Talk:1154: Resolution - Revision history

162.158.126.88 at 01:53, 9 February 2018

2018-02-09T01:53:24Z

162.158.62.159 at 14:51, 12 September 2017

2017-09-12T14:51:37Z

68.196.18.238 at 11:41, 2 January 2013

2013-01-02T11:41:41Z

68.75.178.240: Edited comment

2013-01-01T00:32:05Z

Edited comment

68.75.178.240: Added comment

2013-01-01T00:28:14Z

Added comment

208.98.237.225 at 22:19, 31 December 2012

2012-12-31T22:19:30Z

208.98.237.225 at 22:18, 31 December 2012

2012-12-31T22:18:30Z

St.nerol: Created page with "It's good! But self-explanatory? -- ~~~~"

2012-12-31T16:06:43Z

Created page with "It's good! But self-explanatory? -- ~~~~"

New page

It's good! But self-explanatory? -- [[User:St.nerol|St.nerol]] ([[User talk:St.nerol|talk]]) 16:06, 31 December 2012 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:53, 9 February 2018
Line 21:		Line 21:

	Any good scientific experiment needs a control and that was just what the prior year was to compare the actual changes of the upcoming year. [[Special:Contributions/162.158.62.159\|162.158.62.159]] 14:51, 12 September 2017 (UTC)		Any good scientific experiment needs a control and that was just what the prior year was to compare the actual changes of the upcoming year. [[Special:Contributions/162.158.62.159\|162.158.62.159]] 14:51, 12 September 2017 (UTC)
		+
		+	__________________
		+	I keep pressing random page and it sends me back here. wobsite creators have sense of humor
		+	01:53, 9 February 2018 (UTC)01:53, 9 February 2018 (UTC)01:53, 9 February 2018 (UTC)~

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:51, 12 September 2017
Line 19:		Line 19:
	…try bribery. (diplomatic version)		…try bribery. (diplomatic version)
	…redefine success. (political version)		…redefine success. (political version)
		+
		+	Any good scientific experiment needs a control and that was just what the prior year was to compare the actual changes of the upcoming year. [[Special:Contributions/162.158.62.159\|162.158.62.159]] 14:51, 12 September 2017 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:41, 2 January 2013
Line 6:		Line 6:

	I took this to be a reference to infinite loops because of "being stuck" "thinking I'm fixing things about myself", "break out of loops", and "not making progress". Also, the title "Resolution" could be said to refer to the test statement in a loop to determine whether or not to continue the loop, ''resolving'' the loop. --[[Special:Contributions/68.75.178.240\|68.75.178.240]] 00:28, 1 January 2013 (UTC)		I took this to be a reference to infinite loops because of "being stuck" "thinking I'm fixing things about myself", "break out of loops", and "not making progress". Also, the title "Resolution" could be said to refer to the test statement in a loop to determine whether or not to continue the loop, ''resolving'' the loop. --[[Special:Contributions/68.75.178.240\|68.75.178.240]] 00:28, 1 January 2013 (UTC)
		+
		+	******
		+
		+	If at first you don’t succeed
		+	…try, try again! (a mother’s advice)
		+	…that’s one data point. (scientific version)
		+	…click “undo.” (IT version)
		+	…read the directions. (engineering version)
		+	…keep a separate ledger. (business version)
		+	…call in an air strike. (military version)
		+	…file an appeal. (legal version)
		+	…try bribery. (diplomatic version)
		+	…redefine success. (political version)

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:32, 1 January 2013
Line 5:		Line 5:
	Humans seem to have a biological mechanism to bypass this conundrum wherein we make linear extrapolations or use weak induction for situations where there is insufficient data.[[Special:Contributions/208.98.237.225\|208.98.237.225]] 22:19, 31 December 2012 (UTC)		Humans seem to have a biological mechanism to bypass this conundrum wherein we make linear extrapolations or use weak induction for situations where there is insufficient data.[[Special:Contributions/208.98.237.225\|208.98.237.225]] 22:19, 31 December 2012 (UTC)

−	I took this to be a reference to infinite loops because of "being stuck" "thinking I'm fixing things about myself", "break out of loops", and "not making progress". --[[Special:Contributions/68.75.178.240\|68.75.178.240]] 00:28, 1 January 2013 (UTC)	+	I took this to be a reference to infinite loops because of "being stuck" "thinking I'm fixing things about myself", "break out of loops", and "not making progress". Also, the title "Resolution" could be said to refer to the test statement in a loop to determine whether or not to continue the loop, ''resolving'' the loop. --[[Special:Contributions/68.75.178.240\|68.75.178.240]] 00:28, 1 January 2013 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:28, 1 January 2013
Line 4:		Line 4:

	Humans seem to have a biological mechanism to bypass this conundrum wherein we make linear extrapolations or use weak induction for situations where there is insufficient data.[[Special:Contributions/208.98.237.225\|208.98.237.225]] 22:19, 31 December 2012 (UTC)		Humans seem to have a biological mechanism to bypass this conundrum wherein we make linear extrapolations or use weak induction for situations where there is insufficient data.[[Special:Contributions/208.98.237.225\|208.98.237.225]] 22:19, 31 December 2012 (UTC)
		+
		+	I took this to be a reference to infinite loops because of "being stuck" "thinking I'm fixing things about myself", "break out of loops", and "not making progress". --[[Special:Contributions/68.75.178.240\|68.75.178.240]] 00:28, 1 January 2013 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:19, 31 December 2012
Line 3:		Line 3:
	The reference to a single data point may reference a common problem in "long-term" or "one-off" observations - that statistical significance can probably never be achieved because of the labour involved in creating individual data points. In this case Cueball essentially makes one data point per year (or many depending on whether you consider individual observations to happen throughout the year...), and thusly one year is insufficient to determine if there is a large "yearly" loop with nested daily/weekly loops.		The reference to a single data point may reference a common problem in "long-term" or "one-off" observations - that statistical significance can probably never be achieved because of the labour involved in creating individual data points. In this case Cueball essentially makes one data point per year (or many depending on whether you consider individual observations to happen throughout the year...), and thusly one year is insufficient to determine if there is a large "yearly" loop with nested daily/weekly loops.

−	Humans seem to have a biological mechanism to bypass this conundrum wherein we make linear extrapolations or use weak induction for situations where there is insufficient data.	+	Humans seem to have a biological mechanism to bypass this conundrum wherein we make linear extrapolations or use weak induction for situations where there is insufficient data.[[Special:Contributions/208.98.237.225\|208.98.237.225]] 22:19, 31 December 2012 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:18, 31 December 2012
Line 1:		Line 1:
	It's good! But self-explanatory? -- [[User:St.nerol\|St.nerol]] ([[User talk:St.nerol\|talk]]) 16:06, 31 December 2012 (UTC)		It's good! But self-explanatory? -- [[User:St.nerol\|St.nerol]] ([[User talk:St.nerol\|talk]]) 16:06, 31 December 2012 (UTC)
		+
		+	The reference to a single data point may reference a common problem in "long-term" or "one-off" observations - that statistical significance can probably never be achieved because of the labour involved in creating individual data points. In this case Cueball essentially makes one data point per year (or many depending on whether you consider individual observations to happen throughout the year...), and thusly one year is insufficient to determine if there is a large "yearly" loop with nested daily/weekly loops.
		+
		+	Humans seem to have a biological mechanism to bypass this conundrum wherein we make linear extrapolations or use weak induction for situations where there is insufficient data.