&gt;
:Also, the short-answer articles aren't too short. If you look at [https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php/What_If%3F_chapters#:~:text=Short Answer Section II Short%20Answer%20Section%20II], for example, it explanations are very short, and rightfully so. --[[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 15:49, 21 March 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== What about Good Question? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There does appear to be a *fourth* &amp;quot;What If?&amp;quot; thing Randall has done that is seemingly only documented at [[New York Times: Good Question]]; the New York Times's [https://www.nytimes.com/column/good-question-randall-munroe-xkcd Good Question], which does appear to maybe have some chapter reposts (i.e. Cosmic Road Trip/&amp;quot;How Long Is the Drive to the Edge of the Universe?&amp;quot;). My question is, is this worth documenting on this page in specific? [[User:Adrmcr|Adrmcr]] ([[User talk:Adrmcr|talk]]) 18:36, 21 March 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Oh, right, I had forgotten about that page! I like the idea of doing something with it, it's currently almost impossible to find. To give it more visibility, I think we could move its contents here. I'm not sure if we should add them to the existing table or put them in a new section, maybe at the bottom. I could see something like this working:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;sortable wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
! rowspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; scope=&amp;quot;col&amp;quot; class=&amp;quot;unsortable&amp;quot; |  Thumbnail&lt;br /&gt;
! rowspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; scope=&amp;quot;col&amp;quot; data-sort-type=text|  Title&lt;br /&gt;
! rowspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; scope=&amp;quot;col&amp;quot; data-sort-type=text|  question&lt;br /&gt;
! rowspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; scope=&amp;quot;col&amp;quot; class=&amp;quot;unsortable&amp;quot; |  Randall's answer&lt;br /&gt;
! colspan=&amp;quot;3&amp;quot;|                                  Article available in... &amp;lt;noinclude&amp;gt;&amp;lt;!--&amp;lt;/noinclude&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;background-color:#FFFF00;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;noinclude&amp;gt;--&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/noinclude&amp;gt;&amp;amp;nbsp;''(click to sort)''&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;lt;noinclude&amp;gt;&amp;lt;!--&amp;lt;/noinclude&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;noinclude&amp;gt;--&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/noinclude&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! scope=&amp;quot;col&amp;quot; data-sort-type=number |           Blog&lt;br /&gt;
! scope=&amp;quot;col&amp;quot; data-sort-type=number |           Books&lt;br /&gt;
! scope=&amp;quot;col&amp;quot; data-sort-type=number |           YouTube&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| rowspan=&amp;quot;7&amp;quot; |&lt;br /&gt;
| rowspan=&amp;quot;7&amp;quot; |'''Good Question'''&lt;br /&gt;
|[https://www.nytimes.com/column/good-question-randall-munroe-xkcd ''&amp;quot;How Long Is the Drive to the Edge of the Universe?&amp;quot;'']&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;—Randall Munroe&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Cras sagittis lacus sit amet porta vulputate.&lt;br /&gt;
|1st &amp;quot;[https://www.nytimes.com/column/good-question-randall-munroe-xkcd Good Question]&amp;quot; NYT article, on 2012‑07‑10&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[https://www.nytimes.com/column/good-question-randall-munroe-xkcd ''&amp;quot;Shark or Orca: Which Should You Fear More?&amp;quot;'']&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;—Randall Munroe&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|rutrum eros id, tincidunt neque. Integer hendrerit magna ac nibh fringilla, &lt;br /&gt;
|2nd &amp;quot;[https://www.nytimes.com/column/good-question-randall-munroe-xkcd Good Question]&amp;quot; NYT article, on 2012‑07‑10&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[https://www.nytimes.com/column/good-question-randall-munroe-xkcd ''&amp;quot;	How Many Languages Could a Child Speak?&amp;quot;'']&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;—Randall Munroe&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|non venenatis lacus hendrerit. Pellentesque ullamcorper dolor eget nunc gravida, nec euismod risus efficitur. &lt;br /&gt;
|3rd &amp;quot;[https://www.nytimes.com/column/good-question-randall-munroe-xkcd Good Question]&amp;quot; NYT article, on 2012‑07‑10&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The old page could become a redirect to the new section/NYT table. --[[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 08:49, 22 March 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::Anyone? --[[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 16:56, 23 March 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Striking a match on Titan - additional ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Depends on how you read it, but try to strike a safety match ''on'' Titan probably would do nothing at all (just like if you tried to strike it on a bit of Earth rock, here on the surface of Earth), as it needs the chemicals in the striking-strip to (in small amounts) combine with the oxidiser in the match-head coating to spark up and ''then'' prompt the relatively slower-burning process that leads to the atmosphere-fed burning of the 'stick'.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This means that striker+match reaction will also work in most situations (including underwater and in vacuum), though of course may then fail to get significant amount of post-striking ignition to continue. As non-safety/strike-anywhere ones will, given the friction (hmmm... would you get good friction off of the ice-boulders of Titan?).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But coating your matchheads with wax (or manufactured with a suitable coating) is advisable for 'survival kit' matches, to prevent infusion of water to 'dampen the squib'. Would be interesting to know to what degree the anoxic atmosphere of Titan might seep in and similarly suppress the various types of ready-to-react compounds, before even the lack of free oxygen ends the intended flare-up. [[Special:Contributions/172.71.26.37|172.71.26.37]] 10:19, 29 March 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Uhh, what article are you talking about? This info could be useful to add in the index! --[[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 15:06, 29 March 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::Easily searchable (or made visible as per my recent change), it's not the only &amp;quot;match&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;Titan&amp;quot; reference, but there aren't so many of either that you need to check much further than the first appearance of either, probably.&lt;br /&gt;
::But, as you ask, it's in the Book 2 &amp;quot;Short Answers #3&amp;quot; collection (the penultimate one of that grouping). And, now that I've reached home, I can also tell you that it's pp.141-142 in the UK hardback edition (whether or not that's identical/near to your own copy's appearance of it).&lt;br /&gt;
::However, no ''more'' info needs to be added, IMO. I changed the prior edit (not sure who/which IP did it, without checking, but their edit popped it up on my own radar as worthy of minor refinement) to just say that it's oxidiser, not just &amp;quot;oxygen&amp;quot; (there's oxygen in the &amp;quot;stick&amp;quot; and any other &amp;quot;head&amp;quot;-coatings applied, but basically incidental to the initial ignition when it's the oxidiser component that primarily contributes to that). And, to my mild and gratifying surprise, now find that this is pretty much exactly what the Short Answer says (except in 'Merkin form of &amp;quot;oxidizer&amp;quot; - so now, I think to myself, did I write my edit in Leftpondian (as I should, just because Noah Webster wanted to be a Lexicographical Edgelord), or Rightpondian (as is my default habit, because that's how I was educated)... need to check that!), in the form of a summary which ''our'' summary pretty much matches&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;&amp;amp;#91;[[559: No Pun Intended|''NPI!'']]&amp;amp;#93;&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; in all useful ways.&lt;br /&gt;
::I added the stuff here, about the Safety Match detail, as a bonus bit of info for anyone who cares to scan down here to know this additional thing that I happen to know (but not necessarily explain well?)... Randall does not go that far into the details in his book-answer (he does divert into a footnote about KClO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; being used in airliner oxygen masks, but that's beyond the scope of adding here, and he totally avoids the safety/strike-anywhere distinctions). Adding the above to the Explanation Table would be overkill, and misrepresent Randall's original format to no real benefit (except maybe some curious pyromaniacs, on Earth or elsewhere) [[Special:Contributions/172.69.195.179|172.69.195.179]] 16:58, 29 March 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== A bit disappointed in the lack of progress ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I mean, I understand that this is a volunteer project and I can't force people to work on this thing, hell, I don't even have the time to fill out most of the pages even if I HAVE read the What IF in question. However, it's still a bit disheartening to see so many &amp;quot;too shorts&amp;quot; even after several weeks. [[Special:Contributions/172.69.208.133|172.69.208.133]] 12:32, 17 April 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:If it was up to me, I'd solve the issue of too many &amp;quot;Too short&amp;quot;s by... deleting the unnecessary &amp;quot;Too short&amp;quot;s... I have no desire to expand the sufficient summaries with much longer reruns of the full answers. [[Special:Contributions/162.158.216.168|162.158.216.168]] 15:39, 17 April 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::I think the progress we made is still a lot, considering the state the index was previously. Also, it's not the only incomplete thing, there are about other 80 incomplete pages here. Also, as I said a while back:&lt;br /&gt;
::If the explanation is satisfactory and mentions everything except things like the methodology used and minor &amp;quot;sub-answers&amp;quot;, please remove the notices! &amp;quot;Could I/we/humanity &amp;lt;bar&amp;gt;?&amp;quot; probably doesn't need much more than &amp;quot;[Yes/No], but &amp;lt;unexpected thing...&amp;gt;&amp;quot;. Agree, but usually the entire article revolves around that unexpected thing, so i think we should summarise that too. Again, feel free to remove the ones you're ''sure'' can't be made any longer in a useful way. At the start of the project, I added a lot and didn't have time to go read the article for each one! --[[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 17:03, 17 April 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== &amp;quot;nonmonomolecular&amp;quot; and peptides ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
About &amp;quot;the longest sequence of letters using one number key&amp;quot;: Yamaki, Sahori B. et al.'s article published on 15 March, 2005 in ''Journal of Colloid and Interface Science'' volume 283, issue 2 on pages 464–471 titled ''Morphological and structural characteristics of diazo dyes at the air–water interface: in situ Brewster angle microscopy and polarized UV/vis analysis'' uses &amp;quot;nonmonomolecular&amp;quot; (with neither hyphens nor dashes nor anything else), a word with 9 consecutive letters using the 6 key a total of 20 times. The word also has [[:wikt:nonmonomolecular|an article on Wiktionary]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
About the peptides: &amp;quot;Glycylglycylglycyl[…]glycine&amp;quot; and other spelled-out amino acid sequences (like titin's) status as a word is dubious. If we assume they are all considerable as words, there is no upper limit on peptide sequence word length (e. g. &amp;quot;glycyl&amp;quot; adds 6 to the length and 0 to the count of unallowed letters (U, B, X, O, J, Z), &amp;quot;phenylalanyl&amp;quot; adds 12 and 0, respectively, etc.). [[Special:Contributions/172.70.39.208|172.70.39.208]] 21:21, 27 April 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Great! You can add all that in the explanation in the main table :D &amp;amp;nbsp; --[[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 14:32, 28 April 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Contact Randall (or his team): link rot on &amp;quot;Pressure Cooker&amp;quot; What if? page ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On this page: https://what-if.xkcd.com/40/ &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There's a link ostensibly to an article about O2F2, link text is &amp;quot;Another article&amp;quot;. It goes to lateralscience.com. Unfortunately, the original site there has been replaced by a domain squatter advertising online casinos. I don't know how to contact Mr. Munroe to tell him. [[User:Nitpicking|Nitpicking]] ([[User talk:Nitpicking|talk]]) 20:23, 12 May 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:You can just shoot him an email at his personal address: rmunroe@gmail.com &amp;amp;nbsp; --[[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 15:03, 13 May 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== 10th Anniversary Annotations ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hello, new here. I honestly have no idea what I am doing. But I read the 10th anniversary edition of ''[[What If?]]'', and one annotation, in the same chapter, added dimethylmercury far off to the right, and about halfway up the y axis. [[User:Majordesmosnerd|Majordesmosnerd]] ([[User talk:Majordesmosnerd|talk]]) 22:18, 19 March 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:We as a community have not decided what to do with annotations, as there are many of them scattered throughout the book and it would be a painstaking process to document them all. I would like invite further discussion about this so we can come to a consensus. [[User:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font:11pt Cormorant Garamond&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#4A86A6&amp;quot;&amp;gt;tor&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#C0728D&amp;quot;&amp;gt;i :3&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font:8pt Cormorant Garamond&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#7E7E7E&amp;quot;&amp;gt;talk &amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#C0728D&amp;quot;&amp;gt;to &amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#4A86A6&amp;quot;&amp;gt;me!&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 01:05, 20 March 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::Agree it'd be nice to have them documented somewhere! [[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 12:21, 4 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::How would we format it? Do we want to make a new template for these annotations? I'd be willing to go through my book if I can find the time for it between all my work. [[User:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font:11pt Cormorant Garamond&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#4A86A6&amp;quot;&amp;gt;tor&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#C0728D&amp;quot;&amp;gt;i :3&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font:8pt Cormorant Garamond&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#7E7E7E&amp;quot;&amp;gt;talk &amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#C0728D&amp;quot;&amp;gt;to &amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#4A86A6&amp;quot;&amp;gt;me!&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 19:41, 5 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::::Maybe a second table somewhere else on the page, with a link from the main table (in the book column?) that goes to the second table, so a user can jump between them when they see the little &amp;quot;see annotations!&amp;quot; link in the book column? (or another column?) I've already filled the table with anchors, so for example to jump to chapter 34 of the second book just can just type [[#2-34]] and it'll take you there. Or for the blog, type any number like [[#55]]. I'm not sure how we should format the annotations, maybe copy the text around it (coloured black like normal text) and make the annotations bold? Or create a {{tl|red}} template that just makes the text of the annotation red. It could work! Unfortunately i don't have the book, i bought the first one :( ㅤ [[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 16:06, 7 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::I think that a second page would be smart. We could do something like &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;[[what if? articles/Annotations]]&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt; with a table: page number, chapter, transcript, and I'll see if I can find the images for the actual annotations somewhere. As for formatting, I think we should do black text for describing any doodles that Randall made, then red text for the actual annotation itself. Let me know if you have any other concerns. [[User:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font:11pt Cormorant Garamond&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#4A86A6&amp;quot;&amp;gt;tor&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#C0728D&amp;quot;&amp;gt;i :3&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font:8pt Cormorant Garamond&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#7E7E7E&amp;quot;&amp;gt;talk &amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#C0728D&amp;quot;&amp;gt;to &amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#4A86A6&amp;quot;&amp;gt;me!&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 16:28, 15 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>42.book.addict</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:what_if%3F_articles&amp;diff=409652</id>
		<title>Talk:what if? articles</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:what_if%3F_articles&amp;diff=409652"/>
				<updated>2026-04-05T19:41:39Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;42.book.addict: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{TOC}}Note: I moved over the discussion page from my [[User talk:FaviFake|talk page]], which is where the merger of the two what if? indexes was initially coordinated and organized. Most of the topics below were originally created on [[User talk:FaviFake]]. Thanks! --[[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 09:21, 2 February 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
==Introduction to coordinate the merger==&lt;br /&gt;
Hey! This is intended to be a space to coordinate the merging of the two tables. I see that [[User:1234231587678]] and [[User:Apollo11]] have been helping us create the two tables! I'm messaging you to coordinate a little bit. Since we're the 3 most active editors, let's coordinate!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
My idea for the table was the following: there would be one single sortable table instead of two, and the information density would be very high. There were the columns I had in mind:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* N&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Date (the date YYYY-MM-DD, and then includes week after prev. article)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Thumbnail&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Title (hyperlinked)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Reader's question&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Randall's answer&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Book - in something like this format: '''WI?2, n. 40''' (BOOK1,2,3, nr. ARTICLE NUMBER), which is easily sortable by book - for unnumbered, use the assumed number with an asterisk like this: 69* - this column would also be color coded, by book - this would also contain the title in the book if different - empty when not in any book&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* YT (the date YYYY-MM-DD, and then a hyperlinked link with the YT title. if the title is the same, don't repeat it) empty when not on YT&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I realise my mistake was listing the things we had to do together with the huge task, merging the tables! So what happened is you both contributed, but each of you contribued to a different table. In an attempt to solve this, i have created my own table, which is ready to receive the two additional columns!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''I believe this third table (available at [[User:FaviFake]]) is the best option for us to work on the index together, so that once it has the 2 additional columns and contains all the articles, we can put it on the blog page and delete the [[What If? chapters]] table. What do you think?'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I have also made other adjustments:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Made the Date column nowrap, so the date doesn't wrap around, and made the first column (N) centered and '''bold'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Turned each Reader's question cell italic, and added quotation marks to the start and end of each cell. Ex: HOW OLD? becomes ''&amp;quot;HOW OLD?&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* In the Randall's answer column, split the rows into one per question. For example, if there are 5 bullet points in 1 cell, split the &amp;quot;Reader's question&amp;quot; and the &amp;quot;Randall's answer&amp;quot; columns into 5 rows for that particular Article so that each question has its own mini-row.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Added file link to all rows so you can just click to go straight to the upload file page.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;lt;s&amp;gt;'''Downgrade''': titles aren't hyperlinked&amp;lt;/s&amp;gt; -  {{Done}} Update: I manually hyperlinked all of them!&lt;br /&gt;
'''&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Downgrade''': the last ~100 articles are missing. I'll try to add them the day after tomorrow! --[[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 17:06, 17 January 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Regarding the additional 2 columns: I've been thinking a lot about how we should do them. I see 4 options:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:*'''Option 1: Separate Tables''' - separate tables for the YouTube video information and book information, and link articles across tables using the &amp;quot;N&amp;quot; column (or another unique identifier like the title). Advantages: Keeps sorting straightforward in each table. Maintains the integrity of your original table while allowing for sorting by videos and books in their respective tables. Flexible for adding future metadata. Disadvantages: Requires users to cross-reference between tables, which can be inconvenient.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:*'''Option 2: Expand Rows with Sub-Rows''' - How it works: For each article, add one or two additional sub-rows (One for YouTube video information (e.g., YT video number, link, title, thumbnail), and one for book information (e.g., book number, article number, title, color-coded cell). Advantages: Keeps all information together, visually grouped by article. Makes it easy to see all data without leaving the main table. Disadvantages: Sub-rows might disrupt column sorting. Could make the table visually cluttered for articles with both video and book.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:*'''Option 3: Additional Columns''' - new columns for: (FIRST COLUMN) YouTube video number, link, title, and thumbnail, and, (SECOND COLUMN) Book name, article number, title, and color-coding. Advantages: Sorting by videos or books is easy. Keeps all information in a single row. Disadvantages: The table becomes much wider, which can reduce readability on smaller screens. Many empty cells for articles without video or book.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I've also thought about using a template. What do you think of the idea of a creating a template like these:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{Done}} UPDATE: i did create the templates! See the top of [[User:FaviFake]]! &amp;lt;s&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{yt|YTNUMBER (1, 2, 3, etc)|YTLINK|VIDEOTITLE (optional)}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:It would be used in the column that we still need to create. It would also colour the cell in '''red'''. I was also thinking of doing a similar thing for the What If? books:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{bk|WHICH-BOOK|CHAPTER-NUMBER|CHAPTER-TITLE (if different)}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:For example, it would look like this (This one would also colour the cell based on the book, e.g., green for WI?1, yellow for WI?2, blue for WI10th ed.):&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{book|2|69|Jellyfish}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 What If? 2, chapter '''69: Jellyfish'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Would someone be able to create something like this? I know nothing about templates, and i doubt I'll be able to ask chatgpt to do everything for me correctly. --[[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 10:28, 18 January 2025 (UTC)&amp;lt;s&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/s&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
==1234231587678==&lt;br /&gt;
::I saw your message, and this would be a good idea to coordinate. Maybe also add the missing &amp;quot;Peptides&amp;quot; that was accidentally released on the blog, as index 153 (i think) or have two articles with the same index number, just putting &amp;quot;current&amp;quot; for the current article. --[[User:1234231587678|1234231587678]] ([[User talk:1234231587678|talk]]) 20:47, 17 January 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Also I think the &amp;quot;0w later&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;1w later&amp;quot; on the comics looks a bit odd, maybe remove them entirely? The dates are already present. --[[User:1234231587678|1234231587678]] ([[User talk:1234231587678|talk]]) 20:49, 17 January 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Thanks for replying! I LOVE the idea of inserting the Peptides article directly in the index. It would technically make it a little less official, but I'm all for it. It looks and feels like a proper article.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::I also fully agree with you regarding the '''1w later''' line! I do like the idea of seeing the frequency right from the index, but it's too much right now. My idea is to remove the &amp;quot;1w later&amp;quot; part, but leave it in for the articles that aren't released a week after the previous one. For example, this would keep the '''2w later''' and '''0w later''' lines for the articles that have them, but declutter the date cells of the &amp;quot;normal&amp;quot; ones. What do you think?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::I can't do it right now, but it should be easy. We can also delay it until all articles are on the table, so we only have to do it once. Btw, I hope to get all the articles on the table by the day after tomorrow or the day after that. Meanwhile, you or other editors can add the 2 columns (Book and YT)! --[[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 22:14, 17 January 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I currently don't have the books, so can't help with that, but I've added a few YT videos. Also the book template seems to be buggy (and/or a WIP), so I removed it from the 1st article. ALSO, the YT template display {5}&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;th&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; instead of 5th; weird. --[[User:1234231587678|1234231587678]] ([[User talk:1234231587678|talk]]) 15:13, 19 January 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Thank you so much! I fixed the YT template, let me know if there are any other issues. Also, you '''can''' help with books, even if you don't have them! All you need to do is look at the page [[What If? chapters]], which catalogues every chapter of every book. The &amp;lt;s&amp;gt;[[Template:book]]&amp;lt;/s&amp;gt; i was trying to create is broken because I gave up trying to make it work (1h and 20min of my life wasted). Anyways, we now have 4 different templates, one for each book (the fourth is a placeholder!): [[Template:book1]], [[Template:book2]], [[Template:book3]], [[Template:book4]]. There are instructions on hot to use them on their page. Please continue adding the videos and the books if you can! This is exactly what we need! --[[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 15:18, 19 January 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Apollo11==&lt;br /&gt;
This a big page so I’m not sure I’m in the right spot (also typing one handed so sorry for mistakes). I like the table on you page, however I did notice it’s missing which book it’s in and the YouTube channel. I love how the one I edited was formatted, I think if you added that table to your existing table it’d be perfect. I would also add a page number for the books. [[User:Apollo11|Apollo11]] ([[User talk:Apollo11|talk]]) 16:34, 18 January 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ok just saw the three options. I’d go with either 1 or 3. 1 would look the best and probably be easiest to find what you’re looking for as long as your have links to the other tables very clear. What I would do is have a table with title, and where to find the article (blog, book 1, book 2, YouTube). Then have a 4 tables, one for each, where you can go more in depth about each article, date, explanation, jokes, things like that. Option 3 would be the simplest, and if that’s what you wanna do, I’d have the simplest things on the left and the more complicated things on the right. So the date and title would be in the left and the e explanation would be far to the right. You’ve probably been thinking about this a lot longer than me so I’m probably missing something, so please tell me if I’m wrong abo it anything. Also if my comment is in the wrong spot feel free to move me to the right conversation. I’d love to help in anyway!! Just give me directions and I’ll do by best!! [[User:Apollo11|Apollo11]] ([[User talk:Apollo11|talk]]) 16:58, 18 January 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: Thanks so much for your interest! I thought about it a lot today, and i landed on 1, huge, information-laden table. I think having 3 or 4 tables would be too confusing and too hard to navigate. Plus, i think i found a good way to avoid making the table too wide. I added a few articles to showcase it. I don't have a lot of time to do all of them. Regarding the page number, I used the chapter number since it's easier for people who don't own the books.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: &amp;gt; I’d love to help in anyway!! Just give me directions and I’ll do by best!!&lt;br /&gt;
: Love it! You can do everything that's listed at the top of [[User:FaviFake]], but the first one might be more annoying to do on a phone (I'm not sure where you're editing from, actually). If you don't understand something on that page, please do let me know. I promise i'll answer quicker next time. ;)  --[[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 20:03, 19 January 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:: Looks great!! I’ll get on it sometime early next week!! (Ftr I’m usually on a phone but sometimes I’ll go over to a computer for bigger projects, like added links and full researched paragraphs) [[User:Apollo11|Apollo11]] ([[User talk:Apollo11|talk]]) 20:56, 19 January 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::: Amazing! I hope I'll have added all the missing articles by the day after tomorrow. --[[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 21:30, 19 January 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Adding the book-exclusive articles==&lt;br /&gt;
I noticed that there’s not a column for if the article is in the blog. I also don't think some of the ones in the book that aren’t on the blog are in there. Please correct me if I’m wrong. [[User:Apollo11|Apollo11]] ([[User talk:Apollo11|talk]]) 18:17, 21 January 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Yeah, I’ve noticed that some of the What If? Chapters aren’t in the table. I think that we should add them in too '''[[User:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:9pt;color:#A9C6CA&amp;quot;&amp;gt;42.book.addict&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:6pt;color:#516874&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Talk to me!&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;''' 18:42, 21 January 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Thank you all for pointing it out! And again sorry it took me so long, I'm not good at prioritising. (but at least today i did something! I fixed both the YouTube template, there are new instructions on [[User:FaviFake]], and the book templates when used in merged cells. Anyways!)&lt;br /&gt;
::I had forgotten the other table also contained the book-exclusive questions! Of course we should add them! We need to think about this before doing anything though. I have so many questions!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*In what order do we put them? Unfortunately, the chapter of the book are mixed between non-excusive and exclusive.&lt;br /&gt;
*Do we need all the columns?&lt;br /&gt;
 N	Date	Thumbnail	Title	Reader's question	Randall's answer	Books	YouTube&lt;br /&gt;
**What happens to the unnecessary columns? We could merge them, but I'm not sure whether the sorting will work if we merge them.&lt;br /&gt;
*Should we change the columns, so that the '''blog number''' column is more similar to the '''Book''' and '''YouTube''' columns? Or are blog articles more important because they fill all the cells, while book-exclusives don't have all the same info?&lt;br /&gt;
*Is there ANY way you can think of to make the insertion of these articles into the existing index seamless? I'm usually on the side of one big index instead of many little indexes, but I'm having a hard time figuring this out. One of the main reasons I wanted to do this project was so that people wouldn't need to move between 2 different tables to see all articles.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::One way could be to just add all book-exclusive articles, each in their own row, in a big dump on the release date of the book. Even tho it would technically be in chronological order, i don't really like the idea. Please send all your thought! There must me something I'm not thinking of, or something I've been thinking wrong about! --[[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 18:10, 22 January 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::* What order do we put them in&lt;br /&gt;
:: I would do it in the same order as the other table, blog articles first in chronological, what if chapters in chapter order. I believe the YouTube channel is all old questions, but if he posts a new one, then put that below the books.&lt;br /&gt;
::* change blog columns&lt;br /&gt;
::I think you should move the blog date and number to after randalls answer, similar to the books, and for the date for book exclusives maybe jus the book release date? Or NA.&lt;br /&gt;
::* unessery colums&lt;br /&gt;
:: Example?&lt;br /&gt;
::* Seamless integration&lt;br /&gt;
::Just stick them on the bottom, the exact same way you’d put another blog article on the bottom.&lt;br /&gt;
::I think that covers it all? [[User:Apollo11|Apollo11]] ([[User talk:Apollo11|talk]]) 19:15, 22 January 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Sticking the chapters at the end was the same idea I had, and I think that we can just put (What If? Exclusive) inside the date part of the table. '''[[User:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:9pt;color:#A9C6CA&amp;quot;&amp;gt;42.book.addict&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:6pt;color:#516874&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Talk to me!&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;''' 19:22, 22 January 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Thanks for replying so quickly! I don't have time right now to read everything but I can already tell that this is much easier than I thought it would be. I'll answer tomorrow. Before i start overthinking everything: What would you put inside the columns thumbnail, Question, and Answer? Just empty? I'm trying to think of something useful.&lt;br /&gt;
::::Also, what do you think of merging the N (blog) column and the Date columns, just like we do with the YouTube column? Would there be any downsides?&lt;br /&gt;
:::: I hope I'm not preventing it edits by not adding the articles quickly, in the meantime you can help by adding YT videos, now that the template works! --[[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 21:31, 22 January 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::: I think that the YT videos are all added? At least the blog ones and not the What If? exclusive ones. Or maybe Restricted Mode on my home wifi is blocking some. But I think that it’s all done? Tried my best anyways '''[[User:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:9pt;color:#A9C6CA&amp;quot;&amp;gt;42.book.addict&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:6pt;color:#516874&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Talk to me!&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;''' 03:52, 23 January 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::This is great news, thanks! I didn't know there were YouTube videos on book-exclusive articles! I'll get started, this is my plan:&lt;br /&gt;
::::::*The book articles are positioned like the old [[What If? chapters]] table.&lt;br /&gt;
::::::*New column setup:&lt;br /&gt;
 Thumbnail	Title	Reader's question	Randall's answer	'''Blog (this contains both N and Date)'''	Books	YouTube&lt;br /&gt;
::::::*The sometimes-unnecessary columns are left empty.&lt;br /&gt;
::::::*The '''Blog''' column is more similar to the '''Book''' and '''YouTube''' columns: it has a template and colors the cell light blue.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::I feel great about this! We're getting near the finish line. --[[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 15:36, 23 January 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::I think that I added all the What If? And What If? 2 chapters to the table for the ones that were copied from the blog '''[[User:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:9pt;color:#A9C6CA&amp;quot;&amp;gt;42.book.addict&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:6pt;color:#516874&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Talk to me!&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;''' 23:48, 23 January 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::Love it! I hope i'll be able to add some of the missing articles today, but i might not be able to do them all (or any at all). --[[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 18:01, 24 January 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::{{Done}}  I did it! You can now add the missing YT videos :) {{unsigned|FaviFake|20:49, 24 January 2025 (UTC)}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::::Doing it now! '''[[User:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:9pt;color:#A9C6CA&amp;quot;&amp;gt;42.book.addict&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:6pt;color:#516874&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Talk to me!&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;''' 21:24, 24 January 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::::based on the 20 videos that I can see on the YT channel, ALL YT VIDEOS HAVE BEEN ADDED! '''[[User:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:9pt;color:#A9C6CA&amp;quot;&amp;gt;42.book.addict&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:6pt;color:#516874&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Talk to me!&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;''' 21:39, 24 January 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::::::We actually did it! Now all that's left are the explanations, which i'm sure people will prefer doing over merging 2 wikipedia tables. There's just one small problem: I searched for &amp;quot;Featured in What If?,&amp;quot; and instead of 69 results, i got 67. This means two of the articles that are both in the book and in the blog haven't been added. Do you think you could figure out which ones? I also checked the other book and the YouTube videos, and they're all there, it's just the first book. Again, thank you so much for all your work, it would've likely taken weeks to get to this point without your efforts!  --[[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 11:21, 25 January 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
ok, i’ll poke around and see if i can find them. also, I GOT WHAT IF? 10TH ANNIVERSARY! i can add the bonus chapter that is at the end-it’s basically “what if we tried more power” when blasting away at the moon with lasers. '''[[User:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:9pt;color:#A9C6CA&amp;quot;&amp;gt;42.book.addict&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:6pt;color:#516874&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Talk to me!&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;''' 21:22, 25 January 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Congrats on the book! I didn't buy it because i have the original, it's great that someone here owns it. Can you describe in a little more detail the last chapter? I don't understand a few things: does the second YouTube video say exactly the same thing as the blog article? Why are there two videos about 1 article? Or is the second YT video only about the Bonus Chapter in the book, which goes even further than the blog article? Is that bonus chapter not in any other book or blog? Thanks! --[[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 11:13, 26 January 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Also, is the chapter only called Bonus Chapter, or does it also have other names? --[[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 18:15, 26 January 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Sorting &amp;quot;Chapter xx..&amp;quot;==&lt;br /&gt;
Hi... An alternative to the way you are lead-zeroing the text cell's numeric suffix, for sorting purposes, which is what I think {{diff|363528|this is all about}}, would be to do so something like:&lt;br /&gt;
 ... || data-sort-value={{{1}}} | Chapter {{{1}}} || ...&lt;br /&gt;
Should be able to deal with any numeric value, while still rendering it simply as &amp;quot;Chapelter 1&amp;quot;/&amp;quot;Chapter 10&amp;quot;/&amp;quot;Chapter 100&amp;quot;/ etc, but adding ''data-sort-type=&amp;quot;number&amp;quot;'' to the header cell might even be able to sort not-quite-numbers, should a future book ever do chapters like  &amp;quot;... 7, 7a, 9, 10, 11, 12, 12b, 14, ...&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;Perhaps even ''data-sort-value=&amp;lt;booknumber&amp;gt;.&amp;lt;chapternumber&amp;gt;'' would be useful. Though you'd have to use the sufficient-leading-zeroes method, again, and could start at 1.0000001 ''just'' in case there's ever a million (but not more than 10mil-1) chapters in a future bookbut would probably be useful to sort all book-contained items, across all books but not interleaved.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;I'll let you consider if/what you find it more useful. And perhaps check if I've given you the right table markup options by going and checking the Help:Sorting Tables/whatever pages. ;) [[Special:Contributions/141.101.99.107|141.101.99.107]] 00:01, 26 January 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I agree that the current method isn't great, and I'm very glad to see there's another, better way. Unfortunately, I don't really understand most of what you said. BUT! You seem very experienced and I don't have a lot of time, so it would be perfect if you could edit directly the templates/table/cells/whatever needs to be changed. The best option is to remove the leading zeroes and still make the sorting work, for the blog, books, and YT templates. If you (or someone else) could do that, it'd be wonderful. Please feel free to try it yourself if you want! --[[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 11:13, 26 January 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== weird table bugs ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
hey favifake, i found two bugs that i don’t really know how to fix in the table: one of them is in regard to the what if 2 template, whenever it has a “S2” or a “W1” “chapter” it gives an error. the second bug can be found on the laser pointer row-i added the what if? 10th anniversary template, but the yt template doesn’t “fit” (for lack of a better word) with the table. could you dig into these and try to figure out what has gone wrong? thanks! '''[[User:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:9pt;color:#A9C6CA&amp;quot;&amp;gt;42.book.addict&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:6pt;color:#516874&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Talk to me!&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;''' 00:55, 26 January 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Hey 42! I saw what you were trying to do, i think i fixed it now? I removed the '''book3''' template from the original '''Laser Pointer''' row because all original articles are technically in the 10th Ann. book. (i added &amp;quot;exclusively on&amp;quot; to the '''book3''' template to make it clearer). Regarding the other S1 bug, i don't know why but it seems fixed now?? I saw the error just a few hours ago and now it works. I have no idea what happened. Let me know if it reappears or something. --[[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 11:13, 26 January 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Without going in and trying it myself, is this because of the &amp;quot;trying to zero-pad a number&amp;quot; thing (as given a possible alternative, above), because it can't test if &amp;lt;usually number, in this case text&amp;gt; is greater/less than &amp;lt;static number&amp;gt;?&lt;br /&gt;
:Quick-fix (not doing anything else new) would need the test enclosed with an isthisanumber? test (if so, do zero-padding testing, etc; if not, maybe don't try).&lt;br /&gt;
:Exactly how S2/W1 sorts (or doesn't) using the sorting data (bare number only!) and/or the forced data type as number (to do its best for what numeric data it is presented, despite occasional non-numeric interloping characters), would need testing.&lt;br /&gt;
:Or I misunderstand. But, ''if'' I don't, maybe this is useful additional pointer to a solution/acceptance of the problem. [[Special:Contributions/172.71.178.123|172.71.178.123]] 01:21, 26 January 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::IP user, I answered above. :) --[[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 11:13, 26 January 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
== Interesting streamlined 'table furniture', but... ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
...I'm wondering about the current (slight) usage differences between:&lt;br /&gt;
 style=&amp;quot;text-align:center&amp;quot; | {{{1}}}&lt;br /&gt;
and:&lt;br /&gt;
 style=&amp;quot;white-space:nowrap&amp;quot; |&lt;br /&gt;
Do you need to add the Param1 to the nowrap/remove if from the text-alignment?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
And what if someone wanted no-wrap+centre at the same time? There maybe ''are'' ways to combine &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{ac|&amp;lt;foo&amp;gt;}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{nw}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;, but it seems non-trivial to to do. (Unless you make a &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{nwac}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;, but then where do you end?) I'm wondering if you should try it without the |-character.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Let's see if that ''could'' work:&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;margin:auto&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+ Test&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! Foo !! Bar !! Baz&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Normal text of a normal style || style=&amp;quot;text-align:center&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;white-space:nowrap&amp;quot; | This is as if using variations &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{ac|&amp;lt;foo&amp;gt;}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{nw}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt; as rendered without the pipe-character or inconsistent parameter, which is tricky to demonstrate with the actual templates.|| More normal text of a normal style&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Normal text of a normal style || style=&amp;quot;text-align:center&amp;quot; | style=&amp;quot;white-space:nowrap&amp;quot; | This is how &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{ac|{{nw}} &amp;lt;foo&amp;gt;}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt; might look || More normal text of a normal style&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Normal text of a normal style || {{ac|{{nw}} This is how &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{ac|{{nw}} &amp;lt;foo&amp;gt;}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt; ''does'' look, using the current state of the templates.&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;s&amp;gt;''NB. Why is it in bold? Is that a normal feature of a style of text-align:center?''&amp;lt;/s&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
| More normal text of a normal style&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Normal text of a normal style || style=&amp;quot;white-space:nowrap&amp;quot; | style=&amp;quot;text-align:center&amp;quot; | This is how &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{nw}} {{ac|&amp;lt;foo&amp;gt;}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt; might look || More normal text of a normal style&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Normal text of a normal style || {{nw}} {{ac|This is how &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{nw}} {{ac|&amp;lt;foo&amp;gt;}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt; ''does'' look, using the current state of the templates.}}&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;s&amp;gt;''Also goes bold, I notice!''&amp;lt;/s&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
| More normal text of a normal style&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
So, yes, it looks like it might be better to just remove the pipe (or pipe-and-param) and rely on the table-writer to just put in the relevent bare style-giving {{}} (or {{}}s) before the pipe. (I must look into why there's unexpected boldness. I don't know if that comes from the way you templated it or as an associated function of the aligh-center style. But it doesn't appear when I do it 'raw'.) Anyway, food for thought, over to you. It looks like I ''could'' edit your templates, but that might be rude, and would of course instantly break whatever it is you're currently using them (singly) for. That's the ''What If?'' table, I suppose? Anyway, you can both 'fix' how they work and adjust how they are invoked, rather than leaving me to guess about the latter. ;) [[Special:Contributions/162.158.74.49|162.158.74.49]] 19:04, 17 January 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:PS: Yes, I have just checked, and, yes you've added (apparently ''after'' I saw and copied the original {{template|ac}} for my own testing and emulating purposes!) the bolding to the aligh-centering template. That part of the mystery is solved! :P [[Special:Contributions/162.158.74.49|162.158.74.49]] 19:10, 17 January 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:PPS: I know what happened. I copied the (slightly '''formatted''') 'plaintext' as it appeared in the template. If I'd have edited it and copied the wikisource then I'd have grabbed the &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;'''formatted''&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt; as you already had it by the time I passed by. Don't mind me, it was just something that made me wonder. Probably moreso than the thing that I was ''actually'' trying to prod and poke and solve! IOW: Ignore me. On this bit, at least! [[Special:Contributions/172.68.205.151|172.68.205.151]] 19:32, 17 January 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I love how interested you are about this! Honestly i'm not really sure what exactly it is you're asking, but you seem very smart so do whatever you want! My only request is that the {{:ac}} thing keeps working as expected, so i don't have to change the table again. I had forgotten about the {{:nw}} thing, you can delete it or change it or do anything else, I don't use it anymore. Feel free to add to the documentation that these are just for 1 table and might break everything if used anywhere else. Or, if they already work everywhere, great! I remember I created them expecting the entire page to be destroyed when used, and being pleasantly surprised when they worked. So yeah go wild! --[[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 21:19, 17 January 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::I'm not going to make any change without taking time to check your tables and making sure the appropriate change doesn't inflict damage on your attempts to curate the tables you're probably using it for.&lt;br /&gt;
:::But, in short, I understand that you're streamlining the (often longwinded) style=&amp;quot;&amp;quot; statements, an admirble task. In the structure of &amp;quot;| cell || another cell || etc&amp;quot;, you're doing something to save from having to do cumbersome &amp;quot;| cell || style=&amp;quot;this-style: that; that-style: that; the-other-style: the.other&amp;quot; | another cell || etc&amp;quot;, all of which makes editing 'difficult'. (I tend to do such things in Notepad, or whatever separate text editor I have, which lets me add temporary whitespace and use with no-wrap on the markup while I'm working on it, rather than in this textbox editor.)&lt;br /&gt;
::: But the single-pipe that formats the cell isn't a ''great'' difficulty to maintain (indeed, it is useful to line up). As such I'd suggest &amp;quot;| cell || &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{??}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt; | another cell || etc&amp;quot; would be as good. i.e. leave the pipe (intended for the table-cell) out of the template. For the no-wrap version, that's easy enough. Though I do understand that you want to put bold-format about the cell contents, so that's why you give it as a param and explicitly bold the Param1 as you pass it back out.&lt;br /&gt;
::: Maybe the solution to ''that'' is to also add (to the style, along with the text-align:center) the &amp;quot;font-weight: bold&amp;quot; doublet. Then &amp;quot;... || &amp;lt;format(s), as templates and/or raw&amp;gt; | Cell Text || ...&amp;quot; doesn't ''need'' to 'enclose' the Cell Text in any way.&lt;br /&gt;
::: But making the change from something that expects to transclude the &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;range of the template&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; &amp;quot;... || &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;format | Cell Text&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; || ...&amp;quot; to &amp;quot;... || &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;format&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; | Cell Text || ...&amp;quot; obviously requires that each and every table-cell item that uses &amp;quot;... || &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{template|Cell Text}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt; || ...&amp;quot; to be converted to &amp;quot;... || &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{template}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt; | Cell Text || ...&amp;quot;, or... it'll definitely not work as it was originally set.&lt;br /&gt;
::: Anyway, that's just my own vision of how you can do what you seem to have wanted to, without introducing more complications. As the cell-formatting gladly accepts multiple statements of the form style=&amp;quot;...&amp;quot; (it adds &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;style=&amp;quot;...&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;...&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;...&amp;quot;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt; together, much as &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;style=&amp;quot;...; ...; ...&amp;quot;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt; does), an editor now has complete freedom to compound the two format-templates you created. And any additional ones that might be useful. Such ones to usefully colour cell backgrounds as red/yellow/green (for use on the various Confusion Tables), something that I sometimes take a couple of goes to do... not least because I habitually spell 'color' as 'colour'..! ;)&lt;br /&gt;
::: ...but that's just to explain so that (should you/anybody else wish to follow my own instincts on the matter), you have some decent idea of what I'm getting at. There are probably other ways of doing it. Templates can be made to detect and extract pipes, so that &amp;quot;... || &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{template1|{{templete2|Cell Text}}}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; || ...&amp;quot; ''or'' &amp;quot;... || &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{template2|{{templete1|Cell Text}}}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; || ...&amp;quot; would equally produce &amp;quot;... || &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;templateOneOrTwoFormat templateTwoOrOneFormat | Cell Text&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; || ...&amp;quot;, but that would take a degree of of unwieldy parameter-processing functions (that I'd have to work out, probably would involve some subst-function, but might depend upon what's available in the installed mediawiki version). I just think you could avoid all that trouble! [[Special:Contributions/162.158.74.118|162.158.74.118]] 22:51, 17 January 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Forgot to say, that for what you want to use it for, there's ''another'' way:&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;margin:auto&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+ Example 2&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! Number (Centered) !! Foo !! Bar (Centered) !! Baz&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! 1&lt;br /&gt;
| Normal text of a normal style&lt;br /&gt;
! Some text of whatever size (centered)&lt;br /&gt;
| More normal text of a normal style&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! 2&lt;br /&gt;
| Normal text of a normal style&lt;br /&gt;
! Some text of whatever size (also centered, though not so obviously so)&lt;br /&gt;
| More normal text of a normal style&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
:::... This is only possible by newlining each new cell, in the example (you can't do &amp;quot;! cell || cell !! cell || cell&amp;quot;, you have to line-break it as you change from &amp;quot;!&amp;quot;-/&amp;quot;|&amp;quot;-starting cell-groups), but it isn't really so great a loss to do so.&lt;br /&gt;
:::The &amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; class gives these 'header cells' a different background too, but (if you really don't like that) it that can be adjusted in various other ways (including with scope=&amp;quot;col&amp;quot;, I think), or you can leave the wikitable class off (it centres and bolds, but doesn't give cell-borders) and re-add the whole-table bordering style that this now leaves out. But you really don't want me listing ''every'' idea I had, just this one was the other (template-free) option to enforcing centre-aligning bold text on ''certain'' cells. [[Special:Contributions/162.158.74.119|162.158.74.119]] 23:09, 17 January 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Huh, I was actually thinking of doing the opposite of what you're suggesting: include even more pipes inside the template so the editor is cleaner and easier to use. (UPDATE: this probably worse than the other option you gave at the end, see below). So instead of this: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 |-&lt;br /&gt;
 &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;| {{ac|4}} || &amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::You would just use this:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 |-&lt;br /&gt;
 &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{ac|4}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::And it would contain all the pipes needed. I guess then we would have to update the documentation to point out that this template's use case is extremely narrow. Also, if you want to see how it is currently used, the table is on my user page! That's the only place where it's used&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Since you seem very interested in templates, What do you think of the idea of a creating a template like these:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{yt|YTNUMBER (1, 2, 3, etc)|YTLINK|VIDEOTITLE (optional)}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::It would be used in the column that we still need to create. It would also colour the cell in '''red'''. I was also thinking of doing a similar thing for the What If? books:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{bk|WHICH-BOOK|CHAPTER-NUMBER|CHAPTER-TITLE (if different)}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::For example, it would look like this: (This one would also colour the cell based on the book, e.g., green for WI?1, yellow for WI?2, blue for WI10th ed.)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{book|2|69|Jellyfish}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 What If? 2, chapter '''69: Jellyfish'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Would you be able to create something like this? I know nothing about templates, and i doubt I'll be able to ask chatgpt to do everything for me correctly. --[[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 07:16, 18 January 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::&amp;gt; Forgot to say, that for what you want to use it for, there's ''another'' way:&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Oh, i think i had forgotten to read this part!! This seems very interesting! I should try that, since it seems much simpler. --[[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 10:10, 18 January 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::'''Update:''' {{Done}} I applied your suggestion, now the numbers are in their own row:&lt;br /&gt;
 |-&lt;br /&gt;
 !1&lt;br /&gt;
 | The rest of the table&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 10:33, 18 January 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== What If Chapters ==&lt;br /&gt;
Hey FaviFake, there are some What If? Chapters that aren’t included in the blog. Are we going to add them to the table? '''[[User:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:9pt;color:#A9C6CA&amp;quot;&amp;gt;42.book.addict&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:6pt;color:#516874&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Talk to me!&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;''' 17:41, 22 January 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Great timing! You sent me this message while i was in the process of replying to the question. I'm not good at prioritising, I should've definitely responded before doing other edits. Check out my &amp;lt;s&amp;gt;list of questions for y'all&amp;lt;/s&amp;gt; reply above! --[[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 18:10, 22 January 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== YouTube template ==&lt;br /&gt;
Hey FaviFake, on the &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{yt}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt; template, you asked for help on fixing the code of the template. What help do you need to “improve” it? I’m willing to help now that I’m not sick, as I was last week. '''[[User:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:9pt;color:#A9C6CA&amp;quot;&amp;gt;42.book.addict&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:6pt;color:#516874&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Talk to me!&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;''' 18:35, 19 January 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Thank you! Glad to hear you're healthy. That message was mostly a joke, but it is in fact barely held together. (Try modifying the hyperlink that's displayed when a title isn't provided, somehow what you add gets duplicated??) If you have the time and know how to make it more reliable and easily editable in the future, please do! I am honstly scared to touch it fearing it might explode.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Buuut, to be fair there is one template that i desperately needed help with, and that is [[:Template:book]]. I wasted a ton of time to try to get it to change the cell background, and it never worked, so i decided to create [[Template:book1]], [[Template:book2]], [[Template:book3]], [[Template:book4]], and these do work beaytifully, but are harder to edit in bulk. (I still have profound hatred towards [[Template:book]]...). If you actually manage to do what i wanted (which i'm not sure is even clear after the all the mess i've made... ask me if you can't figure it out!), I would be very grateful. PS. I'm not sure if i should warn you, given my very low ability to create templates, but it's definitely not easy, imo.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I'm not sure how skilled you are at template editing, so if you want, you can absolutely continue uploading the What If? thumbnails like you did a few days ago! I just added [[User:FaviFake|a new batch of articles]] (about 60) thanks to some annoyingly complex jailbreaking of Google's NotebookLM. The new table of course includes the quick 100px link to upload a file. Again, thanks for reaching out! --[[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 19:04, 19 January 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::The YT link appears to be going to &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;[[whatever the name of the YouTube video is called]]&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt; and not acting as a [youtube.com filler thingy] linking to a YouTube video. I’m going to hit the books on template writing and try to see if I can do anything about it. Cheers! '''[[User:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:9pt;color:#A9C6CA&amp;quot;&amp;gt;42.book.addict&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:6pt;color:#516874&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Talk to me!&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;''' 03:11, 21 January 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Oh great, that's broken too. I didn't even realise it. Thanks!--[[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 04:57, 21 January 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Partly because you've removed the bit about how to better sort the book-column elements, but are using the same trick in the youtube-column, and partly because it's easier (more on that in a moment), I've just modified the {{template|yt}} to give it the sort value (of article number) directly. Have not removed the expression test to make &amp;quot;6th video ...&amp;quot; into &amp;quot;06th video ...&amp;quot;, for sorting purposes, but I feel confident that you ''can'' do that (and remove the comment about making it give &amp;quot;006th video ...&amp;quot;, in future, should that become necessary) if you now so wish.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:For the books, I was thinking that if, instead of &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;=&amp;quot;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{{1|0}}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;quot;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;, you could maybe use &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;=&amp;quot;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{#expr:10000+{{{1|0}}}}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;quot;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt; for ''What If?'' (in {{template|book1}}) and &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;=&amp;quot;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{#expr:20000+{{{1|0}}}}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;quot;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt; for ''What If? 2'' (in {{template|book2}}), to let it sort by book ''and then'' chapter within book...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:For ''What If? 10th Anniversary Edition'' ({{template|book3}}), I was thinking if you could make the added-to number 11000. Though anything from above 10000+&amp;lt;last chapter number&amp;gt; and below 20000-&amp;lt;last chapter number&amp;gt; would do (and 15000 would work), it leaves room to make any appearance of the 15th anniversary, 20th anniversary, 42nd anniversary, ..., 95th anniversary be able to use the mnemonic offsets of 11500+, 12000+, 14200+, ..., 19500+.. ;) Obviously, it would need revamping if there becomes a centenary edition of Book 1 (or any version of it ever gets ''so many'' &amp;quot;bonus chapters&amp;quot; that it breaks out of its own sequence into the next extant anniversary edition. But you'd need to start adding 100 newly-numbered chapters ''per year'' to do that, so probably not likely. But, right now, the sorting on the &amp;quot;Exclusive to ''What If? 10th Anniversary Edition''&amp;quot; line sorts ''before'' the &amp;quot;NNth chapter of ''What If?''&amp;quot; lines. The above should fix that...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:And the format can be used for other (future?) books and their (possible) reissues: For ''What If? '''N''''', reissued '''YY''' years after the original, that's the number &amp;quot;NYY00&amp;quot;, to which you add the chapter number. Fairly futureproofed, but if Randall ''ever'' publishes anything that makes you need to make the offset &amp;quot;NNYYY000&amp;quot; (e.g. for the quarter-of-a-millenium reissue of ''What If? 15'', having a total of 512 chapters being 15250000+[1..512]) then I reckon the requisite changes will be easy enough to handle as and when, swapping in the expanded offset. And... hey... if they're still being written, ''and'' published, then I can only hope I'm still around to be able to add that edition to my bookshelf!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:You could even redo the {{template|book}} idea (parameters of ...|book=#|chapter=#|optional:edition=#?|...) to only ever need to maintain the one source with ''all'' this flexibility. You've already got experience (by the 1st/2nd/3rd/Nth code) with what's needed to translate Book Number(+Edition Number, if applicable) into unique background colour codes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The big problem, though, is still the non-numeric chapter 'numbers' in ''WI?2''. I have two (or three) different thoughts about that.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:*For only the numeric bits (currently, in the test for less-than-10, etc; in the above for within the &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;data-sort-value=&amp;quot;...&amp;quot;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;) you might want to switch &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{{1|0}}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt; with &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{#if:{{#ifexpr:{{{1|0}}}}}|99|{{{1|0}}}}}{{{1|0}}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;... This should test the param1 value for being a valid value (or missing, when you already make it zero... though not sure for what circumstance you should consider it validly missing) and using it if it is so, or else using the value &amp;quot;99&amp;quot; (or you could have &amp;quot;0&amp;quot;, or &amp;quot;0.5&amp;quot;, or whatever floats your boat). Then at least you'd get ''a'' value (that doesn't cause errors), though it probably wouldn't be sorted very precisely (though appear just after/before all other chapters of the book).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:*The other idea is to use &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{{effectiveChapter|{{{1|0}}}}}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;, then you can append a parameter of &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;...|effectiveChapter=11.5}}&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt; to a non-numeric one sitting between actual chapters 11 and 12 (I haven't checked if that's an actual example, but imagine it is...). Also, for multiple items on page-chapter, you could even have =11.51, =11.52, =11.53, etc, to retain order within the book and ''upon the page''... (You could also give effectiveChapter as &amp;quot;NYYCC(.optional)&amp;quot; format, direct, for ''all'' what if? Numbers, YYearly-editions and CChapters (with possibly sub-positions), come to that, but I don't see that as any simpler a solution as building it in.)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:*The third option would be to use (for hidden sorting-only purpose, mostly) a value of P(.optionalDecimal) either as another numeric parameter or a named one, with P as ''page number'', not chapter number. But, given how hardback vs. paperback (or just another imprint, not necessarily even a Anniversary redo, but I've got the UK edition with an additional UK foreword) ''might'' effect page numbers and/or where end-of-pages interupts any given chapter internals, it's possible that this is not consistent enough. But food for thought, maybe. Only needs to be definitively done once (or thoroughly checked and shuffled along as nevessary if redone to include other changes that require consistency).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Any of that make sense? Hopefully I've at least given you enough examples to ponder, where not immediately obvious. I'd ''really'' rather not change all your hard work just for the sake of a minor cosmetic change with a possibly major set of retouches, which is one of the reasons why I thought I'd do just the basic Youtube 'sort assisting' bit and let those of you who have already had so much 'fun' (tweaking the table formats) decide if and how you make full use of it. Assuming it isn't (differently) broken, for whatever reason may crop up, it shouldn't be a problem if you do nothing at all more with it (either in the {{template|yt}} or {{template|book#}}s). [[Special:Contributions/172.71.241.26|172.71.241.26]] 14:38, 28 January 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Thank you so much! Would you mind if I moved your message to [[Talk:What If? chapters]], to group everything regarding the index in one place?&amp;lt;!-- Do as you wish, it's your Talk namespace, here, and *if* you can make it halfway readable then you can display it where you like, on my behalf. You (and Firestar) made decent use of my ideas, which I had no time to get into the actual implementation of. Signed: that IP again.--&amp;gt; &amp;lt;!--Got it! Thank you. Signed: FaviFake--&amp;gt; Anyways:&lt;br /&gt;
*I did the thing on the yt and {{template|blog}} one and it works!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 For the books, I was thinking that if, instead of &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;=&amp;quot;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{{1|0}}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;quot;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;, you could maybe use &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;=&amp;quot;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{#expr:10000+{{{1|0}}}}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;quot;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt; for ''What If?'' (in {{template|book1}}) and &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;=&amp;quot;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{#expr:20000+{{{1|0}}}}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;quot;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt; for ''What If? 2'' (in {{template|book2}}), to let it sort by book ''and then'' chapter within book...&lt;br /&gt;
*Done! Thanks! For ({{template|book3}}) i used 30000 to have the chapter in chronological order.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 You could even redo the {{template|book}} idea&lt;br /&gt;
*Sorry but I'm not touching that... ''thing'' anymore. That template traumatized me (jk! if you want to try fixing it i'd be very happy)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 For only the numeric bits (currently, in the test for less-than-10, etc; in the above for within the &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;data-sort-value=&amp;quot;...&amp;quot;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;) you might want to switch &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{{1|0}}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt; with &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{#if:{{#ifexpr:{{{1|0}}}}}|99|{{{1|0}}}}}{{{1|0}}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;... This should test the param1 value for being a valid value (or missing, when you already make it zero... though not sure for what circumstance you should consider it validly missing) &lt;br /&gt;
*I'm not sure why that's needed (and also how to actually implement it). What happens if the value is invalid? it seems to work. Or is it required for the other improvements you suggested?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 The other idea is...&lt;br /&gt;
 The third option would be...&lt;br /&gt;
*Yeah this seems pretty hard to solve easily (which is why i'd love it if you did it!). I guess it'll stay slightly broken until it becomes a bigger issue. --[[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 16:54, 28 January 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::It seems like you just forgot to escape pipe characters in the [[Template:book|book template]] in the table within the switch statement, so it just interpreted the non-formatting statements to be a case grouped with the next 'actual' case [[User:Firestar233|guess who]] ([[User talk:Firestar233|if you desire conversing]] | [[Special:Contributions/Firestar233|what i have done]]) 07:23, 29 January 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::BTW I fixed the book template. It should now appear the same as the other templates, and even work with the youtube template [[User:Firestar233|guess who]] ([[User talk:Firestar233|if you desire conversing]] | [[Special:Contributions/Firestar233|what i have done]]) 09:13, 29 January 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::OMG THANK YOU SO MUCH!!! IT ACTUALLY WORKS! What! How! Why!&lt;br /&gt;
:::Thanks so much for fixing the template! I can't describe how glad I am to see it working as (and even better than) I wanted. My life is finally complete. I have switched to using your template in the index.&lt;br /&gt;
:::The reason there was a YT link in one of the {{template|book}} documentation examples is because I was going insane and likely pasted it there by accident. From what I can tell, you seem to have set up {{template|book}} so well that {{template|book}} accepts a YouTube link as input, while the {{template|yt}} template it's based on doesn't if used by itself (requires only the ID). I love this! Since we're gonna have many YT videos to add, it's great to have a much simpler option which doesn't require extracting the ID of the video. Is there a way you could maybe incorporate this improvement into {{template|yt}} itself? Or maybe you're 10 steps ahead of me and you've already done it (which wouldn't surprise me given the amount of wizardry you used on these bad boys!), and I just didn't notice. Please let me know! And again, thank you so much!!! --[[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 17:56, 29 January 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Also, since you've already rendered 4 templates useless thanks to your improvements, why not also add {{template|yt}} to the list of pages to delete, by incorporating it into {{template|book}}? This, unlike {{template|book}}, is absolutely not needed, and I also have no idea if it's as easy as a simple copy-and-paste, or if it requires more work. If it's the latter, please don't do it if you don't want to! I'm just throwing ideas around! --[[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 18:04, 29 January 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
That IP, here. I (think) I fixed the sorting ''and'' error-fallback issues. I think (without trying to roll back to how you had it) you 'broke the sort' by putting in line-feeds (maybe double-ones), that messed up the table/cell handling. Then you broke the handling by commenting out too much (you needed to &amp;quot;&amp;lt; ! - -&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;- - &amp;gt;&amp;quot;, without spaces, without crossing the quotes and |ing boundaries in data-sort-value=&amp;quot;...&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;...&amp;quot; and the 'release', by pipe symbol, to cell-contents).&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Recommented for it to work normally, first without the new 'sort assistance' and then with again. Had a look at the error-catcher (went down a blind alley, at first) and made it an explicit &amp;quot;catch all other inputs&amp;quot; for the errororing display, which I formatted in a more obvious manner ''and'' forced to sort to the start. (Well, almost the start. It puts empty cells with no sorting 'ahead' of even the -999 value I made it give any error-caught cells.)&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;If it were me, I'd be happy to have {{template|yt}} entirely separate from the {{template|book}} handling. It is mnemonically confusing and adds needless (and possibly error-prone) &amp;quot;if we have far too many params for Book template, feed it all into the Youtube template&amp;quot;. Unless you're folding the ''whole'' Youtube template into the body of the Book one (even more work to maintain/debug), it's just adding complication for both server and editors who feel forced to use it. The beauty of the monolithic Book template is that (otherwise identical) &amp;quot;Book N, chapter C, optional new title T&amp;quot; information is trivially similar between different Ns. But it's not my project.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;I'll have a dig about in maybe how to have a table sort &amp;quot;valueless&amp;quot; cells (in reality the empty value of cell absolutely without anything in it) beyond the sort-valued ones. The 'easiest' means I could imagine is to accept &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{book|0}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;, needing no further params, to create a &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;data-sort-value=&amp;quot;999999&amp;quot; |''&amp;lt;blank&amp;gt;''&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt; cell-definition, and have every book-column cell without a book-reference explicitly use that (ditto for &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{yt|0}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt; to have the same pre-trap to it). But seems wasteful. A template &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{empty}}, or even something like {{e}},&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt; (without checking if either of those are free names) could also just give us this behaviour straight off, of course. It's potentially a lot of fuss to make consistent and flexible enough, either way.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;But what I already did probably also needs to be checked for more edge-conditions... I may still have to tweak things when I have a better chance of catching errors (very difficult, on a tablet), and quicker. [[Special:Contributions/172.70.162.196|172.70.162.196]] 21:32, 29 January 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:I also think that the book template shouldn't be used for the videos, on the basis that youtube is not a book.&lt;br /&gt;
:for the default cell, it would probably take no arguments (i.e. just &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{yt}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;), and it would also probably be it's own template rather than implemented on each template. However, I have done some digging, and empty cells (cells with no sort value) are given a value of &amp;quot;-infinity&amp;quot;, so they sort as the absolute minimum no matter what sort method is used (which means always at the top when sorting ascending). I have been looking to find a way to make a row always sort to the bottom regardless of sort order if the column that is sorted has an empty/valueless cell at that row, but if it exists, it is not documented.&lt;br /&gt;
:Interestingly, it is possible to sort by many columns at once by shift-clicking the second column after sorting the first column, and the rows will be sorted within the first sorting. it might be useful for sorting by chapter within each book [[User:Firestar233|guess who]] ([[User talk:Firestar233|if you desire conversing]] | [[Special:Contributions/Firestar233|what i have done]]) 06:51, 30 January 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::Yes, a book (or youtube) template could default to whatever seems suitable as sort-value without params, but it might be more obvious if explicitly book(/video) zero. Or caught by &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{book|nobook=yet}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;, or whatever. I'm trying to think what looks least confusing to future editors (those expanding/editing the table, and/or template(s)), but conflicted about what to anticipate.&lt;br /&gt;
::I had indeed been looking to see if the -infinity thing could be overriden by a column header defined &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;blank-sort-value=&amp;quot;999999&amp;quot;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt; sort of thing. If nothing else, you'd expect there to be a perceived need to sort a range of cells so that explicit negative and explicit positive contents, either by actual cell value or data-sort-value, to sit either side of blank cells... Not ''all'' the time, as sorting to show blanks ''separate'' from filled rows with actual zeroes is also useful, but it seems to useful not to have been suggested as a configurable change.&lt;br /&gt;
::The booknumber*A_LARGE_NUMBER offset to the chapter number is probably one of the most useful ways to sort by (primarily) book, then chapter, as it takes just one click. (I believe clicking the secondary and then clicking the primary does the same job as clicking the primary and shift-clicking the primary.) I see so little use to doing a primary sort by chapter (with or without secondary sorting by books, or any other column's detail), to interleave all chapter 1s and so on, that having a &amp;quot;book #&amp;quot; column and a &amp;quot;chapter(/page) #&amp;quot; column (two cells in sequence easily created by the book template, and could also handle the double-blank needed by book=none implementation, if we went that route) would be just complicating matters in an unnecessary manner. (As opposed to how we've complicated matters in a 'necessary' one!)&lt;br /&gt;
::Good catch on bringing the BOOK+CHAPTER sort value out of the #switch, BTW, as I was debating how much of the switch-statement I could treat as generic and not need repeating. (My original idea for the 10th Anniversary version of Book 1 to be effectively &amp;quot;Book1.1&amp;quot; made me still want to option of overriding the N*10000 as being 3=&amp;gt;11000 instead of =&amp;gt;30000, but that could ''still'' be implemented by a bit of &amp;quot;(if N=3, 1.1, else N) times 10000&amp;quot; pre-logic, ''or'' by handling &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{book|1.10|...}} instead of {{book|3|...}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;. Anyway, not important, either way.)&lt;br /&gt;
::...all this is why I left Favi (and you/others) get on with the original restructuring effort without jumping in (despite having two of the three books, and having seen all the youtubes). I had plenty of ideas of what to do, but did not want to restructure anything from what seemed to be a happy little project with its own momentum and targets. I finally gave in when I noticed an impasse being hit, with errors and confusion, to which I since ''hope'' I have provided a net reduction in both. Though it's only the first of these about which I'm fairly confident. ;) Anyway, perhaps I'm sliding back to my position on the sidelines, now... [[Special:Contributions/172.70.91.245|172.70.91.245]] 11:20, 30 January 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::These comments are great and extremely detailed, thank you! Thanks to your efforts I was able to retire these templates: book1, book2, book3, book4, and yt, so now we only have the huge {{template|book}} template and {{template|blog}}. I kinda agree with IP that it might not be future-proof, but I don't really see a reason to believe we'll add 2 more parameters to the book-specific columns. And even then, it's not that hard to update the template. But please do let me know if you can think of other issues with the current implementation! --[[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 19:50, 30 January 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
I've added a minor feature to the template so that we can see which short video one is. For example, the &amp;quot;everyone jump&amp;quot; short is the 17th one posted, so it now displays on the table as &amp;quot;17th Short video, on 2025‑11‑25: What if everyone on Earth was in the same place and jumped at the same time?&amp;quot;. Hope it helps! [[User:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font:11pt Cormorant Garamond&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#5CA7CF&amp;quot;&amp;gt;tor&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#F08DB0&amp;quot;&amp;gt;i :3&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font:8pt Cormorant Garamond&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#9E9E9E&amp;quot;&amp;gt;talk &amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#F08DB0&amp;quot;&amp;gt;to &amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#5CA7CF&amp;quot;&amp;gt;me!&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 17:38, 11 February 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Thanks! Initially i didn't add it to allow column sorting to work only for videos, but now that there are many shorts the number is definitely neeeded somehwere :) [[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 20:39, 13 February 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== tldr ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
hey favifake! i just came back from a 5 day yosemite trip, that’s why i have been awol for that time. could you please really quick give me a tldr of what has been going on in the past couple days? i see that we finished the index, but i’m just wondering if there’s anything else. thanks! '''[[User:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:9pt;color:#A9C6CA&amp;quot;&amp;gt;42.book.addict&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:6pt;color:#516874&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Talk to me!&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;''' 02:52, 1 February 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Welcome back! We now only use the {{template|book}} and {{template|blog}} templates, all the others have been merged into {{template|book}} by the incredible [[User:Firestar233]], the templates are much more solid, they also added all the questions and almost all the what if? 2-exclusive chapters. So now we're only missing the questions from the first book and an explanation for the third's bonus chapter (which you own!). I don't have much time, but you can look at the history of the templates and the main what if chapters page, and also this talk section. There's also a to-do list above the index! --[[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 18:32, 1 February 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::ok, great! i'll try to work on the chapter explainations once i find the time '''[[User:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:9pt;color:#A9C6CA&amp;quot;&amp;gt;42.book.addict&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:6pt;color:#516874&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Talk to me!&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;''' 21:04, 1 February 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Amazing! Thanks for your help. If you're interested, I've just added a simple (yet boring) task:&lt;br /&gt;
:::*''&amp;quot;Need to add the name(s) of the readers who asked each questions. It's easy! The instructions are in the ''[[What If? chapters#Editors|Editors section]]''!&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
:::If you have time, the names are missing for some book-exclusive articles and the blog articles. --[[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 10:59, 2 February 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Table for smaller screens ==&lt;br /&gt;
Do we think we should list out who asked each question in the table? [[User:Firestar233|guess who]] ([[User talk:Firestar233|if you desire conversing]] | [[Special:Contributions/Firestar233|what i have done]]) 03:09, 2 February 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:If so (and I'm not sure it's necessary), please not as an extra column. Already it's squeezing what's there down, something chronic. At least on my current screen, right now. &lt;br /&gt;
:*The thumbnail column can't get smaller (unless we use smaller/downscaled thukbnails, of course, but there's a limit to that)&lt;br /&gt;
:*The title column (of the first non-hdader is &amp;quot;Relatacistic(Newline)Baseball&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
:*The &amp;quot;Reader's(Newline)question&amp;quot; column goes &amp;quot;(quote)What would(Newline)happen if you(Newline)(...etc)&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
:*The &amp;quot;Randall's answer&amp;quot; column is positively spacious (no doubt forced to be so by the &amp;quot;Too short!&amp;quot; infoboxes), letting it read &amp;quot;The ball would create plasma and(Newline)reach home plate by about 70(Newline)(...etc)&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
:*The three columns for Blog/Book/Vid couldn't be narrower and make sense.&lt;br /&gt;
:If the questioner is to be asked, set it after the question (same cell, maybe horizontal rule).&lt;br /&gt;
:In fact, what do you think of the following layout modification?&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;sortable wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
!Title&lt;br /&gt;
!Question / Answer&lt;br /&gt;
!Blog&lt;br /&gt;
!Books&lt;br /&gt;
!YouTube&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|'''{{what if|1|Relativistic Baseball}}'''&lt;br /&gt;
 [[File:Relativistic Baseball.png|100px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|''&amp;quot;What would happen if you tried to hit a baseball pitched at 90% the speed of light?&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Ellen McManis&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
The ball would create plasma and reach home plate by about 70 nanoseconds. The result would be some kind of nuclear explosion, destroying everything about a mile from the field. A ruling of &amp;quot;{{w|hit by pitch}}&amp;quot; could be interpreted in this situation.&lt;br /&gt;
|{{blog|1|2012|07|10}}&lt;br /&gt;
|{{book|1|2}}&lt;br /&gt;
|{{book|5|2024|02|06|3EI08o-IGYk|What if you threw a baseball at nearly light speed?}}&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|'''{{what if|2|SAT Guessing}}'''&lt;br /&gt;
 [[File:SAT Guessing.png|100px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|''&amp;quot;What if everyone who took the SAT guessed on every multiple-choice question? How many perfect scores would there be?&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Rob Balder&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
No one would get a perfect score. The odds of guessing correctly on every question would be less than the odds of every ex-living president at that time and the main cast of [[:Category:Firefly|Firefly]] getting struck by lightning on the same day.&lt;br /&gt;
|{{blog|2|2012|07|10|7d early}}&lt;br /&gt;
|{{book|1|66}}&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
:Saves trouble of having emphatically unsortable columns, this way, being mere continuations of the cell contents we ''do'' want to sort. Assuming we don't decide we want to sort by &amp;quot;Firstname(s) Lastname&amp;quot; (or &amp;quot;Lastname, Firstname(s)&amp;quot;), as well as by sorting by &amp;quot;What would...&amp;quot; / &amp;quot;What if...&amp;quot; / &amp;quot;How much...&amp;quot; / &amp;quot;Is there...&amp;quot;ness, etc. But that's another step with another answer to it. (e.g. a &amp;quot;By&amp;quot; column with data-sort-value=&amp;quot;Lastname, Firstname(s)&amp;quot; defined but ''no visible content''... It'll be as minimally thin as &amp;quot;By&amp;quot; and the sort-glyph allows, only minimally squeezing the other columns. ...if that's more desirous than merely 'data-sort-value'ing the Question(/Name)/Answer field by name (whatever format), and finding little real reason to sort the &amp;quot;How&amp;quot;s from the &amp;quot;What&amp;quot;s from the &amp;quot;Is&amp;quot;s. But that's something that deserves more thought!)&lt;br /&gt;
:But what I ''do'' highly suggest (at least add the &amp;quot;Who&amp;quot; after the &amp;quot;Question&amp;quot;, same cell, and looks nice with right-align; on top of that, cell-mergering like this, ''probably'' with the horizontal rule markup in the Q&amp;amp;A divide) looks good to me.&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;quot;Relativistic Baseball&amp;quot;(noNewline!) and &amp;quot;(quote)What would happen if you tried to hit a&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;(Newline, etc...)&amp;quot; is how the example table pans out in Preview, which is an improvement for readability.&lt;br /&gt;
:I won't pre-emptimptively assume you're ok with this plan, but (if it seems the idea is liked/not disliked), when I have the time to do it I could blitz this (or any other consensus change of similar radicality, that gets proposed instead) later on (at least 12 hours from now, maybe a full day...). I'll do what I can to fill (or visibly format, if already there) such authors as I'm not left totally stumped about for whatever nazcent reason. Sound good to y'all? ;) [[Special:Contributions/141.101.98.190|141.101.98.190]] 05:00, 2 February 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Thanks for your suggestions! These are my thoughts:&lt;br /&gt;
 Do we think we should list out who asked each question in the table?&lt;br /&gt;
::Yes! I thought about doing this after you commented each reader after the question, but didn't have the time. The ay you went about adding them makes it very easy to create a &amp;quot;find-and-replace&amp;quot; to do it for all cells at once.This is how I'd do it:&lt;br /&gt;
:: &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;''&amp;quot;Question?&amp;quot;''&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:: &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;—Rob Balder&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 In fact, what do you think of the following layout modification?&lt;br /&gt;
 [...] cell-mergering like this, ''probably'' with the horizontal rule markup in the Q&amp;amp;A divide) looks good to me.&lt;br /&gt;
::I don't really like it and I don't think it's needed, mainly because it only looks good on a small screen. Meanwhile, on a normal-sized desk monitor, it makes the table '''almost twice as tall''' on my end. I don't think we should optimise for smaller screens and disregard other users with a larger screen real estate. If you find any other way to improve the table on both screen sizes, please do let us know!&lt;br /&gt;
 (e.g. a &amp;quot;By&amp;quot; column with data-sort-value=&amp;quot;Lastname, Firstname(s)&amp;quot; defined but ''no visible content''... It'll be as minimally thin as &amp;quot;By&amp;quot; and the sort-glyph allows, only minimally squeezing the other columns.&lt;br /&gt;
::I don't really like this idea, seems confusing for the end user (why is there an empty column?), doesn't add so much value, and needs to be maintained. If someone wants to sort by reader alphabetically, they'll likely find a way to isolate the '''&amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;—Rob Balder&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;''' part.&lt;br /&gt;
 But what I ''do'' highly suggest (at least add the &amp;quot;Who&amp;quot; after the &amp;quot;Question&amp;quot;, same cell, and looks nice with right-align [...]&lt;br /&gt;
::Love that! See above.&lt;br /&gt;
::--[[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 09:01, 2 February 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I formatted them! All the ones that were added as comments in the table are now visible. I also added this to-do, mainly for blog posts:&lt;br /&gt;
::*Need to add the name(s) of the readers who asked each questions. It's easy! The instructions are in the ''[[What If? chapters#Editors|Editors section]]''!&lt;br /&gt;
::--[[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 10:57, 2 February 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Regarding &amp;quot;...on a normal-sized desk monitor, it makes the table '''almost twice as tall''' on my end.&amp;quot; my display (non-desktop) has ultra-wide aspect ratio (when landscape; I rarely use portrait for browsing because then web-pages are scaled to unreadable levels).&lt;br /&gt;
:::With side-by-side Q and A columns, the &amp;quot;Too small&amp;quot; warning box dictates the minimum width of the Answer column, making the Question column even more narrow (when you take the minimum width of the thumbnail out of the horizontal space, then the title and the three &amp;quot;occurance&amp;quot; columns fight for what remains) than it might otherwise need to be. (If/when we remove ''all'' these hints to edit longer answer-'summaries', the table will doubtless realign its contents to a more equitable share of width between columns.)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Most often, this still results in (non-short) &amp;quot;Answer&amp;quot; columns being longer than they need to be, and forcing the whole row to be vertically wasteful. An opposite case (such as replicated below) does it with the Question having to have excessive linefeeds, being less readable (needs scrolling to read it all) and leaving a vast desert of blankness in the cell to its immediate right.&lt;br /&gt;
:::Isolating just the Q and A columns (to remove other confounding factors, for most displays except maybe phones-in-portrait - which is already an abominable mode and I find most websites look ''far'' more unreadable in ultra-tall-portrait orientation, so I generally avoid doing that on my tablet) and manually adding the line-breaks I see, you get:&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;sortable wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;quot;When my wife&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;and I started&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;dating she&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;invited me over&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;for dinner at one&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;time. Her&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;kitchen had&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;something&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;called Bauhaus&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;chairs, which are&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;full of holes,&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;approx 5-6&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;millimeters in&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;diameter in both&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;back and seat.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;During this&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;lovely dinner I&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;was forced to&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;liberate a small&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;portion of wind&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;and was relieved&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;that I managed&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;to do so very&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;discretely. Only&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;to find that the&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;chair I sat on&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;converted the&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;successful&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;silence into a&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;perfect, and&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;loud, flute note.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;We were both&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;(luckily) amazed&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;and surprised&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;and I have often&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;wondered what&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;the odds are for&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;something like&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;that happening.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;We kept the&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;chairs for five&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;years but&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;despite laborious&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;attempts it&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;couldn't be&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;reproduced.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|This... isn’t actually a question, but&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;thank you for sharing!&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
:::Integrating the row into the above-suggested format of table, we get (showing just that single combined Q+A cell, minus any &amp;quot;by&amp;quot;-line), the following:&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;sortable wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;quot;When my wife and I started dating she invited&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;me over for dinner at one time. Her kitchen had&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;something called Bauhaus chairs, which are full&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;of holes, approx 5-6 millimeters in&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;diameter in both back and seat. During this lovely dinner I&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;was forced to liberate a small portion of wind&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;and was relieved that I managed to do so very&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;discretely. Only to find that the chair I sat on&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;converted the successful silence into a perfect,&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;and loud, flute note. We were both (luckily)&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;amazed and surprised and I have often&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;wondered what the odds are for something like&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;that happening. We kept the chairs for five&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;years but despite laborious attempts it couldn't be reproduced.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
This... isn’t actually a question, but thank you&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;for sharing!&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
:::Yes, the non-Q&amp;amp;A cells (which I've left out, just there) are still comparatively empty (especially as &amp;quot;Relativistic Baseball&amp;quot; isn't forced into two lines, and even the final three columns don't need quite as many linefeeds between them ...you could probably narrow them further by forcing some linebreaks back into them, giving even more width to Q+A column), but they're actually often ''less'' empty because they aren't as artifically tall as a function of =max(height(question),height(answer)), instead being =height(wider(question+answer)). The conversion to not force a short question to inhabit a desolately empty cell as long as narrowly squashed answer, ''and'' a short answer to be as long as an even more narrowly squashed question, seems to be more wasteful of space than to give combined Q&amp;amp;A far more width and let it be ''exactly'' as long as it needs to be for both to fill it (being the crux of the row, the rest being 'annotations' to the paragraphed question/answer interplay).&lt;br /&gt;
:::Though I'm not next to my own desktop display, right now, I can tell you that the space-wasting I'm showing is notable (though not quite so egregious) there, too, and I had already thought to try out (at least for a Preview) a Q+A column.&lt;br /&gt;
:::I wasn't, at that time, even thinking of thumbnail+title columns merging (which would help even more), but I'm sorely tempted now. Whether or not Q+A merging is accepted by the wider set of editors. Merging title+thumbnail ''could'' trivially let the Q-column expand maybe to double its current width, depending upon the other dynamics involved in apportioning rendered width and height. [[Special:Contributions/172.70.90.9|172.70.90.9]] 13:00, 2 February 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Ok, for reference: The desktop machine has the following line-feeds for the above example, as ''currently'' shown in the Thumbnail|Title|Question|Answer|... format:&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;sortable wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;quot;When my wife and I started dating she invited me&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;over for dinner at one time. Her kitchen&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;had something called Bauhaus chairs, which are full of&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;holes, approx 5-6 millimeters in diameter in both&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;back and seat. During this lovely dinner I was forced&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;to liberate a small portion of wind and was relieved&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;that I managed to do so very discretely. Only to find&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;that the chair I sat on converted the successful&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;silence into a perfect, and loud, flute note. We were&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;both (luckily) amazed and surprised and I have often&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;wondered what the odds are for something like that&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;happening. We kept the chairs for five years but&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;despite laborious attempts it couldn't be&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;reproduced.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|This... isn’t actually a question, but thank you for sharing!(Single line!)&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
:::Testing the above-suggested format of table, we get:&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;sortable wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;quot;When my wife and I started dating she invited me over for dinner at one time. Her kitchen had something called Bauhaus&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;chairs, which are full of holes, approx 5-6 millimeters in diameter in both back and seat. During this lovely dinner I was&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;forced to liberate a small portion of wind and was relieved that I managed to do so very discretely. Only to find that the&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;chair I sat on converted the successful silence into a perfect, and loud, flute note. We were both (luckily) amazed and surprised&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;and I have often wondered what the odds are for something like that happening. We kept the chairs for five years but&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;despite laborious attempts it couldn't be reproduced.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
This... isn’t actually a question, but thank you for sharing!&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
:::Again, produces shorter (and more readable?) rows. In this particularly extreme example, at least. [[Special:Contributions/162.158.74.49|162.158.74.49]] 14:25, 2 February 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::::Thanks for your answer, these are my thoughts:&lt;br /&gt;
 the &amp;quot;Too small&amp;quot; warning box dictates the minimum width of the Answer column, making the Question column even more narrow [...] than it might otherwise need to be&lt;br /&gt;
::::*I hadn't thought of that, but still: if the issue is mainly caused by these notices, it's very easy to replace them with something else that doesn't force the column to be too wide.&lt;br /&gt;
  I generally avoid doing that on my tablet&lt;br /&gt;
::::*Oh, you're still the same IP as before! Hey there! My point ''wasn't'' that your idea wouldn't benefit small-sized screens like tablets (because it does, as you proved!), but that we should mainly focus on desktop users, which is how most readers that aren't on their phones will use the index. I don't like the idea of making the experience worse for everyone except tablet users (and phone users, but i can't imagine someone browsing such a huge index on their phones, so i don't think we should consider them). I'd love it you could improve the experience for both types of devices!&lt;br /&gt;
 &amp;quot;When my wife and I started dating she invited me over for dinner at one time. Her kitchen&lt;br /&gt;
::::*I think that's a bad example because the question is 4x the normal question length and there is no answer. I don't think we'd want to optimise the index so that that specific article looks better but most other articles don't.&lt;br /&gt;
::::*I think the perfect example of how it will one day look is article 2, with the question being slightly shorter than the answer, and that difference being balanced by the name of the reader who asked the question:&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;sortable wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
!class=&amp;quot;unsortable&amp;quot;|Thumbnail&lt;br /&gt;
!Title&lt;br /&gt;
!Reader's question&lt;br /&gt;
!class=&amp;quot;unsortable&amp;quot;|Randall's answer&lt;br /&gt;
!Blog&lt;br /&gt;
!Books&lt;br /&gt;
!YouTube&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:SAT Guessing.png|100px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|'''{{what if|2|SAT Guessing}}'''&lt;br /&gt;
|''&amp;quot;What if everyone who took the SAT guessed on every multiple-choice question? How many perfect scores would there be?&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;—This is a name&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|No one would get a perfect score. The odds of guessing correctly on every question would be less than the odds of every ex-living president at that time and the main cast of [[:Category:Firefly|Firefly]] getting struck by lightning on the same day.&lt;br /&gt;
|{{blog|2|2012|07|10|7d early}}&lt;br /&gt;
|{{book|1|66}}&lt;br /&gt;
|{{book|16|2024|09|24|0EytSWiKrFg|What if example?}}&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
::::*This specific example, which is how most articles do/will look hopefully, is '''~45% shorter''' than [[#Question askers|your example]] and thus wastes much less space on my screen size.&lt;br /&gt;
 the final three columns don't need quite as many linefeeds between them ...you could probably narrow them further by forcing some linebreaks back into them [...]&lt;br /&gt;
::::*If they need linebreaks, doesn't that mean that their column would be the most narrow one? I thought mediawiki balanced the table pretty well.&lt;br /&gt;
 thumbnail+title columns merging (which would help even more), but I'm sorely tempted now&lt;br /&gt;
::::*But I think this idea has the same problem, looking too tall on desktops and beautiful on a tablet. I wouldn't want to ruin the UX of desktop users to favour tablet users, but i'd love a way to improve both!&lt;br /&gt;
::::*Also, I'd like to one day make the thumbnail bigger, because currently it's too small in my opinion. But if i increased its size right now, it would force every row to be even taller, which would waste space on desktop (and, of course, save space on small screens, or at least not make that big of a difference). --[[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 17:04, 2 February 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::::Is there a &amp;quot;mobile&amp;quot; version/url for this site? because there might be a way to make the table try to display a different layout if it's on the mobile url/version or if the screen is too small, but that would require putting complicated expressions in every row and in the header columns. [[User:Firestar233|guess who]] ([[User talk:Firestar233|if you desire conversing]] | [[Special:Contributions/Firestar233|what i have done]]) 20:53, 3 February 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Yeah I had thought of doing a similar thing, maybe have two pages with different coding and use complex transclusions to keep the content the same? But I wouldn’t even know where to begin with that. But you're the wiki-editing wizard here. --[[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 17:50, 4 February 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::As I predicted, now that most columns are filled, on my screen they're almost the same width! I think it'd be even more balanced if we removed the notices --[[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 15:44, 31 March 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== adding what if? 10th ann   ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
as most of you know, the what if? 10th anniversary edition is basically an updated version of what if?, compete with red annotations and a bonus chapter that i need to get around to explaining. since it has all the original what if? chapters, should we add a red 10th anniversary box under each green what if? box? '''[[User:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:9pt;color:#A9C6CA&amp;quot;&amp;gt;42.book.addict&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:6pt;color:#516874&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Talk to me!&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;''' 16:12, 3 February 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Yeah I realized it was just small annotations after i created the template and now I've changed the 10th ann. one to say ''Featured '''exclusively''' on the 3rd ed. etc.'' Not sure if that's enough, could also be much longer since it's only used on 1 row, but we definitely shouldn't add the template to every other article, (would break the style= html tag). Someone should still mention that articles on the first book are all available on the 3rd (and add more info) on both '''[[what if? (blog)]]''' and '''[[What If? 10th Anniversary Edition]]'''.&lt;br /&gt;
:Don't worry too much about explaining it, it can just be a couple of sentences. People can watch the video if they want details. Thanks for your work!{{unsigned|FaviFake|09:57, 3 February 2025 (UTC)}} &amp;lt;!-- I'm so bad at this! I love how both IP and Firestar rushed to add my signature hahaha --&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The fact that the 10th Anniversary ed (&amp;quot;book3&amp;quot;, in original nomenclature) was basically a bonus-chapter version of the original (&amp;quot;book1&amp;quot;), was behind my suggestion that book|3 should sort-value itself as between book|1 articles and the completely new book|2, but there are severl ways of doing it (including maybe using something akin to {{w|Template:Diagonal split header}} for book|1 (assumed to also be book|3) rendering. [[Special:Contributions/162.158.38.96|162.158.38.96]] 21:08, 3 February 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::That's interesting, I didn't know that existed! I wonder if there's a less repetitive and/or space-efficient way of expressing the same message (&amp;quot;this is on both&amp;quot;), but idk. (look, I remembered to sign this time!) --[[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 17:43, 4 February 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::another question: should i be updating the explanations to be accurate as of 2024? many of the red annotations contain corrections or updates. '''[[User:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:9pt;color:#A9C6CA&amp;quot;&amp;gt;42.book.addict&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:6pt;color:#516874&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Talk to me!&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;''' 16:08, 4 February 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
That's interesting! I like the idea of adding them, but I can't seem to find a nice way to add them:&lt;br /&gt;
*We could add them to the existing explanation, but that would be weird because half of the blog articles, which are public on the site, don't have these additions.&lt;br /&gt;
*We could add them to the book column, but it'd likely get too big, and we would need to figure out a way to make the template do that.&lt;br /&gt;
*We could create a duplicate row of every red-annotated article, even if they're on the blog, but that would be confusing and might clutter the index.&lt;br /&gt;
*We could create a new column, but we already have too many.&lt;br /&gt;
*Also, we'd need to figure out how to add them. Do we want to make the text red like in the book? Should we use a new/old template for that?&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 17:43, 4 February 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== By what measure is anything &amp;quot;too short&amp;quot;. ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I am very close to just removing all the &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{notice|Too short}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt; additions, on the basis that this seems to be a purely subjective measure. The only reason I haven't is because they'll probably just be added back in again (with no more reasoning than before). But, if anyone wants more information, everyone already knows where they can find the ''full'' text (or narrated video) that gives it, while a summary is a summary. [[Special:Contributions/172.70.85.49|172.70.85.49]] 20:28, 19 March 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:The reason I add them is because I'd like people browsing the index to be able to glance at a question and read its summary. I try to check the original article to see if there are any important things we missed and point them out. But if, after reading through an article, you find that our summary is clear and '''fully answers''' the question, you can remove it. I started adding these because some early summaries were way too short, just 5-10 words, and mostly didn't answer the question. For example, if an answer is &amp;quot;We would all die&amp;quot;, that doesn't answer the question, but &amp;quot;The radiation from the nuclear bomb would be so pervasive that we would all die in 2 years&amp;quot; does.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Of course people can just read all ~250 articles, but if someone just wants the answer quickly, we offer that. Please feel free to remove them from answers that are already complete, but not all of them.--[[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 16:48, 20 March 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Reviewing the current first five &amp;quot;Too short&amp;quot; complaints, IMO you cannot get much more fully answered without expanding the &amp;quot;summary&amp;quot; to basically going through the article's in-depth explanation and copying/paraphrasing it. Which seems to me to miss the point.&lt;br /&gt;
::Parallel requests for rewording/better phrasing I can understand (if I thought that any change I made in that direction was going to stand when it got &amp;quot;made longer&amp;quot;, I might even try to help out in that direction), but I'm still none the wiser why they are too short.&lt;br /&gt;
::Answering a question of &amp;quot;How long/heavy/bright/fast is &amp;lt;foo&amp;gt;?&amp;quot; shouldn't need more than a simple &amp;quot;it is &amp;lt;measurement&amp;gt;, given &amp;lt;caveat&amp;gt;&amp;quot;, in most cases. Maybe a couple of those if there's different caveats, or add why it would end the world if you even ''had'' such a &amp;lt;foo&amp;gt;. &amp;quot;Could I/we/humanity &amp;lt;bar&amp;gt;?&amp;quot; probably doesn't need much more than &amp;quot;[Yes/No], but &amp;lt;unexpected thing...&amp;gt;&amp;quot; And I'm not sure if it's still there, because I'm not going to recheck it all, but at one point I noted at least one short-question/short-answer that had a longer 'summary' than the answer given.&lt;br /&gt;
::I like words. I need to expend effort to not use more of them, myself, and am quite pleased if I ''can'' satisfactorily say what I'm trying to say in a succint manner. (i.e. not like this...) But I'm still none the wiser what (lower) thresholds there are in this situation. I'm going to consider if I can help, here, but not right this moment. [[Special:Contributions/172.71.241.122|172.71.241.122]] 20:29, 20 March 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Oooh you're the same IP! I didn't recognise you.&lt;br /&gt;
 Reviewing the current first five &amp;quot;Too short&amp;quot; complaints, IMO you cannot get much more fully answered without expanding the &amp;quot;summary&amp;quot; to basically going through the article's in-depth explanation and copying/paraphrasing it. Which seems to me to miss the point.&lt;br /&gt;
:::Sounds good. If the explanation is satisfactory and mentions everything except things like the methodology used and minor &amp;quot;sub-answers&amp;quot;, feel free to remove the notices!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
  &amp;quot;How long/heavy/bright/fast is &amp;lt;foo&amp;gt;?&amp;quot; shouldn't need more than a simple &amp;quot;it is &amp;lt;measurement&amp;gt;, given &amp;lt;caveat&amp;gt;&amp;quot;, in most cases. Maybe a couple of those if there's different caveats, or add why it would end the world if you even had such a &amp;lt;foo&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
:::Agreed!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &amp;quot;Could I/we/humanity &amp;lt;bar&amp;gt;?&amp;quot; probably doesn't need much more than &amp;quot;[Yes/No], but &amp;lt;unexpected thing...&amp;gt;&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
:::Agree, but usually the entire article revolves around that unexpected thing, so i think we should summarise that too. Agin, feel free to remove the ones you're sure can't be made any longer in a useful way At the start, I added a lot and didn't have time to go read the article for each one! --[[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 15:56, 21 March 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Alternate universe What-Ifs ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Should we make the explanation for Alternate universe What-Ifs a separate page? Explaining every section in this article might be too long, and if the other explanations are anything to go by, an explanation that fits would be considered too short. [[Special:Contributions/172.68.174.147|172.68.174.147]] 06:09, 21 March 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:I think we should definitely explain it, but maybe it's better if we keep it in the table? Why'd you want to split into another page?&lt;br /&gt;
:Also, the short-answer articles aren't too short. If you look at [https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php/What_If%3F_chapters#:~:text=Short Answer Section II Short%20Answer%20Section%20II], for example, it explanations are very short, and rightfully so. --[[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 15:49, 21 March 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== What about Good Question? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There does appear to be a *fourth* &amp;quot;What If?&amp;quot; thing Randall has done that is seemingly only documented at [[New York Times: Good Question]]; the New York Times's [https://www.nytimes.com/column/good-question-randall-munroe-xkcd Good Question], which does appear to maybe have some chapter reposts (i.e. Cosmic Road Trip/&amp;quot;How Long Is the Drive to the Edge of the Universe?&amp;quot;). My question is, is this worth documenting on this page in specific? [[User:Adrmcr|Adrmcr]] ([[User talk:Adrmcr|talk]]) 18:36, 21 March 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Oh, right, I had forgotten about that page! I like the idea of doing something with it, it's currently almost impossible to find. To give it more visibility, I think we could move its contents here. I'm not sure if we should add them to the existing table or put them in a new section, maybe at the bottom. I could see something like this working:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;sortable wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
! rowspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; scope=&amp;quot;col&amp;quot; class=&amp;quot;unsortable&amp;quot; |  Thumbnail&lt;br /&gt;
! rowspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; scope=&amp;quot;col&amp;quot; data-sort-type=text|  Title&lt;br /&gt;
! rowspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; scope=&amp;quot;col&amp;quot; data-sort-type=text|  question&lt;br /&gt;
! rowspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; scope=&amp;quot;col&amp;quot; class=&amp;quot;unsortable&amp;quot; |  Randall's answer&lt;br /&gt;
! colspan=&amp;quot;3&amp;quot;|                                  Article available in... &amp;lt;noinclude&amp;gt;&amp;lt;!--&amp;lt;/noinclude&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;background-color:#FFFF00;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;noinclude&amp;gt;--&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/noinclude&amp;gt;&amp;amp;nbsp;''(click to sort)''&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;lt;noinclude&amp;gt;&amp;lt;!--&amp;lt;/noinclude&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;noinclude&amp;gt;--&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/noinclude&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! scope=&amp;quot;col&amp;quot; data-sort-type=number |           Blog&lt;br /&gt;
! scope=&amp;quot;col&amp;quot; data-sort-type=number |           Books&lt;br /&gt;
! scope=&amp;quot;col&amp;quot; data-sort-type=number |           YouTube&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| rowspan=&amp;quot;7&amp;quot; |&lt;br /&gt;
| rowspan=&amp;quot;7&amp;quot; |'''Good Question'''&lt;br /&gt;
|[https://www.nytimes.com/column/good-question-randall-munroe-xkcd ''&amp;quot;How Long Is the Drive to the Edge of the Universe?&amp;quot;'']&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;—Randall Munroe&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Cras sagittis lacus sit amet porta vulputate.&lt;br /&gt;
|1st &amp;quot;[https://www.nytimes.com/column/good-question-randall-munroe-xkcd Good Question]&amp;quot; NYT article, on 2012‑07‑10&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[https://www.nytimes.com/column/good-question-randall-munroe-xkcd ''&amp;quot;Shark or Orca: Which Should You Fear More?&amp;quot;'']&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;—Randall Munroe&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|rutrum eros id, tincidunt neque. Integer hendrerit magna ac nibh fringilla, &lt;br /&gt;
|2nd &amp;quot;[https://www.nytimes.com/column/good-question-randall-munroe-xkcd Good Question]&amp;quot; NYT article, on 2012‑07‑10&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[https://www.nytimes.com/column/good-question-randall-munroe-xkcd ''&amp;quot;	How Many Languages Could a Child Speak?&amp;quot;'']&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;—Randall Munroe&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|non venenatis lacus hendrerit. Pellentesque ullamcorper dolor eget nunc gravida, nec euismod risus efficitur. &lt;br /&gt;
|3rd &amp;quot;[https://www.nytimes.com/column/good-question-randall-munroe-xkcd Good Question]&amp;quot; NYT article, on 2012‑07‑10&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The old page could become a redirect to the new section/NYT table. --[[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 08:49, 22 March 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::Anyone? --[[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 16:56, 23 March 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Striking a match on Titan - additional ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Depends on how you read it, but try to strike a safety match ''on'' Titan probably would do nothing at all (just like if you tried to strike it on a bit of Earth rock, here on the surface of Earth), as it needs the chemicals in the striking-strip to (in small amounts) combine with the oxidiser in the match-head coating to spark up and ''then'' prompt the relatively slower-burning process that leads to the atmosphere-fed burning of the 'stick'.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This means that striker+match reaction will also work in most situations (including underwater and in vacuum), though of course may then fail to get significant amount of post-striking ignition to continue. As non-safety/strike-anywhere ones will, given the friction (hmmm... would you get good friction off of the ice-boulders of Titan?).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But coating your matchheads with wax (or manufactured with a suitable coating) is advisable for 'survival kit' matches, to prevent infusion of water to 'dampen the squib'. Would be interesting to know to what degree the anoxic atmosphere of Titan might seep in and similarly suppress the various types of ready-to-react compounds, before even the lack of free oxygen ends the intended flare-up. [[Special:Contributions/172.71.26.37|172.71.26.37]] 10:19, 29 March 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Uhh, what article are you talking about? This info could be useful to add in the index! --[[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 15:06, 29 March 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::Easily searchable (or made visible as per my recent change), it's not the only &amp;quot;match&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;Titan&amp;quot; reference, but there aren't so many of either that you need to check much further than the first appearance of either, probably.&lt;br /&gt;
::But, as you ask, it's in the Book 2 &amp;quot;Short Answers #3&amp;quot; collection (the penultimate one of that grouping). And, now that I've reached home, I can also tell you that it's pp.141-142 in the UK hardback edition (whether or not that's identical/near to your own copy's appearance of it).&lt;br /&gt;
::However, no ''more'' info needs to be added, IMO. I changed the prior edit (not sure who/which IP did it, without checking, but their edit popped it up on my own radar as worthy of minor refinement) to just say that it's oxidiser, not just &amp;quot;oxygen&amp;quot; (there's oxygen in the &amp;quot;stick&amp;quot; and any other &amp;quot;head&amp;quot;-coatings applied, but basically incidental to the initial ignition when it's the oxidiser component that primarily contributes to that). And, to my mild and gratifying surprise, now find that this is pretty much exactly what the Short Answer says (except in 'Merkin form of &amp;quot;oxidizer&amp;quot; - so now, I think to myself, did I write my edit in Leftpondian (as I should, just because Noah Webster wanted to be a Lexicographical Edgelord), or Rightpondian (as is my default habit, because that's how I was educated)... need to check that!), in the form of a summary which ''our'' summary pretty much matches&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;&amp;amp;#91;[[559: No Pun Intended|''NPI!'']]&amp;amp;#93;&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; in all useful ways.&lt;br /&gt;
::I added the stuff here, about the Safety Match detail, as a bonus bit of info for anyone who cares to scan down here to know this additional thing that I happen to know (but not necessarily explain well?)... Randall does not go that far into the details in his book-answer (he does divert into a footnote about KClO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; being used in airliner oxygen masks, but that's beyond the scope of adding here, and he totally avoids the safety/strike-anywhere distinctions). Adding the above to the Explanation Table would be overkill, and misrepresent Randall's original format to no real benefit (except maybe some curious pyromaniacs, on Earth or elsewhere) [[Special:Contributions/172.69.195.179|172.69.195.179]] 16:58, 29 March 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== A bit disappointed in the lack of progress ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I mean, I understand that this is a volunteer project and I can't force people to work on this thing, hell, I don't even have the time to fill out most of the pages even if I HAVE read the What IF in question. However, it's still a bit disheartening to see so many &amp;quot;too shorts&amp;quot; even after several weeks. [[Special:Contributions/172.69.208.133|172.69.208.133]] 12:32, 17 April 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:If it was up to me, I'd solve the issue of too many &amp;quot;Too short&amp;quot;s by... deleting the unnecessary &amp;quot;Too short&amp;quot;s... I have no desire to expand the sufficient summaries with much longer reruns of the full answers. [[Special:Contributions/162.158.216.168|162.158.216.168]] 15:39, 17 April 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::I think the progress we made is still a lot, considering the state the index was previously. Also, it's not the only incomplete thing, there are about other 80 incomplete pages here. Also, as I said a while back:&lt;br /&gt;
::If the explanation is satisfactory and mentions everything except things like the methodology used and minor &amp;quot;sub-answers&amp;quot;, please remove the notices! &amp;quot;Could I/we/humanity &amp;lt;bar&amp;gt;?&amp;quot; probably doesn't need much more than &amp;quot;[Yes/No], but &amp;lt;unexpected thing...&amp;gt;&amp;quot;. Agree, but usually the entire article revolves around that unexpected thing, so i think we should summarise that too. Again, feel free to remove the ones you're ''sure'' can't be made any longer in a useful way. At the start of the project, I added a lot and didn't have time to go read the article for each one! --[[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 17:03, 17 April 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== &amp;quot;nonmonomolecular&amp;quot; and peptides ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
About &amp;quot;the longest sequence of letters using one number key&amp;quot;: Yamaki, Sahori B. et al.'s article published on 15 March, 2005 in ''Journal of Colloid and Interface Science'' volume 283, issue 2 on pages 464–471 titled ''Morphological and structural characteristics of diazo dyes at the air–water interface: in situ Brewster angle microscopy and polarized UV/vis analysis'' uses &amp;quot;nonmonomolecular&amp;quot; (with neither hyphens nor dashes nor anything else), a word with 9 consecutive letters using the 6 key a total of 20 times. The word also has [[:wikt:nonmonomolecular|an article on Wiktionary]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
About the peptides: &amp;quot;Glycylglycylglycyl[…]glycine&amp;quot; and other spelled-out amino acid sequences (like titin's) status as a word is dubious. If we assume they are all considerable as words, there is no upper limit on peptide sequence word length (e. g. &amp;quot;glycyl&amp;quot; adds 6 to the length and 0 to the count of unallowed letters (U, B, X, O, J, Z), &amp;quot;phenylalanyl&amp;quot; adds 12 and 0, respectively, etc.). [[Special:Contributions/172.70.39.208|172.70.39.208]] 21:21, 27 April 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Great! You can add all that in the explanation in the main table :D &amp;amp;nbsp; --[[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 14:32, 28 April 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Contact Randall (or his team): link rot on &amp;quot;Pressure Cooker&amp;quot; What if? page ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On this page: https://what-if.xkcd.com/40/ &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There's a link ostensibly to an article about O2F2, link text is &amp;quot;Another article&amp;quot;. It goes to lateralscience.com. Unfortunately, the original site there has been replaced by a domain squatter advertising online casinos. I don't know how to contact Mr. Munroe to tell him. [[User:Nitpicking|Nitpicking]] ([[User talk:Nitpicking|talk]]) 20:23, 12 May 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:You can just shoot him an email at his personal address: rmunroe@gmail.com &amp;amp;nbsp; --[[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 15:03, 13 May 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== 10th Anniversary Annotations ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hello, new here. I honestly have no idea what I am doing. But I read the 10th anniversary edition of ''[[What If?]]'', and one annotation, in the same chapter, added dimethylmercury far off to the right, and about halfway up the y axis. [[User:Majordesmosnerd|Majordesmosnerd]] ([[User talk:Majordesmosnerd|talk]]) 22:18, 19 March 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:We as a community have not decided what to do with annotations, as there are many of them scattered throughout the book and it would be a painstaking process to document them all. I would like invite further discussion about this so we can come to a consensus. [[User:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font:11pt Cormorant Garamond&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#4A86A6&amp;quot;&amp;gt;tor&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#C0728D&amp;quot;&amp;gt;i :3&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font:8pt Cormorant Garamond&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#7E7E7E&amp;quot;&amp;gt;talk &amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#C0728D&amp;quot;&amp;gt;to &amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#4A86A6&amp;quot;&amp;gt;me!&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 01:05, 20 March 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::Agree it'd be nice to have them documented somewhere! [[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 12:21, 4 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::How would we format it? Do we want to make a new template for these annotations? I'd be willing to go through my book if I can find the time for it between all my work. [[User:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font:11pt Cormorant Garamond&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#4A86A6&amp;quot;&amp;gt;tor&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#C0728D&amp;quot;&amp;gt;i :3&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font:8pt Cormorant Garamond&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#7E7E7E&amp;quot;&amp;gt;talk &amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#C0728D&amp;quot;&amp;gt;to &amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#4A86A6&amp;quot;&amp;gt;me!&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 19:41, 5 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>42.book.addict</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=User_talk:42.book.addict&amp;diff=409651</id>
		<title>User talk:42.book.addict</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=User_talk:42.book.addict&amp;diff=409651"/>
				<updated>2026-04-05T19:40:50Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;42.book.addict: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;'''Archive 1'''&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;[[File:archive.png]]&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;For old and irrelevant messages, see my [[User talk:42.book.addict/archive|archive!]]&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== introductions ==&lt;br /&gt;
Just replying to your message (also dw no big deal for bothering me)&lt;br /&gt;
You click on your username and there should be an edit box. --[[User:1234231587678|1234231587678]] ([[User talk:1234231587678|talk]]) 04:58, 7 February 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:it says that i dont have permission to create the page…&lt;br /&gt;
:There is currently no text in this page. You can search for this page title in other pages, or search the related logs, but you do not have permission to create this page. it says [[User:42.book.addict|42.book.addict]] ([[User talk:42.book.addict|talk]]) 19:33, 7 February 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I think you might have to wait some time (like a timer) until you can edit your own page... I think I only got to edit my page after 1 month of creating my account.--[[User:1234231587678|1234231587678]] ([[User talk:1234231587678|talk]]) 21:31, 7 February 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:ok, thx [[User:42.book.addict|42.book.addict]] ([[User talk:42.book.addict|talk]]) 21:52, 7 February 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
My guess on where you live is somewhere in the GMT zone, so United Kingdom.--[[User:1234231587678|1234231587678]] ([[User talk:1234231587678|talk]]) 03:43, 8 February 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:nope, im a california girl :) ([[User talk:42.book.addict|talk]]) 05:04, 8 February 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
lol you never know with utc times --[[User:1234231587678|1234231587678]] ([[User talk:1234231587678|talk]]) 16:52, 8 February 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Depends what you wanted to do... ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Is the following what you intended?&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{Userbox | border-c = #255 | border-s = 1 | info-s = 9 | id = [[File:trans_flag.png|45px]] | info = [[{{w|Transgender|This user is trans.}}]]  | float = left }} &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{clear}}...or is even the [[]] part not what you want?{{clear}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{Userbox | border-c = #255 | border-s = 1 | info-s = 9 | id = [[File:trans_flag.png|45px]] | info = {{w|Transgender|This user is trans.}}  | float = left }} &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{clear}}As brief a guide as I can manage:&lt;br /&gt;
*URL links use []. Although literal https://www.google.com will self-link without ''any'' wikimarkup, you probably don't want it to look like that most of the time.&lt;br /&gt;
** Just give the URL, as in &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;[https://www.google.com]&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;, to get a [https://www.google.com] (i.e. a reference number), not the best way to do it. It can be organised better with a 'References' section, but we don't do that here (they do on wikipedia, but usually with other bits to it.&lt;br /&gt;
** Better to give the URL and the text to use (after a space, a character that never appears raw in any proper URL). This can be &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;[https://www.google.com Check It Out On Google!]&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt; or even &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;[https://www.google.com https://www.microsoft.com (only kidding!)]&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;, to give [https://www.google.com Check It Out On Google!] or [https://www.google.com https://www.microsoft.com (only kidding!)]... But perhaps best not to do the latter too much (I really didn't want to post that without the &amp;quot;(only kidding!)&amp;quot; part, in fact.)&lt;br /&gt;
*Internalised wikilinks use the [[]]s.&lt;br /&gt;
**Anything that can be found under the title, e.g. &amp;quot;2: Petit Trees (sketch)&amp;quot; (or, because of redirections, &amp;quot;2&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;Petit Trees (sketch)&amp;quot; go to the same spot, so &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;[[2]], [[Petit Trees (sketch)]] and [[2: Petit Trees (sketch)]]&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt; gives you the literal links [[2]], [[Petit Trees (sketch)]] and [[2: Petit Trees (sketch)]]&lt;br /&gt;
**Or use &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;[[2: Petit Trees (sketch)|that comic with the little trees]]&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;, additional text separated by the 'pipe' symbol (i.e. &amp;quot;|&amp;quot;), to link to [[2: Petit Trees (sketch)|that comic with the little trees]]&lt;br /&gt;
**You can also link across to articles on other 'wikimedia family' sites, but I'm not going to try to summarise that, as the primary reason to do that is to go to an actual Wikipedia article, and there's a template set up to do that ''very'' nicely, already (and also a few other places, like Wiktionary, and some not-really-wikis with a similar philosphy like TVTropes). If in doubt, do it as a URL link ''or'' find a place where someone else has clearly markuped a link to the same site as you want to link to.&lt;br /&gt;
*So, anyway, Wikilink templates use the {{template|w}}-template, with one or two paramaters (pipe-separated). (It shortcuts the thing you'd maybe use [[]]s for&lt;br /&gt;
**Using &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{w|article}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt; gives you a link to &amp;quot;{{w|Article}}&amp;quot; (it capitalises the first character, even if you don't)&lt;br /&gt;
**Using &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{w|article|with alternate text}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt; gives you a link there but &amp;quot;{{w|article|with alternate text}}&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
**If the article name has whitespace (or other 'URL-unfriendly' characters) in it, those characters in the URL (which you wouldn't want to use) will be rendered as something URL-friendly. The URL for &amp;quot;Whitespace (programming language)&amp;quot;, for example, is https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Whitespace_(programming_language) but you wouldn't normally use that so literally in any case, and definitely not when you can significanty shorten it with the {{template|w}} notation.&lt;br /&gt;
***What you can do is (without 'alternate link text') render it as &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{w|Whitespace_(programming_language)}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt; - i.e. {{w|Whitespace_(programming_language)}} - but that's not nice to see 'rendered raw' when you ''want'' the spaces. You could give it alternate text via &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{w|Whitespace_(programming_language)|Whitespace (programming language)}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt; to give {{w|Whitespace_(programming_language)|Whitespace (programming language)}} ...but that's wasteful and unnecessary.&lt;br /&gt;
***Instead, just do &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{w|Whitespace (programming language)}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt; (that's the literal copy of the article's own page title, from the rendered page) - and shows as {{w|Whitespace (programming language)}} - which is good. Although &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{w|Whitespace (programming language)|the programming language called Whitespace}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt; might be the best way to seemlessly link to {{w|Whitespace (programming language)|the programming language called Whitespace}} ...depends what you want to appear there.&lt;br /&gt;
***And you can link to header anchors pretty much ''like'' the URL of https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Whitespace_(programming_language)#History by using &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{w|Whitespace (programming language)#History|the history of Whitespace}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt; to have you show {{w|Whitespace (programming language)#History|the history of Whitespace}} or whatever else you might want to use.&lt;br /&gt;
**Also, for the use of a link which is singular but which you would like to include as the plural (usually the &amp;quot;...s&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;...es&amp;quot; version), you could use article-name first parameter and ''pluralised'' article name as second, but instead of &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{w|Plural|Plurals}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;, for a link to the {{w|Plural|Plurals}}, you can save yourself a lot of effort by doing &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{w|Plural}}s&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt; to also give you a linke to {{w|Plural}}s. Magic, eh? And it also works with &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{w|Ox}}en&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt; to link the different standard plural of {{w|Ox}}en to the article for &amp;quot;Ox&amp;quot; (better than linking to the word for {{w|Oxen}}, which ends up redirecting to {{w|Ox}} anyway).&lt;br /&gt;
...so, anyway, that's the basics. And a few not-so-basics. So if the solutions to your tagging issue aren't already solved (or even if they are!), you might have enough info here to kludge it into whatever form of infobox info text you ''really'' wanted to use. Ok? Probably far too much info for you to absorb in one go, but covers loads of interesting possibilities. About the only thing you don't want to do is wikilink straight to the word &amp;quot;trans&amp;quot;, at that'll be a disambiguation page. And there's also no way (or reason?) to use the terms &amp;quot;trans man&amp;quot;/&amp;quot;trans woman&amp;quot; as the pluralised &amp;quot;trans men&amp;quot;/&amp;quot;trans women&amp;quot; versions via the &amp;quot;directly add the plural suffix&amp;quot; thing, of course. :P Anyway, FYI. [[Special:Contributions/162.158.38.217|162.158.38.217]] 20:40, 25 May 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::oh my god thank you so much [[User:42.book.addict|42.book.addict]] ([[User talk:42.book.addict|talk]]) 19:38, 27 May 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Welcome back, Tori! ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
How's life? [[User:CalibansCreations|'''&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#ff0000;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Caliban&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;''']] ([[User talk:CalibansCreations|talk]]) 18:47, 1 December 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Eh, it’s fine. I just came back from New York on a ''very'' stressful flight-missed the original one, did my Language Arts homework on the flight, and came back to California at 2 am. '''[[User:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:9pt;color:#db97bf&amp;quot;&amp;gt;42.book.addict&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:6pt;color:#97b6db&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Talk to me!&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;''' 16:26, 2 December 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Comics with inverted brightness. ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
At the most arbitrary, I'd suggest that, just maybe, ''panes'' with inverted brightness fulfil the category requirements, or perhaps a bit of white text because it happens to be written on a more shaded bit of background, but I'm unsure that the {{diff|358698|lavatory signs}} strictly invoke inverted brightness (if real signs exist that are light-on-dark, which at least some of them are, this makes it an ''un''inverted depiction of one of them), and I'm unhappy with your (presumed) linking of this category for a {{diff|358691|tree silhouette}}  (it shows the perfectly cromulant situation of bright sky behind a relatively dark tree, again not inverted, merely drawn for contrast).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
An interesting example is something like [[811: Starlight]]. The stars (white spots on floodfilled black background) really shouldn't be considered inverted (black stars on white sky would be inverted; it's only that the category specifically mentions night ''and'' space scenes makes it valid from that perspective), but the text and stickfigures/etc ''are'' definitely inverted (all due to the background they're on).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It's just my opinion, but I don't think that any patch of black-floodfill (especially in just a fraction of a pane or two, within an otherwise normal multi-pane comic) around a white detail is automatically ripe for marking as inverted. I'll reluctantly accept &amp;quot;night sky&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;space&amp;quot; (but only with stars... no &amp;quot;entirely featureless black, through a window/porthole&amp;quot;) as cause for being classed as Inverted, due to the category explanation. But feel that the true &amp;quot;inversion&amp;quot; is where there is [[566: Matrix Revisited|pane inversion]] which results in white text and/or (character) stickfigures upon black background as a definite contrast to 'normality'. Before you go too far with HotCatting some things that I'd feel compelled to revert (as I'm very tempted with the tree silhouette, and almost certain I should with the Gents-signs, for example...). [[Special:Contributions/141.101.98.119|141.101.98.119]] 19:12, 5 December 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Hey again, I know we have some bad blood but...==&lt;br /&gt;
Hey 42, it's Z1m. I know we haven't seen each other in a while (who am I kidding, it's a wiki; I meant talked) Can you do the little welcome thing so I can edit my talk page? Thanks! [[User:Maybe Bill Cipher|An anonymous Gravity Falls expert]] ([[User talk:Maybe Bill Cipher|talk]]) 19:26, 10 December 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Why can’t you use your old account? '''[[User:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:9pt;color:#A9C6CA&amp;quot;&amp;gt;42.book.addict&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:6pt;color:#516874&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Talk to me!&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;''' 21:38, 10 December 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::I forgot my pass :skull: [[User:Maybe Bill Cipher|An anonymous Gravity Falls expert]] ([[User talk:Maybe Bill Cipher|talk]]) 22:33, 10 December 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::SMH. Done. '''[[User:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:9pt;color:#A9C6CA&amp;quot;&amp;gt;42.book.addict&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:6pt;color:#516874&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Talk to me!&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;''' 22:37, 10 December 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::::Thanks! [[User:Maybe Bill Cipher|An anonymous Gravity Falls expert]] ([[User talk:Maybe Bill Cipher|talk]]) 22:42, 10 December 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==I FORGOT MY PASS AGAIN ASDFGHJK&amp;lt;SAHFJEWIUBEIUWDBHIVHJ==&lt;br /&gt;
Help :( [[User:Definitely Bill Cipher|Help I&amp;amp;#39;m not OK]] ([[User talk:Definitely Bill Cipher|talk]]) 18:49, 13 December 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:''sigh'' '''[[User:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:9pt;color:#A9C6CA&amp;quot;&amp;gt;42.book.addict&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:6pt;color:#516874&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Talk to me!&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;''' 19:41, 13 December 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:I KNOW I'M A DINGUS DON'T LOOK AT ME LEAV EME TO MY BASIC YELLOW DORITO SHAME [[User:Definitely Bill Cipher|Do not click on this link if you wish to keep your soul]] ([[User talk:Definitely Bill Cipher|talk]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Hi (3==&lt;br /&gt;
Sorry if I'm bothering you too much, just wanted to say hi. {{unsigned|Definitely Bill Cipher|15:19, 17 December 2024 (UTC)}}&lt;br /&gt;
:Please sign your comments with &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;~~~~&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt; '''[[User:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:9pt;color:#A9C6CA&amp;quot;&amp;gt;42.book.addict&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:6pt;color:#516874&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Talk to me!&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;''' 16:05, 17 December 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::Sorry [[User:Definitely Bill Cipher|A dream demon]] ([[User talk:Definitely Bill Cipher|talk]]) 19:10, 17 December 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::It’s fine, as long as you remember. '''[[User:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:9pt;color:#A9C6CA&amp;quot;&amp;gt;42.book.addict&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:6pt;color:#516874&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Talk to me!&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;''' 20:51, 17 December 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::::So, uh... do you wanna take this to my talk page and we can talk or... [[User:Definitely Bill Cipher|A dream demon]] ([[User talk:Definitely Bill Cipher|talk]]) 21:18, 17 December 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Congrats==&lt;br /&gt;
:I checked and you're the contributor today that has made the most edits. I'm on the leaderboard too, but not in the top three *0(*.  Anyway, I just wanted to congratulate you. Talk to me anytime! [[User:Definitely Bill Cipher|⯅A dream demon⯅]] ([[User talk:Definitely Bill Cipher|talk]]) 15:52, 19 December 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::Ok, that’s nice. I’ve stopped viewing Contribution Scores as a measurement of my editing ability-it only measures how many points and how many pages I have edited, not the quality of my edits or how much of an impact they have on the wiki. A bot can spam and get onto the All-Time Top 50 Leaderboard, but that's not reflective of its helpfulness (none). '''[[User:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:9pt;color:#A9C6CA&amp;quot;&amp;gt;42.book.addict&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:6pt;color:#516874&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Talk to me!&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;''' 16:49, 19 December 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::I remain free from all such objectivity by staying firmly off the list. I ''could'' flatter myself that I deserve a place, for all my (useful?) work over the last 10+ years, but... no definitive tallying and I don't even fool myself that this statement can be believed. Which is liberating. No temptation to &amp;quot;edit for editing's sake&amp;quot;, and remaining blissfully unaware how much time I must have spent not doing ''other'' important things. But that's just me (assuming you accept my account), and please don't consider this as downplaying the known-and-named contributors (current and past) who have made a more attributable contribution. Horses for courses. You (both) be you, and who knows where any of us might be in another ten years; hopefully managing to create a net positive outcome for the world, as the only thing that ''anybody'' should aspire to.[[Special:Contributions/172.69.43.182|172.69.43.182]] 17:18, 19 December 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Bluey news just dropped. ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
https://youtu.be/ititZcuih8E?si=_9ceRfwc52qfa5Tu [[User:CalibansCreations|'''&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#ff0000;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Caliban&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;''']] ([[User talk:CalibansCreations|talk]]) 20:23, 19 December 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:NOOOO '''[[User:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:9pt;color:#A9C6CA&amp;quot;&amp;gt;42.book.addict&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:6pt;color:#516874&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Talk to me!&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;''' 21:25, 19 December 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::wait, what?--[[User:Bb777|me, hi]] ([[User talk:Bb777|talk]]) 16:53, 3 April 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Deleting User Talk Pages ==&lt;br /&gt;
I noticed that you added some user talk pages into the pages to be deleted category. Even if they are an IP address and only have one comment, they still probably shouldn't be deleted. I only noticed because you had marked my talk page. [[User:Firestar233|guess who]] ([[User talk:Firestar233|if you want to]] | [[Special:Contributions/Firestar233|what i have done]]) 09:19, 1 January 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:As I commented over on your page (sorry, didn't spot this, yet), I think that it's perfectly legitimate to correct (by ''requesting'' deletion) the creation of IP-based User and User Talk namespace pages. The intended source/target can never make any proper use of them, and they are instead left open to disproportionately high chance of ''improper'' use.&lt;br /&gt;
:IPs ''may'' have been more reliably associated with particular login-less users (such as myself) in the earliest days of the site, but it's not just the current proxy-provider that makes it likely that anyone coming here is effectively randomised. A 2015-era commentator almost certainly doesn't have the exact same IP ''from their ISP'' (which is Cloudflared away, anyway), unless they've taken great trouble to maintain statically upon it, and that's presuming that they haven't switched providers and/or routing hardware in the last decade, to further muddle it up.&lt;br /&gt;
:So far, I haven't seen any communications to a User Talk:&amp;lt;IP&amp;gt; page that deserves preserving (and User:&amp;lt;IP&amp;gt; stuff tends to be worse, thankfully rarer), but if a named user (who may or may not be currently active, or have had their own Talk page) contributes anything 'untrivial' then you could perhaps copy it to their own (newly created, if necessary?) user-page, or to whatever article Talk page it's identifiably about. Admonations not to delete Incomplete-templates and nice messages of agreement about some Conan-related link-finding are not al all that level of preservable conversation (well, not even a dialogue, as they weren't even acknowledged!), as 'recent' examples.&lt;br /&gt;
:Anyway, marking for deletion still requires that someone ''actually'' deletes them. Currently, '42' can't do that. (They're clearly eager to be helpful, but not yet admin-material.) Realistically, it will need someone else to actually do that bit. And I think the current 'someone else' concerned isn't overly eager to delete things not related to more current unwanted contributions. I'd have done a bit more cleaning up, myself, but by deliberately having kept out of consideration for such responsibiity, it's not something I should actively complain about. ;) [[Special:Contributions/141.101.98.186|141.101.98.186]] 13:00, 1 January 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Hiiiii==&lt;br /&gt;
:Heya, 42! Just wanted to check in because I left for winter break and I thought 'I wonder how she's doing?'&lt;br /&gt;
:If I'm being annoying, you can just say so and I'll leave you alone.&lt;br /&gt;
:Anyway, I'm gonna go comic hop. Talk to me anytime! [[User:Definitely Bill Cipher|⯅A dream demon⯅]] ([[User talk:Definitely Bill Cipher|Come and talk!]]) 15:15, 7 January 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::I’m fine. I went skiing in {{w|Heavenly Mountain Resort|Tahoe}} 5 days during winter break and also went to {{w|Point Reyes Station}}. '''[[User:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:9pt;color:#A9C6CA&amp;quot;&amp;gt;42.book.addict&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:6pt;color:#516874&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Talk to me!&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;''' 22:50, 7 January 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Cool, if you wanna talk I'm here (3 [[User:Definitely Bill Cipher|⯅A dream demon⯅]] ([[User talk:Definitely Bill Cipher|talk]]) 15:35, 9 January 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== I heard about the wildfires. ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Are you safe? Are you alright? [[User:CalibansCreations|'''&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#ff0000;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Caliban&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;''']] ([[User talk:CalibansCreations|talk]]) 08:43, 8 January 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:That’s SoCal, not the Bay Area, so I’m all good. '''[[User:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:9pt;color:#A9C6CA&amp;quot;&amp;gt;42.book.addict&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:6pt;color:#516874&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Talk to me!&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;''' 10:10, 8 January 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Any luck with Jeff? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It’s been a while since you’ve put up the “banner” on your page. Has he responded yet? [[User:Apollo11|Apollo11]] ([[User talk:Apollo11|talk]]) 22:23, 8 January 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Nope. I’ve emailed Davidy22 and he responded, but he doesn’t have server access. I tried on Gmail, Reddit, X, asked @ActuallyBerg from [[explain xkcd#History|the old forum]] who’s apparently a friend with Jeff on both X and Bluesky. '''[[User:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:9pt;color:#A9C6CA&amp;quot;&amp;gt;42.book.addict&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:6pt;color:#516874&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Talk to me!&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;''' 22:25, 8 January 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::Damn… that’s slightly (very) worrying. Good job for trying tho [[User:Apollo11|Apollo11]] ([[User talk:Apollo11|talk]]) 22:57, 8 January 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Yeah…I’m just going to keep on trying, seeing if I can solve some of the problems remotely. Not too sure what much I can do about the ‘crat situation though. '''[[User:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:9pt;color:#A9C6CA&amp;quot;&amp;gt;42.book.addict&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:6pt;color:#516874&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Talk to me!&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;''' 22:59, 8 January 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::::Well good luck [[User:Apollo11|Apollo11]] ([[User talk:Apollo11|talk]]) 23:07, 8 January 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== {{w|WP:REMOVED}} ==&lt;br /&gt;
kindly stop adding it back. thank you. [[user talk:lett‪herebedarklight|youtu.be/miLcaqq2Zpk]] 15:53, 10 January 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:very well. '''[[User:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:9pt;color:#A9C6CA&amp;quot;&amp;gt;42.book.addict&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:6pt;color:#516874&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Talk to me!&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;''' 16:05, 10 January 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::ok, that's the limit. {{w|WP:NOBAN|don't post on my talk page again.}} if you wish to fiddle with minutae, go to wikipedia, where that sort of thing is appreciated. i'll also note that no one else has complained about my signature, only you. [[user talk:lett‪herebedarklight|youtu.be/miLcaqq2Zpk]] 10:13, 11 January 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::touche. to be honest, grabbing at your throat for a simple signature issue got a bit boring after a couple days. have a nice day! '''[[User:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:9pt;color:#A9C6CA&amp;quot;&amp;gt;42.book.addict&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:6pt;color:#516874&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Talk to me!&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;''' 11:28, 11 January 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Talk Page added to &amp;quot;pages to delete ==&lt;br /&gt;
Hey, I noticed you added my talk page to the &amp;quot;pages to delete&amp;quot; category. Why? I don't really want my talk page deleted. &amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#0645AD&amp;quot;&amp;gt; Qoiuoiuoiu (talk) &amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;  16:29, 10 January 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Sorry, changed it. '''[[User:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:9pt;color:#A9C6CA&amp;quot;&amp;gt;42.book.addict&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:6pt;color:#516874&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Talk to me!&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;''' 17:58, 10 January 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::If you want my advice (no reason you do...), do a little more checking of the page history. ''And'' that of the partner page (compare User: &amp;lt;-&amp;gt; User Talk), where it exists. You might find a few of the ones that you marked for deleting weren't created, unused and abandoned, but actually 'in use' (even if not directly).&lt;br /&gt;
::You're eager, and I still completely support IP-related pages being marked for deletion (remembering that you don't have the power to ''actually'' delete them... which is probably a relief to a small handful of actal users, like the above), but maybe dial it back a bit so that you don't make a few more taggings that need to be reverted... Build up a personal 'hitlist', maybe, but do more poking around and keep it down to a handful of the 'best' candidaates that you find, not a couple of a dozen in quick order, which I think you did yesterday.... [[Special:Contributions/162.158.74.25|162.158.74.25]]&lt;br /&gt;
:::I did check the Page history of [[User talk:Qoiuoiuoiu]] though, and saw that it was created by [[User:While False]]. I also checked the User Page, and saw that it was edited slightly to change While False’s announcement. Because the entire purpose of [[User talk:Qoiuoiuoiu]] was to presumably reduce red links, I tagged [[:Category:Pages to delete]]. Checking page history and user pages honestly doesn’t take that much time, and I checked them for every single page (I think). Upon [[User:Qoiuoiuoiu|Qoiuoiuoiu’s]] complaint, I removed the Category and added a comment so that the talk page has a purpose. I believe that I was in the right to tag them in this case, and that is my decision. Although I do like the idea of the “hitlist”, and will create one. '''[[User:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:9pt;color:#A9C6CA&amp;quot;&amp;gt;42.book.addict&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:6pt;color:#516874&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Talk to me!&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;''' 19:46, 10 January 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Bluey ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I can't believe you watch a ''children's'' show like Bluey. You should watch an ''adult'' show, like my personal favourite, {{w|My Little Pony: Friendship Is Magic}} ;).  [[User:Beanie|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;text-shadow:0 0 5px black;font-size:11pt;color:#dddddd&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Beanie]]&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt; [[User talk:Beanie|&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;text-shadow:0 0 3px black;font-size:8pt;color:#dddddd&amp;quot;&amp;gt;talk]]&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 19:38, 11 January 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://gamejolt.com/games/sonic/783884 nah I'm sending you to the green hills for that one buddy] /j [[User:CalibansCreations|'''&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#ff0000;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Caliban&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;''']] ([[User talk:CalibansCreations|talk]]) 20:39, 11 January 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:LMFAOOO '''[[User:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:9pt;color:#A9C6CA&amp;quot;&amp;gt;42.book.addict&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:6pt;color:#516874&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Talk to me!&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;''' 22:38, 11 January 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== &amp;quot;Shared named&amp;quot; comics... ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Not too sure about the shared-name status for &amp;quot;Advent Calendar&amp;quot;, &amp;quot;Advent Calendar Advent Calendar&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;Advent&amp;quot; (more clear if there was &amp;quot;Advent Calendars&amp;quot;, the AVAV ''might'' be deemed a copy (literally!) of AV, but it'd be a stretch to link the A to the AV and thus also the AVAV), but you can't really put just one comic in the Shared Name category, can you? If you're happy for it, then do it for all of them. And, when you do, might be a good idea to put the markup comment after the category membership tag with an explanation of which one(s) you're linking it with, to avoid random editors getting the wrong idea (or ''no'' idea) on spotting it... [[Special:Contributions/162.158.33.252|162.158.33.252]] 00:26, 12 January 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Why do you have a hitlist? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Please don't put me on there 😭😭😭 [[User:CalibansCreations|'''&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#ff0000;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Caliban&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;''']] ([[User talk:CalibansCreations|talk]]) 13:53, 17 January 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:It’s for user pages/talk pages to delete. It’s fine, you’re fine, everybody’s fine (except for me i have a flu) '''[[User:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:9pt;color:#A9C6CA&amp;quot;&amp;gt;42.book.addict&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:6pt;color:#516874&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Talk to me!&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;''' 23:59, 17 January 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::Ykkkkkk, I bet Jeff’s heir would be easier to contact… Just saying…… [[User:Apollo11|Apollo11]] ([[User talk:Apollo11|talk]]) 17:01, 18 January 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::which would be the next ‘crat with server control, someone who doesn’t exist yet since Jeff still needs to promote them. '''[[User:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:9pt;color:#A9C6CA&amp;quot;&amp;gt;42.book.addict&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:6pt;color:#516874&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Talk to me!&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;''' 23:17, 18 January 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::: dammit [[User:Apollo11|Apollo11]] ([[User talk:Apollo11|talk]]) 15:53, 20 January 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==We're cooked==&lt;br /&gt;
You-know-who became president on MLK Day. We're so cooked, 42. [[User:Definitely Bill Cipher|⯅A dream demon⯅]] ([[User talk:Definitely Bill Cipher|talk]]) 19:23, 22 January 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:as a Brit I too am concerned [[User:CalibansCreations|'''&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#ff0000;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Caliban&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;''']] ([[User talk:CalibansCreations|talk]]) 14:36, 30 January 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::Yeh i'm scared [[User:Definitely Bill Cipher|⯅A dream demon⯅]] ([[User talk:Definitely Bill Cipher|talk]]) 15:21, 31 January 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::yayyyyy politics [[User:Apollo11|Apollo11]] ([[User talk:Apollo11|talk]]) 16:38, 31 January 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Different name in ContributionScores? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hi 42&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I just realized that in the [https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php/Special:ContributionScores ContributionScores] you are listed as Victoria. How come you manage to have two different names on this wiki? Is that some error? It is confusing at least.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Keep up the good work --[[User:Kynde|Kynde]] ([[User talk:Kynde|talk]]) 13:20, 4 February 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:I noticed that too! What's your secret?--[[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 15:06, 4 February 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::haha, there’s no secret. my name’s victoria, but i also go by tori. that’s why if you look up at old messages, some people refer to me as victoria or tori. if you want to keep on calling me 42, or 42.book.addict, that’s completely fine! '''[[User:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:9pt;color:#A9C6CA&amp;quot;&amp;gt;42.book.addict&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:6pt;color:#516874&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Talk to me!&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;''' 16:05, 4 February 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Yeah I guess what i was asking is how you managed to change your name on the leaderboard! I can't figure it out haha. --[[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 17:11, 4 February 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::::oh, that’s easy-you just change it in your preferences. find the real name box, and input whatever you want. some people might find it confusing, and you might need to explain to people the difference, like this converstaion right now. '''[[User:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:9pt;color:#A9C6CA&amp;quot;&amp;gt;42.book.addict&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:6pt;color:#516874&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Talk to me!&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;''' 17:18, 4 February 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Oh, cool! Thanks. --[[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 17:53, 4 February 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Well if it is a part of the wiki I guess it is fine. But I think it is a bit confusing that we cannot see the user name of the person on the leaderboard. So it would be great if the name in the leader-board could also change to 42. But I guess that is not possible? As you know I'm made an admin, but also I have way to little knowledge of programming and wiki etc. And full time job, other hobbies and two kids, one of which seems to be older than 42. So it is not your age, but 42 comes from your love of Hitchhikers Guide to the galaxy? (Big fan me-self).  Impressive the amount of work you have put into the wiki in such a short time. I have been a member since October 2013. I still remember [[Talk:30: Donner|my first comment]] on explain, actually made it before I signed up and then added my signature after signing up a few days later ;-) Back then I used much more time on explain. Had actually not intended to become admin. But second time I was asked, and with no active admins I accepted. --[[User:Kynde|Kynde]] ([[User talk:Kynde|talk]]) 13:39, 5 February 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::Oh, nice! Never knew that you were a parent. i ''could'' remove the Victoria from the leaderboard by blanking my real name in preferences, but honestly, I’d rather not. There are tons of other people with a situation like this, and I don’t think that it’ll cause much confusion. I’m always happy to explain why it’s listed as Victoria or not! (BTW, Victoria is literally on my User Page) '''[[User:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:9pt;color:#A9C6CA&amp;quot;&amp;gt;42.book.addict&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:6pt;color:#516874&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Talk to me!&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;''' 16:20, 5 February 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Well we usually do not now much about each other and I had not read your user page before I found out you where also Victoria. Not sure what you mean by Victoria being on you user page. I searched on it and found no hit for Victoria... But no big problem. Just a bit confusing. Just stay on the leaderboard. --[[User:Kynde|Kynde]] ([[User talk:Kynde|talk]]) 08:26, 9 February 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::::weird...i could've sworn that i added it to my user page. i'll add it now to try to reduce confusion in the future. '''[[User:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:9pt;color:#A9C6CA&amp;quot;&amp;gt;42.book.addict&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:6pt;color:#516874&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Talk to me!&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;''' 17:09, 9 February 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== You into Friday Night Funkin? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
tldr it's a silly Newgrounds-inspired rhythm game with literally hundreds if not thousands of mods. you should get into it if you're not already &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:CalibansCreations|'''&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#ff0000;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Caliban&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;''']] ([[User talk:CalibansCreations|talk]]) 11:19, 18 February 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:moved this to the bottom so you'd be more likely to see this haha [[User:CalibansCreations|'''&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#ff0000;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Caliban&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;''']] ([[User talk:CalibansCreations|talk]]) 11:03, 17 April 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::no-i don’t play rhythm games. moved it back up for chronological order. '''[[User:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:9pt;color:pink&amp;quot;&amp;gt;42.book.addict&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:6pt;color:#B1E4E3&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Talk to me!&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;''' 16:34, 18 April 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Contacting Randall ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hey Victoria! Sorry to hear about your mental health issues, I hope you're getting better.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Here's some good news: I tried contacting Randall to ask him when he replaced comic [[36: Scientists]], and he replied! It's weird that Randall is easier to reach than the owner of this wiki... You can read the conversation and a summary of what happened [[User:FaviFake|on my user page]]. Among other things, he gave me the official release date, April 28th, and, after I asked, he told me he might reply to more simple questions! If you have some technical or administrative questions, I could ask them directly to him. If you're curious, there are more details about this [[User:FaviFake|here]]. --[[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 18:32, 21 February 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==oof==&lt;br /&gt;
:I'm so sorry, 42. I go to therapy and picked up a couple things, so if you need me, I'm here. You can leave a message on my talk page anytime and we can yap about whatever. Hang in there 0) [[User:Definitely Bill Cipher|⯅A dream demon⯅]] ([[User talk:Definitely Bill Cipher|talk]]) 15:35, 27 February 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Uncooperating User ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hi 42&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
You originally wrote regarding [[User talk:Lettherebedarklight]] here:&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; [[explain_xkcd:Community_portal/Admin_requests#Uncooperating_User|Uncooperating User]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
I warned him not to change his signature to a link and also not deleting his talk page. But he has not complied. But now I saw your comment on his user page, after I rolled back his latest deletion... Regarding wiki policy. And since I do not go much into this I need some help here. I do not have time to read up on this. I'm just so unlucky as to be the only admin still active here... Not by my own wish. Maybe FaviFake should also say something here? --[[User:Kynde|Kynde]] ([[User talk:Kynde|talk]]) 06:39, 5 March 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:I believe this is what's happening: 42 originally noticed the user's signature, which is clearly a violation of the Wikipedia policy, and you warned them. They didn't cooperate, and then you warned them again, but this time you also told them to not blank their talk page (and to not redirect it), which wasn't among the things 42 pointed out. Because of this, she mentioned they're allowed to blank their talk page and redirect it to their user page, but not to have a signature that looks like an external link. And now, as you can see in [https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=User:FaviFake&amp;amp;diff=367780&amp;amp;oldid=367750 this edit of theirs], they have done both things. The signature is not allowed, but blanking their page is. --[[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 16:56, 5 March 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::But if they blanck their talk page, then I cannot discuss the issues that are in violation of with their signature. So how can this be an acceptable conduct. Maybe blanking their user page but not the talk page...? As far as I can see his signature link still go to his user talk page, and not to the rickroll link, you have to copy paste that to get rolled... But if it is a problem, should I then block him for being uncooperative? --[[User:Kynde|Kynde]] ([[User talk:Kynde|talk]]) 11:52, 7 March 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::I don't know, 42 pointed it out because she was confused by the link. i'm not really an expert in Wikipedia policy either. --[[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 18:22, 7 March 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Formatting ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Just wondering why you're using awkward formatting on your user page when you could easier use:&lt;br /&gt;
*Foo&lt;br /&gt;
*Bar&lt;br /&gt;
**Baz subthing&lt;br /&gt;
**Bat subthing&lt;br /&gt;
*Flibble&lt;br /&gt;
...etc? No need for BRs and NBSPs. Can be combined with colon-leveling (though can also replace it). Swap *s for #s to get (nested) numbered lists, or *# for indented numbers with #* continuing the numbers around sub-bullets (starts to get complicated, but it's an option) if you decided you need to. Maybe it's a choice you're making, but FYI if you haven't already picked up the bullet-point syntax in all your time here.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Anyway, just perhaps whilst you're active again. No problem if you don't make use of this information now/ever. [[Special:Contributions/172.71.178.133|172.71.178.133]] 07:56, 9 April 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:I never knew that-thank you! '''[[User:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:9pt;color:pink&amp;quot;&amp;gt;42.book.addict&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:6pt;color:#B1E4E3&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Talk to me!&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;''' 15:55, 9 April 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== so why do you wanna to delete [[user talk:物灵]]? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
he and i were both from another website. i chose to chat with him here because i don't want Zhou Chenxiao to revert my edit. why you want to delete? [[User:Translated ORK|Translated ORK]] ([[User talk:Translated ORK|talk]]) 09:56, 21 April 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:I will say this, here, in case you don't get to read my other note. This is not a refugee camp for conversations displaced from elsewhere. There's not even any chat goin on because it's all just you. (If there's another site where ''he'' is one-sidedly 'replying' to ''you'' , then I bet that place is equally bemused and unamused.)&lt;br /&gt;
:I can't speak for 42, but I'm not surprised someone else here wants to do that.&lt;br /&gt;
:Elsewhere you talk of Free Speech, but I think you might be confused. As well as the ''{{w|Gratis versus libre}}'' issue, this extends to what is written below any submission you are making: &amp;quot;Please note that all contributions to explain xkcd may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors.&amp;quot; Consensus may decide that the point you make is not worth the having been made. (Later, consensus may also decide that a removal/re-edit is bad and ''restore'' it, but that is a community issue to resolve.)&lt;br /&gt;
:This is as close to democracy as we can get (but, unlike the ''original'' democracy, we also let women and all kinds of other people 'vote'! ;) ), with shades of anarchy and the only totalitarian elements being when certain pages are locked-down/deleted by a designated admin who is probably acting upon community feeling (or on behalf of it, seeing where it is heading). It's a system that works (mostly hands-off). And you still can't falsely shout &amp;quot;Fire!&amp;quot; in a crowded theater without push-back. Does that make sense? (@UT, also @42...) [[Special:Contributions/172.71.26.36|172.71.26.36]] 10:50, 21 April 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::Seconded. I explicitly said in my edit summary that I deleted the content for being off-topic. Thanks to the IP for responding for me! '''[[User:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:9pt;color:pink&amp;quot;&amp;gt;42.book.addict&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:6pt;color:#B1E4E3&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Talk to me!&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;''' 15:20, 21 April 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Thirded. (Is that a word?) --[[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 06:26, 22 April 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Welcome Back!==&lt;br /&gt;
I'm unsure as to whether we've met. I think we were editing at the same time for a period. Anyways, hello Tori (if I may call you that). Welcome back to the wiki! :) --'''''[[User:DollarStoreBa'al |&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Atomic Age;font-size:12pt;color:red;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;DollarStoreBa'al&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:DollarStoreBa'al |'''''Converse''''']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;[[Special:Contributions/DollarStoreBa'al|'''''My life choices''''']] 14:14, 26 August 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:hi, thanks so much for the welcome! '''[[User:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:9pt;color:pink&amp;quot;&amp;gt;42.book.addict&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:6pt;color:#B1E4E3&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Talk to me!&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;''' 03:59, 27 August 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::Please see my user page.--'''''[[User:DollarStoreBa'al |&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Atomic Age;font-size:12pt;color:red;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;DollarStoreBa'al&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:DollarStoreBa'al |'''''Converse''''']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;[[Special:Contributions/DollarStoreBa'al|'''''My life choices''''']] 16:42, 27 August 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Thank you for your apology. And it's no big deal with my time-bio's boring anyways lol '''[[User:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:9pt;color:pink&amp;quot;&amp;gt;42.book.addict&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:6pt;color:#B1E4E3&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Talk to me!&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;''' 16:43, 27 August 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Mark April Fool's Sandbox for deletion?==&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Aprilfoolsupdate!/Sandbox]] should be marked for deletion, I feel. It has been removed from his watchlist and provides nothing useful to the wiki. [[Special:Contributions/204.137.100.1|204.137.100.1]] 15:04, 28 August 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Deleted by  --[[User:Kynde|Kynde]] ([[User talk:Kynde|talk]]) 19:20, 29 August 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== From /sig Talk Page (adminship) ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Just so you know, 42, you'd make a great admin. --'''''[[User:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#023020&amp;quot;&amp;gt;DollarStoreBa'al&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User_talk:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#000080&amp;quot;&amp;gt;'''''converse'''''&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 18:18, 28 August 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==An odd question for someone who would know the answer==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Would it be allowed if you created a template for your sig (e.g. 42sig/DSBSig?) Could be useful for those with long usernames. --'''''[[User:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#023020&amp;quot;&amp;gt;DollarStoreBa'al&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User_talk:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#000080&amp;quot;&amp;gt;'''''converse'''''&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 15:59, 29 August 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:why would you need a template? &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;~~~~&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt; works just fine... '''[[User:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:9pt;color:pink&amp;quot;&amp;gt;42.book.addict&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:6pt;color:#B1E4E3&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Talk to me!&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;''' 16:17, 29 August 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::Well, it would allow for more characters. This is why I ask, as both you and I have had issues setting up signatures due to long usernames. Setting your signature up as &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{SigTemplateName}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt; in preferences would have it automatically display your signature when typing &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;~~~~&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;.  --'''''[[User:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#023020&amp;quot;&amp;gt;DollarStoreBa'al&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User_talk:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#000080&amp;quot;&amp;gt;'''''converse'''''&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 16:20, 29 August 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::More characters ''would'' be nice, but creating a bunch of templates only available for use for a single person would be less than ideal. What if we had a template called &amp;quot;sig&amp;quot;, and inside was wikitext encoded so that when we called &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{sig|User:XYZ}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;; it could paste in the custom signature for XYZ? This is a pretty interesting idea-I'll reach out on the proposals portal and ask FaviFake to see if there's support for this. '''[[User:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:9pt;color:pink&amp;quot;&amp;gt;42.book.addict&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:6pt;color:#B1E4E3&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Talk to me!&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;''' 16:32, 29 August 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::::That.... That could work! Great idea! --'''''[[User:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#023020&amp;quot;&amp;gt;DollarStoreBa'al&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User_talk:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#000080&amp;quot;&amp;gt;'''''converse'''''&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 16:34, 29 August 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::A bonus of that is that it's basically a sig museum, where you can browse other people's sigs and get inspired by them. There is the downside of people being able to edit other's sigs tho. --'''''[[User:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#023020&amp;quot;&amp;gt;DollarStoreBa'al&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User_talk:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#000080&amp;quot;&amp;gt;'''''converse'''''&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 16:37, 29 August 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::The idea of a sig museum is actually super cool-we could also add interesting signatures that were used by other users before to put on showcase. We could also make it so that only autoconfirmed users can edit it (and there's enough active users that any vandalism would probably be reverted quickly enough). '''[[User:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:9pt;color:pink&amp;quot;&amp;gt;42.book.addict&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:6pt;color:#B1E4E3&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Talk to me!&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;''' 16:43, 29 August 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::Honestly, forgot about that. I wonder what they say. FaviFake hasn't been active in a bit, so maybe we could reach out to kynde? --'''''[[User:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#023020&amp;quot;&amp;gt;DollarStoreBa'al&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User_talk:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#000080&amp;quot;&amp;gt;'''''converse'''''&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 17:17, 29 August 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::It's probably fine. Contribution history says that it's only been a week-he very well may be on vacation or too busy to work. Give it some time. '''[[User:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:9pt;color:pink&amp;quot;&amp;gt;42.book.addict&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:6pt;color:#B1E4E3&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Talk to me!&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;''' 18:16, 29 August 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::::I know, it's just weird. I've almost never seen FaviFake not edit for more than a day. {{unsigned|DollarStoreBa'al|19:14, 29 August 2025 (UTC)}}&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::::hi im back. --[[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 14:26, 31 August 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::::Go check the proposals board! '''[[User:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font:9pt Cormorant Garamond&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#89CFF0&amp;quot;&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#FFB7CE&amp;quot;&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#D3D3D3&amp;quot;&amp;gt;.&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#FFB7CE&amp;quot;&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#89CFF0&amp;quot;&amp;gt;o&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#89CFF0&amp;quot;&amp;gt;o&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#FFB7CE&amp;quot;&amp;gt;k&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#D3D3D3&amp;quot;&amp;gt;.&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#FFB7CE&amp;quot;&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#89CFF0&amp;quot;&amp;gt;d&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#89CFF0&amp;quot;&amp;gt;d&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#FFB7CE&amp;quot;&amp;gt;i&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#D3D3D3&amp;quot;&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#FFB7CE&amp;quot;&amp;gt;t&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font:6pt Cormorant Garamond&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#89CFF0&amp;quot;&amp;gt;T&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#FFB7CE&amp;quot;&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#D3D3D3&amp;quot;&amp;gt;l&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#FFB7CE&amp;quot;&amp;gt;k&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#89CFF0&amp;quot;&amp;gt; &amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#89CFF0&amp;quot;&amp;gt;t&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#FFB7CE&amp;quot;&amp;gt;o&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#D3D3D3&amp;quot;&amp;gt; &amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#FFB7CE&amp;quot;&amp;gt;m&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#89CFF0&amp;quot;&amp;gt;e&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#89CFF0&amp;quot;&amp;gt;!&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;''' 19:16, 29 August 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:I have seen you proposal and I must say I really hope you are not planning on making this your signature fro now on 42!&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font:9pt Cormorant Garamond&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#89CFF0&amp;quot;&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#FFB7CE&amp;quot;&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#D3D3D3&amp;quot;&amp;gt;.&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#FFB7CE&amp;quot;&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#89CFF0&amp;quot;&amp;gt;o&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#89CFF0&amp;quot;&amp;gt;o&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#FFB7CE&amp;quot;&amp;gt;k&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#D3D3D3&amp;quot;&amp;gt;.&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#FFB7CE&amp;quot;&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#89CFF0&amp;quot;&amp;gt;d&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#89CFF0&amp;quot;&amp;gt;d&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#FFB7CE&amp;quot;&amp;gt;i&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#D3D3D3&amp;quot;&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#FFB7CE&amp;quot;&amp;gt;t&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font:6pt Cormorant Garamond&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#89CFF0&amp;quot;&amp;gt;T&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#FFB7CE&amp;quot;&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#D3D3D3&amp;quot;&amp;gt;l&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#FFB7CE&amp;quot;&amp;gt;k&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#89CFF0&amp;quot;&amp;gt; &amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#89CFF0&amp;quot;&amp;gt;t&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#FFB7CE&amp;quot;&amp;gt;o&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#D3D3D3&amp;quot;&amp;gt; &amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#FFB7CE&amp;quot;&amp;gt;m&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#89CFF0&amp;quot;&amp;gt;e&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#89CFF0&amp;quot;&amp;gt;!&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:It is very confusing for the next editor, and I just tried to comment on your proposal when you posted it and could not understand what I was seeing in the editor (as I got there first because of edit conflict). Please stop using this as your signature! --[[User:Kynde|Kynde]] ([[User talk:Kynde|talk]]) 19:22, 29 August 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::Got it. I'll change it and see if I can find another solution. '''[[User:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:9pt;color:pink&amp;quot;&amp;gt;42.book.addict&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:6pt;color:#B1E4E3&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Talk to me!&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;''' 19:33, 29 August 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::I personally think we should move forward with the template idea. That way, the wikitext would show &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{sig|UserXYZ}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt; instead of the full wikitext. --'''''[[User:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#023020&amp;quot;&amp;gt;DollarStoreBa'al&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User_talk:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#000080&amp;quot;&amp;gt;'''''converse'''''&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 19:42, 29 August 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::::Also, I created a pride sig that is almost 1400 characters long.... yeah we need a way to not show the full wikitext. --'''''[[User:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#023020&amp;quot;&amp;gt;DollarStoreBa'al&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User_talk:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#000080&amp;quot;&amp;gt;'''''converse'''''&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 19:44, 29 August 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::::Sorry for the late reply. I think that we should '''''not''''' go ahead with the template idea. It's unnecessary and will clog up the server, both in readability and server load. Please look at my response in the proposals board. Thanks! '''[[User:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:9pt;color:pink&amp;quot;&amp;gt;42.book.addict&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:6pt;color:#B1E4E3&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Talk to me!&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;''' 19:06, 3 September 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== &amp;quot;fact&amp;quot; template (un)tagging. ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{fact}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt; template was (it was deleted? I missed that!) redirected to the &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{Citation needed}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt; template. I think maybe replacing the &amp;quot;fact&amp;quot; with &amp;quot;Citation needed&amp;quot; might have been a better change than nowiki-ing the now-broken tags, in the cases you did that.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
And then there were all the demonstrative examples (two or three in things I historically wrote, I notice, in various Talk: pages... under a historical range of IPs). Assuming you really want to edit other people's signed Talk contributions at all (not generally done, though I'm ambivalent about you 'tidying up' things where I only included &amp;quot;fact&amp;quot; as then-current, alongside the other examples), it would seem to be no more work to just refactor the phrasings to no longer have that in the list of (say) {{template|citation needed}}, {{template|Citation Needed}}, {{template|cn}}, etc, to no great loss of meaning.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But I appreciate you probably took some time to hunt down all &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{fact}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt; examples (and at least one &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{template|fact}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;, I think). Plus the Fact/CN set of tags ''are'' sometimes overused, IMO, so a few less versions (put almost everywhere that anyone vaguely thought amusing) is certainly gratifying from ''that'' perspective. ;) [[Special:Contributions/82.132.245.43|82.132.245.43]] 22:55, 10 September 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==It's alright :)==&lt;br /&gt;
None taken :) I myself know I am prone to that sort of thing. --'''''[[User:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#023020&amp;quot;&amp;gt;DollarStoreBa'al&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User_talk:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#000080&amp;quot;&amp;gt;converse&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 19:18, 16 September 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:sorry, what? '''[[User:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:9pt;color:#3a795e&amp;quot;&amp;gt;42.book.addict&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:6pt;color:#ce5f15&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Talk to me!&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;''' 19:57, 16 September 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::Second item on the hitlist. Sorry about the confusion. --'''''[[User:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#023020&amp;quot;&amp;gt;DollarStoreBa'al&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User_talk:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#000080&amp;quot;&amp;gt;converse&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 19:59, 16 September 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Ah, I see. It's no problem! '''[[User:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:9pt;color:#3a795e&amp;quot;&amp;gt;42.book.addict&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:6pt;color:#ce5f15&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Talk to me!&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;''' 20:02, 16 September 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==So, about that wikitext signature...==&lt;br /&gt;
Yeah... I wanna make it red and yellow with (talk) replaced by (yap here) and it's in Comic Sans... if you could help me out please. [[User:Definitely Bill Cipher|⯅A dream demon⯅]] ([[User talk:Definitely Bill Cipher|talk]]) 20:24, 19 September 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Ok, I'll work on it if I find the time! Shouldn't take me more than 5-10 minutes though '''[[User:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:9pt;color:#3a795e&amp;quot;&amp;gt;42.book.addict&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:6pt;color:#ce5f15&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Talk to me!&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;''' 04:34, 22 September 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:It really depends on the shades of red and yellow you want. Use &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#hexcode&amp;quot;&amp;gt;yap here&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt; for each of the colors you want. Search 'google color picker' on Google and it gives you a hex code finder. I do not know how those fonts work though...--'''''[[User:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#023020&amp;quot;&amp;gt;DollarStoreBa'al&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User_talk:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#000080&amp;quot;&amp;gt;converse&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 17:22, 26 September 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Fonts... well, if you put in a style to with with &amp;quot;Comic Sans&amp;quot;, then you probably want to try a style element like &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;font-family: 'Comic Sans MS', 'Chalkboard SE', 'Comic Neue', sans-serif;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;, because not everywhere will have (perhaps not want!) MS Comic Sans and you would have to fail-back to various alternatives and (if all else fails) whatever generic SS font there is.&lt;br /&gt;
:Personally, though I'd not bother. Comic Sans is pretty much a Marmite font, and trying hard to make ''everyone'' experience something like the marmite taste (even those who normally do not) could annoy people.&lt;br /&gt;
:It'd also take up a lot of your allowable 'signature length quota' to add these (and more?) fail-throughs to the appropriate list. Though you could just give the single correct font ''for you'', and accept that it just won't do anything out of the ordinary for other people, too (which probably suits them down to the ground).&lt;br /&gt;
:Oh, and I'd also ''never'' recommend that you upload anything that you want in a personally-chosen font as an image, and embed that image as a pixel-perfect (but accessibility-deficient and text-scale-non-respecting!) alternative. [[Special:Contributions/92.17.62.87|92.17.62.87]] 00:10, 27 September 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
 I'd also never recommend that you upload anything that you want in a personally-chosen font as an image&lt;br /&gt;
::100% (it also breaks enwiki's signature policies) --[[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 12:57, 29 September 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Is this wiki dying?==&lt;br /&gt;
Lately, I've noticed a gradual decrease in the amount of daily contributions. Have you been noticing this too, or is that just me? --'''''[[User:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#023020&amp;quot;&amp;gt;DollarStoreBa'al&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User_talk:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#000080&amp;quot;&amp;gt;converse&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 14:32, 3 November 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:If I may contribute, ahead of 42... It's been busier and it's been quieter, even just within both of your own usernames' 'lifetimes'. Perhaps more (fellow, but clearly not as long-term) IPs, but hard to tell since whatever happened to not squash us down into the Cloudfare gateway IP ranges, etc.&lt;br /&gt;
:New comics still don't stay unExplained for long. And there's not so much traffic, or indeed vanalism in the worst cases, that it's hard to keep on top of anything that arises. I'd say there's still a community, albeit loose and ad hoc (in different ways to other online communities I'm party to, or have been).&lt;br /&gt;
:But I've not emperically compared 'now' with any given historical snapshots. This is just my impression. Please do this, if you feel like it. The number of edits done on yesterday's date, in prior years, perhaps. Or the dates of the past week, to even out the spikes on 'comic days' vs non-comic days. ''Might'' show year-on-year fluctuations, together with background noise.&lt;br /&gt;
:...sorry, meant to say less, not to totally pre-empt Victoria. But maybe she still has things to say, perhaps even in total disagreement with my above thoughts! [[Special:Contributions/82.132.239.95|82.132.239.95]] 15:48, 3 November 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::I mostly agree with these sentiments. I do feel like we used to have a more active past and would work fervently on documenting large projects such as April Fool's comics, Hoverboard, Time, etc. We do have a bit of backlog on Collector's Edition, but we put in a LOT of work into the What If? project. Places that we should tackle are probably the less known xkcd pages, secret comics, and of course Collector's Edition. &lt;br /&gt;
::Personally, I've had a lot less time to dedicate towards working on this project just because of how busy I am. I've had midterms, projects, and sports to juggle, resulting in almost no free time that I can spend. Circumstances change. Maybe other editors are also getting more busy. Who knows? Anyways, this isn't a race. We don't have any deadlines to reach, so any progress we make, regardless of pace, is good. '''[[User:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:9pt;color:#3a795e&amp;quot;&amp;gt;42.book.addict&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:6pt;color:#ce5f15&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Talk to me!&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;''' 19:58, 3 November 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==1==&lt;br /&gt;
54 52 41 4f 53 4e 49 53 53 49 4g 4f 20 4g 4f 45 20 4g 46 20 46 4g 55 52 3b 20 58 56 45 52&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
XIP EPFTO'U MPWF B GFX NPSF OVNCFST {{unsigned ip|204.137.100.1|20:23, 12 November 2025 (UTC)}}&lt;br /&gt;
:What? &amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family: Times New Roman, serif; font-size: 16px;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;--'''''[[User:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#E3C6BE&amp;quot;&amp;gt;DollarStoreBa'al&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User Talk:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#CC9A8B&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Converse&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt; 21:08, 12 November 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::There may be (intentional?) coding errors in that top one. Or it was double-encoded, thanks to the lower one. So my advice is to crack the second one first.&lt;br /&gt;
::But fairly trivial, both of them.&lt;br /&gt;
::You can probably do the second in your head, by a single easy step, once you work out what does and doesn't matter.&lt;br /&gt;
::The first is a bit more technical, it helps if you're used to low-level data storage (ok, probably not actually in your wheelhouse, but not too hard to discover) ''and'' initially needs to be have the second code's thing unapplied to it to make logical sense.&lt;br /&gt;
::My advice is to have fun working it out. And expect three more (or two... but I don't think the second is &amp;quot;the second&amp;quot;) to look at, if the author is true to their word. [[Special:Contributions/82.132.244.30|82.132.244.30]] 21:25, 12 November 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Huh. The first bit almost reminds me of a hexadecimal, but that doesn't have 'g' &lt;br /&gt;
:::Second part is shifted ROT1 in a Caesar Cipher (used a decoder). Translates to 'WHO DOESN'T LOVE A FEW MORE NUMBERS'. &amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family: Times New Roman, serif; font-size: 16px;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;--'''''[[User:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#E3C6BE&amp;quot;&amp;gt;DollarStoreBa'al&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User Talk:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#CC9A8B&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Converse&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt; 21:39, 12 November 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::::Update: CacheSleuth's multi decoder thinks top line is a bacon cipher. No clue. &amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family: Times New Roman, serif; font-size: 16px;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;--'''''[[User:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#E3C6BE&amp;quot;&amp;gt;DollarStoreBa'al&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User Talk:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#CC9A8B&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Converse&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt; 21:43, 12 November 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Remember, I said that the second cipher had probably been applied also to the first. You're closer to the solution than you think. ;) [[Special:Contributions/82.132.244.30|82.132.244.30]] 21:48, 12 November 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
{{outdent|:::::}}&lt;br /&gt;
Are you behind this? Anyway, I'll try to apply a ROT-1, then see if it decides from hex. &amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family: Times New Roman, serif; font-size: 16px;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;--'''''[[User:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#E3C6BE&amp;quot;&amp;gt;DollarStoreBa'al&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User Talk:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#CC9A8B&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Converse&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt; 22:21, 12 November 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Results! TRANSMISSION ONE OF FOUR: XVER.&lt;br /&gt;
:I wonder what XVER means... &amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family: Times New Roman, serif; font-size: 16px;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;--'''''[[User:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#E3C6BE&amp;quot;&amp;gt;DollarStoreBa'al&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User Talk:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#CC9A8B&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Converse&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt; 22:24, 12 November 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::Not me, I was just nerdsniped. Note that the next one popped up on Favi's pages. It also has a nonsense final 'word', meaning yet to be resolved.&lt;br /&gt;
::If you prefer to keep talking about it, here, I'll pop back later and see if you've figured it out (I know what it is, but not why it is!), without necessarily spoiling it right now.&lt;br /&gt;
::(PS, sorry, 42, I know you're probably not involved in this, maybe not interested even. Ba'al: Unless we hear from 42, if you're wanting to keep looking at this, maybe transfer the conversation/copy the original items over to your space? Obviously I've got nowhere better for it, but its up to you and you're interested in this now.) [[Special:Contributions/82.132.245.223|82.132.245.223]] 22:47, 12 November 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::I personally have no interest, but you can feel free to keep on working on it. DSB, if you want to keep on cracking it, I can move it over to your page. '''[[User:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:9pt;color:#3a795e&amp;quot;&amp;gt;42.book.addict&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:6pt;color:#ce5f15&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Talk to me!&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;''' 23:51, 12 November 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Editing other people's words? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I mean, in Explanations, etc, you can redo anything that has previously been edited, that's the point of any Wiki articles. No issues with that.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But you're 'correcting' signed (or, indeed unsigned) Talk comments. However badly spelt, you shouldn't really be changing things for them like that. Perhaps they like things to be spelt the way they're spelling them, perhaps they ''intend'' that version of the word. Perhaps the word they intended isn't the one you think is intended and you've changed the entire meaning by making it 'differently more correct'.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Append the signature-replacements that they lack, yes. ''Perhaps'' re-indent things (though I've had things reindented for me, in the past, but by a misunderstandng which then makes it look like I'm replaying to something else). Very possibly changing a [bare-wiki-URL] to a {{template|w}}-type version doesn't matter too much, but... that's the point, it doesn't ''really'' matter. Warts and all. You could tell a regular named-user about the convention to use the 'w'/'wiktionary'/'tvtropes' things, so that it saves you work tuning up the Explanations where they've used the long-hand (and/or inefficient) link-forms, but there's no need to neaten up 'messy' Talk comments, and ''very'' occasionally there might be very real need to not do so.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
See {{w|Wikipedia:TPO}} for Wikipedia's policy, which isn't ''necessarily'' the one here (even if its the line I wouldn't normally try to cross). Though you'll see it still appreciates changes in lines with {{w|Wikipedia:TPFIXFORMAT}} and {{w|Wikipedia:TPFIXLAYOUT}}, amongst others. [[Special:Contributions/2.98.65.8|2.98.65.8]] 22:11, 14 November 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Agreed. Getting things signed is perfectly fine, and, as long as you don't change the appearance of a link, you can optimize that as well. But please refrain from editing the message that's given in the comment. &amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family: Times New Roman, serif; font-size: 16px;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;--'''''[[User:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#E3C6BE&amp;quot;&amp;gt;DollarStoreBa'al&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User Talk:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#CC9A8B&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Converse&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt; 22:19, 14 November 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:e.g. [https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:1120:_Blurring_the_Line&amp;amp;curid=5005&amp;amp;diff=390955&amp;amp;oldid=369184 this edit], where you changed 'coloured' to 'colored'. That is just a regional spelling of the word, commonly used in British English. It's not even a misspelling! &amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family: Times New Roman, serif; font-size: 16px;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;--'''''[[User:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#E3C6BE&amp;quot;&amp;gt;DollarStoreBa'al&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User Talk:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#CC9A8B&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Converse&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt; 22:23, 14 November 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::Ah, looks like you spotted it too. Did a part-revert of that exact example (but only that!), as a passive example, not knowing you'd found it and pointed it out here.&lt;br /&gt;
::And I can't help it if all y'all can't spell properly, thanks to Noah Webster. ;) [[Special:Contributions/2.98.65.8|2.98.65.8]] 23:14, 14 November 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::I understand that it is British spelling, thank you very much. Please see {{diff|14586|here}} for the original comment and {{diff|17180|here}} where [[User:Weatherlawyer]] changed it. '''[[User:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:9pt;color:#3a795e&amp;quot;&amp;gt;42.book.addict&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:6pt;color:#ce5f15&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Talk to me!&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;''' 01:07, 15 November 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Additionally, [[explain xkcd:Editor FAQ#How do I enter links to other pages?|the FAQ page]] says all explainxkcd.com and en.wikipedia.org links should be written with &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;[[ ]]&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;code&amp;gt; &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{w| }}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt; &amp;lt;/code&amp;gt; respectively around them. '''[[User:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:9pt;color:#3a795e&amp;quot;&amp;gt;42.book.addict&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:6pt;color:#ce5f15&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Talk to me!&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;''' 01:22, 15 November 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::::({{diff|83069|You actually meant this change by Weatherlawyer...}} Which shouldn't have been done, so my redoing of it was in error. Though the trivia of it makes ''all'' our actions around it equally inexplicable.)&lt;br /&gt;
::::The FAQ is not a commandment that &amp;quot;everything that is not like that should be made like that&amp;quot;. As far as neatening up an Explanation is concerned, you'd of course be rewriting and making it the best-practice w-template version, if it had been originally left as [] or bare-URL, because the original writer did not know/care about the handy site-standard. But it doesn't really mean that there's a need to mess about with the normally-inviolate bones of past Talk-comments. Its a lot of unnecessary work, at best.&lt;br /&gt;
::::And something like the &amp;quot;As Slow as Possible&amp;quot; bit in {{diff|390995|this edit}} arguably makes it flow less obviously. It originally namechecked ''As Slow as Possible'' and then helpfully offered the URL, at the end, as a bare reference. More 'properly' written it would have had a the w-tagged put around the first mention, which is in its own context, but the bare-URL at the end basically said &amp;quot;and this is a URL that explains it&amp;quot; that's actually nicely in line with the bare-URL line in the FAQ.&lt;br /&gt;
::::If (as it looks like) you're just zooming through looking for every bare wikipedia.org link and 'converting' it, without looking into it further, you're probably missing something. And slowing down the generally excellent work, that you're doing, in giving everything 'unsigned' its historic details. It's your time, but going to far in such editorialising can be unproductive. Even when not actually a bit counterproductive. [[Special:Contributions/2.98.65.8|2.98.65.8]] 20:44, 15 November 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Alright. I'll put more of my attention in signing comments and give less of it towards this issue. Thanks for your feedback! '''[[User:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:9pt;color:#3a795e&amp;quot;&amp;gt;42.book.addict&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:6pt;color:#ce5f15&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Talk to me!&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;''' 23:39, 15 November 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
{{outdent|:::::}}&lt;br /&gt;
Why did you make [https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:2347:_Dependency&amp;amp;diff=prev&amp;amp;oldid=391211 this edit], where you fully deleted a comment left by an IP? What was the point of that? &amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family: Times New Roman, serif; font-size: 16px;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;--'''''[[User:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#E3C6BE&amp;quot;&amp;gt;DollarStoreBa'al&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User Talk:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#CC9A8B&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Converse&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt; 18:19, 19 November 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:If you mean the &amp;quot;German Television ... Log4j&amp;quot; one, that was moved (a long way) further down, not deleted. Did not really check why, possibly thematically to fit it with other comments, and/or timstamp order of new comments not replying to anything earlier, but I'm just guessing and didn't try to reconcile it fully (once I'd seen it pop up 'later' in the scroll-down). [[Special:Contributions/82.132.236.44|82.132.236.44]] 18:44, 19 November 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Ok, I see you put it back (without removing the second copy), but you broke things. By using &amp;quot;::;&amp;quot; it set it as double-indented and then as a &amp;quot;;terminology:definition&amp;quot; pair, which activated upon the &amp;quot;:&amp;quot; in the time-stop given. So deleted it again. There's still the new version, lower down, that I just mentioned.&lt;br /&gt;
:Also reverted a deity/diety spelling error (actual one, I'm sure, not a mistaken one) just because it's still &amp;quot;editing other people's comments&amp;quot;, the point made above, and frowned upon in this context. I haven't bothered to check how many other ones have happened, hidden in the midst of rearrangements by either of you, but that was very obviously different. It's an unforced error that someone made in a comment. Don't try to polish it, in case you're adding further errors by misunderstanding, like the first deity-&amp;gt;diety change. (For all I know, DIETYBOUNCE is correct... Though it does sound more like a slimming supplement!) [[Special:Contributions/82.132.236.44|82.132.236.44]] 19:07, 19 November 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::[https://queue.acm.org/blogposting.cfm?id=74439 Deitybounce is correct]. &amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family: Times New Roman, serif; font-size: 16px;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;--'''''[[User:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#E3C6BE&amp;quot;&amp;gt;DollarStoreBa'al&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User Talk:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#CC9A8B&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Converse&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt; 20:12, 19 November 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::It is (almost certainly) {{diff|196415|their own edit}}, though. It's a bad habit to change things. It's not ''brilliant'' to have to try to change them back (see my initial error), but best things like that don't change in the first place. Both of you, please. Then others like me and ^^them^^ don't feel the need to try to make it authentically incorrect again. [[Special:Contributions/2.98.65.8|2.98.65.8]] 23:24, 19 November 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Change to Comic (sandbox) template ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I'm guessing it didn't work (just seen your sandbox changes), and I'll also know why it didn't. But I'm going to suggest you leave that to one of the others. There's slightly more to it than just duplicating the opening 'if', and you probably need to get your head around their solution rather than just prod at it all on your own. Enlightenment ''will'' come, but it may take patience... ;) [[Special:Contributions/82.132.236.65|82.132.236.65]] 08:52, 23 November 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Yeah-that's basically what I concluded and I haven't touched the template since. I think I'm more suited towards doing repetitive, tedious tasks anyways C: '''[[User:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:9pt;color:#3a795e&amp;quot;&amp;gt;42.book.addict&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:6pt;color:#ce5f15&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Talk to me!&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;''' 17:42, 23 November 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==How do you receive Notifications?==&lt;br /&gt;
You said you receive watchlist notifications in the summary of [https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=User%3A42.book.addict&amp;amp;type=revision&amp;amp;diff=391911&amp;amp;oldid=391885 this edit]. How do you do that? I thought the email system was broken. &amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family: Times New Roman, serif; font-size: 16px;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;--'''''[[User:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#E3C6BE&amp;quot;&amp;gt;DollarStoreBa'al&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User Talk:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#CC9A8B&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Converse&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt; 14:21, 2 December 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Let's decrease that number, shall we?==&lt;br /&gt;
11k images, all uncategorized... on it. &amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family: Times New Roman, serif; font-size: 16px;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;--'''''[[User:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#023020&amp;quot;&amp;gt;DollarStoreBa'al&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User Talk:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#000080&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Converse&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt; 18:57, 2 December 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:I like how you think C: '''[[User:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:9pt;color:#3a795e&amp;quot;&amp;gt;42.book.addict&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:6pt;color:#ce5f15&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Talk to me!&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;''' 21:11, 2 December 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::I periodically check recent changes, and it's funny to see our different methods work in tandem. You're a bit faster, but there's a slight lull when you're refilling your taskbar with tabs, and I catch up. Our methods are almost equal. &amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family: Times New Roman, serif; font-size: 16px;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;--'''''[[User:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#FF0000&amp;quot;&amp;gt;DollarStoreBa'al&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User Talk:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#00873E&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Converse&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt; 22:24, 3 December 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::It is funny! Have you checked the Discord server? I sent a photo of my keyboard layout for reference :3 '''[[User:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:9pt;color:#3a795e&amp;quot;&amp;gt;42.book.addict&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:6pt;color:#ce5f15&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Talk to me!&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;''' 22:25, 3 December 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::::I'm an idiot, aren't I..... ''sigh''... welp, we've got just under a thousand images left, so i should have nothing left to mess up in a bit. &amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family: Times New Roman, serif; font-size: 16px;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;--'''''[[User:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#FF0000&amp;quot;&amp;gt;DollarStoreBa'al&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User Talk:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#00873E&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Converse&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt; 01:42, 5 December 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Welp, we've got about 150 images left. Personally, I don't trust myself with them. I have no clue where to put them. So, I'll leave them to you for both our sakes. &amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family: Times New Roman, serif; font-size: 16px;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;--'''''[[User:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#FF0000&amp;quot;&amp;gt;DollarStoreBa'al&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User Talk:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#00873E&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Converse&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt; 16:57, 5 December 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::I noticed your summary lol. What's nice is, after a while, I just spaced out and when I came back, I'd done all but 100 of the remaining frames of Time. I'll go back to... a more normal schedule. &amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family: Times New Roman, serif; font-size: 16px;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;--'''''[[User:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#FF0000&amp;quot;&amp;gt;DollarStoreBa'al&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User Talk:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#00873E&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Converse&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt; 18:29, 5 December 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==A little leaderboard notice==&lt;br /&gt;
With your latest push, you've officially become a more prolific editor than every other non-admin and non-bot user to ever edit the wiki. You're now 5th all-time, behind Kynde, Davidy22, ThusafBOT, and Waldir. &amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family: Times New Roman, serif; font-size: 16px;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;--'''''[[User:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#FF0000&amp;quot;&amp;gt;DollarStoreBa'al&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User Talk:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#00873E&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Converse&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt; 19:34, 3 December 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Not that I really deserve it. Most of the people I've passed were/are on the wiki for far longer than I have and have contributed a lot more. I don't really see it as an achievement TBH. You've also pushed into the Top 10, with your absolutely mental 2451 score this week. If you keep up your pace you can definitely push at least 5k this week-today's only your 2nd day, no? Try to take a break-it's probably not healthy for you to be working for so long doing the same menial task over and over again. There's no rush! '''[[User:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:9pt;color:#3a795e&amp;quot;&amp;gt;42.book.addict&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:6pt;color:#ce5f15&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Talk to me!&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;''' 19:38, 3 December 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::Tbh I don't feel I deserve it either. It feels weird. I was expecting a slow rise towards the top. Suddenly seeing myself in 8th is odd. &amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family: Times New Roman, serif; font-size: 16px;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;--'''''[[User:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#FF0000&amp;quot;&amp;gt;DollarStoreBa'al&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User Talk:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#00873E&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Converse&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt; 19:41, 3 December 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Knowing how much work you had to do to complete the task, I fully expected you to get there eventually...&lt;br /&gt;
:::Though you're making me dizzy (and I had to increase my &amp;quot;Recent Changes&amp;quot; view to ''at least'' 1000 items, in order to not miss any changes that ''aren't'' by you( two)... ;)&lt;br /&gt;
:::(I know I could hide minor edits, but not sure that anybody else hasn't snuck through a 'minor' edit I want to see having happened. Also could hide &amp;quot;registered users&amp;quot;, but that'd obscure anyone that's not also an IP like me... again...)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Anyway, the last '1000 view' seemed to cover just a ''tad'' over three hours of both your edits. And I had to scroll through carefully to try to spot anything that's (probably!) not a &amp;quot;File:&amp;quot; item and hasn't had either of your usernames as the sole-(or co-!)editor. And dive in on the occasional one that was like that, just to satisfy myself that you've not messed something up. (Unlikely... but... a lot of edits, a lot of little chances... maybe you'd slip up, and ''maybe'' maybe I'd spot it and correct it for you... ;) )&lt;br /&gt;
:::Can't wait for you to finish... Both because it's then finsihed and ''also'' no longer currently happening. But at the same time I'm definitely not to keen on encouraging you to accelerate the process much more than you're doing now! It'd not beright for me to ask you to dial it back, but I could definitely live with that. :P [[Special:Contributions/78.144.255.82|78.144.255.82]] 20:04, 3 December 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::::You could also exclude the File namespace from your Recent Changes page... (select Files in your namespace drop down bar and invert selection) '''[[User:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:9pt;color:#3a795e&amp;quot;&amp;gt;42.book.addict&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:6pt;color:#ce5f15&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Talk to me!&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;''' 20:07, 3 December 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Shifting from 7th to 8th gear, about halfway through the straightaway at the Circuit de Hermanos Rodriguez. &amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family: Times New Roman, serif; font-size: 16px;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;--'''''[[User:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#FF0000&amp;quot;&amp;gt;DollarStoreBa'al&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User Talk:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#00873E&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Converse&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt; 20:23, 3 December 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::I'm really not keen on filtering ''anything'' out, really, because (if I do something like filter out the &amp;quot;File:&amp;quot; examples entirely) there's always a chance that something that isn't your work gets hidden from me, just because it ''looks'' like your work. (Also, you'll forgive me for keeping an eye out for those errors that I'm ''sure'' you won't make, but might!) I just am happier if I just 'get my eye in', and look for anything more odd-looking than the usual, no matter what the mix of similarities and differences between a 'filterable' target. Designing a 'very cautious filter' is a lot more work than just doing it in my head while scrolling. [[Special:Contributions/78.144.255.82|78.144.255.82]] 20:41, 3 December 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::Ok, feel free to take your time. I'll probably stop throughout the day and might not touch it after 1pm because I have other things to attend to. Cheers! '''[[User:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:9pt;color:#3a795e&amp;quot;&amp;gt;42.book.addict&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:6pt;color:#ce5f15&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Talk to me!&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;''' 20:43, 3 December 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Coordination idea==&lt;br /&gt;
Btw, I've done up to frame 1592. Maybe I could start from the end and work backwards, while you continue forwards, and we meet in the middle? Just a thought.&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family: Times New Roman, serif; font-size: 16px;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;--'''''[[User:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#FF0000&amp;quot;&amp;gt;DollarStoreBa'al&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User Talk:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#00873E&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Converse&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt; 20:20, 3 December 2025 (UTC)&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
We could also go the other way around, if you prefer. &amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family: Times New Roman, serif; font-size: 16px;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;--'''''[[User:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#FF0000&amp;quot;&amp;gt;DollarStoreBa'al&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User Talk:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#00873E&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Converse&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt; 20:21, 3 December 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:First one works with me. Here's also my current strategy: I open up about 50-80 tabs (as many as my Chromebook can handle without lagging). I've copied the text below and paste it in if the page is empty. If the page has Licensing but not Category, I use CTRL-A to select everything and CTRL-V to replace it with my copied text. If there's other text pertaining to the image hashes, I just do a quick SHIFT-UP twice and delete the Licensing, then paste in. After saving, I use CTRL-W to quickly close the tab and move on to the next one. Rinse and repeat.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;== Licensing ==&lt;br /&gt;
{{XKCD file}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Helper comic images (1190)]]&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:--'''[[User:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:9pt;color:#3a795e&amp;quot;&amp;gt;42.book.addict&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:6pt;color:#ce5f15&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Talk to me!&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;''' 20:25, 3 December 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Hello! ==&lt;br /&gt;
You seem very cool based on your user page. I'm new to this wiki, but I saw you mentioned a long backlog of files that need categorizing. I am very much willing to help with that (it's a thing I can do while procrastinating about writing {{w|User:lp0 on fire/Drafts/Beate Pokorny|something useful}}, which in turn is procrastination about doing {{w|real life|something important}}) so if you just tell me where to find the uncategorized things and which categories are relevant then I will have a go. [[User:lp0 on fire|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color: #c56030&amp;quot;&amp;gt;lp0&amp;amp;nbsp;on&amp;amp;nbsp;fire&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;amp;nbsp;[[User talk:lp0 on fire|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color: #64cea0&amp;quot;&amp;gt;()&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]] 20:42, 3 December 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Alright, I have a couple of initial questions. How familiar are you with MediaWiki and Wikitext? Do you understand the differences between Helper categories and Comic images? And do you understand how XKCD licensing works? This is just to get an understanding of what I have to explain. '''[[User:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:9pt;color:#3a795e&amp;quot;&amp;gt;42.book.addict&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:6pt;color:#ce5f15&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Talk to me!&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;''' 20:46, 3 December 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::I have never heard the term &amp;quot;helper category&amp;quot; before, nor do I have any specific understanding of &amp;quot;comic image&amp;quot; other than presumably an image that is actually taken from [https://xkcd.com xkcd.com]. I am reasonably competent with most normal aspects of wikitext, though I've never written a template and would probably panic and run away if someone asked me to write an edit filter. I'm here from enwiki where I am at least somewhat active, so I understand the basics of how to write/edit and so forth. I believe xkcd is licensed under {{w|CC BY-NC 2.5}} (with the exception of [[1167]] which is also licensed under {{w|CC BY-SA 4.0}}) and I understand broadly what that means, but I'm not a lawyer by any means. [[User:lp0 on fire|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color: #c56030&amp;quot;&amp;gt;lp0&amp;amp;nbsp;on&amp;amp;nbsp;fire&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;amp;nbsp;[[User talk:lp0 on fire|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color: #64cea0&amp;quot;&amp;gt;()&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]] 20:59, 3 December 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Sorry, should've been a lot clearer. But here's the quick runthrough. Currently, DollarStoreBa'al and I are working on categorizing still frames of the Comic [[1190: Time]]. You can work on categorizing [https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?limit=100&amp;amp;title=Special%3AContributions&amp;amp;contribs=user&amp;amp;target=TheusafBOT&amp;amp;namespace=6&amp;amp;tagfilter=&amp;amp;topOnly=1&amp;amp;newOnly=1&amp;amp;start=&amp;amp;end= comic images]. You don't really need to know about the stuff that I asked you-the bot already handled most of it. All you need to do is copy paste &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;[[Category:Comic images]]&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt; into the file page. Good luck! '''[[User:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:9pt;color:#3a795e&amp;quot;&amp;gt;42.book.addict&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:6pt;color:#ce5f15&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Talk to me!&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;''' 21:21, 3 December 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::::Oh right, I was wondering why there was a problem since there are only 3175 comics. Forgot about Time. I'll get going doing this if I have some time and nothing productive to do. Thanks (: [[User:lp0 on fire|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color: #c56030&amp;quot;&amp;gt;lp0&amp;amp;nbsp;on&amp;amp;nbsp;fire&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;amp;nbsp;[[User talk:lp0 on fire|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color: #64cea0&amp;quot;&amp;gt;()&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]] 21:39, 3 December 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==A Barnstar for you!==&lt;br /&gt;
{| style=&amp;quot;border: 1px solid gray; background-color: #fdffe7;&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|rowspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;vertical-align:middle;&amp;quot; | [[File:Tireless Categorization Barnstar.png|100px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|rowspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; |&lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;font-size: x-large; padding: 0; vertical-align: middle; height: 1.1em;&amp;quot; | '''The Tireless Categorization Barnstar'''&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;&amp;quot; | You did a very good job on the image categorization project. Also, you somehow managed to locate and fix all my mistakes on top of that. That deserves a Barnstar! &amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family: Times New Roman, serif; font-size: 16px;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;--'''''[[User:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#FF0000&amp;quot;&amp;gt;DollarStoreBa'al&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User Talk:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#00873E&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Converse&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt; 17:05, 8 December 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
:Agreed! Great work, both of you! [[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 16:22, 18 December 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Welcome back!==&lt;br /&gt;
Honestly, 'we'll see' is basically what we say with everything going on right about now lol. Glad to see you. &amp;lt;!--things have been...very stressful for us lately, haven't they...--&amp;gt;--'''''[[User:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#3c2004&amp;quot;&amp;gt;DollarStoreBa'al&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User Talk:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#1E0F00&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Converse&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; (BLM) 16:56, 4 February 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:pfffft, yeah... :C thanks though! [[User:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font:9pt Cormorant Garamond&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#89CFF0&amp;quot;&amp;gt;tor&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#FFB7CE&amp;quot;&amp;gt;i :3&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font:6pt Cormorant Garamond&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#D3D3D3&amp;quot;&amp;gt;talk &amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#FFB7CE&amp;quot;&amp;gt;to &amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#89CFF0&amp;quot;&amp;gt;me!&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 01:26, 5 February 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::BTW, the 'section' thing on the talk page has been there since early December 2025. Looks like Lp0 on Fire added it... for some reason. [https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=User_talk:42.book.addict&amp;amp;diff=prev&amp;amp;oldid=397274 here's the edit if you're curious]. No clue why. --'''''[[User:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#3c2004&amp;quot;&amp;gt;DollarStoreBa'al&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User Talk:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#1E0F00&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Converse&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; (BLM) 14:14, 10 February 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Hm, ok. Thanks for letting me know [[User:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font:9pt Cormorant Garamond&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#5CA7CF&amp;quot;&amp;gt;tor&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#F08DB0&amp;quot;&amp;gt;i :3&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font:6pt Cormorant Garamond&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#9E9E9E&amp;quot;&amp;gt;talk &amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#F08DB0&amp;quot;&amp;gt;to &amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#5CA7CF&amp;quot;&amp;gt;me!&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]] 20:18, 10 February 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Personal attacks ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Greetings; if you wish to personally attack me, then I welcome you to conduct the attacks on my User Talk page. I see no need to waste every editor's time on a project talk page. I think we should focus on improving the category. That being said, I expressed no opinion about any editor at all. In fact, my scenario was completely hypothetical. I was using ''reductio ad absurdum''. If you want to attack hypothetical scenarios with speculative adjectives, again, I will direct you to [[User talk:Elizium23]]. Thank you for your attention to this matter! [[User:Elizium23|Elizium23]] ([[User talk:Elizium23|talk]]) 06:48, 10 February 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:My apologies. I have shifted my comment here. It would be greatly enjoyable if you were a bit less condescending? &amp;quot;Insufferable, redundant, and monotonous&amp;quot; are all phrases that indicate that you believe yourself better than us. Can't you just be a bit more respectful? This website isn't even related to politics or any controversial topics-the wiki's just a passion project for us to explain xkcd. I would also like to make some additional points. Personally. I think that it isn't wasting everyone's time by talking on a project's talk page. It is their choice on whether or not they wish to read the discussion. If it does not relate to them, I see no reason in them reading through it. And if they do, that is a choice on their own part. I have also seen that you have made attacks and opinions on editors before, as you can see below:&lt;br /&gt;
{{quote|I also hope that you accept responsibility for wasting everybody's time.}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{quote|because your shitty justification on the Admin Portal talk page does not constitute a policy, random IPv4 with no reputation.}} &lt;br /&gt;
:(please note that it is up to an individual to decide if they want to register an account on this wiki or not. being an ip editor does not necessarily discredit them or their opinions) &lt;br /&gt;
{{quote|nobody knows what the hell you did before a couple weeks ago}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{quote|You are utterly wasting our time and you are proving that you hate regular editors with accounts, and you care more about trolls and spammers than about editors who are trying to do something constructive here. You are wasting our time, our free time, our volunteer time, that we're trying to give to this wiki.}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{quote|That is idiotic and reprehensible}}&lt;br /&gt;
:Plus, you say that your scenario was completely hypothetical. What about ''my'' hypothetical on the [[explain_xkcd:Community_portal/Admin_requests#Removing_disruptive_material|community portal]] last week? Am I automatically wrong because I have a different viewpoint than you? You accuse me of having &amp;quot;created another strawman to set on fire&amp;quot;, when I was trying to compromise and explore how we could possibly put your idea into action, given that there was consensus of course. None of us get paid to do this, and we don't have to deal with your bullshit. I'm tired of all the sarcasm and BS. I'm tired of all the double standards. So please, cut it out. I'm not saying that you don't bring up any good points, or that your point of view is completely invalid, but it would be nice to have civil conversations without you constantly sniping at us.Please, hold yourself accountable first before you come for us. '''[[User:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font:9pt Cormorant Garamond&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#89CFF0&amp;quot;&amp;gt;tor&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#FFB7CE&amp;quot;&amp;gt;i :3&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font:6pt Cormorant Garamond&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#D3D3D3&amp;quot;&amp;gt;talk &amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#FFB7CE&amp;quot;&amp;gt;to &amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#89CFF0&amp;quot;&amp;gt;me!&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]''' 07:10, 10 February 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::Yes, you are right, and I am sorry for those conversations, and I regret them. I brought too much emotion and frustration. And my attitude is uncalled-for. I apologize and I am very sorry for causing offense to you and others who work on this wiki here. I hope that we will not repeat these conflicts. I do not wish to be embroiled in them or continue any, whether I started them or not. I hope that I can promise to straighten out from now on. Thank you. [[User:Elizium23|Elizium23]] ([[User talk:Elizium23|talk]]) 07:38, 10 February 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Thank you for your response. I look forward to collaborating together in the future. And I really hope that we, as a community, can see some immediate, real change moving forward. That being said, I really do appreciate your apology. It takes someone a lot more courage to admit that they were wrong than to keep on insisting that they were right. [[User:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font:9pt Cormorant Garamond&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#5CA7CF&amp;quot;&amp;gt;tor&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#F08DB0&amp;quot;&amp;gt;i :3&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font:6pt Cormorant Garamond&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#9E9E9E&amp;quot;&amp;gt;talk &amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#F08DB0&amp;quot;&amp;gt;to &amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#5CA7CF&amp;quot;&amp;gt;me!&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 07:42, 10 February 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Minor Edit Reminder==&lt;br /&gt;
Thank you for fixing my mistakes! Please remember to make sure your edits are minor, though. --'''''[[User:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#3c2004&amp;quot;&amp;gt;DollarStoreBa'al&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User Talk:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#1E0F00&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Converse&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; (BLM) 21:23, 11 February 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:oh, right. thanks for the reminder! [[User:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font:11pt Cormorant Garamond&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#5CA7CF&amp;quot;&amp;gt;tor&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#F08DB0&amp;quot;&amp;gt;i :3&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font:8pt Cormorant Garamond&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#9E9E9E&amp;quot;&amp;gt;talk &amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#F08DB0&amp;quot;&amp;gt;to &amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#5CA7CF&amp;quot;&amp;gt;me!&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 00:30, 12 February 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Good Idea!==&lt;br /&gt;
I saw how you linked the FAQ instead of creating the pages. I honestly think that should be the standard procedure instead of creating someone else's pages, because that always leads to the person who asked creating other user's pages at random. I think you and I both did that in our early careers. So, yeah, I just wanted to compliment your judgement there. :)--'''''[[User:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#3c2004&amp;quot;&amp;gt;DollarStoreBa'al&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User Talk:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#1E0F00&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Converse&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; (BLM) 15:59, 20 February 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Please fix your broken signature ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Your signature has an unclosed &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt; tag that messes up transclusion of Talk pages into article pages, resulting in the word &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;div&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt; overlapping the words &amp;quot;Add comment&amp;quot; at, e.g., the bottom of [[3219:_Planets_and_Bright_Stars]].&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
See discussion at https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk%3A3219%3A_Planets_and_Bright_Stars&amp;amp;type=revision&amp;amp;diff=408118&amp;amp;oldid=408111.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
In of itself, this kind of problem is an excellent reason not to use fancy signatures, and also the coloring and faintness of your signature make it incredibly annoying and hard to read (indeed, it makes me annoyed just reading your comments! I wonder if that's true more editors than not?). In any event, the problem appears to be because you have:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font:11pt Cormorant Garamond&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#5CA7CF&amp;quot;&amp;gt;tor&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#F08DB0&amp;quot;&amp;gt;i :3&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font:8pt Cormorant Garamond&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#9E9E9E&amp;quot;&amp;gt;talk &amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#F08DB0&amp;quot;&amp;gt;to &amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#5CA7CF&amp;quot;&amp;gt;me!&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
When it should be:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font:11pt Cormorant Garamond&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#5CA7CF&amp;quot;&amp;gt;tor&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#F08DB0&amp;quot;&amp;gt;i :3&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font:8pt Cormorant Garamond&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#9E9E9E&amp;quot;&amp;gt;talk &amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#F08DB0&amp;quot;&amp;gt;to &amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#5CA7CF&amp;quot;&amp;gt;me!&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
that is, in redline:&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font:11pt Cormorant Garamond&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#5CA7CF&amp;quot;&amp;gt;tor&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#F08DB0&amp;quot;&amp;gt;i :3&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:blue; font-weight: bold&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font:8pt Cormorant Garamond&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#9E9E9E&amp;quot;&amp;gt;talk &amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#F08DB0&amp;quot;&amp;gt;to &amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#5CA7CF&amp;quot;&amp;gt;me!&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
which closes the initial font span before the superscript starts.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Let me know if you would like me to setup a sandbox page that demonstrates this problem a bit more clearly—it seemed a waste of a page creation, but happy to do it.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Please fix your signature so your talk comments stop disrupting the wiki by their very existence. It would be a good time to consider dropping the flamboyent signature altogether and using something that regular people can read without hurting their eyes. There is a place for expressiveness, but you have overdone it (objectively, since you have broken &amp;quot;the world&amp;quot;). Thank you. [[User:JohnHawkinson|JohnHawkinson]] ([[User talk:JohnHawkinson|talk]]) 14:03, 14 March 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Please note that another editor has [https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:3219:_Planets_and_Bright_Stars&amp;amp;diff=prev&amp;amp;oldid=408152 repaired your signature in the above-referenced talk page], so the problem is no longer visible there. This does help confirm my diagnosis of the problem. The problem remains visible in other places, e.g., [[3209: Plums]]. {{unsigned|JohnHawkinson|16:41, 14 March 2026 (UTC)}}&lt;br /&gt;
::It's now been fixed once I realized the issue and learned about this problem. I've also corrected all of my other comments that have a broken signature. If you notice them, please let me know so that I can fix it! Additionally, I've tried to make my signature more readable by increasing the darkness of my signature. If you still struggle, I would be more than happy to change it so that it is more readable on a white background. All the best, [[User:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font:11pt Cormorant Garamond&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#5CA7CF&amp;quot;&amp;gt;tor&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#F08DB0&amp;quot;&amp;gt;i :3&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font:8pt Cormorant Garamond&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#9E9E9E&amp;quot;&amp;gt;talk &amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#F08DB0&amp;quot;&amp;gt;to &amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#5CA7CF&amp;quot;&amp;gt;me!&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 17:25, 18 March 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Thanks for the repair. As for readability, I don't see a difference? Previously it was #5CA7CF, #F08DB0, and #9E9E9E. Your signature above just now seems to have the same colors and font weights. Am I missing something? [[User:JohnHawkinson|JohnHawkinson]] ([[User talk:JohnHawkinson|talk]]) 17:35, 18 March 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::::Ah, sorry. I had to go back to class, but I've fixed it now and darkened the hex codes in my signature. Hope it helps! [[User:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font:11pt Cormorant Garamond&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#4A86A6&amp;quot;&amp;gt;tor&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#C0728D&amp;quot;&amp;gt;i :3&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font:8pt Cormorant Garamond&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#7E7E7E&amp;quot;&amp;gt;talk &amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#C0728D&amp;quot;&amp;gt;to &amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#4A86A6&amp;quot;&amp;gt;me!&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 21:57, 18 March 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Update for your info===&lt;br /&gt;
I've just seen your acknowledgement of the signature tagging issues. If you don't mind, I've deconstructed (indendent) your current version. I basically added a layer of indenting for everything 'within' other tagging. Mostly HTMLs (&amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;tag&amp;gt; ... &amp;lt;/tag&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt; type) but also the Wiki-linking (&amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;[[destination| ... ]]&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;pre&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
  [[User:42.book.addict|&lt;br /&gt;
    &amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font:11pt Cormorant Garamond&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
      &amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#5CA7CF&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
        tor&lt;br /&gt;
      &amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
      &amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#F08DB0&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
        i :3&lt;br /&gt;
      &amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
    &amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
  ]]&lt;br /&gt;
  &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
    [[User talk:42.book.addict|&lt;br /&gt;
      &amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font:8pt Cormorant Garamond&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
        &amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#9E9E9E&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
          talk&lt;br /&gt;
        &amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
        &amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#F08DB0&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
          to&lt;br /&gt;
        &amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
        &amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#5CA7CF&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
          me!&lt;br /&gt;
        &amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
      ]]&lt;br /&gt;
    &amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
  &amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
  17:25, 18 March 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/pre&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The HTML tags are all matched, now, but the Wiki-style link for (this here) User talk page, in the lower half is disjointed across this. As in:&lt;br /&gt;
*open &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
**open &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;[[link to User talk:&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
***open &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt; for font size and style&lt;br /&gt;
****open &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt; for font colour&lt;br /&gt;
*****(text)&lt;br /&gt;
****close &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt; for font colour&lt;br /&gt;
****open &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt; for font colour&lt;br /&gt;
*****(more text)&lt;br /&gt;
****close &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt; for font colour&lt;br /&gt;
****open &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt; for font colour&lt;br /&gt;
*****(yet more text)&lt;br /&gt;
****close &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt; for font colour&lt;br /&gt;
***'''close the &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;link to User talk:]]&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;''', despite technically being still in the font-size span...&lt;br /&gt;
**'''close &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt; for font size and style''', out of order...&lt;br /&gt;
*close &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*...then the appended (deliberately bland) timestamp&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Because it's a mix between HTML-style markup and Wiki-style markup (and, moreover, web-browsers tend to work around things that are closed out of order, although - as already seen - not always without strange effects popping up), it might not have been too obvious.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''In short''', the quick fix that I'd suggest is to swap the &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt; to be &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But, rather than just tell you that, I thought you might like to know how I personally checked this. (There are other ways.) By adding linefeeds and spacings, you can run up and down the editor and make sure that a column that a tag starts on has a closing tag on the same 'level'. (All of this obviously, you'd then to restore back to ''no'' linefeeds and only spacing where you still need it. Either the original you 'expanded' being proven entirely correct, guided by whatever fixes it needs or by 'unexpanding' it back again.) [[Special:Contributions/81.179.199.253|81.179.199.253]] 21:04, 18 March 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Thanks for helping out! I'll make sure to run through this method whenever I want to make an alteration or work with HTML. [[User:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font:11pt Cormorant Garamond&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#4A86A6&amp;quot;&amp;gt;tor&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#C0728D&amp;quot;&amp;gt;i :3&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font:8pt Cormorant Garamond&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#7E7E7E&amp;quot;&amp;gt;talk &amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#C0728D&amp;quot;&amp;gt;to &amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#4A86A6&amp;quot;&amp;gt;me!&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 21:57, 18 March 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::No problem. It's more a general &amp;quot;helping you to help yourself&amp;quot;, and if you have a different way of checking this than this particular indenting version (with mixed-markup!) that works better for you, then use that.&lt;br /&gt;
::A more 'destructive' check is to take the text (or a copy of it!) and first of all look for any standalone (non-containing) &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;tag /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;s and remove them, as well as all 'bare content'. Then find where you now have &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;tag&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/tag&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt; happening, with nothing between start and end, and remove those. Rinse and repeat, structurally eating out clearly open-and-close content wherever you see it. If it doesn't reduce down to ''nothing'', then you've got a (probable!) error. - Though it might be a ''bit'' trickier to find out where the error you have just found is, if the tag you've 'hit' looks a lot like a lot of the other parallel tags. And it's not as clear a result to show someone else, which is why I did the depth-indenting method for you, above. [[Special:Contributions/81.179.199.253|81.179.199.253]] 22:32, 18 March 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Just wanted to say hi ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hi :) 42. Can’t believe I’m on this site for almost a year already! The last April fools only seems like a year ago! [[User:Aprilfoolsupdate!| &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;April&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;fools&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;update&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;!]]([[User talk:Aprilfoolsupdate!|talk]]) 06:02, 18 March 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Vandal counter may need to be updated==&lt;br /&gt;
I noticed that your user page has a vandalism counter at 47. Just so you know, your userpage got vandalized twice by the 165 IP, so the most accurate tally would be 49. Just wanted to let you know. --'''''[[User:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#023020&amp;quot;&amp;gt;DollarStoreBa'al&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User Talk:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#09ff00&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Converse&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;  14:57, 30 March 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Thanks DSB [[User:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font:11pt Cormorant Garamond&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#4A86A6&amp;quot;&amp;gt;tor&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#C0728D&amp;quot;&amp;gt;i :3&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font:8pt Cormorant Garamond&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#7E7E7E&amp;quot;&amp;gt;talk &amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#C0728D&amp;quot;&amp;gt;to &amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#4A86A6&amp;quot;&amp;gt;me!&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 21:24, 30 March 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== How tf did you go 2 years w/o learning how to close HTML tags??? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
😭 [[User:CalibansCreations|'''&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#ff0000;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Caliban&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;''']] ([[User talk:CalibansCreations|talk]]) 12:55, 5 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
: (specifically 2 years on this site lmao) [[User:CalibansCreations|'''&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#ff0000;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Caliban&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;''']] ([[User talk:CalibansCreations|talk]]) 12:56, 5 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::i just...didn't? don't really know what else to say [[User:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font:11pt Cormorant Garamond&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#4A86A6&amp;quot;&amp;gt;tor&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#C0728D&amp;quot;&amp;gt;i :3&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font:8pt Cormorant Garamond&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#7E7E7E&amp;quot;&amp;gt;talk &amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#C0728D&amp;quot;&amp;gt;to &amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#4A86A6&amp;quot;&amp;gt;me!&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 19:40, 5 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>42.book.addict</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:3227:_Creation&amp;diff=409580</id>
		<title>Talk:3227: Creation</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:3227:_Creation&amp;diff=409580"/>
				<updated>2026-04-03T21:07:51Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;42.book.addict: so funny i forgot to laugh&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&amp;lt;!-- Please sign your posts with ~~~~ and don't delete this text. New comments should be added at the bottom. --&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
did anyone else wait for the screensaver to hit the corner? [[Special:Contributions/216.25.182.141|216.25.182.141]] 20:13, 1 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Yes. I watched waaay too long to see if it would, but lost patience and I don’t want to put effort into determining if it will happen. Can anyone confirm whether or not it will eventually happen either for some people or for all people? [[User:Dúthomhas|Dúthomhas]] ([[User talk:Dúthomhas|talk]]) 23:06, 2 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I can't work out what Modem mode is meant to do... on my machine it just freezes the whole page. [[Special:Contributions/78.213.151.110|78.213.151.110]] 20:22, 1 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:It plays the sound of an old-style phone modem, and scrolls the comic into view slowly. It's supposed to represent the early days when downloading an image would take a long time. [[User:Barmar|Barmar]] ([[User talk:Barmar|talk]]) 20:31, 1 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:can confirm on android firefox it seems to render the page unresponsive to input - [[User:Vaedez|Vaedez]] ([[User talk:Vaedez|talk]]) 21:18, 1 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Same here on Desktop Firefox - under &amp;quot;Modem mode&amp;quot;, the whole page freezes up and the browser prompts me to close it (&amp;quot;this page is slowing down Firefox&amp;quot;, or words to that effect). I wonder if it's a Firefox thing - odd if so, because I imagine Randall of all people would test on browsers other than Chrom* - or some weird side-effect of my ad/popup/script/cookie-blockers. A shame because all the other modes seem to work - &amp;quot;Greyscale mode&amp;quot; is far too subtle, and I'm ashamed to admit I missed the change from &amp;quot;math&amp;quot; to &amp;quot;maths&amp;quot;! - but this is a great April Fools' comic. [[Special:Contributions/50.45.232.78|50.45.232.78]] 22:56, 1 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Firefoxer here, and ''without'' any particular add-ons that might interact badly with it... It does (seem to) lock up and it does (sometimes... didn't on at least one occasion) prompt Firefox to ask if I want to stop the page. But if I wait long enough it 'wipes off' the last seen comic image, starts to 'scanline' it back (note: not actually accurate to the real days of modems, as you'd probably be loading up images in interlaced mode) and ''then'' starts to give a modem-shriek.&lt;br /&gt;
:I wonder, without delving into the code used, if it's the method used to 'sleep' (could it be using busy-busy NOP-like code, rather than true sleep-interupts?), or just a slightly different asynchronous script-handling method that Firefox uses instead of other test-platforms. [[Special:Contributions/81.179.199.253|81.179.199.253]] 23:46, 1 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::Using Firefox (On mac, in Australia, if relevant) and it works fine, but no audio component. [[Special:Contributions/114.198.19.39|114.198.19.39]] 08:07, 2 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
: For me (in Chrome) it scrolled the whole page in from the bottom, but then kept scrolling so that you got the top of the page appearing beneath the bottom of it - like a TV with vertical hold problems (kids - ask your grandparents). Then changing to other modes it was stuck in that position. However, on subsequent attempts it only scrolled open the comic portion of the page. [[Special:Contributions/82.13.184.33|82.13.184.33]] 08:35, 2 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I clicked darker mode and my screen is black and I cant undo it help {{unsigned ip|207.233.27.2|20:24, 1 April 2026 (UTC)}}&lt;br /&gt;
:I assume you mean Darkest Mode, since there's no darker mode. The screen turns black but if you look carefully you can still see the grey of the menu and you can click on it. Also, the menu border continues to appear after you select the choice (at least it does on my Mac). P.S. Don't forget to sign your comment with 4 ~ characters. [[User:Barmar|Barmar]] ([[User talk:Barmar|talk]]) 20:31, 1 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Modem mode doesn’t work for me what does it do [[Special:Contributions/2A06:5906:1412:4100:352D:1A2:184:5F3|2A06:5906:1412:4100:352D:1A2:184:5F3]] 20:29, 1 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Modem mode makes the comic slowly print from above [[Special:Contributions/216.25.182.141|216.25.182.141]] 20:34, 1 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I see the mobile site m.xkcd.com was left out on this change😔 [[Special:Contributions/104.28.215.219|104.28.215.219]] 20:37, 1 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:I have been viewing via a tablet, though I think I've permwnently set my browsers to ''not'' use mobile version sites (they tend to assume viewing everything in portrait, I have found, whereas I almost always browse in landscape, so it gives me badly relocated on-page menu bars, or other wierdnesses).&lt;br /&gt;
:Everything seems to work nicely, as I bounced back and forth between modes (and occasionaly went to other comics to see how something like Stained Glass worked with them). Until I tried out the Star Wars scrolling one. Earlier on, I'd checked it out on a desktop, so I left it until one of the last few because it was hardest on the desktop to move on from (unless you used the cursor key, when you'd let the select-drop-down element drift to far 'away' to easily click.&lt;br /&gt;
:However, on the tablet, it ''just'' goes black, no appearance of the scrolly-scrawled page contents. (No way to use cursors to change the in-focus drop-down element to a neighbour.) Back-paging just takes me back through the various Random-comic pages I'd passed through, then the plain xkcd.com latest-comic default, all completely black, no animation. (Plane/Boat/Spring/Screensave mode dynamics, etc animated/transformed properly in their various ways.) Back-paging to before landing on xkcd.com (the tab I'd set off from) then forward again landed me in the all-black page with no space-sprawl in evidence...&lt;br /&gt;
:...''until'' I turned the tablet sideways (portrait proportions), and there it was. And rotated back to landscape to find it ''still'' properly visible, still scrolling away. Also, discovered I could drag (without pinch-dragging, which is zooming) the scrawl back 'towards me' (essentially scrolling down the skewed page, not an interaction that I'd attempted on the desktop computer), so that I could intercept the dropdown box and shift myself onto a different mode again.&lt;br /&gt;
:This is on Chrome For Android. I have other tablet browsers handy, but would need to check them properly before committing to ''their'' compatabilities or peculiarities. But sort of works, after you get over a funny hurdle (as just described), and ''perhaps'' need to have set Desktop Site as default rather than letting your device attempt to automatically use the &amp;quot;m.&amp;quot; site version. [[Special:Contributions/82.132.237.40|82.132.237.40]] 02:56, 2 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I read “Modern mode” instead of Modem mode and I spent a while making wild theories about what it could be referencing. But I’m also quite sleepy. [[Special:Contributions/146.70.116.107|146.70.116.107]] 20:51, 1 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:i also misread it as modern mode, it made everything lag for me, made it feel like a modern website [[Special:Contributions/85.206.187.35|85.206.187.35]] 00:57, 2 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I deminified the code if anyone wants it. There are no hidden options or anything like right-click has, but it would be extremely easy to add modes to it. [[Special:Contributions/2601:441:4B7E:7660:0:0:0:AC72|2601:441:4B7E:7660:0:0:0:AC72]] 20:59, 1 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Modem mode&amp;quot; works for me in Chromium, but not Firefox. [[User:Robobun|Robobun]] ([[User talk:Robobun|talk]]) 21:06, 1 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:For me it's just slow on Firefox. It takes about 5 seconds to clear the comic and start scrolling it back in, and the static doesn't start until it's almost all showing. [[User:Barmar|Barmar]] ([[User talk:Barmar|talk]]) 21:11, 1 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
applies across the whole website? i forsee a preservation effort in the near future to capture What This Was Like, when randall inevitably removes the menu and all its modes--there's no chance this is staying, is there? - [[User:Vaedez|Vaedez]] ([[User talk:Vaedez|talk]]) 21:24, 1 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:It applies to older comics, but not other parts of the site. I'm also wondering if this might be just for April Fool's Day. [[User:Barmar|Barmar]] ([[User talk:Barmar|talk]]) 21:27, 1 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:: I know it's april the 1st, but could we keep the modes? Stainglass is fun when the background doesn't turn maroon (and makes the text hard to read). I also checked other pages of xkcd, the modes are on on the other comics. {{unsigned ip|2a04:cec0:121a:5180:bcf7:54ff:feb2:d55|21:31, 1 April 2026 (UTC)}}&lt;br /&gt;
::Of course it's the April Fools'/Fools' comic. Nice to see it being on time, this year, and I too wonder how long it'll stay. Might it permanently stay on this comic page, perhaps even stay if you jump off of it, but comic 3228 (or the 'default' latest-comic page) will probably be back to normal on Friday. [[Special:Contributions/81.179.199.253|81.179.199.253]] 22:14, 1 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Luckily, preservation is easy enough. I think you just need to save the main [https://xkcd.com/3227/5710add.js Javascript file] (which contains the CSS, and generates the necessary DOM on the fly) and the [https://xkcd.com/3227/imgs/nyoom_2x.png one image asset]. I think it should be easy enough to turn it into a UserScript if you turn the png into a data URI, or even a web extension if that's more your speed. [[User:Dratini0|Dratini0]] ([[User talk:Dratini0|talk]]) 00:12, 2 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Finally we have the Boat Mode from the footer! [[User:B_for_brain|B for brain]] ([[User_talk:B_for_brain|talk]]) ([https://www.youtube.com/@bforbrain youtube channel] [https://bforbrain.weebly.com/ wobsite (supposed to be a blag)]) 21:33, 1 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Attention admins''' I think there's an &amp;quot;oops&amp;quot; in this line:&lt;br /&gt;
 &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;To experience the interactivity, visit the {{xkcd|{comicNum}|original comic}}!&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[Special:Contributions/64.201.132.210|64.201.132.210]] 21:43, 1 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Yeah, looks like this is a regression in this corner case. I should have a fix for it soon. —[[User:Theusaf|theusaf]] ([[User talk:Theusaf|talk]]) 23:41, 1 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Has the full footer always been there? &amp;quot;xkcd.com is best viewed with Netscape Navigator 4.0 or below on a Pentium 3±1 emulated in Javascript on an Apple IIGS at a screen resolution of 1024x1. Please enable your ad blockers, disable high-heat drying, and remove your device from Airplane Mode and set it to Boat Mode. For security reasons, please leave caps lock on while browsing.&amp;quot; --[[User:Chance2travel|Chance2travel]] ([[User talk:Chance2travel|talk]]) 22:30, 1 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Yes, always has been. Learn more at the page for [[Footnote]]. [[Special:Contributions/104.28.215.219|104.28.215.219]] 23:17, 1 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I think the Dorian Greyscale Mode takes 5 minutes to complete. I see this in the Javascript: &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;body.mode-dorian-greyscale {\n    transition: filter 300s ease-out;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt; [[User:Pgn674|Pgn674]] ([[User talk:Pgn674|talk]]) 22:36, 1 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Dorian Greyscale Mode seems like it ought to use only the white keys on a standard piano, and go DEGFCDBA, with adjacent notes differing in a single bit position. [[Special:Contributions/2A02:8084:2862:4F80:65B7:327D:E614:342F|2A02:8084:2862:4F80:65B7:327D:E614:342F]] 22:56, 1 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I'd love to know if the modem mode's audio file decodes to anything if you try to decode it as a v.92 stream or something similar. [[Special:Contributions/2603:6011:4504:D100:3BD0:B617:9D7:1C80|2603:6011:4504:D100:3BD0:B617:9D7:1C80]] 23:24, 1 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Stained Glass Mode doesn't show title text? Might be a bug [[User:X|X]] ([[User talk:X|talk]]) 23:38, 1 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Not gonna lie, I got nerd-sniped hard here. I thought the noise in the modem mode might be real modem noises, and I tried to demodulate it. With Gnuradio, I got to the point of guessing that it's 4FSK at 2400 baud, with a center frequency of about 1700 Hz and a frequency deviation of about 300 Hz. I couldn't find the corresponding modem standard, so I started deminifying the source code that generates it. The good news is that I was correct. It's 4FSK, 2400 baud, center frequency 1710 Hz, frequency deviation 270 Hz. The bad news? The data is Math.random(). That feels bittersweet. I saw a puzzle where there was none. I want to post the relevant snippet of deminified code. Am I allowed to do that? Is the site itself also under CC-BY-NC, or just the comics? [[User:Dratini0|Dratini0]] ([[User talk:Dratini0|talk]]) 23:58, 1 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Honestly, I'd love a real dark mode for xkcd.com.  But one where the comic isn't inverted.  Sometimes I prefer to read the comic here on explainxkcd.com since I have mediawiki settings for dark mode, but those don't invert the comic.  (I don't think I can make mediawiki settings for space opera mode...)    [[User:Orion205|Orion205]] ([[User talk:Orion205|talk]]) 00:28, 2 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:You should be able to force a custom CSS on this site (with or without any browser-helpers, but there are ones out there that streamline/automate/augment this ability). The AFD-code is applying a full visual filter (over the top of the comic; maybe or maybe not above the mode-selection 'widget', depending upon browser implementation), but sounds like you just want to apply foreground/background inversion as priority (above anything xkcd.com normally 'suggests' via CSS/tag-attributes) to all markup, but leave the comic image (and any other images, like the thumbnails) as is. Might he tricky if any element is &amp;quot;black-on-transparency&amp;quot; image, which assumes white but now has your code turning it black behind the non-transparent black, but you could probably live with it (or make it 75% dark-grey or so?), and non-transparent black-on-white (presuming white all around it) could look strange.&lt;br /&gt;
:But you can't tell for sure without trying to tweak your end (or actually checking the source HTML, on the way to doing just that).&lt;br /&gt;
:Alternatively, maybe you can isolate the on-site code for just the Dark Mode of the entire-page treatment, modified to 'demask' the filter exactly over the limits of the comic img-rendering area. If it's been done the way I think it's been done (not gonna try to check, 'til I'm not on mobile platform myself) should be a fairly trivial job to add to the fraction of the code you 'borrow'. Or at least a learning experience, as you work out what tweaks do what. [[Special:Contributions/82.132.237.40|82.132.237.40]] 12:22, 2 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I spent way too long watching screensaver mode to see if it would do anything if the comic hit a corner. [[Special:Contributions/170.142.177.145|170.142.177.145]] 00:31, 2 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:fyi ive found that the comic panels bounce on the edges of the viewport but move with reference to page coordinates--which means if you scroll just right you can place a corner of your screen where it's going to hit, without having to wait for it to get there on its own - [[User:Vaedez|Vaedez]] ([[User talk:Vaedez|talk]]) 03:39, 2 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I wonder if the choice of the actual text in the comic is a reference to the Apollo 8 Christmas broadcast of Genesis, due to the Artemis II launch today... or maybe I'm overthinking it and it's simply a joke about light and dark mode. [[Special:Contributions/2601:241:8002:3E0:5CAD:3E02:93FF:FB00|2601:241:8002:3E0:5CAD:3E02:93FF:FB00]] 01:05, 2 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:TY! I was not aware of that broadcast and it seems incredibly strange, since everything done on the mission &amp;quot;debunks&amp;quot; that passage! Apparently it was done because anything alluding to &amp;quot;world peace&amp;quot; in any way would seem like a commentary on the Vietnam War. Which, depending on one's skepticism of religion, can also seem quite ironic -now I'm overthinking, so I'll stop now. [[User:Cuvtixo|Cuvtixo]] ([[User talk:Cuvtixo|talk]]) 16:00, 3 April 2026 (UTC)  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Anyone test the other April fools comics? [[User:Commercialegg|Commercialegg]] ([[User talk:Commercialegg|talk]]) 01:14, 2 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:I tried Machine (2916) in dark mode and it just froze after the tutorial. [[User:King Pando|King Pando]] ([[User talk:King Pando|talk]]) 03:34, 2 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I noticed using some of the modes makes xkcd.com/688 no longer self describing, not sure if its worth noting on either wiki [[User:Daunting Zebra|Daunting Zebra]] ([[User talk:Daunting Zebra|talk]]) 07:31, 2 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The current explanation of dark mode as 'inverting black and white pixels' isn't quite correct. For example, on [[2623]] a pale yellow colour gets flipped to black. On the other hand, other colours elsewhere are left untouched. So it must be doing 'some very light area of colour palette &amp;gt; black' and presumably 'some very dark area of colour palette &amp;gt; white'. [[Special:Contributions/82.13.184.33|82.13.184.33]] 11:27, 2 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
: On [[2342]] a light khaki(?) colour gets changed to a dark grey - not even a black. [[Special:Contributions/82.13.184.33|82.13.184.33]] 11:29, 2 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
: Brown sun, anyone? [[2750]] [[Special:Contributions/82.13.184.33|82.13.184.33]] 11:33, 2 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Similar to the criteria for the Stained Glass region borders, perhaps? Sufficiently light grey (or unssaturated+light colours) do not 'edge' a given floodfill area, it seems. (See {{xkcd|1811}}, and how it floods/filters that, for example, with pre-coloured ''and'' greyscale text to compare its operational limits upon.) [[Special:Contributions/82.132.237.40|82.132.237.40]] 12:22, 2 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
: It is not flipped to black. It is turned into a very dark yellow that appears closer to black than the original yellow appeared to white because it is not gamma-corrected. [[Special:Contributions/80.187.115.75|80.187.115.75]] 00:05, 3 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
... ... I was hoping this comic would be actually fun, like ALL previous April 1 comics are... :( It would be much better if it follows its name and the standards of earlier April 1's, i.e. there is only a &amp;quot;dark&amp;quot; option and when you switch to it the story progresses and you continue to do some other things and eventually complete a full xkcd-style &amp;quot;creation&amp;quot; (a great idea!) [[Special:Contributions/203.198.86.210|203.198.86.210]] 11:43, 2 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
unsigned comment (pretend it's April foooools) {{unsigned ip|13:27, 2 April 2026 (UTC)}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Is nobody noticing the fact that Randall was ACTUALLY ON TIME? That's quite rare! --''''''[[User:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#023020&amp;quot;&amp;gt;DollarStoreBa'al&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User Talk:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#09ff00&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Converse&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;  13:58, 2 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I wonder if any intentional &amp;quot;Easter eggs&amp;quot; were hidden inside other comic pages. [[User:Benzaldehyde|Benzaldehyde]] ([[User talk:Benzaldehyde|talk]] 17:10, 2 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:I tried looking up #[[880]] (the one about 3D) and sadly it has no additional easter eggs with it :( [[Special:Contributions/2407:0:3006:2959:B0A4:2347:EF39:22AE|2407:0:3006:2959:B0A4:2347:EF39:22AE]] 12:03, 3 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Did anyone else notice that the effect (3D, Airplane, etc.) carries over to other comics accessed by the 'Random' button?&lt;br /&gt;
:You can change it on any comic. The dropdown is still there. [[User:King Pando|King Pando]] ([[User talk:King Pando|talk]]) 23:09, 2 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Spring Mode is broken on comic [https://xkcd.com/1127/ 1127]. It doesn't do anything for that one, but the other modes work. [[Special:Contributions/2600:4040:2CD4:C200:C134:93AD:21E2:1202|2600:4040:2CD4:C200:C134:93AD:21E2:1202]] 12:35, 3 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>42.book.addict</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=User:42.book.addict&amp;diff=409272</id>
		<title>User:42.book.addict</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=User:42.book.addict&amp;diff=409272"/>
				<updated>2026-04-01T06:01:47Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;42.book.addict: finally being perceived haha there's still an hour left in my time zone (utc-7)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{notice|I have reached out to [[User:Jeff|Jeff]]-the owner of this wiki and the only active (sort of) ‘crat-via Gmail and X. Hopefully he responds soon! You can see my To-Do List for him at the bottom of my user page. If there is anything else you think is important, please add to it. I am also considering asking him for adminship, for I am pretty active and available, as well as very dedicated towards this project. What do you think? &lt;br /&gt;
TL;DR-emailed/tweeted to [[User:Jeff|Jeff]], asked him to do some very important things, I want to become an admin, please give me your thoughts.}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{notice|I've created a Discord server for Explain XKCD! Join it at [https://discord.com/invite/zGEVanBBAx discord.gg/zGEVanBBAx]! I intend for it to be a backup format for us to communicate in the case of a server outage, to coordinate online, and to have fun connecting with each other!}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hi! If you see this, you have reached my user page! My name's Victoria, although you can call me Tori for short. I’m 15, live in California, love reading, and started reading Randall’s works (What If?, Thing Explainer, XKCD) in 2018. I started editing on Feb. 1, 2024. I've done {{#cscore:42.book.addict|changes}} changes across {{#cscore:42.book.addict|pages}} pages, bringing to a total of {{#cscore:42.book.addict|score}} point contribution score. See my [[User:42.book.addict/userbox|userboxes]]! &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==My Loves==&lt;br /&gt;
*{{w|Hatsune Miku|Hatsune Miku &amp;lt;33}}&lt;br /&gt;
*{{w|Kasane Teto}}&lt;br /&gt;
*Classical music ({{w|Beethoven}}, {{w|Mozart}}, {{w|Shostakovich}})&lt;br /&gt;
*Reading (i read an entire scientific encyclopaedia during the lockdown :3)&lt;br /&gt;
**although not so much anymore because i’ve been too busy&lt;br /&gt;
*ao3 yuri&lt;br /&gt;
*Pokémon cards (i have a pretty solid portfolio/collection)&lt;br /&gt;
*Bluey (yes, i enjoy watching a preschool show. sue me.)&lt;br /&gt;
*Science&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://www.youtube.com/@rachie rachie]&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://www.twitch.tv/shxtou shoto]&lt;br /&gt;
*MCSR Ranked&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==To Do List==&lt;br /&gt;
*learn to use the goddamned preview button &lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:green; font-size:1.5em;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;✓&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;amp;nbsp;'''{{{1|Done}}}'''&lt;br /&gt;
*get a life&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;red&amp;quot;&amp;gt;✗&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt; '''impossible'''&lt;br /&gt;
*create a bot that fixes grammatical mistakes through the Pywiki library&lt;br /&gt;
**&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{citation needed}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;, extra periods/commas/spaces/whitespace &lt;br /&gt;
**'''In progress'''&lt;br /&gt;
*clean out the maintenance report pages&lt;br /&gt;
*Use the summary box more often&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:green; font-size:1.5em;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;✓&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;amp;nbsp;'''{{{1|Done}}}'''&lt;br /&gt;
*finish up [[2288: Collector's Edition]]&lt;br /&gt;
*Whittle down [[Special:WhatLinksHere/Template:Actual_citation_needed|Template:Actual Citation Needed]]&lt;br /&gt;
*Whatever's on [[explain_xkcd:Community_portal/Coordination#To_do_list|here]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Special:UnusedTemplates]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Special:WantedCategories]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Special:WantedFiles]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Special:WantedPages]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==List of Big Projects==&lt;br /&gt;
*What If? chapter explanation completion&lt;br /&gt;
*upload all loot files of [[2288: Collector's Edition]]&lt;br /&gt;
:*'''In progress'''&lt;br /&gt;
*Categorize all uncategorized files&lt;br /&gt;
:*'''In progress'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Log==&lt;br /&gt;
*yayyyyy only 3 months on the wiki and already 43rd place in overall editing for the entire history of this wiki! also, first admin beat in edit count! more edits to come! (5/14/2024)&lt;br /&gt;
*42nd place-the answer to life, the universe and everything else (5/16/2024)&lt;br /&gt;
*what on earth did I do that made my contribution score jump 70 points (9/24/2024)&lt;br /&gt;
*''must…figure…out…how…to…set…up…a…custom…sig (collapses after fighting with wikitext)'' (9/26/2024)&lt;br /&gt;
*300 edits in a month! (10/1/2024, 2:13 PM PST) &lt;br /&gt;
*broke my right wrist and yet I’m still editing this wiki at the hospital-what the hell am I doing with my life. (10/1/2024, 5:24 PM PST) &lt;br /&gt;
*'''1000. EFFING. EDITS. YESSSSSSSSS.''' (I’m doing this edit with a damn cast 😭-I really need to take a break.) (10/1/2024, 6:20 PM PST) &lt;br /&gt;
*wow, i did a 10 mile hike. i’m proud of myself. (10/13/2024) &lt;br /&gt;
*organized user page, made a separate userbox page. (10/15/2024) &lt;br /&gt;
*new sig, can’t use it due to “HTML tag errors”. gave out 2 barnstars, got both user/discussion pages protected. vandal count:  31! (10/25/2024) &lt;br /&gt;
*just realized that it’s because my sig is way too damn long (10/30/2024) &lt;br /&gt;
*AHHHHHHH [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7aG7tmL5lJ0 WHITEPINE 3] CAME OUT AND I MISSED THE LIVESTREAM (happy halloween! 🎃) (10/31/2024) &lt;br /&gt;
:*Anddddd I also missed Episode 4 (''smh'') (12/16/2024)&lt;br /&gt;
*I have fixed my sig! 255 characters-exactly at the max. '''[[User:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:9pt;color:#db97bf&amp;quot;&amp;gt;42.book.addict&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:6pt;color:#97b6db&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Talk to me!&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;''' (11/04/2024) &lt;br /&gt;
*Pulled an all-nighter to finish a Geo project-would’ve been absolute hell if I was editing in between. Hiatus is still on, just wanted to add this It’s 5:29 AM right now. (11/21/2024) &lt;br /&gt;
*''In New York,'' &lt;br /&gt;
''Concrete jungle where dreams are made of,'' &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
''Theres nothing you can’t do,'' &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
''Now you’re in New York,'' &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
''these streets will make you feel brand new,'' &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
''the lights will inspire you,'' &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
''lets hear it for New York, New York, New York'' &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
(I’m on vacation in New York! The skyline’s very pretty :3) (11/28/2024) &lt;br /&gt;
*Oh wow, over 1K pages edited! (12/06/2024) &lt;br /&gt;
*It's {{w|Beethoven#Life and career|Beethoven's}} birthday today! (12/16/2024) &lt;br /&gt;
::''Happy Birthday to you; Happy Birthday to you; Happy Birthday dear Ludwig; Happy Birthday to you!''&lt;br /&gt;
*2000 Edits! 🎉 Thank you so much to everyone who has been with me throughout this journey! (01/08/2025) &lt;br /&gt;
*holy shit the {{w|January 2025 Southern California wildfires|wildfires}} in socal look really bad (01/09/2025) &lt;br /&gt;
*i have decided to fully embrace {{w|WP:FUCK}} after a sleepless night’s worth of reflection. let the peace and zen commence (haha jk i’m freaking out over some family members in Santa Monica scarily close to the Palisades fire) (01/11/2025) &lt;br /&gt;
*oh wow-10th overall place in edits! what a surprise-i didn't expect i would reach it in less than a year (01/20/2025) &lt;br /&gt;
*to be honest, I started editing about a year ago because I was too scared to join the “real” English Wikipedia and decided to join this small community to learn about Wikipedia policy by lurking around for a year, getting the hang of using templates, wikitext, etc. Also because xkcd is cool. I think that I’ll create an English Wikipedia account on the anniversary of my joining of explain xkcd, Feb. 1, and split my attention between both here and on WP. I’m also doing some research on what WikiProjects I could join, if y’all have any recommendations based on what little y’all know about me I’ll be willing to listen to them. Lore’s over, back to editing! (01/22/2025)  &lt;br /&gt;
*back! (even if it’s only for a bit to take care of the vandalism issue that cropped up after randall published [[Tariffs|tariffs]]) (04/08/2025)&lt;br /&gt;
*Jeff tweeted on September 3rd...he still hasn't responded to any of my emails or tweets :C (09/12/2025)&lt;br /&gt;
*it's been a while, huh? (11/10/2025)&lt;br /&gt;
*12,319 uncategorized comic images left... Happy Thanksgiving! (11/27/2025)&lt;br /&gt;
:*...can I finish it all by Christmas? If I ''do'' finish it up all by myself, I would take #1 on the All-Time editing leaderboard by at least 3,000+ more edits and some 8,000+ pages (11/28/2025)&lt;br /&gt;
*wow-I've made over 1,100 edits this week...can't believe that just a year ago I was celebrating my 1,000th edit C: (12/1/2025)&lt;br /&gt;
*learned how to close tags properly in html today!! (03/18/2026)&lt;br /&gt;
*happy trans visibility day!! (03/31/2026)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Vandal Counter==&lt;br /&gt;
[https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=User:42.book.addict&amp;amp;offset=&amp;amp;limit=500&amp;amp;action=history 4][https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=User_talk:42.book.addict&amp;amp;offset=&amp;amp;limit=500&amp;amp;action=history 9] times! (I’m going to take it as a sign that my impact on this wiki is positive enough to be recognized and singled out by vandals)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==To Do List for [[User:Jeff|Jeff]]==&lt;br /&gt;
*Update the MySQL and MediaWiki software (technical and security ease) &lt;br /&gt;
*Promote another ‘crat (this is sort of needed if we want to be able to keep this wiki going and have active admins) &lt;br /&gt;
*Promote some more active admins (both [[User:Dtgriscom|Dtgriscom]] and [[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] are candidates, maybe me?) &lt;br /&gt;
*Find out the root cause behind all of these [[explain_xkcd:Community_portal/Technical#the_site_is_collapsing|errors]] (preventative measures-I suspect unupdated MediaWiki software makes this wiki vulnerable to hacks and DDoS attacks) &lt;br /&gt;
*Give TheusafBOT bot status (no-brainier) &lt;br /&gt;
*De-sysop [[User:Markhurd|Markhurd]], [[User:Lcarsos|Lcarsos]], [[User:Mynotoar|Mynotoar]], [[User:Dgbrt|Dgbrt]], maybe [[User:Philosopher|Philosopher]] and other inactive admins (this list is only admins who haven’t edited in over 2 years) (preventative measures, [[User:Markhurd]] had deleted the Main Page once years after he was reported to have passed away) &lt;br /&gt;
*Fix email confirmation (account reclaims and notifications) &lt;br /&gt;
*Fix broken RSS Feed (broken ampersand, need server access to change &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;amp;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt; to &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;amp;amp;amp;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;) &lt;br /&gt;
*Restore server access to [[User:Davidy22]] (general maintenance from a technical admin)&lt;br /&gt;
*Fix Contribution Scores to exclude all Minor Edits&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Subpages==&lt;br /&gt;
*[[User:42.book.addict/common.css]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[User:42.book.addict/common.js]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[User:42.book.addict/sandbox]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[User:42.book.addict/sig]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[User:42.book.addict/userbox]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[User talk:42.book.addict/archive]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Signature History and Catalogue ==&lt;br /&gt;
'''Huge''' thanks to [[User:Omega|Omega]] for the framework of this signature! User &amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:serif&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[[User:Bubblegum|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#00BFFF&amp;quot;&amp;gt;bubblegum&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]-[[User_talk:Bubblegum|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#BF7FFF&amp;quot;&amp;gt;talk&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]|[[Special:Contributions/Bubblegum|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#FF7FFF&amp;quot;&amp;gt;contribs&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt; also inspired this sig.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Apparently, MediaWiki doesn’t allow you to have an sig longer than 255 characters. I’ll try my best to compact it, but if anybody has suggestions or would like to help, I will '''absolutely''' accept it. V1 is 490 characters, V2 is 345 characters, V3 is 255 characters (just at the limit, had to compromise contributions). V4 is 253 characters and with the same layout of V3 but with a color change to reflect spring and summer colors. V5 is an autumn/fall based signature, while V6 is a winter themed signature. V7 is an updated signature to clear up confusion about my name. See notes (''I know that this is probably just for my own self-reference'') for my details.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
V1: &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;span title=“…would I make a good admin? If you think so, drop me a message!” style=&amp;quot;font-family: Cormorant Garamond&amp;quot;&amp;gt;'''[[User:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-size:10pt;color:#db97bf&amp;quot;&amp;gt;42.book.addict&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-size:7pt;color:#97b6db&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Talk to me!&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]] [[User:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=“font-size:7pt;color:#00000”&amp;gt;|&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]] [[Special:Contributions/42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-size:7pt;color: #b069db&amp;quot;&amp;gt;What I’ve Done&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
V2: &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond&amp;quot;&amp;gt;'''[[User:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-size:10pt;color:#db97bf&amp;quot;&amp;gt;42.book.addict&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-size:7pt;color:#97b6db&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Talk to me! | &amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]][[Special:Contributions/42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-size:7pt;color:#b069db&amp;quot;&amp;gt;| What I’ve Done&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
V3: &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[User:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:9pt;color:#db97bf&amp;quot;&amp;gt;42.book.addict&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:6pt;color:#97b6db&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Talk to me!&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
V4: &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Notes: Spring/Summer signature (flowery/bright colors) &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[User:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:9pt;color:pink&amp;quot;&amp;gt;42.book.addict&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:6pt;color:#B1E4E3&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Talk to me!&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
V5: &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Notes: Autumn signature (colors reminiscent of fall foliage) &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[User:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:9pt;color:#3a795e&amp;quot;&amp;gt;42.book.addict&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:6pt;color:#ce5f15&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Talk to me!&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
V6: &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Notes: Winter signature (the cool and icy colors of this signature are similar to each other and show the blending of colors when covered in ice and snow during winter) &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[User:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:9pt;color:#A9C6CA&amp;quot;&amp;gt;42.book.addict&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:6pt;color:#516874&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Talk to me!&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
V7: &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Notes: Updated Standard Signature (tired of this whole 42/tori/book.addict thing) &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[User:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:9pt;color:#db97bf&amp;quot;&amp;gt;tori :3&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:6pt;color:#97b6db&amp;quot;&amp;gt;talk to me!&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
V8: &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Notes: TRANS PRIDE YIPPEE (unusable due to character limit (1068&amp;gt;255)) &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[User:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font:9pt Cormorant Garamond&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#89CFF0&amp;quot;&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#FFB7CE&amp;quot;&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#D3D3D3&amp;quot;&amp;gt;.&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#FFB7CE&amp;quot;&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#89CFF0&amp;quot;&amp;gt;o&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#89CFF0&amp;quot;&amp;gt;o&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#FFB7CE&amp;quot;&amp;gt;k&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#D3D3D3&amp;quot;&amp;gt;.&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#FFB7CE&amp;quot;&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#89CFF0&amp;quot;&amp;gt;d&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#89CFF0&amp;quot;&amp;gt;d&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#FFB7CE&amp;quot;&amp;gt;i&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#D3D3D3&amp;quot;&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#FFB7CE&amp;quot;&amp;gt;t&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font:6pt Cormorant Garamond&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#89CFF0&amp;quot;&amp;gt;T&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#FFB7CE&amp;quot;&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#D3D3D3&amp;quot;&amp;gt;l&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#FFB7CE&amp;quot;&amp;gt;k&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#89CFF0&amp;quot;&amp;gt; &amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#89CFF0&amp;quot;&amp;gt;t&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#FFB7CE&amp;quot;&amp;gt;o&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#D3D3D3&amp;quot;&amp;gt; &amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#FFB7CE&amp;quot;&amp;gt;m&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#89CFF0&amp;quot;&amp;gt;e&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#89CFF0&amp;quot;&amp;gt;!&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Current: &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[User:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font:9pt Cormorant Garamond&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#89CFF0&amp;quot;&amp;gt;tor&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#FFB7CE&amp;quot;&amp;gt;i :3&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font:6pt Cormorant Garamond&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#D3D3D3&amp;quot;&amp;gt;talk &amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#FFB7CE&amp;quot;&amp;gt;to &amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#89CFF0&amp;quot;&amp;gt;me!&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]'''&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>42.book.addict</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=User_talk:42.book.addict&amp;diff=409112</id>
		<title>User talk:42.book.addict</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=User_talk:42.book.addict&amp;diff=409112"/>
				<updated>2026-03-30T21:24:22Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;42.book.addict: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;'''Archive 1'''&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;[[File:archive.png]]&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;For old and irrelevant messages, see my [[User talk:42.book.addict/archive|archive!]]&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== introductions ==&lt;br /&gt;
Just replying to your message (also dw no big deal for bothering me)&lt;br /&gt;
You click on your username and there should be an edit box. --[[User:1234231587678|1234231587678]] ([[User talk:1234231587678|talk]]) 04:58, 7 February 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:it says that i dont have permission to create the page…&lt;br /&gt;
:There is currently no text in this page. You can search for this page title in other pages, or search the related logs, but you do not have permission to create this page. it says [[User:42.book.addict|42.book.addict]] ([[User talk:42.book.addict|talk]]) 19:33, 7 February 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I think you might have to wait some time (like a timer) until you can edit your own page... I think I only got to edit my page after 1 month of creating my account.--[[User:1234231587678|1234231587678]] ([[User talk:1234231587678|talk]]) 21:31, 7 February 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:ok, thx [[User:42.book.addict|42.book.addict]] ([[User talk:42.book.addict|talk]]) 21:52, 7 February 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
My guess on where you live is somewhere in the GMT zone, so United Kingdom.--[[User:1234231587678|1234231587678]] ([[User talk:1234231587678|talk]]) 03:43, 8 February 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:nope, im a california girl :) ([[User talk:42.book.addict|talk]]) 05:04, 8 February 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
lol you never know with utc times --[[User:1234231587678|1234231587678]] ([[User talk:1234231587678|talk]]) 16:52, 8 February 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Depends what you wanted to do... ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Is the following what you intended?&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{Userbox | border-c = #255 | border-s = 1 | info-s = 9 | id = [[File:trans_flag.png|45px]] | info = [[{{w|Transgender|This user is trans.}}]]  | float = left }} &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{clear}}...or is even the [[]] part not what you want?{{clear}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{Userbox | border-c = #255 | border-s = 1 | info-s = 9 | id = [[File:trans_flag.png|45px]] | info = {{w|Transgender|This user is trans.}}  | float = left }} &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{clear}}As brief a guide as I can manage:&lt;br /&gt;
*URL links use []. Although literal https://www.google.com will self-link without ''any'' wikimarkup, you probably don't want it to look like that most of the time.&lt;br /&gt;
** Just give the URL, as in &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;[https://www.google.com]&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;, to get a [https://www.google.com] (i.e. a reference number), not the best way to do it. It can be organised better with a 'References' section, but we don't do that here (they do on wikipedia, but usually with other bits to it.&lt;br /&gt;
** Better to give the URL and the text to use (after a space, a character that never appears raw in any proper URL). This can be &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;[https://www.google.com Check It Out On Google!]&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt; or even &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;[https://www.google.com https://www.microsoft.com (only kidding!)]&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;, to give [https://www.google.com Check It Out On Google!] or [https://www.google.com https://www.microsoft.com (only kidding!)]... But perhaps best not to do the latter too much (I really didn't want to post that without the &amp;quot;(only kidding!)&amp;quot; part, in fact.)&lt;br /&gt;
*Internalised wikilinks use the [[]]s.&lt;br /&gt;
**Anything that can be found under the title, e.g. &amp;quot;2: Petit Trees (sketch)&amp;quot; (or, because of redirections, &amp;quot;2&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;Petit Trees (sketch)&amp;quot; go to the same spot, so &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;[[2]], [[Petit Trees (sketch)]] and [[2: Petit Trees (sketch)]]&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt; gives you the literal links [[2]], [[Petit Trees (sketch)]] and [[2: Petit Trees (sketch)]]&lt;br /&gt;
**Or use &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;[[2: Petit Trees (sketch)|that comic with the little trees]]&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;, additional text separated by the 'pipe' symbol (i.e. &amp;quot;|&amp;quot;), to link to [[2: Petit Trees (sketch)|that comic with the little trees]]&lt;br /&gt;
**You can also link across to articles on other 'wikimedia family' sites, but I'm not going to try to summarise that, as the primary reason to do that is to go to an actual Wikipedia article, and there's a template set up to do that ''very'' nicely, already (and also a few other places, like Wiktionary, and some not-really-wikis with a similar philosphy like TVTropes). If in doubt, do it as a URL link ''or'' find a place where someone else has clearly markuped a link to the same site as you want to link to.&lt;br /&gt;
*So, anyway, Wikilink templates use the {{template|w}}-template, with one or two paramaters (pipe-separated). (It shortcuts the thing you'd maybe use [[]]s for&lt;br /&gt;
**Using &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{w|article}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt; gives you a link to &amp;quot;{{w|Article}}&amp;quot; (it capitalises the first character, even if you don't)&lt;br /&gt;
**Using &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{w|article|with alternate text}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt; gives you a link there but &amp;quot;{{w|article|with alternate text}}&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
**If the article name has whitespace (or other 'URL-unfriendly' characters) in it, those characters in the URL (which you wouldn't want to use) will be rendered as something URL-friendly. The URL for &amp;quot;Whitespace (programming language)&amp;quot;, for example, is https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Whitespace_(programming_language) but you wouldn't normally use that so literally in any case, and definitely not when you can significanty shorten it with the {{template|w}} notation.&lt;br /&gt;
***What you can do is (without 'alternate link text') render it as &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{w|Whitespace_(programming_language)}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt; - i.e. {{w|Whitespace_(programming_language)}} - but that's not nice to see 'rendered raw' when you ''want'' the spaces. You could give it alternate text via &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{w|Whitespace_(programming_language)|Whitespace (programming language)}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt; to give {{w|Whitespace_(programming_language)|Whitespace (programming language)}} ...but that's wasteful and unnecessary.&lt;br /&gt;
***Instead, just do &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{w|Whitespace (programming language)}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt; (that's the literal copy of the article's own page title, from the rendered page) - and shows as {{w|Whitespace (programming language)}} - which is good. Although &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{w|Whitespace (programming language)|the programming language called Whitespace}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt; might be the best way to seemlessly link to {{w|Whitespace (programming language)|the programming language called Whitespace}} ...depends what you want to appear there.&lt;br /&gt;
***And you can link to header anchors pretty much ''like'' the URL of https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Whitespace_(programming_language)#History by using &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{w|Whitespace (programming language)#History|the history of Whitespace}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt; to have you show {{w|Whitespace (programming language)#History|the history of Whitespace}} or whatever else you might want to use.&lt;br /&gt;
**Also, for the use of a link which is singular but which you would like to include as the plural (usually the &amp;quot;...s&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;...es&amp;quot; version), you could use article-name first parameter and ''pluralised'' article name as second, but instead of &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{w|Plural|Plurals}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;, for a link to the {{w|Plural|Plurals}}, you can save yourself a lot of effort by doing &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{w|Plural}}s&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt; to also give you a linke to {{w|Plural}}s. Magic, eh? And it also works with &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{w|Ox}}en&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt; to link the different standard plural of {{w|Ox}}en to the article for &amp;quot;Ox&amp;quot; (better than linking to the word for {{w|Oxen}}, which ends up redirecting to {{w|Ox}} anyway).&lt;br /&gt;
...so, anyway, that's the basics. And a few not-so-basics. So if the solutions to your tagging issue aren't already solved (or even if they are!), you might have enough info here to kludge it into whatever form of infobox info text you ''really'' wanted to use. Ok? Probably far too much info for you to absorb in one go, but covers loads of interesting possibilities. About the only thing you don't want to do is wikilink straight to the word &amp;quot;trans&amp;quot;, at that'll be a disambiguation page. And there's also no way (or reason?) to use the terms &amp;quot;trans man&amp;quot;/&amp;quot;trans woman&amp;quot; as the pluralised &amp;quot;trans men&amp;quot;/&amp;quot;trans women&amp;quot; versions via the &amp;quot;directly add the plural suffix&amp;quot; thing, of course. :P Anyway, FYI. [[Special:Contributions/162.158.38.217|162.158.38.217]] 20:40, 25 May 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::oh my god thank you so much [[User:42.book.addict|42.book.addict]] ([[User talk:42.book.addict|talk]]) 19:38, 27 May 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Welcome back, Tori! ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
How's life? [[User:CalibansCreations|'''&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#ff0000;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Caliban&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;''']] ([[User talk:CalibansCreations|talk]]) 18:47, 1 December 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Eh, it’s fine. I just came back from New York on a ''very'' stressful flight-missed the original one, did my Language Arts homework on the flight, and came back to California at 2 am. '''[[User:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:9pt;color:#db97bf&amp;quot;&amp;gt;42.book.addict&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:6pt;color:#97b6db&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Talk to me!&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;''' 16:26, 2 December 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Comics with inverted brightness. ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
At the most arbitrary, I'd suggest that, just maybe, ''panes'' with inverted brightness fulfil the category requirements, or perhaps a bit of white text because it happens to be written on a more shaded bit of background, but I'm unsure that the {{diff|358698|lavatory signs}} strictly invoke inverted brightness (if real signs exist that are light-on-dark, which at least some of them are, this makes it an ''un''inverted depiction of one of them), and I'm unhappy with your (presumed) linking of this category for a {{diff|358691|tree silhouette}}  (it shows the perfectly cromulant situation of bright sky behind a relatively dark tree, again not inverted, merely drawn for contrast).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
An interesting example is something like [[811: Starlight]]. The stars (white spots on floodfilled black background) really shouldn't be considered inverted (black stars on white sky would be inverted; it's only that the category specifically mentions night ''and'' space scenes makes it valid from that perspective), but the text and stickfigures/etc ''are'' definitely inverted (all due to the background they're on).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It's just my opinion, but I don't think that any patch of black-floodfill (especially in just a fraction of a pane or two, within an otherwise normal multi-pane comic) around a white detail is automatically ripe for marking as inverted. I'll reluctantly accept &amp;quot;night sky&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;space&amp;quot; (but only with stars... no &amp;quot;entirely featureless black, through a window/porthole&amp;quot;) as cause for being classed as Inverted, due to the category explanation. But feel that the true &amp;quot;inversion&amp;quot; is where there is [[566: Matrix Revisited|pane inversion]] which results in white text and/or (character) stickfigures upon black background as a definite contrast to 'normality'. Before you go too far with HotCatting some things that I'd feel compelled to revert (as I'm very tempted with the tree silhouette, and almost certain I should with the Gents-signs, for example...). [[Special:Contributions/141.101.98.119|141.101.98.119]] 19:12, 5 December 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Hey again, I know we have some bad blood but...==&lt;br /&gt;
Hey 42, it's Z1m. I know we haven't seen each other in a while (who am I kidding, it's a wiki; I meant talked) Can you do the little welcome thing so I can edit my talk page? Thanks! [[User:Maybe Bill Cipher|An anonymous Gravity Falls expert]] ([[User talk:Maybe Bill Cipher|talk]]) 19:26, 10 December 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Why can’t you use your old account? '''[[User:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:9pt;color:#A9C6CA&amp;quot;&amp;gt;42.book.addict&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:6pt;color:#516874&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Talk to me!&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;''' 21:38, 10 December 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::I forgot my pass :skull: [[User:Maybe Bill Cipher|An anonymous Gravity Falls expert]] ([[User talk:Maybe Bill Cipher|talk]]) 22:33, 10 December 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::SMH. Done. '''[[User:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:9pt;color:#A9C6CA&amp;quot;&amp;gt;42.book.addict&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:6pt;color:#516874&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Talk to me!&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;''' 22:37, 10 December 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::::Thanks! [[User:Maybe Bill Cipher|An anonymous Gravity Falls expert]] ([[User talk:Maybe Bill Cipher|talk]]) 22:42, 10 December 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==I FORGOT MY PASS AGAIN ASDFGHJK&amp;lt;SAHFJEWIUBEIUWDBHIVHJ==&lt;br /&gt;
Help :( [[User:Definitely Bill Cipher|Help I&amp;amp;#39;m not OK]] ([[User talk:Definitely Bill Cipher|talk]]) 18:49, 13 December 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:''sigh'' '''[[User:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:9pt;color:#A9C6CA&amp;quot;&amp;gt;42.book.addict&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:6pt;color:#516874&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Talk to me!&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;''' 19:41, 13 December 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:I KNOW I'M A DINGUS DON'T LOOK AT ME LEAV EME TO MY BASIC YELLOW DORITO SHAME [[User:Definitely Bill Cipher|Do not click on this link if you wish to keep your soul]] ([[User talk:Definitely Bill Cipher|talk]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Hi (3==&lt;br /&gt;
Sorry if I'm bothering you too much, just wanted to say hi. {{unsigned|Definitely Bill Cipher|15:19, 17 December 2024 (UTC)}}&lt;br /&gt;
:Please sign your comments with &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;~~~~&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt; '''[[User:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:9pt;color:#A9C6CA&amp;quot;&amp;gt;42.book.addict&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:6pt;color:#516874&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Talk to me!&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;''' 16:05, 17 December 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::Sorry [[User:Definitely Bill Cipher|A dream demon]] ([[User talk:Definitely Bill Cipher|talk]]) 19:10, 17 December 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::It’s fine, as long as you remember. '''[[User:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:9pt;color:#A9C6CA&amp;quot;&amp;gt;42.book.addict&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:6pt;color:#516874&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Talk to me!&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;''' 20:51, 17 December 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::::So, uh... do you wanna take this to my talk page and we can talk or... [[User:Definitely Bill Cipher|A dream demon]] ([[User talk:Definitely Bill Cipher|talk]]) 21:18, 17 December 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Congrats==&lt;br /&gt;
:I checked and you're the contributor today that has made the most edits. I'm on the leaderboard too, but not in the top three *0(*.  Anyway, I just wanted to congratulate you. Talk to me anytime! [[User:Definitely Bill Cipher|⯅A dream demon⯅]] ([[User talk:Definitely Bill Cipher|talk]]) 15:52, 19 December 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::Ok, that’s nice. I’ve stopped viewing Contribution Scores as a measurement of my editing ability-it only measures how many points and how many pages I have edited, not the quality of my edits or how much of an impact they have on the wiki. A bot can spam and get onto the All-Time Top 50 Leaderboard, but that's not reflective of its helpfulness (none). '''[[User:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:9pt;color:#A9C6CA&amp;quot;&amp;gt;42.book.addict&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:6pt;color:#516874&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Talk to me!&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;''' 16:49, 19 December 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::I remain free from all such objectivity by staying firmly off the list. I ''could'' flatter myself that I deserve a place, for all my (useful?) work over the last 10+ years, but... no definitive tallying and I don't even fool myself that this statement can be believed. Which is liberating. No temptation to &amp;quot;edit for editing's sake&amp;quot;, and remaining blissfully unaware how much time I must have spent not doing ''other'' important things. But that's just me (assuming you accept my account), and please don't consider this as downplaying the known-and-named contributors (current and past) who have made a more attributable contribution. Horses for courses. You (both) be you, and who knows where any of us might be in another ten years; hopefully managing to create a net positive outcome for the world, as the only thing that ''anybody'' should aspire to.[[Special:Contributions/172.69.43.182|172.69.43.182]] 17:18, 19 December 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Bluey news just dropped. ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
https://youtu.be/ititZcuih8E?si=_9ceRfwc52qfa5Tu [[User:CalibansCreations|'''&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#ff0000;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Caliban&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;''']] ([[User talk:CalibansCreations|talk]]) 20:23, 19 December 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:NOOOO '''[[User:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:9pt;color:#A9C6CA&amp;quot;&amp;gt;42.book.addict&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:6pt;color:#516874&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Talk to me!&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;''' 21:25, 19 December 2024 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::wait, what?--[[User:Bb777|me, hi]] ([[User talk:Bb777|talk]]) 16:53, 3 April 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Deleting User Talk Pages ==&lt;br /&gt;
I noticed that you added some user talk pages into the pages to be deleted category. Even if they are an IP address and only have one comment, they still probably shouldn't be deleted. I only noticed because you had marked my talk page. [[User:Firestar233|guess who]] ([[User talk:Firestar233|if you want to]] | [[Special:Contributions/Firestar233|what i have done]]) 09:19, 1 January 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:As I commented over on your page (sorry, didn't spot this, yet), I think that it's perfectly legitimate to correct (by ''requesting'' deletion) the creation of IP-based User and User Talk namespace pages. The intended source/target can never make any proper use of them, and they are instead left open to disproportionately high chance of ''improper'' use.&lt;br /&gt;
:IPs ''may'' have been more reliably associated with particular login-less users (such as myself) in the earliest days of the site, but it's not just the current proxy-provider that makes it likely that anyone coming here is effectively randomised. A 2015-era commentator almost certainly doesn't have the exact same IP ''from their ISP'' (which is Cloudflared away, anyway), unless they've taken great trouble to maintain statically upon it, and that's presuming that they haven't switched providers and/or routing hardware in the last decade, to further muddle it up.&lt;br /&gt;
:So far, I haven't seen any communications to a User Talk:&amp;lt;IP&amp;gt; page that deserves preserving (and User:&amp;lt;IP&amp;gt; stuff tends to be worse, thankfully rarer), but if a named user (who may or may not be currently active, or have had their own Talk page) contributes anything 'untrivial' then you could perhaps copy it to their own (newly created, if necessary?) user-page, or to whatever article Talk page it's identifiably about. Admonations not to delete Incomplete-templates and nice messages of agreement about some Conan-related link-finding are not al all that level of preservable conversation (well, not even a dialogue, as they weren't even acknowledged!), as 'recent' examples.&lt;br /&gt;
:Anyway, marking for deletion still requires that someone ''actually'' deletes them. Currently, '42' can't do that. (They're clearly eager to be helpful, but not yet admin-material.) Realistically, it will need someone else to actually do that bit. And I think the current 'someone else' concerned isn't overly eager to delete things not related to more current unwanted contributions. I'd have done a bit more cleaning up, myself, but by deliberately having kept out of consideration for such responsibiity, it's not something I should actively complain about. ;) [[Special:Contributions/141.101.98.186|141.101.98.186]] 13:00, 1 January 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Hiiiii==&lt;br /&gt;
:Heya, 42! Just wanted to check in because I left for winter break and I thought 'I wonder how she's doing?'&lt;br /&gt;
:If I'm being annoying, you can just say so and I'll leave you alone.&lt;br /&gt;
:Anyway, I'm gonna go comic hop. Talk to me anytime! [[User:Definitely Bill Cipher|⯅A dream demon⯅]] ([[User talk:Definitely Bill Cipher|Come and talk!]]) 15:15, 7 January 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::I’m fine. I went skiing in {{w|Heavenly Mountain Resort|Tahoe}} 5 days during winter break and also went to {{w|Point Reyes Station}}. '''[[User:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:9pt;color:#A9C6CA&amp;quot;&amp;gt;42.book.addict&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:6pt;color:#516874&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Talk to me!&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;''' 22:50, 7 January 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Cool, if you wanna talk I'm here (3 [[User:Definitely Bill Cipher|⯅A dream demon⯅]] ([[User talk:Definitely Bill Cipher|talk]]) 15:35, 9 January 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== I heard about the wildfires. ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Are you safe? Are you alright? [[User:CalibansCreations|'''&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#ff0000;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Caliban&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;''']] ([[User talk:CalibansCreations|talk]]) 08:43, 8 January 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:That’s SoCal, not the Bay Area, so I’m all good. '''[[User:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:9pt;color:#A9C6CA&amp;quot;&amp;gt;42.book.addict&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:6pt;color:#516874&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Talk to me!&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;''' 10:10, 8 January 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Any luck with Jeff? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It’s been a while since you’ve put up the “banner” on your page. Has he responded yet? [[User:Apollo11|Apollo11]] ([[User talk:Apollo11|talk]]) 22:23, 8 January 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Nope. I’ve emailed Davidy22 and he responded, but he doesn’t have server access. I tried on Gmail, Reddit, X, asked @ActuallyBerg from [[explain xkcd#History|the old forum]] who’s apparently a friend with Jeff on both X and Bluesky. '''[[User:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:9pt;color:#A9C6CA&amp;quot;&amp;gt;42.book.addict&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:6pt;color:#516874&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Talk to me!&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;''' 22:25, 8 January 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::Damn… that’s slightly (very) worrying. Good job for trying tho [[User:Apollo11|Apollo11]] ([[User talk:Apollo11|talk]]) 22:57, 8 January 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Yeah…I’m just going to keep on trying, seeing if I can solve some of the problems remotely. Not too sure what much I can do about the ‘crat situation though. '''[[User:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:9pt;color:#A9C6CA&amp;quot;&amp;gt;42.book.addict&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:6pt;color:#516874&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Talk to me!&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;''' 22:59, 8 January 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::::Well good luck [[User:Apollo11|Apollo11]] ([[User talk:Apollo11|talk]]) 23:07, 8 January 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== {{w|WP:REMOVED}} ==&lt;br /&gt;
kindly stop adding it back. thank you. [[user talk:lett‪herebedarklight|youtu.be/miLcaqq2Zpk]] 15:53, 10 January 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:very well. '''[[User:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:9pt;color:#A9C6CA&amp;quot;&amp;gt;42.book.addict&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:6pt;color:#516874&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Talk to me!&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;''' 16:05, 10 January 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::ok, that's the limit. {{w|WP:NOBAN|don't post on my talk page again.}} if you wish to fiddle with minutae, go to wikipedia, where that sort of thing is appreciated. i'll also note that no one else has complained about my signature, only you. [[user talk:lett‪herebedarklight|youtu.be/miLcaqq2Zpk]] 10:13, 11 January 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::touche. to be honest, grabbing at your throat for a simple signature issue got a bit boring after a couple days. have a nice day! '''[[User:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:9pt;color:#A9C6CA&amp;quot;&amp;gt;42.book.addict&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:6pt;color:#516874&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Talk to me!&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;''' 11:28, 11 January 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Talk Page added to &amp;quot;pages to delete ==&lt;br /&gt;
Hey, I noticed you added my talk page to the &amp;quot;pages to delete&amp;quot; category. Why? I don't really want my talk page deleted. &amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#0645AD&amp;quot;&amp;gt; Qoiuoiuoiu (talk) &amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;  16:29, 10 January 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Sorry, changed it. '''[[User:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:9pt;color:#A9C6CA&amp;quot;&amp;gt;42.book.addict&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:6pt;color:#516874&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Talk to me!&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;''' 17:58, 10 January 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::If you want my advice (no reason you do...), do a little more checking of the page history. ''And'' that of the partner page (compare User: &amp;lt;-&amp;gt; User Talk), where it exists. You might find a few of the ones that you marked for deleting weren't created, unused and abandoned, but actually 'in use' (even if not directly).&lt;br /&gt;
::You're eager, and I still completely support IP-related pages being marked for deletion (remembering that you don't have the power to ''actually'' delete them... which is probably a relief to a small handful of actal users, like the above), but maybe dial it back a bit so that you don't make a few more taggings that need to be reverted... Build up a personal 'hitlist', maybe, but do more poking around and keep it down to a handful of the 'best' candidaates that you find, not a couple of a dozen in quick order, which I think you did yesterday.... [[Special:Contributions/162.158.74.25|162.158.74.25]]&lt;br /&gt;
:::I did check the Page history of [[User talk:Qoiuoiuoiu]] though, and saw that it was created by [[User:While False]]. I also checked the User Page, and saw that it was edited slightly to change While False’s announcement. Because the entire purpose of [[User talk:Qoiuoiuoiu]] was to presumably reduce red links, I tagged [[:Category:Pages to delete]]. Checking page history and user pages honestly doesn’t take that much time, and I checked them for every single page (I think). Upon [[User:Qoiuoiuoiu|Qoiuoiuoiu’s]] complaint, I removed the Category and added a comment so that the talk page has a purpose. I believe that I was in the right to tag them in this case, and that is my decision. Although I do like the idea of the “hitlist”, and will create one. '''[[User:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:9pt;color:#A9C6CA&amp;quot;&amp;gt;42.book.addict&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:6pt;color:#516874&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Talk to me!&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;''' 19:46, 10 January 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Bluey ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I can't believe you watch a ''children's'' show like Bluey. You should watch an ''adult'' show, like my personal favourite, {{w|My Little Pony: Friendship Is Magic}} ;).  [[User:Beanie|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;text-shadow:0 0 5px black;font-size:11pt;color:#dddddd&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Beanie]]&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt; [[User talk:Beanie|&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;text-shadow:0 0 3px black;font-size:8pt;color:#dddddd&amp;quot;&amp;gt;talk]]&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 19:38, 11 January 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://gamejolt.com/games/sonic/783884 nah I'm sending you to the green hills for that one buddy] /j [[User:CalibansCreations|'''&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#ff0000;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Caliban&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;''']] ([[User talk:CalibansCreations|talk]]) 20:39, 11 January 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:LMFAOOO '''[[User:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:9pt;color:#A9C6CA&amp;quot;&amp;gt;42.book.addict&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:6pt;color:#516874&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Talk to me!&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;''' 22:38, 11 January 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== &amp;quot;Shared named&amp;quot; comics... ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Not too sure about the shared-name status for &amp;quot;Advent Calendar&amp;quot;, &amp;quot;Advent Calendar Advent Calendar&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;Advent&amp;quot; (more clear if there was &amp;quot;Advent Calendars&amp;quot;, the AVAV ''might'' be deemed a copy (literally!) of AV, but it'd be a stretch to link the A to the AV and thus also the AVAV), but you can't really put just one comic in the Shared Name category, can you? If you're happy for it, then do it for all of them. And, when you do, might be a good idea to put the markup comment after the category membership tag with an explanation of which one(s) you're linking it with, to avoid random editors getting the wrong idea (or ''no'' idea) on spotting it... [[Special:Contributions/162.158.33.252|162.158.33.252]] 00:26, 12 January 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Why do you have a hitlist? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Please don't put me on there 😭😭😭 [[User:CalibansCreations|'''&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#ff0000;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Caliban&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;''']] ([[User talk:CalibansCreations|talk]]) 13:53, 17 January 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:It’s for user pages/talk pages to delete. It’s fine, you’re fine, everybody’s fine (except for me i have a flu) '''[[User:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:9pt;color:#A9C6CA&amp;quot;&amp;gt;42.book.addict&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:6pt;color:#516874&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Talk to me!&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;''' 23:59, 17 January 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::Ykkkkkk, I bet Jeff’s heir would be easier to contact… Just saying…… [[User:Apollo11|Apollo11]] ([[User talk:Apollo11|talk]]) 17:01, 18 January 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::which would be the next ‘crat with server control, someone who doesn’t exist yet since Jeff still needs to promote them. '''[[User:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:9pt;color:#A9C6CA&amp;quot;&amp;gt;42.book.addict&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:6pt;color:#516874&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Talk to me!&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;''' 23:17, 18 January 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::: dammit [[User:Apollo11|Apollo11]] ([[User talk:Apollo11|talk]]) 15:53, 20 January 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==We're cooked==&lt;br /&gt;
You-know-who became president on MLK Day. We're so cooked, 42. [[User:Definitely Bill Cipher|⯅A dream demon⯅]] ([[User talk:Definitely Bill Cipher|talk]]) 19:23, 22 January 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:as a Brit I too am concerned [[User:CalibansCreations|'''&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#ff0000;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Caliban&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;''']] ([[User talk:CalibansCreations|talk]]) 14:36, 30 January 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::Yeh i'm scared [[User:Definitely Bill Cipher|⯅A dream demon⯅]] ([[User talk:Definitely Bill Cipher|talk]]) 15:21, 31 January 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::yayyyyy politics [[User:Apollo11|Apollo11]] ([[User talk:Apollo11|talk]]) 16:38, 31 January 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Different name in ContributionScores? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hi 42&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I just realized that in the [https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php/Special:ContributionScores ContributionScores] you are listed as Victoria. How come you manage to have two different names on this wiki? Is that some error? It is confusing at least.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Keep up the good work --[[User:Kynde|Kynde]] ([[User talk:Kynde|talk]]) 13:20, 4 February 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:I noticed that too! What's your secret?--[[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 15:06, 4 February 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::haha, there’s no secret. my name’s victoria, but i also go by tori. that’s why if you look up at old messages, some people refer to me as victoria or tori. if you want to keep on calling me 42, or 42.book.addict, that’s completely fine! '''[[User:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:9pt;color:#A9C6CA&amp;quot;&amp;gt;42.book.addict&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:6pt;color:#516874&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Talk to me!&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;''' 16:05, 4 February 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Yeah I guess what i was asking is how you managed to change your name on the leaderboard! I can't figure it out haha. --[[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 17:11, 4 February 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::::oh, that’s easy-you just change it in your preferences. find the real name box, and input whatever you want. some people might find it confusing, and you might need to explain to people the difference, like this converstaion right now. '''[[User:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:9pt;color:#A9C6CA&amp;quot;&amp;gt;42.book.addict&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:6pt;color:#516874&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Talk to me!&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;''' 17:18, 4 February 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Oh, cool! Thanks. --[[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 17:53, 4 February 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Well if it is a part of the wiki I guess it is fine. But I think it is a bit confusing that we cannot see the user name of the person on the leaderboard. So it would be great if the name in the leader-board could also change to 42. But I guess that is not possible? As you know I'm made an admin, but also I have way to little knowledge of programming and wiki etc. And full time job, other hobbies and two kids, one of which seems to be older than 42. So it is not your age, but 42 comes from your love of Hitchhikers Guide to the galaxy? (Big fan me-self).  Impressive the amount of work you have put into the wiki in such a short time. I have been a member since October 2013. I still remember [[Talk:30: Donner|my first comment]] on explain, actually made it before I signed up and then added my signature after signing up a few days later ;-) Back then I used much more time on explain. Had actually not intended to become admin. But second time I was asked, and with no active admins I accepted. --[[User:Kynde|Kynde]] ([[User talk:Kynde|talk]]) 13:39, 5 February 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::Oh, nice! Never knew that you were a parent. i ''could'' remove the Victoria from the leaderboard by blanking my real name in preferences, but honestly, I’d rather not. There are tons of other people with a situation like this, and I don’t think that it’ll cause much confusion. I’m always happy to explain why it’s listed as Victoria or not! (BTW, Victoria is literally on my User Page) '''[[User:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:9pt;color:#A9C6CA&amp;quot;&amp;gt;42.book.addict&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:6pt;color:#516874&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Talk to me!&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;''' 16:20, 5 February 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Well we usually do not now much about each other and I had not read your user page before I found out you where also Victoria. Not sure what you mean by Victoria being on you user page. I searched on it and found no hit for Victoria... But no big problem. Just a bit confusing. Just stay on the leaderboard. --[[User:Kynde|Kynde]] ([[User talk:Kynde|talk]]) 08:26, 9 February 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::::weird...i could've sworn that i added it to my user page. i'll add it now to try to reduce confusion in the future. '''[[User:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:9pt;color:#A9C6CA&amp;quot;&amp;gt;42.book.addict&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:6pt;color:#516874&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Talk to me!&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;''' 17:09, 9 February 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== You into Friday Night Funkin? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
tldr it's a silly Newgrounds-inspired rhythm game with literally hundreds if not thousands of mods. you should get into it if you're not already &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:CalibansCreations|'''&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#ff0000;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Caliban&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;''']] ([[User talk:CalibansCreations|talk]]) 11:19, 18 February 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:moved this to the bottom so you'd be more likely to see this haha [[User:CalibansCreations|'''&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#ff0000;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Caliban&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;''']] ([[User talk:CalibansCreations|talk]]) 11:03, 17 April 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::no-i don’t play rhythm games. moved it back up for chronological order. '''[[User:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:9pt;color:pink&amp;quot;&amp;gt;42.book.addict&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:6pt;color:#B1E4E3&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Talk to me!&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;''' 16:34, 18 April 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Contacting Randall ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hey Victoria! Sorry to hear about your mental health issues, I hope you're getting better.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Here's some good news: I tried contacting Randall to ask him when he replaced comic [[36: Scientists]], and he replied! It's weird that Randall is easier to reach than the owner of this wiki... You can read the conversation and a summary of what happened [[User:FaviFake|on my user page]]. Among other things, he gave me the official release date, April 28th, and, after I asked, he told me he might reply to more simple questions! If you have some technical or administrative questions, I could ask them directly to him. If you're curious, there are more details about this [[User:FaviFake|here]]. --[[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 18:32, 21 February 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==oof==&lt;br /&gt;
:I'm so sorry, 42. I go to therapy and picked up a couple things, so if you need me, I'm here. You can leave a message on my talk page anytime and we can yap about whatever. Hang in there 0) [[User:Definitely Bill Cipher|⯅A dream demon⯅]] ([[User talk:Definitely Bill Cipher|talk]]) 15:35, 27 February 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Uncooperating User ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hi 42&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
You originally wrote regarding [[User talk:Lettherebedarklight]] here:&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; [[explain_xkcd:Community_portal/Admin_requests#Uncooperating_User|Uncooperating User]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
I warned him not to change his signature to a link and also not deleting his talk page. But he has not complied. But now I saw your comment on his user page, after I rolled back his latest deletion... Regarding wiki policy. And since I do not go much into this I need some help here. I do not have time to read up on this. I'm just so unlucky as to be the only admin still active here... Not by my own wish. Maybe FaviFake should also say something here? --[[User:Kynde|Kynde]] ([[User talk:Kynde|talk]]) 06:39, 5 March 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:I believe this is what's happening: 42 originally noticed the user's signature, which is clearly a violation of the Wikipedia policy, and you warned them. They didn't cooperate, and then you warned them again, but this time you also told them to not blank their talk page (and to not redirect it), which wasn't among the things 42 pointed out. Because of this, she mentioned they're allowed to blank their talk page and redirect it to their user page, but not to have a signature that looks like an external link. And now, as you can see in [https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=User:FaviFake&amp;amp;diff=367780&amp;amp;oldid=367750 this edit of theirs], they have done both things. The signature is not allowed, but blanking their page is. --[[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 16:56, 5 March 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::But if they blanck their talk page, then I cannot discuss the issues that are in violation of with their signature. So how can this be an acceptable conduct. Maybe blanking their user page but not the talk page...? As far as I can see his signature link still go to his user talk page, and not to the rickroll link, you have to copy paste that to get rolled... But if it is a problem, should I then block him for being uncooperative? --[[User:Kynde|Kynde]] ([[User talk:Kynde|talk]]) 11:52, 7 March 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::I don't know, 42 pointed it out because she was confused by the link. i'm not really an expert in Wikipedia policy either. --[[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 18:22, 7 March 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Formatting ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Just wondering why you're using awkward formatting on your user page when you could easier use:&lt;br /&gt;
*Foo&lt;br /&gt;
*Bar&lt;br /&gt;
**Baz subthing&lt;br /&gt;
**Bat subthing&lt;br /&gt;
*Flibble&lt;br /&gt;
...etc? No need for BRs and NBSPs. Can be combined with colon-leveling (though can also replace it). Swap *s for #s to get (nested) numbered lists, or *# for indented numbers with #* continuing the numbers around sub-bullets (starts to get complicated, but it's an option) if you decided you need to. Maybe it's a choice you're making, but FYI if you haven't already picked up the bullet-point syntax in all your time here.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Anyway, just perhaps whilst you're active again. No problem if you don't make use of this information now/ever. [[Special:Contributions/172.71.178.133|172.71.178.133]] 07:56, 9 April 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:I never knew that-thank you! '''[[User:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:9pt;color:pink&amp;quot;&amp;gt;42.book.addict&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:6pt;color:#B1E4E3&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Talk to me!&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;''' 15:55, 9 April 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== so why do you wanna to delete [[user talk:物灵]]? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
he and i were both from another website. i chose to chat with him here because i don't want Zhou Chenxiao to revert my edit. why you want to delete? [[User:Translated ORK|Translated ORK]] ([[User talk:Translated ORK|talk]]) 09:56, 21 April 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:I will say this, here, in case you don't get to read my other note. This is not a refugee camp for conversations displaced from elsewhere. There's not even any chat goin on because it's all just you. (If there's another site where ''he'' is one-sidedly 'replying' to ''you'' , then I bet that place is equally bemused and unamused.)&lt;br /&gt;
:I can't speak for 42, but I'm not surprised someone else here wants to do that.&lt;br /&gt;
:Elsewhere you talk of Free Speech, but I think you might be confused. As well as the ''{{w|Gratis versus libre}}'' issue, this extends to what is written below any submission you are making: &amp;quot;Please note that all contributions to explain xkcd may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors.&amp;quot; Consensus may decide that the point you make is not worth the having been made. (Later, consensus may also decide that a removal/re-edit is bad and ''restore'' it, but that is a community issue to resolve.)&lt;br /&gt;
:This is as close to democracy as we can get (but, unlike the ''original'' democracy, we also let women and all kinds of other people 'vote'! ;) ), with shades of anarchy and the only totalitarian elements being when certain pages are locked-down/deleted by a designated admin who is probably acting upon community feeling (or on behalf of it, seeing where it is heading). It's a system that works (mostly hands-off). And you still can't falsely shout &amp;quot;Fire!&amp;quot; in a crowded theater without push-back. Does that make sense? (@UT, also @42...) [[Special:Contributions/172.71.26.36|172.71.26.36]] 10:50, 21 April 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::Seconded. I explicitly said in my edit summary that I deleted the content for being off-topic. Thanks to the IP for responding for me! '''[[User:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:9pt;color:pink&amp;quot;&amp;gt;42.book.addict&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:6pt;color:#B1E4E3&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Talk to me!&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;''' 15:20, 21 April 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Thirded. (Is that a word?) --[[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 06:26, 22 April 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Welcome Back!==&lt;br /&gt;
I'm unsure as to whether we've met. I think we were editing at the same time for a period. Anyways, hello Tori (if I may call you that). Welcome back to the wiki! :) --'''''[[User:DollarStoreBa'al |&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Atomic Age;font-size:12pt;color:red;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;DollarStoreBa'al&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:DollarStoreBa'al |'''''Converse''''']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;[[Special:Contributions/DollarStoreBa'al|'''''My life choices''''']] 14:14, 26 August 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:hi, thanks so much for the welcome! '''[[User:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:9pt;color:pink&amp;quot;&amp;gt;42.book.addict&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:6pt;color:#B1E4E3&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Talk to me!&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;''' 03:59, 27 August 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::Please see my user page.--'''''[[User:DollarStoreBa'al |&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Atomic Age;font-size:12pt;color:red;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;DollarStoreBa'al&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:DollarStoreBa'al |'''''Converse''''']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;[[Special:Contributions/DollarStoreBa'al|'''''My life choices''''']] 16:42, 27 August 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Thank you for your apology. And it's no big deal with my time-bio's boring anyways lol '''[[User:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:9pt;color:pink&amp;quot;&amp;gt;42.book.addict&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:6pt;color:#B1E4E3&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Talk to me!&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;''' 16:43, 27 August 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Mark April Fool's Sandbox for deletion?==&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Aprilfoolsupdate!/Sandbox]] should be marked for deletion, I feel. It has been removed from his watchlist and provides nothing useful to the wiki. [[Special:Contributions/204.137.100.1|204.137.100.1]] 15:04, 28 August 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Deleted by  --[[User:Kynde|Kynde]] ([[User talk:Kynde|talk]]) 19:20, 29 August 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== From /sig Talk Page (adminship) ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Just so you know, 42, you'd make a great admin. --'''''[[User:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#023020&amp;quot;&amp;gt;DollarStoreBa'al&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User_talk:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#000080&amp;quot;&amp;gt;'''''converse'''''&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 18:18, 28 August 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==An odd question for someone who would know the answer==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Would it be allowed if you created a template for your sig (e.g. 42sig/DSBSig?) Could be useful for those with long usernames. --'''''[[User:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#023020&amp;quot;&amp;gt;DollarStoreBa'al&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User_talk:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#000080&amp;quot;&amp;gt;'''''converse'''''&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 15:59, 29 August 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:why would you need a template? &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;~~~~&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt; works just fine... '''[[User:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:9pt;color:pink&amp;quot;&amp;gt;42.book.addict&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:6pt;color:#B1E4E3&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Talk to me!&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;''' 16:17, 29 August 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::Well, it would allow for more characters. This is why I ask, as both you and I have had issues setting up signatures due to long usernames. Setting your signature up as &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{SigTemplateName}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt; in preferences would have it automatically display your signature when typing &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;~~~~&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;.  --'''''[[User:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#023020&amp;quot;&amp;gt;DollarStoreBa'al&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User_talk:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#000080&amp;quot;&amp;gt;'''''converse'''''&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 16:20, 29 August 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::More characters ''would'' be nice, but creating a bunch of templates only available for use for a single person would be less than ideal. What if we had a template called &amp;quot;sig&amp;quot;, and inside was wikitext encoded so that when we called &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{sig|User:XYZ}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;; it could paste in the custom signature for XYZ? This is a pretty interesting idea-I'll reach out on the proposals portal and ask FaviFake to see if there's support for this. '''[[User:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:9pt;color:pink&amp;quot;&amp;gt;42.book.addict&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:6pt;color:#B1E4E3&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Talk to me!&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;''' 16:32, 29 August 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::::That.... That could work! Great idea! --'''''[[User:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#023020&amp;quot;&amp;gt;DollarStoreBa'al&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User_talk:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#000080&amp;quot;&amp;gt;'''''converse'''''&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 16:34, 29 August 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::A bonus of that is that it's basically a sig museum, where you can browse other people's sigs and get inspired by them. There is the downside of people being able to edit other's sigs tho. --'''''[[User:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#023020&amp;quot;&amp;gt;DollarStoreBa'al&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User_talk:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#000080&amp;quot;&amp;gt;'''''converse'''''&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 16:37, 29 August 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::The idea of a sig museum is actually super cool-we could also add interesting signatures that were used by other users before to put on showcase. We could also make it so that only autoconfirmed users can edit it (and there's enough active users that any vandalism would probably be reverted quickly enough). '''[[User:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:9pt;color:pink&amp;quot;&amp;gt;42.book.addict&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:6pt;color:#B1E4E3&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Talk to me!&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;''' 16:43, 29 August 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::Honestly, forgot about that. I wonder what they say. FaviFake hasn't been active in a bit, so maybe we could reach out to kynde? --'''''[[User:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#023020&amp;quot;&amp;gt;DollarStoreBa'al&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User_talk:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#000080&amp;quot;&amp;gt;'''''converse'''''&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 17:17, 29 August 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::It's probably fine. Contribution history says that it's only been a week-he very well may be on vacation or too busy to work. Give it some time. '''[[User:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:9pt;color:pink&amp;quot;&amp;gt;42.book.addict&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:6pt;color:#B1E4E3&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Talk to me!&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;''' 18:16, 29 August 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::::I know, it's just weird. I've almost never seen FaviFake not edit for more than a day. {{unsigned|DollarStoreBa'al|19:14, 29 August 2025 (UTC)}}&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::::hi im back. --[[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 14:26, 31 August 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::::Go check the proposals board! '''[[User:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font:9pt Cormorant Garamond&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#89CFF0&amp;quot;&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#FFB7CE&amp;quot;&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#D3D3D3&amp;quot;&amp;gt;.&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#FFB7CE&amp;quot;&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#89CFF0&amp;quot;&amp;gt;o&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#89CFF0&amp;quot;&amp;gt;o&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#FFB7CE&amp;quot;&amp;gt;k&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#D3D3D3&amp;quot;&amp;gt;.&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#FFB7CE&amp;quot;&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#89CFF0&amp;quot;&amp;gt;d&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#89CFF0&amp;quot;&amp;gt;d&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#FFB7CE&amp;quot;&amp;gt;i&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#D3D3D3&amp;quot;&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#FFB7CE&amp;quot;&amp;gt;t&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font:6pt Cormorant Garamond&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#89CFF0&amp;quot;&amp;gt;T&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#FFB7CE&amp;quot;&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#D3D3D3&amp;quot;&amp;gt;l&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#FFB7CE&amp;quot;&amp;gt;k&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#89CFF0&amp;quot;&amp;gt; &amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#89CFF0&amp;quot;&amp;gt;t&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#FFB7CE&amp;quot;&amp;gt;o&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#D3D3D3&amp;quot;&amp;gt; &amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#FFB7CE&amp;quot;&amp;gt;m&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#89CFF0&amp;quot;&amp;gt;e&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#89CFF0&amp;quot;&amp;gt;!&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;''' 19:16, 29 August 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:I have seen you proposal and I must say I really hope you are not planning on making this your signature fro now on 42!&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font:9pt Cormorant Garamond&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#89CFF0&amp;quot;&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#FFB7CE&amp;quot;&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#D3D3D3&amp;quot;&amp;gt;.&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#FFB7CE&amp;quot;&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#89CFF0&amp;quot;&amp;gt;o&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#89CFF0&amp;quot;&amp;gt;o&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#FFB7CE&amp;quot;&amp;gt;k&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#D3D3D3&amp;quot;&amp;gt;.&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#FFB7CE&amp;quot;&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#89CFF0&amp;quot;&amp;gt;d&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#89CFF0&amp;quot;&amp;gt;d&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#FFB7CE&amp;quot;&amp;gt;i&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#D3D3D3&amp;quot;&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#FFB7CE&amp;quot;&amp;gt;t&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font:6pt Cormorant Garamond&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#89CFF0&amp;quot;&amp;gt;T&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#FFB7CE&amp;quot;&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#D3D3D3&amp;quot;&amp;gt;l&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#FFB7CE&amp;quot;&amp;gt;k&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#89CFF0&amp;quot;&amp;gt; &amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#89CFF0&amp;quot;&amp;gt;t&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#FFB7CE&amp;quot;&amp;gt;o&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#D3D3D3&amp;quot;&amp;gt; &amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#FFB7CE&amp;quot;&amp;gt;m&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#89CFF0&amp;quot;&amp;gt;e&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#89CFF0&amp;quot;&amp;gt;!&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:It is very confusing for the next editor, and I just tried to comment on your proposal when you posted it and could not understand what I was seeing in the editor (as I got there first because of edit conflict). Please stop using this as your signature! --[[User:Kynde|Kynde]] ([[User talk:Kynde|talk]]) 19:22, 29 August 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::Got it. I'll change it and see if I can find another solution. '''[[User:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:9pt;color:pink&amp;quot;&amp;gt;42.book.addict&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:6pt;color:#B1E4E3&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Talk to me!&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;''' 19:33, 29 August 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::I personally think we should move forward with the template idea. That way, the wikitext would show &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{sig|UserXYZ}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt; instead of the full wikitext. --'''''[[User:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#023020&amp;quot;&amp;gt;DollarStoreBa'al&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User_talk:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#000080&amp;quot;&amp;gt;'''''converse'''''&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 19:42, 29 August 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::::Also, I created a pride sig that is almost 1400 characters long.... yeah we need a way to not show the full wikitext. --'''''[[User:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#023020&amp;quot;&amp;gt;DollarStoreBa'al&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User_talk:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#000080&amp;quot;&amp;gt;'''''converse'''''&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 19:44, 29 August 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::::Sorry for the late reply. I think that we should '''''not''''' go ahead with the template idea. It's unnecessary and will clog up the server, both in readability and server load. Please look at my response in the proposals board. Thanks! '''[[User:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:9pt;color:pink&amp;quot;&amp;gt;42.book.addict&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:6pt;color:#B1E4E3&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Talk to me!&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;''' 19:06, 3 September 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== &amp;quot;fact&amp;quot; template (un)tagging. ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{fact}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt; template was (it was deleted? I missed that!) redirected to the &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{Citation needed}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt; template. I think maybe replacing the &amp;quot;fact&amp;quot; with &amp;quot;Citation needed&amp;quot; might have been a better change than nowiki-ing the now-broken tags, in the cases you did that.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
And then there were all the demonstrative examples (two or three in things I historically wrote, I notice, in various Talk: pages... under a historical range of IPs). Assuming you really want to edit other people's signed Talk contributions at all (not generally done, though I'm ambivalent about you 'tidying up' things where I only included &amp;quot;fact&amp;quot; as then-current, alongside the other examples), it would seem to be no more work to just refactor the phrasings to no longer have that in the list of (say) {{template|citation needed}}, {{template|Citation Needed}}, {{template|cn}}, etc, to no great loss of meaning.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But I appreciate you probably took some time to hunt down all &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{fact}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt; examples (and at least one &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{template|fact}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;, I think). Plus the Fact/CN set of tags ''are'' sometimes overused, IMO, so a few less versions (put almost everywhere that anyone vaguely thought amusing) is certainly gratifying from ''that'' perspective. ;) [[Special:Contributions/82.132.245.43|82.132.245.43]] 22:55, 10 September 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==It's alright :)==&lt;br /&gt;
None taken :) I myself know I am prone to that sort of thing. --'''''[[User:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#023020&amp;quot;&amp;gt;DollarStoreBa'al&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User_talk:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#000080&amp;quot;&amp;gt;converse&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 19:18, 16 September 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:sorry, what? '''[[User:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:9pt;color:#3a795e&amp;quot;&amp;gt;42.book.addict&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:6pt;color:#ce5f15&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Talk to me!&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;''' 19:57, 16 September 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::Second item on the hitlist. Sorry about the confusion. --'''''[[User:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#023020&amp;quot;&amp;gt;DollarStoreBa'al&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User_talk:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#000080&amp;quot;&amp;gt;converse&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 19:59, 16 September 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Ah, I see. It's no problem! '''[[User:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:9pt;color:#3a795e&amp;quot;&amp;gt;42.book.addict&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:6pt;color:#ce5f15&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Talk to me!&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;''' 20:02, 16 September 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==So, about that wikitext signature...==&lt;br /&gt;
Yeah... I wanna make it red and yellow with (talk) replaced by (yap here) and it's in Comic Sans... if you could help me out please. [[User:Definitely Bill Cipher|⯅A dream demon⯅]] ([[User talk:Definitely Bill Cipher|talk]]) 20:24, 19 September 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Ok, I'll work on it if I find the time! Shouldn't take me more than 5-10 minutes though '''[[User:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:9pt;color:#3a795e&amp;quot;&amp;gt;42.book.addict&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:6pt;color:#ce5f15&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Talk to me!&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;''' 04:34, 22 September 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:It really depends on the shades of red and yellow you want. Use &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#hexcode&amp;quot;&amp;gt;yap here&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt; for each of the colors you want. Search 'google color picker' on Google and it gives you a hex code finder. I do not know how those fonts work though...--'''''[[User:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#023020&amp;quot;&amp;gt;DollarStoreBa'al&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User_talk:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#000080&amp;quot;&amp;gt;converse&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 17:22, 26 September 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Fonts... well, if you put in a style to with with &amp;quot;Comic Sans&amp;quot;, then you probably want to try a style element like &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;font-family: 'Comic Sans MS', 'Chalkboard SE', 'Comic Neue', sans-serif;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;, because not everywhere will have (perhaps not want!) MS Comic Sans and you would have to fail-back to various alternatives and (if all else fails) whatever generic SS font there is.&lt;br /&gt;
:Personally, though I'd not bother. Comic Sans is pretty much a Marmite font, and trying hard to make ''everyone'' experience something like the marmite taste (even those who normally do not) could annoy people.&lt;br /&gt;
:It'd also take up a lot of your allowable 'signature length quota' to add these (and more?) fail-throughs to the appropriate list. Though you could just give the single correct font ''for you'', and accept that it just won't do anything out of the ordinary for other people, too (which probably suits them down to the ground).&lt;br /&gt;
:Oh, and I'd also ''never'' recommend that you upload anything that you want in a personally-chosen font as an image, and embed that image as a pixel-perfect (but accessibility-deficient and text-scale-non-respecting!) alternative. [[Special:Contributions/92.17.62.87|92.17.62.87]] 00:10, 27 September 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
 I'd also never recommend that you upload anything that you want in a personally-chosen font as an image&lt;br /&gt;
::100% (it also breaks enwiki's signature policies) --[[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 12:57, 29 September 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Is this wiki dying?==&lt;br /&gt;
Lately, I've noticed a gradual decrease in the amount of daily contributions. Have you been noticing this too, or is that just me? --'''''[[User:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#023020&amp;quot;&amp;gt;DollarStoreBa'al&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User_talk:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#000080&amp;quot;&amp;gt;converse&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 14:32, 3 November 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:If I may contribute, ahead of 42... It's been busier and it's been quieter, even just within both of your own usernames' 'lifetimes'. Perhaps more (fellow, but clearly not as long-term) IPs, but hard to tell since whatever happened to not squash us down into the Cloudfare gateway IP ranges, etc.&lt;br /&gt;
:New comics still don't stay unExplained for long. And there's not so much traffic, or indeed vanalism in the worst cases, that it's hard to keep on top of anything that arises. I'd say there's still a community, albeit loose and ad hoc (in different ways to other online communities I'm party to, or have been).&lt;br /&gt;
:But I've not emperically compared 'now' with any given historical snapshots. This is just my impression. Please do this, if you feel like it. The number of edits done on yesterday's date, in prior years, perhaps. Or the dates of the past week, to even out the spikes on 'comic days' vs non-comic days. ''Might'' show year-on-year fluctuations, together with background noise.&lt;br /&gt;
:...sorry, meant to say less, not to totally pre-empt Victoria. But maybe she still has things to say, perhaps even in total disagreement with my above thoughts! [[Special:Contributions/82.132.239.95|82.132.239.95]] 15:48, 3 November 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::I mostly agree with these sentiments. I do feel like we used to have a more active past and would work fervently on documenting large projects such as April Fool's comics, Hoverboard, Time, etc. We do have a bit of backlog on Collector's Edition, but we put in a LOT of work into the What If? project. Places that we should tackle are probably the less known xkcd pages, secret comics, and of course Collector's Edition. &lt;br /&gt;
::Personally, I've had a lot less time to dedicate towards working on this project just because of how busy I am. I've had midterms, projects, and sports to juggle, resulting in almost no free time that I can spend. Circumstances change. Maybe other editors are also getting more busy. Who knows? Anyways, this isn't a race. We don't have any deadlines to reach, so any progress we make, regardless of pace, is good. '''[[User:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:9pt;color:#3a795e&amp;quot;&amp;gt;42.book.addict&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:6pt;color:#ce5f15&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Talk to me!&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;''' 19:58, 3 November 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==1==&lt;br /&gt;
54 52 41 4f 53 4e 49 53 53 49 4g 4f 20 4g 4f 45 20 4g 46 20 46 4g 55 52 3b 20 58 56 45 52&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
XIP EPFTO'U MPWF B GFX NPSF OVNCFST {{unsigned ip|204.137.100.1|20:23, 12 November 2025 (UTC)}}&lt;br /&gt;
:What? &amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family: Times New Roman, serif; font-size: 16px;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;--'''''[[User:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#E3C6BE&amp;quot;&amp;gt;DollarStoreBa'al&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User Talk:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#CC9A8B&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Converse&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt; 21:08, 12 November 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::There may be (intentional?) coding errors in that top one. Or it was double-encoded, thanks to the lower one. So my advice is to crack the second one first.&lt;br /&gt;
::But fairly trivial, both of them.&lt;br /&gt;
::You can probably do the second in your head, by a single easy step, once you work out what does and doesn't matter.&lt;br /&gt;
::The first is a bit more technical, it helps if you're used to low-level data storage (ok, probably not actually in your wheelhouse, but not too hard to discover) ''and'' initially needs to be have the second code's thing unapplied to it to make logical sense.&lt;br /&gt;
::My advice is to have fun working it out. And expect three more (or two... but I don't think the second is &amp;quot;the second&amp;quot;) to look at, if the author is true to their word. [[Special:Contributions/82.132.244.30|82.132.244.30]] 21:25, 12 November 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Huh. The first bit almost reminds me of a hexadecimal, but that doesn't have 'g' &lt;br /&gt;
:::Second part is shifted ROT1 in a Caesar Cipher (used a decoder). Translates to 'WHO DOESN'T LOVE A FEW MORE NUMBERS'. &amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family: Times New Roman, serif; font-size: 16px;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;--'''''[[User:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#E3C6BE&amp;quot;&amp;gt;DollarStoreBa'al&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User Talk:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#CC9A8B&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Converse&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt; 21:39, 12 November 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::::Update: CacheSleuth's multi decoder thinks top line is a bacon cipher. No clue. &amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family: Times New Roman, serif; font-size: 16px;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;--'''''[[User:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#E3C6BE&amp;quot;&amp;gt;DollarStoreBa'al&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User Talk:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#CC9A8B&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Converse&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt; 21:43, 12 November 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Remember, I said that the second cipher had probably been applied also to the first. You're closer to the solution than you think. ;) [[Special:Contributions/82.132.244.30|82.132.244.30]] 21:48, 12 November 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
{{outdent|:::::}}&lt;br /&gt;
Are you behind this? Anyway, I'll try to apply a ROT-1, then see if it decides from hex. &amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family: Times New Roman, serif; font-size: 16px;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;--'''''[[User:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#E3C6BE&amp;quot;&amp;gt;DollarStoreBa'al&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User Talk:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#CC9A8B&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Converse&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt; 22:21, 12 November 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Results! TRANSMISSION ONE OF FOUR: XVER.&lt;br /&gt;
:I wonder what XVER means... &amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family: Times New Roman, serif; font-size: 16px;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;--'''''[[User:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#E3C6BE&amp;quot;&amp;gt;DollarStoreBa'al&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User Talk:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#CC9A8B&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Converse&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt; 22:24, 12 November 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::Not me, I was just nerdsniped. Note that the next one popped up on Favi's pages. It also has a nonsense final 'word', meaning yet to be resolved.&lt;br /&gt;
::If you prefer to keep talking about it, here, I'll pop back later and see if you've figured it out (I know what it is, but not why it is!), without necessarily spoiling it right now.&lt;br /&gt;
::(PS, sorry, 42, I know you're probably not involved in this, maybe not interested even. Ba'al: Unless we hear from 42, if you're wanting to keep looking at this, maybe transfer the conversation/copy the original items over to your space? Obviously I've got nowhere better for it, but its up to you and you're interested in this now.) [[Special:Contributions/82.132.245.223|82.132.245.223]] 22:47, 12 November 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::I personally have no interest, but you can feel free to keep on working on it. DSB, if you want to keep on cracking it, I can move it over to your page. '''[[User:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:9pt;color:#3a795e&amp;quot;&amp;gt;42.book.addict&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:6pt;color:#ce5f15&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Talk to me!&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;''' 23:51, 12 November 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Editing other people's words? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I mean, in Explanations, etc, you can redo anything that has previously been edited, that's the point of any Wiki articles. No issues with that.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But you're 'correcting' signed (or, indeed unsigned) Talk comments. However badly spelt, you shouldn't really be changing things for them like that. Perhaps they like things to be spelt the way they're spelling them, perhaps they ''intend'' that version of the word. Perhaps the word they intended isn't the one you think is intended and you've changed the entire meaning by making it 'differently more correct'.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Append the signature-replacements that they lack, yes. ''Perhaps'' re-indent things (though I've had things reindented for me, in the past, but by a misunderstandng which then makes it look like I'm replaying to something else). Very possibly changing a [bare-wiki-URL] to a {{template|w}}-type version doesn't matter too much, but... that's the point, it doesn't ''really'' matter. Warts and all. You could tell a regular named-user about the convention to use the 'w'/'wiktionary'/'tvtropes' things, so that it saves you work tuning up the Explanations where they've used the long-hand (and/or inefficient) link-forms, but there's no need to neaten up 'messy' Talk comments, and ''very'' occasionally there might be very real need to not do so.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
See {{w|Wikipedia:TPO}} for Wikipedia's policy, which isn't ''necessarily'' the one here (even if its the line I wouldn't normally try to cross). Though you'll see it still appreciates changes in lines with {{w|Wikipedia:TPFIXFORMAT}} and {{w|Wikipedia:TPFIXLAYOUT}}, amongst others. [[Special:Contributions/2.98.65.8|2.98.65.8]] 22:11, 14 November 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Agreed. Getting things signed is perfectly fine, and, as long as you don't change the appearance of a link, you can optimize that as well. But please refrain from editing the message that's given in the comment. &amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family: Times New Roman, serif; font-size: 16px;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;--'''''[[User:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#E3C6BE&amp;quot;&amp;gt;DollarStoreBa'al&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User Talk:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#CC9A8B&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Converse&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt; 22:19, 14 November 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:e.g. [https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:1120:_Blurring_the_Line&amp;amp;curid=5005&amp;amp;diff=390955&amp;amp;oldid=369184 this edit], where you changed 'coloured' to 'colored'. That is just a regional spelling of the word, commonly used in British English. It's not even a misspelling! &amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family: Times New Roman, serif; font-size: 16px;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;--'''''[[User:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#E3C6BE&amp;quot;&amp;gt;DollarStoreBa'al&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User Talk:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#CC9A8B&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Converse&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt; 22:23, 14 November 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::Ah, looks like you spotted it too. Did a part-revert of that exact example (but only that!), as a passive example, not knowing you'd found it and pointed it out here.&lt;br /&gt;
::And I can't help it if all y'all can't spell properly, thanks to Noah Webster. ;) [[Special:Contributions/2.98.65.8|2.98.65.8]] 23:14, 14 November 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::I understand that it is British spelling, thank you very much. Please see {{diff|14586|here}} for the original comment and {{diff|17180|here}} where [[User:Weatherlawyer]] changed it. '''[[User:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:9pt;color:#3a795e&amp;quot;&amp;gt;42.book.addict&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:6pt;color:#ce5f15&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Talk to me!&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;''' 01:07, 15 November 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Additionally, [[explain xkcd:Editor FAQ#How do I enter links to other pages?|the FAQ page]] says all explainxkcd.com and en.wikipedia.org links should be written with &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;[[ ]]&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;code&amp;gt; &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{w| }}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt; &amp;lt;/code&amp;gt; respectively around them. '''[[User:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:9pt;color:#3a795e&amp;quot;&amp;gt;42.book.addict&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:6pt;color:#ce5f15&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Talk to me!&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;''' 01:22, 15 November 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::::({{diff|83069|You actually meant this change by Weatherlawyer...}} Which shouldn't have been done, so my redoing of it was in error. Though the trivia of it makes ''all'' our actions around it equally inexplicable.)&lt;br /&gt;
::::The FAQ is not a commandment that &amp;quot;everything that is not like that should be made like that&amp;quot;. As far as neatening up an Explanation is concerned, you'd of course be rewriting and making it the best-practice w-template version, if it had been originally left as [] or bare-URL, because the original writer did not know/care about the handy site-standard. But it doesn't really mean that there's a need to mess about with the normally-inviolate bones of past Talk-comments. Its a lot of unnecessary work, at best.&lt;br /&gt;
::::And something like the &amp;quot;As Slow as Possible&amp;quot; bit in {{diff|390995|this edit}} arguably makes it flow less obviously. It originally namechecked ''As Slow as Possible'' and then helpfully offered the URL, at the end, as a bare reference. More 'properly' written it would have had a the w-tagged put around the first mention, which is in its own context, but the bare-URL at the end basically said &amp;quot;and this is a URL that explains it&amp;quot; that's actually nicely in line with the bare-URL line in the FAQ.&lt;br /&gt;
::::If (as it looks like) you're just zooming through looking for every bare wikipedia.org link and 'converting' it, without looking into it further, you're probably missing something. And slowing down the generally excellent work, that you're doing, in giving everything 'unsigned' its historic details. It's your time, but going to far in such editorialising can be unproductive. Even when not actually a bit counterproductive. [[Special:Contributions/2.98.65.8|2.98.65.8]] 20:44, 15 November 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Alright. I'll put more of my attention in signing comments and give less of it towards this issue. Thanks for your feedback! '''[[User:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:9pt;color:#3a795e&amp;quot;&amp;gt;42.book.addict&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:6pt;color:#ce5f15&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Talk to me!&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;''' 23:39, 15 November 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
{{outdent|:::::}}&lt;br /&gt;
Why did you make [https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:2347:_Dependency&amp;amp;diff=prev&amp;amp;oldid=391211 this edit], where you fully deleted a comment left by an IP? What was the point of that? &amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family: Times New Roman, serif; font-size: 16px;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;--'''''[[User:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#E3C6BE&amp;quot;&amp;gt;DollarStoreBa'al&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User Talk:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#CC9A8B&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Converse&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt; 18:19, 19 November 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:If you mean the &amp;quot;German Television ... Log4j&amp;quot; one, that was moved (a long way) further down, not deleted. Did not really check why, possibly thematically to fit it with other comments, and/or timstamp order of new comments not replying to anything earlier, but I'm just guessing and didn't try to reconcile it fully (once I'd seen it pop up 'later' in the scroll-down). [[Special:Contributions/82.132.236.44|82.132.236.44]] 18:44, 19 November 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Ok, I see you put it back (without removing the second copy), but you broke things. By using &amp;quot;::;&amp;quot; it set it as double-indented and then as a &amp;quot;;terminology:definition&amp;quot; pair, which activated upon the &amp;quot;:&amp;quot; in the time-stop given. So deleted it again. There's still the new version, lower down, that I just mentioned.&lt;br /&gt;
:Also reverted a deity/diety spelling error (actual one, I'm sure, not a mistaken one) just because it's still &amp;quot;editing other people's comments&amp;quot;, the point made above, and frowned upon in this context. I haven't bothered to check how many other ones have happened, hidden in the midst of rearrangements by either of you, but that was very obviously different. It's an unforced error that someone made in a comment. Don't try to polish it, in case you're adding further errors by misunderstanding, like the first deity-&amp;gt;diety change. (For all I know, DIETYBOUNCE is correct... Though it does sound more like a slimming supplement!) [[Special:Contributions/82.132.236.44|82.132.236.44]] 19:07, 19 November 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::[https://queue.acm.org/blogposting.cfm?id=74439 Deitybounce is correct]. &amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family: Times New Roman, serif; font-size: 16px;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;--'''''[[User:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#E3C6BE&amp;quot;&amp;gt;DollarStoreBa'al&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User Talk:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#CC9A8B&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Converse&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt; 20:12, 19 November 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::It is (almost certainly) {{diff|196415|their own edit}}, though. It's a bad habit to change things. It's not ''brilliant'' to have to try to change them back (see my initial error), but best things like that don't change in the first place. Both of you, please. Then others like me and ^^them^^ don't feel the need to try to make it authentically incorrect again. [[Special:Contributions/2.98.65.8|2.98.65.8]] 23:24, 19 November 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Change to Comic (sandbox) template ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I'm guessing it didn't work (just seen your sandbox changes), and I'll also know why it didn't. But I'm going to suggest you leave that to one of the others. There's slightly more to it than just duplicating the opening 'if', and you probably need to get your head around their solution rather than just prod at it all on your own. Enlightenment ''will'' come, but it may take patience... ;) [[Special:Contributions/82.132.236.65|82.132.236.65]] 08:52, 23 November 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Yeah-that's basically what I concluded and I haven't touched the template since. I think I'm more suited towards doing repetitive, tedious tasks anyways C: '''[[User:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:9pt;color:#3a795e&amp;quot;&amp;gt;42.book.addict&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:6pt;color:#ce5f15&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Talk to me!&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;''' 17:42, 23 November 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==How do you receive Notifications?==&lt;br /&gt;
You said you receive watchlist notifications in the summary of [https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=User%3A42.book.addict&amp;amp;type=revision&amp;amp;diff=391911&amp;amp;oldid=391885 this edit]. How do you do that? I thought the email system was broken. &amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family: Times New Roman, serif; font-size: 16px;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;--'''''[[User:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#E3C6BE&amp;quot;&amp;gt;DollarStoreBa'al&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User Talk:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#CC9A8B&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Converse&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt; 14:21, 2 December 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Let's decrease that number, shall we?==&lt;br /&gt;
11k images, all uncategorized... on it. &amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family: Times New Roman, serif; font-size: 16px;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;--'''''[[User:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#023020&amp;quot;&amp;gt;DollarStoreBa'al&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User Talk:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#000080&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Converse&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt; 18:57, 2 December 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:I like how you think C: '''[[User:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:9pt;color:#3a795e&amp;quot;&amp;gt;42.book.addict&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:6pt;color:#ce5f15&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Talk to me!&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;''' 21:11, 2 December 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::I periodically check recent changes, and it's funny to see our different methods work in tandem. You're a bit faster, but there's a slight lull when you're refilling your taskbar with tabs, and I catch up. Our methods are almost equal. &amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family: Times New Roman, serif; font-size: 16px;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;--'''''[[User:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#FF0000&amp;quot;&amp;gt;DollarStoreBa'al&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User Talk:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#00873E&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Converse&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt; 22:24, 3 December 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::It is funny! Have you checked the Discord server? I sent a photo of my keyboard layout for reference :3 '''[[User:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:9pt;color:#3a795e&amp;quot;&amp;gt;42.book.addict&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:6pt;color:#ce5f15&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Talk to me!&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;''' 22:25, 3 December 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::::I'm an idiot, aren't I..... ''sigh''... welp, we've got just under a thousand images left, so i should have nothing left to mess up in a bit. &amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family: Times New Roman, serif; font-size: 16px;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;--'''''[[User:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#FF0000&amp;quot;&amp;gt;DollarStoreBa'al&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User Talk:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#00873E&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Converse&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt; 01:42, 5 December 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Welp, we've got about 150 images left. Personally, I don't trust myself with them. I have no clue where to put them. So, I'll leave them to you for both our sakes. &amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family: Times New Roman, serif; font-size: 16px;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;--'''''[[User:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#FF0000&amp;quot;&amp;gt;DollarStoreBa'al&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User Talk:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#00873E&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Converse&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt; 16:57, 5 December 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::I noticed your summary lol. What's nice is, after a while, I just spaced out and when I came back, I'd done all but 100 of the remaining frames of Time. I'll go back to... a more normal schedule. &amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family: Times New Roman, serif; font-size: 16px;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;--'''''[[User:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#FF0000&amp;quot;&amp;gt;DollarStoreBa'al&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User Talk:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#00873E&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Converse&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt; 18:29, 5 December 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==A little leaderboard notice==&lt;br /&gt;
With your latest push, you've officially become a more prolific editor than every other non-admin and non-bot user to ever edit the wiki. You're now 5th all-time, behind Kynde, Davidy22, ThusafBOT, and Waldir. &amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family: Times New Roman, serif; font-size: 16px;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;--'''''[[User:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#FF0000&amp;quot;&amp;gt;DollarStoreBa'al&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User Talk:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#00873E&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Converse&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt; 19:34, 3 December 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Not that I really deserve it. Most of the people I've passed were/are on the wiki for far longer than I have and have contributed a lot more. I don't really see it as an achievement TBH. You've also pushed into the Top 10, with your absolutely mental 2451 score this week. If you keep up your pace you can definitely push at least 5k this week-today's only your 2nd day, no? Try to take a break-it's probably not healthy for you to be working for so long doing the same menial task over and over again. There's no rush! '''[[User:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:9pt;color:#3a795e&amp;quot;&amp;gt;42.book.addict&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:6pt;color:#ce5f15&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Talk to me!&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;''' 19:38, 3 December 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::Tbh I don't feel I deserve it either. It feels weird. I was expecting a slow rise towards the top. Suddenly seeing myself in 8th is odd. &amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family: Times New Roman, serif; font-size: 16px;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;--'''''[[User:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#FF0000&amp;quot;&amp;gt;DollarStoreBa'al&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User Talk:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#00873E&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Converse&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt; 19:41, 3 December 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Knowing how much work you had to do to complete the task, I fully expected you to get there eventually...&lt;br /&gt;
:::Though you're making me dizzy (and I had to increase my &amp;quot;Recent Changes&amp;quot; view to ''at least'' 1000 items, in order to not miss any changes that ''aren't'' by you( two)... ;)&lt;br /&gt;
:::(I know I could hide minor edits, but not sure that anybody else hasn't snuck through a 'minor' edit I want to see having happened. Also could hide &amp;quot;registered users&amp;quot;, but that'd obscure anyone that's not also an IP like me... again...)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Anyway, the last '1000 view' seemed to cover just a ''tad'' over three hours of both your edits. And I had to scroll through carefully to try to spot anything that's (probably!) not a &amp;quot;File:&amp;quot; item and hasn't had either of your usernames as the sole-(or co-!)editor. And dive in on the occasional one that was like that, just to satisfy myself that you've not messed something up. (Unlikely... but... a lot of edits, a lot of little chances... maybe you'd slip up, and ''maybe'' maybe I'd spot it and correct it for you... ;) )&lt;br /&gt;
:::Can't wait for you to finish... Both because it's then finsihed and ''also'' no longer currently happening. But at the same time I'm definitely not to keen on encouraging you to accelerate the process much more than you're doing now! It'd not beright for me to ask you to dial it back, but I could definitely live with that. :P [[Special:Contributions/78.144.255.82|78.144.255.82]] 20:04, 3 December 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::::You could also exclude the File namespace from your Recent Changes page... (select Files in your namespace drop down bar and invert selection) '''[[User:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:9pt;color:#3a795e&amp;quot;&amp;gt;42.book.addict&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:6pt;color:#ce5f15&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Talk to me!&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;''' 20:07, 3 December 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Shifting from 7th to 8th gear, about halfway through the straightaway at the Circuit de Hermanos Rodriguez. &amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family: Times New Roman, serif; font-size: 16px;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;--'''''[[User:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#FF0000&amp;quot;&amp;gt;DollarStoreBa'al&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User Talk:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#00873E&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Converse&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt; 20:23, 3 December 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::I'm really not keen on filtering ''anything'' out, really, because (if I do something like filter out the &amp;quot;File:&amp;quot; examples entirely) there's always a chance that something that isn't your work gets hidden from me, just because it ''looks'' like your work. (Also, you'll forgive me for keeping an eye out for those errors that I'm ''sure'' you won't make, but might!) I just am happier if I just 'get my eye in', and look for anything more odd-looking than the usual, no matter what the mix of similarities and differences between a 'filterable' target. Designing a 'very cautious filter' is a lot more work than just doing it in my head while scrolling. [[Special:Contributions/78.144.255.82|78.144.255.82]] 20:41, 3 December 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::Ok, feel free to take your time. I'll probably stop throughout the day and might not touch it after 1pm because I have other things to attend to. Cheers! '''[[User:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:9pt;color:#3a795e&amp;quot;&amp;gt;42.book.addict&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:6pt;color:#ce5f15&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Talk to me!&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;''' 20:43, 3 December 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Coordination idea==&lt;br /&gt;
Btw, I've done up to frame 1592. Maybe I could start from the end and work backwards, while you continue forwards, and we meet in the middle? Just a thought.&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family: Times New Roman, serif; font-size: 16px;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;--'''''[[User:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#FF0000&amp;quot;&amp;gt;DollarStoreBa'al&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User Talk:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#00873E&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Converse&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt; 20:20, 3 December 2025 (UTC)&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
We could also go the other way around, if you prefer. &amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family: Times New Roman, serif; font-size: 16px;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;--'''''[[User:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#FF0000&amp;quot;&amp;gt;DollarStoreBa'al&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User Talk:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#00873E&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Converse&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt; 20:21, 3 December 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:First one works with me. Here's also my current strategy: I open up about 50-80 tabs (as many as my Chromebook can handle without lagging). I've copied the text below and paste it in if the page is empty. If the page has Licensing but not Category, I use CTRL-A to select everything and CTRL-V to replace it with my copied text. If there's other text pertaining to the image hashes, I just do a quick SHIFT-UP twice and delete the Licensing, then paste in. After saving, I use CTRL-W to quickly close the tab and move on to the next one. Rinse and repeat.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;== Licensing ==&lt;br /&gt;
{{XKCD file}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Helper comic images (1190)]]&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:--'''[[User:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:9pt;color:#3a795e&amp;quot;&amp;gt;42.book.addict&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:6pt;color:#ce5f15&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Talk to me!&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;''' 20:25, 3 December 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Hello! ==&lt;br /&gt;
You seem very cool based on your user page. I'm new to this wiki, but I saw you mentioned a long backlog of files that need categorizing. I am very much willing to help with that (it's a thing I can do while procrastinating about writing {{w|User:lp0 on fire/Drafts/Beate Pokorny|something useful}}, which in turn is procrastination about doing {{w|real life|something important}}) so if you just tell me where to find the uncategorized things and which categories are relevant then I will have a go. [[User:lp0 on fire|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color: #c56030&amp;quot;&amp;gt;lp0&amp;amp;nbsp;on&amp;amp;nbsp;fire&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;amp;nbsp;[[User talk:lp0 on fire|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color: #64cea0&amp;quot;&amp;gt;()&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]] 20:42, 3 December 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Alright, I have a couple of initial questions. How familiar are you with MediaWiki and Wikitext? Do you understand the differences between Helper categories and Comic images? And do you understand how XKCD licensing works? This is just to get an understanding of what I have to explain. '''[[User:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:9pt;color:#3a795e&amp;quot;&amp;gt;42.book.addict&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:6pt;color:#ce5f15&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Talk to me!&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;''' 20:46, 3 December 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::I have never heard the term &amp;quot;helper category&amp;quot; before, nor do I have any specific understanding of &amp;quot;comic image&amp;quot; other than presumably an image that is actually taken from [https://xkcd.com xkcd.com]. I am reasonably competent with most normal aspects of wikitext, though I've never written a template and would probably panic and run away if someone asked me to write an edit filter. I'm here from enwiki where I am at least somewhat active, so I understand the basics of how to write/edit and so forth. I believe xkcd is licensed under {{w|CC BY-NC 2.5}} (with the exception of [[1167]] which is also licensed under {{w|CC BY-SA 4.0}}) and I understand broadly what that means, but I'm not a lawyer by any means. [[User:lp0 on fire|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color: #c56030&amp;quot;&amp;gt;lp0&amp;amp;nbsp;on&amp;amp;nbsp;fire&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;amp;nbsp;[[User talk:lp0 on fire|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color: #64cea0&amp;quot;&amp;gt;()&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]] 20:59, 3 December 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Sorry, should've been a lot clearer. But here's the quick runthrough. Currently, DollarStoreBa'al and I are working on categorizing still frames of the Comic [[1190: Time]]. You can work on categorizing [https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?limit=100&amp;amp;title=Special%3AContributions&amp;amp;contribs=user&amp;amp;target=TheusafBOT&amp;amp;namespace=6&amp;amp;tagfilter=&amp;amp;topOnly=1&amp;amp;newOnly=1&amp;amp;start=&amp;amp;end= comic images]. You don't really need to know about the stuff that I asked you-the bot already handled most of it. All you need to do is copy paste &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;[[Category:Comic images]]&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt; into the file page. Good luck! '''[[User:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:9pt;color:#3a795e&amp;quot;&amp;gt;42.book.addict&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:6pt;color:#ce5f15&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Talk to me!&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;''' 21:21, 3 December 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::::Oh right, I was wondering why there was a problem since there are only 3175 comics. Forgot about Time. I'll get going doing this if I have some time and nothing productive to do. Thanks (: [[User:lp0 on fire|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color: #c56030&amp;quot;&amp;gt;lp0&amp;amp;nbsp;on&amp;amp;nbsp;fire&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;amp;nbsp;[[User talk:lp0 on fire|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color: #64cea0&amp;quot;&amp;gt;()&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]] 21:39, 3 December 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==A Barnstar for you!==&lt;br /&gt;
{| style=&amp;quot;border: 1px solid gray; background-color: #fdffe7;&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|rowspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;vertical-align:middle;&amp;quot; | [[File:Tireless Categorization Barnstar.png|100px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|rowspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; |&lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;font-size: x-large; padding: 0; vertical-align: middle; height: 1.1em;&amp;quot; | '''The Tireless Categorization Barnstar'''&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;&amp;quot; | You did a very good job on the image categorization project. Also, you somehow managed to locate and fix all my mistakes on top of that. That deserves a Barnstar! &amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family: Times New Roman, serif; font-size: 16px;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;--'''''[[User:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#FF0000&amp;quot;&amp;gt;DollarStoreBa'al&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User Talk:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#00873E&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Converse&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt; 17:05, 8 December 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
:Agreed! Great work, both of you! [[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] ([[User talk:FaviFake|talk]]) 16:22, 18 December 2025 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Welcome back!==&lt;br /&gt;
Honestly, 'we'll see' is basically what we say with everything going on right about now lol. Glad to see you. &amp;lt;!--things have been...very stressful for us lately, haven't they...--&amp;gt;--'''''[[User:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#3c2004&amp;quot;&amp;gt;DollarStoreBa'al&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User Talk:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#1E0F00&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Converse&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; (BLM) 16:56, 4 February 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:pfffft, yeah... :C thanks though! [[User:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font:9pt Cormorant Garamond&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#89CFF0&amp;quot;&amp;gt;tor&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#FFB7CE&amp;quot;&amp;gt;i :3&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font:6pt Cormorant Garamond&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#D3D3D3&amp;quot;&amp;gt;talk &amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#FFB7CE&amp;quot;&amp;gt;to &amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#89CFF0&amp;quot;&amp;gt;me!&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 01:26, 5 February 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::BTW, the 'section' thing on the talk page has been there since early December 2025. Looks like Lp0 on Fire added it... for some reason. [https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=User_talk:42.book.addict&amp;amp;diff=prev&amp;amp;oldid=397274 here's the edit if you're curious]. No clue why. --'''''[[User:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#3c2004&amp;quot;&amp;gt;DollarStoreBa'al&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User Talk:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#1E0F00&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Converse&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; (BLM) 14:14, 10 February 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Hm, ok. Thanks for letting me know [[User:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font:9pt Cormorant Garamond&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#5CA7CF&amp;quot;&amp;gt;tor&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#F08DB0&amp;quot;&amp;gt;i :3&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font:6pt Cormorant Garamond&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#9E9E9E&amp;quot;&amp;gt;talk &amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#F08DB0&amp;quot;&amp;gt;to &amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#5CA7CF&amp;quot;&amp;gt;me!&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]] 20:18, 10 February 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Personal attacks ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Greetings; if you wish to personally attack me, then I welcome you to conduct the attacks on my User Talk page. I see no need to waste every editor's time on a project talk page. I think we should focus on improving the category. That being said, I expressed no opinion about any editor at all. In fact, my scenario was completely hypothetical. I was using ''reductio ad absurdum''. If you want to attack hypothetical scenarios with speculative adjectives, again, I will direct you to [[User talk:Elizium23]]. Thank you for your attention to this matter! [[User:Elizium23|Elizium23]] ([[User talk:Elizium23|talk]]) 06:48, 10 February 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:My apologies. I have shifted my comment here. It would be greatly enjoyable if you were a bit less condescending? &amp;quot;Insufferable, redundant, and monotonous&amp;quot; are all phrases that indicate that you believe yourself better than us. Can't you just be a bit more respectful? This website isn't even related to politics or any controversial topics-the wiki's just a passion project for us to explain xkcd. I would also like to make some additional points. Personally. I think that it isn't wasting everyone's time by talking on a project's talk page. It is their choice on whether or not they wish to read the discussion. If it does not relate to them, I see no reason in them reading through it. And if they do, that is a choice on their own part. I have also seen that you have made attacks and opinions on editors before, as you can see below:&lt;br /&gt;
{{quote|I also hope that you accept responsibility for wasting everybody's time.}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{quote|because your shitty justification on the Admin Portal talk page does not constitute a policy, random IPv4 with no reputation.}} &lt;br /&gt;
:(please note that it is up to an individual to decide if they want to register an account on this wiki or not. being an ip editor does not necessarily discredit them or their opinions) &lt;br /&gt;
{{quote|nobody knows what the hell you did before a couple weeks ago}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{quote|You are utterly wasting our time and you are proving that you hate regular editors with accounts, and you care more about trolls and spammers than about editors who are trying to do something constructive here. You are wasting our time, our free time, our volunteer time, that we're trying to give to this wiki.}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{quote|That is idiotic and reprehensible}}&lt;br /&gt;
:Plus, you say that your scenario was completely hypothetical. What about ''my'' hypothetical on the [[explain_xkcd:Community_portal/Admin_requests#Removing_disruptive_material|community portal]] last week? Am I automatically wrong because I have a different viewpoint than you? You accuse me of having &amp;quot;created another strawman to set on fire&amp;quot;, when I was trying to compromise and explore how we could possibly put your idea into action, given that there was consensus of course. None of us get paid to do this, and we don't have to deal with your bullshit. I'm tired of all the sarcasm and BS. I'm tired of all the double standards. So please, cut it out. I'm not saying that you don't bring up any good points, or that your point of view is completely invalid, but it would be nice to have civil conversations without you constantly sniping at us.Please, hold yourself accountable first before you come for us. '''[[User:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font:9pt Cormorant Garamond&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#89CFF0&amp;quot;&amp;gt;tor&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#FFB7CE&amp;quot;&amp;gt;i :3&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font:6pt Cormorant Garamond&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#D3D3D3&amp;quot;&amp;gt;talk &amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#FFB7CE&amp;quot;&amp;gt;to &amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#89CFF0&amp;quot;&amp;gt;me!&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]''' 07:10, 10 February 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::Yes, you are right, and I am sorry for those conversations, and I regret them. I brought too much emotion and frustration. And my attitude is uncalled-for. I apologize and I am very sorry for causing offense to you and others who work on this wiki here. I hope that we will not repeat these conflicts. I do not wish to be embroiled in them or continue any, whether I started them or not. I hope that I can promise to straighten out from now on. Thank you. [[User:Elizium23|Elizium23]] ([[User talk:Elizium23|talk]]) 07:38, 10 February 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Thank you for your response. I look forward to collaborating together in the future. And I really hope that we, as a community, can see some immediate, real change moving forward. That being said, I really do appreciate your apology. It takes someone a lot more courage to admit that they were wrong than to keep on insisting that they were right. [[User:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font:9pt Cormorant Garamond&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#5CA7CF&amp;quot;&amp;gt;tor&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#F08DB0&amp;quot;&amp;gt;i :3&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font:6pt Cormorant Garamond&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#9E9E9E&amp;quot;&amp;gt;talk &amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#F08DB0&amp;quot;&amp;gt;to &amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#5CA7CF&amp;quot;&amp;gt;me!&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 07:42, 10 February 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Minor Edit Reminder==&lt;br /&gt;
Thank you for fixing my mistakes! Please remember to make sure your edits are minor, though. --'''''[[User:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#3c2004&amp;quot;&amp;gt;DollarStoreBa'al&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User Talk:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#1E0F00&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Converse&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; (BLM) 21:23, 11 February 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:oh, right. thanks for the reminder! [[User:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font:11pt Cormorant Garamond&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#5CA7CF&amp;quot;&amp;gt;tor&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#F08DB0&amp;quot;&amp;gt;i :3&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font:8pt Cormorant Garamond&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#9E9E9E&amp;quot;&amp;gt;talk &amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#F08DB0&amp;quot;&amp;gt;to &amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#5CA7CF&amp;quot;&amp;gt;me!&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 00:30, 12 February 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Good Idea!==&lt;br /&gt;
I saw how you linked the FAQ instead of creating the pages. I honestly think that should be the standard procedure instead of creating someone else's pages, because that always leads to the person who asked creating other user's pages at random. I think you and I both did that in our early careers. So, yeah, I just wanted to compliment your judgement there. :)--'''''[[User:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#3c2004&amp;quot;&amp;gt;DollarStoreBa'al&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User Talk:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#1E0F00&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Converse&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; (BLM) 15:59, 20 February 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Please fix your broken signature ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Your signature has an unclosed &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt; tag that messes up transclusion of Talk pages into article pages, resulting in the word &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;div&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt; overlapping the words &amp;quot;Add comment&amp;quot; at, e.g., the bottom of [[3219:_Planets_and_Bright_Stars]].&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
See discussion at https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk%3A3219%3A_Planets_and_Bright_Stars&amp;amp;type=revision&amp;amp;diff=408118&amp;amp;oldid=408111.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
In of itself, this kind of problem is an excellent reason not to use fancy signatures, and also the coloring and faintness of your signature make it incredibly annoying and hard to read (indeed, it makes me annoyed just reading your comments! I wonder if that's true more editors than not?). In any event, the problem appears to be because you have:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font:11pt Cormorant Garamond&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#5CA7CF&amp;quot;&amp;gt;tor&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#F08DB0&amp;quot;&amp;gt;i :3&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font:8pt Cormorant Garamond&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#9E9E9E&amp;quot;&amp;gt;talk &amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#F08DB0&amp;quot;&amp;gt;to &amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#5CA7CF&amp;quot;&amp;gt;me!&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
When it should be:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font:11pt Cormorant Garamond&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#5CA7CF&amp;quot;&amp;gt;tor&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#F08DB0&amp;quot;&amp;gt;i :3&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font:8pt Cormorant Garamond&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#9E9E9E&amp;quot;&amp;gt;talk &amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#F08DB0&amp;quot;&amp;gt;to &amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#5CA7CF&amp;quot;&amp;gt;me!&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
that is, in redline:&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font:11pt Cormorant Garamond&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#5CA7CF&amp;quot;&amp;gt;tor&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#F08DB0&amp;quot;&amp;gt;i :3&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:blue; font-weight: bold&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font:8pt Cormorant Garamond&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#9E9E9E&amp;quot;&amp;gt;talk &amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#F08DB0&amp;quot;&amp;gt;to &amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#5CA7CF&amp;quot;&amp;gt;me!&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
which closes the initial font span before the superscript starts.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Let me know if you would like me to setup a sandbox page that demonstrates this problem a bit more clearly—it seemed a waste of a page creation, but happy to do it.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Please fix your signature so your talk comments stop disrupting the wiki by their very existence. It would be a good time to consider dropping the flamboyent signature altogether and using something that regular people can read without hurting their eyes. There is a place for expressiveness, but you have overdone it (objectively, since you have broken &amp;quot;the world&amp;quot;). Thank you. [[User:JohnHawkinson|JohnHawkinson]] ([[User talk:JohnHawkinson|talk]]) 14:03, 14 March 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Please note that another editor has [https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:3219:_Planets_and_Bright_Stars&amp;amp;diff=prev&amp;amp;oldid=408152 repaired your signature in the above-referenced talk page], so the problem is no longer visible there. This does help confirm my diagnosis of the problem. The problem remains visible in other places, e.g., [[3209: Plums]]. {{unsigned|JohnHawkinson|16:41, 14 March 2026 (UTC)}}&lt;br /&gt;
::It's now been fixed once I realized the issue and learned about this problem. I've also corrected all of my other comments that have a broken signature. If you notice them, please let me know so that I can fix it! Additionally, I've tried to make my signature more readable by increasing the darkness of my signature. If you still struggle, I would be more than happy to change it so that it is more readable on a white background. All the best, [[User:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font:11pt Cormorant Garamond&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#5CA7CF&amp;quot;&amp;gt;tor&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#F08DB0&amp;quot;&amp;gt;i :3&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font:8pt Cormorant Garamond&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#9E9E9E&amp;quot;&amp;gt;talk &amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#F08DB0&amp;quot;&amp;gt;to &amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#5CA7CF&amp;quot;&amp;gt;me!&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 17:25, 18 March 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Thanks for the repair. As for readability, I don't see a difference? Previously it was #5CA7CF, #F08DB0, and #9E9E9E. Your signature above just now seems to have the same colors and font weights. Am I missing something? [[User:JohnHawkinson|JohnHawkinson]] ([[User talk:JohnHawkinson|talk]]) 17:35, 18 March 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::::Ah, sorry. I had to go back to class, but I've fixed it now and darkened the hex codes in my signature. Hope it helps! [[User:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font:11pt Cormorant Garamond&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#4A86A6&amp;quot;&amp;gt;tor&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#C0728D&amp;quot;&amp;gt;i :3&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font:8pt Cormorant Garamond&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#7E7E7E&amp;quot;&amp;gt;talk &amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#C0728D&amp;quot;&amp;gt;to &amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#4A86A6&amp;quot;&amp;gt;me!&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 21:57, 18 March 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Update for your info===&lt;br /&gt;
I've just seen your acknowledgement of the signature tagging issues. If you don't mind, I've deconstructed (indendent) your current version. I basically added a layer of indenting for everything 'within' other tagging. Mostly HTMLs (&amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;tag&amp;gt; ... &amp;lt;/tag&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt; type) but also the Wiki-linking (&amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;[[destination| ... ]]&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;pre&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
  [[User:42.book.addict|&lt;br /&gt;
    &amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font:11pt Cormorant Garamond&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
      &amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#5CA7CF&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
        tor&lt;br /&gt;
      &amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
      &amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#F08DB0&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
        i :3&lt;br /&gt;
      &amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
    &amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
  ]]&lt;br /&gt;
  &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
    [[User talk:42.book.addict|&lt;br /&gt;
      &amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font:8pt Cormorant Garamond&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
        &amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#9E9E9E&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
          talk&lt;br /&gt;
        &amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
        &amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#F08DB0&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
          to&lt;br /&gt;
        &amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
        &amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#5CA7CF&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
          me!&lt;br /&gt;
        &amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
      ]]&lt;br /&gt;
    &amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
  &amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
  17:25, 18 March 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/pre&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The HTML tags are all matched, now, but the Wiki-style link for (this here) User talk page, in the lower half is disjointed across this. As in:&lt;br /&gt;
*open &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
**open &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;[[link to User talk:&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
***open &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt; for font size and style&lt;br /&gt;
****open &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt; for font colour&lt;br /&gt;
*****(text)&lt;br /&gt;
****close &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt; for font colour&lt;br /&gt;
****open &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt; for font colour&lt;br /&gt;
*****(more text)&lt;br /&gt;
****close &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt; for font colour&lt;br /&gt;
****open &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt; for font colour&lt;br /&gt;
*****(yet more text)&lt;br /&gt;
****close &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt; for font colour&lt;br /&gt;
***'''close the &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;link to User talk:]]&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;''', despite technically being still in the font-size span...&lt;br /&gt;
**'''close &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt; for font size and style''', out of order...&lt;br /&gt;
*close &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*...then the appended (deliberately bland) timestamp&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Because it's a mix between HTML-style markup and Wiki-style markup (and, moreover, web-browsers tend to work around things that are closed out of order, although - as already seen - not always without strange effects popping up), it might not have been too obvious.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''In short''', the quick fix that I'd suggest is to swap the &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt; to be &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But, rather than just tell you that, I thought you might like to know how I personally checked this. (There are other ways.) By adding linefeeds and spacings, you can run up and down the editor and make sure that a column that a tag starts on has a closing tag on the same 'level'. (All of this obviously, you'd then to restore back to ''no'' linefeeds and only spacing where you still need it. Either the original you 'expanded' being proven entirely correct, guided by whatever fixes it needs or by 'unexpanding' it back again.) [[Special:Contributions/81.179.199.253|81.179.199.253]] 21:04, 18 March 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Thanks for helping out! I'll make sure to run through this method whenever I want to make an alteration or work with HTML. [[User:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font:11pt Cormorant Garamond&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#4A86A6&amp;quot;&amp;gt;tor&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#C0728D&amp;quot;&amp;gt;i :3&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font:8pt Cormorant Garamond&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#7E7E7E&amp;quot;&amp;gt;talk &amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#C0728D&amp;quot;&amp;gt;to &amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#4A86A6&amp;quot;&amp;gt;me!&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 21:57, 18 March 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::No problem. It's more a general &amp;quot;helping you to help yourself&amp;quot;, and if you have a different way of checking this than this particular indenting version (with mixed-markup!) that works better for you, then use that.&lt;br /&gt;
::A more 'destructive' check is to take the text (or a copy of it!) and first of all look for any standalone (non-containing) &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;tag /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;s and remove them, as well as all 'bare content'. Then find where you now have &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;tag&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/tag&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt; happening, with nothing between start and end, and remove those. Rinse and repeat, structurally eating out clearly open-and-close content wherever you see it. If it doesn't reduce down to ''nothing'', then you've got a (probable!) error. - Though it might be a ''bit'' trickier to find out where the error you have just found is, if the tag you've 'hit' looks a lot like a lot of the other parallel tags. And it's not as clear a result to show someone else, which is why I did the depth-indenting method for you, above. [[Special:Contributions/81.179.199.253|81.179.199.253]] 22:32, 18 March 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Just wanted to say hi ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hi :) 42. Can’t believe I’m on this site for almost a year already! The last April fools only seems like a year ago! [[User:Aprilfoolsupdate!| &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;April&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;fools&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;update&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;!]]([[User talk:Aprilfoolsupdate!|talk]]) 06:02, 18 March 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Vandal counter may need to be updated==&lt;br /&gt;
I noticed that your user page has a vandalism counter at 47. Just so you know, your userpage got vandalized twice by the 165 IP, so the most accurate tally would be 49. Just wanted to let you know. --'''''[[User:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#023020&amp;quot;&amp;gt;DollarStoreBa'al&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User Talk:DollarStoreBa'al|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#09ff00&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Converse&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;  14:57, 30 March 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Thanks DSB [[User:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font:11pt Cormorant Garamond&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#4A86A6&amp;quot;&amp;gt;tor&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#C0728D&amp;quot;&amp;gt;i :3&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font:8pt Cormorant Garamond&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#7E7E7E&amp;quot;&amp;gt;talk &amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#C0728D&amp;quot;&amp;gt;to &amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#4A86A6&amp;quot;&amp;gt;me!&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 21:24, 30 March 2026 (UTC)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>42.book.addict</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=User:42.book.addict&amp;diff=409111</id>
		<title>User:42.book.addict</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=User:42.book.addict&amp;diff=409111"/>
				<updated>2026-03-30T21:23:59Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;42.book.addict: thanks bsd&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{notice|I have reached out to [[User:Jeff|Jeff]]-the owner of this wiki and the only active (sort of) ‘crat-via Gmail and X. Hopefully he responds soon! You can see my To-Do List for him at the bottom of my user page. If there is anything else you think is important, please add to it. I am also considering asking him for adminship, for I am pretty active and available, as well as very dedicated towards this project. What do you think? &lt;br /&gt;
TL;DR-emailed/tweeted to [[User:Jeff|Jeff]], asked him to do some very important things, I want to become an admin, please give me your thoughts.}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{notice|I've created a Discord server for Explain XKCD! Join it at [https://discord.com/invite/zGEVanBBAx discord.gg/zGEVanBBAx]! I intend for it to be a backup format for us to communicate in the case of a server outage, to coordinate online, and to have fun connecting with each other!}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hi! If you see this, you have reached my user page! My name's Victoria, although you can call me Tori for short. I’m 15, live in California, love reading, and started reading Randall’s works (What If?, Thing Explainer, XKCD) in 2018. I started editing on Feb. 1, 2024. I've done {{#cscore:42.book.addict|changes}} changes across {{#cscore:42.book.addict|pages}} pages, bringing to a total of {{#cscore:42.book.addict|score}} point contribution score. See my [[User:42.book.addict/userbox|userboxes]]! &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==My Loves==&lt;br /&gt;
*{{w|Hatsune Miku|Hatsune Miku &amp;lt;33}}&lt;br /&gt;
*{{w|Kasane Teto}}&lt;br /&gt;
*Classical music ({{w|Beethoven}}, {{w|Mozart}}, {{w|Shostakovich}})&lt;br /&gt;
*Reading (i read an entire scientific encyclopaedia during the lockdown :3)&lt;br /&gt;
**although not so much anymore because i’ve been too busy&lt;br /&gt;
*ao3 yuri&lt;br /&gt;
*Pokémon cards (i have a pretty solid portfolio/collection)&lt;br /&gt;
*Bluey (yes, i enjoy watching a preschool show. sue me.)&lt;br /&gt;
*Science&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://www.youtube.com/@rachie rachie]&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://www.twitch.tv/shxtou shoto]&lt;br /&gt;
*MCSR Ranked&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==To Do List==&lt;br /&gt;
*learn to use the goddamned preview button &lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:green; font-size:1.5em;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;✓&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;amp;nbsp;'''{{{1|Done}}}'''&lt;br /&gt;
*get a life&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;red&amp;quot;&amp;gt;✗&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt; '''impossible'''&lt;br /&gt;
*create a bot that fixes grammatical mistakes through the Pywiki library&lt;br /&gt;
**&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{citation needed}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;, extra periods/commas/spaces/whitespace &lt;br /&gt;
**'''In progress'''&lt;br /&gt;
*clean out the maintenance report pages&lt;br /&gt;
*Use the summary box more often&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:green; font-size:1.5em;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;✓&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;amp;nbsp;'''{{{1|Done}}}'''&lt;br /&gt;
*finish up [[2288: Collector's Edition]]&lt;br /&gt;
*Whittle down [[Special:WhatLinksHere/Template:Actual_citation_needed|Template:Actual Citation Needed]]&lt;br /&gt;
*Whatever's on [[explain_xkcd:Community_portal/Coordination#To_do_list|here]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Special:UnusedTemplates]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Special:WantedCategories]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Special:WantedFiles]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Special:WantedPages]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==List of Big Projects==&lt;br /&gt;
*What If? chapter explanation completion&lt;br /&gt;
*upload all loot files of [[2288: Collector's Edition]]&lt;br /&gt;
:*'''In progress'''&lt;br /&gt;
*Categorize all uncategorized files&lt;br /&gt;
:*'''In progress'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Log==&lt;br /&gt;
*yayyyyy only 3 months on the wiki and already 43rd place in overall editing for the entire history of this wiki! also, first admin beat in edit count! more edits to come! (5/14/2024)&lt;br /&gt;
*42nd place-the answer to life, the universe and everything else (5/16/2024)&lt;br /&gt;
*what on earth did I do that made my contribution score jump 70 points (9/24/2024)&lt;br /&gt;
*''must…figure…out…how…to…set…up…a…custom…sig (collapses after fighting with wikitext)'' (9/26/2024)&lt;br /&gt;
*300 edits in a month! (10/1/2024, 2:13 PM PST) &lt;br /&gt;
*broke my right wrist and yet I’m still editing this wiki at the hospital-what the hell am I doing with my life. (10/1/2024, 5:24 PM PST) &lt;br /&gt;
*'''1000. EFFING. EDITS. YESSSSSSSSS.''' (I’m doing this edit with a damn cast 😭-I really need to take a break.) (10/1/2024, 6:20 PM PST) &lt;br /&gt;
*wow, i did a 10 mile hike. i’m proud of myself. (10/13/2024) &lt;br /&gt;
*organized user page, made a separate userbox page. (10/15/2024) &lt;br /&gt;
*new sig, can’t use it due to “HTML tag errors”. gave out 2 barnstars, got both user/discussion pages protected. vandal count:  31! (10/25/2024) &lt;br /&gt;
*just realized that it’s because my sig is way too damn long (10/30/2024) &lt;br /&gt;
*AHHHHHHH [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7aG7tmL5lJ0 WHITEPINE 3] CAME OUT AND I MISSED THE LIVESTREAM (happy halloween! 🎃) (10/31/2024) &lt;br /&gt;
:*Anddddd I also missed Episode 4 (''smh'') (12/16/2024)&lt;br /&gt;
*I have fixed my sig! 255 characters-exactly at the max. '''[[User:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:9pt;color:#db97bf&amp;quot;&amp;gt;42.book.addict&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:6pt;color:#97b6db&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Talk to me!&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;''' (11/04/2024) &lt;br /&gt;
*Pulled an all-nighter to finish a Geo project-would’ve been absolute hell if I was editing in between. Hiatus is still on, just wanted to add this It’s 5:29 AM right now. (11/21/2024) &lt;br /&gt;
*''In New York,'' &lt;br /&gt;
''Concrete jungle where dreams are made of,'' &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
''Theres nothing you can’t do,'' &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
''Now you’re in New York,'' &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
''these streets will make you feel brand new,'' &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
''the lights will inspire you,'' &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
''lets hear it for New York, New York, New York'' &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
(I’m on vacation in New York! The skyline’s very pretty :3) (11/28/2024) &lt;br /&gt;
*Oh wow, over 1K pages edited! (12/06/2024) &lt;br /&gt;
*It's {{w|Beethoven#Life and career|Beethoven's}} birthday today! (12/16/2024) &lt;br /&gt;
::''Happy Birthday to you; Happy Birthday to you; Happy Birthday dear Ludwig; Happy Birthday to you!''&lt;br /&gt;
*2000 Edits! 🎉 Thank you so much to everyone who has been with me throughout this journey! (01/08/2025) &lt;br /&gt;
*holy shit the {{w|January 2025 Southern California wildfires|wildfires}} in socal look really bad (01/09/2025) &lt;br /&gt;
*i have decided to fully embrace {{w|WP:FUCK}} after a sleepless night’s worth of reflection. let the peace and zen commence (haha jk i’m freaking out over some family members in Santa Monica scarily close to the Palisades fire) (01/11/2025) &lt;br /&gt;
*oh wow-10th overall place in edits! what a surprise-i didn't expect i would reach it in less than a year (01/20/2025) &lt;br /&gt;
*to be honest, I started editing about a year ago because I was too scared to join the “real” English Wikipedia and decided to join this small community to learn about Wikipedia policy by lurking around for a year, getting the hang of using templates, wikitext, etc. Also because xkcd is cool. I think that I’ll create an English Wikipedia account on the anniversary of my joining of explain xkcd, Feb. 1, and split my attention between both here and on WP. I’m also doing some research on what WikiProjects I could join, if y’all have any recommendations based on what little y’all know about me I’ll be willing to listen to them. Lore’s over, back to editing! (01/22/2025)  &lt;br /&gt;
*back! (even if it’s only for a bit to take care of the vandalism issue that cropped up after randall published [[Tariffs|tariffs]]) (04/08/2025)&lt;br /&gt;
*Jeff tweeted on September 3rd...he still hasn't responded to any of my emails or tweets :C (09/12/2025)&lt;br /&gt;
*it's been a while, huh? (11/10/2025)&lt;br /&gt;
*12,319 uncategorized comic images left... Happy Thanksgiving! (11/27/2025)&lt;br /&gt;
:*...can I finish it all by Christmas? If I ''do'' finish it up all by myself, I would take #1 on the All-Time editing leaderboard by at least 3,000+ more edits and some 8,000+ pages (11/28/2025)&lt;br /&gt;
*wow-I've made over 1,100 edits this week...can't believe that just a year ago I was celebrating my 1,000th edit C: (12/1/2025)&lt;br /&gt;
*learned how to close tags properly in html today!! (03/18/2026)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Vandal Counter==&lt;br /&gt;
[https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=User:42.book.addict&amp;amp;offset=&amp;amp;limit=500&amp;amp;action=history 4][https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=User_talk:42.book.addict&amp;amp;offset=&amp;amp;limit=500&amp;amp;action=history 9] times! (I’m going to take it as a sign that my impact on this wiki is positive enough to be recognized and singled out by vandals)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==To Do List for [[User:Jeff|Jeff]]==&lt;br /&gt;
*Update the MySQL and MediaWiki software (technical and security ease) &lt;br /&gt;
*Promote another ‘crat (this is sort of needed if we want to be able to keep this wiki going and have active admins) &lt;br /&gt;
*Promote some more active admins (both [[User:Dtgriscom|Dtgriscom]] and [[User:FaviFake|FaviFake]] are candidates, maybe me?) &lt;br /&gt;
*Find out the root cause behind all of these [[explain_xkcd:Community_portal/Technical#the_site_is_collapsing|errors]] (preventative measures-I suspect unupdated MediaWiki software makes this wiki vulnerable to hacks and DDoS attacks) &lt;br /&gt;
*Give TheusafBOT bot status (no-brainier) &lt;br /&gt;
*De-sysop [[User:Markhurd|Markhurd]], [[User:Lcarsos|Lcarsos]], [[User:Mynotoar|Mynotoar]], [[User:Dgbrt|Dgbrt]], maybe [[User:Philosopher|Philosopher]] and other inactive admins (this list is only admins who haven’t edited in over 2 years) (preventative measures, [[User:Markhurd]] had deleted the Main Page once years after he was reported to have passed away) &lt;br /&gt;
*Fix email confirmation (account reclaims and notifications) &lt;br /&gt;
*Fix broken RSS Feed (broken ampersand, need server access to change &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;amp;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt; to &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;amp;amp;amp;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;) &lt;br /&gt;
*Restore server access to [[User:Davidy22]] (general maintenance from a technical admin)&lt;br /&gt;
*Fix Contribution Scores to exclude all Minor Edits&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Subpages==&lt;br /&gt;
*[[User:42.book.addict/common.css]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[User:42.book.addict/common.js]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[User:42.book.addict/sandbox]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[User:42.book.addict/sig]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[User:42.book.addict/userbox]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[User talk:42.book.addict/archive]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Signature History and Catalogue ==&lt;br /&gt;
'''Huge''' thanks to [[User:Omega|Omega]] for the framework of this signature! User &amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:serif&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[[User:Bubblegum|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#00BFFF&amp;quot;&amp;gt;bubblegum&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]-[[User_talk:Bubblegum|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#BF7FFF&amp;quot;&amp;gt;talk&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]|[[Special:Contributions/Bubblegum|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#FF7FFF&amp;quot;&amp;gt;contribs&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt; also inspired this sig.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Apparently, MediaWiki doesn’t allow you to have an sig longer than 255 characters. I’ll try my best to compact it, but if anybody has suggestions or would like to help, I will '''absolutely''' accept it. V1 is 490 characters, V2 is 345 characters, V3 is 255 characters (just at the limit, had to compromise contributions). V4 is 253 characters and with the same layout of V3 but with a color change to reflect spring and summer colors. V5 is an autumn/fall based signature, while V6 is a winter themed signature. V7 is an updated signature to clear up confusion about my name. See notes (''I know that this is probably just for my own self-reference'') for my details.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
V1: &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;span title=“…would I make a good admin? If you think so, drop me a message!” style=&amp;quot;font-family: Cormorant Garamond&amp;quot;&amp;gt;'''[[User:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-size:10pt;color:#db97bf&amp;quot;&amp;gt;42.book.addict&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-size:7pt;color:#97b6db&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Talk to me!&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]] [[User:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=“font-size:7pt;color:#00000”&amp;gt;|&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]] [[Special:Contributions/42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-size:7pt;color: #b069db&amp;quot;&amp;gt;What I’ve Done&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
V2: &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond&amp;quot;&amp;gt;'''[[User:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-size:10pt;color:#db97bf&amp;quot;&amp;gt;42.book.addict&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-size:7pt;color:#97b6db&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Talk to me! | &amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]][[Special:Contributions/42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-size:7pt;color:#b069db&amp;quot;&amp;gt;| What I’ve Done&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
V3: &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[User:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:9pt;color:#db97bf&amp;quot;&amp;gt;42.book.addict&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:6pt;color:#97b6db&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Talk to me!&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
V4: &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Notes: Spring/Summer signature (flowery/bright colors) &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[User:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:9pt;color:pink&amp;quot;&amp;gt;42.book.addict&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:6pt;color:#B1E4E3&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Talk to me!&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
V5: &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Notes: Autumn signature (colors reminiscent of fall foliage) &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[User:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:9pt;color:#3a795e&amp;quot;&amp;gt;42.book.addict&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:6pt;color:#ce5f15&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Talk to me!&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
V6: &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Notes: Winter signature (the cool and icy colors of this signature are similar to each other and show the blending of colors when covered in ice and snow during winter) &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[User:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:9pt;color:#A9C6CA&amp;quot;&amp;gt;42.book.addict&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:6pt;color:#516874&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Talk to me!&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
V7: &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Notes: Updated Standard Signature (tired of this whole 42/tori/book.addict thing) &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[User:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:9pt;color:#db97bf&amp;quot;&amp;gt;tori :3&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-family:Cormorant Garamond;font-size:6pt;color:#97b6db&amp;quot;&amp;gt;talk to me!&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
V8: &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Notes: TRANS PRIDE YIPPEE (unusable due to character limit (1068&amp;gt;255)) &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[User:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font:9pt Cormorant Garamond&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#89CFF0&amp;quot;&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#FFB7CE&amp;quot;&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#D3D3D3&amp;quot;&amp;gt;.&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#FFB7CE&amp;quot;&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#89CFF0&amp;quot;&amp;gt;o&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#89CFF0&amp;quot;&amp;gt;o&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#FFB7CE&amp;quot;&amp;gt;k&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#D3D3D3&amp;quot;&amp;gt;.&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#FFB7CE&amp;quot;&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#89CFF0&amp;quot;&amp;gt;d&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#89CFF0&amp;quot;&amp;gt;d&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#FFB7CE&amp;quot;&amp;gt;i&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#D3D3D3&amp;quot;&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#FFB7CE&amp;quot;&amp;gt;t&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font:6pt Cormorant Garamond&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#89CFF0&amp;quot;&amp;gt;T&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#FFB7CE&amp;quot;&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#D3D3D3&amp;quot;&amp;gt;l&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#FFB7CE&amp;quot;&amp;gt;k&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#89CFF0&amp;quot;&amp;gt; &amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#89CFF0&amp;quot;&amp;gt;t&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#FFB7CE&amp;quot;&amp;gt;o&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#D3D3D3&amp;quot;&amp;gt; &amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#FFB7CE&amp;quot;&amp;gt;m&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#89CFF0&amp;quot;&amp;gt;e&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#89CFF0&amp;quot;&amp;gt;!&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Current: &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[User:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font:9pt Cormorant Garamond&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#89CFF0&amp;quot;&amp;gt;tor&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#FFB7CE&amp;quot;&amp;gt;i :3&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:42.book.addict|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font:6pt Cormorant Garamond&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#D3D3D3&amp;quot;&amp;gt;talk &amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#FFB7CE&amp;quot;&amp;gt;to &amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#89CFF0&amp;quot;&amp;gt;me!&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;]]'''&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>42.book.addict</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:3223:_Inflation_Timeline&amp;diff=408768</id>
		<title>Talk:3223: Inflation Timeline</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:3223:_Inflation_Timeline&amp;diff=408768"/>
				<updated>2026-03-24T03:09:20Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;42.book.addict: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&amp;lt;!-- Please sign your posts with ~~~~ and don't delete this text. New comments should be added at the bottom. --&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
;Sexy? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What about the regular/sexy thing?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Body_inflation [[Special:Contributions/155.33.87.241|155.33.87.241]] 19:14, 23 March 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I would say this is an application of the &amp;quot;today's lucky 10,000&amp;quot; concept, but this probably doesn't qualify as a thing that everyone knows by the time they're an adult so the number is probably lower. But I hope this experience of learning something new is still as fun as Coke and Mentos! [[User:Dextrous Fred|Dextrous Fred]] ([[User talk:Dextrous Fred|talk]]) 19:47, 23 March 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::Not so sure closing this gap in knowledge would really count as &amp;quot;lucky&amp;quot;, but each to their own. [[Special:Contributions/204.77.3.72|204.77.3.72]] 00:07, 24 March 2026 (UTC)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>42.book.addict</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=File:xkcdevent.jpg&amp;diff=408767</id>
		<title>File:xkcdevent.jpg</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=File:xkcdevent.jpg&amp;diff=408767"/>
				<updated>2026-03-24T03:08:14Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;42.book.addict: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Doesn't load in a web browser, works when viewed locally&lt;br /&gt;
==Licensing==&lt;br /&gt;
{{XKCD file}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:xkcd]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>42.book.addict</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=File:xkcd_website.png&amp;diff=408766</id>
		<title>File:xkcd website.png</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=File:xkcd_website.png&amp;diff=408766"/>
				<updated>2026-03-24T03:08:09Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;42.book.addict: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==Licensing==&lt;br /&gt;
{{XKCD file}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:xkcd]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>42.book.addict</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=File:xkcd_links.png&amp;diff=408765</id>
		<title>File:xkcd links.png</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=File:xkcd_links.png&amp;diff=408765"/>
				<updated>2026-03-24T03:08:05Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;42.book.addict: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==Licensing==&lt;br /&gt;
{{XKCD file}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:xkcd]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>42.book.addict</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=File:xkcd_header.png&amp;diff=408764</id>
		<title>File:xkcd header.png</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=File:xkcd_header.png&amp;diff=408764"/>
				<updated>2026-03-24T03:08:02Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;42.book.addict: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==Licensing==&lt;br /&gt;
{{XKCD file}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:xkcd]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>42.book.addict</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=File:xkcd_comic.png&amp;diff=408763</id>
		<title>File:xkcd comic.png</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=File:xkcd_comic.png&amp;diff=408763"/>
				<updated>2026-03-24T03:07:59Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;42.book.addict: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==Licensing==&lt;br /&gt;
{{XKCD file}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:xkcd]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>42.book.addict</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=File:xkcd_chat_Forum.PNG&amp;diff=408762</id>
		<title>File:xkcd chat Forum.PNG</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=File:xkcd_chat_Forum.PNG&amp;diff=408762"/>
				<updated>2026-03-24T03:07:53Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;42.book.addict: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==Licensing==&lt;br /&gt;
{{XKCD file}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:xkcd]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>42.book.addict</name></author>	</entry>

	</feed>