https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/api.php?action=feedcontributions&user=172.68.34.46&feedformat=atomexplain xkcd - User contributions [en]2024-03-28T15:19:36ZUser contributionsMediaWiki 1.30.0https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=624:_Branding&diff=156141624: Branding2018-04-21T16:15:13Z<p>172.68.34.46: Changed wording as twitter is now 280 characters</p>
<hr />
<div>{{comic<br />
| number = 624<br />
| date = August 17, 2009<br />
| title = Branding<br />
| image = branding.png<br />
| titletext = Actually, 'RSS&M' is kinda catchy.<br />
}}<br />
<br />
==Explanation==<br />
This comic pokes fun at web sites (adult-themed sites in particular) which try to inflate their popularity by comparing themselves to other popular online services. The strip shows four such advertisements that appear to [[Cueball]] as he browses the Internet.<br />
<br />
{{w|Adblock}} is a browser extension which prevents advertisements from being displayed. Presumably Cueball normally browses the Internet with Adblock enabled, and thus would not see any of these ads.<br />
<br />
The first advertises a website that brands itself as the "{{w|Facebook}} of sex". Because Facebook is ubiquitous, this is a good branding idea. Facebook is known to most users and connotes an easy-to-use platform where it's very easy to find people, chat with them, share pictures, etc. For someone looking for sex, this would probably seem like a good site to use. There are, in fact, sites that use this branding in their advertisements and/or their user interface which is likely what inspired [[Randall]] to write this comic. Cueball sighs and moves on, probably having seen this kind of ad many times already.<br />
<br />
The second brands itself as "Twitter for 18+ singles". It is a similar but seemingly invented ad which again plays on the ubiquity and popularity of {{w|Twitter}}. Twitter being a (generally) public chat forum which at the time this comic was published limited posts to 140 characters is still popular enough to get some attention and make someone think about going to the site. Sending messages to the world in 140 characters or less might be somewhat less of a versatile platform than Facebook for chatting with other singles, but still perhaps viable. Cueball notes that it is becoming more and more popular to brand adult sites by comparing them to popular non-adult sites.<br />
<br />
This third takes a turn for the unusual, branding itself as "Google Reader for S&M". {{w|Google Reader}} is a now-defunct platform that allows users to aggregate web feeds such as RSS feeds into one place for convenience. The service is notably less well-known and popular than Facebook or Twitter, and given that it doesn't directly link you with other people, doesn't have the same connotation of allowing you to connect with others. Perhaps it would be a site that allowed you to aggregate various fan fictions, blogs, or other written works relating to {{w|Sadomasochism|S&M}}. However, Cueball is surprised such a site would exist.<br />
<br />
The final ad brands itself as a "GitHub for lesbians". {{w|GitHub}} is a website that allows developers to collaborate on software projects using the {{w|Git (software)|Git}} revision control system. The concept is absurd — GitHub has a specialized function unrelated to anyone's gender or orientation, and it's barely a social network at all; the usefulness or appeal of such a system made specific to lesbians is not apparent. Cueball is surprised and possibly even intrigued by this last ad.<br />
<br />
The title text relates to the third panel. {{w|RSS}} is a technology involved in Google Reader. RSS&M is a portmanteau of RSS and S&M. This is a possible way for the third web site to brand itself.<br />
<br />
==Transcript==<br />
:Browsing without adblock<br />
:[Cueball is sitting at a computer.]<br />
:[Pop-up window with red background.]<br />
:The Facebook of SEX! Click now!<br />
:Cueball: Sigh.<br />
:<nowiki>*Close*</nowiki><br />
<br />
:[Pop-up window with green background.]<br />
:Twitter for 18+ singles! Join today!<br />
:Cueball: Does every porn site have to brand itself like this?<br />
:<nowiki>*Close*</nowiki><br />
<br />
:[Pop-up window with blue background.]<br />
:We're like Google Reader for S&M!<br />
:Cueball: ''Really?''<br />
:<nowiki>*Close*</nowiki><br />
<br />
:[Pop-up window with orange background.]<br />
:Try the new GitHub for lesbians!<br />
:Cueball: Ok, wait, what?<br />
<br />
{{comic discussion}}<br />
[[Category:Comics featuring Cueball]]<br />
[[Category:Comics with color]]<br />
[[Category:Internet]]<br />
[[Category:Portmanteau]]<br />
[[Category:Sex]]<br />
[[Category:Social networking]]</div>172.68.34.46https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:1948:_Campaign_Fundraising_Emails&diff=151713Talk:1948: Campaign Fundraising Emails2018-01-30T17:50:39Z<p>172.68.34.46: typo in Tom Hanks attack ads?</p>
<hr />
<div><!--Please sign your posts with ~~~~ and don't delete this text. New comments should be added at the bottom.--><br />
can someone make a table with all the emails and an explanation column? I'm shit at formatting. [[User:DPS2004|DPS2004&#39;); DROP TABLE users;--]] ([[User talk:DPS2004|talk]]) 16:38, 29 January 2018 (UTC)<br />
: Relevant username? [[Special:Contributions/172.68.58.83|172.68.58.83]] 17:42, 29 January 2018 (UTC)<br />
:: Actually more based on Exploits of a mom [[User:DPS2004|DPS2004&#39;); DROP TABLE users;--]] ([[User talk:DPS2004|talk]]) 15:05, 30 January 2018 (UTC)<br />
ActBlue is a political action committee aimed at helping people on the internet raise money for the Democratic party - there is no Jennifer ActBlue Heir to the ActBlue fortune. [[Special:Contributions/172.68.174.40|172.68.174.40]] 17:14, 29 January 2018 (UTC)Daniel Macintyre<br />
*That's what Jennifer wants you to think.[[Special:Contributions/162.158.122.12|162.158.122.12]] 17:23, 29 January 2018 (UTC)<br />
<br />
It's interesting to note that for three of the emails, the subject isn't bolded, indicating that those emails were read. All three refer to female candidates [[User:JamesCurran|JamesCurran]] ([[User talk:JamesCurran|talk]]) 17:20, 29 January 2018 (UTC)<br />
: Are we sure those are subject lines? I don't usually write or get emails where the subject line flows seamlessly into the contents like this. (Not sure what else they could be, of course.) Also, the lack of bold text could indicate an email without a subject line. [[Special:Contributions/162.158.78.220|162.158.78.220]] 18:54, 29 January 2018 (UTC)<br />
:: I had actually initially taken the bold text as having being tweaked to emphasize those words, or that they were bold in the email, and that the emails which didn't were actual interesting and legitimate messages. :) Of course that would leave these emails without subjects, so the bold text being subjects makes more sense, and the lack of bold is just without a subject. As for part of the email starting after the subject, I think I've seen that. I know different email providers and programs show things differently. I have my email setup to only show subjects when I'm in my Inbox like this, but I've also seen ones where there's a couple of lines of preview. Perhaps Randall just has his to show only 1 line of subject and preview. If I cared about having a preview in my Inbox I'd set it that way, to save space. [[User:NiceGuy1|NiceGuy1]] ([[User talk:NiceGuy1|talk]]) 05:20, 30 January 2018 (UTC)<br />
<br />
I'm guessing the $35.57 may have been related to a recent Jimquisition episode focusing on this ad: https://youtu.be/Tu3rwf27VRE [[User:Odysseus654|Odysseus654]] ([[User talk:Odysseus654|talk]]) 21:13, 29 January 2018 (UTC)<br />
<br />
Some of these scenarios are especially hilarious to me!<br />
:1) When Amy decided to run for Congress, I was like "Huh?" but I checked Wikipedia, and apparently it's a branch of...<br />
:Who needs to know anything when we have Wikipedia?<br />
:2) I will lead the fight against the big banks, special interests, the Earth's climate, and our children. I...<br />
:Won't someone please think of the children? (Those little !#$!%#^$^s!) [Edited slightly, because they are really horrid when they have at-signs in their expletives.]<br />
:3) Whoops. Due to a typo, we spent months running attack ads against Tom Hanks. Now, we need to make up for...<br />
:Yay, automation!<br />
:4) Our campaign's only chance is to seduce Jennifer Actblue, heir to the Actblue fortune. For that, we need a fancy...<br />
:That is just what we need: a candidate with a fresh approach. Will he get slapped?<br />
[[Special:Contributions/108.162.216.154|108.162.216.154]] 21:30, 29 January 2018 (UTC) Gene Wirchenko genew@telus.net<br />
: The wiki screwed up your nice legible formatting, LOL! Looks great in the edit box, a little confusing once submitted (I've noticed the wiki ignores a single New Line, unless followed by a colon) [[User:NiceGuy1|NiceGuy1]] ([[User talk:NiceGuy1|talk]]) 05:20, 30 January 2018 (UTC)<br />
:: I have just repaired the formatting. The wiki had also interpreted my faux expletive as an E-mail address (and protected it). Mr. Munroe needs to do a strip on how computers "help" us like this.<br />
:: [[Special:Contributions/108.162.216.154|108.162.216.154]] 06:23, 30 January 2018 (UTC) Gene Wirchenko genew@telus.net<br />
Is it just me, or does anyone else think that the wording of the message starting "Hopeless" is deliberately written in the style of Donald Trump's tweets? [[Special:Contributions/108.162.250.41|108.162.250.41]] 02:01, 30 January 2018 (UTC)<br />
<br />
Right now there's a double Incomplete message, with one asking for contact information in case someone wants to actually donate to one of these campaigns... Is it just me, or does this in fact NOT IDENTIFY ANYBODY? As in, there's nobody to donate TO! [[User:NiceGuy1|NiceGuy1]] ([[User talk:NiceGuy1|talk]]) 05:20, 30 January 2018 (UTC)<br />
<br />
Note that the "Doom" email says "Where is the horse and the rider" not "Where now the horse and the rider," and also skips several lines in the middle of the poem. It's quoting the Peter Jackson movie, not the book. [[Special:Contributions/172.69.70.185|172.69.70.185]] 05:43, 30 January 2018 (UTC)<br />
<br />
I know what Ford's controversial comment was: it was characterised by The New York Times as "FORD TO CITY: DROP DEAD". [[Special:Contributions/162.158.165.190|162.158.165.190]] 07:09, 30 January 2018 (UTC)<br />
<br />
The comment about the establishment not taking Hitler seriously might be referring to that "the powers that be" in pre-Nazi Germany thought they could control Hitler and use his popularity to their advantage. We all know how this plan worked out. --[[User:LordHorst|LordHorst]] ([[User talk:LordHorst|talk]]) 10:16, 30 January 2018 (UTC)<br />
<br />
Having read it before, I still laughed more at the linked "Bushism" Wikipedia page than at today's comic. [[Special:Contributions/172.68.25.208|172.68.25.208]] 12:29, 30 January 2018 (UTC)<br />
<br />
Having that my college does some fund-raising events, I have seen some of the mails like this being displayed on my lecturer's laptop, so I find it relatable.Boeing-787lover 13:24, 30 January 2018 (UTC)<br />
<br />
I'm trying to figure out what the typo was in the Tom Hanks attack ads. Perhaps they attacked Big Hanks instead of Big Banks? -- [[Special:Contributions/172.68.34.46|172.68.34.46]] 17:50, 30 January 2018 (UTC)</div>172.68.34.46https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:1919:_Interstellar_Asteroid&diff=148410Talk:1919: Interstellar Asteroid2017-11-27T18:27:11Z<p>172.68.34.46: </p>
<hr />
<div><!--Please sign your posts with ~~~~ and don't delete this text. New comments should be added at the bottom.--><br />
Let's see:<br />
<br />
* Long and thin.<br />
* From another solar system.<br />
* Made mostly of metal.<br />
* Spinning to create artificial gravity.<br />
<br />
...yeah - could be anything really! [[Special:Contributions/173.245.50.102|173.245.50.102]] 05:16, 22 November 2017 (UTC)<br />
:Well, at about 200 meters in length, rotating once every 8 hours... If it's spinning for gravity, it's ''very'' low gravity.<br />
<br />
:Also be aware that it's '''tumbling ''end over end'', not rolling''', so the momentum ("spin gravity") would be greatest at the ends, not along the sides.<br />
:[[Special:Contributions/162.158.75.130|162.158.75.130]] 21:41, 23 November 2017 (UTC)<br />
<br />
Has he ever referenced Weird al before? [[Special:Contributions/172.68.174.94|172.68.174.94]] 05:35, 22 November 2017 (UTC)<br />
:There's one potential reference in 488 and an example of something he talks about in 1576, but nothing directly. [[User:Fabian42|Fabian42]] ([[User talk:Fabian42|talk]]) 08:34, 22 November 2017 (UTC)<br />
<br />
Obviously in the alt-text he is referencing Starship Troopers [http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0120201/] [[Special:Contributions/172.68.50.142|172.68.50.142]] 08:55, 22 November 2017 (UTC)<br />
:I've read Heinlein's story, & seen the movies, but I can't think of a specific element of those which corresponds to the "return fire" mentality implied in the Alt-Text; almost every SciFi dealing with aliens has humans urging a counter-attack. In fact, I think an old Twilight Zone or Outer Limits episode might be a better example than Starship Troopers, in which we at least had solid evidence of another species. In many SciFi plots we just assume anything unusual is hostile, whether it's actually alive or not.<br />
:[[Special:Contributions/162.158.75.130|162.158.75.130]] 21:41, 23 November 2017 (UTC)<br />
:: Not the "return fire" part, that's Randall's contribution. The concept of sending an asteroid as an intentional attack. [[User:NiceGuy1|NiceGuy1]] ([[User talk:NiceGuy1|talk]]) 05:34, 24 November 2017 (UTC)<br />
::: Regarding the remark that the asteroid might be to precise for the bugs - well, everyone in the move (as well es the novel) underestimated the bugs, didn't they? Even some skymarshall took the responsibility and had to step down (oh no!) [[Special:Contributions/172.68.50.142|172.68.50.142]] 08:29, 24 November 2017 (UTC)<br />
<br />
Why is Megan coming up with these ideas, instead of say Whitehat? [[Special:Contributions/108.162.249.40|108.162.249.40]] 10:39, 22 November 2017 (UTC)<br />
:White-Hat isn't as imaginative as Megan, based upon their general depictions.<br />
:[[Special:Contributions/162.158.75.130|162.158.75.130]] 21:41, 23 November 2017 (UTC)<br />
<br />
So, it's an interstellar object that just happens to have come close enough to Earth to be spotted? What are the odds of that being purely random, just an asteroid passing by, rather than a swing and a miss or a little recon mission? --[[User:AnnatarsGift|AnnatarsGift]] ([[User talk:AnnatarsGift|talk]]) 12:21, 22 November 2017 (UTC)<br />
:There is no data to estimate the frequency of interstellar objects transiting our star system, because ''this is literally the '''first''' interstellar object'' ever known to have done so. It's expected to completely exit Sol system (passing beyond our Oort cloud) in about 200,000 years, so it's a very long term "event".<br />
:Likewise, there is no data on any known extrasolar species, so it's impossible to know how likely a recon mission would be. If we assume the presence of interstellar explorers, we're also assuming some level of technology or biology well beyond our current capabilities, so it's still pretty hard to guess how likely they'd be to send a big tumbling metallic probe.<br />
:That said, its course is less than ideal for speedy fly-bys: Even if someone decided to send out a long-term recon mission (measured in tens of millions of years since launch), ʻOumuamua's orbit is extremely unstable with a high likelihood of low-mass collisions or capture by a planetary body. "Sub-optimal" might be putting it too kindly, as mission plans go.<br />
:[[Special:Contributions/162.158.75.130|162.158.75.130]] 21:41, 23 November 2017 (UTC)<br />
: For all we know, Earth is late to this party. Maybe asteroids randomly fly by other planets all the time within observable distance, just that there were no Earthlings present to do said observing. [[User:NiceGuy1|NiceGuy1]] ([[User talk:NiceGuy1|talk]]) 05:34, 24 November 2017 (UTC)<br />
<br />
I believe we have decided the Eggplant emoji is an euphemism.<br />
<br />
Here's a picture of the monolith [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Monolith_(Space_Odyssey)] [[User:Rtanenbaum|Rtanenbaum]] ([[User talk:Rtanenbaum|talk]]) 13:37, 22 November 2017 (UTC)<br />
:Agreed, mentioning the Eggplant emoji is definitely a way of implying "penis shaped" without saying that. I am reminded of the Austin Powers movie: "It looks like a giant~" "Willy, come look at this!"<br />
:[[Special:Contributions/162.158.75.130|162.158.75.130]] 21:41, 23 November 2017 (UTC)<br />
<br />
Anybody else read "Rendezvous with Rama" by Arthur C. Clarke? The behavior of this object is disturbingly similar to the ship described there. [[User:Archiesholland|Archiesholland]] ([[User talk:Archiesholland|talk]]) 16:13, 22 November 2017 (UTC)<br />
:I think that's what the first comment is referring to.<br />
::On re-reading, I think you're right. Probably also applies to AnnatarsGift's comment. [[User:Archiesholland|Archiesholland]] ([[User talk:Archiesholland|talk]]) 21:16, 22 November 2017 (UTC)<br />
:Wayyy too small though (only ~200 meters long); Unless it's crewed by microscopic tardigrades!?!<br />
;D<br />
:[[Special:Contributions/162.158.75.130|162.158.75.130]] 21:41, 23 November 2017 (UTC)<br />
:: I know as a somewhat tall guy I'm in the vicinity of 2 meters tall, so that would be a HUNDRED of me. :) If it's even slightly better dimensionally distributed than 2001's monolith, that sounds fine. Also, the space shuttle was merely 56 meters long, 200 sounds downright spacious and roomy by comparison. LOL! I can't help but think of how the phone in my pocket has more computational power than the roomful of computers which first sent men to the moon, imagine that kind of minimizing progress applied to space vehicles? [[User:NiceGuy1|NiceGuy1]] ([[User talk:NiceGuy1|talk]]) 05:34, 24 November 2017 (UTC)<br />
<br />
Note that Weird Al recently tweeted about the trademark on his name.<br />
<br />
(previous commenter forgot to sign)<br />
The style of this and the last explaination is very different than of most other recent ones. usually it is quite long, describing the comic and everything, even the most obvious thing in there in biggest detail. These 2 just give references to some points - is there any reason to that? [[User:Lupo|Lupo]] ([[User talk:Lupo|talk]])<br />
:Yes: The comics are relatively straightforward, so little explanation is needed. It happens; enjoy it. '''--BigMal''' // [[Special:Contributions/108.162.216.184|108.162.216.184]] 20:53, 22 November 2017 (UTC)<br />
:: I've seen simple, even 1 panel, comics get such an explanation as could be published as a book... Introducing confusion where there was none. I'd say the brevity on this one is just a sign of it still being early, just wait for it. LOL! [[User:NiceGuy1|NiceGuy1]] ([[User talk:NiceGuy1|talk]]) 05:34, 24 November 2017 (UTC)<br />
<br />
<br />
NO mention of how "iPhone XXXXX" should most likely be "iPhone L"? Or that it's not means it's most likely referencing clothes sizes, how they add X's to indicate bigger sizes? (L, XL, XXL, XXXL, XXXXL, etc)? Okay... [[User:NiceGuy1|NiceGuy1]] ([[User talk:NiceGuy1|talk]]) 05:38, 24 November 2017 (UTC)<br />
<br />
<br />
In terms of another object it could be, the NASA APOD page for NOV. 22 2017 mentions the similarities to Arthur C. Clark's Rama ship.Just a thought. [[Special:Contributions/172.68.34.46|172.68.34.46]] 18:27, 27 November 2017 (UTC)</div>172.68.34.46https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=1912:_Thermostat&diff=1474741912: Thermostat2017-11-06T20:52:41Z<p>172.68.34.46: /* Explanation */</p>
<hr />
<div>{{comic<br />
| number = 1912<br />
| date = November 6, 2017<br />
| title = Thermostat<br />
| image = thermostat.png<br />
| titletext = Your problem is so terrible, I worry that, if I help you, I risk drawing the attention of whatever god of technology inflicted it on you.<br />
}}<br />
<br />
==Explanation==<br />
{{incomplete|Rough draft, could still use work. Do NOT delete this tag too soon.}}<br />
<br />
[[Hairy]] is working at a tech support office, and receives a call from [[Cueball]]. After the scripted greeting, Cueball, who [[1084|has the]] [[1586|weirdest]] [[1700|tech issues]], tells Hairy that his thermostat - a single-purpose device used to adjust the settings of indoor heating and air conditioning - is showing an ''Android error screen'', and asking if he wants to partition the volume. The android error seems to imply that it is trying to mount a file with .doc extension (most likely a [[1459|Microsoft Word document]]) as the {{w|Boot_device|boot device}}. An added twist is the "(1)" in the filename, which is appended by Windows when a user attempts to copy a file into a directory that already has a file with the same name. The error message suggests a system problem at the core of the device. Not only is the operating system completely missing, but the device is trying to locate the operating system inside a Microsoft Word document, something that has nothing to do with regulation of temperature and should have no way of getting to the device in the first place, let alone be considered as a boot volume. This is so abnormal that Hairy is briefly struck silent, and upon recovering, he suggests Cueball {{tvtropes|SuicideBySea|walk into the sea}} as a form of suicide (most likely a reference to Chopin's ''The Awakening'', or as a reference to ''Eldritch Horror''). The title text elaborates that the situation is so insanely absurd that it must be divine punishment, and Hairy does not want to try and help him for fear of invoking the wrath of whatever deity is issuing it.<br />
<br />
==Transcript==<br />
:[Hairy, with a head set on, is sitting in an office chair at a desk hands ready on they keyboard of his computer.]<br />
:Hairy: Tech support, how can I help you?<br />
<br />
:[Cueball is on his smartphone while looking at a small blinking panel on the wall on front of him.]<br />
:Cueball: The little LCD on my thermostat says <small>''Error: Android system recovery: Unrecognized boot volume "/MONTHLY ENERGY REPORT (1).DOC"</small><br />
:[In a frame-less beat panel Hairy just stares at his screen hands in his lap.]<br />
<br />
:[Back to Cueball, now with Hairy's reply coming from the smartphone in a box with a jagged arrow pointing to the smartphone.]<br />
:Cueball: It's asking if I want to partition the volume. What should I do?<br />
:Hairy (on the phone): Have you tried walking into the sea.<br />
<br />
{{comic discussion}}<br />
<br />
[[Category:Comics featuring Hairy]]<br />
[[Category:Comics featuring Cueball]]<br />
[[Category:Computers]]</div>172.68.34.46https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php?title=1808:_Hacking&diff=1366321808: Hacking2017-03-08T06:10:10Z<p>172.68.34.46: Add explanation for GCC/Bash</p>
<hr />
<div>{{comic<br />
| number = 1808<br />
| date = March 8, 2017<br />
| title = Hacking<br />
| image = hacking.png<br />
| titletext = The dump also contains a list of millions of prime factors, a 0-day Tamagotchi exploit, and a technique for getting gcc and bash to execute arbitrary code.<br />
}}<br />
<br />
==Explanation==<br />
{{incomplete|Add explanation for gcc and bash}}<br />
While publishing email addresses on websites, people often add space between parts of the email. For example, john.doe@example.org may be written as john dot doe at example dot org. This is to prevent the page scrapping bots from harvesting email addresses, which may in turn be sold as address lists for email marketers.<br />
<br />
In this comic, [[Ponytail]] tells [[Cueball]] that there is a tool which can delete such spaces. Such a tool can fix the space and most likely convert the words "dot" and "at" into their respective symbols. This will overcome the problems faced by such harvesting tools, and make these email addresses more prone to receive spam. Cueball is shocked to hear this news.<br />
<br />
This comic is referencing a leak by {{w|WikiLeaks}} that compromises thousands of hacking exploits and programs from the CIA on 2017-03-07.<br />
<br />
The title text references more interesting parts of the dump, such as millions of prime factors - which can be used to break a {{w|RSA (cryptosystem)|RSA cipher}}, a 0-day exploit for {{w|Tamagotchi|Tamagotchis}} - which is mostly useless because Tamagotchis aren't connected to the Internet, and a way to get gcc and bash (two command line tools) to execute code - a function those tools are designed to perform.<br />
<br />
==Transcript==<br />
:[Cueball looks over Ponytail's shoulder at her desk.]<br />
:Ponytail: You know how sometimes people put a space in their email address to make it harder to harvest?<br />
:Cueball: Yeah?<br />
:Ponytail: They have a tool that can delete the space!<br />
:Cueball: Oh my god.<br />
<br />
:[Caption below the panel:]<br />
:Less-dramatic revelations from the CIA hacking dump<br />
<br />
<br />
{{comic discussion}}</div>172.68.34.46