<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=Carrera</id>
		<title>explain xkcd - User contributions [en]</title>
		<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=Carrera"/>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php/Special:Contributions/Carrera"/>
		<updated>2026-04-16T10:03:44Z</updated>
		<subtitle>User contributions</subtitle>
		<generator>MediaWiki 1.30.0</generator>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:2600:_Rejected_Question_Categories&amp;diff=229309</id>
		<title>Talk:2600: Rejected Question Categories</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:2600:_Rejected_Question_Categories&amp;diff=229309"/>
				<updated>2022-03-30T20:12:48Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Carrera: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&amp;lt;!--Please sign your posts with ~~~~ and don't delete this text. New comments should be added at the bottom.--&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
I added the transcript, but I'm not sure if it's appropriate to use an emoji for the paperclip symbol. Especially since the emoji paperclip leans to the left, but the icon in the comic leans to the right. [[User:Barmar|Barmar]] ([[User talk:Barmar|talk]]) 20:07, 30 March 2022 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I wonder why there's no question mark at the end of the unanswerable question. [[User:Barmar|Barmar]] ([[User talk:Barmar|talk]]) 20:07, 30 March 2022 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:I think that it is because the question likely continues on, beyond the bounds of the comic (hence why the text is partially cut off), so there's not a question mark there because it isn't actually the end of the question. --[[User:Carrera|Carrera]] ([[User talk:Carrera|talk]]) 20:12, 30 March 2022 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I wonder if the spider thing is a reference to [[1688:_Map_Age_Guide]], more specifically, the part about Colorado becoming a radioactive exclusion zone by 2022, with the &amp;quot;spiders&amp;quot; being mentioned after 2023. It is currently 2022, after all... --[[User:Carrera|Carrera]] ([[User talk:Carrera|talk]]) 20:12, 30 March 2022 (UTC)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Carrera</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:1992:_SafetySat&amp;diff=156976</id>
		<title>Talk:1992: SafetySat</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:1992:_SafetySat&amp;diff=156976"/>
				<updated>2018-05-12T05:21:11Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Carrera: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&amp;lt;!--Please sign your posts with ~~~~ and don't delete this text. New comments should be added at the bottom.--&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I was excited that I might be the first to give an explanation (because the comic was so late in being posted), but when it finally arrived, I had no way to interpret it.  It was just a gigantic Γ shape (though with a rounded corner).&lt;br /&gt;
Now that the real comic{{Citation needed}} has been posted, I find that I'm ''still'' not very qualified to explain it.  (I can guess at some of the references, but not the important ones.)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I guess my only constructive comment here is encouragement to have a section (trivia?) talking about the initial failed comic image. [[Special:Contributions/172.69.22.104|172.69.22.104]] 19:38, 11 May 2018 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:There was a broken image a xkcd and uploaded by the BOT. It's now fixed at xkcd and here too. --[[User:Dgbrt|Dgbrt]] ([[User talk:Dgbrt|talk]]) 19:48, 11 May 2018 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Someone should point out how much damage the &amp;quot;extends spikes in all directions&amp;quot; safety measure could do. And I note SpaceX scrubbed a satellite launch with 1 minute to go yesterday because of some anomaly. Maybe the impetus for this cartoon? [[User:Yngvadottir|Yngvadottir]] ([[User talk:Yngvadottir|talk]]) 20:23, 11 May 2018 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I figured today's comic was in reference to this picosat launch from India, which was denied launch in the US for being below minimum size (&amp;quot;too hard to track if they go offline&amp;quot;) &amp;amp; thus in violation of the requisite cubesat specs: &lt;br /&gt;
https://spectrum.ieee.org/tech-talk/aerospace/satellites/fcc-accuses-stealthy-startup-of-launching-rogue-satellites &lt;br /&gt;
Personally I'm in favor of these sub-cubesat launches; My concern is with liability, not safety, per-se.&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:ProphetZarquon|ProphetZarquon]] ([[User talk:ProphetZarquon|talk]]) 20:47, 11 May 2018 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I would be concerned with safety as well, if not for the radar reflector ... seriously, this looks more like FCC wanting to destroy the company for being innovative than trying to ensure the visibility. -- [[User:Hkmaly|Hkmaly]] ([[User talk:Hkmaly|talk]]) 23:01, 11 May 2018 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Considering that it says the solar panel was &amp;quot;found&amp;quot;, I think that implies that perhaps it was stolen? Or just literally found on the side of the road. Either way, it seems kinda shady. [[User:Carrera|Carrera]] ([[User talk:Carrera|talk]]) 22:20, 11 May 2018 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Are there any rules regarding solar panels on spacecraft? Seeing that Randall &amp;quot;found&amp;quot; it, I'm wondering if this would be a violation of any rules. [[User:Herobrine|Herobrine]] ([[User talk:Herobrine|talk]]) 23:41, 11 May 2018 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What would happen to wet sand if put in a cubesat and then released?  Water released into space boils and then desublimates into a cloud of ice crystals.  But what would the temperature and pressure be as the cubesat was launched?  Starting from wet sand at one atmosphere and whatever ambient temperature, would it cool down fast enough for the water to freeze before it was dispensed? (Release a gritty snowball.) If the dispenser is not kept at atmospheric pressure, would the water boil as the satellite was ascending to orbit? I wish Randall was still doing what-if.  [[Special:Contributions/162.158.255.22|162.158.255.22]] 01:22, 12 May 2018 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;gt; quality of the solar panel and the power it produces&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Quality of the power ?  Isn't all solar power clean and green quality ? [[User:Spongebog|Spongebob]] ([[User talk:Spongebog|talk]]) 04:28, 12 May 2018 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Well a solar panel's efficiency depends on how well it's made, and what materials have been used to make it. Considering that it was just &amp;quot;found&amp;quot;, it may not be efficient enough to actually run the satellite, or even work in a vacuum. Then again, it's not like the satellite does much other than point lasers and explode. [[User:Carrera|Carrera]] ([[User talk:Carrera|talk]]) 05:21, 12 May 2018 (UTC)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Carrera</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:1992:_SafetySat&amp;diff=156958</id>
		<title>Talk:1992: SafetySat</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:1992:_SafetySat&amp;diff=156958"/>
				<updated>2018-05-11T22:20:00Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Carrera: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&amp;lt;!--Please sign your posts with ~~~~ and don't delete this text. New comments should be added at the bottom.--&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I was excited that I might be the first to give an explanation (because the comic was so late in being posted), but when it finally arrived, I had no way to interpret it.  It was just a gigantic Γ shape (though with a rounded corner).&lt;br /&gt;
Now that the real comic{{Citation needed}} has been posted, I find that I'm ''still'' not very qualified to explain it.  (I can guess at some of the references, but not the important ones.)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I guess my only constructive comment here is encouragement to have a section (trivia?) talking about the initial failed comic image. [[Special:Contributions/172.69.22.104|172.69.22.104]] 19:38, 11 May 2018 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:There was a broken image a xkcd and uploaded by the BOT. It's now fixed at xkcd and here too. --[[User:Dgbrt|Dgbrt]] ([[User talk:Dgbrt|talk]]) 19:48, 11 May 2018 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Someone should point out how much damage the &amp;quot;extends spikes in all directions&amp;quot; safety measure could do. And I note SpaceX scrubbed a satellite launch with 1 minute to go yesterday because of some anomaly. Maybe the impetus for this cartoon? [[User:Yngvadottir|Yngvadottir]] ([[User talk:Yngvadottir|talk]]) 20:23, 11 May 2018 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I figured today's comic was in reference to this picosat launch from India, which was denied launch in the US for being below minimum size (&amp;quot;too hard to track if they go offline&amp;quot;) &amp;amp; thus in violation of the requisite cubesat specs: &lt;br /&gt;
https://spectrum.ieee.org/tech-talk/aerospace/satellites/fcc-accuses-stealthy-startup-of-launching-rogue-satellites &lt;br /&gt;
Personally I'm in favor of these sub-cubesat launches; My concern is with liability, not safety, per-se.&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:ProphetZarquon|ProphetZarquon]] ([[User talk:ProphetZarquon|talk]]) 20:47, 11 May 2018 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Considering that it says the solar panel was &amp;quot;found&amp;quot;, I think that implies that perhaps it was stolen? Or just literally found on the side of the road. Either way, it seems kinda shady. [[User:Carrera|Carrera]] ([[User talk:Carrera|talk]]) 22:20, 11 May 2018 (UTC)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Carrera</name></author>	</entry>

	</feed>