<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=66.214.89.97</id>
		<title>explain xkcd - User contributions [en]</title>
		<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=66.214.89.97"/>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php/Special:Contributions/66.214.89.97"/>
		<updated>2026-07-10T19:25:46Z</updated>
		<subtitle>User contributions</subtitle>
		<generator>MediaWiki 1.30.0</generator>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=179:_e_to_the_pi_times_i&amp;diff=10612</id>
		<title>179: e to the pi times i</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=179:_e_to_the_pi_times_i&amp;diff=10612"/>
				<updated>2012-08-26T05:06:21Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;66.214.89.97: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{comic&lt;br /&gt;
| horizontal = yes&lt;br /&gt;
| number    = 179&lt;br /&gt;
| date      = November 3, 2006&lt;br /&gt;
| title     = e to the pi times i&lt;br /&gt;
| image     = e_to_the_pi_times_i.png&lt;br /&gt;
| titletext = I have never been totally satisfied by the explanations for why e to the ix gives a sinusoidal wave.&lt;br /&gt;
| imagesize = &lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Explanation==&lt;br /&gt;
The comic largely references {{w|Euler's identify}}.  This identity states that e^(i*π) + 1 = 0.  Therefore, e^(i*π) = -1.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The humour from this comic is because of the seemingly arbitraty relationship between e, π, and the identity of i (the square root of -1). e is the mathematical identity of which the derivative of e^x with respect to x is still e^x, while π is the relationship between the circumfrance of a circle divided by its diameter.  Taking these two values and applying them to the value of i in such a manner seems counterintuitive to getting i^2 (-1) from basic analysis.  The above linked Wikipedia page goes into good detail of how to derive this identity.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The title text refers to how Euler's identity is called upon in complex form (separating real and imaginary numbers): e^(i*π) = cos(x) + i*sin(x).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{Comic discussion}}&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>66.214.89.97</name></author>	</entry>

	</feed>