https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/api.php?action=feedcontributions&user=108.162.215.10&feedformat=atomexplain xkcd - User contributions [en]2024-03-29T02:25:58ZUser contributionsMediaWiki 1.30.0https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=2396:_Wonder_Woman_1984&diff=2029522396: Wonder Woman 19842020-12-10T05:19:00Z<p>108.162.215.10: </p>
<hr />
<div>{{comic<br />
| number = 2396<br />
| date = December 9, 2020<br />
| title = Wonder Woman 1984<br />
| image = wonder_woman_1984.png<br />
| titletext = 'Wait, why would you think a movie set in 1984 would do drive-ins as a retro promotion?' 'You know, 80s stuff. Drive-in movies. Britney Spears doing the hustle. Elvis going on Ed Sullivan and showing off his pog collection.' 'What year were you born, again?'<br />
}}<br />
<br />
==Explanation==<br />
{{incomplete|Created by Walter Mondale. Please mention here why this explanation isn't complete. Do NOT delete this tag too soon.}}<br />
Ponytail, who was eager to see ''{{w|Wonder Woman 1984}}'', the sequel to the acclaimed 2017 ''{{w|Wonder Woman (2017 film)|Wonder Woman}}'' film, decided to block all news media leading up to the film, to avoid {{w|Spoiler (media)|spoilers}}. This is a common practice for people who do not wish to be "spoiled" by reading or hearing any plot points of the film, and want to experience it for the "first time" when watching it. Many early reviewers may inadvertently give away key parts of the film, which may "ruin" the experience for some watchers.<br />
<br />
However, there have been many delays for release of the film, in part because of the [[:Category:COVID-19|COVID-19 pandemic]]. The film was originally delayed from November 1, 2019 to June 5, 2020, and then was pushed to August 14, 2020, and October 2, 2020, before it was finally moved to December 25, 2020. The film studio announced a simultaneous release of the film in theaters and also on streaming platform {{w|HBO Max}}.<br />
<br />
Absurdly, Ponytail did not turn off her news site blocker and so has not read any news for the past year. Because of this, she does not know who became the 2020 Democratic nominee, or who won the 2020 United States presidential election (both {{w|Joe Biden}}). Even more absurdly, she has not noticed others wearing masks, seen any Biden campaign signs, etc. It also seems that she does not know about the COVID-19 pandemic, as she seems confused as to why her movie is now being shown at a {{w|drive-in theater}}. Drive-in theaters have been seen as a much safer option than regular movie theaters during the pandemic. <br />
<br />
Cueball tries to warn her about the ongoing pandemic, but in an effort to avoid spoilers, she refuses to listen to him. Cueball then tells her to wear a mask, but she is still confused. Ponytail says that she will dress up in costume as Wonder Woman, who is traditionally shown wearing a {{w|tiara}}, but not a mask (unlike Batman or many other comic characters).<br />
<br />
The title text shows Ponytail’s even more remarkable historical imagination. According to Wikipedia, drive-in theaters were in fact in decline in the 80s due to the advent of cable TV, VCRs, and home video. {{w|Britney Spears}} was popular in the late 1990s and early 2000s. {{w|Hustle(dance)|The Hustle}} was a disco dance popular in the mid 1970s. {{w|Pogs}} under that name peaked in the mid-1990s. {{w|Elvis}}'s appearance on the ''{{w|Ed Sullivan Show}}''- one of the pivotal moments of American pop culture- occurred on September 9, 1956. Cueball points out this mess of inconsistencies by asking Ponytail when she was born, referring to the idea that she would subconsciously combine all these time periods because she didn't live through them, and only knows about them through pop culture.<br />
<br />
This comic is similar to [[2280: 2010 and 2020]], which features someone who also is unaware of the COVID-19 pandemic.<br />
<br />
==Transcript==<br />
{{incomplete transcript|Do NOT delete this tag too soon.}}<br />
:[Ponytail sitting at a desk, chatting with Cueball (off-screen) on a laptop]<br />
:Ponytail: Just two weeks until I see ''Wonder Woman 1984'', learn who the Democratic nominee was, and find out how the election went.<br />
:Cueball: Huh?<br />
<br />
:[Close-up on Ponytail]<br />
:Ponytail: To avoid spoilers, I blocked all news sites ahead of the November 2019 release.<br />
:Ponytail: But then they bumped the date on my ticket to June 2020, and now December 25th.<br />
:Ponytail: It also moved to a drive-in theater? Some retro promotion, maybe.<br />
<br />
:[Cueball on his laptop, chatting with Ponytail (off-screen) on a laptop]<br />
:Cueball: Wait, you haven't seen '''''any''''' news?<br />
:Ponytail: Nope!<br />
:Cueball: So you don't know about -<br />
:Ponytail: '''''No spoilers!'''''<br />
<br />
:[Back to Ponytail sitting at a desk, chatting with Cueball (off-screen) on a laptop]<br />
:Cueball: Okay. Just...<br />
:Cueball: Bring a mask, in case you need to get out of the car.<br />
:Ponytail: Oh, I'll have a full '''''costume!''''' But it's a tiara, not a mask.<br />
<br />
{{comic discussion}}<br />
[[Category:Comics featuring Ponytail]]<br />
[[Category:Comics featuring Cueball]]<br />
[[Category:COVID-19]]<br />
[[Category:Fiction]]</div>108.162.215.10https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=2393:_Presidential_Middle_Names&diff=2026702393: Presidential Middle Names2020-12-03T22:03:27Z<p>108.162.215.10: /* List of Presidents with middle names */ garfield</p>
<hr />
<div>{{comic<br />
| number = 2393<br />
| date = December 2, 2020<br />
| title = Presidential Middle Names<br />
| image = presidential_middle_names.png<br />
| titletext = The bottom of the list remains unchanged. Poor Rutherford Birchard Hayes.<br />
}}<br />
<br />
==Explanation==<br />
{{incomplete|Created by RICHARD MILHOUS NIXON, WITHOUT THE E. Please mention here why this explanation isn't complete. Do NOT delete this tag too soon.}}<br />
A list of what Randall perceives will be the prettiest presidential middle names after the inauguration on January 20, 2021. {{w|Joe Biden|Joe Robinette Biden}} (46th president-elect) will take the second slot bumping previous second-place holder {{w|Franklin D. Roosevelt|Franklin Delano Roosevelt}}, the 32nd president, back to third. {{w|Warren G. Harding|Warren Gamaliel Harding}}, the 29th president, remains in first. Robinette is Biden's [https://nymag.com/intelligencer/2008/08/joe_bidens_middle_name_is_robi.html grandmother's maiden name].<br />
<br />
The title text announces that {{w|Rutherford B. Hayes|Rutherford Birchard Hayes}}, the 19th president, remains at or near the bottom. <br />
<br />
Overall, the ranking would not include every president, as many early presidents, such as {{w|George Washington}} and {{w|John Adams}}, lacked middle names. Some presidents were also more commonly known by their middle names as opposed to their first names; examples include Hiram {{w|Ulysses Grant}}, Stephen {{w|Grover Cleveland}}, and Thomas {{w|Woodrow Wilson}}. It is unclear how Randall’s list would deal with these cases.<br />
<br />
The humour is based around the misuse of an abstract descriptive subjective variable (prettiness) as an ordinal discrete variable scale.<br />
<br />
==List of Presidents with middle names==<br />
{| class="wikitable"<br />
|+ (Ordered by middle name)<br />
| James ABRAM Garfield<br />
|-<br />
| Chester ALAN Arthur<br />
|-<br />
|Lyndon BAINES Johnson<br />
|-<br />
|Rutherford BIRCHARD Hayes<br />
|-<br />
|John CALVIN Coolidge<br />
|-<br />
|Herbert CLARK Hoover<br />
|-<br />
|Dwight DAVID Eisenhower<br />
|-<br />
|Franklin DELANO Roosevelt<br />
|-<br />
|James EARL Carter<br />
|-<br />
|John FITZGERALD Kennedy<br />
|-<br />
|Warren GAMALIEL Harding<br />
|-<br />
|Stephen GROVER Cleveland<br />
|-<br />
|William HENRY Harrison<br />
|-<br />
|George HERBERT WALKER Bush<br />
|-<br />
|William HOWARD Taft<br />
|-<br />
|Barack HUSSEIN Obama<br />
|-<br />
|William JEFFERSON Clinton<br />
|-<br />
|Donald JOHN Trump<br />
|-<br />
|James KNOX Polk<br />
|-<br />
|Richard MILHOUS Nixon<br />
|-<br />
|John QUINCY Adams<br />
|-<br />
|Gerald RUDOLPH Ford<br />
|-<br />
|Harrison S Truman<br />
|-<br />
|Hiram ULYSSES Grant<br />
|-<br />
|George WALKER Bush<br />
|-<br />
|Ronald WILSON Reagan<br />
|-<br />
|Thomas WOODROW Wilson<br />
|}<br />
<br />
==Transcript==<br />
:<big>Prettiest</big><br />
:Presidential Middle Names Official Rankings<br />
:(Updated for 2021)<br />
<br />
# Gamaliel (Warren Harding)<br />
#<span style="color:red">Robinette (Joe Biden) '''(NEW!)'''</span><br />
#Delano (Franklin Roosevelt)<br><br />
<br />
{{comic discussion}}<br />
<br />
[[Category:Comics with color]]<br />
[[Category:Comics featuring politicians]]</div>108.162.215.10https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:1957:_2018_CVE_List&diff=152670Talk:1957: 2018 CVE List2018-02-19T07:48:07Z<p>108.162.215.10: </p>
<hr />
<div><!--Please sign your posts with ~~~~ and don't delete this text. New comments should be added at the bottom.--><br />
[[First]] post!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Anyway, the explanation looks like a train wreck, and I'm not sure if a rearranging it into a table or just adding bullet points to everything is better. I'm guessing that a table would be better, but I don't know how I can rearrange it. Can somebody help? [[User:Herobrine|Herobrine]] ([[User talk:Herobrine|talk]]) 06:35, 19 February 2018 (UTC)<br />
: Added a table layout to the [[explain_xkcd:Sandbox|sandbox]]. Might be of some use to another editor. [[Special:Contributions/162.158.74.45|162.158.74.45]] 07:32, 19 February 2018 (UTC)<br />
<br />
Never ever have I heard anyone pronounce SQL as "sequel" - Is that a reqional dialect? [[Special:Contributions/162.158.93.15|162.158.93.15]] 07:41, 19 February 2018 (UTC)<br />
<br />
I want to take a moment to congratulate the dedication of whomever wrote the original explanation. Second languages are hard, bro. [[Special:Contributions/108.162.215.10|108.162.215.10]] 07:48, 19 February 2018 (UTC)</div>108.162.215.10https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=1595:_30_Days_Hath_September&diff=1039791595: 30 Days Hath September2015-10-26T06:56:55Z<p>108.162.215.10: </p>
<hr />
<div>{{comic<br />
| number = 1595<br />
| date = October 26, 2015<br />
| title = 30 Days Hath September<br />
| image = 30_days_hath_september.png<br />
| titletext = There's a cool mental calculation hack I recently learned for this: If you open the calendar app on your phone or computer, the highest-numbered box along the bottom is equal to the number of days in the month!<br />
}}<br />
<br />
==Explanation==<br />
{{incomplete|Created by a BOT - Please change this comment when editing this page.}}<br />
Cueball is reciting a mnemonic device to try and remember how many days there are in a specific month -- this month, it's October. However, Cueball isn't paying attention to the poem and gets distracted, since the specific word "October" isn't in the poem, so he recites it again, leading his scatterbrained... brain into a loop.<br />
<br />
The title text suggests cutting out the middleman and just looking up on your computer's calendar how many days there are in each month.<br />
<br />
==Transcript==<br />
:[Cueball is thinking.]<br />
<br />
:Thirty days hath September, April, June and November<br />
:All the rest have 31- except February, which has 28, and leap year makes it 29.<br />
<br />
:Wait, which month was I listening for? Oh right, October.<br />
<br />
:Did I say "October" in there? Now I can't remember.<br />
<br />
:30 days hath September...<br />
<br />
<br />
:Caption: I get stuck in this loop every month.<br />
<br />
{{comic discussion}}</div>108.162.215.10https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=User:108.162.215.10&diff=103830User:108.162.215.102015-10-23T04:43:05Z<p>108.162.215.10: Created page with "Hi there, in case you're not aware I'm some random guy on the internet. To clear things up, my first edit was 09:47, 30 September 2015 on the page Talk:632: Suspicion. A..."</p>
<hr />
<div>Hi there, in case you're not aware I'm some random guy on the internet.<br />
<br />
<br />
To clear things up, my first edit was 09:47, 30 September 2015 on the page [[Talk:632: Suspicion]]. All preceding edits were by someone who names himself "Greg", although I'm not sure how our IP addresses linked up.</div>108.162.215.10https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=1594:_Human_Subjects&diff=1038291594: Human Subjects2015-10-23T04:39:18Z<p>108.162.215.10: </p>
<hr />
<div>{{comic<br />
| number = 1594<br />
| date = October 23, 2015<br />
| title = Human Subjects<br />
| image = human_subjects.png<br />
| titletext = After meeting with a few of the subjects, the IRB actually recommended that you stop stressing out so much about safety guidelines.<br />
}}<br />
<br />
==Explanation==<br />
{{incomplete|First attempt - Incomplete - Please change this comment when editing this page.}}<br />
This strip plays on certain experiments involving human subjects. [[Ponytail]] is discussing [[Megan]]'s experiment's fallacies. She mentions that several control group members in an experiment had been arrested with arson; this is troubling, as the control group would not be expected to have such a high rate of incidence, while if the trend had occurred in the experimental group the drug could be identified as the cause of the arson, due to unexpected side effects. The next panel alludes to the prisoner's dilemma, while the last panel mentions the Milgram experiment. In both cases, the subjects are shown to likely by sociopathic or psychopathic.<br />
<br />
==Transcript==<br />
[Ponytail and Megan sit at a desk.]<br />
<br />
Ponytail: We're concerned that some of your results may be tainted by the fact that your human subjects are ''awful''.<br />
<br />
Megan: What do you mean?<br />
<br />
<br />
[Ponytail picks up a sheet of paper.]<br />
<br />
Ponytail: Several participants in your drug trial were arrested for arson.<br />
<br />
Megan: Side effects can be unpredictable.<br />
<br />
Ponytail: They were in the control group.<br />
<br />
<br />
Ponytail: In your prisoner's dilemma study, 80% of the participants chose to betray their partners ''before'' the experimenter had a chance to tell them about the reward.<br />
<br />
Megan (off-panel): Definitely troubling.<br />
<br />
<br />
[Ponytail shows Megan another sheet of paper.]<br />
<br />
Ponytail: In one experiment, your subjects repeatedly gave electric shocks to a stranger in another room.<br />
<br />
Megan: That's a famous philosophical-<br />
<br />
Ponytail: This was a study of moisturizing creams!<br />
<br />
Megan: Yes, we're not sure how they snuck in all that equipment.<br />
<br />
{{comic discussion}}</div>108.162.215.10https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=7:_Girl_sleeping_(Sketch_--_11th_grade_Spanish_class)&diff=1031767: Girl sleeping (Sketch -- 11th grade Spanish class)2015-10-10T04:00:33Z<p>108.162.215.10: /* Trivia */</p>
<hr />
<div>{{comic<br />
| number = 7<br />
| date = September 30, 2005<br />
| title = Girl sleeping (Sketch -- 11th grade Spanish class)<br />
| image = girl_sleeping_noline_(1).jpg<br />
| titletext = I don't remember her name at all, but she fell asleep on the floor in front of me.<br />
}}<br />
<br />
==Explanation==<br />
The early comics sometimes do not present a particular point, but are just pictures drawn by [[Randall]].<br />
<br />
This is as the title says- a sketch of a girl sleeping, presumably in a Spanish class.<br />
<br />
According to the title text, she is also on the floor.<br />
<br />
==Transcript==<br />
:[Girl sleeping on her side, facing away from view.]<br />
<br />
==Trivia==<br />
*This was the 1st comic originally posted to [[LiveJournal]].<br />
**The next was [[4: Landscape (sketch)]]. <br />
*Original title: "Girl sleeping"<br />
*Original [[Randall]] quote: "I drew this in 11th-grade Spanish class. We were watching a movie and she was asleep on the floor in front of me."<br />
*This was one of the [[:Category:First day on LiveJournal|thirteen first comics]] posted to LiveJournal within 12 minutes on Friday September 30, 2005.<br />
*This comic was posted on [[xkcd]] when the web site opened on Sunday the 1st of January 2006.<br />
**It was posted along [[:Category:First day on xkcd|with all 41 comics]] posted before that on LiveJournal as well as a few others.<br />
**The latter explaining why the numbers of these 41 LiveJournal comics ranges from 1-44.<br />
*One of the original drawings drawn on [[:Category:Checkered paper|checkered paper]].<br />
*The drawing returns in [[1506: xkcloud]] as one of the [[1506: xkcloud/Pictures of other pages#Help! We lost the text|Help! We lost the text]] given images.<br />
<br />
{{comic discussion}}<br />
[[Category:Comics posted on livejournal| 01]]<br />
[[Category:First day on LiveJournal| 01]]<br />
[[Category:First day on xkcd]]<br />
[[Category:Checkered paper]]</div>108.162.215.10https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=1586:_Keyboard_Problems&diff=1028401586: Keyboard Problems2015-10-05T08:29:12Z<p>108.162.215.10: /* Transcript */</p>
<hr />
<div>{{comic<br />
| number = 1586<br />
| date = October 5, 2015<br />
| title = Keyboard Problems<br />
| image = keyboard_problems.png<br />
| titletext = In the future, a group of resistance fighters send me back in time with instructions to find the Skynet prototype and try to upgrade it.<br />
}}<br />
<br />
==Explanation==<br />
{{incomplete|Created by a BOT - Please change this comment when editing this page.}}<br />
<br />
==Transcript==<br />
:[[[Cueball]] sits between two laptops. [[Megan]] stands behind him.]<br />
<br />
:Cueball: Keys on my keyboard keep falling, even when I boot from an external recovery disk.<br />
:Megan: Sounds like it's hardware, then.<br />
<br />
:[Cueball moves over to the laptop behind him.]<br />
<br />
:Cueball: Yeah... except the problem followed me from my ''last'' computer.<br />
:Megan: You have the most ''bizzare'' tech issues.<br />
<br />
:[Cueball picks up the keyboard from the rear computer and plugs it into the one in front of him.]<br />
<br />
:Cueball: It must be spreading via keyboards. This one won't work with ''any'' computer now.<br />
:Megan: When the robot apocalypse happens, I'm hiding out in your house. Any Skynet drones that come near will develop inexplicable firmware problems and crash.<br />
<br />
{{comic discussion}}</div>108.162.215.10https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:632:_Suspicion&diff=102616Talk:632: Suspicion2015-09-30T09:47:32Z<p>108.162.215.10: </p>
<hr />
<div>"I'm more than a spambot! Our love was real!" might suggest that the spambot has actually more self-awareness/feelings than you might expect. -- [[Special:Contributions/145.7.91.126|Arjen]] 10:35, 28 December 2012 (UTC)<br />
<br />
:Or an extremely well designed spambot. ;) [[Special:Contributions/173.245.55.67|173.245.55.67]] 20:43, 18 April 2014 (UTC)BK201<br />
<br />
Couples wanting to check themselves can try an implementation of this test at http://vk-couples-testing.appspot.com/ :-) --[[User:Mormegil|Mormegil]] ([[User talk:Mormegil|talk]]) 15:10, 1 February 2013 (UTC)<br />
<br />
Should we consider the name "Lisa" to be important? One of the very first chat-bots was called Eliza. [[Special:Contributions/91.183.95.109|91.183.95.109]] 15:13, 25 February 2013 (UTC)<br />
<br />
::Don't forget that Apple's first GUI was the Lisa system.{{unsigned ip|24.207.62.236}}<br />
<br />
I would be happy to see a reference to Philip K. Dick's Voigt-Kampff from his book 'Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep?' Since it was written in 1968 and Scott used it as an inspiration to write Blade Runner. Original source and stuff. [[Special:Contributions/108.162.231.55|108.162.231.55]] 22:31, 31 October 2013 (UTC)<br />
<br />
Considering what's on panel #2 and #3, I thought that "getting tested" meant those ads that asks to insert your name and your partner's name to check if it's a good relationship. [[Special:Contributions/108.162.212.196|108.162.212.196]] 14:00, 4 January 2014 (UTC)<br />
<br />
I thought VK stood for the Russian social network. --[[Special:Contributions/108.162.221.153|108.162.221.153]] 15:57, 11 March 2015 (UTC)<br />
<br />
I landed on this page on xkcd using the random button. Then when I hit the random button again, I was on the exact same page. That happen to anyone? [[Special:Contributions/108.162.215.10|108.162.215.10]] 09:47, 30 September 2015 (UTC)</div>108.162.215.10https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:385:_How_it_Works&diff=97890Talk:385: How it Works2015-07-16T08:33:18Z<p>108.162.215.10: </p>
<hr />
<div>I will admit, after I finished Calc 1, I came across this yet again via the random button, and kind of rolled my eyes. Then I read the title text, and this became one of my favorite comics. --[[Special:Contributions/140.198.42.64|140.198.42.64]] 00:19, 20 March 2013 (UTC)<br />
<br />
This type of generalization also has a special name called "Stereotype threat". Research shows that women/girls who are good at math (identify as good at math) will do worse on hard math questions when they think (consciously or unconsciously) that her own personal failings will reflect on the negative stereotype. (Real example: a group of professors asked SAT testing body to ask for demographic questions (gender/race) after the test instead of before.) [[Special:Contributions/108.162.254.107|108.162.254.107]] 04:15, 18 June 2014 (UTC)<br />
<br />
I don't really think that pi + C is different from just C. Pi is a constant anyway! {{unsigned ip|173.245.48.96}}<br />
<br />
in popular culture:it appeared twice in the grade 10 english module in the philippines,and without the correct citation.<br />
p.s. what should i do? [[Special:Contributions/108.162.215.10|108.162.215.10]] 08:33, 16 July 2015 (UTC)</div>108.162.215.10https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=explain_xkcd_talk:Advertise_Here&diff=97531explain xkcd talk:Advertise Here2015-07-10T20:13:05Z<p>108.162.215.10: /* Animated ads */</p>
<hr />
<div>==Whitelisting==<br />
I did this WHITE HAT listing, and I just see this picture at the left side: [http://www.projectwonderful.com/img/uploads/pics/91967-1378268302.png Your Ad...] But do I know if "www.projectwonderful.com" is just Black HAT? I do whitelist this page (expainxkcd), not more. --[[User:Dgbrt|Dgbrt]] ([[User talk:Dgbrt|talk]]) 21:17, 27 September 2013 (UTC)<br />
:Whitelisting isn't short form for anything, it just means that you allow certain sites to pass through your adblocker. That image that you're seeing means that we don't have any advertisers running ads in your region currently, and clicking it will just tell you how you can advertise with us. If you can see that image, you're doing it right. EU tends to be less popular than our global traffic, despite EU being second in ad impressions only to our US traffic. An awful lot of our advertisers don't seem to be savvy enough to target EU manually, but if you have a business that you represent that you would like to promote through us, click on the bit of text that says "Your ad here, right now: $3.90" and try making an account and bid yourself on our EU/US space. '''[[User:Davidy22|<u>{{Color|#707|David}}<font color=#070 size=3>y</font></u><font color=#508 size=4>²²</font>]]'''[[User talk:Davidy22|<tt>[talk]</tt>]] 22:50, 27 September 2013 (UTC)<br />
<br />
<br />
==Miscellaneous observations==<br />
Looking at the ad stats, the ads with the highest click rates (value for money) are grayscale. Moving ads tend to have similar click rates to ordinary, colored ads, and our ad provider seems to have had a recent shoot in popularity with kickstarter projects. Just a few curiosities that I've noticed recently. '''[[User:Davidy22|<u>{{Color|#707|David}}<font color=#070 size=3>y</font></u><font color=#508 size=4>²²</font>]]'''[[User talk:Davidy22|<tt>[talk]</tt>]] 08:26, 13 October 2013 (UTC)<br />
<br />
==Full Disclosure on Lunarpages Ads==<br />
We should probably explain the Lunarpages ad, because an awful lot of our users really hate ads. Lunarpages is our new host, and they offered to give us dedicated scalable server space with unlimited bandwidth for free in return for a .jpg banner ad on our sidebar. That's a pretty big deal, because it shaves off about $700 of yearly fees, plus potentially unlimited overage charges with their standard bandwidth limit. If comic number [[1190]] had happened and we were on that bandwidth cap, we would have had to fork out up to $600 per month, which would make this wiki very costly to maintain indeed. By going with this ad deal, we can eliminate all unpredictable costs, allowing us to use our Project Wonderful ad money to pay for webpage caching/CDN services and buy ad space on other websites to spread the joy. With no ads, all of the above would put a ~$2000-3000 dent in our pockets per year. With ads earning at their current rate, we can very comfortably pursue things like our current dedicated hosting or cloudflare to make the site faster without actually having to pay out our own money or beg users for donations. Our ads are small in terms of file size, and they only take up space in the sidebar that Mediawiki would have otherwise left blank. That's not much to pay for substantially faster server hardware and essentially free advertising. '''[[User:Davidy22|<u>{{Color|#707|David}}<font color=#070 size=3>y</font></u><font color=#508 size=4>²²</font>]]'''[[User talk:Davidy22|<tt>[talk]</tt>]] 16:50, 31 October 2013 (UTC)<br />
: Updated this a bit. --[[User:Jeff|<b><font color="orange">Jeff</font></b>]] ([[User talk:Jeff|talk]]) 02:09, 20 November 2013 (UTC)<br />
<br />
== Donations ==<br />
<br />
Can we make donations instead of looking at ads? If so, add a link in the adblock message. {{unsigned ip|108.162.219.74}}<br />
:We can probably put that in our adblock message, I'll get the donation link. Donations in the past haven't been enough to pay for what we have now, but you can totally donate and keep adblock on if you want. If donations start performing well enough in the future, we might even be able to drop the ads entirely. That's pretty far off at the moment though. '''[[User:Davidy22|<u>{{Color|#707|David}}<font color=#070 size=3>y</font></u><font color=#508 size=4>²²</font>]]'''[[User talk:Davidy22|<tt>[talk]</tt>]] 20:43, 12 November 2013 (UTC)<br />
:: Well, how much do you make from ads, per viewer? I would guess that a typical donation would be larger? I don't see any donation links, though. [[Special:Contributions/173.245.52.211|173.245.52.211]] 16:48, 19 December 2013 (UTC)<br />
::: You can donate via [https://www.paypal.com/cgi-bin/webscr?cmd=_donations&business=E646N7XZDZYRQ&lc=US&item_name=Explain%20XKCD&currency_code=USD&bn=PP%2dDonationsBF%3abtn_donate_LG%2egif%3aNonHosted in dollars via Paypal] or via [https://coinbase.com/checkouts/01a21cdc2c8cd33da6b32da887630d7f Bitcoin]. We will make these more prevalent shortly. --[[User:Jeff|<b><font color="orange">Jeff</font></b>]] ([[User talk:Jeff|talk]]) 15:02, 24 December 2013 (UTC)<br />
::::If you sell a product, you may also consider [[explain xkcd:Advertise Here|advertising with us]]. Clicking on the "Your ad here" message on the side of the page should take you to our advertiser page, and you can use the money you were gonna donate to get some publicity for your stuff at the same time. '''[[User:Davidy22|<u>{{Color|#707|David}}<font color=#070 size=3>y</font></u><font color=#508 size=4>²²</font>]]'''[[User talk:Davidy22|<tt>[talk]</tt>]] 07:22, 25 December 2013 (UTC)<br />
<br />
== Animated ads ==<br />
<br />
Hello, I just wanted to say that [http://www.projectwonderful.com/img/uploads/pics/99067-1399070236.gif the current ad banner displayed in Europe] would be somewhat annoying enough for me to reactivate my ad blocker. Now I gave it a bit of extra tolerance because of its hyper-relevant topic (and in a way I was happy to be informed of [http://bobcatinabox.com/ the Bobcatinabox project]), but I think this banner is getting too animated and distracts too much when reading the website's content. The first form this ad took was [http://www.projectwonderful.com/img/uploads/pics/99067-1399069286.jpg that static image], which I prefer a lot and by the way got my interest enough to click on.<br />
<br />
I find the message displayed when using an ad blocker (''"It seems you are using noscript,..."'') sincerely convincing, especially the part saying ''"our ads are restricted to unobtrusive images and slow animated GIFs."'' It made me immediately disable mine when that message appeared some time ago, and since then I've been okay with static or quietly animated banners; but basically my point is that '''animated ads like this one could drive users, frustrated from the distracting effect, to activate their ad blocker'''.<br />
<br />
So maybe the ad banners moderation should require less animation? I'm of course interested in any other view on the matter.<br />
<br />
[[User:Cos|Cos]] ([[User talk:Cos|talk]]) 12:59, 15 May 2014 (UTC)<br />
:Unfortunately, we can't specify a maximum speed for ads; the checkbox only lets us allow or disallow animated GIFs. We accept ads on a per-advertiser basis, so when we accept an advertiser, they're clear to change and put up new ads whenever they want, so they can vary the images they show without us having to say yes every time a change is made. That particular guy had actually been rejected before and told to slow down the animation, which he did initially. I'll talk to the advertiser about it. '''[[User:Davidy22|<u>{{Color|#707|David}}<font color=#070 size=3>y</font></u><font color=#508 size=4>²²</font>]]'''[[User talk:Davidy22|<tt>[talk]</tt>]] 17:24, 15 May 2014 (UTC)<br />
:<br />
::Well, thanks for this reply <small>(and sorry for the delay of mine)</small>, that explains and addresses pretty much everything about that issue. [[File:Face-smile.svg|20px|Smile|link=]] - [[User:Cos|Cos]] ([[User talk:Cos|talk]]) 14:27, 21 May 2014 (UTC)<br />
<br />
I've disabled adblock for the site but this projectwonderful banner is extremely annoying, so I have no recourse but to enable it back. Things jumping around on the periphery of your viewing field are '''extremely''' annoying. I already hate the advertiser company, but I don't want to hate explainxkcd too - I actually like the site. That's why I am disabling the ads. {{unsigned ip|108.162.215.10}}<br />
:Huh. Which site was it, in particular? We can get that dealt with in short order. '''[[User:Davidy22|<u>{{Color|#707|David}}<font color=#070 size=3>y</font></u><font color=#508 size=4>²²</font>]]'''[[User talk:Davidy22|<tt>[talk]</tt>]] 03:48, 5 July 2015 (UTC)<br />
:: The image is http://www.projectwonderful.com/img/uploads/pics/22694-1385223182.gif and the link leads to http://theworstthingsforsale.com/tag/safe-for-work/. Still can see it right now. --[[Special:Contributions/108.162.215.10|108.162.215.10]] 20:13, 10 July 2015 (UTC)<br />
<br />
Again, [http://www.projectwonderful.com/img/uploads/pics/22694-1385223182.gif this ad] features WAY to much obnoxious animation. Enough to make me re-enable adblock. I usually enjoy the explain xkcd ads, but this ad fits my description for the most obnoxious kind of ad there can be: a weird, inexplicable animated gif. [[User:Suspender guy|Suspender guy]] ([[User talk:Suspender guy|talk]]) 14:57, 10 July 2015 (UTC)<br />
:Huh. We allow ads on a per-advertiser basis, and that guy had a static ad in his initial submission. Ads from that site have been disabled for the time being. '''[[User:Davidy22|<u>{{Color|#707|David}}<font color=#070 size=3>y</font></u><font color=#508 size=4>²²</font>]]'''[[User talk:Davidy22|<tt>[talk]</tt>]] 16:13, 10 July 2015 (UTC)<br />
<br />
==Spelling/Grammar==<br />
It says "ads than masquerade as operating system dialog boxes", using "than" instead of "that" (Can be fixed quick) —[[User:Artyer|Artyer]] ([[User talk:Artyer|talk]]) 17:44, 8 September 2014 (UTC)<br />
:Done. '''[[User:Davidy22|<u>{{Color|#707|David}}<font color=#070 size=3>y</font></u><font color=#508 size=4>²²</font>]]'''[[User talk:Davidy22|<tt>[talk]</tt>]] 17:46, 8 September 2014 (UTC)</div>108.162.215.10https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=explain_xkcd_talk:Advertise_Here&diff=96981explain xkcd talk:Advertise Here2015-07-05T03:35:55Z<p>108.162.215.10: </p>
<hr />
<div>==Whitelisting==<br />
I did this WHITE HAT listing, and I just see this picture at the left side: [http://www.projectwonderful.com/img/uploads/pics/91967-1378268302.png Your Ad...] But do I know if "www.projectwonderful.com" is just Black HAT? I do whitelist this page (expainxkcd), not more. --[[User:Dgbrt|Dgbrt]] ([[User talk:Dgbrt|talk]]) 21:17, 27 September 2013 (UTC)<br />
:Whitelisting isn't short form for anything, it just means that you allow certain sites to pass through your adblocker. That image that you're seeing means that we don't have any advertisers running ads in your region currently, and clicking it will just tell you how you can advertise with us. If you can see that image, you're doing it right. EU tends to be less popular than our global traffic, despite EU being second in ad impressions only to our US traffic. An awful lot of our advertisers don't seem to be savvy enough to target EU manually, but if you have a business that you represent that you would like to promote through us, click on the bit of text that says "Your ad here, right now: $3.90" and try making an account and bid yourself on our EU/US space. '''[[User:Davidy22|<u>{{Color|#707|David}}<font color=#070 size=3>y</font></u><font color=#508 size=4>²²</font>]]'''[[User talk:Davidy22|<tt>[talk]</tt>]] 22:50, 27 September 2013 (UTC)<br />
<br />
<br />
==Miscellaneous observations==<br />
Looking at the ad stats, the ads with the highest click rates (value for money) are grayscale. Moving ads tend to have similar click rates to ordinary, colored ads, and our ad provider seems to have had a recent shoot in popularity with kickstarter projects. Just a few curiosities that I've noticed recently. '''[[User:Davidy22|<u>{{Color|#707|David}}<font color=#070 size=3>y</font></u><font color=#508 size=4>²²</font>]]'''[[User talk:Davidy22|<tt>[talk]</tt>]] 08:26, 13 October 2013 (UTC)<br />
<br />
==Full Disclosure on Lunarpages Ads==<br />
We should probably explain the Lunarpages ad, because an awful lot of our users really hate ads. Lunarpages is our new host, and they offered to give us dedicated scalable server space with unlimited bandwidth for free in return for a .jpg banner ad on our sidebar. That's a pretty big deal, because it shaves off about $700 of yearly fees, plus potentially unlimited overage charges with their standard bandwidth limit. If comic number [[1190]] had happened and we were on that bandwidth cap, we would have had to fork out up to $600 per month, which would make this wiki very costly to maintain indeed. By going with this ad deal, we can eliminate all unpredictable costs, allowing us to use our Project Wonderful ad money to pay for webpage caching/CDN services and buy ad space on other websites to spread the joy. With no ads, all of the above would put a ~$2000-3000 dent in our pockets per year. With ads earning at their current rate, we can very comfortably pursue things like our current dedicated hosting or cloudflare to make the site faster without actually having to pay out our own money or beg users for donations. Our ads are small in terms of file size, and they only take up space in the sidebar that Mediawiki would have otherwise left blank. That's not much to pay for substantially faster server hardware and essentially free advertising. '''[[User:Davidy22|<u>{{Color|#707|David}}<font color=#070 size=3>y</font></u><font color=#508 size=4>²²</font>]]'''[[User talk:Davidy22|<tt>[talk]</tt>]] 16:50, 31 October 2013 (UTC)<br />
: Updated this a bit. --[[User:Jeff|<b><font color="orange">Jeff</font></b>]] ([[User talk:Jeff|talk]]) 02:09, 20 November 2013 (UTC)<br />
<br />
== Donations ==<br />
<br />
Can we make donations instead of looking at ads? If so, add a link in the adblock message. {{unsigned ip|108.162.219.74}}<br />
:We can probably put that in our adblock message, I'll get the donation link. Donations in the past haven't been enough to pay for what we have now, but you can totally donate and keep adblock on if you want. If donations start performing well enough in the future, we might even be able to drop the ads entirely. That's pretty far off at the moment though. '''[[User:Davidy22|<u>{{Color|#707|David}}<font color=#070 size=3>y</font></u><font color=#508 size=4>²²</font>]]'''[[User talk:Davidy22|<tt>[talk]</tt>]] 20:43, 12 November 2013 (UTC)<br />
:: Well, how much do you make from ads, per viewer? I would guess that a typical donation would be larger? I don't see any donation links, though. [[Special:Contributions/173.245.52.211|173.245.52.211]] 16:48, 19 December 2013 (UTC)<br />
::: You can donate via [https://www.paypal.com/cgi-bin/webscr?cmd=_donations&business=E646N7XZDZYRQ&lc=US&item_name=Explain%20XKCD&currency_code=USD&bn=PP%2dDonationsBF%3abtn_donate_LG%2egif%3aNonHosted in dollars via Paypal] or via [https://coinbase.com/checkouts/01a21cdc2c8cd33da6b32da887630d7f Bitcoin]. We will make these more prevalent shortly. --[[User:Jeff|<b><font color="orange">Jeff</font></b>]] ([[User talk:Jeff|talk]]) 15:02, 24 December 2013 (UTC)<br />
::::If you sell a product, you may also consider [[explain xkcd:Advertise Here|advertising with us]]. Clicking on the "Your ad here" message on the side of the page should take you to our advertiser page, and you can use the money you were gonna donate to get some publicity for your stuff at the same time. '''[[User:Davidy22|<u>{{Color|#707|David}}<font color=#070 size=3>y</font></u><font color=#508 size=4>²²</font>]]'''[[User talk:Davidy22|<tt>[talk]</tt>]] 07:22, 25 December 2013 (UTC)<br />
<br />
== Animated ads ==<br />
<br />
Hello, I just wanted to say that [http://www.projectwonderful.com/img/uploads/pics/99067-1399070236.gif the current ad banner displayed in Europe] would be somewhat annoying enough for me to reactivate my ad blocker. Now I gave it a bit of extra tolerance because of its hyper-relevant topic (and in a way I was happy to be informed of [http://bobcatinabox.com/ the Bobcatinabox project]), but I think this banner is getting too animated and distracts too much when reading the website's content. The first form this ad took was [http://www.projectwonderful.com/img/uploads/pics/99067-1399069286.jpg that static image], which I prefer a lot and by the way got my interest enough to click on.<br />
<br />
I find the message displayed when using an ad blocker (''"It seems you are using noscript,..."'') sincerely convincing, especially the part saying ''"our ads are restricted to unobtrusive images and slow animated GIFs."'' It made me immediately disable mine when that message appeared some time ago, and since then I've been okay with static or quietly animated banners; but basically my point is that '''animated ads like this one could drive users, frustrated from the distracting effect, to activate their ad blocker'''.<br />
<br />
So maybe the ad banners moderation should require less animation? I'm of course interested in any other view on the matter.<br />
<br />
[[User:Cos|Cos]] ([[User talk:Cos|talk]]) 12:59, 15 May 2014 (UTC)<br />
:Unfortunately, we can't specify a maximum speed for ads; the checkbox only lets us allow or disallow animated GIFs. We accept ads on a per-advertiser basis, so when we accept an advertiser, they're clear to change and put up new ads whenever they want, so they can vary the images they show without us having to say yes every time a change is made. That particular guy had actually been rejected before and told to slow down the animation, which he did initially. I'll talk to the advertiser about it. '''[[User:Davidy22|<u>{{Color|#707|David}}<font color=#070 size=3>y</font></u><font color=#508 size=4>²²</font>]]'''[[User talk:Davidy22|<tt>[talk]</tt>]] 17:24, 15 May 2014 (UTC)<br />
:<br />
::Well, thanks for this reply <small>(and sorry for the delay of mine)</small>, that explains and addresses pretty much everything about that issue. [[File:Face-smile.svg|20px|Smile|link=]] - [[User:Cos|Cos]] ([[User talk:Cos|talk]]) 14:27, 21 May 2014 (UTC)<br />
<br />
I've disabled adblock for the site but this projectwonderful banner is extremely annoying, so I have no recourse but to enable it back. Things jumping around on the periphery of your viewing field are '''extremely''' annoying. I already hate the advertiser company, but I don't want to hate explainxkcd too - I actually like the site. That's why I am disabling the ads. <br />
<br />
==Spelling/Grammar==<br />
It says "ads than masquerade as operating system dialog boxes", using "than" instead of "that" (Can be fixed quick) —[[User:Artyer|Artyer]] ([[User talk:Artyer|talk]]) 17:44, 8 September 2014 (UTC)<br />
:Done. '''[[User:Davidy22|<u>{{Color|#707|David}}<font color=#070 size=3>y</font></u><font color=#508 size=4>²²</font>]]'''[[User talk:Davidy22|<tt>[talk]</tt>]] 17:46, 8 September 2014 (UTC)</div>108.162.215.10https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:802:_Online_Communities_2&diff=55771Talk:802: Online Communities 22013-12-22T22:16:17Z<p>108.162.215.10: </p>
<hr />
<div>I believe I can explain why the e-mail, SMS and Internet areas of the map are surrounded by the "Spoken Language" country. Yes, SMS, e-mail and most of the Internet are "written", but they're more of a "written spoken language", sharing many traits with informal spoken language. Maybe Wikipedia articles and blog posts can be classified as "standard written texts", but most other forms of electronically-mediated communication bare more resemblance to the way we speak: forums, chatrooms, Facebook posts, SMS texts, the usage of acronyms and smiley faces, etc. It's a widely researched phenomenon, and it continues to be a topic in the fields of linguistics, psychology, sociology and education (literacy attainment). As an aspiring linguist myself, I smiled when I noticed that these so-called "written" forms were next to spoken language :) [[Special:Contributions/108.162.215.10|108.162.215.10]] 22:16, 22 December 2013 (UTC)<br />
<br />
I wonder if it's intentional that 4chan looks like a penis...{{unsigned ip|65.40.201.44}}<br />
<br />
It needs to explain the ferry between 4chan and Gaia. Although, so does a lot of other stuff. [[Special:Contributions/108.162.216.45|108.162.216.45]] 07:58, 9 December 2013 (UTC)<br />
<br />
I am still working on this. However, not only is this a big job, but I also have a lot to do outside here. In fact, I might even take a break from the Internet. I am simply warning others here. [[User:Greyson|Greyson]] ([[User talk:Greyson|talk]]) 04:37, 10 December 2013 (UTC)</div>108.162.215.10https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:1300:_Galilean_Moons&diff=54528Talk:1300: Galilean Moons2013-12-06T18:16:17Z<p>108.162.215.10: /* Animation is incorrect */</p>
<hr />
<div>"most likely Callisto, the outermost of the four" - seems that it's definitely Callisto, since its drawn with little craters - no?<br />
<br />
Hmmm. The animation just added agrees with another animation I've seen, in that the three innermost moons never line up all on one side of Jupiter at the same time. So if "Hi" (Io) and "What's your name" (Europa) conjoin on the right side as we're looking, then "What's your name" and "MOOOON!" (Ganymede) should conjoin on the left side. Not that I'm being critical of course...<br />
<br />
[[User:Just some guy|Just some guy]] ([[User talk:Just some guy|talk]]) 05:39, 6 December 2013 (UTC)<br />
<br />
Some javascript application available on the net to see the 4 moons orbits around [http://www.skyandtelescope.com/observing/objects/javascript/jupiter jupiter]<br />
<br />
[[User:HmmmHmmm|HmmmHmmm]] ([[User talk:HmmmHmmm|talk]]) 06:48, 6 December 2013 (UTC)<br />
<br />
If the inner moons are tidally locked with Jupiter, can you ostensibly state that they're mooning the outer moons, whenever two such moons line up? lol [[Special:Contributions/108.162.222.209|108.162.222.209]] 08:57, 6 December 2013 (UTC)<br />
<br />
Even with the resonance, "MOOOOOON!" appears still not to have been able to escape with that effect alone until Cueball's own close approach to Megan brought his own gravity well close enough to hers to give rise to a viable transfer orbit. And appears to be now retrograde, relative to its last orbit. Or possibly on a free-return path, unless Cueball steps back before the return transfer happens or makes an appropriate sideways move to quash the orbital potential. [[Special:Contributions/141.101.99.229|141.101.99.229]] 09:34, 6 December 2013 (UTC)<br />
:Hang on... "MOOOOOON!" isn't the "Ugh/So annoying/Almost/Yes!" one. Forgot to note the hint of shading. Still, the above applies to the disgusted/elated moon, clearly not liking either of the Valley Girls ''or'' the loudmouth Jock. [[Special:Contributions/141.101.99.229|141.101.99.229]] 09:38, 6 December 2013 (UTC)<br />
<br />
Is it just me or does "MOOOOOON!" have a subtle [http://knowyourmeme.com/memes/moon-moon "MOON MOON"] undertone? [[Special:Contributions/141.101.96.4|141.101.96.4]] 12:26, 6 December 2013 (UTC)<br />
<br />
Am I the only one thinking that the "MOOOOOON!" is a reference to the "SPAAAAACE!" module from portal 2?<br />
No<br />
*I saw a possible reference to [http://www.wondermark.com/302 "Wondermark"]. [[Special:Contributions/173.245.54.5|173.245.54.5]] 15:14, 6 December 2013 (UTC)<br />
<br />
Maybe moons converse with Cueball, not between them itself?<br />
[[Special:Contributions/173.245.53.180|173.245.53.180]] 13:14, 6 December 2013 (UTC)<br />
<br />
Or with Megan, when opposite to her face?<br />
[[Special:Contributions/173.245.53.180|173.245.53.180]] 13:39, 6 December 2013 (UTC)<br />
<br />
:I think the moons are clearly conversing with Cueball. Remember that Io executes a full orbit between every panel. --[[User:BlueMoonlet|BlueMoonlet]] ([[User talk:BlueMoonlet|talk]]) 17:27, 6 December 2013 (UTC)<br />
<br />
== Animation is incorrect ==<br />
<br />
The current animation has the wrong speed of the outermost moon, which is currently orbiting at a 5:1 ratio to the innermost. They should all line up along a vertical line once every four rotations. In fact the current animation never lines up all three moons at the same time (at least, not on the same side of the planet). -Greg<br />
[[Special:Contributions/108.162.215.10|108.162.215.10]] 16:06, 6 December 2013 (UTC)<br />
:The animation is correct. If you look closely at only Europa and Ganymede, you'll see that they are also in a 2:1 resonance, with conjunctions always taking place at the "6 o'clock" position. Io and Ganymede are in a 4:1 resonance, with conjunctions taking place at 12 o'clock, 4 o'clock, and 8 o'clock. The comic is incorrect in having all three moons on the same side of Jupiter at the same time. That never happens in the actual system, though I don't mind it in the name of artistic license. --[[User:BlueMoonlet|BlueMoonlet]] ([[User talk:BlueMoonlet|talk]]) 17:27, 6 December 2013 (UTC)<br />
::The innermost orbit completes 5 rotations for each 1 of the outermost. How is that a 4:1?<br />
[[Special:Contributions/108.162.215.10|108.162.215.10]] 18:16, 6 December 2013 (UTC)</div>108.162.215.10https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:1300:_Galilean_Moons&diff=54517Talk:1300: Galilean Moons2013-12-06T16:06:15Z<p>108.162.215.10: /* Animation is incorrect */</p>
<hr />
<div>Hmmm. The animation just added agrees with another animation I've seen, in that the three innermost moons never line up all on one side of Jupiter at the same time. So if "Hi" (Io) and "What's your name" (Europa) conjoin on the right side as we're looking, then "What's your name" and "MOOOON!" (Ganymede) should conjoin on the left side. Not that I'm being critical of course...<br />
<br />
[[User:Just some guy|Just some guy]] ([[User talk:Just some guy|talk]]) 05:39, 6 December 2013 (UTC)<br />
<br />
Some javascript application available on the net to see the 4 moons orbits around [http://www.skyandtelescope.com/observing/objects/javascript/jupiter jupiter]<br />
<br />
[[User:HmmmHmmm|HmmmHmmm]] ([[User talk:HmmmHmmm|talk]]) 06:48, 6 December 2013 (UTC)<br />
<br />
If the inner moons are tidally locked with Jupiter, can you ostensibly state that they're mooning the outer moons, whenever two such moons line up? lol [[Special:Contributions/108.162.222.209|108.162.222.209]] 08:57, 6 December 2013 (UTC)<br />
<br />
Even with the resonance, "MOOOOOON!" appears still not to have been able to escape with that effect alone until Cueball's own close approach to Megan brought his own gravity well close enough to hers to give rise to a viable transfer orbit. And appears to be now retrograde, relative to its last orbit. Or possibly on a free-return path, unless Cueball steps back before the return transfer happens or makes an appropriate sideways move to quash the orbital potential. [[Special:Contributions/141.101.99.229|141.101.99.229]] 09:34, 6 December 2013 (UTC)<br />
:Hang on... "MOOOOOON!" isn't the "Ugh/So annoying/Almost/Yes!" one. Forgot to note the hint of shading. Still, the above applies to the disgusted/elated moon, clearly not liking either of the Valley Girls ''or'' the loudmouth Jock. [[Special:Contributions/141.101.99.229|141.101.99.229]] 09:38, 6 December 2013 (UTC)<br />
<br />
Is it just me or does "MOOOOOON!" have a subtle [http://knowyourmeme.com/memes/moon-moon "MOON MOON"] undertone? [[Special:Contributions/141.101.96.4|141.101.96.4]] 12:26, 6 December 2013 (UTC)<br />
<br />
Am I the only one thinking that the "MOOOOOON!" is a reference to the "SPAAAAACE!" module from portal 2?<br />
No<br />
*I saw a possible reference to [http://www.wondermark.com/302 "Wondermark"]. [[Special:Contributions/173.245.54.5|173.245.54.5]] 15:14, 6 December 2013 (UTC)<br />
<br />
Maybe moons converse with Cueball, not between them itself?<br />
[[Special:Contributions/173.245.53.180|173.245.53.180]] 13:14, 6 December 2013 (UTC)<br />
<br />
Or with Megan, when opposite to her face?<br />
[[Special:Contributions/173.245.53.180|173.245.53.180]] 13:39, 6 December 2013 (UTC)<br />
<br />
== Animation is incorrect ==<br />
<br />
The current animation has the wrong speed of the outermost moon, which is currently orbiting at a 5:1 ratio to the innermost. They should all line up along a vertical line once every four rotations. In fact the current animation never lines up all three moons at the same time (at least, not on the same side of the planet). -Greg<br />
[[Special:Contributions/108.162.215.10|108.162.215.10]] 16:06, 6 December 2013 (UTC)</div>108.162.215.10https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:1300:_Galilean_Moons&diff=54516Talk:1300: Galilean Moons2013-12-06T16:05:19Z<p>108.162.215.10: /* Animation is incorrect */ new section</p>
<hr />
<div>Hmmm. The animation just added agrees with another animation I've seen, in that the three innermost moons never line up all on one side of Jupiter at the same time. So if "Hi" (Io) and "What's your name" (Europa) conjoin on the right side as we're looking, then "What's your name" and "MOOOON!" (Ganymede) should conjoin on the left side. Not that I'm being critical of course...<br />
<br />
[[User:Just some guy|Just some guy]] ([[User talk:Just some guy|talk]]) 05:39, 6 December 2013 (UTC)<br />
<br />
Some javascript application available on the net to see the 4 moons orbits around [http://www.skyandtelescope.com/observing/objects/javascript/jupiter jupiter]<br />
<br />
[[User:HmmmHmmm|HmmmHmmm]] ([[User talk:HmmmHmmm|talk]]) 06:48, 6 December 2013 (UTC)<br />
<br />
If the inner moons are tidally locked with Jupiter, can you ostensibly state that they're mooning the outer moons, whenever two such moons line up? lol [[Special:Contributions/108.162.222.209|108.162.222.209]] 08:57, 6 December 2013 (UTC)<br />
<br />
Even with the resonance, "MOOOOOON!" appears still not to have been able to escape with that effect alone until Cueball's own close approach to Megan brought his own gravity well close enough to hers to give rise to a viable transfer orbit. And appears to be now retrograde, relative to its last orbit. Or possibly on a free-return path, unless Cueball steps back before the return transfer happens or makes an appropriate sideways move to quash the orbital potential. [[Special:Contributions/141.101.99.229|141.101.99.229]] 09:34, 6 December 2013 (UTC)<br />
:Hang on... "MOOOOOON!" isn't the "Ugh/So annoying/Almost/Yes!" one. Forgot to note the hint of shading. Still, the above applies to the disgusted/elated moon, clearly not liking either of the Valley Girls ''or'' the loudmouth Jock. [[Special:Contributions/141.101.99.229|141.101.99.229]] 09:38, 6 December 2013 (UTC)<br />
<br />
Is it just me or does "MOOOOOON!" have a subtle [http://knowyourmeme.com/memes/moon-moon "MOON MOON"] undertone? [[Special:Contributions/141.101.96.4|141.101.96.4]] 12:26, 6 December 2013 (UTC)<br />
<br />
Am I the only one thinking that the "MOOOOOON!" is a reference to the "SPAAAAACE!" module from portal 2?<br />
No<br />
*I saw a possible reference to [http://www.wondermark.com/302 "Wondermark"]. [[Special:Contributions/173.245.54.5|173.245.54.5]] 15:14, 6 December 2013 (UTC)<br />
<br />
Maybe moons converse with Cueball, not between them itself?<br />
[[Special:Contributions/173.245.53.180|173.245.53.180]] 13:14, 6 December 2013 (UTC)<br />
<br />
Or with Megan, when opposite to her face?<br />
[[Special:Contributions/173.245.53.180|173.245.53.180]] 13:39, 6 December 2013 (UTC)<br />
<br />
== Animation is incorrect ==<br />
<br />
The current animation has the wrong speed of the outermost moon, which is currently orbiting at a 5:1 ratio to the innermost. The should all line up along a vertical line once every four rotations. In fact the current animation never lines up all three moons at the same time (at least, not on the same side of the planet). -Greg<br />
[[Special:Contributions/108.162.215.10|108.162.215.10]] 16:05, 6 December 2013 (UTC)</div>108.162.215.10