Talk:1019: First Post - Revision history

Heleatunda at 17:09, 19 August 2023

2023-08-19T17:09:17Z

2022-02-17T03:26:17Z

adding nonsense

2020-03-31T01:52:33Z

2018-01-10T20:50:52Z

Please sign your comments.

2018-01-03T21:40:46Z

2017-01-07T00:30:15Z

2017-01-07T00:29:39Z

2015-11-19T23:47:13Z

2015-10-12T02:53:52Z

2014-01-27T15:52:43Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:09, 19 August 2023
Line 24:		Line 24:

	:What?? This is definitely a prediction about "democracy" in Serbia few years after this comic. By the way, who's Bloomberg? [[User:BytEfLUSh\|BytEfLUSh]] ([[User talk:BytEfLUSh\|talk]]) 03:26, 17 February 2022 (UTC)		:What?? This is definitely a prediction about "democracy" in Serbia few years after this comic. By the way, who's Bloomberg? [[User:BytEfLUSh\|BytEfLUSh]] ([[User talk:BytEfLUSh\|talk]]) 03:26, 17 February 2022 (UTC)
		+
		+	Does anyone have any examples of parties actually doing this/anyone know how to contact them? Sure could use the extra cash. 😂
		+	[[User:Heleatunda\|Heleatunda]] ([[User talk:Heleatunda\|talk]]) 17:09, 19 August 2023 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:26, 17 February 2022
Line 22:		Line 22:

	He definitely foretold Bloomberg's run for Dem nominee in 2019. (Maybe Bloomberg needed more college students.)[[Special:Contributions/162.158.107.167\|162.158.107.167]] 01:52, 31 March 2020 (UTC)		He definitely foretold Bloomberg's run for Dem nominee in 2019. (Maybe Bloomberg needed more college students.)[[Special:Contributions/162.158.107.167\|162.158.107.167]] 01:52, 31 March 2020 (UTC)
		+
		+	:What?? This is definitely a prediction about "democracy" in Serbia few years after this comic. By the way, who's Bloomberg? [[User:BytEfLUSh\|BytEfLUSh]] ([[User talk:BytEfLUSh\|talk]]) 03:26, 17 February 2022 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:52, 31 March 2020
Line 20:		Line 20:

	I wonder if this cartoon was the inspiration for the Russian trolling operations targeted at the US 2016 Presidential elections and the subsequent European elections. {{unsigned ip\| 172.68.58.5}}		I wonder if this cartoon was the inspiration for the Russian trolling operations targeted at the US 2016 Presidential elections and the subsequent European elections. {{unsigned ip\| 172.68.58.5}}
		+
		+	He definitely foretold Bloomberg's run for Dem nominee in 2019. (Maybe Bloomberg needed more college students.)[[Special:Contributions/162.158.107.167\|162.158.107.167]] 01:52, 31 March 2020 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:50, 10 January 2018
Line 19:		Line 19:
	This is precisely why Digg failed and now Reddit will fail. The moment the owners think they can manipulate discussions is the moment any discussion has any real value. [[Special:Contributions/173.245.50.161\|173.245.50.161]] 02:53, 12 October 2015 (UTC)		This is precisely why Digg failed and now Reddit will fail. The moment the owners think they can manipulate discussions is the moment any discussion has any real value. [[Special:Contributions/173.245.50.161\|173.245.50.161]] 02:53, 12 October 2015 (UTC)

−	I wonder if this cartoon was the inspiration for the Russian trolling operations targeted at the US 2016 Presidential elections and the subsequent European elections.	+	I wonder if this cartoon was the inspiration for the Russian trolling operations targeted at the US 2016 Presidential elections and the subsequent European elections. {{unsigned ip\| 172.68.58.5}}

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:40, 3 January 2018
Line 18:		Line 18:

	This is precisely why Digg failed and now Reddit will fail. The moment the owners think they can manipulate discussions is the moment any discussion has any real value. [[Special:Contributions/173.245.50.161\|173.245.50.161]] 02:53, 12 October 2015 (UTC)		This is precisely why Digg failed and now Reddit will fail. The moment the owners think they can manipulate discussions is the moment any discussion has any real value. [[Special:Contributions/173.245.50.161\|173.245.50.161]] 02:53, 12 October 2015 (UTC)
		+
		+	I wonder if this cartoon was the inspiration for the Russian trolling operations targeted at the US 2016 Presidential elections and the subsequent European elections.

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:30, 7 January 2017
Line 1:		Line 1:
	<span style="color: red"> Consistent posting order . . . .</span>		<span style="color: red"> Consistent posting order . . . .</span>
		+
	You know, I think you're right, [[User:Blaisepascal\|Blaisepascal]]. That's a good point. [[User:SilverMagpie\|SilverMagpie]] ([[User talk:SilverMagpie\|talk]]) 00:29, 7 January 2017 (UTC)		You know, I think you're right, [[User:Blaisepascal\|Blaisepascal]]. That's a good point. [[User:SilverMagpie\|SilverMagpie]] ([[User talk:SilverMagpie\|talk]]) 00:29, 7 January 2017 (UTC)

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 <span style="color: red"> Consistent posting order . . . .</span>
+You know, I think you're right, [[User:Blaisepascal|Blaisepascal]]. That's a good point. [[User:SilverMagpie|SilverMagpie]] ([[User talk:SilverMagpie|talk]]) 00:29, 7 January 2017 (UTC)
 With a Wiki, you can edit the posting order any way you want, there's no reason you have to add your comments to the bottom [[User:Blaisepascal|Blaisepascal]] ([[User talk:Blaisepascal|talk]]) 20:15, 20 August 2012 (UTC)

@@ Line 9: / Line 9: @@
 :I prefer threaded discussions. Chronological is close enough for short discussions, but threaded makes it so much easier to find read all the replies a comment got. (Yes, I know I'm replying to a year-old post.) [[User:gijobarts|gijobarts]] ([[User Talk:gijobarts|talk]]) 07:06, 2 September 2013 (UTC)
+<span style="color: blue">Yes it is. [[User:SuperSupermario24|<span style="color: #c21aff;">Just some random derp</span>]] 23:47, 19 November 2015 (UTC)</span>
 <span style="color: red">. . . . is overrated.</span>  [[Special:Contributions/74.213.186.41|74.213.186.41]] 17:01, 1 April 2013 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:53, 12 October 2015
Line 15:		Line 15:

	I have the same interpretation as the current explanation, yet the "Incomplete" text says there are other interpretations. What are they? [[User:Smperron\|Smperron]] ([[User talk:Smperron\|talk]]) 15:52, 27 January 2014 (UTC)		I have the same interpretation as the current explanation, yet the "Incomplete" text says there are other interpretations. What are they? [[User:Smperron\|Smperron]] ([[User talk:Smperron\|talk]]) 15:52, 27 January 2014 (UTC)
		+
		+	This is precisely why Digg failed and now Reddit will fail. The moment the owners think they can manipulate discussions is the moment any discussion has any real value. [[Special:Contributions/173.245.50.161\|173.245.50.161]] 02:53, 12 October 2015 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:52, 27 January 2014
Line 12:		Line 12:

	<span style="color: red">. . . . is overrated.</span> [[Special:Contributions/74.213.186.41\|74.213.186.41]] 17:01, 1 April 2013 (UTC)		<span style="color: red">. . . . is overrated.</span> [[Special:Contributions/74.213.186.41\|74.213.186.41]] 17:01, 1 April 2013 (UTC)
		+
		+
		+	I have the same interpretation as the current explanation, yet the "Incomplete" text says there are other interpretations. What are they? [[User:Smperron\|Smperron]] ([[User talk:Smperron\|talk]]) 15:52, 27 January 2014 (UTC)