2451: AI Methodology - Revision history

2A00:23C6:99D0:1201:B553:BBEB:6516:ABD2: /* Explanation */ I don't necessarily think this comic is outdated, but some others may.

2026-01-22T10:03:03Z

‎Explanation: I don't necessarily think this comic is outdated, but some others may.

Lp0 on fire: removed Category:Science; added Category:Scientific research using HotCat

2025-12-13T11:44:12Z

removed Category:Science; added Category:Scientific research using HotCat

Drkaii at 09:41, 30 March 2025

2025-03-30T09:41:56Z

Cheesesentience: /* Explanation */

2024-12-10T15:40:42Z

‎Explanation

SilverTheTerribleMathematician at 03:18, 3 January 2023

2023-01-03T03:18:35Z

Jacky720: rv

2022-05-04T21:10:48Z

Show changes

Ex Kay Cee Dee at 20:05, 4 May 2022

2022-05-04T20:05:17Z

Show changes

Davidy22: Reverted edits by X. K. C. D. (talk) to last revision by Trublu

2022-05-04T02:13:53Z

Reverted edits by X. K. C. D. (talk) to last revision by Trublu

Show changes

X. K. C. D. at 22:59, 3 May 2022

2022-05-03T22:59:15Z

Show changes

Trublu: Undo revision 215748 by 108.162.245.217 (talk)

2022-05-03T09:11:43Z

Undo revision 215748 by 108.162.245.217 (talk)

@@ Line 33: / Line 33: @@
 * The spacing information is correlated strongly with good methodology, which implies that they probably don't have very many different sources for their training data. Their sample size is too small and the AI, even if it was improved to ignore this information, needs more data to have a chance at being useful.
-It should be noted that this comic was released about a year and a half before the release of ChatGPT and a new revolution in AI, making the various points in the comic seem out of date by modern standards.
+It should be noted that this comic was released about a year and a half before the release of ChatGPT and a new revolution in AI, making the various points in the comic seem out of date or cleverly prescient, depending on your point of view.
 ==Transcript==

@@ Line 45: / Line 45: @@
 [[Category:Artificial Intelligence]]
 [[Category:Public speaking]]
-[[Category:Science]]
+[[Category:Scientific research]]

@@ Line 32: / Line 32: @@
 * They haven't recognized that it's useless, so their other AI is probably fatally flawed.
 * The spacing information is correlated strongly with good methodology, which implies that they probably don't have very many different sources for their training data. Their sample size is too small and the AI, even if it was improved to ignore this information, needs more data to have a chance at being useful.
 ==Transcript==

@@ Line 9: / Line 9: @@
 ==Explanation==
-The joke in this comic is that the people are using {{w|artificial intelligence}} (AI) without understanding how to, and that by doing this the research concerned is at best unreliable and possibly deliberately compromised. The researchers acknowledge that their approach is risky and requires extra verification, but repeatedly use equally or more unreliable AI-based solutions to these problems. Therefore, their problems are likely as bad as they ever were and any other team using one of their verification tools is likely to experience similar unreliability. For an introduction to machine learning, you can visit https://fast.ai/ .
+The joke in this comic is that the people are using {{w|artificial intelligence}} (AI) without understanding how to, and that by doing this the research concerned is at best unreliable and possibly deliberately compromised, as in [[2494: Flawed Data]]. The researchers acknowledge that their approach is risky and requires extra verification, but repeatedly use equally or more unreliable AI-based solutions to these problems. Therefore, their problems are likely as bad as they ever were and any other team using one of their verification tools is likely to experience similar unreliability. For an introduction to machine learning, you can visit https://fast.ai/ .
 ===Original research===

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:18, 3 January 2023
Line 8:		Line 8:

	==Explanation==		==Explanation==
−	{{incomplete\|Created by a BOT (91%). TRAINED BY AN ADVERSARIAL AI (72%). The explanation has been rewritten to provide more explanation of AI concepts. Please correct any mistakes and identify any points where there is insufficient clarity. Do NOT delete this tag too soon.}}

	The joke in this comic is that the people are using {{w\|artificial intelligence}} (AI) without understanding how to, and that by doing this the research concerned is at best unreliable and possibly deliberately compromised. The researchers acknowledge that their approach is risky and requires extra verification, but repeatedly use equally or more unreliable AI-based solutions to these problems. Therefore, their problems are likely as bad as they ever were and any other team using one of their verification tools is likely to experience similar unreliability. For an introduction to machine learning, you can visit https://fast.ai/ .		The joke in this comic is that the people are using {{w\|artificial intelligence}} (AI) without understanding how to, and that by doing this the research concerned is at best unreliable and possibly deliberately compromised. The researchers acknowledge that their approach is risky and requires extra verification, but repeatedly use equally or more unreliable AI-based solutions to these problems. Therefore, their problems are likely as bad as they ever were and any other team using one of their verification tools is likely to experience similar unreliability. For an introduction to machine learning, you can visit https://fast.ai/ .

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:11, 3 May 2022
Line 8:		Line 8:

	==Explanation==		==Explanation==
		+	{{incomplete\|Created by a BOT (91%). TRAINED BY AN ADVERSARIAL AI (72%). The explanation has been rewritten to provide more explanation of AI concepts. Please correct any mistakes and identify any points where there is insufficient clarity. Do NOT delete this tag too soon.}}

	The joke in this comic is that the people are using {{w\|artificial intelligence}} (AI) without understanding how to, and that by doing this the research concerned is at best unreliable and possibly deliberately compromised. The researchers acknowledge that their approach is risky and requires extra verification, but repeatedly use equally or more unreliable AI-based solutions to these problems. Therefore, their problems are likely as bad as they ever were and any other team using one of their verification tools is likely to experience similar unreliability. For an introduction to machine learning, you can visit https://fast.ai/ .		The joke in this comic is that the people are using {{w\|artificial intelligence}} (AI) without understanding how to, and that by doing this the research concerned is at best unreliable and possibly deliberately compromised. The researchers acknowledge that their approach is risky and requires extra verification, but repeatedly use equally or more unreliable AI-based solutions to these problems. Therefore, their problems are likely as bad as they ever were and any other team using one of their verification tools is likely to experience similar unreliability. For an introduction to machine learning, you can visit https://fast.ai/ .