<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=Anomylous</id>
		<title>explain xkcd - User contributions [en]</title>
		<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=Anomylous"/>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php/Special:Contributions/Anomylous"/>
		<updated>2026-04-20T17:45:17Z</updated>
		<subtitle>User contributions</subtitle>
		<generator>MediaWiki 1.30.0</generator>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:2245:_Edible_Arrangements&amp;diff=185115</id>
		<title>Talk:2245: Edible Arrangements</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:2245:_Edible_Arrangements&amp;diff=185115"/>
				<updated>2019-12-25T01:03:25Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Anomylous: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;How often do typos show up in XKCD comics (&amp;quot;Edible Arrangements is a thing&amp;quot; versus &amp;quot;Edible Arrangements are a thing&amp;quot;)? [[User:Capncanuck|Capncanuck]] ([[User talk:Capncanuck|talk]]) 20:36, 23 December 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:It's not a typo. Randall is referring to the concept of Edible Arrangements, not a collection of edible arrangements. [[Special:Contributions/162.158.63.220|162.158.63.220]] 20:56, 23 December 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::I see what you mean. Should there have been quotes around the terms in the first panel then? [[User:Capncanuck|Capncanuck]] ([[User talk:Capncanuck|talk]]) 20:58, 23 December 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Nevermind, it's a company name. no quotes needed. [[User:Capncanuck|Capncanuck]] ([[User talk:Capncanuck|talk]]) 21:04, 23 December 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Any arrangement is an edible arrangement if you're hungry enough.&amp;quot; - and you have enough mustard. Happy Winter Solstice Everyone![[Special:Contributions/172.68.226.46|172.68.226.46]] 07:48, 24 December 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Any reason to assume a connection to vorarephilia rather than the common suffix &amp;quot;-vore&amp;quot; for &amp;quot;eating&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;swallowing&amp;quot;, as in carnivore, herbivore, insectivore, etc. (and obviously the non-philia part of vorarephilia)? &amp;quot;Vore&amp;quot; may get used as slang/abbreviation for vorarephilia, but in this context I'd have thought the suffix was more the intent. I, at least, was unaware of the slang; possibly Randall was too, but I'd claim the philia is a bit obscure compared with the &amp;quot;vore&amp;quot; etymology. I wouldn't want to &amp;quot;correct&amp;quot; this without someone having the chance to make the argument the other way, though. [[User:Fluppeteer|Fluppeteer]] ([[User talk:Fluppeteer|talk]]) 11:55, 24 December 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Yes, I'm amused by (though am not necessarily disputing) the assertion that vore is &amp;quot;often&amp;quot; used as slang for vorarephilia.  I've not encountered situations where a shortened version is needed to keep conversation flowing smoothly.  [[Special:Contributions/108.162.216.228|108.162.216.228]] 12:37, 24 December 2019 (UTC)Pat&lt;br /&gt;
:The term &amp;quot;vore&amp;quot; is used in various search engines, since &amp;quot;vorarephilia&amp;quot; is difficult to spell.  The Second Life platform has several areas where avatars can participate in &amp;quot;vore&amp;quot; simulations.  (It's a bit disconcerting to stumble across these things...) [[Special:Contributions/108.162.241.30|108.162.241.30]] 13:37, 24 December 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:It does seem to be the primary use of &amp;quot;vore&amp;quot; as a stand-alone word, I'd just assumed that Randall thought he was coining the use as part of his pun. Search engines (with some trepidation) do seem to offer the &amp;quot;-vore&amp;quot; suffix as well. Not to try to appropriate the word from the vore community... Oh well, I learnt something, but I still think anthropomorphizing a flower arrangement in order to make the interpretation make sense is a reach.[[User:Fluppeteer|Fluppeteer]] ([[User talk:Fluppeteer|talk]]) 17:40, 24 December 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Vorarephilia (vore) is a reasonably established/famous Weird Internet Thing. I'd be astonished if Randall wasn't aware of that usage of the term. --[[User:Anomylous|Anomylous]] ([[User talk:Anomylous|talk]]) 01:00, 25 December 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The opening scenes of Roger Corman's original &amp;quot;Little Shop of Horrors&amp;quot; has a customer order a floral arrangement, and leaves the shop eating the blossoms. [[Special:Contributions/108.162.241.30|108.162.241.30]] 13:37, 24 December 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Aren't flowers meant for decoration sprayed with insecticides/fungicides etc. not fit for consumption? So the flower itself might be edible, the various 'icide's aren't. (Though of course literally anything can be eaten at least once in a lifetime)  --[[Special:Contributions/162.158.111.151|162.158.111.151]] 19:32, 24 December 2019 (UTC)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Anomylous</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:2245:_Edible_Arrangements&amp;diff=185114</id>
		<title>Talk:2245: Edible Arrangements</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:2245:_Edible_Arrangements&amp;diff=185114"/>
				<updated>2019-12-25T01:00:42Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Anomylous: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;How often do typos show up in XKCD comics (&amp;quot;Edible Arrangements is a thing&amp;quot; versus &amp;quot;Edible Arrangements are a thing&amp;quot;)? [[User:Capncanuck|Capncanuck]] ([[User talk:Capncanuck|talk]]) 20:36, 23 December 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:It's not a typo. Randall is referring to the concept of Edible Arrangements, not a collection of edible arrangements. [[Special:Contributions/162.158.63.220|162.158.63.220]] 20:56, 23 December 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::I see what you mean. Should there have been quotes around the terms in the first panel then? [[User:Capncanuck|Capncanuck]] ([[User talk:Capncanuck|talk]]) 20:58, 23 December 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Nevermind, it's a company name. no quotes needed. [[User:Capncanuck|Capncanuck]] ([[User talk:Capncanuck|talk]]) 21:04, 23 December 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Any arrangement is an edible arrangement if you're hungry enough.&amp;quot; - and you have enough mustard. Happy Winter Solstice Everyone![[Special:Contributions/172.68.226.46|172.68.226.46]] 07:48, 24 December 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Any reason to assume a connection to vorarephilia rather than the common suffix &amp;quot;-vore&amp;quot; for &amp;quot;eating&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;swallowing&amp;quot;, as in carnivore, herbivore, insectivore, etc. (and obviously the non-philia part of vorarephilia)? &amp;quot;Vore&amp;quot; may get used as slang/abbreviation for vorarephilia, but in this context I'd have thought the suffix was more the intent. I, at least, was unaware of the slang; possibly Randall was too, but I'd claim the philia is a bit obscure compared with the &amp;quot;vore&amp;quot; etymology. I wouldn't want to &amp;quot;correct&amp;quot; this without someone having the chance to make the argument the other way, though. [[User:Fluppeteer|Fluppeteer]] ([[User talk:Fluppeteer|talk]]) 11:55, 24 December 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Yes, I'm amused by (though am not necessarily disputing) the assertion that vore is &amp;quot;often&amp;quot; used as slang for vorarephilia.  I've not encountered situations where a shortened version is needed to keep conversation flowing smoothly.  [[Special:Contributions/108.162.216.228|108.162.216.228]] 12:37, 24 December 2019 (UTC)Pat&lt;br /&gt;
:The term &amp;quot;vore&amp;quot; is used in various search engines, since &amp;quot;vorarephilia&amp;quot; is difficult to spell.  The Second Life platform has several areas where avatars can participate in &amp;quot;vore&amp;quot; simulations.  (It's a bit disconcerting to stumble across these things...) [[Special:Contributions/108.162.241.30|108.162.241.30]] 13:37, 24 December 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:It does seem to be the primary use of &amp;quot;vore&amp;quot; as a stand-alone word, I'd just assumed that Randall thought he was coining the use as part of his pun. Search engines (with some trepidation) do seem to offer the &amp;quot;-vore&amp;quot; suffix as well. Not to try to appropriate the word from the vore community... Oh well, I learnt something, but I still think anthropomorphizing a flower arrangement in order to make the interpretation make sense is a reach.[[User:Fluppeteer|Fluppeteer]] ([[User talk:Fluppeteer|talk]]) 17:40, 24 December 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Vorarephilia (vore) is a reasonably established/famous Weird Internet Thing. I'd be astonished if Randall wasn't aware of that usage of the term. (Also: are we gonna just ignore &amp;quot;oral&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;juicy blossom&amp;quot;?)--[[User:Anomylous|Anomylous]] ([[User talk:Anomylous|talk]]) 01:00, 25 December 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The opening scenes of Roger Corman's original &amp;quot;Little Shop of Horrors&amp;quot; has a customer order a floral arrangement, and leaves the shop eating the blossoms. [[Special:Contributions/108.162.241.30|108.162.241.30]] 13:37, 24 December 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Aren't flowers meant for decoration sprayed with insecticides/fungicides etc. not fit for consumption? So the flower itself might be edible, the various 'icide's aren't. (Though of course literally anything can be eaten at least once in a lifetime)  --[[Special:Contributions/162.158.111.151|162.158.111.151]] 19:32, 24 December 2019 (UTC)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Anomylous</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:2245:_Edible_Arrangements&amp;diff=185113</id>
		<title>Talk:2245: Edible Arrangements</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:2245:_Edible_Arrangements&amp;diff=185113"/>
				<updated>2019-12-25T00:58:43Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Anomylous: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;How often do typos show up in XKCD comics (&amp;quot;Edible Arrangements is a thing&amp;quot; versus &amp;quot;Edible Arrangements are a thing&amp;quot;)? [[User:Capncanuck|Capncanuck]] ([[User talk:Capncanuck|talk]]) 20:36, 23 December 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:It's not a typo. Randall is referring to the concept of Edible Arrangements, not a collection of edible arrangements. [[Special:Contributions/162.158.63.220|162.158.63.220]] 20:56, 23 December 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::I see what you mean. Should there have been quotes around the terms in the first panel then? [[User:Capncanuck|Capncanuck]] ([[User talk:Capncanuck|talk]]) 20:58, 23 December 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Nevermind, it's a company name. no quotes needed. [[User:Capncanuck|Capncanuck]] ([[User talk:Capncanuck|talk]]) 21:04, 23 December 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Any arrangement is an edible arrangement if you're hungry enough.&amp;quot; - and you have enough mustard. Happy Winter Solstice Everyone![[Special:Contributions/172.68.226.46|172.68.226.46]] 07:48, 24 December 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Any reason to assume a connection to vorarephilia rather than the common suffix &amp;quot;-vore&amp;quot; for &amp;quot;eating&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;swallowing&amp;quot;, as in carnivore, herbivore, insectivore, etc. (and obviously the non-philia part of vorarephilia)? &amp;quot;Vore&amp;quot; may get used as slang/abbreviation for vorarephilia, but in this context I'd have thought the suffix was more the intent. I, at least, was unaware of the slang; possibly Randall was too, but I'd claim the philia is a bit obscure compared with the &amp;quot;vore&amp;quot; etymology. I wouldn't want to &amp;quot;correct&amp;quot; this without someone having the chance to make the argument the other way, though. [[User:Fluppeteer|Fluppeteer]] ([[User talk:Fluppeteer|talk]]) 11:55, 24 December 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Yes, I'm amused by (though am not necessarily disputing) the assertion that vore is &amp;quot;often&amp;quot; used as slang for vorarephilia.  I've not encountered situations where a shortened version is needed to keep conversation flowing smoothly.  [[Special:Contributions/108.162.216.228|108.162.216.228]] 12:37, 24 December 2019 (UTC)Pat&lt;br /&gt;
:The term &amp;quot;vore&amp;quot; is used in various search engines, since &amp;quot;vorarephilia&amp;quot; is difficult to spell.  The Second Life platform has several areas where avatars can participate in &amp;quot;vore&amp;quot; simulations.  (It's a bit disconcerting to stumble across these things...) [[Special:Contributions/108.162.241.30|108.162.241.30]] 13:37, 24 December 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:It does seem to be the primary use of &amp;quot;vore&amp;quot; as a stand-alone word, I'd just assumed that Randall thought he was coining the use as part of his pun. Search engines (with some trepidation) do seem to offer the &amp;quot;-vore&amp;quot; suffix as well. Not to try to appropriate the word from the vore community... Oh well, I learnt something, but I still think anthropomorphizing a flower arrangement in order to make the interpretation make sense is a reach.[[User:Fluppeteer|Fluppeteer]] ([[User talk:Fluppeteer|talk]]) 17:40, 24 December 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Vorarephilia (vore) is a reasonably established/famous Weird Internet Thing. I'd be astonished if Randall wasn't aware of that usage of the term. (Also: are we gonna just ignore &amp;quot;oral&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;juicy blossom&amp;quot;?)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The opening scenes of Roger Corman's original &amp;quot;Little Shop of Horrors&amp;quot; has a customer order a floral arrangement, and leaves the shop eating the blossoms. [[Special:Contributions/108.162.241.30|108.162.241.30]] 13:37, 24 December 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Aren't flowers meant for decoration sprayed with insecticides/fungicides etc. not fit for consumption? So the flower itself might be edible, the various 'icide's aren't. (Though of course literally anything can be eaten at least once in a lifetime)  --[[Special:Contributions/162.158.111.151|162.158.111.151]] 19:32, 24 December 2019 (UTC)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Anomylous</name></author>	</entry>

	</feed>