<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=82.13.184.33</id>
		<title>explain xkcd - User contributions [en]</title>
		<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=82.13.184.33"/>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php/Special:Contributions/82.13.184.33"/>
		<updated>2026-04-15T03:29:16Z</updated>
		<subtitle>User contributions</subtitle>
		<generator>MediaWiki 1.30.0</generator>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=3232:_Countdown_Standard&amp;diff=410286</id>
		<title>3232: Countdown Standard</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=3232:_Countdown_Standard&amp;diff=410286"/>
				<updated>2026-04-14T14:46:41Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;82.13.184.33: /* Explanation */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{comic&lt;br /&gt;
| number    = 3232&lt;br /&gt;
| date      = April 13, 2026&lt;br /&gt;
| title     = Countdown Standard&lt;br /&gt;
| image     = countdown_standard_2x.png&lt;br /&gt;
| imagesize = 474x222px&lt;br /&gt;
| noexpand  = true&lt;br /&gt;
| titletext = Anyone who is caught counting 'three ... two ... one ... zero ... GO!' will be punished with a lifetime of eating only ISO standard food samples.&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Explanation==&lt;br /&gt;
{{incomplete|This page WILL BE CREATED IN TWO...THREE...ONE...NEGATIVE ONE...NOW! Don't remove this notice too soon.}}&lt;br /&gt;
This comic reflects the common {{tvtropes|OnThree|trope}} of people preparing for a synchronized action as a group (such as lifting something heavy) counting to get everybody to do the action at the same time, without first having agreed at what point in the count they will act. Two of the ways that people often count up can be confusing: the action can be taken ''on'' the beat of 'three', or on the beat ''after'' 'three'. If the people involved do not all have the same understanding, and so end up acting a beat apart, this could result in undesirable outcomes, such as damage, injury, or just a dispute over who was at fault.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This comic alleges that, if [[Randall]] gained control of the {{w|International Organization for Standardization}} (ISO), he would standardize counting to go ''down'' from three and have the 'go'-point be at zero. However, this proposal would be no better than counting up, as some people may expect to act on the 'one' or, as the title text suggests, to have a 'zero' before the 'go!', leading to exactly the same problems. Moreover, most people are unlikely to refer to the ISO before starting a countdown, and this is likely to simply lead to the problem outlined in [[927: Standards]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Deprecated&amp;quot; is a term applied to something that is no longer recommended for use, so you should fix things so as not to use it anymore. It is commonly used when a standard is replaced by a newer version or an alternative approach, but may still be in use in legacy applications. It is hard to imagine where this would be applicable in this case, since such countdowns tend to be short-lived affairs that would be unlikely to continue running for appreciable periods beyond the publication of the new standard.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The fact that these are called &amp;quot;countdowns&amp;quot;, yet the ones being complained about are counts that go ''up'', is probably intentional, and cause for additional irritation among those who are bothered by the inherent inconsistencies.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{w|ISO}} is an international organization that is responsible for standardizing many things (such as technology and safety standards) to allow for smooth interoperability between countries, manufacturers, and so on. However, it doesn't standardize everyday actions like countdowns. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are no &amp;quot;ISO standard food samples&amp;quot;, as mentioned in the title text, but the implication is that they would be unimaginably bland because they would be 'lowest common denominator' illustrations of the base definition of each food. There ''are'' NIST Standard Reference Materials for food, such as [https://shop.nist.gov/ccrz__ProductDetails?sku=2387 peanut butter] and &amp;quot;[https://shop.nist.gov/ccrz__ProductDetails?sku=1548b typical diet]&amp;quot;. {{w|ISO 3103}} also describes a standardized method for brewing tea, and hacker lore describes a supposed [http://www.catb.org/jargon/html/A/ANSI-standard-pizza.html &amp;quot;ANSI-standard pizza&amp;quot;]. Apparently eating these very bland foods is, in Randall's opinion, suitable punishment for doing “3, 2, 1, 0, Go!” for a countdown. This is a rather more robust level of enforcement than the ISO generally employs against violations of its standards.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Transcript==&lt;br /&gt;
{{incomplete transcript|Don't remove this notice too soon.}}&lt;br /&gt;
[the comic shows three different ways of counting down, with red crosses next to the first 2 (One, Two, Three!, &amp;amp; One, Two, Three, GO!, with 'deprecated' in red ink next to it. There also is a } sign next to the first 2, saying them as 'too easy to mix up'. The last one (Three, Two, One, GO!) is marked with a green tick, with 'ISO standard, next to the tick.]&lt;br /&gt;
]Caption below the comic:]&lt;br /&gt;
If I were in charge of ISO, the first thing I would do would be to standardize the way people count out loud before doing something in sync.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{comic discussion}}&amp;lt;noinclude&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>82.13.184.33</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:1179:_ISO_8601&amp;diff=410285</id>
		<title>Talk:1179: ISO 8601</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:1179:_ISO_8601&amp;diff=410285"/>
				<updated>2026-04-14T14:40:30Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;82.13.184.33: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Apparently there are some mistakes in the Roman numerals in the comic, the year MMXII is 2012. Also LVII/CCLXV = 57/265, whereas February 27th is the 58th day of the year (which has 365 days). --[[User:Ulm|ulm]] ([[User talk:Ulm|talk]]) 07:55, 27 February 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Just guessing, but could this have something to do with the divergence of various Roman calendars, e.g. Julian vs. Gregorian? [[Special:Contributions/98.122.166.235|98.122.166.235]] 13:55, 27 February 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Another error: Obviously 1330300800 is intended to be Unix time, but it corresponds to 2012-02-27 00:00:00 UTC. --[[User:Ulm|ulm]] ([[User talk:Ulm|talk]]) 08:10, 27 February 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:The day part &amp;quot;57&amp;quot; is not wrong: Since Feb 27 is the 58th day of the year, at the beginning of that day, 57 days have gone by since the year started. (At the end of the day, 58 days have gone by) Since we associate days with their beginning (like we do with e.g. hours and minutes), 57 is the correct number (or else Dec 31 would be 2013+365/365 = 2014, and therefore in the wrong year) -- [[User:Xorg|Xorg]] ([[User talk:Xorg|talk]]) 13:53, 27 February 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::The day part is ambiguous. It could be as Xorg suggests, the fraction of the year past at the start of the day. On the other hand it could be interpreted as &amp;quot;day 57 or 365,&amp;quot; as with pieces in a shipment or page numbers. In the latter case it should be 58/265. But then, that (ambiguity) is the point, isn't it? [[User:Jqavins|Jqavins]] ([[User talk:Jqavins|talk]]) 17:40, 27 February 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::Meanwhile the comic was replaced, with CCLXV corrected to CCCLXV. --[[User:Ulm|ulm]] ([[User talk:Ulm|talk]]) Prima vigilia, XVI Kal. Mar. MMDCCLXVI&lt;br /&gt;
::I was just about to publish my theory of how &amp;quot;2012&amp;quot; in the Roman numerals in just the same vein might be intended to indeed represent the year we denote &amp;quot;2013&amp;quot;, but by counting only the finished years. This would also connect with the confusion over {{w|year zero}}, another thing that ISO 8601 tried to straighten out. (They placed it before year 1.) Everything fit so well. Then there was an edit conflict, following Randalls correction to &amp;quot;2013&amp;quot;. I guess you can't always be right. –[[User:St.nerol|St.nerol]] ([[User talk:St.nerol|talk]]) 23:03, 27 February 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Can anyone explain 01237 (last interpretation before the cat)? Thanks [[Special:Contributions/68.230.38.154|68.230.38.154]] 08:04, 27 February 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:The small numbers above and below the larger ones show which digit is used where. For example, the 2nd and 5th digit is a 0, the 3rd digit is a 1 etc.  [[Special:Contributions/82.115.151.1|82.115.151.1]] 08:15, 27 February 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:01237 are the digits used in the date, and the numbers above and below them reflect the order in which they are written; 0 is the second and fifth digit, 1 is the third digit, 2 is the first, sixth and seventh digit, 3 is the fourth digit, and 7 is the eighth digit: 20130227 [[User:Bdemirci|Bdemirci]] ([[User talk:Bdemirci|talk]]) 08:15, 27 February 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Someone can explain me what means: ((3+3)×(111+1)-1)×3/3-1/3&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;? {{unsigned|95.23.147.48}}&lt;br /&gt;
:Read the comic explanation. '''[[User:Davidy22|&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;purple&amp;quot; title=&amp;quot;I want you&amp;quot;&amp;gt;David&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;green&amp;quot; size=&amp;quot;3px&amp;quot;&amp;gt;y&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;indigo&amp;quot; size=&amp;quot;4px&amp;quot;&amp;gt;²²&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;]]'''[[User talk:Davidy22|&amp;lt;tt&amp;gt;[talk]&amp;lt;/tt&amp;gt;]] 10:58, 27 February 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Many of these format mirror how the dates are spoken in languages. For example, Americans will say &amp;quot;February 27, 2013&amp;quot; and write &amp;quot;2/27/2013&amp;quot;, whereas the French will say &amp;quot;27 février 2013&amp;quot; and write &amp;quot;27-02-2013&amp;quot;. As a scientist, I was encouraged to write &amp;quot;27 II 2013&amp;quot; (which is apparently standard in Hungary, according to the explanation above) in my lab notebook to avoid ambiguity. --[[User:Prooffreader|Prooffreader]] ([[User talk:Prooffreader|talk]]) 13:16, 28 February 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A strange thing is that he forgot the form mostly used in Europe: 27.01.2013. --[[User:DaB.|DaB.]] ([[User talk:DaB.|talk]]) 12:44, 27 February 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:: That form is mostly used in Germany. Belgium and France use 27/01/2013 more, Netherlands use 27-01-2013. No idea what the UK prefers although I could imagine 01.27.2013.[[Special:Contributions/62.159.14.62|62.159.14.62]] 12:58, 27 February 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::: The UK prefers 27/02/2013 --[[User:H|H]] ([[User talk:H|talk]]) 13:20, 27 February 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::: That form (27.02.2013) is also common in all of Scandinavia. --[[User:Buggz|Buggz]] ([[User talk:Buggz|talk]]) 14:15, 27 February 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::::It's also widely used in Poland, alongside with 27 II 2013, mentioned above, and also in the comic (though we use space as separator in this format, rather than dot) [[Special:Contributions/162.158.88.206|162.158.88.206]] 23:05, 10 January 2017 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The image text has a subtle twist as  &amp;quot;12/01/04&amp;quot; offers no contextual clues to it meaning at all, can be read three different ways : &amp;quot;December 1st 2004&amp;quot;, &amp;quot;January 12, 2004&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;January 4th, 2012&amp;quot;  (as opposed to, for example, &amp;quot;01/15/98&amp;quot; which could only be interrupted as &amp;quot;January 15th, 1998&amp;quot;) [[User:JamesCurran|JamesCurran]] ([[User talk:JamesCurran|talk]]) 14:29, 27 February 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
: Technically speaking, it could also be interpreted as April 1st 2012 or April 12th 2001, though that would be the least likely interpretation. I personally like spelling out 3 letters of the month and using an apostrophe before the year, such as 27 Feb '13. --[[User:Joehammer79|Joehammer79]] ([[User talk:Joehammer79|talk]]) 15:07, 27 February 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:: And of course December, 4th 2001 Sebastian --[[Special:Contributions/178.26.118.249|178.26.118.249]] 19:54, 27 February 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Is there any way to convert the time-stamp placed on these comments to the YYYY-MM-DD format?  --16:17, 27 February 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
: If you're logged in, you can set your [[Special:Preferences#mw-prefsection-datetime|date and time preferences]].  I doubt it will affect the timestamps on this page, though, since those appear to be saved as plain text.  --[[User:Aaron of Mpls|Aaron of Mpls]] ([[User talk:Aaron of Mpls|talk]]) 23:01, 27 February 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I feel like the cat thing is a reference to something, but I'm not sure what... is it something?  A quick google image search pulls up nothing. --[[User:Jeff|&amp;lt;b&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;orange&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Jeff&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/b&amp;gt;]] ([[User talk:Jeff|talk]]) 17:26, 27 February 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
: Seems to me that Randall missed an opportunity: Why a cat? Why not a '''bob'''cat? It still could be some other reference that I'm missing too.&lt;br /&gt;
:: Black cats are considered unlucky.  I don't see any reference beyond that. [[User:Mattflaschen|Mattflaschen]] ([[User talk:Mattflaschen|talk]]) 17:59, 27 February 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::: It's taking the last two digits from 2013 and emphasizing triskaidekaphobia. Doing a web image search on &amp;quot;Cat 13&amp;quot; will pull up similar artwork of hissing black cats combined with the number 13, including both flyers for Friday 13th drink specials at bars, and combat airplane noseart. Apparently combining the unlucky &amp;quot;13&amp;quot; with an unlucky black cat emphasized that they were bad luck for the enemy. [[User:Columbus Admission|Columbus Admission]] ([[User talk:Columbus Admission|talk]]) 19:20, 27 February 2013 (UTC) &lt;br /&gt;
:::: &amp;quot;You're a Kitty!&amp;quot; http://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=231&lt;br /&gt;
::::: The cat's &amp;quot;Hissss&amp;quot; could be a reference to timestamp formats in PHP web programming, where the desired date format is generally followed by &amp;quot;H:i:s&amp;quot;, the standard 24-hour time format. That would explain the specifically lowercase &amp;quot;i&amp;quot; in the cat's hiss.[[Special:Contributions/208.87.234.180|208.87.234.180]] 13:28, 22 March 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:: It might be a reference to Industrial Workers of the World; IWW frequently used a hissing black cat as a symbol, especially in reference to sabotage and so-called &amp;quot;wildcat strikes,&amp;quot; and the illustration used resembles the one seen here [https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/b/b1/Anarchist_black_cat.svg] [[Special:Contributions/172.70.214.151|172.70.214.151]] 22:08, 1 December 2022 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Cool, this is my birthday. [[User:Mattflaschen|Mattflaschen]] ([[User talk:Mattflaschen|talk]]) 17:59, 27 February 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;However the list then starts listing formats ranging from uncommon to absurd, such as writing the date partly in Roman numerals [...] &amp;quot; - &lt;br /&gt;
My math teacher uses a very similar format (in reverse order, d/m/yy, with m being in Roman numerals, because this is Germany (see above)), so I wouldn't call it absurd. She is the only person I know who uses it though. [[Special:Contributions/87.189.150.212|87.189.150.212]] 19:36, 27 February 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The image and explanation needs to be updated for the corrections.  I could do the explanation part, but I have no idea how to do the image part.  And one without the other would be confusing for the readers, so I'll leave that to wiki-magic. [[Special:Contributions/76.106.251.87|76.106.251.87]] 21:09, 27 February 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: I updated the image as well as the explanation (and transcript). There is still the error on the Unix timestamp though (will this comic be fixed a third time?...). - [[User:Cos|Cos]] ([[User talk:Cos|talk]]) 21:57, 27 February 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Sweden uses the ISO 8601 format. (If only food producers could understand this as well..)&lt;br /&gt;
[[Special:Contributions/46.59.16.141|46.59.16.141]] 21:42, 27 February 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- What can we learn from this? - I've learned that no matter the system we use today to communicate with others, it's probably seems silly for someone else. It's great to document what we do and propose it as an option to others, but it will be next to impossible to force them to adopt. When someone will develop a time reference that makes sense to everyone, it will be adopted all over the world without much effort. - e-inspired [[Special:Contributions/24.51.197.187|24.51.197.187]] 19:07, 27 February 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Perhaps the cat (because of the vagueness of the system) was referring to not the 27th of February 2013. but instead referring to the 13th of February in 1327 which would make it Friday the 13th. {{unsigned|66.35.1.98}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Just so you know, Explainxkcd wiki uses the ISO certified date standard for its &amp;quot;All Comics&amp;quot; page. '''[[User:Davidy22|&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;purple&amp;quot; title=&amp;quot;I want you&amp;quot;&amp;gt;David&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;green&amp;quot; size=&amp;quot;3px&amp;quot;&amp;gt;y&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;indigo&amp;quot; size=&amp;quot;4px&amp;quot;&amp;gt;²²&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;]]'''[[User talk:Davidy22|&amp;lt;tt&amp;gt;[talk]&amp;lt;/tt&amp;gt;]] 01:57, 28 February 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Personally I've always preferred to use Year-Month-Day my personal stuff. I like it because the format is written the way we write any other number: Most significant to left, least significant to right. I didn't know this was a standardized method and I've always wondered why it wasn't used. Nice to know it is![[Special:Contributions/172.191.224.64|172.191.224.64]] 04:09, 28 February 2013 (UTC)ExternalMonologue&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Personally, I like yyyy-mm-dd because it sorts correctly.  I really hate running into a list of dates sorted by month name, or worse, day of the week.  I suspect this was part of why ISO chose this format.  I've never been able to remember the american vs european ordering...  My only other options is: February 27, 2013.  [[User:Divad27182|Divad27182]] ([[User talk:Divad27182|talk]]) 12:11, 28 February 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: I'm not sure what standard the Canadian Military officially uses, but as soldiers we were all taught to use a &amp;quot;7 Feb 2013&amp;quot; format when writing dates.  Seems the most clear and concise to me. {{unsigned|24.85.225.143}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:: Most of the dates I've seen used by the Canadian Military have been of that format but have only used 2-digit years - e.g. 27 Feb 13 (they didn't learn from Y2K!) {{unsigned|64.140.113.219}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- What can we learn from this? - I've learned that keeping our time relative to earth rotation is outdated, we keep having to add seconds here and there just to keep time. And as an engineer don't get me started on complexity of mktime function. I personally think of time as oscillation of a flawed crystal in my circuits that I constantly need to keep accounting for through endless calibrations, and keep wishing that better time references would be cheaper (to me good is never good enough) - [[User:E-inspired|E-inspired]] ([[User talk:E-inspired|talk]]) 15:05, 28 February 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ha ha E-inspired you should read the &amp;quot;falsehoods programmers believe about times&amp;quot; http://infiniteundo.com/post/25326999628/falsehoods-programmers-believe-about-time http://infiniteundo.com/post/25509354022/more-falsehoods-programmers-believe-about-time-wisdom [[Special:Contributions/75.103.23.206|75.103.23.206]] 20:14, 28 February 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Dude, you've just made my DAY! I forgot the last time I've laughed as hard. Why didn't I know about this site before? - [[User:E-inspired|E-inspired]] ([[User talk:E-inspired|talk]]) 20:43, 28 February 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Why is the date of this comic written as &amp;quot;February 27, 2013&amp;quot; and not &amp;quot;2013-02-27&amp;quot;? [[Special:Contributions/93.73.186.104|93.73.186.104]] 08:46, 14 March 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The hover hint says &amp;quot;ISO 8601 was published on 06/05/88 and most recently amended on 12/01/04.&amp;quot; which must be a joke - because it is impossible to know whether these days are 6 May 1988 and 12 January 2004 or 5 June 1988 and 1 December 2004. Why make a comic about ISO 8601 then use ambiguous dates in the hint? {{unsigned ip|141.101.98.95}}&lt;br /&gt;
:I had always assumed that the title text was poking fun at ISO for not complying with their own standard.  Looking at the ISO website today, I'm disappointed to find that this is, in fact, not the case.  Perhaps three years ago it was.  [[User:Zeusfaber|Zeusfaber]] ([[User talk:Zeusfaber|talk]]) 17:07, 9 July 2016 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Amateurs, you don't put periods in format with roman month number. So it's 27 II 2012 [[Special:Contributions/141.101.89.209|141.101.89.209]] 12:48, 20 April 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The chief advantage of the American system is that placing the year last makes it easy to simply drop the year in casual conversation, given how slowly years change.  While it might technically follow just as logically to have the day precede the month, in practice the sequence means less for the first two numbers.  The 31 days or fewer between month changes are relatively frequent, while the 365.25 days between year changes can easily go &amp;quot;out of sight, out of mind&amp;quot; except when approaching a transition.  In either case, placing the nigh-irrelevant year number first in the text string causes the reader to pay attention to that number first, and have to &amp;quot;skip ahead&amp;quot; to discover the month and day, when in truth the day is the most salient datapoint. [[Special:Contributions/173.245.54.52|173.245.54.52]] 20:58, 29 October 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
: Hmm... The comic's point is about '''writing''' dates as '''numbers'''... [[Special:Contributions/162.158.180.215|162.158.180.215]] 09:47, 13 November 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
: Don't write &amp;quot;America&amp;quot; when you mean &amp;quot;USA&amp;quot;. In most of America (and most of the rest of the world) the traditional order is D/M/Y, which makes it even simpler to drop more significant parts in casual conversation. E.g. &amp;quot;it's the 27th of February 2013&amp;quot; becomes &amp;quot;it's the 27th of February&amp;quot; when the year is known and just &amp;quot;it's the 27th&amp;quot; when also the month is known. In my country we traditionally had D/M/Y but we are approaching ISO inch by inch. Personally I've used ISO and four digit year since around 1997. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Date_format_by_country /David A [[Special:Contributions/141.101.80.33|141.101.80.33]] 22:01, 23 September 2016 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Source for the claim about the Swedish date format. I have never seen it, we have been using the ISO-format since before it was defined (I started school 1980 and learned to write dates in the first year or two), not even in old books, movies or similar.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Re: [https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=1179:_ISO_8601&amp;amp;oldid=223421 undoing to a 'working' version] of the penultimate format... Undid version isn't perfect (superscripts and subscripts still prior/next characters from nominally-scripted main digits, rather than above and below), but this one doesn't work at all here. Looks like (describing, in leiu of reliable rendering)... Zero, One, Two-with-small-two-as-cap Three Seven (lower-script Three One Four, in-line) Five Six Seven Eight.  ...essentially, just one off-size number is conceivably placed where it might be, and even that isn't on the right 'parent' character.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ruby&amp;gt;&amp;lt;rb&amp;gt;0&amp;lt;/rb&amp;gt;&amp;lt;rt&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/rt&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ruby&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ruby&amp;gt;&amp;lt;rb&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/rb&amp;gt;&amp;lt;rt&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/rt&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ruby&amp;gt; (displays correctly on one computer, fails on another)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This clearly is not rendering properly, but not sure how without extensive fiddling that'll ''probably'' break things on the browser that currently thinks this reversion renders correctly. Perhaps yet ''another'' method of text-mangling is needed in this case? [[Special:Contributions/141.101.99.32|141.101.99.32]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Usually I’m pretty apathetic about America moving to any global standard (I ''like'' imperial units, they’re a lot more usefully sized), but I really want it to switch to YYYY/MM/DD just to mess with people on the internet (Europeans mostly, from what I can tell) who absolutely insist that DD/MM/YYYY is the only format that “normal” people use. Plus then the yearless format would stay the same — both would be MM/DD. [[User:Intara|Intara]] ([[User talk:Intara|talk]]) 03:41, 14 February 2023 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:As a 'European' (well, for ''part'' of my life, being in the UK) and being active in Y2K mitigation across a US-owned corporation.  I normally default to DD/Mmm/YYYY, to make it abundantly clear to people what I mean, but will go with YYYYMMDD (with optional hhmm[ss[.dd]]] appended) for computerised instances where I've got no pre-existing preference (e.g. days-since-Epoch or ISO format) already there or in the pipeline. The detection and conversion of the intended format is usually easy enough, for both human and electronic recipients (if suitably clued up, in both cases, e.g. knowing the English names for months and thus their unique abbrvs). And if someone converts DD/Mmm/YYYY to Mmm/DD/YYYY then I won't quibble too much, as they're sufficiently disambiguating their (odd) preference as well! [[Special:Contributions/172.70.230.114|172.70.230.114]] 14:12, 14 February 2023 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
They didn't mention Julian Day. It uses just one real number. [[Special:Contributions/172.69.134.70|172.69.134.70]] 00:20, 3 July 2023 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We Germans still use DD.MM.YY most of the time, although our law requires us to use YYYY-MM-DD. I am really angry at Microsoft, because since Windows 10 the default german format is DD-MM-YYYY, which is ''simply wrong'', no matter from which perspective. --[[Special:Contributions/162.158.94.197|162.158.94.197]] 05:12, 29 September 2023 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
i think all of the alternatives are ok [[User:Squishmallow fan]] ([[User talk:Squishmallow fan|talk]]) 2024.10958904109&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>82.13.184.33</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=1179:_ISO_8601&amp;diff=410283</id>
		<title>1179: ISO 8601</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=1179:_ISO_8601&amp;diff=410283"/>
				<updated>2026-04-14T14:37:08Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;82.13.184.33: /* Explanation */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{comic&lt;br /&gt;
| number    = 1179&lt;br /&gt;
| date      = February 27, 2013&lt;br /&gt;
| title     = ISO 8601&lt;br /&gt;
| image     = iso_8601.png&lt;br /&gt;
| titletext = ISO 8601 was published on 06/05/88 and most recently amended on 12/01/04.&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Explanation==&lt;br /&gt;
When abbreviating the date into numerical form, {{w|Date format by country|various areas of the world}} tend to list the year, month, and day in different orders (as well as with different delimiting symbols), which can cause confusion, particularly when the day value is 12 or lower, allowing it to be easily interpreted as the month and vice versa. As a {{w|public service announcement}}, this comic states that there is in fact one international standard for writing numeric dates, set by the {{w|International Organization for Standardization}} in its {{w|ISO 8601}} standard: YYYY-MM-DD.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The comic then proceeds to list several discouraged ways of writing out the date of the comic's publication, as they do not match the standard. It begins with several commonly used ones in countries around the world but then begins to list increasingly uncommon ways, ranging from strange (Roman numerals) to quirky (binary, Unix time) to essentially impossible (painting the numbers onto a black cat).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The title text provides a perfect example of the kind of ambiguity that can arise when non-standard formats are used. The ISO standard was in fact published on 1988-06-05 and amended on 2004-12-01. This is mentioned in the title text in MM/DD/YY format; however, there is no way to naturally figure this out, particularly with the second date.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
With the year truncated to two digits and all three numbers at 12 or lower, the date referring to December 1, 2004 (the digits pairs 12, 01 and 04) has a number of misinterpretations. Usually 12&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;th&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; Jan '04 (if written as US-style but read as European, or vice-versa) but with ISO-influenced &amp;quot;YY MM DD&amp;quot; ordering as one side or other of the misunderstanding it can easily become the 12&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;th&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; day of April 2001, the 4&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;th&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; day of December 2001 and the 4&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;th&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; of January 2012. It takes two such communication errors to 'become' the 1&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;st&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; day of April 2012. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Date formats were again the subject in [[1340: Unique Date]] and [[2562: Formatting Meeting]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The other mentioned formats are:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
;02/27/2013:MM/DD/YYYY, used mostly in the [https://www.trustedtranslations.com/blog/how-are-dates-written-in-different-countries United States, Belize, and Micronesia].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
;02/27/13:MM/DD/YY, same as above but with the year shortened to two digits.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
;27/02/2013:DD/MM/YYYY, used variously in South America, Canada ({{w|Date_and_time_notation_in_Canada|officially uses ISO 8601}}), Australia, New Zealand, and much of Europe.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
;27/02/13:DD/MM/YY, same as above but with the year shortened to two digits.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
;20130227:YYYYMMDD, same as ISO 8601 without delimiting punctuation. Allowed by the standard. Technically not ambiguous but is hard to read as a date at first glance.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
;2013.02.27:YYYY.MM.DD, used in Japan, South Korea, and Hungary. Same as ISO 8601 except with different punctuation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
;27.02.13:DD.MM.YY, used in Germany, Russia, and others.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
;27-02-13:DD-MM-YY, used in Denmark, Netherlands, Indonesia, India, Bangladesh, and others.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
;27.2.13:D.M.YY. It is common in several areas to abbreviate the month or day to a single digit and drop the leading zero when possible.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
;2013. II. 27.:YYYY. MM. DD., with month as {{w|Roman numerals}}, used in Hungary. In this format, February and November are prone to be confused with each other: &amp;quot;II&amp;quot; vs. &amp;quot;11&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Similar formats with the opposite ordering (27. II. 2013) existed historically in various European countries like France, Germany, and Italy. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;27&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;⁄&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-13:&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;D&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;⁄&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;M&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-YY, traditional format in Denmark, Norway, and Sweden. To those unfamiliar with it, could look like a mathematical expression - in this case, 27 divided by 2, minus 13 (giving 1/2).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
;2013.158904109:Year and decimal fraction of year. 0.158904109 is a decimal approximation of 58/365, with February 27 being the 58th day of the year. This format may be easier to read for computers/programs in some contexts, but is difficult for humans to interpret.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
;MMXIII-II-XXVII:The ISO 8601 standard but written in Roman numerals. Never used as a traditional standard anywhere as it is hard to read, parse, and interpret for no benefit.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
;MMXIII &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;LVII&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;⁄&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;CCCLXV&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;:Year followed by its partial fraction 57/365, all in Roman numerals. Equally useless as the above. As a note, apparently this 'standard' is different from the decimal fraction two rows above, as the decimal fraction notation uses the ''end'' of the day (first day of the year is 1/365 while the last is 365/365), while this uses the ''beginning'' (first day is 0/365 and last is 364/365).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
;1330300800:{{w|Unix time|UNIX Timestamp}}, a standard method of storing absolute time in many computer systems and defined as the number of seconds since 00:00:00 on 1970-01-01 (UTC). The Unix time listed here appears to mistakenly be for '''2012'''-02-27, which is also mentioned by [[Randall]] in the original transcript. The Unix Timestamp for 2013-02-27 would be 1361923200.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
;((3+3)×(111+1)-1)×3/3-1/3&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;:A useless format where the numbers 2013, 2, and 27 are written as needlessly long arithmetic expressions using just the digits 1 and 3. For additional confusion, the values are delimited by slashes, enabling confusion with the fraction bar. (If evaluated literally, the entire expression evaluates to 670.963, or 671 minus one twenty-seventh.)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;position:absolute;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;2&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;position:absolute;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;27&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;position:absolute;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;2013&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;amp;nbsp;:A nearly impossible to read date &amp;quot;format&amp;quot; that can be considered a parody &amp;quot;compromise&amp;quot; between different formats: rather than argue about the order in which the year, month, and day should be, they are simply all written on top of each other. As a &amp;quot;bonus&amp;quot;, there is also no arguing over which separator character to use.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
;10/11011/1101:The US mm/dd/yy format in {{w|Binary number|binary}}, corresponding to 2/27/13. Never used for obvious reasons.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
;02/27/20/13:MM/DD/CC/YY, where CC stands for century. This format is never used. Note that while months and days count starting from 1, centuries and years in this format count from 0 for extra confusion. But the CC value is widely used on many operating systems to distinguish between the 20th and 21st century, represented by the values &amp;quot;19&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;20&amp;quot; because 1950 belongs to the 20th century.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
;&amp;lt;table style=&amp;quot;display: inline-table; line-height: 0.6em; align: middle; text-size-adjust: none;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;tr style=&amp;quot;font-size:7pt; text-align: center&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/tr&amp;gt;&amp;lt;tr style=&amp;quot;text-align: center&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;0&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;7&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/tr&amp;gt;&amp;lt;tr style=&amp;quot;font-size:7pt; text-align: center&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;5&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;67&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;8&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/tr&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/table&amp;gt;:An obfuscated format where the small numbers indicate the positions where the respective large digits should be placed. In this reading, 0 is used at positions 2 and 5, 1 is used on position 3, etc. Coincidentally or not, positions 1 to 4 (the year) being all placed above their digits and 5 to 8 (month and day) below; the result being 20130227&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
;[A hissing black cat with &amp;quot;2-27-13&amp;quot; painted on it]:In Western cultures, black cats and the number 13 are associated with bad luck. The cat might also just be angry that someone covered it in paint. Or maybe this is really the correct way.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Transcript==&lt;br /&gt;
:Public Service Announcement:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Our different ways of writing dates as numbers can lead to online confusion. That's why in 1988 ISO set a global standard numeric date format. This is '''''the''''' correct way to write numeric dates:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::2013-02-27&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The following formats are therefore discouraged:&lt;br /&gt;
:*02/27/2013&lt;br /&gt;
:*02/27/13&lt;br /&gt;
:*27/02/2013&lt;br /&gt;
:*27/02/13&lt;br /&gt;
:*20130227&lt;br /&gt;
:*2013.02.27&lt;br /&gt;
:*27.02.13&lt;br /&gt;
:*27-02-13&lt;br /&gt;
:*27.2.13&lt;br /&gt;
:*2013. II. 27.&lt;br /&gt;
:*&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;27&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;⁄&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-13&lt;br /&gt;
:*2013.158904109&lt;br /&gt;
:*MMXIII-II-XXVII&lt;br /&gt;
:*MMXIII &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;LVII&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;⁄&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;CCCLXV&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:*1330300800&lt;br /&gt;
:*((3+3)×(111+1)-1)×3/3-1/3&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:*&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;position:absolute;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;2&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;position:absolute;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;27&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;2013 [the numbers 2013, 02, and 27 written overlapping each other]&lt;br /&gt;
:*10/11011/1101&lt;br /&gt;
:*02/27/20/13&lt;br /&gt;
:*&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;0&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;5&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;67&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;37&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;8&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:*[A black cat with 2-27-13 scrawled across their body in dripping white paint.]&lt;br /&gt;
:**Cat: ''Hissss''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{comic discussion}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Math]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Calendar]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Binary]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Public service announcement]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Cats]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>82.13.184.33</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=1179:_ISO_8601&amp;diff=410282</id>
		<title>1179: ISO 8601</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=1179:_ISO_8601&amp;diff=410282"/>
				<updated>2026-04-14T14:35:09Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;82.13.184.33: /* Explanation */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{comic&lt;br /&gt;
| number    = 1179&lt;br /&gt;
| date      = February 27, 2013&lt;br /&gt;
| title     = ISO 8601&lt;br /&gt;
| image     = iso_8601.png&lt;br /&gt;
| titletext = ISO 8601 was published on 06/05/88 and most recently amended on 12/01/04.&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Explanation==&lt;br /&gt;
When abbreviating the date into numerical form, {{w|Date format by country|various areas of the world}} tend to list the year, month, and day in different orders (as well as with different delimiting symbols), which can cause confusion, particularly when the day value is 12 or lower, allowing it to be easily interpreted as the month and vice versa. As a {{w|public service announcement}}, this comic states that there is in fact one international standard for writing numeric dates, set by the {{w|International Organization for Standardization}} in its {{w|ISO 8601}} standard: YYYY-MM-DD.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The comic then proceeds to list several discouraged ways of writing out the date of the comic's publication, as they do not match the standard. It begins with several commonly used ones in countries around the world but then begins to list increasingly uncommon ways, ranging from strange (Roman numerals) to quirky (binary, Unix time) to essentially impossible (painting the numbers onto a black cat).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The title text provides a perfect example of the kind of ambiguity that can arise when non-standard formats are used. The ISO standard was in fact published on 1988-06-05 and amended on 2004-12-01. This is mentioned in the title text in MM/DD/YY format; however, there is no way to naturally figure this out, particularly with the second date.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
With the year truncated to two digits and all three numbers at 12 or lower, the date referring to December 1, 2004 (the digits pairs 12, 01 and 04) has a number of misinterpretations. Usually 12&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;th&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; Jan '04 (if written as US-style but read as European, or vice-versa) but with ISO-influenced &amp;quot;YY MM DD&amp;quot; ordering as one side or other of the misunderstanding it can easily become the 12&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;th&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; day of April 2001, the 4&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;th&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; day of December 2001 and the 4&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;th&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; of January 2012. It takes two such communication errors to 'become' the 1&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;st&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; day of April 2012. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Date formats were again the subject in [[1340: Unique Date]] and [[2562: Formatting Meeting]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The other mentioned formats are:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
;02/27/2013:MM/DD/YYYY, used mostly in the [https://www.trustedtranslations.com/blog/how-are-dates-written-in-different-countries United States, Belize, and Micronesia].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
;02/27/13:MM/DD/YY, same as above but with the year shortened to two digits.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
;27/02/2013:DD/MM/YYYY, used variously in South America, Canada ({{w|Date_and_time_notation_in_Canada|officially uses ISO 8601}}), Australia, New Zealand, and much of Europe.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
;27/02/13:DD/MM/YY, same as above but with the year shortened to two digits.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
;20130227:YYYYMMDD, same as ISO 8601 without delimiting punctuation. Allowed by the standard. Technically not ambiguous but is hard to read as a date at first glance.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
;2013.02.27:YYYY.MM.DD, used in Japan, South Korea, and Hungary. Same as ISO 8601 except with different punctuation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
;27.02.13:DD.MM.YY, used in Germany, Russia, and others.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
;27-02-13:DD-MM-YY, used in Denmark, Netherlands, Indonesia, India, Bangladesh, and others.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
;27.2.13:D.M.YY. It is common in several areas to abbreviate the month or day to a single digit and drop the leading zero when possible.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
;2013. II. 27.:YYYY. MM. DD., with month as {{w|Roman numerals}}, used in Hungary. In this format, February and November are prone to be confused with each other: &amp;quot;II&amp;quot; vs. &amp;quot;11&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Similar formats with the opposite ordering (27. II. 2013) existed historically in various European countries like France, Germany, and Italy. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;27&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;⁄&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-13:&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;D&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;⁄&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;M&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-YY, traditional format in Denmark, Norway, and Sweden. To those unfamiliar with it, could look like a mathematical expression - in this case, 27 divided by 2, minus 13 (giving 1/2).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
;2013.158904109:Year and decimal fraction of year. 0.158904109 is a decimal approximation of 58/365, with February 27 being the 58th day of the year. This format may be easier to read for computers/programs in some contexts, but is difficult for humans to interpret.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
;MMXIII-II-XXVII:The ISO 8601 standard but written in Roman numerals. Never used as a traditional standard anywhere as it is hard to read, parse, and interpret for no benefit.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
;MMXIII &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;LVII&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;⁄&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;CCCLXV&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;:Year followed by its partial fraction 57/365, all in Roman numerals. Equally useless as the above. As a note, apparently this 'standard' is different from the decimal fraction two rows above, as the decimal fraction notation uses the ''end'' of the day (first day of the year is 1/365 while the last is 365/365), while this uses the ''beginning'' (first day is 0/365 and last is 364/365).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
;1330300800:{{w|Unix time|UNIX Timestamp}}, a standard method of storing absolute time in many computer systems and defined as the number of seconds since 00:00:00 on 1970-01-01 (UTC). The Unix time listed here appears to mistakenly be for '''2012'''-02-27, which is also mentioned by [[Randall]] in the original transcript. The Unix Timestamp for 2013-02-27 would be 1361923200.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
;((3+3)×(111+1)-1)×3/3-1/3&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;:A useless format where the numbers 2013, 2, and 27 written as needlessly long arithmetic expressions using just the digits 1 and 3. For additional confusion, the values are delimited by slashes, enabling confusion with the fraction bar. (If evaluated literally, the entire expression evaluates to 670.963, or 671 minus one twenty-seventh.)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;position:absolute;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;2&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;position:absolute;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;27&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;position:absolute;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;2013&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;amp;nbsp;:A nearly impossible to read date &amp;quot;format&amp;quot; that can be considered a parody &amp;quot;compromise&amp;quot; between different formats: rather than argue about the order in which the year, month, and day should be, they are simply all written on top of each other. As a &amp;quot;bonus&amp;quot;, there is also no arguing over which separator character to use.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
;10/11011/1101:The US mm/dd/yy format in {{w|Binary number|binary}}, corresponding to 2/27/13. Never used for obvious reasons.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
;02/27/20/13:MM/DD/CC/YY, where CC stands for century. This format is never used. Note that while months and days count starting from 1, centuries and years in this format count from 0 for extra confusion. But the CC value is widely used on many operating systems to distinguish between the 20th and 21st century, represented by the values &amp;quot;19&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;20&amp;quot; because 1950 belongs to the 20th century.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
;&amp;lt;table style=&amp;quot;display: inline-table; line-height: 0.6em; align: middle; text-size-adjust: none;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;tr style=&amp;quot;font-size:7pt; text-align: center&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/tr&amp;gt;&amp;lt;tr style=&amp;quot;text-align: center&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;0&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;7&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/tr&amp;gt;&amp;lt;tr style=&amp;quot;font-size:7pt; text-align: center&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;5&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;67&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;8&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/tr&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/table&amp;gt;:An obfuscated format where the small numbers indicate the positions where the respective large digits should be placed. In this reading, 0 is used at positions 2 and 5, 1 is used on position 3, etc. Coincidentally or not, positions 1 to 4 (the year) being all placed above their digits and 5 to 8 (month and day) below; the result being 20130227&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
;[A hissing black cat with &amp;quot;2-27-13&amp;quot; painted on it]:In Western cultures, black cats and the number 13 are associated with bad luck. The cat might also just be angry that someone covered it in paint. Or maybe this is really the correct way.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Transcript==&lt;br /&gt;
:Public Service Announcement:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Our different ways of writing dates as numbers can lead to online confusion. That's why in 1988 ISO set a global standard numeric date format. This is '''''the''''' correct way to write numeric dates:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::2013-02-27&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The following formats are therefore discouraged:&lt;br /&gt;
:*02/27/2013&lt;br /&gt;
:*02/27/13&lt;br /&gt;
:*27/02/2013&lt;br /&gt;
:*27/02/13&lt;br /&gt;
:*20130227&lt;br /&gt;
:*2013.02.27&lt;br /&gt;
:*27.02.13&lt;br /&gt;
:*27-02-13&lt;br /&gt;
:*27.2.13&lt;br /&gt;
:*2013. II. 27.&lt;br /&gt;
:*&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;27&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;⁄&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-13&lt;br /&gt;
:*2013.158904109&lt;br /&gt;
:*MMXIII-II-XXVII&lt;br /&gt;
:*MMXIII &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;LVII&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;⁄&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;CCCLXV&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:*1330300800&lt;br /&gt;
:*((3+3)×(111+1)-1)×3/3-1/3&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:*&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;position:absolute;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;2&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;position:absolute;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;27&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;2013 [the numbers 2013, 02, and 27 written overlapping each other]&lt;br /&gt;
:*10/11011/1101&lt;br /&gt;
:*02/27/20/13&lt;br /&gt;
:*&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;0&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;5&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;67&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;37&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;8&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:*[A black cat with 2-27-13 scrawled across their body in dripping white paint.]&lt;br /&gt;
:**Cat: ''Hissss''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{comic discussion}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Math]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Calendar]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Binary]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Public service announcement]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Cats]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>82.13.184.33</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=3232:_Countdown_Standard&amp;diff=410280</id>
		<title>3232: Countdown Standard</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=3232:_Countdown_Standard&amp;diff=410280"/>
				<updated>2026-04-14T14:27:11Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;82.13.184.33: /* Explanation */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{comic&lt;br /&gt;
| number    = 3232&lt;br /&gt;
| date      = April 13, 2026&lt;br /&gt;
| title     = Countdown Standard&lt;br /&gt;
| image     = countdown_standard_2x.png&lt;br /&gt;
| imagesize = 474x222px&lt;br /&gt;
| noexpand  = true&lt;br /&gt;
| titletext = Anyone who is caught counting 'three ... two ... one ... zero ... GO!' will be punished with a lifetime of eating only ISO standard food samples.&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Explanation==&lt;br /&gt;
{{incomplete|This page WILL BE CREATED IN TWO...THREE...ONE...NEGATIVE ONE...NOW! Don't remove this notice too soon.}}&lt;br /&gt;
This comic reflects the common trope of people preparing for a synchronized action as a group (such as lifting something heavy) counting to get everybody to do the action at the same time, without first having agreed at what point in the count they will act. Two of the ways that people often count up can be confusing: the action can be taken ''on'' the beat of 'three', or on the beat ''after'' 'three'. If the people involved do not all have the same understanding, and so end up acting a beat apart, this could result in undesirable outcomes, such as damage, injury, or just a dispute over who was at fault.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This comic alleges that, if [[Randall]] gained control of the {{w|International Organization for Standardization}} (ISO), he would standardize counting to go ''down'' from three and have the 'go'-point be at zero. However, this proposal would be no better than counting up, as some people may expect to act on the 'one' or, as the title text suggests, to have a 'zero' before the 'go!', leading to exactly the same problems. Moreover, most people are unlikely to refer to the ISO before starting a countdown, and this is likely to simply lead to the problem outlined in [[927: Standards]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Deprecated&amp;quot; is a term applied to something that is no longer recommended for use, so you should fix things so as not to use it anymore. It is commonly used when a standard is replaced by a newer version or an alternative approach, but may still be in use in legacy applications. It is hard to imagine where this would be applicable in this case, since such countdowns tend to be short-lived affairs that would be unlikely to continue running for appreciable periods beyond the publication of the new standard.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The fact that these are called &amp;quot;countdowns&amp;quot;, yet the ones being complained about are counts that go ''up'', is probably intentional, and cause for additional irritation among those who are bothered by the inherent inconsistencies.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{w|ISO}} is an international organization that is responsible for standardizing many things (such as technology and safety standards) to allow for smooth interoperability between countries, manufacturers, and so on. However, it doesn't standardize everyday actions like countdowns. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are no &amp;quot;ISO standard food samples&amp;quot;, as mentioned in the title text, but the implication is that they would be unimaginably bland because they would be 'lowest common denominator' illustrations of the base definition of each food. There ''are'' NIST Standard Reference Materials for food, such as [https://shop.nist.gov/ccrz__ProductDetails?sku=2387 peanut butter] and &amp;quot;[https://shop.nist.gov/ccrz__ProductDetails?sku=1548b typical diet]&amp;quot;. {{w|ISO 3103}} also describes a standardized method for brewing tea, and hacker lore describes a supposed [http://www.catb.org/jargon/html/A/ANSI-standard-pizza.html &amp;quot;ANSI-standard pizza&amp;quot;]. Apparently eating these very bland foods is, in Randall's opinion, suitable punishment for doing “3, 2, 1, 0, Go!” for a countdown. This is a rather more robust level of enforcement than the ISO generally employs against violations of its standards.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Transcript==&lt;br /&gt;
{{incomplete transcript|Don't remove this notice too soon.}}&lt;br /&gt;
[the comic shows three different ways of counting down, with red crosses next to the first 2 (One, Two, Three!, &amp;amp; One, Two, Three, GO!, with 'deprecated' in red ink next to it. There also is a } sign next to the first 2, saying them as 'too easy to mix up'. The last one (Three, Two, One, GO!) is marked with a green tick, with 'ISO standard, next to the tick.]&lt;br /&gt;
]Caption below the comic:]&lt;br /&gt;
If I were in charge of ISO, the first thing I would do would be to standardize the way people count out loud before doing something in sync.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{comic discussion}}&amp;lt;noinclude&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>82.13.184.33</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=3232:_Countdown_Standard&amp;diff=410279</id>
		<title>3232: Countdown Standard</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=3232:_Countdown_Standard&amp;diff=410279"/>
				<updated>2026-04-14T14:24:22Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;82.13.184.33: /* Explanation */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{comic&lt;br /&gt;
| number    = 3232&lt;br /&gt;
| date      = April 13, 2026&lt;br /&gt;
| title     = Countdown Standard&lt;br /&gt;
| image     = countdown_standard_2x.png&lt;br /&gt;
| imagesize = 474x222px&lt;br /&gt;
| noexpand  = true&lt;br /&gt;
| titletext = Anyone who is caught counting 'three ... two ... one ... zero ... GO!' will be punished with a lifetime of eating only ISO standard food samples.&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Explanation==&lt;br /&gt;
{{incomplete|This page WILL BE CREATED IN TWO...THREE...ONE...NEGATIVE ONE...NOW! Don't remove this notice too soon.}}&lt;br /&gt;
This comic reflects the common trope of people preparing for a synchronized action as a group (such as lifting something heavy) counting to get everybody to do the action at the same time, without first having agreed at what point in the count they will act. Two of the ways that people often count up can be confusing: the action can be taken ''on'' the beat of 'three', or on the beat ''after'' 'three'. If the people involved do not all have the same understanding, and so end up acting a beat apart, this could result in undesirable outcomes, such as damage, injury, or just a dispute over who was at fault.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This comic alleges that, if [[Randall]] gained control of the {{w|International Organization for Standardization}} (ISO), he would standardize counting to go ''down'' from three and have the 'go'-point be at zero. However, this proposal would be no better than counting up, as some people may expect to act on the 'one' or, as the title text suggests, to have a 'zero' before the 'go!', leading to exactly the same problems.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Deprecated&amp;quot; is a term applied to something that is no longer recommended for use, so you should fix things so as not to use it anymore. It is commonly used when a standard is replaced by a newer version or an alternative approach, but may still be in use in legacy applications. It is hard to imagine where this would be applicable in this case, since such countdowns tend to be short-lived affairs that would be unlikely to continue running for appreciable periods beyond the publication of the new standard.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The fact that these are called &amp;quot;countdowns&amp;quot;, yet the ones being complained about are counts that go ''up'', is probably intentional, and cause for additional irritation among those who are bothered by the inherent inconsistencies.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{w|ISO}} is an international organization that is responsible for standardizing many things (such as technology and safety standards) to allow for smooth interoperability between countries, manufacturers, and so on. However, it doesn't standardize everyday actions like countdowns. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are no &amp;quot;ISO standard food samples&amp;quot;, as mentioned in the title text, but the implication is that they would be unimaginably bland because they would be 'lowest common denominator' illustrations of the base definition of each food. There ''are'' NIST Standard Reference Materials for food, such as [https://shop.nist.gov/ccrz__ProductDetails?sku=2387 peanut butter] and &amp;quot;[https://shop.nist.gov/ccrz__ProductDetails?sku=1548b typical diet]&amp;quot;. {{w|ISO 3103}} also describes a standardized method for brewing tea, and hacker lore describes a supposed [http://www.catb.org/jargon/html/A/ANSI-standard-pizza.html &amp;quot;ANSI-standard pizza&amp;quot;]. Apparently eating these very bland foods is, in Randall's opinion, suitable punishment for doing “3, 2, 1, 0, Go!” for a countdown. This is a rather more robust level of enforcement than the ISO generally employs against violations of its standards.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Transcript==&lt;br /&gt;
{{incomplete transcript|Don't remove this notice too soon.}}&lt;br /&gt;
[the comic shows three different ways of counting down, with red crosses next to the first 2 (One, Two, Three!, &amp;amp; One, Two, Three, GO!, with 'deprecated' in red ink next to it. There also is a } sign next to the first 2, saying them as 'too easy to mix up'. The last one (Three, Two, One, GO!) is marked with a green tick, with 'ISO standard, next to the tick.]&lt;br /&gt;
]Caption below the comic:]&lt;br /&gt;
If I were in charge of ISO, the first thing I would do would be to standardize the way people count out loud before doing something in sync.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{comic discussion}}&amp;lt;noinclude&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>82.13.184.33</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=3232:_Countdown_Standard&amp;diff=410277</id>
		<title>3232: Countdown Standard</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=3232:_Countdown_Standard&amp;diff=410277"/>
				<updated>2026-04-14T14:22:01Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;82.13.184.33: /* Explanation */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{comic&lt;br /&gt;
| number    = 3232&lt;br /&gt;
| date      = April 13, 2026&lt;br /&gt;
| title     = Countdown Standard&lt;br /&gt;
| image     = countdown_standard_2x.png&lt;br /&gt;
| imagesize = 474x222px&lt;br /&gt;
| noexpand  = true&lt;br /&gt;
| titletext = Anyone who is caught counting 'three ... two ... one ... zero ... GO!' will be punished with a lifetime of eating only ISO standard food samples.&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Explanation==&lt;br /&gt;
{{incomplete|This page WILL BE CREATED IN TWO...THREE...ONE...NEGATIVE ONE...NOW! Don't remove this notice too soon.}}&lt;br /&gt;
This comic reflects the common trope of people preparing for a synchronized action as a group (such as lifting something heavy) counting to get everybody to do the action at the same time, without first having agreed at what point in the count they will act. Two of the ways that people often count up can be confusing: the action can be taken ''on'' the beat of 'three', or on the beat ''after'' 'three'. If the people involved do not all have the same understanding, and so end up acting a beat apart, this could result in undesirable outcomes, such as damage, injury, or just a dispute over who was at fault.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This comic alleges that, if [[Randall]] gained control of the {{w|International Organization for Standardization}} (ISO), he would standardize counting to go ''down'' from three and have the 'go'-point be at zero. However, this proposal would be no better than counting up, as some people may expect to act on the 'one' or, as the title text suggests, to have a 'zero' before the 'go!', leading to exactly the same problems.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Deprecated&amp;quot; is a term applied to something that is no longer recommended for use, so you should fix things so as not to use it anymore. It is commonly used when a standard is replaced by a newer version or an alternative approach, but may still be in use in legacy applications. It is hard to imagine where this would be applicable in this case, since such countdowns tend to be short-lived affairs that would be unlikely to continue running for appreciable periods beyond the publication of the new standard.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The fact that these are called &amp;quot;countdowns&amp;quot;, yet the ones being complained about are counts that go ''up'', is probably intentional, and cause for additional irritation among those who are bothered by the inherent inconsistencies.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{w|ISO}} is an international organization that is responsible for standardizing many things (such as technology and safety standards) to allow for smooth interoperability between countries, manufacturers, and so on. However, it doesn't standardize everyday actions like countdowns. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are no &amp;quot;ISO standard food samples&amp;quot;, as mentioned in the title text, but the implication is that they would be unimaginably bland because they would be 'lowest common denominator' illustrations of the base definition of each food. There ''are'' NIST Standard Reference Materials for food, such as [https://shop.nist.gov/ccrz__ProductDetails?sku=2387 peanut butter] and &amp;quot;[https://shop.nist.gov/ccrz__ProductDetails?sku=1548b typical diet]&amp;quot;. {{w|ISO 3103}} also describes a standardized method for brewing tea, and hacker lore describes a supposed [http://www.catb.org/jargon/html/A/ANSI-standard-pizza.html &amp;quot;ANSI-standard pizza&amp;quot;]. Apparantly eating these very bland foods is, in [[Randall]]'s opinion, suitable punishment for doing “3, 2, 1, 0, Go!” for a countdown. Why this specific method is disliked by him is unknown, but it could be because it could create confusion due to its similarity to [[Randall]]'s ideal 3, 2, 1, Go! method. Countdowns like “3, 2, 1!” could also create similar confusion, but isn't mentioned in the title text.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Transcript==&lt;br /&gt;
{{incomplete transcript|Don't remove this notice too soon.}}&lt;br /&gt;
[the comic shows three different ways of counting down, with red crosses next to the first 2 (One, Two, Three!, &amp;amp; One, Two, Three, GO!, with 'deprecated' in red ink next to it. There also is a } sign next to the first 2, saying them as 'too easy to mix up'. The last one (Three, Two, One, GO!) is marked with a green tick, with 'ISO standard, next to the tick.]&lt;br /&gt;
]Caption below the comic:]&lt;br /&gt;
If I were in charge of ISO, the first thing I would do would be to standardize the way people count out loud before doing something in sync.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{comic discussion}}&amp;lt;noinclude&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>82.13.184.33</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=3232:_Countdown_Standard&amp;diff=410276</id>
		<title>3232: Countdown Standard</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=3232:_Countdown_Standard&amp;diff=410276"/>
				<updated>2026-04-14T14:18:04Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;82.13.184.33: /* Explanation */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{comic&lt;br /&gt;
| number    = 3232&lt;br /&gt;
| date      = April 13, 2026&lt;br /&gt;
| title     = Countdown Standard&lt;br /&gt;
| image     = countdown_standard_2x.png&lt;br /&gt;
| imagesize = 474x222px&lt;br /&gt;
| noexpand  = true&lt;br /&gt;
| titletext = Anyone who is caught counting 'three ... two ... one ... zero ... GO!' will be punished with a lifetime of eating only ISO standard food samples.&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Explanation==&lt;br /&gt;
{{incomplete|This page WILL BE CREATED IN TWO...THREE...ONE...NEGATIVE ONE...NOW! Don't remove this notice too soon.}}&lt;br /&gt;
This comic reflects the common trope of people preparing for a synchronized action as a group (such as lifting something heavy) counting to get everybody to do the action at the same time, without first having agreed at what point in the count they will act. Two of the ways that people often count up can be confusing: the action can be taken ''on'' the beat of 'three', or on the beat ''after'' 'three'. This comic alleges that, if [[Randall]] gained control of the {{w|International Organization for Standardization}} (ISO), he would standardize counting to go ''down'' from three and have the 'go'-point be at zero. However, this proposal would be no better than counting up, as some people may expect to act on the 'one' or, as the title text suggests, to have a 'zero' before the 'go!', leading to exactly the same problems.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Deprecated&amp;quot; is a term applied to something that is no longer recommended for use, so you should fix things so as not to use it anymore. It is commonly used when a standard is replaced by a newer version or an alternative approach, but may still be in use in legacy applications. It is hard to imagine where this would be applicable in this case, since such countdowns tend to be short-lived affairs that would be unlikely to continue running for appreciable periods beyond the publication of the new standard.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The fact that these are called &amp;quot;countdowns&amp;quot;, yet the ones being complained about are counts that go ''up'', is probably intentional, and cause for additional irritation among those who are bothered by the inherent inconsistencies.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{w|ISO}} is an international organization that is responsible for standardizing many things (such as technology and safety standards) to allow for smooth interoperability between countries, manufacturers, and so on. However, it doesn't standardize everyday actions like countdowns. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are no &amp;quot;ISO standard food samples&amp;quot;, as mentioned in the title text, but the implication is that they would be unimaginably bland because they would be 'lowest common denominator' illustrations of the base definition of each food. There ''are'' NIST Standard Reference Materials for food, such as [https://shop.nist.gov/ccrz__ProductDetails?sku=2387 peanut butter] and &amp;quot;[https://shop.nist.gov/ccrz__ProductDetails?sku=1548b typical diet]&amp;quot;. {{w|ISO 3103}} also describes a standardized method for brewing tea, and hacker lore describes a supposed [http://www.catb.org/jargon/html/A/ANSI-standard-pizza.html &amp;quot;ANSI-standard pizza&amp;quot;]. Apparantly eating these very bland foods is, in [[Randall]]'s opinion, suitable punishment for doing “3, 2, 1, 0, Go!” for a countdown. Why this specific method is disliked by him is unknown, but it could be because it could create confusion due to its similarity to [[Randall]]'s ideal 3, 2, 1, Go! method. Countdowns like “3, 2, 1!” could also create similar confusion, but isn't mentioned in the title text.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Transcript==&lt;br /&gt;
{{incomplete transcript|Don't remove this notice too soon.}}&lt;br /&gt;
[the comic shows three different ways of counting down, with red crosses next to the first 2 (One, Two, Three!, &amp;amp; One, Two, Three, GO!, with 'deprecated' in red ink next to it. There also is a } sign next to the first 2, saying them as 'too easy to mix up'. The last one (Three, Two, One, GO!) is marked with a green tick, with 'ISO standard, next to the tick.]&lt;br /&gt;
]Caption below the comic:]&lt;br /&gt;
If I were in charge of ISO, the first thing I would do would be to standardize the way people count out loud before doing something in sync.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{comic discussion}}&amp;lt;noinclude&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>82.13.184.33</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:3232:_Countdown_Standard&amp;diff=410261</id>
		<title>Talk:3232: Countdown Standard</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:3232:_Countdown_Standard&amp;diff=410261"/>
				<updated>2026-04-14T10:54:47Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;82.13.184.33: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&amp;lt;!-- Please sign your posts with ~~~~ and don't delete this text. New comments should be added at the bottom. --&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Refer to all 4 Lethal Weapons movies for discussion. {{unsigned ip|45.138.52.240}}&lt;br /&gt;
:{{citation needed}} --[[User:Kynde|Kynde]] ([[User talk:Kynde|talk]]) 06:45, 14 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Don't most people say &amp;quot;on three&amp;quot;, &amp;quot;on one&amp;quot;, or &amp;quot;on go&amp;quot; before starting the count anyway? And then delay the final (action) number a teensy bit? e.g. &amp;quot;On one. Ready? 3&amp;amp;#8196;2&amp;amp;#8194;&amp;lt;b&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/b&amp;gt;&amp;quot; This isn't that ambiguous, not that I would object to standardisation. [[User:Sameldacamel34|Sameldacamel34]] ([[User talk:Sameldacamel34|talk]]) 23:13, 13 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:It is appallingly common for me to hear the inconsistent and dissonant, &amp;quot;On the count of three…one, two, three, GO!&amp;quot; (This is problematic because it is &amp;quot;on the count of THREE&amp;quot; not &amp;quot;on the count of GO, the word after three&amp;quot;. Or at least, that is what I understand those words to mean.) [[User:JohnHawkinson|JohnHawkinson]] ([[User talk:JohnHawkinson|talk]]) 02:09, 14 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Just &amp;quot;on three&amp;quot; is the most common, I think. You say &amp;quot;On three. Ready? One, two THREE.&amp;quot; [[User:Dogman15|Dogman15]] ([[User talk:Dogman15|talk]]) 02:42, 14 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::&amp;quot;On three... THREE!&amp;quot; [[Special:Contributions/82.13.184.33|82.13.184.33]] 08:56, 14 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:There are two different conventions to synchronize a start -- by reacting or by rythmically coordinating. And both are used: in official swimming championships by World Aquatics they train to start to a perfectly rythmic &amp;quot;bip.. bip.. beeep&amp;quot; while in track and field championships by World Athletics the start judge waits an arbitrary time before triggering the gun to which athletes react. [[Special:Contributions/31.221.183.22|31.221.183.22]] 09:49, 14 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::There's at least a third - go at a predetermined time. And a fourth - use a start gate to physically restrain the starters. [[Special:Contributions/82.13.184.33|82.13.184.33]] 10:23, 14 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
And the Lord spake, saying, &amp;quot;First shalt thou take out the Holy Pin. Then shalt thou count to three, no more, no less. Three shall be the number thou shalt count, and the number of the counting shall be three. Four shalt thou not count, neither count thou two, excepting that thou then proceed to three. Five is right out. Once the number three, being the third number, be reached, then lobbest thou thy Holy Hand Grenade of Antioch towards thy foe, who, being naughty in My sight, shall snuff it. -- Monty Python and the Holy Grail [[User:Jordan Brown|Jordan Brown]] ([[User talk:Jordan Brown|talk]]) 00:35, 14 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:[Arthur:] Right. One, two, five!&lt;br /&gt;
:[Galahad:] Three, sir.&lt;br /&gt;
:[Arthur:] Three! [*throws it*]&lt;br /&gt;
:...just to complicate matters. ;) [[Special:Contributions/81.179.199.253|81.179.199.253]] 00:54, 14 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::Fantastic guys ;-) --[[User:Kynde|Kynde]] ([[User talk:Kynde|talk]]) 06:44, 14 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:I wouldn't look to God for standards on counting - just look at the mess around what 'forty days and forty nights' means. [[Special:Contributions/82.13.184.33|82.13.184.33]] 08:16, 14 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Four... Two... One... One Half... One Quarter... One Eighth... One Sixteenth... One Thirty-second... One Sixty-Fourth... [go to infinity] GO! [[User:King Pando|King Pando]] ([[User talk:King Pando|talk]]) 03:47, 14 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Just to make things even weirder: the movie industry counts 5, 4, 3, 2, go!&lt;br /&gt;
[[Special:Contributions/76.133.66.138|76.133.66.138]] 03:59, 14 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:{{citation needed}} --[[User:Kynde|Kynde]] ([[User talk:Kynde|talk]]) 06:44, 14 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::https://raymonddefelitta.org/i-dig-film-leader/ Film leaders do generally stop at 2 or 3, but they don't really count &amp;quot;3, [2,] go!&amp;quot;. There's a 'silent' count for the absent numbers before you reach the 'go!' point. They're left black to avoid fouling the start of the projection. [[Special:Contributions/82.13.184.33|82.13.184.33]] 10:54, 14 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I'm sure people all over the world will follow this standard just as faithfully as they follow ISO 8601. {{unsigned|2a00:1a28:1410:5::10db}}&lt;br /&gt;
:Here for reference: [[1179: ISO 8601]]. But there is at least one more with ISO reference: [[2322: ISO Paper Size Golden Spiral]]. So that is three comics referencing the ISO system directly (this one not in titel but in the text so no doubt that it would belong with the other two. But I'm not sure three is enough to create and ISO category? Could not on the spot find any others...? If someone can then we could make a category! --[[User:Kynde|Kynde]] ([[User talk:Kynde|talk]]) 06:43, 14 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>82.13.184.33</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:3232:_Countdown_Standard&amp;diff=410259</id>
		<title>Talk:3232: Countdown Standard</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:3232:_Countdown_Standard&amp;diff=410259"/>
				<updated>2026-04-14T10:25:21Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;82.13.184.33: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&amp;lt;!-- Please sign your posts with ~~~~ and don't delete this text. New comments should be added at the bottom. --&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Refer to all 4 Lethal Weapons movies for discussion. {{unsigned ip|45.138.52.240}}&lt;br /&gt;
:{{citation needed}} --[[User:Kynde|Kynde]] ([[User talk:Kynde|talk]]) 06:45, 14 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Don't most people say &amp;quot;on three&amp;quot;, &amp;quot;on one&amp;quot;, or &amp;quot;on go&amp;quot; before starting the count anyway? And then delay the final (action) number a teensy bit? e.g. &amp;quot;On one. Ready? 3&amp;amp;#8196;2&amp;amp;#8194;&amp;lt;b&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/b&amp;gt;&amp;quot; This isn't that ambiguous, not that I would object to standardisation. [[User:Sameldacamel34|Sameldacamel34]] ([[User talk:Sameldacamel34|talk]]) 23:13, 13 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:It is appallingly common for me to hear the inconsistent and dissonant, &amp;quot;On the count of three…one, two, three, GO!&amp;quot; (This is problematic because it is &amp;quot;on the count of THREE&amp;quot; not &amp;quot;on the count of GO, the word after three&amp;quot;. Or at least, that is what I understand those words to mean.) [[User:JohnHawkinson|JohnHawkinson]] ([[User talk:JohnHawkinson|talk]]) 02:09, 14 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Just &amp;quot;on three&amp;quot; is the most common, I think. You say &amp;quot;On three. Ready? One, two THREE.&amp;quot; [[User:Dogman15|Dogman15]] ([[User talk:Dogman15|talk]]) 02:42, 14 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::&amp;quot;On three... THREE!&amp;quot; [[Special:Contributions/82.13.184.33|82.13.184.33]] 08:56, 14 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:There are two different conventions to synchronize a start -- by reacting or by rythmically coordinating. And both are used: in official swimming championships by World Aquatics they train to start to a perfectly rythmic &amp;quot;bip.. bip.. beeep&amp;quot; while in track and field championships by World Athletics the start judge waits an arbitrary time before triggering the gun to which athletes react. [[Special:Contributions/31.221.183.22|31.221.183.22]] 09:49, 14 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::There's at least a third - go at a predetermined time. And a fourth - use a start gate to physically restrain the starters. [[Special:Contributions/82.13.184.33|82.13.184.33]] 10:23, 14 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
And the Lord spake, saying, &amp;quot;First shalt thou take out the Holy Pin. Then shalt thou count to three, no more, no less. Three shall be the number thou shalt count, and the number of the counting shall be three. Four shalt thou not count, neither count thou two, excepting that thou then proceed to three. Five is right out. Once the number three, being the third number, be reached, then lobbest thou thy Holy Hand Grenade of Antioch towards thy foe, who, being naughty in My sight, shall snuff it. -- Monty Python and the Holy Grail [[User:Jordan Brown|Jordan Brown]] ([[User talk:Jordan Brown|talk]]) 00:35, 14 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:[Arthur:] Right. One, two, five!&lt;br /&gt;
:[Galahad:] Three, sir.&lt;br /&gt;
:[Arthur:] Three! [*throws it*]&lt;br /&gt;
:...just to complicate matters. ;) [[Special:Contributions/81.179.199.253|81.179.199.253]] 00:54, 14 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::Fantastic guys ;-) --[[User:Kynde|Kynde]] ([[User talk:Kynde|talk]]) 06:44, 14 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:I wouldn't look to God for standards on counting - just look at the mess around what 'forty days and forty nights' means. [[Special:Contributions/82.13.184.33|82.13.184.33]] 08:16, 14 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Four... Two... One... One Half... One Quarter... One Eighth... One Sixteenth... One Thirty-second... One Sixty-Fourth... [go to infinity] GO! [[User:King Pando|King Pando]] ([[User talk:King Pando|talk]]) 03:47, 14 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Just to make things even weirder: the movie industry counts 5, 4, 3, 2, go!&lt;br /&gt;
[[Special:Contributions/76.133.66.138|76.133.66.138]] 03:59, 14 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:{{citation needed}} --[[User:Kynde|Kynde]] ([[User talk:Kynde|talk]]) 06:44, 14 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I'm sure people all over the world will follow this standard just as faithfully as they follow ISO 8601. {{unsigned|2a00:1a28:1410:5::10db}}&lt;br /&gt;
:Here for reference: [[1179: ISO 8601]]. But there is at least one more with ISO reference: [[2322: ISO Paper Size Golden Spiral]]. So that is three comics referencing the ISO system directly (this one not in titel but in the text so no doubt that it would belong with the other two. But I'm not sure three is enough to create and ISO category? Could not on the spot find any others...? If someone can then we could make a category! --[[User:Kynde|Kynde]] ([[User talk:Kynde|talk]]) 06:43, 14 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>82.13.184.33</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:3232:_Countdown_Standard&amp;diff=410258</id>
		<title>Talk:3232: Countdown Standard</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:3232:_Countdown_Standard&amp;diff=410258"/>
				<updated>2026-04-14T10:23:17Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;82.13.184.33: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&amp;lt;!-- Please sign your posts with ~~~~ and don't delete this text. New comments should be added at the bottom. --&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Refer to all 4 Lethal Weapons movies for discussion. {{unsigned ip|45.138.52.240}}&lt;br /&gt;
:{{citation needed}} --[[User:Kynde|Kynde]] ([[User talk:Kynde|talk]]) 06:45, 14 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Don't most people say &amp;quot;on three&amp;quot;, &amp;quot;on one&amp;quot;, or &amp;quot;on go&amp;quot; before starting the count anyway? And then delay the final (action) number a teensy bit? e.g. &amp;quot;On one. Ready? 3&amp;amp;#8196;2&amp;amp;#8194;&amp;lt;b&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/b&amp;gt;&amp;quot; This isn't that ambiguous, not that I would object to standardisation. [[User:Sameldacamel34|Sameldacamel34]] ([[User talk:Sameldacamel34|talk]]) 23:13, 13 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:It is appallingly common for me to hear the inconsistent and dissonant, &amp;quot;On the count of three…one, two, three, GO!&amp;quot; (This is problematic because it is &amp;quot;on the count of THREE&amp;quot; not &amp;quot;on the count of GO, the word after three&amp;quot;. Or at least, that is what I understand those words to mean.) [[User:JohnHawkinson|JohnHawkinson]] ([[User talk:JohnHawkinson|talk]]) 02:09, 14 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Just &amp;quot;on three&amp;quot; is the most common, I think. You say &amp;quot;On three. Ready? One, two THREE.&amp;quot; [[User:Dogman15|Dogman15]] ([[User talk:Dogman15|talk]]) 02:42, 14 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::&amp;quot;On three... THREE!&amp;quot; [[Special:Contributions/82.13.184.33|82.13.184.33]] 08:56, 14 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:There are two different conventions to synchronize a start -- by reacting or by rythmically coordinating. And both are used: in official swimming championships by World Aquatics they train to start to a perfectly rythmic &amp;quot;bip.. bip.. beeep&amp;quot; while in track and field championships by World Athletics the start judge waits an arbitrary time before triggering the gun to which athletes react. [[Special:Contributions/31.221.183.22|31.221.183.22]] 09:49, 14 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::There's at least a third - go at a predetermined time. [[Special:Contributions/82.13.184.33|82.13.184.33]] 10:23, 14 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
And the Lord spake, saying, &amp;quot;First shalt thou take out the Holy Pin. Then shalt thou count to three, no more, no less. Three shall be the number thou shalt count, and the number of the counting shall be three. Four shalt thou not count, neither count thou two, excepting that thou then proceed to three. Five is right out. Once the number three, being the third number, be reached, then lobbest thou thy Holy Hand Grenade of Antioch towards thy foe, who, being naughty in My sight, shall snuff it. -- Monty Python and the Holy Grail [[User:Jordan Brown|Jordan Brown]] ([[User talk:Jordan Brown|talk]]) 00:35, 14 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:[Arthur:] Right. One, two, five!&lt;br /&gt;
:[Galahad:] Three, sir.&lt;br /&gt;
:[Arthur:] Three! [*throws it*]&lt;br /&gt;
:...just to complicate matters. ;) [[Special:Contributions/81.179.199.253|81.179.199.253]] 00:54, 14 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::Fantastic guys ;-) --[[User:Kynde|Kynde]] ([[User talk:Kynde|talk]]) 06:44, 14 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:I wouldn't look to God for standards on counting - just look at the mess around what 'forty days and forty nights' means. [[Special:Contributions/82.13.184.33|82.13.184.33]] 08:16, 14 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Four... Two... One... One Half... One Quarter... One Eighth... One Sixteenth... One Thirty-second... One Sixty-Fourth... [go to infinity] GO! [[User:King Pando|King Pando]] ([[User talk:King Pando|talk]]) 03:47, 14 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Just to make things even weirder: the movie industry counts 5, 4, 3, 2, go!&lt;br /&gt;
[[Special:Contributions/76.133.66.138|76.133.66.138]] 03:59, 14 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:{{citation needed}} --[[User:Kynde|Kynde]] ([[User talk:Kynde|talk]]) 06:44, 14 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I'm sure people all over the world will follow this standard just as faithfully as they follow ISO 8601. {{unsigned|2a00:1a28:1410:5::10db}}&lt;br /&gt;
:Here for reference: [[1179: ISO 8601]]. But there is at least one more with ISO reference: [[2322: ISO Paper Size Golden Spiral]]. So that is three comics referencing the ISO system directly (this one not in titel but in the text so no doubt that it would belong with the other two. But I'm not sure three is enough to create and ISO category? Could not on the spot find any others...? If someone can then we could make a category! --[[User:Kynde|Kynde]] ([[User talk:Kynde|talk]]) 06:43, 14 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>82.13.184.33</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:3232:_Countdown_Standard&amp;diff=410255</id>
		<title>Talk:3232: Countdown Standard</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:3232:_Countdown_Standard&amp;diff=410255"/>
				<updated>2026-04-14T08:56:46Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;82.13.184.33: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&amp;lt;!-- Please sign your posts with ~~~~ and don't delete this text. New comments should be added at the bottom. --&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Refer to all 4 Lethal Weapons movies for discussion. {{unsigned ip|45.138.52.240}}&lt;br /&gt;
:{{citation needed}} --[[User:Kynde|Kynde]] ([[User talk:Kynde|talk]]) 06:45, 14 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Don't most people say &amp;quot;on three&amp;quot;, &amp;quot;on one&amp;quot;, or &amp;quot;on go&amp;quot; before starting the count anyway? And then delay the final (action) number a teensy bit? e.g. &amp;quot;On one. Ready? 3&amp;amp;#8196;2&amp;amp;#8194;&amp;lt;b&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/b&amp;gt;&amp;quot; This isn't that ambiguous, not that I would object to standardisation. [[User:Sameldacamel34|Sameldacamel34]] ([[User talk:Sameldacamel34|talk]]) 23:13, 13 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:It is appallingly common for me to hear the inconsistent and dissonant, &amp;quot;On the count of three…one, two, three, GO!&amp;quot; (This is problematic because it is &amp;quot;on the count of THREE&amp;quot; not &amp;quot;on the count of GO, the word after three&amp;quot;. Or at least, that is what I understand those words to mean.) [[User:JohnHawkinson|JohnHawkinson]] ([[User talk:JohnHawkinson|talk]]) 02:09, 14 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Just &amp;quot;on three&amp;quot; is the most common, I think. You say &amp;quot;On three. Ready? One, two THREE.&amp;quot; [[User:Dogman15|Dogman15]] ([[User talk:Dogman15|talk]]) 02:42, 14 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::&amp;quot;On three... THREE!&amp;quot; [[Special:Contributions/82.13.184.33|82.13.184.33]] 08:56, 14 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
And the Lord spake, saying, &amp;quot;First shalt thou take out the Holy Pin. Then shalt thou count to three, no more, no less. Three shall be the number thou shalt count, and the number of the counting shall be three. Four shalt thou not count, neither count thou two, excepting that thou then proceed to three. Five is right out. Once the number three, being the third number, be reached, then lobbest thou thy Holy Hand Grenade of Antioch towards thy foe, who, being naughty in My sight, shall snuff it. -- Monty Python and the Holy Grail [[User:Jordan Brown|Jordan Brown]] ([[User talk:Jordan Brown|talk]]) 00:35, 14 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:[Arthur:] Right. One, two, five!&lt;br /&gt;
:[Galahad:] Three, sir.&lt;br /&gt;
:[Arthur:] Three! [*throws it*]&lt;br /&gt;
:...just to complicate matters. ;) [[Special:Contributions/81.179.199.253|81.179.199.253]] 00:54, 14 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::Fantastic guys ;-) --[[User:Kynde|Kynde]] ([[User talk:Kynde|talk]]) 06:44, 14 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:I wouldn't look to God for standards on counting - just look at the mess around what 'forty days and forty nights' means. [[Special:Contributions/82.13.184.33|82.13.184.33]] 08:16, 14 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Four... Two... One... One Half... One Quarter... One Eighth... One Sixteenth... One Thirty-second... One Sixty-Fourth... [go to infinity] GO! [[User:King Pando|King Pando]] ([[User talk:King Pando|talk]]) 03:47, 14 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Just to make things even weirder: the movie industry counts 5, 4, 3, 2, go!&lt;br /&gt;
[[Special:Contributions/76.133.66.138|76.133.66.138]] 03:59, 14 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:{{citation needed}} --[[User:Kynde|Kynde]] ([[User talk:Kynde|talk]]) 06:44, 14 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I'm sure people all over the world will follow this standard just as faithfully as they follow ISO 8601. {{unsigned|2a00:1a28:1410:5::10db}}&lt;br /&gt;
:Here for reference: [[1179: ISO 8601]]. But there is at least one more with ISO reference: [[2322: ISO Paper Size Golden Spiral]]. So that is three comics referencing the ISO system directly (this one not in titel but in the text so no doubt that it would belong with the other two. But I'm not sure three is enough to create and ISO category? Could not on the spot find any others...? If someone can then we could make a category! --[[User:Kynde|Kynde]] ([[User talk:Kynde|talk]]) 06:43, 14 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>82.13.184.33</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=3232:_Countdown_Standard&amp;diff=410251</id>
		<title>3232: Countdown Standard</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=3232:_Countdown_Standard&amp;diff=410251"/>
				<updated>2026-04-14T08:18:27Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;82.13.184.33: /* Explanation */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{comic&lt;br /&gt;
| number    = 3232&lt;br /&gt;
| date      = April 13, 2026&lt;br /&gt;
| title     = Countdown Standard&lt;br /&gt;
| image     = countdown_standard_2x.png&lt;br /&gt;
| imagesize = 474x222px&lt;br /&gt;
| noexpand  = true&lt;br /&gt;
| titletext = Anyone who is caught counting 'three ... two ... one ... zero ... GO!' will be punished with a lifetime of eating only ISO standard food samples.&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Explanation==&lt;br /&gt;
{{incomplete|This page WILL BE CREATED IN TWO...THREE...ONE...NEGATIVE ONE...NOW! Don't remove this notice too soon.}}&lt;br /&gt;
This comic reflects the common trope of people counting to prepare for a synchronized action as a group (such as lifting something heavy) to get everybody to do the action at the same time, without first having agreed at what point in the count they will act. Two of the ways that people often count up can be confusing: the action can be taken ''on'' the beat of 'three', or on the beat ''after'' 'three'. This comic alleges that, if [[Randall]] gained control of the {{w|International Organization for Standardization}} (ISO), he would standardize counting to go ''down'' from three and have the 'go'-point be at zero. However, this proposal would be no better than counting up, as some people may expect to act on the 'one' or, as the title text suggests, to have a 'zero' before the 'go!', leading to exactly the same problems.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Deprecated&amp;quot; is a term applied to something that is no longer recommended for use, so you should fix things so as not to use it anymore. It is commonly used when a standard is replaced by a newer version or an alternative approach, but may still be in use in legacy applications. It is hard to imagine where this would be applicable in this case, since such countdowns tend to be short-lived affairs that would be unlikely to continue running for appreciable periods beyond the publication of the new standard.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The fact that these are called &amp;quot;countdowns&amp;quot;, yet the ones being complained about are counts that go ''up'', is probably intentional, and cause for additional irritation among those who are bothered by the inherent inconsistencies.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{w|ISO}} is an international organization that is responsible for standardizing many things (such as technology and safety standards) to allow for smooth interoperability between countries, manufacturers, and so on. However, it doesn't standardize everyday actions like countdowns. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are no &amp;quot;ISO standard food samples&amp;quot;, as mentioned in the title text, but the implication is that they would be unimaginably bland because they would be 'lowest common denominator' illustrations of the base definition of each food. There ''are'' NIST Standard Reference Materials for food, such as peanut butter ([https://shop.nist.gov/ccrz__ProductDetails?sku=2387&amp;amp;cclcl=en_US see here]). {{w|ISO 3103}} also describes a standardized method for brewing tea, and hacker lore describes a supposed [http://www.catb.org/jargon/html/A/ANSI-standard-pizza.html &amp;quot;ANSI-standard pizza&amp;quot;].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Transcript==&lt;br /&gt;
{{incomplete transcript|Don't remove this notice too soon.}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{comic discussion}}&amp;lt;noinclude&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>82.13.184.33</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:3232:_Countdown_Standard&amp;diff=410250</id>
		<title>Talk:3232: Countdown Standard</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:3232:_Countdown_Standard&amp;diff=410250"/>
				<updated>2026-04-14T08:16:32Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;82.13.184.33: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&amp;lt;!-- Please sign your posts with ~~~~ and don't delete this text. New comments should be added at the bottom. --&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Refer to all 4 Lethal Weapons movies for discussion. {{unsigned ip|45.138.52.240}}&lt;br /&gt;
:{{citation needed}} --[[User:Kynde|Kynde]] ([[User talk:Kynde|talk]]) 06:45, 14 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Don't most people say &amp;quot;on three&amp;quot;, &amp;quot;on one&amp;quot;, or &amp;quot;on go&amp;quot; before starting the count anyway? And then delay the final (action) number a teensy bit? e.g. &amp;quot;On one. Ready? 3&amp;amp;#8196;2&amp;amp;#8194;&amp;lt;b&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/b&amp;gt;&amp;quot; This isn't that ambiguous, not that I would object to standardisation. [[User:Sameldacamel34|Sameldacamel34]] ([[User talk:Sameldacamel34|talk]]) 23:13, 13 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:It is appallingly common for me to hear the inconsistent and dissonant, &amp;quot;On the count of three…one, two, three, GO!&amp;quot; (This is problematic because it is &amp;quot;on the count of THREE&amp;quot; not &amp;quot;on the count of GO, the word after three&amp;quot;. Or at least, that is what I understand those words to mean.) [[User:JohnHawkinson|JohnHawkinson]] ([[User talk:JohnHawkinson|talk]]) 02:09, 14 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Just &amp;quot;on three&amp;quot; is the most common, I think. You say &amp;quot;On three. Ready? One, two THREE.&amp;quot; [[User:Dogman15|Dogman15]] ([[User talk:Dogman15|talk]]) 02:42, 14 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
And the Lord spake, saying, &amp;quot;First shalt thou take out the Holy Pin. Then shalt thou count to three, no more, no less. Three shall be the number thou shalt count, and the number of the counting shall be three. Four shalt thou not count, neither count thou two, excepting that thou then proceed to three. Five is right out. Once the number three, being the third number, be reached, then lobbest thou thy Holy Hand Grenade of Antioch towards thy foe, who, being naughty in My sight, shall snuff it. -- Monty Python and the Holy Grail [[User:Jordan Brown|Jordan Brown]] ([[User talk:Jordan Brown|talk]]) 00:35, 14 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:[Arthur:] Right. One, two, five!&lt;br /&gt;
:[Galahad:] Three, sir.&lt;br /&gt;
:[Arthur:] Three! [*throws it*]&lt;br /&gt;
:...just to complicate matters. ;) [[Special:Contributions/81.179.199.253|81.179.199.253]] 00:54, 14 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::Fantastic guys ;-) --[[User:Kynde|Kynde]] ([[User talk:Kynde|talk]]) 06:44, 14 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:I wouldn't look to God for standards on counting - just look at the mess around what 'forty days and forty nights' means. [[Special:Contributions/82.13.184.33|82.13.184.33]] 08:16, 14 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Four... Two... One... One Half... One Quarter... One Eighth... One Sixteenth... One Thirty-second... One Sixty-Fourth... [go to infinity] GO! [[User:King Pando|King Pando]] ([[User talk:King Pando|talk]]) 03:47, 14 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Just to make things even weirder: the movie industry counts 5, 4, 3, 2, go!&lt;br /&gt;
[[Special:Contributions/76.133.66.138|76.133.66.138]] 03:59, 14 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:{{citation needed}} --[[User:Kynde|Kynde]] ([[User talk:Kynde|talk]]) 06:44, 14 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I'm sure people all over the world will follow this standard just as faithfully as they follow ISO 8601. {{unsigned|2a00:1a28:1410:5::10db}}&lt;br /&gt;
:Here for reference: [[1179: ISO 8601]]. But there is at least one more with ISO reference: [[2322: ISO Paper Size Golden Spiral]]. So that is three comics referencing the ISO system directly (this one not in titel but in the text so no doubt that it would belong with the other two. But I'm not sure three is enough to create and ISO category? Could not on the spot find any others...? If someone can then we could make a category! --[[User:Kynde|Kynde]] ([[User talk:Kynde|talk]]) 06:43, 14 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>82.13.184.33</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=3232:_Countdown_Standard&amp;diff=410249</id>
		<title>3232: Countdown Standard</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=3232:_Countdown_Standard&amp;diff=410249"/>
				<updated>2026-04-14T08:13:11Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;82.13.184.33: /* Explanation */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{comic&lt;br /&gt;
| number    = 3232&lt;br /&gt;
| date      = April 13, 2026&lt;br /&gt;
| title     = Countdown Standard&lt;br /&gt;
| image     = countdown_standard_2x.png&lt;br /&gt;
| imagesize = 474x222px&lt;br /&gt;
| noexpand  = true&lt;br /&gt;
| titletext = Anyone who is caught counting 'three ... two ... one ... zero ... GO!' will be punished with a lifetime of eating only ISO standard food samples.&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Explanation==&lt;br /&gt;
{{incomplete|This page WILL BE CREATED IN TWO...THREE...ONE...NEGATIVE ONE...NOW! Don't remove this notice too soon.}}&lt;br /&gt;
This comic reflects the common trope of people counting to prepare for a synchronized action as a group (such as lifting something heavy) to get everybody to do the action at the same time, without first having agreed at what point in the count they will act. Two of the ways that people often count up can be confusing: the action can be taken ''on'' the beat of 'three', or on the beat ''after'' 'three'. This comic alleges that, if [[Randall]] gained control of the {{w|International Organization for Standardization}} (ISO), he would standardize counting to go ''down'' from three and have the 'go'-point be at zero. However, this proposal would be no better than counting up, as some people may expect to act on the 'one', leading to exactly the same problems.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Deprecated&amp;quot; is a term applied to something that is no longer recommended for use, so you should fix things so as not to use it anymore. It is commonly used when a standard is replaced by a newer version or an alternative approach, but may still be in use in legacy applications. It is hard to imagine where this would be applicable in this case, since such countdowns tend to be short-lived affairs that would be unlikely to continue running for appreciable periods beyond the publication of the new standard.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The fact that these are called &amp;quot;countdowns&amp;quot;, yet the ones being complained about are counts that go ''up'', is probably intentional, and cause for additional irritation among those who are bothered by the inherent inconsistencies.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{w|ISO}} is an international organization that is responsible for standardizing many things (such as technology and safety standards) to allow for smooth interoperability between countries, manufacturers, and so on. However, it doesn't standardize everyday actions like countdowns. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are no &amp;quot;ISO standard food samples&amp;quot;, as mentioned in the title text, but the implication is that they would be unimaginably bland because they would be 'lowest common denominator' illustrations of the base definition of each food. There ''are'' NIST Standard Reference Materials for food, such as peanut butter ([https://shop.nist.gov/ccrz__ProductDetails?sku=2387&amp;amp;cclcl=en_US see here]). {{w|ISO 3103}} also describes a standardized method for brewing tea, and hacker lore describes a supposed [http://www.catb.org/jargon/html/A/ANSI-standard-pizza.html &amp;quot;ANSI-standard pizza&amp;quot;].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Transcript==&lt;br /&gt;
{{incomplete transcript|Don't remove this notice too soon.}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{comic discussion}}&amp;lt;noinclude&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>82.13.184.33</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=3232:_Countdown_Standard&amp;diff=410248</id>
		<title>3232: Countdown Standard</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=3232:_Countdown_Standard&amp;diff=410248"/>
				<updated>2026-04-14T08:11:50Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;82.13.184.33: /* Explanation */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{comic&lt;br /&gt;
| number    = 3232&lt;br /&gt;
| date      = April 13, 2026&lt;br /&gt;
| title     = Countdown Standard&lt;br /&gt;
| image     = countdown_standard_2x.png&lt;br /&gt;
| imagesize = 474x222px&lt;br /&gt;
| noexpand  = true&lt;br /&gt;
| titletext = Anyone who is caught counting 'three ... two ... one ... zero ... GO!' will be punished with a lifetime of eating only ISO standard food samples.&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Explanation==&lt;br /&gt;
{{incomplete|This page WILL BE CREATED IN TWO...THREE...ONE...NEGATIVE ONE...NOW! Don't remove this notice too soon.}}&lt;br /&gt;
This comic reflects the common trope of people counting to prepare for a synchronized action as a group (such as lifting something heavy) to get everybody to do the action at the same time, without first having agreed at what point in the count they will act. Two of the ways that people often count up can be confusing: the action can be taken ''on'' the beat of 'three', or on the beat ''after'' 'three'. This comic alleges that, if [[Randall]] gained control of the {{w|International Organization for Standardization}} (ISO), he would standardize counting to go ''down'' from three and have the 'go'-point be at zero. However, this proposal would be no better than counting up, as some people may expect to act on the 'one', leading to exactly the same problems.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Deprecated&amp;quot; is a term applied to something that is no longer recommended for use, so you should fix things so as not to use it anymore. It is commonly used when a standard is replaced by a newer version or an alternative approach, but may still be in use in legacy applications. It is hard to imagine where this would be applicable in this case, since such countdowns tend to be short-lived affairs that would be unlikely to continue running for appreciable periods beyond the publication of the new standard.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The fact that these are called &amp;quot;countdowns&amp;quot;, yet the ones being complained about are counts that go ''up'', is probably intentional, and cause for additional complaint by those who are as bothered by the inherent inconsistencies.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{w|ISO}} is an international organization that is responsible for standardizing many things (such as technology and safety standards) to allow for smooth interoperability between countries, manufacturers, and so on. However, it doesn't standardize everyday actions like countdowns. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are no &amp;quot;ISO standard food samples&amp;quot;, as mentioned in the title text, but the implication is that they would be unimaginably bland because they would be 'lowest common denominator' illustrations of the base definition of each food. There ''are'' NIST Standard Reference Materials for food, such as peanut butter ([https://shop.nist.gov/ccrz__ProductDetails?sku=2387&amp;amp;cclcl=en_US see here]). {{w|ISO 3103}} also describes a standardized method for brewing tea, and hacker lore describes a supposed [http://www.catb.org/jargon/html/A/ANSI-standard-pizza.html &amp;quot;ANSI-standard pizza&amp;quot;].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Transcript==&lt;br /&gt;
{{incomplete transcript|Don't remove this notice too soon.}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{comic discussion}}&amp;lt;noinclude&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>82.13.184.33</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=3232:_Countdown_Standard&amp;diff=410247</id>
		<title>3232: Countdown Standard</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=3232:_Countdown_Standard&amp;diff=410247"/>
				<updated>2026-04-14T08:10:36Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;82.13.184.33: /* Explanation */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{comic&lt;br /&gt;
| number    = 3232&lt;br /&gt;
| date      = April 13, 2026&lt;br /&gt;
| title     = Countdown Standard&lt;br /&gt;
| image     = countdown_standard_2x.png&lt;br /&gt;
| imagesize = 474x222px&lt;br /&gt;
| noexpand  = true&lt;br /&gt;
| titletext = Anyone who is caught counting 'three ... two ... one ... zero ... GO!' will be punished with a lifetime of eating only ISO standard food samples.&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Explanation==&lt;br /&gt;
{{incomplete|This page WILL BE CREATED IN TWO...THREE...ONE...NEGATIVE ONE...NOW! Don't remove this notice too soon.}}&lt;br /&gt;
This comic reflects the common trope of people counting to prepare for a synchronized action as a group (such as lifting something heavy) to get everybody to do the action at the same time, without first having agreed at what point in the count they will act. Two of the ways that people often count up can be confusing: the action can be taken ''on'' the beat of 'three', or on the beat ''after'' 'three'. This comic alleges that, if [[Randall]] gained control of the {{w|International Organization for Standardization}} (ISO), he would standardize counting to go ''down'' from three and have the 'go'-point be at zero. However, this proposal would be no better than counting up, as some people may expect to act on the 'one', leading to exactly the same problems.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Deprecated&amp;quot; is a term applied to something that will be eliminated in the future, so you should fix things so as not to use it anymore; it is commonly used when a standard is replaced by a newer version or an alternative approach, but may still be in use in legacy applications. It is hard to imagine where this would be applicable in this case, since such countdowns tend to be short-lived affairs that would be unlikely to continue running for appreciable periods beyond the publication of the new standard.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The fact that these are called &amp;quot;countdowns&amp;quot;, yet the ones being complained about are counts that go ''up'', is probably intentional, and cause for additional complaint by those who are as bothered by the inherent inconsistencies.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{w|ISO}} is an international organization that is responsible for standardizing many things (such as technology and safety standards) to allow for smooth interoperability between countries, manufacturers, and so on. However, it doesn't standardize everyday actions like countdowns. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are no &amp;quot;ISO standard food samples&amp;quot;, as mentioned in the title text, but the implication is that they would be unimaginably bland because they would be 'lowest common denominator' illustrations of the base definition of each food. There ''are'' NIST Standard Reference Materials for food, such as peanut butter ([https://shop.nist.gov/ccrz__ProductDetails?sku=2387&amp;amp;cclcl=en_US see here]). {{w|ISO 3103}} also describes a standardized method for brewing tea, and hacker lore describes a supposed [http://www.catb.org/jargon/html/A/ANSI-standard-pizza.html &amp;quot;ANSI-standard pizza&amp;quot;].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Transcript==&lt;br /&gt;
{{incomplete transcript|Don't remove this notice too soon.}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{comic discussion}}&amp;lt;noinclude&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>82.13.184.33</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=3232:_Countdown_Standard&amp;diff=410246</id>
		<title>3232: Countdown Standard</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=3232:_Countdown_Standard&amp;diff=410246"/>
				<updated>2026-04-14T08:07:17Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;82.13.184.33: /* Explanation */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{comic&lt;br /&gt;
| number    = 3232&lt;br /&gt;
| date      = April 13, 2026&lt;br /&gt;
| title     = Countdown Standard&lt;br /&gt;
| image     = countdown_standard_2x.png&lt;br /&gt;
| imagesize = 474x222px&lt;br /&gt;
| noexpand  = true&lt;br /&gt;
| titletext = Anyone who is caught counting 'three ... two ... one ... zero ... GO!' will be punished with a lifetime of eating only ISO standard food samples.&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Explanation==&lt;br /&gt;
{{incomplete|This page WILL BE CREATED IN TWO...THREE...ONE...NEGATIVE ONE...NOW! Don't remove this notice too soon.}}&lt;br /&gt;
This comic reflects the common trope of people counting to prepare for a synchronized action as a group (such as lifting something heavy) to get everybody to do the action at the same time, without first having agreed at what point in the count they will act. Two of the ways that people often count up can be confusing: the action can be taken ''on'' the beat of 'three', or on the beat ''after'' 'three'. This comic alleges that, if [[Randall]] gained control of the {{w|International Organization for Standardization}} (ISO), he would standardize counting to go ''down'' from three and have the 'go'-point be at zero. However, this proposal would be no better than counting up, as some people may expect to act on the 'one', leading to exactly the same problems.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''Deprecated'' is a term applied to something that will be eliminated in the future, so you should fix things so as not to use it anymore; it is commonly used when a standard is replaced by a newer version or an alternative approach, but may still be in use in legacy applications.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The fact that these are called &amp;quot;countdowns&amp;quot;, yet the ones being complained about are counts that go ''up'', is probably intentional, and cause for additional complaint by those who are as bothered by the inherent inconsistencies.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{w|ISO}} is an international organization that is responsible for standardizing many things (such as technology and safety standards) to allow for smooth interoperability between countries, manufacturers, and so on. However, it doesn't standardize everyday actions like countdowns. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are no &amp;quot;ISO standard food samples&amp;quot;, as mentioned in the title text, but the implication is that they would be unimaginably bland because they would be 'lowest common denominator' illustrations of the base definition of each food. There ''are'' NIST Standard Reference Materials for food, such as peanut butter ([https://shop.nist.gov/ccrz__ProductDetails?sku=2387&amp;amp;cclcl=en_US see here]). {{w|ISO 3103}} also describes a standardized method for brewing tea, and hacker lore describes a supposed [http://www.catb.org/jargon/html/A/ANSI-standard-pizza.html &amp;quot;ANSI-standard pizza&amp;quot;].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Transcript==&lt;br /&gt;
{{incomplete transcript|Don't remove this notice too soon.}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{comic discussion}}&amp;lt;noinclude&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>82.13.184.33</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=3232:_Countdown_Standard&amp;diff=410245</id>
		<title>3232: Countdown Standard</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=3232:_Countdown_Standard&amp;diff=410245"/>
				<updated>2026-04-14T08:03:11Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;82.13.184.33: /* Explanation */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{comic&lt;br /&gt;
| number    = 3232&lt;br /&gt;
| date      = April 13, 2026&lt;br /&gt;
| title     = Countdown Standard&lt;br /&gt;
| image     = countdown_standard_2x.png&lt;br /&gt;
| imagesize = 474x222px&lt;br /&gt;
| noexpand  = true&lt;br /&gt;
| titletext = Anyone who is caught counting 'three ... two ... one ... zero ... GO!' will be punished with a lifetime of eating only ISO standard food samples.&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Explanation==&lt;br /&gt;
{{incomplete|This page WILL BE CREATED IN TWO...THREE...ONE...NEGATIVE ONE...NOW! Don't remove this notice too soon.}}&lt;br /&gt;
This comic reflects the common trope of people counting to prepare for a synchronized action as a group (such as lifting something heavy) to get everybody to do the action at the same time, without first having agreed at what point in the count they will act. Two of the ways that people often count up can be confusing: the action can be taken ''on'' the beat of 'three', or on the beat ''after'' 'three'. This comic alleges that, if [[Randall]] gained control of the {{w|International Organization for Standardization}} (ISO), he would standardize counting to go ''down'' from three and have the 'go'-point be at zero. However, this proposal would be no better than counting up, as some people may expect to act on the 'one', leading to exactly the same problems.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''Deprecated'' is a term applied to something that will be eliminated in the future, so you should fix things so as not to use it anymore; it is commonly used when a standard is replaced by a newer version or an alternative approach, but may still be in use in legacy applications.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The fact that these are called &amp;quot;countdowns&amp;quot;, yet the ones being complained about are counts that go ''up'', is probably intentional, and cause for additional complaint by those who are as bothered by the inherent inconsistencies.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{w|ISO}} is an international organization that is responsible for standardizing many things (such as technology and safety standards) to allow for smooth interoperability between countries, manufacturers, and so on. However, it doesn't standardize everyday actions like countdowns. Also, there are no &amp;quot;ISO standard food samples&amp;quot; as mentioned in the title text, but one can imagine they would be unimaginably bland. However, there are NIST Standard Reference Materials for food, such as peanut butter ([https://shop.nist.gov/ccrz__ProductDetails?sku=2387&amp;amp;cclcl=en_US see here]). On the other hand, {{w|ISO 3103}} describes a standardized method for brewing tea. Hacker lore describes a supposed [http://www.catb.org/jargon/html/A/ANSI-standard-pizza.html &amp;quot;ANSI-standard pizza&amp;quot;].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Transcript==&lt;br /&gt;
{{incomplete transcript|Don't remove this notice too soon.}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{comic discussion}}&amp;lt;noinclude&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>82.13.184.33</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=3232:_Countdown_Standard&amp;diff=410244</id>
		<title>3232: Countdown Standard</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=3232:_Countdown_Standard&amp;diff=410244"/>
				<updated>2026-04-14T07:58:47Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;82.13.184.33: /* Explanation */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{comic&lt;br /&gt;
| number    = 3232&lt;br /&gt;
| date      = April 13, 2026&lt;br /&gt;
| title     = Countdown Standard&lt;br /&gt;
| image     = countdown_standard_2x.png&lt;br /&gt;
| imagesize = 474x222px&lt;br /&gt;
| noexpand  = true&lt;br /&gt;
| titletext = Anyone who is caught counting 'three ... two ... one ... zero ... GO!' will be punished with a lifetime of eating only ISO standard food samples.&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Explanation==&lt;br /&gt;
{{incomplete|This page WILL BE CREATED IN TWO...THREE...ONE...NEGATIVE ONE...NOW! Don't remove this notice too soon.}}&lt;br /&gt;
This comic reflects the common trope of people counting to prepare for a synchronized action as a group (such as lifting something heavy) to get everybody to do the action at the same time, without first having agreed at what point in the count they will act. Two of the ways that people often count up can be confusing: the action can be taken ''on'' the beat of 'three', or on the beat ''after'' 'three'. This comic alleges that, if [[Randall]] gained control of the {{w|International Organization for Standardization}} (ISO), he would standardize counting to go ''down'' from three and have the 'go'-point be at zero. ''Deprecated'' is a term applied to something that will be eliminated in the future, so you should fix things so as not to use it anymore; it is commonly used in coding, when procedures, libraries, etc. are planned to be retired. However, this would be no better than counting up, as some people may expect to act on the 'one', leading to exactly the same problems.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The fact that these are called &amp;quot;countdowns&amp;quot;, yet the ones being complained about are counts that go ''up'', is probably intentional, and cause for additional complaint by those who are as bothered by the inherent inconsistencies.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{w|ISO}} is an international organization that is responsible for standardizing many things (such as technology and safety standards) to allow for smooth interoperability between countries, manufacturers, and so on. However, it doesn't standardize everyday actions like countdowns. Also, there are no &amp;quot;ISO standard food samples&amp;quot; as mentioned in the title text, but one can imagine they would be unimaginably bland. However, there are NIST Standard Reference Materials for food, such as peanut butter ([https://shop.nist.gov/ccrz__ProductDetails?sku=2387&amp;amp;cclcl=en_US see here]). On the other hand, {{w|ISO 3103}} describes a standardized method for brewing tea. Hacker lore describes a supposed [http://www.catb.org/jargon/html/A/ANSI-standard-pizza.html &amp;quot;ANSI-standard pizza&amp;quot;].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Transcript==&lt;br /&gt;
{{incomplete transcript|Don't remove this notice too soon.}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{comic discussion}}&amp;lt;noinclude&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>82.13.184.33</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=3231:_Lightning&amp;diff=410243</id>
		<title>3231: Lightning</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=3231:_Lightning&amp;diff=410243"/>
				<updated>2026-04-14T07:51:36Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;82.13.184.33: /* Explanation */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{comic&lt;br /&gt;
| number    = 3231&lt;br /&gt;
| date      = April 10, 2026&lt;br /&gt;
| title     = Lightning&lt;br /&gt;
| image     = lightning_2x.png&lt;br /&gt;
| imagesize = 328x364px&lt;br /&gt;
| noexpand  = true&lt;br /&gt;
| titletext = Maybe you should wear one too? I guess I'm taller than you, so as long as I have one we're fine.&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Explanation==&lt;br /&gt;
{{incomplete|This page was created by a GROUNDED BOT. Don't remove this notice too soon.}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
An {{w|anti-static wrist strap}} is a device worn by people working with sensitive electronic devices. The strap is connected to a {{w|Ground (electricity)|&amp;quot;ground&amp;quot;}}, so any static charge will be neutralized rather than accumulating and discharging to the device, potentially causing damage. Many electrical devices are grounded by conductors in their power cords, protecting the devices (and their users) from electrical faults.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{w|Lightning}} is a release of static electricity that occurs when there's a large charge difference between a cloud and the Earth or between two clouds. In the comic, [[Cueball]] has [[649|once again]] confused how anti-static devices work — rather than protecting a device from static in the person, he thinks it will protect the person from static in the lightning. In fact, wearing a strap that conducts electricity will make it fractionally ''more'' likely that he will be struck by lightning (by bringing the typical 'ground' anode marginally closer to the cloud's cathode, bypassing the usually greater electrical impedance of his body), and then the strap is far too small to protect him from the electricity in the lightning strike once this happens.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
He may think that the anti-static device works like a {{w|lightning rod}}, attracting the lightning that would have struck his body, and diverting it away from it. The reason they work is because lightning takes the easiest path. If a tall structure is going to be hit by a lightning strike, it's better to have that strike not go via more resistive materials that can be easily damaged or destroyed. A proper lightning conductor is designed to conduct the large amount of energy of lightning safely to the bottom&amp;lt;!-- and can be repaired/replaced, after an incident, far easier than the structure it may have sacrificially protected, in the case of any strike that *definitely* would have damaged the thing it is protecting... You then have to take your chances from further strikes in the same storm, but you're no worse off than you would have been, in such extreme circumstances, and decent lightning protection should normally be more than capable of taking many strikes between thorough inspections--&amp;gt;, unlike a wrist-strap cable that is only made to leak away much smaller static buildups and could not contain a sudden cloud-to-ground surge of electricity.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This is further echoed by the title text, in which he thinks that [[Ponytail]] should be safe because he's taller than she is (plus also higher up in the hill in the comic — although she could at some time easily move further up the hill than him, so relative tallness is only part of the issue), and lightning tends to be attracted to the most prominent conductor in its vicinity (e.g., lightning rods that extend above the roof of the building they're protecting). While it is true that Ponytail is less likely to be struck by lighting directly she is by no means safe: If lighting hits the ground a very large current is discharged into the earth, and will spread outwards from the impact point. Since Ponytail (like all humans) has a lower resistance than the ground, this current will travel through her feet and legs upon reaching her.  Since Cueball has (by an extension of his own logic) made himself more likely to be struck he has increased the risk for Ponytail even if the grounding would protect him. (Obviously, there are better ways to be protected during a thunderstorm; see the What If on {{What If|16|lightning}}.)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Randall]] also shows [[Cueball]]'s incorrect views on lightning in [[795: Conditional Risk]], in that case confusing statistics.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Transcript==&lt;br /&gt;
{{incomplete transcript|Don't remove this notice too soon.}}&lt;br /&gt;
:[Lightning overhead. Cueball and Ponytail (the latter holding a walking stick) are standing on a hill at night with various shrubbery on it, watching the lightning.]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[In the sky, by the lightning:]&lt;br /&gt;
:BOOOOM&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Cueball: Don't worry, I'm wearing an anti-static wrist strap&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Trivia==&lt;br /&gt;
There was indeed a {{w|Lightning rod fashion|brief period}}, starting in France in 1778, when lightning rods were incorporated into clothing. Its effectiveness is debatable. One would need data about how many people wearing such clothing were struck by lightning but unhurt because of the rods, and there's no way to know how many people wearing such clothing weren't struck at all, but ''would'' have been struck if they hadn't been wearing it.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{comic discussion}}&amp;lt;noinclude&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Comics featuring Cueball]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Comics featuring Ponytail]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Science]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Comics with inverted brightness]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>82.13.184.33</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:3231:_Lightning&amp;diff=410242</id>
		<title>Talk:3231: Lightning</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:3231:_Lightning&amp;diff=410242"/>
				<updated>2026-04-14T07:49:07Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;82.13.184.33: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&amp;lt;!-- Please sign your posts with ~~~~ and don't delete this text. New comments should be added at the bottom. --&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
I don't know if this is important, but at least right now there is no period. Might change later. [[User:Majordesmosnerd|Majordesmosnerd]] ([[User talk:Majordesmosnerd|talk]]) 20:52, 10 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
im not sure how to insert it into the current state of the explanation, but by being a lightning rod nearby but higher up, he ''is'' providing protection to ponytail, right? - [[User:Vaedez|Vaedez]] ([[User talk:Vaedez|talk]]) 21:04, 10 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:That does seem to be the premise, but I doubt that a few inches are sufficient for this, especially if they're several feet apart. But I had the same idea and already put it into the explanation. [[User:Barmar|Barmar]] ([[User talk:Barmar|talk]]) 21:11, 10 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ironically, wearing a (properly grounded) anti-static strap would actually _increase_ the odds of being struck by lightning, turning you into a human lightning rod.  The whole point of an anti-static strap is to dissipate any intrinsic potential difference between you and the ground, thus making you a (marginally) shorter path for the extreme potential difference between the clouds and the ground state.  [[Special:Contributions/50.47.191.231|50.47.191.231]] 21:10, 10 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
: - and of course someone said that in the explanation in the time it took me to write the comment.  :-p. [[Special:Contributions/50.47.191.231|50.47.191.231]] 21:12, 10 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php/649:_Static Fortunately, Randall also presents an alternative solution.] [[Special:Contributions/216.7.114.74|216.7.114.74]] 23:13, 10 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Timing kinda sucks for this one: [https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cz90vpvlvq3o Colorado officials trying to identify woman struck by lightning]. [[User:RandalSchwartz|RandalSchwartz]] ([[User talk:RandalSchwartz|talk]]) 22:54, 10 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Compare xkcd [[795]]. [[User:X|X]] ([[User talk:X|talk]]) 00:59, 11 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
THE EXPLANATION GIVEN ABOVE is WRONG-ish. &amp;quot;, Cueball has once again confused how anti-static devices work &amp;quot;. Actually, earthing does protect against lighting strikes -- the ground potential shapes around above the ground point. Cueball is less likely to be hit by lighting while wearing a correctly earthed grounding strap.  Imagine that instead of &amp;quot;Cueball&amp;quot;, what you see is the surface of the mountain curving up and around over Cueball. And yes, he is also more likely to be hit while he is the tallest point, lightning rods do get hit.  Also, to work correctly, a lighting rod should have a pointed tip -- this makes it less likely to be hit because it works better at lifting the &amp;quot;surrounding ground&amp;quot; up to the point of the lighting rod.  If it works perfectly, Cueball won't be the &amp;quot;high point&amp;quot; -- the surrounding air will be at the same potential has him.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;gt; &amp;quot;&amp;quot;''possibility, however, that the wire goes down the torso (ideally in an insulated manner, ....''&amp;quot;&amp;quot; -- The lightning bolt has just jumped hundreds of feet through air from(/to) the sky.  No wire insulation flexible enough to walk with will stop a lightning bolt that strong. --[[User:PRR|PRR]] ([[User talk:PRR|talk]]) 06:18, 11 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:It has long been a matter of contention whether a pointy tip (or even multiple spikes, branching out like crown of thorns), or (say) a ball-top, is the 'best' shape for the tip of a lightning conductor. It's very hard to practically test and compare different designs. But the balance of evidence seems to point (no pun intended!) towards a 'blunt-tipped-pencil'-like single extension (like a sharp end, but rounded off) for every 'summit' (though you can and should place multiple 'single spikes' for area-protection), in part because it never gets so thin as to have the flowing charge all trying to squeeze through it (at the moment where the atmosphere just is no longer enough of an insulator across the air-gap and the ionising 'feeler' can establish itself) which won't exactly help things if and when the lightning does strike.&lt;br /&gt;
:There's also a lot of other contentious/commonly-misunderstood details about how lightning-protection works,to which I originally elaborated. But it looked a bit too much TL;DR; even to me, so I just now cut it back, fortunately for y'all. ;) But the best way to prevent conductive damage between conductor and the structure (or person?) it's mounted upon is to have it ''standing off'' whatever it's attached to, secured periodically (enough to not flap about) but maintain an air-gap.&lt;br /&gt;
:Or, for things that ''really'' don't need (and maybe can't have) a conductor running down them, like rockets on pads, set up several free-standing 'lightning masts' surrounding the core structure, with a greater height sufficient to intercept chance lightning events that ''might'' have sought the structure of interest without these stand-offish towers being more ready to form the base of any initial upstroke. (Perhaps mount ionising lasers on them, to also make that 'bit of air' slightly more likely to be used, if you can't fly kites from them. Or even fire spool-tethered sounding rockets up when critical conditions are detected. Neither of which sound like good solutions when adjacent to a rocket-pad, of course. :p ). [[Special:Contributions/82.132.239.232|82.132.239.232]] 13:23, 11 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This might be a stretch but the art reminds me a lot of the art for the Magic card Lightning Bolt, might be an intentional reference. [https://scryfall.com/card/a25/141/lightning-bolt] -magic nerd [[Special:Contributions/38.85.177.78|38.85.177.78]] 10:47, 11 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Yes that is a very long stretch. There are only som many ways to draw lightning. ;-) --[[User:Kynde|Kynde]] ([[User talk:Kynde|talk]]) 09:07, 12 April 2026 (UTC) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Does anyone know what the other comic is where Randall shows lightning? It's one where Cueball keeps walking in a storm, because he thinks the amount of people that die each year from lightning strikes is so small he can't possibly get struck-Despite him being all reckless in a storm by keeping going, thus making him a big target. Anyone know which one it is? [[User:GSLikesCats307|GSLikesCats307]] ([[User talk:GSLikesCats307|talk]]) 15:29, 11 April 2026&lt;br /&gt;
:Linked earlier: &amp;quot;Compare xkcd [[795]].&amp;quot; [[User:RandalSchwartz|RandalSchwartz]] ([[User talk:RandalSchwartz|talk]]) 17:29, 11 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:As well as prior confusion on how antistatic wrist straps work: [https://xkcd.com/649/ xkcd 649]. (Or I have misunderstood what is happening in the strip)[[Special:Contributions/24.255.31.134|24.255.31.134]] 00:34, 12 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I don't see any comments about the feature of this cartoon visible in my Safari browser on a Mac (not viewing the mobile friendly web site: m.xkcd.com but rather https://xkcd.com/3231/) which shows a Mode pulldown list instead of title text. The pull down list includes: Light Mode, Lighter Mode, Dark Mode, Darkest Mode (Sets the window totally black), Blury Mode, etc. the end of the list is the most disturbing of all, it's Boat Mode. &lt;br /&gt;
Isn't anyone else seeing these? They are hilarious. SAWilkus --[[Special:Contributions/2A09:BAC2:B089:1D37:0:0:2E9:CF|2A09:BAC2:B089:1D37:0:0:2E9:CF]] 00:44, 12 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:They all appeared on all comics since April fools day --[[User:Darth Vader|Darth Vader]] ([[User talk:Darth Vader|talk]]) 08:07, 12 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Yes, see [[3227]] itself for all comments (explanations, general chit-chat, etc) directly arising from that...&lt;br /&gt;
:At this point, I'm tentatively thinking it's a permanent ''and global'' site addition (not just active for AFD itself, or even just the week following release), or at least as long as there are no further page-redesigns that force Randall to squish it out (except perhaps for #3227 itself).&lt;br /&gt;
:Most April 1st 'specials' (or ''intended'' April 1st, give or take delays) only did their thing (assuming there even was a 'thing') on themselves, and http://https://3d.xkcd.com/ only catered for (almost all) comics up until the one for which that was the release (also, you now need to go find it actively sitting on a parallel site). That this is a global site-redesign (except maybe not where it would clash with other single-comic interactivity?), that's not even that intrusive, bodes well for it being a 'standard' feature of the site perpetually from this point on... But I'm open to being wrong, if it for some reason needs to revert to become a feature only upon the 'origin' comic (where I hope it can at least stick around there, for as long as the site lasts). [[Special:Contributions/82.132.238.12|82.132.238.12]] 14:55, 12 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
: Thank you for explaining the addition of the Modes to this and previous XKCD sites. --[[User:SAWilkus|SAWilkus]] ([[User talk:SAWilkus|talk]]) 20:36, 12 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Note: There was indeed a brief period in real life when lightning rods were incorporated into clothing in France in 1778: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lightning_rod_fashion {{unsigned ip|80.146.191.143|13:53, 13 April 2026}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I removed this paragraph from the Explanation because I believe substantial parts of it are untrue or misleading:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 ''Additionally, merely ''wearing'' such a device has no effect at all if it isn't connected to a handy grounding point, which is unlikely to be the case if you're actively moving around, such as with the two characters here who seem to be hiking during the storm. You'd possibly even need a couple of grounding-wires, always one secured to some suitable 'earthing point' even while the other is being unclipped from where you've just been and reclipped to slightly ahead of where you're going. Close examination of the 'protected' individual shows that there is a loop of some dangling wire going from their wrist to their body. If that's all it does, then it's practically useless. There is some vague possibility, however, that the wire goes down the torso (ideally in an insulated manner, to avoid both electrical and thermal transference in the event of a lightning strike passing through it) and splits to connect down each leg and towards a grounding-plate/spike on the sole of each foot. ''This'' would technically create a dynamic 'always active' form of lightning-rod protection (ignoring the discrepancy between the height of the figure's wrist and the possibility that the higher crown of the head might be struck by lightning more in the first instance) where the act of walking will always create a protective connection to the ground — so long as Cueball does not attempt to run or (even momentarily) make any jumping movements. And it still relies upon an effective lightning-conductor connection that is rated sufficient to carry a strike's charge properly, without creating additional surface effects to the skin/clothing it passes down along. This is one of the rare situations in which wearing a {{w|tin foil hat}} might actually be of some benefit, assuming that it was connected to ground via a conductor, all sufficiently heavy-duty to carry the current.''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I believe removing that paragraph serves the readers, but it is not beyond repair. Let's workshop it! [[Special:Contributions/2603:800C:1200:596A:B10C:CCAA:E864:EE7B|2603:800C:1200:596A:B10C:CCAA:E864:EE7B]] 03:58, 14 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>82.13.184.33</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=3231:_Lightning&amp;diff=410186</id>
		<title>3231: Lightning</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=3231:_Lightning&amp;diff=410186"/>
				<updated>2026-04-13T14:46:43Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;82.13.184.33: /* Explanation */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{comic&lt;br /&gt;
| number    = 3231&lt;br /&gt;
| date      = April 10, 2026&lt;br /&gt;
| title     = Lightning&lt;br /&gt;
| image     = lightning_2x.png&lt;br /&gt;
| imagesize = 328x364px&lt;br /&gt;
| noexpand  = true&lt;br /&gt;
| titletext = Maybe you should wear one too? I guess I'm taller than you, so as long as I have one we're fine.&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Explanation==&lt;br /&gt;
{{incomplete|This page was created by a GROUNDED BOT. Don't remove this notice too soon.}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
An {{w|anti-static wrist strap}} is a device worn by people working with sensitive electronic devices. The strap is connected to a {{w|Ground (electricity)|&amp;quot;ground&amp;quot;}}, so any static charge will be neutralized rather than accumulating and discharging to the device, potentially causing damage. Many electrical devices are grounded by conductors in their power cords, protecting the devices (and their users) from electrical faults.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{w|Lightning}} is a release of static electricity that occurs when there's a large charge difference between a cloud and the Earth or between two clouds. In the comic, [[Cueball]] has [[649|once again]] confused how anti-static devices work — rather than protecting a device from static in the person, he thinks it will protect the person from static in the lightning. In fact, wearing a strap that conducts electricity will make it fractionally ''more'' likely that he will be struck by lightning (by bringing the typical 'ground' anode marginally closer to the cloud's cathode, bypassing the usually greater electrical impedance of his body), and then the strap is far too small to protect him from the electricity in the lightning strike once this happens.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
He may think that the anti-static device works like a {{w|lightning rod}}, attracting the lightning that would have struck his body, and diverting it away from it. The reason they work is because lightning takes the easiest path. If a tall structure is going to be hit by a lightning strike, it's better to have that strike not go via more resistive materials that can be easily damaged or destroyed. A proper lightning conductor is designed to conduct the large amount of energy of lightning safely to the bottom&amp;lt;!-- and can be repaired/replaced, after an incident, far easier than the structure it may have sacrificially protected, in the case of any strike that *definitely* would have damaged the thing it is protecting... You then have to take your chances from further strikes in the same storm, but you're no worse off than you would have been, in such extreme circumstances, and decent lightning protection should normally be more than capable of taking many strikes between thorough inspections--&amp;gt;, unlike a wrist-strap cable that is only made to leak away much smaller static buildups and could not contain a sudden cloud-to-ground surge of electricity.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This is further echoed by the title text, in which he thinks that [[Ponytail]] should be safe because he's taller than she is (plus also higher up in the hill in the comic — although she could at some time easily move further up the hill than him, so relative tallness is only part of the issue), and lightning tends to be attracted to the most prominent conductor in its vicinity (e.g., lightning rods that extend above the roof of the building they're protecting). While this is true, it ignores the fact that (by an extension of his own logic) he's made himself more likely to be struck, and potentially severely hurt or killed, by a lightning strike. (Obviously, there are better ways to be protected during a thunderstorm; see the What If on {{What If|16|lightning}}.)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Additionally, merely ''wearing'' such a device has no effect at all if it isn't connected to a handy grounding point, which is unlikely to be the case if you're actively moving around, such as with the two characters here who seem to be hiking during the storm. You'd possibly even need a couple of grounding-wires, always one secured to some suitable 'earthing point' even while the other is being unclipped from where you've just been and reclipped to slightly ahead of where you're going. Close examination of the 'protected' individual shows that there is a loop of some dangling wire going from their wrist to their body. If that's all it does, then it's practically useless. There is some vague possibility, however, that the wire goes down the torso (ideally in an insulated manner, to avoid both electrical and thermal transference in the event of a lightning strike passing through it) and splits to connect down each leg and towards a grounding-plate/spike on the sole of each foot. ''This'' would technically create a dynamic 'always active' form of lightning-rod protection (ignoring the discrepancy between the height of the figure's wrist and the possibility that the higher crown of the head might be struck by lightning more in the first instance) where the act of walking will always create a protective connection to the ground — so long as Cueball does not attempt to run or (even momentarily) make any jumping movements. And it still relies upon an effective lightning-conductor connection that is rated sufficient to carry a strike's charge properly, without creating additional surface effects to the skin/clothing it passes down along. This is one of the rare situations in which wearing a {{w|tin foil hat}} might actually be of some benefit, assuming that it was connected to ground via a conductor, all sufficiently heavy-duty to carry the current.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Randall]] also shows [[Cueball]]'s incorrect views on lightning in [[795: Conditional Risk]], in that case confusing statistics.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Note: There was indeed a brief period in real life when lightning rods were incorporated into clothing in France in 1778: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lightning_rod_fashion&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Transcript==&lt;br /&gt;
{{incomplete transcript|Don't remove this notice too soon.}}&lt;br /&gt;
:[Lightning overhead. Cueball and Ponytail (the latter holding a walking stick) are standing on a hill at night with various shrubbery on it, watching the lightning.]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[In the sky, by the lightning:]&lt;br /&gt;
:BOOOOM&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Cueball: Don't worry, I'm wearing an anti-static wrist strap&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{comic discussion}}&amp;lt;noinclude&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Comics featuring Cueball]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Comics featuring Ponytail]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Science]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Comics with inverted brightness]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>82.13.184.33</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:3231:_Lightning&amp;diff=410175</id>
		<title>Talk:3231: Lightning</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:3231:_Lightning&amp;diff=410175"/>
				<updated>2026-04-13T08:12:02Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;82.13.184.33: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&amp;lt;!-- Please sign your posts with ~~~~ and don't delete this text. New comments should be added at the bottom. --&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
I don't know if this is important, but at least right now there is no period. Might change later. [[User:Majordesmosnerd|Majordesmosnerd]] ([[User talk:Majordesmosnerd|talk]]) 20:52, 10 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
im not sure how to insert it into the current state of the explanation, but by being a lightning rod nearby but higher up, he ''is'' providing protection to ponytail, right? - [[User:Vaedez|Vaedez]] ([[User talk:Vaedez|talk]]) 21:04, 10 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:That does seem to be the premise, but I doubt that a few inches are sufficient for this, especially if they're several feet apart. But I had the same idea and already put it into the explanation. [[User:Barmar|Barmar]] ([[User talk:Barmar|talk]]) 21:11, 10 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ironically, wearing a (properly grounded) anti-static strap would actually _increase_ the odds of being struck by lightning, turning you into a human lightning rod.  The whole point of an anti-static strap is to dissipate any intrinsic potential difference between you and the ground, thus making you a (marginally) shorter path for the extreme potential difference between the clouds and the ground state.  [[Special:Contributions/50.47.191.231|50.47.191.231]] 21:10, 10 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
: - and of course someone said that in the explanation in the time it took me to write the comment.  :-p. [[Special:Contributions/50.47.191.231|50.47.191.231]] 21:12, 10 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php/649:_Static Fortunately, Randall also presents an alternative solution.] [[Special:Contributions/216.7.114.74|216.7.114.74]] 23:13, 10 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Timing kinda sucks for this one: [https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cz90vpvlvq3o Colorado officials trying to identify woman struck by lightning]. [[User:RandalSchwartz|RandalSchwartz]] ([[User talk:RandalSchwartz|talk]]) 22:54, 10 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Compare xkcd [[795]]. [[User:X|X]] ([[User talk:X|talk]]) 00:59, 11 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
THE EXPLANATION GIVEN ABOVE is WRONG-ish. &amp;quot;, Cueball has once again confused how anti-static devices work &amp;quot;. Actually, earthing does protect against lighting strikes -- the ground potential shapes around above the ground point. Cueball is less likely to be hit by lighting while wearing a correctly earthed grounding strap.  Imagine that instead of &amp;quot;Cueball&amp;quot;, what you see is the surface of the mountain curving up and around over Cueball. And yes, he is also more likely to be hit while he is the tallest point, lightning rods do get hit.  Also, to work correctly, a lighting rod should have a pointed tip -- this makes it less likely to be hit because it works better at lifting the &amp;quot;surrounding ground&amp;quot; up to the point of the lighting rod.  If it works perfectly, Cueball won't be the &amp;quot;high point&amp;quot; -- the surrounding air will be at the same potential has him.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;gt; &amp;quot;&amp;quot;''possibility, however, that the wire goes down the torso (ideally in an insulated manner, ....''&amp;quot;&amp;quot; -- The lightning bolt has just jumped hundreds of feet through air from(/to) the sky.  No wire insulation flexible enough to walk with will stop a lightning bolt that strong. --[[User:PRR|PRR]] ([[User talk:PRR|talk]]) 06:18, 11 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:It has long been a matter of contention whether a pointy tip (or even multiple spikes, branching out like crown of thorns), or (say) a ball-top, is the 'best' shape for the tip of a lightning conductor. It's very hard to practically test and compare different designs. But the balance of evidence seems to point (no pun intended!) towards a 'blunt-tipped-pencil'-like single extension (like a sharp end, but rounded off) for every 'summit' (though you can and should place multiple 'single spikes' for area-protection), in part because it never gets so thin as to have the flowing charge all trying to squeeze through it (at the moment where the atmosphere just is no longer enough of an insulator across the air-gap and the ionising 'feeler' can establish itself) which won't exactly help things if and when the lightning does strike.&lt;br /&gt;
:There's also a lot of other contentious/commonly-misunderstood details about how lightning-protection works,to which I originally elaborated. But it looked a bit too much TL;DR; even to me, so I just now cut it back, fortunately for y'all. ;) But the best way to prevent conductive damage between conductor and the structure (or person?) it's mounted upon is to have it ''standing off'' whatever it's attached to, secured periodically (enough to not flap about) but maintain an air-gap.&lt;br /&gt;
:Or, for things that ''really'' don't need (and maybe can't have) a conductor running down them, like rockets on pads, set up several free-standing 'lightning masts' surrounding the core structure, with a greater height sufficient to intercept chance lightning events that ''might'' have sought the structure of interest without these stand-offish towers being more ready to form the base of any initial upstroke. (Perhaps mount ionising lasers on them, to also make that 'bit of air' slightly more likely to be used, if you can't fly kites from them. Or even fire spool-tethered sounding rockets up when critical conditions are detected. Neither of which sound like good solutions when adjacent to a rocket-pad, of course. :p ). [[Special:Contributions/82.132.239.232|82.132.239.232]] 13:23, 11 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This might be a stretch but the art reminds me a lot of the art for the Magic card Lightning Bolt, might be an intentional reference. [https://scryfall.com/card/a25/141/lightning-bolt] -magic nerd [[Special:Contributions/38.85.177.78|38.85.177.78]] 10:47, 11 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Yes that is a very long stretch. There are only som many ways to draw lightning. ;-) --[[User:Kynde|Kynde]] ([[User talk:Kynde|talk]]) 09:07, 12 April 2026 (UTC) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Does anyone know what the other comic is where Randall shows lightning? It's one where Cueball keeps walking in a storm, because he thinks the amount of people that die each year from lightning strikes is so small he can't possibly get struck-Despite him being all reckless in a storm by keeping going, thus making him a big target. Anyone know which one it is? [[User:GSLikesCats307|GSLikesCats307]] ([[User talk:GSLikesCats307|talk]]) 15:29, 11 April 2026&lt;br /&gt;
:Linked earlier: &amp;quot;Compare xkcd [[795]].&amp;quot; [[User:RandalSchwartz|RandalSchwartz]] ([[User talk:RandalSchwartz|talk]]) 17:29, 11 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:As well as prior confusion on how antistatic wrist straps work: [https://xkcd.com/649/ xkcd 649]. (Or I have misunderstood what is happening in the strip)[[Special:Contributions/24.255.31.134|24.255.31.134]] 00:34, 12 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I don't see any comments about the feature of this cartoon visible in my Safari browser on a Mac (not viewing the mobile friendly web site: m.xkcd.com but rather https://xkcd.com/3231/) which shows a Mode pulldown list instead of title text. The pull down list includes: Light Mode, Lighter Mode, Dark Mode, Darkest Mode (Sets the window totally black), Blury Mode, etc. the end of the list is the most disturbing of all, it's Boat Mode. &lt;br /&gt;
Isn't anyone else seeing these? They are hilarious. SAWilkus --[[Special:Contributions/2A09:BAC2:B089:1D37:0:0:2E9:CF|2A09:BAC2:B089:1D37:0:0:2E9:CF]] 00:44, 12 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:They all appeared on all comics since April fools day --[[User:Darth Vader|Darth Vader]] ([[User talk:Darth Vader|talk]]) 08:07, 12 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Yes, see [[3227]] itself for all comments (explanations, general chit-chat, etc) directly arising from that...&lt;br /&gt;
:At this point, I'm tentatively thinking it's a permanent ''and global'' site addition (not just active for AFD itself, or even just the week following release), or at least as long as there are no further page-redesigns that force Randall to squish it out (except perhaps for #3227 itself).&lt;br /&gt;
:Most April 1st 'specials' (or ''intended'' April 1st, give or take delays) only did their thing (assuming there even was a 'thing') on themselves, and http://https://3d.xkcd.com/ only catered for (almost all) comics up until the one for which that was the release (also, you now need to go find it actively sitting on a parallel site). That this is a global site-redesign (except maybe not where it would clash with other single-comic interactivity?), that's not even that intrusive, bodes well for it being a 'standard' feature of the site perpetually from this point on... But I'm open to being wrong, if it for some reason needs to revert to become a feature only upon the 'origin' comic (where I hope it can at least stick around there, for as long as the site lasts). [[Special:Contributions/82.132.238.12|82.132.238.12]] 14:55, 12 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
: Thank you for explaining the addition of the Modes to this and previous XKCD sites. --[[User:SAWilkus|SAWilkus]] ([[User talk:SAWilkus|talk]]) 20:36, 12 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>82.13.184.33</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=3231:_Lightning&amp;diff=410174</id>
		<title>3231: Lightning</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=3231:_Lightning&amp;diff=410174"/>
				<updated>2026-04-13T08:09:35Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;82.13.184.33: /* Explanation */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{comic&lt;br /&gt;
| number    = 3231&lt;br /&gt;
| date      = April 10, 2026&lt;br /&gt;
| title     = Lightning&lt;br /&gt;
| image     = lightning_2x.png&lt;br /&gt;
| imagesize = 328x364px&lt;br /&gt;
| noexpand  = true&lt;br /&gt;
| titletext = Maybe you should wear one too? I guess I'm taller than you, so as long as I have one we're fine.&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Explanation==&lt;br /&gt;
{{incomplete|This page was created by a GROUNDED BOT. Don't remove this notice too soon.}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
An {{w|anti-static wrist strap}} is a device worn by people working with sensitive electronic devices. The strap is connected to a {{w|Ground (electricity)|&amp;quot;ground&amp;quot;}}, so any static charge will be neutralized rather than accumulating and discharging to the device, potentially causing damage. Many electrical devices are grounded by conductors in their power cords, protecting the devices (and their users) from electrical faults.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{w|Lightning}} is a release of static electricity that occurs when there's a large charge difference between a cloud and the Earth or between two clouds. In the comic, [[Cueball]] has [[649|once again]] confused how anti-static devices work &amp;amp;mdash; rather than protecting a device from static in the person, he thinks it will protect the person from static in the lightning. In fact, wearing a strap that conducts electricity will make it ''more'' likely that he will be struck by lightning{{acn}}, and the strap is far too small to protect him from the electricity in the lightning strike.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
He may think that the anti-static device works like a {{w|lightning rod}}, attracting the lightning and diverting it away from his body. The reason they work is because lightning takes the easiest path. This is corroborated by the title text, in which he thinks that [[Ponytail]] should be safe because he's taller than she is (plus also higher up in the hill in the comic &amp;amp;mdash; although she could at some time easily move further up the hill than him, so relative tallness is only part of the issue), and lightning tends to be attracted to the most prominent conductor in its vicinity (e.g., lightning rods that extend above the roof of the building they're protecting). While this is true, it ignores the fact that he's made himself more likely to be struck, and potentially severely hurt or killed, by a lightning strike. (Obviously, there are better ways to be protected during a thunderstorm; see the What If on {{What If|16|lightning}}.)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Additionally, merely ''wearing'' such a device has no effect at all if it isn't connected to a handy grounding point, which is unlikely to be the case if you're actively moving around, such as with the two characters here who seem to be hiking during the storm. You'd possibly even need a couple of grounding-wires, always one secured to some suitable 'earthing point' even while the other is being unclipped from where you've just been and reclipped to slightly ahead of where you're going. Close examination of the 'protected' individual shows that there is a loop of some dangling wire going from their wrist to their body. If that's all it does, then it's practically useless. There is some vague possibility, however, that the wire goes down the torso (ideally in an insulated manner, to avoid both electrical and thermal transference in the event of a lightning strike passing through it) and splits to connect down each leg and towards a grounding-plate/spike on the sole of each foot. ''This'' would technically create a dynamic 'always active' form of lightning-rod protection (ignoring the discrepancy between the height of the figures hand and the possibility that the higher crown of the head might be struck by lightning more in the first instance) where the act of walking will always create a protective connection to the ground - so long as Cueball does not attempt to run or (even momentarily) make any jumping movements. And it still relies upon an effective lightning-conductor connection that is rated sufficient to carry a strike's charge properly, without creating additional surface effects to the skin/clothing it passes down along. This is one of the rare situations in which wearing a {{w|tin foil hat}} might actually be of some benefit, assuming that it was connected to ground via a conductor, all sufficiently heavy-duty to carry the current.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Randall]] also shows [[Cueball]]'s incorrect views on lightning in [[795: Conditional Risk]], in that case confusing statistics.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Transcript==&lt;br /&gt;
{{incomplete transcript|Don't remove this notice too soon.}}&lt;br /&gt;
:[Lightning overhead. Cueball and Ponytail (the latter holding a walking stick) are standing on a hill at night with various shrubbery on it, watching the lightning.]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[In the sky, by the lightning:]&lt;br /&gt;
:BOOOOM&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Cueball: Don't worry, I'm wearing an anti-static wrist strap&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{comic discussion}}&amp;lt;noinclude&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Comics featuring Cueball]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Comics featuring Ponytail]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Science]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Comics with inverted brightness]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>82.13.184.33</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=3231:_Lightning&amp;diff=410173</id>
		<title>3231: Lightning</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=3231:_Lightning&amp;diff=410173"/>
				<updated>2026-04-13T08:08:18Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;82.13.184.33: /* Explanation */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{comic&lt;br /&gt;
| number    = 3231&lt;br /&gt;
| date      = April 10, 2026&lt;br /&gt;
| title     = Lightning&lt;br /&gt;
| image     = lightning_2x.png&lt;br /&gt;
| imagesize = 328x364px&lt;br /&gt;
| noexpand  = true&lt;br /&gt;
| titletext = Maybe you should wear one too? I guess I'm taller than you, so as long as I have one we're fine.&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Explanation==&lt;br /&gt;
{{incomplete|This page was created by a GROUNDED BOT. Don't remove this notice too soon.}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
An {{w|anti-static wrist strap}} is a device worn by people working with sensitive electronic devices. The strap is connected to a {{w|Ground (electricity)|&amp;quot;ground&amp;quot;}}, so any static charge will be neutralized rather than accumulating and discharging to the device, potentially causing damage. Many electrical devices are grounded by conductors in their power cords, protecting the devices (and their users) from electrical faults.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{w|Lightning}} is a release of static electricity that occurs when there's a large charge difference between a cloud and the Earth or between two clouds. In the comic, [[Cueball]] has [[649|once again]] confused how anti-static devices work &amp;amp;mdash; rather than protecting a device from static in the person, he thinks it will protect the person from static in the lightning. In fact, wearing a strap that conducts electricity will make it ''more'' likely that he will be struck by lightning{{acn}}, and the strap is far too small to protect him from the electricity in the lightning strike.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
He may think that the anti-static device works like a {{w|lightning rod}}, attracting the lightning and diverting it away from his body. The reason they work is because lightning takes the easiest path. This is corroborated by the title text, in which he thinks that [[Ponytail]] should be safe because he's taller than she is (plus also higher up in the hill in the comic &amp;amp;mdash; although she could at some time easily move further up the hill than him, so relative tallness is only part of the issue), and lightning tends to be attracted to the most prominent conductor in its vicinity (e.g., lightning rods that extend above the roof of the building they're protecting). While this is true, it ignores the fact that he's made himself more likely to be struck, and potentially severely hurt or killed, by a lightning strike. (Obviously, there are better ways to be protected during a thunderstorm; see the What If on {{What If|16|lightning}}.)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Additionally, merely ''wearing'' such a device has no effect at all if it isn't connected to a handy grounding point, which is unlikely to be the case if you're actively moving around, such as with the two characters here who seem to be hiking during the storm. You'd possibly even need a couple of grounding-wires, always one secured to some suitable 'earthing point' even while the other is being unclipped from where you've just been and reclipped to slightly ahead of where you're going. Close examination of the 'protected' individual shows that there is a loop of some danling wire going from their wrist to their body. If that's all it does, then it's practically useless. There is some vague possibility, however, that the wire goes down the torso (ideally in an insulated manner, to avoid both electrical and thermal transference in the event of a lightning strike passing through it) and splits to connect down each leg and towards a grounding-plate/spike on the sole of each foot. ''This'' would technically create a dynamic 'always active' form of lightning-rod protection (ignoring the discrepancy between the height of the figures hand and the possibility that the higher crown of the head might be struck by lightning more in the first instance) where the act of walking will always create a protective connection to the ground - so long as Cueball does not attempt to run or (even momentarily) make any jumping movements. And it still relies upon an effective lightning-conductor connection that is rated sufficient to carry a strike's charge properly, without creating additional surface effects to the skin/clothing it passes down along. This is one of the rare situations in which wearing a {{w|tin foil hat}} might actually be of some benefit, assuming that it was connected to ground via a conductor, all sufficiently heavy-duty to carry the current.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Randall]] also shows [[Cueball]]'s incorrect views on lightning in [[795: Conditional Risk]], in that case confusing statistics.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Transcript==&lt;br /&gt;
{{incomplete transcript|Don't remove this notice too soon.}}&lt;br /&gt;
:[Lightning overhead. Cueball and Ponytail (the latter holding a walking stick) are standing on a hill at night with various shrubbery on it, watching the lightning.]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[In the sky, by the lightning:]&lt;br /&gt;
:BOOOOM&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Cueball: Don't worry, I'm wearing an anti-static wrist strap&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{comic discussion}}&amp;lt;noinclude&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Comics featuring Cueball]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Comics featuring Ponytail]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Science]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Comics with inverted brightness]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>82.13.184.33</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:3230:_Overton&amp;diff=410046</id>
		<title>Talk:3230: Overton</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:3230:_Overton&amp;diff=410046"/>
				<updated>2026-04-10T10:00:03Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;82.13.184.33: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&amp;lt;!-- Please sign your posts with ~~~~ and don't delete this text. New comments should be added at the bottom. --&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
4 January 1960 – 30 June 2003 {{unsigned ip|77.87.241.9|18:34, 8 April 2026}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Someday this cartoon will be politically inappropriate.  [[Special:Contributions/64.201.132.210|64.201.132.210]] 19:16, 8 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
: ^ Absolutely. [[Special:Contributions/66.154.219.123|66.154.219.123]] 21:16, 8 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
randall posting a politics-related comic? which could be construed as discontent with the current political landscape? inb4 somebody &amp;lt;s&amp;gt;bashes&amp;lt;/s&amp;gt; complains at kynde again - [[User:Vaedez|Vaedez]] ([[User talk:Vaedez|talk]]) 22:15, 8 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I think it's worth noting that the window keeps updating to the right. [[Special:Contributions/50.47.108.55|50.47.108.55]] 02:22, 9 April 2026 (UTC) Ale10ander&lt;br /&gt;
: Only if you consider dates to go from left to right instead of any other direction. [[Special:Contributions/2A02:C7C:7344:4C00:BC19:A5A4:14E8:E888|2A02:C7C:7344:4C00:BC19:A5A4:14E8:E888]] 08:27, 9 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What's the next death date? 2027? (Just guessin) [[User:Cream Starlight|Cream S.L.]] ([[User talk:Cream Starlight|talk]] / [[Special:Contributions/Cream_Starlight|contribs]]) 03:33, 9 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Does he keep dying because he's gone over a ton?  (1 ton = 2000 lbs) {{unsigned ip|2607:fb91:bd8a:8e2f:858d:1e1b:f461:5f6e|04:35, 9 April 2026 (UTC)}}&lt;br /&gt;
:Too heavy even the time is altered, i see [[User:Cream Starlight|Cream S.L.]] ([[User talk:Cream Starlight|talk]] / [[Special:Contributions/Cream_Starlight|contribs]]) 05:53, 9 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:F.Y.I.: 1 ton = 2,000 ''or'' 2,204.6 ''or'' 2,240 pounds, at least.&lt;br /&gt;
:Also it can be 40, 42 or 60 cubic feet (amongst others). Or 12,000 British Thermal Units-per-Hour. And, at least colloquially, I might use it to describe 100 ''miles per hour'' or GB£100. [[Special:Contributions/82.132.238.115|82.132.238.115]] 16:02, 9 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Reincarnation - Can someone suggest a suitable Buddhist or Hindu text as citation for them multiple lifes? [[Special:Contributions/87.129.222.20|87.129.222.20]] 06:39, 9 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:The windows are overlapping, so no this is not a reference to reincarnation. [[User:Zmatt|Zmatt]] ([[User talk:Zmatt|talk]]) 16:00, 9 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:: Are they French windows, or sash windows? [[Special:Contributions/82.13.184.33|82.13.184.33]] 10:00, 10 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For what it's worth, though Wikipedia currently describes Overton as a &amp;quot;political scientist,&amp;quot; that is likely to shift soon. (That is to say, unless someone makes a compelling case on the Talk page, I'm going to change his description to &amp;quot;political activist,&amp;quot; which I think is more accurate to someone who never had a political science degree, never had academic employment, and worked as an electrical engineer before working at an activist think tank.) [[Special:Contributions/38.69.197.145|38.69.197.145]] 12:33, 9 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
: Does that mean that the Overton Window Overton Window has moved? [[Special:Contributions/82.13.184.33|82.13.184.33]] 13:16, 9 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In case anyone wants to check:  [https://www.findagrave.com/memorial/122681438/joseph_paul-overton/photo#view-photo=94839436 Here's a pic of his grave] {{unsigned ip|74.87.89.226|18:04, 9 April 2026 (UTC)}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Just want to say that I think the title text is true. Randall will probably find that, in a few months time, the Sun will no longer be in his face, but the cycle will repeat on an annual basis. I have a similar window. [[User:Jeremyp|Jeremyp]] ([[User talk:Jeremyp|talk]]) 19:18, 9 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
;Significance of the Dates&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Many of the dates in listed correspond to major geopolitical events concerning US military and diplomatic policy. They may also correspond to milestone events in US domestic politics. This is an attempt to compile some of the key events that the comic may be referencing.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*1965:&lt;br /&gt;
**The beginning of Operation Rolling Thunder, the US ground invasion of Vietnam. &lt;br /&gt;
**President LBJ signs the Voting Rights Act of 1965&lt;br /&gt;
*- 2011:&lt;br /&gt;
**US special forces kill Osama Bin Laden&lt;br /&gt;
**NATO forces without the US intervene in the Libyan Civil War leading to the ouster of Muammar Gaddafi.&lt;br /&gt;
**More widely, protests spread accross the Middle East and North Africa, dubbed the Arab Spring&lt;br /&gt;
**The last of the US combat forces stationed in Iraq are withdrawn. &lt;br /&gt;
**The Occuppy Wall Street movement begins.&lt;br /&gt;
*1973: &lt;br /&gt;
**The United States signs the Paris Peace Accords, withdrawing from the Vietnam conflict and claiming the war was over&lt;br /&gt;
**The United States Congress overrides a presidential veto to pass the War Powers Resolution, limiting the ability of future presidents to wage war without Congressional approval&lt;br /&gt;
**The Watergate Scandal breaks.&lt;br /&gt;
**Roe v Wade. &lt;br /&gt;
*- 2018:&lt;br /&gt;
**President Donald Trump unilaterally withdraws the United States from the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action, aka the Iran Nuclear Deal.&lt;br /&gt;
**Congress reverses many of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act's reporting and compliance requirements for all but the largest US banks. &lt;br /&gt;
*1982: &lt;br /&gt;
**Israel violates a 1981 U.S. Brokered ceasefire agreement and invades Lebanon. In response the United States spearheads the establishment of a peacekeeping force to protect Beirut, the Multinational Force in Lebanon.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;wbr/&amp;gt;{{unsigned|In-Sanity|22:16, 8 April 2026}}&lt;br /&gt;
:Unfortunately, I suspect that you could easily find such events for absolutely ''every'' year across that range... Unless you narrow down the choices to just something current (i.e. specifically the ones related to current Middle East events, I suppose), which are going to be less frequent but perhaps specifically in Randall's mind.&lt;br /&gt;
:(Oh, and I slightly re-reformatted your amended contribution, presuming that you meant it to look a bit more like it is now.)&lt;br /&gt;
:I was wondering if there was a mathematical pattern to the numbers, myself. [[Special:Contributions/81.179.199.253|81.179.199.253]] 23:00, 8 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>82.13.184.33</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=3230:_Overton&amp;diff=410045</id>
		<title>3230: Overton</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=3230:_Overton&amp;diff=410045"/>
				<updated>2026-04-10T09:57:33Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;82.13.184.33: /* Explanation */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{comic&lt;br /&gt;
| number    = 3230&lt;br /&gt;
| date      = April 8, 2026&lt;br /&gt;
| title     = Overton&lt;br /&gt;
| image     = overton_2x.png&lt;br /&gt;
| imagesize = 242x268px&lt;br /&gt;
| noexpand  = true&lt;br /&gt;
| titletext = I think I accidentally installed an Overton window in my bedroom. A few months ago, the sun wasn't in my face in the morning, but now it is.&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Explanation==&lt;br /&gt;
{{incomplete|This page was created by JOSEPH PAUL OVERTON, BACK FROM THE DEAD. Don't remove this notice too soon.}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{w|Joseph Paul Overton}} was a political scientist who created the concept of the {{w|Overton window}}, which is the range of subjects that are politically appropriate to raise during a period of time. The first set of dates, 1960 and 2003, are the years that Overton was born and died.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is common for political commentators to state that the Overton window has &amp;quot;moved,&amp;quot; meaning that the standard for which political positions are &amp;quot;moderate&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;extreme&amp;quot; has changed. In the comic, the &amp;quot;Overton window&amp;quot; refers to the time span in which Joseph Paul Overton was alive. The dates on Overton's grave have been repeatedly crossed out and replaced as this 'window' has moved. This creates the ridiculous implication that Overton was living at least four overlapping lives, or that history has repeatedly changed so that the dates of his life shifted, either of which is impossible.{{cn}} Alternatively, it could reflect changes in the frame of reference the keepers of the grave are using to date events.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the title text, the speaker notices that the sunlight is now being let in earlier in the morning, and attributes this to it coming through an &amp;quot;Overton window&amp;quot; that can physically move. This is unlikely, since the Overton window is an abstract concept, not an architectural feature, and sunlight is not generally influenced by social attitudes.{{cn}} It is more likely that the phenomenon is due to the seasonal movement of the Sun in the sky, where its apparent path across the sky moves further north or south between the {{w|summer solstice}} (highest arc) and {{w|winter solstice}} (lowest arc), changing the place it falls at a given time of day, and therefore it's angle of entry through any given window. This shift is caused by the Earth's tilt relative to its orbit. The Sun's position at a certain clock time may also be perceived to change suddenly due to the beginning or end of {{w|daylight saving time}}, as occurred in most US states and many other countries shortly before this comic was published. (This is an issue that Randall has covered [[:Category:Daylight saving time|multiple times]], although apparently ''not'' (unless this is a subtle reference) this year.)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Transcript==&lt;br /&gt;
{{incomplete transcript|Don't remove this notice too soon.}}&lt;br /&gt;
:[A gravestone is shown on some grass. On the inscription, all of the years except the last one are crossed out in red, and all except the first pair of years have the years themselves in red. The inscription is as follows:]&lt;br /&gt;
:Joseph Paul Overton&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;s&amp;gt;1960&amp;lt;/s&amp;gt; - &amp;lt;s&amp;gt;2003&amp;lt;/s&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;s&amp;gt;1965&amp;lt;/s&amp;gt; - &amp;lt;s&amp;gt;2011&amp;lt;/s&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;s&amp;gt;1973&amp;lt;/s&amp;gt; - &amp;lt;s&amp;gt;2018&amp;lt;/s&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:1982 - &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{comic discussion}}&amp;lt;noinclude&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Politics]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Comics featuring real people]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Comics with color]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Comics with red annotations]] &amp;lt;!-- 'in universe' versions? --&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>82.13.184.33</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=3230:_Overton&amp;diff=410041</id>
		<title>3230: Overton</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=3230:_Overton&amp;diff=410041"/>
				<updated>2026-04-10T08:18:53Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;82.13.184.33: /* Explanation */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{comic&lt;br /&gt;
| number    = 3230&lt;br /&gt;
| date      = April 8, 2026&lt;br /&gt;
| title     = Overton&lt;br /&gt;
| image     = overton_2x.png&lt;br /&gt;
| imagesize = 242x268px&lt;br /&gt;
| noexpand  = true&lt;br /&gt;
| titletext = I think I accidentally installed an Overton window in my bedroom. A few months ago, the sun wasn't in my face in the morning, but now it is.&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Explanation==&lt;br /&gt;
{{incomplete|This page was created by JOSEPH PAUL OVERTON, BACK FROM THE DEAD. Don't remove this notice too soon.}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{w|Joseph Paul Overton}} was a political scientist who created the concept of the {{w|Overton window}}, which is the range of subjects that are politically appropriate to raise during a period of time. The first set of dates, 1960 and 2003, are the years that Overton was born and died.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is common for political commentators to state that the Overton window has &amp;quot;moved,&amp;quot; meaning that the standard for which political positions are &amp;quot;moderate&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;extreme&amp;quot; changes. In the comic, the &amp;quot;Overton window&amp;quot; instead refers to the time span in which Joseph Paul Overton was alive. The dates on Overton's grave have been repeatedly crossed out and replaced as this 'window' has moved. This creates the ridiculous implication that Overton was living at least four overlapping lives, or that history has repeatedly changed so that the dates of his life shifted, either of which is impossible.{{cn}} Alternatively, it could reflect changes in the frame of reference the keepers of the grave are using to date events.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the title text, the speaker notices that the sunlight is now being let in earlier in the morning, and attributes this to it coming through an &amp;quot;Overton window&amp;quot; that can physically move. This is unlikely, since the Overton window is an abstract concept, not an architectural feature, and sunlight is not generally influenced by social attitudes.{{cn}} It is more likely that the phenomenon is due to the seasonal movement of the Sun in the sky, where its apparent path across the sky moves further north or south between the {{w|summer solstice}} (highest arc) and {{w|winter solstice}} (lowest arc), changing the place it falls at a given time of day, and therefore it's angle of entry through any given window. This shift is caused by the Earth's tilt relative to its orbit. The Sun's position at a certain clock time may also be perceived to change suddenly due to the beginning or end of {{w|daylight saving time}}, as occurred in most US states and many other countries shortly before this comic was published. (This is an issue that Randall has covered [[:Category:Daylight saving time|multiple times]], although apparently ''not'' (unless this is a subtle reference) this year.)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Transcript==&lt;br /&gt;
{{incomplete transcript|Don't remove this notice too soon.}}&lt;br /&gt;
:[A gravestone is shown on some grass. On the inscription, all of the years except the last one are crossed out in red, and all except the first pair of years have the years themselves in red. The inscription is as follows:]&lt;br /&gt;
:Joseph Paul Overton&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;s&amp;gt;1960&amp;lt;/s&amp;gt; - &amp;lt;s&amp;gt;2003&amp;lt;/s&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;s&amp;gt;1965&amp;lt;/s&amp;gt; - &amp;lt;s&amp;gt;2011&amp;lt;/s&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;s&amp;gt;1973&amp;lt;/s&amp;gt; - &amp;lt;s&amp;gt;2018&amp;lt;/s&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:1982 - &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{comic discussion}}&amp;lt;noinclude&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Politics]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Comics featuring real people]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Comics with color]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Comics with red annotations]] &amp;lt;!-- 'in universe' versions? --&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>82.13.184.33</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:3230:_Overton&amp;diff=410040</id>
		<title>Talk:3230: Overton</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:3230:_Overton&amp;diff=410040"/>
				<updated>2026-04-10T08:17:32Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;82.13.184.33: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&amp;lt;!-- Please sign your posts with ~~~~ and don't delete this text. New comments should be added at the bottom. --&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
4 January 1960 – 30 June 2003 {{unsigned ip|77.87.241.9|18:34, 8 April 2026}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Someday this cartoon will be politically inappropriate.  [[Special:Contributions/64.201.132.210|64.201.132.210]] 19:16, 8 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
: ^ Absolutely. [[Special:Contributions/66.154.219.123|66.154.219.123]] 21:16, 8 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
randall posting a politics-related comic? which could be construed as discontent with the current political landscape? inb4 somebody &amp;lt;s&amp;gt;bashes&amp;lt;/s&amp;gt; complains at kynde again - [[User:Vaedez|Vaedez]] ([[User talk:Vaedez|talk]]) 22:15, 8 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I think it's worth noting that the window keeps updating to the right. [[Special:Contributions/50.47.108.55|50.47.108.55]] 02:22, 9 April 2026 (UTC) Ale10ander&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: Only if you consider dates to go from left to right instead of any other direction. [[Special:Contributions/2A02:C7C:7344:4C00:BC19:A5A4:14E8:E888|2A02:C7C:7344:4C00:BC19:A5A4:14E8:E888]] 08:27, 9 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What's the next death date? 2027? (Just guessin) [[User:Cream Starlight|Cream S.L.]] ([[User talk:Cream Starlight|talk]] / [[Special:Contributions/Cream_Starlight|contribs]]) 03:33, 9 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Does he keep dying because he's gone over a ton?  (1 ton = 2000 lbs) {{unsigned ip|2607:fb91:bd8a:8e2f:858d:1e1b:f461:5f6e|04:35, 9 April 2026 (UTC)}}&lt;br /&gt;
:Too heavy even the time is altered, i see [[User:Cream Starlight|Cream S.L.]] ([[User talk:Cream Starlight|talk]] / [[Special:Contributions/Cream_Starlight|contribs]]) 05:53, 9 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:F.Y.I.: 1 ton = 2,000 ''or'' 2,204.6 ''or'' 2,240 pounds, at least.&lt;br /&gt;
:Also it can be 40, 42 or 60 cubic feet (amongst others). Or 12,000 British Thermal Units-per-Hour. And, at least colloquially, I might use it to describe 100 ''miles per hour'' or GB£100. [[Special:Contributions/82.132.238.115|82.132.238.115]] 16:02, 9 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Reincarnation - Can someone suggest a suitable Buddhist or Hindu text as citation for them multiple lifes? [[Special:Contributions/87.129.222.20|87.129.222.20]] 06:39, 9 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The windows are overlapping, so no this is not a reference to reincarnation. [[User:Zmatt|Zmatt]] ([[User talk:Zmatt|talk]]) 16:00, 9 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For what it's worth, though Wikipedia currently describes Overton as a &amp;quot;political scientist,&amp;quot; that is likely to shift soon. (That is to say, unless someone makes a compelling case on the Talk page, I'm going to change his description to &amp;quot;political activist,&amp;quot; which I think is more accurate to someone who never had a political science degree, never had academic employment, and worked as an electrical engineer before working at an activist think tank.) [[Special:Contributions/38.69.197.145|38.69.197.145]] 12:33, 9 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
: Does that mean that the Overton Window Overton Window has moved? [[Special:Contributions/82.13.184.33|82.13.184.33]] 13:16, 9 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In case anyone wants to check:  [https://www.findagrave.com/memorial/122681438/joseph_paul-overton/photo#view-photo=94839436 Here's a pic of his grave] {{unsigned ip|74.87.89.226|18:04, 9 April 2026 (UTC)}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Just want to say that I think the title text is true. Randall will probably find that, in a few months time, the Sun will no longer be in his face, but the cycle will repeat on an annual basis. I have a similar window. [[User:Jeremyp|Jeremyp]] ([[User talk:Jeremyp|talk]]) 19:18, 9 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
;Significance of the Dates&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Many of the dates in listed correspond to major geopolitical events concerning US military and diplomatic policy. They may also correspond to milestone events in US domestic politics. This is an attempt to compile some of the key events that the comic may be referencing.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*1965:&lt;br /&gt;
**The beginning of Operation Rolling Thunder, the US ground invasion of Vietnam. &lt;br /&gt;
**President LBJ signs the Voting Rights Act of 1965&lt;br /&gt;
*- 2011:&lt;br /&gt;
**US special forces kill Osama Bin Laden&lt;br /&gt;
**NATO forces without the US intervene in the Libyan Civil War leading to the ouster of Muammar Gaddafi.&lt;br /&gt;
**More widely, protests spread accross the Middle East and North Africa, dubbed the Arab Spring&lt;br /&gt;
**The last of the US combat forces stationed in Iraq are withdrawn. &lt;br /&gt;
**The Occuppy Wall Street movement begins.&lt;br /&gt;
*1973: &lt;br /&gt;
**The United States signs the Paris Peace Accords, withdrawing from the Vietnam conflict and claiming the war was over&lt;br /&gt;
**The United States Congress overrides a presidential veto to pass the War Powers Resolution, limiting the ability of future presidents to wage war without Congressional approval&lt;br /&gt;
**The Watergate Scandal breaks.&lt;br /&gt;
**Roe v Wade. &lt;br /&gt;
*- 2018:&lt;br /&gt;
**President Donald Trump unilaterally withdraws the United States from the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action, aka the Iran Nuclear Deal.&lt;br /&gt;
**Congress reverses many of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act's reporting and compliance requirements for all but the largest US banks. &lt;br /&gt;
*1982: &lt;br /&gt;
**Israel violates a 1981 U.S. Brokered ceasefire agreement and invades Lebanon. In response the United States spearheads the establishment of a peacekeeping force to protect Beirut, the Multinational Force in Lebanon.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;wbr/&amp;gt;{{unsigned|In-Sanity|22:16, 8 April 2026}}&lt;br /&gt;
:Unfortunately, I suspect that you could easily find such events for absolutely ''every'' year across that range... Unless you narrow down the choices to just something current (i.e. specifically the ones related to current Middle East events, I suppose), which are going to be less frequent but perhaps specifically in Randall's mind.&lt;br /&gt;
:(Oh, and I slightly re-reformatted your amended contribution, presuming that you meant it to look a bit more like it is now.)&lt;br /&gt;
:I was wondering if there was a mathematical pattern to the numbers, myself. [[Special:Contributions/81.179.199.253|81.179.199.253]] 23:00, 8 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>82.13.184.33</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=3230:_Overton&amp;diff=410039</id>
		<title>3230: Overton</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=3230:_Overton&amp;diff=410039"/>
				<updated>2026-04-10T08:14:47Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;82.13.184.33: /* Explanation */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{comic&lt;br /&gt;
| number    = 3230&lt;br /&gt;
| date      = April 8, 2026&lt;br /&gt;
| title     = Overton&lt;br /&gt;
| image     = overton_2x.png&lt;br /&gt;
| imagesize = 242x268px&lt;br /&gt;
| noexpand  = true&lt;br /&gt;
| titletext = I think I accidentally installed an Overton window in my bedroom. A few months ago, the sun wasn't in my face in the morning, but now it is.&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Explanation==&lt;br /&gt;
{{incomplete|This page was created by JOSEPH PAUL OVERTON, BACK FROM THE DEAD. Don't remove this notice too soon.}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{w|Joseph Paul Overton}} was a political scientist who created the concept of the {{w|Overton window}}, which is the range of subjects that are politically appropriate to raise during a period of time. The first set of dates, 1960 and 2003, are the years that Overton was born and died.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is common for political commentators to state that the Overton window has &amp;quot;moved,&amp;quot; meaning that the standard for which political positions are &amp;quot;moderate&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;extreme&amp;quot; changes. In the comic, the &amp;quot;Overton window&amp;quot; instead refers to the time span in which Joseph Paul Overton was alive. The dates on Overton's grave have been repeatedly crossed out and replaced as this 'window' has moved. This creates the ridiculous implication that Overton was living at least four overlapping lives, or that history has repeatedly changed so that the dates of his life shifted, either of which is impossible.{{cn}} Alternatively, it could reflect changes in the frame of reference the keepers of the grave are using to date events.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the title text, the speaker notices that the sunlight is now being let in earlier in the morning, and attributes this to it coming through an &amp;quot;Overton window&amp;quot; that can physically move. This is unlikely, since the Overton window is an abstract concept, not an architectural feature, and sunlight is not generally influenced by social attitudes.{{cn}} It is more likely that the phenomenon is due to the seasonal movement of the Sun in the sky, where its apparent path across the sky moves further north or south between the {{w|summer solstice}} (highest arc) and {{w|winter solstice}} (lowest arc), changing the place it falls at a given time of day. This shift is caused by the Earth's tilt relative to its orbit. The Sun's position at a certain clock time may also be perceived to change suddenly due to the beginning or end of {{w|daylight saving time}}, as occurred in most US states and many other countries shortly before this comic was published. (This is an issue that Randall has covered [[:Category:Daylight saving time|multiple times]], although apparently ''not'' (unless this is a subtle reference) this year.)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Transcript==&lt;br /&gt;
{{incomplete transcript|Don't remove this notice too soon.}}&lt;br /&gt;
:[A gravestone is shown on some grass. On the inscription, all of the years except the last one are crossed out in red, and all except the first pair of years have the years themselves in red. The inscription is as follows:]&lt;br /&gt;
:Joseph Paul Overton&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;s&amp;gt;1960&amp;lt;/s&amp;gt; - &amp;lt;s&amp;gt;2003&amp;lt;/s&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;s&amp;gt;1965&amp;lt;/s&amp;gt; - &amp;lt;s&amp;gt;2011&amp;lt;/s&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;s&amp;gt;1973&amp;lt;/s&amp;gt; - &amp;lt;s&amp;gt;2018&amp;lt;/s&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:1982 - &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{comic discussion}}&amp;lt;noinclude&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Politics]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Comics featuring real people]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Comics with color]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Comics with red annotations]] &amp;lt;!-- 'in universe' versions? --&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>82.13.184.33</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:3230:_Overton&amp;diff=410018</id>
		<title>Talk:3230: Overton</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:3230:_Overton&amp;diff=410018"/>
				<updated>2026-04-09T16:05:41Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;82.13.184.33: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&amp;lt;!-- Please sign your posts with ~~~~ and don't delete this text. New comments should be added at the bottom. --&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
4 January 1960 – 30 June 2003 {{unsigned ip|77.87.241.9|18:34, 8 April 2026}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Someday this cartoon will be politically inappropriate.  [[Special:Contributions/64.201.132.210|64.201.132.210]] 19:16, 8 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
: ^ Absolutely. [[Special:Contributions/66.154.219.123|66.154.219.123]] 21:16, 8 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
randall posting a politics-related comic? which could be construed as discontent with the current political landscape? inb4 somebody &amp;lt;s&amp;gt;bashes&amp;lt;/s&amp;gt; complains at kynde again - [[User:Vaedez|Vaedez]] ([[User talk:Vaedez|talk]]) 22:15, 8 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I think it's worth noting that the window keeps updating to the right. [[Special:Contributions/50.47.108.55|50.47.108.55]] 02:22, 9 April 2026 (UTC) Ale10ander&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: Only if you consider dates to go from left to right instead of any other direction. [[Special:Contributions/2A02:C7C:7344:4C00:BC19:A5A4:14E8:E888|2A02:C7C:7344:4C00:BC19:A5A4:14E8:E888]] 08:27, 9 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What's the next death date? 2027? (Just guessin) [[User:Cream Starlight|Cream S.L.]] ([[User talk:Cream Starlight|talk]] / [[Special:Contributions/Cream_Starlight|contribs]]) 03:33, 9 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Does he keep dying because he's gone over a ton?  (1 ton = 2000 lbs) {{unsigned ip|2607:fb91:bd8a:8e2f:858d:1e1b:f461:5f6e|04:35, 9 April 2026 (UTC)}}&lt;br /&gt;
:Too heavy even the time is altered, i see [[User:Cream Starlight|Cream S.L.]] ([[User talk:Cream Starlight|talk]] / [[Special:Contributions/Cream_Starlight|contribs]]) 05:53, 9 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:F.Y.I.: 1 ton = 2,000 ''or'' 2,204.6 ''or'' 2,240 pounds, at least.&lt;br /&gt;
:Also it can be 40, 42 or 60 cubic feet (amongst others). Or 12,000 British Thermal Units-per-Hour. And, at least colloquially, I might use it to describe 100 ''miles per hour'' or GB£100. [[Special:Contributions/82.132.238.115|82.132.238.115]] 16:02, 9 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Reincarnation - Can someone suggest a suitable Buddhist or Hindu text as citation for them multiple lifes? [[Special:Contributions/87.129.222.20|87.129.222.20]] 06:39, 9 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The windows are overlapping, so no this is not a reference to reincarnation. [[User:Zmatt|Zmatt]] ([[User talk:Zmatt|talk]]) 16:00, 9 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For what it's worth, though Wikipedia currently describes Overton as a &amp;quot;political scientist,&amp;quot; that is likely to shift soon. (That is to say, unless someone makes a compelling case on the Talk page, I'm going to change his description to &amp;quot;political activist,&amp;quot; which I think is more accurate to someone who never had a political science degree, never had academic employment, and worked as an electrical engineer before working at an activist think tank.) [[Special:Contributions/38.69.197.145|38.69.197.145]] 12:33, 9 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
: Does that mean that the Overton Window Overton Window has moved? [[Special:Contributions/82.13.184.33|82.13.184.33]] 13:16, 9 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
;Significance of the Dates&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Many of the dates in listed correspond to major geopolitical events concerning US military and diplomatic policy. They may also correspond to milestone events in US domestic politics. This is an attempt to compile some of the key events that the comic may be referencing.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*1965:&lt;br /&gt;
**The beginning of Operation Rolling Thunder, the US ground invasion of Vietnam. &lt;br /&gt;
**President LBJ signs the Voting Rights Act of 1965&lt;br /&gt;
*- 2011:&lt;br /&gt;
**US special forces kill Osama Bin Laden&lt;br /&gt;
**NATO forces without the US intervene in the Libyan Civil War leading to the ouster of Muammar Gaddafi.&lt;br /&gt;
**More widely, protests spread accross the Middle East and North Africa, dubbed the Arab Spring&lt;br /&gt;
**The last of the US combat forces stationed in Iraq are withdrawn. &lt;br /&gt;
**The Occuppy Wall Street movement begins.&lt;br /&gt;
*1973: &lt;br /&gt;
**The United States signs the Paris Peace Accords, withdrawing from the Vietnam conflict and claiming the war was over&lt;br /&gt;
**The United States Congress overrides a presidential veto to pass the War Powers Resolution, limiting the ability of future presidents to wage war without Congressional approval&lt;br /&gt;
**The Watergate Scandal breaks.&lt;br /&gt;
**Roe v Wade. &lt;br /&gt;
*- 2018:&lt;br /&gt;
**President Donald Trump unilaterally withdraws the United States from the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action, aka the Iran Nuclear Deal.&lt;br /&gt;
**Congress reverses many of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act's reporting and compliance requirements for all but the largest US banks. &lt;br /&gt;
*1982: &lt;br /&gt;
**Israel violates a 1981 U.S. Brokered ceasefire agreement and invades Lebanon. In response the United States spearheads the establishment of a peacekeeping force to protect Beirut, the Multinational Force in Lebanon.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;wbr/&amp;gt;{{unsigned|In-Sanity|22:16, 8 April 2026}}&lt;br /&gt;
:Unfortunately, I suspect that you could easily find such events for absolutely ''every'' year across that range... Unless you narrow down the choices to just something current (i.e. specifically the ones related to current Middle East events, I suppose), which are going to be less frequent but perhaps specifically in Randall's mind.&lt;br /&gt;
:(Oh, and I slightly re-reformatted your amended contribution, presuming that you meant it to look a bit more like it is now.)&lt;br /&gt;
:I was wondering if there was a mathematical pattern to the numbers, myself. [[Special:Contributions/81.179.199.253|81.179.199.253]] 23:00, 8 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>82.13.184.33</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=3230:_Overton&amp;diff=410014</id>
		<title>3230: Overton</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=3230:_Overton&amp;diff=410014"/>
				<updated>2026-04-09T15:59:49Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;82.13.184.33: /* Explanation */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{comic&lt;br /&gt;
| number    = 3230&lt;br /&gt;
| date      = April 8, 2026&lt;br /&gt;
| title     = Overton&lt;br /&gt;
| image     = overton_2x.png&lt;br /&gt;
| imagesize = 242x268px&lt;br /&gt;
| noexpand  = true&lt;br /&gt;
| titletext = I think I accidentally installed an Overton window in my bedroom. A few months ago, the sun wasn't in my face in the morning, but now it is.&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Explanation==&lt;br /&gt;
{{incomplete|This page was created by JOSEPH PAUL OVERTON, BACK FROM THE DEAD. Don't remove this notice too soon.}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{w|Joseph Paul Overton}} was a political scientist who created the concept of the {{w|Overton Window}}, which is the range of subjects that are politically appropriate to raise during a period of time. The first set of dates, 1960 and 2003, are the years that Overton was born and died.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is common for political commentators to state that the Overton window has &amp;quot;moved,&amp;quot; meaning that the standard for which political positions are &amp;quot;moderate&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;extreme&amp;quot; changes. In the comic, the &amp;quot;Overton window&amp;quot; instead refers to the time span in which Joseph Paul Overton was alive. The dates on Overton's grave have been repeatedly crossed out and replaced as this 'window' has moved. This creates the ridiculous implication that Overton was living at least four lives simultaneously, or that history has repeatedly changed so that the dates of his life shifted, either of which is impossible.{{cn}} Alternatively, it could reflect changes in the frame of reference the keepers of the grave are using to date events.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the title text, the speaker notices that the sunlight is now being let in earlier in the morning, and attributes this to it coming through an &amp;quot;Overton Window&amp;quot; that can physically move. This is unlikely, since an Overton Window is an abstract concept, and not an architectural feature, and sunlight is not generally influenced by social attitudes. It is more likely that the phenomenon is due to the seasonal movement of the Sun in the sky, where its apparent path across the sky moves further north or south between the summer solstice (highest arc) and winter solstice (lowest arc), changing the time at which it would fall on a given window. This shift is caused by the Earth's tilt relative to its orbit. The Sun's position at a certain clock time may also be perceived to change suddenly due to the beginning or end of Daylight Saving Time, as occurred in most US states and many other countries shortly before this comic was published (this is an issue that Randall has covered [[:Category:Daylight saving time|multiple times]], although apparently ''not'' (unless this is a subtle reference) this year).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Transcript==&lt;br /&gt;
{{incomplete transcript|Don't remove this notice too soon.}}&lt;br /&gt;
:[A gravestone is shown on some grass. On the inscription, all of the years except the last one are crossed out in red, and all except the first pair of years have the years themselves in red. The inscription is as follows:]&lt;br /&gt;
:Joseph Paul Overton&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;s&amp;gt;1960&amp;lt;/s&amp;gt; - &amp;lt;s&amp;gt;2003&amp;lt;/s&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;s&amp;gt;1965&amp;lt;/s&amp;gt; - &amp;lt;s&amp;gt;2011&amp;lt;/s&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;s&amp;gt;1973&amp;lt;/s&amp;gt; - &amp;lt;s&amp;gt;2018&amp;lt;/s&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:1982 - &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{comic discussion}}&amp;lt;noinclude&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Politics]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Comics featuring real people]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Comics with color]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Comics with red annotations]] &amp;lt;!-- 'in universe' versions? --&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>82.13.184.33</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=3230:_Overton&amp;diff=410012</id>
		<title>3230: Overton</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=3230:_Overton&amp;diff=410012"/>
				<updated>2026-04-09T15:57:21Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;82.13.184.33: /* Explanation */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{comic&lt;br /&gt;
| number    = 3230&lt;br /&gt;
| date      = April 8, 2026&lt;br /&gt;
| title     = Overton&lt;br /&gt;
| image     = overton_2x.png&lt;br /&gt;
| imagesize = 242x268px&lt;br /&gt;
| noexpand  = true&lt;br /&gt;
| titletext = I think I accidentally installed an Overton window in my bedroom. A few months ago, the sun wasn't in my face in the morning, but now it is.&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Explanation==&lt;br /&gt;
{{incomplete|This page was created by JOSEPH PAUL OVERTON, BACK FROM THE DEAD. Don't remove this notice too soon.}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{w|Joseph Paul Overton}} was a political scientist who created the concept of the {{w|Overton Window}}, which is the range of subjects that are politically appropriate to raise during a period of time. The first set of dates, 1960 and 2003, are the years that Overton was born and died.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is common for political commentators to state that the Overton window has &amp;quot;moved,&amp;quot; meaning that the standard for which political positions are &amp;quot;moderate&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;extreme&amp;quot; changes. In the comic, the &amp;quot;Overton window&amp;quot; instead refers to the time span in which Joseph Paul Overton was alive. The dates on Overton's grave have been repeatedly crossed out and replaced as this 'window' has moved. This creates the ridiculous implication that Overton was living at least four lives simultaneously, or that history has repeatedly changed so that the dates of his life shifted, either of which is impossible.{{cn}} Alternatively, it could reflect changes in the frame of reference the keepers of the grave are using to date events.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the title text, the speaker notices that the sunlight is now being let in earlier in the morning, and attributes this to it coming through an &amp;quot;Overton Window&amp;quot; that can physically move. This is unlikely, since an Overton Window is an abstract concept, and not an architectural feature. It is more likely that the phenomenon is due to the seasonal movement of the Sun in the sky, where its apparent path across the sky moves further north or south between the summer solstice (highest arc) and winter solstice (lowest arc), changing the time at which it would fall on a given window. This shift is caused by the Earth's tilt relative to its orbit. The Sun's position at a certain clock time may also be perceived to change suddenly due to the beginning or end of Daylight Saving Time, as occurred in most US states and many other countries shortly before this comic was published (this is an issue that Randall has covered [[:Category:Daylight saving time|multiple times]], although apparently ''not'' (unless this is a subtle reference) this year).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Transcript==&lt;br /&gt;
{{incomplete transcript|Don't remove this notice too soon.}}&lt;br /&gt;
:[A gravestone is shown on some grass. On the inscription, all of the years except the last one are crossed out in red, and all except the first pair of years have the years themselves in red. The inscription is as follows:]&lt;br /&gt;
:Joseph Paul Overton&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;s&amp;gt;1960&amp;lt;/s&amp;gt; - &amp;lt;s&amp;gt;2003&amp;lt;/s&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;s&amp;gt;1965&amp;lt;/s&amp;gt; - &amp;lt;s&amp;gt;2011&amp;lt;/s&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;s&amp;gt;1973&amp;lt;/s&amp;gt; - &amp;lt;s&amp;gt;2018&amp;lt;/s&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:1982 - &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{comic discussion}}&amp;lt;noinclude&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Politics]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Comics featuring real people]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Comics with color]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Comics with red annotations]] &amp;lt;!-- 'in universe' versions? --&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>82.13.184.33</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=3230:_Overton&amp;diff=410010</id>
		<title>3230: Overton</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=3230:_Overton&amp;diff=410010"/>
				<updated>2026-04-09T15:43:45Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;82.13.184.33: /* Explanation */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{comic&lt;br /&gt;
| number    = 3230&lt;br /&gt;
| date      = April 8, 2026&lt;br /&gt;
| title     = Overton&lt;br /&gt;
| image     = overton_2x.png&lt;br /&gt;
| imagesize = 242x268px&lt;br /&gt;
| noexpand  = true&lt;br /&gt;
| titletext = I think I accidentally installed an Overton window in my bedroom. A few months ago, the sun wasn't in my face in the morning, but now it is.&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Explanation==&lt;br /&gt;
{{incomplete|This page was created by JOSEPH PAUL OVERTON, BACK FROM THE DEAD. Don't remove this notice too soon.}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{w|Joseph Paul Overton}} was a political scientist who created the concept of the {{w|Overton Window}}, which is the range of subjects that are politically appropriate to raise during a period of time. The first set of dates, 1960 and 2003, are the years that Overton was born and died.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is common for political commentators to state that the Overton window has &amp;quot;moved,&amp;quot; meaning that the standard for which political positions are &amp;quot;moderate&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;extreme&amp;quot; changes. In the comic, the &amp;quot;Overton window&amp;quot; instead refers to the time span in which Joseph Paul Overton was alive. The dates on Overton's grave have been repeatedly crossed out and replaced as this 'window' has moved. This creates the ridiculous implication that Overton was living at least four lives simultaneously, or that history has repeatedly changed so that the dates of his life shifted, either of which is impossible.{{cn}} Alternatively, it could reflect changes in the frame of reference the keepers of the grave are using to date events.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the title text, the speaker notices that the sunlight is now being let in earlier in the morning, and attributes this to it coming through an &amp;quot;Overton Window&amp;quot; that can physically move. This refers to the seasonal movement of the Sun in the sky, where its apparent path across the sky moves further north or south between the summer solstice (highest arc) and winter solstice (lowest arc), changing the time at which it would fall on a given window. This shift is caused by the Earth's tilt relative to its orbit. The Sun's position at a certain clock time may also be perceived to change suddenly due to the beginning or end of Daylight Saving Time, as occurred in most US states and many other countries shortly before this comic was published (this is an issue that Randall has covered [[:Category:Daylight saving time|multiple times]], although apparently ''not'' (unless this is a subtle reference) this year).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Transcript==&lt;br /&gt;
{{incomplete transcript|Don't remove this notice too soon.}}&lt;br /&gt;
:[A gravestone is shown on some grass. On the inscription, all of the years except the last one are crossed out in red, and all except the first pair of years have the years themselves in red. The inscription is as follows:]&lt;br /&gt;
:Joseph Paul Overton&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;s&amp;gt;1960&amp;lt;/s&amp;gt; - &amp;lt;s&amp;gt;2003&amp;lt;/s&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;s&amp;gt;1965&amp;lt;/s&amp;gt; - &amp;lt;s&amp;gt;2011&amp;lt;/s&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;s&amp;gt;1973&amp;lt;/s&amp;gt; - &amp;lt;s&amp;gt;2018&amp;lt;/s&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:1982 - &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{comic discussion}}&amp;lt;noinclude&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Politics]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Comics featuring real people]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Comics with color]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Comics with red annotations]] &amp;lt;!-- 'in universe' versions? --&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>82.13.184.33</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=3230:_Overton&amp;diff=410009</id>
		<title>3230: Overton</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=3230:_Overton&amp;diff=410009"/>
				<updated>2026-04-09T15:42:48Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;82.13.184.33: /* Explanation */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{comic&lt;br /&gt;
| number    = 3230&lt;br /&gt;
| date      = April 8, 2026&lt;br /&gt;
| title     = Overton&lt;br /&gt;
| image     = overton_2x.png&lt;br /&gt;
| imagesize = 242x268px&lt;br /&gt;
| noexpand  = true&lt;br /&gt;
| titletext = I think I accidentally installed an Overton window in my bedroom. A few months ago, the sun wasn't in my face in the morning, but now it is.&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Explanation==&lt;br /&gt;
{{incomplete|This page was created by JOSEPH PAUL OVERTON, BACK FROM THE DEAD. Don't remove this notice too soon.}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{w|Joseph Paul Overton}} was a political scientist who created the concept of the {{w|Overton Window}}, which is the range of subjects that are politically appropriate to raise during a period of time. The first set of dates, 1960 and 2003, are the years that Overton was born and died.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is common for political commentators to state that the Overton window has &amp;quot;moved,&amp;quot; meaning that the standard for which political positions are &amp;quot;moderate&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;extreme&amp;quot; changes. In the comic, the &amp;quot;Overton window&amp;quot; instead refers to the time span in which Joseph Paul Overton was alive. The dates on Overton's grave have been repeatedly crossed out and replaced as this 'window' has moved. This creates the ridiculous implication that Overton was living at least four lives simultaneously, or that history has repeatedly changed so that the dates of his life shifted, either of which is impossible.{{cn}} Alternatively, it could reflect changes in the frame of reference the keepers of the grave are using to date events.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the title text, the speaker notices that the sunlight is now being let in earlier in the morning, and attributes this to it coming through an &amp;quot;Overton Window&amp;quot; that can physically move. This refers to the seasonal movement of the Sun in the sky, where its apparent path across the sky moves further north or south between the summer solstice (highest arc) and winter solstice (lowest arc), changing the time at which it would fall on a given window. This shift is caused by Earth's tilt relative to its orbit. The Sun's position at a certain clock time may also be perceived to change suddenly due to the beginning or end of Daylight Saving Time, as occurred in most US states and many other countries shortly before this comic was published (this is an issue that Randall has covered [[:Category:Daylight saving time|multiple times]], although apparently ''not'' (unless this is a subtle reference) this year).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Transcript==&lt;br /&gt;
{{incomplete transcript|Don't remove this notice too soon.}}&lt;br /&gt;
:[A gravestone is shown on some grass. On the inscription, all of the years except the last one are crossed out in red, and all except the first pair of years have the years themselves in red. The inscription is as follows:]&lt;br /&gt;
:Joseph Paul Overton&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;s&amp;gt;1960&amp;lt;/s&amp;gt; - &amp;lt;s&amp;gt;2003&amp;lt;/s&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;s&amp;gt;1965&amp;lt;/s&amp;gt; - &amp;lt;s&amp;gt;2011&amp;lt;/s&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;s&amp;gt;1973&amp;lt;/s&amp;gt; - &amp;lt;s&amp;gt;2018&amp;lt;/s&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:1982 - &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{comic discussion}}&amp;lt;noinclude&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Politics]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Comics featuring real people]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Comics with color]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Comics with red annotations]] &amp;lt;!-- 'in universe' versions? --&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>82.13.184.33</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:3230:_Overton&amp;diff=409998</id>
		<title>Talk:3230: Overton</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:3230:_Overton&amp;diff=409998"/>
				<updated>2026-04-09T13:16:47Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;82.13.184.33: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&amp;lt;!-- Please sign your posts with ~~~~ and don't delete this text. New comments should be added at the bottom. --&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
4 January 1960 – 30 June 2003 {{unsigned ip|77.87.241.9|18:34, 8 April 2026}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Someday this cartoon will be politically inappropriate.  [[Special:Contributions/64.201.132.210|64.201.132.210]] 19:16, 8 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
: ^ Absolutely. [[Special:Contributions/66.154.219.123|66.154.219.123]] 21:16, 8 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
randall posting a politics-related comic? which could be construed as discontent with the current political landscape? inb4 somebody &amp;lt;s&amp;gt;bashes&amp;lt;/s&amp;gt; complains at kynde again - [[User:Vaedez|Vaedez]] ([[User talk:Vaedez|talk]]) 22:15, 8 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I think it's worth noting that the window keeps updating to the right. [[Special:Contributions/50.47.108.55|50.47.108.55]] 02:22, 9 April 2026 (UTC) Ale10ander&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: Only if you consider dates to go from left to right instead of any other direction. [[Special:Contributions/2A02:C7C:7344:4C00:BC19:A5A4:14E8:E888|2A02:C7C:7344:4C00:BC19:A5A4:14E8:E888]] 08:27, 9 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What's the next death date? 2027? (Just guessin) [[User:Cream Starlight|Cream S.L.]] ([[User talk:Cream Starlight|talk]] / [[Special:Contributions/Cream_Starlight|contribs]]) 03:33, 9 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Does he keep dying because he's gone over a ton?  (1 ton = 2000 lbs) {{unsigned ip|2607:fb91:bd8a:8e2f:858d:1e1b:f461:5f6e|04:35, 9 April 2026 (UTC)}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Too heavy even the time is altered, i see [[User:Cream Starlight|Cream S.L.]] ([[User talk:Cream Starlight|talk]] / [[Special:Contributions/Cream_Starlight|contribs]]) 05:53, 9 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Reincarnation - Can someone suggest a suitable Buddhist or Hindu text as citation for them multiple lifes? [[Special:Contributions/87.129.222.20|87.129.222.20]] 06:39, 9 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For what it's worth, though Wikipedia currently describes Overton as a &amp;quot;political scientist,&amp;quot; that is likely to shift soon. (That is to say, unless someone makes a compelling case on the Talk page, I'm going to change his description to &amp;quot;political activist,&amp;quot; which I think is more accurate to someone who never had a political science degree, never had academic employment, and worked as an electrical engineer before working at an activist think tank.) [[Special:Contributions/38.69.197.145|38.69.197.145]] 12:33, 9 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
: Does that mean that the Overton Window Overton Window has moved? [[Special:Contributions/82.13.184.33|82.13.184.33]] 13:16, 9 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
;Significance of the Dates&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Many of the dates in listed correspond to major geopolitical events concerning US military and diplomatic policy. They may also correspond to milestone events in US domestic politics. This is an attempt to compile some of the key events that the comic may be referencing.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*1965:&lt;br /&gt;
**The beginning of Operation Rolling Thunder, the US ground invasion of Vietnam. &lt;br /&gt;
**President LBJ signs the Voting Rights Act of 1965&lt;br /&gt;
*- 2011:&lt;br /&gt;
**US special forces kill Osama Bin Laden&lt;br /&gt;
**NATO forces without the US intervene in the Libyan Civil War leading to the ouster of Muammar Gaddafi.&lt;br /&gt;
**More widely, protests spread accross the Middle East and North Africa, dubbed the Arab Spring&lt;br /&gt;
**The last of the US combat forces stationed in Iraq are withdrawn. &lt;br /&gt;
**The Occuppy Wall Street movement begins.&lt;br /&gt;
*1973: &lt;br /&gt;
**The United States signs the Paris Peace Accords, withdrawing from the Vietnam conflict and claiming the war was over&lt;br /&gt;
**The United States Congress overrides a presidential veto to pass the War Powers Resolution, limiting the ability of future presidents to wage war without Congressional approval&lt;br /&gt;
**The Watergate Scandal breaks.&lt;br /&gt;
**Roe v Wade. &lt;br /&gt;
*- 2018:&lt;br /&gt;
**President Donald Trump unilaterally withdraws the United States from the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action, aka the Iran Nuclear Deal.&lt;br /&gt;
**Congress reverses many of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act's reporting and compliance requirements for all but the largest US banks. &lt;br /&gt;
*1982: &lt;br /&gt;
**Israel violates a 1981 U.S. Brokered ceasefire agreement and invades Lebanon. In response the United States spearheads the establishment of a peacekeeping force to protect Beirut, the Multinational Force in Lebanon.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;wbr/&amp;gt;{{unsigned|In-Sanity|22:16, 8 April 2026}}&lt;br /&gt;
:Unfortunately, I suspect that you could easily find such events for absolutely ''every'' year across that range... Unless you narrow down the choices to just something current (i.e. specifically the ones related to current Middle East events, I suppose), which are going to be less frequent but perhaps specifically in Randall's mind.&lt;br /&gt;
:(Oh, and I slightly re-reformatted your amended contribution, presuming that you meant it to look a bit more like it is now.)&lt;br /&gt;
:I was wondering if there was a mathematical pattern to the numbers, myself. [[Special:Contributions/81.179.199.253|81.179.199.253]] 23:00, 8 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>82.13.184.33</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=3230:_Overton&amp;diff=409988</id>
		<title>3230: Overton</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=3230:_Overton&amp;diff=409988"/>
				<updated>2026-04-09T08:50:16Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;82.13.184.33: /* Explanation */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{comic&lt;br /&gt;
| number    = 3230&lt;br /&gt;
| date      = April 8, 2026&lt;br /&gt;
| title     = Overton&lt;br /&gt;
| image     = overton_2x.png&lt;br /&gt;
| imagesize = 242x268px&lt;br /&gt;
| noexpand  = true&lt;br /&gt;
| titletext = I think I accidentally installed an Overton window in my bedroom. A few months ago, the sun wasn't in my face in the morning, but now it is.&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Explanation==&lt;br /&gt;
{{incomplete|This page was created by JOSEPH PAUL OVERTON, BACK FROM THE DEAD. Don't remove this notice too soon.}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{w|Joseph Paul Overton}} was a political scientist who created the concept of the {{w|Overton Window}}, which is the range of subjects that are politically appropriate to raise during a period of time. The first set of dates, 1960 and 2003, are the years that Overton was born and died.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is common for political commentators to state that the Overton window has &amp;quot;moved,&amp;quot; meaning that the standard for which political positions are &amp;quot;moderate&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;extreme&amp;quot; changes. In the comic, the &amp;quot;Overton window&amp;quot; instead refers to the time span in which Joseph Paul Overton was alive. The dates on Overton's grave have been repeatedly crossed out and replaced as this 'window' has moved. This creates the ridiculous implication that Overton had multiple lives (four in the comic), or that history has repeatedly changed so that the dates of his life shifted, either of which is impossible.{{cn}} Alternatively, it could reflect changes in the frame of reference the keepers of the grave are using to date events.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The title text refers to the seasonal movement of the Sun in the sky, where its apparent path across the sky moves further north or south throughout the year. This shift, caused by Earth's tilt, moves between the summer solstice (highest arc) and winter solstice (lowest arc). It may also be perceived to change suddenly due to the beginning or end of Daylight Saving Time, as occurred in a number of US states and other countries shortly before this comic was published (this is an issue that Randall has covered [[:Category:Daylight saving time|multiple times]], although apparently ''not'' (unless this is a subtle reference) this year). However, the character in the text believes that the sunlight is now being let in by an actual window because it has moved in some manner, (rather than the path of the Sun moving), and attributes this to it being an &amp;quot;Overton Window&amp;quot; that can physically move.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Transcript==&lt;br /&gt;
{{incomplete transcript|Don't remove this notice too soon.}}&lt;br /&gt;
:[A gravestone is shown on some grass. On the inscription, all of the years except the last one are crossed out in red, and all except the first pair of years have the years themselves in red. The inscription is as follows:]&lt;br /&gt;
:Joseph Paul Overton&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;s&amp;gt;1960&amp;lt;/s&amp;gt; - &amp;lt;s&amp;gt;2003&amp;lt;/s&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;s&amp;gt;1965&amp;lt;/s&amp;gt; - &amp;lt;s&amp;gt;2011&amp;lt;/s&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;s&amp;gt;1973&amp;lt;/s&amp;gt; - &amp;lt;s&amp;gt;2018&amp;lt;/s&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:1982 - &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{comic discussion}}&amp;lt;noinclude&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Politics]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Comics featuring real people]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Comics with color]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Comics with red annotations]] &amp;lt;!-- 'in universe' versions? --&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>82.13.184.33</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=3230:_Overton&amp;diff=409987</id>
		<title>3230: Overton</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=3230:_Overton&amp;diff=409987"/>
				<updated>2026-04-09T08:46:59Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;82.13.184.33: /* Explanation */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{comic&lt;br /&gt;
| number    = 3230&lt;br /&gt;
| date      = April 8, 2026&lt;br /&gt;
| title     = Overton&lt;br /&gt;
| image     = overton_2x.png&lt;br /&gt;
| imagesize = 242x268px&lt;br /&gt;
| noexpand  = true&lt;br /&gt;
| titletext = I think I accidentally installed an Overton window in my bedroom. A few months ago, the sun wasn't in my face in the morning, but now it is.&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Explanation==&lt;br /&gt;
{{incomplete|This page was created by JOSEPH PAUL OVERTON, BACK FROM THE DEAD. Don't remove this notice too soon.}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{w|Joseph Paul Overton}} was a political scientist who created the concept of the {{w|Overton Window}}, which is the range of subjects that are politically appropriate to raise during a period of time. The first set of dates, 1960 and 2003, are the years that Overton was born and died.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is common for political commentators to state that the Overton window has &amp;quot;moved,&amp;quot; meaning that the standard for which political positions are &amp;quot;moderate&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;extreme&amp;quot; changes. In the comic, the &amp;quot;Overton window&amp;quot; instead refers to the time span in which Joseph Paul Overton was alive. The dates on Overton's grave have been repeatedly crossed out and replaced as this 'window' has moved. This creates the ridiculous implication that Overton had multiple lives (four in the comic), or that history has repeatedly changed so that the dates of his life shifted, either of which is impossible.{{cn}} Alternatively, it could reflect changes in the frame of reference the keepers of the grave are using to date events.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The title text refers to the seasonal movement of the Sun in the sky, where its apparent path across the sky moves further north or south throughout the year. This shift, caused by Earth's tilt, moves between the summer solstice (highest arc) and winter solstice (lowest arc). However, the character in the text believes that the sunlight that is now being let in by an actual window is because the window is an Overton window, and has therefore moved in some manner, rather than the path of the Sun moving. It also can have been perceived to have changed suddenly due to the beginning or end of Daylight Saving Time, as occurred in a number of US states and other countries shortly before this comic was published. This is an issue that Randall has covered [[:Category:Daylight saving time|multiple times]], although apparently ''not'' (unless this is a subtle reference) this year.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Transcript==&lt;br /&gt;
{{incomplete transcript|Don't remove this notice too soon.}}&lt;br /&gt;
:[A gravestone is shown on some grass. On the inscription, all of the years except the last one are crossed out in red, and all except the first pair of years have the years themselves in red. The inscription is as follows:]&lt;br /&gt;
:Joseph Paul Overton&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;s&amp;gt;1960&amp;lt;/s&amp;gt; - &amp;lt;s&amp;gt;2003&amp;lt;/s&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;s&amp;gt;1965&amp;lt;/s&amp;gt; - &amp;lt;s&amp;gt;2011&amp;lt;/s&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;s&amp;gt;1973&amp;lt;/s&amp;gt; - &amp;lt;s&amp;gt;2018&amp;lt;/s&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:1982 - &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{comic discussion}}&amp;lt;noinclude&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Politics]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Comics featuring real people]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Comics with color]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Comics with red annotations]] &amp;lt;!-- 'in universe' versions? --&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>82.13.184.33</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=3230:_Overton&amp;diff=409986</id>
		<title>3230: Overton</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=3230:_Overton&amp;diff=409986"/>
				<updated>2026-04-09T08:46:13Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;82.13.184.33: /* Explanation */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{comic&lt;br /&gt;
| number    = 3230&lt;br /&gt;
| date      = April 8, 2026&lt;br /&gt;
| title     = Overton&lt;br /&gt;
| image     = overton_2x.png&lt;br /&gt;
| imagesize = 242x268px&lt;br /&gt;
| noexpand  = true&lt;br /&gt;
| titletext = I think I accidentally installed an Overton window in my bedroom. A few months ago, the sun wasn't in my face in the morning, but now it is.&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Explanation==&lt;br /&gt;
{{incomplete|This page was created by JOSEPH PAUL OVERTON, BACK FROM THE DEAD. Don't remove this notice too soon.}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{w|Joseph Paul Overton}} was a political scientist who created the concept of the {{w|Overton Window}}, which is the range of subjects that are politically appropriate to raise during a period of time. The first set of dates, 1960 and 2003, are the years that Overton was born and died.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is common for political commentators to state that the Overton window has &amp;quot;moved,&amp;quot; meaning that the standard for which political positions are &amp;quot;moderate&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;extreme&amp;quot; changes. In the comic, the &amp;quot;Overton window&amp;quot; instead refers to the time span in which Joseph Paul Overton was alive. The dates on Overton's grave have been repeatedly crossed out and replaced as this 'window' has moved. This creates the ridiculous implication that Overton had multiple lives (four in the comic), or that history has repeatedly changed so that the dates of his life shifted, either of which is impossible.{{cn}} Alternatively, it could reflect changes in the frame of reference the keepers of the grave are using to date events.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The title text refers to the seasonal movement of the Sun in the sky, where its apparent path across the sky moves further north or south throughout the year. This shift, caused by Earth's tilt, moves between the summer solstice (highest arc) and winter solstice (lowest arc.) However, the character in the text believes that the sunlight that is now being let in by an actual window is because the window is an Overton window, and has therefore moved in some manner, rather than the path of the Sun moving. It also can have been perceived to have changed suddenly due to the beginning or end of Daylight Saving Time, as occurred in a number of US states and other countries shortly before this comic was published. This is an issue that Randall has covered [[:Category:Daylight saving time|multiple times]], although apparently ''not'' (unless this is a subtle reference) this year.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Transcript==&lt;br /&gt;
{{incomplete transcript|Don't remove this notice too soon.}}&lt;br /&gt;
:[A gravestone is shown on some grass. On the inscription, all of the years except the last one are crossed out in red, and all except the first pair of years have the years themselves in red. The inscription is as follows:]&lt;br /&gt;
:Joseph Paul Overton&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;s&amp;gt;1960&amp;lt;/s&amp;gt; - &amp;lt;s&amp;gt;2003&amp;lt;/s&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;s&amp;gt;1965&amp;lt;/s&amp;gt; - &amp;lt;s&amp;gt;2011&amp;lt;/s&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;s&amp;gt;1973&amp;lt;/s&amp;gt; - &amp;lt;s&amp;gt;2018&amp;lt;/s&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:1982 - &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{comic discussion}}&amp;lt;noinclude&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Politics]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Comics featuring real people]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Comics with color]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Comics with red annotations]] &amp;lt;!-- 'in universe' versions? --&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>82.13.184.33</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=3230:_Overton&amp;diff=409985</id>
		<title>3230: Overton</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=3230:_Overton&amp;diff=409985"/>
				<updated>2026-04-09T08:44:28Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;82.13.184.33: /* Explanation */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{comic&lt;br /&gt;
| number    = 3230&lt;br /&gt;
| date      = April 8, 2026&lt;br /&gt;
| title     = Overton&lt;br /&gt;
| image     = overton_2x.png&lt;br /&gt;
| imagesize = 242x268px&lt;br /&gt;
| noexpand  = true&lt;br /&gt;
| titletext = I think I accidentally installed an Overton window in my bedroom. A few months ago, the sun wasn't in my face in the morning, but now it is.&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Explanation==&lt;br /&gt;
{{incomplete|This page was created by JOSEPH PAUL OVERTON, BACK FROM THE DEAD. Don't remove this notice too soon.}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{w|Joseph Paul Overton}} was a political scientist who created the concept of the {{w|Overton Window}}, which is the range of subjects that are politically appropriate to raise during a period of time. The first set of dates, 1960 and 2003, are the years that Joseph Paul Overton was born and died.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is common for political commentators to state that the Overton window has &amp;quot;moved,&amp;quot; meaning that the standard for which political positions are &amp;quot;moderate&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;extreme&amp;quot; changes, and in either direction. In the comic, the &amp;quot;Overton window&amp;quot; instead refers to the time span in which Joseph Paul Overton was alive. In the comic, the dates on Overton's grave have been repeatedly crossed out and replaced as this 'window' has moved. This creates the ridiculous implication that Overton had multiple lives (four in the comic), or that history has repeatedly changed so that the dates of his life shifted, either of which is impossible.{{cn}} Alternatively, it could reflect changes in the frame of reference the keepers of the grave are using to date events.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The title text refers to the seasonal movement of the Sun in the sky, where its apparent path across the sky moves further north or south throughout the year. This shift, caused by Earth's tilt, moves between the summer solstice (highest arc) and winter solstice (lowest arc.) However, the character in the text believes that the sunlight that is now being let in by an actual window is because the window is an Overton window, and has therefore moved in some manner, rather than the path of the Sun moving. It also can have been perceived to have changed suddenly due to the beginning or end of Daylight Saving Time, as occurred in a number of US states and other countries shortly before this comic was published. This is an issue that Randall has covered [[:Category:Daylight saving time|multiple times]], although apparently ''not'' (unless this is a subtle reference) this year.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Transcript==&lt;br /&gt;
{{incomplete transcript|Don't remove this notice too soon.}}&lt;br /&gt;
:[A gravestone is shown on some grass. On the inscription, all of the years except the last one are crossed out in red, and all except the first pair of years have the years themselves in red. The inscription is as follows:]&lt;br /&gt;
:Joseph Paul Overton&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;s&amp;gt;1960&amp;lt;/s&amp;gt; - &amp;lt;s&amp;gt;2003&amp;lt;/s&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;s&amp;gt;1965&amp;lt;/s&amp;gt; - &amp;lt;s&amp;gt;2011&amp;lt;/s&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;s&amp;gt;1973&amp;lt;/s&amp;gt; - &amp;lt;s&amp;gt;2018&amp;lt;/s&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:1982 - &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{comic discussion}}&amp;lt;noinclude&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Politics]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Comics featuring real people]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Comics with color]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Comics with red annotations]] &amp;lt;!-- 'in universe' versions? --&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>82.13.184.33</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:3230:_Overton&amp;diff=409983</id>
		<title>Talk:3230: Overton</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:3230:_Overton&amp;diff=409983"/>
				<updated>2026-04-09T08:24:57Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;82.13.184.33: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&amp;lt;!-- Please sign your posts with ~~~~ and don't delete this text. New comments should be added at the bottom. --&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
4 January 1960 – 30 June 2003 {{unsigned ip|77.87.241.9|18:34, 8 April 2026}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Someday this cartoon will be politically inappropriate.  [[Special:Contributions/64.201.132.210|64.201.132.210]] 19:16, 8 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
: ^ Absolutely. [[Special:Contributions/66.154.219.123|66.154.219.123]] 21:16, 8 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
randall posting a politics-related comic? which could be construed as discontent with the current political landscape? inb4 somebody &amp;lt;s&amp;gt;bashes&amp;lt;/s&amp;gt; complains at kynde again - [[User:Vaedez|Vaedez]] ([[User talk:Vaedez|talk]]) 22:15, 8 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I think it's worth noting that the window keeps updating to the right. [[Special:Contributions/50.47.108.55|50.47.108.55]] 02:22, 9 April 2026 (UTC) Ale10ander&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What's the next death date? 2027? (Just guessin) [[User:Cream Starlight|Cream S.L.]] ([[User talk:Cream Starlight|talk]] / [[Special:Contributions/Cream_Starlight|contribs]]) 03:33, 9 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Does he keep dying because he's gone over a ton?  (1 ton = 2000 lbs) {{unsigned ip|2607:fb91:bd8a:8e2f:858d:1e1b:f461:5f6e|04:35, 9 April 2026 (UTC)}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Too heavy even the time is altered, i see [[User:Cream Starlight|Cream S.L.]] ([[User talk:Cream Starlight|talk]] / [[Special:Contributions/Cream_Starlight|contribs]]) 05:53, 9 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Reincarnation - Can someone suggest a suitable Buddhist or Hindu text as citation for them multiple lifes? [[Special:Contributions/87.129.222.20|87.129.222.20]] 06:39, 9 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
;Significance of the Dates&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Many of the dates in listed correspond to major geopolitical events concerning US military and diplomatic policy. They may also correspond to milestone events in US domestic politics. This is an attempt to compile some of the key events that the comic may be referencing.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*1965:&lt;br /&gt;
**The beginning of Operation Rolling Thunder, the US ground invasion of Vietnam. &lt;br /&gt;
**President LBJ signs the Voting Rights Act of 1965&lt;br /&gt;
*- 2011:&lt;br /&gt;
**US special forces kill Osama Bin Laden&lt;br /&gt;
**The United States and NATO forces intervene in the Libyan Civil War leading to the ouster of Muammar Gaddafi.&lt;br /&gt;
**More widely, protests spread accross the Middle East and North Africa, dubbed the Arab Spring&lt;br /&gt;
**The last of the US combat forces stationed in Iraq are withdrawn. &lt;br /&gt;
**The Occuppy Wall Street movement begins.&lt;br /&gt;
*1973: &lt;br /&gt;
**The United States signs the Paris Peace Accords, withdrawing from the Vietnam conflict and claiming the war was over&lt;br /&gt;
**The United States Congress overrides a presidential veto to pass the War Powers Resolution, limiting the ability of future presidents to wage war without Congressional approval&lt;br /&gt;
**The Watergate Scandal breaks.&lt;br /&gt;
**Roe v Wade. &lt;br /&gt;
*- 2018:&lt;br /&gt;
**President Donald Trump unilaterally withdraws the United States from the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action, aka the Iran Nuclear Deal.&lt;br /&gt;
**Congress reverses many of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act's reporting and compliance requirements for all but the largest US banks. &lt;br /&gt;
*1982: &lt;br /&gt;
**Israel violates a 1981 U.S. Brokered ceasefire agreement and invades Lebanon. In response the United States spearheads the establishment of a peacekeeping force to protect Beirut, the Multinational Force in Lebanon.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;wbr/&amp;gt;{{unsigned|In-Sanity|22:16, 8 April 2026}}&lt;br /&gt;
:Unfortunately, I suspect that you could easily find such events for absolutely ''every'' year across that range... Unless you narrow down the choices to just something current (i.e. specifically the ones related to current Middle East events, I suppose), which are going to be less frequent but perhaps specifically in Randall's mind.&lt;br /&gt;
:(Oh, and I slightly re-reformatted your amended contribution, presuming that you meant it to look a bit more like it is now.)&lt;br /&gt;
:I was wondering if there was a mathematical pattern to the numbers, myself. [[Special:Contributions/81.179.199.253|81.179.199.253]] 23:00, 8 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>82.13.184.33</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=3230:_Overton&amp;diff=409982</id>
		<title>3230: Overton</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=3230:_Overton&amp;diff=409982"/>
				<updated>2026-04-09T08:19:23Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;82.13.184.33: /* Explanation */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{comic&lt;br /&gt;
| number    = 3230&lt;br /&gt;
| date      = April 8, 2026&lt;br /&gt;
| title     = Overton&lt;br /&gt;
| image     = overton_2x.png&lt;br /&gt;
| imagesize = 242x268px&lt;br /&gt;
| noexpand  = true&lt;br /&gt;
| titletext = I think I accidentally installed an Overton window in my bedroom. A few months ago, the sun wasn't in my face in the morning, but now it is.&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Explanation==&lt;br /&gt;
{{incomplete|This page was created by JOSEPH PAUL OVERTON, BACK FROM THE DEAD. Don't remove this notice too soon.}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{w|Joseph Paul Overton}} was a political scientist who created the concept of the {{w|Overton Window}}, which is the range of subjects that are politically appropriate to raise during a period of time. The first set of dates, 1960 and 2003, are the years that Joseph Paul Overton was born and died.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is common for political commentators to state that the Overton window has &amp;quot;moved,&amp;quot; meaning that the standard for which political positions are &amp;quot;moderate&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;extreme&amp;quot; changes, and in either direction. In the comic, the &amp;quot;Overton window&amp;quot; instead refers to the time span in which Joseph Paul Overton was alive. In the comic, the dates on Overton's grave have been repeatedly crossed out and replaced as this 'window' has moved. This creates the ridiculous implication that Overton had multiple lives (4 in the comic), which is impossible.{{cn}} Alternatively, it could reflect changes in the frame of reference the keepers of the grave are using to date events.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The title text refers to the seasonal movement of the Sun in the sky, where its apparent path across the sky moves further north or south throughout the year. This shift, caused by Earth's tilt, moves between the summer solstice (highest arc) and winter solstice (lowest arc.) However, the character in the text believes that the sunlight that is now being let in by an actual window is because the window is an Overton window, and has therefore moved in some manner, rather than the path of the Sun moving. It also can have been perceived to have changed suddenly due to the beginning or end of Daylight Saving Time, as occurred in a number of US states and other countries shortly before this comic was published. This is an issue that Randall has covered [[:Category:Daylight saving time|multiple times]], although apparently ''not'' (unless this is a subtle reference) this year.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Transcript==&lt;br /&gt;
{{incomplete transcript|Don't remove this notice too soon.}}&lt;br /&gt;
:[A gravestone is shown on some grass. On the inscription, all of the years except the last one are crossed out in red, and all except the first pair of years have the years themselves in red. The inscription is as follows:]&lt;br /&gt;
:Joseph Paul Overton&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;s&amp;gt;1960&amp;lt;/s&amp;gt; - &amp;lt;s&amp;gt;2003&amp;lt;/s&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;s&amp;gt;1965&amp;lt;/s&amp;gt; - &amp;lt;s&amp;gt;2011&amp;lt;/s&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;s&amp;gt;1973&amp;lt;/s&amp;gt; - &amp;lt;s&amp;gt;2018&amp;lt;/s&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:1982 - &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{comic discussion}}&amp;lt;noinclude&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Politics]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Comics featuring real people]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Comics with color]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Comics with red annotations]] &amp;lt;!-- 'in universe' versions? --&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>82.13.184.33</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=3230:_Overton&amp;diff=409981</id>
		<title>3230: Overton</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=3230:_Overton&amp;diff=409981"/>
				<updated>2026-04-09T08:18:33Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;82.13.184.33: /* Explanation */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{comic&lt;br /&gt;
| number    = 3230&lt;br /&gt;
| date      = April 8, 2026&lt;br /&gt;
| title     = Overton&lt;br /&gt;
| image     = overton_2x.png&lt;br /&gt;
| imagesize = 242x268px&lt;br /&gt;
| noexpand  = true&lt;br /&gt;
| titletext = I think I accidentally installed an Overton window in my bedroom. A few months ago, the sun wasn't in my face in the morning, but now it is.&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Explanation==&lt;br /&gt;
{{incomplete|This page was created by JOSEPH PAUL OVERTON, BACK FROM THE DEAD. Don't remove this notice too soon.}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{w|Joseph Paul Overton}} was a political scientist who created the concept of the {{w|Overton Window}}, which is the range of subjects that are politically appropriate to raise during a period of time. The first set of dates, 1960 and 2003, are the years that Joseph Paul Overton was born and died.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is common for political commentators to state that the Overton window has &amp;quot;moved,&amp;quot; meaning that the standard for which political positions are &amp;quot;moderate&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;extreme&amp;quot; changes, and in either direction. In the comic, the &amp;quot;Overton window&amp;quot; instead refers to the time span in which Joseph Paul Overton was alive. In the comic, the dates have been repeatedly crossed out and replaced as this 'window' has moved. This creates the ridiculous implication that Overton had multiple lives (4 in the comic), which is impossible.{{cn}} Alternatively, it could reflect changes in the frame of reference the keepers of the grave are using to date events.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The title text refers to the seasonal movement of the Sun in the sky, where its apparent path across the sky moves further north or south throughout the year. This shift, caused by Earth's tilt, moves between the summer solstice (highest arc) and winter solstice (lowest arc.) However, the character in the text believes that the sunlight that is now being let in by an actual window is because the window is an Overton window, and has therefore moved in some manner, rather than the path of the Sun moving. It also can have been perceived to have changed suddenly due to the beginning or end of Daylight Saving Time, as occurred in a number of US states and other countries shortly before this comic was published. This is an issue that Randall has covered [[:Category:Daylight saving time|multiple times]], although apparently ''not'' (unless this is a subtle reference) this year.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Transcript==&lt;br /&gt;
{{incomplete transcript|Don't remove this notice too soon.}}&lt;br /&gt;
:[A gravestone is shown on some grass. On the inscription, all of the years except the last one are crossed out in red, and all except the first pair of years have the years themselves in red. The inscription is as follows:]&lt;br /&gt;
:Joseph Paul Overton&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;s&amp;gt;1960&amp;lt;/s&amp;gt; - &amp;lt;s&amp;gt;2003&amp;lt;/s&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;s&amp;gt;1965&amp;lt;/s&amp;gt; - &amp;lt;s&amp;gt;2011&amp;lt;/s&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;s&amp;gt;1973&amp;lt;/s&amp;gt; - &amp;lt;s&amp;gt;2018&amp;lt;/s&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:1982 - &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{comic discussion}}&amp;lt;noinclude&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Politics]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Comics featuring real people]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Comics with color]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Comics with red annotations]] &amp;lt;!-- 'in universe' versions? --&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>82.13.184.33</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=3229:_Grammar&amp;diff=409980</id>
		<title>3229: Grammar</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=3229:_Grammar&amp;diff=409980"/>
				<updated>2026-04-09T08:15:27Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;82.13.184.33: /* Explanation */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{comic&lt;br /&gt;
| number    = 3229&lt;br /&gt;
| date      = April 6, 2026&lt;br /&gt;
| title     = Grammar&lt;br /&gt;
| image     = grammar_2x.png&lt;br /&gt;
| imagesize = 227x312px&lt;br /&gt;
| noexpand  = true&lt;br /&gt;
| titletext = Communication is one of the most popular ways to transmit information, ahead of rivals such as&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Explanation==&lt;br /&gt;
{{incomplete|Explanation of '''EEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE''' should focus on grammar, not communication.}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Miss Lenhart]] is shown teaching a classroom about {{w|grammar}}, which is a system of rules describing how a certain language is structured. This is useful to make communication and meaning standardized and clear, with little to no difficulty in parsing. However, due to having many rules and structures to learn, the grammar of some languages can be viewed with annoyance by some people who wish it were 'simpler'. Miss Lenhart claims that grammar is &amp;quot;''one'' of the most popular ways to structure a language&amp;quot; and presents two alternative methods, but this is odd, as grammar ''is'' how we structure a language. Also, if the names of these 'rivals' illustrate their use, they reflect their own rules, and thus imply their own grammar. She also presents two alternative methods (though it could be interpreted as a list of four items without commas to split it up) that competed to substitute grammar, yet evidently never took off to be implemented for practical use. Despite seeming nonsensical, they've gained their own linguistic terminology:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
;Words order words random words words random good&lt;br /&gt;
:This alternate to grammar likely has very loose rules around structure, as it consists of simply stating words that relate directly to the idea being conveyed (as opposed to normal grammar, which focuses on linking together many words to form a single coherent idea). This is superficially similar to some languages, like Ukrainian, where word order does not matter. However, in these languages, its role in the sentence is simply replaced with more in-depth conjugation, which is also a form of grammar. The provided sentence, conversely, appears to have neither conjugation nor any meaningful ordering, which would make it difficult to convey more complex concepts.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
;EEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE&lt;br /&gt;
:This might be referencing a scream as a form of communication. Screams are capable of communicating small amounts of information, primarily the fact that someone is attempting to draw one's attention, but cannot convey most concepts without use of complex, structured encoding patterns like Morse code (which do not appear to be present here). Alternatively, it could be made up of various random syllables, with others in the system too. (like 'AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAH' &amp;amp; 'OOOOOOOOOOOH'). It may also be a reference to one of the questions recorded in [[Randall]]'s ''[[What If? 2]]'', in the {{what if|2-58.5|Short Answers #5 chapter}}. The &amp;quot;question&amp;quot;, posted by Nate Yu, was a string of 960 letter &amp;quot;E&amp;quot;s, to which Randall replied: &amp;quot;I feel you, Nate&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The title text continues Lenhart's lecture, as she moves on to {{w|communication}} and its rival alternatives, similar to the subject of grammar, but seems to cut off before naming the first one. Lenhart is self-demonstrating non-communication, as the sudden stop in the middle of the sentence could be a joke for how there are no other ways to convey information without communication. Still, this doesn't rule out at least one other 'rival' to communication, as Lenhart implies that at least one more method exists. If communication is defined as successful transmission of information, it is possible she is referring to some sort of method(s) that attempts, but fails to transmit information. Nonetheless, demonstrating lack of communication would not be useful in this setting without further explanation, as abruptly ceasing to provide more information could cause confusion in her students.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Transcript==&lt;br /&gt;
:[Miss Lenhart is teaching in a classroom. Two students can be seen sitting at desks in front of her, Cueball in the first row and Megan in the second row.]&lt;br /&gt;
:Miss Lenhart: '''Grammar''' is one of the most popular ways to structure a language, ahead of rival methods such as '''''words order words random words words random good''''' and '''''EEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE'''''.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{comic discussion}}&amp;lt;noinclude&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Comics featuring Miss Lenhart]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Comics featuring Cueball]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Comics featuring Megan]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Language]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>82.13.184.33</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:3229:_Grammar&amp;diff=409894</id>
		<title>Talk:3229: Grammar</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:3229:_Grammar&amp;diff=409894"/>
				<updated>2026-04-08T13:09:01Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;82.13.184.33: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&amp;lt;!-- Please sign your posts with ~~~~ and don't delete this text. New comments should be added at the bottom. --&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
E3EeE E3eE!! [[User:Logalex8369|Logalex8369]] ([[User talk:Logalex8369|talk]]) 22:26, 6 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
: E [[User:ProphetZarquon|ProphetZarquon]] ([[User talk:ProphetZarquon|talk]]) 19:54, 7 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I created a transcript, but used OCR for all the E's because I kept losing count of how many there were. If someone wants to factcheck that, please do. [[Special:Contributions/104.28.215.220|104.28.215.220]] 22:45, 6 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
: Factchecked 19 E's counted in the image and 19 E's counted in the transcript. [[Special:Contributions/12.155.149.34|12.155.149.34]] 23:00, 6 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It looks like the bot picked up the April Fool's &amp;quot;feature&amp;quot; as interactive, should we keep it or remove? [[Special:Contributions/104.28.215.220|104.28.215.220]] 22:46, 6 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Side note: I have heard people using both alternate niche methods of language structure, kinda like those people who adopt a losing format even after it's clear it has lost. On character who has on occasion dabbled in both is Homer Simpson, BTW. --[[Special:Contributions/94.73.49.13|94.73.49.13]]&lt;br /&gt;
:I still say that Video2000 was the superior home VCR format, in every way...[[Special:Contributions/81.179.199.253|81.179.199.253]] 23:55, 6 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
: Not really niche - a significant proportion of spoken language is non-grammatical. [[Special:Contributions/82.13.184.33|82.13.184.33]] 16:27, 7 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Any &amp;quot;competitors&amp;quot; to grammar would still be grammars since a grammar, by definition, describes how a language is structured. [[Special:Contributions/75.248.235.98|75.248.235.98]] 00:00, 7 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Well, the Random Words one ''seems'' to have no particular structure beyond being word-utterances, and the EEEEEEEEEEEEEE one doesn't even have much that ''can'' be structuralised (though I'm half expecting it to actually supposed to be a modem 'yowl', it needn't even be that), so I'm willing to bet that this exempts them from any consistent quality of being grammar. [[Special:Contributions/81.179.199.253|81.179.199.253]] 00:08, 7 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
: The second example used the term word-s which in itself is a structure with grammar. And the last example might well have grammar, if eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee is a single morpheme, we siply wouldn't be able to recognize the grammar. [[Special:Contributions/195.65.24.115|195.65.24.115]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I interpreted &amp;quot;words order words random words words random good&amp;quot; differently. I assumed it was missing commas and should be read as &amp;quot;words-order&amp;quot;, &amp;quot;words-random&amp;quot; &amp;quot;words-words&amp;quot; &amp;quot;random-good&amp;quot;. Maybe(probably?) not what Randall intended, but if anyone interpreted it the same as me, you're not alone! {{unsigned ip|69.204.108.174|00:23, 7 April 2026 (UTC)}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
i reconsider this: non-verbal communication isn't another rival for communication, as it is a subset (after seeing and liking [https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=3229:_Grammar&amp;amp;diff=next&amp;amp;oldid=409748 this anon's edit]), but i'm not sure what other methods there could be than just communication and non-communication; Lenhart says &amp;quot;rivals&amp;quot; plural -- &amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;letter-spacing:0.1rem&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[[User:Somefan|somefan]] ([[User talk:Somefan|talk]] | [[Special:Contributions/Somefan|contribs]])&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt; 00:45, 7 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Pretty sure the joke is that any alternative to communication would by definition be impossible to communicate. --[[User:Biotronic|Biotronic]] ([[User talk:Biotronic|talk]]) 08:18, 7 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::Actually, I worded that wrong - what I meant is that '' is an example of non-communication, which is not very effective at transmitting information --[[User:Biotronic|Biotronic]] ([[User talk:Biotronic|talk]]) 08:58, 7 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
give orange me give eat orange me eat orange give me eat orange give me you [[Special:Contributions/137.25.230.78|137.25.230.78]] 00:54, 7 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:steal orange me steal eat orange me eat orange steal me eat orange steal me you [[User:King Pando|King Pando]] ([[User talk:King Pando|talk]]) 02:34, 7 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
orange orange orange &lt;br /&gt;
orange orange orange &lt;br /&gt;
orange orange orange &lt;br /&gt;
yellow&lt;br /&gt;
orange you glad I didn't say orange? [[Special:Contributions/98.22.184.160|98.22.184.160]] 11:27, 7 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I would suggest that light/photons are the most popular way of transmitting information? to (most) humans anyway... {{unsigned ip|2a02:a468:b8cb:0:5a82:a830:1528:55af|13:15, 7 April 2026 (UTC)}}&lt;br /&gt;
: Only up until the last mile. [[Special:Contributions/82.13.184.33|82.13.184.33]] 14:15, 7 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Why waste time use good grammar when bad grammar do trick? [[Special:Contributions/70.40.121.82|70.40.121.82]] 15:08, 7 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Cuz if you're doing too bad grammar, sometimes you'll see some sentences that triggers Uncanny Valley effect (or related stuff). (I would guess this way) [[User:Cream Starlight|Cream Starlight]] ([[User talk:Cream Starlight|talk]]) 15:25, 7 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::It's a reference to [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bctjSvn-OC8 this scene] from the American version of The Office. [[User:MeZimm|MeZimm]] ([[User talk:MeZimm|talk]]) 16:08, 7 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In Cookie Clicker, there’s a news ticker message that says “Neeeeews : &amp;quot;neeeew EEEEEE keeeeey working fineeeeeeeee&amp;quot;, reeeports gleeeeeeeeful journalist.” Might be a reference to that. [[Special:Contributions/185.124.31.68|185.124.31.68]] 15:41, 7 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Erm, isn't the current description kind of missing the point? &amp;quot;Grammar is one of the most popular ways to structure a language&amp;quot; is a tautology. &amp;quot;Grammar&amp;quot; studies how languages are structured, so ANY organization scheme of a language (from random to highly structured) would be classified as that language's grammar. Trying to say there are &amp;quot;other ways to structure a language&amp;quot; would just be a different form of grammar. Same thing with the title text. &amp;quot;Communication&amp;quot; is transmitting information from one individual to another. Any alternative to &amp;quot;Communication&amp;quot; isn't transmitting information. [[Special:Contributions/57.140.32.31|57.140.32.31]] 16:32, 7 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The &amp;quot;words order random words&amp;quot; part may be a reference to {{w|Nim Chimpsky}}'s sign language &amp;quot;sentences&amp;quot; like &amp;quot;Give orange me give eat orange me eat orange give me eat orange give me you&amp;quot;. [[Special:Contributions/193.179.120.253|193.179.120.253]] 18:22, 7 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I figured the EEE....EEE was referring to the screeching of a modem trying to establish communication. --[[User:Jimmosk|Jimmosk]] ([[User talk:Jimmosk|talk]]) 22:07, 7 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Farm Macdonald farm old farm farm had farm a, EEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE [[User:King Pando|King Pando]] ([[User talk:King Pando|talk]]) 02:53, 8 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Somebody should make a version of scream cypher where it's E instead of A. [[Special:Contributions/216.25.182.141|216.25.182.141]] 04:43, 8 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Oh btw, in Chinese translation of What If? 2, the amount of E's featured in the question were 1083. I counted lol [[User:Cream Starlight|Cream Starlight]] ([[User talk:Cream Starlight|talk]]) 04:46, 8 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This reminds me of a linguistics forum post a professor showed my class once. &amp;quot;I respect Chomsky, but Universal Grammar isn't all it's cracked up to be,&amp;quot; it read. &amp;quot;The best way to learn a language is through immersion!&amp;quot; [[User:Flipping Mackerel|Flipping Mackerel]] ([[User talk:Flipping Mackerel|talk]]) 11:46, 8 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
: The best way to learn a language is a correspondence course. [[Special:Contributions/82.13.184.33|82.13.184.33]] 13:09, 8 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I believe this is a reference to frequent weird results that Google AI mode sometimes returns after a search. I got this exact behavior twice. --[[Special:Contributions/82.132.222.151|82.132.222.151]] 12:42, 8 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>82.13.184.33</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:3229:_Grammar&amp;diff=409888</id>
		<title>Talk:3229: Grammar</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:3229:_Grammar&amp;diff=409888"/>
				<updated>2026-04-08T08:11:10Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;82.13.184.33: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&amp;lt;!-- Please sign your posts with ~~~~ and don't delete this text. New comments should be added at the bottom. --&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
E3EeE E3eE!! [[User:Logalex8369|Logalex8369]] ([[User talk:Logalex8369|talk]]) 22:26, 6 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
: E [[User:ProphetZarquon|ProphetZarquon]] ([[User talk:ProphetZarquon|talk]]) 19:54, 7 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I created a transcript, but used OCR for all the E's because I kept losing count of how many there were. If someone wants to factcheck that, please do. [[Special:Contributions/104.28.215.220|104.28.215.220]] 22:45, 6 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
: Factchecked 19 E's counted in the image and 19 E's counted in the transcript. [[Special:Contributions/12.155.149.34|12.155.149.34]] 23:00, 6 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It looks like the bot picked up the April Fool's &amp;quot;feature&amp;quot; as interactive, should we keep it or remove? [[Special:Contributions/104.28.215.220|104.28.215.220]] 22:46, 6 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Side note: I have heard people using both alternate niche methods of language structure, kinda like those people who adopt a losing format even after it's clear it has lost. On character who has on occasion dabbled in both is Homer Simpson, BTW. --[[Special:Contributions/94.73.49.13|94.73.49.13]]&lt;br /&gt;
:I still say that Video2000 was the superior home VCR format, in every way...[[Special:Contributions/81.179.199.253|81.179.199.253]] 23:55, 6 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
: Not really niche - a significant proportion of spoken language is non-grammatical. [[Special:Contributions/82.13.184.33|82.13.184.33]] 16:27, 7 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Any &amp;quot;competitors&amp;quot; to grammar would still be grammars since a grammar, by definition, describes how a language is structured. [[Special:Contributions/75.248.235.98|75.248.235.98]] 00:00, 7 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Well, the Random Words one ''seems'' to have no particular structure beyond being word-utterances, and the EEEEEEEEEEEEEE one doesn't even have much that ''can'' be structuralised (though I'm half expecting it to actually supposed to be a modem 'yowl', it needn't even be that), so I'm willing to bet that this exempts them from any consistent quality of being grammar. [[Special:Contributions/81.179.199.253|81.179.199.253]] 00:08, 7 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
: The second example used the term word-s which in itself is a structure with grammar. And the last example might well have grammar, if eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee is a single morpheme, we siply wouldn't be able to recognize the grammar. [[Special:Contributions/195.65.24.115|195.65.24.115]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I interpreted &amp;quot;words order words random words words random good&amp;quot; differently. I assumed it was missing commas and should be read as &amp;quot;words-order&amp;quot;, &amp;quot;words-random&amp;quot; &amp;quot;words-words&amp;quot; &amp;quot;random-good&amp;quot;. Maybe(probably?) not what Randall intended, but if anyone interpreted it the same as me, you're not alone! {{unsigned ip|69.204.108.174|00:23, 7 April 2026 (UTC)}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
i reconsider this: non-verbal communication isn't another rival for communication, as it is a subset (after seeing and liking [https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=3229:_Grammar&amp;amp;diff=next&amp;amp;oldid=409748 this anon's edit]), but i'm not sure what other methods there could be than just communication and non-communication; Lenhart says &amp;quot;rivals&amp;quot; plural -- &amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;letter-spacing:0.1rem&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[[User:Somefan|somefan]] ([[User talk:Somefan|talk]] | [[Special:Contributions/Somefan|contribs]])&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt; 00:45, 7 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Pretty sure the joke is that any alternative to communication would by definition be impossible to communicate. --[[User:Biotronic|Biotronic]] ([[User talk:Biotronic|talk]]) 08:18, 7 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::Actually, I worded that wrong - what I meant is that '' is an example of non-communication, which is not very effective at transmitting information --[[User:Biotronic|Biotronic]] ([[User talk:Biotronic|talk]]) 08:58, 7 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
give orange me give eat orange me eat orange give me eat orange give me you [[Special:Contributions/137.25.230.78|137.25.230.78]] 00:54, 7 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:steal orange me steal eat orange me eat orange steal me eat orange steal me you [[User:King Pando|King Pando]] ([[User talk:King Pando|talk]]) 02:34, 7 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
orange orange orange &lt;br /&gt;
orange orange orange &lt;br /&gt;
orange orange orange &lt;br /&gt;
yellow&lt;br /&gt;
orange you glad I didn't say orange? [[Special:Contributions/98.22.184.160|98.22.184.160]] 11:27, 7 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I would suggest that light/photons are the most popular way of transmitting information? to (most) humans anyway... {{unsigned ip|2a02:a468:b8cb:0:5a82:a830:1528:55af|13:15, 7 April 2026 (UTC)}}&lt;br /&gt;
: Only up until the last mile. [[Special:Contributions/82.13.184.33|82.13.184.33]] 14:15, 7 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Why waste time use good grammar when bad grammar do trick? [[Special:Contributions/70.40.121.82|70.40.121.82]] 15:08, 7 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Cuz if you're doing too bad grammar, sometimes you'll see some sentences that triggers Uncanny Valley effect (or related stuff). (I would guess this way) [[User:Cream Starlight|Cream Starlight]] ([[User talk:Cream Starlight|talk]]) 15:25, 7 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::It's a reference to [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bctjSvn-OC8 this scene] from the American version of The Office. [[User:MeZimm|MeZimm]] ([[User talk:MeZimm|talk]]) 16:08, 7 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In Cookie Clicker, there’s a news ticker message that says “Neeeeews : &amp;quot;neeeew EEEEEE keeeeey working fineeeeeeeee&amp;quot;, reeeports gleeeeeeeeful journalist.” Might be a reference to that. [[Special:Contributions/185.124.31.68|185.124.31.68]] 15:41, 7 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Erm, isn't the current description kind of missing the point? &amp;quot;Grammar is one of the most popular ways to structure a language&amp;quot; is a tautology. &amp;quot;Grammar&amp;quot; studies how languages are structured, so ANY organization scheme of a language (from random to highly structured) would be classified as that language's grammar. Trying to say there are &amp;quot;other ways to structure a language&amp;quot; would just be a different form of grammar. Same thing with the title text. &amp;quot;Communication&amp;quot; is transmitting information from one individual to another. Any alternative to &amp;quot;Communication&amp;quot; isn't transmitting information. [[Special:Contributions/57.140.32.31|57.140.32.31]] 16:32, 7 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The &amp;quot;words order random words&amp;quot; part may be a reference to {{w|Nim Chimpsky}}'s sign language &amp;quot;sentences&amp;quot; like &amp;quot;Give orange me give eat orange me eat orange give me eat orange give me you&amp;quot;. [[Special:Contributions/193.179.120.253|193.179.120.253]] 18:22, 7 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I figured the EEE....EEE was referring to the screeching of a modem trying to establish communication. --[[User:Jimmosk|Jimmosk]] ([[User talk:Jimmosk|talk]]) 22:07, 7 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Farm Macdonald farm old farm farm had farm a, EEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE [[User:King Pando|King Pando]] ([[User talk:King Pando|talk]]) 02:53, 8 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Somebody should make a version of scream cypher where it's E instead of A. [[Special:Contributions/216.25.182.141|216.25.182.141]] 04:43, 8 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Oh btw, in Chinese translation of What If? 2, the amount of E's featured in the question were 1083. I counted lol [[User:Cream Starlight|Cream Starlight]] ([[User talk:Cream Starlight|talk]]) 04:46, 8 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>82.13.184.33</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=3229:_Grammar&amp;diff=409836</id>
		<title>3229: Grammar</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=3229:_Grammar&amp;diff=409836"/>
				<updated>2026-04-07T16:46:54Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;82.13.184.33: /* Explanation */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{comic&lt;br /&gt;
| number    = 3229&lt;br /&gt;
| date      = April 6, 2026&lt;br /&gt;
| title     = Grammar&lt;br /&gt;
| image     = grammar_2x.png&lt;br /&gt;
| imagesize = 227x312px&lt;br /&gt;
| noexpand  = true&lt;br /&gt;
| titletext = Communication is one of the most popular ways to transmit information, ahead of rivals such as&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Explanation==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Miss Lenhart]] is shown teaching a classroom about {{w|grammar}}, which is a system of rules describing how a certain language is structured. This is useful to make communication and meaning standardized and clear, with little to no difficulty in parsing. However, due to having many rules and structures to learn, the grammar of some languages can be viewed with annoyance by some people who wish it were 'simpler'. However, this comic shows how effective grammar is by comparing it with various other 'forms' of structure. Specifically, Miss Lenhart claims that grammar is &amp;quot;''one'' of the most popular ways to structure a language&amp;quot;. She also presents two alternative methods (though it could be interpreted as a list of four items without commas to split it up) that competed to substitute grammar, yet evidently never took off to be implemented for practical use. Despite seeming nonsensical, they've gained their own linguistic terminology:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
;Words order words random words words random good&lt;br /&gt;
:This alternate to grammar likely has very loose rules around structure, as it consists of simply stating words that relate directly to the idea being conveyed (as opposed to normal grammar, which focuses on linking together many words to form a single coherent idea). This can also refer to other languages, like Ukrainian, where due to conjugation word order does not matter, although it might sound weird.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
;EEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE&lt;br /&gt;
:This might be referencing a scream as a form of communication (albeit an unreliable one). Alternatively, it could be made up of various random syllables, with others in the system too. (like 'AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAH' &amp;amp; 'OOOOOOOOOOOH'). It may also be a reference to one of the questions recorded in [[Randall]]'s [[What If? 2]] book, in the {{what if|2-58.5|''Short Answers #5'' chapter}}. The &amp;quot;question&amp;quot;, posted by Nate Yu, was a string of 960 letters &amp;quot;E&amp;quot;, to which Randall replied: {{what if|2-58.5|&amp;quot;I feel you, Nate&amp;quot;}}.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The title text continues Lenhart's lecture, as she moves on to {{w|communication}} and its rival alternatives, similar to the subject of grammar, but seems to cut off before naming the first one. This may reference {{w|nonverbal communication}} (which is communication without oral means), but this is a subset of communication. Either Miss Lenhart has transferred into another mode of transmitting information to self-demonstrate (that may be impossible to render textually) or lack thereof, as the sudden stop in the middle of the sentence could be a joke for how there no other ways to convey information without communication. Still, this doesn't rule out other possible alternatives to communication, as Lenhart implies that other methods exist. If communication is defined as successful transmission of information, it is possible she is referring to some sort of method(s) that attempts, but fails to transmit information. Nonetheless, self-demonstrating lack of communication would not be useful in this setting without further explanation, as abruptly ceasing to provide more information could instil confusion in her students.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Transcript==&lt;br /&gt;
:[Miss Lenhart is teaching in a classroom. Two students can be seen sitting at desks in front of her, Cueball in the first row and Megan in the second row.]&lt;br /&gt;
:Miss Lenhart: '''Grammar''' is one of the most popular ways to structure a language, ahead of rival methods such as '''''words order words random words words random good''''' and '''''EEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE'''''.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{comic discussion}}&amp;lt;noinclude&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Comics featuring Miss Lenhart]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Comics featuring Cueball]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Comics featuring Megan]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Language]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>82.13.184.33</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:3229:_Grammar&amp;diff=409830</id>
		<title>Talk:3229: Grammar</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:3229:_Grammar&amp;diff=409830"/>
				<updated>2026-04-07T16:27:35Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;82.13.184.33: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&amp;lt;!-- Please sign your posts with ~~~~ and don't delete this text. New comments should be added at the bottom. --&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
E3EeE E3eE!! [[User:Logalex8369|Logalex8369]] ([[User talk:Logalex8369|talk]]) 22:26, 6 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I created a transcript, but used OCR for all the E's because I kept losing count of how many there were. If someone wants to factcheck that, please do. [[Special:Contributions/104.28.215.220|104.28.215.220]] 22:45, 6 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
: Factchecked 19 E's counted in the image and 19 E's counted in the transcript. [[Special:Contributions/12.155.149.34|12.155.149.34]] 23:00, 6 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It looks like the bot picked up the April Fool's &amp;quot;feature&amp;quot; as interactive, should we keep it or remove? [[Special:Contributions/104.28.215.220|104.28.215.220]] 22:46, 6 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Side note: I have heard people using both alternate niche methods of language structure, kinda like those people who adopt a losing format even after it's clear it has lost. On character who has on occasion dabbled in both is Homer Simpson, BTW. --[[Special:Contributions/94.73.49.13|94.73.49.13]]&lt;br /&gt;
:I still say that Video2000 was the superior home VCR format, in every way...[[Special:Contributions/81.179.199.253|81.179.199.253]] 23:55, 6 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
: Not really niche - a significant proportion of spoken language is non-grammatical. [[Special:Contributions/82.13.184.33|82.13.184.33]] 16:27, 7 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Any &amp;quot;competitors&amp;quot; to grammar would still be grammars since a grammar, by definition, describes how a language is structured. [[Special:Contributions/75.248.235.98|75.248.235.98]] 00:00, 7 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Well, the Random Words one ''seems'' to have no particular structure beyond being word-utterances, and the EEEEEEEEEEEEEE one doesn't even have much that ''can'' be structuralised (though I'm half expecting it to actually supposed to be a modem 'yowl', it needn't even be that), so I'm willing to bet that this exempts them from any consistent quality of being grammar. [[Special:Contributions/81.179.199.253|81.179.199.253]] 00:08, 7 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
: The second example used the term word-s which in itself is a structure with grammar. And the last example might well have grammar, if eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee is a single morpheme, we siply wouldn't be able to recognize the grammar. [[Special:Contributions/195.65.24.115|195.65.24.115]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I interpreted &amp;quot;words order words random words words random good&amp;quot; differently. I assumed it was missing commas and should be read as &amp;quot;words-order&amp;quot;, &amp;quot;words-random&amp;quot; &amp;quot;words-words&amp;quot; &amp;quot;random-good&amp;quot;. Maybe(probably?) not what Randall intended, but if anyone interpreted it the same as me, you're not alone! {{unsigned ip|69.204.108.174|00:23, 7 April 2026 (UTC)}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
i reconsider this: non-verbal communication isn't another rival for communication, as it is a subset (after seeing and liking [https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=3229:_Grammar&amp;amp;diff=next&amp;amp;oldid=409748 this anon's edit]), but i'm not sure what other methods there could be than just communication and non-communication; Lenhart says &amp;quot;rivals&amp;quot; plural -- &amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;letter-spacing:0.1rem&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[[User:Somefan|somefan]] ([[User talk:Somefan|talk]] | [[Special:Contributions/Somefan|contribs]])&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt; 00:45, 7 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Pretty sure the joke is that any alternative to communication would by definition be impossible to communicate. --[[User:Biotronic|Biotronic]] ([[User talk:Biotronic|talk]]) 08:18, 7 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::Actually, I worded that wrong - what I meant is that '' is an example of non-communication, which is not very effective at transmitting information --[[User:Biotronic|Biotronic]] ([[User talk:Biotronic|talk]]) 08:58, 7 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
give orange me give eat orange me eat orange give me eat orange give me you [[Special:Contributions/137.25.230.78|137.25.230.78]] 00:54, 7 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:steal orange me steal eat orange me eat orange steal me eat orange steal me you [[User:King Pando|King Pando]] ([[User talk:King Pando|talk]]) 02:34, 7 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
orange orange orange &lt;br /&gt;
orange orange orange &lt;br /&gt;
orange orange orange &lt;br /&gt;
yellow&lt;br /&gt;
orange you glad I didn't say orange? [[Special:Contributions/98.22.184.160|98.22.184.160]] 11:27, 7 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I would suggest that light/photons are the most popular way of transmitting information? to (most) humans anyway... {{unsigned ip|2a02:a468:b8cb:0:5a82:a830:1528:55af|13:15, 7 April 2026 (UTC)}}&lt;br /&gt;
: Only up until the last mile. [[Special:Contributions/82.13.184.33|82.13.184.33]] 14:15, 7 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Why waste time use good grammar when bad grammar do trick? [[Special:Contributions/70.40.121.82|70.40.121.82]] 15:08, 7 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Cuz if you're doing too bad grammar, sometimes you'll see some sentences that triggers Uncanny Valley effect (or related stuff). (I would guess this way) [[User:Cream Starlight|Cream Starlight]] ([[User talk:Cream Starlight|talk]]) 15:25, 7 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::It's a reference to [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bctjSvn-OC8 this scene] from the American version of The Office. [[User:MeZimm|MeZimm]] ([[User talk:MeZimm|talk]]) 16:08, 7 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In Cookie Clicker, there’s a news ticker message that says “Neeeeews : &amp;quot;neeeew EEEEEE keeeeey working fineeeeeeeee&amp;quot;, reeeports gleeeeeeeeful journalist.” Might be a reference to that. [[Special:Contributions/185.124.31.68|185.124.31.68]] 15:41, 7 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>82.13.184.33</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:3229:_Grammar&amp;diff=409816</id>
		<title>Talk:3229: Grammar</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:3229:_Grammar&amp;diff=409816"/>
				<updated>2026-04-07T14:15:01Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;82.13.184.33: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&amp;lt;!-- Please sign your posts with ~~~~ and don't delete this text. New comments should be added at the bottom. --&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
E3EeE E3eE!! [[User:Logalex8369|Logalex8369]] ([[User talk:Logalex8369|talk]]) 22:26, 6 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I created a transcript, but used OCR for all the E's because I kept losing count of how many there were. If someone wants to factcheck that, please do. [[Special:Contributions/104.28.215.220|104.28.215.220]] 22:45, 6 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
: Factchecked 19 E's counted in the image and 19 E's counted in the transcript. [[Special:Contributions/12.155.149.34|12.155.149.34]] 23:00, 6 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It looks like the bot picked up the April Fool's &amp;quot;feature&amp;quot; as interactive, should we keep it or remove? [[Special:Contributions/104.28.215.220|104.28.215.220]] 22:46, 6 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Side note: I have heard people using both alternate niche methods of language structure, kinda like those people who adopt a losing format even after it's clear it has lost. On character who has on occasion dabbled in both is Homer Simpson, BTW. --[[Special:Contributions/94.73.49.13|94.73.49.13]]&lt;br /&gt;
:I still say that Video2000 was the superior home VCR format, in every way...[[Special:Contributions/81.179.199.253|81.179.199.253]] 23:55, 6 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Any &amp;quot;competitors&amp;quot; to grammar would still be grammars since a grammar, by definition, describes how a language is structured. [[Special:Contributions/75.248.235.98|75.248.235.98]] 00:00, 7 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Well, the Random Words one ''seems'' to have no particular structure beyond being word-utterances, and the EEEEEEEEEEEEEE one doesn't even have much that ''can'' be structuralised (though I'm half expecting it to actually supposed to be a modem 'yowl', it needn't even be that), so I'm willing to bet that this exempts them from any consistent quality of being grammar. [[Special:Contributions/81.179.199.253|81.179.199.253]] 00:08, 7 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
: The second example used the term word-s which in itself is a structure with grammar. And the last example might well have grammar, if eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee is a single morpheme, we siply wouldn't be able to recognize the grammar. [[Special:Contributions/195.65.24.115|195.65.24.115]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I interpreted &amp;quot;words order words random words words random good&amp;quot; differently. I assumed it was missing commas and should be read as &amp;quot;words-order&amp;quot;, &amp;quot;words-random&amp;quot; &amp;quot;words-words&amp;quot; &amp;quot;random-good&amp;quot;. Maybe(probably?) not what Randall intended, but if anyone interpreted it the same as me, you're not alone! {{unsigned ip|69.204.108.174|00:23, 7 April 2026 (UTC)}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
i reconsider this: non-verbal communication isn't another rival for communication, as it is a subset (after seeing and liking [https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=3229:_Grammar&amp;amp;diff=next&amp;amp;oldid=409748 this anon's edit]), but i'm not sure what other methods there could be than just communication and non-communication; Lenhart says &amp;quot;rivals&amp;quot; plural -- &amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;letter-spacing:0.1rem&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[[User:Somefan|somefan]] ([[User talk:Somefan|talk]] | [[Special:Contributions/Somefan|contribs]])&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt; 00:45, 7 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Pretty sure the joke is that any alternative to communication would by definition be impossible to communicate. --[[User:Biotronic|Biotronic]] ([[User talk:Biotronic|talk]]) 08:18, 7 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::Actually, I worded that wrong - what I meant is that '' is an example of non-communication, which is not very effective at transmitting information --[[User:Biotronic|Biotronic]] ([[User talk:Biotronic|talk]]) 08:58, 7 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
give orange me give eat orange me eat orange give me eat orange give me you [[Special:Contributions/137.25.230.78|137.25.230.78]] 00:54, 7 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:steal orange me steal eat orange me eat orange steal me eat orange steal me you [[User:King Pando|King Pando]] ([[User talk:King Pando|talk]]) 02:34, 7 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
orange orange orange &lt;br /&gt;
orange orange orange &lt;br /&gt;
orange orange orange &lt;br /&gt;
yellow&lt;br /&gt;
orange you glad I didn't say orange? [[Special:Contributions/98.22.184.160|98.22.184.160]] 11:27, 7 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I would suggest that light/photons are the most popular way of transmitting information? to (most) humans anyway... {{unsigned ip|2a02:a468:b8cb:0:5a82:a830:1528:55af|13:15, 7 April 2026 (UTC)}}&lt;br /&gt;
: Only up until the last mile. [[Special:Contributions/82.13.184.33|82.13.184.33]] 14:15, 7 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>82.13.184.33</name></author>	</entry>

	</feed>