<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=Xquestion</id>
		<title>explain xkcd - User contributions [en]</title>
		<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=Xquestion"/>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php/Special:Contributions/Xquestion"/>
		<updated>2026-05-14T15:29:04Z</updated>
		<subtitle>User contributions</subtitle>
		<generator>MediaWiki 1.30.0</generator>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=1120:_Blurring_the_Line&amp;diff=121574</id>
		<title>1120: Blurring the Line</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=1120:_Blurring_the_Line&amp;diff=121574"/>
				<updated>2016-06-08T21:44:19Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Xquestion: Added reference to comic 1320, where a blurred metaphor is also used.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{comic&lt;br /&gt;
| number    = 1120&lt;br /&gt;
| date      = October 12, 2012&lt;br /&gt;
| title     = Blurring the Line&lt;br /&gt;
| image     = blurring the line.png&lt;br /&gt;
| titletext = People into masturbatory navel-gazing have a lot to learn about masturbation.&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Explanation==&lt;br /&gt;
A {{w|metaphor}} is a comparison which may be used to emphasize, explain or embellish a point, as seen in this comic when [[Cueball]] likens himself to Michael Jordan. {{w|Michael Jordan}} is a famous {{w|basketball}} player who is well known for being one of the very best basketball players. (this saying was used before in [[1027: Pickup Artist]]&lt;br /&gt;
).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[White Hat]] is analyzing a movie about movies when Cueball compares White Hat's description of the movie to masturbatory {{w|Omphaloskepsis|navel-gazing}}, a comment combining two expressions used to refer to a pointless activity or effort, but also specifically self-referential activity. &amp;quot;Mental masturbation&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;navel gazing&amp;quot; are relatively common terms to dismiss work that is regarded as self-indulgent, overly introspective, and self-referential. Calling navel gazing, or introspection, &amp;quot;masturbatory&amp;quot; is a metaphor speaking of it in terms of the physical act of {{w|Masturbation|masturbation}}.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
White Hat then defends the movie by saying that it is about blurring the line between metaphor and reality, commenting that Cueball doesn't understand art. To this Cueball retorts by likening his ability to meld metaphor and reality by using a metaphor comparing himself to Michael Jordan. He then proceeds to actually blur the line by throwing a basketball at White Hat. This can also be understood as another reality metaphor, passing the &amp;quot;conversational ball&amp;quot; to White Hat, or acting like Michael Jordan by playing basketball.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The last frame is also a graphic illustration of blurring the line between metaphor and reality, where a much more &amp;quot;real&amp;quot; depiction of a basketball intrudes into the colorless stick-figure world which serves as an abstraction of our shared reality.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The title text blurs the line between metaphor and reality by dragging both metaphors in the term &amp;quot;masturbatory navel-gazing&amp;quot; into reality and pointing out that literally staring at your navel is not going to be very effective at physical sexual self arousal, which is the goal of masturbation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Another comic that blurs the line of a metaphor is [[1320: Walmart]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Transcript==&lt;br /&gt;
:[White Hat and Cueball are walking.]&lt;br /&gt;
:White Hat: ...No, but see, it's a movie ''about'' movies.&lt;br /&gt;
:Cueball: Sounds like masturbatory navel-gazing.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[Close-up of White Hat.]&lt;br /&gt;
:White Hat: No, it's about blurring the line between metaphor and reality.&lt;br /&gt;
:White Hat: You just don't know much about art.&lt;br /&gt;
:Cueball: ''Seriously?''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[White hat and Cueball are standing.]&lt;br /&gt;
:Cueball: I know ''all'' about blurring the line between metaphor and reality. I'm the goddamn ''Michael Jordan'' of blurring the line between metaphor and reality.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[White hat now standing alone in the panel.]&lt;br /&gt;
:White Hat: ...Huh?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[Basketball appears from nowhere and hits White Hat in the head.]&lt;br /&gt;
:''BONK''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{comic discussion}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Comics featuring Cueball]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Comics featuring White Hat]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Comics with color]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Language]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Basketball]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Xquestion</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:1556:_The_Sky&amp;diff=98544</id>
		<title>Talk:1556: The Sky</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:1556:_The_Sky&amp;diff=98544"/>
				<updated>2015-07-27T16:51:46Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Xquestion: reference to 1368&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Typical, I think nobody's actually going to try to explain this, and I get Save Conflicted.  My (wordier) version.  In case any of it is useful.&lt;br /&gt;
:The sky is ever changing, and can often give interesting views such as that illustrated in the comic.  Cueball and Megan seem to be agreeing about this, and its pleasing nature.&lt;br /&gt;
:As (ignoring particularly unusual viewpoints, severe topography and obscuring vegetation/architecture) the sky is pretty much the upper hemisphere of any external view, it is inded a &amp;quot;half&amp;quot;.  It would seem to be redundant to say it is &amp;quot;one of my favourite halves&amp;quot;, as that indicates both a list of at least two items to choose from ''and'' more than one 'favourite'.  Being in 'the top two of a list of two' actually means nothing.  But the other half could be the ground ''or'' the sea, ''or'' a composite of the two, so conceivably there ''might'' be more than two 'halves' to choose from in this case.  Not that the statement makes much more sense.&lt;br /&gt;
:The title-text acknowledges the fact that the other half can have snakes (the land), shipwrecks (the sea) and rocks (either), in a manner that sounds like justifications for any non-sky 'halves' being interesting too, to the kind of people Cueball and Megan seem to be.  But it also suggests that by removing all of these you'd be seeing sky, below, that people on the other side of the 'rocks' (the whole Earth) had been seeing as their own 'sky above'.  At least until the effects of entirely removing the substance of the planet start to show, of course.&lt;br /&gt;
...for what it's worth. [[Special:Contributions/141.101.98.168|141.101.98.168]] 11:57, 27 July 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Maybe, maybe the comic is a slight refference to the recent observetory of plutos athmosphere. [[User:ẞ qwertz|ẞ qwertz]] ([[User talk:ẞ qwertz|talk]]) 12:55, 27 July 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Maybe this comic is related to comic [[1368]]? [[User:Gartenzaun|Gartenzaun]] ([[User talk:Gartenzaun|talk]]) 13:16, 27 July 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:Or this [[1524: Dimensions]]. Regarding the favourite of a small set.-[[User:Kynde|Kynde]] ([[User talk:Kynde|talk]]) 13:52, 27 July 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I can't defend this position properly (other than by appealing to shipwrecks) but I'm pretty sure &amp;quot;the other half&amp;quot; is the ocean (or water in general) and that this is a callback to something in early XKCD (the halves thing.) I don't care enough to find the reference though, so FFTI. [[Special:Contributions/141.101.88.224|141.101.88.224]] 13:18, 27 July 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
My read on the &amp;quot;halves&amp;quot; bit is the Biblical Genesis bit where the world was split into sky and sea, &amp;quot;And God said, “Let there be a vault between the waters to separate water from water.” So God made the vault and separated the water under the vault from the water above it. And it was so. God called the vault “sky.” And there was evening, and there was morning—the second day.&amp;quot; -[[Special:Contributions/173.245.56.112|173.245.56.112]] 14:36, 27 July 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: Agreed, this appears to be a biblical reference - [[https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Genesis+1&amp;amp;version=GNT| this version]] explains it pretty clearly. [[Special:Contributions/108.162.249.177|108.162.249.177]] 14:41, 27 July 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I can't tell if the sky is a photograph with a digital filter or a painting. [[User:Smperron|Smperron]] ([[User talk:Smperron|talk]]) 14:49, 27 July 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I'm pretty sure it's a digital painting. For one thing, there's a little artistic license in the transition from sunset at the left to evening stars at the top right. [[User:FourViolas|FourViolas]] ([[User talk:FourViolas|talk]]) 14:58, 27 July 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:: I don't see it -- has the picture changed? [[User:Spongebog|Spongebog]] ([[User talk:Spongebog|talk]]) 16:31, 27 July 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::: I didn't notice the stars at the top right until [[User:FourViolas|FourViolas]] pointed it out. [[User:Smperron|Smperron]] ([[User talk:Smperron|talk]]) 16:37, 27 July 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I think it's important that Megan says the sky is ONE of her favorite halves, and that the explanation &amp;quot;at least at their present location...the ground is dark, flat, and otherwise boring&amp;quot; is thus too simplistic. The ground where they are standing is in silhouette (it's presumably sunrise or sunset), but I think the implication is that C. and M. (who are obviously not finding words adequate to express how they feel about what they're seeing), are awed by the beauty of Nature, regardless of whether it's sky, sea (shipwrecks), land (rocks) or living things (snakes).[[User:Jv|Jv]] ([[User talk:Jv|talk]]) 15:01, 27 July 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Is it possible that the meaning of Megan's statement is that there are other binary sets where she prefers one over the other? For example, her favorites might include (in addition to sky) female, light, and loud. [[User:Smperron|Smperron]] ([[User talk:Smperron|talk]]) 16:43, 27 July 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Perhaps Megan is a reporter https://xkcd.com/1368/ [[User:Xquestion|Xquestion]] ([[User talk:Xquestion|talk]]) 16:51, 27 July 2015 (UTC)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Xquestion</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:1553:_Public_Key&amp;diff=98071</id>
		<title>Talk:1553: Public Key</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:1553:_Public_Key&amp;diff=98071"/>
				<updated>2015-07-20T13:03:53Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Xquestion: other comic reference&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;I'm assuming he's referring to the GPG/PGP Key. Basically you have a key pair, one private that you use to sign/encrypt and one public, which can be used to verify your private key was used to sign. See [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Public-key_cryptography Wikipedia] for more information. If you posted your private key, anyone could sign as if they were you. I sign pretty much everything (not to mailing lists though), but don't think I've seen anyone else ever do so, even those I know have keys. See [[1181: PGP]] for more. [[Special:Contributions/198.41.235.35|198.41.235.35]] 04:59, 20 July 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Don't believe everything certification authorities are telling you. X.509 SSL certificates works exactly same. Certificate is just a public key signed by certification authority. And yes, you can sign email with X.509 certificate. -- [[User:Hkmaly|Hkmaly]] ([[User talk:Hkmaly|talk]]) 09:54, 20 July 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This comic should be added to [[:Category:Cryptography]], but I'm not sure how to do that or whether I can do that. [[User:Nick818|Nick818]] ([[User talk:Nick818|talk]]) 07:06, 20 July 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:{{u|Nick818}}—Someone did this today, but for your future reference, you just need to add &amp;lt;tt&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;[[Category:Cryptography]]&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/tt&amp;gt; to the page that needs to be categorized. It's helpful and customary to add the code to the bottom of the page. Cheers, [[User:Jameslucas|jameslucas]] &amp;lt;small&amp;gt;([[User talk:Jameslucas|&amp;quot; &amp;quot;]] / [[Special:Contributions/Jameslucas|+]])&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt; 10:21, 20 July 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This explanation completely misses the point that the PGP workflow is fundamentally flawed which has been stated by more than one expert, e.g. famously last year by Matthew Green, leading to demands to &amp;quot;let it die&amp;quot; and be replaced by something workable. --[[Special:Contributions/108.162.254.190|108.162.254.190]] 11:21, 20 July 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
:The problem is, that there isn’t anything more “workable” at the moment. &amp;lt;small&amp;gt;BTW: 7CD1E35FD2A3A158&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;. --[[User:DaB.|DaB.]] ([[User talk:DaB.|talk]]) 11:27, 20 July 2015 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Remember Responsible Behavior? https://xkcd.com/364/ [[User:Xquestion|Xquestion]] ([[User talk:Xquestion|talk]]) 13:03, 20 July 2015 (UTC)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Xquestion</name></author>	</entry>

	</feed>