Talk:1119: Undoing - Revision history

146.70.174.163 at 18:17, 24 January 2026

2026-01-24T18:17:14Z

Nitpicking: c

2022-04-04T23:47:37Z

SilverMagpie at 20:19, 23 November 2016

2016-11-23T20:19:27Z

Davidy22 at 19:27, 2 May 2016

2016-05-02T19:27:32Z

162.158.83.144 at 15:21, 2 May 2016

2016-05-02T15:21:50Z

Davidy22 at 01:20, 21 January 2015

2015-01-21T01:20:42Z

Weatherlawyer at 17:35, 20 January 2015

2015-01-20T17:35:48Z

Davidy22 at 06:12, 16 September 2014

2014-09-16T06:12:33Z

108.162.250.223 at 03:25, 16 September 2014

2014-09-16T03:25:57Z

173.245.56.24 at 15:35, 8 June 2014

2014-06-08T15:35:12Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:17, 24 January 2026
Line 37:		Line 37:

	Disagreeing with the explanation: the speed of light ''in a medium other than vacuum'' is '''not''' identical for different frequencies. Thus, the light from the hypothetical LEDs would not necessarily travel at the same speed as (all of the) light from the sun. [[User:Nitpicking\|Nitpicking]] ([[User talk:Nitpicking\|talk]]) 23:47, 4 April 2022 (UTC)		Disagreeing with the explanation: the speed of light ''in a medium other than vacuum'' is '''not''' identical for different frequencies. Thus, the light from the hypothetical LEDs would not necessarily travel at the same speed as (all of the) light from the sun. [[User:Nitpicking\|Nitpicking]] ([[User talk:Nitpicking\|talk]]) 23:47, 4 April 2022 (UTC)
		+	: Except that the medium that the light is travelling in, the air, is exactly the same above the solar panel as it is below.

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:47, 4 April 2022
Line 35:		Line 35:

	That's a small turbine based on Cueball's size. [[User:SilverMagpie\|SilverMagpie]] ([[User talk:SilverMagpie\|talk]]) 20:19, 23 November 2016 (UTC)		That's a small turbine based on Cueball's size. [[User:SilverMagpie\|SilverMagpie]] ([[User talk:SilverMagpie\|talk]]) 20:19, 23 November 2016 (UTC)
		+
		+	Disagreeing with the explanation: the speed of light ''in a medium other than vacuum'' is '''not''' identical for different frequencies. Thus, the light from the hypothetical LEDs would not necessarily travel at the same speed as (all of the) light from the sun. [[User:Nitpicking\|Nitpicking]] ([[User talk:Nitpicking\|talk]]) 23:47, 4 April 2022 (UTC)

@@ Line 3: / Line 3: @@
 :I always though that if you put a forest of windmills on top of hill the damage of ecosystem done by the building is enough. Adding the fact about wind used for propagating ... damn, windmills are almost as unecological as solar plants on fields ...
 :Seriously, how can anyone who things ecologically be AGAINST nuclear power? -- [[Special:Contributions/89.177.52.2|89.177.52.2]] 08:19, 12 October 2012 (UTC)
-::Ten thousand years of mutations from radioactivity? (Seriously, we should be using Liquid-fluoride thorium reactors, only 300 year half-life on the waste, rather than 10,000)--[[Special:Contributions/173.245.56.24|173.245.56.24]] 15:35, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
+::Ten thousand  of mutations from radioactivity? (Seriously, we should be using Liquid-fluoride thorium reactors, only 300 year half-life on the waste, rather than 10,000)--[[Special:Contributions/173.245.56.24|173.245.56.24]] 15:35, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
 At first I thought this should be more of a Blackhat trick, but since he seems to think he is creating good in the world by restoring, it makes sense that it is Cueball--[[Special:Contributions/70.166.209.171|70.166.209.171]] 14:35, 10 October 2012 (UTC)
@@ Line 26: / Line 26: @@
 Worth mentioning existence of ram air turbines. [[User:Pallas|Pallas]] ([[User talk:Pallas|talk]]) 08:53, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
-Um, wind turbines have an electric motor which is computer-controlled, and which I think isn't completely powered by the blades rotating (if only that, when the wind is still, the turbine stops spinning, and needs a boost to start again when the wind picks up, similar to a car battery and starter motor). If the power was cut (which wouldn't happen, BTW. Wind farmers aren't stupid and they realise the problems with normal cables, so it's all underground), the turbine would slow down and stop, like a solar-powered pinwheel. {{unsigned ip|108.162.250.223}}
+Um, wind turbines have an  motor which is computer-controlled, and which I think isn't completely powered by the blades rotating (if only that, when the wind is still, the turbine stops spinning, and needs a boost to start again when the wind picks up, similar to a  battery and starter motor). If the power was cut (which wouldn't happen, BTW. Wind farmers aren't stupid and they realise the problems with normal cables, so it's all underground), the turbine would slow down and stop, like a solar-powered pinwheel. {{unsigned ip|108.162.250.223}}
 I've been sneaking out at night and installing lamps on the underside of every photovoltaic panel I can find. Sure, there are upwards of 80% losses, but I prefer to think of them as nearly 20% gains.
@@ Line 32: / Line 32: @@
 When?[[User:Weatherlawyer| I used Google News BEFORE it was clickbait]] ([[User talk:Weatherlawyer|talk]]) 17:35, 20 January 2015 (UTC)
-Here is the truth: Enough wind turbines over time will kill us all. The wind turbines slow down Earth's rotation. Whit that the trade winds will die and then there would be no life possible on Earth. Maybe and only maybe we already slowed down Earth enough to induce a climatic change (so many strange natural disasters the last few years ...) and we will face a real-life "The Day After Tomorrow". {{unsigned ip|162.158.83.144}}
+Here is the truth: Enough wind turbines over time will kill us all. The wind turbines slow down Earth's rotation. Whit that the trade winds will die and then there would be no life possible on Earth. Maybe and only maybe we already slowed down Earth enough to induce a climatic change (so many strange natural disasters the last few  ...) and we will face a real-life "The Day After Tomorrow". {{unsigned ip|162.158.83.144}}

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:27, 2 May 2016
Line 1:		Line 1:
−	Here is the truth: Enough wind turbines over time will kill us all. The wind turbines slow down Earth's rotation. Whit that the trade winds will die and then there would be no life possible on Earth. Maybe and only maybe we already slowed down Earth enough to induce a climatic change (so many strange natural disasters the last few years ...) and we will face a real-life "The Day After Tomorrow".
−
	Perhaps his motivation is to restore natural wind patterns to the environment. I remember reading about the ecological impact of wind power includes lessened wind currents. Some organisms rely on the wind to propagate the species, such as winds that blow seeds or how some spiders "parachute" on wind currents. Or it could be that he just likes to mess with people. --[[User:Joehammer79\|Joehammer79]] ([[User talk:Joehammer79\|talk]]) 13:46, 10 October 2012 (UTC)		Perhaps his motivation is to restore natural wind patterns to the environment. I remember reading about the ecological impact of wind power includes lessened wind currents. Some organisms rely on the wind to propagate the species, such as winds that blow seeds or how some spiders "parachute" on wind currents. Or it could be that he just likes to mess with people. --[[User:Joehammer79\|Joehammer79]] ([[User talk:Joehammer79\|talk]]) 13:46, 10 October 2012 (UTC)

Line 33:		Line 31:

	When?[[User:Weatherlawyer\| I used Google News BEFORE it was clickbait]] ([[User talk:Weatherlawyer\|talk]]) 17:35, 20 January 2015 (UTC)		When?[[User:Weatherlawyer\| I used Google News BEFORE it was clickbait]] ([[User talk:Weatherlawyer\|talk]]) 17:35, 20 January 2015 (UTC)
		+
		+	Here is the truth: Enough wind turbines over time will kill us all. The wind turbines slow down Earth's rotation. Whit that the trade winds will die and then there would be no life possible on Earth. Maybe and only maybe we already slowed down Earth enough to induce a climatic change (so many strange natural disasters the last few years ...) and we will face a real-life "The Day After Tomorrow". {{unsigned ip\|162.158.83.144}}

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:21, 2 May 2016
Line 1:		Line 1:
		+	Here is the truth: Enough wind turbines over time will kill us all. The wind turbines slow down Earth's rotation. Whit that the trade winds will die and then there would be no life possible on Earth. Maybe and only maybe we already slowed down Earth enough to induce a climatic change (so many strange natural disasters the last few years ...) and we will face a real-life "The Day After Tomorrow".
		+
	Perhaps his motivation is to restore natural wind patterns to the environment. I remember reading about the ecological impact of wind power includes lessened wind currents. Some organisms rely on the wind to propagate the species, such as winds that blow seeds or how some spiders "parachute" on wind currents. Or it could be that he just likes to mess with people. --[[User:Joehammer79\|Joehammer79]] ([[User talk:Joehammer79\|talk]]) 13:46, 10 October 2012 (UTC)		Perhaps his motivation is to restore natural wind patterns to the environment. I remember reading about the ecological impact of wind power includes lessened wind currents. Some organisms rely on the wind to propagate the species, such as winds that blow seeds or how some spiders "parachute" on wind currents. Or it could be that he just likes to mess with people. --[[User:Joehammer79\|Joehammer79]] ([[User talk:Joehammer79\|talk]]) 13:46, 10 October 2012 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:20, 21 January 2015
Line 1:		Line 1:
−	~~I've been sneaking out at night and installing lamps on the underside of every photovoltaic panel I can find. Sure, there are upwards of 80% losses, but I prefer to think of them as nearly 20% gains.~~
−
−	~~When?[[User:Weatherlawyer\| I used Google News BEFORE it was clickbait]] ([[User talk:Weatherlawyer\|talk]]) 17:35, 20 January 2015 (UTC)~~
−
	Perhaps his motivation is to restore natural wind patterns to the environment. I remember reading about the ecological impact of wind power includes lessened wind currents. Some organisms rely on the wind to propagate the species, such as winds that blow seeds or how some spiders "parachute" on wind currents. Or it could be that he just likes to mess with people. --[[User:Joehammer79\|Joehammer79]] ([[User talk:Joehammer79\|talk]]) 13:46, 10 October 2012 (UTC)		Perhaps his motivation is to restore natural wind patterns to the environment. I remember reading about the ecological impact of wind power includes lessened wind currents. Some organisms rely on the wind to propagate the species, such as winds that blow seeds or how some spiders "parachute" on wind currents. Or it could be that he just likes to mess with people. --[[User:Joehammer79\|Joehammer79]] ([[User talk:Joehammer79\|talk]]) 13:46, 10 October 2012 (UTC)

Line 31:		Line 27:

	Um, wind turbines have an electric motor which is computer-controlled, and which I think isn't completely powered by the blades rotating (if only that, when the wind is still, the turbine stops spinning, and needs a boost to start again when the wind picks up, similar to a car battery and starter motor). If the power was cut (which wouldn't happen, BTW. Wind farmers aren't stupid and they realise the problems with normal cables, so it's all underground), the turbine would slow down and stop, like a solar-powered pinwheel. {{unsigned ip\|108.162.250.223}}		Um, wind turbines have an electric motor which is computer-controlled, and which I think isn't completely powered by the blades rotating (if only that, when the wind is still, the turbine stops spinning, and needs a boost to start again when the wind picks up, similar to a car battery and starter motor). If the power was cut (which wouldn't happen, BTW. Wind farmers aren't stupid and they realise the problems with normal cables, so it's all underground), the turbine would slow down and stop, like a solar-powered pinwheel. {{unsigned ip\|108.162.250.223}}
		+
		+	I've been sneaking out at night and installing lamps on the underside of every photovoltaic panel I can find. Sure, there are upwards of 80% losses, but I prefer to think of them as nearly 20% gains.
		+
		+	When?[[User:Weatherlawyer\| I used Google News BEFORE it was clickbait]] ([[User talk:Weatherlawyer\|talk]]) 17:35, 20 January 2015 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:35, 20 January 2015
Line 1:		Line 1:
		+	I've been sneaking out at night and installing lamps on the underside of every photovoltaic panel I can find. Sure, there are upwards of 80% losses, but I prefer to think of them as nearly 20% gains.
		+
		+	When?[[User:Weatherlawyer\| I used Google News BEFORE it was clickbait]] ([[User talk:Weatherlawyer\|talk]]) 17:35, 20 January 2015 (UTC)
		+
	Perhaps his motivation is to restore natural wind patterns to the environment. I remember reading about the ecological impact of wind power includes lessened wind currents. Some organisms rely on the wind to propagate the species, such as winds that blow seeds or how some spiders "parachute" on wind currents. Or it could be that he just likes to mess with people. --[[User:Joehammer79\|Joehammer79]] ([[User talk:Joehammer79\|talk]]) 13:46, 10 October 2012 (UTC)		Perhaps his motivation is to restore natural wind patterns to the environment. I remember reading about the ecological impact of wind power includes lessened wind currents. Some organisms rely on the wind to propagate the species, such as winds that blow seeds or how some spiders "parachute" on wind currents. Or it could be that he just likes to mess with people. --[[User:Joehammer79\|Joehammer79]] ([[User talk:Joehammer79\|talk]]) 13:46, 10 October 2012 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:12, 16 September 2014
Line 26:		Line 26:
	Worth mentioning existence of ram air turbines. [[User:Pallas\|Pallas]] ([[User talk:Pallas\|talk]]) 08:53, 29 April 2014 (UTC)		Worth mentioning existence of ram air turbines. [[User:Pallas\|Pallas]] ([[User talk:Pallas\|talk]]) 08:53, 29 April 2014 (UTC)

−	Um, wind turbines have an electric motor which is computer-controlled, and which I think isn't completely powered by the blades rotating (if only that, when the wind is still, the turbine stops spinning, and needs a boost to start again when the wind picks up, similar to a car battery and starter motor). If the power was cut (which wouldn't happen, BTW. Wind farmers aren't stupid and they realise the problems with normal cables, so it's all underground), the turbine would slow down and stop, like a solar-powered pinwheel.	+	Um, wind turbines have an electric motor which is computer-controlled, and which I think isn't completely powered by the blades rotating (if only that, when the wind is still, the turbine stops spinning, and needs a boost to start again when the wind picks up, similar to a car battery and starter motor). If the power was cut (which wouldn't happen, BTW. Wind farmers aren't stupid and they realise the problems with normal cables, so it's all underground), the turbine would slow down and stop, like a solar-powered pinwheel. {{unsigned ip\|108.162.250.223}}

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:25, 16 September 2014
Line 25:		Line 25:

	Worth mentioning existence of ram air turbines. [[User:Pallas\|Pallas]] ([[User talk:Pallas\|talk]]) 08:53, 29 April 2014 (UTC)		Worth mentioning existence of ram air turbines. [[User:Pallas\|Pallas]] ([[User talk:Pallas\|talk]]) 08:53, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
		+
		+	Um, wind turbines have an electric motor which is computer-controlled, and which I think isn't completely powered by the blades rotating (if only that, when the wind is still, the turbine stops spinning, and needs a boost to start again when the wind picks up, similar to a car battery and starter motor). If the power was cut (which wouldn't happen, BTW. Wind farmers aren't stupid and they realise the problems with normal cables, so it's all underground), the turbine would slow down and stop, like a solar-powered pinwheel.