<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=Anff59</id>
		<title>explain xkcd - User contributions [en]</title>
		<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=Anff59"/>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php/Special:Contributions/Anff59"/>
		<updated>2026-04-15T13:58:13Z</updated>
		<subtitle>User contributions</subtitle>
		<generator>MediaWiki 1.30.0</generator>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:1290:_Syllable_Planning&amp;diff=52631</id>
		<title>Talk:1290: Syllable Planning</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:1290:_Syllable_Planning&amp;diff=52631"/>
				<updated>2013-11-13T07:37:39Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Anff59: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;I remember my father telling me when I was a teenager about a scholarly paper that described this exact topic, namely the rules governing where 'fucking' can be injected into multi-syllable words.  I still remember discussing the options for &amp;quot;fantastic&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;government&amp;quot;.  Decades later I had a dream about words like &amp;quot;uninstallable&amp;quot; (which can either mean something that can be uninstalled or something that can't be uninstalled), and discovering that someone had written a paper about that very subject (http://www.hum.au.dk/engelsk/engsv/papers/vikn08b.pdf).  [[Special:Contributions/199.27.128.127|199.27.128.127]] 06:00, 13 November 2013 (UTC) Toby Ovod-Everett&lt;br /&gt;
: Think you mean &amp;quot;... can be uninstalled or .... can't be installed&amp;quot;. --[[Special:Contributions/173.245.51.227|173.245.51.227]] 06:42, 13 November 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
Surely the question is which words benefit from the effing emphasis? Fan-effing-tastic is a natural, but with 'government' I wouldn't try...I'd just say 'effing government (what a bunch of wankers, bastards, mongrels, etc)'.[[User:Anff59|Anff59]] ([[User talk:Anff59|talk]]) 07:37, 13 November 2013 (UTC)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Anff59</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:1290:_Syllable_Planning&amp;diff=52630</id>
		<title>Talk:1290: Syllable Planning</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:1290:_Syllable_Planning&amp;diff=52630"/>
				<updated>2013-11-13T07:32:33Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Anff59: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;I remember my father telling me when I was a teenager about a scholarly paper that described this exact topic, namely the rules governing where 'fucking' can be injected into multi-syllable words.  I still remember discussing the options for &amp;quot;fantastic&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;government&amp;quot;.  Decades later I had a dream about words like &amp;quot;uninstallable&amp;quot; (which can either mean something that can be uninstalled or something that can't be uninstalled), and discovering that someone had written a paper about that very subject (http://www.hum.au.dk/engelsk/engsv/papers/vikn08b.pdf).  [[Special:Contributions/199.27.128.127|199.27.128.127]] 06:00, 13 November 2013 (UTC) Toby Ovod-Everett&lt;br /&gt;
: Think you mean &amp;quot;... can be uninstalled or .... can't be installed&amp;quot;. --[[Special:Contributions/173.245.51.227|173.245.51.227]] 06:42, 13 November 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
Surely the question is which words benefit from the effing emphasis? Fan-effing-tastic is a natural, but with 'government' I wouldn't try...I'd just say 'effing government (what a bunch of wankers, bastards, mongrels, etc)'.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Anff59</name></author>	</entry>

	</feed>