2538: Snack - Revision history

Ravenclawinaleatherjacket: /* Explanation */

2022-10-13T04:01:32Z

‎Explanation

141.101.98.135: added category

2022-06-21T02:27:28Z

added category

Jacky720: rv

2022-05-04T21:10:12Z

Show changes

Ex Kay Cee Dee at 20:15, 4 May 2022

2022-05-04T20:15:45Z

Show changes

Mapron01: Undo revision 240681 by Ex Kay Cee Dee (talk)

2022-05-04T18:02:58Z

Undo revision 240681 by Ex Kay Cee Dee (talk)

Show changes

Ex Kay Cee Dee at 17:21, 4 May 2022

2022-05-04T17:21:12Z

Show changes

172.68.66.3: Undo revision 236546 by X. K. C. D. (talk)

2022-05-04T01:21:34Z

Undo revision 236546 by X. K. C. D. (talk)

Show changes

X. K. C. D. at 00:59, 4 May 2022

2022-05-04T00:59:45Z

Show changes

172.70.206.93: /* Explanation */ good enough

2022-01-28T02:13:01Z

‎Explanation: good enough

172.70.126.79 at 21:00, 29 November 2021

2021-11-29T21:00:12Z

@@ Line 18: / Line 18: @@
 Studies done on humans are subject to important ethical controls, particularly if the subjects are not fully informed of the study's purpose. "IRB" stands for {{w|Institutional Review Board}}, which is a committee (for example, at a university) which must approve such research to ensure that there's no significant risk of doing harm to the subjects of the study.
-The title text jokes that graduate students have so much work to do that they are liable to forget to eat entirely and stereotypically too impoverished to afford adequate amounts of food; when presented with an offer of a snack, they don't ponder the implications or potential ulterior motives; they just eat it quickly and get back to work.
+The title text jokes that graduate students have so much work to do that they are liable to forget to eat entirely and stereotypically too impoverished to afford adequate amounts of food; when presented with an offer of free food, they don't ponder the implications or potential ulterior motives; they just eat it quickly and get back to work.
 ==Transcript==

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:27, 21 June 2022
Line 34:		Line 34:
	[[Category:Science]]		[[Category:Science]]
	[[Category:Food]]		[[Category:Food]]
		+	[[Category:Psychology]]

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:13, 28 January 2022
Line 8:		Line 8:

	==Explanation==		==Explanation==
−	~~{{incomplete\|Created by the APPLE COOKIE REVIEW BOARD- Please change this comment when editing this page. Do NOT delete this tag too soon.}}~~
−
	Many psychological studies involve participants being asked to make decisions under varying conditions, to determine how those conditions influence decision making. A common example is to give subjects a choice between eating a healthy snack (such as an apple) or a tasty snack (such as a cookie), which may be used as a simple proxy for whether they're prioritizing long-term health or short-term gratification. In most cases they are not made aware of the nature of the experiment, as knowing the premise of the study is liable to influence their behavior and alter the results. Instead subjects may deliberately be given a false impression of the purpose of the study, or they may be offered a choice under conditions where they're not aware that they're part of an experiment at all.		Many psychological studies involve participants being asked to make decisions under varying conditions, to determine how those conditions influence decision making. A common example is to give subjects a choice between eating a healthy snack (such as an apple) or a tasty snack (such as a cookie), which may be used as a simple proxy for whether they're prioritizing long-term health or short-term gratification. In most cases they are not made aware of the nature of the experiment, as knowing the premise of the study is liable to influence their behavior and alter the results. Instead subjects may deliberately be given a false impression of the purpose of the study, or they may be offered a choice under conditions where they're not aware that they're part of an experiment at all.

@@ Line 20: / Line 20: @@
 Studies done on humans are subject to important ethical controls, particularly if the subjects are not fully informed of the study's purpose. "IRB" stands for {{w|Institutional Review Board}}, which is a committee (for example, at a university) which must approve such research to ensure that there's no significant risk of doing harm to the subjects of the study.
-The title text jokes that graduate students have so much work to do that they are liable to forget to eat entirely and stereotypically too impoverished to afford adequate amounts of food; when presented with an offer of a snack, they don't ponder the implications or potential ulterior motives, they just eat it quickly and get back to work.
+The title text jokes that graduate students have so much work to do that they are liable to forget to eat entirely and stereotypically too impoverished to afford adequate amounts of food; when presented with an offer of a snack, they don't ponder the implications or potential ulterior motives; they just eat it quickly and get back to work.
 ==Transcript==